Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Come satisfy your appetite for wealth
0:02
with baking profits . Now
0:05
here's your host , mike and Brad
0:07
. Hey
0:11
, how's it going everybody ? Welcome to Baking Profits
0:13
. We're your host , mike , aka
0:16
D-Fy Donut , and I'm Brad aka
0:18
the breadmaker . And today we're going to dive
0:20
into technical analysis versus
0:22
news and take a look at Web 1.0
0:25
, 2.0 , and Web 3.0 . And
0:27
then wrap up about digital entities
0:29
. And if you'd like to , you can follow the crumbs on our socials
0:32
at Baking Profits , at
0:34
Bread Bites , at the Breadmaker , at
0:36
D-Fy Donut , and be sure to subscribe wherever
0:38
you get your podcasts . And today we
0:40
are drinking Blade and Bo
0:42
, is that right ?
0:44
Yeah , I'd probably put this in top five .
0:46
You really yeah . Not me
0:48
, man no .
0:49
It's got that like . It's like top ten . I don't know . You know
0:51
how some of those whiskies have that kind of like a pepper
0:54
kind of taste . You know what I'm saying ? Not
0:56
at all All right . Well , I guess I
0:58
can't go with that . Then I don't know , man , it's
1:01
got this weird sweet taste , but also this
1:03
kind of peppery , almost like a doctor
1:05
pepper , not like actual pepper , but like I don't
1:07
even know how to explain it . It's a weird tasting
1:10
whiskey compared to the ones we've had .
1:12
If I could give some feedback back to this company
1:14
. It was very hard to open this bottle . I
1:17
thought the key was like , oh
1:19
, okay , I just need to rip it open . Not
1:22
the case . I had to take a knife and
1:24
essentially cut at the top off .
1:27
Yeah , I mean , at the very least you went
1:29
classy with a butter knife , so I mean
1:31
the best way to do it .
1:32
You know I wasn't going to say it was a butter knife . I was
1:34
thinking crocodile dundee knife .
1:36
Yeah .
1:37
Wasn't that cool . It is what it is , but
1:39
anyways , yes , so we are going
1:42
to start today off talking a little bit about
1:44
technical analysis and how
1:46
news can interrupt this . You know , not
1:48
going to lie , this subject came up because of a
1:50
recent interaction that you had with someone
1:53
on Twitter and a few people . Yeah , I thought
1:55
this would make a really good topic and I think
1:57
a lot of people are , you know , maybe
2:00
not as informed of how
2:02
news impacts the market and how
2:04
technical analysis can be
2:06
traded alongside of news
2:08
. So you know , we really wanted to dive
2:10
into that . I know , just in case
2:12
you're wondering , like , what is technical analysis
2:15
? Technical analysis is just the breakdown of
2:17
what's happening on the chart . You're looking at
2:19
patterns , you know tracking momentum
2:22
and trend and volatility , looking
2:24
at the volume , and there's so many different
2:26
indicators that will help you
2:28
determine whatever you're
2:30
looking to determine on that chart . But when it comes
2:32
to news , let me hear your thoughts on
2:34
that .
2:35
Yeah , so to kind of , I guess , bring
2:37
everybody up to speed a little bit , that might be listening
2:39
is you know ? Essentially I
2:41
kind of had a conversation back and
2:43
forth with a handful of different people on
2:45
how you know news
2:47
is highly unpredictable in my opinion
2:50
. You know you don't really necessarily know what
2:52
or when it's going to come out and
2:54
how that's going to impact the markets . And
2:56
I had some you know back and forth with some people
2:58
online about how you can
3:00
essentially predict what's
3:03
going to happen with the market from a new standpoint
3:05
based off technical analysis . In
3:08
my opinion that is just like wildly
3:10
bogus . You never really know what's going to happen
3:13
from a news standpoint . You know even just
3:15
some stuff that's pretty consistent , like
3:17
CPI reports and PI reports
3:19
, and you know whenever Powell
3:21
has you know economic
3:24
conferences and speaking and meetings
3:26
and things like that FOMC meetings , even
3:28
just your traditional news you know . Recently
3:30
, kind of one of the areas that we were somewhat
3:32
debating was the XRP news
3:34
. You know it had one in a court hearing
3:36
and it sent XRP
3:38
through the roof . It sent the markets up . This
3:41
was probably about two weeks ago now and
3:44
my kind of argument
3:46
to this was you don't know that's going to happen
3:48
until it happens . So it's a reactionary
3:50
situation and I kind
3:53
of got into it back and forth on Twitter with some people
3:55
basically saying that they
3:57
, you know , were able to predict that this was going to happen , basically
4:00
from technical analysis , which I
4:02
call massive BS on in my opinion
4:04
. You know , don't want to necessarily call people
4:06
out and stuff , but at the end of the day , like it
4:08
calls into question their credibility . In my
4:10
opinion , if they have that kind of a mindset
4:13
because there's no way you can predict that
4:15
, if you're in hindsight , you could . I mean
4:17
, if I look at the chart afterwards on XRP , I'm sure
4:19
I could find some technical analysis related
4:22
thought or assumption that I've been like oh yeah
4:24
, if I had been looking at these specific indicators
4:26
, it would have indicated that XRP
4:29
was bullish and then in this case it popped
4:31
off and I would have been able to make money . But
4:33
I would love to see someone show
4:35
me that during a
4:37
CPI event or a PI event or
4:39
FOMC meeting or any news event
4:42
that they were ahead of it . Due to technical
4:44
analysis , I call 1000%
4:46
BS on that . Nobody's able to do that because news
4:48
is unpredictable . You could have a positive
4:50
reaction to a CPI
4:52
or PPI that is bearish and vice
4:55
versa , and it's complete
4:57
nonsense . To me , it's a kind of a frustrating topic
4:59
for me to talk about , because whenever anybody
5:01
tries to contradict me , I'm just so
5:03
like this is whack
5:05
that I can't even like take their opinion
5:08
seriously .
5:09
Yeah , I mean I definitely think news
5:11
impacts the market
5:14
in ways that it
5:16
is unpredictable . I mean , in some cases
5:18
there is that like the old saying , buy
5:20
the room or sell the news , like if you happen to
5:22
know . For example , let's say
5:25
, elon Musk was like you know what , in
5:27
the near future I'm going
5:29
to resign as CEO . It's
5:31
like okay , that message
5:33
is news itself . It
5:35
is going to create waves , but possibly
5:38
the resignation of him
5:40
as CEO on that day
5:42
maybe that will impact the market
5:45
as well , but probably not
5:47
as much as just the initial
5:49
shock of it all . And I think that's why
5:51
, like when the XRP situation happened
5:53
, or you get information
5:56
through you know FOMC
5:58
when it happens , right then , and there we all
6:00
find out about it at the same time , the
6:03
market is wildly
6:05
unpredictable . It's a flip of a coin for sure
6:07
.
6:08
Sometimes you can get burned in both directions too , Like
6:10
oh yeah , I mean a lot of times that that can happen
6:12
. So you know , if you take your example of Elon Musk
6:15
saying he's gonna resign from the position and
6:17
he announces that , basically
6:19
what other people are saying is you
6:21
know , let's just hypothetically say , in that scenario
6:24
, twitter goes up 10%
6:27
after he announces that . Essentially
6:29
, what the other side of the coin is saying , which I'm
6:31
disagreeing with , is they're saying that
6:33
I could use technical analysis To
6:36
have already been in a bullish
6:38
long position to prepare myself for that
6:40
kind of news , and I'm calling BS on that . 100%
6:42
, absolutely . Now like I said , hindsight
6:44
, you know , if he were to do something
6:47
like that and if Twitter were to go up 10% , I
6:49
could easily go back on the chart and be like
6:51
, oh yeah , you see , right here , this RSI
6:53
was down here and this was here and I could have , you
6:55
know , gone long at this point in time and you
6:58
know I would have predicted this correctly . But I
7:00
want to see someone in the moment Accurately
7:02
, consistently trading news based
7:05
off technical analysis , and I can almost guarantee
7:07
you nobody can do it , because it's bullshit .
7:09
Yeah . So what are you saying ? That
7:11
news will ruin technical
7:14
analysis .
7:15
Yes , in most cases . I believe so . I believe
7:18
TA is out the window when news is in play . You
7:20
can't really do much with TA
7:22
when news events hit
7:25
, like you know , if you have a specific set
7:27
parameters . You know , I know we've traded , you know
7:29
, in the past a lot on support and resistance
7:31
and sometimes that's worked really , or most
7:33
of time that's worked really well . But sometimes
7:36
when a news event happens , we might have
7:38
a bounce off support and we're like alright , this position
7:40
is going pretty well , and then news event may tank
7:42
the market , it may shed through support and then we
7:44
take a loss . In my opinion , ta goes
7:46
out the window as soon as that news event comes on
7:49
and for other people to say
7:51
or think that you know essentially
7:53
technical and you can predict the
7:56
way the news event is gonna go based off technical
7:59
analysis indicators 1000%
8:01
bullshit . Anybody that says that in my
8:03
opinion , I lose massive credibility on
8:05
anything that they say going forward after that , because
8:07
it's just like I can't even Wrap my brain around
8:09
how somebody could even think that way . It makes no
8:12
logical sense to me .
8:13
Yeah , I mean the way I see it is like , especially
8:15
around supporting resistance . It's a little bit easier
8:17
, but like if a price comes up to the resistance
8:20
level and it rejects over
8:22
and over again and you see that this is
8:24
, you know , maybe the highest high of the year
8:27
, or two year or maybe all time
8:29
. If a news event
8:31
occurs and it takes the price
8:33
above that , you have all this
8:35
evidence that says , hey , the prices come up here
8:37
dozens of times and has never
8:39
broken this , except this . You
8:42
know one little blip here . The
8:44
odds are that is gonna reject again and again
8:46
until something
8:48
pushes it up forward . And I Think
8:51
there's just so many people that are on that herd mentality
8:54
or that hold you know mentality
8:56
where it's like , yes , I have
8:58
to fully , 100% , dive into
9:00
this entire ecosystem , make
9:02
it my lifestyle and only Shield
9:04
this one product which I
9:06
got . A hand it to the XRP community
9:08
. They are excellent at that . Oh
9:11
yeah , these guys are rider dies 100%
9:13
crazy , all in yeah
9:15
, super all in and they talked it up during
9:17
the entire Downfall of it . I
9:20
don't own XRP . I don't
9:22
really know . I don't really done
9:24
much research on it to understand what
9:26
what is even happening . To me it's always
9:28
just been like it is what it is . You
9:30
know it's caught up in some litigation . I don't want
9:33
to deal with it .
9:33
Yeah , I mean from the XRP standpoint
9:35
. It's crazy the what people
9:38
think will happen to this thing
9:40
. You know it goes into a whole nother topic
9:42
of just like . I see people all the time oh
9:44
yeah , this coin's gonna be 10 , 20 , 30
9:46
dollars in the future . I'm like dude , god
9:49
damn it is trillions of market cap . Yeah
9:51
, it's looks like . Why are you so dumb ? But I
9:53
mean , even like a lot of people thought the
9:55
SEC news and go , oh , once XRP
9:57
, you know , wins this hearing it's gonna
10:00
overtake Bitcoin and stuff , I'm like dude
10:02
. I don't even pay that attention because I'm just like
10:04
you know , the XRP maxis
10:06
are just like I mean it's insane . It's like
10:08
, yeah , I don't even understand
10:10
it , I can't wrap my brain around it . You know that's
10:12
a whole another side topic . But yeah , just
10:15
from the TA side of things , it's just you
10:17
know , technical analysis is technical
10:19
analysis , fundamental analysis
10:21
is fundamental analysis . And then there's the
10:23
news factor , which is its own realm
10:26
of Having it's the wild
10:28
card and all of it fundamental in my opinion
10:31
. You use a lot of that for your long-term
10:33
plays and identifying the structure
10:35
and long jevity and long-term
10:38
viability of a company . And
10:40
then technical analysis you can kind
10:42
of use it in any way . You can use a short-term , midterm
10:44
or long-term Based off of you know
10:46
technical things and then the news is the wild
10:48
card piece , especially if you're trading
10:50
. You know short-term trades or small swing trades
10:52
or things like that news can disrupt
10:54
all of that Playing and unravel your
10:56
whole trade or make your whole
10:58
trade for you . But in my opinion , what ends
11:00
up happening and the reason people have this
11:02
, you know other notion that they can
11:04
predict a news-based
11:07
move based off of technical analysis
11:09
one is most these people look
11:12
at hindsight . They're not actually actively trading
11:14
and actively looking at it . So you
11:16
know , in my opinion , if you're telling me you're looking at
11:18
this in hindsight , you've already lost
11:20
me . Like I'm already out , I've tapped out . At
11:22
that point I'm like there's no point . You're not
11:24
doing yourself any favors by saying like , oh
11:27
yeah , if you would looked at this specific thing , you
11:29
know , last week you would have predicted this . Okay , it's
11:31
like I could have a hundred percent win rate on
11:33
all my trades if I look back and knew
11:35
exactly what was gonna happen before it Happened . Like it's
11:37
a freaking joke and I can almost guarantee you
11:39
I'll put anybody to test . I'd love to watch somebody
11:42
Consistently use technical
11:44
analysis prior to news
11:46
coming out and consistently have
11:48
a win rate . I bet most of them are sub
11:51
50% , at least probably in
11:53
the 30 to 40% range because , like I said , there's a lot
11:55
of times , especially with like CPI and
11:57
PI and those you know monthly
11:59
or weekly known events , you
12:02
get burned in both directions It'll go up
12:04
and then it'll go down and might go back up , or
12:06
vice versa , might go down and then go back up and
12:08
then down again . You get chopped up in all
12:10
kinds of ways that way . So I don't buy
12:12
anybody that can live
12:14
trade news Prenews
12:17
essentially based off of technical
12:19
analysis and consistently hit on it bullshit
12:22
.
12:23
Yeah , I totally agree . I think news
12:26
and how it interacts with the market has changed
12:28
so much over time . I mean think
12:30
about 20 years ago the
12:32
type of news that moved the markets
12:35
Versus the type of news that moves
12:37
the markets nowadays . We are so connected
12:40
to Everything that is happening
12:42
, so there are plenty of events
12:44
that occur Throughout all
12:46
the weeks , you know , every week
12:48
. That probably would have tanked
12:51
the market 20 years ago and
12:53
I think it's good and bad . It's good to have access
12:56
to all of this news , it's good to be
12:58
connected and it definitely helps us make
13:00
more informed trades , like when we can
13:03
go to a company's website , we
13:05
can look at their roadmap , we can see
13:07
the initiatives that they're putting forth
13:09
, and then we can , for example , like maybe they're
13:11
doing business in a Foreign
13:14
country . We can go to that country , we can see , like
13:16
, how is this business being
13:18
interpreted ? You know there are ways that
13:20
you can analyze your
13:22
investments that you could have never
13:24
done 20 years ago . But I
13:27
also think that there's just so much information
13:29
, so many things happening , that you know
13:31
it's weird , like sometimes big things
13:34
happen and the price barely does anything
13:36
or it does the opposite , and it really is a sell
13:38
the news type of situation or
13:40
, on the other hand , there's small things
13:42
that happen that just move the market
13:44
where you're like wait what ?
13:46
so to me , news is always
13:49
a flip of a coin yeah
13:51
, it's definitely the wild card and Just
13:54
overall trading analysis , that's
13:56
your biggest wild card is the news piece
13:58
. If you hear anybody saying that they can Predict
14:01
it based off of technical analysis
14:03
, I'd be running for the hills as
14:05
soon as somebody says that , because they have
14:08
no idea what they're talking about . But
14:10
you know , kind of going back to what you were saying about markets
14:12
and the news , and 10 to 20 years ago versus
14:15
now , I mean yeah , that's wildly different . The whole
14:17
way you receive news is so different now
14:19
, whether in the past it being a newspaper
14:21
or something like that . You got to imagine
14:23
how delayed that is . I'd also
14:25
be interested to know how delayed
14:27
the markets were to news events compared
14:29
to now . I mean , I think they're much more reactionary
14:32
now but it might be a smaller reaction
14:34
than what you would get 10 20 years
14:36
ago . But you know , people have information
14:38
at their fingertips now . All their trading
14:41
applications have news in them . You
14:43
use that like Twitter and stuff like that . You
14:45
can get push notification alerts and stuff like that . But
14:47
also think of the flip side of this , of like
14:49
think about the people that were like
14:51
privy to this news beforehand
14:54
. Do the upper hand that they had
14:56
10 , 20 years ago had
14:58
to have been insane from an insider
15:00
trading or like a Manipulation
15:03
side of things . I mean , I got to imagine people
15:05
that had insider information or news
15:07
preemptively from a company
15:09
or something like that that they worked for or you
15:12
know news publication or something like that . If
15:14
they were savvy Investors
15:17
or traders , I'm like dude . They probably
15:19
made fucking bank .
15:21
Yeah , I mean Nancy Pelosi
15:23
. How many times
15:25
have I dropped ?
15:26
her on this podcast need to have her on
15:28
as a guest so you can grill her .
15:30
Christ , that would be fucking amazing
15:32
. Yeah , yeah , I know that there's
15:34
a lot of places that people get news , you know I
15:36
. You brought up a good point . You can get it straight from your
15:38
exchange and while you're making
15:40
that trade you can get live news . I know for
15:43
traditional finance I get a lot of
15:45
my news through CNBC . I
15:47
actually get a good weekly recap
15:49
from stock toys . They send a
15:51
email out . I forgot about that
15:53
every single day , and occasionally
15:56
I'll happen to catch it and he gives
15:58
a pretty good summary of like what went down
16:00
, and they include crypto and
16:02
traditional finance in there , and
16:04
Sometimes it's , you know , like I'll
16:06
see something like oh , I didn't
16:09
know that this was gonna be a thing . Like
16:11
I mean , I learned about the I believe it
16:13
was the TD Ameritrade getting bought
16:15
out . Yeah , I think I learned
16:17
about that through one of stock twist emails
16:19
. But yeah , things like that newsletters
16:22
. You know there's a lot of crypto sites
16:24
that Cater to news . Curious
16:26
to know , though like where are you getting your news
16:29
from ?
16:29
I think my number one spot is honestly CNBC
16:32
. It's a little bit I mean , it's obviously a lot
16:34
of it less Crypto related , but
16:36
I follow them on Twitter . They have
16:38
a decent amount of sub accounts within
16:41
CNBC that are various things
16:43
that I follow as well and I feel like they
16:45
do a good job of just like , especially
16:47
on Twitter . I try and stay on Twitter and fairly
16:49
active on there pretty regularly , so they're
16:51
pretty good about like consistently posting
16:53
articles or information or whatever
16:55
it may be , based off market conditions or what's
16:57
happening in the market . So that's probably
17:00
one of my go-to sources . And then obviously , just
17:02
Twitter in general . Obviously , if , especially
17:04
if something's happening in the crypto markets , somebody
17:06
I'm following or somebody in my newsfeed
17:08
is talking about what's
17:11
happened or is happening in the markets
17:13
, and then it's easy for me to kind of spider
17:15
web from there into Searching additional
17:17
information on there , finding other people talking about
17:19
it , finding additional information about it . So
17:21
it's crazy how much , how fast you can
17:24
just like absorb a ton of information
17:26
. Now you know , in a matter of Minutes
17:29
. Yeah , through different , you know
17:31
various ways of gathering information , but
17:34
Twitter is my main source . But I would say , within
17:36
Twitter you , cnbc is probably my
17:38
main go-to .
17:39
Nice . Yeah , I mean I kind of think about
17:41
like is this a good thing really
17:43
? I know it is good for Making
17:46
more informed decisions , but overall
17:49
, is it good that we have access to all
17:51
this information ? Is it too much ? You
17:53
know , when you see those people who just learned
17:55
technical analysis really , and they have
17:58
like 50 Fucking indicators
18:00
on their chart , yeah , what the hell
18:02
paralysis by analysis right there
18:04
.
18:04
Yes , for sure .
18:06
I think about that all the time . It's like
18:08
maybe it's not so good that
18:10
we have this easy
18:12
access to so much news
18:14
. I mean so I've
18:16
mentioned this before but , like you know , sometimes I'll be just
18:18
be scrolling on Reddit . The
18:20
public , like , first off , got to be careful
18:23
with that .
18:23
Oh yeah .
18:25
I mean I'll just be flipping through the videos
18:27
and then boom , I just watched a homeless dude just get shot
18:29
in the head or something . It's like what the hell ? And
18:32
it's like do I need to see this ? What
18:34
is how ? It seems like everybody's recording everything
18:37
nowadays and stuff like that
18:39
has impact on news . Like I mean , there's definitely
18:41
been times where CEOs of companies
18:43
have been caught doing something that they probably shouldn't have
18:45
been doing and it was filmed about
18:48
and people were like you know what this is gonna
18:50
affect the stock price and
18:52
sure enough it kind of becomes
18:54
a self-fulfilling prophecy . So I
18:56
wouldn't be surprised if there are people who
18:59
are hired just to figure
19:01
out you know news about
19:04
these CEOs . Like track these people .
19:05
Oh , I'm sure , yeah .
19:07
Look at the things that are happening in this company and
19:09
see is there anything going down that would
19:11
impact it . I mean especially , you
19:13
know , on these higher profile companies . I'm assuming
19:16
everything that Elon Musk touches is like Heavily
19:19
, you know , watch at all times .
19:20
I'm sure , yeah , I'm sure they've got people watching
19:23
him and then they've probably got people on Elon's
19:25
side , you know , watching the
19:27
people that are trying to watch him , and you know
19:29
it's just a little cat and mouse game that they probably play
19:31
exactly .
19:33
We keep calling it Twitter . It's xcom
19:35
.
19:36
Well , is it ? Did they get the comm or I don't know .
19:38
Yeah , so he actually Started out
19:41
with , you know this he wanted to revolutionize
19:43
the banking industry . Right became
19:45
part of PayPal and they were xcom
19:48
and eventually turned to PayPal and
19:51
he ended up buying back xcom
19:53
after selling all of his shares and
19:55
PayPal to eBay and and
19:57
I don't think it was ever disclosed like how
19:59
much he paid for it , but I'm assuming
20:02
it was little and he's had xcom
20:04
all the way back since , but
20:06
I think is like late 90s
20:08
or so , wow , so he's been sitting on it
20:10
for a while .
20:11
That's crazy . I told some article about how
20:13
Facebook some how own
20:16
something x related , xcom
20:18
related or something like that that he's gonna have to try
20:20
and get , which I'm like him
20:22
and Zuck is gonna be a good luck
20:25
. Yeah , I was gonna say that's a situation
20:27
right there . But kind of going back to what
20:29
you were saying about the , you know , is
20:31
the amount of news that we get now Better
20:33
than what it was in the past ? And it's like I
20:35
think about that a little bit and I'm like I kind of
20:38
agree that probably is a little bit paralysis
20:40
by analysis because we have so much information . But
20:42
I think the bigger worry that I have , you know , as
20:45
AI and things like that come
20:47
along , it's like the potential
20:49
false news or Imitation
20:51
news or things that look real like how are we discerning
20:54
what's real and what's not going forward
20:56
? I think that's gonna be a challenge . I mean , if you think about
20:58
it , when Elon first Well
21:00
, not first , but early on in his
21:02
Twitter ten year ship you know he
21:04
had , he went when he first was allowing
21:07
anybody to get verified , basically if they paid
21:09
For Twitter blue he
21:11
had . I think it was like there was companies
21:13
or Companies that were imitating
21:16
other companies that were getting verified before
21:18
that company would and then they would tweet out
21:20
news . I remember I can't remember what company
21:22
it was , but it was a publicly traded
21:24
company and but it wasn't
21:26
the actual company , it was someone , some random
21:28
person that got verified with
21:31
a very similar Twitter handle
21:33
and then they posted out some bad news
21:35
about the company and the company stock price dropped
21:37
like eight and a half percent , like immediately . And
21:40
but it was just some random dude just making up some shipperity
21:42
account . Yeah , yeah , yeah , and that was
21:44
like even well , I wouldn't say it wasn't necessarily
21:47
pre chat GPT , but it was just
21:49
pre a lot of this like AI hype , and
21:51
I'm like , as this AI hype becomes bigger
21:53
and more sophisticated , I'm like
21:55
man , it's gonna be tough to sift through what's real and what's
21:58
not yeah , absolutely .
22:00
I mean the one thing that I worry about when
22:02
it comes to machine learning and the
22:05
basic , you know , artificial intelligence
22:07
that we know , like I mean not full-on
22:09
robotics or anything , but , you know , think
22:11
about it will know the spending
22:14
habits of the area you live
22:16
in , right ? I mean they already can determine
22:18
that , like , if I want to build a doughnut shop and
22:20
I want to put it somewhere , there are ways
22:22
for me to figure out that most optimum place
22:24
to put that doughnut shop . Well , now they're
22:27
gonna be able to figure out like , when
22:29
it , how much volume
22:31
is done on each
22:33
day of the week , at what period of time
22:36
and what is happening . Like
22:38
what are the Americans doing ? What you
22:40
know the Asians doing , like , is
22:42
there anything that are Common
22:44
similarities between they can start tying
22:47
all these things together and find these optimum
22:49
trade zones for Algorithmic
22:51
bots run by AI
22:53
to perform these trades . Because maybe
22:56
people are bored . I know so
22:58
many people that trade Robin Hood
23:00
, like I mean pretty idiotically
23:03
, but just like hop , I'm kind of bored , I'm gonna
23:05
see , fucking make five bucks and they just take a
23:07
trade and they watch it and then it's
23:09
like boom , they sell . You know , it's just like I made
23:11
five bucks and it's so crazy
23:14
and dumb and it usually works in
23:16
their favor because it's so small amount of money and they're not
23:18
Overthinking it . But I mean there's
23:20
gonna be a lot of people that are taking advantage of
23:22
you know in ways . They're gonna be influenced
23:24
. In ways I mean they might be influenced
23:26
to buy certain companies , like
23:28
, for example , let's say , you
23:31
know , the narrative for the AI
23:33
is to hey , let's promote Microsoft
23:35
. They can promote Microsoft
23:37
in so many subtle ways where
23:39
it's never Received as
23:41
a microsoft advertisement yeah
23:44
and they could be subtly getting into people's
23:46
brains and thinking like man Microsoft
23:48
is gonna be doing great things . I'm
23:50
gonna buy Microsoft Scary
23:52
.
23:53
Yeah , I mean I think that's a big challenge
23:55
and a big kind of roadblock for AI going
23:57
forward . I mean , they're already gathering
24:00
a lot of that stuff from you know . They're building
24:02
a profile on people based off their social
24:04
media habits and their internet
24:06
Habits and the what websites they go to
24:08
, when they go to those websites , how much time
24:10
they spend on those websites , things like that . I
24:12
mean , each person has a kind
24:14
of like web profile that's been built
24:16
by these social media companies and things
24:18
like that . That . They can just , you know , track you down
24:21
to a T and kind of mold what
24:23
you look at or what you're interested
24:26
in and influence those things . So it
24:28
is definitely scary and it's gonna be interesting what
24:30
the next like three to five years , look
24:32
like for sure , because , you know
24:34
, ai has a potential to do a lot of different things
24:36
, good and bad , as with anything . So
24:39
it's just a matter of like how
24:41
most people are gonna utilize it and how
24:43
easily it's gonna be able to
24:45
, you know , blend and identify
24:48
what's Factual and what's
24:50
not and what's real and what's fake yeah
24:52
, you kind of just segwayed into
24:54
like .
24:54
Our next topic of Discussing , like
24:57
the web 1.0 , is to web 3.0
24:59
and what you kind of described is a little bit
25:01
of the future of web 3.0 . But
25:03
I know this question comes up a lot . I've seen
25:05
it a lot on threads
25:08
. Actually People just wanting
25:10
to know , like , what the hell
25:12
is web 3.0 like ? What
25:14
was web 1.0 ? What was web
25:16
2.0 ? And you know I've actually
25:19
been engaging with these individuals
25:21
and kind of answering this question and
25:23
I know a lot of people have asked me
25:25
this question like in real life . But web
25:27
1.0 is like the
25:29
start of everything . Right , it's like little
25:31
to no interaction . It's sort of
25:33
like going to Amazoncom
25:37
and buying a book and that's
25:39
all you did is you bought an item and that
25:42
was it . That was all the interaction . Very
25:44
basic websites , web kind of 1.5
25:47
Introduced like chatting
25:49
, that's like the AOL . It's like okay , now there's
25:51
a little bit of inner , you know , interaction
25:53
between people and you
25:55
know I can chat with somebody , but
25:58
that's about all that I can do . Now
26:00
web 2.0 is where
26:02
things get a little interesting , because now in
26:04
web 2.0 you have the ability
26:06
to Like , for example
26:09
, leave reviews . Like now it's like I'm
26:11
purchasing a product and I'm Interacting
26:14
with it in a way that's gonna impact the
26:16
purchasing of other people's , like I'm
26:18
able to say this product is great or this
26:20
product is not great . We're able to create social
26:22
medias and , like you said , like social profiles
26:25
, for you know yourself , that is built
26:27
by companies and web 2.0
26:29
is sort of like where everything
26:32
that crypto is now was
26:34
kind of derived from . And
26:36
you know web 2.5 is like in
26:38
my mind is kind of like an uber , you
26:40
know you think about you open up an app and
26:43
you digitally order a
26:45
ride that physically shows
26:48
up , you can digitally
26:50
leave a review , and
26:52
it's got this built-in
26:55
machine learning into it . It's saying
26:57
like , hey , these are the peak times
26:59
, the cost is gonna go up , you
27:02
know , oh , you're near downtown
27:04
and it's close to the clubs coming
27:06
. You know Closing time
27:09
price to go up . So there is that
27:11
machine learning built into and that is
27:13
what web 3.0 is all machine
27:15
learning . And I think everything that you talked about
27:17
kind of ties into what
27:20
web 3.0 is that there are
27:22
Entities out there that are
27:24
mining us , like
27:26
we are the product right for
27:28
these social media companies and it's hard
27:30
to understand because everybody
27:33
uses this product for free . But how
27:36
often are you using it in a way that has
27:38
been official to yourself
27:40
. Like I know First-hand
27:42
, sometimes I get lost in the sauce
27:44
. I'm like 35
27:46
videos in on , like Instagram
27:48
shorts or something . Yeah , I'm like what am
27:50
I doing ? It's
27:53
scary .
27:53
I mean it and they're able to cater the content to
27:55
know exactly what you like and what is , you
27:58
know , peaking your interest and kind of Feeding it
28:00
to you so you stay on their platform longer
28:02
. So you know it's scary
28:04
and Beneficial at the same time
28:06
. I mean I think you know . I kind of wonder if how
28:09
many people are finding a Benefit
28:11
from it versus like an entertainment
28:13
factor . I would assume most
28:16
from a social media standpoint and from just
28:18
like a web standpoint in general
28:20
, it's more of an entertainment factor than
28:22
it is anything else . But I'm sure there's a lot of people
28:24
out there that maybe they use Tiktok
28:27
or Instagram or any of these other social media channels
28:29
and they're able to absorb a lot of information and
28:31
learn things that they didn't know before
28:33
or they can use in
28:35
their day-to-day life as an application
28:38
to things that make them Beneficial
28:41
. I know do one that was like
28:43
eye-opening to me I think your wife
28:45
shared it with me or something like that which
28:47
was this person that
28:49
showed how to hang a picture
28:51
frame by using like a piece
28:54
of Painters tape behind it and then you like
28:56
mark where the hole is and then you put the painters tape
28:58
up , make sure it's level and then the hole is already there
29:00
. Basically , you and you put it in and it's
29:02
like boom , it took me like dude . I started
29:04
hanging picture frames like a freaking
29:07
professional after that and it was like I
29:09
Think she sent my wife like a you
29:11
know , a two-minute tiktok or something like that and like
29:13
that kind of stuff is like okay , well , this just
29:15
saved me a shit ton of time from having
29:17
to hang all these stupid ass pictures you
29:19
know by and having to take
29:22
24 measurements to make sure it's hanging
29:24
correctly . And this little hack was
29:26
, you know , beneficial , which I know is kind
29:28
of a popular way to absorb social
29:30
media content now , but I would assume you
29:33
know 80 to 90 percent of it is pure
29:35
entertainment factor .
29:37
Yeah , I kind of got lost in this thought
29:39
the other night , but I was thinking
29:41
about the Like YouTube
29:44
and how much has YouTube hurt
29:46
the overall economy . Because
29:49
when I think of it this way , I'm like first
29:51
off I was thinking about it because I'm like man , I
29:54
have learned so much stuff on YouTube
29:56
. I haven't had to call out so
29:59
many people to do repairs on something
30:01
because I'm just like I'm gonna YouTube it and
30:03
I mean , obviously I have my own wall . But there are some
30:05
people they're like I'm doing everything
30:08
myself and this whole
30:10
you know , diy like
30:12
movement Just kind of came
30:14
about . Everybody's refinishing their house . I just
30:16
refinished my kitchen . It's like how
30:19
much money are people saving ? That
30:21
was pulled from the economy . And
30:23
also , on top of that , think
30:25
about all the time that is wasted
30:28
Sitting and viewing
30:30
YouTube . Imagine you go back
30:32
to the 1700s and
30:34
you're telling people like , oh yeah , I sit in
30:36
front of a tiny little rectangle
30:38
for For five hours
30:41
a day .
30:42
They're like wait what ?
30:43
like ? I'm sure every minute
30:46
of their day was packed
30:48
Just to survive . So
30:50
I'm like now we've grown as a
30:53
you know culture and economy
30:55
, but we have people that are just
30:57
literally wasting their lives in
30:59
front of this for no reason . We
31:01
also have other people that are
31:03
making money off of that . In
31:05
a weird way . It's just like , oh , I get to
31:07
sit here and kind
31:10
of like , how are they contributing to society
31:12
? You know what I mean ? It's kind of weird
31:14
thing to think about .
31:15
Yeah , I mean , I think it definitely goes both ways
31:17
, because it's like , okay , yes , there are companies
31:19
out there your handyman companies and
31:22
stuff like that that maybe get impacted
31:24
by the people that are just
31:26
like you know what , I'm just gonna watch a YouTube video and figure this
31:28
out myself , but then on the flip
31:30
side of that , the person that made the YouTube videos probably
31:33
making money . So it's like the money is
31:35
still exchanging hands . It's just exchanging
31:37
hands in a different way than
31:39
it's less traditional way of money
31:43
transfer .
31:44
It's going , instead of the handyman , it's going
31:46
to the YouTuber , yeah , the YouTuber , yeah
31:48
.
31:49
They're making money on the
31:51
video that they have , or the
31:53
ad revenue or whatever it may be that
31:55
they've generated from that video and
31:58
rather than going to the handyman
32:00
and then so like , but it's great for the end
32:03
user , because the end user is getting
32:05
this completely free . So it's
32:07
like , you know , it's like , okay , well , yeah
32:09
, the handyman potentially loses a little bit
32:11
of money . On their end , that money gets moved over
32:13
to the content creator , but then when
32:15
it funnels down , instead of the user paying
32:18
the handyman , they're getting the content
32:20
from the content creator for free , but
32:22
then the content creator is getting paid from
32:25
the Glamorant of YouTube . So
32:27
it's an interesting funnel because
32:29
, at the end of the day , I would assume that
32:32
the user is the
32:34
beneficiary of everything because , they
32:36
don't have to pay the handyman , they don't have to get overpriced
32:38
or potentially price couched or you
32:40
know whatever , or even just pay out of
32:42
pocket for this , and at the
32:44
same time they're kind of more or less learning a new
32:46
skill that they could potentially apply in
32:49
future uses . I know , dating
32:51
years and years back , I know it's a pretty simple task
32:53
, but I had to learn
32:55
how to install a fan in
32:58
one of my rooms and I
33:00
watched a YouTube video on how to install a fan
33:03
. I installed it . It worked fine . And then
33:05
I moved into this new house a year and a half ago and
33:07
there was three bedrooms that didn't
33:09
have fans and I wanted to
33:11
have fans in each one of those rooms . So I bought three of the same
33:13
fan and I was able to install it in all those
33:16
rooms without having to really watch a video
33:18
or anything like that , because it's kind of like I've been there , done
33:20
that , whereas if I hadn't watched that YouTube video
33:22
probably would have paid a handyman to
33:24
install that fan and then , when I moved to my new house
33:26
, I would have paid another handyman to pay it to install three
33:28
more fans , which you're
33:30
looking at . Hundreds and hundreds of dollars that I
33:33
essentially saved and I learned a skill
33:35
on how to install a ceiling fan .
33:37
Yeah , it's so weird that this is a
33:39
career for people because again
33:42
, I just think going back to like
33:44
early 1900s and you're like
33:46
you got factory workers
33:48
, you've got Wall
33:50
Street , but even was probably a foreign
33:53
concept to them . But now it's like
33:55
, what do you do ? Oh yeah , I just
33:57
I'm an influencer or what
33:59
. I make videos . I sell what . Do
34:01
you sell Nothing ? I sell nothing
34:03
. I sell air . What .
34:06
Yeah , I mean , I kind of like
34:08
it in my opinion . Honestly , I think it's nice that
34:10
you as a person can
34:12
just like take whatever skill
34:15
you may have and apply it
34:17
and find a way to make money out of it , rather
34:19
than being forced to go the nine to five
34:21
route or forced to
34:23
work a factory job or something like that , just
34:25
to pay the bills . It's like , okay , well , I've
34:27
got so many different ways in this
34:29
, like gig economy , to make money . This
34:32
is why I feel like just about
34:34
anybody , if they have the work ethic
34:36
for it , can make money
34:38
, and it's more of a will
34:40
issue than a skill issue , in my opinion . If
34:43
you want to do it , there's ways to
34:45
do it . If you don't want to
34:47
do it , or you don't want to have the work ethic
34:49
to do it , well then you're probably just gonna
34:51
be one of those people that just sits around and complains about
34:53
not having enough money . But at the end
34:55
of the day , every single person out there if
34:57
they want to make money , there's ways
34:59
to make money , and this time and this age
35:02
that we're in right now is the easiest
35:04
way to make money for to
35:07
do whatever you want to do , then
35:09
it's ever been in
35:11
the history of mankind , in my opinion .
35:13
Oh yeah , and then it seems like the more niche
35:16
you are , the more effective
35:18
you can be . I mean , do I think about some of the coolest
35:20
videos that I've watched , like they're
35:23
the most random things ? Like I watched this one video
35:25
about bow fishing and I'm I
35:27
don't know the way the guy was explaining it
35:29
, the way he was doing it I was like , oh , this is kind of cool
35:31
. And I realized like I've been watching this for 30
35:34
minutes and it's where me and my
35:36
kid we watched this one guy . He builds these
35:38
things in the jungle and he builds
35:40
like these structures , like these , like little
35:42
mini castles , and then
35:44
at the very end he puts like kittens in them but
35:47
he has like motes and draw bridges
35:49
and like that's cool . Yeah , I mean
35:51
it is cool and he builds it out of clay
35:53
and just brush and all things
35:55
Like there's this one guy , he makes these ant
35:57
farms that are like I
36:00
don't know if it's sand or what , but he builds like a little
36:02
ant city and then he like puts all these ants
36:04
in them and you're just , but it's just
36:06
stupid as shit . But
36:09
it's like it's sucking them my time , it's
36:11
sucking up my kid's time and it's like , wow , okay .
36:14
And you know if it's sucking up that time , at
36:16
the end of the day , that dude's getting paid .
36:17
Exactly , and I see the views
36:20
on it and I'm like , oh , I mean , it was probably recommended
36:22
in some form or fashion to us .
36:24
So which means it's got a good bit of a following
36:26
or views already .
36:27
Yeah , and that's . This is essentially
36:30
what you know web 3.0
36:32
is . It's a . Pretty much Digital
36:34
economy , and part of the digital economy
36:36
is content . Content is a currency
36:39
and you know , it seems like everybody
36:42
I mean , I guess , technically everybody is
36:44
a content creator . We're all creating
36:46
our own thoughts in our head and as soon as you write
36:48
that out and put it on social media , it's like you
36:51
have a voice , it is being heard
36:53
and you know . What's scary
36:55
is and I think this is where
36:58
things can get dangerous is the machine
37:00
learning and the algorithms . Part of it . It's like now
37:02
, especially like in social media and Facebook
37:05
, it's there are algos at play . You
37:07
know , for narratives , like we've
37:09
seen it in elections , where the narrative
37:11
is one presidential candidate
37:14
over another . We've seen it , you
37:16
know , with how COVID
37:18
and some people feel like COVID was blown out of
37:20
proportion because of such stuff
37:22
like this . So I think that while there's
37:24
so much good to it , there's a dangerous side of
37:26
it . And another big part of web
37:29
3.0 that is tied to it is
37:31
crypto . You know it's like it's just digital
37:33
currency . It's this peer to peer exchange that
37:35
really is never
37:37
seen before , like eBay
37:39
is a good example of a web 2.0
37:42
peer to peer , because it's like you're using
37:44
eBay to sell one thing to
37:46
another person . But as soon as you
37:48
go web 3.0 , it's like
37:50
you and I . There's
37:52
no middleman , it's all decentralized and
37:55
it's me and you sending money anonymously
37:57
.
37:58
Directly to each other .
37:59
Yeah , and we're interacting with services
38:01
that are created from thin air
38:03
and we're using , you know
38:06
, advanced mathematics and the baby
38:09
stages of AI to really
38:11
guide it further . But I mean , I know eventually
38:13
there will be a 4.0 . It's like
38:16
what the fuck is that ?
38:16
Yeah , I mean , I feel like we're not even
38:19
far enough into web 3.0 yet to even
38:21
get past what that is and what
38:23
you know , web 4.0 is
38:25
. I don't even think everybody's fully wrapped their
38:27
head around and obviously embrace web 3.0
38:30
. It's not even , you know , it's definitely
38:32
not mainstream yet . We're still a ways away
38:34
from mainstream web 3.0
38:36
. But , yeah , I'll be interested to
38:38
see what the future holds and what everything
38:40
ends up looking like once the
38:43
adoption , you know , comes into play . But
38:45
I think crypto is going to be a massive factor
38:47
. I mean , in my opinion , whenever I think of web 3.0 , I'm
38:49
immediately thinking of crypto and that's , in
38:52
my opinion , most of what web 3.0
38:54
is made up of . So it's just a matter
38:56
of how long is it going to take for that
38:58
mainstream adoption to take place ? I
39:00
was telling you a little bit earlier , before we did the podcast
39:02
, I saw a coffee shop
39:05
that I don't even know where it was I think it's
39:07
in the US that specifically
39:09
was taking USDC as
39:11
one of the only forms of payment that they would
39:13
accept at the coffee shop . You go into the coffee shop
39:15
strictly crypto and you
39:17
could , you know , scan with like
39:19
a coin base wallet account or something like that
39:21
. You type in the amount , pay it . There was no
39:23
gas fees , no nothing . It was
39:25
quick , instant transactions and
39:28
you were able to grab a cup of coffee , hang out at the cafe
39:30
. Pretty cool to see that in action
39:33
. I guess Haven't really seen much of that
39:35
take place just yet from a crypto
39:37
standpoint . So cool to see that , and I think
39:39
that's just the beginning of kind
39:42
of what web 3.0 can be .
39:44
Yeah , it's . I mean , a big part
39:46
of it is the digital entities that we were talking
39:48
about at the beginning of the episode , and I mean , I know you
39:50
got a Palo ID , which I'd
39:53
love to explore here , but you know , as
39:55
you create these digital
39:57
entities of ourselves , these digital identities
40:00
, we have spending patterns
40:02
, we have tone , you know things
40:04
like businesses can use this
40:06
as a new version
40:08
of what a credit score is and they can say
40:11
, hey , you know what ? I don't really like how this
40:13
person interacted with these people on Twitter
40:15
. That doesn't seem like someone who'd be a good
40:17
fit for our team and I think
40:19
a lot of older people
40:21
don't consider any of that
40:24
.
40:24
And definitely not .
40:25
When they're going online and typing . Most people probably
40:27
don't consider it , let's be honest , but the younger generations
40:29
, I think they do kind
40:32
of consider it a little bit different . They consider it one
40:35
.
40:36
It says part of their interactions .
40:38
Yes .
40:39
Whereas I think older generations is like there's
40:41
a disconnect . There it's like I'm my person
40:43
and then online I'm this person
40:46
essentially . Not quite like a catfish
40:48
situation , but kind of
40:50
it's like they're two different identities , where I think the younger
40:52
generation is just like they've grown up with
40:54
it , so it's like whatever they say on the internet
40:56
is an extension of themselves , whereas
40:59
you know the older generation . I think
41:01
they're almost like two separate entities
41:03
.
41:04
Yeah , I mean it's like the avatar situation right , If
41:07
you're still human , but you're also this
41:09
avatar while you're the avatar .
41:11
Yeah . And it's the same as going
41:13
online and reminds me of the show that
41:15
I've been watching , this upload show .
41:17
That is pretty cool I don't know .
41:19
I've been watching it pretty religiously . It's all right , it's
41:21
not . It's kind of this like dramedy
41:23
type of show . It's decent , but yeah , it's
41:25
kind of like that . It's basically essentially like futuristic-ish
41:29
and it's basically how this you
41:31
know dude dies , essentially , and
41:33
they have this situation or
41:35
program called upload and you can basically
41:37
upload yourself and do a digital avatar of
41:40
yourself and kind of have like your own
41:42
afterlife and people from
41:44
your day-to-day life can interact
41:46
with you in your afterlife avatar
41:48
. But yeah , anyway , I think it's just
41:51
kind of one of those things where you
41:53
know the younger generation , it's definitely
41:55
their social media interactions
41:57
and the things they do on the internet is
42:00
definitely a full-on extension of
42:02
themselves , extension of their personality , extension
42:04
of who they are . Where , I think the older generation
42:06
, there's definitely a disconnect in between the
42:08
person that you interact with online
42:11
versus the person you talk to in person .
42:13
Yeah , I mean there's a lot of Twitter Handlers
42:16
or you know , like watcher guru for example
42:18
. Like if that guy was like oh hey
42:21
, everybody , my name is Ben , no one's
42:23
gonna call him Ben , they're gonna be like watcher guru
42:25
. You know there's people who have taken on those
42:27
pseudonyms , that kind of just they
42:29
take on their online personality ?
42:31
Yeah , exactly .
42:32
That's just who they are . But I
42:34
didn't want to talk about the power thing , because this
42:36
is interesting . So I guess , just tell
42:38
us about what the heck this is and how
42:40
you got it .
42:41
Yeah , so I got an ID ID
42:43
from a country of
42:46
residency which called Palo . The
42:48
website is rnsid . It's
42:50
pretty interesting concept is essentially a
42:52
country that offers
42:55
a digital residency ID
42:57
within their country super crypto
42:59
friendly country and essentially you can apply
43:02
to become a resident of
43:04
Palo and when you
43:06
get their ID , you get a residency
43:09
ID as a resident of that country
43:11
and essentially some of the benefits
43:13
that you get from this is it allows
43:15
you to potentially KYC Yourself
43:18
within certain exchanges . So I've
43:20
tested this out on quite a few exchanges . You
43:22
know the main ones that's worked really well on is I
43:25
was able to get KYC with big get . I was
43:27
able to get KYC'd with Coo-coin
43:29
. I was able to get KYC with by bit . Some
43:31
of the ones I couldn't get it worked to work on . Some
43:33
people did say they got it To work on Binance . I'm not exactly
43:36
sure how they were able to get it to work on Binance . I really
43:38
wanted it to work on Binance , but
43:40
I could not get the ID
43:42
to work on Binance . They were Binance
43:45
. Every time I was going through the KYC
43:47
process with Binance they were requesting a passport
43:49
and not an ID , so I couldn't get past that one
43:51
. Okay , x was another one that I couldn't
43:54
get on . Being X was another one
43:56
that I couldn't get on being X . The main
43:58
reason I couldn't get on them was because they didn't even
44:00
like whenever you go to KYC
44:02
and you click on the drop-down options . They didn't
44:04
even have Palo as a country that
44:06
I could select , so I'm gonna kind of scratch that
44:08
one right off from the beginning . But it's cool concept
44:11
. It's essentially you do have to pay for it . It's
44:13
a yearly renewal of your residency
44:15
within the country . It's like 250
44:18
bucks , so not cheap
44:20
, but not super expensive . You break that out
44:22
over a 12 month time frame . You know it's not
44:24
a ton of money . At the end of the day is like 20
44:26
bucks a month essentially . But yeah
44:28
, it's a really . It's a really interesting and
44:30
it's interesting these countries do
44:32
this kind of thing . In my opinion , it's great for the country
44:35
one . They're generating income to
44:37
their offering crypto services
44:40
and they're kind of accepting that web 3.0
44:42
Future mentality
44:44
. In my opinion , they're kind of like seeing around corners
44:46
a little bit and identifying like hey
44:48
, you know this is pretty popular , this could potentially
44:51
be a big thing for us , and if they hit on it
44:53
early , you know it could be a big boom for
44:55
their economy within their specific country
44:57
. So it's an interesting concept that they've
44:59
built out within their country . And , you
45:02
know , something I'm interested in kind of seeing what the
45:04
future has in store . Obviously , I'm
45:06
kind of invested in them at the moment
45:08
through my digital residency . It's
45:10
been a benefit to me just by being
45:12
able to KYC with some of these exchanges . So
45:14
there's a lot of other perks that they offer . They offer
45:17
, you know , discounts on hotels and
45:19
you know , I think you can use it as an ID
45:21
for different websites and Memberships
45:24
like Costco and stuff like that . So , like
45:26
I said , pretty interesting concept , pretty unique
45:28
, unique idea . I'm interested to see how
45:30
this idea evolves over the future
45:32
and what the country itself
45:35
does with their , the
45:37
amount of crypto friendliness they have , you
45:39
know , currently going for them .
45:41
Yeah , so couple questions
45:43
here . Did you get a physical ID ?
45:45
Yeah , yeah , so you start off with a digital ID
45:47
. Once you , they'll ask for all your information
45:49
I think it was like name , address , birthday
45:52
, stuff like that though you also have to upload
45:54
a picture of yourself to put on the ID , and
45:56
then it goes through their government agency
45:59
and Then they'll let you know once it passes
46:01
. Once it passes , you get a digital ID . You
46:03
can't use that , though , for like KYC
46:06
or memberships or anything like that . But
46:08
once you get the ID , you
46:11
can then , or once you get the digital
46:13
ID , they usually send you an email , probably
46:16
like two weeks later . I mean is a semi lengthy
46:18
process . I probably applied probably within
46:20
about two weeks I got the digital ID
46:22
and then , once I got the digital ID , it
46:24
was probably about a couple days later and they let me know
46:26
my physical ID shipped and then it was probably
46:29
about two-ish weeks to get the physical
46:31
ID . So I probably put it at about four
46:33
to six weeks total process from the moment
46:35
that I signed up to the moment I actually
46:37
got a physical card in the mail . It was probably
46:40
about a month and a half .
46:41
Not too bad . So I was kind of cracking
46:43
up over here thinking about
46:46
this . But have you tried to go and
46:48
use this ID anywhere
46:50
locally here in Austin Texas ?
46:52
I have not . I don't even really know
46:54
where it would be applicable . I'm
46:56
like I kind of was thinking about . I was like we should
46:59
just like go out For a night
47:01
and just go bar hopping and I just want to see
47:03
if I could just hand them my . It's
47:06
gonna say Republic of Palo on
47:08
it . I mean , it has my date of birth on it
47:10
and that's . Fuck yeah
47:12
they're gonna be like where is this guy from
47:14
? And then they're probably gonna be thrown
47:17
off because I just talk like a Normal person
47:19
and I don't have any accent or anything
47:21
. So I'd be interested to
47:23
test it . I should have like , whenever I went to go pick
47:25
up the alcohol today , I should have brought it and just
47:27
brought as my identification , for
47:29
I mean , at the end of the day , it has my date of
47:31
birth on it . So I'm like yeah . I
47:33
would assume they just look at the date of birth . They'll be like , oh , this guy's
47:36
over 21 . All right , and then just let me in
47:38
. But I wonder
47:40
if it would turn any heads and be like Yo , what
47:42
is this ? I'm sure Like
47:45
a bouncer . They've probably never seen that thing before
47:47
and they're probably look at that . I'm like I've never
47:49
seen this kind of card before .
47:51
Yeah , I mean , imagine getting pulled over and you just
47:53
give him the .
47:54
Yeah , I would not do that , but
47:56
I'd be down to do it at like a bar to
47:58
start trying to get entry , but he
48:00
did it over as an identification to a cop
48:02
. That's how you know it's .
48:04
It's a silent signal of like hey , I
48:06
got crypto . If you know , you want to let this Job
48:10
me your wallet . But
48:12
I do like the concept . I think it is
48:14
pretty cool . I think it . You know these countries
48:16
that pretty much recognize like look
48:19
, we're a third world country with . You
48:21
know , a lot of third world countries have beautiful
48:23
tourist spots and they just
48:25
can't get enough people
48:27
there to really like bring them
48:30
from a third world to a second
48:32
world . And I think being able to
48:34
recognize like , oh , crypto
48:36
is something that is gonna be here to stay for a while
48:38
. This is a good opportunity . We should hop on it . I'm like
48:41
that's a solid idea . I saw that . I
48:43
think it's a day they actually had ripple out
48:45
. I did see that .
48:46
Yeah , yeah , paolo had some . I
48:48
didn't really go super deep into it , but it
48:50
looks like they ripple and Paolo had
48:52
some sort of a meeting together or something like
48:54
that . So , yeah , it's funny too , because I actually
48:57
did do a little bit of research on the country
48:59
itself Over the past several weeks since I got
49:01
the card and I had a . You know , I've actually
49:03
looked at some of the hotels and stuff like that and the resorts
49:05
and I'm like dude , this place is freaking beautiful . I
49:07
was like I kind of want to go here on vacation sometime . The
49:10
other thing that's nice is like they accept
49:12
crypto in most places there . There's
49:14
no tax on crypto .
49:16
That's pretty cool in their country .
49:17
So I'm like I probably go on
49:19
a fairly cheap vacation there
49:21
in crypto , non-taxed
49:23
. Nice , beautiful country with nice
49:25
beaches on the water
49:28
. I'm like Doesn't sound like a
49:30
half bad idea .
49:31
I don't know how the hell you get there , yeah .
49:32
I mean I'm assuming they got flights , but but
49:35
yeah , I was doing a little bit of deeper dives
49:37
on like the different resorts and hotels and stuff like
49:39
that they had in the country . I mean it definitely looked
49:41
very small and very , you know , not a ton
49:44
that was available , but what was available
49:46
look pretty freaking nice .
49:47
What we should do is record a baking
49:49
profits episode Directly
49:52
live from Palo , that would be
49:54
legit get the government official
49:56
in here yeah some fuss
49:58
them , bourbon . I'd be like listen
50:00
, this is what our show is about . Trust us , this
50:02
is gonna get viewed by millions .
50:04
Hey , we need to hit them up and just be like listen , you flies
50:07
out there , cover all the costs and everything like that We'll
50:09
interview you on a podcast . Promote
50:11
Palo a little bit . That would
50:13
be a fun collab right there next
50:15
thing , you know , they're trading gluten-free , that's
50:17
all I gotta do .
50:19
So I know that you know this is
50:21
not the first time that you sort of interacted
50:24
with a , I guess , project
50:26
where the country was very Pro-crypto
50:29
. You know , recently we've been , you
50:31
know , kind of just digging through
50:34
a lot of the things that we had talked about in the past
50:36
, and one of those happened to be a project
50:38
called Satoshi Island
50:41
, which I Completely
50:43
forgot about . I know , when we
50:45
talked about it you were like what
50:47
? So , as we did research
50:49
, you know we did a little bit , with just some surface level
50:52
. It seems like they're still around . They just
50:54
did their funding round and I mean they don't know
50:56
anything about this project . So please
50:58
do not go out and just be like I'm gonna buy this
51:00
because they're talking about it , but it
51:02
seems like a cool concept and the
51:05
gist of it is like you're buying
51:07
ownership into this special island
51:10
that is going
51:12
to be a crypto island
51:14
.
51:14
Yeah , crypto-centric island yeah .
51:16
They're gonna have tiny homes and it's
51:18
an island in Fiji and apparently
51:20
I don't know if it was , you know , a
51:22
government official or a project
51:24
official or somebody interacted
51:26
with Fiji's government was like this is a providence
51:29
of your , you know , country , state , whatever
51:31
. We want to turn this into a crypto island . They
51:33
had to get approval to accept crypto . They had
51:35
to get approval for all this stuff . They bought the land
51:38
outright . But cool concept
51:40
where we see , not only
51:42
do we see like a digital
51:44
economy , web 3.0 , but
51:46
we see like , you know , tying into
51:49
our previous episode with NFTs- yeah
51:51
. You had to buy an NFT . That was
51:53
your ticket to this island and it's like
51:55
I like it .
51:57
Yeah , yeah , it's a really cool idea . Essentially
52:00
, you know , someone buys . I assume they
52:02
bought an island or owned an
52:04
island , something along those lines , and then
52:06
they were like you know what , I'm deep into crypto
52:08
. I'm going to make this a very crypto-centric
52:10
island . You know , you have to
52:12
own a specific NFT to
52:14
own a piece of the island
52:16
or own a tiny home on
52:18
the island to be able to have residency
52:21
there , things like that . So it's a
52:23
really cool idea . I'm going to be interested . I
52:25
want to see it like actually
52:27
happen . I want to see tiny homes on the island
52:29
live . I want to see people that have
52:32
owned a specific Satoshi island NFT
52:34
have access to
52:36
a specific you
52:39
know home or piece of the island
52:41
or whatever . I think this is a really
52:43
cool concept . It really goes kind of
52:45
deep . If you didn't get a chance to listen
52:47
to or watch our last episode on NFTs
52:50
, we kind of touched on this in
52:52
a way , not this specific idea from
52:54
Satoshi island , but the general idea of
52:56
what the future of NFTs look like , and
52:58
this is kind of , you know , a preview of
53:00
that . So the funny thing is I signed up
53:02
for this like a year ago and I could not
53:05
figure out how to identify
53:07
if I actually owned an NFT or not , Because , dude
53:09
, I don't even know how you even reminded
53:11
me of this , but I forgot
53:13
completely about this whole thing that
53:15
. I signed up for , or went
53:18
through the process of , like a year and a half ago , but
53:20
I couldn't figure out a way to verify whether
53:22
or not I actually owned an NFT from them or not
53:24
. So still kind of waiting from their website
53:27
side of things . But I mean , their website looked cool . The
53:29
island looked pretty cool . It's part of Fiji so
53:31
it's , you know , a real place . The , at
53:34
least the concepts of what their tiny homes
53:36
look like . I'm like they're pretty like modern
53:38
, looking , nice , decent sized places
53:40
. So , you know , I think it's an interesting
53:42
concept and I think some of these third world
53:44
countries are going to have to like take the risk
53:47
and then , if it proves to be beneficial
53:49
, I think we'll just start seeing that adoption
53:51
grow and grow and grow and then maybe
53:53
we'll start seeing some first world countries , like
53:56
you know , have some level of something like
53:58
that , you know , down the road .
54:00
Yeah , I mean , if you really want to think about it , because I was
54:03
thinking about this after Satoshi Island . I was
54:05
like , is there a way that this could be done
54:07
, you know , within the States , for example
54:09
? And I started thinking about it . I was like kind
54:11
of already is being done in a different
54:13
way . Like I took my kids last year to Disney
54:16
World . Now , when you go to Disney World
54:18
really is like its own city
54:20
. I mean , true , you know this , you
54:23
grew up in Florida . So when you drive
54:25
into that area , first off , everything
54:27
becomes Disney , everything is advertised
54:30
by Disney . The only
54:32
thing that separates them
54:34
from their own country , right , is a currency
54:37
. But if they were like you know what we're going to
54:39
accept Disney bucks , and
54:41
Disney bucks was a cryptocurrency
54:44
on the blockchain , right , all
54:46
of a sudden it would be exactly like Satoshi
54:48
Island , but in Florida .
54:50
That's true . Yeah , I didn't really even think about it like that
54:52
. I was thinking , like you know , from the US side
54:54
, like there's so much regulation , there's no way this
54:56
could happen . But I mean it's
54:59
actually kind of easier than
55:01
most think about it . Use your example
55:03
right there . I'm like that's not really that much work on there
55:06
and I mean it probably is a lot of work at
55:08
the end of the day . But you know , realistically
55:11
, just changing the way they accept
55:13
currency into their own currency makes
55:16
it crypto basically .
55:17
Yeah , you know , one of the things that the US government
55:19
can never say is they can never
55:21
stop a business from accepting
55:24
cryptocurrency , like I
55:26
can sell whatever I want for
55:29
whatever I want , because at the end of the day , it
55:31
doesn't matter if they recognize it as a cryptocurrency
55:34
or you know a
55:36
piece of a rock . It's me
55:38
selling my service or my product for
55:41
, you know , whatever it is , and they have to
55:43
accept that and they do . And so what
55:45
I'm getting at is , if I owned a big piece of land
55:47
, I was like you know what ? I'm going to put an amusement park
55:49
here and I'm only going to accept crypto
55:51
and I'm only going to
55:53
cater to this niche audience and
55:56
everything is going to be DeFi
55:58
, you know , centric , and I'm going to create
56:00
a project and there'll be a game
56:02
. It's like it's kind of like roller coaster , tycoon
56:04
, but it'll be for just my amusement park
56:07
and people can digitally put stuff up and
56:09
it's like you could tie everything
56:11
to it and build an entire economy around
56:13
this amusement park and kind of circumvent
56:16
the standard economy
56:19
and probably make so much more money
56:21
.
56:21
Oh yeah , it'll be way more lucrative , for sure
56:24
.
56:24
And this is 100% Web 3.0
56:26
. So to me , it's like
56:28
it's really interesting to think about
56:30
what the future holds . And I think these
56:32
projects like you know , satoshi
56:35
Island , and even what Paolo
56:37
is doing with its IDs I would assume
56:39
that more is to come like these
56:41
kinds , especially if Ripple's out there , they're clearly
56:44
thinking like there's something in
56:46
there for them as well . And what
56:48
will that be ? Will that be a sponsorship
56:51
project ? You know , whatever it doesn't even
56:53
matter , maybe initiative , but as
56:55
soon as you know Paolo gets
56:58
to the point where it's like , hey , we want to do something
57:00
big in the crypto space , they're going to have , you
57:03
know , a wide audience to already
57:05
speak to . So I think
57:07
there's going to be a lot of opportunity for
57:10
you know these type of ideas to flourish
57:12
. But I'm really eager to see you
57:14
know what kind of happens . And I think as
57:16
more people get opened
57:18
up to crypto , they'll
57:20
start to see these ideas , because when you talk to someone
57:22
about crypto , they don't think about things
57:25
like this at all .
57:26
They think about scams . They think about massive
57:28
gains , massive losses , things
57:30
like that . They just , you know , see
57:32
it as this volatile , crazy , you
57:34
know out of thin air thing . But I
57:37
think we talked about this I don't think it was the last episode
57:39
, but I'm going to be in the episode before that where we , like
57:41
all currency is
57:43
basically fake in , made
57:45
up in the air , but most people don't draw
57:47
that like conclusion . They just think
57:49
, like the dollar is this hard and
57:51
fast thing , it's backed by all this
57:54
shit and it's really at the end of the days . That
57:56
has made up as crypto is just like every
57:58
other freaking currency . So it's like , you
58:00
know , it's kind of one of those things where I think a lot of people just
58:02
they don't take the time to think about it and
58:05
then they're . You know . I know for myself my
58:07
gears have turned on that kind of stuff
58:09
. You know , even over the last like six
58:11
, 12 months , I was like man , yeah , like
58:14
crypto isn't that different from
58:16
all this other shit , even from the stock
58:18
market ? It's like , yes , the stocks move , you
58:20
know less volatile and stuff like that . But you
58:23
know , realistically , from a trading standpoint
58:25
and concept standpoint and you
58:27
know an execution standpoint , it's
58:30
roughly the same .
58:31
Yeah , I've studied a lot of uncurrencies
58:33
and you know , currency is very strange because
58:35
it is man made and it's
58:37
the value that is put into it is
58:39
the perception of what that value
58:42
is . And it's like if I went back to the year 200
58:44
and I showed somebody a piece of paper
58:46
and was like no , this
58:49
, I'm going to buy all your wheat
58:51
with this . What the hell is
58:53
that ? Like wheat had value
58:55
, because wheat has a purpose
58:57
. You know , oil , gold
58:59
, these things can be used , you
59:02
know , not just as like a form of currency
59:04
, but like I could actually use it , like I could
59:06
take this bread and I can eat it , but that's
59:08
a currency . And so currency has gone
59:11
back to the dawn of time , and
59:13
it's just until recent
59:15
times where it's like the currency is
59:17
not things that we actually use . The only
59:19
thing that you can use essentially
59:22
a dollar bills for is
59:24
making a fire and keeping yourself
59:26
warm , true , which is
59:28
fucking crazy because our
59:31
entire world is guided
59:33
by that piece of paper
59:35
. And I think that is the biggest scare , for crypto
59:37
is like you remove that and it becomes
59:40
digitalized and it becomes more of
59:42
a like I
59:44
don't know , just a commodity , unless a
59:46
currency .
59:47
I mean a lot of it is driven by supply and demand
59:49
at the end of the day . I mean , I saw
59:52
something that was kind of . I saw like it
59:54
was like a freaking like TikTok video
59:56
or something like that or just like a short video , and
59:58
I was like it's kind of eye opening to me
1:00:00
. It was a person that was selling
1:00:02
eggs next to another person that was
1:00:04
selling eggs . One person was selling them for like
1:00:07
I don't know , like a 36 of them for
1:00:09
like $10 . And the other person was selling
1:00:11
36 for like $9 . Well , what the
1:00:13
one person did the person that was selling them
1:00:15
for $10 went over to the stand that was
1:00:17
selling them for $9 and bought up all their eggs
1:00:19
and then they went back to their stand with all the extra
1:00:22
eggs and then they changed their price to
1:00:24
$25 . And it's like they have no
1:00:26
more competition and they're the only supply
1:00:28
and there's demand for it , so they can price it whatever
1:00:30
the fuck they want . And then it becomes it's
1:00:32
almost like currency in a way , where it's just like
1:00:34
it's made up based off
1:00:37
the supply and the demand and the interest in
1:00:39
it . You know , just like crypto is essentially
1:00:41
. It's like if there's demand for something
1:00:43
the price can consistently go
1:00:45
up until the demand diminishes
1:00:47
and then it goes down . Very similar to
1:00:49
real estate as well . Same concept for real estate
1:00:51
is , you know , once the demand starts diminishing
1:00:54
and there's not as much demand to buy homes
1:00:56
, prices of the homes generally decrease and
1:00:58
then , once that demand or the supply goes
1:01:00
down , you know , demand goes back up and
1:01:03
then the price goes back up . So it's a really
1:01:05
interesting concept and just general
1:01:07
economics and finance in general
1:01:09
. But it really just shows you if there's
1:01:12
a demand there , you can really price
1:01:14
it whatever the hell you want . If you've got a product
1:01:16
and nobody knows about it , you're
1:01:18
probably going to have to , you know , lower your prices
1:01:20
to get people to buy it . But
1:01:23
then once it becomes super popular and everybody
1:01:25
wants it , you could charge whatever the hell you want for
1:01:27
it , because there's going to be a huge demand for it and
1:01:29
if there's a limited supply it's
1:01:31
game over , which also ties back into our last
1:01:34
episode of NFTs . Yeah , which is like
1:01:36
the whole limited edition side of things . And you
1:01:38
know , if you have a limited supply of something
1:01:40
, you can continue to increase the price of it , which
1:01:42
increases the value of it . You know , et cetera
1:01:44
, et cetera . So you know , I think all
1:01:47
currency and finances are kind of built
1:01:49
off that framework .
1:01:50
Yeah , one thing you kind of tied there together is
1:01:52
the real estate . I hate that
1:01:54
argument , though , because with real estate , it's like
1:01:57
you get something that is physical , and
1:01:59
with Bitcoin , you get nothing
1:02:01
. And this goes back to my
1:02:03
quote unquote boomerism of
1:02:06
hating Bitcoin
1:02:08
. It's like God damn it . I
1:02:10
fucking hate Bitcoin , man . There's no real fucking
1:02:12
value there . But what's the difference between that and
1:02:14
any other currency though ? There's , that's what I was about
1:02:16
to say . There's no difference , except
1:02:19
that people have put value in
1:02:21
the dollar . Don't get me wrong . If I woke
1:02:23
up tomorrow and everybody put value into Bitcoin
1:02:25
, you bet your ass I'm gonna
1:02:27
be like Bitcoin for life motherfuckers For
1:02:30
sure . But because the value
1:02:32
right there is , I just don't see a
1:02:34
majority of the world being like the
1:02:36
majority of the world . I can go anywhere on the planet
1:02:38
and spend a dollar . A US dollar
1:02:41
has value everywhere
1:02:43
, not all currencies . Like Zimbabwean
1:02:46
, I can't go to the convenience store and
1:02:49
spend whatever they call , you
1:02:51
know , zimbabwe currency or rupees
1:02:53
or whatever , even Canadian
1:02:55
money . I can't spend a Canadian dollar at
1:02:58
my convenience store , but I've been to Canada
1:03:00
and I've spent US dollars . I've been
1:03:02
to Europe and I've spent US dollars because
1:03:05
it's just accepted everywhere . It's
1:03:07
so crazy .
1:03:09
Yeah , I mean this kind of goes back to my
1:03:11
argument . With this whole
1:03:13
Bitcoin situation . You know
1:03:15
several episodes ago that we talked about
1:03:17
which is like okay , if you have
1:03:20
, if you're , I don't understand
1:03:22
how you can be pro crypto , got
1:03:24
an anti Bitcoin . It makes no
1:03:26
sense to me . I don't understand .
1:03:27
There's no utility . The utility is currency
1:03:29
.
1:03:30
Yeah , so is US dollar so
1:03:32
exactly . Yeah , but I understand that it's not widely
1:03:34
adopted at the moment . But if you believe
1:03:36
crypto in the long run is going to be
1:03:38
widely adopted , then Bitcoin is naturally
1:03:41
going to be widely adopted , which is going to increase its value
1:03:43
, increase its price . It's only got a certain
1:03:45
amount of you know , supply of it
1:03:47
, which is going to increase the demand of it .
1:03:49
It's like let me just say this
1:03:51
let's say , okay , I've
1:03:54
got , I'm about to start a basketball
1:03:56
team and I'm going to , you know , poll people
1:03:58
like hey , do you want
1:04:01
Joe Blow or
1:04:03
LeBron James ? Lebron James
1:04:05
, in this situation , is the
1:04:07
US dollar . He has a
1:04:09
perfect track record of
1:04:12
being an amazing basketball player
1:04:14
, similar to the US dollar
1:04:16
, has a great track record
1:04:18
of lasting this long and
1:04:21
showing that . Hey , we can , you
1:04:23
know , have an economy . A new
1:04:25
player coming in playing LeBron
1:04:27
James likely is going to lose
1:04:30
right , unless you happen to be
1:04:32
a LeBron James yourself , which the
1:04:34
odds of that happening pretty
1:04:36
slim to none . I think that Bitcoin
1:04:38
, how they come in at the same time
1:04:41
as US dollar , then it would be a flip
1:04:43
of the coin . It would just be on who's adopting
1:04:45
what . But to challenge the dollar
1:04:47
as soon as the dollar goes digital
1:04:50
, I don't it . The government
1:04:52
is going to force their digital dollar . They
1:04:54
are going to want to deter people from Bitcoin . There's always
1:04:56
going to be Bitcoin maxis and you know
1:04:59
what ? Bitcoin has a whopping
1:05:01
one . What billion dollar
1:05:03
market cap ? How
1:05:06
much ? What is the market cap ? Are not me ? No , one billion
1:05:08
, I'm in a hundred billion
1:05:10
, but okay , but I mean , how much is it like ?
1:05:12
I don't know , I think it's like five hundred billion
1:05:14
, honestly , yeah .
1:05:15
I think the peak like all of crypto
1:05:17
was like valued less than you
1:05:19
know Microsoft , and it's just like
1:05:21
we're talking pennies
1:05:23
, man , we're talking no money whatsoever
1:05:26
when it really boils down to that actual
1:05:28
global economy . Bitcoin is
1:05:30
trying to challenge every currency
1:05:32
. At the same time , it's trying to say , hey , I'm
1:05:34
a currency of myself and
1:05:36
that I'm fine with that . It can be a currency
1:05:39
of itself , but there's no utility
1:05:41
behind that currency other than the fact that it's a currency
1:05:43
and it can buy things , whereas , like
1:05:46
a theorem , can act as a
1:05:48
currency but also has a lot
1:05:50
of utility . Matic same thing
1:05:52
you can use it as a currency . You have it as a utility
1:05:55
. I'm not saying that I think
1:05:57
those Long term are going to be
1:05:59
extremely successful , but I do like
1:06:01
to put my odds in these
1:06:04
things that are more than just a currency .
1:06:06
Yeah , I mean , I get that , but in
1:06:08
my opinion , at the end of the day , just Bitcoin comes with
1:06:11
a viewer bullish on crypto in general Over
1:06:13
the next five years you have to be bullish
1:06:15
on Bitcoin like . I don't understand how you cannot
1:06:17
be , you know .
1:06:19
I think Bitcoin was like you know .
1:06:21
It's almost like in the stock market being bullish on the
1:06:23
stock market but then being bearish on
1:06:25
all the tech stocks . It's like , well , the tech stock
1:06:27
way like 30% of the market
1:06:29
.
1:06:30
So that was a terrible example , because I could easily shut
1:06:32
that down . I mean dot-com bubble
1:06:34
. You know you're gonna have
1:06:36
a bubble burst . Like what , if okay , here's
1:06:38
a prime example not anytime soon .
1:06:40
I'm talking like next five years .
1:06:41
Let's , let me just throw me down next
1:06:43
five years , like that . This goes
1:06:46
back to TA in news where it's like hindsight
1:06:48
, it's like I proved my point and you're like oh wait , no
1:06:51
.
1:06:51
I said a second ago . I said and if
1:06:53
you're bullish on crypto in the next five years , you
1:06:56
can't not be . I'll take you
1:06:58
five years . Good thing this . We about to
1:07:00
play this back .
1:07:01
I Guess what my point
1:07:03
is like . Look , you know , I definitely
1:07:05
think that Bitcoin is going to go
1:07:08
up if crypto goes up . I'm not arguing
1:07:10
that and I'm not arguing that Bitcoin is gonna be
1:07:12
here for the long term . I'm just saying like
1:07:14
I don't like to invest in
1:07:16
things that I Personally don't
1:07:19
believe in . I mean shit , man
1:07:21
. I mean I think Philip Morris
1:07:23
as a company is gonna last a long
1:07:26
time , but I don't smoke cigarettes
1:07:28
and I don't like to support smoking
1:07:30
cigarettes , and so I just don't buy
1:07:32
into it . But do I think it's gonna be a good
1:07:34
, stable stock for a long
1:07:36
time ? Yeah , I probably will be , and
1:07:39
it has been for a very long time . So
1:07:41
there are , I guess , like ways that you can
1:07:43
spin it as an investor . But for
1:07:46
me it's just like I think that the potential
1:07:48
growth like if Bitcoin is
1:07:50
500 billion , even if
1:07:52
it eventually goes to its peak , which
1:07:54
what I think was close to a trillion dollar valuation
1:07:57
how can it 10x from
1:07:59
there , whereas things like Matic
1:08:01
can easily 10x from
1:08:03
now and from there ?
1:08:05
Yeah , I mean I get that from a market cap standpoint . Yeah
1:08:07
, I mean it's hard to sit here and say , like
1:08:09
you know , if Bitcoin has a 500 billion
1:08:12
dollar market cap right now , 10xing that
1:08:14
, I mean that's an astronomical number . And
1:08:16
then when you compare that to the stock market
1:08:18
right now , I mean you're talking bigger numbers
1:08:20
than any of the Individual
1:08:22
stocks combined in
1:08:24
Bitcoin , which I think that's a long , long
1:08:27
, long , long ways off . But at
1:08:29
the end of the day , in my opinion , is like if you're gonna
1:08:31
be bullish on crypto , you kind of have to . Just
1:08:33
Bitcoin comes with that . It's just part of
1:08:35
the , you know , it's part of the package
1:08:37
deal with crypto . So , and
1:08:39
I think , over time , I think Bitcoin will be accepted
1:08:41
a little bit more and more frequently
1:08:43
, and I don't really think it's that different from any
1:08:46
other currency that's out there , except
1:08:48
the fact that there's a limited supply of it , which
1:08:50
obviously , in my opinion , is in its favor
1:08:52
compared to the you know Inflation
1:08:54
and diminishing returns that you get from other currencies
1:08:56
.
1:08:57
I think it'll be made to seem like
1:08:59
it's a novelty . I think the Governments
1:09:02
around the world are Bitcoin is not
1:09:04
good for them , like it's not good for China
1:09:06
, it's not good for US , it's not good for India
1:09:08
, it's not good for any second
1:09:11
or first world country , the countries that
1:09:13
it boosts the most , our third world and
1:09:15
beyond 100% .
1:09:16
And unless you're like what was it Venezuela
1:09:19
that bought in at like 69k .
1:09:22
Ouch , and this is , I mean , I hate
1:09:24
to say , but that's a prime example of why
1:09:26
countries don't want Bitcoin in
1:09:28
their ecosystem . They don't want their
1:09:31
citizens to lose that
1:09:33
money , not putting it into
1:09:35
their economy . If they lose it in US
1:09:37
dollars like if they go to a casino and
1:09:39
lose All of their wealth
1:09:41
in one night that still
1:09:43
goes to the economy . The casino is gonna
1:09:46
have to pay taxes on that . The
1:09:48
casino is gonna do something with that . But
1:09:50
it , when it goes to Bitcoin , you know
1:09:52
, especially when a government of the third
1:09:55
world country is using it , it's like we
1:09:57
don't know what's happening with that . I
1:09:59
mean we don't know anything of what's
1:10:01
happening with , but I mean that's the argument of
1:10:03
like what's good about Crypto
1:10:05
is like there isn't that's
1:10:07
why a lot of these countries are pushing their own , you
1:10:10
know , digitalized token or whatever
1:10:12
. Yeah , and that's kind of what I think is gonna happen
1:10:14
. I think every currency that
1:10:16
exists today is it gonna be digital
1:10:18
100% . Yeah , that's definitely happening , so
1:10:20
then Bitcoin becomes another
1:10:22
currency .
1:10:23
Yeah , I mean it's gonna be interesting to see . Maybe that's
1:10:25
a topic for another podcast episode . But it's
1:10:27
gonna be interesting to see what the outlook
1:10:30
is in the next five to ten years
1:10:32
of , you know , finance
1:10:34
. If you know , all these countries have
1:10:36
their own Digitalized token . What
1:10:38
happens to like actual crypto
1:10:41
? Yeah , at that point .
1:10:42
Yeah , I still can't get over the fact that
1:10:44
I said that Bitcoin has was valued
1:10:46
at one billion , and then I said
1:10:48
here and looked at you like you're an idiot . That's embarrassing
1:10:50
this guy not getting what I'm saying , like
1:10:52
. I was like All
1:10:56
right , folks , I think this is a good place to
1:10:58
wrap up . Yeah , again , if you'd like
1:11:00
to , you can follow the crumbs on our socials
1:11:02
, at baking profits at
1:11:05
the bread maker , at breadbites , add
1:11:07
D5 donut and again have
1:11:09
a warm until next time .
1:11:10
Have a good one later .
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More