Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:14
Pushkin, the
0:30
brain activity that arose when we thought of our
0:32
future selves looked more like the brain
0:34
activity that arose when we thought of
0:37
others. On a neural level, the future
0:39
self looks like another person.
0:41
Psychologist Hal Hirschfield studies
0:43
the emotional connection we have to our future
0:45
selves and the benefits of strengthening
0:48
that connection.
0:49
We've found that people who
0:51
are connected to their future
0:53
selves are more likely to have saved
0:56
money over time, they exercise
0:59
more, They're more likely to make
1:01
ethical decisions, and feel
1:04
more of a sense of meaning in their lives.
1:10
On today's episode, Why Your Future
1:12
Self Needs Your Help Today, I'm
1:17
Maya Shunker and this is a slight change
1:19
of plans, a show about who we
1:21
are and who we become in the face.
1:23
Of a big change.
1:36
Hell is a professor at UCLA and
1:38
his work is at the intersection of psychology
1:40
and economics. His new book
1:43
is called Your Future Self, How
1:45
to Make Tomorrow Better Today. It
1:48
might seem funny to think of yourself in this way,
1:51
that there's a present you and a future
1:53
you. I mean, isn't there just one
1:55
you? But Hell says the
1:57
way your brain thinks about your sense of self
1:59
isn't quite so straightforward.
2:01
I think on the surface many of us would say, yet like
2:03
I am who I am, I'm oneself, You're Maya, I'm
2:06
hal and I have been and you have been.
2:09
So what's interesting here is that if
2:11
you start thinking about your life over time, it
2:14
becomes a little hard to say that you are sort of this single
2:17
entity. Right. Your interests may have changed, your
2:19
friends may have changed, the city you live in, the
2:22
job you have, like all of these things
2:24
about you, your personality,
2:26
right, all of these things, and so
2:29
it can be a little bit difficult to say that there's
2:31
sort of this oneself. And so I think a better
2:33
notion to really capture
2:35
the essence of identity
2:37
over time is that we are
2:39
a collection of separate selves. And so
2:41
you do have the current version of you,
2:44
current Maya, but then there's also a
2:47
future self. There's a future version of
2:49
you in five years, and there's also a
2:51
future self that exists in
2:53
twenty years or thirty years. So
2:55
when I talk about current and future selves,
2:58
what I'm trying to reflect is the reality
3:00
that in many ways we're not
3:03
this stable single entity
3:05
over time.
3:06
Yeah, yeah, I mean, there's really fascinating
3:09
neuroscience research and psychology research
3:12
that corroborates this and shows
3:14
that from a psychological point of view,
3:17
we don't see ourselves as this single
3:19
entity over time that persists, and
3:22
I think there's a lot of benefits from that, right,
3:24
Maybe it opens us up to wonder
3:27
and curiosity about who we might become. But
3:29
there's also research showing that there's a possible
3:31
downside to seeing ourselves
3:33
as a collection of cells. And one of those downsides
3:36
is that when we see our future cells
3:38
as a distinct entity from
3:40
who we are today, it can lead
3:42
to our having less empathy towards
3:44
that future self. And so, can
3:47
you tell me how about what I find to be
3:49
just an amazing neuroscience study showing
3:51
how our brains perceive
3:54
our present day self and our future self.
3:57
So, one of the things that neuroscientists
4:00
have found is that there's a different pattern
4:02
of activity in the brain when people think about
4:04
themselves compared to when they think about others.
4:07
Now, my collaborators and I said, let's take these same
4:09
ideas and apply them to thoughts
4:11
of future selves. And what
4:13
we found is that when we put people into the scanner,
4:16
the brain activity that arose when people
4:18
thought of their future selves looked
4:21
more like the brain activity that arose
4:23
when they thought of other people, which
4:26
is really striking in a way. It's on the neural
4:28
level, the future self looks like another person.
4:30
Wow, it suggests that we are thinking of
4:32
those future selves as if they are other people. Now,
4:35
there's an important caveat here, which
4:37
is that that's on average. Some people had
4:40
patterns in the brain where the future self looked wildly
4:43
like another person, and some people the difference
4:45
was much smaller. Now a
4:47
couple weeks later, we brought those
4:49
same people back to the lab and we gave them
4:52
decisions that they could make between smaller amounts
4:54
of money that they could have right now and
4:57
larger amounts of money they could have later. It's sort of a classic
4:59
present future trade off. It's a little like spending versus
5:02
saving, and it's.
5:03
Really asking at its heart, how much
5:05
do you care about your future self being happy
5:07
with this sum of money versus your present day
5:09
self?
5:10
Right exactly. So, on
5:12
the one hand, what we found is that the people for whom the future
5:14
self looked most like another person, they
5:16
said, I'll take the money right now and not save it for later.
5:19
But then the flip side, the people for whom the
5:21
future self looked most similar, most
5:24
connected to the current self. Those
5:27
are the ones who said, I'll wait, I'll
5:29
wait till later and take more money for
5:31
a future version of me.
5:33
Yeah.
5:34
Are there any psychological studies
5:36
that look at the amount of empathy that
5:38
we have towards our future selves.
5:40
There is one study that comes to mind. So krim ca some
5:43
and his colleagues did this work where they might say that people
5:45
imagine you to win a lottery right now,
5:47
how happy would you be on it, you know, on a one to
5:49
ten scale, about an eight, I
5:52
guess, And then they ask
5:54
people how happy would you be if you want sort
5:56
of an equivalent, you know, let's adjusted for inflation,
5:59
lottery in the future, in five years,
6:01
two years, whatever it might be. And
6:04
the interesting thing there is that people's responses
6:06
are lower. So I say, oh, I don't know, I'd be about a six
6:08
or seven. And it's funny
6:10
because if it's the same amount of money, you think I'd
6:12
be the same amount of happy. But
6:14
the reality is, somehow
6:17
the things that are happening now feel stronger,
6:20
and the things that are happening in the future feel somehow
6:23
more muted.
6:24
Another study that I love, which I think shows
6:26
the same result that emerges from the neuroscience study
6:28
is shown in this psychological study in terms
6:31
of our frame of reference when we're thinking
6:33
about our present day self and our future self.
6:36
And gosh, I love this one.
6:38
It feels so viscerally true in my
6:40
own experience. So do you mind describing this particular
6:43
study?
6:43
Yes? So, Emily Pronin and Lee Ross
6:45
did this great work. They ask people to describe
6:48
a meal they're having right now, and when
6:50
people do that, they naturally use the first
6:52
person perspective. I am eating plasta,
6:54
I am eating a sandwich or whatever it
6:56
is. And then they ask a different group to imagine
6:59
a meal in the very distant future. And
7:02
when a different group of people do that
7:05
exercise, some of them
7:07
say, oh, I'll be eating pasta,
7:09
I'll beating a sandwich, but way more of them
7:11
switch to say he is
7:14
eating a sandwich, He's eating pasta. They
7:16
flip to use the third person perspective
7:18
when thinking about their future self. And this is work that's
7:21
been replicated by Neil McCrae and others
7:23
as well. And I find it so interesting
7:25
because it suggests that on this subtle
7:28
psychological level, we make
7:30
this little flip in our mind so
7:32
that our future self now is
7:34
seen as another.
7:35
Yeah, when I sit here and then I
7:37
imagine myself if I'm so lucky that I'm
7:39
here many decades from now, in
7:42
say a convalescent home.
7:44
Right, I'm looking at
7:46
myself sitting
7:49
in the convalescent home.
7:51
Right.
7:51
I have the ability to imagine myself in the first person.
7:53
But it's not what comes instinctively, Whereas
7:55
if I imagine my life
7:58
today or imagine my life tomorrow, I
8:00
am seeing it through the mind's eye. So
8:03
why do you think we're like this? So why do you think
8:05
it is that we feel less empathy
8:07
towards our future selves than we might otherwise
8:10
want to.
8:11
I mean, I think to some extent you could go back in
8:13
history and come up with an answer. Right, when
8:15
life expectancy was much shorter, it really
8:18
made sense to focus on what was
8:20
certain, which was the present. Right, the
8:22
distant future is wildly uncertain. Why should
8:24
I do anything for it? But now
8:27
we're living much longer, especially
8:29
in developed countries, and
8:32
not empathizing with the future self
8:35
can look as if we are almost
8:38
overly focused on the
8:40
present self. It sort of brings up the concept of what
8:42
behavioral economists and psycholoists called present
8:44
bias, which is that we are to some extent bias
8:46
towards the things that are happening now, so much so
8:49
that we end up really undervaluing
8:52
things that will happen to some future
8:54
version of ourselves. So if
8:56
our future self is the type
8:59
of person who we know exists but we
9:01
don't really care about them, then
9:03
we're probably not going to be doing things
9:06
for their benefit.
9:09
Are there any other studies showing that the way
9:11
we view our future self can change
9:13
the kinds of decisions we make on
9:16
behalf of that future self.
9:17
Absolutely so. In my own work, we've
9:20
found that people who are
9:22
connected to their future selves are more
9:24
likely to have saved
9:27
money over time, they experience greater financial
9:29
wellbeing, they perform
9:32
in more patient ways and laboratory tasks,
9:34
you know. Other research has even found that the people
9:36
who experience a greater
9:38
sense of similarity and connection
9:41
with their future selves also feel
9:44
more of a sense of meaning in their lives. They're
9:46
more likely to make ethical decisions
9:49
when given the option to act unethically, which
9:51
is another one of these sort of present future
9:53
trade offs.
9:54
Wait, tell me more about that one. How that's fascinating.
9:57
Well, if you think about it, If I'm given the option
9:59
to cut a corner right now and get
10:02
a little benefit right now, the trade off
10:04
there is that I get something right now, but I also have the possibility
10:06
of getting punished later.
10:07
Yeah, we're guilt feeling of guilt
10:09
later.
10:10
Or guilt later, right, And I
10:12
have researched with collaborators where we found
10:14
that the people who experience
10:17
a lower degree of connection with their future
10:19
selves, they're more likely to
10:21
opt for unethical negotiation
10:23
strategies. Fascinating when given
10:25
the opportunity, and that we even see
10:27
this. It's a small effect that
10:29
we see in laboratory settings where they get the opportunity
10:32
to sort of cheat, if you will.
10:34
Given that we might change in unexpected
10:37
ways, given that we will change, I should just say it's
10:39
inevitability we will change in unexpected
10:41
ways in the future. It can
10:43
become a little bit tricky to figure out who
10:45
we're actually making decisions on behalf
10:47
of right, So when
10:49
I make a decision today on behalf of my future self,
10:52
I am incorporating my current preferences,
10:54
my current values, my current beliefs into
10:56
that decision. Making calculus and those
10:58
things might radically change. And
11:00
so let's say, like how you've
11:03
convinced me I need to bridge any empathy gaps
11:05
that exist between my present self and my future self. I need
11:07
to care a lot more about future Maya. But
11:10
I don't know who I'm solving for.
11:13
Of course, if we're planning, we have
11:15
to base those plans off of something, and the
11:18
most relevant something is how we feel right
11:20
now and who we are right now. And
11:22
as you pointed it out really well, that change changes
11:25
us and we can't fully anticipate
11:27
those changes. At the same time,
11:29
we can look to the core of us and the
11:31
things that matter and
11:34
try to make plans based on
11:37
the values that we hold and what's important
11:39
right now. And I want to layer
11:41
on top of that the need to revisit
11:44
our plans and be compassionate
11:47
with the idea that some of those
11:50
values and some of our preferences may
11:52
change over time.
11:54
Are there predictable ways in which we might
11:56
change that we can account for now in terms of the decisions
11:58
we make, or are there at least stable aspects
12:01
of who we end up being that we
12:04
can feel fairly good about.
12:05
Yeah, your question also gets a sort of this
12:07
nuanced psychology of how much we actually
12:10
change over time and in some ways. You know, what personality
12:12
psychologists suggests is that it depends on where
12:14
you look. In some ways
12:17
we change and other ways we've remain the
12:20
same. And so you know, there's the big five personality
12:22
traits openness, conscientiousness, extraversion,
12:24
agreeableness, neuroticism. Over
12:27
a ten year period, we can expect one of those
12:29
to change. There's a good chance that one of
12:31
those traits will change, which is wild
12:33
in a way. Right, there's the five core traits. One of them
12:35
changes.
12:36
Can I choose neuroticism?
12:37
Please?
12:38
Can I talk to the psychology nods. I'd
12:40
like to change that one everyone.
12:42
Yeah, my magic eight ball says that
12:44
one is fixed.
12:45
Oh damn it.
12:46
You know, you know, we can expect right to get
12:49
a more conscientious over time, and
12:51
yet some of the other traits may
12:53
remain quite stable. And obviously there's lots
12:56
of videosyncrasies here, and there's individual differences.
12:59
We can't predict what environmental
13:01
factors and what external factors will will
13:03
change those things.
13:04
Yeah, and I think the broader message is sure
13:07
there might be some misforecast about
13:09
how we think will end up. But it's better
13:11
to care period about your future self, so at least
13:14
that can be integrated into your present day decisions.
13:17
I think that's exactly right. And I think at
13:19
the same time, if we're making all of
13:21
our decisions for that future self, that's
13:23
not going to lead to a very satisfying
13:25
life right now. And you know that future self is
13:27
constantly bugging me about decisions,
13:29
like I'm going to get annoyed by him and probably start
13:32
start ignoring him, right So, I mean, to some
13:34
extent, this is really about some sense
13:37
of balance, if you will, and flexibility
13:39
between now and later.
13:40
After the break, we talk about how to strike
13:43
that balance, plus a few ways
13:45
you can build a better relationship with your future
13:47
self. We'll
13:51
be back in a moment with a slight change of plans.
14:06
I feel like I Maya
14:09
only learned maybe five years ago that
14:11
I even had a present day self, because I'm
14:14
so.
14:14
Oriented in the future.
14:16
I have been living future self Maya
14:18
for so long, and then recently
14:20
it was like, oh my gosh, there's actually
14:22
a present day version of the How interesting
14:24
maybe I should invest in now.
14:26
Well, this is so interesting because researchers
14:29
talk about the experience
14:31
you're describing, as they refer
14:33
to it as hyperopia. So my apia
14:36
is when I focus so much on the present that
14:38
I missed the future. Hyperopia is where I focus
14:40
so much on the future that I miss the present.
14:42
Yes, I feel so seen right now
14:44
by this random technical term.
14:50
Well, what I find so interesting about
14:52
this is that even though
14:54
hyper apia is being so focused on the future,
14:56
ironically, one of the outcomes of that is
14:58
that we can end up almost doing
15:01
a disservice to our future selves. The
15:03
classic example of this is I
15:06
have a gift certificate to a restaurant and I hold
15:08
on to it, waiting for the perfect time to go to
15:10
that restaurant. And we could go
15:12
this weekend, but you know what, not this weekend. I want
15:14
to wait until it's just right. And then time
15:16
goes by and the restaurant closes. And now I
15:19
was thinking about doing something for my future self
15:21
to make it a really great experience, And what I've done is
15:24
robbed him of that experience. I've also robbed my
15:26
present self of doing it now. And
15:28
there's something humorous about that one. But then you think about
15:30
these other cases. You know, maybe I'm working
15:33
too much, Maybe I'm overly focused
15:35
on certain goals I have, and
15:38
in being so overly focused on them, I miss
15:40
the stuff that's right in front of me. Of course,
15:42
that resonates with me too, and I think it resonates
15:45
with a lot of people. One
15:47
of the ways that I like to think about
15:49
dealing with this is how do I
15:51
create? And the term I really like here is
15:53
harmony between present
15:55
and future selves, so that in
15:57
certain cases, the present self can live
15:59
now to give the future self memories
16:02
to look back on. And another case is maybe
16:05
the present self pulls back a little bit so that the
16:07
future self has more resource is to
16:09
use to create other memories. But if
16:12
I went one direction or the other, it
16:14
would be almost lumpy from
16:17
a well being standpoint. And what
16:19
my preference, at least in my own life would be is to smooth
16:21
that out so that all those selves
16:23
have that well being and utility.
16:26
Yeah, by the way, what you described so
16:28
tracks with my experience as a kid. I
16:30
went home to visit my parents in Connecticut. I was
16:32
up in the attic just looking through old boxes of
16:34
you know, I'm one of four kids, so there's a lot of boxes
16:36
in the attic of like our old things, and
16:38
I find this treasure
16:41
trove of my absolute
16:43
favorite stationary okay from the
16:45
time, and I was just unwilling
16:47
to use it. Ever, it's like no, apparently
16:50
I was saving it for the perfect occasion with
16:52
a perfect friend, and there's
16:54
just piles of it. Now this is all useless.
16:56
It's like Coropi and Hello Kitty
16:59
and all this stuff from this is really dating
17:01
me, all those characters.
17:04
But it's so useless now. But I remember
17:06
at the moment thinking like, this is gold.
17:09
You need to hold on to it. Maya right, Okay,
17:11
you gotta.
17:12
Yeah, I'm here to say now is the time I think,
17:14
you know, all future noteshould be on Hello Kitty.
17:18
Yeah, you just like can't use it recreationally by
17:20
but any what I'm gleaning from this conversation is
17:22
that you will actually become my pen
17:24
pal after this and I will be writing
17:27
letters to you and all that stationary. So it
17:29
eventually went to good use, right because right
17:31
now it's collecting dust.
17:32
It's in an addict in Connecticut.
17:34
Yes, okay, So moving on to those
17:36
of us who struggle to have sufficient empathy
17:38
for our future selves, it strikes
17:41
me that part of the problem
17:43
might be that we don't empathize
17:46
enough with our present day selves, and
17:48
so maybe that that's a place where we might
17:50
start. You know, I was interviewing Kristin Neff on the
17:52
science of self compassion for a slight
17:54
change of plans, and so I'm just curious
17:56
to know how you think about the relationship between
17:59
present day empathy and future empathy. It's
18:01
like, well, I don't I'm not very kind to myself
18:03
right now, and maybe I'm treating myself
18:05
like I would a stranger that I was indifferent towards.
18:08
It doesn't really well for me to really care
18:10
about seventy year old Maya.
18:12
Yeah, no, I love that idea,
18:14
and I think it makes perfect sense. It's
18:16
slightly cheesy metaphor, but you know, when you're on
18:18
an airplane and they say, you know, if oxygen
18:20
mas terdrop, you have to put yours on first before you can help
18:22
someone else. And the whole idea, of course, is that if
18:25
you're rushing to help someone else and you
18:27
haven't take care of yourself first, you'll no longer be able
18:29
to help them. And I think absolutely
18:32
the same could be said for our present and future selves.
18:34
That before we can start taking care
18:36
of that future self and empathizing with them.
18:39
We have to some extent take care of
18:41
and empathize with the person we are right now. I
18:43
don't know of any empirical research that's
18:45
been done in this space, but man, that's a really
18:47
interesting question.
18:49
So given that, what
18:51
types of things can we do to cultivate
18:53
a closer relationship with our future selves?
18:56
So one way to think about this is to start
18:58
from the perspective that future self is, in
19:00
many ways, as we've said, like another
19:02
person. So if you start from that
19:05
perspective, now I can say, all right, well, how
19:07
can we get our cells to
19:10
foster a greater connection to other people.
19:13
We don't have to reinvent the wheel. Charities do this
19:15
all the time. Marketers do this really well.
19:17
And what they do is they make the
19:19
recipients of charity donations
19:22
more salient and more vivid and
19:25
more emotional. So let's apply those same lines
19:28
of thinking to our future selves. Let's
19:30
make them more vivid and
19:32
more emotional. Right, Because if I can feel
19:34
the emotions, I can feel the empathy that's going
19:36
to drive me to do the actions, do the
19:38
things that make life better. Right. So, you know,
19:41
the high tech version of this. Something I've been playing
19:43
with over the years is to show people
19:45
what they'll look like. Right. We can use
19:47
age progression technology, and
19:50
my collaborators and I have done this where we actually
19:52
show people what they'll look like in the future.
19:54
And we've played around with this in different context.
19:57
Most recently, we ran a large scale
19:59
study in Mexico and found
20:01
that people who were exposed to their age
20:03
progress images of their future selves were more
20:06
likely to make a contribution to retirement
20:09
account. There
20:11
are lower tech ways to do this too, so
20:13
we don't all have to sit around printing out images
20:16
of our future selves.
20:17
But some of us just all of a sudden
20:19
have a bunch of gray hair on their heads without
20:22
intending to.
20:23
Suddenly, I have looked in the mirror, and it's it's
20:25
strange, how that is my future self.
20:27
No technology needed in this case.
20:29
Out very very weird
20:31
how that happens. Yeah, you know
20:33
so. Some lower tech versions of this are a
20:35
conversational exercise writing
20:37
letter to your future self and
20:40
then writing a letter from your future
20:42
self. And the reason I say that this is a
20:44
low tech version is because of course we're not doing the technology,
20:46
but it's still doing the same thing. It
20:48
is making that future self more
20:51
vivid.
20:52
One thought experiment that strikes me as potentially
20:54
helpful for building a stronger connection
20:56
with your future self is actually
20:58
to look backwards and think about
21:01
your past and recognize that your present
21:03
day self, which you really care
21:05
a lot about, is the future version of
21:08
ten years younger Maya. Yeah, so like I
21:10
am actually twenty something Maya's
21:13
future self really care about
21:15
myself today? I would really have wanted twenty
21:17
something Maya to care about this version
21:19
of me. So is that also an exercise
21:21
that we can use.
21:23
I think it's a lovely exercise, And so it's not something
21:25
that we've tested. But I love the idea of scaffolding
21:27
things by saying, when I was a
21:29
present self.
21:31
Ten years ago, yeah, as totally
21:33
that.
21:33
Past version of me made decisions
21:35
that now affect the person I am right
21:38
now. You know, when you do that, I think
21:40
it can really highlight these threads
21:42
of connection over time, and
21:44
you know, really shine a light on the idea
21:47
that the things I did in the past have
21:50
impacted the person I am now, and the things I'm
21:52
doing right now will impact the person
21:54
I will be, and more than that, will also
21:57
impact the things that that person
22:00
that future me looks back
22:02
on, either happily or regretfully.
22:05
So, you know, one of the techniques that I love is
22:08
the idea of incre breating commitment devices.
22:10
There's been lots of research on the idea that
22:12
we can recognize that
22:15
there's a version of me right now, and then there's this version
22:18
of my future self who I want to say, you know, has done
22:20
noble things and has eaten healthy and
22:22
exercise and put on my sunscreen. And
22:26
then there's the sort of you
22:28
know, version of me in the middle who
22:31
may screw those things up, right, the guy who doesn't
22:33
wake up in the morning to exercise, the guy who snacks
22:35
so much overnight, and then the guy who
22:37
says, you know, I think I'm good on the sunscreen. I'd like to get
22:39
tanner. And so commitment
22:42
devices are an amazing strategy because
22:44
what they do is they put guardrails on
22:47
our ability to make
22:49
mistakes in the future. And so the idea
22:52
is that I sort of commit to behaving a
22:54
certain way so that my present
22:56
self wishes can become the things
22:58
that you know, the eventual future version of me actually
23:01
actually follows through on and does.
23:03
Is there an example of a commitment device that
23:06
you've implemented on behalf of future.
23:07
How Okay?
23:10
So I have like you would almost call it a light
23:12
commitment device. It's a box
23:14
I have at home. It's called a case safe, and it's
23:16
just a little safe with an electronic timer on it.
23:19
Okay.
23:19
And so in an ideal world,
23:22
around dinner time, I put my phone in there and I lock
23:24
it away for two hours.
23:25
Oh wow.
23:26
And the commitment there
23:28
is that I don't have access to all
23:31
the fun things that my phone has on it, and the
23:33
outcome is that I can be much more present with
23:36
my family, you know, around dinner time,
23:38
bedtime, et cetera. There's one
23:40
catch, though, which is that I have to do it. I have
23:42
to put it in there to begin with, right, And so the
23:45
case safe lives in a cabinet.
23:48
If it was on the counter, I think I would
23:50
do it a lot more. But my wife says that it doesn't look
23:53
great on the counter, So so
23:55
I haven't done that.
23:55
But you know what does look great? Lots
23:57
of happy memories that you kids can look back
23:59
on.
24:00
Yes, there we go.
24:01
I shall tell you that that's the best form of aesthetic.
24:04
That's what I need to say. And when
24:06
I do it, by the way, it changes the experience
24:09
of dinner time. Yeah, because there's not even
24:11
a temptations, Like the actual only
24:13
way I can get my phone is if I take a hammer to
24:15
the safe.
24:15
Oh that's right, because it's got this electronic thing where
24:17
you can really only get access to it two hours
24:20
later.
24:20
So once it's in, yeah, it's done.
24:22
Okay, you can set it anywhere from one minute to ten days.
24:25
But it benefits me now and it benefits me later.
24:28
How do you think that when we have a more empathetic
24:31
view of our future selves, it could
24:33
have a positive spillover effect on our empathy
24:35
towards others. And you know the reason I'm interested
24:38
in this is the other day I was in the doctor's
24:40
office and when the elevator door
24:42
opened, I saw this young woman just barrel
24:44
past this older woman
24:46
that was using a walker, and I
24:49
just wanted to be like, uh.
24:50
Dude, that's going to be you.
24:53
Like, if you're lucky and you make it in
24:55
this life, that will be you, I promise. And
24:57
so that failure of empathy was just
24:59
so devastating for me to witness. I
25:01
mean, even for non selfish reasons, we
25:03
should be kind to people and consider it. But
25:06
even for selfish reasons, we should recognize
25:08
that it and inevitably that will be our future.
25:10
I've thought about this a lot, because, you know, when you think
25:13
about the way that we empathize with other
25:15
people, by definition, we are not a part of those
25:17
groups. But the one interesting thing here is
25:19
that I will one day become my future self.
25:21
I will one day become an older person,
25:24
and so I've always wondered, if I can increase
25:26
empathy for my future self, may
25:28
I also increase empathy for older people
25:31
and vice versa. If I can reduce
25:33
some agism and increase empathy
25:35
for older people, might that spillover to
25:37
my own self? And it's just a wonderful
25:40
open question right now that
25:42
we should dig into.
25:43
One challenge we face, especially younger
25:45
generations, is just feeling so
25:48
much fear about the future, right, feeling
25:50
so much negativity that there's
25:52
an anxiety and even thinking about future
25:54
you, right, of course, And so how
25:56
do we grapple with that.
25:58
I've heard younger people say, like, why should
26:00
I even care? Right when jobs
26:02
are being taken over by AI and climate
26:04
change and inflation, and I'm
26:06
making myself anxious right now listening all these things
26:08
out, One exercise I like to consider
26:11
is what sort of decisions from the
26:13
past seemed like small
26:15
decisions at the time, seemed like things we
26:17
might want to ignore, but then became
26:20
something much bigger that we're dealing with right now.
26:22
And then let me sort of translate
26:24
that over to say, what sort of things are
26:26
happening in the present right now that may evolve
26:29
into something much bigger later.
26:31
And so even though it may be
26:33
scary and uncertain and
26:36
undesirable to think about the future, we
26:38
still have agency over it. We can still start to think
26:40
about what are the seeds
26:43
that are being planted right now that I can fertilize
26:46
or pull out and change. And
26:49
I like using that lens to
26:52
start grappling with some of the uncertainty
26:54
that is existing both now
26:56
and in the decades
26:58
and even centuries to come.
27:01
Yeah, well on behalf of all
27:03
future versions of myself. Thank you for
27:05
this interview. How it's been such
27:08
a pleasure to chat with you, so thank you so much.
27:10
Thank you, Maya, so great to talk to you.
27:42
Hey, thanks so much for listening. If
27:45
you enjoyed my conversation with Hal, you might
27:47
also like my episode with psychologist
27:49
Kristin Nef It's called the Science
27:51
of Self Compassion. And join
27:53
me next week for a conversation with author
27:56
and happiness expert Gretchen Ruben. We'll
27:58
talk about how understanding our personalities
28:01
can help us unlock a better path to happiness.
28:04
See you next week. A
28:15
Slight Change of Plans.
28:16
Is created, written, and executive produced
28:18
by me Maya Shunker. The Slight
28:20
Change family includes our showrunner Tyler
28:22
Green, our senior editor Kate
28:25
Parkinson Morgan, our producer
28:27
Trisha Bovida, and our sound engineer
28:29
Andrew Vastola. Louis
28:32
Scara wrote our delightful theme song,
28:34
and Ginger Smith helped arrange the vocals.
28:37
A Slight Change of Plans is a production of Pushkin
28:39
Industries, so big thanks to everyone
28:41
there, and of course a
28:44
very special thanks to Jimmy Lee.
28:46
You can follow A Slight Change of Plans on Instagram
28:49
at doctor Maya Shunker.
28:50
See you next week.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More