Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Forward Guidance is brought to you by VanEck, a
0:02
global leader in asset management since 1955. You'll
0:05
be hearing more about a VanEck ETF later
0:07
on, but for now, let's get into today's
0:09
interview. Very
0:15
pleased to welcome to Forward Guidance,
0:17
Jonah VanBorg, a macro trader who
0:19
has lots of experience trading commodities,
0:21
volatility, and crypto at the highest
0:23
level. Jonah, great to have you
0:25
here. Just tell the audience a
0:28
little bit about your background. How
0:30
did you get into trading commodities?
0:32
Thank you so much for having me on the
0:35
show, Jack. I really appreciate it. I love your
0:37
show and I'm honored to be a guest. So
0:39
I graduated in 2007 and started at Lehman Brothers,
0:41
a really awesome first job to
0:43
kind of pick the short straw
0:46
there. I picked the hot desk,
0:48
CDS trading, credit default swaps. And
0:50
then when Lehman blew up, I
0:52
sort of saw the eye of
0:54
that particular storm. So after
0:56
getting kind of tossed around finance for
0:58
a while, I ended up in oil
1:01
trading just by happenstance. A
1:04
connection of mine was looking for somebody with my skills
1:06
to be sort of the junior trader on the oil
1:08
trading desk at Goldman Sachs. And
1:10
I ended up doing
1:12
that for four years. And then I got poached
1:14
by VTOL, which is the world's largest oil trading
1:17
company shortly
1:19
thereafter in London. And I worked
1:21
there for seven years, at
1:24
which point crypto called, not
1:26
to bore your listeners too much with my career, but I
1:29
was sort of an oil options trader at
1:31
VTOL. I focused on systematic trading,
1:33
oil, just sort
1:36
of listed derivatives options, the way
1:38
to get leverage by buying and
1:40
selling insurance on the price of oil. And then through that,
1:43
I got some exposure to physical oil
1:45
trading as well. And my hands on
1:47
some physical cargoes as well. Super
1:50
exciting. Ultimately though,
1:52
when crypto started
1:54
to look like a commodity in 2021,
1:59
and an opportunity came, along to run an entire
2:01
trading business, it was pretty exciting for me. So I
2:03
went and took it. That's
2:05
how I ended up running trading at
2:07
Cumberland, which is DRW's cryptocurrency
2:09
arm. And when you said Bitcoin was
2:12
performing like a commodity in 2021, what
2:14
did you mean? So
2:17
a commodity in and of itself, it can
2:19
be useful if it's a refined commodity like
2:21
gasoline, or it can be completely useless like
2:23
crude oil. You know, sometimes, like
2:26
who uses crude oil except a refinery to turn
2:28
it into something useful. So to me, I looked
2:31
at a commodity like ETH, and I thought, all right,
2:34
in and of itself, this token is worthless.
2:36
But if you refine it by basically buying
2:38
some of it and spending a bit of
2:40
it as gas to, you know, basically gain
2:42
access to certificate of
2:44
authenticity, like, you know,
2:46
that basically proves ownership of your digital
2:48
goods and services like an NFC or
2:51
DeFi, you know, you hey, you, you
2:53
can't get a yield bearing, dollarized
2:56
instrument, but you can
2:58
maybe access, you know,
3:00
a yield bearing DeFi stream
3:03
of income. And you know, you live somewhere outside the
3:05
United States, like, to me, it was like, okay, this
3:07
is a commodity, you buy it or mine it at
3:09
the time, if it was proof of work, you
3:11
refine it, i.e. spend some gas, and you
3:14
can turn it into something useful, like it
3:16
all kind of started to click. And the
3:18
market had also just become big enough that
3:20
there was volatility, there was opportunity to trade
3:22
it, what there's opportunity to
3:24
profit, whether the price went up or
3:26
down, and the structure, sort of the
3:28
micro structure of the asset itself looked,
3:31
you know, familiar. That's, that's why I jumped
3:33
in. What do you mean the micro structure?
3:35
The micro structure is in, it
3:37
had the characteristics of a commodity, like you buy
3:40
it or mine it, it's useless
3:42
in its native form, then you turn it into
3:44
something interesting with
3:46
with some losses, much like a refinery. So that
3:48
that sort of micro structure, but then also micro
3:51
structure like, hey, this, you know, this
3:53
is an OTC product. Over here,
3:55
for certain counter parties, that looks like FX
3:57
micro structure. Over here, there's sort of a,
4:00
of a burgeoning exchange ecosystem. There's
4:02
FTX and Binance and Coinbase and
4:04
a few others. That
4:06
looks a lot like equities or commodities
4:09
trading. The market microstructure and fundamental
4:15
asset microstructure started to look familiar. What
4:17
do you think about crypto right now?
4:19
Are we in a crypto bull market?
4:21
And what are your thoughts? I
4:24
think we are absolutely in a crypto bull
4:26
market, medium to long term. I am so
4:28
bullish, I can't even see straight. I
4:31
think this is the asset
4:33
to own for the medium to
4:35
long term more
4:38
than any other asset. However, in the
4:41
short run, we've just pulled back from
4:43
$70,000 plus per
4:45
Bitcoin to $61K. In
4:48
the short term, we're due for some proper
4:50
chop for a number of reasons. I interpret
4:52
chop as very volatile, down
4:54
a lot, up a lot, but staying within
4:57
a range, not a
4:59
protracted decline. Is that what
5:01
chop means to you? Exactly what it means
5:03
to me. I think we're going to be in
5:06
a wide, high amplitude volatile range
5:08
for a while in the short
5:11
run. I've been a trader for almost 20 years.
5:13
I've witnessed a lot of some
5:16
of the best traders to ever do it
5:18
and also some very junior traders as well.
5:21
And what you see on Twitter, if you
5:23
follow crypto accounts, you see
5:25
junior trader emotions
5:27
and behavior. You see people getting bearish
5:29
on the lows and euphoric and bullish
5:31
on the highs, and that's normal. That's
5:33
human nature. That's market psychology. I think
5:35
that people in these
5:37
sort of public forums trying to
5:40
predict the price of Bitcoin in
5:42
the very short run struggle, because
5:46
a lot of them haven't been through the
5:48
types of mechanisms in professional trading that allow
5:50
you to profit from short term chop. And
5:52
in my opinion, there are two ways to
5:55
profit from short term chop. One of them
5:57
is market making, just showing
5:59
prices. prices benefiting from
6:01
that volatility without taking a directional view.
6:04
And the other is systematic
6:06
trading strategies that are
6:09
in the industry parlance described as
6:11
high frequency or mid frequency. Basically
6:14
anything with an outlook of seconds
6:16
to a day. So
6:18
why do you think Bitcoin or crypto stays
6:21
range bound now and chops in a range
6:24
as opposed to shooting up or shooting
6:26
down in price? Over the
6:28
long run I do think it'll shoot up, but
6:30
in the short run the reason why I think
6:32
it stays in a range is because for an
6:35
asset like Bitcoin or any asset you
6:37
need an influx of new money to
6:39
send it higher. I
6:41
think the most recent big leg
6:43
higher came from ETFs, legs higher
6:45
before that came from different
6:48
participant bases either entering the space for
6:50
the first time or committing new capital
6:52
after a spectacular sell off. This
6:55
time there's no real narrative or
6:57
catalyst for a vast new pool of
6:59
money to enter the space. You
7:02
basically have algorithm on algorithm violence
7:04
going on in the short term.
7:06
And I think that retail without
7:09
the backing of tremendous financial and
7:11
quantitative slash algorithmic firepower getting involved
7:13
in this chop is going to
7:15
struggle I think in the short
7:17
term. I think ultimately
7:19
the reason why we're going to
7:21
chop, you have one very bullish
7:23
long term narrative which is Bitcoin
7:26
becoming a geopolitically relevant force that
7:28
keeps central banks honest. Sovereign,
7:32
non sovereign money you could say. This
7:35
massive tailwind combined with more
7:38
of a technical thing which is ETFs,
7:41
debottlenecking, retail and
7:43
institutional investor access to the asset
7:45
class. There's that bullish thing as
7:48
well as the Bitcoin halving which is
7:51
a structural fundamental bull thing going on
7:53
in the background contrasting
7:55
with Mt. Gox unlocking some somewhere
8:00
between $8.5 and $9 billion worth of
8:02
Bitcoin that's been basically off the table
8:04
for 10 years, deterioration in
8:06
sentiment around altcoins, which is something that
8:08
we should probably touch
8:11
on briefly because the promise of
8:13
blockchain as a technological enabler for
8:16
all sorts of different financial applications
8:19
is, it's essentially falling short of
8:21
its promise, which is weighing on
8:24
the entire space, including Bitcoin, undeservedly
8:27
so I would say. We
8:29
also have investor fatigue
8:31
and capitulation and
8:34
a few other momentum trades.
8:36
So ultimately you have this
8:38
unstoppable force being the
8:40
structural bull market for Bitcoin against
8:43
this immovable object, which is effectively
8:46
a number of factors representing
8:48
disenchantment with the space and a lack
8:51
of new money in the short term,
8:53
creating this short term chop. And
8:56
I think that unless you're atomically scanning
8:58
the order book every nanosecond,
9:01
you're going to have a hard time trying to actively day
9:03
trade this. It's
9:05
a better thing to just sort of wait around and
9:07
buy dips in my opinion for the longer term megatrend.
9:11
Thank you. Jonah, describe how
9:13
you see Bitcoin becoming a
9:15
geopolitical asset that is actually
9:17
used by
9:20
I don't want to say central banks,
9:22
but for example, oil traders in Venezuela, like
9:25
not just there's this narrative that sounds great on the one
9:27
hand. And then at the same
9:29
time, the price is going up because people are
9:31
speculating that the narrative will play out. But actually
9:33
like the institutional players starting to use it as
9:36
an asset, you know, BlackRock all these
9:38
ETF companies, shout out to
9:40
VanEck, that is one thing. But when it
9:43
comes to using it as a currency or
9:45
a medium of exchange or a reserve asset
9:47
instead of just buying it as an investment.
9:50
So I think Bitcoin is the only token
9:52
with spectacular product market
9:55
fit. And what is that product
9:57
market fit? The
10:00
way I would describe it is that, let's
10:03
start here, Bitcoin in my opinion is a
10:05
better store of value and in
10:08
many cases a better means of
10:10
exchange, not for microtransactions but for
10:13
big payments, then let's
10:15
call it 100 to 150 of the world's bottom
10:17
fiat currencies. Not
10:22
the dollar, not the euro, not the yen.
10:25
If you're Toyota and you sell
10:28
a car in
10:30
Japan, yen's fine, it works, you don't need
10:32
Bitcoin. If
10:34
you're buying a coffee in Chad, you don't
10:36
need Bitcoin to pay for your coffee or
10:38
pay for your meal.
10:42
Let's say that you're doing international commerce
10:44
in one of the world's, in
10:48
one of the economies that has one of the world's bottom
10:50
150 currencies or no
10:52
disrespect to these places or
10:55
let's say that you are a person
10:57
attempting to store value in one of
10:59
these places. If you lived
11:01
in Libya, would you rather hold the Libyan
11:04
local currency or would you rather hold Bitcoin?
11:07
I don't even think there's a debate about the right answer
11:09
to that question at this point. Let's
11:11
say that you're having
11:13
worked at VTOL and seen what it's
11:15
like to lift a cargo of crude
11:17
oil from Nigeria and ship it off
11:19
to China. The crazy thing about that
11:21
type of trade, and this isn't buying
11:23
a coffee, this is a big transaction.
11:26
When you load crude oil in Nigeria, it's a deep
11:29
water port. Usually you're putting
11:31
2 million barrels of crude oil in there, that
11:33
cargo is holding $160 million
11:35
worth of hydrocarbons. It goes from Nigeria
11:37
to some port in the Shandong province
11:40
and it has to get paid for
11:42
and transported. All of this
11:44
stuff, China doesn't want to use
11:46
the dollar because they're basically in an economic
11:49
cold war with the United States. Nigeria,
11:52
they're happy to take dollars, but how does
11:54
that filter through to the local economy? It
11:57
settles T plus 17 days. 17
12:01
business days or whatever, and then in order
12:03
to convert those dollars into Naira and have
12:06
that wealth trickle down to local economies, God
12:08
knows how much grift occurs in the middle
12:10
of that. It's a
12:12
disaster when you watch emerging economy
12:14
to emerging economy, commodities trade.
12:16
To me, it would be much simpler
12:19
for Bitcoin
12:21
to be the denominator of this, rather than
12:23
a currency like
12:25
the dollar that's one counterpart is quite
12:28
hostile to and the other counterpart just
12:30
can't get banked in. It makes no
12:32
sense. So already you're seeing at
12:35
the very extremes of this debate,
12:37
countries like Venezuela offer discounts to
12:39
buyers of their refined products if
12:42
they're willing to transact in Bitcoin because
12:44
it allows them, frankly, to circumvent sanctions
12:46
and the US banking system, but
12:49
also because it's just it settles at
12:51
the speed of a block, which is T plus
12:53
15 minutes instead of T plus whenever. And
12:56
so as the US starts to weaponize
12:58
the dollar more and more throughout time,
13:02
like I don't even think Bitcoin's a dark horse
13:04
for the next candidate to
13:06
become like an alternative reserve currency. It's certainly not
13:09
going to be the wand or the euro or
13:11
the yen. What else is
13:13
there really? That's the first time I've heard
13:15
a narrative about Bitcoin that I can really
13:17
wrap my head around because it is limited.
13:19
You're not saying it's going to be for
13:21
small transactions. No one's, you know, I mean,
13:23
very few people are going to be going
13:25
to Starbucks and buying coffee with with Bitcoin.
13:27
So very large transactions and it's not the
13:29
dollar, the euro, the yen or the top
13:31
number of currencies. It is for very
13:34
large transactions, commodity transactions that
13:36
are transacted in a currency
13:39
that has issues such as the Venezuelan
13:42
currency, the Argentine peso, Nigeria,
13:45
Naira. So tell us, let's just
13:47
compare, you know, you're at VTOL,
13:49
the world's largest trading firm, commodity
13:52
trading firm, and you're you're lifting
13:54
Nigerian oil in Naira and
13:57
then you're selling to China, presumably in in
13:59
Chinese you want or. or maybe dollars, I
14:01
don't know. But tell us, let's go through
14:03
that transaction, the challenges of that transaction compared
14:05
to if you had done it in Bitcoin.
14:07
Why would Bitcoin have been easier? So let
14:09
me caveat this by saying that I was
14:11
never in the finance department managing the minutia
14:13
of this transaction, but I was
14:15
adjacent to it. I understood it. Now I was
14:17
at VTOL during the zero interest rate era. So
14:20
a lot of what I just said is far more
14:22
relevant now than it was then.
14:25
But let me talk you through
14:27
it as you requested. Nigeria is a place
14:29
where there's too much oil and China is
14:31
a place where there's not enough, right?
14:34
The job of trading companies like VTOL
14:36
is to reallocate commodities across
14:39
the world from places where there's a surplus
14:41
to places where there's a deficit. And
14:43
VTOL is not the only company that does
14:45
this. There are hundreds of them, big and
14:47
small. A VTOL will have relationships with the
14:50
NNPC, the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation. They'll have
14:52
relationships with like the
14:55
grandma seamstress who
14:59
had a relationship with a general at a time
15:01
where it was economically
15:03
beneficial to do so and happened to,
15:05
you know, part of her family office
15:07
portfolio is this stream of oil called
15:10
Forkados in what's a place called the
15:12
Creeks. It's like a warlord run ecological
15:15
disaster where Shell found
15:17
a lot of oil and pipes it
15:19
to a offshore platform. Anyway, like there
15:21
are all these little independent and national
15:23
non-independent producers of oil in Nigeria. They've
15:25
got oil. They
15:27
don't have a, like
15:29
they don't have Xi Jinping on speed dial,
15:31
right? They need some help, right?
15:34
So VTOL get in there and like form
15:36
the relationships and have some people in a
15:39
place called Banana Island in
15:41
the middle of Lagos, like a place, you know, like
15:43
a place where you can live there without
15:46
feeling insecure. Anyway,
15:48
like there are lots of oil companies that do
15:50
stuff like this. Anyway, so there'll be relationships and
15:53
VTOL will buy the oil. They'll
15:57
buy it with a pricing mechanism that, you know,
15:59
I'm not a... at Liberty to get
16:01
into, but there's a mechanism there that
16:03
you pay for the oil with a
16:05
certain set of
16:07
rules. Yeah, you can't say, but I'll make
16:09
it up of, oh, this oil is similar
16:12
to the sweet sour crude and we're going
16:14
to have a certain margin of safety. And
16:17
then there's the cost for us to transport to
16:19
China, all of the costs, and we're targeting a
16:21
certain return, something like that, right? Yeah,
16:24
except the Nigerians won't pay for the freight to China. So
16:27
just sell it, what's called FOB, free on
16:29
board, which is like, this is the price
16:31
at our port in Nigeria
16:35
or next to Nigeria. And then do
16:37
you pay for that? Like how
16:40
do you determine the right price? Well,
16:42
it's not just like going to the
16:44
store and buying an ice cream cone
16:46
and the ice cream cone guy picks the ice
16:48
cream seller, picks the price of the ice cream
16:50
cone. It's linked
16:52
to the price of global crude with
16:55
a formula. Anyway, so that transaction
16:57
will happen. The trading company will
17:00
buy the oil from Nigeria. The
17:02
price will be determined at some later date
17:05
in arrears and then money will get wired
17:07
somehow to some bank in Nigeria in dollars.
17:11
And then obviously that'll go through correspondent banks
17:13
and it's a big, big
17:15
mess to get it back like
17:18
into the Nigerian economy because as
17:20
you'd imagine, Bank of America isn't
17:22
like handing out business bank accounts
17:24
in the creeks, right?
17:26
It'll eventually get there, but between the
17:28
time when the oil is, it's
17:31
called lifted into meaning
17:33
like taken from the port
17:36
into the boat and a bill of
17:38
lading is issued, which is shipping speak for like
17:40
a receipt for the oil. You're
17:45
looking at like possibly weeks before
17:48
dollars hit the local Nigerian banks
17:50
in or Nigeria hit the local
17:52
Nigerian banks. And in
17:54
the zero interest rate area, it didn't like
17:56
who cares money now equals money later. But
17:58
in the current era. like if
18:01
your money is tied up in transit, you could be
18:03
earning interest on it. And these are not like microtransactions,
18:05
you know, like a couple of weeks worth of interest
18:07
on $180 million or $160 million
18:09
or whatever is not trivial, especially in these emerging economies that
18:15
need the money to grow. Then
18:18
the boat will go over
18:20
to China. It'll go, you know,
18:22
around the Horn of Africa, basically. You know, this is
18:24
like in the case of a direct voyage. Sometimes
18:27
the trading companies like back to back to
18:29
it. They just have a buyer at the
18:31
same time as they bought
18:33
the oil. Other times they're like floating
18:35
it out there speculatively, hoping that someone
18:38
in Shandong or not
18:40
hoping algorithmically or discretionarily
18:42
determining that someone in Shandong will want to
18:44
buy that oil. By the
18:46
time the next bill of lading gets
18:48
issued in China to like offload that
18:50
oil into some refining pipeline system, it
18:52
can turn it into useful things like jet
18:55
fuel and gasoline for the Chinese people to
18:57
put into their cars and airplanes to
18:59
get around, you know, and use as a
19:02
mobility catalyst. Then
19:04
there's going to be another few weeks worth
19:06
of pricing
19:08
and arrears and nonsense before those dollars
19:10
end up in a Chinese bank account
19:13
that hopefully isn't sanctioned
19:15
for Iran oil trade and
19:18
can then get converted into one
19:20
somehow with their complicated system of
19:22
onshore and offshore currency management. It's
19:26
not simple, right? Like all of that's a
19:28
big shit show. It would be so much
19:30
easier if the trading company could just lift
19:33
the oil in Nigeria,
19:35
send Bitcoin to
19:37
a local gateway, and
19:40
then as soon as it arrives in China, just
19:42
receive Bitcoin for the cargo,
19:45
right? Like there's no correspondent banking
19:47
system. There's no Swift. There's no
19:49
currency conversion. All of the pricing
19:52
can be converted based on some
19:54
index. Like they're fixings for Bitcoin
19:57
to dollar. Like none of this
19:59
correspondent banking. banking and the hold
20:01
up, the tie up in time space,
20:04
which now has translated in a high
20:07
interest rate environment into dollar space is
20:09
necessary. You
20:14
could literally just hand a thumb, this wouldn't
20:16
happen, but you could literally just hand
20:19
a thumb drive over to somebody at the
20:21
port in Nigeria and pick one up in
20:23
China. And otherwise you don't
20:26
offload the oil. Coin
20:30
is elegant in that it settles at
20:32
block time and it can be transferred
20:34
and stored in a minuscule sort
20:36
of like thing in
20:38
the physical world. It's very interesting
20:40
stuff. So the oil
20:42
traders would be sending into Nigeria dollars,
20:45
but would the oil be bought in
20:47
dollars or in Naira? In
20:49
other words, is the conversion from dollars
20:51
to Naira, is that the oil traders
20:54
problem or the Nigerian producers problem? It's
20:56
the Nigerian producers problem and converting Bitcoin
20:58
to Naira would be a Nigerian producers
21:00
problem. But my hypothesis is
21:03
that as the dollar becomes a bigger
21:05
and bigger weapon and as dollar banking
21:07
becomes less and less available and as
21:10
populations across the world, like
21:12
in emerging markets, demographically, these
21:14
populations are quite young and
21:16
quite crypto savvy. These
21:19
economies will get re-denominated into Bitcoin,
21:21
much like El Salvador has. I
21:24
don't understand why if you're Nigerian, you would
21:26
ever want to hold Naira, whether you're young
21:29
or old, it just inflates your wealth into
21:31
oblivion. And so I
21:34
understand why if you're an American, you want dollars. That's
21:36
a no brainer. But if you live in Chad,
21:38
why wouldn't you want to have your wealth in
21:41
Bitcoin instead of their local currency? And Chad has
21:43
quite a lot of oil too, interestingly enough, Exxon
21:45
explored it. Eventually you'll
21:47
remove that last hop when
21:50
Chad becomes like El Salvador and Bitcoin is
21:52
a local currency. You won't even have to
21:54
do any conversion at the end of the
21:56
funnel. It'll just go straight into the local
21:58
economy and its local currency. which is Bitcoin.
22:02
Guidances Brought to you by VanEck. The
22:04
VanEck Morningstar-wide Moat ETF ticker MOAT
22:06
has outperformed the S&P 500 for
22:09
over a decade. How?
22:12
Moat strives to achieve a simple
22:14
but challenging task. Buy quality stocks
22:16
when they're undervalued and sell them
22:19
when they're overvalued. Visit vaneck.com/moatfg to
22:21
learn more. That's vaneck.com/moatfg. Now
22:24
the disclosures. All investing is subject to risk,
22:26
including the possible loss of money you invest.
22:28
Visit vaneck.com to carefully read or prospectus before
22:30
investing. The VanEck Morningstar-wide Moat ETF
22:32
is distributed by VanEck Securities Corporation,
22:34
a wholly owned subsidiary of VanEck
22:36
Associates Corporation. Thanks. Let's get back
22:38
to the interview. Got it. So
22:41
I see from 2008, the Nigerian Naira
22:43
has depreciated against the dollar 92%. You
22:46
also have to take into account though, the interest
22:49
rate added bonus of, you know, Nigerian interest
22:51
rate right now is 24%. You
22:55
know, in 2013, it was 12%, which earns more than the dollar. So
22:59
it's not as bad as that 92%, you know,
23:01
looks you get, you've got to adjust for that.
23:04
But that's a very interesting use case. Tell us
23:06
more about your thesis and when do you think
23:08
this would happen? I mean, it sounds like the
23:10
Venezuela thing is happening now. When did that happen?
23:13
I read that news a couple of months ago.
23:15
You know, I think it's going to happen gradually
23:17
than all at once. And it's the gradually part
23:19
has already, you know, people think I'm crazy, right?
23:22
You know, I come from an industry that's very well
23:24
established, oil is 100 and, you know,
23:27
100 as a hydrocarbon
23:29
market, like with use cases, it started
23:31
in the late 1800s. So
23:33
it's very mature. And if you leave
23:35
a, you know, a stable oil job to go into crypto, people
23:37
say you're nuts. But I really believe this
23:39
is going to happen. I don't
23:42
think I'm crazy. And I think it's already
23:44
started. I think that, you know,
23:47
the Bretton Woods sort of
23:49
like dollar world is
23:52
gradually deteriorating. America's pulling back, right?
23:54
America's not going to be the
23:56
global guarantor of safety and dollarized
23:58
diplomacy forever, probably. And
24:00
so you need some sort of
24:02
common denominator, some sort of financial
24:05
common denominator that can perforate these
24:07
Orwellian hemispheres of influence, East and
24:09
West, emerging economies
24:11
and developed economies. And
24:13
to me, Bitcoin seems like an obvious one. I think
24:15
at this point, it
24:18
checks all the boxes for kind of
24:20
an independent monetary system in a box
24:23
that, again, like with time
24:25
and battle testing, it's like there's not a
24:27
debate that it's better than most of the
24:29
world's currencies. Then most of
24:31
the world's currencies by number, but
24:34
probably not most of the world's currencies if
24:36
you weight them by size, because
24:39
the dollar is so big, right? That's right.
24:41
Yeah, that's right. And there's this awesome movie that
24:43
I posted on Twitter. It's
24:46
a pie chart representing market
24:48
share of every global
24:50
reserve currency. And
24:53
every frame is a different year. So it
24:56
starts in like 1890 or something and goes
24:58
until the present day. And what you can
25:00
see is just how dynamic it was, like
25:02
the Dutch Gilder, the French Frank, the British
25:05
Pound, like the
25:07
global reserve currency picture is extremely
25:10
fluid. It wasn't always the
25:12
dollar and it won't always be the dollar. And
25:14
it's really hard to see a sovereign
25:17
currency being the next
25:19
global reserve currency for
25:22
major international hydrocarbon trade
25:24
transactions as well as
25:27
others, other types of transactions.
25:30
That is really interesting. I will try and
25:32
check out that pie chart and if we
25:34
can, we can put it on screen. I'm
25:37
sure that that pie chart shows what you said it
25:39
shows. My understanding of the
25:42
history of global reserve currencies is
25:44
slightly different in that now, obviously, the
25:46
world's been on the dollar. For
25:48
that, it was the Pound-Stirling. But before that,
25:50
it was the Gilder. And
25:53
then I don't know so much about the French Frank. Maybe
25:55
it was a very close number two. French Frank was like
25:58
a runner up. It was not really a winner. Is
26:00
that you have to have, I mean, like the
26:02
Great Depression and World War I was
26:04
not sufficient to unseat the pound. You need the Great
26:06
Depression, World War I and World War II. So
26:09
it seems like you need pretty big seismic
26:11
moves and I'm sure the next 30 years
26:14
is gonna be wild and great things are
26:16
gonna happen, horrible things are gonna happen, but I
26:18
don't know if they're gonna be of the extremes
26:20
of the 19- No, you're
26:23
absolutely right. And let me caveat, like I don't
26:25
want people to just like leave
26:27
this podcast right here, like
26:30
hit, like turn
26:33
off Spotify and get upset. Like basically what I
26:35
was trying to say was, okay,
26:37
so I'm not saying that Bitcoin needs
26:39
to displace the dollar as the number
26:41
one global reserve currency in the imminent
26:43
future. What I'm saying is when
26:46
you look at this pie chart and we
26:48
will get it up there, like you can
26:50
see just how many reserve currencies there are
26:52
on there. And I think if Bitcoin eats
26:55
even a, like if it
26:57
eats a plurality of market share, like even
26:59
if it's a few
27:01
basis points or 10%, like
27:03
you're looking at millions of dollars per token
27:06
in terms of the price of Bitcoin. And it
27:08
doesn't need to go any further than that. Like
27:11
the dollar will always dominate in
27:13
the, let's call it NATO hemisphere,
27:15
right? For global trade,
27:17
like the UK and the US will not
27:20
be swapping energy commodities
27:22
in Bitcoin anytime soon. But
27:24
Nigeria and China just might,
27:26
right? Or the US and
27:29
Iran inadvertently might, or
27:31
Venezuela. That's how these
27:33
networks work. So
27:35
I think
27:37
it will become a
27:39
minority player in the global reserve currency
27:41
market. Jay, just to clarify, so you're
27:44
not talking about Bitcoin becoming the world
27:46
reserve currency, you're talking about it becoming
27:48
a reserve currency, perhaps within the top 10.
27:51
And the people who say de-dollarization
27:53
is happening and the people who trash those
27:55
people and say de-dollarization isn't happening, they're kind
27:57
of both right. I think, over the last
27:59
decade, the past 10 years, the euro
28:01
and you know, some Nordic krona type
28:03
currencies have inched their way up. So
28:05
the dollar is you know, instead of
28:07
being 90%, it's now only 86%. And
28:09
the Swedish krona,
28:12
you know, has gone from six basis points to
28:15
12 basis, I'm just making that up. But you
28:17
know, these things do happen very, very slowly. And
28:19
so there had has been a move. So
28:21
thank you for clarifying that. Do you have any insight
28:23
at all on Saudi Arabia, moving
28:26
off the petrodollar, which I don't know if
28:28
they've actually done that, or I think some
28:30
contracts officially expire that they did not renew.
28:32
But yeah, I've seen some headlines about that.
28:34
What's going on there? I think 50 years
28:37
ago, they signed some 50 year agreement to
28:39
use the dollar. And they haven't like, raised
28:41
their hand saying, Joe Biden, we'd like to renew this
28:44
and sign up for another 50 years. But I mean,
28:46
let's let's face it, right? Billions
28:49
of dollars of Saudi
28:51
oil every month are getting sold
28:54
to mostly Europe
28:56
and Asia, not so
28:58
much North America anymore denominated in
29:00
dollars still. So symbolically, it matters,
29:02
because they're not like, gosh,
29:05
we're so in bed with America that like,
29:07
we're committing publicly
29:10
to another, another half century
29:12
of this, but functionally, nothing's
29:14
changed. And so, you know,
29:17
back to our original conversation about Bitcoin as a
29:19
global reserve currency for this type of trade. I
29:22
like I, as a Bitcoin hyper bull
29:24
over the long run, over my lifetime, like
29:27
I do think it will be a major
29:29
reserve currency, if not the major reserve currency,
29:31
I know that I'm I've got a fringe
29:33
opinion there. I think a more acceptable base
29:35
case would be that it becomes a relevant
29:39
global reserve currency in which Saudi
29:41
Arabia perhaps denominates some of its
29:43
hydrocarbon trade, but not most. I
29:45
think the dollar is going to
29:47
be around for a while, unless
29:49
we Americans do something really stupid.
29:51
Like you said, something really drastic. But
29:53
yeah, I think to your point about
29:56
Saudi Arabia, just to close the thought
29:58
not renewing it like not renewing
30:00
a contract that you don't have to renew?
30:02
Why would they
30:04
give up the optionality? Yeah, not renewing
30:06
is not the same thing as canceling.
30:08
That's right. Okay, that's very interesting. People
30:10
are attributing the sharp
30:13
fall in Bitcoin today, as
30:16
recorded the afternoon of June 24th, to
30:18
these tokens from Mt. Gox, this exchange
30:20
that got taken over 10 years
30:23
ago. I was finally releasing the token,
30:25
you said $8.5 billion worth of Bitcoin, that's
30:27
8.5 divided by 60,000. So that's
30:30
how many tokens it is. How big of
30:32
a move do you think this is for
30:34
Bitcoin? Okay, so what's interesting about
30:36
this is that when I was at Cumberland, we
30:39
actually priced a few big liquidations, because
30:41
a lot of bankrupt crypto
30:44
companies, like the estate of
30:46
the bankrupt crypto
30:48
companies would come to us and they'd say, you know,
30:50
we have this many tokens for sale. We
30:53
have a yard of ETH, a
30:56
yard of staked ETH, a yard of Bitcoin,
30:58
like a yard is a billion dollars. You
31:00
know, like, what's your
31:02
bid? You know, if you're bidding in one
31:05
shot, if you're bidding a billion dollars
31:07
worth of Bitcoin in the middle of
31:09
a like nuclear
31:12
bear market, you're not going to get
31:15
away with and you're in competition, meaning
31:17
you can't just like, you
31:20
can't just show some price that you can't
31:22
show an uncompetitive price, basically, you're not going
31:24
to show more than one or 2% off
31:26
of mids for
31:31
like an enormous amount of Bitcoin, you can get out of
31:33
it really easily. Binance
31:35
was this phenomenal
31:37
liquidity engine with so much going through
31:39
it and that liquidity filtered through the
31:41
whole crypto market. So even
31:43
in a falling market of November or December 2020. Oh,
31:46
if you if you were bidding a
31:48
billion dollars worth of Bitcoin on a day where
31:50
it was down percent, yeah, it'd be hard. But
31:52
like I'm talking about just in a like the
31:54
liquidity picture in us on a sideways day, like
31:56
you wouldn't bid down more than one or 2%
31:58
for that much. volume. So okay,
32:00
so eight and a half billion dollars. Realistically,
32:04
like the Mount Gox community
32:06
is not asking one
32:09
or two liquidity providers for a bid
32:11
on eight and a half billion over
32:13
the course of like
32:15
a few minutes, right? The
32:17
bid for that would be like down five
32:19
or six percent, so, or
32:22
seven percent, but like nothing crazy, like, okay,
32:24
$5,000 a token, worst
32:28
case scenario for that. Instead, what's going to happen
32:30
is it's going to get slowly unlocked over the
32:32
course of six months, if this is real, unlike
32:34
the last five times we the market thought Mount
32:37
Gox was unlocking, but like, let's assume this is
32:39
actually for real this time. Basically, what's going to
32:41
happen is you're going to have like some
32:44
of the people want to keep their tokens because
32:46
they still are bullish Bitcoin. You're going to
32:49
have some of the people wanting to sell some
32:52
or all of their tokens, and they're
32:54
going to go and do that piecemeal
32:56
on a variety of exchanges. I think
32:59
this is getting delivered on Kraken and
33:01
a couple of others. It's very different.
33:03
Like one thing you learn as
33:05
a trader, which I've been doing for 20
33:07
years, if you feed risk to the market,
33:09
it digested very quickly. And if the one
33:11
shot worst case scenario bid for the full
33:13
size is like down five or six percent,
33:16
then the like feed it to the market
33:18
over six months for like a
33:20
third of that size or a
33:22
half of that size price
33:25
is probably like almost negligible. So a
33:27
good heuristic if you're a trader is
33:30
you want to, it's called the participation rate.
33:32
It's the amount of the daily volume that
33:34
is like generated by you. If you're
33:37
less than 10% participation, meaning
33:40
like your volume accounts for less than 10% of
33:42
the market's volume, that's usually like
33:44
a sort of like a rule
33:47
of thumb maximum for what it takes to
33:49
like get your volume off without moving the
33:51
price too much or barely in barely
33:54
noticeable amounts. And like
33:56
the, what I just described where there's like
33:58
a six month rateable unlock. of $8.5 billion
34:01
worth of Bitcoin, of which maybe
34:03
half at most gets sold, like
34:05
your participation rate is going to be
34:08
well below 10%. I mean, tens of billions of
34:10
dollars worth of this stuff trades every day. So
34:12
I think this, I think Mt. Gox
34:14
has a negligible price impact. I think the reason
34:16
why it nuked on the Mt. Gox headlines was
34:19
because people just
34:22
sort of like forgetting this cardinal rule, which is
34:24
that you can't front run flow the timing of
34:26
which you aren't completely fully aware of. You can
34:28
only front run flow when you know exactly when
34:30
it's going to hit the market. And I think
34:33
it's amateur hour out there where people are like,
34:35
oh, it's going to be selling. Let me sell.
34:37
So I think there's been some panic
34:40
around that. Ultimately though, Jack, I think
34:42
what's really causing the sell off is
34:45
a broader light bulb going off,
34:48
which is that most alt coins are completely
34:50
worthless and like
34:53
billions of dollars worth of VC unlocks are
34:55
happening. So I think a lot
34:57
of retail is finally waking up to the fact that
34:59
their shit coin of choice is,
35:03
it's dead. And I think that's like
35:05
weighing on the crypto space as a
35:07
whole right now. So
35:09
just to be very clear, you are a Bitcoin
35:11
bull, but not necessarily a bull on things that
35:13
could be called alt coins, like outside of the
35:15
top 10 or even the top five. Yeah. My
35:18
soundbite on that, like I think the meme coin
35:20
casino is a fun way to play around and
35:22
make money. I think that the majors like BTC,
35:24
ETH, and Solana are an awesome
35:26
long-term hold. Anything in the middle of that
35:28
risk curve, the
35:31
alt coin space with air quotes, I
35:33
think it will ultimately have value when
35:35
there's regulatory clarity. And when
35:37
crypto can fulfill Chris Dixon's
35:39
sort of prediction, he's a
35:42
venture capitalist at A16Z, he
35:44
basically predicted that crypto would disrupt the LLC.
35:46
It would disrupt corporate structure. It's better than
35:48
a safe agreement or startup private equity. Like
35:51
I totally agree with that. It's a better
35:53
way to organize value
35:55
sharing amongst like disparate participants in
35:57
some sort of like, you know,
35:59
software project. I totally agree
36:01
with that. You need regulatory
36:03
approval first. And then once
36:06
a crypto economic system can
36:08
pass through the benefits of
36:11
genuine economic activity, pass
36:13
through the, you know, like revenues of a
36:15
real business to token holders, which is not
36:17
currently legal, when that happens, then you'll have
36:19
new sources of inflows into crypto
36:22
other than just like the greater fool
36:24
buying your shit coin. But until then,
36:26
I think we've run out of greater
36:28
fools to buy your shit coin. And I think that
36:30
that whole alt coin space is going to go from,
36:32
you know, hundreds
36:34
of billions of dollars in market cap to a
36:37
lot lower, unfortunately. Wow.
36:39
So just to your point on Mt.
36:41
Gox, it sounds like all things being
36:43
equal, you don't think the $8.5 billion
36:45
worth of Bitcoin that's going to be
36:47
sold would have a sizable
36:50
impact on the price of Bitcoin. But you
36:52
know, as we all know, all things are never equal. And it could
36:54
have a huge impact on sentiment if
36:56
ever if this scares everyone and it spooks people
36:58
and then people are selling into a falling
37:01
market. Of course, that could happen. But you're just just
37:03
talking about the $8.5 billion to
37:05
be sold. You don't think that by itself
37:08
is something to worry about. That by itself
37:10
is irrelevant. I think the selling flow on
37:12
BCH, which is I think it's like almost
37:14
nine figures or maybe slightly over that that
37:16
could send BCH down a lot. So
37:19
that that selling will matter for Bitcoin cash. But
37:22
no, the actual flows of Mt. Gox
37:24
Bitcoin unlocks don't matter. It's just it's
37:26
the news is hitting the market at
37:28
a fragile time when there's already like
37:31
I said, all coin carnage going on and a
37:33
lot of value being lost and people panicking and
37:35
getting upset. So yeah, like you said, sentiment is
37:37
the exact word I would use to describe what
37:39
was causing the sell off right now, not
37:41
actual like technicals. So Bitcoin Cash is an
37:44
old node of Bitcoin. I'm going to pretend
37:46
to understand the technology. But you know, Bitcoin
37:48
is now on a new node and Bitcoin
37:50
Cash is that old node. Some true believers
37:52
are still on the Bitcoin Cash thing. But
37:55
why do you think this will be worse for Bitcoin Cash than
37:57
Bitcoin? And I'll just say on your Twitter, you said Bitcoin Cash
37:59
could to zero. The great thing about crypto
38:01
is that the code is open source. So
38:04
if some people don't like the roadmap
38:06
for a given project, they can just do what's called
38:09
forking it, which is copy all the code, paste it
38:11
into some new repository and
38:13
get going with like the exact same
38:15
thing with a few small modifications. And
38:17
I, you know, honestly, I
38:20
think Bitcoin, I can't remember whether the
38:22
current Bitcoin is the original stem or
38:24
whether Bitcoin caches. I think Bitcoin cache
38:26
is an original stem of
38:28
like Bitcoin looked more like Bitcoin cache
38:30
in the beginning than it does today.
38:33
And so our current Bitcoin is a
38:35
fork of Bitcoin cache or something. I
38:38
don't remember exactly. I'm not a dev.
38:40
I haven't been in this since 2011.
38:42
But anyway, Bitcoin cache is this like
38:44
legacy, almost Bitcoin Bitcoin thing that, you
38:47
know, is held by a few whale accounts
38:49
and some true believers who are, you
38:51
know, they are true believers. Right.
38:53
So if you held Bitcoin on, on
38:56
Mt. Gox way back when, when the
38:58
exchange got hacked, you like the fork
39:00
happened after the exchange went
39:02
down. So now all of
39:05
those exchange accounts are holding both
39:07
current, like what is today Bitcoin
39:09
and the fork, which is Bitcoin
39:11
cache. And so, like
39:14
theoretically, most of
39:16
these people don't want Bitcoin cache. It's just
39:18
a shit coin that they don't want. So
39:20
they're probably going to sell it. And unless
39:23
all of the Bitcoin cache, true believers slash
39:25
whales go and absorb that extra
39:27
hundred million, which they very well may, but I
39:29
doubt they will, you know, the,
39:33
the marginal buyer of that, which is where
39:35
the price gets set, right, for anything, whether
39:37
it's oil or Bitcoin or
39:40
some random token you've never heard of,
39:42
it's always the price the marginal buyer is
39:44
willing to pay for additional supply. All
39:47
the supplies coming to market, like I don't
39:49
really see who's going to be willing to
39:51
pay up for it. So maybe zero is
39:53
probably an exaggeration that I posted to get
39:55
some engagement, but I think it's going down
39:57
a lot. It already has. 20%
40:00
in a couple of minutes on the
40:02
headline. Final thing on altcoins. Yesterday you
40:04
posted that altcoins are not done nuking.
40:06
This is not an opportunity to buy.
40:09
And you said your signal was to
40:11
get out of alts was that the
40:13
Bitcoin to ETH to sole ratio. And
40:15
you talked about that earlier on the
40:18
1000x pod shout out to that. But
40:20
just when you say about why do you
40:22
think this is the moment for altcoins to
40:24
do poorly? Typically, I think it is fair
40:26
to say, I gotta, we don't have huge
40:28
amounts of sample size, but when
40:30
Bitcoin goes up, ETH also goes up and other
40:33
altcoins goes up. I mean, there's a go up.
40:35
There's a time when Solana and ETH were considered
40:37
altcoins in the same way that if the S&P
40:39
goes up, the high beta stocks, Tesla and Nvidia
40:41
will go up as well. And you know, the
40:43
crappy, you know, huge frenetic bull market like 2021
40:45
or late 2020, the
40:48
crappier the company, the higher rate of company, the more it
40:50
will go up. And certainly that can be characterized of
40:52
crypto during the same period of 2020 and 2021. Why
40:55
is this time different? And just to sort of preempt
40:58
your response about, oh, the fundamental tech isn't there. But
41:00
I would have said that that was true in 2020 and 2021. Like
41:03
the promising has been very, very big and
41:05
the delivery has been a little short to
41:07
say the least. So, but
41:10
that's not new to me. So what's different?
41:12
Yeah, okay. So first of all,
41:14
yes, you're absolutely right. This is
41:17
a controversial take, spicy take. I've
41:20
taken a lot of heat for
41:22
it on Twitter. Here's why I'm confident that
41:24
my contrarian view on altcoins is correct. Let's
41:28
say that you were to create a systematic strategy. The
41:30
systematic strategy is buy an
41:33
index of the top thousand altcoins, market
41:36
cap weighted index of the top thousand altcoins.
41:39
When the market, when Bitcoin
41:42
has been in a bull
41:44
market by some definition, let's say,
41:48
pick your definition, it doesn't matter, has been
41:50
in a bull market for longer than six
41:52
months, right? You would have had an
41:54
awesome time in 2017 and
41:57
again in 2021. So your
41:59
system. Systematic strategy has two
42:02
data points to sort of like
42:04
validate your thesis, right? This
42:07
is not in the
42:09
parlance of systematic trading statistically significant. It's
42:11
entirely possible that something that worked twice
42:14
could fail on the third time. And
42:18
I firmly believe that it will. Why?
42:21
Well, retail has had their
42:23
hands burned twice
42:25
by this. Retail
42:28
was not deploying the systematic
42:30
strategy at an optimal time and exiting at
42:32
the highs. Retail was holding
42:34
the bag in the last
42:36
two altcoin bull markets. And
42:40
I do not think that retail
42:42
is there this time to buy
42:44
suey and Aptos and say. What
42:48
say? Great question. But it's an
42:50
L1, right? It does
42:52
something that no one cares about, right?
42:55
Like there are people that like
42:57
when there are no venture capitalist
42:59
unlit unlocks and there's
43:01
no supply, the marginal buyer for
43:04
what what little liquidity is out there,
43:06
you know, their algos sloshing things around
43:08
their market makers like GSR and Wintermute
43:10
providing two ways on these tokens because
43:12
they're contractually required to do so so
43:15
that they look liquid and stable. And
43:18
the marginal buyer is, you know, somebody
43:20
who just like listens to a podcast
43:22
about suey or say and gets
43:24
excited and pushes the price up. But like
43:26
when the venture capitalists who have, you know,
43:28
in these in their like investment vehicles like
43:30
hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars
43:32
worth of this funny money to unlock, there's
43:35
not enough retail to buy it anymore
43:37
because retail has gone and bought the
43:39
last two VC bull markets. And I,
43:41
you know, there's just not like you
43:44
need a new infusion of capital. And
43:46
so my whole thesis around crypto, like
43:48
around altcoins in particular and tokenomics in
43:50
general is what I was saying earlier,
43:52
which is that you
43:54
need another source of capital other than
43:57
like random guys on the street. and
44:00
mom and pop people to come and buy altcoins.
44:02
You need inflows from genuine
44:04
business activity. You need this to
44:06
start disrupting trad-fi economics in order
44:08
to bring in the amounts of
44:11
capital necessary to sustain these
44:13
multi-billion dollar valuations. And we're not gonna
44:15
get it in the next year or
44:17
two. So I think we're
44:20
due for proper
44:22
altcoin underperformance. Now
44:24
on the other side of that, just very quickly, my
44:27
former boss at
44:29
DRW, Don Wilson, has this amazing saying,
44:32
which is, I was complaining one time
44:34
about Cardano or Polkadot. I don't remember
44:36
which, something that shouldn't exist. And he's
44:38
like, Jonah, tokens don't file for bankruptcy.
44:41
Which is true, they don't go to zero. You can't
44:44
short them, right? So it's unlike stocks. You're not just
44:46
like, these things aren't gonna go to zero. So
44:48
you'll have a lot of zombie
44:50
tokens out there floating around. But
44:53
I don't think that's
44:56
what people are looking for if they're
44:58
going and buying altcoins. So I would be, I wouldn't
45:01
touch the altcoin space with a 10 foot
45:03
pole. Now to your point about ETH and
45:05
Solana, yes, they were altcoins at some point.
45:07
So if you're that good at picking winners,
45:09
and we can talk about ways to do
45:11
so, like I think there are tokens here and
45:13
there that are gonna 1000X. I'm
45:16
just saying the space as a whole, it's kind of cursed.
45:19
Like what tokens do you think are gonna 1000X?
45:21
And I should say, because your podcast is called 1000X, unless
45:25
you think Bitcoin is gonna 1000X, which would
45:27
be something to behold, from
45:30
a $60,000 per Bitcoin price right
45:32
now, what's going 1000X? I
45:34
mean, we can't change the show name, unless you
45:36
made it. Well, okay, so
45:39
just a little bit of like inside baseball for you.
45:42
We wanted to call the show 100X, but
45:45
Arthur Hayes, the founder of Bitcoin, Bitmex,
45:47
sorry. He had
45:49
that, like he already had
45:51
a company called 100X, his investment company.
45:53
So out of respect to Arthur, we're like, are
45:55
we gonna call it 10X? No
45:58
one's gonna listen to this shit. So call it 1000X. It's
46:01
a little bit aspirational, so I'm not sure I know
46:03
what's going to 1000X. But
46:05
in terms of what I think is going to 100X,
46:08
I am extremely bullish
46:11
on what's called, like
46:13
things like Ondo, like things like, let's call
46:15
it the RWA space, even though a treasury
46:18
bond is not a real world asset. I
46:20
think that use cases like stablecoins, like, did
46:22
you know that stablecoins are the 18th biggest
46:25
lender to the United States of America right
46:27
now? To me,
46:30
the idea that JP Morgan won't bank
46:32
you if you live in Argentina, or
46:34
you're an itinerant farmer in Bolivia, but
46:37
you can get a
46:39
dollarized checking account with Tether or
46:41
a dollarized high yield savings account
46:43
with Ondo on Chain, to me,
46:45
that's just pure magic. And
46:48
so I think that to the extent that I do believe
46:50
the dollar will remain the world's leading
46:52
global reserve currency, not the only one. I
46:55
think that on chain
46:57
projects that collect a
47:00
sliver of the difference between the
47:02
yield they deliver to their end
47:05
user and the yield that they
47:07
collect from lending to Uncle Sam,
47:10
I think that those types of
47:12
projects represent like an absolutely critical
47:14
use case in the global banking
47:16
ecosystem. And as soon as
47:18
regulatory clarity starts to emerge, I think you're going
47:20
to end up with a system
47:22
where those revenues get passed through to
47:25
token holders and you're not just holding
47:27
some worthless governance token, you're getting actual
47:29
dividends from that business. And then
47:32
soon you'll end up with tokenized
47:34
stocks on these platforms, tokenized corporate
47:36
bonds, hell, maybe even tokenized
47:38
cargos of hydrocarbons. And I think that if
47:40
you're going to take a bet on pre-regulatory
47:42
clarity, if you're going to
47:47
take a bet on an altcoin, you should be
47:50
sitting around waiting to dip by the things that
47:52
will benefit the most from genuine
47:55
business activity revenue pass through.
47:58
I know it's a complicated thing. but to
48:00
me it may like I just I'm seeing
48:02
that ball very clearly personally and so those
48:04
are the all coins I like now do
48:06
I want to buy them here watch them
48:09
sell off 90%
48:11
and then have the the regulatory clarity emerge like
48:13
no I'm kind of waiting in the wings right
48:15
so those are the ones that I think You'll
48:18
ultimately want to buy on a proper
48:20
jackknife What's a jackknife?
48:22
Just like a real like massive?
48:25
Vertical sell-off buying buying a falling knife
48:28
jack. Yeah. Okay. So what you
48:30
think suddenly eating most altcoins are nonsense Like
48:32
what do you think about the AI coins?
48:35
so Some of them
48:37
actually work like live peer. I
48:40
had a chat with the are we of
48:42
guys and oh my god Like a oh
48:44
is just so interesting a stateless computer that
48:46
can process like llama 3 on
48:48
Jane Like I love these ideas.
48:50
I think they're so interesting. I I
48:53
think again the
48:56
blockchain product
48:59
is early stage and
49:01
Even if the blockchain product achieves
49:03
mass adoption They're like
49:06
we're past the point where in terms
49:08
of like just markets markets
49:10
and market psychology Where like people are
49:12
gonna feel comfortable buying a token? Because
49:15
in name only it's associated
49:17
with something that's kind of cool,
49:19
right? Or that works
49:21
or that people are using like again
49:23
You need a pass-through of genuine economic
49:26
activity to the token holders in order
49:28
for people to in order for there
49:30
to be like a hope that The
49:33
tide is gonna rise and lift your ship right
49:36
now if you buy a oh Which
49:38
is the AI sort of like let's
49:40
call it the like computational engine of
49:42
our weave which is very capable of
49:44
processing You
49:47
know AI Applications like
49:49
llama or even if you buy our weave AR
49:51
the token which is already basically the
49:54
most important consumer product in crypto It's
49:56
like the AWS the Amazon Web Services
49:58
of crypto like Any
50:00
revenue that people are spending
50:04
to store or compute on our
50:06
weave, like the only way that
50:08
you're getting that as a token holder is like
50:10
through buy and burn or
50:13
something that seems kind of nebulous. Like
50:15
the money needs to actually just flow
50:17
straight through into your wallet in
50:19
order for it to be a layup
50:21
trade. You know, until then
50:23
you're still basically hoping that no one
50:25
else around you sells and other fools
50:28
come in to buy. Not that you're
50:30
full for buying, are we? But you
50:32
need people to keep lifting it in
50:34
order to earn the types of returns
50:36
that you expect from your investment. You
50:38
earn your 100X. Your 100X.
50:40
Very interesting. Jonah, thanks for talking about
50:42
crypto. We've done close to an hour.
50:44
I want to now talk about oil
50:46
where you have got some strong views.
50:48
The price of crude is around 80
50:50
bucks. What's your view on it? Right
50:53
now, crude oil is not the most
50:55
exciting trade from the perspective of a
50:58
retail investor. Like retail investors like to
51:00
watch things go super
51:03
high or oh my God,
51:05
crude oil went below zero. How's that
51:07
even possible, right? Right now, we're in
51:09
a situation where there's a lot of
51:11
slack in global crude oil markets. And
51:13
what is slack? Slack means that producers
51:15
could produce more and
51:18
consumers could consume less, right?
51:21
So let's say that the price skyrockets
51:26
for I don't know what reason. Saudi
51:30
Arabia could pump an extra one
51:32
or two million barrels a day.
51:34
I think one, they say two.
51:36
Consumers could theoretically, consumers
51:38
being refineries, they could
51:40
draw from stocks. There's
51:43
a global strategic petroleum reserve ecosystem. China has
51:45
a lot of oil and tank. So does
51:47
the U.S. So
51:50
consumption could be supplemented
51:52
by some of these reserves that are being held
51:54
by governments, much like what happened in 2022. So
51:58
there's a lot of extra oil that could hit the market. Normally,
52:00
or if there's a
52:03
huge sell-off, that's I think where you could
52:05
potentially run into a big price move and
52:07
some problems for the economy. But I don't
52:09
think there's going to be a big sell-off
52:12
because the global economy is growing robustly. Ultimately,
52:15
OPEC and Russia, their friends in
52:17
OPEC Plus are keeping a lot of oil
52:20
off the market. So
52:23
really the big move that the crude
52:25
oil market's exposed to is a down
52:27
move. And I just don't have the
52:30
view that there's going to be a
52:32
massive COVID-style macroeconomic catastrophe in the near
52:34
term, like a demand shock that
52:36
it would take to catalyze that move. Don't
52:39
see it. So you think when you said producers could put
52:42
a lot more supply in the market if they wanted to, that means
52:44
there's a lot of spare capacity. That if the price
52:47
goes up from 80 to 90, boom, a lot more
52:49
supply goes on the market. You're not going to have
52:51
80 to 90, and then no one else is going
52:53
to stop that train and we go to 140, 150.
52:57
I think at $90, I don't think
52:59
extra production would come online. So right
53:02
now the price of Brent, which
53:04
is the global waterborne crude that comes from the North
53:06
Sea between England and Norway, that's sort of between 85
53:08
and $88 a barrel right
53:11
now. So that's the market that
53:13
the Saudis and every other OPEC producer will
53:15
look at. The WTI,
53:18
the one that used to be relevant, is
53:20
landlocked crude in Texas. Well,
53:22
it's not landlocked anymore. But that's a bit
53:24
lower because of freight, but that's not the
53:26
price that people pay attention to or the
53:28
relevant people pay attention to. So let's say
53:30
the price is basically already close to 90.
53:32
If the price were to go to 100, maybe
53:35
you'd see a little bit more production, but OPEC has
53:37
said they're going to unwind their cuts later in this
53:39
year. They're not really trying to unwind them now. They
53:42
want the revenue. So ultimately,
53:44
if the price were to suddenly go to 110, there'd
53:46
be a lot of oil hitting the market. To
53:49
me, the last time the oil market
53:51
was truly, truly very
53:54
fragile. And let's go
53:56
pre-Ukraine because Ukraine, people thought Russia wasn't
53:58
going to be able export. So let's
54:01
ignore that. The last time you
54:03
were in a geopolitically stable environment,
54:05
and oil was fragile, as ever
54:09
was kind of I would say 2018. In the summer of 2018,
54:14
every producer was pumping max and demand
54:16
growth was so robust. And
54:19
supply was like, like
54:21
threatening to come offline in Libya and
54:23
all these other places, where if you'd
54:25
lost even half a million barrels a
54:28
day, in a world where the human
54:30
economy was the global economy, humans
54:32
were consuming almost 100 million barrels of oil a
54:34
day. So you lose even, even half a percent
54:37
of that, like the price could have shot up by 30, 40, 50
54:41
dollars a barrel. And then Trump did
54:43
something to alleviate that he waved
54:45
the sanctions on Iranian oil to let
54:47
a little bit more of it out
54:49
to prevent that price shock outcome. Like
54:53
that was the last bit of spare capacity in the
54:56
market at that time. That
54:58
was the only slack. Now there's slack
55:00
everywhere. Russia has slack. Saudi
55:02
Arabia has slack. The United Arab Emirates
55:04
has slack. Kuwait has slack.
55:07
Iraq and you know, Nigeria pretend
55:09
they have slack, but they don't.
55:11
They're pumping max. Iraq too. But
55:13
yeah, you get the
55:15
drift. In 2018, so the price of oil was
55:17
$70. So it was lower than
55:19
it was now. I also associate 2018 as
55:21
that is a time of rapid growth in
55:23
Permian production. So you're saying that the potential
55:26
declines from Libya and the other places you
55:28
mentioned would have more than offset the growth
55:30
in production from Permian growth was starting to
55:32
taper off back then. What was happening in
55:34
2018 was that Wall
55:37
Street was getting sick of lending money
55:39
to Permian producers and receiving a negative
55:41
yield for that money on that money
55:43
negative return on investment. So
55:45
the money tap was starting to dry up.
55:48
Permian production growth was starting to
55:50
taper off. The
55:52
narrative was shifting from like drill
55:55
baby drill pump as much as
55:57
you can to like fiscal prudence
55:59
and profitability. Kind of like what
56:01
you're seeing in the SaaS market right now, you
56:03
know? Meanwhile,
56:06
the global oil markets were tight. Economic
56:08
growth globally was robust. Demand
56:11
growth was robust. And all
56:13
it would take was one Libyan supply shock
56:15
to send the thing into the stratosphere. Like
56:17
the crude oil is a, crude oil does
56:19
not have a lot of, like it has
56:21
tremendous elasticity of price with respect to demand.
56:23
So like you're not going to stop driving
56:25
to work because gasoline prices go up. You're
56:29
just going to keep eating it
56:31
until you go broke, right? And
56:33
that's why big oil shocks create
56:35
recessions. And so would you
56:37
say that the period we have now where you
56:39
see a low risk for a huge move upwards,
56:41
is that true most of the time in the
56:44
oil markets? I am a crude
56:46
oil permeable because I believe
56:48
that unless OPEC is
56:50
in a market share war like it
56:53
was in 2020 or 2014, they're
56:56
artificially propping up the market
56:58
and it tends to grind higher. And
57:02
I occasionally have gotten lucky on this or managed to
57:04
get in at a very low price like in mid-2020
57:07
or early 2016. With
57:13
the exception of 2022, it's very rare to see the price just go
57:15
look like it's going to
57:18
go to infinity. And even in 2022, Joe
57:21
Biden showed up with more than a hundred
57:23
million barrels worth of physical
57:25
crude oil to just like flood the
57:27
market to prevent that from happening
57:29
because that's a game changer if you
57:31
end up in an oil shock like in the 1970s, right? People
57:35
lose their jobs and some people lose their heads
57:38
over that. It's like crazy. It's
57:42
bad. It's very, very bad.
57:44
Wars start over oil. So yeah,
57:48
basically, I would
57:51
never buy like you buy calls, you buy
57:53
options when you expect the market to move
57:55
fast. I would never buy
57:58
a front end oil call. unless
58:00
it was just so frigging
58:02
cheap after years and years
58:05
of oil doing nothing or
58:07
oil being in a permanent sell off. And
58:09
we're not there yet because oil had a huge move in 2022. Yeah,
58:12
no. I mean, the best trade of the year
58:14
in oil has been selling options. It's called the
58:17
implied daily move or the implied break even. There's
58:19
like a price where you break, if
58:21
you buy a straddle, you break even if the price of
58:23
oil moves that many dollars and cents per day. At the
58:25
beginning of the year, it was like 180. Now
58:28
it's like $1.10. That's
58:31
a huge sell off in the price of oil
58:33
options. So yeah, selling
58:36
vol because of all this slack in the system.
58:38
And by vol, I mean volatility options.
58:42
That's been the trade this year in
58:44
oil. And what are you seeing in
58:46
the world of refined products
58:48
or distillates like diesel, gasoline, that
58:50
kind of stuff? Gasoline is actually
58:53
not a distillate. You
58:56
have to recombine some distillates and do
58:58
some fancy chemistry to make gasoline. Is
59:00
gasoline a refined product? Yes. Yes, it
59:03
is. So distillation is
59:05
the process of boiling something, taking
59:07
the steam, cooling the steam back
59:09
down. And whatever you get out
59:11
of that is a distillate. So
59:13
you can get distilled water from distilling
59:15
water. It's like slightly
59:18
less minerally cleaner water. If
59:21
you distill oil, you end up with products
59:24
like diesel, which
59:26
people put in trucks. You end
59:29
up with jet fuel, stuff like that.
59:31
So the big trade this year in
59:33
refined products has been
59:35
this round trip in diesel, where
59:38
to start the year, the
59:40
price of diesel was quite low. And
59:42
diesel is usually considered to be the
59:44
input product for economic activity, because
59:47
trucking, a lot of
59:49
people are buying toys on
59:51
Amazon. And you need more trucks to
59:53
move it around, basically. So that's the
59:55
basic explanation. Anyway, so diesel started the
59:57
year at quite a low price. It
1:00:01
rallied in a straight line for three months on
1:00:03
bullish economic prospects and cheap crude
1:00:06
oil. Rising crude oil
1:00:08
is linked to diesel, but cracks
1:00:10
were rallying as well. So
1:00:14
the margin to produce this stuff was
1:00:16
relatively healthy for finer, and then it
1:00:18
sort of peaked out sometime around mid-February
1:00:22
or early March, I forget. Hedge
1:00:24
funds, a hedge fund that
1:00:26
was short, a massive
1:00:29
hedge fund known
1:00:31
for being the best hedge fund
1:00:33
in commodities was massively short. Diesel
1:00:36
all the way up, stopped
1:00:38
out, fired their portfolio manager,
1:00:41
and the global price of diesel
1:00:43
moved. Another significant
1:00:47
amount of dollars per ton on
1:00:49
that stopout finished
1:00:52
around March, and then it's just careened
1:00:54
back down into
1:00:57
Hades from then
1:00:59
until basically two weeks ago. So
1:01:01
that's been like the thing about
1:01:03
refined products trading. When
1:01:05
you talk to people on the street about
1:01:07
refined products, the one they identify with is
1:01:09
gasoline. The one they identify with the second
1:01:11
most is jet fuel. They
1:01:14
could be like, oh, my plane ticket price is higher. Oh, filling
1:01:16
up at the pump. It was cheaper this week than it was
1:01:18
a couple months ago. Usually
1:01:21
what they're seeing is the price of
1:01:24
crude oil, but the individual relationship
1:01:27
between the distillate
1:01:30
or the refined product and the price of crude
1:01:32
oil is what industry people like. People
1:01:34
like me will get involved with, and
1:01:36
that's usually a lot less transparent to
1:01:38
people. And ultimately, the story this year
1:01:41
was like, oh, my God, road
1:01:43
fuels going to infinity. The
1:01:45
economy is picking back up. It's doing
1:01:48
better than expected. Oh, my God, distillates
1:01:50
are incredible. Oh, my God, somebody's
1:01:52
stopping out and driving it even higher. Oh, wait, actually,
1:01:54
there's not enough demand to sustain these levels, and it
1:01:56
crashes back down. So distillate trading is something that's going
1:01:58
to be a little bit more difficult. It's all about
1:02:00
mean reversion. You find some of the best
1:02:02
traders in the distillates world are mean reversion
1:02:04
traders. They learn to fade these
1:02:06
highs by selling them and buy the lows. They're
1:02:09
not like the kind of people you meet in
1:02:11
crypto who are just these massive momentum traders. Okay,
1:02:13
that's interesting. I was able to find a chart
1:02:15
very interesting of the price of Brent crude oil
1:02:17
and the price of jet fuel and then the
1:02:20
crack spread between them. And so
1:02:23
that shows it was not a big spread for
1:02:25
most of 2020 and 2021. Then
1:02:27
with Russia's invasion of Ukraine, as the price of
1:02:30
oil spiked up, the price of jet fuel
1:02:32
spiked up even higher. So you had a
1:02:34
huge explosion in the jet fuel price and
1:02:36
it's lower than. Tell me about that
1:02:38
mean reversion trade because I can imagine someone in January
1:02:41
2022 saying that
1:02:43
the crack spread for jet fuel has
1:02:46
gone up. So it's time to short that crack spread
1:02:48
and then just getting destroyed. That's right.
1:02:50
And the people who did that then
1:02:52
lost their jobs for sure. I mean,
1:02:55
ultimately refineries. Okay,
1:02:57
so there are certain things that the human
1:02:59
race can't do without, right? Like
1:03:03
transportation. It's always going
1:03:05
to be there. You're going to buy it at
1:03:07
most prices. But when something
1:03:09
like COVID comes along, like you could just
1:03:11
work from home. And so people
1:03:14
stop driving and cracks for
1:03:16
a lot of crack spreads for a lot of these
1:03:19
refined products like went at
1:03:21
times negative. So
1:03:25
basically these big shocks create opportunities
1:03:27
for mean reversion traders to come
1:03:29
in and scoop up the pieces.
1:03:33
Ultimately like there's only one buyer of
1:03:35
crude, as we discussed earlier on the
1:03:37
podcast. It's a refinery, right? And refineries
1:03:40
are like very economically
1:03:42
rational actors for the most part.
1:03:44
They have what's called an LP,
1:03:46
a linear program that tells
1:03:49
them like, hey, I'm seeing this much
1:03:51
demand at what's called the rack when
1:03:53
big trucks with tanks pick up gasoline.
1:03:55
Or hey, I'm seeing this much
1:03:57
demand for jet fuel. hey,
1:04:00
I'm seeing this much demand for fuel oil,
1:04:02
which is what powers big oil
1:04:04
tankers and cruise ships, the biggest
1:04:06
ships. They can see demand in
1:04:09
real time for
1:04:11
these refined products. They can switch between
1:04:13
them so they can do
1:04:15
more hydrocracking or less. They can make
1:04:17
more naphtha, which is a precursor to
1:04:20
plastic, or less. They can make more
1:04:22
gasoline or less. So when basically the
1:04:25
price of a refined product relative
1:04:27
to crude moves too
1:04:30
much to the upside, they'll make more of
1:04:32
it. Because they're like, oh, my LP tells
1:04:35
me that it's like, I should be making
1:04:37
naphtha because everybody wants plastic and nobody wants
1:04:39
jet fuel. So I'm just gonna like go
1:04:41
all in on naphtha for a little while.
1:04:43
Oh, actually now, you
1:04:46
know, no one wants shampoo and plastic,
1:04:49
Ziploc bags anymore, and everybody wants gasoline.
1:04:51
So I'm gonna stop making naphtha and
1:04:53
make more gasoline because that's where the,
1:04:55
you know, it's like whack-a-mole, right? I'm
1:04:58
oversimplifying it massively. But basically,
1:05:01
because of these, because
1:05:03
of these LPs, and because of the
1:05:05
end user demand, you
1:05:08
know, being at times
1:05:10
quite elastic, at times inelastic, like the refinery
1:05:12
is ultimately going to be able, like it's
1:05:15
a mean reversion trade. If there, if something's,
1:05:17
if the get-ins too good in some refined
1:05:19
product, all the refiners are going to go
1:05:22
make it. It's a waterborne market. It's going
1:05:24
to find its way to the places
1:05:26
where there's a deficit, and then the prices are going
1:05:28
to come back down, and vice versa,
1:05:31
you know? So that's
1:05:33
kind of how it works. Like if there's a, if
1:05:36
there's a massive oversupply of
1:05:38
something, like refineries are
1:05:40
going to stop making it, basically. And
1:05:42
then the price is going to come back after
1:05:45
people, people in Germany are like,
1:05:47
wow. So in Germany, diesel is called gas oil,
1:05:49
and it's used to heat homes, right? So if
1:05:51
diesel goes too low, then you know, in Germany,
1:05:53
people are going to be like, wow, I can
1:05:56
buy an entire winter's worth of heat for pennies on
1:05:58
the dollar. Let me just go and and
1:06:00
fill up the tank in my backyard. Commodities
1:06:02
markets are really interesting like that. So
1:06:07
it's ultimately refined product. Crack spreads
1:06:09
are, I would say, a mean
1:06:12
reversion game. The more risk
1:06:14
tolerance you can wear in casino parlance, the
1:06:18
more times you can double down at the
1:06:20
blackjack table, the
1:06:23
more money you can make on these obvious
1:06:25
mean reversion trades. It's just about your entry
1:06:28
price, your timing, and whether you can stay
1:06:30
solvent longer than the market remains irrational on
1:06:32
the refined product side. So jet
1:06:35
fuel that crack spread has been narrowing,
1:06:37
although it probably still is above the
1:06:40
pre-2020 levels. What's
1:06:42
happening to the crack spreads of diesel
1:06:44
and gasoline and the other stuff?
1:06:47
Gasoline is a summer trade. So
1:06:50
let's start there. Gasoline rallies in the summer. Why?
1:06:52
Because summer is driving season. That's
1:06:55
when most gasoline gets used. So
1:06:58
basically, if you're a commodities trader and you
1:07:00
get long gasoline cracks, when
1:07:03
everybody's buying gasoline, usually
1:07:06
the world is prepared for
1:07:08
that seasonality of gasoline. You're
1:07:12
probably wondering to yourself, does the
1:07:14
price of ice cream spike in
1:07:16
the summer? Well, no. But the
1:07:18
thing about gasoline is occasionally there's
1:07:21
more demand than people anticipate. And
1:07:23
you also have this optionality from
1:07:25
buying gasoline in the summertime when
1:07:27
occasionally a refinery will just explode
1:07:30
by accident. It's called unplanned maintenance,
1:07:32
right? When let's say
1:07:34
it's like 50 degrees Celsius in
1:07:37
some refinery in the Middle East, and
1:07:39
it'll just blow up. Or some old
1:07:41
refinery in Pennsylvania will just fall
1:07:43
apart and blow up and literally.
1:07:46
And then suddenly there's not enough gasoline,
1:07:48
right? Or pipeline
1:07:50
will blow up. So yeah, there's optionality
1:07:52
to that. Or hurricane knocks
1:07:54
out a couple of refineries and there's not enough gasoline.
1:07:57
Anyway, so gasoline's got this sort of upside
1:07:59
option. So if you can get it at
1:08:01
a cheap enough price into the summer, it's called
1:08:03
buying Q3 cracks. That's the trade. So
1:08:07
for the third quarter, because those derivatives
1:08:09
price during the summer. Anyway,
1:08:12
so basically,
1:08:16
so that's what's going on there. So that
1:08:18
stuff's starting to rally after a period of
1:08:20
weak demand. Jet
1:08:23
fuel and diesel, they're both
1:08:25
distillates. So
1:08:28
refineries kind of switch back and forth
1:08:30
between making one or the other a little bit more
1:08:32
fungibly and easily. Just
1:08:35
distillates in general, like think of it
1:08:37
as a complex, right? Like they kind
1:08:40
of trade together. The distillates
1:08:42
complex, like we discussed,
1:08:45
rallied like crazy for the first three
1:08:47
months of the year on demand and
1:08:49
then stopouts vomited into
1:08:51
oblivion in the following three months. And
1:08:53
now it's just starting to recover as
1:08:55
of a couple days ago. There
1:08:57
are sort of some of the early
1:08:59
indications like physical diesel barge
1:09:02
prices, like the price at which you'd buy
1:09:04
literally a barge, like a river barge worth
1:09:06
of diesel in China. Like those are starting
1:09:08
to pick up. It's a good leading indicator.
1:09:11
So all this stuff's happening. So
1:09:13
it's like kind of, there's some green
1:09:15
shoots in that market, but ultimately they're
1:09:19
within that market. Everything's
1:09:21
called regrades, the difference between the price of jet
1:09:23
and the price of diesel. You
1:09:26
have to adjust it for dollars
1:09:29
per barrel because it's priced in dollars per
1:09:31
ton, but they have different molecules
1:09:33
or different sizes. So you have to
1:09:35
like multiply them
1:09:37
by different numbers to get a volumetrically equivalent
1:09:39
crack between jet fuel and diesel. Like there
1:09:42
are all these little minutia of things that
1:09:44
are trading back and forth in that
1:09:47
world. So I think anything's
1:09:49
particularly interesting inside of the
1:09:51
diesel complex right now. Sorry, inside of the
1:09:54
distillates complex. It's more just like distillates
1:09:57
I think have bottomed out and we're going
1:09:59
to start to I see some
1:10:01
like, I think a sustained rally
1:10:03
in distillates provided the economy doesn't
1:10:05
crap out, which is my base case. You
1:10:07
have to underwrite something, right? If
1:10:09
the economy doesn't crap out, then
1:10:12
you think distillates will rally, they'll spread. Yeah,
1:10:14
I think distillates will rally with respect to
1:10:16
crude. I'm bullish distillates from here. A
1:10:19
lot of the shares of the
1:10:21
refining companies like Marathon Petroleum, Phillips
1:10:23
66 have been on a tear.
1:10:25
Are you a structural bull on
1:10:27
the business of refining crude oil?
1:10:29
So it's interesting. Everybody likes to
1:10:31
look at refining stocks as, like
1:10:34
people just don't get this. I'm
1:10:36
sure your listeners do because they're
1:10:38
educated, handsome, slash beautiful, amazing people
1:10:41
who take the time to understand these topics
1:10:43
in depth. But most people
1:10:45
just think like, oh, crude oil's
1:10:47
up. Like refining stocks
1:10:49
should be up, right? Like it's no,
1:10:51
it's not quite that simple. It's basically
1:10:54
refiners make money when the refining
1:10:56
margins are high, which is basically
1:10:59
when the difference between the price of crude
1:11:01
oil and the price of refined products is
1:11:03
wide. They
1:11:06
also make money when there is
1:11:08
volatility in what's called the
1:11:10
margin, which is the difference between
1:11:12
the price of crude and the price
1:11:14
of refined products. So when there's volatility,
1:11:16
they can capture opportunity. And then beyond
1:11:18
that, there's one extra layer of complexity,
1:11:21
which is margins are very different
1:11:23
in different regions. So let's just
1:11:25
break the world into three parts. There's
1:11:27
the North American refining margins. Texas
1:11:30
is kind of the hub of all that. Then
1:11:33
there's, let's call it European finding
1:11:35
margins. You have two regions with
1:11:37
huge refinery systems. One is Northwest
1:11:39
Europe, that's like the UK and
1:11:42
something called ARA, Amsterdam, Rotterdam, and
1:11:44
Antwerp. So all the refining is
1:11:47
in Northwest Europe. Then there's the
1:11:49
Mediterranean, like huge,
1:11:51
huge refineries in Greece and Southern
1:11:53
France and Spain and all those
1:11:55
places. Then
1:11:57
Turkey, then there's.
1:11:59
That's Eastern refining margins. So let's
1:12:02
call it two regions. There's China
1:12:04
and then there's non-China. Anyway,
1:12:07
so if you break the world up into three regions,
1:12:09
you can have like the 2010s where
1:12:12
margins in Europe were just horrendous for
1:12:14
a decade and margins in the US
1:12:16
were okay and margins in Asia were
1:12:18
excellent. So just to connect your point
1:12:20
earlier about how just because a bullish
1:12:22
crude market doesn't mean their finding margins
1:12:25
are high in non-US
1:12:27
markets. In 2010,
1:12:29
the price of oil from 2010 to 2014, it
1:12:31
only went up, but that doesn't mean that refining
1:12:33
margins were good. That's right. So
1:12:35
basically, if you're going to buy a refiner,
1:12:37
like ask yourself, where are the refineries and
1:12:40
what does the margin look like in that area? Like
1:12:43
don't just like, well,
1:12:45
it's a good market for refined
1:12:48
products and economies growing. So I'm going
1:12:50
to buy a refiner. Be like, okay,
1:12:52
am I buying a European refiner? What
1:12:54
are refining margins like in Europe? What
1:12:56
part of Europe? Red or Northwest Europe? And what
1:12:59
are they going to look like for
1:13:01
the next five years and why? Like
1:13:04
our refineries getting taken offline and there's not
1:13:06
a lot of competition or the like 12
1:13:09
different refineries getting built. Is there the
1:13:11
world, the Africa's biggest refinery called dang
1:13:14
Godi getting built in Nigeria about to
1:13:16
export like an enormous amount of refined
1:13:18
products into that region, depressing the price
1:13:21
of refined products, but doing nothing to
1:13:23
the price of crude? Like,
1:13:25
you have to ask yourself these questions. It's
1:13:28
harder. Could do a quick
1:13:30
tour of other commodities, whether it's precious metals,
1:13:32
gold, gold and silver, uranium, coal.
1:13:35
What's the most interesting commodity to you
1:13:37
outside of oil and the petroleum space?
1:13:39
The petroleum space has always been my
1:13:41
sort of my passion. Like I just
1:13:43
love oil. So interesting. I
1:13:46
think there are two areas in the
1:13:48
commodities world that people should focus on.
1:13:51
I think the first area is
1:13:54
obvious. It's natural gas because natural
1:13:56
gas is kind of like that
1:13:58
lily pad between. the
1:14:00
carbon intensive commodities like coal
1:14:03
and oil and
1:14:05
the renewable low carbon
1:14:07
future that we all
1:14:09
aspire to. And obviously
1:14:11
they're emerging commodities like
1:14:14
they're called environmental products
1:14:16
like biogas, biodiesel, renewable,
1:14:19
like it's called SAF jet fuel.
1:14:22
Like basically you take like
1:14:25
chicken oil or whatever the byproduct of making
1:14:27
a McDonald's burger is and you turn it
1:14:29
into diesel. Like I don't know how that
1:14:31
world works. It's an emerging market
1:14:34
in commodities but I think like the
1:14:36
natural gas market is just so exciting
1:14:39
because gas
1:14:41
has just become a global commodity for the first
1:14:43
time with the rise of LNG. And
1:14:46
this is like the ultimate plug to
1:14:49
make us a little bit cleaner as
1:14:51
a human power consuming
1:14:54
entity on this planet before
1:14:56
we can go fully sustainable. So I think
1:14:58
gas markets are by far gonna be the
1:15:00
most volatile, the most interesting and also generate
1:15:02
the biggest profits for the
1:15:05
international oil companies, sovereigns and
1:15:08
trading houses alike. So I
1:15:11
think natural gas is the big one to pay
1:15:13
attention to. And
1:15:15
then the other sort of thing that I
1:15:18
think is really exciting in commodities aside from
1:15:20
that renewable environmental
1:15:22
products space I just talked
1:15:24
to you about is, and this comes
1:15:26
from my experience in crypto. People
1:15:29
will start, this is my big like worldview
1:15:31
and this is something that I wanna pursue
1:15:33
personally with my own career.
1:15:36
I believe that people will start
1:15:39
to view things as
1:15:42
commodities in the future which
1:15:45
are not currently being viewed
1:15:47
as commodities. And what
1:15:49
I mean by that is I
1:15:53
believe that there will be a vast
1:15:55
commoditization, financialization
1:15:58
and either future is... or
1:16:01
tokenization of many
1:16:03
different markets that
1:16:06
ultimately fuel a
1:16:09
lot of human consumption and productivity.
1:16:11
I believe that firmly, and I think that's a space
1:16:14
to watch in the coming decades, and it's
1:16:16
something that I'd like to personally participate in.
1:16:19
So when you say things that are not considered
1:16:21
commodity and they become a commodity, to me, I
1:16:23
think of interest rates, which were not considered commodity
1:16:25
in the 1970s and before,
1:16:28
but then they became one with your
1:16:30
dollar futures, LIBOR, which are the same
1:16:32
thing. Interest rate futures,
1:16:34
10 year note, it's always a constant maturity type thing. What
1:16:37
are you referring to? You could look at commodities
1:16:40
for which there are already illiquid
1:16:42
futures markets like milk and cheese.
1:16:45
I'm not saying that I think those are going to be
1:16:47
exciting markets. I don't. But
1:16:50
I think that financial innovation will
1:16:53
make, let's say, a market like rice more
1:16:55
liquid and interesting. Perhaps crypto will
1:16:58
be that. I also
1:17:00
think that tokenization will probably make
1:17:02
markets like carbon, regional
1:17:05
markets global, right? Like Microsoft
1:17:08
or Apple as part of
1:17:10
their decarbonization initiatives. If
1:17:13
they don't have access to a local voluntary
1:17:17
carbon market in the United States, they may
1:17:19
feel comfortable buying a
1:17:22
token that guarantees the proof of carbon
1:17:24
removal in Indonesia. I
1:17:27
think that some financial innovation
1:17:29
will probably commoditize
1:17:32
things like carbon
1:17:34
a bit further out the risk
1:17:36
curve, maybe rice. Then I
1:17:38
think that there are also, I don't
1:17:41
want to spill the beans on what I'm
1:17:43
personally excited about on the air yet at
1:17:45
the risk of sounding like a fool. But
1:17:48
after this whole conversation about refined
1:17:50
products, I think that I would
1:17:54
encourage your audience who are
1:17:56
obviously very educated macroeconomic thinkers
1:17:59
to imagine And what is gasoline?
1:18:01
It's something that's been manufactured, right?
1:18:05
Raw inputs came in,
1:18:07
crude oil and some natural gas came
1:18:09
in and out came gasoline, right? Or
1:18:12
out came naphtha or out came diesel. What
1:18:16
else out there has been manufactured that's
1:18:18
kind of a commodity product, right? Something
1:18:21
where you wouldn't necessarily want to do
1:18:23
a startup to make it because the
1:18:25
price is not going to
1:18:27
go up that much and you don't have a
1:18:30
monopoly on it, but it's
1:18:32
volatile, it's important, it's necessary. So
1:18:34
I would encourage the world to
1:18:36
start thinking about, or your listeners
1:18:39
to start thinking about what manufactured
1:18:41
products like gasoline are commodities and
1:18:44
would the world be better off with
1:18:46
a futures market for those commodities that
1:18:48
they become liquid and fungible and
1:18:51
would trading expertise
1:18:53
make it easier to
1:18:55
transport those vital manufactured commodities
1:18:59
from places of surplus, where there's
1:19:01
too much, manufacturing regions to places
1:19:03
of deficit, maybe emerging economies, where
1:19:05
there's demand. To
1:19:08
me, that's the commodities blue
1:19:10
sky space where I hope young
1:19:12
people become entrepreneurs. Interesting. So
1:19:15
you said natural gas is a
1:19:17
really interesting space because
1:19:19
now there's a liquefied natural gas LNG
1:19:21
market, so it's a global market. Of
1:19:23
course, that has to be converted from
1:19:25
natural gas to liquefied natural gas. Are
1:19:28
you a bull on, I don't know
1:19:30
if it's called refining, but the process
1:19:32
of liquefaction of turning natural gas into
1:19:34
LNG, a company that does that would be, for example,
1:19:36
Shenier, whose ticker happens to be LNG. I didn't know their
1:19:38
ticker. That's a good one. Yeah.
1:19:41
So liquefaction is turning it into from a gas into
1:19:43
liquid and then re-gasification, a good
1:19:45
word is turning it from liquid back
1:19:47
into gas. And
1:19:51
so I would be bullish,
1:19:53
well-managed re-gasification projects at
1:19:57
demand centers like Europe. If
1:20:02
they can get their ducks in a row, in
1:20:04
terms of the global fungible price of natural
1:20:06
gas, I would be bullish
1:20:08
the hubs and bearish
1:20:13
the current price of LNG because I think there's
1:20:16
only going to be more liquefaction going on. The
1:20:19
hubs meaning like where it comes out of the,
1:20:22
like basically the places where it's aggregated and priced.
1:20:25
Final question, Jonah, uranium and gold.
1:20:27
Any thoughts? Yeah, so uranium,
1:20:31
quick hit. Humanity solved climate
1:20:33
change in 1942. I
1:20:35
don't for the life of me understand
1:20:37
why there aren't more countries other than
1:20:40
basically China and India building a ton of
1:20:42
nuclear reactors. Like what the F is going
1:20:44
on there. I don't get it. I
1:20:46
just don't get it. So I
1:20:49
want to be bullish uranium and I like,
1:20:51
I own a little bit of the ETF
1:20:53
and my PA, not a lot, but like
1:20:55
I'm just, I'm literally sitting here wondering like
1:20:58
when, when are the
1:21:00
government's going to start firing up these
1:21:02
nuclear reactors? Like it makes no
1:21:05
sense whatsoever to just keep
1:21:07
stalling and delaying. I
1:21:10
don't get it. So that's, that's a
1:21:12
hard trade. You're basically the market's
1:21:15
not efficient enough for you to take a
1:21:17
good bet on that one. I
1:21:19
don't think there's asymmetry either. This is run up
1:21:22
quite a lot from the post Fukushima doldrum days.
1:21:24
Then in terms of gold, central banks have bought
1:21:27
a lot of it, which is what
1:21:29
I expect them to do with Bitcoin. But you
1:21:31
know, if you look at the S and
1:21:33
P priced in gold since the twenties, I
1:21:35
think it's like flat. I mean, I honestly,
1:21:37
I, as
1:21:40
the dollar becomes this like increasingly
1:21:43
abused, like ever more valueless
1:21:46
piece of toilet paper that,
1:21:48
that gets inflated and abused
1:21:50
into oblivion by fiscal profligacy
1:21:52
that us millennials can't control,
1:21:55
but it impacts us so much. Like things like
1:21:57
gold should perform, even though I don't like gold
1:21:59
or like the idea of gold or own any
1:22:01
gold or like the
1:22:03
look of it like I
1:22:05
know other people do and much like
1:22:08
Bitcoin, what else is there when
1:22:10
they're just running the printing press
1:22:13
like night and day?
1:22:15
I don't know. What do you think about that one?
1:22:17
It's interesting. I think there are like,
1:22:20
theoretically, there should be a strong correlation between printing
1:22:22
a lot of money and inflation and the price
1:22:24
of gold going up. And
1:22:27
debt creation, but oftentimes
1:22:30
it doesn't happen. For example, there's
1:22:33
a ton of debt creation from the 1980s to 2000 and the price of
1:22:35
gold went
1:22:37
down a lot. So yeah, anything
1:22:40
can happen. I feel like
1:22:42
positive real rates, it
1:22:45
is correlated with
1:22:49
inflation adjusted interest rates. So real
1:22:51
rates going from negative to positive has
1:22:53
been a hindrance to gold and yet
1:22:55
it has rallied despite that, which
1:22:57
you could say it's gold's overvalued relative to that. Or
1:22:59
you could say, hey, something
1:23:01
bad happened and the price of gold didn't go down and went
1:23:03
up. So that's a contrary signal. So I
1:23:05
don't know. Yeah. Pocket of
1:23:08
strength and when it should be weak is
1:23:10
usually bullish. I'm
1:23:12
totally with you there. I mean, I'm
1:23:14
starting to think of gold and Bitcoin in the
1:23:16
same light. They're not necessarily inflation hedges or debt
1:23:19
hedges. They're debasement
1:23:22
hedges. And
1:23:25
the medicine that our
1:23:28
American economy should have taken in 2008 and again in
1:23:30
2020 was
1:23:34
evaded via
1:23:36
debasement by cutting
1:23:38
and printing. Debasement? How do you define
1:23:41
debasement? Just printing more money, transferring
1:23:43
risk from the balance sheets of
1:23:45
private individuals and companies onto the
1:23:47
central bank's balance sheet, buying of
1:23:50
the purchase en masse of
1:23:53
mortgage backed and other debt
1:23:55
obligations that should have been borne
1:23:57
by the consumer and got put on the government's balance sheet.
1:24:00
and paid for by basically printing,
1:24:02
right? To me, like
1:24:04
Bitcoin and gold protect you against that.
1:24:07
And so if whenever
1:24:09
the next crisis comes along, central
1:24:13
banks and treasuries and presidents of the world
1:24:15
and prime ministers have two options. Option one
1:24:17
is to take the medicine that should have
1:24:20
been taken in 2008 and again in 2020.
1:24:25
And again, in whatever this next crisis is. So
1:24:27
that'll be like three pills, but
1:24:29
the compounding effect of it all will
1:24:31
be more than, you know,
1:24:33
one plus one plus one equals three.
1:24:36
It'll be something larger than that, right?
1:24:38
So really, really bad
1:24:40
pill to take. Or they just
1:24:43
print us out of it again. I
1:24:46
think that no one has the courage to take
1:24:48
the former path or the mandate. And I think
1:24:50
that everybody's gonna go take the latter path. And
1:24:52
then I think that's when you get your parabolic
1:24:55
move in Bitcoin, that's when you get hyperinflation, that's
1:24:57
when you get fiat debasement. And I think
1:25:00
that's what probably drives, to
1:25:02
our point earlier in the conversation,
1:25:04
kind of like more adoption
1:25:06
of Bitcoin. And you probably get more gold
1:25:08
getting stashed on balance sheets too in central
1:25:10
banks for one reason, which is that like,
1:25:14
in addition to it holding its value during
1:25:16
these times, like let's
1:25:18
say you're China and you hold or
1:25:20
you held eight to $10 trillion
1:25:22
worth of US securities on your balance sheet. And
1:25:24
the US is starting to talk a little nasty
1:25:26
to you and threaten to cut
1:25:28
off your banking lines and punishes your neighbor Russia.
1:25:32
And you wanna invade Taiwan and do all
1:25:35
sorts of things the US doesn't want. You're
1:25:37
probably gonna start looking at like letting some
1:25:39
of those trillions roll off and you have
1:25:41
to replace it with something, right? Like gold
1:25:43
and Bitcoin are out there. They're not gonna
1:25:45
get debased by the US or sanctioned.
1:25:48
So I think it's
1:25:50
as much as I don't like gold
1:25:52
or identify with it or understand it,
1:25:54
like it's structurally it makes, it's
1:25:57
kind of hard not to be bullish, you know?
1:25:59
Yes. Final question for you Jonah is I know
1:26:01
you have a plan for
1:26:04
when you're gonna sell all of your crypto. When
1:26:06
is that time and does it depend
1:26:08
upon anything other than just
1:26:11
a timeline of regardless of when I'm gonna
1:26:13
sell this month at this day, this year?
1:26:15
Yeah, so great question. I
1:26:18
don't have a plan in price or
1:26:21
time space. I have
1:26:23
an indicator that I look at, it's
1:26:25
called MVRVZ. It
1:26:27
is the ratio of market
1:26:29
value, which is market cap to
1:26:32
realized value, which is like, how
1:26:35
do I explain this quickly? It's like
1:26:39
a price adjusted market cap. It's the price
1:26:41
at which basically
1:26:43
adjusted by the price at which Bitcoin
1:26:45
has last traded, right? So you can
1:26:47
tell like when Bitcoin moves
1:26:49
hands, there's like a way to measure
1:26:52
that. You can monitor things called UTXOs.
1:26:56
Basically, it's a measure
1:26:58
that shows you the ratio of
1:27:01
the market cap of Bitcoin to the market
1:27:04
cap of last transacted Bitcoin. And it
1:27:06
shows you whether the space
1:27:08
is like wildly in the money
1:27:10
or wildly underwater. And then
1:27:13
the Z part stands for Z score, which
1:27:15
is like, it just basically
1:27:17
translates that ratio into standard
1:27:19
deviation space. So are you
1:27:22
like historically underwater or historically
1:27:24
like euphoric and partying with
1:27:26
all your money as a Bitcoin
1:27:28
space? So when MVRVZ hits like
1:27:30
six or seven, well,
1:27:32
six or seven, I don't even
1:27:34
think it's standard deviations. It's just, I don't know
1:27:36
what the unit of this is. Like it tends
1:27:38
to be a great signal top. So whenever that
1:27:40
happens, I'm projecting, it
1:27:43
probably happens late next year. I'm
1:27:45
out. I'm probably gonna keep a little
1:27:47
bit just because you always learn
1:27:49
a little bit more when you have your finger on the pulse
1:27:51
and some skin in the game. But
1:27:53
I'm not gonna be shy about selling when it
1:27:56
gets there. That's my target. Usually
1:27:59
MVRV below. 2 is when you
1:28:01
buy and NPR be above 6 is when
1:28:03
you start to lighten up. Very interesting. Jonah,
1:28:05
thank you so much for coming on, sharing
1:28:08
your views. People can find you on Twitter
1:28:10
at jvb underscore xyz, as well as on
1:28:12
the excellent 1000x podcast on
1:28:14
the Blockworks podcast network. Thank you again,
1:28:16
Jonah, and thanks everyone for watching. Thank
1:28:19
you so much, Jack. Really appreciate you having me on
1:28:21
the show. Great conversation. Thanks
1:28:26
for watching. Remember to check out vanik.com/mote
1:28:28
FG to learn more about the Vanik
1:28:31
Morningstar Wide Mode ETF ticker M O
1:28:33
A T. Lastly, forward guidance is available
1:28:35
not just on YouTube, but on all
1:28:37
podcasts, apps and video version is available
1:28:40
on Spotify and Twitter where I post
1:28:42
interviews regularly. Thanks again. Until next time.
1:28:52
Transcribed by https://otter.ai
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More