Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
the international community must prepare for
0:02
the worst. The worst is that
0:05
the RSA will attack on fashion. How
0:07
the international community can prepare for that, I
0:09
think they must provide safe
0:12
areas and safe
0:14
passage for civilians who
0:17
may flee areas of
0:19
risk. Welcome
0:23
to Global Dispatches, a podcast for
0:25
the foreign policy and global development
0:28
communities and anyone who wants a
0:30
deeper understanding of what is driving
0:32
events in the world today. I'm
0:35
your host, Mark Leon Goldberg. I
0:37
am a veteran international affairs journalist
0:39
and the editor of UN Dispatch.
0:42
Enjoy the show. Looking
0:56
for a trustworthy podcast to bring
0:58
you unfiltered viewpoints and experiences on
1:00
global health? Tune into
1:02
Global Health Matters, the podcast
1:05
that connects silos and amplifies
1:07
diverse voices to give you
1:09
a holistic picture. Each
1:11
month, Dr. Gary S. Lanyon from
1:14
the World Health Organization hosts discussions
1:16
with guests spanning former ministers of
1:19
health, award-winning journalists and authors, and
1:21
frontline public health workers. Join
1:24
listeners from across 180 countries
1:26
for an exciting season four,
1:29
launching in June. Global
1:31
Health Matters is available on Apple
1:34
Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube. El
1:40
Fashir is the largest city in
1:43
Sudan's Darfur region. It
1:45
is also one of the only
1:47
cities in Darfur that has not
1:49
fallen to the paramilitary rapid support
1:52
forces in a civil war which
1:54
broke out last year. However,
1:57
at time of recording, it looks as
1:59
if an attack on al-Fasher
2:01
was imminent. The
2:03
RSF has surrounded the city and is
2:05
laying siege. The United
2:07
States, United Nations and key players
2:10
around the world are urging against
2:12
this impending attack but it is
2:14
not clear that the RSF will
2:16
be restrained. There
2:18
are deep concerns for the fate of at
2:20
least 800,000 people trapped
2:23
in al-Fasher for the fact
2:25
that the RSF is a
2:27
genocidal militia. The
2:29
RSF is the rebranded Janjaweed
2:31
militia which carried out the
2:34
Darfur genocide 20 years ago
2:37
and since a full-scale civil war broke
2:39
out in Sudan in April 2023 the
2:43
RSF has reprised many
2:45
of their genocidal tactics
2:47
of targeting non-Arab ethnicities
2:49
in Darfur for annihilation.
2:53
My guest today Mutasim Ali is
2:55
a legal advisor at the Raoul
2:57
Wallenberg Center for Human Rights. Last
3:00
week the Wallenberg Center published
3:03
a report of compiled evidence
3:05
demonstrating that genocide is ongoing
3:07
in Darfur and is being
3:10
perpetrated by the RSF against
3:12
non-Arab groups. We
3:15
discuss at length how they came to
3:17
that conclusion. Mutasim
3:19
Ali is also from al-Fasher so
3:21
we discuss the looming RSF assault
3:24
on that city and what
3:26
if anything can be done to prevent
3:28
this attack. Sudan is
3:31
the largest humanitarian crisis in
3:33
the world. This episode
3:35
is part of our ongoing
3:37
series on the atrocities in
3:39
Darfur and the civil war
3:41
in Sudan which unfortunately is
3:43
getting scant media attention at
3:46
least compared to the sheer scale
3:48
of this ongoing calamity. Please
3:51
support this effort by becoming a paying
3:53
subscriber to Global Dispatches
3:56
by visiting globaldispatches.org or upgrading
3:58
your or a
4:00
subscription in the Apple Podcasts app.
4:03
We are able to do these
4:06
kinds of episodes with such frequency
4:08
because of listener support. So
4:10
thank you. You can visit
4:13
the show notes of this episode
4:15
to find links to globaldispatches.org. Now
4:19
here is my conversation with Mutasim
4:21
Ali, legal advisor at the Raoul
4:24
Wallenberg Center for Human Rights. Thank
4:30
you. So
4:43
we are gonna be spending the
4:45
bulk of our conversation today discussing
4:47
the actions of the Rapid Support
4:49
Forces, the RSF. This is something
4:51
I've discussed a lot on the
4:53
show in the past year, but
4:55
can you just describe the conduct,
4:57
the activities of the RSF
5:00
in Darfur since
5:02
the start of this full-blown
5:05
civil war a
5:07
year ago in April? I
5:09
just wanna note that the RSF, now
5:12
that fighting the Sudanese Armed Forces,
5:15
they were actually aligned together
5:17
in the beginning of the Darfur
5:20
conflict. They were created by the
5:22
Sudanese government. They were
5:24
trained by the Sudanese Armed Forces. And
5:27
so they were working together in
5:30
committing atrocities in Darfur.
5:32
So they were partners in crime
5:34
in the early 2000s genocide. Now
5:37
the current war, the
5:39
fallout between the Rapid Support Forces
5:41
and the Sudanese Armed Forces occurred
5:44
on April 15th, 2023. There
5:48
were many reasons. Some of them say
5:50
power struggle, struggle
5:53
for more economic resources, fear
5:55
of accountability and the like.
5:58
But what is really clear. here
6:00
is that the two generals, the
6:02
commander of the Sudanese armed forces of Burhan
6:05
and Hometi, who is the commander of the
6:07
weapons support forces, his full
6:09
name is Muhammad Hamdan Dagalu. Better
6:11
known as Hometi. Yes, everybody knows
6:14
him as Hometi. And
6:16
so really the underlying crisis between
6:18
the two generals is really the
6:21
competition for power. To
6:23
the RSF's context in
6:25
the context of the current war, I
6:28
must note that the weapons support
6:30
forces, the RSF, never
6:32
cease to commit atrocities in Darfur,
6:35
even during the transitional period, especially
6:38
in Western Fall. During
6:41
the transitional period in 2019 and 2020 and 2021, the RSF
6:47
committed a series of ethnically
6:50
motivated attacks against the
6:53
misleading Western Fall. Of
6:55
course, there are many other incidents in
6:58
North Darfur in an area called
7:00
Pawila or in Kabir or in
7:02
South Darfur in Greer, but there
7:04
are many, many I can cite
7:06
a number of incidents committed by the RSF.
7:09
And so the RSF really never cease to
7:12
commit atrocities. The
7:14
significance of the current
7:16
conflict and the war between the Sudanese
7:19
armed forces and
7:21
the R forces
7:37
and therefore they became the target.
7:40
This is what they said in many
7:42
of their statements when they launched their
7:44
attack in Western Fall. And
7:46
so basically the fallout between the weapons
7:48
support forces and the Sudanese armed forces
7:51
served as an execute for the RSF
7:53
to commit more atrocities. So now they
7:56
commit atrocities really
7:58
widespread. the
8:00
guise of we're defending ourselves,
8:02
we're fighting for democracy, and
8:05
we're fighting the remnants of the old regime.
8:08
And so part of their
8:11
policy is to besiege cities
8:14
before they actually attack them. Then
8:18
they loot shops, hospitals, you
8:20
know, warehouses. And the idea
8:22
was really to weaken the
8:25
society and to make their
8:27
attack a lot more easier to prevent
8:29
any resistance. Of
8:31
course, they also commit
8:34
rape as a weapon
8:36
of war. This has been a systematic
8:39
murder of Brande since
8:41
early 2000s. Most of
8:43
the contacts that we see today are exact
8:46
same as in early 2000s. And
8:50
having covered that earlier genocide,
8:52
you know, the ostensible
8:54
reason for the first genocide
8:58
was that these groups would attack
9:00
the civilian population from which an
9:02
insurgency against the government, which was
9:04
then aligned with the RSF and
9:07
John Deweed. But
9:09
now you have the RSF attacking
9:11
the Muslim population in West Darfur
9:14
because they ostensibly believe
9:17
them to be aligned with the government who they're
9:19
fighting in this civil war.
9:23
That is precise. So we've seen
9:26
mass movement of Muslim people
9:28
from places where the RSF
9:30
have taken over. People
9:33
are kind of voting with their
9:35
feet. They're fleeing for fear of
9:37
being attacked based on their ethnicity.
9:40
What evidence have you
9:42
compiled thus far that these
9:44
attacks amount to genocide, which
9:46
is a very high
9:48
legal threshold to cross? I mean,
9:51
we've seen reports since the start
9:53
of this civil war of all
9:56
sorts of atrocities. But
9:58
what makes you certain? that
10:00
these atrocities have crossed that threshold to
10:02
genocide? The primary
10:05
source of our evidence is
10:07
the open source
10:09
information, right? And that is
10:11
purposeful because we
10:13
want to say that everything we say
10:16
it is already out there with nothing
10:18
confidential about the evidence we
10:20
cite. And so we relied
10:23
heavily on reports. Some
10:25
of the reports cover victims
10:27
testimonies especially those who fled
10:30
to Eastern Chad, Adri. And
10:33
so that's really the primary source of
10:35
our evidence. I must
10:37
also say that the
10:39
report is endorsed by
10:41
world-leading experts in the field,
10:44
lawyers, international jurists, academics,
10:47
former prosecutors, international
10:49
tribunals, former prosecutor
10:51
of the ICC and former UN
10:54
officials and the like. Very
10:56
comprehensive despite the fact that
10:58
or maybe because of the fact that
11:00
it relies on such a volume of
11:02
open source material it really is you
11:04
know indeed like a comprehensive collection of
11:08
many of the crimes that the RSF
11:10
have committed in Darfur since the start
11:13
of the conflict. But I guess I'm
11:15
wondering what makes you think that these
11:17
crimes rise to that level
11:19
of genocide? The major question that
11:21
we face in making analysis is in
11:23
order to establish the crime of genocide
11:26
really you have to prove that the
11:28
acts were committed with intent to
11:30
destroy and hold or impart a
11:33
protected group. There is quite
11:36
agreement among most
11:38
scholars and those who document the
11:40
situation in Darfur that the acts were committed
11:43
in Darfur are
11:45
ethnically motivated nature right like
11:48
basically targeting particular ethnic groups.
11:50
These are protected groups. This
11:53
was established even by the ICC
11:55
in the first ever indictment against
11:57
Bashir right. Masalid is a protected group. group.
12:01
Now we established that the Maasai-DS is
12:03
a protected group. We established
12:05
that the acts that were committed are
12:08
genocidal acts and now the major
12:10
question is whether there is actually
12:13
an intent to destroy the Maasai-DS in
12:15
the whole important part. And that's
12:17
always the most difficult part of any
12:19
genocide case. I mean you could have
12:21
lots of crimes on the ground. You
12:23
could have evidence of mass graves and
12:25
mass killing and ethnic cleansing but what
12:28
makes genocide unique is that in order to
12:30
be proven there has to be that intent
12:32
to destroy a group in a
12:34
whole or in part. So how was it
12:36
that you were able to establish
12:39
that genocidal intent? First
12:42
we referenced earlier incidents, right?
12:44
The incitement to genocide, implicit
12:47
incitement, explicit incitement and then
12:49
we compared them with recent
12:52
incitement rhetoric in West Darfur, right? Like
12:54
we're here to kill all of them,
12:56
so leave. So it's just leave. This
12:58
is the land of Arabs and that
13:00
Maasalid and killing the Maasalid boys and
13:02
so we documented that very
13:04
well. Although there
13:07
is no written policy to
13:10
say that the RSF actually
13:12
intended to kill or to
13:14
wipe out the Maasalid, the
13:17
pattern of conduct and the incitement
13:20
followed by their actions, right? The
13:22
rape and the systematic depopulation of
13:24
Maasalid and execution of Maasalid searching
13:26
them house by house made
13:29
us believe that the only reasonable inference
13:32
from all these conduct is the intent
13:35
to destroy the Maasalid in whole
13:37
or in part as investigators,
13:39
right? We are not a court of
13:41
law and therefore our
13:43
standard of proof is not like
13:46
no one would be using the court
13:48
of law, right? It's not beyond reasonable
13:50
doubt. We use with
13:52
clear and convincing evidence, right? This
13:54
is being used also in other
13:56
contexts by the ICCS
13:58
wall and therefore For based
14:01
on the evidence that we collected, there
14:03
is no way that you can infer
14:05
any other than the
14:07
intent to destroy the Mesalite group
14:09
in whole or in part. Can
14:12
you just give by way of example
14:15
any specific evidence that
14:17
you think is really kind of
14:19
conclusive to your determination? O'Four
14:31
towards Adri in Chad
14:34
and on their way to Adri,
14:36
to a few decabin, is from
14:38
Chad, there were many
14:41
RSF checkpoints and
14:44
so women with infants,
14:46
like even six months old, were
14:49
sourced to check whether they are males
14:51
or females. If they were males, then
14:53
they would be killed immediately. And
14:56
the argument is that the RSF will kill the
14:58
boys to prevent them from
15:00
being fighters in the future. And
15:03
this is sort of accusation and
15:05
mirror, right? We're speaking of
15:07
MVA, six months old, and there are many
15:10
incidents of this sort. Then
15:13
you will find evidence
15:15
of the RSF
15:18
fighters going to houses, searching
15:20
for Mesalite, just to execute
15:22
them. And
15:25
incidents of rape. As they
15:27
commit rape, they would say, this
15:29
is the land of Arabs, there will
15:32
be no Mesalite anymore and we will
15:34
execute you all. The best
15:36
option for you is to flee to Chad, for example.
15:38
And so there are really series of shocking
15:41
incidents that we
15:43
can continue to narrate, but all
15:46
indicate that the RSF actually intended
15:48
to eradicate Mesalite
15:50
from their land. And
15:52
your report makes clear, these weren't just isolated incidents.
15:54
It was a very common pattern
15:56
of behavior over the course of the year
15:58
that led to the end to
16:00
your genocide conclusion. One really
16:04
interesting thing about your report is
16:06
that while it does establish, I
16:08
think, conclusively, that RSF is committing
16:10
genocide, it also suggests
16:12
very strongly that certain
16:15
state parties to the Genocide Convention
16:17
like the United Arab Emirates and
16:19
CHAD are complicit as
16:22
well. Could you describe
16:24
how it is you concluded,
16:26
for example, that the United Arab
16:28
Emirates is also implicated in the
16:31
genocide of the mazalit by
16:33
the RSF? The
16:35
relationship between the RSF and
16:37
the United Arab Emirates goes
16:40
back to 2014 when
16:43
the RSF soldiers were
16:45
sent to Yemen to fight on behalf of
16:47
the Emiratis and Saudis, right? They were getting
16:49
a lot of financial support,
16:52
military supplies and the like. But
16:55
since the outbreak of the April 2023
16:57
war, we've been able to document
17:02
and read many other
17:04
credible reports about
17:07
the UAE's direct support
17:09
of the RSF. These
17:12
reports include UN panel
17:14
of experts on Sudan, other
17:17
open-source investigative journalists
17:19
that commented the
17:22
UAE's support through Libya,
17:25
through CHAD, through
17:27
Central African Republic, and
17:30
were able to also see that
17:32
the UAE is using CHAD as
17:35
a place to support
17:38
the RSF by building sort
17:40
of a got humanitarian
17:42
hospital in Israel and
17:44
Chad in Jorah city.
17:47
Also not just humanitarian hospital, hospital to
17:49
serve as a... It was a pretext,
17:51
right? I remember reading that report. It's
17:54
basically the UAE established
17:56
this quote-unquote hospital at an airport
17:58
in Chad. but used
18:01
the idea that they were transporting humanitarian
18:03
goods as a cover to actually transport
18:05
arms and munitions to the RSF, which
18:08
they then used to carry out their
18:10
genocide against the Muslim people. Right. And
18:13
so there was really quite
18:15
extensive evidence of
18:17
the UAE using chat
18:19
as a place to support
18:22
the RSF. And
18:25
of course we have other confidential evidence
18:27
that we have not used in our
18:29
report, but again, the UAE
18:32
support is quite well-documented, including,
18:35
as I mentioned, by the UN panel
18:37
of experts on Sudan. And
18:40
actually even the US found those
18:42
reporting as credible. It
18:44
seems at this point you have this situation where
18:47
the most powerful army in
18:49
Sudan is the RSF. They
18:52
are committing genocide against the Muslim
18:54
people and are being supported by
18:56
a very wealthy country that carries
18:58
a lot of diplomatic weight in
19:00
the UAE and the
19:03
neighboring country, Chad. Absolutely. It's
19:05
like a recipe for complete
19:07
disaster. Right. And by
19:09
the way, the UAE is support
19:11
or complicity. It's not only because
19:13
of funding military supplies to the
19:15
RSF through Chad or Central African
19:17
Republic or Libya, but also the
19:19
fact that some of the RSF
19:22
affiliated companies are based in the UAE.
19:24
For example, some of the companies that were
19:27
recently sanctioned by the US
19:29
government, by the Canadian government, by
19:31
the UK government, and by the
19:33
EU as well, to NATO
19:35
and to ADIF. And these
19:37
are basically like front companies that are
19:39
used to make money for the RSF.
19:41
Exactly. And therefore what
19:44
we're saying is that under
19:46
the genocide convention, to
19:48
which the UAE is a third party, the
19:51
UAE could have acted to prevent,
19:54
right, because it has
19:56
leverage over the RSF, right. And
19:58
it failed to do so. This is number one. And second,
20:01
it is actually also complicit
20:03
in providing funds and
20:06
arms. And there
20:08
is no chance that the
20:10
RSF could actually sustain this
20:12
long fight without having a
20:14
backing from a state like the UAE.
20:17
So, we are speaking on Thursday, May 2nd.
20:21
And by the time this episode
20:23
is released, it may be the
20:25
fact that the RSF is
20:28
attacking or has already attacked
20:30
one of the largest cities
20:32
in the region, al-Fashir. The
20:35
United States government, the UN, everyone
20:37
is saying, please do not attack
20:39
this city. This is going
20:42
to cause a humanitarian catastrophe. If
20:45
indeed the RSF does
20:47
carry out this attack
20:49
on al-Fashir, what
20:51
would you expect to happen based
20:54
on all that you know about
20:56
the RSF? So
20:58
definitely the consequences would
21:00
be more
21:03
catastrophic in terms
21:05
of numbers than what we
21:07
have seen in Al-Janaina. The
21:09
capital of West Darfur, which
21:11
RSF sacked over there last
21:13
summer? Right. And there
21:16
are a couple of reasons why I
21:19
believe that al-Fashir will be more tragic.
21:22
Al-Fashir now is home to, according to
21:24
the UN, 800,000 people. And
21:30
I'm from North Darfur al-Fashir and
21:32
I believe this number is inaccurate.
21:34
The population of Al-Fashir is way,
21:36
way bigger than this. But
21:39
let's rely on the UN numbers. There
21:42
are about 800,000 people. Most
21:44
of these people have already displaced
21:46
from other places that are captured
21:49
by the RSF. Displays
21:52
Have been displaced for more than 20
21:55
years since the first genocide, right? the
21:57
11 and IDP, the Infamous Displace Process.
22:00
The around and faster. Oh,
22:02
because of this huge number
22:05
of people either. Flasher. The.
22:07
Attack on our fashion by
22:10
the Rsf would definitely result
22:12
in more casualties. This number
22:14
one, number two. In.
22:16
As in a now capital of for stuff
22:19
for. Sale was. Perhaps.
22:21
A walkable distance to move. And.
22:24
Was seated was eg. com but his swing set.
22:27
In. Or Pfizer. There's
22:29
no possible way that people
22:31
can flee. To. Chat. And
22:34
prices in the middle of promise?
22:36
nowhere? And it
22:38
is now is so called by the
22:40
Rss. And so basically people have
22:42
no way to flee to. Adding.
22:45
To this. It is now dry
22:47
season is them. And advice
22:49
was router with. Desert land.
22:52
And. So even if people were able
22:55
to leave the city of a
22:57
faster. Probably. They wouldn't
22:59
be able to survive. The. Desert. And
23:03
therefore. And. Attack on and faster.
23:05
Would. Definitely. Be.
23:07
A lot more. Isaac. And.
23:10
It is exactly that reason
23:12
why we think I'll report
23:14
is timely. In. Loading the
23:16
international community. And people
23:19
of consists. To. Prevent.
23:21
Would. We have seen already. He
23:23
has janine and in other parts of door
23:26
for. From. Happening again in
23:28
a fight or anywhere else in.for.
23:30
The I mean this is the
23:33
same set of actors of once
23:35
again surrounding and trying to sack
23:37
as city you well documented their
23:40
intent to be genocidal. your you
23:42
said you are from El Fasher.
23:44
What are you hearing from people
23:46
in the city right now who
23:49
are essentially trap presumably some of
23:51
your your friends and family. Absolutely
23:54
speaking to. People.
23:56
They're just t. Know.
23:58
How they're doing. And how they
24:00
feel about the sufficient what are the
24:03
ways week and hub and people just
24:05
this hurt right A lot of people
24:07
as Saudi gave up a mean there
24:09
is no where they can go and
24:11
even if they are some pathways people
24:13
didn't have the means to leave and
24:16
faster and therefore people just giving up
24:18
and this a you know would wait
24:20
for all faith this and that the
24:22
first time dates and gulf fleeing for
24:24
safety of this is be a consistent
24:26
Wales live for them disorders. Part about
24:29
this is that. For a lot
24:31
of people in a fire, sure. He. Became
24:33
part of their daily a
24:36
superiors to hear gunshots and
24:38
people being cozy and there
24:41
and is. On. Forced him
24:43
to normalize something like that and therefore,
24:45
I think people, really. Willy. Nilly.
24:48
Giving up for what is to com because
24:50
they used in a see. A
24:52
way out of this. Unless. The.
24:55
International Community Act decisively.
24:58
And tend to course of history but
25:00
people they're not really hopping a lot
25:02
because in or as a commune has
25:05
already fell several times and the consists
25:07
of Door For and so. That.
25:09
Is the saddest emitter We continue to hear from
25:11
people there. Do. You suspect
25:13
that this attack will happen. You.
25:15
Know I have reason to believe that
25:17
this attack is imminent and in it
25:19
is really a matter of. When.
25:22
Not if because the aura of
25:24
is determined and I take them
25:26
by the words. They. Take and
25:28
feist of as. A military
25:30
objectives and the in circles on
25:33
they took you know the ways
25:35
nine to eleven. Villages.
25:37
with a foster. They
25:40
took one of the biggest cities in
25:42
northern of us have caused believe. This.
25:44
Is sort of a gateway to Alsace
25:46
you it's a big city and ah
25:48
for at that most of the humanitarian
25:50
aid or supplies come through Millie. And.
25:53
So everything that the aura of is
25:55
doing these days they will he indicated
25:58
there with identifies of as. About
26:00
when and then of course, in addition to that,
26:03
The. Same incitement. That.
26:05
We have or. Guess.
26:08
The. Mythology and was duffel but now
26:10
be used against as a gallon
26:12
for in north.for and these are
26:14
two other ethnic groups. the Muslim
26:16
are are not predominant in Northern
26:18
Darfur, but does Zoc our and
26:20
the For our predominant in El
26:23
Fasher. And and your concern that
26:25
you're here in the same kind
26:27
of anti Muslim rhetoric that we
26:29
heard earlier now again targeting these
26:31
other non Arab ethnic groups. Absolutely.
26:33
And these are the indications that
26:35
will make us believe that the
26:37
Rss. Is. Going T. Attack.
26:40
Us faster and less. The or
26:42
is really a big thing happens
26:45
on the international community spirit and
26:47
of course the ongoing recruitment from
26:49
all parts of Darfur. You know
26:51
the are as of now taking
26:54
control of for other states and
26:56
door for now they have the
26:58
access to a lot more resources
27:00
but also easy to is to
27:03
people and record people. And
27:05
other assays to come and join their
27:07
fighters in North Darfur. and so. There.
27:10
Is room and I'm going with
27:12
was miss our combined with deliberate
27:14
incitement against particular ethnic groups for
27:16
and the Gower case and that's
27:19
what makes us believe that the
27:21
Rss will attack and fi stuff.
27:23
And it is about when. Than.
27:25
That if. As. You
27:27
said this attack really does
27:29
seem imminent. Your It could
27:31
be that by the time
27:34
this episode is released, that
27:36
attack is ongoing. I'm wondering
27:38
though, is stopping the Rsf
27:40
from attacking El Fasher at
27:42
this point? A matter of
27:44
international diplomacy. specifically. Countries.
27:46
Like the United States more
27:48
heavily leaning on Rsf enablers
27:50
like the Uae he to
27:53
rain them in is that
27:55
the most. Perhaps. Direct
27:57
pressure points that my
27:59
for. B us have to change
28:01
their calculus at this point. Or.
28:03
Is there anything that could change their calculus? Sula.
28:06
Given the. Eminent. Thread
28:08
that. People. Are and
28:10
Fi surveys seen many. The thing
28:13
that the best. Way. To
28:15
prevent atrocities is peacekeeping mission trade.
28:17
but given the current said authors
28:20
a d to thirty thousand the
28:22
dynamic the this is unlikely and
28:24
so what does the next from
28:27
the probably wouldn't influence that has
28:29
on and Pfizer. definitely a direct
28:31
pressure on the way He given
28:33
the lovely the day you he
28:36
has over the are safe and
28:38
it's leaders this is going to
28:40
be extremely helpful again because the
28:43
Are as if relies heavily. On.
28:45
The you a you the
28:47
support second. I. Think. The.
28:50
Right price or of perhaps
28:52
even target is sizes or
28:54
even an arrest warrant. Against.
28:57
The commander of the Rsf
28:59
him as thou would definitely
29:01
influence the situation as well.
29:03
One of the reasons why
29:05
the hours of fighters continue
29:07
to commit atrocities without fear
29:09
and often time. actually Latino
29:11
broke has its on social
29:14
media platforms right? Twitter, Tic
29:16
Toc, Facebook, and like. Because
29:19
they do not fear accountability.
29:21
The. Has never been. A
29:23
transitional Just as even didn't
29:26
transitional period. And
29:28
so that revelus of impunity.
29:31
Sort. Of awarded the Rss because the
29:33
war is paying off for them they
29:35
can do They can make. More
29:37
money and therefore by targeting
29:40
the news. They. May
29:42
fear. As. So I think. Those.
29:45
Are the direct things that. People.
29:47
Can do a didn't and on some
29:49
level. But. Also, I think. That
29:52
would. Not going t hundred percent
29:55
the doors of another type of
29:57
fashion. That. definitely will inflows of
29:59
the ways and but probably
30:01
would delay the attack on alfashire. But
30:03
I do think that the international community
30:06
must prepare for the worst. And the
30:08
worst is that the RSL will attack
30:10
alfashire. How the international community
30:12
can prepare for that, I think they
30:14
must provide safe areas
30:18
and safe passage for civilians
30:20
who may flee areas
30:22
of risk. So
30:26
your answer just now, and the
30:28
report on genocide in
30:31
Darfur demands a key
30:33
question. What opportunities
30:35
exist for accountability for
30:38
war crimes that have
30:40
been committed to include
30:43
genocide? On
30:45
normal circumstances, the
30:47
most effective way to halt
30:50
perpetrators' account will be domestic
30:52
accountability mechanisms. But
30:54
this is absent in the case of
30:56
Sudan. We don't have even a functioning
30:58
government in the country. And therefore we
31:00
cannot rely on
31:03
national or domestic mechanism. And
31:06
so now we're left with few options
31:08
at the international level, and
31:10
perhaps at the regional level, at
31:12
the African Union, maybe if there
31:14
is a political will, they
31:17
can establish special tribunals, right?
31:19
It's a prosecute perpetrators. But
31:22
I also see that as
31:24
unlikely, given how some of
31:26
the African states are welcoming Hometi
31:29
and the leaders of the RSF
31:31
in South Africa, for example,
31:34
in Ethiopia, Kenya, Uganda, Djibouti,
31:36
and the like, even
31:38
Rwanda. And therefore I think the
31:41
only way is international mechanisms.
31:43
That includes the International Criminal
31:45
Court, the ICC. And
31:48
now I know that the prosecutor general
31:50
is investigating the situation in
31:52
Darfur, especially in West
31:54
Darfur. And I hope that there
31:57
will be a West Warren sometime soon. Of course,
31:59
there are already. already seven individuals have been
32:01
indicted by the ICC before only one
32:03
person has been on trial right now,
32:05
right? Which is in a service, unfortunately,
32:08
makes a lot of people do not believe
32:10
in the international mechanisms. But this
32:12
is the only thing that we have at this point
32:14
in time. Then the second thing
32:16
this is what we rely on a
32:19
lot is the case before International Court
32:21
of Justice, the ICJ. The
32:23
ICJ, hopefully what we will do is
32:26
to bring a case against
32:28
states that we identified as
32:30
complicit in the Dafrojuna side.
32:33
But as an organization or a
32:36
private town, this would not be
32:38
able to bring case before ICJ. You need
32:40
a government. We need a government. Do you
32:42
have any governments that you think might step
32:44
up as plaintiffs in a
32:46
case against, you know,
32:48
the way the ICJ works is that
32:50
the ICJ is where countries go to
32:52
sue other countries, the countries that would
32:54
be defendants here, presumably would be the
32:56
UAE and Chad. The ICJ is not
32:59
a forum where the RSF would defend
33:01
itself because it's not a state vector.
33:03
So are there like plaintiffs in
33:05
the waiting countries that would take up the
33:07
cause? We haven't reached out to states at
33:09
this point in time, but this is going
33:11
to be one of our
33:13
missions to make sure
33:16
that the ICJ will remain irrelevant. Accountability
33:18
forum, at least for states complicit
33:21
in the genocide in Dafrojuna.
33:24
As to the RSF, of course, you know,
33:26
there is a lack
33:28
on international legal frameworks that we
33:31
cannot really prosecute entities. There's no
33:33
legal framework for that. But I
33:35
think for the RSF, we
33:37
leave that to the ICC and other
33:40
hopefully additional mechanisms. Because the
33:42
ICC, of course, does have the
33:45
capacity to prosecute
33:47
individuals, whether they're state
33:49
actors or non-state actors, as opposed to the
33:51
ICJ, which only adjudicates
33:53
disputes between states. Right.
33:56
I don't know. I heard South Africa is interested
33:58
in genocide. So maybe- can get
34:00
them on board. I think this is
34:02
an excellent idea. I was wondering whether, I
34:05
mean, you know, we would have hoped that
34:07
a country like South Africa would take a
34:10
case like this, looking at the continent, you
34:12
know, but definitely we'll pursue
34:14
every avenue to make sure that the
34:16
ICJ will remain an available
34:19
mechanism. And of course, we
34:22
definitely support the ICC in everything that
34:24
they do. And we encourage in all
34:26
the meetings that we have with governments
34:28
to support the ICC's investigations. Unfortunately,
34:30
the ICC cannot try all individuals
34:32
involved in the atrocities. We know
34:35
that thousands of people have engaged
34:37
in atrocities. The ICC may only
34:39
have capacity to try senior
34:41
leaders. But I think that
34:44
will still be important until hopefully
34:46
there will be peace in Sudan and
34:48
there will be an actual, true transitional
34:50
justice in the country to prosecute all
34:52
involved. Tosim, thank
34:54
you so much for your time
34:56
and for this valuable report. Thank
34:58
you very much, Mark. Appreciate it.
35:08
Thanks for listening to Global Dispatches. The
35:11
show is produced by me, Mark Leon
35:13
Goldberg. It is edited and
35:15
mixed by Levi Sharpe. If
35:17
you are listening on Apple podcasts, make
35:20
sure to follow the show and enable
35:22
automatic downloads to get new episodes as
35:24
soon as they're released. On
35:27
Spotify, tap the bell icon to
35:29
get a notification when we publish
35:31
new episodes. And of
35:33
course, please visit globaldispatches.org to get on
35:36
our free mailing list, get in touch
35:38
with me and access our
35:40
full archive. Thank you.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More