Podchaser Logo
Home
Funding Alzheimer's Tx Dev with ADDF's Karen Harris

Funding Alzheimer's Tx Dev with ADDF's Karen Harris

Released Monday, 1st April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Funding Alzheimer's Tx Dev with ADDF's Karen Harris

Funding Alzheimer's Tx Dev with ADDF's Karen Harris

Funding Alzheimer's Tx Dev with ADDF's Karen Harris

Funding Alzheimer's Tx Dev with ADDF's Karen Harris

Monday, 1st April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

The Business of Biotech is produced by

0:02

Life Science Connect and its community

0:04

of learning , solving and sourcing

0:06

resources for biopharma decision

0:08

makers . If you're working on biologics

0:11

process development and manufacturing challenges

0:13

, you need to swing by bioprocessonlinecom

0:16

. If you're trying to stay ahead of the cell

0:18

or gene therapy curve , visit cellandgenecom

0:21

. When it's time to map out your clinical

0:24

course , let ClinicalLeadercom help

0:26

, and if optimizing outsourcing

0:29

decisions is what you're after , check out

0:31

OutsourcePharmacom . We're

0:33

Life Science Connect and we're here to help . Venture

0:40

philanthropy has remained one of the few bright

0:42

spots in an otherwise gloomy

0:44

biotech funding scene . Couple

0:47

that with rising unmet medical needs

0:49

in neurodegeneration and

0:51

the recent regulatory activity in

0:53

the Alzheimer's therapeutic space and

0:56

you've got a situation where the Alzheimer's

0:58

Drug Discovery Foundation's stock and

1:00

relevance are steadily rising

1:02

. The ADDF is

1:04

a venture philanthropy fund founded by

1:06

the Lauder family , as in Estee

1:09

, and supported generously by

1:11

the likes of Bill Gates , jeff Bezos

1:13

and the Dolby and Schwab families

1:15

. Its mission is to accelerate

1:18

the discovery of drugs to prevent , treat

1:20

and cure Alzheimer's disease , and

1:22

it does that by investing in biotechs

1:24

developing Alzheimer's therapeutics , much

1:27

like a venture capitalist would , then

1:29

directing its proceeds back into the fund

1:31

. I'm Matt Pillar . This is

1:33

the Business of Biotech and the opportunity

1:35

to sit down with ADDF Chief

1:37

Financial Officer and Head of Mission-Related

1:40

Investments , Karen Harris , in San Francisco

1:42

, was one I didn't take lightly . Her

1:45

perspective on Alzheimer's therapeutic

1:47

progress , the market , what's fundable

1:49

and why is one of a kind . Let's

1:52

give it a listen . I

1:54

want to start with the foundation . I want to

1:56

get an understanding of the mission

1:58

and the venture philanthropy model

2:01

. So typically my

2:03

interviews are with biotech CEOs

2:05

, the companies that are more than

2:07

likely interested in partnering

2:09

with you . I've only had a couple

2:11

of venture philanthropy leaders

2:14

on the show in the past , so

2:16

it's fascinating to me , though

2:18

I love the concept .

2:21

So tell me about that . No

2:23

, it's great to be here . There

2:25

are a handful of venture philanthropies , but

2:27

we're definitely a pretty unique

2:29

animal . So the mission of the

2:32

Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation

2:34

is to accelerate the development

2:37

of drugs to prevent

2:39

, treat and hopefully eventually

2:41

cure Alzheimer's disease . And

2:44

when we started

2:46

, we were set up as a

2:48

venture philanthropy by our founders

2:50

, which were Ronald and Leonard

2:53

Lauder , and then Dr Howard Fillett

2:55

, who's still there as our co-founder and chief

2:57

science officer . And they set us up

2:59

as a venture philanthropy , which means

3:01

instead of giving grants

3:03

to academia and to

3:05

biotechs , we actually

3:08

invest in them . So we

3:10

invest in biotechs the same way

3:12

a VC would invest in a biotech

3:15

we buy preferred stock or we

3:17

buy convertible debt or royalty

3:19

arrangements sometimes , and with

3:21

academia we have royalty arrangements

3:23

and what happens is the money that we get

3:25

back from returns goes

3:28

right back into the mission . But

3:30

I think donors seem to really like the

3:32

model and like to know that

3:34

their money is being used

3:37

efficiently and that we are getting some return

3:39

. And then that gets plowed right back

3:41

into ADDL .

3:43

Yeah , direct . I mean the

3:45

donors have to like the fact that there's a direct influence

3:47

on the real work , right

3:49

, yeah , yeah , no , absolutely .

3:51

And it gives us the opportunities to work with

3:53

biotechs , because it's kind

3:56

of awkward if you're a non-profit to

3:58

be handing money to biotech companies . So

4:01

I think this venture philanthropy model

4:03

where we invest in the biotechs , is

4:07

just a better way to go about

4:09

it for that type of thing .

4:11

Yeah , yeah . So and you're the

4:13

chief financial officer there . Tell

4:15

me about that role . Like what does the CFOs

4:17

sort of illustrate , what the CFO's

4:19

role ? Is in venture philanthropy .

4:22

Well , I feel

4:24

like I have two jobs . So I'm the CFO

4:26

and then I'm the head of mission-related

4:28

investing , and as the CFO

4:31

, it's really my job to make sure that

4:33

the donor's money gets

4:36

placed as efficiently

4:38

and

4:40

as well as possible into

4:43

these Alzheimer's companies

4:45

in order to accelerate a cure

4:47

.

4:49

No pressure there .

4:50

Yeah , we're so lucky in

4:52

that the Lauder family , at the end

4:54

of 2022 , gave us a

4:56

$200 million gift

4:58

to cover our operating expenses

5:00

for the next 15

5:02

to 20 years expenses

5:08

for the next 15 to 20 years . So I take that very seriously to really steward their

5:10

money to make sure it lasts for our operating costs as long as

5:12

possible . But it's a great position for

5:14

a CFO to be in so that I don't

5:16

have to worry about my operating costs

5:19

and all the donors'

5:21

money that gets donated to us

5:23

goes straight to the science , not

5:25

to our operating costs . So this

5:27

fact that all your money goes to research

5:30

. I think is a very attractive

5:32

thing .

5:33

Yeah , that is fantastic .

5:35

So that's the CFO job the

5:37

head of mission-related investing

5:39

is . Since we do invest in biotechs

5:42

, we have to structure the investments

5:44

and negotiate the deals

5:46

with the biotech companies , and

5:49

so I do all of the

5:51

structuring and the negotiations

5:53

of those deals . And

5:56

the reason that works so

5:58

well is I have an investment banking background

6:00

and so I'm able to use a lot

6:02

of that for structuring

6:05

these deals . When I was starting

6:07

out in investment banking , I worked

6:10

on a lot of biotech IPOs and

6:12

so a lot of that knowledge is

6:14

very helpful when dealing with these biotech

6:17

companies , and it's such a treat to

6:19

work with these companies . They are

6:22

just so dedicated and

6:24

they just don't give up . It's been hard

6:26

to raise money this year , and

6:29

I'm I'm really just

6:31

always super impressed by

6:33

their commitment yeah , yeah

6:36

, particularly .

6:36

I mean you know I've interviewed hundreds

6:38

of them , biotech execs , and you

6:41

know , uh , the commitment and

6:43

the altruism , it's all on full display it

6:45

seems like that's even ratcheted up a notch

6:47

in the alzheimer's space , because so many people are

6:49

, you know , have been affected by it and have

6:51

personal experience yeah , I

6:53

think that's true .

6:54

I think almost anybody

6:57

you talk to has

6:59

a mother-in-law or

7:01

a sister or an aunt or somebody

7:04

who's been touched by Alzheimer's and

7:06

I think the fact that you know , for 20

7:08

to 30 years there was no drug

7:10

approved and now we have

7:12

two that were , one

7:15

that has been approved by the FDA and

7:17

another from Eli Lilly

7:19

that's about to be and

7:21

so it's a really exciting time in the

7:23

Alzheimer's field right now , and so it's

7:25

a really exciting time in the Alzheimer's

7:27

field right now ?

7:33

Sure is . Yeah , you mentioned that prior to ADDF you were

7:35

in investment banking and I'm curious about that . I looked at your background

7:37

for the interview and it's intriguing to me

7:39

. You were in pretty big

7:41

name investment banking after you earned your

7:44

Columbia undergrad in economics

7:46

and your Stanford MBA in finance

7:49

. When I look at your career at

7:51

least on paper , on LinkedIn right , the latter

7:53

half of it seems like it's very focused

7:55

on endeavors that are far

7:58

from you know getting rich and making rich

8:00

people richer , yes . Tell

8:02

me about that . I look at Mount Sinai Adolescent Health

8:04

Center , east Harlem Tutorial Program and now the ADDF Tell me about that . I went to Mount Sinai Adolescent Health Center , east Harlem

8:06

Tutorial Program and now the ADDF Tell

8:08

me about that . Yeah .

8:09

So I left

8:12

UBS in 2012

8:14

to join a

8:16

hedge fund and after

8:19

a while several

8:21

months I really came to the conclusion

8:24

that the world did not need this other

8:26

hedge fund , that we have enough hedge

8:28

funds , and I didn't really feel that we

8:31

were going to be so much better than

8:33

anybody else , and my dad

8:35

had done a lot of non-profit work after

8:37

he retired and so

8:39

I investigated

8:41

. I took some courses at

8:44

NYU New York University in

8:46

philanthropy and I

8:48

liked it , so I decided I would try

8:51

it out , and I think that

8:53

I really felt

8:55

that I wanted to do mission related work

8:57

at that point , and I

9:00

first went into development

9:02

, and I don't really know why

9:05

I did that . I think I did that because I liked the

9:07

classes , which

9:09

is a very silly way to

9:11

pick anything , and

9:14

I worked at the Mount Sinai Adolescent

9:16

Health Center eventually as their director

9:19

of development and I

9:22

. It was very interesting

9:24

, I liked it , but I missed finance

9:26

and so then I moved to

9:28

the East Harlem Tutorial Program , which

9:30

is charter schools in

9:32

East Harlem , and

9:34

was the CFO there and

9:37

then ultimately got recruited to

9:39

ADVF . But I'm very happy

9:41

to have worked at these social services

9:44

organizations for

9:46

several years .

9:47

Yeah , I can imagine that's fulfilling

9:49

, Much more fulfilling than running

9:51

a hedge fund . The

9:54

ADDF recruitment . How did that come to pass ?

9:57

You know it was COVID and

9:59

I just got a call from a recruiter

10:01

and I think I had met

10:03

her once before and

10:05

she just how she just called

10:08

and I had interviews completely

10:10

online and I

10:12

think it was a year before I met

10:14

the CEO in person because it was like

10:16

smack in the middle of the really

10:18

bad COVID . But

10:21

I thought this would be super interesting

10:23

and it was

10:25

different . But the whole investment

10:28

part of it- was really interesting to me

10:30

.

10:30

For sure , yeah , kind of brought you back to that

10:32

world that

10:34

you had been in .

10:35

Yeah , it's kind of the perfect job because

10:38

I get to really match

10:40

the investment banking skills

10:42

as well as the CFO

10:45

skills , so I really can't think

10:47

of a more perfect job for me .

10:49

Yeah , that's great , so I

10:52

want to talk a little bit more about

10:54

ADDF and what it's supporting . As

10:57

you know , the bulk of our audience are biotech

10:59

execs and CEOs , many of whom founders

11:02

, many of whom worked in the Alzheimer's space . You

11:04

guys support the events of both diagnostics

11:06

and therapeutics .

11:20

Yeah , we're involved in diagnost

11:22

that are

11:24

developing drugs based on the biology

11:27

of aging , so drugs that will

11:29

treat the underlying diseases

11:31

of aging , with the idea

11:33

that if we can treat that , then

11:35

we can ultimately

11:38

reduce Alzheimer's , because Alzheimer's

11:40

ultimately is a disease of aging

11:43

. And we

11:45

decided about 10 years

11:47

ago not to focus on

11:49

amyloid which is what these new

11:51

drugs are because pharma

11:54

was focusing on amyloid and pouring

11:56

tons of money into it . So we wanted to

11:58

invest where we thought that our money

12:01

would be more useful in

12:03

novel ideas and , as it

12:05

turns out , where the science has moved

12:07

now is towards the biology

12:09

of aging , because these

12:11

amyloid drugs are

12:14

, you know , shown they

12:16

reduce amyloid , but I still

12:18

think the jury's out as to

12:20

how effective . You know , maybe they'll slow

12:22

cognitive decline by

12:25

30% , but that's

12:27

not enough , and we think that a

12:29

lot of these other ideas are

12:31

going to come to fruition and ultimately

12:34

it's going to be a combination therapy

12:37

or precision medicine

12:39

that is going to cure Alzheimer's

12:41

. Much in the way of the cancer space does

12:44

it with their immunotherapy

12:46

. So , um , so

12:48

we really take in uh , they

12:50

, my CEO likes to say

12:52

shots on goal , and we've

12:54

taken a lot of shots on goal . And

12:56

our um co-founder

12:59

and chief science officer is an absolute

13:02

. We call

13:04

him the truffle hound because

13:06

he just seems to be able to seek

13:08

out the most interesting biotech

13:10

companies , and we've

13:13

done quite well with some of them

13:15

. We invested

13:18

early on in a

13:20

program that was licensed by

13:22

Amavid or by Avid

13:24

Pharmaceuticals , and then the company

13:27

was bought by Eli Lilly and

13:29

it was the first PET scan to

13:31

actually be able to identify

13:33

amyloid , because before that

13:36

there was no way to really tell

13:38

if you had Alzheimer's except

13:40

for either a cognitive

13:42

interview , which doesn't you know

13:44

, that's not very scientific or

13:47

else an autopsy after death . So

13:49

that was one of the things that

13:51

we invested in early

13:54

on , as well as blood tests

13:56

for the

13:58

diagnosis , for

14:04

the diagnosis , and I think now , with these anti-amyloid drugs , there's going to be a need to figure out

14:06

who has Alzheimer's in an easier way than the

14:08

PET scan , and I think a lot of blood tests

14:10

are being developed now , some

14:12

already marketed . So , that's really

14:14

. That's diagnostics as well

14:17

, and that's the diagnostics part of the business

14:19

. And there we have

14:22

a hundred million dollars that

14:24

was given , donated

14:27

to us from the Gates from

14:30

Bill Gates and other philanthropists

14:32

, leonard Lauder and

14:34

we are using that money

14:37

to try to accelerate

14:39

the

14:41

detection and diagnosis of Alzheimer's

14:44

, with the thought that the earlier you

14:46

can detect it , the better

14:48

off you're going to be and the

14:50

more probable that you could get a treatment

14:52

that would work . We

14:55

have invested in therapeutics this

14:57

year $34 million

14:59

. We'll invest $45 million next

15:01

year . And then

15:03

we have the diagnostic accelerator

15:05

money to invest . But our biomarker

15:08

team and our therapeutics

15:11

team talk all the time

15:13

and are completely sort

15:15

of married at the hip because

15:18

the two really go together .

15:19

Yeah , yeah , is , is , is

15:22

the ? Is the truffle hunting more difficult

15:24

on the therapeutic side than it is on

15:26

the diagnostic side ?

15:28

Um , yeah

15:30

, you know it's different and

15:33

I think therapeutics take a lot longer

15:36

to come to market , so you have to wait longer

15:38

. Um , but I think the returns are

15:40

ultimately better in the end

15:42

. So I think if

15:45

somebody comes up with the therapeutic

15:47

for Alzheimer's that really works

15:49

, that's going to make a lot

15:51

more money than the diagnostic test

15:53

that told you that a person

15:56

would have Alzheimer's . But

15:58

I do think that it's quicker to market

16:00

the diagnostic tools and it's

16:02

absolutely essential If you think about

16:05

it . Like , imagine if

16:07

we didn't have a way to tell

16:09

whether you have high blood pressure .

16:11

Right .

16:11

And and with it really helps

16:14

in the clinical trials , because they

16:16

used to do clinical trials and

16:18

a quarter of the people

16:21

wouldn't even have alzheimer's because there

16:23

was no way to really know , you just guess

16:25

. So , um , it's very important

16:28

when you're doing the clinical trials

16:30

and also when you're measuring the

16:32

endpoint to see if your therapy is effective

16:34

, to have a good biomarker

16:36

to be able to actually know

16:39

whether your drug is doing

16:41

the appropriate work .

16:42

Sure , and as those drugs become more

16:44

precision , presumably

16:46

the diagnostic tools

16:48

are going to be key because precision

16:51

drugs and

16:53

their correlation to stage of diagnosis

16:56

. They've got to work hand in hand .

16:58

Absolutely , absolutely . They've

17:05

got to work hand in hand , absolutely , and that

17:07

is why the Diagnostics Accelerator is trying to find novel biomarkers

17:09

. So there might be a biomarker

17:11

for inflammation , for vascular

17:14

disease , because these

17:17

things are other aspects

17:19

of Alzheimer's that people

17:22

have and will ultimately need to be

17:24

measured .

17:26

So , speaking of the therapeutic focus

17:28

, do you have any favorite

17:30

horses in the race in terms of modalities

17:33

?

17:34

Yes . So , as I said , we invest

17:37

in companies that are focused on the biology

17:39

of aging and , in terms of the

17:41

stage that we're interested

17:44

in , it's typically now the IND

17:46

enabling stage or proof

17:48

of concept , phase

17:50

one , proof of concept trials

17:53

and then early phase two , because

17:55

that's where our money is going to

17:57

be the most meaningful . You

17:59

know , then later , for the phase

18:01

three trials , they're going to need

18:04

hundreds of millions of dollars

18:06

and we can't . We don't have

18:08

that money , so we're trying to invest

18:10

in ideas that ultimately can

18:12

raise future money from

18:15

the VCs and from pharma

18:17

and be

18:19

able to continue

18:22

on after , after our donations

18:24

done .

18:24

But we do give a lot of follow-on donations

18:27

as well when

18:29

you first uh survey opportunities

18:32

uh or entertain opportunities

18:34

other well , you know , let me let me stop there

18:36

and and focus there for a minute , like are

18:39

you typically hunting , or are

18:41

you typically being courted , or

18:43

is it a combination of the two ?

18:45

um , it's a combination of both . So

18:47

we are always

18:49

looking for areas of our

18:51

portfolio of investments where

18:54

maybe we're lacking , like oh

18:56

, maybe you know , here's an idea

18:58

where we don't have any

19:00

drugs being tested for

19:02

this in our portfolio , like , maybe it's

19:04

gene therapy , so we

19:06

would be actively

19:09

looking . But also

19:11

we have several RFPs that

19:13

we do and we have a lot

19:15

of incoming requests . You can imagine

19:18

, in this down market , all

19:21

the demand and what I would say about

19:24

our model is

19:26

, while we do want the returns

19:28

that VCs get , we don't have limited

19:30

partners and we

19:32

focus the most important

19:35

thing for us as a science and

19:37

we hope to make a good return , but

19:40

we're not

19:42

so much focused

19:44

on the returns as we are on the science

19:47

. And so in this difficult

19:49

market , we've been able to fund

19:51

companies that have trouble finding money

19:53

anywhere else , that

19:56

our scientific

19:59

diligence is so admired

20:01

at ADDF that often

20:03

we are like the stamp of approval

20:06

that enables these companies to get

20:08

future funding . And a lot of the time

20:10

people will say , well

20:13

, can we sign your contract early , because

20:15

the next venture partner

20:17

won't come in until you've

20:19

actually signed . So we see a lot

20:22

of that . Yeah , that's interesting .

20:25

What does the scientific validation component

20:27

look like ? You have like a board . Yeah

20:29

, so we have .

20:31

I'm going to get the number wrong , but I think

20:33

it's like we have like 19

20:35

PhD scientists

20:38

on board and so the first investigation

20:41

is an internal one and

20:43

then if we like an idea

20:45

and we think it will fit well

20:48

in our portfolio , then we have

20:51

outside reviewers review it . These

20:53

are prominent people in the Alzheimer's field

20:56

and then after that

20:58

it goes to our scientific

21:01

investment committee , who you

21:04

know , study the idea and vote to approve

21:06

or not to approve . So that that is

21:09

our scientific method . And

21:11

you know , obviously over

21:13

the years we've developed such an expertise

21:15

in Alzheimer's specifically

21:18

that you know

21:20

I think a lot of the vcs really

21:22

admired that knowledge yeah

21:24

, um

21:26

, as far as scientific analysis of potential

21:29

partners goes , have you noticed

21:31

any trends or do you have any preferences

21:34

in terms of you mentioned gene therapy ?

21:35

for instance like you know , is

21:38

small mall more attractive

21:40

than a biologic , more attractive

21:42

than a gene therapy , like any

21:44

trends there , or are you pretty agnostic ?

21:47

Um , I think we are pretty

21:49

agnostic in sort of this . We

21:51

think they're going to be a lot of targets and

21:55

we like to have a

21:57

good range of things

21:59

. A couple of companies

22:01

, for example , like we

22:04

invest in Luxio

22:06

Therapeutics , which happens to have just

22:09

presented at the JP

22:11

Morgan Conference , and they're

22:14

a genetic medicine company

22:16

, a clinical stage genetic medicine

22:19

. So that's one company

22:21

that we invested in early in 2014

22:23

, where we

22:26

actually invested when

22:28

that , when the idea was at Weill Cornell

22:30

university , and then

22:32

it it somehow got

22:35

into . It became a company Lexio

22:37

or Alexio bought it .

22:39

I don't know how .

22:40

And then it it

22:44

just went public . So we made another investment

22:46

in 2020 and now it's gone public

22:48

. So

23:07

that's , that's one company

23:09

and you know it's

23:12

very rewarding . Toibrin , which is supposed

23:14

to be bad for

23:16

neurons and cognitive

23:19

declines , and now

23:21

again in 2023

23:25

, and they are doing their

23:28

Series A right now and

23:30

are trying to fund the Phase

23:32

2 study .

23:33

Yeah , that's great . You

23:36

talked a little bit about how ADDS

23:39

support is seen as a stand-up , a sought-after

23:42

sort of stand-up of approval . Stamp

23:48

of approval . Um , do you look for ? You might have touched on this , but I'm curious about

23:50

how it's maybe changed in the recent you know the recent , uh , financial

23:53

climate . Do you , do you look for

23:55

companies that have , like you know , your

23:57

? Your reputation is often determined

24:00

by the company you keep right , do you look for ? Companies

24:02

that have um specific

24:04

business development , support from specific

24:07

firms or even pharma

24:09

companies .

24:11

Um well , we we typically

24:13

would invest before the pharma companies

24:15

would come in , and we're really trying to

24:17

get these companies ready for pharma

24:20

. So no . I wouldn't say

24:22

so much . I wouldn't say

24:24

so much , I wouldn't really

24:26

say that so much . I think we're

24:28

investing 100%

24:30

based on what we think

24:32

is the validity of the science .

24:35

Yeah , all right , once you

24:37

validate the science and

24:39

strike up a partnership , is it

24:42

pretty ? Maybe not monetarily

24:44

, but is it pretty cookie cutter . Like , is it pretty automated

24:47

?

24:55

Yeah . So once the science is validated , then it comes to the . We negotiate the deal

24:57

and then it comes to our investment committee . So we do have an investment

24:59

committee that has to approve the terms of

25:01

the deal and they're really the ones

25:04

who want to see that we're getting

25:06

quote venture like returns

25:08

, and that we're . We've actually structured

25:10

and negotiated a good deal

25:13

and it's

25:15

actually not cookie

25:17

cutter because ADDF , we

25:19

don't invest directly

25:22

. Well , we do , we buy preferred

25:24

stock , but that's that

25:26

money that we give a company has to go

25:28

to a specific project with the

25:30

budget and a work plan , and so

25:32

we're in very close touch , helping

25:34

the companies design the

25:37

projects and design the clinical

25:39

trials , and we help them with IP

25:41

and with business plans . So

25:44

we're having a very close relationship

25:46

even before we approve the

25:48

proposal and then , once it's approved

25:51

and once they start working , doing

25:54

the work , we stay in touch

25:56

with them very closely to see

25:58

how it's going and how we can set them

26:00

up for success , and

26:02

even after

26:05

. We've done a lot of follow-on deals this

26:07

year and we

26:09

tend to like to do that and

26:11

to really help our companies prosper

26:14

.

26:14

That's cool . What is the sort of the I

26:17

don't know day-to-day , not necessarily

26:20

day-to-day , but that sort of relationship management

26:22

aspect ? Are there like customer

26:24

relationship managers at ADDF that work with these

26:26

folks ? We're a nonprofit .

26:31

No , it's really the science teams

26:33

that work with them . I work with them if there

26:35

are any finance related issues

26:37

or anything related

26:40

to the structure of the deal . Do

26:42

they need an extension on their convertible ? No

26:44

, you know those kind of things , but the

26:46

scientists are really working with them

26:49

on

26:51

a day-to-day basis . So , with

26:53

regards to how the project is going

26:55

, yeah , the

26:57

venture philanthropy model in

27:00

general .

27:05

how has the recent economic headwinds

27:08

impacted the venture

27:10

philanthropists in general ? Has

27:13

it been a are you fairly insulated

27:16

, or is it impacted ?

27:18

Well , what I would say is it's

27:20

actually made the venture philanthropy

27:22

model that much more important . And

27:25

we do a lot of what I call bridge financing

27:27

, which is , you know this

27:29

say you have a company and they

27:31

needed to raise their series A

27:34

by January , or else they're

27:36

going to run out of money and can't complete

27:38

the next trial . And

27:40

here it's happened quite

27:42

a number of times in this

27:44

market where you know the

27:47

companies are unable to complete

27:49

the Series A on time , they just can't

27:51

get the investors . And so we

27:53

provide bridge financing , which is

27:56

usually in the form of a convertible note

27:58

, which is debt that's going to convert into

28:00

equity and basically

28:02

bridge them over , to tie

28:04

them over to when they're able to

28:06

finally close their preferred round

28:08

. And we've done a lot of that this

28:10

year , and we just need

28:13

to be careful that the company

28:15

does have enough cash to

28:17

continue on and finish our project

28:20

and ultimately will

28:22

have results that will draw

28:24

in the money of venture

28:27

capital and of pharma

28:29

potentially , or they could

28:31

go to the public markets . But I

28:33

think that ADDF's stamp

28:35

of approval and this

28:37

bridge financing , it's

28:40

something we can do because , once

28:42

again , we don't need the venture

28:45

return . We

28:48

really want the science to progress

28:50

.

28:51

Is bridge financing a risky

28:53

proposition ?

28:56

It is a risky proposition because

28:58

you don't know if the

29:01

series A or B or

29:03

C is actually going to get done . So

29:05

yes , it's definitely a risky proposition

29:08

and ADDF can take that risk

29:10

when others don't want to

29:12

, and I think that ADDF

29:15

, by taking that risk , helps venture

29:18

firms feel comfortable about

29:20

investing . But it is definitely

29:23

a risk and the investment committee is

29:25

very careful

29:28

about making sure that that company

29:31

has a plan to

29:33

be able to stay

29:35

in business and continue and

29:37

finish our project . So usually

29:40

what we like to see is that there's some

29:42

inflection point coming up where

29:44

they're going to be results announced and

29:47

therefore they can draw in

29:49

additional capital okay

29:52

, um , what is your

29:54

uh general

29:56

sense for ?

29:58

uh , you know , obviously , in this environment

30:00

, karen , like everyone's sunshine

30:03

and roses , it's jp mor

30:05

. You know everyone's everyone's happy

30:07

, but I'm

30:10

picking up on some genuine sentiment

30:13

that things are improving . You

30:15

know what's your , what's

30:18

your take .

30:19

Yeah , I think that it has been extremely

30:21

difficult . It's been a very

30:24

bad market . The public markets have

30:26

been terrible . The IPO markets are

30:28

pretty closed up

30:30

until maybe the fourth quarter

30:32

of this year and

30:34

it's really hard to

30:36

get venture investors to invest

30:38

now because they weren't able

30:40

to take their companies public , so

30:43

they're having to put money into

30:45

their existing companies rather than new

30:47

companies . So , as a new company , to get

30:49

a lead investor is

30:51

really really hard right now . I

30:54

think things are looking

30:57

up . There's been an

30:59

uptick in the biotech index

31:01

in the last few weeks

31:04

really , with a lot of mergers

31:06

that have been announced , and what's

31:08

interesting for us is we've

31:11

seen two mergers , one

31:13

from Merck

31:16

of Carraway Therapeutics and

31:18

one from AbbVie of a company called

31:20

Cereval both CNS companies

31:22

and those are among the most risky

31:25

, and so that leads me to believe

31:27

that somehow the

31:30

valuations are low enough that the

31:32

market is going to turn . So we've seen

31:34

a lot of M&A . There's been a lot of M&A

31:36

announced at JP Morgan and

31:38

interest rates are projected to come

31:40

down , and I think if

31:42

that happens , then it'll

31:46

be a big help to these biotechs

31:48

and ultimately people will start investing

31:51

again . I mean the valuations . I

31:53

would say that the boom years of

31:55

20 and 21 were maybe a little

31:58

over-exuberant and

32:00

the valuations were too high

32:02

and a lot of companies were able to go

32:04

public that shouldn't be public companies

32:06

that are now trading at a

32:08

dollar a share . So I

32:11

think that there's that overhang in the

32:13

market . But I do think we've seen

32:15

two IPOs of CNS

32:17

related companies . One

32:20

is Lexio , another is Nomura

32:22

Therapeutics , and there

32:25

again , you know they're both trading now above

32:27

issue price . So that leads me to believe

32:30

that the market is going

32:32

to get better . I think it's going to take a little

32:34

while , but I think by the end of 2024

32:37

and 2025

32:39

, things are going to be better .

32:41

And how does that like ?

32:42

how do you ?

32:43

envision that hopeful

32:45

improvement impacting ADDF

32:48

. What does that do for you ?

32:51

Well , one thing

32:53

that does for us is to

32:55

help us

32:58

get returns . So

33:00

basically we call them mission-related

33:02

returns . So if the public

33:04

markets turn and a

33:07

lot of our companies can do initial public

33:09

offerings , we typically , once

33:11

an investment becomes liquid , we

33:13

sell . We make sure we

33:15

sell in a way that we won't hurt the

33:17

stock price of the company , so very

33:20

slowly over time . But you know

33:22

, we believe that once we

33:24

gain liquidity we should sell and

33:26

then make investments in other

33:28

science . And

33:30

so you

33:32

know , I think that we'll

33:35

get a lot . We will see a lot

33:37

of M&A , where

33:40

we will get returns , or we will

33:42

see IPOs where we're

33:44

going to get returns . So

33:46

we're hoping for that that money

33:49

gets plowed right back into the

33:51

science . And also with

33:53

the new , with the new drug

33:56

approvals for

33:58

Alzheimer's , we're seeing an increased

34:01

interest in just CNS

34:03

related work

34:05

and we're I've

34:07

seen from the VCs an interest

34:10

to get educated

34:12

on the neurodegenerative

34:14

disease and we call them neurocurious

34:16

VCs and

34:18

I think you know a lot

34:20

of VCs wouldn't invest in the

34:23

neuro world because it was too

34:25

risky and I think maybe they're going

34:27

to start coming , coming in now .

34:29

Yeah , well , I mean the , the , I

34:31

guess , association with anti-aging

34:34

. But the anti-aging space I mean that

34:36

that's a , that's a hot space

34:38

right now and I can see , you know

34:40

, the , the VC appetite in

34:42

that space and crazy saying it has things to turn

34:45

around too . So it's . It's a good corollary

34:47

right yes .

34:48

The anti that space and criticizing as things turn around

34:50

too . So it's a good corollary , right ? Yes , the anti aging space is really interesting

34:53

and I was hoping to hear more about it at jp morgan . Uh , we didn't

34:55

, but I think you

34:57

know everybody seems dollars

35:00

a year in anti-aging and

35:25

we are trying to get some of the sovereign

35:27

wealth money to go towards

35:29

alzheimer's , which is

35:31

a disease of aging . So , um

35:33

, we , we are trying

35:35

to get some of that money into

35:38

alzheimer's .

35:39

Yeah , very good . When you come

35:41

to an investor conference like this

35:43

, you know you're in a unique position cfo

35:45

of venture philanthropy , uh at

35:47

atf .

35:48

What's , what's your ?

35:49

what's your goal , what's your mo here ?

35:51

so I'm very interested

35:53

to see what the public

35:55

companies are doing in the neurodegenerative

35:58

space . So I make sure to

36:00

see those companies . You know to

36:02

see biogen , who is

36:05

introducing one of their al's drug

36:07

, and Lilly to talk about their drug

36:09

. So I'm interested

36:12

in seeing those companies . I'm also very

36:14

interested in understanding what

36:16

they think when they think the market's

36:18

going to return , because

36:20

you know , I

36:22

have ADDF can have an opinion

36:24

, but I'm very interested in the investor's

36:27

opinion as to when the market's going

36:29

to come back . And then I've been meeting

36:31

a lot of the CEOs of

36:33

either companies we already fund

36:35

or companies that

36:37

are in the process of

36:39

applying to get funding

36:42

from us . So I've been meeting with a

36:44

lot of them as well as

36:46

some people on the venture side

36:48

, because one thing we try to

36:50

do for our companies is to

36:52

get additional venture money

36:54

into them . So it's

36:56

very helpful at ADDF to have

36:58

venture connections so

37:01

that we can help our companies raise

37:03

money .

37:04

Yeah , what's the appropriate way

37:06

for a company who's interested in working with

37:08

you to ? What's the channel to

37:11

get the conversation started ?

37:13

So I would say that you

37:15

know we're interested in companies focused

37:18

on the biology of aging at the

37:20

clinical stage

37:22

and if you fit

37:24

that model , reach out to

37:26

our scientists . We

37:30

have several RFPs . So look at our website and

37:32

we really do encourage people

37:34

to start the conversation . We're

37:37

interested in unique

37:39

, innovative science and our

37:42

scientists are always happy to talk

37:44

to you .

37:45

Good , If I were a

37:47

better interviewer . What would I have ? Asked

37:49

you that I didn't About

37:53

ADDF ?

37:56

Let me think about that .

38:00

Well , if you have to think about it , I must have done a pretty good job

38:02

.

38:02

Yeah , you know , I think you did a great job

38:04

and I'm not sure what

38:06

else you could have asked me . But , yeah , I think it's did a great job and

38:08

I I'm not sure , uh , what else you could have asked me . But , um , yeah , I

38:10

think it's been a great discussion and I'm

38:12

very happy for people

38:14

to know more about venture philanthropy

38:17

. And also , you know , I want

38:19

to really help our

38:21

biotech companies who

38:23

are doing research in alzheimer's . It's such

38:25

an important area . And these

38:28

biotech companies are just

38:30

, you know , they never stop

38:32

working , and it's just very impressive

38:34

.

38:35

It is , and the work that you're doing

38:37

is very impressive too . I just recalled that

38:39

, as I said , I don't often have

38:41

venture philanthropists on the

38:43

show , but the last time I did was a couple of years

38:46

ago . I think it was the JDDF

38:48

Katie Alley . Oh , okay . You

38:50

know , Katie had always fascinated conversation

38:52

with her as well . I admire the work

38:54

that folks like you do , yeah

38:56

, and I encourage you to keep

38:59

up that work , and I wish you all the best

39:01

success in 24 .

39:02

Well , thank you so much . I really appreciate

39:04

having this conversation . It's

39:07

very fun .

39:09

Yeah , we'll get back together and do it again . You

39:11

know , maybe the next wave

39:13

of Alzheimer's approval .

39:15

We'll get into the effect . That would

39:17

be very interesting . Break some of that , yeah , and we're

39:19

looking forward to the next approval , so

39:21

absolutely .

39:22

Great , great Well . Karen Harris , pleasure

39:25

to meet you . Thank you for coming on the show . I'm

39:27

Matt Pillar and you just listened to the Business of

39:29

Biotech , the weekly podcast dedicated

39:32

to the builders of biotech . We

39:34

drop a new episode with a new exec every

39:36

Monday morning and I'd like you to join

39:38

our community of subscribers at BioprocessOnline . com

39:42

Apple Podcasts , spotify , google

39:44

Play or anywhere you get your podcasts You

39:52

can also subscribe to our never spammy , always insightful monthly newsletter at bioprocessonline . com/bob

39:55

. If you have feedback or topic

39:58

and guest suggestions , hit me up on LinkedIn

40:00

and let's chat and , as always , thanks

40:02

for listening .

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features