Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
When you daydream about a vacation, where does your mind go? A sandy beach?
0:05
A bustling city? No matter what you choose,
0:08
it probably involves a dream location away from your desk.
0:12
That's because the right environments transform our experiences.
0:16
It's not just what you do, but where you do it.
0:19
And Boot Camp 2024 has the "where" on lock.
0:23
Gather with arts professionals from across the country at one of the dreamiest
0:27
arts destinations around: Broadway. We're talking lights,
0:32
showbiz, spectacle, and two days of unmatched learning alongside arts lovers just like you.
0:39
Recharge your creativity with industry-leading sessions,
0:42
then take in a post-conference show or stroll down Museum Mile.
0:47
Join us at the Times Center in New York City, October 24th and 25th,
0:51
and escape to a world of artistic inspiration.
0:54
Treat yourself to a ticket at capacityinteractivebootcamp.com.
1:07
Hello there, arts aficionados! Welcome back to CI to Eye. Now,
1:12
one of the questions we hear most often from arts marketers is:
1:16
how do my campaign results compare to those of my peers?
1:19
We all want to know how everyone else is doing, and it's an excellent question,
1:23
especially since pre-pandemic benchmarks are all but obsolete right now.
1:26
Audience behavior has changed so much over the past few years,
1:30
and if we want to adjust to the demands of today's market,
1:32
we need updated markers for success.
1:35
And if you've been listening to the podcast, you know by now that we are relentless,
1:39
proud data nerds. A lack of measurement just doesn't sit right with us.
1:44
So the CI team put together a study based on our own bank of campaign data for
1:49
over 150 client organizations to uncover brand new digital
1:54
marketing benchmarks and emerging trends for our industry.
1:58
It's called Cultural Compass. And in today's episode,
2:01
we'll preview some of the most impactful findings before it's officially
2:05
released to the public. That's right, spoilers ahead.
2:08
I'll sit down with Senior Consultant Ali Blount to discuss the study's
2:12
parameters, the biggest surprises in her data analysis,
2:15
and a few key findings to help inform your FY25 media planning.
2:20
Shall we dive in? I'm here with Senior Consultant Ali Blount,
2:31
one of my favorite people to have on the podcast and lead researcher for CI's
2:35
brand new Cultural Compass study. Ali, say hello to your many, many fans.
2:40
All three of them. All three of them.
2:43
All three of them, my children and my husband. Hello.
2:46
I'm very excited to be here. So CI used to release an arts industry benchmark study,
2:53
and this looked at the state of digital marketing practices in the arts.
2:56
So how is Cultural Compass different?
2:59
So in some ways it's a 2.0 version,
3:01
and in some ways it's a completely new study.
3:03
It's adjacent to those other studies that we ran,
3:07
but also a completely new set of questions and things that we're looking at.
3:12
We actually looked at the data that we have at our fingertips.
3:15
So all of the campaigns that we run for our clients throughout the years,
3:19
we analyzed that data to come up with lots of different conclusions to kind of
3:22
see what's happening in the world today... in the digital marketing world.
3:28
And there's been definitely a lot of changes in the industry over the last few
3:31
years. I'm sure people on the podcast are sick of us saying, "Well,
3:34
the industry has changed so much over the last few years!
3:37
Unprecedented changes!" But it does feel like now would be a good time to look
3:41
at how we approach digital marketing, right?
3:43
Yes. And that's the reason that we really chose right now to be the time that we're
3:47
like, okay, we're doing this, we're studying this data.
3:50
We are emerging from the pandemic-whatever phase of the pandemic we're in,
3:53
who knows. But whatever phase we're in,
3:56
we're at a point where audiences really have settled.
4:00
The audience behavior changed throughout, and now we're at a point where it's like we're in that new routine.
4:05
We have things like AI and machine learning on the rise.
4:08
We have new platforms like TikTok and Spotify that a couple years ago were brand
4:13
new and now they also have kind of settled and they're not going anywhere,
4:16
and we have a better sense of that landscape. So it feels like we're at this really big watershed moment,
4:21
and that's why we were like, okay, this is the moment.
4:23
This is where we want to be answering all of these questions and making sure
4:28
that we're studying this data to really push us forward into what the next level
4:33
of digital marketing is going to look like.
4:36
Yeah, I think whenever a big study like this happens,
4:38
it's interesting to think about what questions the study is trying to answer.
4:43
So what were we looking at when we were originally creating this study?
4:47
So the idea for this kind of came because constantly our clients are asking
4:52
us, how do I compare to my peers? I am a museum and I want to know,
4:57
what are other museums in my area doing? Or I'm a theater,
5:00
what are other theaters doing? Or whatever. So we were really curious to actually be able to answer those questions.
5:06
So the big one was just generally, what can I learn from my peers in the industry that can help really guide my own
5:13
organization's growth? And then from there,
5:15
we really took it in a ton of different directions.
5:18
How does my media spend compare?
5:20
How can I diversify across other digital channels?
5:24
What can I learn from other organizations in my region, my budget size,
5:29
my genre? Yeah, I think knowing what your peers are doing is such a valuable way of
5:35
measuring your own performance.
5:38
And it can be so insular when you're at an organization because you're just in
5:41
the day-to-day, and you don't often think about what's everyone else doing and what can I do
5:45
differently? And especially with all the changes that have happened recently in the last few
5:50
years, things have gone up, things have gone down,
5:53
but you want to see if that's everyone, not just yourself, right?
5:56
Yeah. It's really because typically when clients ask us these kinds of questions,
6:00
often our answer is like, okay, well you want to benchmark against yourself.
6:03
If you're a theater in the Northeast, you don't necessarily expect that you're going to perform the same as other
6:08
theaters in the Northeast for various reasons.
6:10
Even just programming can affect it, everything can affect it.
6:13
But that being said, there are definitely some big questions where it would be really helpful and
6:18
interesting to know how your peers are performing.
6:21
Thinking even about something like budget where you're looking at, okay,
6:24
well what percentage of my budget am I spending on Meta versus Google?
6:27
How much should I be spending? Just having a sense of what your peers are doing I think is helpful to guide
6:32
you. Maybe you are spending a lot less than them and you could and should be spending
6:37
more. Some people might be pushed to their max and that's fine.
6:39
But I think it's interesting to be able to compare and tweak and see if there
6:43
are best practices that you're not kind of living up to and maybe figure out how
6:47
you can. And seeing what you are outperforming, as well.
6:50
Seeing what you're doing really well and might want to lean into even more.
6:55
Oh yeah. To be able to invest. If you're really crushing it in the video category,
6:59
maybe you want to amp that up and spend even more on video.
7:01
Yeah. So you mentioned we pulled from clients' campaign data for this study,
7:05
so we must have a bunch of data. What kind of organizations are represented and what were some of the parameters?
7:11
What did we look at? Yeah, so I was super excited by the response to this.
7:15
I was very nervous when we started asking for client permission because I was
7:18
like, how many are we going to get? And we ended up getting 152 organizations to agree for us to study their data,
7:24
which is incredible. It's a much better response than I ever expected.
7:27
And those are organizations across the US and Canada,
7:30
and they are across every genre and organization size and all of that.
7:35
So we have the organization size broken down into three buckets. So small,
7:40
medium, large. Small being 5 million budget or less,
7:44
or under 5 million. Medium is 5 million to 14.9 million.
7:48
And then large organizations have a budget of 15 million plus.
7:52
So we're really having everybody represented.
7:54
I think any organization listening to this,
7:57
you'll find your peers represented in this study,
8:00
especially because we had a massive pool of data, which was exciting.
8:04
We also looked at a full calendar year, which was really important to me.
8:08
I wanted to make sure that we could study things like seasonality,
8:11
things like holiday programming. So we looked at last year, so 2023,
8:15
January 1st to December 31st.
8:19
So this is a huge, huge study. And as you were digging through the data,
8:22
what jumped out to you? What findings surprised you the most?
8:26
A lot of things did, which was really awesome that we ended up finding a lot of things.
8:31
One that was really interesting was how organization size played into things,
8:36
looking at large versus small organizations.
8:39
And there are some things that are expected. Large organizations have larger budgets, and in many cases,
8:46
of course they're going to have better performance. We saw a lot of higher ROIs and higher purchase conversion rates and things like
8:52
that. But what I thought was really interesting is that smaller organizations actually
8:57
can still hold their own and do so by spending a lot less than
9:02
medium and large size organizations.
9:05
The area that we really saw this was with video, interestingly.
9:09
So small organizations had the second highest video rates behind medium
9:13
size, and large organizations actually had the lowest video view rates any way we
9:19
sliced it, which was really surprising because you think that a large organization has a
9:23
ton of money to pour into video production,
9:26
so naturally their videos must be the best and performing the best,
9:29
and it was the opposite of that, that they actually have the lowest rates.
9:33
So it was really interesting. Yeah. Why is that, do you think?
9:37
Is it because smaller organizations can generate a greater volume of
9:42
content for their size, or is it... I always think about the scrappiness-in a good way-of smaller organizations.
9:49
About being able to just make the content without going through levels of
9:53
approval. I think that's exactly it.
9:56
I think that one of the most interesting metrics that we found was that for
10:00
video view rate in particular, larger organizations actually had the lowest video view rates and small
10:07
organizations had much, much higher video view rates.
10:09
And I think you kind of hit the nail on the head that a smaller organization is
10:13
going to be more nimble, so maybe they don't have the ability to produce this very expensive video,
10:19
but perhaps they can produce something that's really relevant and fun and
10:23
engaging and interesting. Perhaps that's using a trending audio or something that's very topical.
10:29
So I think that they actually in many ways can produce better content on less
10:33
budget, which we saw because we saw stronger video view rates for smaller organizations.
10:38
I think the last two bootcamps we've done,
10:42
we've had people talking about TikTok and they emphasized how important it is to
10:46
follow these trends and just make the video and put it up there without worrying
10:51
too much about if it's perfect. On the platform is better than perfect and not on the platform.
10:57
100%. So I've worked at larger organizations and I've seen what it's like to get lots
11:02
of approvals and it can take a while, and that's just not something that works as well.
11:06
When you're looking at content creation, at the end of the day,
11:09
you need to make really compelling content,
11:12
and you can't always do that if you're waiting two weeks to be able to get it
11:16
approved. And I don't mean to disparage large organizations,
11:20
they obviously still perform very well, they all are doing great.
11:23
They're large for a reason. But just small organizations, I wouldn't want them to be like, oh,
11:30
we don't have a budget to produce things. I want to give some hope there that you can still make incredible content and
11:35
see incredible campaign results even if you don't have a lot of budget and a lot
11:39
of staff and things like that. You just need to make incredible content that is tailored to your specific
11:44
audience. And no matter what size organization you are,
11:48
there's always wins that you can have regardless,
11:50
like branded campaigns for search.
11:54
You can run branded campaigns regardless of your organization size.
11:57
And like you said, it's such an easy win because I mean,
12:01
my personal recommendation is that anybody, any organization, size, type,
12:04
should be running a branded search campaign year round,
12:07
and we saw the results really supported that.
12:09
So that's a huge win that anybody can do. Things like shifting some money to Google,
12:14
which I definitely want to talk about, can be a really easy one too.
12:19
So obviously size of an organization can make a big difference,
12:22
but we also looked into different genres as well.
12:25
We did, yeah, we looked at every genre within the arts.
12:29
For ease of interpreting results, we broke it down into two buckets.
12:33
So we had exhibition, exhibit-based organizations, museums and things like that.
12:37
And then we had performing arts kind of all lumped together,
12:40
and we did see some interesting results.
12:44
One thing that was fascinating to me is that the exhibition-based organizations
12:48
saw stronger engagement rates for their Meta posts,
12:52
and one theory we have behind that is that the exhibition based
12:56
organizations do a really good job at representing what it's like to
13:01
actually visit the organization. In a lot of these posts,
13:05
you can really see when you go to visit the museum, you know what it's like.
13:09
You're looking at whatever exhibit or whatever the entrance is.
13:13
That's really part of the post, just inherently.
13:16
Whereas performing arts posts tend to focus a little bit more on the art itself,
13:21
which is... there's nothing wrong with that, that's really important.
13:24
People need to know what they're going to go see,
13:26
but the thing that's really missing is what that experience is going to be like,
13:30
which is often what gets people out of the door and out of their house,
13:34
is what the whole experience is, not just the art itself.
13:37
So I think that that's something that performing arts organizations can learn
13:40
from the exhibit-based, is really [to] focus on the full picture from A to Z as opposed to just the
13:46
middle section where you're actually seeing the show.
13:49
Yeah, capturing that excitement of going into a theater I think is...
13:53
Every time I go in and I get my seat and flick through the playbill and pretend
13:56
to read it-. I read it! Always. It doesn't surprise me that you're not a playbill reader.
14:00
No, my wife is. She collects all the playbills.
14:04
Well, she's better than you. Yeah, yeah. Well, in every way. Yeah, definitely. And yeah,
14:08
I mean capturing the sort of magic as you walk into a theater,
14:12
I always get so excited in my belly when I walk into a theater.
14:16
In your belly? Yeah, I feel like a kind of,
14:19
almost like butterflies a little bit whenever I walk into a big theater or even
14:23
a little theater, to be honest. It is just exciting to sit down.
14:27
And capturing that inside an ad I think is a really strong move.
14:31
Oh yeah. When you said little theater, it just made me think,
14:34
I took my kids to see The Little Mermaid at a very tiny theater this weekend,
14:39
and it was my daughter's first show. She's two, and she did amazing.
14:41
She sat quietly the entire time, but I'm going to fully admit that I cried when we walked in and they were both
14:48
looking around at the theater and it was just so sweet,
14:50
and they were so excited, and I fully cried at The Little Mermaid because I was just like,
14:56
this is just such an experience and a moment.
14:58
It was just so exciting for them to witness this live amazing thing.
15:03
Yeah, I mean, little theaters, there's something magical and scrappy and fun about a little tiny theater.
15:09
I do improv every two weeks in a little 30-seat theater, and it's tiny,
15:14
but that packed out is magical when people are
15:19
jammed in. So a tiny theater,
15:22
that's an experience that you can't necessarily replicate in a lot of bigger
15:26
venues. Do you get jam-packed crowds for your improv...?
15:29
Oh, we actually do! We're doing all right. Yeah, we do. We've been selling out.
15:33
Not in the past... I'm happy for you. I've done the Edinburgh Fringe a few times.
15:36
I've definitely had light audiences of just one or two people before.
15:41
It's more intimate. Yes. Yeah. What a diplomatic way of putting that.
15:47
What about the other way? Is there anything that you think exhibit-based organizations can learn from
15:51
performance-based organizations? Yes.
15:54
The performing arts organizations saw much stronger video rates.
15:58
So video view rates were a lot higher for performing arts,
16:01
and our reason for that is they just tend to be more dynamic,
16:05
which is not fair to exhibit-based organizations. Of course,
16:08
visual art is inherently kind of static.
16:12
There are very few visual arts exhibits that are moving and dynamic.
16:16
That happens, but not always. Whereas performing arts is very dynamic and that makes a more dynamic video,
16:22
just like inherently. So those videos tend to perform a lot better.
16:27
So I think that's something that exhibition-based organizations could work on is
16:30
making sure that their video content in particular is really dynamic.
16:34
It's a great reminder of just creating compelling content in general.
16:38
And you also researched ideal video length for these paid campaigns, right?
16:42
Yeah, so we've talked a lot about video,
16:45
and I think that one of the big questions that I certainly always get from my
16:48
clients, I'm sure every single consultant at CI gets from their clients, is:
16:51
what is the best video length? And I hate to give an answer to that because ultimately the answer is the best
16:58
video length is making a video that is strong and compelling and wonderful with
17:02
the time that you need. But if we want to put an answer behind it,
17:05
which people do... Such a consultant answer right there. I know. But if we're going to put an actual number behind it,
17:11
we really did see spikes at one to two minutes. One to two,
17:16
and between those were when we saw a lot of spikes in all the metrics:
17:20
engagement rate, video view rate, page view rate, et cetera.
17:23
So I hate to say it, but there was a sweet spot there of one to two minutes,
17:28
although we still also did see strong results with videos across the spectrum.
17:32
So all that to say is, if you're making a video,
17:36
use the amount of time that you need to use. If you need to make a five minute video and that's the best way to tell your
17:41
story, then do it. We saw plenty of five minute videos that had amazing results,
17:46
but if you don't need a five minute video,
17:48
then maybe try to edit it down to 60 seconds or so.
17:53
I think a lot of listeners are deep into the FY25 strategic planning stage of
17:58
the year, and as they put media plans together for the next season,
18:01
what do you think are some of the biggest opportunities according to this data?
18:05
There are a lot. I think the one that I'm most excited about,
18:08
just because it was honestly kind of wild as I kept doing the data analysis and
18:12
kept seeing the results come in, is Q3. So July through September,
18:17
we see a ton of opportunity there.
18:20
It was very interesting because organizations spend the least.
18:24
We looked at media spend for each quarter,
18:27
and the lowest media spend was in Q3. But on the flip side,
18:30
all of the other metrics were better in Q3. So CPA, cost per acquisition,
18:35
was at its lowest in Q3. CPM,
18:39
effectively how much we're spending on these ads, was at its lowest in Q3.
18:43
Page view rates were highest in Q3, purchase rates were highest in Q3.
18:48
So it's this interesting thing where nobody's spending there as much,
18:51
but the people who are spending are seeing the best results of the year.
18:55
I think many organizations are dark in the summer months.
18:58
It runs from September to May. And so we think naturally as marketers we're like, well,
19:04
we're not selling anything. Let's turn off the tap and save some money.
19:07
But that's not always the best use of our time and money.
19:11
No, it really isn't. Kind of out of sight,
19:13
out of mind where if you're not running,
19:15
then by the time you start up again and you have tickets on sale or programming
19:20
starting, you might not be top of mind for people.
19:23
So I think this is a huge opportunity to make sure that at the very least that
19:26
you have a branded campaign running. If not, if you're selling tickets,
19:30
if your on-sale is then, make sure you have an on-sale campaign.
19:33
If you are starting actual performances, have a single ticket campaign.
19:37
And there's lots of options there that you can be doing with those types of
19:40
campaigns, but just have something going.
19:42
What are some other ways you can change up your marketing mix?
19:46
You mentioned prioritizing Google as well, which we've already chatted about a little bit.
19:50
Yeah, so one of the interesting things that we found is that people tended throughout
19:54
2023 to invest more in Meta. The split was roughly...
19:57
Looking at Meta and Google specifically, the split was roughly like 60-40 ish,
20:02
give or take, and that makes sense. Meta has incredible results,
20:06
and the one thing we found though is that we are seeing really strong results
20:10
recently from Google. Google has really done a lot of investment in their dynamic ads and their
20:17
machine learning to make sure that their campaigns are going to perform really
20:21
well, and we're seeing that play out. We saw crazy high results for a lot of Google campaigns.
20:25
So we're not necessarily saying, take all of your Meta money and put it in Google.
20:29
That's not what I want people to do. Meta is still really important and it still does really, really well,
20:34
but if there are ways to make sure that you can shift a little to Google or just
20:37
make sure you have a presence on Google, that is definitely something we're recommending. Like I said,
20:41
people aren't spending there as much. I'm sure many organizations have no Google budget,
20:46
so just explore that and tap into Google and really try to spend a little bit
20:50
there if you can. I think that becomes a little easier when we think about things like Performance
20:54
Max and Demand Gen campaigns, which are performing really,
20:58
really well at the moment. They are. That was one of the most interesting takeaways I think,
21:03
was how well Performance Max is doing.
21:06
What is Performance Max just so we can, because it is a weird concept, right?
21:09
So Performance Max is basically letting you tap into all of the Google
21:13
inventory. So you run your one ad, you give Google all of your assets,
21:17
so like your copy, your imagery, which could be video ads and static images,
21:21
and you put it all in there, and then they're going to serve out the best possible ad combination.
21:25
So they're going to piece those together. Best possible ad combination for each person on the best possible placement for
21:31
each person, which is kind of where that interesting twist is.
21:34
So you can tap into Gmail and YouTube and all the different places from this one
21:38
campaign. It's a little bit of a black hole because you're trusting the Google algorithm
21:43
and you're not telling it, "I want to serve X amount of impressions on YouTube" or anything like that.
21:49
I will fully admit that I was a skeptic when it was first announced.
21:53
I have a tendency to not trust the machines and AI...
21:58
You've learned well from sci-fi films, I feel. I sure have.
22:01
But especially coming out of this study and seeing just how high the results are
22:06
for Performance Max, I am truly converted.
22:10
I've been telling all my clients that we need to run-and we have-that we need to
22:12
run on Performance Max. So unsurprisingly, for Google,
22:15
paid search was the top.
22:18
It was performing the highest for any metric, you name it. Paid search wins,
22:22
which makes sense. Of course we would expect that. But next,
22:26
in pretty much every case-I don't think there was ever a metric that this wasn't
22:29
true-next was Performance Max,
22:31
and then there was some various mix with the next three of Display, Demand Gen,
22:36
and YouTube. But the top two by far, solidified,
22:40
were paid Search and Performance Max,
22:42
and I thought that was really interesting because there are very few people who
22:45
actually are running Performance Max campaigns,
22:47
so it's a huge opportunity for people to shift their budget to be running there.
22:52
Also, keeping in mind that you need to be running paid search when you run Performance
22:55
Max, just as an FYI. Yeah,
22:59
so all of this information is super helpful and I think a really good preview of
23:03
the Cultural Compass findings.
23:06
When is this coming out and where can people find it?
23:09
So it's going to be released in June on CI's website,
23:12
so you can go there to find it when it's published.
23:15
If you're not already on CI's list, I highly recommend signing up for our emails so that you can be one of the first
23:20
to know when it actually gets published. And it's a huge study.
23:26
How's the best way to approach this study, and what can we take from it?
23:30
I think that the main thing that-when I started this study and the research for
23:33
it, I really wanted to make sure that it was actionable.
23:36
That was my number one goal here was whatever the results are, whatever we have,
23:40
I want to make sure that people can read this and that they can take action from
23:44
it and apply the findings. There's nothing worse than having a bunch of data and then just thinking, cool!
23:49
And not doing anything with it. Especially because we are in this work all the time and we have a tendency to be
23:56
really in the weeds, and I wanted to make sure that we're zooming out and making sure that anybody
24:00
reading this is going to understand the results and also know what to take away
24:04
from them. So for every piece of data,
24:06
for every metric and benchmark and question that we answer,
24:09
we have an explanation of what it's actually saying and showing,
24:13
and then we also have our CI recommendations for every single piece of data.
24:17
So it's like, what if you are meeting this benchmark or not?
24:20
What could you be doing? Here's the big takeaway from this.
24:23
All those kinds of things are in there to make sure that you can really take
24:26
action and apply this to your next season and beyond as you plan.
24:31
Yeah, I'm really excited for clients to dig into this and see all the work that you've
24:37
done in this study. I think it's such a useful resource,
24:40
especially as we're planning the next year for marketing.
24:43
So thank you so much for joining us and talking through the Cultural Compass.
24:47
Thanks for having me, as always. Thank you for listening to CI to Eye.
25:01
This episode was edited and produced by Karen McConarty and co-written by Karen
25:05
McConarty and myself, Dan Titmuss. Stephanie Medina and Jess Berube are CI to Eye's designers and video editors,
25:12
and all work together to create CI's digital content.
25:15
Our music is by whoisuzo. If you enjoyed today's episode,
25:20
please take a moment to rate us or leave a review.
25:23
A nice comment goes a long way in helping other people discover CI to Eye and
25:27
hear from experts in the arts and beyond. If you didn't enjoy today's episode,
25:31
pass it on to all of your enemies. Don't forget to follow us on Facebook,
25:35
Instagram, LinkedIn, and YouTube for regular content to help you market smarter.
25:40
You can also sign up for our newsletter at capacityinteractive.com so you never
25:44
miss an update. And if you haven't already,
25:47
please click the subscribe button wherever you get your podcasts.
25:50
Until next time, stay nerdy.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More