Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:02
If it's Monday after the daring and
0:04
deadly raid that brought home four Israeli
0:06
hostages, Secretary of State Antony
0:08
Blinken is back in the region, as
0:11
a ceasefire deal in this eight-month-long war
0:13
now seems even less likely. Plus,
0:16
it's in the jury's hands, deliberations beginning
0:18
just moments ago in Hunter Biden's criminal
0:20
trial, and a verdict could come at
0:22
any moment. That is, the
0:24
president's son faces multiple charges tied to
0:27
gun possession while using drugs. The
0:30
former President Donald Trump meets virtually with
0:32
his New York City probation officer as
0:34
he hits the campaign trail, rails
0:36
against the verdict, and vows vengeance
0:38
against his political enemies. And
0:52
welcome to Meet the Press Now. I'm
0:54
Aaron Gilchrist in Washington. We are learning
0:56
more today about how Israel rescued four
0:59
hostages this weekend from Gaza, and about
1:01
the casualties in that daring daytime operation.
1:04
Over the weekend, emotional scenes of celebration
1:06
and relief as those four hostages returned
1:08
home to Israel, hugging their families after
1:10
being held hostage for more than 240
1:12
days. The
1:15
Hamas-run health ministry is saying at least 274 Palestinian
1:19
civilians were killed during the Israeli
1:21
raid, and while Israel acknowledges there
1:23
were civilian casualties, they estimate that number to
1:25
be less than 100. The
1:28
IDF says all four hostages were being
1:30
held in an apartment building that also
1:32
housed civilian families. And a
1:35
U.S. official familiar with the matter says the
1:37
U.S. provided intel to support the rescue operation.
1:40
And today, NBC News is also
1:42
exclusively reporting that the Biden administration
1:44
is considering a potential unilateral deal
1:46
with Hamas to secure the release
1:48
of American hostages in Gaza, as
1:50
well as the bodies of Americans
1:52
killed during the October 7 attack. Now,
1:55
when pressed about it by NBC's Andrea Mitchell
1:57
today in Egypt, Secretary of State Blinken did
1:59
not and
4:00
his allies in his very right-wing government are now
4:02
going to be able to point to this, and
4:04
we're already seeing this, as the
4:07
only solution, that continuing the war, not
4:09
reaching a ceasefire, is the best way
4:11
to free the hostages, that they can
4:13
have their cake and eat it too.
4:15
By continuing the war, they will accomplish
4:17
both goals. And as you mentioned before,
4:20
in the introduction, that kind of
4:22
makes any peace negotiations that are
4:24
now being shepherded by Secretary Blinken
4:26
here in the Middle East even
4:28
further apart, even less likely, than they
4:30
were before, and they were not likely before.
4:33
Aaron. Matt, I want to go
4:35
back to this number of casualties here. We do
4:37
have the Hamas-run Ministry of Health saying that more
4:39
than 270 Palestinians were killed
4:42
during that operation. Has Israel had much
4:44
to say about the civilian deaths here,
4:46
and also how are Arab countries reacting
4:49
to this weekend's operation? Well,
4:53
this has been considered outrageous by
4:55
most Arab countries. They're not celebrating
4:58
like the Israelis, even those who
5:00
have diplomatic relations. And this is
5:02
consistent. The same kind of noises
5:04
we've been hearing from neighboring Arab countries and Muslim countries throughout
5:06
the world, and really a lot
5:08
of leaders in European countries, advocacy
5:11
organizations, United Nations officials, all outraged at
5:13
the death toll, not just from what
5:16
we saw in Nusayrat refugee camp over
5:18
the weekend, freeing those four hostages, but
5:21
also now we've seen the death toll, according to
5:23
the Hamas-run Ministry of Health in the Gaza
5:25
Strip, topping 37,000 people. Even
5:29
if that is an exaggeration, and the Israelis
5:31
have consistently said that those numbers are inflated,
5:33
they are still sky-high numbers, really, no matter
5:36
how you slice it. And that is what
5:38
we're seeing and hearing from the Palestinians here.
5:41
And, Matt, you insert the U.S. here.
5:44
We have Secretary Blinken back in Israel
5:46
today, his eighth visit to the region
5:48
since the fighting began in Gaza. What
5:50
are your biggest takeaways from the meeting that the
5:53
secretary has had today, and is in Israel? a
14:00
greater likelihood of a ceasefire deal being done.
14:03
But if you ask me a week from now, will we still be
14:05
in the same place we are right now? I wouldn't be so sure.
14:09
Well, what gives you that feeling though?
14:11
I mean, you point out the idea
14:13
that Hamas might be embarrassed. What incentive
14:17
do they have in the near term
14:19
to go back to the drawing board to
14:21
say, oh yes, we'll take the deal even
14:23
though we have this new operation behind us?
14:26
Well, a couple of things. One is
14:28
the Israelis are still operating in Rafah
14:30
and they're also operating within central Gaza.
14:34
One of the factors that influences his
14:36
sinwar is how close does
14:38
the Israeli military to him? And
14:41
does he therefore have an interest
14:43
in getting a reprieve? That's
14:45
number one, that's one factor. The
14:48
second is, okay, maybe there will be
14:50
other Israeli operations that we plan. The last thing
14:52
Hamas wants to do is have
14:54
other rescue operations that once again, rob
14:57
them of what they see as being these
15:00
bargaining chips, these assets that they have. So
15:03
I wouldn't conclude that necessarily
15:05
from Hamas standpoint, everything
15:07
is in a sense off the table. Number
15:10
three, I suspect that they will be under
15:12
increasing pressure from Qatar
15:15
and from Egypt precisely because the Secretary
15:17
of State is in the region. So
15:19
this is not a static situation. I
15:21
think we shouldn't draw conclusions based
15:24
on this operation and say, now it looks
15:26
like it's impossible. I don't conclude
15:28
that it's impossible. Having said that, when
15:30
the Yayha's sinwar is the arbiter of whether or not
15:33
you can do a hostage deal, it's pretty
15:35
hard to predict that you're going to see one. What
15:38
do you think this does for Benjamin
15:40
Netanyahu? We know that he's faced criticism
15:42
from Israelis, from hostage families for not
15:44
doing enough to get the hostages home
15:46
at different points during this conflict. Does
15:48
this rescue operation change that? Is he
15:51
gonna see domestic pressure that he's been
15:53
facing ease after the rescue
15:55
of these four hostages? Or does this
15:57
embolden him to do more militarily? substance
26:00
at every moment in time, such as
26:02
when he's filling out the form. And
26:05
I think the defense in the case
26:07
has been, well, he was an addict,
26:09
but he didn't recognize himself as an
26:11
addict at the time. Because remember, one
26:14
of the devastating pieces of evidence in
26:16
this case is Hunter Biden's own book,
26:18
where he says that he was an
26:20
addict during this two year period of
26:23
time. So his very own words, and
26:25
by the way, because he did an
26:27
audible book, they even have
26:29
him saying those words out loud as if
26:31
he had testified in the trial that he
26:34
was addicted to drugs during the two year
26:36
period around 2018. So
26:40
it's a tough fact pattern for the defense to deal
26:42
with. Well, let me ask you a few more
26:44
things about the defense here. We saw the defense push
26:47
back pretty hard on Halle
26:49
Biden's testimony. She was called by the prosecution.
26:51
She suggested that they suggested
26:53
that Hunter told her to find the gun
26:56
and also told her to file a police
26:58
report after it was dumped. Does
27:01
redefining that testimony at this
27:03
point give Hunter Biden more
27:05
credibility? Does it risk highlighting that he
27:07
was sort of more involved here? Hard
27:11
to say because you have to remember
27:13
that part of her testimony also was
27:15
that she became addicted to crack herself
27:17
as a result of her relationship with
27:19
him. So many of the women
27:21
who were called in the case were
27:24
very harmful to him in terms of
27:27
the testimony. I think with
27:29
respect, though, to the gun charge, that
27:32
testimony would seem to indicate that he
27:34
wasn't he hadn't planned to use
27:36
the gun on any person in particular
27:38
and that at least the jury will
27:40
think that nobody in Delaware was endangered
27:42
by anything that he did during that
27:44
time period other than himself. And of
27:46
course, the big picture when you step
27:48
way back on this case and maybe
27:50
the jury will do this is
27:53
that he's he hasn't been addicted to
27:55
drugs for a very long time now
27:57
for at least a few years. And
27:59
he seems to have straightened his life.
28:01
out. This kind of charge usually is
28:03
lodged against an active addict
28:05
who presents a danger to society. So I think
28:07
they're hoping that the jury will look at the
28:09
big picture and not the details of the evidence.
28:12
Well, let me ask you about that. We just
28:14
learned that the jury has been sent home for
28:16
the day. 4.30 was the time we
28:18
understood that was going to be happening. So they
28:20
do have the case now, though. They've been able
28:23
to start at least some level of deliberation on
28:25
this. How soon do you think
28:27
we might see a verdict in a case like this
28:29
with evidence presented in the way that you've just laid
28:31
out? Is this fairly
28:33
straightforward legally? Well,
28:36
it is straightforward legally. And I
28:38
would be very surprised if we
28:41
don't have a verdict tomorrow in
28:43
the case. I mean, it could go for
28:45
a third day. But I would think by
28:47
days and tomorrow, the jury would have been
28:50
through all of the facts. Now, the only
28:52
thing you can't really measure is whether there's
28:54
a possibility of a hung jury. And that
28:56
is if if there are
28:58
two or three jurors who really don't want
29:00
to convict him and they're
29:02
willing to hold out against the other jurors,
29:05
then jury deliberations could go for a longer
29:07
period of time. All right. Paul
29:09
Callan with us today. Paul, we appreciate your time today. Thank
29:11
you. Thank you, Aaron. Coming
29:14
up next, Congresswoman Nancy Mace is in
29:16
the fight for her political life. Will
29:18
her vote to oust Speaker McCarthy cost
29:20
her her seat in Congress? We'll explain
29:22
that for you next. You're watching Meet
29:24
the Press Now. And
29:35
welcome back. Whether you call it
29:37
revenge, payback, or just hard-nosed politics,
29:39
tomorrow's Republican primary for South Carolina's
29:41
first congressional district is shaping up
29:43
to be a dramatic proxy fight
29:45
between incumbent Nancy Mace and Kevin
29:47
McCarthy, the former speaker of the
29:49
House, who she helped oust last
29:51
fall. NBC's Ali Vitale has more
29:53
from the Palmetto state. Around
29:57
Charleston, South Carolina, shade isn't just thrown
29:59
by the Check out
30:01
just a few. This is just
30:03
a sampling of Catherine Templeton's lies.
30:07
Our current congressman goes to Washington and
30:09
votes however she wants. This race to
30:11
oust Nancy Mace is the first of
30:13
the primary challenges to the eight Republicans
30:15
who voted out former Speaker Kevin McCarthy
30:17
last year. I'm on the side of the
30:19
people. I'm not on the side of the establishment. Now
30:22
Mace appears to be Act One in McCarthy's
30:24
revenge tour, though he says he's not out
30:26
for payback. Are you on a political vengeance
30:28
tour? No, I know you guys try to
30:30
say that. McCarthy says it's not a revenge
30:32
tour. Oh, 100%. He's a mean girl. I mean, oh, absolutely.
30:34
He's a mean girl. This
30:38
is all about revenge. It's about powerful people
30:40
that were taken out. No regrets about that
30:42
vote. Never. Never. Mace
30:45
is no stranger to intra-party feuds. Last cycle,
30:47
her quarrel was with Trump. He endorsed her
30:49
challenger, who she beat by 5,000 votes. Now
30:52
she's back in Trump's favor. Congresswoman
30:55
Nancy Mace. We've
30:58
come a long way. Well, we've come a
31:00
long way. A full circle moment for the
31:02
woman who called on her party to start
31:04
over from Trump after January 6. This was
31:07
an easy call supporting Donald Trump because we've
31:09
had four years of Joe Biden. Mace has
31:11
outraised and outspent her nearest opponent, Catherine Templeton,
31:13
a Trump backer and former Labor Secretary to
31:15
former Governor Nikki Haley. She's
31:18
widely seen as McCarthy's pick in this race. I
31:21
haven't talked to him about taking out Congressman
31:23
Mace, but I have asked him to help
31:25
me raise money. Mace's vote to boot the
31:27
speaker is why she's in it. I saw
31:29
you say that that's when you decided you
31:31
were running. Absolutely. She broke our trust and
31:33
she did it by voting out Kevin McCarthy.
31:35
Still, she downplayed the former speaker's power. All
31:37
due respect to Kevin McCarthy, who is, I'm
31:39
sure, a wonderful man. Nobody's paying attention to
31:41
Kevin McCarthy in the low country of South
31:43
Carolina. On the airwaves, though? Self-serving
31:46
politicians like Nancy Mace. Follow
31:48
the money. Find a rhino. That's Catherine Templeton.
32:00
box where voters settled the score one way
32:02
or another. We need mature adults, not silly
32:04
girls. I want to win bigger than ever
32:06
before on Tuesday night because I want to
32:08
send a message to Washington that voters don't
32:10
care about DC. And
32:13
Ali Vitale joins us now from Charleston.
32:16
So, Ali, we heard from Templeton herself
32:18
there, but is anybody in South
32:20
Carolina paying attention to Kevin McCarthy? Does it seem
32:22
like that's the case? If this is a revenge
32:24
tour, did he pick an effective platform? Look,
32:29
at this point, McCarthy might be more
32:31
a vehicle for getting Mace out of
32:33
office. You're seeing specifically the way that
32:35
groups that are aligned or allied with
32:37
the former speaker are spending big on
32:40
the airwaves here, trying to go negative
32:42
on the incumbent on Nancy Mace. For
32:44
Mace, though, and in our conversations with
32:46
sources on the ground who know South
32:48
Carolina so well, the McCarthy vote could
32:50
be both a knock against her, but
32:53
also something that helps bolster her independent
32:55
credentials. We know that conservative voters love
32:57
people who go against the establishment, who
32:59
aren't afraid to buck the grain of
33:01
the party. Certainly, Mace going against McCarthy
33:03
did just that. She thinks it could
33:06
help her, and so do some experts
33:08
who know South Carolina well. So,
33:10
Ali, if this is a revenge tour, who's number two
33:12
on the list here? This
33:16
is the first act of the so-called revenge
33:18
tour. And again, McCarthy might not think it's
33:21
that, but we know the way that he
33:23
talked about these members who voted against him.
33:25
We know that these challengers also didn't come
33:27
out of thin air, so next week we'll
33:30
head to Virginia's fifth congressional district. That's where
33:32
Congressman Bob Goode, who's now the head of
33:34
the rabble-rousing Freedom Caucus, will face his own
33:36
challenger, a state senator there who's actually earned
33:39
the endorsement of Donald Trump. It's going to
33:41
be a very different dynamic than what we've
33:43
seen on the ground here in Charleston, where
33:46
Mace has Trump's endorsement. She's a powerful incumbent.
33:48
Goode, on the other hand, is working against
33:50
the Trump grain. He could be in some
33:52
trouble, but of course, we'll see that next
33:55
week. You mentioned Nancy Mace having
33:57
Trump's endorsement. There was a point in time
33:59
when she did not. I mean, she some
34:01
would say has a unique ability to sort
34:03
of create some bad blood among party leaders
34:05
there, including former President Trump at one time
34:07
and still survive. Does something like
34:09
this only strengthen her hand, you think? She
34:14
has an act for that, certainly. And I
34:16
think that she relishes the idea that she
34:18
has earned attention for bucking the establishment, for
34:21
going against the powerful people that are at
34:23
the top of the party. Certainly
34:25
it was something where you saw her with
34:27
that scarlet letter A in the piece. That
34:29
was something she wore, really earned attention for
34:32
after the vote to oust McCarthy. That attention
34:34
getting is also something that her critics are
34:36
seizing on here in this race, saying that
34:38
she's not in it for South Carolina voters.
34:40
She's in it to earn attention and media
34:43
for herself. Of course, Mace would say
34:45
that she's still in this for South Carolina
34:47
voters. She pointed to several different moments of
34:49
constituent services. But that's really what she's trying
34:51
to point to here. But look, on the
34:53
Trump of it all, she is someone who
34:55
endorsed the former president at a critical moment
34:58
here in South Carolina. It didn't go unnoticed
35:00
by a lot of people, including Trump, because
35:02
now he's back in her corner. All
35:04
right, Ali Vitali for us in Charleston, South Carolina.
35:06
Ali, thank you. Well,
35:09
after the break, running on revenge, former
35:11
President Trump lashes out against his political
35:14
enemies and his criminal conviction as he
35:16
meets with his probation officer. The
35:18
panel's up next. You're watching Meet the Press Now.
35:29
And welcome back to Meet the Press Now.
35:32
Amid meetings with campaign staff, donors and strategists,
35:34
former President Donald Trump has another kind of
35:36
meeting on his schedule today with
35:38
his probation officer. NBC News was first to
35:41
report that the presumptive Republican nominee is sitting
35:43
for a virtual interview with a New York
35:45
City probation officer today while he's off the
35:47
trail at Mar-a-Lago in Florida. Trump's
35:50
legal team is expected to submit
35:52
their sentencing recommendation this week, ahead
35:54
of his July 11th sentencing date.
35:56
Now, that probation meeting comes after
35:58
a rally yesterday. in 100
36:00
degree temperatures in Las Vegas, where Trump
36:02
condemned his guilty verdict, and he accused
36:05
President Biden of weaponizing the American justice
36:07
system. Since that verdict, Mr.
36:09
Trump has repeatedly floated the idea of
36:12
using a second term to exact revenge
36:14
against his political enemies, even as some
36:16
interviewers gave him the opportunity to soften
36:18
his tone. Listen. You
36:21
know, the word revenge is a very strong word,
36:23
but maybe we have revenge through success, but
36:26
that's what I'd like to see. I want
36:28
to see the country survive, because this country's
36:30
not going to survive like this. Well, revenge
36:33
does take time, I will say that. It
36:35
does. And sometimes revenge can be justified. Well,
36:37
you pledge to restore equal
36:40
justice, equal application of
36:42
our laws, and this
36:45
practice of weaponization. Is that
36:47
a promise you're going to make? You have to do it, but
36:49
it's awful. Look, I know you want me to say
36:51
something. No, I don't want you to say I'm asking.
36:53
But I don't want to look naive. Joining
36:57
me now on set here is
36:59
Tolu Olurenipa, White House Bureau Chief
37:01
for the Washington Post, Fash secure,
37:03
Senior Advisor to Vermont Independent Senator
37:05
Bernie Sanders and Sarah Chamberlain, President
37:08
and CEO of the Republican Main
37:10
Street Partnership. Thank you all for being
37:12
here today. Tolu, I'll start with you on this. My
37:14
colleague Matt Dixon here at NBC News talked
37:16
to Trump's former attorney, Ty Cobb, about this
37:19
revenge rhetoric. We'll put up on the screen
37:21
what he had to say about this. I
37:23
think there should be concern. From a 30,000
37:25
foot view, what
37:27
I see is Trump angrier now than he
37:29
was before because he
37:31
is convicted now. Is
37:34
what we're hearing from the former
37:36
president something a message, this revenge
37:38
language breaking through with voters? Well,
37:41
what Ty Cobb said is pretty interesting
37:44
in part because Trump was pretty angry
37:46
during his first term in office. He
37:48
was impeached twice. He had a lot
37:50
of his policy goals flouted by the
37:52
Democrats who took power and started investigating
37:54
him. Now that he is a convicted
37:56
felon, he is even more determined
37:59
to go after him. his enemies. He's more determined
38:01
to go after Joe Biden, the
38:03
quote unquote Biden crime family, and go after
38:05
Democrats and prosecutors and people who have made
38:07
his life miserable for the last couple of
38:09
years. And so I do think that's breaking
38:11
through with some voters, some voters like that.
38:13
Large number of voters think that that takes
38:15
us very far from what a president should
38:18
be, not only a convicted felon, but someone
38:20
who's determined to seek revenge against his enemies.
38:22
Do we know who those voters are? I
38:24
mean, who is that messaging, messaging breaking through
38:26
with? Well, you have a number of voters
38:28
that have started to stray away from the
38:30
Republican party, Reagan Republicans, moderates, college educated Republicans
38:32
who like the policies, they like the tax
38:34
cuts, but they don't like the extremism. They
38:37
don't like the idea of, you know, a
38:39
president going after his enemies with the Justice
38:41
Department. And so some of those voters have
38:43
started to stray away even before this guilty
38:46
verdict. And they could be even
38:49
more of those voters going away from him if he continues
38:51
to use this language. Sarah, I'm going to ask you to
38:53
weigh in here. I want to play a little bit more
38:55
sound though from this is from the campaign trail yesterday in
38:57
Las Vegas, the former president there talking about January
39:00
6th defendants. Let's listen to this. We're
39:03
going to look very strongly at J six.
39:05
Those people, there's never been people treated more
39:08
horrifically than J six
39:11
hostages. Those J six warriors, they were
39:14
warriors, but they were really more than
39:16
anything else. They're victims of what happened.
39:18
All they were doing is protesting a
39:20
rigged election. That's what they were doing.
39:23
So Donald Trump has been a candidate for what,
39:26
a decade or so now in one way or
39:28
another. And so there are some people who may
39:30
not be following day to day everything that's happening
39:32
and everything that's being said. But what we do
39:34
here, when we do hear things like this and
39:37
we hear some of the revenge
39:39
language, what's your impression of whether that's breaking through with
39:41
part of the electorate in a way that's going to
39:43
be helpful to him? So it's certainly going
39:45
to be helpful with the Magus. I mean, they're
39:47
more fired up than ever to turn out to
39:50
vote for him, to send money to him. So
39:52
that is working with them. The suburban women, which
39:54
I would argue is going to decide this election.
39:56
It's not really breaking through with them. They're kind
39:59
of turned off. 720
48:01
seats and you've got various political
48:03
groups which are sort of umbrella
48:05
groups under which you've got political
48:07
parties in every single country, 27
48:09
countries. You mentioned France.
48:12
What a humiliating night for Emmanuel
48:14
Macron. A crushing defeat.
48:17
His party coming in with 15% of the vote. Far-right
48:22
parties combined received 40%. That's
48:25
four in 10 people in France voting for a
48:27
far-right party. You've got
48:30
a landscape, a reality on the
48:32
ground that is not reflected in
48:34
the parliament in France and so
48:36
hence his decision to dissolve parliament.
48:38
It was, it stunned the
48:40
country quite frankly, leaving experts,
48:43
analysts bewildered. Some people are
48:45
calling it political suicide, but he is daring
48:47
the French people. He's saying, I dare you
48:49
to let this happen at
48:51
home. He didn't have to call elections. His
48:54
position is safe until 2027. That's
48:57
when the next presidential elections will be. But
49:00
we find ourselves in a position where
49:02
in just a few weeks' time, the
49:04
opening of the Olympics in Paris, he
49:07
could very well be next to a
49:09
prime minister who is anti-EU, anti-immigration, stands
49:11
for everything he stands, against everything he
49:14
stands for. That is certainly be
49:16
a first in French politics. I
49:18
am curious. You talk about anti-EU
49:20
and anti-immigration. I do wonder what
49:22
it was that seemed to drive these
49:24
gains for the far-right and
49:26
the European Union parliament. Well
49:32
they have over the years. I mean, like I said earlier,
49:34
what was on the minds of these voters? Migration,
49:36
a huge topic in Germany, in France,
49:39
really the cost of living. The farmers.
49:42
Farmers are a huge issue in
49:44
Europe. All these environmental
49:47
bills being passed by parliament. But
49:49
as we say, big picture, central
49:52
right stays, holds onto power with
49:54
gains on the far left and
49:56
the far right. Thank you Danielle.
50:00
All right, the news continues now with Halle Jackson.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More