Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Hi, everybody. This
0:05
is Josh
0:05
Mankiewicz and we're talking Dateline.
0:08
And today's guest is... Andrea
0:11
Canning, also talking Dateline. Nice
0:13
to see you. You too. We're
0:16
here to talk about your episode,
0:18
The Hunt for the Gilgo Beach Killer.
0:22
Now, if you have not, you in the audience
0:24
have not seen this or heard the podcast
0:27
version, it is the podcast
0:29
right below this on
0:30
the list of podcasts that you
0:32
chose this episode for. So
0:35
go there, listen to it or
0:37
watch it on TV and then come
0:39
back here. Andrea,
0:41
I want to congratulate you
0:43
and Mario Garcia who produced
0:46
this epic episode.
0:50
You spoke with a lot of people.
0:52
This might be a new
0:54
record for my Datelines for a number
0:57
of interviews. I
0:59
think the reason we had so many was
1:01
obviously this case is very expansive,
1:03
but it was that we started
1:06
and you know, sometimes when you don't get those bookings
1:08
right away and so you do other bookings
1:10
and you're like, what can we get? And
1:13
then it snowballs and then those bookings start coming
1:15
through that you were really trying to get. And
1:18
so then you end up with a lot of interviews.
1:21
And then you discover that some of the people that you
1:23
booked because you thought you couldn't get those first
1:25
group of people that you wanted. Sometimes that
1:27
second group of people turns out
1:29
they're great and you want to make sure they're in there. Here's
1:32
something I want to talk about right off the top. You know,
1:34
usually Dateline stories
1:37
are about things that are not
1:39
known to the audience. Like they don't know these
1:41
people. We're introducing them to the
1:43
audience for the first time. What
1:45
is it like and what's different when
1:48
you're covering a story like
1:50
this one, like Gilgal Beach, which is being
1:52
covered widely by our competition
1:55
and by newspapers and by television
1:57
stations and networks everywhere.
1:59
and where a lot of people
2:02
in your audience in the country sort
2:04
of already know where the
2:06
story stands. That's different from what
2:08
we usually do. You
2:10
know, when these cases get this big,
2:13
when they rise to the level of the Gilgo Beach
2:17
story, you know, we will put them on the air
2:19
sooner because there is such an appetite
2:21
for it. And I think also we
2:23
need to do better than those other shows. We need to find
2:25
more people. We need to put on a better program. And
2:27
I think in this episode, we really did that.
2:30
You know, we gave you so many people and so
2:32
many different insights that I believe people hadn't
2:35
heard before.
2:35
And also we just we put
2:38
it into a package for you, you know, A to
2:40
Z.
2:40
This might be the most comprehensive
2:43
version of this out there now. I think it probably
2:45
is. I think that's right. And
2:48
I think it's unusual
2:50
for us to do a story when
2:52
there's only an arrest. So
2:54
on the other hand, there's so much story
2:57
that just leads up to that arrest, which you
3:00
tell in this. What
3:02
was incredible to me was how much information
3:05
the prosecutor, the police released
3:08
when they arrested Rex Horman.
3:10
You don't usually get A, that
3:12
much information, B, the
3:15
key people talking before there's
3:17
been a trial. Right. Usually
3:20
it's an ongoing investigation and until the trial,
3:22
we're not going to say anything because usually when
3:24
we're doing dateline hours
3:27
or two hours, the cops and
3:29
the prosecutors will not talk to you until
3:31
there's been a conviction. And in this case,
3:34
you got both of them. We got both of
3:36
them. Yeah, they're talking and people from the past
3:38
are talking as well. The former commissioner
3:41
and, you know, other people involved.
3:44
A lot of times those people won't talk either because,
3:46
you know, they'll go and talk to the prosecutor and
3:48
the prosecutor will say, please wait. You
3:50
know, we're trying to. So even those side
3:53
players or the past players usually don't talk
3:55
to you. So in this case, it's interesting how everyone
3:57
just really opened up, which made our.
4:00
job a lot easier. It
4:02
must have also been unusual for you,
4:05
Andrea, to cover a story sort
4:08
of at its end or at least nearer
4:10
to its end that you would also cover
4:12
at the beginning all those years ago before
4:15
you were on dayline. Yes,
4:17
I covered the story extensively
4:20
when the bodies were found. When
4:22
I heard there was an arrest, to be honest, I'd kind
4:24
of forgotten about the story because it had been
4:27
so many years and I went, wait, what? So
4:29
it was a shock to me too to hear that it was
4:31
Rex Huerman, is the
4:33
person arrested, is the person suspected?
4:36
Because
4:38
back then there were so many theories floating
4:40
around. Oh, it has to be a police officer.
4:42
It's a doctor. It's a lobsterman. It's...
4:45
And some... Robert Kolker, the
4:47
author of the story, said it best. He said, with serial
4:50
killers, uncaught serial killers, it
4:52
becomes like a parlor game. Who
4:55
did it? Everyone has their own theory
4:57
as to who did it. So for it to finally
5:00
come out that the accused was an architect,
5:02
working in Manhattan, that was
5:05
strange to me. I was not expecting
5:07
that. One of the great things
5:09
that I thought you did in this story visually
5:12
was you made the beach and
5:14
the shoreline, which is a beautiful
5:17
place, I certainly think, in almost
5:19
all places where there is shoreline, it's
5:22
gorgeous. But you made it seem
5:24
in this story kind of scary and kind of
5:26
forbidding and ominous because this is
5:28
where the bodies were found. And it's also
5:30
where the
5:34
first person you talk about, Shannon Gilbert, where she
5:36
disappeared. So tell me
5:38
a little bit about sort of what the mood was
5:40
back then when the bodies were found in what
5:42
was a pretty nice area. Yeah,
5:44
I think it was just a lot of fear. Fear
5:47
of the unknown, fear of is this person
5:49
amongst us. Because
5:52
the thought was that this person knows
5:54
this area, especially to have
5:57
so many bodies dump there.
5:59
You know, a.
5:59
course, is it the same person? Are there multiple
6:02
killers? They didn't know, but they
6:04
definitely felt like
6:06
the person or the people responsible knew
6:09
this area. If you live around there,
6:11
you might know it. Exactly. You might cross
6:13
paths with them all the time. Might be somebody you
6:16
see in your daily routine who you don't feel
6:18
afraid of at all. Right. Because they didn't,
6:20
they did not feel like this with someone driving
6:23
from somewhere far away who really
6:25
doesn't know the area but keeps jumping bodies there.
6:27
That was not what anyone thought. So that
6:30
was the prevailing thought was that this
6:32
is one of us. This is someone we
6:35
know. This could be a neighbor. And so
6:37
I think that there's that element of we
6:40
live in this beautiful community. We
6:42
live on the beach. In the summer,
6:44
it is so busy there. People are everywhere.
6:47
It's a really popular place to go.
6:49
Jones Beach is right near there. Now,
6:52
in the winter, it
6:53
has a different vibe.
6:55
There's no people around. It becomes
6:57
very desolate. You know, it's cold. So there's
7:00
kind of two sides to that area. And
7:02
the spookier side,
7:04
I would say, is that winter side. In the
7:07
summer, it's just very vibrant. You don't really
7:09
think about that kind of thing happening.
7:12
For the people who live there, it's just shattered their world
7:14
because this is their idyllic, you know,
7:16
slice of heaven that they live in along the Atlantic.
7:19
One of the problems that
7:22
you talked about in this story is how law
7:24
enforcement was accused early on
7:26
of not taking murders
7:29
of women in the sex business as seriously
7:31
as others. And that's also the problem in
7:33
journalism. And I thought that you did a great job making
7:36
it clear how all of the women in your
7:38
story were loved and
7:41
missed regardless of the work that
7:43
they were doing at the time. Because sometimes it's hard
7:45
to get families to talk
7:47
about that because they're
7:49
embarrassed or they want to fix the other person,
7:52
the dead person's image after
7:55
they're gone. And I thought the
7:58
families that you interviewed were... sort
8:00
of very, you know, very
8:03
clear about, you know, I didn't
8:05
love that she was doing this, but this is who she was, and
8:07
she was doing it, and we loved her, and we
8:09
didn't stop loving her because of the business she was in.
8:12
It was amazing how honest they were. And for
8:15
me, it was really important, the tone of the story,
8:18
to make sure that we got that across, that
8:20
these were mothers, they were sisters,
8:22
they were daughters, they were all loved.
8:25
You know, none of these
8:26
women were just abandoned by their families and
8:28
didn't want anything to do with them. You know, they
8:30
had families back home. They just unfortunately
8:33
got into this cycle because they needed many, one of
8:35
them needed money for her child,
8:38
you know, one of them wanted to make it on Broadway, and
8:40
of course it's very difficult, you know, so here she
8:42
is in New York City with no money. So
8:45
unfortunately, whether it was their choice or,
8:47
you know, their boyfriend dragged them into it,
8:50
you know, or whatever it was, they
8:52
did end up in this life that
8:54
they never set out to be in, and suddenly
8:57
they were in it. And so
8:59
I admired the families for being open about
9:01
that. You know, I mean,
9:03
it's a, sometimes family and
9:05
friends don't want to talk, in part because like people want
9:08
to judge, you know, they're afraid of getting
9:10
on television and saying, this was my
9:12
sister or this was my daughter. I
9:15
always say, if this was a
9:17
soccer mom from Westport,
9:20
Connecticut, who goes missing,
9:23
two completely different responses,
9:26
two different worlds. Because we know
9:29
that if a mom goes missing from Westport, it's going
9:31
to be on every news cycle, every
9:33
morning show, there's going to
9:35
be press conferences from the lawn, you know,
9:38
it's going to be a just a much different scenario.
9:40
And there's going to be a police task force. Yeah,
9:43
immediately. That's what sort of sad is
9:45
how, you know, people, I think blame them.
9:47
Well, you got yourself into this life, you know, there are
9:49
people who see it that way. But you know, I
9:51
mean, clearly, one of the things
9:53
that changed was that both
9:56
the DA and the police
9:59
commissioner there are. relatively new
10:01
and so you know this was
10:03
a this
10:06
mark just not sort of new blood in
10:08
the suffocating but also really kind of a
10:10
new attitude they made
10:12
this a priority clearly they felt
10:15
it had sort of languished too
10:17
long and they worked really hard on it
10:19
and look what happened
10:28
you know one of the things that can happen
10:29
in a big case is
10:32
that with a lot of info
10:34
coming in which you know certainly
10:37
in the early days you don't necessarily know what's important
10:39
what is it things can fall between the cracks
10:41
and it feels like that's what happened here
10:44
the the tip that came from
10:48
from one of Amber Costello's roommates yeah
10:50
and I had actually interviewed one of
10:52
the roommates back in the day when I covered
10:54
this story and by
10:57
scouring through these old witness accounts
10:59
these old reports there's a little
11:01
nugget in there a little diamond you
11:04
know amongst all this information
11:06
they said it
11:07
was a
11:08
man that she had been with who was oglish
11:11
looking really tall and drove
11:13
a Chevy Avalanche the green Chevy
11:16
Avalanche green they gave the color and it ended
11:18
up being like a first edition first edition
11:20
or something they struck gold
11:22
you know they they I'm sorry I keep using
11:25
diamonds and gold and but
11:28
I mean this was the gold this was the diamonds
11:30
this was everything right it was
11:32
the mother load this was the mother load
11:34
of this story was taking
11:37
that tip seriously finally
11:39
and it just and it cracked the case
11:41
wide open it was it was huge you
11:44
know it opened the floodgates it left led
11:47
to who owns this
11:49
vehicle in this area you
11:52
know and I hope we have Rex Heuerman an architect
11:54
who commutes between Massapequa Park
11:56
in Manhattan which is where these phones were
11:58
you know triangulated Cops
12:01
sometimes talk about how cold
12:03
cases are solved by changes
12:06
in circumstance, which is, you
12:08
know, somebody like says, you know, I'm not gonna lie
12:10
for you anymore. You know, I gave you an alibi 20 years
12:13
ago, but you're not my boyfriend
12:15
or girlfriend anymore, and I'm not gonna have anything
12:17
to do with you, and I'm changing my story. I'm gonna say what
12:19
really happened. Or changes in
12:21
technology, which is, you know, things like touch
12:24
DNA and cell phone
12:26
triangulation, the ability
12:29
of a police
12:31
department to figure out, oh, no, these phones
12:33
are active in two places. This is
12:35
a guy who commutes, which sort of
12:37
fits with what the profiler
12:39
said, which is this is gonna be somebody who just
12:42
sort of slithers among us that
12:44
we don't even think about, somebody
12:46
who just seems completely normal. Well,
12:50
once you get to know Rex Hureman,
12:52
some people are gonna say he's completely normal, and
12:55
some people who you interviewed are gonna
12:57
say something else. I
13:00
mean, there really were two sides to this guy. Yeah,
13:02
there were. And even the
13:04
side that people didn't like,
13:06
I don't know that
13:08
even for them that rose to the level
13:10
of, you know, alleged serial killer. No.
13:13
Like he was in maybe he was annoying at work or he
13:15
made, you know, offhanded comments that people
13:17
didn't like, but I don't think anyone
13:19
was thinking, I don't like him. He's a serial
13:21
killer. No,
13:23
I loved that you booked his coworker and that woman
13:26
who said, you know, in a million years
13:28
I never would have thought this was possible because that's
13:31
exactly the kind of person that doesn't
13:33
want to talk after somebody's
13:36
arrested. And when they realize, oh, I was actually wrong
13:38
about this person. And one of the
13:41
parts of her interview that didn't make the show was
13:44
when she talks about him taking her to her
13:47
apartment after she slipped and fell on the ice
13:49
and he took her to the hospital and he went, you know,
13:51
to the pharmacy for her and he went up to her apartment. I
13:55
said to her, I said,
13:56
I almost like cringe saying
13:58
it.
13:59
They said, would you call him? Like, was
14:02
he like a gentle giant?
14:05
And she cringed
14:06
saying it back, yes.
14:08
Because
14:08
it's like you don't
14:10
want to say that about someone who's accused
14:12
of such heinous crimes. You don't want to call
14:14
them a gentle giant, but that's how she felt in the moment.
14:17
But the guy she knew was. Yeah.
14:21
So that was like a powerful moment in that interview for
14:23
me. I was like, wow. But
14:25
you know what she said, though? That was so poignant.
14:28
She said, because she was about
14:30
the age
14:30
of the victims at that point.
14:33
And she said, but like there's two
14:35
kinds of people for him. She wasn't that
14:37
escort. She
14:40
was a co-worker. She was in a different bucket.
14:43
So she was
14:44
very likely never in danger. It
14:47
didn't seem like to anyone that he would
14:49
go after someone like her. He had
14:52
allegedly, he had a type.
14:55
So this is something
14:57
we were discussing a little bit earlier. This
15:00
is a story where there's a lot of competition for
15:02
interviews. So let's talk a little bit
15:04
about what we do and what we don't do
15:08
when we are competing with other people
15:10
for a story. For example, somebody
15:12
in this story, we don't have to say who, but somebody
15:15
in this story who was someone we would have
15:17
loved to have spoken with wanted money.
15:20
And we don't pay anybody. So like you
15:23
have to let that go. I've had that happen in other
15:25
stories in which somebody says, I'll
15:28
do it, but I'm going to need to get paid. And I say,
15:31
then we can't do it. That's really common these
15:33
days, especially as true crime just seems
15:35
to keep exploding. Everyone's
15:38
covering true crime now. And some
15:40
of those outlets pay. They
15:43
will pay money. We are a news organization.
15:45
We are NBC News. We do not pay.
15:48
So sometimes you're booking these people with one arm
15:50
tied behind your back. And
15:52
you have to use just old fashioned like, look,
15:55
we will do you right. I think
15:57
that people are almost always happy with the way
15:59
they're portrayed on day one. unless they happen to be
16:01
the actual murder. When people are reticent,
16:04
when they're uncomfortable with talking, I always
16:07
say to them, look, don't take my word for it.
16:09
Call somebody else. Call another family
16:11
that's been on Dateline and see what they thought. Pick
16:14
anybody. We'll put you in Dutch with them. Our
16:16
best recommendation is our resume. Oops. I
16:19
don't... Did you hear that? There's a cat... I'm gonna
16:22
break it up with a Reese's Peanut Butter Cup. Hold on.
16:24
Go away.
16:26
Leftover Halloween candy, breaking up a cat
16:28
fight. In my room, sorry.
16:31
No, this is the kind of Dateline behind the scenes moment
16:33
that our viewers and listeners love. I
16:36
have two female cats that do not get along. One's
16:39
a kitten. One has been here for a while. She didn't
16:41
like the kitten taking over her turf.
16:43
So now we have this. Getting
16:46
back to what we're talking about, I think we do pay
16:49
very careful attention to what families want
16:52
to talk about. And
16:54
frequently they are. They are nervous
16:56
going into interviews because they think like, this
16:59
is it. I'm telling the story not just
17:01
to you, but in front of the whole country. Yeah. I mean,
17:03
they're not doing it for us.
17:05
They're doing it for themselves. They're doing
17:08
it for... So people can learn about
17:10
their loved one. And it's important to
17:12
me that we honor that because
17:16
otherwise, what is the point of doing it? Because
17:19
most people don't want to be on TV. They're
17:21
not... Especially after what they've been through, they're, oh,
17:23
this is going to get me on TV. No, that is not
17:26
what is going through their minds. Not at all.
17:29
I want my loved one to be honored
17:31
and I want my story to be heard. One
17:33
of the things that I
17:35
experience again and again with Dateline is sort
17:38
of how you
17:40
end up going through this whole process with
17:42
the family. Because you're originally
17:44
making contact with them frequently before
17:47
any arrest has been made. The
17:50
crime has happened. The person's either
17:52
missing or they've been found dead, but
17:55
there's no resolution to it at all. And
17:57
then you're kind of with them over those weeks.
18:00
months, sometimes years before
18:02
there's an answer, you've been interacting
18:04
with that family, you know, at all
18:07
levels from the first shock and the first
18:09
grief and the hope that maybe they're going to be found alive
18:11
to the beliefs that they won't be and
18:13
then the news that they actually have been found and you
18:15
sort of, you know, live that with them
18:18
all the way through if they're
18:20
lucky, you know, arrest, trial,
18:22
conviction. So you see
18:24
the families at all these different stages. Yeah,
18:27
and you feel a connection with them too. Sure,
18:30
you have to. You finish the interview and
18:32
you're like, look, think about what we
18:34
just went through. You know, we just went
18:36
through the whole story from beginning
18:39
to end of their child
18:41
or their sister or friend, you know, especially
18:43
if it's a child, it's like we go back to the beginning.
18:45
What kind of child was she or he and, you
18:48
know, all the way up to sentencing,
18:50
you know, you've essentially covered
18:52
an entire span of someone's
18:55
life in this, you know, three hour interview
18:57
and you feel really connected
18:59
to the person you're talking to at the end that because
19:01
they've shared such
19:02
personal information with you.
19:11
What's the thinking now among
19:13
law enforcement? I mean, if it
19:16
is Rex, because we haven't had the trial, if it is
19:18
Rex Uriman, did he have help
19:21
or are there two killers, two
19:24
killers who just happened to coincidentally
19:26
dump their bodies in the same area? People
19:29
didn't know each other. Yeah. Could be more. That's
19:32
a little hard to believe, but there's nothing pointing
19:34
to anybody else involved. Yeah,
19:36
I mean, he's accused of killing
19:38
three of the women and he's the prime suspect and
19:41
a fourth. You know, is he responsible
19:43
for more? I mean, we know there's many
19:45
more bodies. So, you know, no one knows
19:47
right now. This is, this investigation
19:50
is far from over. He's accused
19:52
in three, a prime suspect
19:54
in a fourth, but he's not accused
19:57
in the case of Shannon Gilbert, which
19:59
was a the case that started all of this and
20:01
led to the bodies being discovered
20:04
because police don't officially
20:06
believe that hers was a murder.
20:10
And I will say she does sound like
20:12
she could be disoriented or on something
20:14
in that 911 call, but the
20:17
family is convinced that she did
20:19
meet some kind of foul play, even though police
20:22
are sort of convinced that she did not,
20:24
that that was accidental. Foul play
20:26
or maybe she was given drugs
20:29
and it made her even more disoriented
20:32
or... But remember, she's running saying
20:34
they're trying to kill me on her 911 call. So
20:37
who's trying to kill her? But remember,
20:39
John Ray, the family attorney, has now,
20:42
in our story, he
20:44
has brought more witnesses
20:46
to the table. John Ray does not
20:48
believe that
20:49
Shannon died of natural causes
20:52
and nor does her sister. So
20:54
John Ray is definitely more in the camp of that
20:57
she was potentially murdered. John
20:59
Ray hired by the family. Right. And
21:02
he worked with Mary, the mother who tragically died.
21:05
She died without really truly knowing
21:07
what happened
21:09
to Shannon. And without
21:11
seeing any arrest in the case, that
21:13
would have been before this.
21:15
No. And she didn't know
21:17
obviously about the arrests in the cases
21:20
of the other women. So she died
21:22
very unsettled with
21:24
what had happened to her daughter. So
21:31
now I think we're going to talk about, let's
21:33
talk about Commissioner Harrison. One
21:36
of the things I loved about
21:38
your interviews was that the DA
21:41
talks like a cop and the cop
21:43
talks like a DA. Like, Rodney
21:45
Harrison sounds like he's like a politician. He's
21:48
very great on camera.
21:51
And choosing his words carefully. And
21:53
the DA is like, you know, he was
21:56
letting it flow. He sounds like a police
21:59
officer. Yeah, that's right. Yeah. And then
22:01
Commissioner Harrison was saying, I hope
22:04
he didn't say too much, you
22:06
know, which I feel like usually
22:08
it's the other way around. The DA is more
22:10
concerned about the police saying
22:12
too much so they don't mess up their case. So
22:15
they definitely both had very different
22:17
personalities. And
22:19
you know what I respect so much about Rodney
22:22
Harrison is the
22:24
fact that he really recognized
22:27
how much the families were
22:29
ignored and he's
22:31
working so hard to change that. And
22:34
when John Ray had that press conference about the new
22:36
witnesses, Commissioner Harrison
22:39
went and he told
22:41
me, I interviewed him after just as a quick follow up
22:43
and he said, why
22:46
would I not be there? Why would I not
22:48
be open to anything anyone has to
22:50
say at this point? We have unsolved
22:53
murders. We need people to come forward
22:56
and I need to show the public that
22:58
I am open to anything and anyone.
23:01
And District Attorney Tierney as
23:03
well, you know, really also, you
23:06
know, wanted to get those answers for the family. So
23:08
my hats off to both of them for
23:11
this hard work that they've done and for caring
23:13
as much as they do and making a great team. You
23:16
know, this stint in Suffolk County,
23:18
you know, sort of came at the after
23:21
the end of a lengthy career in New
23:23
York City for Chief of Detective. He's
23:26
got a big family of police officers
23:28
himself, right? He's kind of like the real
23:30
life bluebloods. Well, that's what
23:33
I said because
23:35
he has children who are police
23:37
officers. His wife was a police officer. Oh
23:39
my gosh, it went on and on. How many police officers?
23:41
And I said, you're like bluebloods. And he said, well, we're
23:43
the black version of bluebloods.
23:47
And he laughed. Oh, and I'll tell
23:49
you one funny thing you said. So we
23:51
were doing the follow up interview after the John
23:54
Ray press conference and we were on that
23:56
stretch of Gilgo.
23:58
And it was very.
23:59
noisy. And also
24:02
our producer Mario was afraid to
24:04
cross the street. He's gonna kill me for a second.
24:06
He was like, I don't know that we should cross the street. And the
24:09
commissioner kind of made fun of Mario about crossing
24:11
the street. And it was all
24:13
in jest, I promise you. Anyway, we crossed and
24:15
it was we started doing the interview was super loud.
24:18
So Commissioner Harrison said he's
24:20
like, well, I can shut this down if you
24:22
want. Do you want me to shut it down? Just quickly.
24:25
I know some people. And I was like,
24:28
I was like, No, I know what I just
24:31
in good faith can't do that to the people
24:33
commuting. Can't make Long Island
24:35
traffic any worse. It is
24:37
one of those stretch of roads that isn't like, you
24:40
know, it wouldn't cause like a major meltdown. But
24:42
I just I was like, I can't because if it was me
24:44
and I had to turn around or wait, I would
24:46
be like, No, 35 years
24:49
ago, I did a series for Channel Two in New
24:51
York about how terrible the traffic was on Long Island.
24:53
So I'm only getting it. I can tell
24:55
you worse. Oh, my gosh, having to drive
24:58
out there so many times this summer and
25:00
on call, I was right. Oh,
25:02
my gosh, I was like, and you
25:04
start, you stop, you start, you stop. You
25:06
don't know what the problem is. So
25:09
anyway, so so I declined the offer
25:11
and I told him that was very nice. But we
25:13
would wait for gaps in traffic to
25:17
to do our interviews. So we got
25:19
a good chuckle out of that. The drivers
25:21
of Suffolk County appreciate you, Andrea. So,
25:24
you know, it feels like this is a story
25:27
that you and Mario, your producer,
25:29
are almost certainly going to return to.
25:32
Oh, yes, there's going to there's going to be a trial.
25:35
There might be other arrests, might be other suspects.
25:38
You know, nobody really knows what lies ahead, except
25:40
that we there's a lot that we do
25:42
not know. And there's also
25:44
the case which you mentioned of the woman in
25:46
South Carolina. Yeah, about
25:48
which very little is known. I don't
25:51
know a lot about it, just we know that a lead
25:53
was provided because Rex
25:55
Heurman owned property
25:57
in South Carolina and that a lead was
25:59
provided that they're
25:59
could be a connection there. So I
26:02
know that the task force is investigating,
26:04
don't know much more about it,
26:06
you know, other than that this
26:08
is something they're now looking into, that she, you
26:11
know, she could be another victim. I mean,
26:13
there could end up being, you know, even a date, a
26:15
separate date line with another
26:18
case that does not involve Rex Heurman,
26:20
but involves Gilgo Beach. What
26:22
an unbelievable coincidence that would
26:25
be if it turns out there's a second killer
26:28
and unconnected to Rex Heurman
26:30
or whoever is responsible for the murders
26:33
that he's going to go on trial for. It's
26:35
hard to believe, but that could happen. This
26:39
was something that I don't see in a lot of date
26:41
line stories. I loved that there was
26:43
footage of the arrest. That
26:47
frequently is not something that we're lucky enough
26:49
to get the video of, but we did in
26:52
this case. And frequently when we do get
26:54
it, it's because the trial's
26:56
already over and there was a conviction. And
26:58
in this case, you had it and
27:00
there hasn't even been a trial yet, which I just thought was
27:02
great. It's like there has been
27:04
a trial with all the information that's out
27:07
there, even though we know there has not been a trial, but
27:09
it feels like there's been a trial
27:12
with the information that we've been provided, which
27:15
just shows how transparent
27:18
they're being with the public. You
27:20
know, it's just unusual that you can provide this
27:22
much information, this early
27:25
on in a case. So it's
27:27
not over. We're going to see a lot more. We're
27:29
going to learn a lot more information and
27:33
you know, they're busy, busy, busy working
27:35
on these other bodies. So it will
27:38
be very, very interesting to find, to
27:40
see what they find out. Andrea,
27:43
thank you for talking Dateline. Thank
27:45
you. you
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More