Podchaser Logo
Home
Israel-Gaza: How the conflict divided Britain and the US, with Ed Kessler

Israel-Gaza: How the conflict divided Britain and the US, with Ed Kessler

Released Sunday, 7th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Israel-Gaza: How the conflict divided Britain and the US, with Ed Kessler

Israel-Gaza: How the conflict divided Britain and the US, with Ed Kessler

Israel-Gaza: How the conflict divided Britain and the US, with Ed Kessler

Israel-Gaza: How the conflict divided Britain and the US, with Ed Kessler

Sunday, 7th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Thanks for listening to The Rest is Politics.

0:02

Sign up to The Rest is Politics Plus

0:05

to enjoy ad-free listening, receive a weekly newsletter,

0:07

join our members chatroom and gain early access

0:09

to live show tickets. Just go to therestispolitics.com.

0:11

That's therestispolitics.com. Hi, it's

0:14

Tom Holland here from the Goldhanger sister

0:16

show, The Rest is History. And I'm

0:18

here to tell you about a very

0:20

exciting episode. It's out today. It's all

0:23

about the men who walked on the

0:25

moon, the Apollo missions, the space race.

0:27

And it features a very exciting special

0:30

guest, none other than Tom Hanks. So

0:32

that is out today. And

0:34

here is a little teaser. The

0:37

interesting personalities of

0:39

all of these crews, I think, comes out

0:41

in Apollo 11, because I don't think you

0:43

could have two individuals that are more different

0:46

than Neil Armstrong was from Buzz Aldrin. And

0:48

you chucked Michael Collins in there. And you

0:50

have, honestly. I'm not sure

0:52

those guys would have volunteered to, you know, drive

0:55

to the beach to get, had they not been

0:57

assigned to it. Search

1:02

The Rest is History wherever you get

1:04

your podcasts to listen now. Today,

1:08

we're releasing an interview that Alistair and I

1:10

did with Ed Kessler. We recorded it on

1:13

the 18th of March. And

1:15

I think at the center of the

1:17

whole thing is the relationship between what

1:20

is international, in this case, Israel-Gaza, and

1:22

what is domestic British politics, American politics,

1:24

and the way those two things interact.

1:27

In the week in which we're releasing

1:29

it, for example, we've seen a former

1:31

conservative foreign minister demand that a conservative

1:34

security minister in Britain be fired from

1:36

his job for apparently supporting settlements. We've

1:38

seen demands for members of the House of Lords to

1:41

be stripped of their position for speaking

1:43

for Israel in the House of Lords.

1:45

And of course, we have continuing the

1:47

fallout from the death of aid workers

1:50

killed by an Israeli strike in Gaza,

1:52

which we covered in the podcast this

1:54

week. But the broader issue, whether you're

1:56

talking about South Africa's case, or whether

1:58

you're talking about Biden's electoral

2:01

politics or Labour's struggle around this

2:03

issue, the way in

2:05

which an international issue becomes domestic

2:07

and the way in which tensions

2:09

are now rising within our own

2:11

societies between communities. And that's

2:14

where Ed Kessler has worked very, very

2:16

hard for 30 years and where

2:18

he says things have never been as

2:21

tricky as they are today. Welcome to

2:26

the West Sports League

2:29

with me Rory Stewart and

2:31

with me Ernest Campbell. And today

2:33

we're very lucky to have with

2:35

us Ed Kessler. He's a scholar

2:37

but he's particularly well known for

2:40

his work on the relationship between

2:42

different faiths. In particular, the relationship

2:44

between I suppose Judaism, Christianity and

2:46

Islam. He is the founder president

2:49

of the Wolf Institute which is

2:51

an academic institute in Cambridge which

2:53

studies interfaith relations. I first came

2:55

across him in fact in Amman

2:57

where we had an extraordinary dinner

3:00

with Muhsengess and also a Palestinian

3:02

newly appointed Palestinian bishop I think

3:04

who just turned up. And Ed's

3:07

story is of somebody who

3:09

is Jewish but who's taken a real

3:11

interest in this very, very tricky question

3:14

of engaging both in terms of communities

3:16

here in the United Kingdom, so thinking

3:18

through issues of antisemitism and the phallophobia

3:21

particularly relevant today and the extremism today

3:23

with Michael Gove, the definition

3:25

of government but also of course somebody

3:27

who knows the Middle East well. And

3:29

when I came across him was engaged

3:31

in very difficult issues of community relations

3:33

in Israel, Palestine. So

3:36

thank you very, very much for joining us.

3:38

Yeah, it's good to be here. And I'm going

3:40

to hand over I suppose to Alistair to get

3:42

us going and then come back. Yeah, thanks for

3:44

being here. I mean, I guess I want to

3:46

start with the observation that we probably wouldn't be

3:48

talking to you had it not been for October

3:50

the 7th. We might have done, but

3:53

I think that that has brought the sort of

3:55

issues we're going to talk about into very, very

3:57

sharp relief. So I want to start by asking...

4:00

Whether you have the same reaction

4:02

as we did when October Seventh

4:04

happened, that this was going to

4:06

presage. A. Pretty horrible period.

4:08

and the is being borne

4:10

out by events. It's been

4:12

absolutely calamitous period since October

4:14

seventh. Not simply because of

4:16

the attacks in Israel, but the following

4:19

war in Gaza, which is still ongoing

4:21

and the impact that his head around

4:23

the world. I've never known relations between

4:25

faith communities, particularly as Rory said, she's

4:27

Christmas and Muslims in this country to

4:29

be as bad as they are, and

4:31

that's a direct effect of struggling with.

4:34

Probably. The most difficult issue between us

4:36

all which is Israel? Palestine? Getting.

4:39

The when Hamas lot shudder soft

4:41

the thought of as thinking was

4:43

that that would happen. And. Is

4:45

this a good thing for what they are

4:47

trying to achieve? Whatever those I think there

4:49

are lots of reasons for some Us attack

4:51

and you've discussed. I'm in the program. The

4:53

rest is politics. I doesn't a source by

4:55

intimate relations. I think they wanted to undermine

4:57

whatever conversations that we're going on between Israel

4:59

and the Gulf States from some political normalization.

5:02

I think that one is from the mine.

5:04

any conversations that were happening between the Israelis

5:06

and Palestinians. I want a government that was

5:08

at serious decline, but they just wanted to

5:10

blow everything up bitterly And they've achieved that.

5:12

And I think they suspected they get the

5:14

response which. They have which is calamitous for

5:16

everybody and how do you see the way

5:18

out? where will that will come and and

5:21

oval comes to an end of one side

5:23

or another and what we've gotta start thinking

5:25

about. His said the day after eight will

5:27

end with some kind of resolution probably brokered

5:29

by Cutter. There was source a conversation going

5:31

on at the moment very said when I

5:34

met him in a man that was specifically

5:36

about terrorism and there's lots of conversations, mattress

5:38

and in some ways the map as the

5:40

theory some has been thrown already to steaks.

5:42

The courage of leaders on a great to.

5:45

And else to enable their to be

5:47

some kind of and resolution and moving

5:49

forward said would come back to the

5:51

Slater in that program that I'd love

5:53

to take steps to you and your

5:55

story. a sense of how old you

5:57

are, what I'm I'm somehow or. I

6:00

was gonna get a community you grew up

6:02

within the Us. How you came to this

6:04

works. How this work has changed isn't the

6:07

most substantial guess so them. So if my

6:09

parents were both born in Vienna, Came.

6:11

Over as refugees and personally chairing a commission

6:13

and the integration of refugees said the sec

6:16

who has that come around and as very

6:18

aware of as a kid growing up in

6:20

South Gate north London one of the nice

6:23

suburb and and said give me South Gators

6:25

with dull areas of the universe or same

6:27

as thirty one thing at size sars I

6:29

know nuts Amy Winehouse went solo facilities to

6:32

come to assess assess assess your skates when

6:34

school London's local primary school and so public

6:36

school deeply unhappy at school secondary school and

6:39

then when seen of us T and I

6:41

ended. Up in this world Murray because

6:43

of Maggie Thatcher. Contest.

6:45

Other sites of here have to school in university

6:47

works and then i went to Israel with on

6:50

a kibbutz before traveling around the middle east but

6:52

a time i came back at apply to study

6:54

hebrew. He read apartments at close.

6:57

To. New applications because of the cats says they

6:59

put me in his partner theology at I

7:01

ended up to religious studies, Tory cuts, sores

7:03

and your parents came in from Vienna when

7:05

has chosen to my mother me kindertransport signal

7:07

right? Yeah they have a very very i'm

7:09

leaving their pants behind So my father's family

7:11

go out to the had a business than

7:13

the whole family got out the sunset. The

7:15

business again in East London caucuses without has

7:17

the group i work that a seven years

7:19

and what does it does at the time?

7:21

My great great grandfather was a would Santa

7:23

and he made umbrella handles which was assessed

7:25

in excess for in the. Eighteen eighties Eighty

7:27

nine says and he said so one of his

7:30

shouldn't go to London because it rains a lot

7:32

that be good for business as a result of

7:34

that decision that an asian in London he got

7:36

the whole family out the last. the business because

7:38

of cost for seems appropriate to by Hitler and

7:41

the regime but this ah stuff again in Stoke

7:43

Newington and be salaries and now they're in in

7:45

East London. My mother was sponsored by synagogue called

7:47

the Liberty or Synagogue and we were brought up

7:49

there in since on who is it was a

7:51

slip from South Case but. They sponsor

7:53

my mother out says good enough reason and tells

7:56

us that of that's what an approaching a

7:58

cynical to sign the huts sits within. Judaism.

8:00

So the Jewish community in this country is about

8:02

300,000 and it's divided between, if

8:05

you like, three different denominations. There are lots, of

8:08

course, but let's put them into three, a bit

8:10

like the Catholics, Protestants and the Orthodox church. You

8:12

have the Orthodox, you represent about 30%. And

8:15

then you have the progressives, liberal and reform.

8:17

In fact, they're going to become one movement

8:19

in the coming year. And they also represent

8:21

about 30%. And

8:23

then you have ultra-Orthodox, that's called Haredi, whether

8:25

it's in Stanford Hill, the Northeast, who really

8:28

just keep themselves in their own little world.

8:30

And you have a good proportion of Jews who are

8:32

non-affiliated who are secular. I work very hard when people

8:34

ask me what kind of Jew I am, which you

8:36

haven't asked, but I'm going to preempt it to say

8:38

that I'm a Jewish Jew, because I would go to

8:41

a liberal to reform to an Orthodox synagogue. And in

8:43

the work that I do, it's

8:45

really important that I cross boundaries. And

8:47

also to the ultra-Orthodox community. Yes, I

8:49

have relations with the ultra-Orthodox community as

8:51

well. They have interesting outreach programs. There

8:53

are some similarities between the evangelical churches

8:55

and the ultra-Orthodox communities that you wouldn't

8:57

expect. Just to explain to somebody who

9:00

doesn't really understand that much about religion,

9:02

define the difference between a Jew and

9:04

a Christian. What are the big things

9:06

that divide a Jew from a Christian?

9:08

The irony is that Christianity is based

9:10

around the Jew, called Jesus. Jesus

9:12

was born, he lived, he died a Jew.

9:14

And his followers claimed him to be God

9:17

or the son of God. And that's what

9:19

made Christianity begin to separate from Judaism, even

9:22

though it was about Jewish things. And the

9:24

arguments in the New Testament are about things

9:26

like food, law, circumcision, or whatever. But the

9:28

belief in the life, death, and resurrection of

9:31

Christ as something absolutely

9:33

fundamental is what

9:35

divides Jews and Christians. In which case, why

9:37

can't they sort of quite come to get

9:39

along? Why can't they resolve that rather than

9:41

they've done? Because you would understand in the

9:44

political world, there are certain truth claims that

9:46

you have. You and Rory get on pretty

9:48

well. I get on with Christians pretty well,

9:50

but you differ over your allegiances, over your

9:52

political truth claims, as do Jews and Christians.

9:54

Jews don't think the Messiah is right, don't

9:56

think the world has changed in that way,

9:58

Christians think he has. and thinks he's going

10:01

to come back. Even more puzzling, I think, for

10:03

somebody from the outside, difference between Jews and Muslims.

10:05

I mean, that seems much closer, really, than the

10:07

distinction between Jews and Christians. Am I wrong about

10:09

that? You're wrong and you're right. So,

10:12

on the one hand, Jews and Christians show the fact

10:14

that Jesus was Jew, the first Christians were Jews, etc.,

10:16

etc. But the irony is,

10:18

theologically, Muslims and Jews are much closer. The

10:20

emphasis on the unity of God, the emphasis

10:23

on the legal tradition, coming out the Middle

10:25

East, customs like food laws and things like

10:27

that, circumcision, the boys, you know, they're incredibly

10:29

close. And in my conversations with Muslims around

10:31

the world, of course, that's where we always

10:34

begin. What do we have in

10:36

common? Through your life, have you, as an individual,

10:38

experienced much antisemitism? I did when I was younger.

10:40

I was an arsenal supporter, and arsenal top

10:42

of the games were pretty unpleasant affairs in

10:44

those days, and there was a lot of

10:47

antisemitic chanting. There was a lot of racist

10:49

chanting full stop. But, hold on, the antisemitic

10:51

chanting was directed against persons? Yes, we've still

10:54

made arsenal supporters feel pretty uncomfortable, right? Yeah,

10:56

imagine, yeah. But that was, have you personally,

10:58

as an individual? At school, you have comments

11:00

made about being a Jew. Sometimes

11:03

this antisemitism is so lightweight, you know, it

11:05

could be about, you know, comments about

11:07

your wealth or your power, your authority, you

11:09

know. Those are the tropes. Yeah, the tropes,

11:12

exactly. You mentioned October the 7th, and one of the shocking

11:14

things is the 12 fold rise in reported

11:18

incidents of antisemitism just in the

11:20

last few months. And these vary

11:22

from online antisemitic comments to, you

11:24

know, physical abuse and so on.

11:26

So antisemitism is dormant, it's always

11:28

there, as actually some form of

11:30

racism and hatred is often there

11:32

within our society, but it's very

11:34

much come into Western culture. Where

11:36

do you think it comes from?

11:38

I've never understood it. I've never

11:40

understood why the Jews should be seen

11:43

as such a persecuted race, and why there

11:45

is such a thing as antisemitism, why it

11:47

seems to be so profound through history. I've

11:50

struggled with that, you know, because much of

11:52

my work is about Jewish-non-Jewish relations. First

11:54

of all, there is within us, all of us,

11:56

an aspect where there is a dislike of somebody

11:59

else. all perfect. So you

12:01

have that within the human condition. Secondly, Judaism

12:03

and Christianity, which are the bedrock, if you

12:05

like, of Western culture. And obviously, we've added

12:07

Islam more recently in the last 150 years

12:09

or so. But nevertheless, Christians identified themselves as

12:11

not Jews. You know, we're not like you,

12:13

you might have provided Jesus a Jew, but

12:16

you failed to see that he was the

12:18

Messiah. You didn't read your own scriptures properly.

12:20

It goes back to that. Oh, yeah, absolutely.

12:22

Fundamentally, fundamentally, even earlier in some of the

12:24

pagan rock. Most of the people who today

12:26

might define themselves or we would say

12:29

you're being anti Semitic, would they even know

12:31

that's what it's about? They may not,

12:33

but it's like a cloud. It's there.

12:35

But what you're referring to is the

12:37

modern complexion of anti Semitism, which is

12:39

the rise of anti Semitism as a

12:41

racism, you know, Jews as what Hitler

12:43

did to intermention subhumans

12:46

and entered society in those tropes, as

12:48

you mentioned. That's interesting. So you're suggesting that

12:51

maybe I'm misunderstanding that with Hitler, a slightly

12:53

different form of anti Semitism emerged, got more

12:55

connected to race. So potentially an idea

12:57

that previously, the Christian antipathy was towards practicing

12:59

Jews, but that if a Jew converted to

13:02

become a Christian, was that something? You're

13:04

right. We go there in a moment in

13:06

terms of the difference of the rise of

13:08

racism in the late 19th century, it wasn't

13:11

Hitler creation, Hitler exploited it. But in

13:13

fact, the beginning of modern anti Semitism is

13:15

actually go back to Spain, the Iberian peninsula.

13:17

So Jews who were forced to convert

13:19

as were some Muslims were forced to convert,

13:22

they became new Christians, new Christians, not Christians.

13:24

In other words, those Christians time either married

13:26

old Christians, but they wouldn't marry the

13:28

new Christians because they were deemed a slightly

13:30

different. And you have this whole history of

13:33

what became known as Miranos or cryptochus,

13:35

secretus and Muslims as well became known as

13:37

Moriscos. Right. And so they were already deemed

13:39

as different as in the 16th, 17th century,

13:42

let alone in the late 19th. You

13:44

think about Hitler, though, in Germany in the 30s,

13:46

you may say that they were identified as

13:48

an intermensch. But actually, the fear was that

13:50

they were the kind of ubermensch, they have

13:52

the power, they have the money, they have

13:54

the tropes. The irony is they were the

13:56

communists, and they were also controlling the world.

13:58

They were guttless. You know, you could

14:01

choose whatever you want. Right. And so what Hitler

14:03

did, of course, was to find a scapegoat for

14:05

the failure of the First World War. And the

14:07

scapegoat within their midst was there. Was

14:09

it small? Yeah, relatively small. They

14:12

might have been very integrated, very German.

14:14

I mean, it was Austrian, of course,

14:16

very Austrian. Right. Leopoldstadt, you know, you

14:18

think about the contribution of Jews to

14:20

culture in Europe in that period before

14:23

Hitler. They were very easy targets. And

14:25

Jews couldn't believe what was going to

14:27

happen. It's easy looking back on it,

14:29

isn't it? They say that the optimists

14:31

stay behind and the pessimists left. So

14:33

if you take the Boy and the

14:36

Striped Pajamas, the final scene, it's almost

14:38

like when they're walking into the gas

14:40

chain, but they still don't know.

14:42

They still don't know that all hope is

14:44

gone. So what does that say

14:47

about, I guess, about the power of survival?

14:49

But also, I wonder how you

14:52

feel today's form of antisemitism differs from

14:54

that sort of antisemitism we saw then.

14:56

Today's form of antisemitism is often but

14:58

not always about Israel and Zionism. There

15:01

may be other tropes that hide behind

15:03

it, but actually a lot of it

15:05

is to do with Zionism and how

15:07

we handle Zionism. And one of the

15:10

failings of my world of interfaith and

15:12

one of the reasons why there's been such

15:14

a calamitous reaction here between communities is we

15:16

haven't dealt with the most obvious thing, which

15:18

is how do you deal with difference? We're

15:21

very good at building up relations where

15:23

with what we haven't common, Jesus the

15:25

Jew, sharing with Islam and vice versa.

15:27

It's not one way, but we haven't

15:29

really got to. We have

15:31

to get there. How do we deal

15:33

with the most difficult issues? And it could be theological.

15:35

I believe I'm safe and you're damned. It could be

15:37

a little bit profound. Yeah, or it could be to

15:39

do with a piece of real estate the size of

15:41

Wales. So let's move forward into the work that you

15:43

do professionally and have done now for more years than

15:45

you're prepared to reveal on the podcast. You're

15:48

saying that one of the

15:50

challenges is that interfaith work, bringing communities

15:52

together, isn't necessarily always about emphasizing similarities.

15:54

It may be about being honest about

15:56

difference. You start with what you have

15:59

in common. You know that and

16:01

the work you do. I want to get to know

16:03

you I mean dialogue is very easy because I

16:05

simply say tell me your story and I shut up

16:08

literally shut up So the

16:10

first thing is you get to know the

16:12

other person and you can't go anywhere without

16:14

that whether it's knowledge Whether it's feeling whatever

16:16

it is experiencing things together But

16:18

then you've got to go on to where

16:20

do we differ and how do we manage

16:22

that difference and we haven't done that well

16:25

enough I mean it's remarkable how

16:27

well we have done but October the 7th

16:29

and the invasion of Gaza and the war

16:31

Shows us how far we have yet to go.

16:33

What's the difference between what you

16:35

define as? dialogue and Conversation

16:38

I've seen you talking about that before I

16:40

thought it was really interesting Essentially

16:42

dialogue is really difficult dialogue is

16:44

about understanding the other person as

16:47

that person wishes to be understood

16:49

If we just unpack that it's

16:51

not simply you Messaging me

16:54

or me answering a question about a

16:56

fact It's you trying to get

16:58

into my shoes and vice versa.

17:01

It is really really difficult. That is

17:03

genuine dialogue That's what Martin boob talked

17:05

about. Hmm. There was a wonderful bishop

17:07

called Christa Stendhal He had three principles

17:09

of dialogue and and I add a

17:11

fourth to his three and the first

17:13

thing He said is when you want

17:15

to understand something go to that

17:17

person's religion You want to understand Judaism

17:20

or Christianity Islam? Whatever Hinduism go to a first

17:22

book or the person the second thing is compare

17:24

best with best or worst with worst I mean,

17:26

we're very good at comparing my best with your

17:28

worst The third in the interfaith world is to

17:31

have something called holy envy admire something about somebody

17:33

else And what I would add to it all

17:35

is have a sense of humor Because

17:37

there's a tricky world out there and

17:40

sometimes you can absolutely prick the tension

17:42

with a joke or something self-deprecating If

17:44

you as you were speaking I was

17:46

thinking right if this thing is

17:48

gonna get resolved at some point There

17:50

has to be some kind of dialogue

17:52

and some kind of progress between Israeli

17:55

and Palestinian right now on

17:58

all four I think

18:00

of the people that I've been seeing speaking for

18:03

Israel or speaking for the Palestinians and I see

18:05

no possible meeting of minds right now. You're

18:07

not speaking to the people who are trying

18:10

to do that. You're speaking to the leaders,

18:12

the representatives, quite rightly. But if

18:14

you go on the ground, there are some

18:17

little pockets of excellence, whether it's Jewish and

18:19

Arab groups in Palestinian groups in Israel, trying

18:21

to protect certain places. Rory will

18:23

know in certain parts of the West Bank,

18:25

whether it's rabbis or human rights working with

18:27

Muslim leaders. These are little pockets. They are

18:29

under incredible pressure because what's happened since October

18:31

the 7th is that for those of us

18:34

who are trying to do it, we're being

18:36

squeezed. When the majority feel

18:38

under attack, what do they do? They retreat

18:41

and they retreat within. That's what we've got at the

18:43

moment. I don't have a lot of optimism, but no,

18:45

to say there's nothing happening is not right. There are

18:47

things happening. There are things, but not

18:49

many. And once you're, we talked to Yuval

18:51

Noherari and he gave

18:53

a very interesting assessment of his own

18:55

relationship with the concept of Israel. And

18:58

now I think it's fair to say it was changing as

19:00

a result of October the 7th. Probably

19:03

still hates Netanyahu, but has a stronger feeling

19:05

for Israel. How would you define your relationship

19:07

as a Jew who hasn't lived in Israel?

19:10

How would you define your relationship with Israel?

19:12

Personally, I think as a Jew, I relate

19:14

to three aspects. I relate to the religion

19:16

and the way that I practice. I

19:18

relate to the culture, Jewish culture and literature

19:20

and so on. And I relate to land.

19:23

The land being specifically the land of Israel. My

19:26

aspiration, my hope is that there is a land of

19:28

Palestine and a land of Israel. How

19:30

we get there is beyond my pay grade.

19:32

We have to build the relationships up from

19:34

the ground. So in a way, I suppose

19:36

I would define myself and we've got to

19:39

be very careful. My wife read a book

19:41

recently called Untied Kingdom. Don't you come across

19:43

it? The Stuart Ward. It looks at the

19:45

development of the UK since the colonies and

19:47

since the subcontinent 1947 Palestine,

19:50

Ireland 1920s and so on. And

19:53

he came up with this term loose

19:55

fitting clothes. In other words,

19:57

you take a term and you kind of make it fit to

19:59

whatever you want. want. Some like Zionism. Zionism can

20:01

mean a whole array of different things, whether

20:03

I'm a West Bank nationalist religious settler on

20:06

the West Bank, whether I'm a secular Jew

20:08

in Tel Aviv, or whether I'm sitting in

20:10

London or in Cambridge or wherever I'm sitting.

20:12

So there's almost Zionism, which essentially means a

20:14

homeland for the Jewish people in the land

20:17

of Israel, makes no points and definitions about

20:19

the size of that land, the extent of

20:21

that land, the relationship with others. It's just

20:23

saying there should be a homeland there. That's

20:25

all it is. And I relate to that.

20:28

Well, that's just sort of interesting. How did

20:30

you get to your view that you are

20:32

in favor of space of what we would

20:34

call a two-state solution? How did you

20:36

decide that that is the direction of travel? Why do

20:38

you remain committed to that despite all the problems? And

20:40

is that a loose fitting garment? Oh, it certainly is

20:43

a loose fitting garment. It might be so loose that

20:45

it's fallen off. It's not clear to me, Rory, that

20:47

there is a two-state

20:49

solution such as the complexity and the division

20:51

and the building blocks in certain places. It

20:53

may be that we end up with one

20:55

state as a kind of federal state of

20:57

some kind or other. Princess Anna

20:59

Jordan, our mutual friend, talks about a confederation

21:02

of Israel, Palestine and Jordan. The answer is

21:04

I don't know. My work,

21:06

although I've done some work in

21:08

Israel in Jerusalem bringing together Israelis

21:10

and Palestinians and Israeli Palestinians and

21:12

Jordanians about Jerusalem itself and particularly

21:14

about Al-Aqsa, but my work really

21:16

is about the relations between people

21:19

and how we can get to a level where we

21:21

can actually get on a little bit better, whether

21:23

that's in Israel or Palestine

21:25

or whether that's here in the UK. Al-Aqsa

21:27

being, of course, the conversation around the Dome

21:29

of the Rock and the... It means the

21:32

furthest place, right? So it's the third oldest

21:34

place in Islam. It's also where the Temple,

21:36

the biblical Temple, stirred. It's 500 yards if

21:38

that from the Church of East Seprica. And

21:40

what we did, in fact, one of my

21:43

proudest moments was bringing together to Cambridge with

21:45

Prince Hassan's support just before COVID, 21 Israeli-Palestinian

21:47

Jordanians who work on the ground. How

21:49

can we or... I mean, I

21:51

don't mean to incense... The world. Well,

21:54

no, how can they? Yeah. Those three

21:56

groups. Those three groups sitting around the same. We do not

21:58

get along. How can we get along? help

22:00

you get along. It was a wonderful conversation

22:02

because they were out of the spotlight, they

22:04

weren't in their homeland, there was no coverage

22:06

and we were beginning to get somewhere. Tell

22:08

us about what that feels like. What are

22:10

the sort of changes you might see through

22:12

a conversation like that from how they arrive,

22:14

not getting along at the beginning and getting

22:16

a bit better as that conversation happens? What's

22:18

a good story there? A good story is

22:20

around the table when people introduce themselves, most

22:22

people knew most people, not everybody. Juan Israe

22:24

de Jú said quite aggressively, I want you

22:26

to know I am the

22:28

eighth generation Jerusalemite. And

22:31

everyone goes, goes

22:33

around about three further on and there's

22:35

Palestinian Catholic, not Muslim, Palestinian Catholic says

22:38

thank you, I'll give his name, thank you for sharing

22:40

that, I want you to know I'm the thirteenth generation.

22:44

And it kind of set the context, a little

22:46

bit gladiatura, a little bit adversarial, but

22:48

then the next day literally they sat down together

22:50

at breakfast. In the end

22:52

about relationships, can I trust you or not

22:54

trust you? It's not theology, it's not ideology,

22:57

it's not politics, it's simply look in your

22:59

eye, it's dialogue, understanding that person is the

23:01

other person which is to be understood and

23:04

it's trusting. Can I trust you? And at the moment there

23:06

is almost no trust between

23:08

the groups on the ground. When I saw

23:10

you walking up towards Piccadilly a few weeks

23:12

ago, you said that your sense was the

23:14

Jewish community in Britain was afraid and the

23:16

Muslim community was angry, I think. Tell us

23:18

a little bit about that, tell us firstly

23:20

about how the Jewish community feels and then

23:22

how in your experience the Muslim community feels

23:24

in Britain. The impact of the attack has

23:27

been quite traumatic on Jews around the world,

23:29

not just in the UK, but here in

23:31

the sense that nobody expected it, it was

23:33

a slaughter. It wasn't just an attack, it

23:35

was a slaughter, some of the things that

23:37

happened were truly, truly Awful.. And The

23:39

reaction to that was a rise in

23:41

antisemitism and it's like how have we

23:43

got here? And Then a retreat within

23:46

and then the kind of feeds one

23:48

off and the other. Let's just unpack

23:50

everything. What is the answer for why

23:52

the October 7th attack then triggered a

23:54

rise in antisemitism? This is very odd

23:57

collection of bedfellows, whether it's left wing,

23:59

anti-colonial, rhetoric. Reg Sees Israel is the

24:01

sort of representatives the sauce type of

24:03

colonialism. There is a sensors sadness at

24:06

the suffering of Palestinians and how terrible

24:08

it is. There is such heightened sensitivity

24:10

is that what is taken? his criticism

24:13

now becomes anti semitism. You know you

24:15

have something like something as simple as

24:17

from the river to the see. Lead

24:20

Palestine be free. That in itself isn't

24:22

anti semitic. my feet waving Palestinian flags

24:24

on anti semitic. but am I drive

24:26

through the streets of a Jewish area?

24:29

hunky my home. Waving Palestinian flags and

24:31

shouting that might be anti semitic it gets

24:33

so complicated Number two's have been on the

24:35

marches the big pro Palestine much as and

24:37

friend of mine sit outside what's in the

24:40

months said it was amazing. Hundreds of thousands

24:42

of people I didn't see any and to

24:44

some history any anti semitism another friends or

24:46

they saw with a few placards that were

24:49

anti semitic or the newtown scientist my think

24:51

it's what you select to see nuts on

24:53

the Muslim side and would making generalizations here

24:55

at least I am of which I'll be

24:57

criticized when I go back to Cambridge but

25:00

nevertheless. I'm on the Muslim side. generally

25:02

speaking there is incredible frustration at the

25:04

Palestinian voice might have had been heard

25:06

of the suffering of Palestinians, the lack

25:08

of progress in fact even was the

25:10

decline of any possibilities and the frustration

25:12

anger with that smell. The irony is

25:14

is what I've managed to to in

25:16

the nice to the Wilsons to has

25:18

managed to the last few months is

25:20

brings together small numbers of jews and

25:22

Muslims quietly here in London, in Oxford,

25:24

in Birmingham in other faces Cambridge First

25:26

for to say tell me your story

25:29

of how you feeling. Right now let

25:31

everybody expel that and then to

25:33

say way to weekend. And

25:35

the thing is Rory, they say the same

25:38

thing. I'm scared of going on the

25:40

tube in my head shop have taken down my missus of

25:42

from the door. And worried about

25:44

my kids. I'm worried about my past security.

25:46

I'm worried about social media. If is know

25:48

what hit shop and mrs it was you

25:50

wouldn't know whether some is in which he

25:53

sang he they say the same things and

25:55

then they hear themselves say it and it's

25:57

the beginning. Of. Moving forward isn't

25:59

she? The Jugular in the week

26:01

of St. Patrick's Day and I've

26:03

been watching endless soon so to

26:05

be just clips of the First

26:08

Minister and deputy First Minister of

26:10

Northern Ireland month cufflinks, one Protestant

26:12

going around Washington together and whenever

26:14

see the As and got that

26:16

shows that progress has been made

26:18

or this one review have any

26:20

sense of how within the Middle

26:22

East and context Israel, Palestine there

26:24

is still a process that can

26:27

lead to that kind of image

26:29

with in this context. Would you feel

26:31

pretty hopeless? One As a pessimist, I have

26:33

no choice but to be optimistic as a

26:35

story about three people who may interest in

26:38

every day. And. They look around

26:40

and I see that the world's chaos this

26:42

fighting the side The three pessimists. And

26:44

one day one from sense france have a to the

26:46

since you know have converted he said have become an

26:49

optimist. So. Has he been ups

26:51

Mississippi? Terrible things going on Center of so I

26:53

am now so accepting does that? Oh friends And

26:55

then a few minutes later they look at this

26:57

new to concerted optimistic looks been like me. wrinkles

26:59

and frowns and bitter gray. Has they say why

27:02

you looking so worried if you're not to miss.

27:04

He. Said you things easy to be an optimist. There's

27:08

no other ways way to go. For. Me

27:11

personally robbers amenities where's your doesn't

27:13

come from from Some advice over

27:15

I'm a senses. A process

27:17

you can see you're looking for process. Yeah

27:19

I'm looking for a license. okay I'm looking

27:21

for were those relations that people are gonna

27:23

get along that dinner begin to build bridges

27:26

between community standard of and an ordinance absolutes

27:28

and it happened at the same time in

27:30

the process. the also process was going on

27:32

at the same time. What happened to know

27:34

of none it was as a stretch out.

27:37

This piece may be a cold peace but

27:39

this piece was happening in Israel Palestine. The

27:41

collapse he okay at allissa could break. This.

27:48

Episode is supported by Naughty Bad

27:50

now Off the Top Your House

27:53

think some countries that restaurant internet

27:55

since. China. Yet.

27:58

Iran's yet. The Venezuelans probably

28:00

shut it down a fair bit. Maybe

28:02

Egypt movies anywhere we find that authoritarian regime.

28:05

That's. Right? So it's a living similar

28:07

that it's actually pretty tough to access

28:09

Basic sets inflation, get on with Pt

28:12

of fine cellphone. so it's a virtual

28:14

private network in those places. allows you

28:16

to communicate privately or change him apparently.

28:19

test it. Cannot She stopped Getting Arrested.

28:21

Now it's not an absolute or guarantee

28:23

because some of these countries can get

28:25

round this. but Nord V Pin has

28:28

been providing a free emergency Vpn service.

28:30

The journalists and activists who oppression and

28:32

heavy internet restrictions. Since. Twenty

28:34

Nineteen and Access Gems have found it

28:36

very useful in some countries I can't

28:39

imagine or the Missouri do very, very

28:41

well. Is. A place where

28:43

we couldn't quickly access those news

28:45

sources that we trust. That's true,

28:47

and I think the standards of

28:49

the stuff on the rest of

28:51

politics might decline greatly into. Researching

28:55

says I'm so we have. One of things

28:57

I use Nord Weekend for is a virtual

28:59

private network when I'm traveling about touches where

29:01

that is restricted access and so it's something

29:04

that list as benefit from the short term.

29:06

You could also benefit by signing up for

29:08

Nord Vpn yourself. so to get the bus

29:11

discount of you know Vpn plan. Good

29:13

know the pin.com/leading Vpn and I'll link.

29:15

Will also give you an extra four

29:17

months when the to your plan and

29:20

there's no risk with Nord Thirty day

29:22

money back guarantee and you'll be supporting

29:24

the podcast. Blink is in the podcast

29:26

episode Disruptions. Going

29:33

on us. I've just come back

29:35

from sitting in America just last

29:37

week and. I'm. Not sure

29:39

some much British listeners are

29:42

aware just how. Extreme

29:44

situations. The common American investors

29:46

not on the one hands

29:48

you get your since at

29:50

Harvard's reporting poll were think

29:52

you're single stone people and

29:55

seeding private that so who's

29:57

screaming. And it's that sucks.

29:59

Slogans, Feeling afraid, feeling that

30:01

the class is being taught at Harvard

30:03

or themselves anti Semitic. So that's expenses

30:05

juice at Harvard. Very very negative. Very

30:08

frightened. And on the other hand I

30:10

have Muslim students saying to me that

30:12

there's no think what a canary list

30:15

where is they are reported to have

30:17

made for is considered an anti Semitic

30:19

statement and many of them would say

30:21

they haven't made any Edison excitements They

30:24

get on the list and then they

30:26

can't get a job at Mckinsey or

30:28

Top Hedge Funds New York. Ban

30:31

is driven up to Harvard let's

30:33

showing photographs. Name's the students who

30:35

are supposed to have made us

30:38

excitements. Endorsed. Palestine way

30:40

that any that's a script he lit

30:42

or Mccarthy Star Witch Hunts the names

30:44

of people have seems is being. Anti

30:46

Jewish or publish their said across the same

30:49

addresses some both sides. The thing as reach

30:51

six on a pits of real with and

30:53

I just want to leave can reflect slow

30:55

but about your sense of what's happening in

30:57

the Us Now he has who are Anyway,

31:00

I'm glad I'm not going to university now

31:02

you know or anything I might have been

31:04

appears in the social media never to be

31:06

rescinded. sort of things I did as a

31:08

kid than you probably did. You know to

31:11

declare him physically him beautiful. Give me the.

31:14

So America's in a really tricky situation, not

31:16

just. In this Universe says that in his

31:18

social structure is socioeconomic backgrounds in his political

31:20

machinations In the Universe is and he slept

31:23

with the resignations just recently of Gay right

31:25

ahead of Harvest. And not just the it

31:27

does, the Universe is that had source or

31:30

less. That's. The. Woke Culture the

31:32

wires about freedom of speech, the

31:34

incredible sensitivity to anything is deeply

31:36

deeply wiring. My worry is to

31:38

what extent as being transferred over

31:41

here. I in my classes want

31:43

my students to say inane, difficult,

31:45

problematic, possibly racist thing so I

31:47

can say this to stop the

31:49

some pack what you had to

31:51

say because they can't say it

31:54

with me. I worry where they

31:56

are gonna say at night and

31:58

honesty is that opens. The to

32:00

do that which we seem to have lost

32:02

in the United States even I find a

32:04

tricky fum giving a class somebody puts the

32:06

phone starts recording me because I don't know

32:08

I want to engage and I'm in. it's

32:10

kind of wires me when I make a

32:13

joke is appropriate. One of the courses we

32:15

talked with the Metropolitan Police officers Some I

32:17

started off with a really tricky joke and

32:19

they didn't know whether to laugh. So we're

32:21

at that point where everything so sensitive be

32:23

deployed Roar is making is the he silly

32:25

much much much more found in the United

32:27

States. Do think is coming here as well.

32:30

Because we we talked to Jamie Ruben

32:32

recently been American diplomats and separate from

32:34

the podcast he was telling me some

32:36

be very very similar stories about how

32:38

this this woke soldier goes way way

32:40

deeper in America that it does here

32:42

but yet we tend to follow American

32:44

so many ways. is like coming here

32:46

I think is coming here light so

32:49

we shouldn't be as alarms ruiz by

32:51

was hum in America. So. Angry.

32:53

So the academic freedom and correct. I'm

32:55

not as alarmed at what's going on

32:57

here as I am at what's going

33:00

on the states and was some quite

33:02

close to things and senses she's christians,

33:04

Muslims in the States And so no,

33:06

yes, there are challenges here. There certainly

33:09

are and isn't the more difficult engaging

33:11

in the classroom dialogue today than twenty

33:13

five years ago when I set up

33:15

against good mentions Michael Gove and his

33:18

introduction and goes recent definition of Extremism

33:20

would make of that debate it's unbelievably

33:22

devices. It's a shows how difficult it is

33:25

what may be extremists you is not for

33:27

me how difficult is to do that sorted

33:29

in the doing it. One of my fears

33:31

is they are weaponizing Islam, a phobia and

33:33

anti semitism for own political ends and that

33:35

it's become a become a wedge issue and

33:37

that in particular Mrs and she's had to

33:39

stop That must not allow that to happen.

33:41

And I do fear that with election coming

33:43

up in some ways having a Hindu prime

33:45

minister's wonderful and a person of color because

33:47

I hope that life as it's a bit

33:50

like by my also give cover for it.

33:52

it might have. Capita The thankfully the

33:54

Anderson left the party. right?

33:56

How much was it will be the somebody like

33:58

that stayed within the main. extreme politics.

34:01

So it's a really tricky one because, for example,

34:03

the government's decision to take funding away from the

34:05

Interfaith Network. 1987 it was founded, this body on

34:09

the ground trying to bring little communities

34:11

together. It's national, but it's like little

34:13

communities in Bristol, in the

34:15

north, in Bradford, wherever, around the whole of the UK.

34:18

The government promised about

34:20

150 grand, not pocket money, and

34:22

they would join it and it's about to close.

34:24

I mean, this is the sort of thing we should

34:26

be investing in, not just financially, but supporting. Roy,

34:28

can I just... Why did you make of Gove's

34:31

extremism initiative? Yeah, I'm very worried, and

34:33

maybe to be more explicit than Ed,

34:35

because Ed can be. I

34:38

think this relates to the fact that

34:40

you see again and again at PMQs,

34:42

Rishi Sunak leaning over and saying Jeremy

34:44

Corbyn and Kia Stama were

34:46

very close and you can see Stama's

34:49

body language a bit uncomfortable. And I'm

34:51

worried, with the conservatives behind in the

34:53

polls going into an election, they're desperately

34:55

trying to define the Labour Party as

34:58

being Jeremy Corbyn's anti-Semitic party and trying

35:00

to mobilize a group which Lee Anderson

35:02

was speaking for who think there's some

35:04

existential fight against Islam at stake. And

35:07

they're going to try to challenge Labour

35:09

to either take them on on this

35:12

or even more dangerous to my point of view that

35:14

Labour gets pulled onto their side because they don't want

35:16

to get into that discussion. That's

35:19

very Gove-ian. But the responses, I think,

35:21

that I'm very, very worried that we're

35:24

going to end up demonizing Muslims. I

35:26

want to pick up your point about

35:28

demonizing Muslims because I think there are

35:30

some encouraging signs. We're having this conversation

35:32

during Ramadan, about two weeks in, a

35:34

bit less. And what I've noticed is

35:36

although the number of Iftars that are

35:38

being hosted by churches and synagogues have

35:40

declined, they're still happening. That's really encouraging

35:42

because that's the kind of solidarity. It's

35:44

about crossing a threshold. It's why I

35:46

take my students into a mosque. Cross

35:48

that threshold. It's not as you might think

35:51

it is And the Synagogue. So

35:53

There are these little positive signs. And

35:55

I Think sometimes we underestimate how well

35:57

we do multiculturalism and multi-faith. Get

36:00

a criticizing ourselves rightly and there's a lot

36:02

to criticize why they wouldn't with their what

36:05

noisy that is what a Brockman is.

36:07

Ah the hotels a multi soon as you

36:09

said module from and working. As far as

36:11

I'm concerned I say absolutely loudly and

36:13

proudly Multiculturalism is a success. I'm on Arsenal

36:15

supporters he said before the site my sunspots

36:18

never pull her when most hello scores

36:20

and frustrates on the ground. As a Muslim,

36:22

what to look for, supports his chance

36:24

if he scores as you are become a

36:26

Muslim To is great and. Very

36:29

different from what I was brought up with

36:31

when I went to the Arsenal. right there.

36:33

So many things that mention that recipients Prime

36:35

Minister, you look at the different celebrities of

36:38

different faiths, different cultures. We are now a

36:40

multicultural society. Back to Nineteen Sixty One in

36:42

One Hundred and Sixty People will not Christian

36:44

that they say it's you. Now.

36:47

Is one in ten? British?

36:49

One Intense. We are all

36:51

minorities. I think that's incredibly

36:53

liberating that we're all minorities.

36:55

Because you don't have a majority culture the

36:58

console the minority culture from as I suspected

37:00

this is how to do it to. Just

37:02

say recently not of Roger I'm sure is

37:04

some nut. Absolutely massive Christian our hearts the

37:07

lives are Christian values everyday life that he

37:09

recently slydial feals reserve the contrary when his

37:11

his money going to understand mirror christian country

37:13

was when is the Oscars country not criticizing

37:16

the government? There's something about the road of

37:18

the auspicious hands free to hold out saloon

37:20

how the government and others he was a

37:22

weaponizing christianity as well. Not yet but there's

37:25

always been criticism. Maggie Thatcher criticize the Oscars

37:27

can't often. One is that since oh that's

37:29

not a new phenomenon, disease and new phenomena

37:31

but they but the weaponizing of christianity as

37:33

a minority religion. I think the weaponizing for

37:36

senate see less of a minority religion but

37:38

being persecuted. So it's when christians have been

37:40

persecuted you know insist on or you bring

37:42

in other parts the well with the on

37:44

sufficient cares about Muslim I was Rosnano think

37:47

you're right as says one of the conceptual

37:49

things which presumably Michael Dead is getting. His

37:52

decided somehow by talking to extremists

37:54

that in my some my question to

37:56

is how do you get that balance

37:58

right Because wheels. So yeah, how does

38:01

his friend Jonathan Powell say, ultimately,

38:03

you have to talk to terrorists, right, to bring

38:05

peace. So how do you understand, right, between people

38:07

who say, you've got to talk to the extremists

38:09

and people who say, you mustn't talk to them?

38:11

You need wiggle room. I personally

38:13

have wiggle room. I'm just an academic, I'm

38:16

a teacher, I'm a leader in interfaith.

38:18

I can meet pretty much anybody. Have

38:21

you met Hannes? I've met lots

38:23

of problematic people in Doha. Right. I've

38:26

met people who I fundamentally disagree with, whose

38:29

views may be, I don't know,

38:31

homophobic, Islamophobic, anti-Semitic, whatever. I will

38:33

meet anybody as long as I

38:35

don't feel threatened. But I

38:37

have that wiggle room that perhaps politicians don't have

38:39

so much. They have to use conduits. But yes,

38:42

everyone has to make up their own mind who

38:44

they can and can't meet. But is it smart

38:46

of governments not to engage? I would have thought

38:48

actually, governments need to have the wiggle

38:50

room. They need to be, to say, this is a

38:53

list of people we won't talk to when they're citizens

38:55

from your own country. Whether they're

38:57

Islamists, or they're even the far right. I

38:59

mean, obviously, you know, somebody like me is

39:01

very worried about the far right, but I

39:03

suppose my instinct would be, you need to

39:05

be able to probably talk to Tommy Robinson

39:07

as well. You need to be a- Stephen

39:09

Yax-Lennon. Stephen Yax-Lennon. That's a good one by

39:11

his real name. Whether the government sit down

39:13

officially, publicly, and talk to them is one

39:15

thing, but they should certainly be understanding where

39:17

they're coming from and have people who are

39:19

talking to them, right? The foolishness is pretend that

39:22

you can't talk to anybody. I mean, you know,

39:24

boy cards. I'm really not a

39:26

fan of that. I'm a fan of building relationships, as

39:28

you can tell. And that means talking to people who

39:30

you fundamentally disagree with. You would

39:32

be alarmed at the moment if there wasn't,

39:35

however, securitously, some kind of direct contact going

39:37

on between Hamas and the Israeli government. There

39:39

is. Right. I know where there is. Yeah,

39:41

and it would be a terrible mistake on both sides if there

39:43

wasn't. There has to be. It was

39:45

interesting you mentioned Qatar, as when you were talking about

39:48

who might put this together, because a few years ago,

39:50

I'm sure we would have said the United States is

39:52

probably the only broker that could maybe do this, but

39:54

you think Qatar takes the lead here. The US has

39:56

always been criticized for not being a balanced player, but

39:59

particularly under Trump. but not only has been

40:01

seen more and more as simply a supporter of

40:03

Israel and a defender of Israel. Now

40:05

of course Qatar is probably more aligned for

40:07

Palestinian cause. It certainly funds Hamas in the

40:09

strip and Gaza strip. It's very good at

40:11

looking two ways at the same time. And

40:14

again it's important a peace process. It is, it

40:16

is. So it won't be any one state, it

40:18

would be a combination of states. But I do

40:20

worry if there's one thing I worry about is

40:22

with the possible election of Donald Trump for a

40:25

second term in terms of what the impact will

40:27

be in that part of the world because it

40:29

could well lead to the end of one

40:31

or two countries. One thing that I

40:33

keep coming back to is Jewish friends of

40:35

mine, close friends of mine, angry with me

40:38

listening to the podcast because they think I

40:40

spent too much time talking about Gaza and

40:42

they think that that is fueling anti-Semitism

40:44

and that I'm failing to express enough

40:46

sympathy on anti-Semitism. They're very,

40:49

very powerful reason autocollary in the Atlantic

40:51

on anti-Semitism in the US and of course they

40:53

have the deal who's interviewed talk a lot about

40:55

this. Only Jews

40:57

saying there's absolutely no need

41:00

to draw any connection at all between what

41:02

Israel is doing in Gaza. And

41:04

I do notice that the video often says that I don't know

41:06

anything about Israel and not interested in Israel and I'm

41:08

talking about Israel and talking about Jews and

41:11

that. And that is Jesus. Nonetheless, those

41:14

things do seem to be more complicatedly

41:16

related at the moment. Do you have

41:18

any sense of what advice you

41:20

can give to me and us

41:23

or indeed actually to a responsible

41:25

politician today on how you find

41:27

the language to say what Israel

41:29

is doing in Gaza is cruel

41:31

and a catastrophic mistake and it's

41:33

not going to eliminate Hamas and

41:35

it's going to cause horrifying problems

41:37

for Israel and the targeting is

41:39

no good because of suffering and

41:41

Hamas conducted extreme and appalling atrocities

41:44

and the anti-Semitism and the Islamophobia that somehow makes

41:46

sense of this in a way that doesn't sound

41:48

like you're not listening to anyone? Well, I can't

41:50

do it in a soundbite and it is all

41:52

the ends that you put together. And

41:55

the problem is not just the however many

41:57

digits there are for a tweet nowadays. people

42:00

want things done very, very quickly, and

42:02

they want things summarized very, very easily and it

42:04

ain't possible. So when I'm pushed something like that,

42:07

can you explain it simply? I'm sorry to say

42:09

the answer is no, I can't. Give

42:11

me a bit of your time and I'll

42:13

explain it and I'll go through it with

42:15

you. And I think to have the courage

42:17

to say that rather than simply come up

42:19

with something that is a platitude or something

42:22

that is so short that of course it

42:24

leaves something out. So the bottom line is

42:26

it's incredibly complicated and that doesn't mean that

42:28

you ignore the terrible suffering of Palestinians and

42:30

you ignore the dehumanizing language that politicians,

42:32

particularly in that part of the world,

42:34

seem to adopt so easily. The calamitous

42:36

regime and the government of Netanyahu's calamitous,

42:38

it seems not just for me, my

42:40

view, not just for Palestinians and particularly

42:42

in Gaza right now, but for the

42:44

state of Israel. That's my personal view.

42:47

But you have to get a sense

42:49

of the complexity of it and you

42:51

do that with a little bit of

42:53

having a relationship, right? Having built up a

42:56

little bit of trust. If I go into

42:58

a room with a group of Muslims, the

43:00

first thing I do is not talk about Israel Palestine.

43:03

I talk about what we have in common and

43:05

then talk about difficult things. Maybe going to theology

43:07

of land, why is Mecca and Medina holy? What's

43:09

special about Jerusalem? Begin to get there. You

43:12

don't go there straight away. And

43:14

unfortunately in politics, I don't know, I can

43:17

ask you this question. Everything seems to be

43:19

transactional. You know, I give you this, you

43:21

give me that. But

43:24

in religion and dialogue, that's not the case.

43:26

It's not transaction. It's relationship based and it's

43:28

different, isn't it? Yeah. I mean, listen, I

43:30

agree with you. I think the world is

43:32

crying out for politicians who are able to

43:34

say this is really complicated,

43:36

but then demand the time of be

43:38

it an interviewer or the public, demand

43:40

the time to be able to explain

43:42

a bit of the history, explain some

43:45

of the choices and some of the

43:47

complexities. I'm not sure that

43:49

it's all transactional. I do think that the

43:51

combination of a different form of political communication

43:53

allied to social media and the pressures

43:55

that brings to the debate have

43:58

made it a lot harder to do. still

44:00

think that good politicians have the capacity to

44:02

set this agenda. I wish some of them

44:04

would make longer and deeper speeches about this.

44:06

It'd be fair if Biden has actually. One

44:08

of the things that you do notice in

44:10

the States is the generational split as

44:12

far as Israel's concerned. So the Biden

44:14

generation is much more aware of that

44:16

history of Israel, the vulnerability of Israel

44:19

in its early years, supporting Israel, it

44:21

being bipartisan, you know, and then the

44:23

next generation, perhaps our generation, sort of

44:25

much more aware of the complexity Israel

44:27

as a power less vulnerable than it

44:29

was and the difficulty relationship with Palestinians.

44:31

And then you have our kids generation who

44:33

just can't understand. No, nothing other than Israeli

44:35

occupation of the West Bank. And

44:37

Israel still in many ways, the government

44:39

of Israel and the people of Israel

44:41

still see themselves as a minority.

44:44

And I get that because they're surrounded by a

44:46

majority member Prince Hassan of Jordan saying to me

44:49

when he met Shimon Peres, Mr. Peres, your Highness,

44:51

you don't have to have got it is for

44:53

us Israelis we're surrounded by enemies who want to

44:55

throw us into the sea. And

44:57

C.D. Hassan said, I understand, Mr. Peres,

45:00

but you don't know how lucky you are. You are surrounded by

45:02

enemies. But I'm surrounded by friends. It's

45:06

not easy, right? It's not an easy neighborhood.

45:08

I think Harry Ahmed and the House of

45:10

Lords gets right because he's got special responsibility

45:12

for the sacred sites in Jerusalem. He gets

45:14

the complexity of it. And that's really important.

45:17

You talked about this concept of

45:19

the transfer of conflict. What do you mean

45:21

by that? What are you trying to get at?

45:23

I'm trying to get at the fact that now

45:25

that we are such a multicultural society, when something

45:27

happens in India, there could be riots in Leicester,

45:30

as there were in 2022 between Hindus

45:32

and Muslims. Driven from India. Driven from

45:35

India. The war in Gaza

45:37

has driven the anti-Semitism Islamophobia

45:39

we see today. Back

45:41

when there was the Rushdie affair in

45:43

1992, or the destruction of the mosque

45:46

in Iota in India the same year,

45:48

there weren't riots here. There were riots

45:50

about anger in the Muslim community about

45:52

the Satanic verses. Don't get me wrong,

45:54

but in terms of interfaith pressures, there

45:57

weren't. That's happening now. Things transfer so

45:59

quickly. from one place to the other.

46:01

It could be Gaza, it could be Karachi, it

46:03

could be anywhere, it could be Washington. And it's

46:05

a real challenge for us in the political sphere

46:08

but also in the religious sphere because suddenly you're

46:10

under pressure because of what somebody said. We'll do

46:12

a group of that though. You try and say

46:14

stop, you try and breathe,

46:16

you try and say this is not as

46:18

simple as you think. Again, it's... Complacency. Yeah.

46:21

Can I finish with a said? What I'm not seeing

46:24

at the moment from any of the major political

46:26

leaders are people saying our

46:28

priority now is to bring communities

46:30

together. What I'm seeing is people

46:32

condemning, condemning extremism, condemning

46:36

marches, condemning attacks. What

46:38

I'd like to see is people saying

46:41

actually we are facing a serious threat

46:43

of inter-communal tensions and violence and that

46:45

my political priority is to actually ease

46:47

that. I'd like to see the same

46:49

but I'd also like to say on the

46:51

ground there are some really good things happening.

46:53

There are synagogues and churches holding Iftar's example.

46:56

Research of the Wolf Institute has shown

46:58

very recently that the effective dialogue starts

47:00

from the bottom up. It

47:03

may be that you meet the Pope or

47:05

the Grand Mufti or the Chief Rabbi, that's

47:07

a nice photo opportunity moment but actually the

47:09

change comes from the ground, from

47:11

street relations. And there are a lot

47:14

of problematic things happening but there are some good

47:16

things happening. So again, I hang on to a

47:18

sense of optimism about what might be. I would

47:20

love our political leaders to say,

47:23

you know, that to bring our communities

47:25

together and mean it. I'd like them

47:27

to invest in that. There are many,

47:29

many good politicians who are going out

47:31

there within our communities who understand the

47:33

local community. The constituencies help that. It

47:35

fosters that. We don't have a constituency

47:37

system, for example, in Israel. It's just

47:39

national or in the States. It's so

47:41

big. But yeah, there are some good

47:43

things happening here. My last question is going

47:45

to contain a couple of fastballs. So Rory

47:48

mentioned that you're chair of the Commission on

47:50

the Integration of Refugees. I'd like

47:52

your take on the current attitudes

47:54

to refugees in our politics and more

47:57

broadly in the country. The

48:00

second word just outside the off stump, faith

48:03

schools, where you are on that. I'm

48:05

not a fan. Okay. So

48:08

the Commission on the Integration of

48:10

Refugees recently issued its report with

48:12

16 recommendations, 14

48:14

of which were unanimous. Now this

48:16

commission is 22 people, both left wing

48:18

and right wing. We have Tory, we

48:21

have Labour, we have policy exchange, we

48:23

have refugees, we have faith leaders, we

48:25

have people who do not agree with

48:27

each other like Brenda Hale, Lady Hale

48:29

and David Gutthart. They sit on the

48:31

same commission, they agree the system is

48:33

broken and they say what can we

48:35

do to fix it. We've published a

48:37

series of recommendations that have been costed,

48:39

are evidence based with hearings all around

48:41

the country. And actually there's such good

48:43

practice that's going on. Again, it's actually

48:45

acknowledging what is working well. For example, homes

48:47

for Ukraine, there are 150,000 or so Ukrainians here,

48:49

73,000 are in

48:52

people's homes. That's remarkable. It's not about taking somebody's

48:54

home away from somebody else. And of course living

48:56

in somebody's home means that you're going to integrate

48:59

more quickly. One of our recommendations

49:01

was that people should be able to access

49:03

work from six months. At the moment, you

49:05

can't work at least until 12 months and

49:08

then only on the job shortage occupation list.

49:10

It's bringing people together across these boundaries, having

49:12

a serious and forgive me adult

49:14

conversation with people who disagree

49:16

with each other but want the asylum system

49:18

to work and doing it with people who

49:21

spend time with refugees around the country. It's

49:23

remarkable what consensus has been achieved on a

49:25

very difficult topic. So is this Rwanda debate

49:27

just kind of going on over there and

49:29

it's got nothing to do with what you've

49:31

been talking about? First of all, the Rwanda

49:33

debate is ongoing. And even when it becomes

49:35

law or has become law, it's going to

49:37

go through a various court of appeal. Whatever

49:40

happens, there will be refugees. We can't

49:42

stop refugees, whether it's a Ukraine scheme

49:44

or Hong Kongers or others, we

49:47

need better ways to integrate them into

49:49

our society. At the moment, the average

49:51

excluding the special cases of the 20,000

49:53

Afghans and so on is about

49:55

50,000 a year. Yeah, no, let's be

49:57

honest, we're not going to stop the boats. we've

50:00

got to do is have proper safe and

50:02

legal passage. That's a different subject outside the

50:04

Commission, but we have to integrate it better.

50:07

And these recommendations, as I say, are cross-party.

50:09

You know, it's a real example of what

50:11

can be achieved in faith schools. A

50:14

few years ago, I was Vice Chair,

50:16

thankfully, not Chair, of a Commission on Religion

50:19

and Belief. There are some excellent faith schools,

50:21

right? In fact, the majority of faith schools

50:23

are probably excellent, right? But we

50:25

made a statement that the children coming out

50:27

of faith schools should have some encounter with

50:29

an understanding of others, whether

50:32

it's a 20% number, a percentage

50:34

within a faith school, or something like

50:36

that. At that time, the Cardinal of

50:38

Westminster and the Chief Rabbi sent me

50:40

separate letters that had obviously got together

50:42

condemning that recommendation. And it was a

50:44

wonderful example of Jewish-Christ relations in action,

50:46

but not quite the type I had

50:49

hoped for. Personally, as long

50:51

as faith schools ensure their children

50:53

don't just learn about another faith,

50:55

but their children engage with children

50:57

of other faiths, ideally in the

50:59

same school, then I'm absolutely for

51:01

them. I'm not in favour of 100% based

51:04

faith schools whose graduates do not

51:06

engage with and do not understand

51:08

and do not encounter children

51:10

of other faiths. Amen to that. Thank

51:13

you so much, Khatan. It's been a real

51:15

privilege. Thank you. Thanks very much. Really enjoyed

51:17

it. Pleasure. We

51:21

often talk about guests out there, and

51:23

obviously we love to get serving politicians

51:25

or senior ex-politicians. But it's also good

51:27

to remember that politics in any country

51:29

isn't just about the elected people. It's

51:32

about people who are really engaged communities,

51:34

who are chairing commissions in a sense

51:36

of case on refugees, who are trying

51:38

to provide some of the kind of,

51:41

I guess some of the leadership outside of parliament. Anyway,

51:43

what do you reckon? I thought

51:45

he was great. I mean, I like his passion.

51:47

I like his knowledge. I like the fact he's

51:49

very clear, he explains things, and he's not afraid

51:51

of saying what he thinks. He

51:54

clearly is not a fan of Netanyahu. Clearly

51:57

is not a fan of some of the things this

51:59

government has been doing in relation to

52:01

refugees or in relation to this definition

52:04

of extremism stuff. What I

52:06

liked about him was that he's essentially saying,

52:08

unless you have whatever is happening at the

52:10

top level of politicians shouting at each other

52:12

and people killing each other, which is horrific,

52:15

you have to have this other stuff going

52:17

on. He thinks I'm a bit hung up

52:19

on process, but his dialogue is the process

52:21

in a way. That has to lead somewhere.

52:24

You need people like him. I was hopeful

52:26

that when you said, have you

52:28

met people from Hamas? And

52:30

quite clearly the answer is yes. You need that.

52:33

You need people who are doing that. Listen

52:35

to this just quickly. Any reflections on echoes

52:37

of Northern Ireland and community and

52:39

faith groups engaging there? Oh yeah, absolutely.

52:41

Oh look, very, very hard to imagine

52:43

how it's happening in the

52:46

wake of, as he says, horrific

52:48

events of October the 7th and the

52:50

horrific action inside Gaza since. So both

52:52

sides very, very polarized. But there were

52:55

definitely moments when there was utter polarization

52:57

and very publicly expressed hatreds when

53:00

there would be people in and

53:03

around all of those events

53:05

still talking to each other. I think

53:07

some of the women's group stuff was amazing, that they

53:09

just kept going with trying to build

53:11

bridges across the divide. Now I don't know

53:13

how much of that's going on. We see

53:15

the top level stuff most of the time,

53:17

don't we? That's the point he was making,

53:19

the sort of people we talked to about

53:21

this, the people in politics where it's very,

53:23

very difficult at the moment. But you know, you

53:26

need people like that who

53:28

will be useful at certain

53:31

stages to politicians who are trying to get

53:33

this thing done. You presumably thought a

53:35

lot about this after 9-11. I mean the

53:37

question of community relations and how to reach

53:39

out to Muslim communities and how

53:41

to deal with extremists and how to create

53:43

better. I mean, any lessons you took from that?

53:46

What were the challenges, what are the things you

53:48

remember most in that period? I remember that we

53:51

essentially asked Tessa Jowel, RIP,

53:55

to focus on nothing else pretty much for quite

53:57

a while. And was she good at it? Very

53:59

good, yeah. And what made her good

54:01

at it? What made her a good choice? Very interestingly,

54:03

exactly what Ed was saying, very good

54:05

at listening to people and

54:07

very good at giving a sense of understanding

54:10

other people's story and bringing people

54:12

together. And the other thing

54:14

that I remember on 9-11 itself, coming

54:17

back from Brighton where Tony had been making

54:19

this speech to the TUC and having this

54:21

sort of huge meeting with the whole kind

54:23

of everybody, it was police, security services, military,

54:25

the whole thing. And one of

54:27

the first things on the agenda being

54:30

extra security around Jewish

54:32

sites and Jewish areas, but also an

54:35

understanding that there would

54:37

have to be proper protection

54:40

of Muslim communities as well.

54:42

So seeing it as a combination of

54:44

policing and that kind of

54:46

community dialogue. And it's interesting, I think the

54:49

organisation that he mentioned whose funding was being

54:51

cut, I've got a feeling that that was

54:53

one of Tony Blair's things, he

54:56

drove that quite hard, because Tony's obsessed with this

54:58

interfaith stuff, he sees it as the key to

55:01

solving a lot of the problems of the world. Finally,

55:03

do you think it's helpful that

55:05

we now have a far more diverse

55:07

group of political leaders? I mean, we're

55:10

doing so just in the week in which we now

55:12

have a political leader in Wales,

55:14

we've got a Muslim political leader in Scotland,

55:17

we've got a Hindu political leader in the

55:19

United Kingdom. Do you think that that helps,

55:21

that it means that we now have a

55:23

generation that's got more empathy, more understanding of

55:26

these things? Well, I hope so. I hope

55:28

so. But I do worry, you

55:30

know, you made the point about and Ed made

55:32

the point about how she's being weaponised. And I

55:34

do think Michael Gove was up to quite Michael

55:37

Gove tricks last week. And I worry that Rishi

55:39

Sunak is enabling and empowering this.

55:41

So yes, on the surface, I

55:43

think it's fantastic. I really believe

55:45

that multiculturalism is a British success

55:47

story. But it's quite odd to

55:49

have this British Hindu Prime Minister

55:51

and Suela Braverman, former Home Secretary,

55:54

essentially running this line that multiculturalism has

55:56

failed. I find that very,

55:58

very odd and quite troubling. Well, thank you.

56:00

Capture,paradec

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features