Podchaser Logo
Home
Bill Gates has a problem (E)

Bill Gates has a problem (E)

Released Wednesday, 5th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Bill Gates has a problem (E)

Bill Gates has a problem (E)

Bill Gates has a problem (E)

Bill Gates has a problem (E)

Wednesday, 5th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Bill. Gates has a problem.

0:03

A Big problem. Billions of

0:05

problems. Hey. This is

0:07

Emily in the Bronx and you

0:10

are listening to a special archived

0:12

episode of Akimbo. So

0:18

what's his problem? Is problem is

0:21

it. he did something brave and generous.

0:23

him powerful and twenty ten about nine

0:25

years ago. He. And

0:27

Warren Buffet. At the time the

0:30

to richest men in the world

0:32

invented the giving pledge. And

0:34

the idea is that if you have

0:37

more than a hundred million dollars, you

0:39

can join their exclusive club. And

0:41

what the club says is that every member.

0:44

Pledges, To. Give

0:46

at least half of their

0:49

net worth a way to

0:51

charity. Now. Before.

0:54

They die. Or. In there will. When

0:57

they began. They. Had about

0:59

a dozen members. Quickly.

1:01

A good a forty. Now.

1:04

It's more than a hundred and

1:06

fifty. With. Most of them. Being.

1:09

Billionaires, This. Is

1:11

great news. It's great news

1:14

because it means that talented,

1:16

leveraged people. Are. Playing

1:18

a second game again. That.

1:21

About weaving our culture and

1:23

leading. They're. Helping. Those

1:25

in need. Instead. Of

1:27

only seeking to make one

1:29

metric. Co. Op. So

1:33

what's the problem? The problem is

1:35

that Bill Gates has more money

1:37

now. Than when he

1:39

started this project. That

1:41

as much good as the Gates

1:44

Foundation has done. As much money

1:46

as he has given away. Billionaires,

1:50

Make money from their billions

1:52

and he has more money

1:54

now. Then when he

1:56

started. In fact, if

1:58

we look at the child double

2:00

spending. Of the men and women

2:02

who have signed up, For the giving pledge.

2:05

We. See that they are almost

2:07

all. Falling. Behind.

2:11

They are falling behind because

2:13

on average they are giving

2:15

one point two percent away.

2:17

While. The money that they

2:19

have in their assets is

2:21

ernie eight, nine, or ten

2:23

percent a year. So.

2:26

At that rate, It. Will take

2:28

infinity years. Before. They

2:30

have given away half of their

2:32

net worth. The. Gap gets

2:35

bigger year after year. The

2:38

collected group of billionaires as

2:40

measured by bridge span has

2:42

given away about forty five

2:45

billion dollars a year. You

2:48

can see all the stats from some

2:50

fascinating reports on the show. notes at

2:52

a kimbo that link. The.

2:55

Problem is that unless they

2:57

get close to ninety or

2:59

two hundred billion dollars a

3:01

year given away. They're.

3:04

Going to keep falling behind. So.

3:06

What's the problem? Why don't we just wait till

3:08

they're dead? Well. For a

3:11

you reasons. First of all when they're

3:13

dead were not sure where that money

3:15

is gonna go and second. The.

3:17

Earth has problems now. And

3:19

many of the problems are compounding.

3:22

Which. Means that solving them

3:24

yesterday is significantly cheaper

3:26

and easier. Than. Solving

3:28

them tomorrow. So.

3:31

How do we explain? This

3:34

lack of giving. Biggest

3:36

the people who aren't giving. Have

3:39

signed up publicly to give. The.

3:41

People who are giving. they're not the

3:43

selfish ones who are hiding in the

3:45

corner. these are people who raised their

3:47

hands, put down their names you can

3:49

see them in the Wikipedia article and

3:51

have agreed. To make this

3:53

commitment. Well if you

3:55

ask them, Some.

3:57

Of their complaints will be things

3:59

like who of rigor in the

4:01

non profit space. Things. Are hard

4:04

to measure. Time. Frames

4:06

It very difficult to know what

4:08

to invest in because it might

4:11

take five, ten, or fifteen years

4:13

before you discover if the intervention

4:15

is working. A fear

4:18

of side effects that may

4:20

be putting money into the

4:22

problem will actually make the

4:24

problem worse. The. List

4:26

goes on and on. Here's

4:29

the thing. Over the

4:32

last few years, more than

4:34

six billionaires. Have. Put

4:36

more than a hundred

4:38

million dollars each. Into

4:41

college sports. Hundreds.

4:43

Of millions of dollars to support.

4:46

A college football team. Nothing.

4:48

Near that. For river

4:50

blindness. Nothing. Near

4:53

that for mental health care

4:55

for people who are homeless,

4:57

nothing near that. For. Six

4:59

seeing school systems. That.

5:02

Desperately need help. So.

5:05

Yes, we have a disconnect

5:07

here and in the bridge.

5:09

Spam report in Calla Hands

5:11

review of what to do

5:13

about it. We. See some

5:15

interesting ideas? Perhaps they say they

5:17

should be a fund of fun,

5:19

so every what instead of starting

5:22

your own foundation can lump their

5:24

money together Committed. To.

5:26

A group foundation that

5:28

might have more leverage.

5:30

Or perhaps we need

5:32

better data reporting? Perhaps

5:34

nonprofits need to work.

5:37

A lot more. Like. Corporations.

5:40

Maybe. We need a better way. To

5:42

measure a win. And

5:44

I agree that effectiveness ought to

5:46

be increased and measurement ought to

5:49

get better. These things matter a

5:51

great deal. Sauce Addict is doing

5:53

great work on this would lead

5:56

data. But. Here's the

5:58

thing. When. I look at the. Of

6:01

the top donations via The

6:03

Chronicle of Philanthropy year after

6:05

year after year, the question

6:07

is. Where. Do the fifty

6:09

million dollar gifts Go! There

6:11

when a billionaire gives away a chunk

6:14

of money. Where. Does he

6:16

or she send? First

6:19

a small aside. A. Billionaire.

6:22

What's a billionaire? Well. I want

6:24

you to imagine a millionaire. A

6:26

millionaire is imagine a book. A

6:28

millionaire is somebody who probably needs

6:30

to work by. Not a lot.

6:33

A millionaire is somebody who

6:36

owns a house outright. Who.

6:38

Can fly where they need to fly. when they

6:41

need to fly there. Now. Imagine

6:44

one thousand. Millionaires,

6:48

Does. To billionaire. And

6:50

if you're talking about somebody like

6:53

Elon Musk or Mike Bloomberg might

6:55

as fifty five billion dollars according

6:57

to the twenty seventeen numbers, he

6:59

probably more. Now that's. Fifty.

7:02

Five thousand. Millionaires,

7:05

In one who's. To. As

7:08

to billion and when we look

7:10

at the list of where their

7:13

biggest donations go over and over

7:15

again year after year. They.

7:17

Go to colleges, And. Hospitals.

7:20

Steer is. Not. A lot

7:22

of discussion. About the cost effectiveness

7:25

of hospitals. Still, if you compare

7:27

a hospital in the U S

7:29

E New York to our of

7:31

in the eye hospital I talked

7:33

about a bunch of episodes ago.

7:35

there's no. Comparison. That

7:37

you can get. Fine quality

7:39

cataract surgery. And our of

7:42

in for a hundred and fifty bucks if you

7:44

pay for the private room. Whereas

7:46

you'll pay ten or hundred

7:48

time. Sat for a similar

7:51

intervention in New York self.

7:53

Were. Not given money to hospitals.

7:56

Because. They're the most

7:58

efficient or transparent. And

8:01

famous colleges? well, not. And

8:03

glad we're has famously pointed out

8:05

again and again that Princeton has

8:08

enough money to do anything

8:10

you want For a very

8:12

long time, Harvard could have every

8:14

single student go to Harvard for

8:16

free for a hundred years.

8:19

So. Why give your money

8:21

to these institutions? The.

8:23

Answers: Really simple. Because.

8:26

You get a building. Because. There

8:28

is scarcity. Because. Scarcity

8:31

leads just. And

8:34

what we heard? him. One of the

8:36

very first episodes of Akimbo was a

8:39

rant about status false. Truman.

8:42

Hates Baxter and vice versa.

8:44

Which. Dog is up and which dog is

8:46

down. Status. A

8:49

lot of this was created by

8:52

Forbes Magazine years ago. The.

8:54

Billionaires didn't know who the other billionaires

8:56

weren't They weren't very many of them.

8:58

and perhaps you bumped into them at

9:00

a party. But. Forbes.

9:03

Started. The list. And

9:05

famously people lied to get

9:07

on the list. Famously people

9:09

hid to get off the

9:11

list. but the list did

9:13

something magical. What? The

9:16

list did. Was. For

9:18

people who are keeping track of a

9:20

number. It. Created a

9:22

published list. Of

9:24

the number. And if

9:27

you are only measuring one saying. Cause.

9:29

They weren't measuring health or happiness

9:31

or impact, just one thing. Then.

9:34

Having a way to keep score of

9:36

that one thing. Became.

9:39

Something that to rose folks.

9:41

To. Make that number go up.

9:44

And once you're on the hook to make

9:46

the number go up. Making.

9:48

The number go up feels like

9:50

a good game to play tomorrow.

9:52

Law surprises. Lots of applause for

9:55

making the number go up. So

9:57

I'm super excited and. Crowd

10:00

of worn and bill for coming up with

10:02

the giving pledge because what it did was

10:04

it added a second number. Are

10:07

you on the list or not? Status.

10:10

A cruise. To people

10:12

who cared enough. To.

10:14

Put their name on the list. It's

10:17

a very special club. In

10:19

billions the Tv show when acts one

10:21

into by an Nfl team he reached

10:24

out to get on the list to

10:26

show that he was a good person.

10:29

Status. Roles: Competitiveness

10:31

Scarcity. Who's.

10:34

Better than who? And

10:36

then. We. Come face to

10:38

face with the problem which is. You.

10:41

Not really sure what you're buying.

10:43

When. You start to invest your

10:45

money in philanthropy. If.

10:48

You want to build a company to send

10:50

a rocket to Mars? You can make progress

10:52

every day and when you get to Mars,

10:54

you got to Mars and everyone knows you

10:56

got to Mars. Or the other

10:58

hand. If you commit to getting plastic

11:00

out of the ocean. You're. Not

11:02

gonna get all the plastic. Added

11:05

the ocean. It's. Often a habit,

11:07

it's a hard one of the. Nick

11:10

had our has spearheaded the

11:12

work. To. Get the minimum

11:14

wage raised to fifteen dollars.

11:16

His organization one a big win.

11:19

In Washington State. Now.

11:23

The. Working people Washington State have a floor.

11:25

they make Fifteen dollars an hour minimum.

11:28

He. Can own. A

11:30

contribution. To that cause and it

11:32

cost him a lot of time and money. It's

11:36

possible to do that with something like

11:38

polio. Which. The Gates Foundation

11:40

is getting closer and closer to

11:42

eradicating. It's not clear

11:44

we can do it for homelessness. It's

11:46

not clear we can do it for

11:48

a river, blindness or atmosphere cancer, the

11:51

warming of the earth, So

11:53

the question is. What?

11:55

Are we selling? When. We're

11:57

selling philanthropy. It's

12:00

one thing. To. Say to a

12:02

human being face to face. Doesn't.

12:05

To see that person face down in

12:07

the puddle when you walk by? They're

12:09

gonna drown unless you save them. In

12:12

that situation, every one except a

12:15

sociopath. Is going to wade into

12:17

the water and say that person's life. But.

12:20

Is Peter Singer has pointed out. If

12:22

I can tell you with certainty that four

12:24

hundred dollars will save the life of someone

12:26

just like that who's not sitting right in

12:29

front of you. It's

12:31

a hard yourself. In

12:33

a recent blog post on

12:35

Sleep Star Codex, our host

12:37

Scott points out that is

12:39

a typical election. In.

12:42

United States of America in total.

12:45

Counting direct contributions, soft

12:47

money advertising and the

12:49

like. Americans spend

12:52

less on politics. Then.

12:54

They spend. Buying. Almonds.

12:57

I'm assuming is counting almond milk but still.

13:00

Less. Than. we spend on

13:02

arm. How we justify that?

13:04

How does that make sense? Well.

13:06

The simplest answer is this: When

13:09

you spend two dollars on almonds,

13:11

he get two dollars worth of

13:13

almonds. But when you spend two

13:15

dollars throwing some money to your

13:17

favorite candidate. It's not

13:19

clear you get anything. And

13:22

so the giant challenge philanthropy has.

13:24

if it's going to be measured

13:26

on the short term given, get

13:28

Massive Capitalism. Is that?

13:31

We. Don't get to dollars worth of almonds.

13:34

On. One hand, capitalism is a

13:36

miracle. It has completely rewired the

13:38

way we go to work and

13:41

the world in which we live.

13:44

But. Applying those rules relentlessly

13:46

the short term. Return.

13:49

On Equity mindset, the things

13:51

that don't respond well to

13:53

them. Isn't always

13:55

the best way forward? Three.

13:58

Hundred years ago. Two hundred

14:00

years go. A hundred years

14:03

ago as capitalism was being

14:05

perfect and the people who

14:07

started industries that today are

14:09

insane Li profitable. Didn't.

14:12

Have to answer questions about what

14:14

was your return on equity today.

14:17

That if you were busy

14:19

building a car company in

14:22

nineteen twelve, you were focused

14:24

on staying in business day

14:26

to day. Not. How is

14:28

this going to be worth

14:30

billions of dollars? That when

14:32

the internet was young and

14:34

people were building the very

14:37

first web, these were hobbies.

14:39

These words attempts at multi.

14:41

Billion. Dollar Industries. What

14:43

happened is a ratchet showed

14:46

up. Things got better over

14:48

time the same way. So.

14:51

Much of what we take for

14:53

granted in our civilized world. Avast

14:56

over time. The

14:59

thought: The going to the doctor

15:01

or taking a medicine is almost

15:03

certainly not going to cause you

15:05

to die. Is. A pretty new

15:07

one. It was super

15:10

risky to eat food when

15:12

you on the road travelling.

15:14

Now. Not so much which

15:16

is certainly sake the industrial system

15:18

for a lot of food safety.

15:21

But a big part came because

15:23

the culture changed over time. Bit.

15:26

By bit things got better.

15:28

Because. People worked. To.

15:30

Make them better. Not.

15:33

Because they were going to make a profit. Doing.

15:35

It. When

15:38

someone was investing five thousand dollars in

15:40

a car company or ten thousand dollars

15:42

the lobby a politician to get a

15:44

road built. They. Didn't

15:46

say. Will this make me

15:49

a billionaire in a year? That

15:51

in Silicon Valley. When. People

15:53

were making crazy investments in

15:56

speculative internet bubble companies.

15:58

They didn't say. Show

16:01

us with transparency exactly how you gonna

16:03

make a profit. That,

16:05

in fact, Market. thinking.

16:08

Status. Seeking. Lead

16:10

to a rush. And that rush.

16:13

Brought. In New people and those new

16:15

people try new things and most of

16:17

those things did not work. Most.

16:20

Of the ideas the capitalists of had

16:22

over the years did not work. And

16:25

the ones that did work. Took.

16:27

Decades and they never.

16:30

Turned. Out the way the original

16:32

business plan said they would and

16:34

so does show up. At

16:36

a small non profit and say so as

16:39

to the penny. What? Your advocacy

16:41

is. There. Are very

16:43

few entrepreneurs who could withstand that

16:46

scrutiny in the first five, ten,

16:48

fifteen years of their entrepreneurial journey.

16:51

That we need to keep track of

16:53

a second. Think we need to move

16:55

the money that's been promised. Because.

16:58

We're offering people status.

17:01

How much of your pledge have you for

17:03

silt? How much can you

17:05

move over right now? Not with questions.

17:08

About two days Africa seat

17:10

or two days Transparency. But

17:13

how instead can we create a

17:15

new game here? And a new

17:17

game is about the peace and

17:19

gentle weaving. Of a

17:21

different kind of culture. What?

17:24

We do is we

17:26

give traditional status oriented

17:28

non profit surpass. We'll

17:31

challenge the efficacy of the

17:33

opera or the museum. Or.

17:35

The Hospital or the college.

17:38

But. When innovators so up. We.

17:41

Grill them. We demand that they

17:43

count the paper clips. We don't

17:45

leave any room. For

17:47

the tremendous innovation cycle.

17:50

That. Got us the capitalistic.

17:53

Pillars. that we cell count

17:55

on today. That it

17:58

is entirely possible. That

18:00

we're going to solve. He had another

18:02

problem. It is entirely possible that we

18:04

can take a vaccine. And make

18:06

it free to the masses. It

18:08

is possible that the next Wikipedia.

18:11

Will. Educate millions and millions

18:13

of people that the lessons

18:15

of one laptop per child

18:18

will spread from one place

18:20

to another. All of

18:22

these things are possible. We have seen

18:24

them happen before. We will see them

18:26

happen again. But. The

18:29

way we get some money there. Is

18:31

either. Take. A deep breath

18:33

and figure out that it all

18:36

of our responsibility and do it

18:38

with an organization that been practiced

18:40

at doing it for the government.

18:42

The one that built all those roads.

18:45

The one that built the internet you're

18:47

hearing this on or. Before

18:49

they're still rely on philanthropy. Turn

18:52

it into the status game. That.

18:54

Billionaires demand create.

18:57

Enough social pressure. That. It

18:59

is better for your status as a billionaire

19:01

to give away money. That.

19:03

It is to see it grow. Not.

19:06

Because it is a rational out

19:08

to his dick investment of the

19:10

highest yield per dollar. But.

19:13

Simply because you're human. The.

19:15

Kind of human who wanted to

19:17

give money to sports teams to

19:19

kind of human who wanted to

19:22

have a wing of a hospital

19:24

named after you or your cousin.

19:26

that human beings to human things.

19:28

we are not rational outsourced. Instead

19:30

we are people who are seeking.

19:33

To. Deal with the fact that we know we're going to

19:35

die. And that until we do we would

19:37

like to live in a place. Where. We

19:40

are welcome. Where. We think we

19:42

have made a difference, Where our work

19:44

matters, where we have woven. A

19:46

Culture. That. We can be proud

19:48

of. All of

19:51

us get to do those things. Billionaires get

19:53

to do them more loudly. We.

19:56

Need more innovative nonprofits

19:58

We need. Nonprofits,

20:01

It are willing to show up and say. This.

20:03

Might not work. And. We're

20:05

going to do it anyway. We.

20:08

Need. Fast. Moving.

20:10

Fast. Mistake. generous thinking.

20:13

In order to change that of our culture,

20:16

Not. Because it's gonna make a profit. Some.

20:18

People say. It's. A shame that

20:21

nonprofit are named after the things that they

20:23

are not. But. In

20:25

a culture that so dominated by. What?

20:27

Do you make. Maybe.

20:29

That's exactly what they should be known for.

20:32

The. Fact that they're not seeking to make

20:34

a profit. But. That they are merely.

20:36

Seeking. To make it if it. Thanks.

20:40

For listening. Who. See you

20:42

next time I said the Mighty and

20:44

a half. My name's Kyle reading some

20:46

steam out Madison, Wisconsin Hi. Hi.

20:52

Hi warm greetings from

20:54

Curacao. Right

20:57

from my family says

20:59

ranks hi. Hi

21:02

this is Robert Parry of my question is.

21:05

And that completes my question. Say.

21:09

So listening, we love to hear

21:11

from you. If you've got a

21:13

question, I hope you will visit

21:15

Akimbo.linked as a gay I M

21:17

B O.l I N K and

21:19

press the appropriate button while you're

21:21

there. Check out the show Notes:

21:26

Isis. This is Spencer from Amsterdam.

21:28

I was listening to the question

21:30

around said at the end of

21:32

the Perils of Mind Reading episode

21:34

about the benefits of So That.

21:37

You were talking about changing the

21:40

colchester actions, creating opportunities and I've

21:42

seen as if. I'd

21:44

like to propose a maybe we can take

21:47

it further. I was

21:49

lucky enough to meet an amazing

21:51

woman recently rides up a large

21:53

engineering organization. Now remember, the average

21:55

amount of women in the engineer

21:57

profession is somewhere around seven percent.

22:01

We have many people in positions

22:03

of power saying that when they

22:05

advertise for engineers, they will hardly

22:07

get any female applicants and then

22:09

perpetuate this myth about their be

22:11

in a Pipeline problem. Yet.

22:14

This woman I met her organization

22:16

tested during a recruitment campaign that

22:18

advertises for a female only recruitment

22:20

rounds. And yes, you guessed it,

22:22

the Africans went through the roof.

22:25

As love your thoughts on this kind of

22:27

idea if you think it could spread in

22:29

hope of changing the culture. As always thank

22:32

you for be in a much needed voice

22:34

and presence in the world. Thanks

22:37

to this question, it's certainly current and

22:39

relevant to what so many of us

22:41

are facing. And I'm going to begin

22:43

with this. Most. Humans

22:46

don't like doing things they

22:48

think they're going to fail

22:50

at. That seems

22:52

really obvious. However, we have

22:54

structured many of our institutions

22:57

to imply to some people

22:59

said they're going to fail.

23:02

If they show up. And then were

23:04

surprised. When. They don't show up.

23:07

So you're absolutely correct in talking

23:09

about to the pipeline problem. If

23:11

we keep doing what we've been

23:13

doing, why are we surprised that.

23:16

The. Very same kind of people keep

23:18

showing up in our pipeline if

23:20

we want to change the people

23:22

we get to choose from of

23:24

who to change, who gets a

23:26

seat at the table. It helps

23:28

to create a different sort of

23:31

pipeline and while you're example is

23:33

an extreme one. there are plenty

23:35

of ways that we can do

23:37

this. So. On to cerebral.boonies

23:39

Cerebral Guy Boonies A make believe

23:42

sport invented by Jimmy Cantor's and

23:44

in the sport people who are.

23:47

Nine. Years old have a significant

23:49

advantage over people who are say

23:51

sistine. For. Example: If

23:54

the sport requires shimmying on

23:56

the ground under nice. A

23:58

piece of wood. A little

24:01

kid's going do it better than a big

24:03

kid if you've got to actually literally jump

24:05

through hoops. Turns. Out little kids

24:07

are better. At jumping through hoops

24:09

than big kids. If you

24:11

start a cerebral guard booting competition,

24:14

I think you'll discover that little

24:16

kids are way more eager to

24:18

sign up for it then big

24:20

kids. And. So now

24:22

we think about the jobs and

24:24

the positions of authority because what

24:27

we decided a long time ago

24:29

is that being good at interviewing

24:31

in a high pressure situation in

24:33

which the interviewer is likely to

24:35

be a white male is a

24:37

good indicator of whether or not

24:39

you will be good. At.

24:41

Your job. Wealth. A

24:43

lesser job involves being interviewed. It's

24:46

not clear that being good at

24:48

interviewing is a good way to

24:50

find out his someone's good at

24:52

a job. One thing that we

24:54

have found is that many jobs

24:56

benefit from having people interview in

24:58

writing. Send them the questions and

25:01

have them send back the answers, because if that's

25:03

the sort of way they're going to do their

25:05

job, You've. Just discovered a good

25:07

way of finding out of the going. Be good.

25:10

As their job. Or consider

25:12

the idea of changing the

25:14

pipeline if you want more

25:16

diversity in your engineering ranks.

25:19

Well, Why not go

25:21

run some hacker science at

25:23

historically black universities and colleges?

25:26

Why not So up? Where.

25:28

People you are looking for

25:30

already hang out and create

25:32

activities and interactions were the

25:34

ones who are ready to

25:36

sign and do work with

25:38

you. Are more likely to

25:41

show up. So we

25:43

need to change how we are filling the

25:45

pipeline. We need to change the game you

25:47

have to play before you play the game.

25:50

If we are hoping. For other players

25:52

to be part of what we are building.

25:56

Thanks. Again for listening. We'll. See you next

25:58

to.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features