Podchaser Logo
Home
Three Powerful Lessons About Love

Three Powerful Lessons About Love

Released Wednesday, 28th February 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Three Powerful Lessons About Love

Three Powerful Lessons About Love

Three Powerful Lessons About Love

Three Powerful Lessons About Love

Wednesday, 28th February 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

This podcast is supported by BetterHelp Online

0:02

Therapy. Do relationships have to be easy

0:04

to be right? Of course not. The

0:06

best relationships with friends, family, or partners

0:09

happen when both people put in the

0:11

time and commitment to make them great.

0:14

Therapy can help. BetterHelp offers

0:16

convenient, affordable online therapy. Start the

0:18

process in minutes and switch therapists

0:20

anytime. Give your relationship some love

0:23

with BetterHelp. Visit betterhelp.com/modern

0:25

today to get 10%

0:28

off your first month. That's BetterHelp.

0:31

help.com/modern.

0:35

Love now and tomorrow. Love

0:39

is stronger than

0:41

anything. And

0:43

they love you more than anything. They

0:46

still love you. From

0:50

the New York Times, I'm Anna Martin. This

0:52

is Modern Love. This

0:54

year marks the 20th anniversary of the

0:56

Modern Love column. 20

0:59

years, can you believe that? Two decades

1:01

of essays that have made us laugh,

1:03

made us gasp, broken our hearts, reminded

1:05

us of the fundamental goodness of people.

1:08

And let's be honest, a lot of

1:10

these essays should come with tissues. It's

1:13

kinda our thing here, making you cry. To

1:16

mark this big anniversary, we've got a

1:18

conversation with Modern Love founder Daniel Jones.

1:21

Dan has edited around 1,000 essays since

1:23

the first one ran back in 2004. And

1:26

when you spend all your professional time

1:29

contemplating human connection, that work

1:31

doesn't stay at the office. It

1:33

impacts you in profound ways. So

1:36

today, Dan shares the three essays that

1:38

have changed the way he approaches love

1:40

and relationships in his own life. And

1:43

at the end of the show, stay tuned for

1:45

a very exciting announcement about the rest of our

1:47

season. So

1:58

it feels strange to say what I say to... guest

2:00

on the show which is welcome because really

2:02

you welcomed me into this

2:04

universe. So instead of saying

2:06

welcome, I'm going to say Dan Jones, hello,

2:09

and thank you so much. It

2:11

is great to be back here. The

2:13

modern love column has been around for almost 20 years

2:16

which is a long time and I

2:19

do not say this in a rude way but that also

2:21

means that you are 20 years

2:23

older than you were when you started it.

2:26

Is there anything that's happened in your

2:28

life over those two

2:30

decades that has changed your approach

2:33

to the work or reframed

2:35

it in some way? I've

2:38

gone from being young to less

2:40

young over that time. Delicately

2:43

put. I

2:46

started the column with children

2:48

who are now very

2:51

much adults and have gone

2:53

through their own breakups

2:55

and traumas and all of that and

2:57

got out into the world and got

2:59

jobs. My marriage

3:02

of 29 years

3:05

came to an amicable end.

3:09

My father died two

3:11

months ago and there's

3:13

been a lot of tough family time

3:16

since then. I

3:18

feel like my life was pretty

3:21

stable during sort

3:23

of the family, child rearing

3:26

years and then oddly

3:29

timed to the pandemic I have to say. It

3:32

happened to many. It

3:34

just opened up and it was like the

3:37

column was saying to me, okay, you're

3:39

going to experience the whole range

3:42

of what you've been putting out

3:44

there. Funnily

3:47

enough, I feel like working on

3:49

the column for all these years has

3:52

given me sort of touchstones

3:54

and tools and not just

3:56

for me, for other people too, to be able

3:59

to... to navigate difficult

4:02

times in life. It feels

4:04

like this churning reservoir of human

4:06

experience that sort of

4:08

feeds into your veins if you are

4:10

open to it. I

4:12

love what you said that you gave so much

4:15

to the column and now you're in this place

4:17

in your career and your life or it's giving

4:19

back to you. I mean, what a- It's

4:21

like an annuity program. It's like, yeah, it's like

4:23

a 401k. Right, right. It's

4:26

like a Roth IRA. Modern

4:28

love 401k. That's a sexy way to say

4:30

it, right? No, I'm withdrawing. I'm

4:32

getting close to the age where I'm gonna be forced

4:35

to withdraw, so it's a good thing. People are loving

4:37

this metaphor, yeah. Okay, so that's

4:39

where you are now, but when

4:41

you were starting the column, did you see

4:43

yourself as an expert in relationships

4:45

or in romance? I

4:48

wasn't great at romantic relationships. I

4:51

was like, how does this work? How

4:53

does this work? I was really terrible at it

4:55

in high school. I was really terrible at it

4:57

in college. Still found

4:59

it really hard. My first girlfriend in

5:02

grad school. You're

5:04

wild. But very slow learning,

5:06

very shy, but

5:08

I think just the weightiness

5:11

of romantic relationships is a

5:13

scary thing. And I

5:16

wasn't paralyzed with fear or anything. Like I just, I assumed

5:19

I'd get married, I'd have a family. Like

5:21

all those things were just assumptions and didn't

5:23

seem all that hard to make happen in a way. But

5:26

the complications of relationships

5:29

and loss and

5:32

just all those big things, I

5:34

felt like those were things that happened to

5:36

somebody else. Those were out

5:39

there and were these deep dark wells that

5:44

I hadn't really experienced and didn't

5:46

have a sense of

5:48

how to navigate. How

5:50

did the people in your life react when

5:52

you told them like, hey, I got a new gig,

5:55

I will be covering love and relationships

5:58

the New York Times, did people? people, you know,

6:00

how do people react? Some people

6:03

were just, they were surprised that that

6:05

would be my subject. Huh. And

6:07

that would be my beat in a way. To

6:10

me, I don't think of love

6:12

and relationships as being a beat. I

6:15

think of it as being like the center of all

6:17

life. You know, it's like, it's

6:20

not off to the side. Say that. It's

6:23

the center of things. Honestly, I

6:25

don't like the word romance. It just feels like

6:28

shallow and... Schlocky. Schlocky

6:30

and whatever. But the

6:33

word love, like, has it

6:35

all. It's like, that's the

6:37

core of human existence, it seems

6:39

to me. It's the

6:42

stuff of life and loss and death

6:45

and yearning and dreaming and

6:47

all of that stuff. Have

6:51

you come to that understanding of

6:53

these stories about love or really stories

6:55

about life? Do you enter into

6:58

the column, the early days of this column, with

7:00

that understanding or has that been worked out over

7:02

20 years of editing these pieces?

7:05

We started that way a little

7:08

intentionally. We made it clear that

7:10

the stories were not just about

7:12

romantic relationships. It was of family

7:14

relationships and friendships and parenthood

7:16

and the whole sort of gamut

7:19

of human love and bonds. In

7:23

coming up with the title, Modern

7:25

Love, we wanted an

7:27

umbrella that was sort of wide

7:29

enough to encompass love

7:31

and the modern part of it could

7:34

mean a lot of things. To me,

7:36

it meant something that was contemporary,

7:38

like a way we connect that we didn't use

7:40

to, a way we use technology, the way we

7:42

have children that we didn't use to, all

7:45

of those ways that are now.

7:47

And we just thought modern would cover that piece

7:50

of it. Okay, so

7:52

another big part of the column is

7:54

that it's totally based on reader

7:56

submissions, meaning anyone can send in Their

7:58

idea for a story and you can do it. You select

8:00

the ones you want to edit and

8:02

then publish. Why did you go with

8:04

that submission model as opposed to like.

8:07

Commissioning stories from famous writers

8:09

or other well known people.

8:12

I. Just thought, let's just open the

8:14

floodgates and see what comes in. I

8:17

didn't realize the time. What a great

8:19

idea that one. I

8:21

realize later I'm a junior suffered frickin'

8:24

just is pursuing a flipper minutes and

8:26

I'm not much like it's some kind

8:28

of new idea, but for for this

8:30

kind of a forum. It

8:32

was essential and. As

8:35

an example, just a few weeks

8:37

ago, we published a story. By.

8:40

A Bangladeshi immigrants who'd been a

8:42

taxi driver who New York is

8:45

an arranged marriage from Bangladesh and

8:47

one of the visa lottery and

8:49

moved here than they settled in

8:51

Queens the had a daughter, she

8:53

became a doctor. And

8:55

I asked him what made you rights

8:58

dismissed for he a love story from

9:00

thirty years ago and making bring it

9:02

up to now yeah what made you

9:04

submit as we said oh I've been

9:06

reading Modern Love with her twenty year

9:09

and off you know everything at every

9:11

week and he he he wasn't a

9:13

writer he just been really Mccollum file

9:15

I have a story. All

9:18

these people who have stories. They read stories

9:20

to think, what about my story. And

9:22

that's something. I was a late and realizing

9:24

that it was just. It had

9:26

drawn stories out of people who otherwise would

9:29

not have told them. It

9:31

felt like a safe space for them.

9:34

They. Thought about other people have done it.

9:36

Totally know I could do it to. Let

9:42

me come back Dances. As the three

9:44

essays that taught him the most about

9:46

lasts with a little Help Subject Kill

9:48

Hall and Connie Britton. This

10:00

podcast is supported by BetterHelp Online

10:02

Therapy. Do relationships have to be

10:05

easy to be right? Of course

10:07

not. The best relationships with friends,

10:09

family, or partners happen when both

10:11

people put in the time and commitment to make them

10:13

great. Therapy can help. BetterHelp

10:15

offers convenient, affordable online therapy. Start

10:18

the process in minutes and switch

10:20

therapists anytime. Give your relationship some

10:22

love. What's BetterHelp? Visit

10:24

betterhelp.com/modern today to get 10%

10:27

off your first month. That's

10:30

BetterHelp, help.com/modern.

10:34

I'm Emily Badger. I'm a reporter with The

10:36

New York Times. Since the

10:39

pandemic, empty office buildings have become much more

10:41

common in many cities. Why can't we just

10:43

turn them into housing? It's actually

10:45

a really complicated question. To

10:48

answer this question, you have to find

10:50

a developer trying to turn an office

10:52

building into apartments. Ride a

10:54

rickety elevator to the 30th floor of

10:56

a construction site to see the interior

10:58

gates of a building. Finds an

11:00

expert in incandescent light bulbs who can explain

11:03

to you how they fundamentally change office buildings.

11:05

And that's just the beginning of what you

11:07

have to do. When you

11:09

subscribe to The New York Times, you are

11:12

sending reporters like me out into the world

11:14

to ask questions of dozens of different experts

11:16

to go and visit places most people don't

11:18

get to go, to try to come back

11:21

with answers, and then turn all of that

11:23

into something that anyone can understand. If

11:26

you'd like to become a subscriber, head

11:28

to nytimes.com slash subscribe.

11:31

You need to see the animated floor plans in

11:33

this piece. All

11:43

right, so Dan, can you please kick us off with

11:45

the first essay you want to talk about? Yeah,

11:48

so this is an essay. It's called

11:50

One Bouquet of Fleeting Beauty, Please. And

11:54

the writer is named Alicia Gorder.

11:57

So this is a story that begins with a

11:59

young man. woman working in a

12:01

flower shop describing the kinds

12:03

of customers who come in, the kinds of

12:07

flower bouquets that they buy and for

12:09

what reason. And you think you're

12:11

in this sort of light, airy story

12:14

about a flower shop and then

12:16

about halfway through it takes

12:19

a plunge into this really troubling

12:22

backstory where her high school

12:24

boyfriend had died by suicide

12:26

at age 18

12:29

and throws this what

12:32

she's talking about at the flower

12:34

shop into a whole new context.

12:38

And in the end it turns

12:40

into a meditation of why flowers?

12:44

Why are these the things that people

12:48

rely on for these important transitions

12:50

and moments and life and

12:53

comes to a wisdom

12:55

at the end that has just stayed

12:57

with me ever since? And

13:00

longtime listeners will remember that this essay

13:03

was featured on the podcast years ago

13:05

back when we had celebrities and

13:07

voice actors read the essays. Let's

13:10

hear a part of this one performed I

13:12

think really tenderly by the actor Carrie

13:14

Bache. There's a picture

13:17

I took of him just days before

13:19

I left for college, two months before

13:21

he died. It

13:23

was the summer of chips and guacamole dinners

13:25

we shared sitting on the living room floor.

13:29

He's standing in the kitchen wearing a

13:32

white t-shirt and jeans, one

13:34

perfect half of an avocado cradled in

13:36

his hand. His

13:39

face is turned away, hidden from

13:41

the camera, but I

13:44

like to think he's smiling. I

13:49

remember the song we were listening to, the chatter

13:53

of frogs through the screen door, my

13:56

bare feet on wood, precious

13:59

moments made. all the more

14:01

precious by the fact that they have

14:03

already come and gone. Now

14:08

I measure months by what's in season.

14:12

Sunflowers in July,

14:14

dahlias in August, rose

14:16

hips and maple in October, pine

14:19

in December, hyacinth in March,

14:21

crowd-pleasing peonies in May. A

14:28

favorite of mine is tulip magnolia,

14:31

the way the buds erupt into blooms

14:33

and the blooms into a litter of

14:35

color on lawns, all in a matter of

14:37

weeks while it's smelling cherry blossoms. How

14:40

startlingly beautiful impermanence can

14:43

be. You

14:49

said that it's that ending and

14:51

in fact it's that final line that

14:53

really speaks to you. Can you tell me what you

14:56

learn or take away from that line? It's

15:00

sort of grown on me how startlingly

15:02

beautiful impermanence can be. It's

15:06

not that love or connection

15:08

is beautiful and

15:11

impermanent. It's beautiful because

15:14

it's impermanent. And the

15:18

fleeting nature of any connection

15:22

is what makes it precious and what makes it beautiful.

15:25

And the way that she saw

15:28

this in petals on the

15:30

ground that are soon to dry up

15:32

and go away, but the beauty is

15:34

in that it won't last. I

15:37

mean there's this section I think a

15:39

little bit earlier than that when she even poses the

15:41

question quite directly like, why flowers? Why do we give

15:43

these things that are going to shrivel and die? You

15:46

have to throw away, yeah. And I love what you're

15:48

saying. It's not despite the

15:50

impermanence. It's really loving because of

15:52

it, because our time is. That

15:54

is the arc of life. It's

15:57

shortened with flower blossoms but

15:59

that is it. It sometimes lasts

16:01

a long time, sometimes a short time,

16:04

but it will always feel fleeting in a way, that

16:07

level of beauty. What

16:10

does this essay make you think about in

16:13

terms of your own life or your

16:15

own relationships? To me,

16:17

it's about, I mean, it's a buzzword we always hear

16:19

about, but here it really comes home to roost as

16:22

presence, as being present. And

16:24

it's always the hardest thing for

16:27

me, for a lot of people, appreciating

16:29

what you have now

16:31

and not

16:34

thinking about what you're building toward

16:36

and what you're accumulating wealth for

16:38

and what's to come, but

16:41

the connections you have now that are

16:44

beautiful in the moment and not fearing

16:47

that you're going to lose them because you are.

16:51

It's a certainty, but just

16:53

being able to be present and

16:55

appreciate them. And the fact

16:57

that it's this young woman who

16:59

was able to artfully, in the

17:02

midst of grief, compose

17:05

such a beautiful piece that teaches

17:07

that was just miraculous

17:09

to me. You

17:12

mentioned earlier that your dad

17:14

recently passed. Did you

17:16

return to this essay then? Was it in the back of

17:18

your mind as you were processing all that? You

17:21

know, it must have been because I was

17:24

scrolling through the archive and saw

17:26

that illustration and clicked

17:29

on it. And

17:32

I did see it in sort of a new way.

17:35

I like remembered how

17:38

much I appreciated it at the time, but

17:41

I was able to hold it together here. When

17:45

I read it aloud to a friend who was

17:47

sitting there when I was rereading

17:50

it, I just couldn't get through

17:52

the final lines. I was really broken up by

17:54

it. It sounds like

17:56

this piece resonated with you and

17:58

spoke to you in... in a

18:00

different way years later, which is

18:03

really powerful. Do

18:05

you want to talk about the next essay? Yeah,

18:09

so this one is called Nursing a

18:11

Wound in an Appropriate Setting. It's

18:13

written by Thomas Hoeven,

18:16

who is a doctor. He's not a

18:18

writer, but you would never know

18:21

that. No, you would not. Reading this incredible

18:23

essay. And

18:25

I think about

18:27

this essay all the time. This was published in 2013.

18:32

He describes his relationship with

18:34

his longtime girlfriend before he goes

18:36

to medical school. They knew each other for 12 years. They

18:39

were both the children of divorce and of

18:42

unstable households that were scary.

18:46

And they gave each other a

18:48

sense of safety. He describes

18:50

their relationship as being no fighting. Fighting

18:54

was what their parents did. Fighting would threaten

18:56

their equilibrium, yeah. Fighting would threaten their love.

19:00

And so it was sort of

19:02

a flat, safe relationship. They

19:05

were together for 12 years. They

19:08

got engaged. He was about to head

19:10

off to medical school. And

19:15

then she abruptly broke

19:17

up with them. I think there were only a few

19:19

weeks from their marriage. I

19:21

think three. Three weeks. Three

19:23

weeks, okay. Wow. And he

19:26

was just devastated. Doesn't

19:29

begin to describe it. And

19:32

he goes off to medical school

19:34

for his residency. And

19:36

it's sort of his boot camp in feelings

19:40

and complications

19:42

and devastation and

19:45

real life. Like real

19:48

life. And

19:51

then after this sort of time in

19:53

the wilderness in his residency and going through all

19:55

this, he learns what real

19:58

love is. Yeah,

20:00

I mean his idea of what real love

20:02

is at the end of the

20:04

essay is so powerful. This

20:07

essay was also featured on an

20:09

early season of the podcast. So

20:11

here's Jake Gyllenhaal reading Thomas Hoovin's

20:13

essay, Nursing a Wound in an

20:15

Appropriate Setting. Yeah,

20:17

this one is so great. My

20:20

ex and I are not in touch. Our

20:24

relationship so long in the

20:26

making and so quick to end was

20:29

like an ornamental piece of crystal.

20:33

Aesthetically pleasing but lacking

20:35

resilience and once

20:38

shattered, irrecoverable.

20:45

Looking back at the various romantic and not

20:48

so romantic dating experiences I

20:50

had afterwards, it's

20:52

hard to separate my growth as an

20:55

emotionally conversant partner from my

20:57

development as a capable physician. Both

21:01

happened simultaneously

21:04

and gradually through

21:08

stretches of triumph and sorrow. There

21:12

were no eureka moments and

21:16

neither ever really ended.

21:21

The turmoil I experienced as an intern left

21:23

me with a deeper understanding of how pain

21:25

works, how

21:27

it feels, how it

21:29

ends, and how

21:31

it leaves you less naive. I

21:35

also learned to open up to important

21:37

facets of life that my previous relationship

21:39

had locked out. Unhappiness,

21:44

uncertainty, regret,

21:49

comfort around feelings like

21:51

these is crucial in

21:54

both medicine and

21:56

intimate relationships. basis

22:01

of empathy. I

22:05

didn't understand that before my ex left me,

22:08

and I learned it the hard way. By

22:16

the time I met my wife, I

22:18

was a changed man, and

22:20

a real doctor, and

22:23

our love developed differently from any

22:25

I had ever experienced before. Just

22:30

like a crystal vase, more

22:32

like a basketball, our

22:35

relationship is made for bouncing, for good

22:38

and sometimes rough play that

22:41

modern professional lives generate. We

22:44

do have fights, oh yes we do,

22:47

but they do not threaten our

22:49

foundation, they deepen it.

22:54

Tell me what you take away

22:56

about Thomas's articulation of what

22:58

real love is, what is he saying? Well,

23:02

this is one of these essays that

23:04

I feel like mirrored my experience in

23:07

a way. I

23:09

didn't come from a family of turmoil, but

23:12

I'm afraid of conflict, total fear of

23:14

conflict, don't like to fight, like to

23:16

argue. My

23:18

idea of a successful

23:21

romantic loving relationship

23:24

was being in a harmonious space

23:26

all the time. Or not

23:28

all the time, sometimes you'd be bored, but you wouldn't be fighting.

23:32

So this idea

23:35

that fighting can

23:37

bring you closer is revolutionary

23:40

to me. It

23:42

still is revolutionary to me, not only that

23:45

it can bring you closer, but it's the only

23:47

thing to bring you closer and the only thing

23:49

to deepen your relationship. Fighting

23:51

can lead to end the relationship, definitely, but

23:54

the only way forward and

23:57

the only way deeper is through

24:00

conflict and resolving conflicts to a

24:02

new understanding of the relationship

24:04

and who you're with and the person you're with and getting

24:06

to know them better and all of that. And

24:10

I don't know what business he has writing

24:12

this well about. It's

24:14

not fair to be like a doctor.

24:16

And I know and also to be

24:18

able to write this well about and

24:21

understand love this well and

24:24

loss and conflict and

24:26

depth. It's

24:28

remarkable. So

24:30

are you like fighting all the time now? No.

24:35

I still need to learn how to fight better. Let's

24:39

talk about the final essay. This

24:41

is an essay by Elizabeth Fitzsimmons.

24:44

It's called My First Lesson in

24:46

Motherhood. Can you tell me what that essay is about?

24:50

Yeah. So this is a piece that ran on Mother's

24:52

Day way back in 2007. And

24:57

it's yet another one that takes a

24:59

really dramatic turn, several dramatic turns. And

25:03

it's an essay about bravery

25:05

when you didn't think you had

25:07

the capacity for it. It's

25:10

a couple who are having trouble

25:12

getting pregnant and decide

25:14

to adopt the baby girl in China.

25:18

And they specifically

25:21

fill out forms

25:23

saying like we're new parents.

25:25

We don't want any any

25:28

disabilities. We can't deal with

25:30

anything basically except for

25:33

just a perfect little healthy baby. And

25:36

they get a baby who's

25:39

chosen for them by

25:41

the time they get there and meet

25:43

with the baby and are

25:45

alone with her for the first time. They

25:48

discover sort of alarming physical

25:51

problems, a really

25:54

bad rash and a scar at the base

25:56

of her spine. And

25:59

he's a really good person. hear a

26:01

horrifying diagnosis that the child will

26:03

be paralyzed from the waist down,

26:06

will be in the continent, will

26:09

have serious, serious

26:12

problems. And unbelievably,

26:15

they talk to the agents

26:17

from the adoption agency and they say,

26:19

oh well, you know, we're

26:21

sorry about this, and

26:23

essentially offer a swap for

26:26

a different baby. Yeah,

26:28

that's a moment that is kind of unbelievable in

26:30

this piece. The view

26:33

of human life in that circumstance.

26:36

So this essay was read by

26:38

the actress Connie Britton in 2016,

26:40

and you can just hear the

26:42

emotional stakes of the story in

26:44

her performance. Let's listen to it.

26:46

Yeah, she's really perfect for this one. I

26:50

pictured myself boarding the plane with some

26:52

faceless replacement child and then explaining

26:54

to friends and family that she wasn't

26:56

Natalie, that we had left Natalie

26:58

in China because she was too damaged, that

27:01

the deal had been a healthy baby and she

27:03

wasn't. How

27:05

could I face myself? How

27:07

could I ever forget? I would

27:09

always wonder what happened to Natalie. I

27:17

knew this was my test. My

27:19

life's worth distilled into a moment.

27:23

I was shaking my head no before they

27:26

finished explaining. We didn't

27:28

want another baby, I told them. We wanted our

27:30

baby, the one sleeping right over there.

27:33

She's our daughter, I said. We

27:36

love her. Yet

27:39

we had a long fraught night ahead, wondering

27:41

how we would possibly cope. I

27:44

called my mother in tears and told her the news. There

27:48

was a long pause. She said, Oh

27:54

honey, I thought. She

27:58

waited until I caught my breath. It

28:00

would be okay if you came home

28:02

without her. Why

28:05

are you saying that? I

28:08

just want to absolve you. What

28:10

do you want to do? I

28:13

want to take my baby and get out of here,

28:15

my dad. But,

28:17

my mother said, then that's what you

28:19

should do. I

28:28

mean, I'm tearing up. Me too. So,

28:31

the lesson in

28:33

this piece to me is sort

28:35

of about a test. It's really a

28:37

test. It's like, what are you

28:39

capable of? Like, what kind

28:41

of devotion? What kind of sense

28:44

of responsibility? What

28:46

are you going to take on? And

28:49

they have to decide in the moment, are

28:52

they going to, you know, stick

28:55

with this child with this horrifying

28:58

set of health complications that

29:00

could control their lives

29:03

forever? Are

29:05

they going to push that baby

29:08

aside and accept a healthier

29:10

baby? And then, you know, how do they live

29:12

with themselves if they do that? Neither

29:14

choice is an appealing choice. No.

29:18

This essay, I mean,

29:20

all of these essays bowled me over. And this one

29:22

just made me, I mean, I quite literally

29:25

called my mom after this. It is

29:27

such a moving

29:30

testament to

29:32

just the completely inexplicable

29:34

immediate bond of between

29:37

parent and child. I just like, I... Yeah,

29:40

I'm still not crying. I mean, it's just,

29:42

it's remarkable. Tell me what you're taking. I

29:44

mean, you are a parent. Like, tell me

29:46

what you're thinking about when you read this

29:49

essay. Well, first

29:51

of all, I'm thinking, I think

29:54

anyone reading these things, what

29:56

would choice what I have made? Of course. And

29:58

you would like to think that you... would make the

30:02

choice of keeping the child. But

30:04

honestly, one of the most moving

30:06

things and tragic

30:08

things that happened in the wake

30:10

of publishing this essay is we

30:13

got emails from people who'd faced this

30:15

choice and made the opposite choice and

30:17

either left with a healthy baby and

30:21

struggled and struggled and struggled with having

30:23

done that. More common

30:25

was giving up on adoption entirely and

30:27

just walking away, walking away

30:29

from that child or any child. But

30:32

she's just like, I'm going to walk

30:34

into this, like I'm going to just

30:36

walk forward into this and it's going

30:38

to be what it's going to be.

30:40

And miracle of miracles, like

30:43

within a year or so, all that stuff has

30:45

gone away. I know the kid

30:48

is fine. I'm going to cry again. It's like

30:50

after making this decision, they go

30:52

home and she heals. Yeah.

30:56

And she recoiled it thinking that

30:58

was a reward for making the right choice. Like

31:01

she said, it's not about that. It's not about

31:03

like we were generous or

31:05

we were good and therefore our child

31:07

turned out fine. It's not that

31:09

at all. It just happened

31:11

that way. But it's yet another lesson

31:14

in you can't

31:16

predict the smooth path. You

31:18

just have to sort of walk

31:20

forward and be brave. I

31:24

often say with modern love stories

31:26

that are really

31:28

about choices and hard choices

31:31

and how it's sort

31:34

of ordinary people being incredibly

31:37

brave. I mean, I often wonder

31:39

what creates the

31:41

person who can make the

31:43

brave choice versus the person who shrinks from

31:46

it. Like, well, what is that magic sauce?

31:48

Or what is that childhood experience? Or what

31:50

is the parenting that they have? Because

31:53

there is a divide. Like there is a divide

31:55

often in those circumstances that

31:57

we saw in the outpouring after the

31:59

essay. We

32:02

see instances of bravery in all three

32:04

of the essays that you've shared today.

32:07

Bravery to embrace the brevity

32:09

of love, bravery to engage

32:12

in fighting in a relationship, bravery

32:15

to make a choice. Would

32:17

you define bravery as

32:20

like a core act of love?

32:24

Yeah, a core act of love and

32:26

a core act of life. People's

32:29

bravery has been my biggest takeaway

32:32

over 20 years of doing this work. It's

32:36

never a person who says, I am brave.

32:38

It's almost the opposite. It's people

32:40

who say, I'm not brave. I'm a

32:42

coward. And

32:45

the lesson, just sort of the lesson

32:47

of that, like life,

32:49

it's going to be a mess

32:51

one way or the other. Like you just sort of choose

32:53

your mess, but that is what

32:55

it is. That is life. You're

32:58

not going to avoid it. There's

33:01

such a school of life that

33:03

is about trying to make your

33:05

life as clean and tidy as

33:07

possible. And it's really

33:09

a struggle to do that. And

33:12

I'm not sure it's well-directed energy.

33:16

What do you think we should direct our energy to?

33:18

And now this is just truly me asking you because

33:20

I want you to give me life advice. If not

33:22

to cleaning up our life. I'm not an advice

33:25

giver. I know, but just please put on

33:27

the hat for one second. Like if not

33:29

to direct our energy towards cleaning up our

33:31

life in your 20 years of doing this

33:33

work, like what is the more worthwhile thing

33:36

to direct energy towards? This is not

33:38

exactly new advice, but

33:41

it's really the wisdom from

33:43

Alicia Gorder's essay, which is

33:46

be in the moment. Value

33:48

the people you're with now. Don't

33:51

think I'm planning for 10 years from

33:53

now. Put your 401k

33:55

out of your mind. Contribute to

33:57

it, but put it out of your mind. It's now.

34:00

It's the now, that is

34:02

the work. Dan, I love that.

34:04

It's the now. You

34:07

know, I feel like so

34:09

many listeners right now are clinging to every

34:12

word you've said, trying to figure out what you're looking

34:14

for in a modern love essay pitch. And

34:17

by the way, you can

34:19

send those submissions to modernloveatnytimes.com.

34:22

Dan, can you give us a few quick tips

34:24

on what makes a story stand out in your

34:27

inbox? Well, like

34:29

a bad subject line is modern love submission.

34:31

You're like, you know, 80% of people who submit. And

34:37

a good subject line would include

34:39

sort of an attempt

34:41

at a title, which would be like,

34:43

please, Lord, let him be 27. Please,

34:46

Lord. And I read that, yeah, I read that

34:49

subject line. It was

34:51

funny, it was smart, it was vulnerable.

34:54

I just prayed the essay would deliver on that

34:56

promise. And it did

34:58

deliver, we actually featured it on the podcast a

35:00

few seasons ago. So

35:02

a good subject line is very practical advice,

35:05

but what about the essence of a

35:07

story? Like, what are you looking for there? Harder

35:11

to define quality is a

35:13

sense of humility. Like, there's

35:15

a sense that you're not the smartest

35:17

person in the world, but you do have something to offer. And

35:20

in the world of pitching and

35:22

of trying to get published, there's

35:25

an overriding sense that you have that

35:27

confidence, you have to sell your

35:29

product, you have to say,

35:31

this essay is going to be perfect for you. And

35:34

that's just the wrong approach. That

35:37

kind of confidence is not what

35:39

a hard experience leaves you with. It

35:41

can leave you shaken, it can leave

35:44

you wise, but it doesn't leave you

35:46

cocky. And I think it's

35:48

important that the stories aren't really about answers, they're

35:50

about a search for answers, and

35:52

they don't need to come to a conclusion, but

35:56

they need to present a problem in an interesting way that

35:59

makes you think about it. Well,

36:01

now you're going to get even more

36:03

submissions that can fuel the next 20 years of Modern

36:06

Love. Dan, thank you

36:08

so much for the conversation today. Thanks,

36:11

Anna. That was a lot of fun. So

36:18

listeners, at the beginning of this episode, I

36:20

told you we have an announcement about the rest

36:22

of our season. In honor

36:25

of 20 years of Modern Love, we're

36:27

launching a special series that's really an ode

36:29

to the early years of the podcast that

36:31

so many of you love so much. Starting

36:34

next week, our favorite actors,

36:36

musicians, writers, and artists will read

36:38

hand-picked essays from the Modern Love Archive and

36:40

we'll talk with them about how those essays

36:43

relate to their life and their world. We've

36:46

got a truly incredible lineup that we can't

36:48

wait to share with you. So

36:50

happy anniversary, Modern Love listeners.

36:52

We are so excited for

36:54

this season-long celebration. See you next

36:56

week. Modern

37:01

Love is produced by Julia Botero,

37:03

Christina Joseph, Reva Goldberg, and Emily

37:05

Lang. It's edited by

37:07

Jen Poient and Paula Schumann. Our executive

37:10

producer is Jen Poient. This

37:12

episode was mixed by Daniel Ramirez. Our show

37:14

is recorded by Maddie Maciello. The

37:17

Modern Love theme music is by Dan Powell. Digital

37:20

production by Mihima Czablani and Nell Gologli.

37:24

All thanks to Larissa Anderson, Kate

37:26

Lapreste, Davis Land, and Lisa Tobin.

37:29

The Modern Love column is edited by Daniel

37:31

Jones. Mia Lee is the editor

37:33

of Modern Love Projects. I'm Anna

37:35

Martin. Thanks for listening.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features