Podchaser Logo
Home
Adam Grant Helps Unlock Our Hidden Potential

Adam Grant Helps Unlock Our Hidden Potential

Released Monday, 18th December 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Adam Grant Helps Unlock Our Hidden Potential

Adam Grant Helps Unlock Our Hidden Potential

Adam Grant Helps Unlock Our Hidden Potential

Adam Grant Helps Unlock Our Hidden Potential

Monday, 18th December 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:14

Pushkin Hay

0:18

Slight Changers, It's Maya. Before

0:21

we get to this week's episode, I wanted to let

0:23

you know that I'm launching a newsletter. It's

0:26

a place where I can update you about the podcast,

0:28

my life, and other exciting news. If

0:31

you'd like to sign up, you can visit the link in our

0:33

show description or go to Maya

0:35

Shunker dot com. That's m A y

0:37

A s h A n k a r dot

0:40

com.

0:41

Thanks.

0:54

So much of learning requires us to put ourselves

0:56

in uncomfortable situations because that's where

0:58

the challenge lies. But the fear

1:00

of embarrassment holds us back, and

1:03

so we end up making these tiny little

1:05

adjustments instead of big leaps.

1:07

Author and podcaster at A Grant

1:09

is back on a slight change of plans,

1:12

and he's got a new book full of ideas

1:14

for how we can unlock our hidden potential.

1:17

One of his tips is to think differently about

1:20

how we learn from others.

1:22

A lot of people think being a sponge is

1:24

about just absorbing as much information

1:26

as you can seek infinite amounts

1:29

of feedback. Engage all of your critics,

1:32

not so much. Not all critics

1:35

are thinking critically, and I

1:37

think a huge part of being an effective sponge

1:39

is being proactive, not just about what you take

1:41

in, but also what you expel

1:44

out.

1:48

On today's episode, how to Unlock

1:51

Your Hidden Potential, I'm

1:56

maya Shunker and this is a slight change

1:58

of plans, a show about who we are

2:00

and who we become in the face of a

2:02

big change.

2:15

Adam is an organizational psychologist

2:17

and a professor at the Wharton School at

2:19

the University of Pennsylvania. He's

2:21

also the author of a bunch of bestsellers

2:24

and a repeat visitor to the Ted stage.

2:26

I'm pretty sure after one more Ted talk

2:29

he can turn in his punch card for free

2:31

sandwich. Adam's

2:33

new book is called Hidden Potential, The

2:35

Science of Achieving Greater Things, and

2:38

as you'll hear, this is one of my favorite

2:40

topics to discuss and spar

2:42

with him about. I started

2:45

our conversation by asking Adam why

2:47

he's so interested in the topic of hidden

2:49

potential.

2:51

I think there are so many reasons to be interested

2:53

in it. I mean, how many times have you met

2:56

somebody who didn't live

2:58

up to the potential you saw in them because

3:00

they didn't see it in themselves, or because

3:03

they weren't lucky enough to have a coach or a mentor,

3:05

or a teacher or a parent who saw

3:07

it in them. And I think the fundamental

3:09

mistake we make can we make this mistake when we're judging

3:11

other people and when we're evaluating ourselves,

3:14

is that we assess potential by where

3:16

we start, and if something's

3:18

easy for us, if we have a natural

3:21

talent for it, then we assume

3:23

there's a very highest ceiling on our potential. And

3:25

if we struggle early or if we fail,

3:28

we think this is not for me. And

3:30

what we overlook is that growth is not

3:32

determined by where you start. It's about

3:35

the distance you can travel. But we can't

3:37

see that distance yet, right. We don't have a crystal law

3:39

to look into the future, and so we end

3:41

up missing out on a great deal

3:43

of possibility that I think goes unrecognized.

3:46

Yeah, and one thing I loved reading about in your book,

3:48

as you say, the things that you're most proud

3:50

of aren't the domains where you've

3:53

gotten to the highest heights. It's actually where you started

3:55

off at the lowest point but made

3:57

a ton of progress along the way. So can you share

3:59

a little bit more about that.

4:01

I really loved sports growing up, and

4:04

after failing to make the middle

4:06

school basketball team and the high school

4:08

soccer team, I turned my attention

4:11

to springboard diving, which I had sort

4:13

of caught the bug for late as a teenager.

4:16

And it was abundantly clear that I did not have

4:18

the physical talent to be a great diver. My

4:20

teammates called me Frankenstein because I didn't bend

4:22

my knees when I walked, which

4:24

was ironic because in order to touch my toes

4:26

I had to bend my knees. I wasn't flexible, I

4:29

didn't have the grace or explosive power, and

4:32

I was also afraid of heights, so

4:35

not exactly set up for success. And

4:38

I had an extraordinary coach, Eric Best, who

4:40

said on day one of practice, I will

4:42

never cut anyone who wants to be here, and

4:46

if you know, if you focus

4:48

your energy on this, I believe you can be a state

4:50

finalist by the time you're a senior

4:53

in high school. And thanks to Eric's

4:55

coaching, I made the state finals as a junior in high

4:57

school, and I got nowhere

4:59

near the Olympics. Let's be clear, I could

5:01

not have qualified for Olympic trials if

5:03

my life depended on it. But I

5:06

got a lot better than I ever expected. I ended

5:08

up qualified for the Junior Olympic Nationals

5:10

twice, and I made the All American list and ended up

5:12

getting recruited a diving college.

5:14

And it was such a pivotal experience

5:17

for me to realize just because

5:19

I start with a lack of talent doesn't

5:21

mean I can't overcome many

5:24

of the obstacles on my path.

5:25

Yeah, yeah, I resonate with your story.

5:28

I truly think there's nothing that I enjoy

5:30

more in life than witnessing

5:32

progress. Well maybe a really good Indian meal

5:35

cooked by my mother, but second to that, I

5:38

love witnessing progress. And so I think my

5:41

version of Adam as the diver is

5:43

I began learning Mandarin about

5:46

six years ago or so because

5:48

my husband's Chinese and none

5:50

of his relatives speak English, and so I thought, oh,

5:52

this would be a really nice way to connect

5:55

with his family and you know, try to show

5:57

them that I, you know, really love Jimmy and

5:59

I really you know want to fit into the family.

6:02

And talk about a low

6:04

starting point, Adam, I took the

6:06

cake there, I promise, But

6:08

the joy of improving

6:10

at a language that I found so challenging

6:14

has been intoxicating, like truly.

6:16

So I remember there was this one day where

6:18

I got into a lift and it was

6:20

clear that driver was a little bit uneasy because

6:23

he didn't speak English. And then I looked at

6:25

his phone and I saw Chinese characters, and

6:27

I was like, this is my moment, and so I

6:29

filt of all this courage and I spoke to him

6:31

in broken Mandarin and he understood

6:34

what I was saying. And after I got out

6:36

of that lift, I called Jimmy and I was squealing.

6:38

It was literally like the best day of

6:40

my year. And so yeah,

6:43

and that starting point again was so low that when

6:45

you witness the potential that you

6:48

had in a space where you really underestimated

6:50

yourself, it's just so satisfying.

6:51

That's amazing. I had no idea that you learned Mandarin.

6:54

Where have you been hiding this secret?

6:55

Well, learning I inng It

6:58

is a works in progress. So this

7:00

is what's really interesting because this, I

7:02

think hits on another theme in your book, which is

7:05

my decision to pick up a new language of all

7:07

things in adulthood was never

7:09

something that I thought would happen. And that's because

7:12

I historically just sucked at learning

7:14

foreign languages. So in high school

7:16

I took Spanish. In college I took

7:18

Hi the terrible at both of them, and

7:21

so I was pretty hesitant to give a

7:23

foreign language a go, especially in my thirties.

7:25

This is so fascinating. Okay, I have a bunch

7:27

of reactions. So first of all, can

7:29

we just pause to mark the moment

7:31

when the world learned that there was something

7:34

that Maya Shankar was not good at?

7:36

Okay, Adam, that's.

7:38

Because I mean, I think everyone admires

7:40

what a natural you are at so many things you

7:43

know, from your

7:45

music virtuoso childhood to your

7:47

mastery of cognitive science to your ability

7:50

to have a conversation with anyone about anything

7:52

and make their complex ideas understandable.

7:55

I think it's reassuring

7:57

to the rest of us that there are things that you two

7:59

struggle with. Would be my first reaction.

8:02

Secondly, I'm thinking about I guess

8:04

the common arc of saying, well, I'm not a

8:06

foreign language person, I lack this skill,

8:09

and then realizing that it was actually not

8:11

skill that you lacked entirely. It sounds

8:13

to me like you had a different kind of motivation.

8:16

In your thirties, one hundred percent.

8:18

You were one excited intrinsically to learn,

8:20

which maybe you were less so in

8:23

high school. And two you also had

8:25

a really strong pro social purpose here, which

8:27

is you're trying to connect

8:29

with Jimmy's family, and I think that probably

8:31

made the language learning a lot more meaningful.

8:34

Yeah, the root of your motivation matters

8:36

so much when it comes to learning. So

8:38

when I was in high school, it was like, Okay,

8:41

just got to get through that language requirement, try

8:43

to get the A because I want to get into a good college,

8:46

like blah blah blah. Right, And then similarly

8:48

in college, I think Hindy was just a way of checking

8:50

the box on the foreign language requirement. And

8:53

what happened with Mandarin, like you said,

8:55

is it took on this hugely emotional

8:57

quality to it, right, which I wasn't expecting.

9:00

And on top of feeling like

9:02

I was going to be able to connect with Jimmy's relatives, what

9:04

I didn't realize is that so

9:07

much of culture is baked into language,

9:09

and so when I was learning it, I was learning

9:11

about this fundamental humility

9:13

that exists within Chinese culture, and like how much

9:16

I love that? And so it's really it's

9:18

been so charming to learn about

9:20

those elements, and I would have ignored them

9:22

entirely in the context of like a high school class

9:24

right where I didn't understand how it's going to play out.

9:27

Yes, and I wonder, okay. So the other thing is you

9:29

talk about using it in the cab. So

9:32

one of the things I learned while researching basically,

9:35

how do you become better at getting better?

9:38

So what's the science of improving at

9:40

improving? One of the things that holds a lot

9:42

of us back is we're reluctant to put ourselves

9:44

in uncomfortable situations. And

9:47

nowhere is this more clear than learning a foreign language.

9:50

If you look at why so many people struggle in high

9:52

school to learn a language, it's not necessarily that

9:54

they lack the language gene or they missed

9:56

the critical period, and if only they had learned it

9:58

younger, they had an aptitude that's gone. It's

10:01

that they're afraid to use it because you don't want

10:03

to sound like an idiot. Absolutely, we

10:05

don't want to embarrass ourselves, and that's totally reasonable.

10:08

But the only way to learn to speak a language

10:11

is to talk it out loud and to use

10:13

it as you're acquiring it, whereas

10:15

most people expect that they can master it,

10:17

that they can commit the entire vocabulary

10:19

and grammar to memory, and only then

10:22

are they ready to speak it. I wonder

10:24

if you were that person earlier.

10:26

I was so anxious about speaking in a foreign

10:29

language, especially Chinese, where you

10:31

might say a tone with a slightly different inflection,

10:34

and you've now set a completely different sentence, because

10:36

it's like ma versus ma, right, those mean

10:38

totally different things. And yet I think

10:41

what happened in the car that day and

10:43

where I found the courage was he

10:45

doesn't speak English. He's clearly feeling

10:47

anxious. I'm clearly feeling anxious

10:49

that I can't communicate with him, and

10:52

so that I like dig within myself. I have to like excavate

10:54

courage, like it's so deep inside of my body,

10:56

and I pull it out and I communicate

10:59

with him. And I thought to myself, Wow,

11:01

talk about a emotional return on investment,

11:04

Like I communicated with a human that I would not

11:06

have been able to communicate with had it not

11:08

been for the skill building. And so sometimes

11:10

it takes situations like that to

11:12

allow yourself to engage with the thing you're

11:15

not very good at before you achieve mastery.

11:17

I literally could have written about you in chapter one

11:19

of the book. You're embodying

11:22

the very principle I was trying to unpack. And

11:25

I feel like so much of learning requires

11:27

us to put ourselves in uncomfortable situations,

11:29

because that's where the challenge lies. Yes,

11:31

but the fear of embarrassment, of feeling

11:34

incompetent, of looking stupid

11:36

holds us back, and so we end up

11:38

making these tiny little adjustments instead

11:41

of big leaps.

11:42

Yeah, And I mean discomfort carries

11:44

the illusion that we're not making progress, right,

11:46

And I mean, from a neuroscientific

11:49

perspective, the best way to boost

11:51

brain plasticity is to fail at things,

11:54

because when you fail, those

11:56

errors signal to the brain that something's

11:58

wrong. In turn, it triggers

12:01

the release of this beautiful cocktail of

12:03

neurochemicals that help reshape the brain.

12:06

It's only when you tell your nervous system, hey,

12:08

buddy, the current setups not good enough

12:11

that it starts making the relevant changes, right,

12:13

And so maybe we can channel some of that when we get

12:15

frustrated.

12:16

Exactly. Yeah, that's a great way to describe

12:18

it.

12:20

Okay, let's now shift to the ingredients

12:23

to the toolkit for unlocking our potential.

12:26

You talk about the importance of character

12:29

or what's otherwise known as soft skills, and

12:32

can you please first share the origin story

12:34

of the term soft skills because

12:36

I absolutely loved it, and I feel like soft skills has gotten

12:38

such a bad rep for so long, and I feel

12:40

like you're redeeming it. So on behalf of all people

12:43

who enjoy soft skills and enjoy cultivating

12:45

them. Thank you, sir.

12:47

Yes, anytime I think of character

12:49

skills as learn capacity is to put your principles

12:51

into practice.

12:53

You know.

12:53

At some point I got curious about where the term came from,

12:56

like, why do we call these vital behavioral

12:58

skills? Why do we call them soft?

13:00

That sounds weak. Well, if you trace

13:03

the history, it turns out that the

13:05

term originated from the US Army

13:08

when they were trying to classify different skills

13:10

for soldiers and basically

13:12

measure competencies to go and defend

13:14

national security. And they

13:17

had a list of hard skills, which were

13:19

literally the capabilities to work with machines.

13:21

Machines were made out of metal that's hard, and

13:24

so operating a tank or a gun was considered

13:26

a hard skill, and so then everything

13:28

else leadership collaboration

13:32

was lumped in this soft skills bucket,

13:34

which they didn't think was unimportant. They just

13:36

meant you're not using a

13:38

piece of almost unbreakable equipment.

13:41

Yeah, exactly. So

13:43

I think obviously that did a great disservice

13:46

to this category of skills. And I

13:48

actually really wonder if we had called

13:50

those behavioral skills, if they had been called leadership

13:53

skills, would they be branded differently

13:55

today. The study that really

13:58

blew my mind was a study that roz Chetti

14:00

led where he found that we could

14:02

predict your income in your twenties, how much

14:04

money you make from the number of years

14:06

of experience your kindergarten teacher had.

14:09

Wow, unreal.

14:12

I could not believe this when I read this research.

14:14

And by the way, listeners, Rod Shetty is

14:16

like a natural experiment genius, so he

14:18

has controlled for all of the relevant variables,

14:21

I assure you. Anyway, continue, Yeah.

14:23

He's a world class economist and the

14:27

finding is very robust. And

14:29

the big question is, well, what are these experienced

14:31

kindergarten teachers doing that sets kids

14:34

up on a different trajectory. And my assumption

14:36

was cognitive skills, like

14:39

they're giving you an edge and reading and math,

14:41

and then you get to carry that with you. It is

14:43

true that the more experienced teachers are

14:45

better at teaching math and reading, but

14:48

that advantage dissipates over the next few years and

14:50

other kids catch up. Where

14:53

kids get a lasting advantage from an experienced kindergarten

14:55

teacher is in character skills. In

14:57

fourth and eighth grade, the kids who

14:59

happen to have a more experienced kindergarten teacher

15:02

randomly assigned ended up getting

15:04

rated higher by their later teachers

15:07

in being proactive, pro

15:09

social, disciplined, and determent,

15:12

and those skills are almost

15:15

two and a half times more important for predicting

15:17

future success than cognitive

15:19

skills.

15:20

I'm wondering if we can explore some of the mechanisms

15:23

by which character skills lead to better

15:25

outcomes. So, as I'm thinking about

15:27

it now, it seems like, okay, determination kind

15:29

of a clear one. It means you're practicing maybe

15:31

more deliberately, you're practicing harder, etc. It's

15:34

also possible that when

15:36

you build character skills, you're more

15:39

likable, and so you're more likely to draw

15:41

in mentors and peers

15:44

and teachers and to

15:46

attract the attention of employers, And so there might be

15:48

this virtuous cycle where character

15:50

certainly is making you better at honing the craft,

15:53

but having character skills

15:55

makes other people in your orbit more

15:58

likely to want to work with you and help make you

16:00

better.

16:01

I think that's right. I do wonder how much

16:03

of growth is about character

16:06

skills elevating your individual learning versus

16:09

attracting people into your orbit who build

16:11

the scaffolding to help you climb.

16:14

So, speaking of character skills, I mean, you're

16:16

just one of my favorite people to intellectually spar with. But

16:18

we were chatting last week about the degree

16:21

to which we think character skills are valuable.

16:23

I tend to lean more nature

16:26

versus nurture in that debate, and so,

16:28

yeah, I guess my question here is do

16:31

we have encouraging evidence that adults

16:33

can improve their character skills in a

16:35

persistent and meaningful way. And,

16:37

by the way, I would love for you

16:39

to be right here. I want to be wrong because

16:42

I really do want these skills to be valuable

16:44

and mutable, and so I have

16:46

no pride around my current point of view.

16:49

Well, there's no one easier to persuade than

16:51

somebody who's already invested in believing.

16:53

The case hereabouts exactly.

16:56

Well, no, honestly, I'm not here to make an argument.

16:58

I don't want to persuade you. What I want to do is

17:01

share with you some of the evidence that's really shaped

17:03

my thinking on this and see if you find

17:05

it compelling. So let's start with the evidence

17:07

in the book. I was quite

17:10

taken with the experiment

17:12

that Francisco Campus and colleagues

17:14

did on entrepreneurs in West Africa.

17:17

So you take in this experiment, you

17:19

take fifteen hundred small business owners,

17:22

You randomly assign them to a control

17:24

group, a cognitive skills training group or

17:27

a character skills training group, and

17:30

the character skills training group sees

17:32

their businesses grow almost

17:34

three times as much over the next two years as

17:36

the cognitive skills training group. Now,

17:38

these founders are mostly in their forties and fifties,

17:41

so it's quite late to be learning character

17:43

skills.

17:44

Yeah, you're not in any kind of critical period, you

17:46

know. Yeah,

17:48

exactly.

17:49

And the training program is not rocket science.

17:51

It's a week of practicing

17:54

being proactive and disciplined

17:56

and determined, and then thinking about

17:58

how those skills apply to your business. The fact

18:00

that randomly assigning people to just practice

18:02

honing those skills for a week at midlife,

18:05

mid career, then you

18:07

know, dramatically increases their revenue you

18:09

looking at both sales and profits. That

18:12

to me is pretty persuasive. So

18:14

tell me why that didn't persuade you or why

18:16

it wasn't enough.

18:17

Yeah, okay, So let me tell you what

18:20

I think would persuade me. Just

18:22

conceptually and embarras me, I'm thinking about this

18:24

out loud. What I hear in the study

18:27

you mentioned from Africa might be

18:29

explained by the following. There are

18:32

capacities that lay dormant in many

18:34

of us, and we simply don't know that

18:36

they're useful to recruit in any given

18:38

setting. And so what you've done in this intervention

18:41

is you've simply made salient to these entrepreneurs

18:44

that things like proactivity and

18:47

determination, whatever the other soft skills are

18:49

are going to be helpful to them in their business

18:51

pursuits. So it's less about them

18:54

growing and seeing improvement in their

18:56

character skills as much as knowing to access

18:58

them in the first place. Fascinating,

19:02

fascinating, and because it's week long, I'm

19:04

kind of like that could be an alternative explanation,

19:06

and that's still valuable right to alert

19:08

people in certain disciplines that that

19:10

matters.

19:12

Yeah, okay, that's very interesting. Yeah,

19:14

I find that totally plausible. I

19:16

would still say that, you know, what's happening

19:19

is they're activating a set of

19:21

dormant capacities and turning them into

19:23

useful skills, and so in that

19:25

sense, they're still learning.

19:27

I agree with that. But if say these

19:29

things exist in their dormant and you unlock

19:31

them over the course of a week, you might go

19:33

from like zero to four in terms of

19:35

like how much you know. And what I'm arguing

19:38

is, in the absence of a longitudinal

19:40

study that shows that a person can

19:42

go on the Proactivity scale, for example,

19:44

go from zero to seventy five, I'm

19:47

not certain about how much room

19:49

for growth there is within that particular

19:51

character trait, and so

19:54

I'm unclear as to how again malleable

19:56

it is. So we know they can unlock it in the first place,

19:59

we know they can maybe inch a little forward over the

20:01

course of the week, But how possible

20:03

is it for two people pull out of a random

20:05

sample to both get to seventy five

20:08

with the right tools.

20:09

Yeah, that's a very good question. I think

20:11

it's an empirical question that I have not

20:14

seen a good answer to.

20:16

After the break the case for imperfectionism

20:19

from a fellow recovering perfectionist,

20:22

and we'll hear about a technique to unlock

20:24

our hidden potential. It comes

20:26

from a sea creature that's

20:29

up next. On a slight change of plans,

20:48

I want to start with your suggestion that

20:50

we try and be more

20:52

like a sponge, and like a literal,

20:55

living sea sponge. We're not talking about like

20:57

a kitchen dish sponge situation. So

20:59

can you tell me a little bit more about this metaphor,

21:02

and then I will tell you why I'm obsessed with it.

21:05

So when I was interested in proactivity, I was interested

21:07

in being proactive to absorb information

21:10

that helps you grow. And we've known for a long

21:12

time that this is an important driver of

21:14

reaching potential. I was looking

21:16

for insight about that, and people kept

21:18

saying as I talked to people who had achieved

21:20

extraordinary growth or coach others to do the

21:22

same, they kept saying I was like a

21:24

sponge, she was a sponge. He

21:27

was a human sponge. And eventually

21:29

it hit me that this might be more than a metaphor. So

21:32

I started reading about sea sponges and

21:34

I learned that the yeah, I mean,

21:36

that's in the job description. Obviously, any

21:39

self respecting social scientists has to take

21:42

the sea sponge.

21:42

Yes, there's the sea sponge part of the textbook.

21:45

Right, Yeah, du Never. I

21:47

didn't know a thing about them. I learned a lot, and one

21:49

of the things that I learned was that

21:52

they're not just adept at taking

21:54

in nutrients, they also have finely

21:57

tuned filters to expel harmful

21:59

particles. And I

22:01

think why this resonated with me is a

22:03

lot of people think being a sponge is

22:05

about just absorbing as much information

22:08

as you can seek infinite amounts

22:10

of feedback, engage all of your critics.

22:14

Not so much. Not all critics

22:16

are thinking critically, not all critics

22:18

are speaking constructively, And

22:21

I think a huge part of being an effective sponge

22:23

is being proactive, not just about what you take

22:25

in, but also what you expel

22:28

out.

22:29

Yes, I mean, I love this concept

22:31

about filtration because I think it's so crucial

22:34

and it's interesting.

22:36

I mean, you talk in the book about the perils of having

22:39

an ego based filtration system, So that's where

22:41

you're pushing out a lot of the bad

22:43

stuff that you hear and you're just kind of

22:45

absorbing all the like, Oh, you're great, and this speech

22:48

is great, and there's no room for improvement, right. I

22:51

have the underfiltration problem

22:53

that you described, and it's been a journey

22:55

over time. So if I rewind

22:57

the clock a bit, I mean, starting from the time that I was a

23:00

little kid playing the violin, I

23:02

was always someone who sought out an enormous

23:04

amount of feedback. But the problem that

23:06

I have is I've let

23:09

too much feedback in and at times

23:11

assigned equal importance to all of it than

23:13

would have been helpful. And the way

23:15

that I rationalize this, that I've justified this

23:17

is, Okay, I'm a person with a lot of blind spots.

23:20

There's a lot of people out there who know a lot more than I

23:22

do about any given thing, and I want to improve

23:24

as much as possible, and I don't want to be prideful

23:26

in these pursuits. But it's taken me

23:29

a lot of time and a lot of confidence

23:31

building to recognize

23:35

what feedback better serves

23:37

the thing I'm working on and what doesn't.

23:40

And that's a really hard it's

23:42

really hard to fine tune this

23:44

filtration system.

23:46

Yeah, it's not easy, and

23:49

I think probably I

23:51

would guess that most people are on

23:53

one extreme or another on this. Either

23:55

they pay attention to all the criticism because

23:57

they're so obsessed with learning and they think that's part

24:00

of having a growth mindset, or their

24:03

egos are fragile and being in

24:05

secure means that nothing gets in. Yeah,

24:07

and they don't really learn from criticism,

24:10

and I obviously want to find the

24:12

sweet spot there. So I think

24:14

for me, the key questions looking

24:16

at the research on what makes for useful

24:19

input are one expertise

24:22

is this person credible in the domain? Two

24:25

familiarity does this person know you? And

24:28

three care? Are they actually trying to help

24:31

you get better?

24:31

Yes?

24:32

Yes, And I think it's very

24:34

common to have a critic who

24:37

checks the first two boxes but not the

24:39

third, which means they

24:41

don't necessarily have your best interest at heart.

24:43

Yeah.

24:44

I think a good coach is not

24:47

just attacking your worse self, but actually recognizing

24:49

your hidden potential and trying to help you become

24:52

a better version of yourself.

24:54

And I think to add to that, it's okay to

24:56

not assign equal weight to every piece of

24:58

feedback given to you by someone that

25:00

you admire. So there's a difference between

25:02

admiring a person and

25:04

then accepting all of their feedback,

25:06

and we shouldn't confuse the two. And I

25:08

have a personal example with you on

25:11

this topic, right, So you generously

25:13

gave me a bunch of feedback on my TED talk.

25:15

You really helped elevate it. But crucially

25:19

I didn't accept all your feedback. And

25:21

I remember thinking, wait a second,

25:24

I'm rejecting Adam Grant's feedback.

25:26

And this man literally holds the world

25:29

record for like the most TED talks given

25:31

by like any human. But

25:33

then I thought to myself, what would Adam

25:35

tell me about whether or not to reject

25:37

this feedback? And I heard you in my head. I

25:39

heard you telling me on the phone, Leya, I'm

25:41

just one person. It's one person's feedback. Just

25:44

reject this feedback if this doesn't apply to you

25:46

or feel constant with you and your personality

25:48

type and the kind of TED talk you want to give who

25:51

cares like. Don't accept feedback just

25:53

because it's someone's feedback. Accept it

25:55

because it resonates with you. And that

25:58

was growth for me because I think back

26:00

in the day right, Like ten years ago, I would have

26:02

been like, accept it all, no filtration

26:04

process. But I appreciate you being

26:06

that voice in my head along the way.

26:09

Well, I'm sorry that I didn't say it more explicitly

26:12

right off the bat. If you get a

26:14

comment just from one person, that may just

26:16

be their idiosyncratic taste or their subjective

26:18

reaction, and you don't have to pay attention to

26:21

it just because someone that you like or respect said

26:23

it.

26:23

No, exactly. And I think actually the root

26:26

cause of this, and I'm just I'm going to be working on the skill

26:28

over the course of my whole life, is that it

26:30

is very very easy for

26:32

me to see another person's point

26:35

of view. And I don't want to rid

26:37

myself of this trait altogether, because I really

26:39

do value my open mind and I think it makes

26:41

me a better person overall. It's just

26:43

that I see that there are some downsides.

26:45

I agree, and I think this would be an example

26:47

of what psychologists would call a strength

26:49

overused.

26:50

Oh that's really nice.

26:51

Yeah, So you don't want to eliminate the

26:53

strength. You want to make sure you're

26:55

not using it excessively or misusing

26:57

it by applying it in the wrong situations.

26:59

Yes, exactly. But I

27:01

also think from a developmental perspective,

27:04

is really natural and healthy when

27:06

we're young to allow in a bunch of feedback

27:08

and to test out because we're still

27:10

figuring out who we are, like, what

27:13

we care about, what we value, what

27:15

we prize when it comes to giving a talk

27:17

or writing a song or whatever it is. And

27:20

it is through the process of receiving feedback

27:23

and seeing how we respond that we sometimes

27:25

even learn what our preferences

27:27

are in the first place, right, and what we care

27:29

about. And what's so interesting in my own evolution

27:32

is that I assumed with age that this

27:34

would become easier, right, Filtering would become

27:36

easier, and it absolutely has overall.

27:39

But I do feel like

27:41

when I enter a new domain,

27:44

so podcasting for example, or giving

27:46

my first head talk, I go back

27:48

into that developmental stage of mind where

27:51

I open the floodgates and I let all this

27:53

feedback in and I again have

27:56

to fine tune those filtration

27:58

skills to figure out, you know, where I want

28:00

to go. So it can be a process, right.

28:02

Yeah, I think it's better to err on the side

28:04

of being too open than too closed, because

28:07

it's much easier to turn on the filter than

28:09

it is to suddenly absorb

28:12

information that you don't have access to

28:14

anymore because people have learned that

28:17

you're not receptive to it. And I

28:19

love the research showing that we're better

28:21

off asking for advice than feedback.

28:23

Yeah, tell me more about that, because

28:25

when I read that in the book, I was like, aren't they kind of the same

28:27

thing.

28:28

So when you ask for feedback, the other

28:30

person rewinds to the past and

28:32

tells you what you did wrong or what you did right,

28:35

and that can lead you to ruminate about

28:37

all of your mistakes. Yeah, and then

28:39

it's really hard to carry that forward

28:41

to what am I going to do differently tomorrow. It

28:43

can also if it's positive feedback, it can

28:45

lead you to say, all right, I'm good, I don't

28:47

need to change anything. And when

28:49

you ask for advice, people actually

28:52

look ahead and they say, well, here's the thing I might

28:54

adjust next time, And then you

28:56

can immediately think about, Okay,

28:58

next time I'm in this situation, what do

29:00

I want to try? And that's less

29:03

threatening. You're not defensive. You don't have

29:05

to claim that you actually were perfect

29:07

last time. It's a little bit more optimistic

29:10

because you have an opportunity to improve it. So

29:13

I've actually stopped asking for feedback. I used to

29:15

do every talk, I would get off stage and say, what

29:17

feedback do you have? Now I say, what's

29:19

the one thing I can do better?

29:21

Yeah?

29:22

So, on the topic of coaches, how

29:24

is it that we find good coaches

29:26

and mentors? And there's a somewhat counterintuitive

29:29

finding in your book that I'd love you to talk about when

29:31

it comes to searching for these people. Yeah.

29:34

I think what most of us assume is that you want

29:36

to learn from the best, So find

29:38

the most accomplished musician, the greatest

29:41

athlete, the genius scientist,

29:43

whatever your field is, you want to learn from the expert.

29:46

The empirical evidence does not support

29:49

that as the best idea. My favorite

29:51

demonstration being that if you take an

29:53

intro class with an

29:55

adjunct professor or a lecturer

29:58

as opposed to somebody who's tenured

30:01

or tenure track in that field, you actually go

30:03

on to get better grades in your next class

30:05

than that subject. In other words,

30:07

the person with less expertise is a better

30:09

teacher. Why would that be? I

30:12

think there's evidence for a couple of mechanisms.

30:15

One is that sometimes

30:17

experts are too far from where you

30:19

are to actually remember

30:21

what it's like to be in your shoes, so they

30:24

can't teach the basics. Einstein

30:26

was an awful intro physics

30:28

teacher. The second

30:30

challenge is that the process of gaining expertise

30:34

can make people worse at communicating what they

30:36

know. So it's not just that they forgot,

30:38

it's that they've been doing a lot of it on autopilot,

30:40

and they tend to take much of the knowledge

30:43

they have for granted. I think oftentimes

30:45

the best mentor is somebody who's just a couple of

30:47

steps ahead of you, and maybe

30:50

not somebody who was a natural, but somebody who struggled

30:53

because they actually had to study how to improve.

30:55

And I guess that has led

30:57

me to say, instead of those

31:00

who can't do teach, we

31:02

should say those who can do often can't

31:04

teach the basics.

31:05

Yeah, I mean, I love this message. And

31:08

then also with that said, you know, I

31:10

did have the amazing fortune of studying with

31:13

It's a Pearlman, who's yeah, widely considered

31:15

the greatest violinist in the world. And

31:17

I will say that Pearlman had a very

31:20

unusual way of teaching that led

31:23

to really great outcomes, and this is what he did.

31:25

So I would be playing some passage

31:28

and rather than being prescriptive about

31:30

what to do and like how I could play

31:32

it better, he would interrogate me

31:35

with a litany of questions around

31:37

how it is that I thought I could make

31:39

the passage better. So it was sort of like a

31:41

maya, you're clearly unhappy with the way that phrase

31:44

is being shaped. What do you think you can do about

31:46

it? And at the time, Adam, I remember being

31:48

like, dude, you're the freakin'

31:50

expert. Why are you asking me? Right?

31:53

My like thirteen year old brain didn't really

31:55

understand the power the gift that he was

31:57

giving me. But what he was training me to

31:59

do was to be a critical thinker.

32:02

I don't want to be a lobbyist for the world experts.

32:04

They don't actually need our help right now. They're doing just

32:06

fine. But I want to argue

32:08

that there's the potential for them to be great teachers

32:10

too.

32:11

I think they have hidden potential. So many

32:13

teachers and mentors think that they're supposed

32:15

to be Yoda and they're

32:18

just gonna they're gonna unfold their wisdom

32:20

for you. And the reality is

32:22

that people are much better

32:24

positioned to learn if you

32:26

guide them to come up with their own answers as

32:28

opposed to just spoon feeding them

32:31

your answers. It sounds like what it's

32:33

like Proman was doing for you is activating the tutor

32:35

effect and the coach effect. So

32:37

the tutor effect is the finding that the best way

32:40

to learn something is often to teach it that

32:42

when you have to, in this case, sort of teach yourself

32:45

and say, well, here's what I didn't like about this

32:47

violin performance. That leads you to

32:49

understand it better because you have to explain it.

32:51

It leads you to remember it better because you have to

32:53

retrieve it. And then in the process

32:55

of coaching, normally it would be coaching someone

32:58

else, but in this case coaching yourself out loud,

33:00

you actually discover that you have some of

33:02

the knowledge you already need, and that builds

33:04

your confidence and your motivation. Is

33:07

better to be uncomfortable today and better to maor

33:09

than it is to avoid discomfort today and

33:11

stagnate tomorrow.

33:12

Yeah, Okay, there are limits though,

33:15

right to our desire to get better. Talk

33:17

about imperfectionism and how that can be an asset

33:19

to us when it comes to unlocking our hidden

33:21

potential.

33:22

Yeah, so this is for me, being an imperfectionist

33:25

is about It's not about lowering your standards

33:28

at all. It's about learning to accept the

33:30

right imperfections that are not essential

33:32

to the excellence you're trying to achieve, or that

33:35

are necessary for growth. So

33:37

I'll give you my diving example, because

33:39

this is where I first learned that this

33:41

is a skill. And to be clear, I'm

33:43

still in recovery from perfectionism.

33:46

Yeah, we're both recovering perfectionists, so big

33:48

time, big time.

33:50

But I think in diving, I always

33:53

was trying to aim for a perfect ten. And one day my coach,

33:55

Eric Best sat me down and said, you know, there's

33:57

no such thing as a perfect ten. It's a misnomer.

34:00

In one rule book, a ten is for excellence.

34:02

In the other, it's very good. And

34:05

all of a sudden I realized that

34:07

the time I was spent trying to perfect

34:09

my dives was actually limiting

34:11

my growth. In fact, I've come to believe

34:14

that if perfectionism were medication, it would

34:16

come with a warning label that says warning

34:18

may cause stunted growth.

34:21

You just got yourself a job at the FDA out

34:23

of a nice job.

34:24

I mean maybe, but what I

34:26

lived was exactly what the research shows, which is

34:28

you only work on the things you know you can do well. Yeah,

34:31

if you're trying to be perfect, you avoid anything

34:33

where you might fail. You end

34:35

up missing the forest in the trees and trying

34:37

to tinker with these tiny details instead of

34:39

looking at the big picture, and you ruminate

34:41

a lot and beat yourself up. And I guess the way

34:43

that I've tried to put that into practice is

34:46

I try to calibrate. I

34:49

have, you know, a range of different priorities in

34:51

my life. And when I write a book,

34:53

I'm aiming for a nine because it's

34:55

a huge investment of time and I

34:57

hope there will be a decent number of people who

35:00

read it and benefit from it. But

35:02

I don't treat everything that way, you know, I'm

35:04

very content with a seven when

35:07

I give a speech, no, knowing

35:09

that each audience is a little different and

35:12

each performance is going to be a little different, and

35:15

good enough is actually good enough in that situation. And

35:17

I think this is something we can all do, is to

35:20

pause to ask how high are the stakes

35:22

here?

35:22

Yeah?

35:23

And we aim obviously higher

35:25

when it's more important and we give

35:27

ourselves a little bit more grace and permission

35:29

to be imperfect on

35:32

things that are less consequential. And look,

35:35

no matter how good you get, there are always going

35:37

to be people who don't like what you do, and

35:40

there are always going to be aspects of your performance

35:42

that are going to fall short of someone's standards.

35:45

You cannot please everyone,

35:48

so you might as well decide who you're willing

35:50

to disappoint.

35:51

Can you just say that one more time? I

35:53

need to hear that.

35:53

One you, in particular,

35:56

you as a human cannot please everyone, and

35:59

neither can anyone.

36:00

Okay, and therapy right there.

36:03

So you might as well decide who

36:05

you're willing to disappoint and

36:08

which standards are important to you.

36:10

Yeah, And I'm thinking about

36:12

all the domains where this imperfectionism

36:14

perfectionist mindset is relevant. And I'm

36:16

thinking about all those parents out there that just

36:19

brate themselves every day because

36:21

they don't think they're the perfect parents. And it's

36:23

like, well, what if a nine is every

36:25

day my kids knew I loved them? Like

36:28

what if that was a nine? Like maybe that is

36:31

good enough slash perfection in the

36:33

domain of parenting versus oh, I

36:35

know coach them through the remote. I mean, just so it is a

36:37

huge manual now, right for how it is that

36:39

we should raise our kids. But yeah, it's just

36:41

making me think about how we define

36:43

our north star. Yeah.

36:45

At first I was really reluctant to apply this to parenting,

36:48

Like I don't want parents to be scored.

36:52

Your parenting today was a three and a half. Yeah,

36:55

but you just changed my mind

36:57

because there's no reason why

36:59

we can't clarify. Like, first

37:01

of all, you should not expect to be a perfect parent.

37:04

No one will ever achieve that standard. It's

37:06

impossible. Yeh. Every parent makes mistakes.

37:09

I think that's part of how we grow as parents. I

37:11

think some of my best moments of growth as a parent actually

37:13

have come when I've been really disappointed

37:16

in myself for getting frustrated and

37:18

impatient with our kids. But I don't think

37:20

a lot of parents I think this is a big aha

37:22

mooent for me. I don't think a lot of parents have sat down

37:24

to say, Okay, I want to be a nine

37:27

parent, not a ten parent, because that's

37:29

going to be healthier for me and for my kid. What

37:32

does a nine look like? What

37:34

are the behaviors that really matter and what are the

37:36

ones that are okay to be imperfect on.

37:39

Yeah.

37:40

I think that's a great discussion that we could all have with our families.

37:43

I'm going to force myself to have it this

37:45

weekend.

37:46

Yeah. I think the most hopeful

37:48

message coming out of your book, and I love

37:50

that you devote a sizeable chunk of the book

37:52

to this topic, is how

37:54

we can help unlock potential in others.

37:57

It is a very other focused orientation,

37:59

which I think is just going to make humanity better

38:02

across the board, because you don't always see that represented

38:04

in in psych books. And so can

38:06

you just leave us with some reflections

38:09

on how we can help unlock

38:11

potential in those around us?

38:13

This is my top pick for kicking

38:16

myself that I didn't write this into the book, Like,

38:19

how did this not make the cut? I don't

38:21

know, all right. So, a

38:23

group of my colleagues, led by Laura Morgan

38:25

Roberts, created an exercise called the Reflected

38:28

Best Self Portrait, and

38:30

the idea is that a lot of people have

38:33

hidden potential that's invisible to them. It's almost

38:35

like the opposite of a blind spot, that

38:37

you're not aware of some of your own strengths and

38:40

so you need other people to hold up a mirror to help you

38:42

identify the things that you're good at

38:44

that maybe these are underutilized strengths as

38:46

opposed to the overused ones that we talked about

38:48

earlier. So the exercise,

38:51

I've had students and leaders do

38:53

it for about fifteen years now, and people

38:55

often come back and say, this was a life

38:58

changing experience. So all you

39:00

do is you reach out to some people

39:02

who know you well in different walks of life. You could do this with

39:04

family, some friends, some colleagues,

39:07

and you ask them to tell a story about you

39:09

at a time when you were at your best. And

39:11

then you collect all the stories, which is the

39:14

most delightful set of emails you will

39:16

ever get. And then your job

39:19

is to recognize the patterns and compose

39:21

a self portrait of who you are at your best.

39:24

And very often when people do this

39:26

like oh, I didn't even know that was the strength of

39:29

mine, and now I see all these places I

39:31

can use it. I also felt

39:33

like this is a gift you can give to other

39:35

people to help them see their hidden potential. So

39:37

when I first learned about this exercise, I think it was

39:39

gosh, it must have been twenty years ago. I remember the

39:42

winter break starting and I

39:44

was a first year grad student. I

39:46

had nothing on my calendar. I was broke.

39:49

What am I going to do with this week? I decided

39:52

that I was going to invert the exercise, and

39:55

I picked up a bunch of people who mattered

39:57

to me, and I wrote them all a story

39:59

about a time when they were at their best

40:02

and just emailed it to them out of the blue.

40:06

It is one of the most meaningful weeks

40:09

I have ever spent, even though I was just sitting

40:12

in a room writing

40:14

emails, because really thinking about,

40:16

well, what is other people's hidden potential

40:18

and how can I make that more

40:20

visible to them felt like a really

40:23

meaningful act of friendship

40:26

or you know, an investment in a relationship, and

40:29

people seem to really appreciate it.

40:30

I love that example. That's something that everyone listening

40:33

can actually do right now.

40:34

I mean, just even pick one person and

40:36

tell them who they are at their best.

41:13

Hey, thanks so much for listening. If

41:15

you enjoyed my conversation with Adam, you might

41:17

want to check out the first time he was on the show.

41:20

It's an episode called Adam Grant

41:22

Thinks Again, and we'll link to it in

41:24

the show notes. And that's a

41:26

wrap on our season. I just

41:28

want to thank you for spending this time with me and

41:30

the remarkable guests we've had on the show.

41:33

We'll be back early next year with new episodes.

41:36

In the meantime, I'm wishing you a happy

41:38

and healthy rest of your year and

41:40

a bit more equanimity in the face

41:42

of any Slight Changes of plan. A

41:54

Slight Change of Plans is created, written,

41:56

and executive produced by me Maya Schunker.

41:59

The Slight Change family includes our showrunner

42:02

Tyler Green, our senior editor

42:04

Kate Parkinson Morgan, our producer

42:06

Trisha Bovida, and our sound engineer

42:09

Andrew Vestola. Louis

42:11

Scara wrote our delightful theme song,

42:14

and Ginger Smith helped arrange the vocals.

42:16

A Slight Change of Plans is a production of Pushkin

42:19

Industries, so big thanks to everyone

42:21

there, and of course a

42:23

very special thanks to Jimmy Lee.

42:26

You can follow A Slight Change of Plans on Instagram

42:28

at doctor Maya Schunker. So,

42:51

I remember when I flew to China

42:54

after Jimmy and I got married, and we had

42:56

this big wedding reception, and I

42:58

was so jetlagged first of

43:00

all, and I was in extremely elementary

43:02

Chinese land. I'm still in elementary Chinese

43:04

land, but I remember my

43:06

in laws kind of looked at me and they're like, so archie

43:09

to say something. And then on the spot, I had to come

43:11

up with this like wedding speech, and

43:14

it was so it was so basic, Adam.

43:16

I was like, hello, I am Maya,

43:19

I'm married Jimmy. Thank you so

43:21

much for being here, you know, really poetic,

43:23

like so much emotional residence. I'm sure this

43:26

is great.

43:27

You're like, see spot spot

43:29

run exactly.

43:30

I'm like, I currently am in China.

43:33

You are all currently here as well,

Rate

From The Podcast

A Slight Change of Plans

You can follow the show at @DrMayaShankar on Instagram.Apple Podcasts’ Best Show of the Year 2021 Editor's Note: Maya Shankar blends compassionate storytelling with the science of human behavior to help us understand who we are and who we become in the face of a big change. Maya is no stranger to change. “My whole childhood revolved around the violin, but that changed in a moment when I injured my hand playing a single note,” says Shankar, who was studying under Itzhak Perlman at the Juilliard School at the time. “I was forced to try and figure out who I was, and who I could be, without the violin." Maya soon discovered a new path in the field of cognitive science, where she earned her PhD as a Rhodes Scholar studying how and why we change. Her insights into human behavior ultimately led her to create A Slight Change of Plans—Apple Podcasts’ Best Show of the Year in 2021. You’ll hear intimate conversations with people like Tiffany Haddish, Kacey Musgraves, and Riz Ahmed, as well as real-life inspirations, like John Elder Robison, who undergoes experimental brain stimulation to deepen his emotional intelligence, Daryl Davis, a Black jazz musician who inspires hundreds of KKK members to leave the Klan, and Shankar herself, who had her own “slight change of plans” earlier this year. The show also explores the science of change with experts like Adam Grant and Angela Duckworth. "What I love most about this show is that the content is evergreen," says Shankar. "You can listen to episodes in any order and at any time."

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features