Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Oh, watch your step. Wow, your attic
0:03
is so dark. Dark? I
0:05
know, right? It's the perfect place
0:07
to stream horror movies. Flee me.
0:10
What movie is that? I haven't pressed
0:12
play yet. Ahh!
0:15
AT&T Fiber with All-Fi covers your whole house.
0:17
Even your really, really creepy attic turned home
0:20
theater. Jimmy, what have I told you
0:22
about scaring our guests? Get AT&T
0:24
Fiber with All-Fi and live like a
0:26
gillionaire. Limited availability covers may require
0:28
extenders at additional charge. This
0:31
program is sponsored by the
0:33
Kavli Prize, which honors scientists
0:35
for breakthroughs in astrophysics, nanoscience,
0:37
and neuroscience. The
0:39
Kavli Prize is a partnership among
0:42
the Norwegian Academy of Science and
0:44
Letters, the Norwegian Ministry of Education
0:46
and Research, and the
0:48
U.S.-based Kavli Foundation in Los
0:50
Angeles, California. I'm
0:57
Alan Alder, and this is Clear
0:59
and Vivid, conversations about
1:01
connecting and communicating. In
1:07
this, the last of our four special
1:10
episodes celebrating the Kavli Prize, I'll
1:12
be talking with two of the winners of
1:14
this year's Kavli Prize for nanotechnology. Chad
1:18
Merkin developed microscopic carriers able to
1:20
deliver new types of medicines. Robert
1:23
Langer also made breakthroughs in drug delivery
1:26
by devising ways for drugs to be released
1:28
in the body slowly over time. Both
1:32
Merkin and Langer have played major
1:34
roles in developing the biotechnology industry.
1:37
Between them, they've filed thousands of patents
1:39
and they've helped found multiple companies. First,
1:42
my conversation with Chad Merkin. You
1:47
know, I've been excited about nanotechnology since
1:49
I first heard about it. You've
1:51
been doing incredible work in this field. You're
1:54
the person to ask this question that all
1:56
of us can understand a little better. How
1:58
would you describe nanotechnology? It's
2:00
a study of the small. It's an interesting field
2:02
in the sense that everything
2:05
when miniaturized is different.
2:08
If you take anything and shrink it down to the
2:10
nanometer length scale it has different properties. The
2:13
thing that's hard for most of us to get
2:15
I think is how small small
2:17
is. You say nanometer or nanometer? Tomato
2:19
or tomato. You can go either way.
2:23
So a nanometer, it's a
2:25
billionth of a meter? Well the way I like
2:27
to think about it is a human red blood
2:29
cell is about 80 microns in
2:32
diameter. So 80,000 nanometers.
2:35
So it's huge compared to
2:37
a nanoparticle, a 10 nanometer
2:39
nanoparticle. This is a really, really
2:42
tiny length scale. It's not the tiniest of length
2:44
scales because atoms are even smaller.
2:47
But it's a length scale that actually
2:49
is in between what I call
2:51
the chemistry length scale and the biological length scale. That's one
2:53
of the reasons it's so interesting especially
2:56
when you talk about advances in
2:58
biology and medicine. I
3:00
think it was around 1959 when Richard
3:02
Feynman gave that talk called Plenty of
3:05
Room at the Bottom, meaning there's a
3:07
lot to be learned about the smallest
3:09
particles, nanoparticles. He was predicting a lot
3:11
of new research. But
3:14
it was quite a bit later before you got into
3:16
it. What got you into it? Was there still plenty
3:18
of room at the bottom or was it a thriving
3:20
field by then? All the room
3:22
was still at the bottom. So
3:25
I always say I hit my
3:27
career with perfect timing. Timing
3:29
is everything in many careers, especially the case
3:32
in science. So I'd come from a lab
3:34
where people were beginning to
3:36
understand that really interesting things happen when
3:38
you miniaturize them. And we were miniaturizing
3:40
them to the micro scale. And
3:43
then right when I moved to Northwestern, these
3:45
really powerful tools called scanning tunneling microscopes and
3:47
atomic force microscopes that allow you to manipulate
3:50
atoms one at a time were
3:52
coming online and in fact becoming commercially available.
3:55
And I began to get interested in
3:57
them and began to develop a real
3:59
path. for really looking at
4:02
the chemical consequences of miniaturization and
4:04
ultimately began to build a very
4:07
large effort in my own research operation and
4:09
now we've built the largest Institute of Northwestern
4:11
for nanotechnology. It's called the International Institute
4:14
for Nanotechnology. So spherical
4:16
nucleic acid which is what you
4:18
won the Cauley Prize for, right?
4:21
Correct. You start off with a
4:23
particle that's spherical and
4:25
you somehow can attach little bits
4:27
of DNA to it and yeah
4:30
let me let me take you back a little
4:33
bit so so so it's been known for a
4:35
long time that you can make materials called colloids
4:37
these are dispersions of particles nanoparticles. Gold
4:40
is a great example of this importance of
4:42
miniaturization. If I take and shrink gold down
4:44
to the nanometer length scale it's no longer
4:46
golden color. The tiny little particles
4:48
are actually red in color. Oh I read
4:50
they use that ability for it to turn
4:52
color to make stained glass in the Middle
4:55
Ages. That's exactly right so so so in
4:57
the middle age and even to this day
4:59
a lot of the colors in
5:01
stained glass windows come from these particles. We
5:04
then take those same particles we've learned how to
5:06
make them and make them in large quantities and
5:09
we can also synthesize DNA short
5:12
little strands of DNA that have n groups that
5:14
can chemically react with the particles and
5:16
arrange themselves in the surface of the particle and
5:19
at high density you get kind of
5:21
a kushball like structure a globular
5:23
form of DNA that has
5:26
no natural equivalent it's only made through
5:28
chemistry and nanotechnology concepts but
5:30
it has properties that allow
5:33
it to interact with living and biological systems
5:35
in ways that we've never seen before. Now
5:37
whose DNA is it? Is it the DNA of
5:40
a person or the DNA of an invading
5:42
microorganism or what? It's
5:45
a great question it's actually any sort
5:47
of DNA we'd like we
5:49
can make whatever code we'd like in the course of
5:51
an afternoon using something called
5:53
a gene machine. This is what makes
5:55
it so powerful with respect to your
5:58
question everything living has a in
6:00
each genetic code. You do, I
6:02
do, any organism does, any
6:05
infectious disease organism, viruses, bacteria. If
6:07
I know those codes, I now
6:10
can create tiny particles that are
6:12
complementary to those codes and
6:14
they can latch onto them. So one of the
6:16
first things that we invented and
6:18
developed based upon spherical nucleic acids, really
6:21
sensitive and selective point
6:23
of care medical diagnostic tools that allowed
6:25
you to detect in
6:28
a sample different disease
6:30
elements. And you could do
6:32
it very rapidly and you could look for many different signatures
6:35
of disease in parallel with
6:37
one another. That must make a tremendous difference
6:39
to be able to diagnose a
6:41
disease in the hospital or perhaps even
6:44
in a doctor's office. That's
6:46
exactly right. So we wanna go ultimately to the doctor's
6:48
office, but it would turn out at the time, so
6:50
this goes back to the early 2000s, we
6:52
invented one of the first point of care
6:54
medical diagnostic tools of the nano age based
6:57
upon spherical nucleic acids.
7:00
And the idea was to try to
7:02
move these testing capabilities from remote labs
7:05
at the very least to the hospital. Apparently
7:07
you can use this not only to diagnose
7:09
a disease, but to treat a disease as
7:11
well, is that right? Well,
7:13
it's interesting. Yeah, the same constructs are
7:15
used also for the development of therapeutics.
7:18
The world has opened up to
7:20
the idea of genetic medicines through
7:22
the COVID era, right? That's a
7:24
fantastic class of genetic medicines. And
7:27
that's the reason why we're talking about the
7:29
mRNA vaccines. Well, it turns out
7:31
that DNA and RNA delivered in
7:34
different forms can be used for anything ranging
7:36
from creating medicines that downregulate the
7:39
production of certain proteins that cause disease. So if you
7:42
have a certain disease that causes you to produce too
7:44
much of a given protein, you
7:46
can use these types of drugs
7:48
to downregulate that. You can
7:50
cause cancer cells to selectively die, and
7:53
you can use these types of
7:55
therapies for not just infectious disease, but
7:58
for many forms of cancer that basically Now
12:00
the vast majority of nanoparticles are
12:03
spherical. So that was the obvious
12:05
one to start with. Hence when
12:07
we made the first DNA modified particle,
12:09
it was a spherical nucleic acid as
12:11
opposed to a cubic nucleic acid or
12:13
whatever else you'd like to work with
12:15
respect to shape. ["The
12:24
I'm interested in the fact that
12:26
your companies, and you've created a
12:28
number of companies, some of them
12:30
seem to go much broader than
12:32
the field of medication. For instance,
12:34
you have one that helps create
12:36
the smallest 2D printer. What
12:38
do you need a small 2D printer for?" Ah,
12:41
that's interesting. Okay, so yeah, we invented what's
12:44
often referred to as the
12:46
world's smallest pen, the world's smallest printer. We
12:48
took one of these tools that
12:51
we talked about at the start of this podcast that
12:54
was used to manipulate atoms, something called
12:56
an atomic force microscope. And
12:58
it was invented to actually get a
13:00
topological map of a surface, to
13:02
look at the contour of a surface on the
13:05
nanometer length scale. Basically it's a
13:07
feeler. And we
13:09
converted it from a reader to a writer
13:12
by putting chemicals on the tip that could chemically
13:14
react then with the surface that you were moving
13:16
it over. So would you
13:18
use the world's smallest pen to write an
13:20
apology letter? Well, what do
13:22
you need it for? We, one
13:24
stunt we did was we used the world's smallest pen
13:26
to write Feynman's speech, plenty of room at the bottom
13:29
to prove a point. And I'll
13:31
send you a copy of that. That's actually quite interesting.
13:33
Great. What use does that have?
13:36
Or are you waiting to find the use? It
13:38
has a lot of uses. So the first thing
13:40
you can do is you can begin to make
13:42
miniaturized electronics. This allowed us to
13:44
make devices out of molecules, asking instead of
13:46
using silicon, can we make molecules that behave,
13:48
for example, as transistors and can we place
13:51
them between the components of devices so that
13:53
we can make measurements on them. On
13:55
the biological side of things, we
13:58
can now begin to pattern proteins on.
14:00
surfaces and different types of chemical structures
14:02
that could control what cells do. So
14:04
we could pattern underneath a single cell
14:07
thousands of different types of chemical components
14:10
that could regulate how that cell moves on a
14:12
surface, how it grows, if it's a stem cell,
14:14
how it differentiates, how it becomes a bone cell,
14:16
how it becomes a nerve cell, how it becomes
14:18
a fat cell. All sorts
14:20
of things become possible when you can
14:23
fabricate on this tiniest of length scales.
14:25
This is really mind-boggling. And
14:28
it sounds incredibly promising to me
14:30
to learn that you're dealing with
14:32
nanomaterials that can accelerate
14:34
the energy transition, I understand. How does that
14:36
work? Well, this is very... So take that
14:39
same tools. We came up with a way,
14:41
instead of using one tiny tip, we
14:43
now have commercial tools that use
14:46
up to 11 million tips. And
14:49
each of those tips you
14:51
can kind of think of as individual people that
14:54
are all chemically synthesizing something different
14:56
in different locations on the chip. So
14:59
now imagine having a two by two centimeter chip
15:02
where we can make millions to billions
15:04
of new materials, all positionally
15:06
encoded on the chip. This
15:09
allows you to begin to look at
15:11
different combinations of elements to find the
15:14
next materials that matter. And so
15:16
we have a company called Matik,
15:18
MatIQ, that is trying
15:20
to basically use this to find the
15:23
materials that will allow you to convert
15:25
CO2 into high value
15:27
products, ethylene, propylene, methane,
15:31
acetic acid, that will
15:33
allow you to capture solar energy efficiently,
15:35
that will allow you to create very
15:37
efficient solar displays, that will allow you
15:40
to electrify almost anything and convert it
15:42
into... Take a low
15:44
value feedstock and turn it into a
15:46
high value product. But
15:49
the advantage is we've
15:51
gone from this tool that was designed for
15:53
fabrication to the world's most
15:55
parallel synthesis tool. So that's the
15:57
equivalent of having 11 million people coming
15:59
to your... lab and all making
16:02
things simultaneously. We've dramatically accelerated how
16:04
fast the world finds materials that
16:06
ultimately matter. And to me, that's
16:08
a game changer because if you
16:11
think of history, right? We've
16:13
had the Stone Age, the Bronze
16:15
Age, the Iron Age, we're living
16:18
through the Silicon Age. New materials
16:20
drive new capabilities. They change civilization
16:22
in a significant way. And
16:24
so if you can make things faster than anybody else
16:27
can, good things are going to happen. This
16:33
sounds like an impossible question to answer given
16:35
what you just said. But
16:37
do you have a vision of what could be the
16:39
next thing in nano beyond where you can go now?
16:42
That's, I think,
16:45
so dependent upon the person that you talk
16:47
to. In my two areas, I want
16:49
to do two things. One, on the medical side, I
16:52
want to completely change the way vaccines are produced.
16:54
And I don't mean by mRNA. I
16:56
mean completely change the way we develop vaccines
16:58
using the vaccine. We call it vaccines using
17:00
nanotechnology to put together the components in
17:03
a vaccine that matter, the adjuvant that's
17:05
the stimulator of the immune system and the antigen,
17:07
which is a trainer of the immune system, some
17:09
sort of peptide that tells your immune system to
17:12
only kill certain cancer cells, but not touch the
17:14
healthy cells. Putting those together in
17:16
the form of a
17:18
nanostructure where you find the
17:20
structural arrangement that maximizes vaccine
17:23
performance. We call that rational vaccinology.
17:25
That is vaccines 3.0. That's coming down the pike.
17:27
We're going to see that over the next 10
17:29
years. I think you're going to see tremendous
17:31
advances in that area. The
17:34
second area is a little
17:36
bit builds off what I just said with respect
17:38
to the world's most parallel synthesis tools. So
17:42
when I make a chip that has billions
17:44
of new materials and I screen it to
17:46
find the materials that allow me to convert,
17:48
for example, CO2 into ethanol.
17:50
That's fantastic. But
17:52
those chips also represent
17:56
the largest amount of high
17:58
quality data in the immune system. materials
18:00
discovery space. So we're
18:02
naturally creating an incredible database
18:05
that can be used to train artificial
18:08
intelligence algorithms so that
18:10
machines can now begin to tell us
18:12
what types of materials to go after, what types of
18:14
nanostructures to go after that will really
18:17
make a difference depending upon our need. And
18:19
that is the ultimate in terms of using these
18:21
types of tools to get to a game-changing,
18:24
world-changing capability. Well,
18:27
your work is extraordinary, and it's
18:29
been really, really enlightening to talk
18:31
to you. I very
18:33
much appreciate you taking the time because I
18:36
can't imagine anybody busier than you doing
18:38
the things you've just described. And
18:40
thanks for being with us today. It was just great. I
18:43
appreciate it. Thank you very much. When
18:50
we come back from our break, my guest is Robert
18:52
Langer, a chemical engineer
18:54
famed for his prolific inventiveness. Langer's
18:58
Covelry Prize announcement cites his
19:00
role in using nanotechnology to
19:03
help develop techniques to deliver drugs in
19:05
new ways by controlling how
19:07
they're released in the body. Our
19:12
program is sponsored by the
19:15
Covelry Prize, which honors scientists
19:17
for breakthroughs in astrophysics, nanoscience,
19:19
and neuroscience that transform
19:22
our understanding of the very big,
19:24
the very small, and the
19:26
very complex. From
19:28
scientific breakthroughs like the discovery
19:30
of CRISPR-Cas9 and the detection
19:33
of gravitational waves, to
19:35
inventing new fields of research, Covelry
19:37
Prize Laureates push the limits of what
19:40
we know and advance science in ways
19:42
that could not have been imagined. The
19:45
Covelry Prize is a partnership among
19:47
the Norwegian Academy of Science and
19:49
Letters, the Norwegian Ministry of Education
19:51
and Research, and the
19:53
US-based Covelry Foundation in Los
19:56
Angeles, California. The
38:01
music is courtesy of the Stefan Koenig
38:03
Trio. Next
38:12
week we'll be back with a conversation on
38:14
my favorite topic, connecting and
38:17
communicating. And not just
38:19
communicating, but super communicating. That's
38:22
the subject of a new book by journalist
38:24
Charles Duhigg. When they've talked to
38:27
folks who are consistent super communicators, because we're all
38:29
super communicators at one time or another, but
38:31
people who can connect with almost anyone, who are
38:33
really good at this. And they
38:35
ask them, have you always been good at communication?
38:39
Most often they say no. They say
38:41
something like, you know, when I was
38:43
in high school I had trouble making friends, so
38:45
I really had to study how kids talk to each other. Or
38:48
my parents got divorced and I had to be the
38:50
peacemaker between them. Or my dad was
38:52
a salesman and my grandfather was a con man. And
38:55
so I really had to think about, like, study them
38:57
and try and figure out what's going on. And I
39:00
think what's happening there is that oftentimes
39:02
thinking, just a little, like half
39:04
an inch deeper, thinking about communication
39:07
is what makes us better at communication. Charles
39:10
Duhigg and how those he calls super
39:12
communicators unlock the secret language
39:15
of connection. Next
39:17
time on Clear and Vivid. For
39:20
more details about Clear and Vivid and to sign
39:22
up for my newsletter, please
39:24
visit alanalda.com. And
39:27
you can also find us on Facebook and
39:29
Instagram at Clear and Vivid. Thanks
39:32
for listening. Bye-bye. Ben
39:44
hadn't had a decent night's sleep in a
39:47
month. So, during
39:49
one of his restless nights, he booked
39:51
a package triple broth on Expedia. When
39:54
he arrived at his beachside hotel,
39:56
he discovered a miraculous bed slump
39:58
between two trees. and fell into
40:00
the best sleep of his life.
40:04
You were made to be rechargeable.
40:07
We were made to package flights and
40:09
hotels and hammocks for less. Expedia,
40:12
made to travel.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More