Podchaser Logo
Home
Minister Emer Higgins concerns about Dublin's new traffic plan

Minister Emer Higgins concerns about Dublin's new traffic plan

Released Monday, 1st July 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Minister Emer Higgins concerns about Dublin's new traffic plan

Minister Emer Higgins concerns about Dublin's new traffic plan

Minister Emer Higgins concerns about Dublin's new traffic plan

Minister Emer Higgins concerns about Dublin's new traffic plan

Monday, 1st July 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Drive Time on RTU Radio 1,

0:02

sponsored by Zorik. It's your

0:04

future. Let Zorik help you protect it.

0:07

Talk to us today about life and serious

0:09

illness cover. Drive Time

0:11

on RTU Radio 1 with Sarah

0:13

McInerney and Cormac O'Hara. You're

0:17

welcome back. Dublin City Council is

0:19

due to discuss the city's transport

0:22

plan during its full meeting later.

0:24

Changes to how cars can

0:26

travel in the capital, including bus skates on

0:28

the keys, are due to

0:30

come into effect in August. But Minister

0:33

of State with responsibility for business, employment

0:35

and retail, Eamer Higgins, has

0:37

concerns about the impact it could have

0:39

on jobs and retail sales in the

0:41

city. Dublin City Council have told

0:43

Drive Time that the meeting was

0:46

a positive engagement and fresh

0:48

from that meeting is the Minister of

0:50

State for Business, Employment and Retail, Eamer

0:52

Higgins. Minister, Eamer Higgins, you're welcome to

0:54

the programme. Thank you very much.

0:56

How did the meeting go? Yeah,

0:58

I think it was very positive. And

1:00

I suppose just just to give you

1:02

a listen to context, as Minister with

1:04

responsibility for retail, I chair what's called

1:07

the Retail Forum. I chaired my first

1:09

Retail Forum meeting earlier. Well,

1:11

last month, this stage, June. The

1:13

number one issue of concern that was raised with

1:15

me at that was the Dublin City Transport Plan.

1:18

And I acted on those concerns by setting

1:20

up a meeting with Dublin City Council. We

1:22

had that first meeting last week, which which

1:24

felt was a very productive meeting. And today

1:26

we had a follow up meeting. And

1:29

I suppose really that the main thing to

1:31

say is that everybody wants to get this

1:34

plan in place. And what's the outcome? Everybody

1:36

wants to get it done right. So what's the

1:38

outcome? Is the transport plan, will it be delayed?

1:41

There is no outcome to this meeting because

1:43

this meeting wasn't a decision making forum. The

1:46

decision rests solely with the Dublin City Council. And

1:49

just to be clear on that, and I

1:52

fully respect their mandate in that regard. But

1:54

what the meeting was about was about putting

1:56

the very legitimate concerns of retailers on the

1:58

table. And it was about. City Council

2:00

hearing their worries, understanding their perspectives and

2:03

understanding that they're coming from a position

2:05

that is all about jobs. Which

2:07

they heard twice at least because the Green

2:09

Party leader was speaking over the weekend,

2:12

Aiman Ryan, he was saying that they

2:14

voted on this the local council and

2:16

the councillors twice. They green lighted the

2:18

plan twice and some councillors,

2:20

Green Party councillors, are calling this a

2:22

major overreach from you. Listen

2:26

just to be clear I'm not being political here.

2:28

What I'm doing is I'm prioritizing the protection of

2:30

jobs. I want to see this implemented but I

2:32

want us to get it right. I'm the Minister

2:34

of Responsibility for Retail so when members of the

2:36

Retail Forum come to me and

2:39

express concerns to me about football in

2:41

Dublin City Centre, about jobs in Dublin

2:43

City Centre, I escalated that to Dublin

2:45

City Council and I opened those lines

2:47

of communication as is my job. As

2:50

I said I want this to happen but the

2:52

question that retailers are asking is

2:54

is Dublin City ready? And what they're

2:56

saying to me is would this be

2:58

better time after Christmas? And I suppose

3:00

I understand their concern because there's been

3:02

so much uncertainty these last few years

3:04

between COVID and energy prices and the

3:06

reduction in football because of changed working

3:09

patterns like hybrid working and working from

3:11

home and they're worried about heading

3:13

into their busy season with further uncertainty but

3:15

others are very supportive

3:17

of this and are saying that when

3:19

this happens it should be happening on

3:21

a trial basis. So should be monitored

3:23

or assessed or adjusted as needed. Was this

3:25

a solo run Eamer on

3:28

your part or did you do this with

3:30

the imprimatur and blessing of Finnegeil and your

3:32

party leader? Well listen

3:34

Finnegeil policy has always been about protecting

3:36

jobs. I'm the Minister with Responsibility for

3:38

Retail so when people came to me

3:40

with very valid concerns that there could

3:42

be an impact from a jobs perspective

3:45

and said that they felt that their

3:48

position and their concerns weren't being

3:50

heard. I thought it was my duty to

3:52

session the meeting with Dublin City Council. Did

3:55

you discuss this meeting with DCC with

3:57

Simon Harris? I discussed this

3:59

meeting with business. they're the people I'm

4:01

representing here. Businesses came to me with

4:03

these concerns. I've heard that. Just

4:05

in terms of your own political discussion,

4:07

did you discuss it with the Tisha?

4:11

No, I went ahead and set up a meeting

4:13

between Dublin City Council and businesses. Okay.

4:15

So politically this

4:17

was a solo role. No, it's not.

4:19

It's not a departure at all from

4:22

policy. I mean, I'm in favour of this

4:24

plan happening. I want to make sure this

4:27

plan happens in a way that doesn't jeopardise

4:30

jobs. I mean, that's government's

4:32

position. Is it a departure from

4:34

transport and climate or environmental policy?

4:38

No, I mean, absolutely not. I mean, I

4:40

fully respect the mandate of others here in

4:42

terms of the Minister for Transport. But my

4:44

job is to make sure that the impact

4:47

on business is part of the consideration too,

4:49

that it's part of the discussion. So

4:51

I organised the meeting to take place so

4:53

with that businesses were able to put their

4:56

perspective on the table with the decision

4:58

makers, that they could be heard, that they

5:00

could be listened to, and

5:02

that those concerns could be taken on board. That's

5:04

my duty as Minister. That's my job. Yeah.

5:06

Were they not heard previous to this when

5:08

the Council greenlighted this twice? Well,

5:11

retailers were telling me that they weren't. No.

5:13

And I suppose we're operating in that changed

5:15

landscape that we're talking about with reduced football.

5:18

And as I was saying,

5:20

some people feel that when this happens, it

5:22

should happen on a trial basis, that it

5:24

should be monitored, assessed, adjusted as needed. I

5:27

would see that as a very sensible strategy. And

5:30

I think really, everybody agrees on two things

5:32

that firstly, we need to get better at

5:34

engaging and talking to businesses, but also that

5:36

we need to be data driven here. And

5:39

right now, Dublin city traders are doing

5:41

an economic impact assessment on this. And that

5:43

needs to form part of the strategy.

5:45

I think that's a reasonable ask. But

5:47

wasn't there a public consultation? There

5:49

was public. There was two public consultations.

5:51

Absolutely. They

5:55

did. But consultation doesn't begin and end on portals

5:57

or emails. You know, I think face to face.

6:00

There is

6:02

still a very valid reason to have face-to-face

6:05

engagement. That is what we have had this

6:07

week and last week in terms of retailers

6:09

represented on the retail forum engaging directly with

6:11

Dublin City Council and the NTA. I

6:14

think that has been really positive and productive. As

6:17

Minister, that is my priority. It is

6:19

to make sure that jobs and businesses

6:21

are part of the decision-making landscape in

6:23

Dublin City Council. I think having had

6:25

those good discussions, we can see that

6:27

they are being taken on board by Dublin

6:29

City Council. You say this is about protecting jobs.

6:31

What about protecting the environment? What

6:33

about making Dublin City a better

6:36

place for cyclists and pedestrians and

6:38

making it a faster public transport system?

6:41

What about that? Absolutely.

6:43

That is exactly what we want. That is exactly

6:45

the place we want to get to. We want

6:47

to get there in a way that does not

6:49

jeopardise jobs. We are all on the same page

6:51

when it comes to wanting to reduce congestion in

6:53

Dublin City. But we also

6:55

want to get this right. Councillors

6:57

were telling me that their perspectives and

6:59

concerns weren't being heard. So I facilitated

7:02

a meeting to tease out those concerns.

7:04

It was productive. They were

7:06

teased out already in the public

7:09

consultation and in discussions with

7:11

councillors in the Council. I don't know

7:13

if you have ever made the submission to public

7:15

consultation. Sometimes you write it

7:17

out, you hit send and that

7:20

is the end of it. It is not necessarily

7:22

always an engaging process. Are you saying they weren't

7:24

considered by the Council? No,

7:26

I am not saying that. I am

7:28

saying that it doesn't lend itself to two-way

7:30

communication. That is what I wanted to deliver

7:33

here. A two-way communication between businesses and Dublin

7:35

City Council. That is why I got everybody

7:37

around the same table to tease out those

7:39

issues. I do

7:41

think that is the right thing to do. That

7:43

is the way to make sure that business is

7:46

part of the decision-making process here. I understand. Can

7:48

I ask you finally then, do you think

7:50

or would you like to see the plan

7:52

fundamentally change before it is implemented? My

7:57

perspective on this is I would like to

7:59

see a situation where... retailers concerns are

8:01

late. To me it's about

8:03

getting this plan happening, it's about getting it happening

8:05

as quickly as possible and getting it right and

8:08

that means protecting jobs. That's the perspective

8:10

I've come from, making sure that we're

8:12

protecting jobs here. Minister of

8:14

State for Business, Employment and Retail, Emer Higgins of

8:16

Finnegaill. Thank you very much.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features