Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
The legacy of racial segregation
0:04
as relates to the COVID pandemic is
0:06
that hyper segregated cities
0:09
served as ground zero
0:11
in terms of the mass spread of
0:14
COVID nineteen in America.
0:16
If we didn't have American
0:18
apartheid, if we didn't have racial segregation
0:20
to that degree, it would have made it much harder
0:23
for COVID to really pick up and
0:25
spread in a mess kind of way. That's
0:29
Dr Lawrence T. Brown, director
0:31
of the Black Butterfly Project, Drawing
0:34
on as many years of social science research,
0:36
policy analysis, and archival
0:38
material, Dr Brown recently published
0:41
his first book, The Black Butterfly, The
0:43
Harmful Politics of Race and Space
0:45
in America, a fascinating look
0:47
at the ongoing historical trauma caused by
0:49
a combination of policies, practices,
0:52
systems, and budgets which are at the
0:54
root of uprisings and crises
0:56
in hyper segregated cities around
0:58
the country. But there is reason for hope,
1:00
as Dr Brown offers up a wide range
1:03
of innovative solutions to help heal and
1:05
restore redlined black neighborhoods
1:07
across this country. We
1:09
also hear from Dr Brian Smedley, co
1:12
founder and executive director of the National
1:14
Collaborative for Health Equity, a project
1:16
that connects research, policy analysis,
1:18
and communications with on the ground activism
1:21
to advance health equity. In this
1:23
role, Dr Smedley oversees several
1:25
initiatives designed to improve opportunities
1:28
for good health for people of color
1:30
and undo the health consequences of
1:32
racism. The way that healthcare
1:35
resources are distributed here in
1:37
the US is deeply inequitable. Often,
1:39
those communities that are sickest and in greatest
1:42
need of access to health care
1:44
services and culturally appropriate services
1:47
in their community simply don't have that
1:49
access. So the big takeaway
1:51
for me is that nations
1:54
that cooperate together, that show
1:56
a level of social cohesion and
1:59
solidarity, will do much better
2:01
in stopping the spread of the virus than
2:03
those communities characterized by deep
2:06
divisions, such as here in the United
2:08
States. I'm
2:12
Justin Beck, founder and CEO of
2:14
Contact World. I'm here with my co
2:16
host Katherine Nelson and dep Pava,
2:19
and over the coming months we'll be talking to scientists,
2:22
researchers, celebrities, experts,
2:24
anyone who's been affected by COVID and
2:27
getting to the bottom of how we can improve public
2:29
health together. We may not have all
2:31
the answers, but you deserve to understand what
2:33
goes on in your neighborhood and the decisions
2:35
that will affect you and your family's health. Welcome
2:41
back everybody to Contact World. So
2:43
today we're gonna hear from Dr Lawrence T. Brown
2:45
and Dr Brian Smedley. Previously,
2:48
we've talked about, you know, the political
2:50
determinants of health and the way
2:52
that politics have influenced public
2:55
health. But it was interesting to learn
2:57
how segregation in America
2:59
has actually caused this proliferation
3:01
of COVID nineteen. It makes
3:03
a lot of sense that we're in the position we're
3:06
in because things that affect
3:08
marginalized communities affect everyone. And
3:11
it was interesting the intersection
3:13
between these two conversations because on
3:15
one hand, we don't have data because we've
3:18
been trying to ignore the data, right, we've
3:20
been trying to sweep it under a rug, because
3:22
our country has an absolute history
3:25
of racial segregation and
3:27
it has caused a lot of the problems
3:29
that we're experiencing today.
3:32
Justin you bring a very interesting point
3:34
that I found personally very revelational.
3:37
In the midst of the crisis, our
3:39
understanding of this inequity was delayed and
3:42
remains limited because many
3:44
health care institutions, as well as state
3:46
and the federal government, they were still
3:48
to capture the demographic information on
3:51
COVID nineteen because the health equity
3:54
data was not available. And
3:56
one of the most crucial things is a
3:58
data to an approach that can be used
4:00
to address this very racial disparity
4:03
in the health care outcomes. And
4:05
data does make a difference because unless
4:08
you can measure something, how can you even
4:10
think about solving that? Right? Yeah,
4:13
and I agree with you, but I think there is
4:15
some sort of acknowledgement, especially
4:18
by the current administration. And
4:20
what I enjoyed the most about both interviews
4:23
is that they both had
4:25
some positive policy changes
4:27
and that's where we're going to see the difference. And
4:30
one example of that is the Health Equity
4:32
Tracker project that Daniel Dawes
4:34
was leading, and they're starting to tackle
4:36
the data issues surrounding
4:39
the pandemic and health equity
4:41
and it does really start with a commitment
4:43
to saying, hey, we have to find the data
4:46
in order to address the problems. It's
4:48
was one into transparency in my open and
4:50
it's really about transparency and having
4:53
integrity that you will not use the data the way it
4:55
should not be used, and again
4:57
building trust within the governments, within
4:59
the healthy institutions, within public institutions.
5:02
But one has to acknowledge
5:04
that segregation by design is happening,
5:06
and only then we can make afoot towards
5:09
conquering this problem. We're
5:11
in this position because we defunded
5:14
public health and yet we expect these
5:16
heroes to perform more than a
5:18
miracle and trying to get us out of this situation.
5:21
But the concept of a community health workforce,
5:23
I think is a really strong one because
5:26
if we're expecting marginalized communities
5:29
to strictly sign up online and
5:31
that's the only way that they're gonna get vaccinated, we're
5:34
missing the point that these
5:36
digital divides are going to continue to create problems.
5:38
So community health workforces,
5:41
whether it's through the Heroes Act or
5:43
whether it's through Biden's new executive orders
5:45
around improving public health infrastructure,
5:48
is really exciting to think about. Yeah,
5:50
and also it conveys the seriousness
5:53
and it's less remote when you tell
5:55
someone you have to log into a website
5:57
and you know, I'm sending my information over
6:00
the airwaves. I don't know where it's going to home.
6:02
But if there's an actual human knocking
6:05
at my door, speaking to me directly, then
6:07
I'm more inclined to cooperate.
6:10
It conveys the seriousness but also the human
6:12
interest. You know, whoever is
6:14
in that community is going to feel looked
6:16
after and cared for, as opposed to
6:19
the desensitized way of your on your own
6:21
you go and you know, register and if
6:23
you don't, then good luck. If
6:25
you don't have a computer, or if you don't have access
6:27
to the internet, I guess you know, you
6:30
just drew the short stick there. I
6:32
love your comment. You're cutting and that reminds
6:34
me of one of the conversations that I've had long back
6:36
with the last Smile health care worker, and
6:39
he told me that, you know, sometimes
6:41
we just talk about technology all the time solving
6:43
these issues. There are places and there are
6:45
people for them. Even pen
6:48
and paper is technology, and
6:50
humans are capable of using that
6:53
and bringing that access.
6:55
We are trying to achieve through technology.
6:58
So if there is a hybrid solution that we can come up
7:00
with, that's what is going to solve the problem
7:02
in a sustainable way. All right, let's
7:04
dive into these powerful conversations and hear
7:06
from two of the most knowledgeable experts
7:09
in this field. Hello,
7:21
Dr Brown, it's a pleasure to meet you.
7:23
Hello, thank you so much for taking the
7:25
time to talk with me today. And can
7:28
you tell us a little bit about your background
7:30
and what led you to write The Black Butterfly.
7:33
Well. I was born in
7:36
well Memphis, Tennessee. We lived in West Memphis,
7:38
Arkansas. Left there my
7:40
family. We went to the Houston area,
7:43
went to moor House after graduating in
7:45
nine seven and major
7:48
in African American studies. And across the
7:50
street from moor House was a public housing
7:52
development called Harris Holmes
7:55
and they were in the third phase of uprooting
7:57
people as a part of Clinton's Hope six
7:59
project, which involved demolishing
8:02
about a quarter million public housing units.
8:05
And so I think it was there that I really
8:07
sort of begin to question policies
8:10
of displacement and how
8:12
and why African Americans are being uprooted,
8:15
and I wanted to know more about, like how
8:18
government played a role in that. So my
8:20
master's degree was in public administration
8:22
at the University of Houston, where I
8:24
picked up that thread to try to understand
8:26
a little bit more about community development. And
8:29
then I got interested in the health
8:31
angle of community development.
8:33
So I went to University Tennessee Health
8:36
Science Center where I obtained my doctorate
8:38
and health outcomes and policy research. After
8:41
finishing it led me to Morgan
8:43
State University in Baltimore, where I
8:45
worked on my post arctro fellowship became an
8:47
a social professor. My research
8:50
kept looking at, you know, how neighborhoods
8:52
impact health outcomes, and that whole
8:55
through line really led me to this book,
8:58
right, And was the initial
9:00
interests to satisfy personal curiosities
9:03
or did you already have a plan in
9:05
mind that this is something that you're gonna work on
9:08
and educate the public as you are doing
9:10
right now. I mean, I think it more
9:12
or less developed organically. I don't
9:14
think I had a master plan in mind, but
9:16
I think you can see how
9:19
one interest, one degree
9:21
kind of led to the other. You know, I
9:23
grew up well, my hometown West
9:26
Memphis, Arkansas's is small. It's
9:28
like thirty thou folks, and the
9:30
county is rural. Arkansas is very rural
9:33
state. And so it's just thinking about
9:35
the impact of space on people's
9:37
health and the impact of how
9:40
space is racialized and how that
9:42
impacts people's health was something that
9:44
I think was there from
9:47
the beginning, just in terms of always being interested
9:49
in, like urban policies, what makes a
9:52
space, you know, be the way that it
9:54
is now. And so with all of the
9:56
cities that I lived in, you're talking about Baltimore,
10:00
Memphis, or West Memphis, Arkansas, Atlanta,
10:02
Georgia, Houston, Texas, and
10:04
so it's just you know, really sort of getting a good
10:06
sense of how these
10:09
different cities meant you have
10:11
different outcomes, and then if you lived in different
10:14
neighborhoods in those cities, you had different
10:16
health outcomes. You know, my background
10:18
and my intellectual interests led me to
10:20
this work. And through your work, how
10:23
do you see the legacy of racist
10:25
policies in cities throughout
10:28
the nation as a contributing factor
10:30
to the disparities of experience throughout
10:33
the COVID nineteen pandemic. Well,
10:35
I mean the biggest contribution
10:38
of urban policy to the current
10:40
pandemic is the municipalization
10:43
of racial segregation. So the ways by
10:46
which racial segregation was
10:48
shaped in urban areas. Baltimore
10:50
Mayor John Barry Mohole, he passed the
10:52
first residential racial zoning
10:54
law in American history on December nineteenth,
10:57
nineteen ten, and so you
10:59
have cities in
11:01
the early nineteen hundreds, they
11:03
were still building out their sewer systems, they
11:06
were still building water filtration to
11:08
clean water, they were still connecting
11:11
water lines. Many
11:13
homes they didn't have plumbing, they didn't have
11:15
clean water, they didn't have sewer systems,
11:18
which meant that they were breeding grounds
11:20
for infectious diseases like influenza
11:23
or like tuberculosis, especially
11:25
yellow fever cholera. So those are
11:27
diseases that were high at the time. But
11:31
the way in which municipalities
11:34
were allocating resources
11:36
to white neighborhoods and white blocks
11:39
and not allocating those two black neighboroos
11:42
or black blocks at the time, that
11:44
had a tremendous impact on the
11:46
infectious epidemics then, and
11:49
then you go further in time
11:51
to where we are today, it has a big
11:54
impact on the COVID
11:56
pandemic. Now, do you think
11:58
these allocations were in sorts
12:01
intentionally depriving
12:03
the minority communities or
12:05
was it maybe disproportionately done
12:08
Well, it was absolutely intentional. Number
12:10
one, race was the reason. Like
12:12
in Baltimore, you saw in the Baltimore Sun,
12:14
I talked about in my book, how the Sun
12:17
kept putting this headline out and their articles
12:19
Negro invasion. There's a Negro
12:22
invasion homebuying while black black
12:24
people are coming. And so they weaponized,
12:27
they used propaganda to
12:30
cause white Baltimoreans to
12:33
engage in the counter offensive against
12:36
black homebuyers. And you see
12:38
public health actually being used
12:40
as a rational for racial segregation.
12:43
The fact that black people had a higher
12:45
rate of tuberculosis and
12:47
other diseases, that was a reason
12:50
to then segregate them. In effect, it
12:52
was a neighborhood quarantine.
12:54
So you see in the Baltimore Sun again
12:57
and other newspapers, how the
13:00
discourse of data and the way
13:02
in which Black people were stigmatized
13:05
and demonized based on these health
13:07
disparities. Given the
13:09
intentionality that you see
13:11
both with newspaper headlines with
13:14
the implication of public health, with
13:16
other media that we're really spreading
13:19
about the time, like the Birth of a Nation by
13:21
D. W. Griffith, which glorifies
13:23
the Kukus Klan, you can
13:25
see how race is intentionally
13:28
being used as a ration
13:30
now to effectuate racial
13:32
segregation. And then if you want to look at Jessica
13:34
trouns Things book Segregation
13:37
by design. She shows empirically
13:39
that that more racial segregation that
13:41
you see in the city, the less
13:44
public resources, the fewer public goods
13:46
are being allocated per capita
13:49
in those cities, and definitely in
13:51
those cities to black neighborhoods. What
13:54
would you say has been the most profound
13:56
impact of these type of policies
13:58
on health vector is during this pandemic.
14:02
Firstly, we had the introduction of the virus,
14:04
so you had California, I believe Seattle,
14:07
if I'm not mistaken, cruise ships they
14:09
sort of brought the virus to the
14:12
nation. But after the virus
14:14
arrived, then it hit hyper
14:16
segregated cities the hardest. New York
14:19
is a Category four hyper
14:21
segregated city, and I used category
14:23
like a hurricane as an analogy. Detroit
14:27
was hit hard, Chicago was hit hard. Those two
14:29
are Category five hyper segregated
14:31
cities. That's the highest form of racial
14:33
segregation that we have, and
14:35
so these cities were hit really
14:37
really hard early on. If you recall March
14:40
in April of last year, hyper segregated
14:42
cities were the first hit. So the
14:45
legacy of racial segregation
14:47
as it relates to the COVID pandemic is
14:50
that hyper segregated cities
14:52
served as ground zero in
14:55
terms of the mass spread of COVID
14:57
nineteen in America. If
14:59
we didn't have American
15:01
apartheid, if we didn't have racial segregation
15:04
to that degree, it would have made it much harder
15:07
for COVID to really pick up
15:09
and spread in a mass kind of way.
15:11
What else have you seen as far as the tangential
15:14
consequence of lockdowns depleted
15:17
economies? For example, you mentioned
15:19
the city's Chicago and New York,
15:22
the lower opportunity streams on these
15:24
communities of colors throughout this crisis.
15:27
There should have been universal basic income.
15:30
There should have been a massive infusion of
15:33
resources from the federal government that
15:35
would actually have allowed people to stay
15:37
home then in a
15:40
concentrated way. Instead, we had a
15:42
president at the time that was
15:44
talking about reopening by easter and
15:47
that the deaths would be under a hundred thousand
15:49
or under sixty thousand at first, and here
15:51
we are now approaching five hundred thousand.
15:54
We didn't lock down long enough. I
15:56
argued that capitalism was going to actually
15:59
work against our ability to fight
16:01
this virus. We needed to develop
16:04
a strong response that was gonna
16:07
help renters, help forty
16:09
million people that were thrown into unemployment.
16:11
Initially, we need to have a
16:13
strong response to effectuate the type
16:15
of lockdown that was needed, and we did not
16:18
do it. So that is what has
16:20
set up the tangential impacts.
16:22
We did a half hearted lockdown, and
16:25
we haven't really made any sort
16:27
of strong effort around economic recovery.
16:30
We had a lot of big businesses spelled
16:32
out, but in terms of regular people,
16:34
they got that one two thousand dollar
16:36
infusion, I believe back in the summer
16:38
of last year, and that just wasn't
16:41
enough. And so we're
16:43
actually, I think getting ready to
16:45
see much more economic
16:47
impacts that are going to be destructive
16:50
in so many lives for a long
16:52
period of time because we did not
16:55
arrest our instincts to be
16:58
this capitalist country at the outset,
17:00
and so we're gonna deal with the issues on the back end
17:03
with the new administration. What are your thoughts
17:05
on, you know, the direction that we're
17:07
taking now. Do you feel that there are appropriate
17:10
measures being taken? Well, I mean,
17:12
certainly the new administration is, you
17:14
know, a breath of fresh air. You know, they's just getting
17:16
their feet on the ground. But I think there
17:19
has to be a lot more again, I think they're talking
17:21
about maybe four hundred or adding four hundreds
17:23
to the six hundred in terms of the next
17:25
COVID stimulus package for people that's
17:28
not universal basic income. Universal
17:30
based income is two thousand a month,
17:33
so I'm talking about universal basic income to
17:35
access secure people's financial
17:37
needs. And then, even though there is
17:39
a rental moratorium,
17:41
I believe that President Biden is trying to extend
17:44
now past the March deadline. You
17:46
know, I think we need to go a lot further because
17:48
not all states are honoring that rental
17:51
eviction. Their courts are not honoring it. So
17:53
we need to really have a strong,
17:56
nationwide you can't get out
17:58
of it strategy that allows
18:01
people to stay where they are, not be put
18:03
out of their homes. I think you've got to
18:05
put things in place to really stabilize
18:07
housing and stabilize
18:10
people's income so that you
18:12
don't have I think the wave of desperation
18:14
that's going to come after that moratorium
18:16
is lifted, because the rent is going to be
18:18
do and you're gonna have an eviction
18:20
crisis. And then if
18:23
everybody is vaccinated at that point,
18:25
you're going to see a spike in COVID.
18:27
So all of this has to work together otherwise
18:30
we're never going to get this virus under control. Right,
18:33
And you speak of desperation,
18:36
do you feel that some
18:38
of the communities of colors are in
18:40
essence feeling desperate
18:42
for the help that they should have gotten, with
18:45
the help that they should be getting, and
18:47
how do they take steps to get
18:49
that help. I think there is
18:52
desperation, but in
18:54
many ways, community of color are
18:57
really masters of resilience, and
18:59
so you may not see it. And
19:01
the fact that people are dealing with deaths and
19:04
contracting COVID. I know my family,
19:07
I've had over ten members in Southern
19:09
States, you know, contract the virus, including
19:11
my two grandparents. So it's
19:13
hard to be engaged, I think on the policy
19:15
front side of it while you're
19:18
dealing with folks that are in the hospital,
19:20
dealing with folks in your family that
19:22
are you know, passing away,
19:24
whether it's due to the disease or in the aftermath
19:27
of it. So we're trucking
19:29
along in terms of the room
19:32
and the space to deal with the policy front.
19:34
I don't know that the advocacy is
19:37
as much there as
19:39
it should be. But you know, in the middle of a global
19:41
pandemic. When you're at the bottom of the social
19:43
hierarchy, you know, that's gonna be tough
19:46
to do now. At the same time, there
19:49
was the action that was taken on election
19:52
day. So
19:54
you did see black voters in cities
19:56
like Atlanta, Philadelphia, Chicago,
20:00
Pittsburgh, Detroit come
20:02
out and support a new administration
20:04
in part because they wanted a better
20:07
COVID response. You know, you saw Latino
20:09
voters in Nevada and Arizona.
20:12
Native American voters in Apache
20:14
County and Navajo County in Arizona
20:17
helped put President Biden over the top.
20:19
So there was maybe
20:22
to even counteract my own point, there
20:24
was that movement to actually
20:27
say, hey, we want a different president in part
20:30
because we want a better COVID response.
20:32
There was that policy push. I want
20:34
to make sure I highlight that. Yeah, it's
20:36
that resiliency on top of their their
20:38
own survival instincts. Yes, how
20:41
do you see the terrain ahead for vaccine
20:44
distribution, contact tracing
20:47
and other interventions? And
20:49
I know this is just kind of broad, but you
20:52
know, how do we build trusts with our communities
20:54
of color, How do we establish
20:57
fairness in the distribution of the
20:59
vaccines? Tell me your thoughts
21:01
on those. Well, what I'm seeing
21:03
right now is a failure to engage
21:06
in vaccine administration equitably.
21:08
You have white people coming in from
21:11
other neighborhoods into black and brown
21:13
neighborhoods to get vaccinated before the black
21:15
and brown people that live in those neighborhoods.
21:18
That story you're seeing in Detroit and Philadelphia.
21:20
They gave a twenty two year old white gentleman,
21:22
they gave him a contract to deal with COVID,
21:25
and they skipped over the black doctors
21:27
who have their own organization that I have
21:30
built trust and that should have gotten
21:32
a contract like that. So you're seeing
21:34
the administration of
21:36
the vaccine this inequity
21:39
in terms of both whereas being
21:42
distributed. If you look in the state of Maryland,
21:44
demographically wider counties are getting
21:47
more vaccines per capita than demographically
21:50
blacker counties. Then you have the
21:52
fact that the primary mode of vaccine
21:55
administration is to have people sign up online.
21:57
Then those people living in those redline
22:00
marginalized sub prime communities
22:03
that are dealing with digital device they're
22:05
going to be left out. So I foresee
22:08
the continuation of what we're seeing
22:10
now vaccine apartheid unless
22:14
we actually engage in the strategy that
22:16
I think we should do, which is
22:18
I believe the Heroes Act from
22:20
last year should be passed the creation
22:23
of a national Community health worker
22:26
workforce. I would hire a
22:28
hundred thousand community health workers
22:30
and I would have my community health workers working
22:33
with nurses and physicians, medical
22:35
professionals going out to
22:38
communities, not waiting until people
22:41
come into the hospital, come into the
22:43
vaccine site, come into
22:45
you know, the stadium where you have it set up,
22:48
or drive through when everybody don't have a car.
22:50
You need a group of folks gonna
22:52
go out and I don't care if they have to go door
22:54
to door. You should have people going
22:57
out to make sure the vaccine is a ministered
23:00
in those communities that are really struggling,
23:02
making sure they have the access that they need,
23:05
and build trust along the way because
23:07
a lot of people they may say
23:09
no right now, but that no could
23:11
be a wait and see. I'm gonna wait and see,
23:14
but maybe in three months I might say yes.
23:17
So that's another reason you need to community health
23:19
work is to be out communicating, out
23:21
discussing, showing their face,
23:23
having conversations. That's the
23:26
kind of interaction, that
23:28
relationship building that's
23:30
gonna be needed, and you need people to do that,
23:32
not technology, not the
23:34
internet. The way we're doing it now is not gonna
23:36
cut it. Yeah, I understand that. In
23:39
our previous episode, we're talking to
23:42
Dr Yasmin and she was explaining how
23:44
there needs to be some level of atonement and
23:46
acknowledgement of wrongs from the
23:49
past in order to build that trust.
23:51
As you mentioned, Absolutely, I
23:54
wanted to ask you about you
23:56
kind of touched on it a little, but you've
23:59
had family you who have been hospitalized
24:01
because of COVID nineteen. First
24:04
of all, has everyone recovered to
24:06
my knowledge, yes, everyone has recovered.
24:08
Like I said, my grandmother passed several
24:11
months later, and I understand it was from heart
24:13
failure, not COVID. Sorry for
24:15
your loss. Absolutely, I
24:17
celebrate her life. And even
24:19
though she recovered and died
24:22
later. You know, COVID still
24:24
has impacts people in their cardiovascular
24:26
system and many systems, even
24:28
the neurological system.
24:30
My grandfather when he was hospitalized,
24:33
he didn't remember who his wife
24:35
was, for instance, and later regained
24:37
his memory. So we're very thankful for that. We've
24:40
heard that you've described the medical system
24:43
as raggedy throughout your experience.
24:46
Can you elaborate on that? Yeah,
24:48
I mean the home health care workers you have to
24:50
call in Arkansas, I had to call
24:52
to you know, arrange that and make sure
24:54
that took place. You know. It's also the case
24:56
where in those smaller rural
24:59
counties like Lee County, Arkansas
25:01
doesn't have a hospital. The hospital
25:04
in Critton County where my grandparents
25:06
lived, I think had six beds for
25:08
I see you cases. So these
25:10
are rural counties that you know, if you get
25:13
ten cases, that's a spike that
25:15
a lot of counties cannot handle if they don't
25:17
have that real health infrastructure. And this
25:19
is America, the wealthiest country on Earth, and
25:22
we can't have health care infrastructure
25:25
for our people. That's why I
25:27
called it ragged. It's a shame and it's
25:29
a hot mess trying to compensate
25:33
as an individual for these systemic
25:35
failings and lack of funding.
25:38
You know, there's been the discussion the
25:41
protests over defunding the police,
25:43
and what I want to point out to
25:45
a lot of people is that we've been defunding
25:48
public health for decades and
25:50
that is why we are in a situation
25:52
now where we're relying on private
25:55
corporations like a Walgreens and
25:57
the CVS to minister vaccines.
25:59
Why do have to rely on them if you have a good public
26:01
health system? Because we don't, and
26:04
not because it's not good as in the people
26:06
aren't trying hard. Is that we deeply
26:08
underfunded, We defund public
26:10
health in this nation. You know,
26:13
if you just dropped in from another planet,
26:15
if you look at COVID data, you would
26:17
say, well, America is the developing country.
26:19
There's no way it could be the most advanced,
26:22
wealthiest country on Earth. But in
26:24
fact it is. Based
26:26
on your background and everything that you've described that
26:28
you've done, you're an expert.
26:31
So what would your top list for policy
26:34
initiatives be at addressing
26:36
the issues and the disparities that
26:38
we've seen so far? Okay, Well,
26:40
for COVID, I'm looking at spatial equity
26:43
testing early on and the vaccine
26:45
administration. Now, if your main
26:48
locations are in wealthier,
26:50
wider communities, that's
26:52
not spatial equity and racial equity.
26:54
You can't have racial equity without spatial equity because
26:56
America is so segregated. So
26:59
where are your testing sites? Where are your vaccine
27:01
administration sites? If they're not in red
27:03
line sub prime low income
27:06
communities, you've already failed
27:08
spatial equity in the response. Like
27:10
I said earlier, Number two, community
27:13
health workers, community health workers. Community
27:15
health workers got to have an outreach
27:17
component, not just to come see us component.
27:20
And then number three is that internet
27:23
can't be your only strategy.
27:25
In fact, I'm not sure it should be much
27:27
of a strategy at all,
27:29
given the way we've seen people gain the
27:32
system, people coming from wealthier,
27:34
wider communities, colonizing
27:36
the vaccine supply, gentrifying vaccine
27:39
administration. Those are the top three
27:41
things that I would look at shifting from internet
27:44
to person based through community health workers
27:46
and with a spatial equity approach, those would
27:48
be my top three for COVID overall.
27:51
You know, health equity is
27:54
important, but alongside health equity,
27:56
we have to have social solidarity.
27:59
And what is that social how there is realizing
28:01
that this whole country is in this
28:04
mess together. Even though the
28:06
deaths are disproportionate among communities
28:09
of color, you still have a huge percentage
28:11
of white people dying from this, and so
28:14
the thing is we're all in this. So whatever
28:17
good programs and strategies
28:19
that we need, universal basic
28:21
income, this community health worker core that
28:23
I'm talking about, having spatial
28:26
equity in the response. These things
28:28
are going to be helpful to everybody.
28:30
So so this just has to be like
28:33
a strong mutual aid outreach,
28:36
you know, working to get folks vaccinated
28:39
and in a holistic way that when you're
28:41
dealing with people on the COVID
28:43
front, you're also checking to make sure that their
28:46
other needs are being met. You know, how
28:48
do we set up a strategy where everyone's
28:50
going to be having their needs
28:52
met holistically? Absolutely? Dr
28:55
Brown, It certainly has been an enlightening
28:57
conversation to speak with you
29:00
and care about the work that you've done and
29:02
how you're shedding much light to a
29:05
lot of important areas and key
29:07
issues. Do you have any final thoughts
29:09
to share with our listeners. The
29:12
biggest thing is, you know, our issues
29:14
as a nation right now are really rooted
29:16
in American apartheid, and
29:19
American apartheid is a system
29:22
that was set up via racial segregation,
29:25
colonization, uprooting communities,
29:28
particularly Native American, Latino
29:30
African American communities. So we
29:32
have to have equity, we have to center
29:34
equity, but at the same time we
29:37
need to also uplift, social
29:39
solidarity, the fact that we are
29:41
all in this together. White people are dying too.
29:44
We want to make sure that every community has
29:46
what it needs, and if some communities
29:48
need more, we need to allocate more to
29:50
those communities. So COVID then
29:52
can be a turning point
29:55
for America where we recognize what
29:58
is really bedoubling us, what is
30:00
really destroying so many lives in this
30:02
country. Because even when you get rid of COVID,
30:04
you're still going to have those other epidemics.
30:06
You're still gonna have deep poverty,
30:09
You're still going to have the four regions in our
30:11
country that are really struggling, the
30:13
Southern Black Belt. You're still gonna have Appalachia
30:15
struggling. You're still gonna have Native American
30:18
tribal lands in the US Mexico
30:20
border counties. So these are all racial
30:22
geographies where
30:24
we have tremendous inequities, and
30:27
you realize that Appalachia means
30:29
a lot of poor white people are in
30:31
that mix. And so that's what we're saying.
30:33
We're saying everybody, everybody
30:36
needs to be on board if we're
30:38
gonna make this country the country that it should
30:40
be instead of lagging behind
30:43
in so many indicators. Very
30:45
well said a great summary. I love
30:47
what you said about social solidarity. I think
30:49
that probably should be one
30:51
of those buzzwords out there that we should all
30:54
be adopting and talking about. Thank
30:56
you for taking the time. Thank you, Bye
30:58
bye. M What
31:01
an honest and insightful conversation
31:04
with Dr Brown, and for anyone
31:06
who needs to understand why communities of
31:08
color in this country continue to struggle
31:10
for access to some of the most basic health needs,
31:13
health needs that so many of us take for granted,
31:16
I encourage you to order his book, The Black
31:18
Butterfly. Now coming
31:20
up, we'll hear from Dr Brian Smedley, another
31:23
torch bearer and lifelong advocate
31:25
for health equity. Hi.
31:38
Brian, it's a pleasure to have you on our show
31:40
today and thanks for making the time so.
31:43
Brian, you are the co founder and
31:45
executive director of National
31:47
Collaborative for Health Equity, a
31:49
project that connects research, policy analysis,
31:52
and communications with on the ground activism
31:54
to advanced health equity. And
31:56
you have been carrying the torch
31:59
for actually said every years now on
32:01
undoing the health consequences of
32:04
racism. Tell me something
32:06
more about your personal motivation
32:09
to start this health equity initiative
32:11
in general, and also what got
32:13
you working on these topics. What's your personal story.
32:16
Well, first, thank you so much for having me. You know,
32:18
health equity is something that we should all
32:20
be concerned about, but I'm personally very
32:22
deeply invested in it. I come from a
32:25
line of people who have committed themselves
32:27
to racial justice work. My mother
32:29
is the late anthropologist Dr Audrey
32:32
Smedley, who wrote quite a bit about the concept
32:34
of race and how it originated here
32:37
in North America, essentially to subjugate
32:39
and exploit, of course, indigenous
32:41
populations and then enslaved Africans
32:43
and so forth. So that's really
32:46
the roots of today's
32:48
health and equities, and given
32:50
my mother's scholarship, given the kinds
32:53
of things that I've observed in my lifetime, such
32:55
as being born in Detroit in
32:58
the nineteen sixties, a city that was going
33:00
through considerable demographic change.
33:03
When I was a little boy, we moved
33:05
to a neighborhood on the west side of Detroit
33:07
that was somewhat integrated, but
33:10
like a lot of other cities in the United States,
33:12
as African Americans began moving into the
33:14
neighborhood, white people began to leave
33:17
in significant numbers to the suburbs.
33:20
And that's the roots of modern
33:22
day racial segregation, which I have
33:24
focused a lot of my work on because it's
33:26
actually at the root of many
33:28
of the health and equities that we see, particularly
33:31
those inequities between
33:33
African Americans and whites. Most
33:35
people don't recognize the role
33:37
of residential segregation as
33:39
being foundational to health inequities.
33:42
And moreover, most Americans don't recognize
33:44
the role of government and actively
33:47
segregating and separating different
33:49
racial and ethnic groups and perpetuating that
33:51
segregation up until nineteen
33:54
sixty four when those practices were
33:56
finally outlawed. So really my
33:58
work is about addressing that asking legacy
34:00
of a structural form of racism,
34:03
which is residential segregation, and
34:06
the role of government and many other actors
34:08
in creating and perpetuating that segregation,
34:11
right, I mean, it takes me to one of the common
34:13
topics we discussed with Dr Brown on our
34:15
podcast as well, the impact of housepiece
34:18
that is racialized is impacting
34:20
people's health. And there's also I think a book which is
34:22
Segregated by Design that really examines
34:24
exactly the topics that you're kind of talking about, and touching
34:27
on you're also
34:29
the Chief of Psychology and the Public
34:32
Interest with American Psychological
34:34
Association, and you're leading
34:36
a PAS efforts to apply the science
34:38
and practice of psychology to fundamental
34:40
problems of human welfare and social justice. What
34:44
would you like to touch upon these
34:46
topics being kind
34:49
of used in terms of the context
34:51
of the pandemic right now, you know, in the last year,
34:53
and how they may be different than what it
34:55
used to be in the past in terms of
34:57
how you've been doing your own work and the challenge
35:00
to sit on deck. Well, we're
35:02
certainly in in our lifetimes unprecedented
35:04
times with the pandemic. We've seen
35:07
that the pandemic has upended so many
35:09
aspects of life and tragically has
35:11
cut many lives short. The
35:13
pandemic really just reflects existing
35:16
inequity. Those populations
35:18
that have been marginalized politically, socially,
35:20
economically typically are most vulnerable
35:23
to infection. They have higher mortality rates.
35:25
So here in the US context, African
35:28
Americans, Latin X populations, American
35:30
Indian populations, and many others
35:33
have been hit particularly hard by
35:35
the pandemic. So our effort
35:37
at the American Psychological Association and other groups
35:39
working in the racial equity and health equity
35:41
space is to simply uplift
35:44
this inequity. It's my contention
35:46
that we will not get out of this pandemic
35:48
unless we center and prioritize
35:50
equity concerns. No reason for this
35:52
is pretty simple. You can't leave any community
35:55
behind and expect that we're all
35:57
going to be okay and healthy and
35:59
that we're going to ltimately defeat the virus. If
36:01
we leave behind those folks
36:04
who are frontline essential workers, folks
36:06
who are working in nursing homes
36:08
and other settings, who are disproportionately
36:11
themselves black and brown immigrant folks,
36:14
if we leave these communities vulnerable, then
36:16
we will all ultimately be vulnerable.
36:18
So we need to address the needs of those most
36:20
marginalized in those most at risk,
36:23
and to prioritize how we
36:25
go about reducing risk. So
36:27
we know, for example, that we all have to practice
36:29
good public health practice wearing masks, washing
36:32
hands, physically distancing, but in
36:34
some cases, in communities of color, for
36:36
example, those are very difficult to do, particularly
36:39
if you have overcrowded housing or
36:41
people working in settings where it's difficult
36:43
to physically distance. We have to prioritize
36:46
the concerns of those communities if we're
36:48
going to ensure that none of us
36:50
are at disproportionate risk and that we can
36:52
all ultimately come out of the virus
36:54
healthier and stronger. Right, I
36:56
mean, the topics you touch upon a very valid and
36:59
actually quite and focus in news
37:01
these days as well. And and I believe
37:03
one of the missions of you know, your Health
37:05
Equity Collaborative is to set up a
37:07
promote health equity by harnessing data.
37:10
And I just want to bring that aspect of data
37:12
here. And you know, I read a federal study
37:15
that found that raise and ethnicity
37:17
data is missing for nearly half
37:19
of coronavirus vaccine recipients,
37:22
and this lack of data is leading to an inequitable
37:24
response to the pandemic, which is
37:26
of course, you know, continuing to undel your burden communities
37:29
of color as well. In fact, the
37:31
Biden administration created COVID
37:33
nineteen Health Equity Task Force has
37:36
also an ambitious promise there of
37:38
an expansion of equity data collection.
37:41
So, first of all, your thoughts on that, and
37:43
secondly, do you see these solutions to
37:46
such challenges in terms of equity data collection,
37:48
which has a major role to play here. Yes,
37:50
that's a wonderful question. Most folks
37:52
would wonder, well, why data collection doesn't
37:55
sound very sexy? How does that help solve
37:57
this problem of this virus epidemia?
38:00
Oology one oh one tells us that we need
38:02
to collect data, very thorough and comprehensive
38:04
data to understand where the virus is spreading,
38:07
which communities are getting hardest hit.
38:09
And unfortunately, when the pandemic
38:11
hit, we had a very weak and ineffective
38:14
federal response. It left it to many of the
38:17
states to be able to forge
38:19
strategies going forward, particularly with respect
38:21
to data collection. We have fifty
38:24
plus different approaches to data
38:26
collection being used among the states, but we
38:28
need comprehensive and complete data
38:31
collection on things like demographic information.
38:33
We need to know who's testing positive
38:36
by race, ethnicity, socio economic
38:38
status. Data such as income, our education
38:41
would be helpful. Where do people live
38:43
places obviously critically important to understand
38:46
the distribution and spread of the virus.
38:48
Are folks with disabilities disproportionately
38:51
affected? Are people who are gender
38:53
or sexual minorities disproportionately
38:55
affected? We simply don't have the
38:57
data, but we need to know this information
39:00
so that we can target strategies to
39:02
help communities to reduce their risks.
39:04
We need data on who is getting tested,
39:07
who's testing positive, who's
39:09
getting hospitalized if necessary, and what
39:11
kinds of treatments might they be receiving.
39:13
We need data on vaccines. We know
39:16
that vaccine acceptance there's
39:18
quite a bit of variation across different communities,
39:20
and there's a long history. That's a whole another story.
39:22
But unless we have the data to understand who's
39:25
getting vaccinated, again, it makes
39:27
our public health response ineffectual.
39:29
It makes it difficult for us to target strategies
39:32
to ensure that we're getting vaccines,
39:34
for example, where they're desperately needed.
39:37
Again, this is something that's going to ultimately
39:39
be of concern for all of us if
39:41
we want to contain the spread and ultimately
39:43
defeat the virus. Right, I mean,
39:45
all of that makes complete sense in order
39:47
to be able to understand the population, to be able
39:49
to address the solutions towards it. Right
39:52
to that extent, would you have any examples
39:55
or maybe initiatives or something that is
39:57
in the planning where you could talk about
39:59
data to and innovations in this health equity
40:02
space to understand
40:04
how communities are responding to vaccine
40:06
availability. We need data. We need
40:08
to be able to understand new
40:10
applications such as artificial intelligence.
40:12
How does that help target vaccine
40:15
distribution where it's needed. For example,
40:17
in some cases, artificial intelligence
40:19
may be not helpful, particularly in the racial ethnic
40:21
context, as there's some data to
40:24
indicate that artificial intelligence
40:26
may be operating differently on the
40:28
basis of race ethnicity in the
40:30
US. We need to be very clear about
40:32
how we can best harness technology
40:35
and where there may be risks with new
40:37
technologies such as AI, other
40:40
than the commonly talked about issues like lacking
40:42
data and infrastructure. Because of the inequities
40:45
in the system, What fragilities
40:47
have highlighted or exposed most
40:50
within these martialized community ecosystems
40:52
during the pandemic In specific,
40:55
how do they relate to psychological
40:57
well being of people. We've
40:59
seen that the pandemic has exposed
41:02
so many inequities and so many risks,
41:04
but the psychological risks are profound.
41:06
We have a combination of economic
41:09
anxiety given the economic disruption
41:11
of the pandemic. We have fear
41:13
of infection or transmission of the virus
41:16
to one's loved ones or family members or
41:18
others in the community, and then
41:20
we have had accompanied with the
41:22
pandemic a resurgence of
41:24
intolerance and expressions of hate. The
41:27
Asian American community here in the US,
41:29
for example, has been disproportionately targeted
41:32
and victimized with assaults
41:34
both a verbal and physical in
41:36
both virtual and physical spaces. Clearly,
41:40
we are in a very stressful time at
41:42
the a p A. We've been predicting a
41:44
mental health tsunami emerging
41:47
as a result of the pandemic and the associated
41:49
stresses, and what it highlights
41:51
for us is the need to rebuild
41:53
the mental health infrastructure. Sadly,
41:56
over a number of decades, we have disinvested
41:59
in the public health and of structure and mental health
42:01
infrastructure here in the US, and
42:03
so we need to rebuild that because clearly
42:06
the mental health consequences that
42:08
we're experiencing right now are deep and profound
42:11
and could have significant implications
42:14
for the overall health status of populations,
42:17
for our ability to recover from the economic
42:19
downturn, and just to be resilient,
42:21
to have our communities be able to draw
42:24
upon sources of strength and resiliency
42:26
to help them emerge from the pandemic stronger.
42:29
So the mental health consequences
42:31
have been significant, and we are
42:33
desperately in need of ways to improve
42:36
our ability to provide services. You
42:38
asked about innovation and technology earlier.
42:40
One such innovation is the increase
42:43
in telehealth and tele mental health
42:45
here in the US, whereby
42:48
people who are seeking psychotherapy,
42:50
for example, can find a provider
42:52
and can interact either over a
42:54
video chat or telephone line. And
42:57
this significantly reduces geographic
42:59
barriers to accessing therapeutic
43:02
services. But it also from an equity
43:04
standpoint, reduces many cultural
43:07
and linguistic barriers. So if a
43:09
person is seeking, for example,
43:11
Spanish language mental health services, but lives
43:13
in a community where no such
43:15
providers are available, that person
43:18
can simply look across
43:20
the state where they live in and attempt
43:22
to access services from qualified
43:24
providers. So it opens up new
43:27
opportunities for seeking
43:29
assistance, and from an equity standpoint,
43:31
that kind of innovation is critically important.
43:34
Yeah, you bring in a lot of interesting topics
43:37
here, but one of the things which
43:39
often strikes me is US is
43:42
facing public health crisis on a level
43:44
not experience for more than a hundred years
43:46
now, right, it should be reasonable
43:48
to expect that all citizens
43:50
can rely on their government and health
43:53
institutions to protect them. But
43:55
for many Black Americans and communities
43:57
of color trust in the girl and
44:00
does not come easy. That you kind of touched upon it as
44:02
well, right, What would
44:04
you say is the reason for that? You
44:07
know, we have a long history and a sad
44:10
history here in the US of abuse
44:13
at the hands of the scientific and medical establishment.
44:16
We've seen that African Americans have been
44:18
abused in public health research,
44:20
such as in the infamous to Skegee
44:23
experiments, where African American
44:25
males who had contracted syphilis were allowed
44:27
to go untreated so that researchers
44:29
could understand the long term effects
44:31
of syphilis. Clearly unethical
44:34
and something that should never have happened
44:36
and should not happen today. So you
44:38
have that history, plus you have
44:40
the fact that there are so many
44:43
structural inequities. The way that healthcare
44:45
resources are distributed here in
44:47
the US is deeply inequitable. Often
44:50
those communities that are sickest and in greatest
44:52
need of access to health care
44:54
services and culturally appropriate services
44:57
in their community simply don't have that
45:00
excess. Adding on top of that, the
45:02
fact that the United States remains a nation
45:04
that is focused on market based healthcare
45:06
delivery. That means we have no uniform
45:09
national strategy for providing health insurance
45:11
coverage. We have no uniform national
45:13
strategy for looking at where
45:16
we need to have our doctors, nurses, clinics,
45:19
hospitals, etcetera. So we in
45:21
fact have multiple systems, many
45:24
of which merely replicate the inequities
45:26
that already exist. So there
45:29
are many lessons to be learned about
45:31
the proper role of government and
45:33
ensuring that we all have a basic level
45:35
of protection. And I'm very hopeful that
45:38
despite the tragedy of the pandemic, that we
45:40
will learn those lessons that there
45:42
is a role for government to ensure a basic
45:45
level of access to health care and
45:47
basic level of public health services,
45:50
and many other countries of course ensure
45:52
that all populations have at least some minimal
45:55
level of access to care. Right.
45:58
I mean, it's very relevant point that you talk
46:00
about the role of government and how they can make
46:02
it more accessible in the health care.
46:05
But this brings me to another very important point,
46:07
the fact that marginalized communities
46:10
and the communities of color are more
46:12
than ever now aware
46:14
of these disparities in the health care system,
46:17
and now they're more than ever are aware that
46:19
they receive lower quality of care. Right
46:21
and during the pendiment, we often heard voices
46:24
coming out and speaking about the topics.
46:26
So this is not only the mistressed
46:28
part, but it's also a level of awareness
46:31
and retaliation at times even right,
46:34
So, is there a way we can manage
46:36
and handle this mistrust, so to
46:38
say, fear among these communities through
46:42
better engagement, better communication.
46:45
And here I would in particularly like you to leaven
46:47
into your expertise in psychology
46:49
and behavioral science as to how to take
46:52
corrective measures here. Sure,
46:55
to your point, we know that there are steps that
46:57
we can take to ensure that people have
47:00
reliable, trustworthy information
47:02
about the vaccine. So, for example,
47:04
given high levels of mistrust in the African
47:06
American community of the medical establishment
47:09
and many other communities as well, we know that
47:11
there are some things that we can do. First, begin
47:13
to work with trusted community leaders
47:15
and advisers, folks who are working at
47:18
the grassroots level, be they working in
47:20
community based organizations, nonprofit
47:23
organizations, civic organizations, faith
47:25
institutions, and many others. Working
47:27
with our trusted leaders to provide
47:30
accurate information is critically
47:32
important. We also need to ensure
47:35
that we're working closely with community groups
47:37
to understand what are the concerns that
47:39
communities may have about accessing the
47:41
vaccine. We need to better understand
47:44
how do we ensure that we're meeting
47:46
other needs that communities may have. It's not just
47:48
related to vaccines. We need to
47:50
ensure, as I mentioned earlier, that we're all
47:53
adopting good public health behaviors,
47:55
and so all of this is tied together
47:58
in terms of understanding trust not
48:00
just in government, but in all of our civic
48:02
institutions. So that's why it's important
48:05
to begin to work with those trusted
48:07
leaders that are already present in communities
48:10
and are already drawing upon sources
48:12
of strength and resiliency that
48:14
already exists in these communities. It's important to
48:16
note that even though we're talking about
48:19
communities that are in many cases politically,
48:21
economically, and socially marginalized,
48:24
these communities have tremendous sources
48:26
of strength and resiliency that
48:28
we need to draw upon in times of
48:30
crisis like this. As very
48:33
often it's said that you know, you often listen to
48:35
the voices of your own communities, and you have to tap
48:37
into that rather than coming it as
48:39
top down and personally. I work a lot
48:41
in human centered design, and I also believe
48:43
that you have to also tap into the moral intuition
48:46
and values of these communities to be able to communicate
48:48
with them in what resonates
48:50
with them best. Right, let's think
48:52
about COVID as a trigger, you know, right
48:54
now, I mean since March last
48:56
year, a few things changed. The nature of work
48:59
changed, onto exchanged. We
49:01
know that people of color and marginalized people
49:03
were, you know, disproportionately impacted. It's
49:05
a known fact now, partially
49:07
because they were the essential workforce during
49:10
the pandemic and they were vulnerable to this exposure.
49:13
Another thing that changed was the nature
49:15
of education. We move from in
49:17
person to remote learning, and then the
49:19
differential access to broadband
49:21
and strong technology, you know, that enabled
49:24
people to connect and learn differently, where
49:26
marginalized populations again got left behind.
49:28
Right now, this is systemic and
49:30
I am just trying to bring that to the health
49:32
equity perspective here in the context
49:35
of vaccine distribution. We
49:37
see this trickle down in the way the vaccine
49:39
distribution is being done at this point in time, where
49:41
there is a digital divide. Now,
49:44
where does the entire health
49:46
equity initiative can play
49:48
a role here in terms of reaching the
49:50
people where they are who
49:52
have very limited access to technology.
49:54
For instance, do you have any solutions there? This
49:58
is such an excellent question because you're hying
50:00
together again many of the pre existing
50:02
inequities and disparities
50:04
in terms of access to broadband internet,
50:06
for example. These are all issues
50:08
that were critically important before the pandemic,
50:11
and we're seeing how much worse it's gotten.
50:13
You mentioned things like children
50:16
learning remotely. There's some evidence that
50:18
the kids are falling behind, and again
50:20
this disproportionately falls on the
50:22
backs of children of color. When
50:25
we're talking about health, generally, the
50:27
best predictor of your health status as an individual
50:30
is your educational attainment, your educational
50:32
level. And so we have left these children
50:35
behind who are most vulnerable at
50:37
this time and who experienced
50:39
many challenges to remote learning. In
50:41
some cases, we have challenges
50:43
with family care and child care that may interfere
50:46
with children's learning, inequitable access
50:48
to broadband as you mentioned, and then
50:51
the challenges of children not
50:53
having adequate nutrition. In many cases
50:55
we have children receiving breakfast
50:58
lunch at reduced or low cost
51:00
or no cost. So these are all deeply
51:03
tied together, and you've asked
51:05
about solutions. There are some really
51:07
interesting innovations happening in terms of
51:10
remotely bringing broadband to
51:12
those communities that lack that access,
51:15
ensuring that children can go to centers
51:17
in communities, for example, where they can much
51:19
more easily access broadband
51:22
and at the same time get some of the
51:24
nutritional and social services that
51:26
they might need. So even though in
51:28
some cases schools are not open
51:30
or are on a hybrid schedule, or
51:33
in other cases schools are just now
51:35
returning to in person learning,
51:38
we have to ensure that we're addressing
51:41
the gaps that have occurred in the time
51:43
where students have been out of school, so
51:45
ensuring that their opportunities for remediation
51:48
and helping children to get caught back up. All
51:51
of these things pose tremendous
51:53
risk for these children individually in terms
51:55
of their opportunities in life and
51:57
their health outcomes. Broadly, but at all so
52:00
affects all of us as a society, as
52:02
a community because again, to the extent
52:04
that we leave these kids behind is
52:06
to the detriment of the entire society.
52:09
Tell me one think, how could
52:12
you or how we as
52:14
a system rethink race
52:17
or racism in the context of health equity,
52:19
and in particular use of
52:21
psychology to make a positive impact
52:23
on these critical site issues. First,
52:26
we need to acknowledge the global presence
52:28
of the belief in human hierarchy, a
52:30
false notion that assigns value
52:33
to some and denies value
52:35
and opportunity for others. And here in the
52:37
u S context, of course, European
52:39
descendants are considered to have value.
52:42
The reality is that as a society,
52:45
we allocate much more in the way
52:48
of societal opportunities to
52:50
children of European descent, while
52:53
systematically posing barriers
52:55
to opportunity for kids of color. Psychologists
52:57
have been studying this phenomena
53:00
for many years, and of course, psychologists have pioneered
53:02
the notion of implicit bias, the
53:04
fact that people, even those with egalitarian
53:07
views and who are deeply anti
53:09
racists, may harbor biases
53:11
that they're not consciously aware of that are automatically
53:14
activated when we're confronted
53:16
with difference, whether it's difference on the
53:18
basis of skin color, gender, language,
53:21
or any number of other factors. So
53:23
psychologists have tried to help the general public
53:25
to understand how these processes operate
53:28
and to help us understand that race is
53:30
in fact a social construct, but
53:32
racism is very real because
53:35
of the tendency for humans
53:37
to believe in forms of
53:39
hierarchy. These, of course, are ideologically
53:42
driven. No child comes into the world
53:44
believing that one group is superior
53:46
to another, but rather how we allocate
53:49
socidal resources, the cultural narratives
53:51
that we hold. The kind of world
53:54
that we create for kids of color is
53:56
often very different for white kids, particularly
53:59
here in the United States, and these children see
54:01
that they understand who
54:03
is valued and who's not when they see those
54:05
kinds of conditions. So we need to do much
54:08
more to help people to understand the fallacy
54:10
of race. There is no biologic or
54:12
genetic underpinning to the
54:15
notion of race. These so called
54:17
races that we have identified are purely
54:20
social myth. But rather, what
54:22
we have done is to create a society
54:24
where people are valued differently
54:26
on the basis of things like skin color, hair
54:29
texture, et cetera. Children see
54:31
that it's reflected in the inequities
54:33
that we see across a range
54:35
of different outcomes, and it's
54:37
my firm belief that we are making progress
54:40
towards helping people in this society
54:43
understand the fallacy of race,
54:45
but the reality of racism
54:47
and importantly how destructive racism
54:50
is for all of us. I believe if
54:52
we keep pushing to raise
54:54
this level of awareness, ultimately
54:56
this will help us to lay a
54:58
foundation to create it a more egalitarian
55:01
society, as we have stated, that
55:03
is our goal. So true, Brian, I
55:05
mean, I agree with every word you said
55:08
right now, because it's really the biases that you've
55:10
kind of built in. And one is working on the systemic
55:12
and the infrastructure part of it and the government role
55:15
that is to be played here. But I think the other
55:17
part is also really the biases
55:19
that we have to fight from within. And in
55:21
the context of all we've talked about
55:23
today, does any you know initiative
55:26
from government or local level,
55:28
federal level, state level, or any other
55:30
country in the world you have witnessed
55:33
where the government has
55:35
risen to the recent challenges in particularly
55:38
productive way. Well,
55:40
we've certainly seen wide variation
55:42
globally in how governments are responding.
55:45
We've seen wide variation in the
55:47
pandemic spread. We all
55:49
can learn quite a bit from New Zealand,
55:51
which has had great success
55:54
in first getting the
55:56
inhabitants of the country to cooperate
55:59
to work together other to do those
56:01
public health behaviors that we
56:03
know from science are important, wearing
56:05
a mask, washing hands, physically distancing,
56:08
and yet we still have resistance
56:11
to that science. In the United
56:13
States, we have people who believe it's a matter
56:15
of their personal freedom to
56:18
not wear a mask, you know, that
56:20
kind of stance. While it may be ideologically
56:23
comforting for some flies
56:25
in the face of science, and so we have to
56:28
come to a reckoning. We can either hold
56:30
onto our ignorance and be willfully
56:33
proud and demand that we have our so called
56:35
freedoms to behave as we
56:37
wish, or we can recognize
56:40
that our behavior affects
56:42
others in our communities. So just
56:44
as we have certain freedoms, we
56:46
also have many responsibilities to
56:49
understand how our behavior affects
56:51
others in our community. Same
56:53
issue with vaccines. The more people
56:55
that we can get to accept the vaccine,
56:58
the more progress we will make toward reducing
57:00
the spread. But the big takeaway
57:02
from me is that nations
57:05
that cooperate together, that show
57:07
a level of social cohesion and
57:10
solidarity, will do much better
57:12
in stopping the spread of the virus
57:14
than those communities characterized by deep
57:17
division such as here in the United
57:19
States. I mean, you touch to a very
57:21
interesting topic here, and I'm forced to ask
57:23
this question, which is around
57:25
science. Right, it's absolutely critical
57:27
in the pandemic response that you know, this
57:30
push against science, anti
57:32
access movement for instance, or also
57:34
not people not wearing masks, or some even
57:36
believing that COVID nineteen doesn't even exist.
57:38
Right, So this scientific fact
57:41
versus misinformation leading
57:43
to apprehensions. What is the
57:45
rule of psychology here? And I mean the
57:47
psychological dimension of the pandemic.
57:50
You know, there are a number of psychologists who have studied
57:52
public health communications. How do we
57:54
ensure that our messages are being
57:57
heard accepted, and that we
58:00
are conveying accurate information?
58:02
Who needs to convey that message? There's
58:04
quite a bit of science on this topic, and so
58:07
we need to be prepared to deploy
58:10
those lessons learn from that science.
58:13
We know pandemics tend
58:15
to elicit some of the worst
58:17
aspects of our tendencies as
58:19
human beings. Pandemics create anxiety,
58:22
They tend to turn neighbor against neighbor.
58:25
They tend to make us distrustful. And
58:27
if we already had a level of distrust in our
58:29
institutions that tends to get worse during
58:31
the pandemic. So understanding
58:33
that yes, we are going to have
58:36
factions, we're going to have divisions during
58:39
a time of extreme anxiety, but
58:41
understanding that there are ways that we can address
58:43
that anxiety and come together,
58:45
and again understanding that our
58:48
ability to cooperate, to work
58:50
together toward our goals as communities,
58:53
as a society is going to be far
58:55
more constructive towards
58:58
flattening the curve. As we say, then
59:00
the divisions that we've seen, so
59:03
this is often hard to convey, and those
59:05
sentiments that are solidly
59:07
anti science, as you've indicated, are
59:10
difficult to change. But if we can
59:12
help people to understand again our collective
59:14
responsibility and what we need
59:16
to do to protect each other, our families,
59:19
our communities, most people would
59:21
be motivated by that kind of information
59:24
and would take the kinds of steps that are needed
59:27
to ensure that we understand our responsibilities
59:29
to each other right totally.
59:32
Bang on, the strategic health communications
59:34
is something that we need to invest in, Brian,
59:37
there were amazing insights. We're very
59:39
interested in humanizing our shared
59:41
experiences, and here, beyond
59:43
your academic work, how
59:45
has the recent pandemic affected you,
59:47
your family, your friendships, any
59:50
stories there. Sure,
59:52
for my family, as with many other families,
59:54
it is challenging. Right. We're unable
59:56
to travel, we're unable to see friends
59:59
and family as we once did. But those
1:00:01
are relatively minor concerns compared
1:00:04
to what some other families have gone through. So many
1:00:07
families have tragically lost loved
1:00:09
ones or have had people get very
1:00:11
sick in their families. I'm so fortunate
1:00:13
that we have not had that experience in
1:00:15
my family, and my heart goes out
1:00:17
to those who have had those kinds of tragic
1:00:20
experiences. The best thing that we can
1:00:22
do for each other is to understand that even
1:00:24
though we must be physically
1:00:26
distant, we need to be socially
1:00:28
together, and thankfully there are many
1:00:31
many ways to do that with technology
1:00:33
today. We need to ensure that
1:00:35
we are expressing care for each other.
1:00:38
We need to ensure that we're communicating
1:00:40
with each other, checking on what we might
1:00:42
need. Again, even as we're
1:00:44
physically distancing, we need to be
1:00:47
socially showing solidarity.
1:00:50
Right. I love the message they're like, we need to be socially
1:00:52
together and that's what is important in these current
1:00:54
times. Thanks Brian for your insights
1:00:56
and for all the work you are doing that
1:00:58
contributes to building the capacity for public
1:01:01
health to advance equity. And I'm
1:01:03
particularly a fan of one of your
1:01:05
initiatives within your Health Equity Collaborative,
1:01:08
which is the Culture of Health leaders. I
1:01:10
mean, we need this foundational leadership
1:01:12
development for people who want to advanced
1:01:15
health equity, and and we need to prepare
1:01:17
and inspire people to provide this transformative
1:01:20
leadership to address health equity in these communities.
1:01:22
So thank you, thank you for doing all the work,
1:01:24
and thank you for speaking to us. Thank you so much
1:01:27
for having me. Racism
1:01:32
is a public health issue. It's
1:01:34
been a humbling experience to talk
1:01:37
about issues of racial segregation and
1:01:39
health equity in America through contact
1:01:41
world truth and health. We
1:01:44
can't hide from truth. We
1:01:46
can't hide from these issues or pretend they
1:01:48
don't exist. Black and brown people
1:01:50
are disproportionately affected by disease
1:01:53
because our system designed it that way.
1:01:56
If I hear one more white person say
1:01:59
all live matter, as if anyone
1:02:01
said or suggested otherwise, I'm going
1:02:03
to pop. While I'm embarrassed
1:02:06
about some of our history, I'm equally
1:02:08
passionate about doing my part and
1:02:10
our part as a company with Contact
1:02:13
World to fix a broken system.
1:02:16
We have to improve health equity in this country,
1:02:19
and most of what's broken comes down to racial
1:02:21
injustice dating back more than one years.
1:02:25
If you deny that, you're part
1:02:27
of the problem. If you allow racism,
1:02:29
even passive racism, to happen
1:02:32
around you, you need to stand up
1:02:34
to it and speak out against it.
1:02:36
Being silent is being complicit.
1:02:40
I'm proud to be part of this movement to reduce
1:02:42
health disparities and eliminate structural racism
1:02:44
in this country. Thank you for being
1:02:47
a part of that too. We'll see you
1:02:49
next time on Contact World Truth and Health,
1:02:51
We're going to talk about data genocide
1:02:53
with a troublemaker who speaks
1:02:56
on behalf of our American Indians and
1:02:58
Alaska Natives. Listen
1:03:03
to Contact World of podcast on the I Heart
1:03:06
Radio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More