Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Black voices are making an impact
0:03
this month and beyond. Keep listening
0:05
to discover one of our favorite
0:06
shows, courtesy of Acast recommends,
0:09
welcome to two black girls, one rose.
0:12
We're two black girls invading the messiest
0:14
reality dating shows on Earth. I'm
0:16
Natasha, and I'm Justine. And
0:19
this season, we're recapping Lifetime TV's
0:21
hit show, Meredith first site in Nashville.
0:24
Meredith first site is a full on
0:26
hot mess of social experiment.
0:28
Each week on our podcast, we recap
0:30
the latest episode and dissect the trials
0:33
and tribulations. These five newly married
0:35
couples are going through, while also dissecting
0:37
a relevant dating marriage and relationship topics.
0:40
And after five years deep in Bachelor
0:42
Nation, we're now diving into the married
0:44
at First Sight University, so come join us.
0:46
Listen to us on all podcast platforms every
0:49
Thursday and join our amazing community
0:51
on Patreon at patreon dot com
0:53
slash two black girls for next.
0:55
Acast helps creators launch,
0:57
grow, and monetize their podcast.
1:00
Everywhere, acast dot com.
1:05
Hey, everyone. John Isleman here, and welcome
1:07
to Helen High Water. My podcast about politics
1:09
and culture on the edge of Armageddon. It's
1:12
determined if dubious, committed,
1:14
if cuckoo for cocoa puffs, often wrong,
1:17
but rarely in doubt exercise, in
1:19
elevated gas baggery. Than
1:21
neither rain nor snow nor heat nor gloom
1:23
of night nor the toxic
1:25
rantings of the not house right, a
1:27
president attempting to invalidate legitimate
1:30
election in stage an auto coup complete
1:32
with an armed disruption of the United States capital,
1:34
nor more broadly and arguably
1:36
even more disturbingly. The capture
1:39
of a decent sized chunk of our political, social,
1:41
and civic spheres by a cadre of
1:43
incoherent, insidious, conspiracy
1:45
adiled, conspiracy craving, authoritarian
1:48
worshiping lunatics, hustlers, grifters, nihilists,
1:51
and nincampups. None of it. None
1:53
of it has kept us from our
1:55
duly sworn duty and obligations.
1:57
Giving you our listeners a fresh
1:59
episode of this podcast week after week
2:02
after week after week. Maybe
2:04
not without fail because,
2:06
you know, hashtag epic fail
2:08
is one of our many models around here,
2:10
but certainly without a pause. We've
2:13
been doing that for more than two years.
2:16
Haven't had a break, all of
2:18
which is to say that I
2:20
am plumb shagged
2:23
out and desperately in need of
2:25
some R and R. And with the midterm
2:27
election now comfortably in the rearview
2:29
mirror in our democracy amazingly,
2:32
if I will admit a little unexpectedly, still
2:35
intact. It seems like a suitable
2:37
time for the Heilemann Water home
2:39
office to give itself a fucking
2:41
break. And so for the next few weeks,
2:44
that is exactly what we are gonna do.
2:46
And we'll see you back here on the other side of the holidays.
2:49
Tanned, rested, refreshed, revitalized, and
2:51
raring to go. Ready to
2:53
get back to cranking out more
2:56
tasty content. In the meantime,
2:58
Don't despair. We're not leaving
3:00
you entirely in the lurch for these
3:03
weeks. To the contrary, every
3:05
Tuesday morning, per usual, you
3:07
will find Aeb, hopefully unfamiliar
3:09
episode of the podcast, doing
3:11
the backstroke in your feed. Drop
3:14
there by the Abel AI fact totems
3:16
who'll be mining the store while we're away.
3:18
And while these episodes come
3:20
over the next few weeks, may not be fresh
3:23
or strictly speaking new,
3:25
they will be piping hot, a carefully
3:27
curated series of hell in high water golden
3:29
oldies, which those of you
3:32
who've been around from the start may remember,
3:35
I hope fondly. And those of you who
3:37
came along sometime later may never have
3:39
encountered it all. Given
3:41
our focus on politics these past few months
3:43
and our desire not to take a dump on
3:45
your mood of holiday inspired good cheer, we've
3:47
decided these encore presentations will avoid
3:49
that topic like the plague. And focuses set
3:51
on culture, entertainment, technology, and such with
3:53
a run of some of our most favorite guests in those
3:55
realms over the past two years, including
3:58
this beauty right here, which
4:00
whether or not you've heard it before, you will
4:02
not want to miss. And so with that,
4:05
we leave it to it with a hearty and heartfelt
4:07
Nalaste. Hey,
4:20
everyone. John Heilemann here, and welcome to Helen
4:22
High Water. My podcast from The Recast and iHeart
4:24
radio with big ups to the one and only Riza
4:26
for our dope theme music. First
4:30
things first, Happy new year, everyone,
4:32
by which I clearly mean, hashtag fuck
4:34
off twenty twenty and hashtag, hello,
4:37
twenty twenty one. As we roll out of
4:39
one political Asian into another from
4:41
the Trump era to the Biden era,
4:43
a great deal of changes a foot in the political
4:46
world. But no matter who is in the White House
4:48
or which party controls congress, Some
4:50
huge and hugely troubling issues,
4:52
as Jesus said of the poor, we always
4:54
have with us, and one of those issues is guns
4:57
and the carnage that has been parted parcel
4:59
of the perfusion of firearms in America.
5:02
So as we head into what we all dearly hope
5:04
will be a brighter and more hopeful future than
5:06
the recent past we all endured last year,
5:08
I thought it would be good to check-in with a central
5:11
figure in the fight against gun violence and
5:13
four gun
5:13
safety. Shannon Watts. The state of our
5:16
union when it comes guns is
5:18
actually a lot better than many
5:20
Americans realize that we are making true
5:22
progress in state houses
5:24
and in boardrooms in this country. And I think we're on
5:27
the precipice of major national
5:29
change.
5:33
Shannon Watts is the founder of mom's man action
5:35
for gunSense in America, a self described
5:38
accidental activist who in the space of
5:40
less than a decade, emerged as the
5:42
face of a grassroots movement that With
5:45
six million supporters, now boast
5:47
more members than the dreaded NRA. Shannon's
5:49
transformation was unexpected and took place
5:51
in something like a heartbeat. Before the
5:53
horrific Sandy Hook elementary school shooting
5:55
in Newton, Connecticut, shocked and shook
5:57
the nation in December two thousand twelve,
6:00
Shannon was a stay at home mom living
6:02
in Zionsville, Indiana. The day after
6:04
Sandy Hook, she started the Facebook group page
6:07
to connect with other parents who were scared
6:09
and outraged by the epidemic of school shootings
6:11
plaguing America. Shannon had only
6:13
seventy five friends on Facebook, but she titled
6:15
the page one million moms for
6:18
gun control. The conversation she started
6:20
there took hold quickly with thousands rallying
6:22
to a march organized the next month in Washington
6:24
DC, hundreds of volunteers lobbying
6:26
congress, and moms mad action
6:28
taking shape as an advocacy group based
6:30
loosely on the model of mothers against drunk
6:32
driving. By the end of twenty thirteen,
6:35
The group had a hundred and thirty thousand members and
6:37
chapters in all fifty states and announced
6:39
that it was joining forces with mayors against
6:41
illegal guns to form the umbrella group
6:43
every town for gun safety, largely
6:45
financed by former New York mayor Mike Bloomberg.
6:48
Since then, every town has become a political
6:50
juggernaut, spending millions of dollars to support
6:53
candidates, legislative campaigns, and corporate
6:55
reform efforts, and changing the political
6:57
dynamics around gun control in ways large
6:59
and small subtle and profound. I
7:02
wanted to talk to Shannon Watts about all of this
7:04
as well as the areas where progress has been harder
7:06
to achieve, about the disheartening increases
7:08
in gun sales, mass shootings, and domestic violence
7:11
last year during the COVID lockdowns about
7:13
the crisis at the NRA. And the roughly
7:15
three dozen moms demand action volunteers
7:18
who ran for office up and down the ballot and
7:20
one about the pivotal roles of women
7:22
and young people in the gun safety movement
7:24
And whether the election of Joe Biden and
7:26
Kamala Harris suggest reason for
7:28
optimism that common sense gun reform
7:30
might finally have a chance at the federal level
7:33
or if the CASM political divide on display
7:35
in the twenty twenty election and its aftermath
7:38
means that Congress will remain as stubbornly
7:40
resistant to positive change as verb.
7:42
And in fact, Shannon and I covered
7:45
all of that more in a conversation where
7:47
her heart and hope consistently went
7:49
out over hell in high water.
7:56
Just briefly, sir. Can I just ask,
7:58
is there anything in your mind that the president
8:00
can do now to make his new bed up?
8:03
What do you think? You know
8:05
the shit he's been saying? He's he's been calling
8:08
Mexican immigrants rapidness in criminals.
8:10
I I don't know. Like, members
8:12
of the press, what the fuck? Hold on
8:14
a second. You know, III
8:17
it's it's these It's these questions
8:19
that you know the answers to. I mean, connect
8:21
the dots about what he's been doing in this country.
8:24
He's not tolerating racism. He's promoting
8:26
racism. Not tolerating violence. He's
8:28
inciting racism and violence in
8:30
his country. So, you know,
8:32
I I just I I don't know what kind
8:34
of question that is. So
8:36
that was better a work in famously viral
8:39
moment after the mass shooting in
8:41
El Paso. And one of the
8:43
things that kind of contributed to his passion
8:45
and his national profile on the subject of
8:47
gun reform and we are here today with Shannon
8:49
Watts from mom's demand in every
8:51
town in all of those organizations that are
8:53
trying to make the world better on this
8:54
front. Shannon's to see you. How are you doing? Oh,
8:57
it's wonderful to see you. And, you
8:59
know, it's a new year and
9:01
a new
9:02
beginning. And I think that this issue
9:04
will be front and center. You know, I started
9:06
by playing Beto just because in
9:08
this podcast, I like to talk a little bit about
9:10
the present and then a little bit
9:12
about the past. And then a little bit about the future.
9:15
And so for our purposes, the president really still lose
9:17
twenty twenty. And I think of that moment in
9:19
the presidential campaign when, you know,
9:21
if there was any issue that better work seemed
9:23
to have some traction in the national dialogue.
9:25
It was obviously around guns in in that moment
9:28
when his hometown, the place he lives, the place he
9:30
works, was afflicted by the all too
9:32
common plague of mass
9:34
shooting that obviously
9:36
emotional and genuine and spontaneous
9:39
on camera moment sort of connected
9:42
with a lot of people. And I wonder whether
9:44
as we just think about this past year, I know
9:46
you're optimistic about the future. We will talk a lot
9:48
about that today. Twenty twenty was a weird
9:50
year in a lot of in a lot of ways. You
9:53
know, among the many issues that
9:55
did not really seem to ever really get
9:58
litigated in the presidential campaign.
10:00
Once we got into twenty twenty, you
10:02
know, the issue of guns was not
10:04
an issue that really was front and center
10:06
in the presidential race, at least. Right? mean,
10:08
obviously, Joe Biden and Donald Trump had very different
10:10
positions on the question, but it was not, you know,
10:12
front and center in the way that maybe
10:15
that that maybe it could have been or should have been.
10:17
And I wonder whether you're disappointed at
10:19
all in the notion that another
10:22
presidential campaign goes by in
10:24
which this issue was not pivotal
10:27
to the outcome or central
10:29
to the debate in what was
10:31
obviously, a big and important, maybe, life
10:33
changing election for a lot of people.
10:37
I I guess, I would argue that little
10:39
bit with you, and and you probably won't be surprised
10:41
given what I do as full time volunteer.
10:43
But I felt like it was a
10:45
big part of the discussion certainly
10:47
COVID and as that became a
10:49
national crisis took center stage,
10:52
but it's important to remember
10:54
that there wasn't a single Democrat running
10:56
for president that
10:59
didn't support this issue. And in fact,
11:02
they were competing with one another
11:04
during the primaries to see who could be
11:07
the best on the issue of gun
11:09
safety, and that is a sea change in
11:11
American politics. I I think it's
11:13
important to go back really quickly to twenty
11:15
ten. When a quarter
11:17
of all Democrats in Congress had an
11:19
a rating from the NRA. If
11:22
you flash forward to the twenty twenty
11:24
elections, only one member
11:26
of congress, a man in
11:28
Minnesota, had an a rating from the
11:30
NRA. He did lose. He lost to
11:32
an even more extreme candidate, and that's
11:34
a whole another discussion. But my point
11:37
being that we have come
11:39
so far on this issue that
11:41
For many years, people considered a political
11:43
third rail. And now, you really do have
11:46
to be on the right side of this issue, at least as a Democrat,
11:49
to even be considered a contender.
11:51
That is certainly been a sea change. It's no
11:53
longer sort of the third rail. I mean,
11:55
in my generation, you think about so
11:57
many Democrats had their consciousness shaped
12:01
around this in the early nineteen nineties
12:03
by taking votes on the assault
12:05
weapons ban and then being targeted by the NRA,
12:07
and these are all kind of cautionary tales. If
12:09
you take a tough vote on gun control, the NRA
12:11
will come after you, you'll lose your seat and so that
12:13
that tended to instill caution. Well,
12:16
there's still lot to discuss I think in terms of the
12:18
the congressional situation because it's not been a lot of progress
12:20
on that front ever since. But I think you're right certainly
12:22
in terms of how the
12:24
playing field has shifted. And now in the least in the
12:26
Democratic Party should say the competition is, who can
12:28
be best on gun control, gun
12:31
safety, gun sensible, gun sensor
12:33
reform? Know, I said twenty twenty has
12:35
been weird year. And I guess I just wanna
12:37
get your sense of it. I mean, I've been looking at these statistics
12:39
and I don't know what
12:41
I thought would happen in COVID. I mean, if you'd asked
12:43
me, there's gonna be giant pandemic in America, what
12:46
will happen to the question of mass shootings? What
12:48
will happen to gun homicides. What will
12:50
happen to gun ownership? don't
12:52
know that I would have been surmised that what
12:54
did happen would happen, which is that everything
12:56
went up. Like, everything went up. Right?
12:58
I mean, even the things that you don't think should have gone
13:00
up like school shootings, see if because there were people in
13:02
school, there were more school shootings, more mass
13:04
shootings, more gun, homicides, more
13:07
domestic abuse, more like there's not a metric
13:09
by which twenty twenty wasn't an off
13:11
the charts bad year when it comes to
13:13
guns. Was that what you expected
13:16
when we went into lockdown? Yes.
13:18
Absolutely. Look, we have four
13:20
hundred million guns in this country and very
13:23
few gun laws. And We
13:25
now look back on those first few months
13:27
of the COVID crisis and can see that there was
13:29
a historic number of gun sales many
13:31
of those two first time buyers who
13:34
may live in states that don't require permitting
13:36
or training. And we
13:38
were seeing these calls to suicide
13:40
hotlines and to domestic violence, hotlines
13:43
spike. And so the
13:45
logical outcome of
13:47
those things is to see COVID
13:50
exacerbate gun violence, two
13:52
crises, two uniquely American
13:54
crises that are spinning out of control.
13:57
We know that women are isolated with
13:59
domestic abusers, many of whom have easy
14:01
access to guns. We know tens of millions
14:04
of kids are home unexpectedly
14:06
from school. Also with easy access
14:08
to guns. We know Americans are
14:12
struggling with isolation and concerns
14:14
about their economic welfare. Also, with
14:17
easy access to guns. We
14:19
know that in city centers in this country
14:21
where they rely on violence interruption
14:23
programs that can no longer get out in
14:25
their communities and interact again
14:28
with easy access to guns. And so,
14:30
sadly, this is sort of the logical
14:32
outcome of allowing essentially
14:35
gun lobbyists to write our gun laws for
14:37
decades.
14:38
I think I'm right when I say we don't have because
14:40
of the nature our system. We don't have really
14:42
a comprehensive database for gun
14:44
sales. Right? We don't really know how many guns got
14:46
bought. We do know how many background checks there were.
14:48
Exactly. That's exactly right. Because
14:51
many people don't realize. I sound like Donald
14:53
Trump, many people don't realize.
14:54
But, you
14:55
know, it It's a guy, Donald Trump. I don't think you have to
14:57
worry about it. Thank you. Thank you. You know, in this
14:59
country, when you buy a
15:01
gun from a licensed dealer, by
15:04
law, you have to have a background check.
15:06
Now, there's something called Charleston loophole,
15:08
which means that if in three days a background
15:11
check hasn't cleared, that dealer
15:13
can go ahead and sell the gun.
15:15
Now, that again is being exacerbated
15:18
by COVID because there's this huge backlog of
15:20
guns being sold, and the time to do background
15:22
check has slowed down. But
15:25
in this country also on unlicensed
15:28
gun sales, no background checkers
15:30
were required except now in twenty
15:32
two states.
15:33
Right? So that means that those
15:35
aren't being tracked and taken into account.
15:37
I don't think we have a complete number for twenty
15:40
twenty yet, but think at the end of November
15:42
was thirty two million dollars some background
15:44
checks, which is a record setting number.
15:46
And as you say, I think a lot of from
15:48
what you can tell anecdotally, at least a lot of people are
15:50
first time buyers. And obviously, that leads to a lot of
15:52
unintentional shootings. And you're not just talking
15:54
about murders and other acts of premeditated
15:57
violence you're talking about suicides and a
15:59
lot of unintentional shootings that take place, and
16:01
that's obviously been a huge problem. Again, I say the
16:03
statistics are all up. There's
16:05
another problem though, right, which is
16:08
why do you see an explosion in in firearm
16:11
acquisition and background checks? And,
16:13
you know, there was a a part of our political
16:15
spectrum that chose to
16:18
seize on the pandemic to
16:21
try to drive the rhetoric
16:23
of fear. I mean, it's the NRA most
16:25
visibly, but, you know, a lot of gun rights
16:28
advocates whose attitude is we
16:30
use pretty much anything to try to scare people.
16:32
They're coming to take your guns, which is a very common
16:34
rhetorical trope of that
16:36
crowd. But in the in a moment of
16:38
trauma, in a moment of national
16:41
crisis. That's their go to
16:43
move. Right? Try to scare the shit out of people
16:45
and say you gotta stockpile your guns because
16:48
don't know when we're gonna get out of this lockdown and we don't
16:50
know what's gonna happen next and this is oppressive government and you
16:52
don't know when they're gonna come and try to take your guns, you need
16:54
to be safe and so go get your guns. And
16:56
that works. Right? That has been
16:58
an effective rhetorical posture for
17:01
the gun rights lobby for a long
17:02
time. And it was during
17:03
COVID, it
17:04
seems to me. Yeah, you know, every country
17:06
is struggling with this COVID
17:08
crisis and keeping it in check.
17:10
Only America has simultaneously given
17:13
all of its citizens incredibly easy access,
17:16
unregulated access to guns. And
17:19
that's a recipe for disaster. And
17:22
we have seen the NRA engage in
17:24
this kind of rhetoric for decades.
17:27
You can go all the way back to hurricane Katrina.
17:29
And see gun lobbyists saying
17:32
the only solution to natural disasters
17:35
is to be armed. We saw it after
17:37
the hurricanes in Texas where gun
17:39
lobbyists were actually able to go into the state
17:41
and loosen gun laws to say, okay, well,
17:43
you don't need a permit of any kind to
17:45
carry a gun in the wake of natural
17:47
disasters. And so when
17:50
COVID happened in this country, you know, the
17:52
gun lobby has saw dollar signs. And
17:54
we saw them put out ads and
17:57
amp up the rhetoric around the
17:59
need to be armed. And they
18:01
were able to get gun
18:03
stores to be considered essential businesses
18:05
in many places. The ATF allowed
18:07
curbside gun sales. And when
18:09
you think about it, if you step back,
18:12
it's insanity. And yet
18:14
that again is what
18:17
we've created in terms of political dynamic
18:19
in this country where the special interest
18:21
is deciding
18:22
what our gun laws should be. Yeah. You
18:25
know, so much our politics are driven by the rhetoric
18:27
of fear, but it's in
18:29
this particular case, you already have so much
18:31
fear and for completely
18:34
natural and predictable. And in some
18:36
cases, legitimate reasons. I mean, people are scared
18:38
in the middle of this pandemic. People are scared for a lot
18:40
of reasons. In the course of twenty twenty, a lot of them make
18:42
a lot of sense and you see people who
18:44
want to stoke that fear and
18:46
then capitalize on it. As you said, you know, that
18:49
crowd sort of had dollar signs in
18:51
its eyes. And yet, I've heard
18:53
you say, and I've heard others say,
18:55
you know, even as we've seen this
18:57
rush towards gun ownership, in
18:59
country that loves guns and there were
19:01
a ton of guns already. It's kinda amazing
19:03
just to think that somehow twenty twenty was
19:05
unusual by our normal standards. But I
19:07
said against that, this was
19:09
not a great year for the NRA, right? This has
19:12
not been a year in which, I mean, by
19:14
some measures, by some political measures, the
19:16
NRA is more on its heels
19:18
than it's been. I think in my lifetime
19:20
covering politics, you know, its dues collection
19:22
is down. Wayne Lappier is under investigation
19:25
by the IRS for tax fraud. You got the
19:27
Leticia James, the Attorney General in New York
19:29
has pledged civil suit against the NRA. And
19:32
then there's the larger political shift you talked about
19:34
before, which is that people in the gun safety
19:36
gun sensible gun reform cause
19:38
people in the movement have are on
19:40
the front foot. Right? And so to just talk little
19:42
bit about that, about what has the
19:44
long been a David and Goliath struggle --
19:46
Mhmm. -- kind of in the cliche. It's
19:48
not quite like that anymore. It's starting to seem
19:51
like a little bit more of a fair fight.
19:53
Oh, absolutely. I mean, first of all,
19:55
the NRA's calculus, the gun lobby's calculus,
19:58
the return on investment has been dwindling
20:00
over the last decade on their
20:02
election spending. So you've got that
20:05
to begin with. And then
20:07
you can see year after year like
20:10
what happens to so many special interests. They
20:12
got so much power and wealth that
20:15
they began to think there was a different set of rules
20:17
for their organization. And there
20:19
was a lot of self dealing, you know, we
20:21
know they're under investigation for
20:23
for potentially being foreign assets.
20:26
Weymop here was spending tens
20:28
of thousands of dollars on Italian suits
20:31
and private jet travel. This is
20:33
not how a non profit organization
20:35
behaves. Certainly, they were
20:37
acting with impunity. And
20:39
they are under investigation on many different
20:42
fronts, but They're also
20:44
in many ways broke. They have spent
20:46
tens of millions of dollars on legal fees
20:48
alone because of these investigations.
20:52
And if you look
20:54
at the bet they made on Donald Trump, they spent
20:56
thirty million dollars on his campaign in twenty
20:59
sixteen. They really
21:01
thought that they would turn right around
21:03
and pass their priority gun legislation,
21:05
which was really two things, concealed
21:07
carry reciprocity. Which means the
21:09
lowest common denominator in
21:12
a state to get a gun permit would apply
21:14
to the entire country. Right? It would it would
21:16
essentially upend state's rights. The
21:19
second thing they wanted to do was to deregulate
21:21
silencers, which they laughingly
21:23
refer to as the Hearing Protection Act.
21:29
And I've seen the whole life. Matter,
21:31
but it really, it's it's at this it's so
21:33
absurd that you can't help the laugh
21:35
or else you'll
21:36
cry. God forbid you air, you know, ear
21:38
plugs, but they failed
21:40
on both fronts. It's really important to remember
21:42
that that we got so good at playing defense
21:45
since two thousand twelve that we were able
21:47
to stop a Republican president and a Republican
21:49
congress for passing the
21:51
gun lobby priority legislation, and they've given tens
21:54
of millions of dollars to these lawmakers. And
21:56
so that is in many ways what
21:58
is the beginning of the end of the NRA.
22:00
I think as we know it, Are they
22:03
able to still juice gun sales? Yes,
22:06
they are. And will they again when Biden
22:08
starts to talk about executive
22:11
actions? Yes. But
22:13
the NRA does not have the same
22:15
power that they used to have because
22:18
they really had a decision to make, I think,
22:20
after the Sandy Hook shooting tragedy in two thousand
22:22
twelve. Come to the Heilemann
22:25
support background checks.
22:29
Or double down. I don't
22:31
know if I'd be sitting here having this conversation with
22:33
you. If they'd allowed Congress to pass back projects,
22:35
we might have thought, okay, our work here is done.
22:37
Right. But instead, they doubled down
22:40
and created really a whole
22:42
movement of millions and millions of
22:43
Americans. I mean, we're bigger than the NRA now.
22:46
That is opposing them at every turn.
22:48
Bigger by what metric? We have
22:50
about six million supporters. They have
22:52
five. They claim I think
22:54
a lot of those people aren't alive and scribe
22:56
to their magazines and you have to sign up as an NRA
22:59
member when you buy a gun that kind of the work.
23:01
But we have this
23:04
huge grassroots army of volunteers like
23:06
myself who show up at every
23:08
gun bill hearing, who have relationships
23:10
with lawmakers, who have become political powerhouses
23:12
even in the redis of
23:14
states. And I think it
23:16
was their worst nightmare that women and mothers
23:18
would organize against them. There's a very interesting
23:20
multilayer kind of thing going on here. Right? Because
23:22
on one hand, with a sick society
23:24
with respect to guns. Right? And for anybody
23:26
who studies comparative crime across
23:28
the industrialized world, these are all now. I remember
23:31
back with that time when this was used to stunned people,
23:33
but you know, there's not really an honest criminologist
23:35
who doesn't come to the conclusion that the thing that really sets
23:38
everything apart is the difference between America's
23:40
easy access to guns and that's what is the
23:42
difference between the violent crime rates
23:44
in America and the rest of industrialized world. And there
23:46
are other cultural, powerful, like cultural,
23:48
and spiritual elements to this that have
23:50
and hold in the country. And so you look at twenty twenty,
23:52
you look at COVID, you look at those stats that I signed
23:54
earlier, and you think, man, this is
23:56
a grim picture. And
23:58
then there's this other picture, which is the picture
24:01
I think you're pointing to, which think it doesn't ameliorate
24:03
the first picture's ugliness, but
24:06
it does seem to me that there's not gonna
24:08
be a thunderbolt or a lightning clap. Maybe
24:10
it's a thunderclap and a lightning bolt. A thunderbolt.
24:13
I don't know. Whatever that bad mix metaphor
24:15
is. I think there's not gonna be this moment
24:17
where the NRA has now been filled
24:19
and it is now no longer a know,
24:22
these legacy organizations take a long time
24:24
to after fee and they wither away rather
24:26
than getting kind of knocked down in one fell swoop.
24:28
But you can sign a see it. Right? You can start
24:30
to see the way in which the struts underneath
24:33
it are kind of being kicked out and the
24:35
hollowness of it is starting to be exposed
24:38
by a lot of factors including the ones you've cited
24:40
just now. You guys said, what? Sixty million
24:42
dollars or so on the on the
24:44
the gun control or the gun safety, whatever
24:46
you wanna call it, that side of the ledger. You guys
24:48
were out there toe to toe with
24:50
the NRA and the gun rights people in the
24:52
congressional elections, local elections across the
24:54
country in in terms of the the broad spectrum
24:57
of American elections in twenty
24:58
twenty. Right? Yeah, you know,
25:01
I always say this is a marathon, not a sprint.
25:03
It takes most social movements
25:05
and decades to get traction and create
25:08
real change. I wish it would
25:10
happen overnight. That's not the way our
25:12
system is set up. So often it is
25:14
incremental change. But
25:16
it's important to remember that if
25:19
you go back to the spring
25:21
of twenty thirteen, when mentioned
25:23
to me, and that was bipartisan bill
25:26
that would have closed the background check loophole
25:28
in honor of the massacre
25:30
at the Sandy Hook School. It bailed
25:32
by handful of votes in the Senate. But
25:35
it's important to remember some of the senators
25:37
who voted against it were democrats.
25:40
Not a single one of them still holds their
25:42
job. The lesson that
25:44
Democrats learned after
25:47
that was that with
25:49
friends like the NRA no one need enemies.
25:51
And that's because every Democrat who voted with
25:53
the NRA was opposed by the NRA
25:56
in the following election. I mean, if you look at Mark
25:58
Pryor in Arkansas, he voted against Manchin
26:00
Tumi what did the NRA do? They went and poured
26:02
millions of dollars into Tom Cotton's campaign.
26:05
And so that was a real turning
26:07
point in this country. And then it really
26:10
started to show that the NRA's bet
26:12
of doubling down was not going to pay off.
26:14
So what did we do? We had just started
26:16
as an organization a few months
26:18
earlier. And again,
26:21
we could have said, okay, the country isn't ready
26:23
for this, the timing is wrong,
26:25
let's go back to our normal lives. Instead,
26:27
what many of our brilliant volunteers did
26:30
was to pivot and to say,
26:32
okay, Congress isn't gonna do this.
26:35
But there are governors who will.
26:38
And we can do this work in state houses and
26:40
in board rooms and eventually point
26:42
the right president in the right Congress in the right
26:44
direction. And so that's what we started
26:46
to do. And since then,
26:48
in the last eight years, we
26:51
have now passed background checks in
26:53
twenty two states. We have disarmed
26:55
domestic abusers in twenty nine
26:57
states, and we've passed something called the red flag
26:59
law in nineteen states.
27:00
Hold on one sec, Shannon. Red flag laws
27:02
are So a red flag
27:04
law allows, depending on
27:06
the state, a family member
27:09
or a police officer, to petition
27:11
a judge for temporary restraining order
27:13
that will remove the guns from someone who is
27:15
a a risk to themselves or others.
27:19
And this is something that passed in Florida,
27:21
for example, after Parkland. It passed in
27:23
California after the UCSB shooting. It's
27:25
a really important tool for
27:28
law enforcement to
27:30
figure out if someone is truly
27:33
a risk to the community. Howard Bauchner:
27:35
So, yeah, that obviously would be an important
27:37
tool. I mean, that's a preventative tool. Right? You're
27:39
getting ahead of potentially
27:42
bad violent situation with guns because you
27:44
would know in advance someone was a risk
27:46
due to mental health, and then you can intervene
27:48
on the front side before an emergency
27:51
happens before something bad actually unfolds,
27:53
you know, red flag laws and disarming
27:56
domestic violence abusers. Those are both
27:58
like, pretty big wins. Yes. Yeah.
28:00
Not to mention the dozens and
28:03
dozens of companies that have now changed
28:05
their corporate policies around OpenCarrie because
28:07
of pressure we've put on them. And that's
28:09
just because we're women pulling
28:11
the levers of power available to us. Now I
28:13
say we're women. We're actually mothers and others
28:15
now. But we are the majority of the voting public.
28:18
We make the majority of spending decisions for our families,
28:20
and that's how we force change.
28:23
But the other thing we didn't realize was
28:25
how much time we were gonna have to spend stopping
28:27
the NRA's agenda in state houses. Right? These
28:30
bills that they were putting forward were just were flying
28:32
through state houses, arming teachers,
28:35
permitless carry, stand your ground,
28:37
guns on college campuses, really
28:40
sort of the NRA's Dream,
28:42
which was a public safety nightmare, was
28:46
happening in states across the country.
28:48
And we now have a ninety percent track
28:50
record of stopping the NRA's agenda
28:52
year after year for the last five
28:54
years. And so
28:56
when you talk about how things have changed,
28:59
you know, that's something the gun lobby never expected
29:01
to not just have us play
29:03
offense, but to be really good at playing defense.
29:05
Yeah. And I think, you know, that the man too
29:08
many things seems like a turning point in some ways because, you know,
29:10
it was a defeat. Right? A kind of a bitter
29:12
and brutal defeat in many ways for the movement
29:14
and yet also a turning point in terms
29:16
of recognizing you recognize
29:18
a lot of things on the base of that. Right? In some ways,
29:20
the Congress was not necessarily not only
29:23
wasn't the only game in town, but was maybe
29:25
not the main game in town, and that you're gonna
29:27
try to win, you needed to win, as
29:29
you said, boardrooms, state legislatures, local,
29:32
all over the country. It was this was a thing that, you know,
29:34
if you just focused on Washington, not only were
29:36
you gonna frustrated, but it's actually not
29:38
the place where most of the I mean, it's
29:40
an important arena for change, but it's not,
29:42
by any means, the only arena or even arguably
29:44
the most important arena for change given the not only touch so
29:46
federal law. And so there's a big lesson
29:49
in that, I think. I remember hearing
29:51
you talk about this. There was a moment where you sort
29:53
of thought with that
29:54
loss. Maybe this is all over and that it's all gonna
29:56
fall apart. And then it turned out to be quite the opposite.
29:58
Howard Bauchner: I have got that, you know, so
30:00
many times along the way. Right? There's
30:02
all these inflection points where you think, okay,
30:04
can can we go on? And
30:07
we decided very early on as an organization
30:10
that really our motto was going to be losing
30:12
forward. Right? You don't take on one of the most wealthy
30:14
powerful interest that's ever existed
30:17
and expect to have a one hundred percent
30:19
win rate. We knew we were going
30:21
to lose and we did lose not
30:23
just mentioned to me, but in state houses as
30:25
well. Now we win more than we lose, thankfully.
30:28
But I'll tell you the story of
30:30
Arkansas quickly. I think it's a really important
30:32
example. You know, I would go to Little Rock
30:35
to visit our volunteers once
30:37
a year for the first couple of years and they never
30:40
grew. They were lovely people. But we would
30:42
have lunch. And I think they
30:44
just kind of expressed this idea that
30:46
many people didn't think it was worth their
30:48
time in Arkansas. That it was such a a losing
30:51
battle that they might as well spend their time
30:53
another way. Right. So then
30:55
what happened? A bill
30:57
to allow guns on college campus
31:00
even at tailgates and inside
31:02
stadiums, sailed through the state
31:04
house, the governor signed
31:06
it into law standing next to the chief
31:08
lobbyist of the NRA. And
31:10
it's so pissed off in particular
31:13
women and moms across the state that
31:16
They came out in droves to volunteer
31:19
for our organization. And
31:22
we used that newfound strength
31:25
in numbers to go back in
31:27
immediately and carve out an
31:29
exemption so that guns would not actually be
31:31
allowed inside stadiums. And
31:33
then the next year, we had two
31:35
of our volunteers run for office and win.
31:37
One of them ran against the guy that put the guns on
31:39
campus go forward and beat him handily.
31:43
He was a retired nurse and a monstimate action
31:45
volunteer. The year after that,
31:48
we had become such a political powerhouse in the
31:51
state of Arkansas. Again, we're talking about
31:52
Arkansas. Yes. We're talking about
31:54
like, you wanna, like, provide please remind me and
31:56
say, we're not talking here about Washington
31:58
State or
31:59
Oregon of Vermont. We're talking here
32:01
about Arkansas. And
32:02
there is a Republican super majority, and
32:04
we beat Standard Ground twice and
32:07
lawmakers were interviewed afterward
32:09
and they said that the NRA's agenda was
32:11
too extreme for the state of Arkansas. So
32:15
would we be where we are in the state of Arkansas
32:17
now? Had we not had that loss
32:19
initially? I don't think so. And that's
32:21
the losing forward motto. Yeah.
32:24
Losing forward is a it encapsulates a
32:26
really important thing about I'd say about
32:28
politics in general, but certainly about activist politics
32:30
and trying to take on big, strong, and trenchant
32:33
entrenched interest where it's it's partly a strategy
32:35
of necessity, but also a strategy that has
32:37
innate kind of inherent power
32:40
it if you can embrace it. I wanna just ask you one
32:42
last thing real quick before we take a break. I
32:44
think, you know, in this cycle, in addition to spending a
32:46
lot of money, to try to help candidates and help
32:48
your causes across the country. I think it's now the case
32:51
that there's thirty five. Maybe it's
32:53
more thirty five. Mom's demand volunteers.
32:56
People have been associated with the organization have went on
32:58
in one elective office in twenty
33:00
twenty. Is that the that number ring a bell to you? Is that
33:02
sound right? It's now forty three. So
33:04
just this election cycle alone, we had over
33:06
one hundred mom's to man action volunteers
33:08
and gun violence survivors run for office.
33:11
We now have two volunteers sitting in
33:13
congress, Lucy McBath and Marie Heilemann. Yeah.
33:16
But other volunteers, one seats
33:18
in state houses like Kansas and
33:20
Wisconsin, in Ohio and
33:23
even in local school board and city council
33:26
races. And I think that is in many ways
33:28
moms two point zero. Right? This idea
33:30
of moving not just from
33:32
shaping policy, but to actually making it. I
33:34
wanna come back around that when we get into our
33:37
more future oriented part of this conversation toward the end
33:39
of the podcast, Lucy McBath and the Georgia six.
33:41
Marie Newman in Illinois three,
33:43
both important women and potential powerhouses
33:46
in Congress, particularly this McBath, who's an incredibly
33:48
impressive Heilemann, and there's much to say about
33:50
her. You said forty three forty
33:52
three is the number now?
33:53
Forty three volunteers, this election cycle,
33:55
that doesn't even include others who run-in the
33:57
past. As
33:57
we're making up our our grand tote board here
34:00
of twenty twenty, the good, the bad, and the ugly.
34:02
That is a new thing for you. Right? I mean, that but
34:04
not new isn't there's never been demand people
34:07
who've run for office before, but that is in
34:09
place where you're going essentially, and this is one of the
34:11
things I wanna talk about a little later. Essentially, what
34:13
we're seeing is the difference
34:15
between having marshaled moms and
34:17
others, not just moms, as activists.
34:19
It's now kinda making that shit from activism to
34:22
policy making and being elected officials
34:24
who are getting actually into the positions where they don't have
34:26
to be working from the outside or where they can work from the
34:28
inside. And this seems like in some ways, a a landmark
34:30
election. On that metric alone for your
34:32
movement, this has been kind of twenty twenty will go
34:34
down in
34:35
history. Is that a kind of a landmark year? Right?
34:37
Yeah. Obviously, women
34:40
are realizing that
34:42
as the saying goes, if you don't have a seat
34:44
at the table, you're probably on the menu. And
34:47
women only make up about seventeen
34:49
percent of the five hundred thousand elected
34:51
positions in this country. And
34:54
what happens when you become a mom's demand
34:56
action volunteer is you spend
34:58
a lot of time in your state house and you realize
35:01
that these are not rocket scientists eighty percent
35:03
of these lawmakers are men. And
35:05
they don't necessarily care what you have to say
35:07
nor are they geniuses. And
35:10
if you are someone who is caring and
35:12
compassionate and concerned, then
35:14
you are more than qualified to hold
35:17
elected office. And so I think
35:19
it is a logical jump to spend all
35:21
of this time as an advocate to
35:23
say, you know, I I can actually be
35:25
a lawmaker. If you don't have a seat
35:27
at the table, you are probably on
35:29
your menu. And even for those of us, the
35:31
rare person you run into in America who
35:33
is in favor of cannibalism, they don't
35:35
wanna be the one actually on the menu. That
35:37
prefer to be the one at the table. We're gonna take
35:39
a break real quick and then come back with Shannon Watts
35:42
to talk some more about guns here on
35:44
Helen High Water. Let's listen to some commercials.
35:51
We gather here in memory of
35:54
twenty beautiful children. And
35:58
six remarkable adults. They
36:02
lost their lives in a school that
36:05
could have been any school. In
36:08
a quiet town full of good and decent people
36:11
that could be any town in America. Here
36:16
in Newtown, I come
36:18
to offer the love and
36:21
prayers of a nation. I
36:25
am very mindful
36:28
that mere words cannot match
36:31
the depths of your
36:32
sorrow. Nor
36:34
can they heal your wounded
36:36
hearts. I
36:39
can only hope it helps for you to
36:41
know that you're not alone
36:44
in your grief. That
36:48
our world too has been torn
36:49
apart. That
36:53
all across this land of ours, we
36:55
have wept with you.
36:59
We pulled our
37:01
children tight. And
37:04
you must know that whatever
37:07
measure of comfort we can provide. We
37:11
will provide. Whatever
37:14
portion of sadness that
37:16
we can share with you to ease
37:19
this heavy load. We
37:22
will gladly bear. Newtown,
37:27
you are not alone.
37:29
So that is the forty fourth president of
37:31
the United States. Brock Obama
37:34
speaking at a memorial service at Newtown
37:37
High School in December of
37:39
twenty twelve just a couple of
37:41
days after the mass shooting
37:44
in that school in Sandy Hook and up in Connecticut.
37:47
The devastating moment Obama had just been
37:49
reelected in twenty twelve and then had
37:51
to face the horror of Newtown, which
37:53
he later said, was like literally
37:55
the hardest thing that he confronted in
37:58
all of his eight years in office. You
38:00
know, we all know there have been a mind numbing
38:03
number of mass shootings and school shootings in America
38:05
over these past twenty years, Shannon. But they wanted
38:08
Sandy Hook had a different kind of
38:10
impact on a lot of people. Barack
38:12
Obama obviously as I said was one, but it
38:14
also had a huge impact on you at about the
38:16
same time. You were living in
38:18
Indiana, not personally connected,
38:21
even tangentially to this tragedy, and
38:23
yet, you know, in very short order,
38:26
you turned your life upside down and put
38:28
gun control against if you're right at the center of your life.
38:31
You've told the story a bunch of times, but
38:33
I'd love for you to tell it again here. For
38:35
the listeners of Heilemann Water?
38:37
So to give some background, I
38:39
had about a decade long career in corporate
38:42
communications where I spent thousands
38:44
and thousands of hours writing press releases
38:46
and honing messages and working with executives
38:49
and telling stories. Right? So that was
38:51
the background that I had. I took
38:53
a five year break because I was blending
38:55
my family with my my husband's together.
38:57
We have five kids. Everything
39:00
from elementary school to college at the time
39:03
and it was the end of that five year
39:05
break. I was getting ready to go back to
39:07
work. I was trying to to find a job.
39:10
And folding laundry, very
39:13
cold day outside of Indianapolis in
39:15
my home. And I see on
39:17
the television that there's an active shooter
39:20
in a place called Newton, Connecticut. And
39:23
it's right before the holiday. You're
39:25
seeing this footage of of children being
39:27
ushered out of school crying, families showing
39:30
up in the parking lot, terrified
39:32
and devastated. And like the rest of
39:34
America, you know, I just sort of sat down on the edge of
39:36
my bed and and watched this unfold. Never
39:38
imagining that the outcome would be so
39:41
horrific that twenty children and
39:43
six educators were slaughtered in
39:45
the sanctity of an American elementary school.
39:49
But I very quickly became
39:52
enraged and that was because politicians
39:54
and pundits were on my television set so
39:56
shortly
39:57
after, we knew what
39:59
had happened inside that school, saying
40:01
that the solution was somehow more
40:03
guns And
40:05
I knew nothing about organizing. I knew nothing
40:07
about gun violence. I
40:10
just knew that that was a lie.
40:12
I knew our country was broken, and because
40:15
congress had done absolutely nothing in the
40:17
wake of Gavi Gifford shooting,
40:19
their own colleague, I
40:21
knew that nothing would be done.
40:24
And so the day after the
40:26
tragedy, I went online in my kitchen,
40:28
on my counter on my laptop thinking
40:31
I'm gonna join something like mothers against drunk
40:33
driving for gun safety surely that already
40:36
exists. And
40:38
it didn't. I had seventy
40:40
five Facebook friends. I decided
40:42
I would start a new Facebook page. I had
40:44
just learned how to do that. I
40:48
called it one million moms for gun control.
40:51
Very shortly thereafter, my daughter who was gay
40:54
informed me that one million moms
40:56
was an anti gay group trying to get Ellen
40:58
DeGeneres not to be this spokesperson for J.
41:00
C. Penney. And then I got a
41:02
call from a congresswoman who said, if you have
41:04
the name gun control, in your organization's name, we
41:06
will never be able to work
41:08
with you. So our name changed quickly
41:10
thereafter, but I started this Facebook page
41:13
And it was truly like lightning in
41:15
a bottle. You know, you hear about that on social media.
41:17
And somehow, at
41:20
least one of my friends seventy five
41:22
Facebook friends connected me to others and
41:24
on and on and on until within
41:27
a week, you know, I was on the front page
41:29
of USA Today. So clearly,
41:31
this was something that was
41:33
needed, something that was necessary, and
41:35
so many others had that same idea
41:37
that day. Howard Bauchner: So here's
41:40
a number of things about this story that
41:42
I find, you know, fascinating.
41:44
Right? I mean, the audacity of
41:47
someone who does not
41:49
have a background in activism, did not
41:51
really know how to use social media, who's
41:54
not someone who's an ex bird in this area
41:56
who had not even really been personally affected by
41:58
this in the sense that you weren't like mother of
42:00
a victim of a school shooting
42:02
or of a mass shooting. To just suddenly
42:05
be, like, moved in the way that you just described.
42:07
And again, the audacity, a Heilemann. You
42:09
know, here we go. A million. I'm, you know, I'm
42:11
just gonna do this. And I'm not I'm really not
42:14
mocking. I find it like everything
42:16
about the way in which you undertook this
42:19
was sort of like It
42:21
was an invitation to naysayers who
42:24
would have said, you know what you're doing,
42:26
you're not qualified, you don't have the credentials,
42:28
you're not really connected to this. Who are you,
42:30
lady? What gives you
42:32
the right to do this? And it's
42:34
a waste of your time. This will never change
42:37
this is foolish or an amateur. There's
42:39
a million and not totally
42:41
unreasonable objections to you undertaking
42:43
this in the spirit that you undertook it. And your attitude
42:46
was and I know you won't but not say
42:48
this, but I would say this for you, which is like
42:50
fuck you. I care about this. I'm doing
42:52
this and I'm gonna do it my way and I'm gonna see what
42:54
happens. The Hutzpa of it, and and
42:56
I say Hutzpa in the most admiring way
42:58
possible. I don't know where did you
43:00
get I mean, it's the thing I most wanna
43:03
understand about you and some ways. It's like
43:05
where that came from because most
43:07
people would have been afraid. And your
43:09
attitude was to all of those objections
43:12
was Thank you very much. I'm doing this
43:14
anyway. I think it's a few things. So
43:16
first of all, there's something to be
43:18
said for naivete. I had no idea
43:21
what I was embarking on. None.
43:24
Right. And look if I had known
43:26
immediately, I would get death threats
43:28
and threats of sexual violence to me, to my
43:30
daughters that I'd have to travel with
43:32
a security guard and use an alias for
43:34
the next eight years. Would I have done
43:36
this? I'd like to say
43:39
yes, but I think there's some benefit
43:41
to have been very naive. The
43:43
other piece of it is I think it's just
43:45
part of my personality that you tell me I can't
43:48
do something. I will double down. It's
43:50
why I've been able to ignore
43:52
those kinds of I think and stay focused.
43:55
And I would say that the third thing
43:57
is that I had this outpouring of support
44:00
from Heilemann mostly women across
44:02
the country, perfect strangers who
44:05
said to me, I will help you.
44:08
I will bring the skill sets that you don't
44:10
have to the table, and we will get this done
44:12
together. And I just have
44:14
always felt that incredible
44:17
support and I talk about
44:19
this in my book where
44:21
every obstacle that existed
44:24
was removed. And I'll just give you an example.
44:26
In the early days, I can't
44:28
even tell you how many trolls would invade
44:30
our Facebook page. Right? The
44:32
families from Sandy Hook would be
44:35
so kind as to give us
44:38
private photos from their families to continue
44:40
to fight on this issue. And and at that time, it was
44:42
really to fight for Manchin Tumi. And
44:44
yet, trolls would say the most disgusting horrible
44:46
things. And if I would spent hours of
44:48
my day while I was trying to get this organization
44:51
off the ground banning and
44:53
blocking and deleting trolls in
44:55
their comments. And I can remember
44:57
I was laying on the floor of
45:00
my closet crying because I just didn't
45:02
know how I was gonna keep all this up. Plus, you know,
45:04
I had five kids. And I got this
45:06
call from a woman who said, I
45:08
am in Indianapolis, I'm disabled, I'm
45:10
home twenty four hours a day, I
45:13
noticed you have a lot of trolls on your
45:15
social media. If you give me your
45:17
passwords, I'll just spend my day blocking
45:19
and deleting them. AND THAT'S EXACTLY
45:21
WHAT SHE DID FOR YEARS
45:24
AND IT'S THINGS LIKE THAT THAT MADE THIS
45:26
POSSIBLE. THERE'S another thing that made
45:28
it possible. I I think you happen to
45:31
have been really lucky in terms of the timing.
45:33
Right? You know, if you had done the same thing,
45:36
three years earlier or three years later, you wouldn't even
45:38
have been too early or too late, but you happen to hit that
45:40
moment. You know, there was a critical mass
45:42
of people out there, a genuine silent majority.
45:44
Who were ready to be activated
45:47
by the right kind of movement with
45:49
the right kind of structure and the right kind of approach.
45:51
You know, I think the other thing is reading fight like
45:54
mother is the book. You've mentioned your book, and I'm gonna say it again
45:56
for those anybody who doesn't know what it's called fight like
45:58
a
45:58
mother, which is a great double edged wand.
46:01
You should buy the book just so you can have a book
46:03
that sells quite like a mother on their bookshelf. You
46:05
know, you're really in tune with a bunch
46:07
of things that are very again, as far as I know,
46:10
although you had some political background and
46:12
worked in things that touched on politics in
46:14
your life, you were not a grassroots
46:16
organizer or, you know, a community
46:18
organizer like Barack Obama by training. Right? But there's
46:20
a lot of the stuff that you've done that it's really in
46:23
tune with how you work
46:25
grassroots now in this world.
46:27
Right? And there were things you didn't necessarily know that much
46:29
about. As you said about social media, but the embrace
46:31
of social media, the embrace of
46:33
volunteerism, the kind
46:35
of understanding of how
46:39
numbers in a world
46:41
where we're constantly quantifying everything all the time
46:43
now and the way in which you went about
46:45
doing this was very much in sync with the
46:47
new kind of model for how to mobilize
46:50
change in this wired
46:52
up connected world that we have that
46:54
allows for a certain kind of social mobilization
46:56
and activism that wasn't really possible
46:59
you
46:59
know, not that long ago, these things would have been
47:01
fanciful and you happen to come along and just like
47:03
like the right moment. I always wonder
47:05
how mothers against drunk driving did it. Right?
47:08
Like, did they call each other on their rotary phones
47:10
and or send letters or or drive to each
47:12
other's homes? How did these
47:14
amazing people organize and get much
47:16
done in a decade. I I do think
47:19
social media has turbocharged what we
47:21
do. I mean, when we were going after
47:23
companies for their open carry policies, we
47:25
were able to get places like Chipotle to
47:28
change them in in just a weekend
47:30
using hashtags like burritos, not bullets.
47:33
We're able to put pressure on lawmakers
47:36
publicly online. We're able to ask people
47:38
to call and to send emails. Like we're
47:40
doing right now to defeat standard ground
47:42
in Ohio. Social media
47:45
has truly enabled what
47:47
I call naptivism. Right? So when
47:50
moms have that precious
47:52
amount of free time to be activists, they
47:55
can't send a tweet or an email or
47:57
a text make a call on their iPhone.
48:00
And really, the benefits
48:03
of this technology have never been more clear,
48:05
right? We were going into COVID and
48:08
just getting ready to hold what we advocacy
48:11
days. These are these major in person
48:13
essentially lobbying days, right, where we show up
48:15
at state house by the hundreds and
48:18
advocate for this issue. And so
48:20
we had more RSVPs in
48:22
Sacramento to show up for our advocacy
48:25
day in California than we'd ever had before and
48:27
just days before we had to pivot to do it
48:29
online. And we actually had
48:31
more people participate than
48:34
had RSVP. And
48:36
I think the lesson that that's taught us is
48:38
This technology allows us to be even
48:41
more inclusive, more
48:43
equitable. You can necessarily get from San
48:45
Diego Sacramento, but you sure can zoom in
48:47
during your lunch hour to have conversation with
48:49
your lawmaker. So I don't think we'll ever
48:51
go back to doing things the way we did before,
48:54
which was so focused on in person.
48:56
There there's this other element though, which is
48:59
in addition to social media, there's also
49:01
this obvious gender element
49:04
to this. Right? Which you're very focused on,
49:06
that that mothers women and
49:09
mothers to overlapping categories,
49:11
but not synonymous categories, obviously. That
49:13
that was the was where the the
49:15
kindling was in a way to to drive this
49:17
movement. And I think that's really the difference
49:20
it seems to me between this and mothers against drunk
49:22
driving, which is
49:23
heard you say at some point that our
49:26
gun laws are what's the phrase
49:28
that you used? Our our masculinity toxic
49:30
masculinity.
49:32
Right. So, you know, unlike
49:34
the situation with drunk driving where
49:36
mothers were affected because they had lost children
49:38
to drunk drivers that was not there
49:41
was not an innate, nothing
49:43
about the laws they wanted to change had. I don't
49:45
think the same kind of quality that
49:47
you're imputing to our gun laws that I think makes
49:49
sense, that notion that our gun laws reflect
49:52
toxic masculinity. And so
49:54
it's another thing that,
49:56
yes, there have been movements of mothers and movement
49:58
of women obviously throughout our our history
50:00
and politics and on the broader social
50:03
field of play, but the
50:06
idea that in the moment when
50:08
feminism and the intersection of feminism and
50:10
politics was getting a certain
50:12
kind of. There was a certain kind of intersectionality
50:15
that, like, guns would be an
50:17
obvious place where that could be powerful.
50:20
I should set it with those guns could be an
50:22
obvious place where it could be powerful. It was not it's
50:24
not obvious, I don't think. And I think it maybe
50:26
had been obvious to you but wouldn't necessarily
50:28
have been obvious to everybody else that the right kind of rocket
50:31
fuel for this movement was gonna end up being
50:33
mothers. And I don't think that would have been necessarily obvious
50:35
to everybody because I think you decoded certain
50:37
thing about the nature of our gun culture
50:39
and the nature of our gun laws that wasn't maybe a thousand
50:41
percent obvious to everybody who'd been working this issue
50:43
in the past. Hey, look, this
50:45
is a fascinating conversation
50:47
and and not without controversy. I
50:50
sure get a lot of blowback for using the word
50:53
moms and moms to me in action. If
50:55
you look at the history of activism
50:57
in this country, it is
51:00
often
51:00
women, at the front line, often
51:02
women of color, Yeah.
51:04
On the front line of this issue, if you go all the
51:06
way back to prohibition, right? It was really the first time
51:08
women were allowed to get involved
51:11
because men thought temperance was
51:13
a Christian value and never could put
51:15
that genie back in the bottle. Women
51:17
wanted to stay involved in activism and they
51:19
they have from suffrage to civil rights
51:22
a child. Labor laws, you know, all the way up to the water
51:24
crisis in Flint, Michigan. It's really been
51:27
women in many ways who have forced change.
51:29
And I think women are often the secret
51:32
sauce of activism. There's a
51:34
thing that goes, you can't beat someone who doesn't give
51:36
up. And when Our
51:39
children's safety and our community safety
51:42
is on the line. I don't
51:44
think women in particular moms will
51:46
give up. Now,
51:49
is it anachronistic to
51:52
sort of call on that? Perceived
51:56
cultural value of being a mom.
51:59
Sure. In a perfect world, women
52:01
would advocate just as being women, but
52:03
when you look at the fact that eighty percent of the lawmakers
52:05
are men in this country. Yeah. And
52:07
that women have certain levers of power they can Heilemann
52:10
that men are innately afraid of mother
52:12
figures. It
52:14
has been powerful, and it's why, you
52:16
know, everyone from the
52:19
president to to member of congress, to people
52:21
in their state houses call and
52:23
ask for dozens or hundreds
52:25
of our volunteers to wear their red
52:27
shirts at their events. That is why.
52:29
Because there is something intrinsic about
52:32
a mother fighting for
52:35
the safety of her family or community
52:38
that is powerful. Will that always
52:40
be the case in this country? I hope not.
52:43
I I hope we hold fifty percent of the positions
52:45
of power. But
52:47
you have to be pragmatic. And I think
52:49
we are nothing if not pragmatic as an
52:51
organization. I asked my friend and
52:53
fellow recount podcast host
52:55
Jennifer Palmarey, who, obviously,
52:58
the long career in Democratic politics,
53:00
who, again, works with us now here. It has
53:02
podcast with a recount call just something
53:04
about her. And I asked her what
53:06
I should ask you today, but I'm gonna
53:08
ask it and then I'm gonna append a
53:10
a sub question to it. Right? Her question was,
53:13
why do Americans love guns so much? And
53:15
my sub question, actually, just talk through
53:17
some of the gender dynamics involved is, is
53:19
that the right question? Does America
53:21
love guns so much? Or do America men love guns so
53:23
much. And I don't mean to suggest there aren't women who love guns.
53:25
There are women who love guns, own guns, shoot guns.
53:28
I know you have said before that your pro
53:30
secret amendment and you're not you know, you
53:32
you don't think that you're not anti second amendment.
53:34
So I'm I'm we're obviously generalizing here
53:37
when we talk on this level. So just to be
53:39
clear to everybody, we all know there are women
53:41
who loved up. Should guns
53:44
but there's the the two part question, which is
53:46
Pomerry's question, why does America love guns so much?
53:48
And then the secondary question, which is,
53:50
is it really America that loves guns so
53:52
much? Or is it really that American men
53:54
love guns? And that that is really
53:57
where the the cultural the attachment
53:59
to guns is a very male thing in
54:01
America. And It's absolutely true. And
54:03
if you look at gun sales, you
54:05
know, about ten percent of the the gun
54:07
sales in this country go to women. That
54:09
has gone up and down a little bit, but
54:11
stayed pretty much the same. So
54:14
this is certainly a male oriented
54:18
issue. When you look at the average gun
54:20
owner, it's a white man over
54:22
the age of fifty. It's important to
54:24
remember that about seventeen
54:28
percent of all gun owners own the
54:30
majority of the four hundred million guns in this country.
54:32
Right? So what the gun lobby has done is
54:34
convince
54:35
a small segment of the population
54:37
that they need to own in arsenal. Right.
54:40
And it's also really
54:42
important to remember that the NRA became
54:47
this powerful wealthy special
54:49
interest starting in the seventies. And
54:52
it's something no other high income
54:54
country has. Which is a
54:56
gun lobby that has been so involved
54:58
in writing gun laws and selling guns. I mean,
55:00
the number of guns in this country has tripled
55:03
since nineteen sixty eight. And
55:05
so part of it is
55:07
cultural, but a very large
55:09
part of it is also
55:11
political. And that is lays
55:13
solely on the the shoulders
55:15
of the ganlami. And I think that's a good
55:18
way to end this before we get a break,
55:20
which is you
55:22
know, the reality is that
55:24
when you look at at all the public opinion
55:26
pulling on these questions, you you have
55:29
ninety plus percent of democrats who are
55:31
in favor of gun safety legislation, various
55:33
kinds. There's different positions on various on
55:35
different proposals, but by and large democrats
55:38
overwhelmingly favor doing stuff either eliminate
55:40
loopholes or background checks or
55:42
try to do things through a legislative
55:45
and regulatory forum to try to make guns
55:47
more safe. And Republicans, it's
55:49
not like you flipped those things. It's not like ten percent of Republicans.
55:51
It's like roughly half of Republicans. Right?
55:54
So you've got a big majority for gun safety
55:56
in the country. And that is both, you
55:58
know, male and female. You don't get those kind
56:00
of numbers in the Democratic Party you're not talking about lot of men
56:02
as long as as well as a lot of women even though you've rightly
56:04
pointed out women have been driving the activism on
56:06
this. But, you know, it's not like a
56:09
a stark gender divide where women want
56:11
gun control and gun safety and men don't.
56:14
But it's an interesting thing just because,
56:16
to your point, which I think is, that
56:19
there's so many issues in American politics
56:22
where the way in which they
56:24
are prosecuted in our politics by
56:27
the organized, moneyed interests
56:29
that dominate the debate is
56:32
divorced from what the actual
56:34
public opinion of the country is on those
56:36
issues. And this, I could list
56:38
thirty issues like this, where it's just
56:40
not where the country is. We're having a
56:42
different argument in the legislative and
56:44
political arena, especially in Washington, which
56:46
is much more toxic and much more polarized and it
56:48
is actually in a lot of the places in the country. And,
56:51
you know, the reality is that guns are a tough
56:53
issue and and it's different from in different
56:55
places in the country. As I know you know, but
56:58
it is a place where there is much
57:00
more common ground on it than
57:03
our political debate has previously
57:05
suggested And think that's part
57:07
of what you've also kind of identified over the course
57:09
of doing this and part of why as we move into
57:11
our discussion of what's gonna happen in the
57:13
future, why there's kind of a a cause for degree
57:15
of optimism about where we're headed? Yeah,
57:18
I think it's inevitable. As you said, you have ninety
57:20
percent of Americans who support stronger gun laws,
57:22
eighty percent of gun owners right,
57:24
only about one in ten of whom
57:26
belong to the NRA. You
57:28
have seventy four percent of NRA
57:31
members. That's a Republican poll by
57:33
Franklin's. Support stronger
57:35
gun laws like a background check on every gun sale.
57:38
So this is inevitable. I
57:40
think what is so hard
57:42
about this issue is that time is of
57:44
the essence. Right? Over
57:46
forty thousand Americans are killed by
57:49
gun violence in this country every year. We know
57:51
that's going to go up. In the wake of COVID,
57:53
that historic number of gun sales we talked about
57:56
earlier, those will have
57:58
ramifications long after. Everyone
58:00
has been vaccinated for COVID. After this
58:02
crisis is over, the gun violence crisis
58:04
will just be the beginning. And so,
58:07
it it time is of the essence I
58:09
know that this is inevitable, but we really
58:11
do have to continue to put pressure on
58:14
lawmakers to
58:14
act. Alright. Let's take another
58:16
break and then we'll come back for the
58:19
last part of our discussion here today on Heilemann
58:21
high water with Shannon Watts.
58:28
Policism.
58:32
Black voices are making an impair this
58:35
month and
58:35
beyond. Keep listening to Discover
58:37
one of our favorite shows, courtesy
58:39
of Acast recommends. The corrupt
58:41
powers that rule this nation are hard at work.
58:44
They are trying to keep wages low
58:46
and the rent high. They are quick to line
58:48
the pockets of big businesses, but tell
58:50
us they can't find a dime for the
58:52
people. I understand this. I've
58:54
seen the rock from the inside as a
58:56
state senator and it's ugly and widespread.
58:59
On emboss, we are working to
59:01
change that. Every day on unballs.
59:03
We are bringing you the stories that really
59:06
matter. We talk about power, corruption,
59:08
justice, or lack thereof. We break
59:10
this down every weekday giving
59:13
you the tools to give the power
59:15
back to where it belongs with the
59:18
people. I'll need a turner, and I am
59:20
unboxed and unboxed. Listen
59:22
to unboxed on Apple Podcasts.
59:26
Acast helps creators launch grow
59:28
and monetize their podcast everywhere,
59:31
acast dot com.
59:35
Who sit in their Gildan House and Senate
59:37
seats funded by the NRA telling us nothing
59:40
could have ever been done to prevent this? We
59:42
call B. S. We
59:47
say that tough they say that tougher
59:49
gun laws do not decrease gun violence.
59:51
We call b s. They
59:54
say a good guy with a gun stops a bad
59:56
guy with a gun. We call
59:58
b s. They say guns
1:00:00
are just tools like knives and are
1:00:02
as dangerous as cars we
1:00:05
call meatballs. No.
1:00:08
This say that no laws could have been able to
1:00:10
prevent the hundreds of senseless tragedies
1:00:12
sort of occur. We call,
1:00:14
yes, that us kids
1:00:16
don't know what we're talking about that we're too
1:00:19
young to understand how the government
1:00:21
works. We call Yeah.
1:00:25
If you agree, or to vote, contact
1:00:27
your local congresspeople.
1:00:34
And that was Emma Gonzalez giving
1:00:37
a very famous speech
1:00:39
that she still high school student
1:00:41
gave at the March for our lives in
1:00:43
Washington, D. C. Shannon Watts.
1:00:46
The reason I wanted to play that clip, you
1:00:48
know, Emma Gonzalez was an accidental
1:00:51
activist and I know you have referred yourself
1:00:53
on more than one occasion as an accidental activist.
1:00:56
You know, you're not alone. A lot of the people who
1:00:58
end up being central figures in
1:01:00
the debate over gun safety turn out to
1:01:02
be accidental activists or at least unwilling
1:01:04
many cases unwilling activists
1:01:06
who have been dragged into this debate
1:01:09
in many cases because of profound tragedies
1:01:11
that have the fallen them or someone
1:01:13
close to them, their community,
1:01:16
their school, And in this case, these
1:01:18
kids who had been at Marjorie Heilemann Douglas
1:01:20
High School in Parkland, Florida, they
1:01:22
became big, big, and really important
1:01:24
and very eventual voices in the debate after the
1:01:26
mass shooting there. Emma Gonzalez captured
1:01:29
in that speech something really
1:01:31
important. First of all, you gotta love anybody
1:01:34
who stands up and calls BS. A
1:01:36
lot of what we do at the recount is called BS on
1:01:38
politicians, and it was great to hear Emma Gonzalez doing
1:01:40
it in that speech. But she was also kind of
1:01:42
using that speech as a as a call to mobilize
1:01:45
her peers to create change. You
1:01:47
know, we've talked, you know, on this podcast about
1:01:49
how essential women are to the
1:01:52
gun safety Heilemann. But it also
1:01:54
seems that kids are really important to
1:01:56
it, and they in some sense of the future of the Heilemann,
1:01:58
And one of the reasons why it could have legs
1:02:00
into the future, you know, we've talked about a number
1:02:03
of reasons for hope and optimism around this movement over
1:02:05
the course of our conversation today. You know,
1:02:07
we know that kids do not love politics,
1:02:09
but on issues that
1:02:11
they care about, they can be passionately and powerfully
1:02:13
engaged. Do you think about obviously, the environment is
1:02:15
a good example of that, but guns or
1:02:18
another. So I'd love for you to talk about
1:02:20
the role that you see young people having in
1:02:22
the movement for gun control and gun safety
1:02:24
and gun common sense in the future
1:02:26
of what you think the role of this
1:02:28
generation, this young generation will be moving
1:02:31
forward. You know, we had
1:02:33
a a pilot program called Student Demand
1:02:35
Action that existed in
1:02:38
two thousand eighteen. And
1:02:40
then after the parking tragedy, I
1:02:43
mean, it just took off.
1:02:45
And local
1:02:47
groups, just like mom's demand action, were formed
1:02:49
all over the country. And
1:02:51
I have been so impressed by their
1:02:53
activism. You know, they have over
1:02:56
four hundred local groups now student
1:02:58
student election is one of the largest student led
1:03:00
gun violence prevention organizations in the country.
1:03:04
During the COVID crisis, you know, they're they are
1:03:06
sitting at home with all this free time on
1:03:08
their hands, and and they've spent it
1:03:10
working as activists. I mean, they registered
1:03:12
over a hundred thousand new voters during
1:03:14
this election cycle. And
1:03:16
I think it's so important that they do activism
1:03:19
differently than my generation does.
1:03:22
They're much more savvy. They use different social
1:03:24
media platforms. It's
1:03:26
gonna be really important. We talked about mothers
1:03:28
against drunk driving. They still
1:03:30
exist. Even after
1:03:33
you win, you have to protect
1:03:35
those wins. And it's gonna be
1:03:37
up to this generation, which is aptly
1:03:39
referred to often as the lockdown generation.
1:03:42
Right? These kids who have to rehearse
1:03:44
their deaths in the bathroom of their
1:03:46
classroom as if that
1:03:48
piece of wood is going to protect them from the
1:03:50
spray of an AR fifteen. They're
1:03:52
angry. And they're right to be angry. And
1:03:54
I I believe strongly
1:03:57
that they will continue to
1:03:59
stay on top of this issue and that it will be
1:04:01
a priority for them and and we see
1:04:03
that in the polling.
1:04:05
So, you know, we're headed into this
1:04:08
new era. And by new era, I
1:04:10
I mean, the post Trump era, we don't know
1:04:12
what gonna happen to Donald Trump once he leaves
1:04:14
office on January twentieth, and we'll see what
1:04:16
role he plays in the future of our politics
1:04:18
and public life and the Republican Party.
1:04:21
But we are gonna have a new president, and I'm
1:04:23
curious what you think about our
1:04:25
president-elect. And the prospects
1:04:28
you know, he is a guy who I've known
1:04:30
for a very long time. There
1:04:32
genuinely is very little that he's done
1:04:34
in his long career in the United States Senate.
1:04:37
That he takes more personal pride in
1:04:39
than in having as
1:04:41
he would put in I beat the NRA.
1:04:43
Now the nineteen ninety four crime bill is a complicated
1:04:46
piece of legislation inflation. It's one that, you know,
1:04:48
is a great thing that Joe Biden feels
1:04:50
enormous pride for, but also that he's
1:04:52
taken a lot criticism for from the left for other reasons.
1:04:55
And it's an interesting thing, you know, when
1:04:57
you look at his policy, his platform,
1:04:59
his promises for what he's gonna do at office, he
1:05:01
says, you know, I will beat the NRA again. And
1:05:03
I take him at his word in the sense that I think he
1:05:05
sincerely honestly really thinks that that
1:05:07
is important to him and something he believes he can achieve.
1:05:10
I ask you whether having
1:05:12
been through what we talked about earlier, seen
1:05:14
how difficult it is to get anything done in the Congress
1:05:16
of the United States, but also taking into account some
1:05:19
of the change that we've discussed When you're
1:05:21
looking at twenty twenty one and beyond Joe Biden's
1:05:23
history, Joe Biden's commitment to
1:05:25
change playing field, both between
1:05:27
and within the parties, Are you
1:05:30
optimistic about the possibility of
1:05:32
congressional federal change in the
1:05:34
short
1:05:34
term? Or are you still kinda like this is the low
1:05:37
mansion to me all over again? You know, first of
1:05:39
all, the very last time I traveled for mom's
1:05:41
demand action was to Columbus, Ohio
1:05:43
where I stood next to Joe Biden with mom's
1:05:45
demand action volunteers and
1:05:48
he was talking about how
1:05:51
this was going to be his one
1:05:53
of his policy priorities as president.
1:05:55
And I truly believe that. I mean, if you look
1:05:57
at at the people, he's nominating so
1:05:59
far, I mean, Susan Rice, she'll
1:06:02
be instrumental. In combating gun
1:06:04
violence in this country in in her
1:06:06
role as the the director of domestic policy
1:06:08
council. And the bottom
1:06:11
line is, you know, Joe Biden and
1:06:13
Kamala Harris are the strongest
1:06:15
gun safety administration in history.
1:06:18
So I am very confident that
1:06:20
they will act. Now we don't know who what
1:06:22
the senate's gonna look like. That obviously plays
1:06:24
a big role in whether it will pass
1:06:27
legislation through Congress or or whether
1:06:30
we'll have to to rely on on
1:06:32
executive actions. But I absolutely believe
1:06:34
we will see action on this issue in the first
1:06:36
one hundred
1:06:37
days. What is it that makes you
1:06:39
think that the incoming Biden administration is
1:06:41
stronger in its commitment on this
1:06:43
issue than the I mean, we know what
1:06:45
the record of the Obama administration was on this
1:06:47
we we have a prospective Biden administration
1:06:49
that can't judge yet because it hasn't been in office. We
1:06:51
have an Obama administration that was in office for
1:06:53
eight years and effectively did not move the ball on gun
1:06:55
control in any meaningful way. So on one hand,
1:06:58
you could say, well, no matter what
1:07:00
they do. The the the record of the Obama administration
1:07:02
is not that strong, so it wouldn't take much for the Biden administration
1:07:04
to do more. But I don't think you doubt
1:07:06
president Obama's -- Yeah. -- but, you know, his
1:07:08
passion and his commitment on trying to
1:07:10
fix this. So what is it that makes you think
1:07:13
Joe Biden will be able to accomplish more than
1:07:15
Barack Obama
1:07:15
did. I think part of it is the the political
1:07:18
playing field. Right? Again, that we have moved
1:07:20
the needle on this issue, which gives elected
1:07:22
officials more freedom to act, the
1:07:25
expectation to act, as
1:07:27
you mentioned Joe Biden's history on his
1:07:29
issue in Congress, He
1:07:31
did establish or help establish the
1:07:33
modern day background check system. He
1:07:35
helped secure the passage of of the assault
1:07:37
weapons ban and high capacity magazine limits.
1:07:41
He really did lead the charge after the Sandy
1:07:43
Hook tragedy, which, you know, President Obama
1:07:46
has said it was one of his greatest regrets that he wasn't
1:07:48
able to get Congress to act. And
1:07:50
Pamela Harris has an incredibly strong
1:07:53
commitment to this issue as well. So, you know,
1:07:55
when you put that together and there's
1:07:58
no doubt they understand how the COVID crisis
1:08:00
is exacerbating the gun violence crisis. You
1:08:03
know, we're having those conversations And
1:08:05
we have put out an action plan
1:08:08
around executive actions that can
1:08:10
be taken on day one.
1:08:12
And we're very hopeful
1:08:15
and incompetent that we will see action on that and
1:08:17
look, I obviously hope that the senate
1:08:19
ends up with a a democratic
1:08:21
majority because they will act on this issue. But if
1:08:23
that doesn't happen, there's still so much that
1:08:26
can be done. And and and not just at a federal
1:08:28
level. Right? We talked about still
1:08:30
working in state houses and even hyper
1:08:32
local municipal work. All of it's
1:08:34
gonna matter offense and defense. And
1:08:37
again, you can't beat someone who doesn't give
1:08:39
up and mouse reduction volunteers won't.
1:08:42
We talked before about the waning power of
1:08:44
the
1:08:44
NRA and some of the dynamics that are in play
1:08:46
there. We said before that the NRA had not
1:08:48
had a great twenty twenty in a couple of the specific
1:08:50
things that happened in twenty twenty
1:08:52
one, you know, we have the head of the the
1:08:55
NRA, Wayne Lappier, who's being investigated
1:08:57
Court of the Wall Street Journalist is being investigated
1:08:59
by the IRS for tax fraud. And
1:09:01
we have the Leticia James lawsuit
1:09:03
in New York. You know, these are things that could be
1:09:06
mortal blows potentially to the NRA
1:09:08
that could kind of unfold relatively quickly
1:09:10
and could be very damaging to its ability
1:09:12
to continue to
1:09:13
function. Yeah, that's absolutely right.
1:09:15
We've always said from day one that our job
1:09:17
as volunteer for gun safety
1:09:20
is to shine a light under the refrigerator and
1:09:22
force the cockroaches to run out. And
1:09:25
that is what we have been doing at the NRA.
1:09:27
We have been involved in these lawsuits when
1:09:29
the NRA was
1:09:32
illegally selling insurance
1:09:35
that would protect people who
1:09:37
were allegedly shooting in self defense,
1:09:39
and it even includes psychological and
1:09:41
cleanup costs, this insurance policy. You
1:09:44
know, our volunteers and states filed lawsuits
1:09:46
against the NRA. We've been part
1:09:49
of different legal filings around
1:09:52
the NRA's behavior, we've certainly pointed
1:09:54
out their corruption over and over again,
1:09:57
and we will keep doing that. And we are very
1:09:59
grateful that state lawmakers
1:10:01
are taking notice in places where the NRA
1:10:04
has established themselves as an organization like
1:10:06
Washington DC and like New York.
1:10:09
And these lawmakers have the
1:10:11
ability to do everything
1:10:13
from remove the NRA's nonprofit
1:10:15
status to dismantling its
1:10:17
board. And we're starting to
1:10:19
see that have an
1:10:21
impact even on the inside. I mean, if you
1:10:23
look at NRA's reelection, which just
1:10:26
took place. It
1:10:28
was not unanimous by
1:10:31
media accounts. They were very clear
1:10:33
to say it was the last time. We
1:10:36
know there is a lot of in fighting. There are
1:10:38
people leaving the organization and telling
1:10:40
the stories of what went on. And
1:10:43
I think it'll be very interesting to
1:10:45
see if Wayne Lopez survives
1:10:47
in his role as the NRA's CEO
1:10:50
in the next year or so. But
1:10:52
the organization will
1:10:55
eventually have to come to the middle
1:10:57
or it will be extinct. And
1:11:00
I just think it's going to be really fascinating
1:11:03
to watch this play out. They
1:11:05
are on the ropes They're weaker than they've
1:11:07
ever been financially, even reputationally.
1:11:10
And the a rating they give out
1:11:12
is really a scarlet
1:11:14
letter. It's no longer a badge of honor.
1:11:16
When you think about the ominous
1:11:18
future for the NRA, there's
1:11:21
the brighter, more encouraging future
1:11:23
for mom's demand and and every Heilemann all
1:11:25
the organizations you're part of. saw you're a you're
1:11:27
a board member on this group called Emerge America,
1:11:29
right, which is about trying to
1:11:32
get women to run for office
1:11:34
basically and to an increase female participation
1:11:36
and women who are gonna run for public office and
1:11:38
helped them to win public office. And we talked a little
1:11:40
before about the success that mom's demand
1:11:43
volunteers have had increasingly, you know, making
1:11:45
that shift from activists to policymakers when
1:11:47
I think about your the organizations
1:11:49
you've been part of, but particularly the mob's demand
1:11:52
group, I think, like, what's the future
1:11:54
of mob's demand future mom's demand is Lucy McBath.
1:11:56
Right? That's, like, that is that she is kind
1:11:58
of state of the art mom's
1:12:00
demand volunteer. African American woman
1:12:03
from Georgia, a blue a red state
1:12:05
who runs, gets elected to Congress, makes transition
1:12:08
from activist to policy makers. She's kind of like
1:12:10
the shining exemplar of what your the
1:12:12
the next phase in where you want to
1:12:14
go. Right?
1:12:16
Lucy is such an
1:12:18
incredible force of nature
1:12:20
and such a hero to me, you know, I I
1:12:23
met Lucy in the spring of twenty thirteen.
1:12:25
Her son, Jordan Davis, was shot and
1:12:27
killed just seventeen by
1:12:30
a white man who said his music was too loud at
1:12:32
Florida gas station. He was killed just
1:12:34
weeks before the Sandy Hook school
1:12:36
shooting tragedy. And
1:12:39
maybe because her dad was a member of the
1:12:41
NAACP. He was actually an official
1:12:44
there and an activist. And maybe
1:12:46
that's where it came from, but she immediately
1:12:49
became an activist on this issue where
1:12:52
she lived in Georgia. Mhmm. And
1:12:55
I had a phone conversation and I said to
1:12:57
her, will you be a mom's demand
1:12:59
action spokeswoman? We were, like,
1:13:01
four months old. And didn't
1:13:03
have any money to give her. And I didn't
1:13:05
even know what that title meant. I just knew
1:13:07
that Lucy was such an important
1:13:10
voice. And she
1:13:12
said, yes. Our volunteers,
1:13:15
because of her trials in Florida, I mean, that's why
1:13:17
we have such an incredibly strong chapter in that
1:13:19
state she went through two trials. The first was in this
1:13:21
trial, the second, the killer was
1:13:23
convicted of murder. And
1:13:27
I can remember every conversation I would have with
1:13:29
Lucy. Eventually, she became an
1:13:31
employee at every town. And I would
1:13:33
end it by saying, so when are you going to run for
1:13:35
office? And I'll be honest,
1:13:37
I thought, okay, that she'll run for statehouse. But
1:13:40
she had much bigger and
1:13:42
and more accurate expectations. And
1:13:45
She called me after the Parkland tragedy and
1:13:47
said, I'm going to run for commerce. And
1:13:51
she ran for a seat that had been
1:13:53
held for thirty years by Republicans. It's
1:13:55
new Kingbridge's old seat in Georgia. Then
1:13:57
she won. She is. Then she
1:13:59
won. And I do think
1:14:01
it's such a a powerful
1:14:04
story about not just moms doing
1:14:06
action, but about using
1:14:09
your voice and what one
1:14:12
person can do in America by
1:14:15
being committed and refusing
1:14:18
to give up. I mean, that's Lucy in a nutshell,
1:14:20
you know, you also mentioned Lucy as
1:14:22
a black mom. And
1:14:25
when I got involved in this issue, it was
1:14:27
as a white suburban mom. Because
1:14:30
I was afraid my kids weren't safe in their schools.
1:14:33
Yep. And so many of the other women who helped
1:14:35
me start this organization were also white
1:14:37
suburban moms. Shame
1:14:39
on us for not realizing that a hundred
1:14:41
Americans are shot and killed every day and that
1:14:44
black women had been putting their
1:14:46
physical bodies on street corners to stop
1:14:48
bullets in their communities. It
1:14:50
took far too long. But
1:14:53
I also think there's an important role
1:14:56
that that we play because this
1:14:58
work shouldn't only be the
1:15:01
burden of black and
1:15:03
brown women whose children
1:15:06
are cut down by bullets in their communities. It has
1:15:08
to be on us too. And
1:15:10
I think that's such an important role for
1:15:12
white women in America as activists, which
1:15:15
is to be doing this work
1:15:18
because it does impact
1:15:21
your sisters all across the country. It
1:15:24
seems like Lucy in some ways
1:15:26
was an
1:15:28
exemplar in a lot of ways, but one of the things that she
1:15:30
did was kind of to help diversify your movement
1:15:32
in some Right? Lucy, it seems like has has
1:15:34
a powerful catalyst for change within
1:15:37
mom's demand in in addition to all of her other
1:15:39
accomplishments. I just find her just like an
1:15:41
insanely impressive insanely impressive
1:15:43
woman with an incredible story and who's
1:15:45
rapidly turning into a powerhouse
1:15:48
on Capitol Hill. She's gonna be incredibly interesting
1:15:50
career to watch going forward. And I wonder,
1:15:53
you know, as you watch her, I'm sure you've
1:15:55
been asked this a thousand times, but I'll ask
1:15:57
you, is there a future run for
1:15:59
public office and the future of Shannon Watts.
1:16:01
Either near term or long
1:16:03
term, is that something you want? Something
1:16:05
you'd contemplate, something you could never
1:16:07
tolerate. Howard Bauchner: Sure, I I think
1:16:09
about it. I have thought about it. I'm always
1:16:11
in encouraging other women to run
1:16:14
and it's something that brings me great
1:16:16
joy and satisfaction is
1:16:18
to help women in particular
1:16:21
run for office and win,
1:16:24
even if that takes several times. But
1:16:27
I I don't rule it out, and
1:16:30
I I don't know what the future holds.
1:16:32
You know, I think it's so important, you know,
1:16:34
we're talking about diversifying the And
1:16:37
I do think that it is important that
1:16:40
other women, black and brown
1:16:42
women, younger women, also
1:16:45
have a voice in this
1:16:47
organization, in this movement. And
1:16:50
another lesson I've learned is that that
1:16:53
work never ends. Right? We were doing a
1:16:55
really good job thanks to Lucy
1:16:57
and others help of
1:16:59
diversifying our policy
1:17:01
portfolio and also our organization internally
1:17:04
and externally. And then, you know, the Parkland
1:17:07
tragedy in two thousand eighteen happened, and
1:17:09
we almost tripled in size overnight
1:17:11
because so many Americans wanna get up the sidelines.
1:17:14
Yes. And what do those people look
1:17:16
like? Who came into the organization? They look like me?
1:17:19
And so that work started all over again.
1:17:21
Right? So that the work never ends. But
1:17:24
I guess that's a long way of saying, you know,
1:17:26
I I won't do this work forever and what's
1:17:28
next it runs the gamut of
1:17:31
running for August to starting a shade
1:17:32
garden. I'm just not sure. Should
1:17:36
you say starting a shade garden? I
1:17:39
don't even know what that is. What's the shade going on? You
1:17:42
you don't have any sun in your yard, so you
1:17:44
start a garden that will grow in the shade. Okay.
1:17:47
Sounds like a rock garden to me. Alright.
1:17:50
Let me ask you one last question and then I'll let you go.
1:17:53
If you were queen, if I were queen, if
1:17:55
you had the ability, like, fiat. I know what
1:17:57
your legislative priorities are at mom's demand,
1:17:59
but I I'm curious if, like, if I give you fiat
1:18:01
and you could do three things that
1:18:03
would most directly,
1:18:06
tangibly, and immediately
1:18:08
affect this issue that you care so much about
1:18:10
what would those three things be if you were queen?
1:18:12
First, I would pass the legislation we were talking
1:18:14
about before at a federal level, background checks,
1:18:16
red flag laws, disarming domestic abusers,
1:18:19
closing loopholes that allow easy gun sales
1:18:22
to people who shouldn't have them. The
1:18:24
second thing I would do is to fund
1:18:26
city gun violence intervention programs.
1:18:28
They're so desperately needed. Our
1:18:30
volunteers work all across the country to
1:18:33
unlock that kind of funding at a municipal
1:18:35
and at state level, but we need
1:18:37
those programs now more than ever.
1:18:40
And the third thing I would say is that
1:18:43
we would require secure gun
1:18:45
storage. We've talked a lot about drug
1:18:47
driving. If you go back to the eighties and someone
1:18:50
would drive drunk and kill their family, people
1:18:52
would say, a horrible tragedy that
1:18:54
that person has suffered enough, we can't punish them.
1:18:56
And then mothers against drunk driving came along
1:18:58
and wait a minute, you know, laws are the moral underpinning
1:19:00
of society. We have to change this. Or this will
1:19:02
keep happening. Flash forward to twenty
1:19:04
twenty, it's the same thing with guns. If I leave a loaded
1:19:06
gun on the counter and my kid or someone
1:19:09
else gets it, you know, it's misdemeanor
1:19:11
and a four hundred dollars fine if there's a death
1:19:13
or injury. And we've got to talk
1:19:15
more about secure storage. We've got to ask the
1:19:17
question when we send our kids to playdates
1:19:19
and families homes. And when you
1:19:21
look at school shooters in this country, most school
1:19:23
shooters are students, and they have easy acts
1:19:26
systems in their homes. So secure storage, I think,
1:19:28
would be the third
1:19:28
thing. It seems like all
1:19:30
of those things that they were to come about, they would all
1:19:32
be things that would be have a manifestly
1:19:35
positive impact. And none of them
1:19:37
seem that wildly fantastical. I thought
1:19:39
at least one of these would be like a
1:19:41
more fanciful notion, but those are all pretty practical,
1:19:44
pragmatic, and and should be achievable.
1:19:46
Maybe we'll get lucky, maybe after this
1:19:48
after twenty twenty, this horrific as
1:19:51
we exit this horrific shit show of
1:19:53
a year and we head towards this brighter, more
1:19:55
optimistic future that you've been sketching out today, maybe
1:19:57
all three of those things you just named will not be
1:19:59
like sort of
1:19:59
fantasies, they'll just become common
1:20:02
sense and we'll get them done.
1:20:03
They will in state houses. We just need
1:20:05
the federal government to do it. Shannon
1:20:08
Watts. Thank you. Thank you. Helen
1:20:11
High Water is a podcast from the recount and iHeartRadio.
1:20:13
Thanks again Shannon much for being here.
1:20:15
If you like this episode of Helen High Water, please
1:20:18
subscribe to the podcast and leave a nice
1:20:20
rating for us in the Apple Podcast app It
1:20:22
helps people to find out what we're doing here.
1:20:24
I am your host and the executive editor of the recount,
1:20:26
John Heilemann. Grace Weinstein is a cocreator
1:20:28
of High Water. Aliyah Jackson engineered
1:20:31
the podcast Justin Chirmel, handled
1:20:33
the research, Stephanie Stender is our
1:20:35
post producer, Sarai Software is our producer,
1:20:38
and Christian Fiedel Castro Rossil,
1:20:40
is our executive producer.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More