Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Taking on a top job is
0:02
unique in many ways. In this episode,
0:04
how to hear more of the truth
0:07
and where to begin with easy wins
0:09
and early moves. This
0:11
is Coaching for Leaders, Episode 685. Produced
0:16
by Innovate Learning, maximizing
0:19
human potential. Greetings
0:24
to you from Orange County, California.
0:27
This is Coaching for Leaders, and
0:29
I'm your host, Dave Stahoviak. Leaders
0:32
aren't born, they're made. And
0:35
this weekly show helps you
0:37
discover leadership wisdom through insightful
0:39
conversations. One of the
0:41
realities that many of us face in
0:43
our careers is starting a top job.
0:46
And when we get into the role,
0:48
it's exciting, can be nerve
0:50
wracking, and often it's hard to
0:52
know where to start, what to do,
0:54
and what not to do. Today a
0:56
conversation that will help us all to
0:59
do a better job at starting that
1:01
top job. I'm so pleased to welcome
1:03
Ty Wiggins to the show. He's a
1:05
leadership expert who's passionate about setting up
1:07
new CEOs for success. As
1:09
the global lead of Russell Reynolds
1:11
Associates CEO and executive transition practice,
1:14
he helps world leading CEOs successfully
1:16
transition into their new roles, guiding
1:19
them through their first 12 to 18
1:21
months as their trusted advisor.
1:24
He is the author of the
1:26
new CEO, Lessons from CEOs on
1:28
how to start well and perform
1:30
quickly minus the common mistakes. Ty,
1:32
what a pleasure to have you.
1:35
Thank you very much for having me, Dave. It's great to be here.
1:38
You have a really beautiful
1:40
quote at the start of one of
1:42
the chapters of the book. That's so true.
1:45
It says, as the well-known saying
1:47
adapted for the business world goes,
1:49
as CEO, you can count on two things.
1:52
You will never be given a cold coffee
1:54
and you will never hear the whole truth.
1:58
And I read that and I thought, wow, how true. that
2:00
is things really are different
2:04
aren't they?
2:07
Yeah once you become CEO or
2:09
even in other roles that are
2:11
very senior, there's this change
2:13
that happens in terms of how people
2:15
see you and how people treat you
2:17
and especially around what
2:19
people tell you. So this
2:21
is one of the areas where new CEOs
2:25
and new senior leaders really
2:27
need to quickly adjust their
2:29
thinking and almost accept
2:31
that this is changed and sometimes
2:34
you find senior leaders really
2:36
resisting that that acceptance.
2:39
What is it that you see
2:41
people when you're working with them
2:43
tend to resist? I think a
2:45
lot of people come through the ranks with
2:47
a you know emerging ideas of
2:49
what type of senior leader they'll
2:52
be or when I'm CEO I'm
2:54
going to be like this and I'm not going to be like that.
2:57
So when you come out of
2:59
the C-suite especially that there is
3:01
sometimes a resistance to really
3:03
step fully into the role of the CEO.
3:05
You still want to be part of the
3:07
team. These are people at your level, they
3:09
may have been peers if you came internally
3:12
and you don't want to lose that
3:14
connection and you don't want to suddenly
3:16
become this sort of all
3:18
powerful leader but the reality
3:21
is that becoming CEO changes the
3:23
dynamics of the relationship. You just
3:25
can't have the same candidate, you
3:28
can't have the same exchanges and
3:31
you are increasingly watched and
3:33
scrutinized in terms of what you
3:35
say and what you do. So
3:38
the quicker that the CEO
3:40
accepts this, the easier
3:42
it is for everyone else to perform because
3:44
the challenge on the senior leadership team is
3:47
they need to accept this as well which
3:49
they generally do far faster but if
3:52
you hold them in this in-between period it
3:54
can make it quite difficult for you to
3:56
really lead and perform. highlight
4:00
in your work is that when you're
4:02
in the top job you see more
4:04
but you hear less and
4:07
you say that this is
4:10
particularly difficult for people who
4:12
were promoted internally. What
4:15
is it that's more difficult for
4:17
someone that's come up through the
4:19
ranks inside the organization? It's
4:21
a comfort level with a
4:24
status quo. So if
4:26
you're an externally recruited CEO,
4:29
you come in accepting that people will
4:31
take time to get to know you,
4:33
take time to trust you and
4:36
so your information flow will
4:38
be restricted. So you have this cognitive
4:40
understanding of what that's going to
4:43
be like. When you're
4:45
promoted internally, you're sort of
4:47
let into this false perception of the information
4:49
flow that you've already been used
4:51
to and you know if it
4:53
was me I'd be saying they know me,
4:56
they've known me for a long time, me
4:58
becoming CEO, nothing's going to
5:01
change, I'm still going to
5:03
be close to the front line, I'm
5:05
still going to get the same level
5:07
of information and so they can be
5:09
blindsided and you know there's
5:11
a couple of examples in the book. Mark
5:14
Bitzer is one when he became CEO of
5:16
Whirlpool. He was disappointed
5:18
that the information that
5:20
he was receiving was suddenly filtered
5:23
at such a greater level and
5:25
one of the things that I say to
5:27
CEOs regularly is that you know the
5:29
same way senior management
5:32
filters information going down,
5:34
people at the front line filter
5:36
information coming up and I argue
5:39
in many cases the thickest filter
5:41
is the C-suite. They're the ones
5:44
usually with good intentions who are
5:46
the last packages of the narrative,
5:48
who are the last adjusters of the
5:51
decks. They're the ones that iron out
5:53
any of the wrinkles so
5:55
you have to be really really careful that
5:57
you aren't assuming the same level Of
5:59
Information. Level Of transparency of information.
6:02
That. You will rely on Ssh Wait
6:04
member because you now have bigger.
6:07
More. Difficult problems to solve and decisions
6:09
to make. You need more information
6:11
and in fact you are getting
6:13
less. You. See in the book that if
6:15
you don't believe this is happening to you and
6:17
the top job, it's one of your blind spots
6:19
and. I. Think about that in
6:21
like part is this is. Mine.
6:24
Said right Understanding that.
6:26
That is happening that when you're in
6:28
a top jobs you are getting filtered
6:30
information and. The sooner you
6:33
make peace with that reality, the
6:35
more you can do to actually.
6:38
Find and surface the information that you need
6:40
it. M I am I hearing that will.
6:43
Absolutely. You. You have
6:45
to acknowledge it if you, if you kids
6:47
yourself. That. Nothing's changed. and you
6:49
that you finger on the polls and
6:52
then everyone from the. Front. Line
6:54
to the senior exec A telling you
6:56
the bear honest truth that is absolutely
6:59
a blind spot. Present is not what
7:01
happens and again it's not necessarily people
7:03
wanting to the saviors. But. People
7:06
want to look good in your eyes.
7:08
They want to please you. They don't
7:10
want tell you things that you don't
7:12
want to hear. They want to try
7:14
and fix problems before it gets here.
7:16
There's a lot of aspects of good
7:18
intended behavior. But. What it does mean
7:21
is that you are not getting the information that
7:23
you think you're getting. So. As a
7:25
new Ceo, You really have
7:27
to think about a identifying those
7:29
rare people that will tell you
7:31
the blatant truth regardless of repercussions.
7:34
And. Hold them close and encourage that.
7:36
But. You'll see a lot of sea
7:39
ice internal and external, doing lots
7:41
of front line meeting, listening to
7:43
his lunches with the Cia breakfast
7:45
and things like that where and
7:47
not only in the new a
7:49
the early stages, but consistently to
7:51
make sure that they're at least
7:53
posturing the opportunity. For. People to
7:55
tell them what's really important. One.
7:57
of the were the questions that i encourage
8:00
CEOs to ask when they become
8:02
CEO is to go at all
8:05
levels of the organization, but especially at the front
8:07
line and ask people, tell
8:09
me some of the workarounds that you have in place.
8:12
And what this fosters is there
8:14
are workarounds that people have around
8:17
processes or policies or structure
8:19
or systems because it just doesn't work.
8:22
And they've probably tried to get it
8:24
changed unsuccessfully, so they create this workaround.
8:27
If you can get people talking about
8:29
the workarounds, you'll get a really good
8:31
understanding of what is getting between them
8:33
and successfully executing their role. And
8:36
you're in a position then where you can actually
8:38
make some early changes that really engages
8:41
the workforce. One
8:43
of the distinctions that I'm thinking about
8:45
is that as the top person, you
8:48
really have to be intentional
8:50
to open those doors
8:53
for the conversation and lead it. And you
8:55
call it finding your espresso machine. The
8:59
discourse, the debate that you may have been used
9:01
to in your last role or on a senior
9:03
team or in the C-suite just
9:06
doesn't happen naturally to all the things you
9:08
just mentioned. And so being the person who
9:10
actually leaves that, opens the door is key
9:13
because if you don't, no one else will. Yeah,
9:15
you have to be so careful. And
9:18
this is one of the key changes
9:20
between being a C-suite executive and the
9:22
CEO. When you're a
9:24
C-suite executive, you are encouraged to
9:27
give your opinion at all
9:29
manner of things. And there
9:31
isn't really a timing issue because when
9:34
you're in the C-suite, if there's a
9:36
discussion at the C-suite level
9:38
with the CEO, then you're lobbying for
9:40
something. Then it's everything you can
9:42
do to get that best outcome. So
9:45
you introduce your opinion upfront, you
9:47
can be a little bit more
9:49
sharp in terms of your responses
9:51
and challenges. You're trying to sway
9:53
people, you're trying to influence them
9:55
to your way of thinking. When
9:58
you're the CEO, you're... ability
10:00
to influence is significantly
10:02
increased. So there's always
10:04
that funny analogy that comes around on
10:07
places like LinkedIn where the leader walks
10:09
into the room and says, okay,
10:12
here's the problem. Here's what
10:14
I think we should do. But I'm really interested
10:16
in your opinion, so tell me what you think. And
10:19
of course, we know that it's done at that point.
10:21
The way as a CEO you frame
10:24
up a discussion can also
10:26
end the discussion. So
10:28
in the book I talk about
10:30
that Nelson Mandela quote around leaders
10:32
should speak last because as
10:35
CEO, once you've framed
10:37
it, outlined it, set
10:39
up the discussion, dealt
10:41
with the silence in the room because you felt
10:43
the obligation to lead, you have
10:45
led the witness in such a way
10:47
that you will now only hear back
10:50
basically what you have put out.
10:53
And you invite us to
10:55
get out of the bubble that
10:58
just naturally forms in the
11:01
top job. And one
11:03
way to do that actually comes back to something
11:05
you mentioned a minute ago, but I'd love to
11:08
dive in on that more is spending
11:10
more time with middle managers
11:12
and frontline employees. And you write
11:14
in the book in RRA's research,
11:16
49% of CEOs
11:18
said they spent too little time with
11:20
middle managers and frontline employees, but those
11:22
who do, it can be
11:24
an invaluable way to get a feel
11:26
for what's really going on. I
11:29
love that question that you asked about, tell
11:32
me some of the workarounds you have in place, talking
11:34
to middle managers, frontline folks of
11:37
the folks you've worked with and observed
11:40
who you've seen really do that well
11:42
to get connected with middle management, frontline
11:44
employees. What is it they
11:46
do to actually connect and open up
11:48
those conversations? This
11:50
is an interesting aspect because I often
11:53
get asked, do I see differences
11:55
between first time and second time CEOs? And
11:58
I've had the opportunity to support. second,
12:00
third, and fourth time CEOs? And
12:03
the answer is yes. And one of
12:05
the differences is the amount of time they
12:08
spend with people early on. So
12:11
a first time CEO will be more inclined
12:13
to spend time on the financials and the
12:15
operating model and the physical infrastructure and the
12:17
things that they feel they need to get
12:19
their head around. Second and
12:21
third time CEOs spend their first month
12:24
to two months out in the field
12:26
talking to people, and they don't
12:28
do rapid fire half an hour
12:30
discussions. They actually get into these
12:32
discussions because what they understand intrinsically
12:35
is if I want to
12:38
do well with this organization, if I
12:40
want to move this organization forward, then
12:43
everything I really need to understand about what
12:45
is performing and stopping it from performing is
12:47
locked in the people. It's not
12:49
in the decks. It's not in the reports. So
12:52
they spend this disproportionate time with people.
12:55
And I think the people that do it really, really
12:57
well, they come back
12:59
with great information. They
13:01
then feed that information back to the
13:03
organization. So one of the suggestions I
13:05
make to clients is when
13:08
you're a new CEO, people are really
13:10
fixated on what you're learning and what
13:12
you're thinking. So share that. So
13:14
I had one CEO in the UK. She
13:16
did a fantastic job of writing an email
13:18
to the organization every week for the first
13:20
10 weeks saying, here's where I
13:22
went. Here's what I'm hearing.
13:24
Here's what I'm learning. And
13:27
here's what I'm starting to sort of understand and
13:29
write it very much in the present tense. And
13:32
this fostered this enormous information flow
13:34
because people would say, oh, wow.
13:37
So if you've learned that, now you need to
13:39
actually know this because that's the next level.
13:42
Or they were able to challenge what she was understanding.
13:45
So what it did was it really brought
13:47
her forward to the organization in a way
13:49
that the organization felt like they knew her
13:52
at a much faster rate than you would normally see.
13:55
And it's a little different than some
13:57
of the traditional advice that we hear
13:59
about. about the first 90
14:02
days, the first 100 days as a
14:04
measure of success. And
14:07
you say that the focus on the
14:09
first 90, first 100 days, depending on
14:11
the model, is a bit
14:14
overstated sometimes. What is it
14:16
that's overstated about it? I
14:18
think the emphasis on your
14:20
transition last 90 days is overstated.
14:22
At junior levels as leaders, yes,
14:24
maybe you can get a lot
14:26
of stuff done in your first
14:29
90 days because it's very basic.
14:31
But as a CEO, by the
14:33
end of 90 or 100 days, you're
14:35
still really coming to grips with the
14:37
organization, understanding your team, you're starting to
14:39
get a real sense of the culture.
14:42
Cultures are one of those things that you
14:44
can't really understand externally. And even
14:47
if you're internal, there's a big difference
14:49
between being part of the culture and
14:51
being responsible for it. So at the
14:53
end of 90 days or 100 days, I think
14:56
the CEO needs to be really
14:58
measured and think about how he
15:00
or she will score their progress.
15:03
You will unlikely to
15:05
have moved the needle significantly in that period
15:07
of time. There will always be
15:09
some things I talk to clients about. These
15:12
early actions are really important. You can
15:15
be very discerning where you put your
15:17
time and energy can make a
15:19
big difference. But I talk a lot about finding
15:22
some of the things that are frustrating
15:24
the organization, finding some of
15:26
the things that are important to people
15:28
at various levels but have been ignored
15:30
or left alone and really getting
15:32
to the end of that 100 days with a
15:34
sense of what have I
15:37
learned, what have I understood. And obviously,
15:39
if something is on fire, then
15:42
you need to put it out. But if
15:44
something's been smoldering and been smoldering for some time,
15:46
you can probably leave it for a little while
15:48
longer because the biggest risk
15:50
you have as the new CEO
15:52
is making decisions or judgments
15:55
without the proper context or information and
15:58
then finding yourself having to change. change
16:00
that down the track, sort
16:02
of the Amazon two-way doors, I
16:04
guess. Making decisions
16:06
on a one-way door really early, that is
16:09
quite restrictive to your ability to perform longer
16:11
term. Yeah, indeed, and not
16:13
being able to go back on that decision.
16:16
But this reminds me of an exchange
16:19
you write in the book that just
16:22
really, I think, captures the complexity of this.
16:24
You say, I have had
16:27
conversations with every CEO I've worked
16:29
with and often several times over
16:31
hear things like this. Should I
16:34
take my time and learn the organization?
16:36
Yes. But if I move too slowly, do
16:38
I run the risk of the board getting rid of me?
16:40
Yes. Do people need to feel the impact
16:43
of a new CEO? Yes. But
16:45
do I run the risk of losing people because I move
16:47
too fast? Yes. So
16:49
what should I do? Be patient or go fast? Yes.
16:53
I was
16:55
reading through that and thinking, it really
16:57
does illustrate the complexity and the art
16:59
of trying to know what to move
17:02
on and not. And the
17:04
distinction you just highlighted, I think,
17:06
is such a helpful one. If
17:08
it's on fire, fix it. But
17:10
if it's smoldering, leave it alone
17:12
until you have more context. And I guess that
17:15
begs the question, how do you know the
17:17
difference sometimes? Because it's sometimes hard to know in the moment.
17:19
Yes. That's probably one of the key
17:22
challenges is that when you come
17:24
in, you need to be
17:26
prepared to be heavily lobbied. People
17:28
will try to catch you off balance and
17:31
push through things that they want done
17:33
because you haven't got full context or
17:36
bring things to your attention because it's really important to
17:38
them. And as CEO,
17:40
everybody else's urgent and
17:43
important will come towards you. But you need to
17:45
be really clear about what is actually important for
17:48
you. So this determining whether it's
17:50
on fire or smoldering, it's going
17:52
to be challenging. This balance
17:55
between Learning and listening and
17:57
moving has a couple of factors. One of them
17:59
is you. I prefer yard.
18:01
There's. A high bias to action is
18:04
this is your first c or wrong.
18:06
There is pressure and a lot of
18:08
the pressure that you feel will actually
18:10
come from yourself. So. I've worked with
18:12
a lotta sea where we've gotten to three
18:14
months and they said things like i haven't
18:16
done anything yet or a to do something
18:18
really quickly. And. I've been able to
18:20
point out that they have done a lot
18:23
of things and that the boys expectation is
18:25
that these things take six to nine months
18:27
so that as an opportunity to exceed the
18:29
expectation that there's very little when in running
18:31
down a path to the quickly just to
18:33
satisfy your own. Some. Concern.
18:36
About your ability to do this. So.
18:38
It is. It is it. It is
18:40
a real challenge and I think these
18:42
these early actions and the shifting into
18:44
action. Eat. This is where
18:47
you need to be asking the right questions.
18:49
This is where you need to be patient.
18:51
This is where you need to be really
18:53
clever with your language that you don't say
18:55
something that people latch on to and go.
18:58
Hey guys, focus is this. So let's bring
19:00
all the information to him on this on
19:02
this matter. And. Either you need
19:04
to be very aware of. Some. Of
19:06
devices that you have like the yeah
19:09
it isn't availability bias which is the
19:11
more available the information the more I
19:13
trusted. So the law people lobby meal
19:15
told me about something the one gonna
19:17
lean into that. And. Then. The.
19:20
Big boss that I say. people coming in
19:22
that really affects them early as their own
19:24
consolation bus. Your. It feels really
19:26
good. To. Find things that you
19:29
expect to find because it reinforces
19:31
to you that you're the right
19:33
person. So this adage of inspect
19:35
what you expect. Is. Really
19:37
valuable early because you can run down
19:39
a series of pathways. Because. You
19:41
wanted to find something along behold. You.
19:44
Find it. You.
19:46
Mentioned a moment ago that. It's.
19:49
Helpful to ask the right questions
19:51
and this of course Tejas contextually
19:53
everywhere. And. yet i'm i'm
19:56
wondering if you have stumbled across
19:58
a question or two someone
20:00
struggling with the, you know, is
20:06
confirmation bias. That sometimes helps
20:08
just to separate that a little bit. There's
20:11
a number of really great questions
20:13
that I think, and I encourage
20:15
leaders at all levels to adopt. One
20:17
is when you are doing early
20:20
rounds of one-on-ones and
20:22
group meetings, that at
20:24
some point in the discussion, you
20:26
ask a version of the question,
20:29
what didn't I ask about but should have?
20:32
And I find this because working across the
20:34
world, most of the cultures
20:36
are fairly compliant. If you ask me
20:38
about something, then I'll answer. But
20:40
if you don't raise it, I won't necessarily
20:42
raise it. So this is the sort
20:45
of unconscious incompetence, the concept that you
20:47
don't know what you don't know. So
20:49
as new CEO, you don't know necessarily
20:51
what to ask. So you need to
20:54
create an environment which puts people a
20:56
bit on the spot. And I've seen
20:58
this personally where people, they fidget and
21:00
they go, oh, that's a good
21:02
question. You really should have asked about the audit. You
21:04
really should have asked about the regulatory body. You should
21:07
have asked about the issue we had four years ago
21:09
because that led to this. So if you
21:11
can start to ask a question like that
21:14
and do it consistently for a number of
21:16
months, what it says to
21:18
the organization is that I am
21:20
truly committed to learning and understanding
21:23
what's going on. I need to understand
21:25
what got us to this point. And
21:27
I'm doing that in the in the
21:29
desire to serve. So the faster you
21:31
can bring me up to speed, the
21:33
more effective I can be for you.
21:36
So that's one of the questions that I really
21:38
encourage people to use in these
21:40
early meetings. When you decide
21:42
to start doing
21:45
something that moves
21:47
forward in some way, there's a
21:49
distinction you make between early
21:51
wins and early moves.
21:55
And I'm wondering if you could
21:57
tell me about that distinction and then what
21:59
is. that's critical about
22:02
early wins? There's
22:04
a lot of focus on early
22:07
wins or quick wins. The distinction
22:09
is that you need to be sure about
22:12
who this is a win for.
22:14
And so as a new CEO, your
22:17
early actions will send really
22:19
clear messages to the organization about
22:21
your focus. So one of
22:23
the areas where I see new CEOs
22:25
do really well is where some
22:28
of these easy wins are
22:30
directed towards the employee to
22:32
the staff, to the things
22:35
that demotivate. You've got a
22:37
good group of people. Most organizations have
22:39
people that are fairly well motivated, but
22:42
there are demotivators along the way. There
22:44
are things that are problematic. So how
22:47
do you as a new
22:49
CEO, as you're moving around,
22:51
work out what is really
22:53
frustrating people? Some people would use it
22:55
as a magic wand type question. If
22:57
I had a small wand and
22:59
a large wand, I could make small changes and
23:02
big changes, what would I change? Another
23:04
question might be, if you were in
23:06
the CEO role, what would you do
23:08
to make the roles of
23:12
people in the organization better? What are the
23:14
things that really annoy? So some of these
23:16
easy wins are things that are just sort
23:18
of sitting there. And in the book, I
23:21
use the example from the show Ted
23:24
Lasso, where he has his suggestion box.
23:26
And most of the suggestions aren't very helpful.
23:28
But one of them is around fixing the
23:30
water pressure in the shower. And
23:32
it's a small fix. It's clearly not a
23:34
big issue to have someone come and fix
23:36
that. But the fact that people hadn't fixed
23:39
it, spoke volumes to the
23:41
players about the care factor. And
23:44
so the fact that Ted fixed it
23:46
early, even though it was very small,
23:48
made a big difference. And I've seen
23:50
that with organizations. One CEO had people
23:52
in two buildings on different floors, and
23:54
no one could communicate. And in
23:56
the third week, he moved everybody. And
23:58
movers come in a move it around. So
24:01
that was a clear indication of something that wasn't a
24:04
massive win for the organization but
24:06
a clear action saying I'm interested,
24:08
I'm listening and I care. And
24:11
so I put those type of things in the
24:13
easy win category. For the
24:15
early moves that's where you're starting to
24:17
make bigger, broader decisions and
24:19
again it takes time to
24:22
really start to change the direction of
24:24
the organization. You will start forming views
24:26
really early and so when
24:28
I talk about early moves, I'm thinking
24:30
about things that are usually sitting just
24:32
below the surface. When you step
24:35
into the CEO role, there's inevitably
24:37
a number of projects or initiatives
24:39
that are part completed or have
24:41
been considered but the former
24:43
CEO or management team hasn't done it. And
24:46
some of these things are because
24:48
the political reward is
24:51
so far down the track that the current CEO
24:53
or current leadership team don't want to do it.
24:55
So I'm not going to invest in this because
24:57
it's going to take X amount of
24:59
capital and we're not going to see benefits for four years
25:01
and I need stuff now. So there are
25:03
some things that will always be there that you'll
25:06
be able to find and so identifying
25:08
those and making those early moves whether
25:11
it's settling a dispute legally, whether
25:13
it's getting rid of a business that everyone
25:15
knows should have been gone a long time
25:17
ago, whether it's finally making the
25:19
decision on the CRM system or
25:21
the IT infrastructure, things that have been hanging
25:24
around for a while, you know
25:26
good early moves to make. This
25:28
goes back to our conversation
25:31
about the 90 days, 100 days
25:33
that the early moves
25:35
especially, you're probably not going to be doing
25:37
that in the the first 90 or 100
25:39
days because you're not going to have the
25:41
context of what are those moves that are
25:44
going to really help the organization over the next
25:46
five to ten years. Correct. These are
25:48
things that you need to, the easy
25:50
wins, yes, maybe. The early
25:53
moves, this is really a sort of
25:55
three to nine month process where
25:58
you've got enough information and for
26:00
some CEOs, it's identifying
26:04
the board's alignment to these as
26:06
well. Some of the things
26:08
that CEOs come in to change
26:10
or want to change fairly early, I encourage
26:13
them to work out who the
26:15
original sponsor was and
26:17
if it's the chair or if it's the board, that
26:20
needs to be dealt with as well. So it does
26:22
take time to understand these but once you
26:24
do have some of these in front of you and
26:27
you can see that the organisation is
26:29
frustrated by a lack of decision
26:31
or a lack of action, you
26:33
can sometimes make these decisions quite quickly
26:35
because you will have a degree
26:37
of objectivity around the fact that this
26:40
decision has been hanging around for two years and
26:42
it's very common for organisations to have these
26:44
things in place. So deal with them if
26:46
you can as also you
26:49
should deal with any of the external
26:51
challenges. It's not unusual for
26:53
CEOs to come into roles and
26:55
then understand that there are legal
26:58
challenges or disputes in place.
27:01
These can be enormously distracting. So
27:03
these are sort of cleaning up some of
27:06
the initial messes is also something
27:08
that CEOs need to focus on and this can
27:10
be quite a derailleur. You come in
27:12
thinking you're going to do all of
27:14
the positive shiny activities and
27:17
you spend your first couple of months in the trenches
27:19
with the lawyers trying to settle cases that they should
27:21
never have been in place and shouldn't have been dragged
27:24
out as long as they were. Thinking
27:26
about the example that you mentioned in the book
27:28
of the – and I don't
27:30
remember the organisation but the CEO came in and
27:33
so much of their business was reliant on a
27:35
connection with Russia or Ukraine and a
27:37
week in the job all of a sudden there's a
27:39
war and the whole plan for the next few years
27:41
was kind of thrown out the window and I think
27:44
it just really speaks to what you
27:46
just said of the importance of taking the time,
27:48
the context and also knowing that things are going
27:50
to change. You're not going to come in and
27:52
things be exactly as you thought. You've got to
27:54
reserve time and space to know
27:56
that you're going to discover things as you go that
27:58
are going to change. What you decide to do
28:00
as those early moves. Yeah the that
28:03
that the flow of information. Is.
28:05
Obviously a normal. But.
28:07
Also the development of that inflation
28:10
so what you know at week
28:12
to. Is far more than double what
28:14
he knew a week one. And.
28:16
Say was week for too weak to
28:18
is exponential in those early months, Which
28:20
is why by the time you get
28:22
to this end of the ninety days,
28:25
he still in this exponential curve. It
28:27
hasn't even started to flatten out yet.
28:29
And. Example that you mention came from
28:31
Sanjeev Lambeau, who is the Ceo of
28:33
Windy. And. He was an internal
28:36
success out. It was a very
28:38
very smooth success and process. He
28:40
is a fantastic Cia. And
28:43
He had written this Perfect plan. Based.
28:45
On the advice he'd read in books
28:47
and and I think planning for your
28:50
transition is very beneficial and you should
28:52
definitely do that. You also need to
28:54
be able to adapt, and that was
28:56
his example. I think three or four
28:58
days into his. Being. Ceo
29:01
Russia invaded Ukraine and he had to
29:03
throw his plan out run another one.
29:05
So there is this. Constant.
29:07
Sort of, You're dealing with the changes
29:09
and being able to adapt while still
29:12
holding that broad direction that you want
29:14
to throw a transition in a longer
29:16
term for the organization. You.
29:18
Invite us to think about a tactic as
29:21
well. I think this is under the category
29:23
theory early ones, but. Tell me
29:25
if I'm wrong, are easy wins rather
29:27
the addressing a com and pinpoint and
29:29
you make the point. It doesn't have
29:32
to be enormous, but it does have
29:34
to be. Deliberate. And
29:36
I'm curious what a com in pain
29:38
point is in what do mean by.
29:41
Deliberate. A. Common time
29:43
point is you in all
29:45
organizations that tends to be.
29:48
Things. That. People talk about
29:50
quite icily at various levels. That.
29:53
Is not great, is not working. often
29:55
it's related to i t
29:58
systems or reporting structure or
30:00
the physical location I mentioned before was
30:03
one and that organisation was just how
30:05
silly it was that half of this
30:07
department was here and half of the
30:10
department were across the street because certain
30:12
individuals wanted this office because of the
30:14
view and etc etc. So
30:16
a common pain point of these things that again
30:19
the organisation is frustrated
30:21
with but they've almost become a little
30:24
bit dull too because no one's changed
30:26
it. So as you
30:28
move around as the CEO or
30:30
a senior leader asking questions
30:32
about what frustrates people, what
30:35
demotivates, what makes the job harder than
30:37
it needs to be, what
30:39
are the things that we used
30:41
to do really well but no longer
30:43
do or what are the things
30:45
that we do that we should no longer do
30:48
and where are these things where you know
30:50
as a leadership team we
30:52
have failed to either
30:55
remove the blockage or enable you or
30:58
unlock the challenges that you've got to
31:00
be successful and to make things easy and
31:03
there's generally a bunch of stuff and
31:05
it's often really really small so if
31:07
you can cotton on to this early
31:10
verify it as you need to
31:12
and make some of these smaller changes it
31:15
speaks volumes to the organisation. So
31:17
when you start to move the
31:19
organisation and start to ask the
31:21
organisation to change and
31:23
to accelerate or to perform
31:26
at a different level, if you
31:28
have first engaged them by
31:30
removing some of the things that make
31:32
their day-to-day job difficult, you have
31:34
a greater chance of them coming with you. As
31:37
I read the book there was so much
31:39
that I thought wow this would be such
31:42
a useful guide for someone who's moving
31:44
into the top role and I think
31:46
you know we've all heard the models on 90 days 100
31:49
days of starting a new role and those are really useful
31:51
models and oftentimes they're more general
31:53
of all kinds of different roles. What
31:55
I love about your book is that it's
31:58
so focused on their own. top
32:00
role. And maybe it is the CEO or
32:02
maybe it's executive director or maybe it's general
32:04
manager or maybe it's a regional VP but
32:06
it's a role that is a senior
32:09
role that you're moving into and there's
32:11
a lot of folks looking at you
32:14
and what a great step-by-step guide
32:16
this is. And I think also really
32:18
helpful even if you're not in
32:20
that role yet, maybe you're supporting someone
32:22
who's making that transition, maybe you're on the
32:24
board, I mean what a useful guide for
32:26
being able to help folks do that well
32:28
in such a concise way. So Ty, I'm
32:30
so glad that you have brought this into
32:32
the world and we'll be linking up to
32:34
it of course and the notes and the
32:36
weekly leadership guide for everyone. Ty, I've got
32:38
one last question for you. As you have
32:41
put together the book, as
32:43
you've been talking with folks about
32:45
it over recent months and supporting
32:48
the CEOs you're working with
32:50
today, I'm curious, you know,
32:52
leaders are always learning and growing themselves, what
32:55
if anything have you changed your mind on in
32:57
the last year or two as you've put this together? The
33:01
aspect that I think really was
33:03
reinforced to me through doing the
33:05
interviews around the book and
33:08
as a blind spot for myself, I
33:10
think I had become a little blasé
33:12
about the impact on
33:14
CEOs of how lonely the role
33:16
is and I think that's in
33:19
part because I'm a solution to
33:21
part of that problem. When
33:23
I work with CEOs I provide that
33:26
sense of confidential sounding board and
33:28
advisor so I step into that.
33:31
So I had I had undervalued a
33:33
little bit over time by watching it
33:35
too often and so to have people
33:37
like Roman Leguata and Carol Tamay and
33:39
Mark Bitzer and Mark Clouse talk about
33:41
this loneliness is a thing and it
33:44
it's really takes some getting used to
33:46
and it's quite challenging to
33:49
be at the top of the house in
33:51
terms of the organization and
33:53
I describe it as feeling like you're
33:55
alone in a crowd. You're very rarely
33:58
physically alone but this loneliness aspect is
34:00
quite a thing and it can become more
34:06
focused on that as a discussion.
34:11
I'm more focused on how we
34:13
build networks and doing a better
34:15
job of connecting new CEOs to
34:17
other CEOs because that's a network they often
34:20
don't have accessible to
34:22
solve this loneliness challenge. Thank
34:26
you so much for your work. Thank
34:35
you guys for having me. You're great. If
34:43
this conversation was helpful to you, three
34:45
related episodes I'd recommend. One of them
34:48
is episode 590, how to genuinely show
34:50
up for others. Marshall Goldsmith was my
34:52
guest on that episode, top executive coach.
34:55
Marshall and I talked about the reality
34:57
that is so true for leaders and
34:59
especially leaders in top jobs, which
35:02
is you often find yourself going
35:04
into all kinds of different conversations throughout
35:06
the day. One
35:08
conversation may be giving someone very difficult
35:10
feedback. The next
35:13
conversation may be celebrating an
35:15
award at a very visible event.
35:17
The next conversation may be thinking
35:19
about the future and being very
35:21
present and listening to someone. Top
35:24
leaders are changing context all the time and
35:26
yet they've learned the best at least, how
35:28
to show up in the moment well. Marshall
35:33
in that conversation talks about the concept of singular
35:35
empathy and how we can do a better job
35:37
of showing up in the moment regardless
35:39
of what may have happened before or after that conversation.
35:41
Episode 590 for Roadmap for You on how to do
35:43
that. I
35:46
also recommend the work of Carol
35:48
Kaufman, episode 617, another coach of
35:50
top leaders, how to start a
35:53
big leadership role. Carol and
35:55
I talked about some of the
35:57
patterns that she sees when executives begin to
35:59
work. begin in new roles, top leaders
36:01
start and it's a wonderful compliment to this
36:03
conversation. We talked about some key concepts that
36:06
we didn't talk about today and vice versa.
36:08
I think it's a great compliment to this,
36:10
episode 617 especially if you're taking on a
36:12
new job or a big role. I think
36:14
it's a great one for you to be
36:16
listening to. And then finally, episode
36:19
662, how an executive
36:21
aligns with a board. Joan Gary was
36:23
my guest on that episode, a tremendous
36:26
leader in the nonprofit space. If you're
36:28
an executive director on the leadership
36:30
team of a nonprofit or on the
36:32
board of a nonprofit, you should absolutely
36:34
know about Joan's work. She
36:36
has just done phenomenal work over years
36:38
of helping nonprofit leaders do
36:41
well. And in that conversation
36:43
specifically, we talk about how to align
36:45
well with a board, so many resources,
36:47
tactics in that conversation. And of course,
36:49
many that Joan offers as part of
36:52
her website and membership as well. That's
36:54
episode 662 for that. All
36:56
of those episodes, of course, you can
36:59
find on the coachingforleaders.com website. If
37:01
you've not already, I'm inviting you
37:03
today to set up your free
37:05
membership at coachingforleaders.com. It's going to
37:07
open up access to a whole
37:09
bunch of benefits inside of the
37:11
free membership. There's a bunch of
37:13
free audio courses, our entire library
37:16
of episodes searchable by topic. And
37:18
also access to all of my interview and book
37:21
notes. I did today, as I do for many
37:23
conversations with Ty, thought about in advance, what are
37:25
the kinds of things I want to be asking
37:27
him? I got those down on my interview notes.
37:30
I've also pulled a number of relevant
37:32
quotes from the book that I think
37:34
that you should probably reflect on, thinking
37:37
about this conversation. Those are all in
37:39
the interview notes, not only for this
37:41
conversation, but all of the interviews in
37:44
recent years. It is part of
37:46
the free membership. You can look on book
37:48
and interview notes, or you can just find
37:50
it on each individual episode library
37:52
inside of the episode notes.
37:55
All of that's part of the free membership
37:57
plus a bunch more. Just go over to
37:59
coachingforleaders.com. set up your
38:01
free membership and I'd also invite you
38:04
to learn about Coaching for Leaders Plus
38:06
especially if you've had your free membership
38:08
for a bit because it's going to
38:10
open up tons more resources for you
38:12
and one of those resources is my
38:14
weekly journal entry. Earlier this month I
38:17
wrote a journal about the reality that
38:19
sometimes we tend to move too quickly
38:21
on things. You heard echoes of that
38:23
in this conversation today with Ty that
38:26
sometimes I find myself giving advice
38:28
to our members that the
38:30
best thing to do is nothing.
38:34
Absolutely nothing at least not beyond what
38:36
they've already done because sometimes we need
38:38
to wait for things to play out
38:40
sometimes we need more context and sometimes
38:43
takes time for things to affect
38:45
change inside of an organization. When do
38:47
you wait and when do you move?
38:49
It's a hard question to answer and
38:52
I share that perspective in one of
38:54
the recent journal entries. If you'd like
38:56
to get that journal entry from me
38:58
it's my writing my thoughts every single
39:00
week in your inbox. Coaching for Leaders
39:02
Plus is a place to look to
39:04
as one of those key benefits inside
39:06
of Coaching for Leaders Plus. Just go
39:08
over to coachingforleaders.plus to find
39:11
out more. Coaching for Leaders is
39:13
edited by Andrew Kroger. Production support
39:15
is provided by Sierra Priest. I'll
39:18
be back next Monday for our
39:20
next episode on leadership. Have a
39:22
great week and see you all
39:25
soon.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More