Podchaser Logo
Home
SCOTUS Ok’s WH to Remove Social Misinformation & AI Consultants Are Making BANK

SCOTUS Ok’s WH to Remove Social Misinformation & AI Consultants Are Making BANK

Released Thursday, 27th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
SCOTUS Ok’s WH to Remove Social Misinformation & AI Consultants Are Making BANK

SCOTUS Ok’s WH to Remove Social Misinformation & AI Consultants Are Making BANK

SCOTUS Ok’s WH to Remove Social Misinformation & AI Consultants Are Making BANK

SCOTUS Ok’s WH to Remove Social Misinformation & AI Consultants Are Making BANK

Thursday, 27th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Keep your body fueled all summer long

0:02

with Factor. Factor's no prep, no mess

0:04

meals make eating right easy. Every meal

0:06

is fresh and never frozen. Head to

0:09

factormeals.com/morningbrew50 and use code morningbrew50 to get

0:11

50% off your first box plus 20%

0:13

off your next month. Good

0:16

morning Brew Daily Show, I'm Neil

0:18

Fryman. And I'm Toby Howell. Today,

0:20

after a decade of false starts,

0:22

is the self-driving era finally here?

0:25

Then AI has done more than make

0:27

Nvidia shareholders really rich. It's also made

0:29

consultants really rich. It's Thursday, June 27th,

0:32

let's ride. It

0:35

is here, the first presidential debate

0:41

of the election season. Tonight at

0:43

9 p.m. Eastern, Joe Biden will

0:45

square off against Donald Trump in

0:47

the first instance of a sitting

0:49

president debating a former president. And

0:51

that's not all that's unusual about

0:53

this debate. It comes months earlier

0:55

than presidential debates in the past

0:57

and neither candidate has participated in

0:59

a debate since their showdown in

1:01

2020. And there

1:03

will be no live audience. Microphones will be

1:06

muted when the candidates are not asked to

1:08

talk and they can't bring in pre-written

1:10

notes or props. So how can you watch?

1:12

Well, the debate is being hosted by CNN,

1:15

but the feed is gonna be shared across

1:18

most other networks and major news sites on

1:20

the internet. In short, it'll be hard to

1:22

miss. It'll be hard to miss, yeah,

1:24

first between sitting and former president, first debate

1:26

hosted by, presidential debate hosted by CNN

1:28

too. It's also the first debate that the

1:31

moderator will begin by saying, let's ride.

1:33

I'm just kidding, but Jake Tapper, Dana Bash,

1:35

we do give you permission to use

1:37

it if you want. Now

1:39

let's hear a word from our

1:41

sponsor, Yahoo Finance. Neil, yesterday Jensen

1:43

Hwang from Nvidia answered questions at

1:45

their annual shareholder meeting. The first

1:47

question related to the company's competition

1:49

as more companies gear up to

1:51

release products to challenge Nvidia's 80%

1:54

market share in AI chips. Please tell me

1:56

he named names and said Intel isn't even

1:58

close to matching them. He played it a

2:00

little closer to the vest, but I will

2:03

happily name names about where I came across

2:05

this information I will do it for you.

2:07

Yahoo Finance. You forget that we sit next

2:09

to each other all day and I see

2:11

your computer Toby I see the purple draped

2:13

all over it. Listen, they've got the news.

2:15

Okay, and we're in the news business Well,

2:17

I am glad you you are using our

2:20

sponsors product because you are a company man

2:22

And if you want to be like Toby

2:24

and spend all of your time bathing in

2:26

Yahoo finances purple glow Head to

2:28

Yahoo Finance comm or download their mobile app

2:30

to get it directly on your phone Yesterday

2:33

the Supreme Court made a pivotal

2:35

decision regarding the government's influence on

2:37

social media companies ruling in favor

2:39

of the Biden administration Let's

2:42

rewind to 2022 two states

2:44

in five social media users sued

2:47

federal officials for violating their first

2:49

amendment rights by being too heavy-handed

2:51

in Urging social media companies to

2:53

suppress certain posts related to kovat

2:55

19 vaccines election fraud amongst Other

2:58

things lower courts sided with the

3:00

states and users But yesterday SCOTUS sided with

3:02

the government bolstering its ability to seek removal

3:04

of what it might view as misinformation The

3:08

ruling comes with immediate significance the Department of

3:10

Homeland Security For instance can continue to flag

3:12

post they think might be the work of

3:14

foreign actors ahead of this year's election But

3:17

the ruling itself didn't dive as much into

3:19

the sticky first amendment rights that were at

3:21

the core of this case Instead

3:23

the court ruled that the users who

3:26

challenged the administration didn't have standing to

3:28

sue So the court kicked the can

3:30

down the road a bit when it comes

3:32

to the central question about what first amendment

3:34

limits apply to The government's influence on tech

3:36

companies But the fact remains that it does

3:39

give the government a free hand to talk

3:41

to social media companies This was a 6-3

3:44

decision with some of the conservative

3:46

justices going over to the liberal

3:48

side justice Amy Coney Barrett penned

3:51

the Decision and she said yeah the the

3:53

plaintiffs just did not have standing to bring

3:55

this case in the first place Which is

3:57

something that we've seen a couple times so

4:00

far on the Supreme Court's docket over the past

4:02

few weeks. She said that the government has not

4:04

caused their injuries. They have to meet two hurdles,

4:06

that the government caused their injuries and that there

4:08

may be injury

4:11

in the future. She said

4:13

that those two thresholds had not been

4:15

met. And one reason why is that

4:17

because social media companies were already policing

4:20

information, they were already taking down information

4:22

or suppressing posts that may not be

4:24

accurate and the government was just corresponding

4:26

with them about that particular thing. It

4:28

wasn't because of the government that they

4:30

started doing this. The government may have

4:32

had an undue influence through

4:34

these back channel email communications that were brought

4:37

up during the court proceedings, but she did

4:39

not make the link between the fact that

4:41

the government was talking to social media companies

4:43

and the fact that they were bringing down

4:45

posts. Right. The underlying issue

4:48

here though was how much power should the

4:50

government have to put pressure on

4:52

social media companies without kind of running into

4:54

some First Amendment issues. And again, I said

4:57

kick the can down the road because they

4:59

did rule on a technicality, but the result

5:01

of that ruling is that the government can

5:03

still have its hand in some of

5:06

these and urging social media companies to

5:08

take certain posts down. Again, I said

5:11

it has immediate consequence because we are in an election

5:13

year and one of the big things that the government

5:15

would love to do, the Department of Homeland Security would

5:17

love to do is say, wait a second, we think

5:19

some of these posts are coming from foreign actors. Can

5:22

we suppress them? Facebook, can we suppress them?

5:24

X. Can we have

5:26

national security search right away? But then

5:28

if you zoom out a little bit,

5:30

there's definitely a loud vocal majority

5:33

or minority of people who are saying

5:35

like, why are we giving the government so

5:37

much power over these supposedly third party institutions

5:41

that kind of act as gatekeepers of

5:43

information right now? And the

5:45

government would respond, look, we have First Amendment rights just

5:47

like anybody else. And for

5:49

centuries, the United States government and

5:52

the president has used their position

5:56

as the bully pulpit, it's called, to sort of

5:58

put their thumb on the scale. and just,

6:00

you know, they can talk just like anybody

6:03

else, so they would respond that we have

6:05

just a first man right, just like anybody

6:07

else to, you know, to sway information or

6:09

put our positions forward. And the interesting part

6:11

too is that some of the cases that

6:13

were mentioned in this case was the Hunter

6:15

Biden laptop story from early, or from the

6:17

late 2020 year. And

6:20

actually internal communications revealed from that story

6:22

showed that Twitter execs were very divided

6:24

on what to do with the company.

6:26

There wasn't some sort of influence from

6:28

the government and Twitter just kind of

6:30

rolled over and did what they said. It

6:32

was very contentious. There was lots of internal

6:35

documents from lots of different social media companies

6:37

revealed through this case. And that was another

6:39

one that I'm sure a lot of people

6:41

remember. Meanwhile, we just have two days left

6:43

in the Supreme Court's term. So

6:46

we should see another flurry of rulings.

6:48

And yesterday there was another big face

6:50

palm by the Supreme Court because someone

6:53

posted the opinion

6:55

for a medical abortion for emergencies

6:57

in Idaho ahead of time, that

7:00

wasn't a final decision. They posted

7:02

it yesterday and Bloomberg got their

7:04

hands on it. And

7:07

it said that the Supreme Court is

7:10

going to allow abortions in medical emergencies

7:12

in Idaho where most abortions are banned.

7:15

So that is one ruling that we kind of

7:18

already know a hint of because they

7:20

posted it. And that's not the first time this has

7:22

leaked from the Supreme Court. Remember back in 2022, the

7:24

Roe v. Wade decision was

7:27

leaked to Politico a couple months ahead of

7:29

time. Now Toby and I are

7:31

going to do our best BBC world

7:34

service impression and bring you the latest

7:36

headlines from around the globe, not in

7:38

a British accent, unfortunately. Let's start in

7:40

Bolivia where a dramatic coup attempt lasted

7:42

all of a few hours. Rebel soldiers

7:44

tried to storm the presidential palace yesterday

7:46

in what President Luis Arce called an

7:49

attempt to overthrow his socialist government. It

7:51

did not work. The soldiers dispersed and the

7:53

general who led the revolt was promptly arrested.

7:56

Still, it reflects pressure on the unpopular

7:58

government to fix a dire accident. economic

8:00

situation. Bolivia's natural gas exports have plunged.

8:02

Its central bank has run out of

8:04

reserves to defend its peg against the

8:06

US dollar. And the government is struggling

8:08

to pay food and diesel subsidies to

8:10

its people. Then again, this is

8:13

nothing new for Bolivia, one of the most politically

8:15

volatile nations in the world. Since

8:17

its independence from Spain two centuries ago, it's

8:19

experienced nearly 200 coups and revolutions.

8:22

You mentioned the word it was a

8:24

dramatic coup because it was actually broadcasted

8:26

live on television that you could literally

8:28

see President Arce confronting the former army

8:30

chief who was leading the coup as

8:32

he stormed up the presidential hallway. So

8:34

it was very much this real time

8:36

thing that was playing out. And to

8:38

make things even more dramatic, Bolivia also

8:41

has an election upcoming in 2025. So

8:44

expect to see more about the Bolivian

8:47

political situation unfolding. Next

8:49

on our international tour, a secret espionage

8:51

trial for Wall Street Journal reporter Evan

8:54

Gershkovich began yesterday in a Russian court

8:56

where he was put on display in

8:58

a padlock transparent box. Evan

9:00

has been in prison since March of last

9:02

year on charges that he was gathering information

9:05

about a Russian defense contractor on behalf of

9:07

the CIA. He the Wall

9:09

Street Journal and the US government say these

9:11

charges are complete bogus. He was simply doing

9:13

his job and that Russia is using Evan

9:16

as a political pawn. And

9:18

even as this trial gets going, Russia has

9:20

not been subtle about its intent to use

9:22

Evan as a bargaining chip. The Kremlin says

9:24

it's down to do a prisoner swap, perhaps

9:27

for former security operative Vadim Krasikov serving a

9:29

live life sentence in Germany. The US responded

9:31

that they aren't going to negotiate in public.

9:33

Of course, the backdrop to Evan's imprisonment is

9:36

crumbling relations between the US and Russia after

9:38

Putin invaded Ukraine in 2022. He

9:41

is the first journalist to be detained in Russia

9:43

since the end of the Cold War. Right. Gershkovich

9:46

faces up to 20 years in prison if

9:48

the court does find him guilty, which by

9:50

all accounts they will. Russian courts convict more

9:52

than 99% of

9:54

defendants who come before them. So you

9:56

hear the word sham trial thrown around

9:58

a lot, but it truly is in

10:00

Russia that it's most. just a sentencing

10:02

hearing, not an actual hearing before law.

10:04

There is also, just to say that

10:06

this does happen, there's another American corporate

10:08

security executive who was arrested in Moscow

10:12

for espionage in 2018. He is

10:14

now serving a 16-year sentence. So

10:16

there's very real possibility that Evan

10:18

does do prison time. Of course,

10:20

you're right. He does want to

10:22

be used as a bargaining

10:24

chip. The last time this happened was

10:26

in 2022 when the U.S.

10:28

exchanged WNBA star Brittany Greiner

10:30

for a arms dealer, Victor

10:33

Baut. So there is precedent for this,

10:35

and I'm sure that we'll see a

10:37

very similar situation with negotiations playing out

10:39

with Evan. Moving on, after a wave

10:41

of protests and an attack on the

10:43

country's parliament, Kenya's president William Ruto reversed

10:46

court yesterday and said he would not

10:48

sign a controversial tax bill into law.

10:50

The exact tolls of the protests are

10:52

still being tallied, but human rights groups

10:54

have said that at least 23 people

10:56

were killed with 300

10:58

injured after the police cracked down using

11:00

tear gas and bullets on protesters marching

11:03

on parliament. Some people did make it

11:05

into the building and set parts of

11:07

it on fire just an hour after

11:09

the legislation was passed. The bill was

11:11

intended to raise revenue through higher taxes,

11:13

which the government said was necessary to

11:15

pay down the country's debt and cover

11:18

the cost of infrastructure, but now the

11:20

president says his government will widen cuts

11:22

in spending instead. Neil, this was one

11:24

of the bloodiest days in Kenya recent

11:26

history with more protesters vowing to march

11:28

again today to call for the resignation

11:30

of the president and all members of

11:32

parliament who voted for this bill. Look,

11:35

Kenya needs to raise revenue. They have

11:37

80 billion dollars worth of debt. 27

11:39

percent of the revenue is collected is

11:41

going to debt service. They are just

11:43

they went on a huge spending spree

11:45

borrowing from China and other institutions in

11:48

the early 2000s to build roads, infrastructure, and

11:50

that has been, you know, overall

11:52

good for their economy. It is the fastest

11:54

growing economy in Africa. The problem is they

11:56

aren't bringing in the tax receipts to be

11:59

able to pay for it. to pay down

12:01

these debts. So that is what this whole

12:03

thing was about. They tried to raise taxes

12:05

to raise more revenue to pay off their

12:07

debts so they don't default, and

12:09

it has backfired. A part of the

12:11

issue too is that a lot of

12:14

the protesters did critique the lifestyle of

12:16

Ruto and his members of his administrations.

12:18

They've called on them to limit their

12:21

expenses. And so that's what Ruto did.

12:23

He did say that we will cut

12:25

back on our spending on travel, our

12:27

cars, our office renovations, the thing that

12:30

are conspicuously spending within the current administration

12:32

and institute more austerity measures. But

12:34

we'll see because this situation is unfolding because

12:36

a lot of people have said they will

12:39

continue to protest until they see the resignation

12:41

of this administration. And they have been led

12:43

by young people mostly. Those are the people

12:45

leading the protests. Finally, Julian Assange

12:47

landed back home in his native Australia

12:49

yesterday, a free man for the first

12:51

time in 12 years. The

12:54

WikiLeaks founder shocked the world when he

12:56

agreed to a deal with the United

12:59

States on Wednesday morning, pleading guilty to

13:01

illegally conspiring to obtain and disseminate classified

13:03

information. Quick LinkedIn bio

13:05

on Assange. He was a prodigy

13:08

programmer who in 2006 started the

13:10

site WikiLeaks, which published more than

13:12

10 million secret documents on everything

13:14

from internal Sony Pictures communications to

13:16

emails from Hillary Clinton's campaign manager.

13:18

A firestorm erupted in 2010 when

13:20

he published distressing video and confidential

13:22

documents around the US's military operations

13:24

in Iraq and Afghanistan, which is

13:27

one of the largest breaches of

13:29

classified material in the US military's

13:31

history. Facing espionage charges from the

13:33

US, he spent seven years hiding

13:35

out in the Ecuadorian embassy in

13:37

London and then five years in

13:39

British prison. Now after the plea

13:41

deal, he is back home. And

13:44

yet he is still as divisive

13:46

as ever cast by some as

13:48

a free speech crusader and by

13:50

others as a villain who put

13:52

lives at risk. Yeah. And

13:55

his wife, who is also on his

13:57

legal team was asked, is he going

13:59

to continue to reveal he's gonna continue

14:01

publishing. And she did not rule it

14:03

out. She called Julian Assange a very

14:05

principled person who is very beholden to

14:07

who he is. And so she said

14:09

that he will always defend human rights

14:11

and will always defend victims. So there

14:13

is a world where he just resumes

14:16

right where he left off, kind of

14:18

revealing and posting some of these sensitive

14:20

internal government documents. Up

14:22

next, a savior has emerged to pull

14:24

the consulting industry out of its funk.

14:29

All right, options traders, listen up. I

14:31

wanna tell you about public.com. But

14:34

first, have you ever considered all the

14:36

fees you're paying to trade options? Aside

14:39

from the regulatory fees, there are commissions

14:41

and most platforms charged per contract fees

14:43

too. That's what makes today's sponsor, public.com,

14:45

so interesting. Public doesn't charge commissions or

14:47

per contract fees. And in an industry

14:49

first, they offer a rebate of up

14:51

to 18 cents per option contract traded

14:54

based on the number of referrals you

14:56

make. Check it out. If you get

14:58

up to the 18 cent rebate and

15:00

you trade 1,000 option contracts

15:02

on public, you could get up to $180 in rebates.

15:07

If you trade 10,000 contracts, you

15:09

could earn almost 2,000 bucks. More

15:12

importantly, the rebate means you can lower

15:14

your trading costs to less than zero.

15:16

To recap, no commissions, no per contract

15:19

fees, and a rebate on every contract

15:21

traded, CY Nerd Wallet recently awarded public

15:23

five stars for options trading and start

15:26

earning a rebate on every options contract

15:28

traded. Only at public.com. That's

15:30

public.com. Paid for by Public Investing. Options

15:33

not suitable for all investors and carry

15:35

significant risk. Nerd Wallet overall rating 4.6

15:37

out of five as of April, 2024.

15:40

Full disclosures in podcast description. Have

15:43

a question or need how-to advice? Just

15:45

ask Meta AI. Whether you want to

15:47

design a marathon training program that will

15:49

get you race ready for fall, or

15:51

you're curious what planets are visible in

15:53

tonight's sky, Meta AI has the answers.

15:55

Perhaps you want to learn how to

15:57

plant basil when your garden only gets

15:59

indirect. sunlight, Meta AI is your intelligent

16:01

assistant. You can even answer your follow-up

16:04

questions like what you can make with

16:06

your basil and the other ingredients you

16:08

have in your fridge. Meta AI can

16:10

also summarize notes, visualize your ideas, and

16:12

so much more. The best part is

16:14

you can find Meta AI right in

16:16

the apps you already have, Instagram, WhatsApp,

16:18

Facebook, and Messenger. Just tag Meta AI

16:20

in your chat or tap the icon

16:22

in the search bar to get started.

16:25

It's the most advanced AI at your

16:27

fingertips. Expand your world with Meta AI.

16:32

Consultants have been having a bit of

16:34

a rough go of it recently. McKinsey

16:36

has cut jobs amid a slowdown in

16:38

demand, and other firms have been shrinking

16:40

the size of their new partner classes.

16:42

But an unlikely savior has come to

16:45

bail out your favorite Patagonia-vested synergy drivers,

16:47

AI. Yes, after chat,

16:49

GPT came out last year. There has been

16:52

a huge demand from businesses wanting to know

16:54

what the heck this thing is and how

16:56

can it help me make money. Consultancies were

16:58

more than happy to step in. Boston Consulting

17:01

Group now earns a fifth of all

17:03

its revenue through work related to artificial

17:05

intelligence. That's pretty remarkable considering two years

17:07

ago, it was zero, and they aren't

17:10

alone. Outside of BCG, McKinsey, Accenture, and

17:12

even IBM's consulting arms are seeing sales

17:14

rise and are hiring in droves again

17:16

as companies try to navigate the age

17:19

of AI. Neil, consulting and

17:21

AI, they go together like you and

17:23

I. I saw this

17:25

firsthand yesterday because I moderated a panel at

17:27

an event that was exclusively about onboarding

17:30

new AI and guess who

17:32

was there, Accenture, IBM. So I saw

17:35

this firsthand how consultants are getting into

17:37

the game about deploying AI at businesses

17:39

because companies see this as a huge

17:41

cost saver, as a way to become

17:43

more efficient and lean to drive productivity

17:45

and it is kind of a confusing

17:47

technology with a lot of different applications,

17:49

a lot of ways you can do

17:52

it from regulatory things to

17:54

getting chatbots up for customer service.

17:57

Or just mining data, so there's a lot

17:59

of potential. applications here and the hype is

18:01

through the roof. So companies are desperate to

18:03

know what to do, but some of them

18:06

don't have the capabilities to send a dedicated

18:08

team to figure out how AI can help

18:10

them. So they're turning to these consultants and

18:12

the consultants are saying, come to Papa, come

18:14

to Papa. This is not the first time

18:16

we've made this comparison, but you have to

18:18

think back to the original tech boom, internet

18:21

boom in the early 2000s, where

18:24

businesses also stampeded two consultants

18:26

for counsel about, hey, what

18:28

is the internet? And I don't

18:30

know what a website does, but I need one.

18:33

And I think you're seeing a lot of the

18:35

same things from companies right now where they don't

18:37

fully grasp it. And so consultancies are more than

18:39

willing to step in and

18:42

hold their hand and say, this is what we can build.

18:44

This is what we can do for you. And

18:46

yeah, it is leading to record revenues for

18:48

them as well. It's so interesting too, because

18:51

literally earlier this year we were talking about

18:53

the slowdown, McKinsey laying off workers, there's just

18:55

not enough demand. These places are too bloated.

18:57

And then all of a sudden, here you

19:00

are, McKinsey said they're deriving 40%

19:02

of their business this

19:04

year from generative AI. It has just

19:06

been this massive boom for them. And

19:08

it's just funny too that, the

19:11

jokes write themselves too. Like it could be

19:13

the blind, lean the blind, or maybe the

19:15

consultancies are actually doing a very good job.

19:17

I know, because I don't know if they're

19:20

doing a good job. I mean, there's gonna

19:22

be hits and misses. One thing that we

19:24

just recently talked about was how McDonald's is

19:26

closing down its AI drive-through experiment. That was

19:28

done with AIBM as consultants. And now

19:31

after a few years that did not

19:33

work out, they were spitting, this AI

19:35

was spitting out ridiculous orders, you know,

19:38

a hundred chicken nuggets, nine iced teas,

19:40

bacon on top of vanilla ice cream.

19:42

So I think there is going to

19:44

be some growing pains here with how

19:46

consultants and companies work together to deploy

19:48

AI. It's funny too, because a lot

19:50

of AI companies are trying to figure

19:52

out how they can make money, what

19:54

their business model is. And yet here,

19:56

consultancies are making money, hand over fist.

20:00

Self-driving cars are a dream

20:02

that plenty of companies have tried to

20:04

sell us in recent years, most of

20:06

all Elon Musk at Tesla. But while

20:08

Elon was promising RoboTaxi on earnings call

20:10

after earnings call, Google's Waymo has slowly

20:12

but surely been bringing self-driving cars to

20:14

the mainstream. As of this

20:16

week, its RoboTaxis are now available to

20:18

all users in San Francisco, expanding its

20:21

ride-hailing service, which had previously only been

20:23

available to a select amount of riders.

20:25

Waymo has flown a bit under the

20:28

radar compared to other self-driving companies. GM's

20:30

cruise has made headlines for collisions

20:32

and accidents while Tesla's full self-driving

20:34

feature still requires an attentive driver

20:36

at the wheel. But Waymo

20:38

has slowly but surely expanded its operations

20:40

with plans to launch in Los Angeles

20:43

and Austin as well this year. Are

20:45

we sleeping on Waymo a little bit? Absolutely.

20:49

It's crazy to think that in Phoenix and

20:51

in San Francisco now, you can just take

20:53

out your phone and order a taxi that

20:56

won't be driven by a human. It'll be

20:58

completely a robot. We've been waiting for

21:00

this for decades. We've been promised this for

21:02

so long. There have been so many stops

21:04

and starts, but in two American cities, you

21:07

can call a self-driving car to take you

21:09

somewhere. It is absolutely incredible to think about,

21:11

but it's been this drip drip drip of

21:13

progress. So we haven't had this crowning moment

21:15

to say, yes, the self-driving era has arrived

21:18

and there have been so many, it's

21:21

always been one step forward, two steps back

21:23

for this industry, but this is a two

21:25

or three step forward moment. Yeah, part of

21:27

the issue and why this snuck up on

21:29

us and we're saying that Waymo slept on

21:31

is that New Salads aren't very good at

21:33

covering technological advances that take

21:35

a while to evolve over time. We're much

21:38

better at having something like chat, GBT drop

21:40

in and the entire paradigm is shifted and

21:42

suddenly NVIDIA is the most valuable company in

21:45

the world. When you compare it

21:47

to AI, self-driving has taken a lot longer to

21:49

materialize. I mean, Waymo is a 15 year

21:51

old company at this point. And then

21:54

also part of the reason why maybe

21:56

we haven't thought about self-driving as advanced

21:58

as it actually is. is that

22:00

we do cover most of the negative

22:02

news associated with it because there has

22:04

been a lot of negative news and

22:06

Waymo recently had some negative news as

22:08

well. They hit a poll in Arizona.

22:10

They've had to do a recall over

22:12

software. So again, it's been very bumpy.

22:14

It hasn't been smooth sailing. But

22:17

part of the reason why we're taking this moment to

22:19

say it's doing well is because you're right. That

22:22

is a pretty magical experience being able to call

22:24

a robo taxi in two major cities in the

22:26

US now. Finally, we are

22:28

going to Neil's numbers, the segment

22:30

where I share three stats from the week's

22:32

news that will be like instantly downloading all

22:35

of Ken Burns' documentaries into your brain. My

22:38

first number is a good news bad

22:40

news situation. First, the good news, pedestrian

22:42

deaths on US roads decreased in 2023,

22:44

according to a new

22:47

report by the Governor's Highway Safety Association.

22:50

Last year saw a 5.4%

22:53

fall in the annual number of pedestrian

22:55

deaths. The first decrease since COVID began

22:57

and certainly a step in the right

22:59

direction. Now the less good news, the

23:01

pedestrian death total of 7318 is still 14% more than before

23:07

the pandemic in 2019. Yeah,

23:09

COVID really increased the danger for

23:11

Americans walking on streets since emptier

23:13

roads allowed for more speeding, alcohol

23:15

use rose and traffic enforcement declined.

23:18

Between 2010 and 2022, the number of pedestrian

23:20

deaths in the US rose nearly 77% to

23:22

record levels.

23:25

But progress is progress and advocates hope they

23:27

can build on last year's encouraging decline. We've

23:30

talked about a lot of how bigger

23:32

cars have led to more pedestrian tests,

23:34

but truly the real concern when it

23:36

comes to pedestrian deaths is inebriation because

23:38

30% of fatalities involved

23:40

a pedestrian who had a blood alcohol

23:43

level that exceeded the legal limit and

23:45

then 19% involved a driver

23:47

above that limit. So it still is,

23:49

alcohol is probably one of the central

23:51

driving factors, as well as the fact

23:53

that the US is set up mostly

23:55

for cars, very little infrastructure to promote

23:57

walking or biking or any other means

23:59

of transportation. So a lot of factors have

24:01

kind of combined in this, but it

24:03

is good to see the numbers a little bit lower than

24:05

they were in 2020 and 2019. And

24:08

if you want to look at a city

24:10

that's doing it right, and there's perhaps a

24:12

model for other American cities to follow, it's

24:14

Hoboken, New Jersey. I mean, they haven't had

24:17

a traffic death from somebody in a car,

24:19

a cyclist, or a

24:21

pedestrian since 2017. They

24:24

are doing it so right. There's a mayor there

24:26

who said, there's this concept in urban planning called

24:29

Vision Zero, and it's basically eliminating

24:32

traffic deaths. And every city is

24:34

trying to do that, but Hoboken is doing it right.

24:37

And one of the biggest strategies that

24:39

they've employed is called daylighting, where you

24:41

remove parking spots from close to intersections

24:43

because that reduces visibility. And the idea

24:45

is that if people can see better

24:48

at intersections, then it will lead to

24:50

a decrease in traffic crashes. And that's

24:52

absolutely happened. There's other sort of things

24:54

you can play with in terms of

24:56

infrastructure and putting curb buffers

24:59

or just limiting speed limit,

25:01

that's also a big thing. But yeah, if you

25:03

go to Hoboken, they're absolutely crushing it in terms

25:05

of limiting traffic deaths. Shout out

25:08

Hoboken, good for them. My second number is

25:10

12 and two, which

25:12

is the New York Mets record ever

25:14

since Grimace throughout the ceremonial first pitch

25:16

at a game two weeks ago. Yes,

25:19

the McDonald's purple amorphous blob mascot is

25:21

being credited with single-handedly saving the Mets

25:23

season because before he threw out the

25:25

pitch, they were down in the dumps.

25:27

But now they're in the thick of

25:29

the playoff hunt. In fact, right after

25:32

Grimace sprinkled his magic vegetable oil on

25:34

the team, they won seven games in

25:36

a row. Grimace Mania is now

25:38

taking over the Mets universe at the game

25:40

against the Yankees Tuesday night. Multiple fans dressed

25:42

up as the mascot when they went to

25:44

the game, and kids at City Field asked

25:46

to take pictures with them when they were

25:48

shown on the Jumbotron, the crowd erupted. Even

25:50

McDonald's is getting in on the bit, updating

25:52

its Twitter avatar to show Grimace in a

25:54

Mets hat. Toby, before you say anything, I

25:57

just want to put my position forward. This

25:59

is all Grimace. is doing. I am

26:01

a firm believer in his mystical powers

26:03

and secondly it's probably not hyperbole to

26:05

say that Grimace is one of the

26:07

most potent forces in marketing today. Oh

26:09

100% remember the Grimace shake trend from

26:11

last year where people were just posting

26:13

these absurdist videos drinking the new Grimace

26:15

shake but I think what's very funny

26:17

is that this happened very organically even

26:20

though Grimace is a corporate mascot and

26:22

the Mets are a very big team

26:24

you just can't make up the fact that they

26:26

just really the data supports your position I mean

26:29

in 14 and 2 since Grimace threw

26:31

out the first pitch there's nothing you could point

26:33

to that said that there hasn't been a Grimace

26:35

effect so I'm 100%

26:37

on your side. You mentioned the people dressing

26:39

up as Grimace they were interviewed a little

26:41

bit and said I feel like I can't

26:43

take my head off ever because all these

26:45

kids think we are Grimace and if they

26:47

saw me removing my helmet it would kind

26:50

of scar them for life but I am

26:52

fully in on Grimace Mania as well. We

26:54

need a Gritty to throw out

26:56

the first pitch at the Phillies and get us

26:58

on a little wind streak here. My final number

27:00

shows how the recent Heat Dome has

27:02

sent Americans scrambling to book cooler 4th

27:04

of July vacations. It's had a real

27:06

impact according to booking.com 64% of American

27:10

travelers said that rising local temps

27:12

are pushing them to seek out

27:14

vacations with bearable temperatures and for

27:16

many bearable temperatures just means that

27:18

cool breeze coming off a lake

27:20

or an ocean coastal destinations and

27:22

ones that offer water sports have

27:24

become the number one vacation pick

27:26

with one third of Americans looking

27:28

for water-centric vacations and that's led

27:30

to a spike in interest in places like Panama

27:33

City Beach, Florida and Myrtle Beach which each saw

27:35

a 30% annual increase

27:37

in searches for the 4th of July

27:39

weekend. Should we start styling MBD bathing

27:41

suits? We should and I am totally

27:43

bucking this trend though because I'm cool-cationing

27:46

to St. Louis, Missouri which no lake

27:48

very hot there as well. I would

27:50

like to put forth my own vacation

27:52

trend though and that is race-cationing where

27:54

you sign up for a half marathon

27:57

or a marathon or a triathlon with

27:59

your friends. You go to the

28:01

destination, you do the race, you feel very

28:03

accomplished about yourself, and then you go and

28:05

have a good time. Would you wanna go?

28:07

Of course you would co-op this segment on

28:10

something that has nothing to do with distance

28:12

running and making it about distance running. But

28:14

quickly, give me your top beach town and

28:16

your top lake town. Well, my top beach

28:18

town is just where I live. I mean,

28:21

I live very close to Siesta Key in

28:23

Florida, also Bradenton Beach. I'm a Florida boy,

28:25

so I'll take those as my beach towns.

28:27

But my lake town is northern Michigan. You've

28:29

been to my cottage up

28:32

in northern Michigan as well. It is just

28:34

heaven on earth up there. So that's where

28:36

we should really go co-location. Let's

28:38

wrap it up there. Thanks so

28:40

much for listening and have a

28:42

wonderful Thursday. You can send all

28:44

of your questions, comments, and favorite

28:46

lake towns to our email, morningbrewdailyatmorningbrew.com.

28:48

Let's roll the credits. Emily Milliron

28:50

is our executive producer. Raymond Liu

28:53

is our producer. Olivia Graham is

28:55

our associate producer. Uchenwa Ogu is

28:57

our technical director. Billy Menino is

28:59

on audio. Hair and Makeup thinks the

29:01

Mets may never lose another game. Devin Emery

29:03

is our chief content officer, and our show

29:05

is a production of Morning Brew. Great show

29:07

today, Neil. Let's run it back tomorrow.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features