Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:03
Good morning from the Financial Times. Today
0:05
is Thursday, July 4th, and this
0:07
is your FT News Briefing. SoftBank
0:11
is ditching share buybacks for
0:13
now, and Shell pulls the
0:16
plug on one of its largest clean
0:18
energy projects. Plus YouTube
0:20
wants to cash in on music
0:22
created by Artificial Intelligence. We're
0:25
not sure if record companies are going to allow it though.
0:28
I'm Mark Filipino and here's the news you need to start
0:31
your day. SoftBank
0:47
is shaking off pressure from activist
0:49
investor, Elliott Management. Elliott
0:51
has a position in SoftBank worth
0:53
more than $2 billion, and is
0:55
pushing SoftBank to greenlight a share
0:57
buyback. Elliott thinks that it
0:59
would shrink the gap between the value of
1:02
SoftBank's portfolio and its market value. But
1:05
SoftBank's chief financial officer basically told
1:07
the FT, nah, we're going
1:10
to invest in artificial intelligence instead. The
1:12
tech group's balance sheet has improved recently, and
1:14
Yoshimitsu Goto said hunting for AI deals
1:16
was a better use of it. Goto
1:19
did not rule out buybacks down the line
1:21
though. Shell
1:29
said this week it's pausing work
1:31
on a huge biofuels plant in
1:33
the Netherlands indefinitely. It was
1:36
supposed to be one of the biggest energy
1:38
transition projects in the world. And
1:40
so the stalled project is a setback for
1:42
the biofuels market. Malcolm
1:44
Morris, the FT's energy editor, and he joins me
1:47
now. Hi Malcolm. Hi there. All
1:49
right, Malcolm. So just tell me a little bit more about this
1:51
project. What was it supposed to be? Okay,
1:54
so the project was unveiled in 2021.
1:58
And back then, Shell... said
2:00
that this was going to be a key part
2:02
of its plans to reduce the
2:04
carbon intensity of its production. And
2:08
essentially what they were going to do is they were going to take
2:10
used cooking oil and
2:12
other animal waste and they were going
2:15
to transform all of that into sustainable
2:18
aviation fuel and also
2:21
biodiesel. And then earlier
2:23
this year they said, oh, actually the plant's
2:26
not going to be operational until the
2:28
latter part of this decade. And
2:31
then this week they said, actually, we need
2:33
to rethink the whole thing. And
2:35
they didn't give a timeframe for when it would be
2:37
operational. Why are
2:39
they putting this project on hold? Shell
2:42
said that they needed to look at it again in terms
2:45
of making sure they got the project
2:47
delivery right, which I'm taking as a
2:49
euphemism for they need to fix the
2:51
engineering. But also the market
2:53
isn't great for biofuels at the moment. And
2:56
I think that Shell's got a new
2:58
CEO. He's focusing more on delivering value
3:00
for shareholders. And he's
3:02
asked everybody to really look at the economics
3:04
of these things and ask themselves if they
3:07
work. Do me a favor.
3:09
Can you explain why biofuels are
3:12
under so much pressure at the moment? Yeah,
3:14
absolutely. So biofuels have been around for a
3:16
long time. And in fact,
3:19
here in the UK, when we fill up
3:21
our cars with diesel or petrol, gasoline, a
3:24
certain proportion of that is already biofuels.
3:26
It's blended into the fuel. So
3:28
oil companies and refineries really like
3:30
biofuels because essentially you don't really
3:32
need to modify your equipment that
3:34
much to produce them. They're
3:37
more sustainable. And you don't
3:39
need to change the engine of the car or anything else. So
3:41
in terms of meeting climate
3:43
targets, everybody has for a long
3:45
time now thought that biofuels are a good idea. The
3:48
issue is that there are lots of people
3:50
who are building capacity to make this stuff.
3:53
There's a lot of biofuels being imported into
3:55
Europe from China. That's really
3:57
depressed the price of biodiesel. And
4:00
that's basically meant that a lot of these plants
4:03
are not making enough money out of it. Seems
4:05
like Shell might not be the only one second
4:07
guessing their biofuels projects right now. So
4:09
all of the big oil companies have
4:11
got climate targets and over the last
4:13
few years, we've seen all of them
4:16
announce big things around biofuels, but
4:18
now we're reaching the stage where actually
4:20
you're seeing people start to pull back
4:22
a little bit. So just before Shell
4:24
made this announcement, BP said that they
4:26
were gonna scale back and maybe pause
4:29
some projects at their existing facilities. It's
4:31
probably the conversation in a lot of places. So
4:34
it sounds like it's a little bit of an
4:36
uphill battle to get the biofuels market back to
4:38
a point where it would have a significant impact
4:41
on the energy transition. What
4:44
would it take to get that done? Yeah,
4:47
so all of this stuff depends on
4:49
countries telling companies that they have to
4:51
produce this stuff because it's more expensive
4:54
than conventional fuel. And
4:56
at the moment, there are those regulations
4:58
in place, but people are a
5:00
little bit skeptical that the regulations are going
5:03
to survive. If there's a public outcry over
5:05
the cost of doing all of this, then
5:07
maybe the politicians will roll back a bit.
5:09
So we're in that phase where
5:11
people are thinking twice about their
5:13
investments because they're not 100% confident
5:16
that the regulations are gonna continue to exist in
5:18
their current form. Malcolm
5:20
Moore is the FT's energy editor. Thanks,
5:23
Malcolm. Thanks, Mark. The
5:32
artificial intelligence boom is putting the music
5:34
industry in a tight spot, and
5:36
YouTube is trying to take advantage of it. It's
5:39
created an AI generator that takes
5:42
actual music, you know, the kind
5:44
made by humans, to help the programs
5:46
learn. The company is
5:48
testing it out on a short-form video
5:51
platform called YouTube Shorts, but the jury
5:53
is still out on how the music
5:55
industry feels about it. I'm
5:57
joined now by the FT's Anna Nicole Aube. She covers
5:59
U.S. media. for the FT. Hi, Anna. Hi,
6:02
Mark. How are you? I'm doing
6:04
well. Thanks for joining us. So
6:06
can you explain to me how YouTube's
6:08
AI song generator works? Yeah,
6:10
so I guess firstly, to be clear, the song generator,
6:12
as it stands right now, is still in kind of a
6:14
test phase. It was only
6:16
kind of a handful of musicians that signed
6:19
up for
6:21
the initial test program. So
6:23
on YouTube Shorts, right now if
6:25
you go on the platform, you can see that some creators
6:27
do have access to this AI song generator
6:29
and have been kind of playing around with it. And
6:31
I mean, the way it works is pretty
6:33
simple. It's, you
6:36
know, you have a prompt, which is the same
6:39
as kind of in chat GPT, where you enter
6:41
text, might say like, give
6:43
me a song that sounds like Drake,
6:45
but singing Dolly Parton, but with lyrics
6:47
that sound like Johnny Cash or something,
6:50
whatever it might be. And then it plays
6:52
back a clip for you. So,
6:54
Anna, is YouTube trying to expand this beyond
6:57
just a test program? So
7:00
YouTube is trying to make it bigger and make
7:02
it a proper product. It's about kind of enticing
7:04
people to Shorts and making them want to stay
7:06
there and watch videos there
7:08
and make videos for Shorts. They've
7:10
recently kind of come to these big music companies
7:13
and said, what if we just pay you, you
7:15
know, a lump sum of money in exchange
7:17
for bringing more of your artists into this
7:20
and allowing more of their music to be
7:22
used to train our AI. And
7:25
that is, it's quite different from
7:28
on Spotify or Apple Music or these
7:30
more established streaming services. They
7:32
have a fairly sophisticated payment structure
7:35
based on streams. This
7:37
would be more of kind of an ad hoc solution.
7:40
So that's kind of the model they're
7:42
looking at right now. And as
7:44
far as I know, talks are happening live.
7:48
How is this different from, I mean, I'm
7:50
old enough to remember like the wild west
7:53
of the music era of the internet with like
7:55
Napster. The Lime Wire
7:57
days? Exactly, exactly.
8:01
Yeah, I mean, there's very clear parallels
8:03
here, right? It's copyright infringement. It's
8:06
this kind of robots versus
8:08
humanity. I think there's definitely
8:10
a sense, and I hear this a lot
8:12
in talking to people in the music industry,
8:14
is that they don't want to do what
8:16
they did that time around. There's this view
8:18
that that time around, they really got caught
8:20
flat-footed and they were kind
8:23
of slow to adapt and,
8:25
you know, they were suing teenagers
8:27
in, like, Kentucky. So I think
8:30
they genuinely are trying to find
8:32
ways to kind of go
8:34
with the wave rather than just pushing
8:36
against it. They're very, very interested in
8:38
not getting themselves into that situation again.
8:42
So we've been talking a lot about
8:44
stuff that had big impacts
8:46
on the music industry. These
8:48
free download sites like LimeWire,
8:50
streaming services, and now artificial
8:52
intelligence. To what
8:54
degree does AI have the potential to
8:57
transform the music industry? Yeah,
8:59
I think it's interesting because
9:01
even with this experiment with YouTube,
9:04
it's not clear to me that everyone is
9:07
going to want to be spending their time
9:09
making AI songs. Like,
9:12
it kind of feels gimmicky in a
9:14
sense. It'll be different from
9:16
Spotify and the, quote, professional catalog, and
9:18
it'll be more of a social media
9:21
thing. The other side of it, further,
9:23
I guess the more extreme view is
9:25
that AI will, in a lot
9:27
of ways, take the place of generic
9:30
music. That could pretty easily
9:32
be replaced, you would think. Like
9:35
elevator music or food music? Yeah, all kinds of things
9:37
like that. Even like they call it, like, music for hire. I
9:40
probably lean towards the other side of it more and
9:43
I don't see it really replacing real people.
9:46
I think there's, like, a very emotional connection
9:48
that people feel to, like, their favorite artists.
9:51
And I don't particularly see that being
9:54
just crushed away by this. But
9:56
yeah, maybe I'm overly unconcerned. I don't
9:59
know. Anna Nicolaou
10:01
is the FT's U.S. media correspondent. Thanks as
10:03
always, Anna. Thanks so much. Before
10:12
we go, I don't need to remind you
10:14
that a lot of our friends in the U.K. are heading
10:16
to the polls today. The country
10:18
is holding a general election, and
10:20
even before anyone had voted,
10:23
conservatives were already waving a
10:25
white flag. One
10:27
Tory minister said this could turn out
10:29
to be, quote, the largest labor landslide
10:31
majority that this country has ever seen.
10:34
We'll have more on the results tomorrow from
10:37
our U.K. colleagues. Stay tuned.
10:46
This has been your daily FT news briefing.
10:48
Make sure you check back tomorrow for the
10:50
latest business news. Sooner
11:11
or later, you'll need to upgrade your tech, but
11:13
you don't have to pay full price. Consider
11:15
BackMarket, a leading online marketplace for
11:17
refurbished smartphones, laptops, tablets, and other
11:20
tech, all up to 70% less
11:23
than brand new. Each device sold on
11:25
BackMarket is tested and restored to perfect
11:27
working condition by industry experts, and they
11:29
all come with a one-year warranty and
11:31
30 days to change your mind. So
11:34
never pay full price for tech again.
11:36
Visit the BackMarket app or backmarket.com to
11:38
save up to 70% on your next
11:40
device.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More