Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
In celebration of the Trinity Collection's
0:02
100th anniversary, this forecast is supported
0:05
by Cartier. From
0:13
the New York Times, I'm Anna Martin. This
0:15
is Modern Love. Today
0:18
I'm talking to the most famous
0:21
couples therapist in the world, Astaire
0:24
Perrell. Astaire's
0:26
books, Mating in Captivity and State
0:28
of Affairs, have forced so many
0:30
of us, myself included, to rethink
0:32
our assumptions about love. Like,
0:35
maybe it's unrealistic to expect the passion
0:37
and fire we feel at the beginning
0:39
of a relationship to last forever. And
0:42
when one partner cheats on the other, what if
0:44
it could actually bring the couple closer, instead
0:46
of tearing them apart? On
0:49
her podcast, Where Should We Begin, Astaire
0:51
lets us eavesdrop on sessions with real
0:53
couples. People come to her
0:55
with impossible problems, and she somehow guides
0:58
them to a breakthrough. She
1:00
gives them hope. When
1:02
I listen to Astaire's podcast, I
1:04
feel like I'm getting a free therapy session. So
1:07
I wasn't surprised in the slightest when
1:09
she told me that people come up
1:11
to her in public all the time
1:13
and ask her deeply personal questions. The
1:15
grocery store is one place, but airplanes
1:17
is even better. Oh, no, Astaire. If
1:20
I were you, I'd be really scared
1:22
to fall. They're
1:24
suspended in the air, and they tell you
1:26
lots of things. And
1:29
it is often about, can trust
1:31
be repaired when it's been broken? Can
1:35
you bring a spark back when it's gone?
1:38
Can you rekindle desire when it's been
1:40
dormant for so long? What
1:42
do you do when you're angry at yourself for
1:44
having stayed when you think you should have left?
1:47
Or what do you do when you're angry at
1:49
yourself when you've left and now you think you
1:51
should have stayed? You're like, I'm just at the
1:53
grocery store, man. Like, I need to check out.
1:56
Yes. Clearly,
1:59
people. are struggling so much
2:01
to be happy in long-term relationships that
2:04
they're cornering this woman basically everywhere she goes.
2:07
And these things people ask Esther about,
2:09
they're exactly the kinds of high-stakes, make-or-break
2:11
questions that come up in the essay
2:13
she chose for our show today. It's
2:16
called What Sleeping with Married
2:18
Men Taught Me About Infidelity by
2:20
Karen Jones. Karen's essay was
2:23
one of the most controversial pieces ever published
2:25
in the history of the Modern Love column.
2:28
But when it comes to talking about sex and
2:30
relationships, nothing is too taboo
2:32
for Esther. Esther
2:37
Perreault, welcome to Modern Love. It's
2:40
a pleasure to be here. So
2:42
you're gonna read Karen Jones's Modern Love
2:44
essay. We're gonna talk all about infidelity.
2:46
But before we get into that,
2:48
I learned something about you that I need to
2:50
know more about. You are
2:52
fluent in nine languages and
2:55
you conduct therapy in seven of them. Is
2:57
that true? Yes. So
3:00
I grew up in Belgium, in the
3:02
Flemish part of Belgium, and I was
3:04
educated in Flemish for 12 years. But
3:07
we also spoke French and German
3:10
and Polish and Yiddish at
3:12
home. Wow. So we had five
3:15
languages in the house and
3:17
then I studied Spanish, Portuguese, Hebrew,
3:20
and English. That comes
3:22
to nine. Would you ever do
3:24
one more just to bring it to a
3:26
solid ten? I always wanted to study
3:28
Arabic. Okay, in your free time,
3:30
in your ample free time. One day. Are
3:33
there certain languages that have better vocabulary
3:35
for talking about the nuances of love
3:37
and relationships than others? That
3:41
is a very difficult question to
3:43
answer because my love language, the
3:45
language in which I learned poetry,
3:48
songs, novels, etc., was primarily
3:50
French. And so of course
3:52
I would say French. But
3:55
that may be because I was inducted in
3:57
it rather than the language itself. What
4:00
I can say is that certain cultures
4:03
are more fluent in
4:06
the language of feelings, love,
4:09
relationships, and desire and
4:11
sexuality than maybe
4:14
English or Anglo cultures that
4:16
are more pragmatic, more practical.
4:18
I think in therapy
4:20
sometimes I find that there is a
4:23
certain culture that allow me to speak
4:25
differently about death, differently
4:27
about the relationship of the
4:29
individual to the collective. What
4:32
I will say is this, in a therapy
4:34
session, if a person tells me
4:36
something and it
4:38
needs to be said in his own language, I
4:40
will ask them to translate it and to
4:43
say it in their mother
4:45
tongue because
4:47
you hear instantly the
4:50
difference, the tone, the timbre, the tremble,
4:52
and I know it. It's like I
4:54
don't even have to understand what they're
4:56
saying. I know that
4:58
there is an authenticity and a
5:01
truth to it that is very different. Sometimes
5:03
afterwards I said, what did you say? But
5:05
sometimes I don't even need to. I
5:08
know when they say, I feel alone,
5:10
I ache for you, I miss you,
5:13
where have you gone, I can't forget you. You
5:15
don't really need to understand
5:18
the words, to understand the
5:20
effect. Esther, the
5:22
Modern Love Essay you're going to read for
5:25
us today tackles a topic that I bet
5:27
is very hard to talk about in almost
5:29
any language. It's called
5:31
What Sleeping with Married Men
5:33
Taught Me About Infidelity by
5:35
Karen Jones. The author
5:38
Karen is recently divorced and she
5:40
becomes the other woman to several
5:42
men. When I
5:44
read that title, I kind
5:46
of expect this story is going to be about
5:48
all the sex she's having or the secrets or
5:50
how they're hiding it, but you've
5:52
worked with so many couples who are in
5:55
the throes of dealing with cheating. So what is the
5:58
word in the book? It's called What Sleeping with Married Men Taught Me About infidelity
6:00
signal to you. You know, I wrote
6:03
a book about infidelity. So I
6:06
would say that one of my attempts in
6:08
writing this book was to
6:11
translate in writing the
6:14
complexity of this experience
6:16
that can be so shattering,
6:19
that can fracture family and
6:21
an entire legacy.
6:25
It needs more than
6:27
just good, bad, victim,
6:29
perpetrator, villain, saint, that
6:31
there's too much happening and for too
6:33
many people that are
6:35
involved to try to reduce it. Infidelity
6:39
is often about a lot of things,
6:41
but sex. It's
6:43
about betrayal. It's about violation of
6:46
trust. It's about lying. It's about
6:48
duplicity. It's about deception. And
6:50
sex is a piece of this, but
6:52
that is not necessarily the only thing.
6:54
Oof, Esther, I am so excited
6:57
to hear you read this. Whenever you're ready.
7:01
Okay. What Sleeping with Married Men Taught
7:03
Me About Infidelity by Karen
7:05
Jones. I'm
7:14
not sure it's possible to justify my
7:16
liaison with married men, but
7:19
what I learned from having them warrants
7:21
discussion. Not
7:23
between the wife and me, though I would
7:25
be interested to hear their side. No,
7:28
this discussion should happen between wives
7:30
and husbands annually, the way we
7:33
inspect the tire tread on the
7:35
family car to avoid accidents. A
7:40
few years ago, while living in London,
7:42
I dated married men for companionship while
7:44
I processed the grief of being newly
7:47
divorced. And
7:50
I created a profile on Tinder and
7:52
on OKCupid saying I was looking for
7:55
no strings attached and counters. Plenty
7:57
of single men messaged me and I got
7:59
together. with several of them. But
8:03
many married men messaged me too. After being
8:06
married for 23 years,
8:08
I wanted sex but not a
8:11
relationship. This is dicey
8:13
because you can't always control emotional
8:15
attachments when body chemicals mix. But
8:19
with the married men, I guess that
8:21
the fact that they had wives, children
8:23
and mortgages would keep them from going
8:25
overboard with their affections. And
8:28
I was right. They didn't
8:30
get overly attached and neither did I. We were safe
8:33
bets for each other. I was careful about the men
8:35
I met. I wanted to make
8:44
sure they had no interest in leaving
8:46
their wives or otherwise threatening all they
8:49
had built together. In
8:51
a couple of cases, the men I
8:53
met were married to women who had
8:55
become disabled and could no longer be
8:57
sexual, but the husbands remained devoted to
8:59
them. All
9:02
told, I communicated with maybe a dozen
9:04
men during that time in my life.
9:07
I had sex with fewer than half. Others
9:10
I texted or talked with, which
9:12
sometimes felt nearly as intimate. Before
9:16
I met each man, I would ask, why
9:18
are you doing this? I
9:20
wanted assurance that all he desired
9:22
was sex. What
9:25
surprised me was that these husbands
9:27
weren't looking to have more sex.
9:30
They were looking to have any sex. I
9:32
met one man whose wife had implicitly consented
9:39
to her husband having a lover because
9:41
she was no longer interested in sex
9:43
at all. They both to some degree
9:45
got what they needed without having to
9:47
give up what they wanted. But the
9:50
other husbands I met would have preferred
9:53
to be having sex with their wives
9:55
and for whatever reason that wasn't happening.
10:00
I know what it feels like to go off sex,
10:02
and I know what it's like to want more than
10:04
my partner. It's also a tall
10:06
order to have sex with the same
10:08
person for more years than our ancestors
10:10
ever hoped to live. Then,
10:13
at menopause, a woman's hormones suddenly
10:15
drop and her desire can wane.
10:19
At 49, I was just about there
10:21
myself and terrified of losing my desire
10:23
for sex. Men
10:26
don't have this drastic change, so we
10:28
have an imbalance, an
10:30
elephant-sized problem so burdensome and
10:32
shameful we can scarcely muster
10:35
the strength to talk about it. If
10:41
you read the work of Esther Pirel, the
10:43
author of the book State of Affairs, you'll
10:46
learn that for many wives, sex outside of
10:48
marriage is their way of breaking free from
10:50
being the responsible spouses and mothers they have
10:52
to be at home. Married
10:55
sex for them often feels
10:57
obligatory. An affair
10:59
is adventure. Meanwhile,
11:03
the husbands I spent time with would
11:05
have been fine with obligatory sex. For
11:07
them, adventure was not the main reason
11:10
for their adultery. The
11:13
first time I saw my favorite married
11:16
man pick up his pint of beer,
11:18
the sleeve of his well-tailored suit pulled
11:20
back from his wrist to reveal a
11:22
geometric kaleidoscope of tattoos. He
11:26
was clean-shaven and well-mannered with a
11:28
little rebel yell underneath. The
11:31
night I saw the full canvas of
11:33
his tattoo masterpiece, we
11:36
drank Prosecco, listened to 80s music,
11:38
and yes, hit sex. We
11:42
also talked. I
11:45
asked him, what if you said
11:47
to your wife, look, I love you and
11:49
the kids, but I need sex in my
11:51
life. Can I just have
11:53
the occasional fling or a casual affair?
11:57
He sighed. If I asked her that
11:59
case, she would say, kind of question, it would kill her,
12:01
he said. So
12:04
you don't want to hurt her, but you
12:06
lie to her instead? Personally, I'd rather know,
12:09
I said. It's
12:12
not necessarily a lie if you don't
12:14
confess the truth. It's kinder to stay
12:16
silent, he said. I'm
12:18
just saying I couldn't do that. I
12:21
don't want to be afraid of talking honestly about
12:23
my sex life with the man I'm married to.
12:25
And that includes being able to at
12:27
least raise the subject of sex outside
12:30
of marriage, I said. Good
12:33
luck with that, he said. I
12:39
never convinced any husband that he could be
12:41
honest about what he was doing. But
12:44
they were mostly good natured about it,
12:46
like a patient father responding to a
12:48
child who keeps asking, why? Why?
12:52
Why? Maybe
12:54
I was being too pragmatic about the
12:56
issues that are loaded with guilt, resentment,
12:59
and fear. After all, it's
13:01
far easier to talk theoretically about marriage
13:03
than to navigate it. But
13:06
my attitude is that if my spouse were
13:08
to need something I couldn't give him, I
13:10
wouldn't keep him from getting it elsewhere, as
13:13
long as he did so in a way
13:15
that didn't endanger our family. I
13:18
suppose I would hope his needs would
13:20
involve fishing trips or beers with friends,
13:22
but sex is basic. Physical
13:25
intimacy with other human beings is
13:27
essential to our health and well-being.
13:30
So how do we deny such a need to the
13:32
one that we care about most? If
13:35
our primary relationship nourishes and
13:37
stabilizes us but lacks intimacy,
13:39
we shouldn't have to destroy
13:41
our marriage to get that
13:43
intimacy somewhere else. Should
13:46
we? I
13:49
didn't have a full-on affair with a tattooed
13:51
husband. We slept together maybe
13:53
four times over a few years. More
13:56
often, we talked on the phone. After
13:59
our second time, I was in the hospital. night together though, I could
14:01
tell this was about more than sex for
14:03
him. He was desperate for
14:05
affection. He
14:08
said he wanted to be close to his
14:10
wife but couldn't because they were unable to
14:12
get past their fundamental disconnect. Lack
14:15
of sex. That led
14:17
to a lack of closeness, which made
14:20
sex even less likely and then turned
14:22
into resentment and blame. I'm
14:26
not saying the answer is non-monogamy.
14:28
That can be rife with risks
14:30
and unintended entanglements. I believe
14:33
the answer is honesty and dialogue,
14:35
no matter how frightening. Lack
14:39
of sex in marriage is common and it
14:41
shouldn't lead to shame and silence. By
14:44
the same token, an affair doesn't have to lead to
14:46
the end of a marriage. What
14:49
if an affair or ideally simply the
14:51
urge to have one can be the
14:53
beginning of a necessary conversation about sex
14:56
and intimacy? What
14:59
these husbands couldn't do was have
15:01
the difficult discussion with their wives
15:03
that would force them to tackle
15:05
the issues at the root of
15:07
their cheating. They tried to convince
15:10
me that they were being kind by
15:12
keeping their affairs secret. They seemed to
15:14
have convinced themselves. But
15:17
deception and lying are ultimately
15:19
corrosive, not kind. In
15:25
the end, I had to wonder if
15:27
what these men couldn't face was something
15:29
else altogether. Hearing
15:31
why their wives no longer wanted to have sex
15:33
with them, it's much
15:35
easier after all to set
15:38
up an accountant in there. Thanks
15:57
so much for that reading Esther. You
16:00
know, it's so funny because Karen
16:02
Jones directly quotes you in
16:04
her piece. And I feel like
16:06
that is the first time ever we've
16:09
had someone read an essay where they're
16:11
directly quoted. Huh, nice. Did
16:13
anything jump out at you as you were reading? What
16:17
jumps out is she
16:19
tackles a lot of different things. The
16:22
subject of what is sexual aliveness,
16:25
what is it that people actually lose when
16:28
they stop being sexual with their
16:30
partner and how that loss of
16:32
intimacy makes the sex even more
16:34
complicated. She talked
16:36
about the loss, the longing that
16:39
this man has. I've often said
16:41
that at the heart of affairs
16:43
you find duplicity and cheating and
16:45
betrayal, but you also fight longing
16:47
and loss for the life
16:49
that one had, for the parts of
16:51
oneself that have been denied. When
16:57
we come back, I talk to Ester about
16:59
the harsh criticism this essay got and
17:02
why Ester thinks Karen Jones deserves
17:04
more credit. Stay with
17:07
us. In
17:12
celebration of the Trinity Collection's
17:14
100th anniversary, this forecast is
17:16
supported by Cartier. This
17:20
is Sarah Koenig, host of Serial. Our
17:22
newest season, season four, is about Guantanamo
17:25
Bay. Remember Guantanamo? Still
17:27
open. It's a prison and
17:29
a court that the U.S. built from
17:31
scratch right after 9-11 to hold people
17:33
we suspected of being Taliban or Al-Qaeda,
17:36
and it is unlike any criminal justice
17:38
system I have ever seen. Reporter
17:40
Dana Chivas and I, Dana is my co-host
17:42
this season, we have been trying to do
17:44
a story about Guantanamo for almost a decade.
17:47
The problem was, for years, all
17:49
the best stories Dana and I heard about what was
17:52
really going on there were off the record.
17:54
But now, people are ready to talk. Guards,
17:57
interrogators, commanders, chaplains, translators...
18:00
and former prisoners. They gave
18:02
us a history of Guantanamo you could only get
18:05
from the people who live through it. People
18:07
who know things the rest of us don't about
18:09
what it's like to be caught inside an improvised
18:11
justice system. From Serial Productions
18:14
in the New York Times, Serial Season 4,
18:16
Guantanamo. Listen wherever you
18:18
get your podcasts. So
18:30
is there this essay by Karen
18:32
Jones was kind of a
18:34
lightning rod when it was published. A ton of
18:36
people were very critical of the author saying
18:38
she was sleeping with these men but then
18:40
also having conversations with them where she was like
18:43
it's very wrong of you not to tell
18:45
your wife what you're up to. Why do you
18:48
think this essay got so much backlash?
18:51
I think that the reaction to stories
18:54
of infidelity are often
18:58
intense. It's
19:01
a subject for which people are
19:03
very quickly dogmatic because
19:06
they have experienced the effects of
19:08
it. You know when I
19:10
am in an audience like if I was to
19:12
ask have you been affected by the experience of
19:15
infidelity in your life? Either
19:17
because one of your
19:19
parents was unfaithful or because you yourself
19:21
had a child of an illicit affair
19:24
or because you had a friend on
19:26
whose shoulder somebody is weeping or you
19:28
had a confidant of someone who is
19:30
in the complete bliss of
19:33
an affair or because you
19:35
are the third person in
19:37
the triangle and about 80% of
19:40
the people will raise their hands. Wow I
19:42
mean 80% sounds like
19:44
a surprisingly large number but when you
19:47
explain it like that with different tendrils of
19:49
an affair that affect everyone
19:51
around the affair not just the people in it it
19:53
makes total sense. And
19:56
it raises intense feelings in
19:58
people. she
20:00
may have gotten the range of it, but you
20:02
will hear more loudly the ones
20:04
who say, you are a homewrecker,
20:06
which by the way, does not exist in
20:08
the masculine. The
20:11
homewrecker is always a woman, because
20:14
the woman is the one who says yes,
20:16
and therefore, if the woman hadn't said yes,
20:18
then he wouldn't be able to do it,
20:21
and then he would not be wrecking his
20:23
family. Yeah, there's no
20:25
other man either, by the way, so
20:27
is the other woman. Huh, there's no
20:29
other man. No. Not in any of
20:31
the, you know, nine languages you speak.
20:34
No, because there's never been another
20:36
man who necessarily was willing to
20:38
live in the shadow
20:40
of a woman for his entire life.
20:43
That is so fascinating. Her lover, Saint-Aman,
20:45
you know, her lover, but the other
20:47
woman usually means that she lives in
20:50
the shadow. She doesn't just have a
20:52
secret, she is the secret. That
20:54
is the hardest thing about it. When
20:57
people are writing to her,
20:59
you can ask yourself, are they
21:01
looking from the perspective of what it meant for
21:03
her, or are they looking from the perspective of
21:05
what it did to me, or to
21:08
us? Yeah, I mean, a
21:10
lot of the criticism directed
21:12
at Karen Jones, it seems, is coming from
21:14
that perspective of saying, look what she did,
21:16
look at the harm she caused, look at
21:19
the pain she caused. Which it is, which
21:21
it is. Right. Not discounting
21:23
that, but it is interesting because her
21:25
piece is so much about meaning making,
21:27
right? That's the whole conceit of her
21:29
essay is mining these experiences for meaning,
21:32
and yet people came with criticism. You
21:35
know, I wonder if this is like a
21:37
kind of unfair question, but I wonder if
21:39
there is like an ethical way to be
21:42
the other person. Is there a responsible way
21:44
to do it without participating in hurt? That
21:50
depends. That depends if you
21:52
think the whole thing is unethical and
21:55
is an egregious betrayal of trust
21:58
and violation. then
22:00
you will say no. I
22:02
think the responsibility lies on the person who
22:04
goes out, not on the lover. Here's
22:08
what many people often say, it's like
22:10
if you had asked me, or
22:12
if you had told me, but you made a
22:15
decision without me, you made a decision about our
22:17
marriage that did not involve me at all. And
22:21
fair point. Of course, they know
22:23
for fact too, that if they had been asked, they would have
22:25
said no. But
22:28
there is this, you know, the things that
22:30
you say after and there is the things that you say
22:32
before. So ultimately,
22:35
I feel like I hear
22:37
you agreeing with Karen Jones
22:39
here, that there are really important
22:41
conversations that need to be happening
22:43
between these husbands and their wives,
22:46
that actually don't even have that much to do
22:48
with Karen. Can you tell me
22:50
more about that? The conversation
22:52
that Karen Jones would like these men
22:55
to have with their wives, is
22:58
the conversations that take place in my book, Mating
23:00
in Captivity. Because mating
23:03
in captivity explore the dilemmas
23:05
of desire inside relationships.
23:07
And why do people seize
23:10
wanting? And could they
23:12
want what they already have? And why
23:14
does good sex fade even in couples
23:16
who still love each other as much
23:18
as ever? And why do
23:20
kids often deliver a fatal erotic
23:22
blow? What happens
23:24
when they don't have this conversation? And
23:28
they go elsewhere. And it's not just a
23:30
conversation about monogamy. It's really a conversation, what
23:32
does sex mean to you? What
23:35
do you want to experience in sex? Is
23:38
it a place for connection? Is it a
23:40
place for transcendence, for spiritual union, to be
23:42
naughty, to finally not be a good citizen,
23:45
to be playful, to be taken care of,
23:47
to surrender, to be safely dominant? What parts
23:50
of you do you connect with through
23:52
sexuality, rather than how often do
23:54
we have sex and we
23:56
never have sex and why don't we do it more?
24:00
So that is a very different
24:02
conversation. But as Karen
24:04
points to in her essay and as you
24:07
certainly point to in your book, those
24:10
conversations are so difficult to have,
24:12
even though, you know, this is
24:14
the person we're supposed to be
24:16
the closest to. Why is
24:18
that? Because
24:21
we grow up learning to be silent
24:23
about sex and never talk about it.
24:25
And then suddenly we are expected to
24:27
talk about it with the person we
24:29
love. Or in other words, sex
24:31
is dirty, but save it for the one you love.
24:34
It's like we have very little practice talking
24:36
about it. You know,
24:38
we don't get any of it in schools. Certainly
24:41
most families don't talk about it either.
24:44
You know, and when we talk about
24:46
sexuality, we talk about the dangers and
24:48
the diseases and the dysfunctions. We don't
24:50
talk about intimacy. We
24:52
don't actually mix the word
24:54
sexuality and relationships as one
24:56
whole. Yeah. And
24:59
I mean, if we don't talk about
25:01
intimacy or the lack of it with
25:03
a partner that can in some cases
25:05
lead to people going outside the marriage
25:07
to find that intimacy they're lacking in
25:09
it. You know, I'm thinking about
25:11
Karen's favorite married man, the one with
25:14
all the tattoos. He says
25:16
it's not necessarily a
25:18
lie. If you don't confess the truth,
25:20
it's kinder to stay silent. In
25:23
your experience working with couples, is he
25:25
right? Is that true? This
25:28
is a very cultural question. Because
25:32
you live in a society here
25:35
that believes in the moral
25:37
cure of truth. But
25:40
there are many societies for
25:42
whom truth and honesty are not
25:44
measured by the confession, but
25:46
they are measured by what it will be like for the
25:49
other person to walk with this on the street. Meaning
25:52
that, you know, they
25:54
will consider the confession often as
25:56
cruelty. So
25:59
what? got it off your chest. So
26:01
now you're less guilty and now I have to
26:03
live with this? Why don't you
26:05
just keep this to yourself kind of thing?
26:07
This is very cultural because in the United
26:09
States that is not the common
26:11
view. The common view is that the confession
26:14
is the best state even if you're going
26:16
to wreck the other person's life for the
26:18
next five years to come. And
26:21
I am left with a question
26:23
mark but when I answer this
26:25
question I ask people about their
26:27
own cultural codes as well. I
26:29
do not impose mine and mine
26:31
fluctuates depending on the context. I
26:33
think these questions are highly contextual
26:36
more than dogmatic. You
26:39
know we've talked about how there's so
26:41
many unsaid things between a couple that
26:43
can lead to distance and
26:45
infidelity. If a couple
26:47
is feeling themselves drifting apart from
26:50
each other emotionally, sexually, both,
26:53
what are some things you could encourage them to do that
26:55
might help? You
26:59
know I like to coach
27:01
people to do letter writing. Sometimes
27:05
I make one person turn their back
27:08
and I make the other person write
27:10
a letter on the back of the other
27:13
person. Oh physically on the back. Yes but
27:15
it's a fake. You're pretending to write but
27:17
you're writing on the back but that way
27:19
you don't see the person. Interesting.
27:22
Hi Anna. This
27:24
is something that I've been wanting to talk to
27:26
you for a long time and I give them
27:28
the prompt. You know we
27:30
never talk much about sexuality between us.
27:32
For some reason I decided a long
27:35
time ago that you wouldn't want to
27:37
but maybe it was I who didn't
27:40
know how to. And
27:42
basically they write these whole letters in
27:44
which they end up telling each other
27:47
much of what they have never spoken.
27:50
I love that. What a kind
27:53
and beautiful and compassionate
27:55
way of easing
27:57
into a conversation you've been afraid of having.
28:00
Esther Perel, thank you so much for
28:03
that idea and thank you for talking with me
28:05
today. Thank
28:07
you for having me. Esther
28:17
Perel is on tour in the US
28:19
right now. Her show is
28:21
called An Evening with Esther Perel, The
28:24
Future of Relationships, Love and Desire.
28:26
If you want to visit for more details and to
28:28
buy tickets, she told me she's going to create an
28:31
erotic experience in these theaters so you do not want
28:33
to miss that. Modern
28:36
Love is produced by Julia Botero, Christina
28:38
Joseph, Reva Goldberg, Davis Land and
28:40
Emily Lang. It's edited by our
28:43
executive producer Jen Poiant and Davis
28:45
Land. The Modern Love theme
28:47
music is by Dan Powell. Original
28:49
music by Dan Powell, Marion
28:52
Lozano, Pat McCusker, Rowan Nemestow,
28:54
Carol Saburo and Diane Wong.
28:57
This episode was mixed by Daniel Ramirez. Our
29:00
show is recorded by Maddie Maciello.
29:02
Digital production by Mijima Chablani and
29:04
Nell Gologli. The
29:06
Modern Love column is edited by Daniel Jones. Mia
29:09
Lee is the editor of Modern Love Projects. I'm
29:12
Anna Martin. Thanks for listening.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More