Podchaser Logo
Home
A Genocidal Massacre is Looming in Darfur

A Genocidal Massacre is Looming in Darfur

Released Monday, 6th May 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
A Genocidal Massacre is Looming in Darfur

A Genocidal Massacre is Looming in Darfur

A Genocidal Massacre is Looming in Darfur

A Genocidal Massacre is Looming in Darfur

Monday, 6th May 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

the international community must prepare for

0:02

the worst. The worst is that

0:05

the RSA will attack on fashion. How

0:07

the international community can prepare for that, I

0:09

think they must provide safe

0:12

areas and safe

0:14

passage for civilians who

0:17

may flee areas of

0:19

risk. Welcome

0:23

to Global Dispatches, a podcast for

0:25

the foreign policy and global development

0:28

communities and anyone who wants a

0:30

deeper understanding of what is driving

0:32

events in the world today. I'm

0:35

your host, Mark Leon Goldberg. I

0:37

am a veteran international affairs journalist

0:39

and the editor of UN Dispatch.

0:42

Enjoy the show. Looking

0:56

for a trustworthy podcast to bring

0:58

you unfiltered viewpoints and experiences on

1:00

global health? Tune into

1:02

Global Health Matters, the podcast

1:05

that connects silos and amplifies

1:07

diverse voices to give you

1:09

a holistic picture. Each

1:11

month, Dr. Gary S. Lanyon from

1:14

the World Health Organization hosts discussions

1:16

with guests spanning former ministers of

1:19

health, award-winning journalists and authors, and

1:21

frontline public health workers. Join

1:24

listeners from across 180 countries

1:26

for an exciting season four,

1:29

launching in June. Global

1:31

Health Matters is available on Apple

1:34

Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube. El

1:40

Fashir is the largest city in

1:43

Sudan's Darfur region. It

1:45

is also one of the only

1:47

cities in Darfur that has not

1:49

fallen to the paramilitary rapid support

1:52

forces in a civil war which

1:54

broke out last year. However,

1:57

at time of recording, it looks as

1:59

if an attack on al-Fasher

2:01

was imminent. The

2:03

RSF has surrounded the city and is

2:05

laying siege. The United

2:07

States, United Nations and key players

2:10

around the world are urging against

2:12

this impending attack but it is

2:14

not clear that the RSF will

2:16

be restrained. There

2:18

are deep concerns for the fate of at

2:20

least 800,000 people trapped

2:23

in al-Fasher for the fact

2:25

that the RSF is a

2:27

genocidal militia. The

2:29

RSF is the rebranded Janjaweed

2:31

militia which carried out the

2:34

Darfur genocide 20 years ago

2:37

and since a full-scale civil war broke

2:39

out in Sudan in April 2023 the

2:43

RSF has reprised many

2:45

of their genocidal tactics

2:47

of targeting non-Arab ethnicities

2:49

in Darfur for annihilation.

2:53

My guest today Mutasim Ali is

2:55

a legal advisor at the Raoul

2:57

Wallenberg Center for Human Rights. Last

3:00

week the Wallenberg Center published

3:03

a report of compiled evidence

3:05

demonstrating that genocide is ongoing

3:07

in Darfur and is being

3:10

perpetrated by the RSF against

3:12

non-Arab groups. We

3:15

discuss at length how they came to

3:17

that conclusion. Mutasim

3:19

Ali is also from al-Fasher so

3:21

we discuss the looming RSF assault

3:24

on that city and what

3:26

if anything can be done to prevent

3:28

this attack. Sudan is

3:31

the largest humanitarian crisis in

3:33

the world. This episode

3:35

is part of our ongoing

3:37

series on the atrocities in

3:39

Darfur and the civil war

3:41

in Sudan which unfortunately is

3:43

getting scant media attention at

3:46

least compared to the sheer scale

3:48

of this ongoing calamity. Please

3:51

support this effort by becoming a paying

3:53

subscriber to Global Dispatches

3:56

by visiting globaldispatches.org or upgrading

3:58

your or a

4:00

subscription in the Apple Podcasts app.

4:03

We are able to do these

4:06

kinds of episodes with such frequency

4:08

because of listener support. So

4:10

thank you. You can visit

4:13

the show notes of this episode

4:15

to find links to globaldispatches.org. Now

4:19

here is my conversation with Mutasim

4:21

Ali, legal advisor at the Raoul

4:24

Wallenberg Center for Human Rights. Thank

4:30

you. So

4:43

we are gonna be spending the

4:45

bulk of our conversation today discussing

4:47

the actions of the Rapid Support

4:49

Forces, the RSF. This is something

4:51

I've discussed a lot on the

4:53

show in the past year, but

4:55

can you just describe the conduct,

4:57

the activities of the RSF

5:00

in Darfur since

5:02

the start of this full-blown

5:05

civil war a

5:07

year ago in April? I

5:09

just wanna note that the RSF, now

5:12

that fighting the Sudanese Armed Forces,

5:15

they were actually aligned together

5:17

in the beginning of the Darfur

5:20

conflict. They were created by the

5:22

Sudanese government. They were

5:24

trained by the Sudanese Armed Forces. And

5:27

so they were working together in

5:30

committing atrocities in Darfur.

5:32

So they were partners in crime

5:34

in the early 2000s genocide. Now

5:37

the current war, the

5:39

fallout between the Rapid Support Forces

5:41

and the Sudanese Armed Forces occurred

5:44

on April 15th, 2023. There

5:48

were many reasons. Some of them say

5:50

power struggle, struggle

5:53

for more economic resources, fear

5:55

of accountability and the like.

5:58

But what is really clear. here

6:00

is that the two generals, the

6:02

commander of the Sudanese armed forces of Burhan

6:05

and Hometi, who is the commander of the

6:07

weapons support forces, his full

6:09

name is Muhammad Hamdan Dagalu. Better

6:11

known as Hometi. Yes, everybody knows

6:14

him as Hometi. And

6:16

so really the underlying crisis between

6:18

the two generals is really the

6:21

competition for power. To

6:23

the RSF's context in

6:25

the context of the current war, I

6:28

must note that the weapons support

6:30

forces, the RSF, never

6:32

cease to commit atrocities in Darfur,

6:35

even during the transitional period, especially

6:38

in Western Fall. During

6:41

the transitional period in 2019 and 2020 and 2021, the RSF

6:47

committed a series of ethnically

6:50

motivated attacks against the

6:53

misleading Western Fall. Of

6:55

course, there are many other incidents in

6:58

North Darfur in an area called

7:00

Pawila or in Kabir or in

7:02

South Darfur in Greer, but there

7:04

are many, many I can cite

7:06

a number of incidents committed by the RSF.

7:09

And so the RSF really never cease to

7:12

commit atrocities. The

7:14

significance of the current

7:16

conflict and the war between the Sudanese

7:19

armed forces and

7:21

the R forces

7:37

and therefore they became the target.

7:40

This is what they said in many

7:42

of their statements when they launched their

7:44

attack in Western Fall. And

7:46

so basically the fallout between the weapons

7:48

support forces and the Sudanese armed forces

7:51

served as an execute for the RSF

7:53

to commit more atrocities. So now they

7:56

commit atrocities really

7:58

widespread. the

8:00

guise of we're defending ourselves,

8:02

we're fighting for democracy, and

8:05

we're fighting the remnants of the old regime.

8:08

And so part of their

8:11

policy is to besiege cities

8:14

before they actually attack them. Then

8:18

they loot shops, hospitals, you

8:20

know, warehouses. And the idea

8:22

was really to weaken the

8:25

society and to make their

8:27

attack a lot more easier to prevent

8:29

any resistance. Of

8:31

course, they also commit

8:34

rape as a weapon

8:36

of war. This has been a systematic

8:39

murder of Brande since

8:41

early 2000s. Most of

8:43

the contacts that we see today are exact

8:46

same as in early 2000s. And

8:50

having covered that earlier genocide,

8:52

you know, the ostensible

8:54

reason for the first genocide

8:58

was that these groups would attack

9:00

the civilian population from which an

9:02

insurgency against the government, which was

9:04

then aligned with the RSF and

9:07

John Deweed. But

9:09

now you have the RSF attacking

9:11

the Muslim population in West Darfur

9:14

because they ostensibly believe

9:17

them to be aligned with the government who they're

9:19

fighting in this civil war.

9:23

That is precise. So we've seen

9:26

mass movement of Muslim people

9:28

from places where the RSF

9:30

have taken over. People

9:33

are kind of voting with their

9:35

feet. They're fleeing for fear of

9:37

being attacked based on their ethnicity.

9:40

What evidence have you

9:42

compiled thus far that these

9:44

attacks amount to genocide, which

9:46

is a very high

9:48

legal threshold to cross? I mean,

9:51

we've seen reports since the start

9:53

of this civil war of all

9:56

sorts of atrocities. But

9:58

what makes you certain? that

10:00

these atrocities have crossed that threshold to

10:02

genocide? The primary

10:05

source of our evidence is

10:07

the open source

10:09

information, right? And that is

10:11

purposeful because we

10:13

want to say that everything we say

10:16

it is already out there with nothing

10:18

confidential about the evidence we

10:20

cite. And so we relied

10:23

heavily on reports. Some

10:25

of the reports cover victims

10:27

testimonies especially those who fled

10:30

to Eastern Chad, Adri. And

10:33

so that's really the primary source of

10:35

our evidence. I must

10:37

also say that the

10:39

report is endorsed by

10:41

world-leading experts in the field,

10:44

lawyers, international jurists, academics,

10:47

former prosecutors, international

10:49

tribunals, former prosecutor

10:51

of the ICC and former UN

10:54

officials and the like. Very

10:56

comprehensive despite the fact that

10:58

or maybe because of the fact that

11:00

it relies on such a volume of

11:02

open source material it really is you

11:04

know indeed like a comprehensive collection of

11:08

many of the crimes that the RSF

11:10

have committed in Darfur since the start

11:13

of the conflict. But I guess I'm

11:15

wondering what makes you think that these

11:17

crimes rise to that level

11:19

of genocide? The major question that

11:21

we face in making analysis is in

11:23

order to establish the crime of genocide

11:26

really you have to prove that the

11:28

acts were committed with intent to

11:30

destroy and hold or impart a

11:33

protected group. There is quite

11:36

agreement among most

11:38

scholars and those who document the

11:40

situation in Darfur that the acts were committed

11:43

in Darfur are

11:45

ethnically motivated nature right like

11:48

basically targeting particular ethnic groups.

11:50

These are protected groups. This

11:53

was established even by the ICC

11:55

in the first ever indictment against

11:57

Bashir right. Masalid is a protected group. group.

12:01

Now we established that the Maasai-DS is

12:03

a protected group. We established

12:05

that the acts that were committed are

12:08

genocidal acts and now the major

12:10

question is whether there is actually

12:13

an intent to destroy the Maasai-DS in

12:15

the whole important part. And that's

12:17

always the most difficult part of any

12:19

genocide case. I mean you could have

12:21

lots of crimes on the ground. You

12:23

could have evidence of mass graves and

12:25

mass killing and ethnic cleansing but what

12:28

makes genocide unique is that in order to

12:30

be proven there has to be that intent

12:32

to destroy a group in a

12:34

whole or in part. So how was it

12:36

that you were able to establish

12:39

that genocidal intent? First

12:42

we referenced earlier incidents, right?

12:44

The incitement to genocide, implicit

12:47

incitement, explicit incitement and then

12:49

we compared them with recent

12:52

incitement rhetoric in West Darfur, right? Like

12:54

we're here to kill all of them,

12:56

so leave. So it's just leave. This

12:58

is the land of Arabs and that

13:00

Maasalid and killing the Maasalid boys and

13:02

so we documented that very

13:04

well. Although there

13:07

is no written policy to

13:10

say that the RSF actually

13:12

intended to kill or to

13:14

wipe out the Maasalid, the

13:17

pattern of conduct and the incitement

13:20

followed by their actions, right? The

13:22

rape and the systematic depopulation of

13:24

Maasalid and execution of Maasalid searching

13:26

them house by house made

13:29

us believe that the only reasonable inference

13:32

from all these conduct is the intent

13:35

to destroy the Maasalid in whole

13:37

or in part as investigators,

13:39

right? We are not a court of

13:41

law and therefore our

13:43

standard of proof is not like

13:46

no one would be using the court

13:48

of law, right? It's not beyond reasonable

13:50

doubt. We use with

13:52

clear and convincing evidence, right? This

13:54

is being used also in other

13:56

contexts by the ICCS

13:58

wall and therefore For based

14:01

on the evidence that we collected, there

14:03

is no way that you can infer

14:05

any other than the

14:07

intent to destroy the Mesalite group

14:09

in whole or in part. Can

14:12

you just give by way of example

14:15

any specific evidence that

14:17

you think is really kind of

14:19

conclusive to your determination? O'Four

14:31

towards Adri in Chad

14:34

and on their way to Adri,

14:36

to a few decabin, is from

14:38

Chad, there were many

14:41

RSF checkpoints and

14:44

so women with infants,

14:46

like even six months old, were

14:49

sourced to check whether they are males

14:51

or females. If they were males, then

14:53

they would be killed immediately. And

14:56

the argument is that the RSF will kill the

14:58

boys to prevent them from

15:00

being fighters in the future. And

15:03

this is sort of accusation and

15:05

mirror, right? We're speaking of

15:07

MVA, six months old, and there are many

15:10

incidents of this sort. Then

15:13

you will find evidence

15:15

of the RSF

15:18

fighters going to houses, searching

15:20

for Mesalite, just to execute

15:22

them. And

15:25

incidents of rape. As they

15:27

commit rape, they would say, this

15:29

is the land of Arabs, there will

15:32

be no Mesalite anymore and we will

15:34

execute you all. The best

15:36

option for you is to flee to Chad, for example.

15:38

And so there are really series of shocking

15:41

incidents that we

15:43

can continue to narrate, but all

15:46

indicate that the RSF actually intended

15:48

to eradicate Mesalite

15:50

from their land. And

15:52

your report makes clear, these weren't just isolated incidents.

15:54

It was a very common pattern

15:56

of behavior over the course of the year

15:58

that led to the end to

16:00

your genocide conclusion. One really

16:04

interesting thing about your report is

16:06

that while it does establish, I

16:08

think, conclusively, that RSF is committing

16:10

genocide, it also suggests

16:12

very strongly that certain

16:15

state parties to the Genocide Convention

16:17

like the United Arab Emirates and

16:19

CHAD are complicit as

16:22

well. Could you describe

16:24

how it is you concluded,

16:26

for example, that the United Arab

16:28

Emirates is also implicated in the

16:31

genocide of the mazalit by

16:33

the RSF? The

16:35

relationship between the RSF and

16:37

the United Arab Emirates goes

16:40

back to 2014 when

16:43

the RSF soldiers were

16:45

sent to Yemen to fight on behalf of

16:47

the Emiratis and Saudis, right? They were getting

16:49

a lot of financial support,

16:52

military supplies and the like. But

16:55

since the outbreak of the April 2023

16:57

war, we've been able to document

17:02

and read many other

17:04

credible reports about

17:07

the UAE's direct support

17:09

of the RSF. These

17:12

reports include UN panel

17:14

of experts on Sudan, other

17:17

open-source investigative journalists

17:19

that commented the

17:22

UAE's support through Libya,

17:25

through CHAD, through

17:27

Central African Republic, and

17:30

were able to also see that

17:32

the UAE is using CHAD as

17:35

a place to support

17:38

the RSF by building sort

17:40

of a got humanitarian

17:42

hospital in Israel and

17:44

Chad in Jorah city.

17:47

Also not just humanitarian hospital, hospital to

17:49

serve as a... It was a pretext,

17:51

right? I remember reading that report. It's

17:54

basically the UAE established

17:56

this quote-unquote hospital at an airport

17:58

in Chad. but used

18:01

the idea that they were transporting humanitarian

18:03

goods as a cover to actually transport

18:05

arms and munitions to the RSF, which

18:08

they then used to carry out their

18:10

genocide against the Muslim people. Right. And

18:13

so there was really quite

18:15

extensive evidence of

18:17

the UAE using chat

18:19

as a place to support

18:22

the RSF. And

18:25

of course we have other confidential evidence

18:27

that we have not used in our

18:29

report, but again, the UAE

18:32

support is quite well-documented, including,

18:35

as I mentioned, by the UN panel

18:37

of experts on Sudan. And

18:40

actually even the US found those

18:42

reporting as credible. It

18:44

seems at this point you have this situation where

18:47

the most powerful army in

18:49

Sudan is the RSF. They

18:52

are committing genocide against the Muslim

18:54

people and are being supported by

18:56

a very wealthy country that carries

18:58

a lot of diplomatic weight in

19:00

the UAE and the

19:03

neighboring country, Chad. Absolutely. It's

19:05

like a recipe for complete

19:07

disaster. Right. And by

19:09

the way, the UAE is support

19:11

or complicity. It's not only because

19:13

of funding military supplies to the

19:15

RSF through Chad or Central African

19:17

Republic or Libya, but also the

19:19

fact that some of the RSF

19:22

affiliated companies are based in the UAE.

19:24

For example, some of the companies that were

19:27

recently sanctioned by the US

19:29

government, by the Canadian government, by

19:31

the UK government, and by the

19:33

EU as well, to NATO

19:35

and to ADIF. And these

19:37

are basically like front companies that are

19:39

used to make money for the RSF.

19:41

Exactly. And therefore what

19:44

we're saying is that under

19:46

the genocide convention, to

19:48

which the UAE is a third party, the

19:51

UAE could have acted to prevent,

19:54

right, because it has

19:56

leverage over the RSF, right. And

19:58

it failed to do so. This is number one. And second,

20:01

it is actually also complicit

20:03

in providing funds and

20:06

arms. And there

20:08

is no chance that the

20:10

RSF could actually sustain this

20:12

long fight without having a

20:14

backing from a state like the UAE.

20:17

So, we are speaking on Thursday, May 2nd.

20:21

And by the time this episode

20:23

is released, it may be the

20:25

fact that the RSF is

20:28

attacking or has already attacked

20:30

one of the largest cities

20:32

in the region, al-Fashir. The

20:35

United States government, the UN, everyone

20:37

is saying, please do not attack

20:39

this city. This is going

20:42

to cause a humanitarian catastrophe. If

20:45

indeed the RSF does

20:47

carry out this attack

20:49

on al-Fashir, what

20:51

would you expect to happen based

20:54

on all that you know about

20:56

the RSF? So

20:58

definitely the consequences would

21:00

be more

21:03

catastrophic in terms

21:05

of numbers than what we

21:07

have seen in Al-Janaina. The

21:09

capital of West Darfur, which

21:11

RSF sacked over there last

21:13

summer? Right. And there

21:16

are a couple of reasons why I

21:19

believe that al-Fashir will be more tragic.

21:22

Al-Fashir now is home to, according to

21:24

the UN, 800,000 people. And

21:30

I'm from North Darfur al-Fashir and

21:32

I believe this number is inaccurate.

21:34

The population of Al-Fashir is way,

21:36

way bigger than this. But

21:39

let's rely on the UN numbers. There

21:42

are about 800,000 people. Most

21:44

of these people have already displaced

21:46

from other places that are captured

21:49

by the RSF. Displays

21:52

Have been displaced for more than 20

21:55

years since the first genocide, right? the

21:57

11 and IDP, the Infamous Displace Process.

22:00

The around and faster. Oh,

22:02

because of this huge number

22:05

of people either. Flasher. The.

22:07

Attack on our fashion by

22:10

the Rsf would definitely result

22:12

in more casualties. This number

22:14

one, number two. In.

22:16

As in a now capital of for stuff

22:19

for. Sale was. Perhaps.

22:21

A walkable distance to move. And.

22:24

Was seated was eg. com but his swing set.

22:27

In. Or Pfizer. There's

22:29

no possible way that people

22:31

can flee. To. Chat. And

22:34

prices in the middle of promise?

22:36

nowhere? And it

22:38

is now is so called by the

22:40

Rss. And so basically people have

22:42

no way to flee to. Adding.

22:45

To this. It is now dry

22:47

season is them. And advice

22:49

was router with. Desert land.

22:52

And. So even if people were able

22:55

to leave the city of a

22:57

faster. Probably. They wouldn't

22:59

be able to survive. The. Desert. And

23:03

therefore. And. Attack on and faster.

23:05

Would. Definitely. Be.

23:07

A lot more. Isaac. And.

23:10

It is exactly that reason

23:12

why we think I'll report

23:14

is timely. In. Loading the

23:16

international community. And people

23:19

of consists. To. Prevent.

23:21

Would. We have seen already. He

23:23

has janine and in other parts of door

23:26

for. From. Happening again in

23:28

a fight or anywhere else in.for.

23:30

The I mean this is the

23:33

same set of actors of once

23:35

again surrounding and trying to sack

23:37

as city you well documented their

23:40

intent to be genocidal. your you

23:42

said you are from El Fasher.

23:44

What are you hearing from people

23:46

in the city right now who

23:49

are essentially trap presumably some of

23:51

your your friends and family. Absolutely

23:54

speaking to. People.

23:56

They're just t. Know.

23:58

How they're doing. And how they

24:00

feel about the sufficient what are the

24:03

ways week and hub and people just

24:05

this hurt right A lot of people

24:07

as Saudi gave up a mean there

24:09

is no where they can go and

24:11

even if they are some pathways people

24:13

didn't have the means to leave and

24:16

faster and therefore people just giving up

24:18

and this a you know would wait

24:20

for all faith this and that the

24:22

first time dates and gulf fleeing for

24:24

safety of this is be a consistent

24:26

Wales live for them disorders. Part about

24:29

this is that. For a lot

24:31

of people in a fire, sure. He. Became

24:33

part of their daily a

24:36

superiors to hear gunshots and

24:38

people being cozy and there

24:41

and is. On. Forced him

24:43

to normalize something like that and therefore,

24:45

I think people, really. Willy. Nilly.

24:48

Giving up for what is to com because

24:50

they used in a see. A

24:52

way out of this. Unless. The.

24:55

International Community Act decisively.

24:58

And tend to course of history but

25:00

people they're not really hopping a lot

25:02

because in or as a commune has

25:05

already fell several times and the consists

25:07

of Door For and so. That.

25:09

Is the saddest emitter We continue to hear from

25:11

people there. Do. You suspect

25:13

that this attack will happen. You.

25:15

Know I have reason to believe that

25:17

this attack is imminent and in it

25:19

is really a matter of. When.

25:22

Not if because the aura of

25:24

is determined and I take them

25:26

by the words. They. Take and

25:28

feist of as. A military

25:30

objectives and the in circles on

25:33

they took you know the ways

25:35

nine to eleven. Villages.

25:37

with a foster. They

25:40

took one of the biggest cities in

25:42

northern of us have caused believe. This.

25:44

Is sort of a gateway to Alsace

25:46

you it's a big city and ah

25:48

for at that most of the humanitarian

25:50

aid or supplies come through Millie. And.

25:53

So everything that the aura of is

25:55

doing these days they will he indicated

25:58

there with identifies of as. About

26:00

when and then of course, in addition to that,

26:03

The. Same incitement. That.

26:05

We have or. Guess.

26:08

The. Mythology and was duffel but now

26:10

be used against as a gallon

26:12

for in north.for and these are

26:14

two other ethnic groups. the Muslim

26:16

are are not predominant in Northern

26:18

Darfur, but does Zoc our and

26:20

the For our predominant in El

26:23

Fasher. And and your concern that

26:25

you're here in the same kind

26:27

of anti Muslim rhetoric that we

26:29

heard earlier now again targeting these

26:31

other non Arab ethnic groups. Absolutely.

26:33

And these are the indications that

26:35

will make us believe that the

26:37

Rss. Is. Going T. Attack.

26:40

Us faster and less. The or

26:42

is really a big thing happens

26:45

on the international community spirit and

26:47

of course the ongoing recruitment from

26:49

all parts of Darfur. You know

26:51

the are as of now taking

26:54

control of for other states and

26:56

door for now they have the

26:58

access to a lot more resources

27:00

but also easy to is to

27:03

people and record people. And

27:05

other assays to come and join their

27:07

fighters in North Darfur. and so. There.

27:10

Is room and I'm going with

27:12

was miss our combined with deliberate

27:14

incitement against particular ethnic groups for

27:16

and the Gower case and that's

27:19

what makes us believe that the

27:21

Rss will attack and fi stuff.

27:23

And it is about when. Than.

27:25

That if. As. You

27:27

said this attack really does

27:29

seem imminent. Your It could

27:31

be that by the time

27:34

this episode is released, that

27:36

attack is ongoing. I'm wondering

27:38

though, is stopping the Rsf

27:40

from attacking El Fasher at

27:42

this point? A matter of

27:44

international diplomacy. specifically. Countries.

27:46

Like the United States more

27:48

heavily leaning on Rsf enablers

27:50

like the Uae he to

27:53

rain them in is that

27:55

the most. Perhaps. Direct

27:57

pressure points that my

27:59

for. B us have to change

28:01

their calculus at this point. Or.

28:03

Is there anything that could change their calculus? Sula.

28:06

Given the. Eminent. Thread

28:08

that. People. Are and

28:10

Fi surveys seen many. The thing

28:13

that the best. Way. To

28:15

prevent atrocities is peacekeeping mission trade.

28:17

but given the current said authors

28:20

a d to thirty thousand the

28:22

dynamic the this is unlikely and

28:24

so what does the next from

28:27

the probably wouldn't influence that has

28:29

on and Pfizer. definitely a direct

28:31

pressure on the way He given

28:33

the lovely the day you he

28:36

has over the are safe and

28:38

it's leaders this is going to

28:40

be extremely helpful again because the

28:43

Are as if relies heavily. On.

28:45

The you a you the

28:47

support second. I. Think. The.

28:50

Right price or of perhaps

28:52

even target is sizes or

28:54

even an arrest warrant. Against.

28:57

The commander of the Rsf

28:59

him as thou would definitely

29:01

influence the situation as well.

29:03

One of the reasons why

29:05

the hours of fighters continue

29:07

to commit atrocities without fear

29:09

and often time. actually Latino

29:11

broke has its on social

29:14

media platforms right? Twitter, Tic

29:16

Toc, Facebook, and like. Because

29:19

they do not fear accountability.

29:21

The. Has never been. A

29:23

transitional Just as even didn't

29:26

transitional period. And

29:28

so that revelus of impunity.

29:31

Sort. Of awarded the Rss because the

29:33

war is paying off for them they

29:35

can do They can make. More

29:37

money and therefore by targeting

29:40

the news. They. May

29:42

fear. As. So I think. Those.

29:45

Are the direct things that. People.

29:47

Can do a didn't and on some

29:49

level. But. Also, I think. That

29:52

would. Not going t hundred percent

29:55

the doors of another type of

29:57

fashion. That. definitely will inflows of

29:59

the ways and but probably

30:01

would delay the attack on alfashire. But

30:03

I do think that the international community

30:06

must prepare for the worst. And the

30:08

worst is that the RSL will attack

30:10

alfashire. How the international community

30:12

can prepare for that, I think they

30:14

must provide safe areas

30:18

and safe passage for civilians

30:20

who may flee areas

30:22

of risk. So

30:26

your answer just now, and the

30:28

report on genocide in

30:31

Darfur demands a key

30:33

question. What opportunities

30:35

exist for accountability for

30:38

war crimes that have

30:40

been committed to include

30:43

genocide? On

30:45

normal circumstances, the

30:47

most effective way to halt

30:50

perpetrators' account will be domestic

30:52

accountability mechanisms. But

30:54

this is absent in the case of

30:56

Sudan. We don't have even a functioning

30:58

government in the country. And therefore we

31:00

cannot rely on

31:03

national or domestic mechanism. And

31:06

so now we're left with few options

31:08

at the international level, and

31:10

perhaps at the regional level, at

31:12

the African Union, maybe if there

31:14

is a political will, they

31:17

can establish special tribunals, right?

31:19

It's a prosecute perpetrators. But

31:22

I also see that as

31:24

unlikely, given how some of

31:26

the African states are welcoming Hometi

31:29

and the leaders of the RSF

31:31

in South Africa, for example,

31:34

in Ethiopia, Kenya, Uganda, Djibouti,

31:36

and the like, even

31:38

Rwanda. And therefore I think the

31:41

only way is international mechanisms.

31:43

That includes the International Criminal

31:45

Court, the ICC. And

31:48

now I know that the prosecutor general

31:50

is investigating the situation in

31:52

Darfur, especially in West

31:54

Darfur. And I hope that there

31:57

will be a West Warren sometime soon. Of course,

31:59

there are already. already seven individuals have been

32:01

indicted by the ICC before only one

32:03

person has been on trial right now,

32:05

right? Which is in a service, unfortunately,

32:08

makes a lot of people do not believe

32:10

in the international mechanisms. But this

32:12

is the only thing that we have at this point

32:14

in time. Then the second thing

32:16

this is what we rely on a

32:19

lot is the case before International Court

32:21

of Justice, the ICJ. The

32:23

ICJ, hopefully what we will do is

32:26

to bring a case against

32:28

states that we identified as

32:30

complicit in the Dafrojuna side.

32:33

But as an organization or a

32:36

private town, this would not be

32:38

able to bring case before ICJ. You need

32:40

a government. We need a government. Do you

32:42

have any governments that you think might step

32:44

up as plaintiffs in a

32:46

case against, you know,

32:48

the way the ICJ works is that

32:50

the ICJ is where countries go to

32:52

sue other countries, the countries that would

32:54

be defendants here, presumably would be the

32:56

UAE and Chad. The ICJ is not

32:59

a forum where the RSF would defend

33:01

itself because it's not a state vector.

33:03

So are there like plaintiffs in

33:05

the waiting countries that would take up the

33:07

cause? We haven't reached out to states at

33:09

this point in time, but this is going

33:11

to be one of our

33:13

missions to make sure

33:16

that the ICJ will remain irrelevant. Accountability

33:18

forum, at least for states complicit

33:21

in the genocide in Dafrojuna.

33:24

As to the RSF, of course, you know,

33:26

there is a lack

33:28

on international legal frameworks that we

33:31

cannot really prosecute entities. There's no

33:33

legal framework for that. But I

33:35

think for the RSF, we

33:37

leave that to the ICC and other

33:40

hopefully additional mechanisms. Because the

33:42

ICC, of course, does have the

33:45

capacity to prosecute

33:47

individuals, whether they're state

33:49

actors or non-state actors, as opposed to the

33:51

ICJ, which only adjudicates

33:53

disputes between states. Right.

33:56

I don't know. I heard South Africa is interested

33:58

in genocide. So maybe- can get

34:00

them on board. I think this is

34:02

an excellent idea. I was wondering whether, I

34:05

mean, you know, we would have hoped that

34:07

a country like South Africa would take a

34:10

case like this, looking at the continent, you

34:12

know, but definitely we'll pursue

34:14

every avenue to make sure that the

34:16

ICJ will remain an available

34:19

mechanism. And of course, we

34:22

definitely support the ICC in everything that

34:24

they do. And we encourage in all

34:26

the meetings that we have with governments

34:28

to support the ICC's investigations. Unfortunately,

34:30

the ICC cannot try all individuals

34:32

involved in the atrocities. We know

34:35

that thousands of people have engaged

34:37

in atrocities. The ICC may only

34:39

have capacity to try senior

34:41

leaders. But I think that

34:44

will still be important until hopefully

34:46

there will be peace in Sudan and

34:48

there will be an actual, true transitional

34:50

justice in the country to prosecute all

34:52

involved. Tosim, thank

34:54

you so much for your time

34:56

and for this valuable report. Thank

34:58

you very much, Mark. Appreciate it.

35:08

Thanks for listening to Global Dispatches. The

35:11

show is produced by me, Mark Leon

35:13

Goldberg. It is edited and

35:15

mixed by Levi Sharpe. If

35:17

you are listening on Apple podcasts, make

35:20

sure to follow the show and enable

35:22

automatic downloads to get new episodes as

35:24

soon as they're released. On

35:27

Spotify, tap the bell icon to

35:29

get a notification when we publish

35:31

new episodes. And of

35:33

course, please visit globaldispatches.org to get on

35:36

our free mailing list, get in touch

35:38

with me and access our

35:40

full archive. Thank you.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features