Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
The Business of Biotech is produced by
0:02
Life Science Connect and its community
0:04
of learning , solving and sourcing
0:06
resources for biopharma decision
0:08
makers . If you're working on biologics
0:11
process development and manufacturing challenges
0:13
, you need to swing by bioprocessonlinecom
0:16
. If you're trying to stay ahead of the cell
0:18
or gene therapy curve , visit cellandgenecom
0:21
. When it's time to map out your clinical
0:24
course , let ClinicalLeadercom help
0:26
, and if optimizing outsourcing
0:29
decisions is what you're after , check out
0:31
OutsourcePharmacom . We're
0:33
Life Science Connect and we're here to help . Venture
0:40
philanthropy has remained one of the few bright
0:42
spots in an otherwise gloomy
0:44
biotech funding scene . Couple
0:47
that with rising unmet medical needs
0:49
in neurodegeneration and
0:51
the recent regulatory activity in
0:53
the Alzheimer's therapeutic space and
0:56
you've got a situation where the Alzheimer's
0:58
Drug Discovery Foundation's stock and
1:00
relevance are steadily rising
1:02
. The ADDF is
1:04
a venture philanthropy fund founded by
1:06
the Lauder family , as in Estee
1:09
, and supported generously by
1:11
the likes of Bill Gates , jeff Bezos
1:13
and the Dolby and Schwab families
1:15
. Its mission is to accelerate
1:18
the discovery of drugs to prevent , treat
1:20
and cure Alzheimer's disease , and
1:22
it does that by investing in biotechs
1:24
developing Alzheimer's therapeutics , much
1:27
like a venture capitalist would , then
1:29
directing its proceeds back into the fund
1:31
. I'm Matt Pillar . This is
1:33
the Business of Biotech and the opportunity
1:35
to sit down with ADDF Chief
1:37
Financial Officer and Head of Mission-Related
1:40
Investments , Karen Harris , in San Francisco
1:42
, was one I didn't take lightly . Her
1:45
perspective on Alzheimer's therapeutic
1:47
progress , the market , what's fundable
1:49
and why is one of a kind . Let's
1:52
give it a listen . I
1:54
want to start with the foundation . I want to
1:56
get an understanding of the mission
1:58
and the venture philanthropy model
2:01
. So typically my
2:03
interviews are with biotech CEOs
2:05
, the companies that are more than
2:07
likely interested in partnering
2:09
with you . I've only had a couple
2:11
of venture philanthropy leaders
2:14
on the show in the past , so
2:16
it's fascinating to me , though
2:18
I love the concept .
2:21
So tell me about that . No
2:23
, it's great to be here . There
2:25
are a handful of venture philanthropies , but
2:27
we're definitely a pretty unique
2:29
animal . So the mission of the
2:32
Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation
2:34
is to accelerate the development
2:37
of drugs to prevent
2:39
, treat and hopefully eventually
2:41
cure Alzheimer's disease . And
2:44
when we started
2:46
, we were set up as a
2:48
venture philanthropy by our founders
2:50
, which were Ronald and Leonard
2:53
Lauder , and then Dr Howard Fillett
2:55
, who's still there as our co-founder and chief
2:57
science officer . And they set us up
2:59
as a venture philanthropy , which means
3:01
instead of giving grants
3:03
to academia and to
3:05
biotechs , we actually
3:08
invest in them . So we
3:10
invest in biotechs the same way
3:12
a VC would invest in a biotech
3:15
we buy preferred stock or we
3:17
buy convertible debt or royalty
3:19
arrangements sometimes , and with
3:21
academia we have royalty arrangements
3:23
and what happens is the money that we get
3:25
back from returns goes
3:28
right back into the mission . But
3:30
I think donors seem to really like the
3:32
model and like to know that
3:34
their money is being used
3:37
efficiently and that we are getting some return
3:39
. And then that gets plowed right back
3:41
into ADDL .
3:43
Yeah , direct . I mean the
3:45
donors have to like the fact that there's a direct influence
3:47
on the real work , right
3:49
, yeah , yeah , no , absolutely .
3:51
And it gives us the opportunities to work with
3:53
biotechs , because it's kind
3:56
of awkward if you're a non-profit to
3:58
be handing money to biotech companies . So
4:01
I think this venture philanthropy model
4:03
where we invest in the biotechs , is
4:07
just a better way to go about
4:09
it for that type of thing .
4:11
Yeah , yeah . So and you're the
4:13
chief financial officer there . Tell
4:15
me about that role . Like what does the CFOs
4:17
sort of illustrate , what the CFO's
4:19
role ? Is in venture philanthropy .
4:22
Well , I feel
4:24
like I have two jobs . So I'm the CFO
4:26
and then I'm the head of mission-related
4:28
investing , and as the CFO
4:31
, it's really my job to make sure that
4:33
the donor's money gets
4:36
placed as efficiently
4:38
and
4:40
as well as possible into
4:43
these Alzheimer's companies
4:45
in order to accelerate a cure
4:47
.
4:49
No pressure there .
4:50
Yeah , we're so lucky in
4:52
that the Lauder family , at the end
4:54
of 2022 , gave us a
4:56
$200 million gift
4:58
to cover our operating expenses
5:00
for the next 15
5:02
to 20 years expenses
5:08
for the next 15 to 20 years . So I take that very seriously to really steward their
5:10
money to make sure it lasts for our operating costs as long as
5:12
possible . But it's a great position for
5:14
a CFO to be in so that I don't
5:16
have to worry about my operating costs
5:19
and all the donors'
5:21
money that gets donated to us
5:23
goes straight to the science , not
5:25
to our operating costs . So this
5:27
fact that all your money goes to research
5:30
. I think is a very attractive
5:32
thing .
5:33
Yeah , that is fantastic .
5:35
So that's the CFO job the
5:37
head of mission-related investing
5:39
is . Since we do invest in biotechs
5:42
, we have to structure the investments
5:44
and negotiate the deals
5:46
with the biotech companies , and
5:49
so I do all of the
5:51
structuring and the negotiations
5:53
of those deals . And
5:56
the reason that works so
5:58
well is I have an investment banking background
6:00
and so I'm able to use a lot
6:02
of that for structuring
6:05
these deals . When I was starting
6:07
out in investment banking , I worked
6:10
on a lot of biotech IPOs and
6:12
so a lot of that knowledge is
6:14
very helpful when dealing with these biotech
6:17
companies , and it's such a treat to
6:19
work with these companies . They are
6:22
just so dedicated and
6:24
they just don't give up . It's been hard
6:26
to raise money this year , and
6:29
I'm I'm really just
6:31
always super impressed by
6:33
their commitment yeah , yeah
6:36
, particularly .
6:36
I mean you know I've interviewed hundreds
6:38
of them , biotech execs , and you
6:41
know , uh , the commitment and
6:43
the altruism , it's all on full display it
6:45
seems like that's even ratcheted up a notch
6:47
in the alzheimer's space , because so many people are
6:49
, you know , have been affected by it and have
6:51
personal experience yeah , I
6:53
think that's true .
6:54
I think almost anybody
6:57
you talk to has
6:59
a mother-in-law or
7:01
a sister or an aunt or somebody
7:04
who's been touched by Alzheimer's and
7:06
I think the fact that you know , for 20
7:08
to 30 years there was no drug
7:10
approved and now we have
7:12
two that were , one
7:15
that has been approved by the FDA and
7:17
another from Eli Lilly
7:19
that's about to be and
7:21
so it's a really exciting time in the
7:23
Alzheimer's field right now , and so it's
7:25
a really exciting time in the Alzheimer's
7:27
field right now ?
7:33
Sure is . Yeah , you mentioned that prior to ADDF you were
7:35
in investment banking and I'm curious about that . I looked at your background
7:37
for the interview and it's intriguing to me
7:39
. You were in pretty big
7:41
name investment banking after you earned your
7:44
Columbia undergrad in economics
7:46
and your Stanford MBA in finance
7:49
. When I look at your career at
7:51
least on paper , on LinkedIn right , the latter
7:53
half of it seems like it's very focused
7:55
on endeavors that are far
7:58
from you know getting rich and making rich
8:00
people richer , yes . Tell
8:02
me about that . I look at Mount Sinai Adolescent Health
8:04
Center , east Harlem Tutorial Program and now the ADDF Tell me about that . I went to Mount Sinai Adolescent Health Center , east Harlem
8:06
Tutorial Program and now the ADDF Tell
8:08
me about that . Yeah .
8:09
So I left
8:12
UBS in 2012
8:14
to join a
8:16
hedge fund and after
8:19
a while several
8:21
months I really came to the conclusion
8:24
that the world did not need this other
8:26
hedge fund , that we have enough hedge
8:28
funds , and I didn't really feel that we
8:31
were going to be so much better than
8:33
anybody else , and my dad
8:35
had done a lot of non-profit work after
8:37
he retired and so
8:39
I investigated
8:41
. I took some courses at
8:44
NYU New York University in
8:46
philanthropy and I
8:48
liked it , so I decided I would try
8:51
it out , and I think that
8:53
I really felt
8:55
that I wanted to do mission related work
8:57
at that point , and I
9:00
first went into development
9:02
, and I don't really know why
9:05
I did that . I think I did that because I liked the
9:07
classes , which
9:09
is a very silly way to
9:11
pick anything , and
9:14
I worked at the Mount Sinai Adolescent
9:16
Health Center eventually as their director
9:19
of development and I
9:22
. It was very interesting
9:24
, I liked it , but I missed finance
9:26
and so then I moved to
9:28
the East Harlem Tutorial Program , which
9:30
is charter schools in
9:32
East Harlem , and
9:34
was the CFO there and
9:37
then ultimately got recruited to
9:39
ADVF . But I'm very happy
9:41
to have worked at these social services
9:44
organizations for
9:46
several years .
9:47
Yeah , I can imagine that's fulfilling
9:49
, Much more fulfilling than running
9:51
a hedge fund . The
9:54
ADDF recruitment . How did that come to pass ?
9:57
You know it was COVID and
9:59
I just got a call from a recruiter
10:01
and I think I had met
10:03
her once before and
10:05
she just how she just called
10:08
and I had interviews completely
10:10
online and I
10:12
think it was a year before I met
10:14
the CEO in person because it was like
10:16
smack in the middle of the really
10:18
bad COVID . But
10:21
I thought this would be super interesting
10:23
and it was
10:25
different . But the whole investment
10:28
part of it- was really interesting to me
10:30
.
10:30
For sure , yeah , kind of brought you back to that
10:32
world that
10:34
you had been in .
10:35
Yeah , it's kind of the perfect job because
10:38
I get to really match
10:40
the investment banking skills
10:42
as well as the CFO
10:45
skills , so I really can't think
10:47
of a more perfect job for me .
10:49
Yeah , that's great , so I
10:52
want to talk a little bit more about
10:54
ADDF and what it's supporting . As
10:57
you know , the bulk of our audience are biotech
10:59
execs and CEOs , many of whom founders
11:02
, many of whom worked in the Alzheimer's space . You
11:04
guys support the events of both diagnostics
11:06
and therapeutics .
11:20
Yeah , we're involved in diagnost
11:22
that are
11:24
developing drugs based on the biology
11:27
of aging , so drugs that will
11:29
treat the underlying diseases
11:31
of aging , with the idea
11:33
that if we can treat that , then
11:35
we can ultimately
11:38
reduce Alzheimer's , because Alzheimer's
11:40
ultimately is a disease of aging
11:43
. And we
11:45
decided about 10 years
11:47
ago not to focus on
11:49
amyloid which is what these new
11:51
drugs are because pharma
11:54
was focusing on amyloid and pouring
11:56
tons of money into it . So we wanted to
11:58
invest where we thought that our money
12:01
would be more useful in
12:03
novel ideas and , as it
12:05
turns out , where the science has moved
12:07
now is towards the biology
12:09
of aging , because these
12:11
amyloid drugs are
12:14
, you know , shown they
12:16
reduce amyloid , but I still
12:18
think the jury's out as to
12:20
how effective . You know , maybe they'll slow
12:22
cognitive decline by
12:25
30% , but that's
12:27
not enough , and we think that a
12:29
lot of these other ideas are
12:31
going to come to fruition and ultimately
12:34
it's going to be a combination therapy
12:37
or precision medicine
12:39
that is going to cure Alzheimer's
12:41
. Much in the way of the cancer space does
12:44
it with their immunotherapy
12:46
. So , um , so
12:48
we really take in uh , they
12:50
, my CEO likes to say
12:52
shots on goal , and we've
12:54
taken a lot of shots on goal . And
12:56
our um co-founder
12:59
and chief science officer is an absolute
13:02
. We call
13:04
him the truffle hound because
13:06
he just seems to be able to seek
13:08
out the most interesting biotech
13:10
companies , and we've
13:13
done quite well with some of them
13:15
. We invested
13:18
early on in a
13:20
program that was licensed by
13:22
Amavid or by Avid
13:24
Pharmaceuticals , and then the company
13:27
was bought by Eli Lilly and
13:29
it was the first PET scan to
13:31
actually be able to identify
13:33
amyloid , because before that
13:36
there was no way to really tell
13:38
if you had Alzheimer's except
13:40
for either a cognitive
13:42
interview , which doesn't you know
13:44
, that's not very scientific or
13:47
else an autopsy after death . So
13:49
that was one of the things that
13:51
we invested in early
13:54
on , as well as blood tests
13:56
for the
13:58
diagnosis , for
14:04
the diagnosis , and I think now , with these anti-amyloid drugs , there's going to be a need to figure out
14:06
who has Alzheimer's in an easier way than the
14:08
PET scan , and I think a lot of blood tests
14:10
are being developed now , some
14:12
already marketed . So , that's really
14:14
. That's diagnostics as well
14:17
, and that's the diagnostics part of the business
14:19
. And there we have
14:22
a hundred million dollars that
14:24
was given , donated
14:27
to us from the Gates from
14:30
Bill Gates and other philanthropists
14:32
, leonard Lauder and
14:34
we are using that money
14:37
to try to accelerate
14:39
the
14:41
detection and diagnosis of Alzheimer's
14:44
, with the thought that the earlier you
14:46
can detect it , the better
14:48
off you're going to be and the
14:50
more probable that you could get a treatment
14:52
that would work . We
14:55
have invested in therapeutics this
14:57
year $34 million
14:59
. We'll invest $45 million next
15:01
year . And then
15:03
we have the diagnostic accelerator
15:05
money to invest . But our biomarker
15:08
team and our therapeutics
15:11
team talk all the time
15:13
and are completely sort
15:15
of married at the hip because
15:18
the two really go together .
15:19
Yeah , yeah , is , is , is
15:22
the ? Is the truffle hunting more difficult
15:24
on the therapeutic side than it is on
15:26
the diagnostic side ?
15:28
Um , yeah
15:30
, you know it's different and
15:33
I think therapeutics take a lot longer
15:36
to come to market , so you have to wait longer
15:38
. Um , but I think the returns are
15:40
ultimately better in the end
15:42
. So I think if
15:45
somebody comes up with the therapeutic
15:47
for Alzheimer's that really works
15:49
, that's going to make a lot
15:51
more money than the diagnostic test
15:53
that told you that a person
15:56
would have Alzheimer's . But
15:58
I do think that it's quicker to market
16:00
the diagnostic tools and it's
16:02
absolutely essential If you think about
16:05
it . Like , imagine if
16:07
we didn't have a way to tell
16:09
whether you have high blood pressure .
16:11
Right .
16:11
And and with it really helps
16:14
in the clinical trials , because they
16:16
used to do clinical trials and
16:18
a quarter of the people
16:21
wouldn't even have alzheimer's because there
16:23
was no way to really know , you just guess
16:25
. So , um , it's very important
16:28
when you're doing the clinical trials
16:30
and also when you're measuring the
16:32
endpoint to see if your therapy is effective
16:34
, to have a good biomarker
16:36
to be able to actually know
16:39
whether your drug is doing
16:41
the appropriate work .
16:42
Sure , and as those drugs become more
16:44
precision , presumably
16:46
the diagnostic tools
16:48
are going to be key because precision
16:51
drugs and
16:53
their correlation to stage of diagnosis
16:56
. They've got to work hand in hand .
16:58
Absolutely , absolutely . They've
17:05
got to work hand in hand , absolutely , and that
17:07
is why the Diagnostics Accelerator is trying to find novel biomarkers
17:09
. So there might be a biomarker
17:11
for inflammation , for vascular
17:14
disease , because these
17:17
things are other aspects
17:19
of Alzheimer's that people
17:22
have and will ultimately need to be
17:24
measured .
17:26
So , speaking of the therapeutic focus
17:28
, do you have any favorite
17:30
horses in the race in terms of modalities
17:33
?
17:34
Yes . So , as I said , we invest
17:37
in companies that are focused on the biology
17:39
of aging and , in terms of the
17:41
stage that we're interested
17:44
in , it's typically now the IND
17:46
enabling stage or proof
17:48
of concept , phase
17:50
one , proof of concept trials
17:53
and then early phase two , because
17:55
that's where our money is going to
17:57
be the most meaningful . You
17:59
know , then later , for the phase
18:01
three trials , they're going to need
18:04
hundreds of millions of dollars
18:06
and we can't . We don't have
18:08
that money , so we're trying to invest
18:10
in ideas that ultimately can
18:12
raise future money from
18:15
the VCs and from pharma
18:17
and be
18:19
able to continue
18:22
on after , after our donations
18:24
done .
18:24
But we do give a lot of follow-on donations
18:27
as well when
18:29
you first uh survey opportunities
18:32
uh or entertain opportunities
18:34
other well , you know , let me let me stop there
18:36
and and focus there for a minute , like are
18:39
you typically hunting , or are
18:41
you typically being courted , or
18:43
is it a combination of the two ?
18:45
um , it's a combination of both . So
18:47
we are always
18:49
looking for areas of our
18:51
portfolio of investments where
18:54
maybe we're lacking , like oh
18:56
, maybe you know , here's an idea
18:58
where we don't have any
19:00
drugs being tested for
19:02
this in our portfolio , like , maybe it's
19:04
gene therapy , so we
19:06
would be actively
19:09
looking . But also
19:11
we have several RFPs that
19:13
we do and we have a lot
19:15
of incoming requests . You can imagine
19:18
, in this down market , all
19:21
the demand and what I would say about
19:24
our model is
19:26
, while we do want the returns
19:28
that VCs get , we don't have limited
19:30
partners and we
19:32
focus the most important
19:35
thing for us as a science and
19:37
we hope to make a good return , but
19:40
we're not
19:42
so much focused
19:44
on the returns as we are on the science
19:47
. And so in this difficult
19:49
market , we've been able to fund
19:51
companies that have trouble finding money
19:53
anywhere else , that
19:56
our scientific
19:59
diligence is so admired
20:01
at ADDF that often
20:03
we are like the stamp of approval
20:06
that enables these companies to get
20:08
future funding . And a lot of the time
20:10
people will say , well
20:13
, can we sign your contract early , because
20:15
the next venture partner
20:17
won't come in until you've
20:19
actually signed . So we see a lot
20:22
of that . Yeah , that's interesting .
20:25
What does the scientific validation component
20:27
look like ? You have like a board . Yeah
20:29
, so we have .
20:31
I'm going to get the number wrong , but I think
20:33
it's like we have like 19
20:35
PhD scientists
20:38
on board and so the first investigation
20:41
is an internal one and
20:43
then if we like an idea
20:45
and we think it will fit well
20:48
in our portfolio , then we have
20:51
outside reviewers review it . These
20:53
are prominent people in the Alzheimer's field
20:56
and then after that
20:58
it goes to our scientific
21:01
investment committee , who you
21:04
know , study the idea and vote to approve
21:06
or not to approve . So that that is
21:09
our scientific method . And
21:11
you know , obviously over
21:13
the years we've developed such an expertise
21:15
in Alzheimer's specifically
21:18
that you know
21:20
I think a lot of the vcs really
21:22
admired that knowledge yeah
21:24
, um
21:26
, as far as scientific analysis of potential
21:29
partners goes , have you noticed
21:31
any trends or do you have any preferences
21:34
in terms of you mentioned gene therapy ?
21:35
for instance like you know , is
21:38
small mall more attractive
21:40
than a biologic , more attractive
21:42
than a gene therapy , like any
21:44
trends there , or are you pretty agnostic ?
21:47
Um , I think we are pretty
21:49
agnostic in sort of this . We
21:51
think they're going to be a lot of targets and
21:55
we like to have a
21:57
good range of things
21:59
. A couple of companies
22:01
, for example , like we
22:04
invest in Luxio
22:06
Therapeutics , which happens to have just
22:09
presented at the JP
22:11
Morgan Conference , and they're
22:14
a genetic medicine company
22:16
, a clinical stage genetic medicine
22:19
. So that's one company
22:21
that we invested in early in 2014
22:23
, where we
22:26
actually invested when
22:28
that , when the idea was at Weill Cornell
22:30
university , and then
22:32
it it somehow got
22:35
into . It became a company Lexio
22:37
or Alexio bought it .
22:39
I don't know how .
22:40
And then it it
22:44
just went public . So we made another investment
22:46
in 2020 and now it's gone public
22:48
. So
23:07
that's , that's one company
23:09
and you know it's
23:12
very rewarding . Toibrin , which is supposed
23:14
to be bad for
23:16
neurons and cognitive
23:19
declines , and now
23:21
again in 2023
23:25
, and they are doing their
23:28
Series A right now and
23:30
are trying to fund the Phase
23:32
2 study .
23:33
Yeah , that's great . You
23:36
talked a little bit about how ADDS
23:39
support is seen as a stand-up , a sought-after
23:42
sort of stand-up of approval . Stamp
23:48
of approval . Um , do you look for ? You might have touched on this , but I'm curious about
23:50
how it's maybe changed in the recent you know the recent , uh , financial
23:53
climate . Do you , do you look for
23:55
companies that have , like you know , your
23:57
? Your reputation is often determined
24:00
by the company you keep right , do you look for ? Companies
24:02
that have um specific
24:04
business development , support from specific
24:07
firms or even pharma
24:09
companies .
24:11
Um well , we we typically
24:13
would invest before the pharma companies
24:15
would come in , and we're really trying to
24:17
get these companies ready for pharma
24:20
. So no . I wouldn't say
24:22
so much . I wouldn't say
24:24
so much , I wouldn't really
24:26
say that so much . I think we're
24:28
investing 100%
24:30
based on what we think
24:32
is the validity of the science .
24:35
Yeah , all right , once you
24:37
validate the science and
24:39
strike up a partnership , is it
24:42
pretty ? Maybe not monetarily
24:44
, but is it pretty cookie cutter . Like , is it pretty automated
24:47
?
24:55
Yeah . So once the science is validated , then it comes to the . We negotiate the deal
24:57
and then it comes to our investment committee . So we do have an investment
24:59
committee that has to approve the terms of
25:01
the deal and they're really the ones
25:04
who want to see that we're getting
25:06
quote venture like returns
25:08
, and that we're . We've actually structured
25:10
and negotiated a good deal
25:13
and it's
25:15
actually not cookie
25:17
cutter because ADDF , we
25:19
don't invest directly
25:22
. Well , we do , we buy preferred
25:24
stock , but that's that
25:26
money that we give a company has to go
25:28
to a specific project with the
25:30
budget and a work plan , and so
25:32
we're in very close touch , helping
25:34
the companies design the
25:37
projects and design the clinical
25:39
trials , and we help them with IP
25:41
and with business plans . So
25:44
we're having a very close relationship
25:46
even before we approve the
25:48
proposal and then , once it's approved
25:51
and once they start working , doing
25:54
the work , we stay in touch
25:56
with them very closely to see
25:58
how it's going and how we can set them
26:00
up for success , and
26:02
even after
26:05
. We've done a lot of follow-on deals this
26:07
year and we
26:09
tend to like to do that and
26:11
to really help our companies prosper
26:14
.
26:14
That's cool . What is the sort of the I
26:17
don't know day-to-day , not necessarily
26:20
day-to-day , but that sort of relationship management
26:22
aspect ? Are there like customer
26:24
relationship managers at ADDF that work with these
26:26
folks ? We're a nonprofit .
26:31
No , it's really the science teams
26:33
that work with them . I work with them if there
26:35
are any finance related issues
26:37
or anything related
26:40
to the structure of the deal . Do
26:42
they need an extension on their convertible ? No
26:44
, you know those kind of things , but the
26:46
scientists are really working with them
26:49
on
26:51
a day-to-day basis . So , with
26:53
regards to how the project is going
26:55
, yeah , the
26:57
venture philanthropy model in
27:00
general .
27:05
how has the recent economic headwinds
27:08
impacted the venture
27:10
philanthropists in general ? Has
27:13
it been a are you fairly insulated
27:16
, or is it impacted ?
27:18
Well , what I would say is it's
27:20
actually made the venture philanthropy
27:22
model that much more important . And
27:25
we do a lot of what I call bridge financing
27:27
, which is , you know this
27:29
say you have a company and they
27:31
needed to raise their series A
27:34
by January , or else they're
27:36
going to run out of money and can't complete
27:38
the next trial . And
27:40
here it's happened quite
27:42
a number of times in this
27:44
market where you know the
27:47
companies are unable to complete
27:49
the Series A on time , they just can't
27:51
get the investors . And so we
27:53
provide bridge financing , which is
27:56
usually in the form of a convertible note
27:58
, which is debt that's going to convert into
28:00
equity and basically
28:02
bridge them over , to tie
28:04
them over to when they're able to
28:06
finally close their preferred round
28:08
. And we've done a lot of that this
28:10
year , and we just need
28:13
to be careful that the company
28:15
does have enough cash to
28:17
continue on and finish our project
28:20
and ultimately will
28:22
have results that will draw
28:24
in the money of venture
28:27
capital and of pharma
28:29
potentially , or they could
28:31
go to the public markets . But I
28:33
think that ADDF's stamp
28:35
of approval and this
28:37
bridge financing , it's
28:40
something we can do because , once
28:42
again , we don't need the venture
28:45
return . We
28:48
really want the science to progress
28:50
.
28:51
Is bridge financing a risky
28:53
proposition ?
28:56
It is a risky proposition because
28:58
you don't know if the
29:01
series A or B or
29:03
C is actually going to get done . So
29:05
yes , it's definitely a risky proposition
29:08
and ADDF can take that risk
29:10
when others don't want to
29:12
, and I think that ADDF
29:15
, by taking that risk , helps venture
29:18
firms feel comfortable about
29:20
investing . But it is definitely
29:23
a risk and the investment committee is
29:25
very careful
29:28
about making sure that that company
29:31
has a plan to
29:33
be able to stay
29:35
in business and continue and
29:37
finish our project . So usually
29:40
what we like to see is that there's some
29:42
inflection point coming up where
29:44
they're going to be results announced and
29:47
therefore they can draw in
29:49
additional capital okay
29:52
, um , what is your
29:54
uh general
29:56
sense for ?
29:58
uh , you know , obviously , in this environment
30:00
, karen , like everyone's sunshine
30:03
and roses , it's jp mor
30:05
. You know everyone's everyone's happy
30:07
, but I'm
30:10
picking up on some genuine sentiment
30:13
that things are improving . You
30:15
know what's your , what's
30:18
your take .
30:19
Yeah , I think that it has been extremely
30:21
difficult . It's been a very
30:24
bad market . The public markets have
30:26
been terrible . The IPO markets are
30:28
pretty closed up
30:30
until maybe the fourth quarter
30:32
of this year and
30:34
it's really hard to
30:36
get venture investors to invest
30:38
now because they weren't able
30:40
to take their companies public , so
30:43
they're having to put money into
30:45
their existing companies rather than new
30:47
companies . So , as a new company , to get
30:49
a lead investor is
30:51
really really hard right now . I
30:54
think things are looking
30:57
up . There's been an
30:59
uptick in the biotech index
31:01
in the last few weeks
31:04
really , with a lot of mergers
31:06
that have been announced , and what's
31:08
interesting for us is we've
31:11
seen two mergers , one
31:13
from Merck
31:16
of Carraway Therapeutics and
31:18
one from AbbVie of a company called
31:20
Cereval both CNS companies
31:22
and those are among the most risky
31:25
, and so that leads me to believe
31:27
that somehow the
31:30
valuations are low enough that the
31:32
market is going to turn . So we've seen
31:34
a lot of M&A . There's been a lot of M&A
31:36
announced at JP Morgan and
31:38
interest rates are projected to come
31:40
down , and I think if
31:42
that happens , then it'll
31:46
be a big help to these biotechs
31:48
and ultimately people will start investing
31:51
again . I mean the valuations . I
31:53
would say that the boom years of
31:55
20 and 21 were maybe a little
31:58
over-exuberant and
32:00
the valuations were too high
32:02
and a lot of companies were able to go
32:04
public that shouldn't be public companies
32:06
that are now trading at a
32:08
dollar a share . So I
32:11
think that there's that overhang in the
32:13
market . But I do think we've seen
32:15
two IPOs of CNS
32:17
related companies . One
32:20
is Lexio , another is Nomura
32:22
Therapeutics , and there
32:25
again , you know they're both trading now above
32:27
issue price . So that leads me to believe
32:30
that the market is going
32:32
to get better . I think it's going to take a little
32:34
while , but I think by the end of 2024
32:37
and 2025
32:39
, things are going to be better .
32:41
And how does that like ?
32:42
how do you ?
32:43
envision that hopeful
32:45
improvement impacting ADDF
32:48
. What does that do for you ?
32:51
Well , one thing
32:53
that does for us is to
32:55
help us
32:58
get returns . So
33:00
basically we call them mission-related
33:02
returns . So if the public
33:04
markets turn and a
33:07
lot of our companies can do initial public
33:09
offerings , we typically , once
33:11
an investment becomes liquid , we
33:13
sell . We make sure we
33:15
sell in a way that we won't hurt the
33:17
stock price of the company , so very
33:20
slowly over time . But you know
33:22
, we believe that once we
33:24
gain liquidity we should sell and
33:26
then make investments in other
33:28
science . And
33:30
so you
33:32
know , I think that we'll
33:35
get a lot . We will see a lot
33:37
of M&A , where
33:40
we will get returns , or we will
33:42
see IPOs where we're
33:44
going to get returns . So
33:46
we're hoping for that that money
33:49
gets plowed right back into the
33:51
science . And also with
33:53
the new , with the new drug
33:56
approvals for
33:58
Alzheimer's , we're seeing an increased
34:01
interest in just CNS
34:03
related work
34:05
and we're I've
34:07
seen from the VCs an interest
34:10
to get educated
34:12
on the neurodegenerative
34:14
disease and we call them neurocurious
34:16
VCs and
34:18
I think you know a lot
34:20
of VCs wouldn't invest in the
34:23
neuro world because it was too
34:25
risky and I think maybe they're going
34:27
to start coming , coming in now .
34:29
Yeah , well , I mean the , the , I
34:31
guess , association with anti-aging
34:34
. But the anti-aging space I mean that
34:36
that's a , that's a hot space
34:38
right now and I can see , you know
34:40
, the , the VC appetite in
34:42
that space and crazy saying it has things to turn
34:45
around too . So it's . It's a good corollary
34:47
right yes .
34:48
The anti that space and criticizing as things turn around
34:50
too . So it's a good corollary , right ? Yes , the anti aging space is really interesting
34:53
and I was hoping to hear more about it at jp morgan . Uh , we didn't
34:55
, but I think you
34:57
know everybody seems dollars
35:00
a year in anti-aging and
35:25
we are trying to get some of the sovereign
35:27
wealth money to go towards
35:29
alzheimer's , which is
35:31
a disease of aging . So , um
35:33
, we , we are trying
35:35
to get some of that money into
35:38
alzheimer's .
35:39
Yeah , very good . When you come
35:41
to an investor conference like this
35:43
, you know you're in a unique position cfo
35:45
of venture philanthropy , uh at
35:47
atf .
35:48
What's , what's your ?
35:49
what's your goal , what's your mo here ?
35:51
so I'm very interested
35:53
to see what the public
35:55
companies are doing in the neurodegenerative
35:58
space . So I make sure to
36:00
see those companies . You know to
36:02
see biogen , who is
36:05
introducing one of their al's drug
36:07
, and Lilly to talk about their drug
36:09
. So I'm interested
36:12
in seeing those companies . I'm also very
36:14
interested in understanding what
36:16
they think when they think the market's
36:18
going to return , because
36:20
you know , I
36:22
have ADDF can have an opinion
36:24
, but I'm very interested in the investor's
36:27
opinion as to when the market's going
36:29
to come back . And then I've been meeting
36:31
a lot of the CEOs of
36:33
either companies we already fund
36:35
or companies that
36:37
are in the process of
36:39
applying to get funding
36:42
from us . So I've been meeting with a
36:44
lot of them as well as
36:46
some people on the venture side
36:48
, because one thing we try to
36:50
do for our companies is to
36:52
get additional venture money
36:54
into them . So it's
36:56
very helpful at ADDF to have
36:58
venture connections so
37:01
that we can help our companies raise
37:03
money .
37:04
Yeah , what's the appropriate way
37:06
for a company who's interested in working with
37:08
you to ? What's the channel to
37:11
get the conversation started ?
37:13
So I would say that you
37:15
know we're interested in companies focused
37:18
on the biology of aging at the
37:20
clinical stage
37:22
and if you fit
37:24
that model , reach out to
37:26
our scientists . We
37:30
have several RFPs . So look at our website and
37:32
we really do encourage people
37:34
to start the conversation . We're
37:37
interested in unique
37:39
, innovative science and our
37:42
scientists are always happy to talk
37:44
to you .
37:45
Good , If I were a
37:47
better interviewer . What would I have ? Asked
37:49
you that I didn't About
37:53
ADDF ?
37:56
Let me think about that .
38:00
Well , if you have to think about it , I must have done a pretty good job
38:02
.
38:02
Yeah , you know , I think you did a great job
38:04
and I'm not sure what
38:06
else you could have asked me . But , yeah , I think it's did a great job and
38:08
I I'm not sure , uh , what else you could have asked me . But , um , yeah , I
38:10
think it's been a great discussion and I'm
38:12
very happy for people
38:14
to know more about venture philanthropy
38:17
. And also , you know , I want
38:19
to really help our
38:21
biotech companies who
38:23
are doing research in alzheimer's . It's such
38:25
an important area . And these
38:28
biotech companies are just
38:30
, you know , they never stop
38:32
working , and it's just very impressive
38:34
.
38:35
It is , and the work that you're doing
38:37
is very impressive too . I just recalled that
38:39
, as I said , I don't often have
38:41
venture philanthropists on the
38:43
show , but the last time I did was a couple of years
38:46
ago . I think it was the JDDF
38:48
Katie Alley . Oh , okay . You
38:50
know , Katie had always fascinated conversation
38:52
with her as well . I admire the work
38:54
that folks like you do , yeah
38:56
, and I encourage you to keep
38:59
up that work , and I wish you all the best
39:01
success in 24 .
39:02
Well , thank you so much . I really appreciate
39:04
having this conversation . It's
39:07
very fun .
39:09
Yeah , we'll get back together and do it again . You
39:11
know , maybe the next wave
39:13
of Alzheimer's approval .
39:15
We'll get into the effect . That would
39:17
be very interesting . Break some of that , yeah , and we're
39:19
looking forward to the next approval , so
39:21
absolutely .
39:22
Great , great Well . Karen Harris , pleasure
39:25
to meet you . Thank you for coming on the show . I'm
39:27
Matt Pillar and you just listened to the Business of
39:29
Biotech , the weekly podcast dedicated
39:32
to the builders of biotech . We
39:34
drop a new episode with a new exec every
39:36
Monday morning and I'd like you to join
39:38
our community of subscribers at BioprocessOnline . com
39:42
Apple Podcasts , spotify , google
39:44
Play or anywhere you get your podcasts You
39:52
can also subscribe to our never spammy , always insightful monthly newsletter at bioprocessonline . com/bob
39:55
. If you have feedback or topic
39:58
and guest suggestions , hit me up on LinkedIn
40:00
and let's chat and , as always , thanks
40:02
for listening .
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More