Podchaser Logo
Home
Ken Burns, Lynn Novick, and Rethinking Vietnam

Ken Burns, Lynn Novick, and Rethinking Vietnam

Released Tuesday, 3rd July 2018
 1 person rated this episode
Ken Burns, Lynn Novick, and Rethinking Vietnam

Ken Burns, Lynn Novick, and Rethinking Vietnam

Ken Burns, Lynn Novick, and Rethinking Vietnam

Ken Burns, Lynn Novick, and Rethinking Vietnam

Tuesday, 3rd July 2018
 1 person rated this episode
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:02

I'm Alec Baldwin, and you were listening

0:05

to Here's the thing I

0:08

think of a recent documentary you've

0:10

loved. The slow pan over

0:12

still photos, the tight queue

0:15

of period music, the subtle

0:17

shift from a personal story to a historical

0:19

one. These techniques have become

0:22

so associated with Ken Burns

0:24

that the word burns in is found

0:26

everywhere from the New Yorker

0:29

to the Times of Israel. And like

0:31

any great artist, Burns has

0:33

created a whole studio of talent

0:36

to carry out his vision. In nine

0:39

he brought on board the brilliant Lynn Novic,

0:41

with whom he just wrapped up ten years of

0:44

work on PBS's The Vietnam

0:46

War. The series wades

0:49

deep into every possible angle of

0:51

a conflict still seared into

0:53

the American consciousness. I

0:55

invited them on the show to talk about

0:58

Vietnam, their paths to a making,

1:00

and they're ridiculously packed production

1:03

schedule. We are planned out

1:05

to and we can waste most of your time

1:08

telling you even the thumbnail descriptions

1:10

of all the things we're doing on the American Revolution and

1:12

Ernest Hemingway and Muhammad Ali in the History

1:14

of Reconstruction lb J

1:17

and civil rights, the possibilities

1:19

must be infinite. Is

1:21

budget a factor? No, who's the decider?

1:24

No, I'm at work, I'm the decider. So

1:26

far, how do you settle on? Hemingway is supposed

1:28

to fit general. So here's what it

1:30

is. It's sort of like friends and love and

1:32

intimacy. We have lots of ideas, as

1:34

you're saying, the cauldrons are all boiling

1:36

over with potential projects, and we think about

1:38

them. We're making lists all the time, but their ideas,

1:40

they're the pink bong balls of the lottery. But

1:43

every once in a while, something goes down in here. So

1:45

for example, Jeff Ward our principal writer,

1:47

and Lynn and I've been talking about Hemingway. Jeff

1:50

and I have been talking since the eighties. Hemingway has been

1:52

on shortlist of things. And then finally

1:54

it's just the gut feeling it comes

1:56

down and say yes, it's time to do Hemmingway.

2:00

Um, now, Lynn, I want to ask you, tell

2:02

me what film and you

2:04

studied American studies at Yale. Yeah.

2:07

Were your parents and the biz at all? No,

2:09

not at all. They're both sort of more in science

2:11

and math. My father's a biologist, my mother's

2:13

a neuropsychologist, so I'm kind of the outlier in the

2:15

family. It was a neuropsychologist who does

2:18

evaluations of kids with learning issues and tries

2:20

to figure out what's going on in their brains and then helps

2:22

figure out how to fix it. And you went to Yale

2:24

four. I thought I was going to be

2:26

premat actually, and that lasted about six

2:28

weeks and I sort of checking it

2:30

down. Yes, exactly. And

2:33

when I sort of evolved into realizing

2:35

I wanted to work in documentary film, they kept saying,

2:37

Okay, but how's that going to work? Where

2:39

are you? Where are you going to actually work? Are you ever going

2:42

to have a job? What are you going to do with yourself?

2:44

Are you gonna move out? Yeah? Exactly. There

2:46

was some of that too. So where did it begin for you in

2:48

terms of when you shouted American studies

2:50

at Yale? Did you go to graduate school? I

2:52

didn't. I thought about going to film school, but at

2:54

the time that I graduated, most film schools really

2:56

focused on narrative scripted. Um

2:59

you know drogs they are now, No, they

3:01

weren't there. You couldn't really study it in film school.

3:03

I don't think we talk about that, but when you

3:05

get out of Yale. So what's the path too? It

3:07

was a very non linear path. Um.

3:10

I worked for a while as a research assistant at the Smithsonian

3:13

Museum of American History, and then I realized

3:15

I didn't want to be a historian and work in a

3:17

museum, and I wanted to work on historical

3:19

documentaries. And I eventually got

3:21

an internship at w n E T here and

3:23

got some some production experience. I've

3:25

freelanced. I worked for Bill Moyers for several years.

3:28

That was wonderful. It was I was going

3:30

to graduate school basically in how

3:32

to do this, And then, luckily for me, I

3:34

figured out that ken Burns was working on a film on the

3:36

Civil War, and I just waited until

3:39

I've heard that he might have an opening, and then I

3:41

applied. And that was what do you think

3:43

he hired you? Four? What do you think ken burn saw

3:45

in you? That's a very good question. I

3:48

guess maybe. Um, I was passionate

3:51

and interested and I wanted to learn, I will

3:53

say those things. And I think having

3:55

worked with film Moyer's helped a little bit. So

4:00

So, first of all, where I

4:02

went to Hampshire College and study

4:04

film and photography every single semester,

4:07

every single semester, every single semester, and

4:09

started we did organize a little film company

4:11

in the college to do uh completely

4:14

at cost films for nonprofits

4:16

in western Massachusetts. And so following

4:19

that model, I started a company called Florentine

4:21

Films after I graduated, and the first one

4:23

was one on the Brooklyn Bridge. I moved out in Manhattan

4:26

up to up to the wilds of New Hampshire

4:28

then, but we were finishing the Civil War. It

4:31

was done or a month or two from

4:33

locking, and I had lost an

4:35

associate producer who just sort

4:37

of very unceremoniously left,

4:39

and friends suggested that I

4:41

talked to Lynn, and she said, you know, I'd

4:43

love this job. You know, all of her credentials

4:46

seemed perfect and and but she

4:48

was going to get married and go on her honeymoon. She wouldn't

4:50

be able to start until mid July. Said that's fine,

4:52

that's fine, that's fine. We take the long view this

4:54

this project had taken five and a half years, and

4:57

uh, she was gonna attend to some rights

4:59

issues for the photographs and other things. And

5:02

the previous person told me they thought it would be

5:04

done the following February.

5:06

By August fifteen, she had it done and

5:08

we've been working together ever since, like

5:11

a month. So so

5:13

Moyers was more shall we say, agit prop

5:15

than a lot of other people. He was a very political

5:18

guy, was the projects I worked

5:20

with him on. Joseph Campbell's series was not really

5:22

political, sort of existential and really

5:24

deep way about philosophical Yeah,

5:27

and that was surprising to me that I when I was

5:29

working on it, I thought, she, I don't know if American people

5:31

are gonna want to watch six or eight

5:33

hours of talking about philosophy and the

5:35

meaning of life, and turned out to be a huge

5:37

hit because there's such a hunger for that kind of conversation.

5:40

Um. Just watching Bill work and seeing how he related

5:43

to the people that he spoke to and the kind of quality

5:45

that he expected of all the producers that worked there was

5:47

a great education for

5:49

you. Ken, I'll go with you first, and then Lynn,

5:52

what did Vietnam mean to you personally?

5:55

At the advent of the project. So I

5:57

always picked things I don't know about and want

5:59

to know about. Rather telling you what I know, I'd

6:01

rather share with you our process of discovery.

6:04

So two films Baseball, which Lenn and I

6:06

produced together uh In

6:08

in the nineties. I thought I knew something because

6:10

I've been a wild about baseball from the moment

6:12

I could remember anything, and I

6:15

instantly found out how little I knew. I

6:17

grew up in Antarbora, Michigan. I was

6:19

present for the first teaching against

6:21

the war and demonstrations, and I

6:23

had a high draft number. But it was very politically

6:26

active campus, very politically active campus,

6:28

and a politically active father, and you

6:30

know, I was just thought, well, I know everything

6:32

about it. And basically

6:34

for ten and a half years, it was daily humiliation

6:36

of what we didn't know. And what's so great is

6:38

that to basically lose your baggage

6:41

early on, lose that conventional wisdom

6:43

that actually is wrong, and then

6:45

be able to avail ourselves in a very clean

6:48

way of more than forty years

6:50

of new scholarship in every single

6:52

department, so that we got excited because

6:54

we dissembled all these scholars there, and as

6:57

we're working first with proposals, then with

6:59

early scripts, then with advanced scripts, then

7:01

with assemblies and rough cuts and fine cuts,

7:03

they're all blown away, not by

7:05

what they've contributed, which is significant

7:08

but what their colleagues have contributed because they

7:10

don't know that stuff. And then all the other colleagues

7:12

are saying the same thing about their stuff, and

7:14

you begin to realize, Wow, we are aggregating

7:16

in here the latest stuff. You know, the centrality

7:19

of Ho Chi Minh to the leadership of the Vietnam

7:22

we assume, you know, we so

7:24

we we we have in episode one. It turns

7:26

out it's another guy who's really in charge,

7:29

and he'll be a character in old ten episodes.

7:32

But everybody presumed Ho Ho

7:34

Ho Chi Minh and LF is gonna win, and

7:37

nobody asked another question about that. I know Lynn

7:39

will agree with me. When Americans talk

7:41

about Vietnam, we just talk about

7:43

ourselves, and that what what we needed to do

7:46

was to triangulate with all the other

7:48

perspectives, not just the enemy. This

7:50

isn't just Clint eas We're doing postcards

7:53

and all of that sort of stuff. It's finding

7:55

out what the civilians felt, the enemy felt,

7:57

the viet Cong felt, But then our our our

7:59

all the South Vietnamese who get

8:01

treated like you know what all the time,

8:04

and their civilians and their protesters,

8:06

as well as all the servicemen

8:08

that we did in the air or marines

8:11

or army guys and everybody all the

8:13

way out to deserters and draft dodgers

8:15

across the American spectrum. And if you

8:17

then do that, then the kind

8:20

of political dialectic loses

8:22

its its force because you realize

8:24

that more than one truth could obtain at

8:27

any given moment. From my money,

8:29

what I walked away with that project was that ho Chiman

8:31

was a man who understood his people and what

8:33

they wanted and what he needed more than

8:36

his American counterparts. From the moment Kennedy

8:38

is assassinated to the moment that Nixon resigns.

8:40

Yes, you go, there's a line from

8:43

sixty three all the way down to seventy

8:45

three. There's ten years there was out

8:47

of power when he died in sixty nine, and by

8:49

sixty four he had essentially neutralized

8:52

himself on the Polite

8:54

Bureau. From there on end he had opposed the tet

8:56

offensive vehemently, and his secretary

8:58

was throughout

9:00

the fifties and then on in the early sixties. And you

9:02

get to some point in this project and go, my

9:05

god, I'm just no, My my next project

9:07

is going to be about the boy Scouts. No, Because

9:09

Lynn came in and we looked at each other and realized we

9:12

had to do Vietnam, inviting exactly

9:14

what you just talked about. The Second

9:16

World War. Our first episode is called a necessary

9:19

war. But what would happen if you took a war

9:21

in which there's not a positive

9:24

that. You know, we didn't unite the Union and free

9:26

slaves, we didn't end the world of militarism

9:29

and fascism. And Americans particularly

9:32

are susceptible to the disease of argument

9:34

that their Second World War they call it the good War.

9:36

It's obviously not the good war. Sixty million people

9:38

died, that's not a good war. You know, you can't

9:41

do that. History is not a parlor game. When they're

9:43

more PTSD candidates from World War Two

9:45

than there are in Vietnam. We just didn't have a name

9:47

and a convenient level. You're saying in the sense that Vietnam

9:49

was no worse than the other war, that's hugely important. It

9:51

was divisive. I think, um,

9:54

it is different than the other wars before

9:56

then that we paid attention to and

9:58

that we didn't win. And it was so divisive

10:00

while it was going on, and we never could talk

10:03

about like Kinna saying, so I

10:05

always think a bit sort of like this childhood

10:07

trauma, say that we never talked about and just never

10:09

dealt with, and it just keeps cooking away underneath

10:12

the surface. And so that's why the

10:14

film was the most challenging thing we've ever done.

10:16

And like Kenna's saying, just this chance to bring people

10:18

together to kind of start over. Okay,

10:21

something terrible happened. We've never really figured it out.

10:23

We don't know what it was, We don't know what was

10:25

going on in Vietnam. Maybe if we would

10:27

just let people tell us their story and

10:29

put it together, we could find out some

10:31

sort of deeper truths that we've never really acknowledged.

10:33

Obviously, the Vietnam War has been covered in you

10:36

know, to a fairy Well and film,

10:38

in books, in Broadway musicals.

10:41

Do you start by immersing yourself and what other people

10:43

have done or you just tune that out completely.

10:45

It's a really tough one because you don't want

10:48

to imitate when anybody else has done. And

10:50

we've certainly carry around in all of our heads the Hollywood

10:52

versions of the Vietnam War, so we didn't have to immerse

10:55

ourselves. They're just they're present health poclets

10:57

now put you in the deer Hunter. We're very familiar

10:59

with those. But for documentaries that

11:01

have been done, and there have been some great ones, and there have been some

11:03

very sort of dated things that were great at

11:05

their time, we sort of check them at the door.

11:08

Our colleagues have to look at all that for for footage

11:10

and stills, so for research perverses,

11:12

we have to go through everything and see what's out there.

11:14

I go to a monastery and take a vale of silence.

11:17

I will not look at anything anywhere,

11:19

nothing, and just try to make sure complete.

11:23

Even though I've seen this, has lind said that, even though I've seen

11:25

this stuff, I need to be free of I'm always in President

11:27

Lincoln. It's difficult. I read

11:29

a lot too. I mean, I think a lot of you know, we we do

11:31

have a big team of people helping us. So I've been in an

11:33

interview you did with somebody where you mentioned a

11:36

board of advisors that you can so describe

11:38

the board of advisors and what their role is. Yeah,

11:40

so we we put together the foremost

11:42

experts on the subject whatever film we're working

11:45

on. So in this particular case, you have an ad hoc consultants

11:48

like that people some some We have a couple

11:50

of people who come on more than one project because they just understand

11:52

American history and pretty much can talk about

11:54

and understand. And every Bill Luchenburg is

11:56

in nineties something year old, yeah year

11:59

old historians, Dean of American Historians. He's

12:01

we don't leave home without him. He was with my Hue Long

12:04

film back in the early eighties and I think he's

12:06

just done the majority of the film since. But

12:08

for this case, we also wanted um veterans,

12:11

we wanted Vietnamese historians, we wanted military

12:13

storms, you wanted social historians, pop culture,

12:16

Hispanic American, African American

12:18

presidential audio. Right, So it's it's

12:20

a wide range. Actually, probably twenty people

12:22

by the time we collect all these different experts.

12:25

Some of them read scripts and then don't come to screenings,

12:27

some kind of screenings and haven't read a script. Some are

12:30

there every step of the way, and their

12:32

roles kind of evolve over time as the film evolved.

12:34

You you remember in another interview

12:37

you will also reference how you

12:39

had the Vietnamese producer Ho

12:43

Ho dang Wa, and you mentioned said

12:45

in another project you did where you were interviewing

12:47

the famous Japanese baseball player, and you couldn't keep

12:50

up with him, and you couldn't that you're a follower, so

12:52

you decided you wanted to approach things differently. But

12:54

but you also mentioned that you were talking to some of these

12:56

men in the Vietnamese counterparts,

12:58

and you were kind of taking with how gracious they

13:00

were talking about people you knew they hated in a despise

13:03

and had fought in war. Very different

13:05

from the American point of because when Americans

13:07

talk about these things it's often very heated.

13:09

We had both, you know, we had people on

13:11

both sides that talked about their hatred

13:14

for the enemy. But it's interesting now that they're

13:16

at the age that they're at and

13:18

many of them are grandfathers and have survived,

13:21

they're most curious. Like we we were

13:23

able before the film came out to share with Center

13:26

McCain, who we did not interview, and consciously

13:28

told him early on in the project we weren't

13:30

going to interview him, or carry or Kissinger

13:32

or heroes. That

13:35

wasn't been a big because no, no, no, because they're

13:37

still polishing their apple in the public sphere,

13:39

and we didn't want any of that. We want people

13:41

that you didn't know, and then they

13:44

would be characters carry and and McCain

13:46

and Kissinger and and but

13:48

they couldn't try to put their thumb on the

13:51

scale in anyway. He got it immediately. But when it

13:53

was done done, he invited us

13:55

in for what was just going to be a few minutes. All he

13:57

wanted to watch, and he kept extending

13:59

it in the aids said no, you've got to go. Was

14:02

he wanted to watch them the other side.

14:04

And what you begin to realize is

14:06

that at that point of combat, which is

14:09

where human beings are at their very worst,

14:11

they're really good at killing the other people and avoiding

14:13

being killed or all this stuff happens. But

14:16

it's hell, and we couldn't even possibly

14:18

imagine what it's like. And we've tried so hard in so

14:20

many films, from Civil War through World War

14:22

Two into this. But they recognize

14:25

each other, and they that recognition has

14:27

transcendent, and so he wants to see

14:29

what they're saying, and what they're saying sounds

14:31

so exactly like our marines and our

14:33

army guys. And so you have a marine,

14:35

for example, Karmar Lantis who says you

14:38

know, we're not the dominant

14:40

species on the planet because we're nice,

14:42

right, And people complained that, oh, the military

14:45

turns young men into killing machines. I'd suggest

14:47

it's only finishing school. On the other side, we

14:49

have an n V a young soldier now kind of beloved,

14:52

David McCullough, Yoda uh

14:54

figure in in in their culture, and

14:57

he says, um, humans are

14:59

the only animal the kill when they're not

15:01

hungry. I've been in the jungle. I spend time in

15:03

the jungle. Even the tiger does not kill

15:05

when it's not hungry. And so what

15:07

you find on the front line is

15:10

a kind of similarity. And so for the North

15:12

Vietnamese, nobody had asked them these questions before,

15:14

because I remember, this is the singular victory

15:17

of the people capital p So they've

15:19

never heard about losses. They've never seen

15:21

their dead bodies scooped up with uh

15:24

you know, you know, bulldozers and things like

15:26

that, and no one said, what did you feel,

15:28

who did you lose? What did your mother worry about? Which

15:31

is the questions we in a kind of egocentric,

15:33

narcissistic Western society kind

15:35

of promote. And so when you

15:38

hear them they break down and cry just

15:40

like our guys do, and they get outraged

15:42

just like our guys doing. It's a pretty

15:45

it's a wonderful affirmation of what

15:47

we sort of loosely talk about

15:49

and don't really believe is a common humanity.

15:52

I think, as this is evolved in my life,

15:55

I'm somebody that as a boy on

15:57

Long Island, they named an award

16:00

my high school, uh for the most

16:02

improved athlete that was called the Roland

16:04

Floria Award, who died

16:07

two weeks before he was meant to come home. He was all

16:09

ready to get discharged. And he was

16:11

the brother of a family that lived down the block

16:13

from us, and the and the sisters in the family were

16:15

our babysitters. And as

16:17

this is evolved in my life watching films

16:20

which Full Metal Jacket is my favorite because you distill

16:22

it down to the the indefective ability

16:24

of the of the enemy. It's a girl

16:26

with a gun in a building and just she's gonna

16:29

take it all the way down the line and kills many of her

16:31

enemy as she can infend. And you met

16:33

her in real life in the Ted Offensive

16:35

a couple of times, right, I mean, you met

16:38

that counterpart from full matile jacket, but it

16:40

really a real person. But for me, what we would

16:42

I arrived at the point I arrived at is not

16:44

just Ellsberg, Pentagon

16:47

papers McNamara. We knew

16:49

was wrong at the time, not in hindsight. We knew

16:51

it was wrong. They knew it

16:54

was a mistake in

16:56

the middle of it. When it also takes me

16:58

to us is the evolution of the MA are in

17:00

military. People are embedded. It's

17:02

a limited transparency, there's no draft,

17:04

it's a professional military. The ten part

17:06

documentary I'd like to see Lennovik and ken Burns

17:09

do is the history of the U. S Military

17:11

and how we've arrived where we are now. We're on

17:13

one hand, you believe even

17:15

though a hornet's nest has been kicked,

17:18

maybe we kicked it, Maybe we should

17:20

have, maybe we shouldn't in the Middle East, But the point of

17:22

the fact matter is we've kicked its kicked

17:24

and if we walk away, we can't walk away.

17:27

We have to engage somewhere, some where

17:29

we engage and how is always the question. But

17:31

the idea that we can just hold the bartend to come home is ridiculous.

17:34

But but but I want to ask you both back

17:37

to one thing that I just in this question of

17:39

heroes, because it's come up a few times about what's

17:41

the hero, and this film taught us that there's lots of different

17:43

ways to be a hero in a situation like this.

17:46

And they're certainly incredibly heroic soldiers

17:48

on both sides, and you know, sacrifice

17:50

for other people and are brave and do incredible

17:52

things and sometimes suffer terribly

17:55

for it. But they're also the heroes

17:57

who went to Canada and the heroes who protested

17:59

the war, and the heroes who revealed

18:01

what was wrong about the war, you know, and the reporters

18:03

who tried to cover it, and the Vietnamese

18:06

who didn't believe that what their government was doing was right.

18:08

So it's just it's sort of up ended our no conventional

18:10

wisdom of what's the hero, which may deal

18:12

with this really horrendous tragedy over

18:15

ten years inspiring for us. Actually,

18:17

I was overcome by a Rory Kennedy's

18:19

movie Last Days of Vietnam, which he talks

18:22

about that guy that was the guy that got everybody out of thereon

18:25

Yeah, he's tortured, Stewart Harrington

18:28

by the people they left behind. To this day, you

18:30

know and and like he personally feels

18:32

he's carrying the weight of the decisions

18:34

made by people in Washington. My

18:37

next question for you is, um,

18:39

are you a filmmaker or a journalist? And

18:43

an easy one, I think yeah. I think we definitely

18:45

in ourselves filmmakers and not journalists. But

18:47

have you picked up some kind of you Obviously you've acquired

18:49

some journalistic education along the world, trying to be

18:51

really scrupulous about what we think is

18:54

true and what the facts are the way of journalist

18:56

would, but we really want distance to

18:58

be able to evaluate which facts are important.

19:00

So Philip Graham, who owned the Washington Post,

19:03

um said that journalism

19:05

is the first rough draft of history. It's a great

19:07

thing. But what history is able to do is come back

19:09

and triangulate, take advantage of

19:11

the perspective. The passage of time has permitted

19:14

us to get uh clearer sources.

19:16

So we do participate in certain

19:19

journalistic ethics, but we're filmmakers. We

19:21

are interested in telling a story. Have you

19:23

ever had a situation where you're doing a project

19:25

and you have someone who is significant

19:28

to the project, even integral, and then

19:30

you find out that they weren't necessarily on the up and up with

19:32

you and what do you do in war?

19:34

You have to be particularly careful because

19:37

the fish gets bigger the farther away

19:39

from the lake you get. And there are people who

19:41

feel a certain amount of survivor's guilt who

19:43

then have to expand their story. And because

19:45

war is tenent combat

19:48

and the rest is support, people who were in

19:50

support often guildlily a little

19:52

bit. So we always make sure that we

19:54

can at least place them at

19:56

the place where they are based on their military

19:58

record at that day. Then we have to

20:01

look him in the eye and say, is this story

20:03

believable? And that's why one of the things

20:05

the veterans do, the advisors do is

20:07

they go, oh, that's bs that that that

20:09

debt didn't happen, And we do it. And sometimes

20:12

we've found people that were, as you say,

20:14

central parts of our narrative that we just

20:16

felt that we felt more comfortable if

20:19

we could pare them back a little bit. Well, people

20:21

who come right out and say John carry

20:23

lied, he didn't do any of the things he did that one in the Purple

20:25

Heart. Some people argue it cost him the presidency,

20:28

that he didn't respond adequately to that nothing

20:30

happened. Well, this is what happens when we politicize.

20:33

We permit that relatively superficial

20:35

but so intoxicating and so seductive

20:38

world of the buying area of the yes and no. And

20:40

so you can't do that with Vietnam. You can't

20:42

do that intel an accurate story because it just

20:45

sort of sets itself against itself,

20:48

you know. So it's we That's why we

20:50

took ourselves out of that contemporary debate

20:52

about say carry it's interesting to hear

20:54

you talk now about you know what the political DNA

20:57

is or isn't in some of these projects, and you privately

20:59

have been somewhat politically. You've given money

21:01

to the Democratic Party. UM. In

21:04

mid June of I

21:06

came out warning people about

21:09

what I felt were the supreme existential

21:12

dangers of the then presumed

21:14

Republican nominee. And that was the first time

21:16

I've ever done it that kind of went viral. Did the video

21:18

for Teddy Kennedy's memorial correct, Yeah, but completely

21:21

anonymously and didn't charge a

21:23

cent and didn't want to be involved in anything other than

21:25

somebody that I had known and respected. I

21:27

don't list that film on my resume. I just

21:30

it was something that I'm say, you have a democratic

21:32

political DNA, but what I would

21:35

think it's masterful. This may be one of the greatest

21:37

things about ken Burns is filmmaking, because you've kept

21:39

the politics out of it. I think the

21:41

integrity of the films is inseparable

21:43

from our collectively, not

21:45

just Lynn, but the films I do with other producers.

21:48

Um, we've we've made that

21:50

decision to leave it out of it

21:53

because it is so binary, it is so

21:55

superficial, it is so easy to just

21:58

it's it's it's in the end

22:00

it is. I mean, there's a place for political

22:02

films, and that's an important part

22:05

of the tradition of documentary films that we have

22:07

advocacy. We still have a First Amendment. People

22:09

can say, I believe it's this way

22:12

I'm trying. There's too much pluribus, Arthur

22:14

Sassenger Jr. Said, and not enough unhum.

22:17

So we actually just started a website called Unum,

22:19

which is trying to curate and take the scenes from

22:21

all these films to say, look, we have shared

22:24

stories. We're not trying to exclude

22:26

anybody. When you add an African dimension

22:28

to a civil war story, you're not excluding other

22:30

people. Well, I mean, this can't

22:32

be helped your ken burn, so you must walk around old day

22:35

people going excuse me, could you do a

22:37

story on the history of pizza.

22:40

I think that people don't understand

22:42

how important pizza is. But

22:45

you know, getting to this idea of

22:47

your own personal ethic, did

22:50

you have to do some kind of political lobotomizing

22:52

in order to do the work you do? Affective? What

22:54

happened for you when you're a politize? You know, I

22:56

feel very grateful that my parents gave me a great education.

22:59

Being credit and thinking about what happened and being

23:01

honest are important, and that's been

23:03

a huge sort of existential challenge to sit

23:05

down people. You do it all the time. A

23:07

lot of people don't do it. Talk to someone

23:10

that you don't necessarily agree with, and here where they're

23:12

coming from, think about why, think about

23:14

who they are. Understand the documentary character.

23:16

Look, you want a narrative character. The minute

23:18

you look at that character in in in literature,

23:21

whether it's Williams or Faulkner or Shakespeare,

23:23

and you look at them and you study and they go, wow, that's interesting.

23:25

You meet the person in real life, feel like, get away from me. You

23:28

mentioned round the Board of Education.

23:31

I can't help but suggest that would be a really great topic

23:33

of the Supreme Court. The Court. So

23:36

sometimes these uh formulations

23:38

get a little bit expository into dactic.

23:41

So what I often say is that

23:43

a lot of times our films will cover

23:45

this, like we've got obviously the Dreads got Decision

23:48

in this film, We've got plus the versus Ferguson

23:50

in five films, We've got you known.

23:54

So what happens is instead of just segregating

23:56

it into Philadelphia with the

23:59

with the wigs and the green felt tables

24:01

with the white quill pens,

24:03

exactly what you you have

24:05

the Constitution operating in

24:07

all of the stories that we're telling, whether it's Jackie

24:10

Jackie Robinson, our film on Jackie Robinson that

24:12

I made with my daughter Sarah Burns and her husband,

24:14

the filmmaker David McMahon a few years

24:16

ago, that is as much the

24:19

story of Jackie Robinson taking away some

24:21

of the myths that everybody has promoted. Even so,

24:24

he was an amazing Lincoln was Lincoln

24:27

during the Civil War and in the Civil Rights movement. You said

24:29

Jackie Robinson was the Lincoln. He's a Republican

24:31

who can't stand Jack Kennedy, won't look him

24:33

in the eye. Kennedy says, well, you know, we

24:36

don't know too many negroes, and he goes, you're

24:38

gonna have to know negroes, and then Kennedy

24:40

has his come to Jesus. By the time of the Civil Rights

24:42

Act, Jackie's with Rockefeller are still a Republican,

24:45

but watches the Goldwater Tide votes

24:47

for Johnson. And you can see

24:49

in the arc of part two of Jackie Robinson

24:52

the whole history of modern political

24:55

America, which is the switch of the

24:57

Republican Party founded in eighteen

24:59

fifty four and rip on Wisconsin with one thing

25:01

in mind, the emancipation of the slave

25:03

hypocrisy that cannot exist any longer

25:06

in this Republic. And now they

25:08

become the harbor, the safe

25:10

haven for white supremacists

25:13

and racists. And and it is

25:15

just it's a stunning flip.

25:18

And the Dixiecrats, who the

25:20

Northern Democrats look the other way and counted

25:23

on their votes and to carry us ali itself

25:25

went the other way. But the Democratic Party

25:27

has been liberated from the tyranny

25:30

of those people. Does he call

25:32

you up at three o'clock in the morning and do this. I

25:35

got this idea and it's like a twenty minute,

25:37

one breath monologue. We're try not to

25:39

send text before six am.

25:43

At the core of Burns and Novic's

25:45

documentaries is a belief in listening

25:47

deeply and understanding all sides.

25:51

But, as Burns said, activist filmmaking

25:53

has its place too. One of the

25:55

best examples, to my mind is Josh

25:58

Fox's gas Land, about fracking

26:00

for natural gas in Pennsylvania. I

26:03

spoke to Josh after the release of

26:05

the film. Their priorities are

26:07

not about protecting groundwater or

26:09

keeping this situation non toxic. That couldn't

26:11

be further from their priorities. Their priorities

26:14

to get the gas out of the ground and make their money.

26:17

Here the rest of my interview with Josh

26:19

Fox at Here's the Thing dot

26:21

org. When we come back, Ken

26:23

Burns and Lynn Novik on Vietnam,

26:26

Trump and why he'd never leave

26:28

PBS for Netflix. I'm

26:41

Alec Baldwin and you're listening to

26:43

Here's the Thing. One

26:46

of Ken burns few overt

26:48

activism projects was lobbying

26:51

presidents to pardon the Great boxer

26:53

Jack Johnson. Burns thinks

26:55

the conviction was driven by racism,

26:58

but after over ten years he much

27:00

gave up. Then, advised

27:02

by Sylvester Stallone, Donald

27:04

Trump made it happen. In May two

27:07

eighteen. You mentioned Jack Johnson, and I'm

27:09

going to think you must be a huge Trump then, Now,

27:12

didn't you lead a movement. I've been working with

27:15

Sander McCain since two thousand and six

27:17

and we couldn't get w to move And for very obvious

27:19

Truss, we tried really

27:21

hard. And and then for Obama,

27:24

you know, I put I lifted up on the accelerated

27:26

because I knew it was a no win situation for

27:28

him. What this black president

27:31

is going to pardon an African American

27:33

who married white women and beat them? Explained

27:35

that people, what what what Johnson's would

27:37

need to be pardoned? Four yea. So Johnson is the

27:39

first African American heavyweight champion, which

27:41

was kind of He won on a mistake.

27:44

Nobody had intended to ever allow a black

27:46

man into the ring to possibly show. In

27:48

those days, the superiority of the races

27:51

was determined in some ways by who was the most

27:53

powerful. So this is a real, just mono

27:55

amount of thing, and he won great hope, and

27:57

then they sent a series of white hopes

27:59

up against him. And then on July four they

28:02

sent up Jim Jefferies, the greatest of all white

28:04

hope, and John Just Johnson

28:06

demolished him, and there were white on black um

28:09

riots all across the United States. So then there

28:12

are a few more fights, but basically everybody

28:14

said, how do we stop this guy. This is a decade

28:17

nineteen o five nineteen fifteen when war African

28:19

Americans were lynched that in any other time,

28:21

and yet he's living exactly the way he wants

28:23

to, dating women and multiple women

28:26

and marrying white women. And so they hooked.

28:28

They got him expost facto, meaning

28:30

they apply to law that had passed after

28:32

he'd done this thing, which is illegal, constitutional

28:34

on on the Man Act and basically for

28:37

crossing state lines with a moral purposes.

28:39

So she wasn't underage, she wasn't under age.

28:41

She was a prostitute. Of course. For people who are

28:44

not familiar with the Mayor film called Unforgivable

28:46

Blackness, The Rise and Fall of Jack Lola Johnson,

28:48

which is from a quote by W. B. Two Boys, a

28:51

great black scholar, who said, look, you know boxing

28:53

is in disfavor, and Johnson hasn't done anything

28:55

that other ball players and sportsmen, meeting

28:57

boxers and even senators haven't

29:00

on it all comes down then to his unforgivable

29:02

black So in this is so at least in the context

29:05

of the single issue thing with Jack Johnson, Trump,

29:07

as far as you're concerned, is the greatest president

29:09

of the modern century. So let me put this very

29:11

delicacy. We support the

29:13

pardon, but let's understand that the underlying issues

29:16

about Jack Johnson are about race, and we're

29:18

dealing with the human being who has a dismal

29:21

record on race. We actually made a film on

29:23

the Central Park five in which these

29:25

are five innocent children, children,

29:27

right, that did not commit the Central Park

29:29

jogger. Right. We know that they've been exonerated,

29:32

but they went to jail, and he took out

29:34

full page ads saying bring back the death penalty

29:37

and double down on it the day of the Access

29:39

Hollywood tape. So this is, you

29:41

know, a tweet from he has a conversation

29:44

with Sylvester Stallone. If

29:46

he does it, that's great. You want

29:48

justice to prevail, to

29:50

get behind the Central Park five. Yes, and then

29:53

he could call Trump. We'll be done. Now

29:55

here's my big gooey deep fried

29:57

smother than cheese. Larry King question,

30:00

what's a Ken Burns movie? Because I

30:02

have Michael want to give him my answer. Yes, Sir Burns,

30:04

his films are He's like Spielberg. You're

30:06

the Spielberg of documentary film, big canvases,

30:09

big themes, big budgets.

30:11

Comparatively speaking, you think about Spielberg,

30:13

you think God doesn't even want to do a movie for like two

30:15

million bucks, and it's Edward Norton

30:18

and Refines trapped in an elevator.

30:20

It's like one set great dialogue. Which

30:22

one do you want to make that you can't? You're

30:25

right, we do bite off. And I have had many

30:28

opportunities to talk to Steven Spielberg about

30:30

this, and we look at each other and we go we

30:32

do the same things. You can make stuff

30:34

up. I can't. What's a VIC movie? I

30:37

think we're plowing in the same field. It's

30:39

too we could pick something very small, but it

30:42

ends up that these projects take a long time, enormous

30:45

amount of effort and sort of psychic energy,

30:47

and so you want to pick something that you're going to really care about

30:49

spending time on. So it's

30:51

American history for sure, but it's also these

30:53

sort of deep questions about the human condition. That sounds

30:55

very pretentious to say that, but when you're looking at

30:58

individual artists like Time Away our Frank

31:00

woid right, it's how do people create and live

31:02

and get their work done. I think what we're

31:05

really interested in ultimately is

31:08

our country stands for something really

31:10

profound and inspiring and beautiful, which is that

31:12

we're all equal and we have this capacity

31:15

to be great, and yet from the day

31:17

we were founded, from before that we are so far

31:19

away from that thing. And in that

31:21

space is where we want to hang

31:23

out and explore, and it's very painful

31:26

and it's also really inspiring. I would just suggest

31:28

too that these big themes, these big

31:30

stories, the constituent building blocks,

31:33

are these intimate, bottom

31:35

up stories, more often than not, of people

31:38

that you don't know. And so like William

31:40

Blake, we're finding the world in a grain of sand,

31:42

and that changes, particularizes,

31:45

literally atomizes the

31:47

way you tell these stories. So it isn't just

31:50

the thirty thousand feet Great Man

31:52

history of the presidency in generals

31:54

and wars. It's something that is bottom

31:56

up and you and you touch on the African American

31:59

experience, which is in almost every film we've

32:01

made, and the failure, as Lena is talking about,

32:03

to live up to our creed. And when

32:05

you learn from so called ordinary people,

32:08

then it sort of mitigates the tension of the

32:10

big idea, right and somewhere

32:12

and there you can begin to negotiate

32:14

some of these bigger questions about who

32:16

we are, where we fail our promise,

32:19

where that exceptionalism is. So it's possible

32:21

in Vietnam, which is a horrible failure

32:23

to find unbelievable pockets

32:26

of love and beauty and redemption. And how

32:28

the political climate in this country now

32:30

make you feel about that. I think we're right

32:32

now in the greatest existential threats, certainly

32:34

since World War Two and the Depression. I

32:37

would just find that an assault on institutions

32:40

and values. And because of the way media is

32:42

and the Internet, which we thought of our

32:45

as our friend, now we don't know what's true, and

32:47

the ability to manipulate images and voices

32:50

now and video give us the

32:52

possibility for a kind of say whatever you

32:54

want to disseminate into. And we've

32:56

stayed in public broadcasting consciously a kind

32:58

of Some people would suggest some creaky old

33:01

form, but in fact is extraordinarily

33:03

was changed during the ark of your career. Not

33:05

much we what I happened to know what I mean,

33:07

everybody knows who studied this, that Reagan

33:09

stacked the CPP with more conservative

33:11

people. Do they wanted doing? They had

33:14

documentaries about the oil

33:16

business. Yeah, but one of his appointees is

33:18

the long time ahead of it now and she's been one

33:20

of our greatest supporters. And the last thing they want to

33:22

do is cross over any kind of line,

33:24

which is why I've stayed there. The unstated

33:26

agreement is you don't make me look bad, I won't make

33:28

you look bad. I wouldn't even say that. I mean, I came out

33:30

with a film called called Unforgivable

33:32

Blackness, and they swallowed hard. They wanted

33:34

to be called Jack Johnson, The Rise and Fall

33:37

of an American, you know, like that. But but

33:39

but but so I feel sort of fortunate.

33:41

I think we all feel very very grateful

33:43

for it. But we're able to make the

33:45

films that we do. And look what happened

33:47

with Vietnam. We accumulated,

33:50

just in the fall its first sets

33:52

of showings, thirty nine million people,

33:54

and then they had thirteen million streams,

33:57

which means this makes it one of the biggest

33:59

things to pass sue the PBS system.

34:01

Ever, this is a truth of people

34:03

don't understand. After the big

34:05

three networks plus Fox, the

34:08

next highest network trading

34:11

with Fox News PBS,

34:13

which means we're already able

34:15

to activate a huge segment

34:18

of the American population, which means old

34:20

media is not so dead. We're actually

34:23

able to approximate the unum

34:25

that we all just talk about in Wanna and

34:28

Wanna, you know, not our head to it. Actually

34:31

we can in a documentary film like this,

34:33

you can have people have a conversation that

34:35

you can't really put in a room together. You couldn't,

34:37

you know, that they would argue, so they'd start yelling at

34:39

each other. And in a documentary,

34:41

we can interview you, and we can interview you, and then we can

34:43

put you together and you can have a civilized

34:45

conversation. And we're kind of modeling a kind of civil

34:48

dialogue or discourse that our country

34:50

really lacks. It's not Jerry Springer. It's not Jerry

34:52

Springer. And PBS is where

34:54

people kind of come. They're expecting that people

34:58

and I'm assuming there must have been many, many

35:00

times that the Netflixes of

35:02

the world and these other independence have said, you come

35:04

with us, come work with us, you leave

35:07

pps that's your childhood. Well

35:09

it's been throughout networks, studios

35:12

more a lot of money in your face. Yeah,

35:15

but you know what it is is that I moved

35:17

out of New York in seventy nine, the summer seventy

35:19

nine, because I had finished most

35:21

of the shooting on my first film. Brooklyn Bridge had

35:24

no idea how he's going to make it into a film. But

35:26

I realized I needed to get a job to survive

35:28

in New York, like a real job, and that if

35:30

I put that film away, I'd still be

35:32

in New York. And you know, like the ad guy who

35:34

woke up and didn't write the novel that he always wanted.

35:36

So I moved to this tiny, little world town where I could

35:39

live for nothing. And that model has

35:41

informed the spirit at least, if not

35:43

precisely the letter, of what we've

35:45

done ever since that we've had a kind of independence,

35:48

we've stayed there. Yes, that

35:50

all that is attractive, but it comes

35:52

with certain things. Suits can come in

35:54

and say longer, shorter,

35:57

more sexy, less sexy, more

35:59

violent, and it's just do

36:02

not want to ever say,

36:05

even when somebody even has

36:07

the whiff of wouldn't it be better if you didn't

36:09

do it? This no focus because and you know what, I'm

36:11

not good at us because I also get in a separate

36:13

way like people I really admire,

36:16

like Errol Morris and Spike Lee who do commercials

36:18

like I would shrivel up to nothing

36:20

if someone said we want you to do like a commercial

36:23

for X y Z and the ken Burn style and

36:25

we're gonna pay you this. You don't do this, Fort

36:28

Knox, I cannot problem. I

36:30

cannot. I've got four kids. I'm hosting

36:32

a game show Friday. Yeah,

36:36

I admire you for that ability to do

36:38

that. I can't do that. But I live in New Hampshire

36:40

and we're fine. Ten and a half

36:42

years somebody was sitting with Richard Plepler and me

36:45

and saying he's the head of HBO. He

36:47

said, well, why don't you fun Ken And

36:49

he stops and I said, because Richard wouldn't

36:51

give us thirty million dollars and ten

36:53

and a half years to do this. The model they're

36:56

as generous and elastic as it is

36:58

at HBO doesn't permit even though the

37:00

PBS brand is

37:02

no less quality wise, it's just a little more obscured

37:04

because of the marketplace is so diverse now and so

37:07

fractured. Just as our

37:09

Civil War came out in nineteen ninety

37:11

when there were maybe twenty other stations,

37:14

right, and then we've gone through all

37:16

of this cable revolution and then the

37:18

Internet revolution. So we've got fifteen

37:21

hundred cable channels and millions

37:23

and millions of Internet possibilities at anything

37:25

in a moment. And what is that that bit

37:27

of audience marching through from thirty

37:30

nine million people for civil wars? But what

37:32

did we get in in the aggregated

37:34

of a few different showings in the fall of Vietnam

37:37

thirty nine million is Florentine headquartered

37:40

up in New Hampshire. That is that where the I L

37:42

M is. Does all the stuff flow through there?

37:44

That's where you cut you do You have

37:46

some superspace station set up there where

37:48

you cut everything and do it. We have a little house

37:51

off the town green that we got in, but

37:53

there's at us. It's the

37:58

former knitting mill that you as a doctor's

38:00

house. You're

38:02

you're contemplating or you're gonna do ali

38:05

What do you think you're going to bring to I

38:07

mean all, he's like the Beatles, He's been covered from every

38:09

angle. What are you gonna do? We're gonna bring a lie, right,

38:12

because here's I made a film on Huey Long in the mid

38:14

eighties, right, And part of my proposal was, we're

38:16

going to intercut pieces of Roderick

38:18

Crawford's performance in the Academy Award winning

38:20

motion picture All the King's Men. We

38:23

put him next to the real speeches of Huey Long.

38:25

It just diminished. Now, I thought, Will Smith, that was a

38:27

you know, that was not a perfect film. The first twenty five

38:29

minutes is one of the greatest openings

38:31

of a modern American movie that Michael Mann

38:33

did. It's just it's but

38:36

here's what happens in all the Ali stuff,

38:38

and there's lots of Ali stuff. It's basically

38:40

this fight or it's that fight. But we want

38:42

to start, as we do with

38:44

the French coming in eighteen fifty

38:46

eight to Danang, Let's tell the whole story.

38:49

So we want to start in Louisville and

38:51

and and tell the whole story up to the end.

38:53

That's what my podcast is about, Origins, is

38:55

you have to do this and what happens is we

38:57

are now, you know, biting

38:59

off smaller and smaller chunks and

39:01

sometimes doing extraordinary

39:03

things with it. I'm not proscribing

39:06

any other way of doing it. We just think

39:08

that there is room for us to learn

39:10

a lot more about, as you say, a person

39:13

who would be impossible to duplicate, So

39:15

why try to duplicate him. Let's just go to the archives

39:17

here and spar with Cosell see the fightstial,

39:20

you know, and people at the end who were there when

39:23

you know most of us were not. You

39:25

know, we understood the power of that

39:27

shaky lighting of the torch

39:29

in Atlanta, But but who was there

39:31

who went back to the hotel room with him

39:33

that night? You know? Um, I

39:36

have for Lynn? How does the me too movement

39:38

play out for you? I mean, I don't mean to be so

39:40

topical, but are you any thoughts about that

39:42

in terms of making a film? Well, I mean,

39:44

it's been really overwhelming

39:47

to see what's happened in our world in the last

39:49

year and a half and how much the stories we've been

39:51

hearing resonate for everyone. I know,

39:54

just the wide range being interrupted,

39:56

just not being taken seriously, having people

39:58

comment on how you look. We've had

40:01

I've had all kinds of inappropriate comments

40:03

in my time, and I've never talked about it. Sure,

40:05

even in public television, even in public

40:07

television, perfectly, the men in public television

40:10

are like the men everywhere else. It's shocking to

40:12

say, but yes, I think it's part

40:14

of human relations and how we've all been. I

40:16

think conditions should just ignore that and just keep going.

40:19

And I frankly would take offense at

40:21

someone saying, oh, you know, what does it

40:23

feel like to be a woman filmmaker. I want to be taken

40:25

seriously as a filmmaker. Was it hard for you to be as a woman

40:27

filmaker in the beginning, No, it really wasn't.

40:30

No, I don't think so. In the documentary world, even

40:32

before landed in Florentine, What was it like

40:34

in the early days. Yeah, I don't I really don't

40:36

have any mess came on this show and she

40:38

was, I don't want to say, in the extreme

40:41

on Mike in the show, she was very

40:43

forthcoming. She said, the guy put his hand

40:45

in the sixties or whatever, the late sing she goes, the guy

40:47

put his hand on my on my leg right, So

40:49

I mean their generation. I think really paid their dues.

40:52

To be honest, She's quite a bit older than me, and I think

40:54

in that time there were very few women in the world

40:56

of news and journalism. And right,

40:58

so Dickerson Right's

41:02

mom exactly, um, and

41:05

what's her name? Povitch Shirley Povid should be interviewed

41:07

for Baseball film. His daughter Lynn Povish

41:09

was a pioneering reporter in news Day Newsweek,

41:12

who sued. I mean, I've heard these these pioneering

41:14

women, and even the women ten years older than me working at

41:16

CBS sixteen minutes. I've heard incredible stories.

41:19

I really have not experienced anything criminal

41:21

or regious or anything I would call harassment, but

41:23

I've certainly been objectivided. I think every

41:25

woman who walks the earth has been. And

41:28

the way I was brought up and the way I just sort of functioned

41:30

was Okay, I'm gonna do my job and

41:33

I have I mean, you know, and I think

41:35

for women coming after me, though, and I have a daughter who's

41:37

twenty five, almost twenty six, I

41:39

don't want that to be her world. In the best

41:41

no, she wants She's getting out of lost medical

41:46

school. Major

41:49

parents happy for healthy granddaughter. Well

41:52

but anyway, you know, I just I

41:54

think it's an exciting time actually that some

41:56

of this kind of conversation is happening. I think that's

41:58

healthy. I think it has gone way too

42:00

far in some ways of convicting

42:02

people without any kind of do process,

42:05

And I think that's the problem. Did you want

42:07

to say something, Well, I have four daughters, so

42:09

you know, we're working with one of Lynn's

42:12

counterparts, another producing partner, Dayton Duncan,

42:14

and I've been working for many years on a film about

42:16

country music. And what's so interesting is that

42:18

women from the very very beginning to take

42:20

a central role in this story, well

42:22

before Rock and roll was dealing with

42:25

some issues about sort of

42:27

spousal abuse and marital rape

42:29

and divorce and taking

42:31

the pill. Loretta Lynn is in the mid

42:33

sixties. This is stuff that Grace Slick is not doing

42:36

or Joni Mitchell is not going to do for another decade.

42:38

But there she is, and you've got Passy Klin

42:40

before her, and all of these stories are

42:42

there in American history. It's what

42:44

we choose to show, and that the ability

42:47

for the patriarchy to limit and narrow

42:49

the story, We've just widened the story and nothing's

42:52

diminished. He gets more dimensional. And the

42:54

same with race, the same with labor, the

42:56

same with you know, complications.

42:58

There's undertow and my real brother

43:01

from another mother. When Marsalis

43:03

said in our Jazz film said that sometimes

43:06

a thing and the opposite of a thing are

43:08

true at the same time, and we have been,

43:11

we've been, we have been working

43:13

on trying to honor that in all

43:15

the situations since he said that in the mid nineties.

43:18

Cust Now are you ken Burns? Are you a collector?

43:20

Privately? What does ken Burns collect? Quilts?

43:23

American quilts by women who

43:26

tell the story I think of

43:28

in an elemental way who we are, the warp

43:30

and the wolf, and in that these are sometimes

43:33

anonymous or collective efforts.

43:35

An Amish piece from the eighteen thirties. A

43:38

hundred years later, piet Mondrian is

43:40

doing these geometrical, loud,

43:42

geometrical, bright colors, which is the epitome

43:45

of modernism. And I go, excuse

43:47

me, I've got a shaker quilt from a hundred

43:49

years before that can sit next to any Piet

43:52

Mondrea painting. And let me show

43:54

this to you. It's like on fire. And

43:56

then it just the lies the kinds of

43:59

borders that we ach, they don't exist for the artists,

44:01

and the borders we make between people based

44:03

on color of the skin or regions, or

44:05

whether they're blue voting or red voting,

44:07

or whether they're gay or they're straight. All

44:09

of these superimposed distinctions

44:12

don't actually exist, and it is possible

44:14

to embrace a complex narrative.

44:17

I have been immersed in

44:20

the world of documentary film for the past almost

44:22

decade because David Nugent, the artistic director

44:24

of the Hampton's Film Festival, and I are partners. But

44:27

docs have become so ubiquitous

44:29

now and so it desired, you know, it's

44:31

thrilling. I remember an

44:33

article that Vincent can Be wrote

44:35

in five about

44:39

the releases of documentary that year.

44:41

The Way I had a film out on Huey Long

44:43

Uh. Fred Wiseman had a cinema very

44:45

Tay. There was a thing called street Wise

44:48

which was really flirting with a dramatic

44:50

films uh and using real

44:53

people. And Ross mckaway did Sherman's

44:55

March, self referential film.

44:58

He said the documentary was too arrow

45:00

word and I think why we're drawn to it today is

45:02

that we have all these outlets that need to

45:04

fill stuff out. But more importantly,

45:07

our plots are not tired

45:09

anymore. Right, Steven's gonna invest

45:12

everything with the meaning. But these plots

45:14

we know what. You know what it's like to go into a movie and go,

45:16

she's dead. She's not gonna survive this film

45:19

and and documentaries, even when you

45:21

know it's gonna turn out the way you know it

45:24

did. You don't think it's gonna happen. Right, you go

45:26

to Ford see or anything. Maybe this time the gun's gonna

45:28

jam. Have you ever put yourself in anything? Done?

45:30

In one film? In baseball, I was interviewing

45:33

Billy the Spaceman,

45:35

the Boston Red Sox pitcher who know

45:37

people when he was traded to Canadian

45:40

team, he would find, uh, you know

45:42

tin foil? I said, why are people throwing tinfoil

45:44

at me? And it was hash

45:47

But anyway, I said, what's your best pitch? And you needed

45:49

it to set up his onlie. You

45:52

put yourself Yeah, and you felt

45:54

you had to do it. Yeah, it was just really necessary.

45:56

We debated about it though. We had a big, huge conversation.

45:59

Do you have one? Well, I have one. It's a World

46:01

War two veteran said Phillips, and I was asking

46:03

him, um, you know, did you have

46:06

a hard time kind of keeping your language clean

46:08

when you came home, because you know how Marines

46:10

talk. And here was this very courtly,

46:12

southern gentleman and he said, you know,

46:14

in the Marines, we only use but one adjective,

46:18

and when I came home, it was really really hard to

46:20

not use that adjective at the dinner table.

46:22

And so you hear me say what was it? And

46:25

he says, I can't tell you. My wife will come down and Heaven

46:27

and hit me on the head. But it's kind of a conceit

46:29

if you think about it. I mean, we were

46:31

doing an event the other day and someone said, was it intentional

46:34

when you cut to this picture? After

46:36

that person said something and as if it was some

46:38

kind of accident that these things happened. I mean,

46:40

every single thing in the film is intentional.

46:43

Right, So we don't put ourselves

46:45

in but we're in every frame. Filmmakers

46:54

Lynnovic and Ken Burns. Their

46:56

latest documentary is The Vietnam

46:59

War. I'm Alec

47:01

Baldwin and you're listening to here's

47:03

the thing

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features