Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:05
This is News Talk Tonight
0:07
on the iHeartRadio Talk Network.
0:11
Welcome back everybody. I'm Richard Krause sitting in for
0:13
the great Jim Richards. He will be back in
0:15
the big chair on Monday. It's
0:18
time to have a look at what's going on in Ottawa.
0:20
It was the week that was with
0:23
Mike Le Couture. Listen,
0:25
Mike, all week we've
0:28
been talking about the by-election in St.
0:30
Paul's in Toronto. And I've been hosting
0:32
this national show. And at first I
0:34
didn't think we should be talking about
0:37
this by-election in this city that I'm
0:39
sitting in because we're heard across the
0:41
country and kind of who cares, but
0:44
this has a seismic effect across the
0:46
country. We've had a riding
0:49
that was liberal for 25
0:51
years, get flipped over to
0:53
Conservative. And tell me
0:55
what you think the fallout from that.
0:57
How significant is this? Yeah, I think
0:59
people need to understand what Fortress 416
1:01
is. 416
1:04
obviously being the area code of Toronto.
1:06
The fact that the Liberals were able
1:09
to keep that area red for so
1:11
long and deeply red, right? I mean,
1:13
let's think about Carolyn Bennett when she
1:16
won this in the last election. She
1:18
had, you know, a significant
1:20
lead, you know, over 20 point lead
1:22
over... I think it was 24 points.
1:24
That was the flip in this one,
1:26
right? So the fact that it was
1:28
that large and then flipped and yes,
1:30
it wasn't a huge margin that the
1:32
Conservatives won by, but that's the issue,
1:34
right? You said it perfectly there, a
1:36
24 point flip for
1:39
this by-election. This is not
1:42
a crack in Fortress, you know,
1:44
Fortress Toronto and GTA. This
1:46
is a serious issue now for
1:48
the Liberals. You know, a
1:50
lot of people have been saying if they can
1:52
lose this, then which other riding really is safe?
1:55
You think of some of those ones on the
1:57
island of Montreal, you think of
1:59
a lot of other... that are now in
2:01
play. I've heard from the NDP saying, hey
2:03
look this is good news for us as
2:05
well, but they didn't do well in that
2:07
by-election. But for Canadians to understand this, this
2:10
is something that the Liberal government now needs
2:12
to look at. The Prime Minister, he is
2:14
not gonna be, you know,
2:16
spending Canada Day with fireworks
2:19
and and popping champagne here. They are
2:21
going to be in a serious mode
2:23
right now looking at, okay what do
2:25
we do now? Because if this one
2:27
goes, then what else happens? And yes,
2:29
we are not going to have a
2:31
general election any time soon, but there
2:33
are other by-elections that are coming up
2:35
across this country and those will
2:37
be other barometers for this government to look
2:40
at and to get an idea of how
2:42
people feel about them, but also about Justin
2:44
Trudeau. And I think that that's a key
2:46
thing. People going into this said this is
2:48
gonna be a referendum not only on the
2:50
Liberal government but on Justin Trudeau. And
2:52
that level of dissatisfaction with him and
2:54
people who have this anger towards him
2:56
that is really palpable now. I mean
2:59
we had seen it in a lot
3:01
of the reporting, my colleague Judy Trinh,
3:03
going to the riding of Toronto St.
3:05
Paul's and people in there saying, love
3:07
Leslie Church, who was the candidate there,
3:10
hate Justin Trudeau. And was
3:12
that what, you know, was that their
3:14
undoing? And I think that is something
3:16
that a lot of people inside the
3:18
Liberal Party are having hard conversations about
3:20
right now. Do you
3:22
think that it is part and parcel?
3:24
I mean I've never seen this kind
3:27
of organized hate against almost any politician,
3:29
let alone a Prime Minister with the
3:31
flags and you know the the bumper
3:33
stickers and everything. I mean there have
3:35
been tastes of it here and there
3:37
over the last, you know, number
3:40
of decades, but this is unlike anything
3:42
I've ever seen before. So there's definitely
3:44
that faction, but do you think that
3:46
part of it could be that he's
3:49
simply, he's been the Liberal leader for
3:51
11 years and people tire
3:54
of the same old in politics after
3:56
that amount of time? Yeah
3:58
they really do and you know we saw it with our
4:00
Harper government when Harper was in
4:02
the last few months of his mandate
4:04
and there was a movement
4:08
that you could hear that people didn't
4:10
like Harper. They wanted him gone. I
4:12
think there was a really funny
4:14
sort of anecdote about this. Rona Ambrose who
4:16
was the interim leader at the time at
4:19
the press gallery dinner which is now on the
4:21
record so you can even look this up. She
4:24
had given a speech and she had said
4:26
we're trying out some new slogans for the
4:28
conservative party and one of them was the
4:30
conservative party don't worry the bad man
4:32
is gone. That was
4:34
the sort of level that people were feeling at
4:36
the time in terms of
4:39
their feelings towards Stephen Harper. This
4:41
is like that on steroids and
4:44
it is clear now yes during
4:47
that so-called freedom convoy that
4:49
came and occupied Parliament Hill you saw
4:51
the flags you saw the anger that
4:54
hasn't gone away. It's just not on Parliament
4:56
Hill on Wellington Street anymore. You're seeing it
4:58
around Ottawa you're seeing it around everybody's
5:00
hometown. He's at the bumper stickers that
5:03
you know have expletive Trudeau on it
5:06
and that type of thing and that
5:08
type of sentiment is out there and
5:10
again it comes back to you know
5:12
this was a party that was
5:14
rebuilt around Justin Trudeau. Let's
5:16
not forget that he rescued
5:19
them from third place in
5:21
2015. It has been a
5:23
party that became the Trudeau Liberals that really
5:25
is built around him at this point. So
5:27
there is a bit of a division within
5:29
caucus right now. Some people that say he
5:31
got us here do we need to let
5:33
him go out on his terms and how
5:36
he wants to do it and others who
5:38
are sitting there going you know what it's
5:40
time for him to go or else we're
5:42
all going down. You know there
5:44
is some interesting polling out there as
5:46
well Richard that some people wonder whether
5:48
or not if he hands it over
5:50
to someone else. Will this be a
5:52
repeat of 93 where Mulroney handed it
5:54
to Kim Campbell. They went down to
5:56
two seats as the Progressive Conservatives or
5:59
is it going to be that
6:01
thing where Justin Trudeau hangs on,
6:04
stays around, saves a few
6:06
of these riotings that maybe they think they can
6:08
hold on to with Justin Trudeau as the leader,
6:11
and then walks off and then has
6:13
a clean slate for the new leader.
6:15
This is all speculation, this is all
6:17
the chatter, but it certainly is not
6:19
going to be a quiet summer in
6:21
terms of politics. No, it was a
6:23
summer that I thought that perhaps, you
6:25
know, Trudeau and the Liberals would look
6:27
at rebuilding, look at, you know, trying
6:29
to make some changes, but now it
6:31
just feels like they're under siege. I'm
6:33
in conversation with Mike Locator, senior political
6:36
correspondent, CTV News Channel.
6:39
So, there's a Nanos poll that
6:41
says that, well, just what I just
6:43
said, Trudeau Liberals feel under siege across
6:45
the country. So, it's not just in
6:47
St. Paul's in Toronto. That
6:49
was a, I wouldn't say
6:52
fairly easy flip from Liberal to Conservative,
6:54
but it took some work. But
6:56
it looks like, you know, Nanos
6:58
is projecting that, you know, this is just
7:00
the first of many. I mean, is there
7:03
any way, any way of turning
7:05
this around short of changing
7:07
up the leaders or turning back time
7:09
somehow with a big magical mystical machine
7:11
that can make everything better for Justin
7:13
Trudeau? Yeah, the question is, is it
7:15
the politician at the head of the
7:17
party or is it the policy that
7:19
the party continues to push out there?
7:21
And if you're not going to change,
7:23
the leader will then do you look
7:25
to some of what you have in
7:27
the window. A lot of people have
7:29
been asking the question, do they reverse
7:31
course on the, you
7:34
know, that new tax that of course Pierre Poliev has
7:36
been pushing out there and everything
7:38
around the capital gains? That is something
7:40
that the Conservatives have dined
7:42
out on recently. Do they U-turn on
7:45
that one? Even though you've had Christopher
7:47
Freeland, the Deputy Prime Minister and Finance
7:49
Minister say this will only affect 0.13%
7:51
of the population in Canada. And they
7:53
are just
7:56
trying to, you know, basically tax the
7:58
people who would be benefiting the most.
8:00
off of their capital gains. The other
8:02
one that you have to wonder about
8:04
is the carbon tax. You have had
8:06
Pierre Poliev dining out
8:09
on this literally and figuratively. He
8:11
has been going around with this
8:13
acts the tax type of slogan
8:15
and it is riling up crowds
8:18
and really the liberals have had
8:20
a failure to try and communicate
8:22
to Canadians why it's so important,
8:24
why they need to hold on
8:27
to it. Will they try at
8:29
some point not to backtrack on it but certainly
8:31
there was a carve out for Atlantic
8:34
Canadians. Will they try and do
8:36
something else with that? Do they
8:38
try and move a little bit
8:40
on that to ease that type
8:42
of pressure or are they just
8:44
abandoning such a cornerstone of their
8:46
policy that it would be the
8:48
liberals are diluting everything that they've
8:50
done just to remain in power
8:53
and certainly the Conservatives are probably waiting and waiting
8:55
to pounce because if they do change on the
8:57
carbon tax then they're going to say well these
8:59
guys just want to stay in power. They don't
9:01
care. They're not standing for anything so they'll fall
9:03
for anything. They'll fall for everything. So
9:06
I think that's one of the questions that
9:08
a lot of people are also looking at
9:11
Richard. If Justin Trudeau doesn't go then which
9:13
one of his policies may he try and
9:15
tinker with or is it a cabinet shuffle?
9:17
Is it a cabinet tinkering? Who knows? These
9:19
are all the questions that I think a
9:22
lot of people are wondering and you know
9:24
when will this happen? Will
9:26
he try and do something in some sort of
9:28
a reset in the next couple of weeks? If
9:30
it's not him taking that proverbial walk in the
9:32
sand or the snow or is
9:35
it a paddle in his canoe? Who
9:37
knows at this point but something clearly has to
9:39
change because of all those polls that we're seeing
9:41
from Nick Nanos and others. That's
9:44
Mike Luchatore. We're talking with him. He
9:46
is the senior political correspondent for CTV
9:48
News Channel. When we come back we're
9:50
going to talk about how some liberal
9:52
insiders worried that they're seen as too
9:54
woke under Justin Trudeau. Stay with us.
10:04
You're listening to News Talk
10:06
Tonight on the iHeartRadio Talk
10:08
Network. Welcome back everybody.
10:10
I'm Richard Krause sitting in for Jim
10:12
Richards. Jim will be back on Monday
10:15
sitting in the big chair bringing with
10:17
him his own unique style of vocalese.
10:19
I know you're all looking forward to
10:21
having him back. Right
10:23
now though, it's the week that
10:25
was with Mike LeCateur, the senior
10:27
political correspondent of CTV News Channel.
10:31
And Mike, a story kind of grabbed my eye
10:33
here and I thought I'd run this past you
10:35
to see what you thought. Some
10:37
liberal insiders worry that they're seen
10:39
as too woke under Justin Trudeau
10:41
and that it may be too
10:43
late for him to go. There's
10:46
a guy called Marcus Palowowski, a
10:48
liberal MP from Northern Ontario, and
10:50
he says that part of the
10:52
problem is public perception, which he
10:54
thinks is wrong, that the party
10:57
is connected with a closed-minded political
10:59
correctness that prioritizes identity politics over
11:01
universal human values. And he goes
11:03
on to say
11:06
that, you know, this
11:09
type of politics includes cancel culture in
11:11
which people are shamed for expressing certain
11:13
opinions, blah, blah, blah, and he's connecting
11:15
it back to people's perceptions
11:17
of the liberal party. Is
11:19
this something you think that is accurate? I
11:22
mean, I think that's for a certain percentage
11:25
of the population, the people with the
11:27
flags and the bumper stickers,
11:29
I think this is probably at the heart
11:31
of their issue. It really is. And,
11:34
you know, we've seen this from either, you
11:36
know, the far right that have said
11:38
this or other people that have sometimes
11:40
been a little more conservative leaning. Interesting
11:43
that we're seeing this from former liberals who
11:45
are coming out and saying this as well.
11:48
You know, and whether or not those are sort of
11:51
the so-called blue liberals who are
11:53
maybe a little more centrist. But, you know,
11:55
the calls for this party to maybe slide
11:57
a little more to the political center as
11:59
opposed to how it's drifted to the left.
12:01
We remember 2015, you know,
12:04
a lot of people had said
12:06
that look, the Liberals under Justin
12:08
Trudeau essentially outflanked the NDP under
12:10
Thomas Mulcair in saying that they
12:12
would spend a lot of money
12:15
and not have balanced budgets and then
12:17
really sort of digging in to
12:19
that sort of left side
12:21
of the political landscape. And you
12:24
know, a number of Liberals have
12:26
said that maybe they've drifted too
12:28
far there, maybe they need somebody
12:30
to bring it back to the centre. And
12:33
I always find it interesting, Richard, you know,
12:35
when people say too woke and the cancel
12:37
culture because you sort of have to sit
12:39
back and go, well, what do you mean
12:41
about that? Like, what is that about? Is
12:43
that something that when
12:45
you think about woke, when you think about cancel
12:47
culture, well, you know, the fact that we now
12:49
know that some of our
12:51
former Prime Ministers or former leaders
12:53
of this country had done pretty
12:55
bad things in the past to
12:58
different segments of the population. You're thinking
13:01
about, you know, Indigenous communities and
13:04
some of that sort of thing. Is that
13:06
too woke? Is that cancel culture when we
13:08
decide that we're gonna put an extra plaque
13:10
next to, you know, that of
13:12
a former Prime Minister or that of somebody
13:14
who has been heralded as a Canadian hero
13:17
in the past just to add that context?
13:19
And I think that those are live
13:21
discussions that people continue to have about
13:24
it, but certainly bringing it back to
13:26
the Liberals and the Liberal Party and
13:29
where they've gone. I don't think
13:31
anybody can really doubt, especially when
13:33
you consider that they, in 2022,
13:35
had the supply and confidence agreement
13:38
with the NDP. Now, their policies
13:40
that the Liberals have because of
13:42
that agreement certainly look very socialist.
13:44
They certainly, you know, quack very
13:46
socialist. So are they the socialist
13:48
duck now in, you
13:50
know, in Parliament? And I think
13:53
people rightly now are going to sort of
13:55
mix those two together and they're gonna say,
13:57
well, this was under that Liberal government. So
13:59
if they didn't... believe in that, then
14:01
why would they still, you know, have that policy?
14:04
And I think it's, this is something that
14:06
some liberals, because the liberals are so diverse
14:09
as a party, they're obviously not a monolith
14:11
and, you know, there's a number of people
14:13
in there, like I said, they're either blue
14:15
liberals or a little more red or, you
14:17
know, maybe leaning a little more left as
14:20
well, that Justin Trudeau has sort of created
14:22
with his coalition of
14:24
liberal MPs. So some people may look at
14:26
that and go, well, maybe it's a little
14:28
too left for me. You
14:30
know, whether or not that, you know,
14:33
former MP is going to be somebody
14:35
who would try and re-up again for
14:37
the liberals, unclear, but there has been
14:39
a number of people, and there
14:41
continues to be a number of people who think that
14:43
the liberal party needs to go a little more to
14:46
the center. And what about
14:48
the NDP? I mean, how long do you think
14:50
that this alliance will last? Because it feels to
14:52
me, if we look at the by-election in St.
14:54
Paul's that we were talking about in the last
14:56
segment, the NDP did not fare
14:59
particularly well there. Do you think that they're being
15:01
tarred with the same brush? It's
15:03
interesting you say that, because I had
15:05
conversations with people within the NDP, and
15:08
they have said, well, if anything that
15:10
this election in the
15:13
by-election in Toronto, St. Paul's has shown us,
15:15
is that people are abandoning the liberals and,
15:17
you know, they're looking for another option, and
15:20
we're ready and willing to be that option.
15:22
They were telling me that their internal polling,
15:24
Richard, is showing that they have a
15:27
wider available voter pool than the
15:29
liberals, i.e. more people are looking
15:31
at the NDP as an option.
15:34
I'm not saying that I disagree with them,
15:36
however, I put it to
15:38
them, but what about Toronto St. Paul's? Yeah, we
15:41
didn't see it. You didn't see it there, did
15:43
you? And their answer was, well, you know, that
15:45
was never one of our seats. Well, if you
15:47
want to take the provincial riding map and overlap
15:49
it there, it is their seat.
15:51
So you can't say that the NDP
15:53
is not popular there as well. So
15:56
it's an interesting question. We all
15:58
know that, look. Jagmeet Singh at
16:00
some point between now and October
16:02
2025 when we expect the next
16:04
election to happen, which actually I'll
16:06
correct myself, between now and June
16:08
2025 has to
16:10
distance himself from the liberals. And I say
16:13
June 2025, that is when their supply and
16:15
confidence agreement expires with this liberal party. Between
16:17
now and then, he's got to show some
16:20
distance between himself and the Prime Minister. So
16:22
does he let it expire or
16:24
does he pull out of it sooner and say, I
16:27
am no longer with these losers to quote
16:29
President Biden yesterday because that was thrown around
16:31
quite a bit during the US presidential debate.
16:33
Is he going to say, I'm no longer
16:36
with these guys and we're going to leave
16:38
him in the dust? When
16:40
he does that, unclear, but he has to
16:42
do it at some point to create that
16:44
space. And for people now on the doorstep
16:46
to say, oh, weren't you
16:49
with Justin Trudeau in this quasi
16:51
coalition and propping him up? He
16:53
has to now create this narrative
16:55
that he's no longer going to
16:57
be there with beside the prime
17:00
minister having those same types of
17:02
policies. And whether or not
17:04
he'll be able to punch through and
17:06
convince voters that everything that came out
17:09
of that supply and confidence agreement, pharmacare
17:11
and dental care that they were pushing for,
17:14
whether or not Jagmeet Singh will be able
17:16
to truly put the NDP
17:18
stamp on those policies. That is to be
17:20
determined because I think a lot of Canadians
17:22
right now look at it and go, well,
17:24
I thought that was the Liberals that did
17:26
that. And Jagmeet Singh will have to convince
17:29
everybody, even though he's been saying it a
17:31
lot, that it was because of the NDP
17:33
that those actually got passed. We
17:36
just have a couple of minutes left, but
17:38
I think we should touch on the presidential
17:40
debate of yesterday. Joe Biden appeared at a
17:43
rally in Raleigh this
17:45
afternoon and sounded great. He
17:47
sounded in control, that raspiness
17:49
in his voice. Someone,
17:51
and I can't remember who, said he didn't have
17:53
a frog of his sword. He
17:55
had a whole amphibian farm down there. Could
17:58
barely get the words out. unfocused,
18:00
seemed old, that seemed to
18:03
be erased today by this rally and
18:05
Raleigh that he really stepped up to.
18:07
Um, but do you think it's too
18:09
little too late? I, I have a
18:12
feeling that last night kind of torpedoed
18:14
a lot of people's ideas of voting
18:16
for Joe Biden. Yeah. It,
18:18
you know, whatever cold medication he was
18:20
on, because the Democrats have said that
18:22
he had a cold, I would love
18:24
some of that stuff because if it
18:27
could get rid of whatever he had
18:29
last night in 24 hours, they need
18:31
to market that. I mean, seriously, no,
18:33
Richard, I think after what we saw
18:35
last night, no matter what anybody sees
18:37
from here on out that the, the,
18:40
the die is cast. People are looking
18:42
at Joe Biden now and saying, okay,
18:44
I think it's time to go. The
18:46
question is kind of like Justin Trudeau.
18:48
Where does the call come from and
18:51
who can actually convince him to walk
18:53
away from this? I mean, you have
18:55
to wonder whether or not there is
18:57
the time according to the Democratic, uh,
18:59
party and what they're able to do.
19:02
This is before the convention where they were supposed
19:04
to, you know, officially nominate
19:06
him. It's possible, but here's the
19:08
question that I think a lot
19:10
of people want, uh, need to
19:13
understand, right? So yes, their
19:15
election is in November. That's not a
19:17
lot of time between now and then
19:19
to bring in somebody new and to
19:21
introduce them to the rest of the
19:23
United States of America so that the
19:25
Democrats can say, this is our new
19:27
person and this is the person that
19:29
you should vote for. You
19:32
know, in politics, obviously a day is a long
19:34
time. A week is forever. And of course a
19:36
month is an eternity, but in the minds of
19:38
voters, they're going to have to get to know
19:40
somebody and they're going to have to have the
19:43
Democratic party rally behind this new
19:45
person. Very, very quick. Mike, we
19:47
have to leave it there. Thanks so much
19:49
for this. That was the week that was
19:51
with Mike Luckett or the senior political correspondent
19:53
of CTV news channel. I'm Richard Krause sitting
19:55
in for Jim Richards. Stay with me. Lots
19:57
more show to come. one
24:00
show on the fifth, two shows on the
24:02
sixth. Check out Comedy
24:04
Bar's website for more information and
24:08
those promised to be great shows. And
24:11
like you said, two are gonna be
24:13
winners and one's gonna be the whammy.
24:16
So you grew up in Milwaukee. Tell me a little
24:18
bit about your first exposure to stand up. Did
24:21
your parents have the George Carlin albums kicking
24:23
around and that's what did it or
24:25
was it from television? What was it? You
24:29
know, it was, there was like
24:31
the peripheral experience which
24:34
where I was, you know, like
24:36
my father had the Steve Martin
24:38
record. But you
24:41
know, my first exposure to the
24:43
first comedian that I just was
24:45
like, I couldn't stop laughing at
24:48
was Louis Anderson. And
24:51
then you know, then it became Robin Williams for me.
24:54
But when I watched Louis Anderson as a kid and he
24:56
would do an impression of his mother, I
24:59
just as a kid thought it was
25:01
the funniest thing I'd ever heard. And
25:04
then I, you know, Milwaukee, I didn't, I
25:07
didn't really start doing stand up until, you
25:10
know, my like late 20s really. I
25:13
spent a lot of time doing improv and they
25:15
had a, there was a good club in Milwaukee
25:17
called Comedy Sports, which is actually based around off
25:19
of theater sports which I think has
25:21
Canadian roots. Yeah, I think it started here. I
25:24
believe so. And like most things,
25:26
we have taken it and the United
25:28
States pretended like it never happened. But
25:33
yeah, so, but my first exposure
25:35
was kind of just watching like,
25:37
you know, Louis Anderson, Robin Williams.
25:40
And then I started to, you know, the
25:42
first time I saw George Carlin to your
25:44
question, I was like, what is actually happening?
25:47
Like there's, you know, some
25:49
really brilliant stuff out there, obviously. Yeah,
25:51
it's kind of the difference between hearing
25:53
Kenny G first and then, you know,
25:55
hearing John Coltrane or something afterwards when
25:58
you hear Carlin. know that Kenny G's
26:00
as good as the kids right. There's
26:03
nowhere to go but up. So tell me
26:05
how goldie goldie locks
26:08
and the three bears in
26:10
French doing that
26:12
influence to your career. Oh,
26:15
that's so funny. You know, what is also funny
26:17
is I'm like, where the hell do I say
26:19
these things? That's great reason. You
26:22
know, I, I often
26:24
say this to people who, you know, when I
26:26
was in college or when I was in high
26:28
school, people didn't know what they wanted to do.
26:31
I was like, I recognize how
26:33
enviable my position was because when I
26:35
first did a production in French
26:38
of goldie locks and the three bears,
26:42
I was the baby bear. And I
26:44
just remember I don't you know, I mean, I don't remember
26:46
what the hell I said, but I, I remember
26:49
getting the first laugh. And
26:51
I remember the electricity that kind
26:53
of went through me in a
26:57
way where I thought, I don't know,
27:00
it fully imprinted on me. And I was seriously,
27:03
you know, six or seven or something
27:05
like that. And it just, it hit
27:07
me. It just really like, I never
27:09
forgot it. I read, you know, it
27:11
is like a muscle memory. I still
27:13
have to this day, which is yet
27:16
it never changed. I knew, I knew
27:18
what I wanted to do. I didn't
27:20
know what it was. But I
27:23
knew the feeling I wanted to chase. Well,
27:25
you may or may not know that French
27:27
is our second language here in Canada. So
27:29
maybe you go on one of those shows
27:32
that isn't going so well. You
27:34
can whip out the baby bear in French and
27:36
see what happens. I think
27:38
that's for the whammy show. That's when
27:40
I'm already circling the drain. I'll just
27:42
dive deeper. Absolutely. So tell
27:46
me then about standing, starting doing stand
27:48
up comedy because improv is different. You're
27:50
not a stand up comedian. It is,
27:52
it's got its own unique set of
27:55
rules. And that was sort of the
27:57
Milwaukee phase of your career. It wasn't
27:59
I don't think until you went to
28:01
Los Angeles that you started doing stand-up
28:03
and Tell me about
28:05
being alone up there because when you
28:08
are doing stand-up, you've got a little
28:10
team around you generally speaking Stand-up
28:13
is a much different thing. Was it terrifying at
28:15
first? Absolutely
28:18
to what you're saying I mean I in Private
28:20
was like, you know you would if if a
28:22
show didn't go well You would have five or
28:25
six people to go like what the hell was
28:27
that to each other? You know, you got you
28:29
kind of lived or died with each other and
28:31
there was there was some comfort in those numbers
28:33
and Not
28:36
only is it alone when
28:38
you're on stage, but when you get off stage if it
28:40
doesn't go well You know, there
28:43
isn't air to other comedians
28:45
where they almost celebrate in your
28:47
bombing in the early phases So
28:50
it's totally opposite and and the truth
28:52
is that it you know, it scared
28:54
me off of stand-up repeatedly There
28:57
I had to get back into
28:59
stand-up, you know four or five times before
29:01
I finally You
29:04
know went through the grind of getting out
29:06
of the bombing phase But
29:08
when you are I mean it is it
29:10
is lonely. I want time bombed at the
29:12
improv and I walked
29:14
off the stage and
29:16
without saying a word to anyone walked
29:18
through the club out the door to
29:21
my car I didn't say another word
29:23
to a person. I just was thinking
29:25
what what just happened? Yeah, the whole
29:27
time and why do I put myself
29:29
very lonely? Yeah. Yeah, I'm speaking Yeah,
29:32
I'm speaking with Gareth Reynolds who is
29:34
on the line From
29:36
Los Angeles. He is doing
29:39
two shows in Toronto at the
29:41
comedy bar on the Danforth July
29:43
5th and July 6th Check
29:45
it out. You can find out more on the comedy
29:48
bar Website when we
29:50
come back We'll find out about what
29:52
it was like writing behind the scenes
29:54
on arrested development and appearing on the
29:56
Marron show and all sorts of other
29:58
Things from my guest Gareth Reynolds.
30:00
Stay with me. Lots more to come. News
30:09
Talk Tonight continues on
30:11
the iHeartRadio Talk Network. Welcome
30:14
back everybody. I'm Richard Krause sitting in for
30:16
Jim Richards. My pleasure to
30:18
welcome Gareth Reynolds to
30:20
the broadcast tonight. And I mean
30:22
it's such a varied and interesting
30:24
resume that I'm looking at here.
30:27
You'll be able to see Gareth do stand
30:29
up at the Comedy Bar in Toronto on
30:32
the Danforth on July 5th and 6th. One
30:35
show on July 5th. Two shows on
30:37
July 6th. Find out more at the
30:39
Comedy Bar website. But when I look
30:41
at this, this kind
30:43
of like extensive
30:46
and really interesting resume,
30:48
I don't even really know where to start.
30:50
Gareth has written on Arrested Development on
30:53
Hoops for Netflix as well as You're
30:55
the Worst on FX I'm Sorry for
30:57
True TV. His
30:59
stand up debut album Riddled with Disease that
31:01
came out in 2019 just
31:04
before everything turned crappy in the world.
31:06
Reach number one on the Billboard charts
31:08
that week. And there's
31:10
so much more. So welcome
31:12
back to the show. Gareth, nice to have you. Thank
31:15
you. So tell me a
31:17
little bit about being a writer on
31:20
a show like Arrested Development because I
31:22
think that writing stand up for yourself
31:25
and then being funny on a television
31:27
show when you're writing for characters pre
31:29
established are two very different things.
31:31
Is it a different muscle for you? Yeah,
31:35
it definitely it kind of goes more a
31:37
little more in the improv direction in a
31:39
way because you know, you're kind of you're
31:42
kind of delivering the dialogue like how
31:45
would people react to those things. But
31:48
on a show like Arrested Development or even
31:51
on You're the Worst when the characters are
31:53
so well defined like on Arrested Development. I
31:55
mean, you know, when I was
31:57
in the writer's room with mature with the creator
31:59
and he was start doing impressions
32:01
of the characters, you just start
32:04
eventually doing that yourself. You
32:07
know, kind of when you're pitching dialogue or you're pitching
32:09
jokes. But
32:11
it is. It's a totally different muscle. It's, and again,
32:13
goes back to improv a little bit more because it's
32:15
a much more collaborative thing. You
32:18
know, you're there with a number of people and, you
32:21
know, you get very good at sort of
32:23
best idea wins and celebrating, you know, just
32:26
the best idea or the best joke. So
32:29
writing on Arrested Development was such a trip because,
32:32
you know, I mean, I, that show was, I
32:34
mean, just to me, one of the greatest shows of all time
32:36
and one of the funniest shows of all time. And then
32:39
to be, you know, they're doing
32:41
it was, was so crazy. It's
32:43
a gold standard kind of show. And
32:46
you know, people say, Oh, it was, it
32:48
wasn't quite as popular as it might have
32:50
been. It doesn't matter. In
32:52
reruns, you watch that thing and there's
32:54
gold in every single episode. Yeah,
32:57
I think to some extent they
33:00
even acknowledged that the show was
33:02
so packed that it
33:04
almost just was too funny at times. You
33:07
know, I mean, it's definitely,
33:09
I mean, the fan base is enormous
33:11
and, you know, and writing on that
33:13
show really changed my writing career because,
33:16
you know, that was not only a show
33:18
that everyone recognized, it was a show that
33:20
in every writers meeting after that to work
33:22
on a show, you know, people wanted to
33:24
talk about Arrested Development. So, you know, it's
33:26
kind of a good touch point, but, but
33:29
yeah, no, it, it, it really was it
33:31
like it, you know, I
33:34
wouldn't say struggled, but it was always
33:36
battling to find an audience consistently. But
33:38
when you go back and watch it
33:40
now, you go, there's just, I
33:42
don't know if there's ever been a show that
33:45
is that full of that many good jokes. You
33:48
also do a really cool podcast called
33:50
The Dollop. And
33:52
is this right? Because this is a big
33:54
number. You do it with
33:56
Dave Anthony and it gets 5 million
33:59
down. unloads every month? Well
34:02
that number was back in
34:04
the day. It does not get that
34:07
many anymore but it's still it you
34:10
know it has we just did our
34:12
tenth year of the
34:14
show and so you know we've gone
34:16
through many ups and downs with the
34:18
show as far as you
34:20
know the way in the ten years we've been
34:23
doing the show the way they've started to count
34:25
numbers has become different and the market obviously has
34:28
changed dramatically but it still is a
34:30
show that most podcast
34:32
most you know hardcore podcast
34:34
fans have heard of
34:37
the dollop and you know we've been
34:39
doing we like I said we just
34:42
did our 10th anniversary show like two
34:44
months ago. Yeah that would mean
34:46
crazy really that you started before everybody
34:48
else had podcast right I mean there's
34:50
something like seven hundred thousand podcasts in
34:52
the world right now ten years ago
34:54
it was a much smaller market
34:57
right? Totally it you know
35:00
our show the the ruse of our show
35:02
is that I know
35:04
nothing about history and the guy
35:06
who I do the show with knows a ton
35:08
about history and he sort of prepares a lesson
35:10
each week and he kind of teaches me a
35:12
crazy story from mostly American history and
35:15
I just kind of react to it and riff on it
35:17
and things like that and that format
35:19
was kind of again I would never be
35:21
like we've made that but if we we
35:23
were not copying anything we just were lucky
35:25
that I knew nothing about history he knew
35:27
a lot about history I mean
35:30
I on the show one time was like I
35:32
was like well when Benjamin Franklin was a president
35:34
and he was like whoa whoa whoa nobody no
35:36
you know like what he's on 100
35:40
so but that format has kind of been replicated
35:42
in many you know there's sports versions of
35:44
it there's murder versions that like there's all
35:46
these true crime versions of it but
35:49
yeah we were really there like you know Marin
35:51
beat us to the punch and a few others
35:53
but you know we got in you know
35:56
before it became the thing and and
35:58
I think that really helped of the
36:00
show as well as the quality of the show but
36:02
that definitely helps. 10 years is
36:04
a long haul for for any show,
36:06
a podcast or anything. So congratulations on
36:08
that. Well, thank you. Yeah,
36:11
it's crazy. We we're we find it crazy.
36:13
The shows that you're doing in Toronto are
36:15
your Toronto debut. Are they your Canadian debut
36:18
as well? No,
36:20
you know, I was in Vancouver, maybe
36:23
three years ago. I
36:27
was working on my special that I recorded called
36:29
England Weed and the Rest, which is it's a
36:31
lot that you will never guess what it's about.
36:34
And, and so
36:36
I did I did some dates in
36:39
Vancouver, but this will be my first
36:41
headlining gig in Toronto. Absolutely.
36:43
And by the way, I have to
36:45
say I, I love to
36:47
run such a Toronto fan. I
36:50
just I remember the first I went there when I was
36:52
18 for the first time and I was like, this is
36:54
my town. Well, it's gonna be hot
36:56
when you're here. So just get ready for that. Terrible
37:00
news. So tell me a little
37:03
bit then about being on the road, you talked
37:05
about honing and fine tuning
37:07
jokes, finding the rhythm, but audiences
37:09
are different, right? And particularly perhaps
37:11
between the US and Canada and
37:13
whatever other country you may, I
37:15
know England is like a blood
37:17
sport almost doing stand up over
37:19
there. But tell me a
37:22
little bit about audiences. Do they really differ
37:24
from city to city? You
37:27
know, they they do. I mean, there's so
37:29
many things that kind of are
37:31
our impactful on a show. What time does it
37:33
start? What day of the week it is? You
37:37
know what? Yeah, what city you're in?
37:40
There's definitely jokes that play stronger in
37:42
certain places. And there's definitely, you know,
37:45
material that you're sort of like, well,
37:47
maybe that won't work here. But, you
37:50
know, for the most part, I don't really pay
37:53
as much attention to that. If I
37:55
want to work on something, or I
37:57
want to try something, you know, I'll
37:59
have the kind of the killer slot
38:01
in it in to make sure that
38:03
there's enough that makes people enjoy the
38:05
show. And then outside of that, I
38:07
really am just trying to either find
38:09
the rhythm of your new joke or
38:11
make a new joke better or chatting
38:13
with the crowd for some clips online
38:15
or whatever it is. I
38:18
try to make sure that I'm getting
38:20
the ones for me to help me get a
38:22
joke closer to done and then getting ones that
38:24
I know people will like. You
38:27
know, I always try to close strong, open strong and then the
38:29
middle gets to be a bit of a weird
38:31
jelly filling at times. That's when you haul
38:33
out Goldilocks and the three bears in French
38:36
for the Canadian audience. Gary, thanks so much
38:38
for this. It's when
38:40
Bob Dylan's playing the new stuff. Yeah, that's right. That's
38:43
right. Gary, thanks so much for this.
38:45
I appreciate it. I appreciate
38:47
it too. Thank you very much for having me on.
38:49
And yeah, remember, come to those shows in Toronto, one
38:52
will be a nightmare. As
38:54
Gareth Reynolds find up at the Comedy Bar
38:56
on the Danforth in Toronto, July 5th and
38:59
6th. Stay with me. Lots
39:01
more to come on News Talk
39:05
tonight. Is it Friday yet? That's part of my job
39:07
here as host is to tell you what day of
39:09
the week it is. My favorite day of the week
39:11
is Friday. What day is today? Friday.
39:13
You know what that means? I want to be
39:15
a DJ. You do? Let's
39:17
go to work. The boss. It's Friday.
39:19
Of course. It's freaking Friday. It is
39:22
Friday. Everybody got big plans for the
39:24
weekend? A fantastic show. Let's get to
39:26
it. Showtime. This is
39:28
News Talk tonight on the iHeartRadio
39:30
Talk Network. Welcome back everybody. I'm
39:32
Richard Krause sitting in for Jim
39:34
Richards. Jim will be back on
39:36
Monday. It's that time in the
39:39
show when we talk about news
39:41
that maybe isn't at the top of
39:43
the news cycle. It's slow
39:45
news day with producer Tony. Tony, what
39:47
is the first story? Let's start with
39:49
the there I ruined it guy. You've
39:51
heard his music before. He's made another
39:53
song. This time it features
39:55
the word baby from several hit songs.
39:58
Enjoy it baby. Baby
40:00
Baby Baby Baby Baby Baby
40:03
Baby Baby Baby Baby Baby
40:05
Baby Baby Baby Baby Baby
40:07
Baby Baby Baby Baby... Now
40:25
I don't know if that's news but it's
40:28
a catchy song. It is catchy baby. There
40:30
you go. A manure
40:32
truck rolled over in a Connecticut
40:34
neighborhood on Tuesday. Sounds like a
40:36
smelly one. After an accident at
40:38
an intersection it sent manure everywhere.
40:41
Here is Ann Baddard talking about
40:43
how it affected her house and
40:45
yard. We can guess. I
40:48
heard bang, like bang, bang. Loud
40:50
metal. The truck was upside down
40:52
and it finally came to a
40:54
stop after it hit my neighbor's
40:56
car. Literally a waterfall of brown.
40:59
All of a sudden we see
41:01
the sewer come out of the truck
41:04
and it just flooded down our property.
41:06
Everybody kept asking, you know, is it
41:08
really bad? Does it foul? And I'm
41:10
like, no, seriously, the windows were open.
41:15
That is really bad news for that person.
41:18
I was going to try and find a
41:20
way to make a joke with a word
41:22
that I can't say on the radio. But
41:24
I'm not going to do that because I'm
41:26
better than that. Well, I'm going to use
41:28
the word stinky news. Stinky news right there.
41:31
A California family had a bear
41:34
sneak into their minivan and wreck
41:36
the vehicle while they were camping.
41:38
That's all. Here is the owner
41:40
of the vehicle, Eric Edens,
41:42
talking about what he witnessed.
41:45
And I noticed there was something moving in the
41:47
car and asking a silhouette to the bear through
41:49
the back windows. Like, oh, we can't. There's a
41:51
bear in our car. And he was trapped in
41:53
there and probably start freaking out and start tearing
41:55
the place apart beyond all the damage to do
41:57
to death. That's causing destroying the car. He
42:00
also defecated and urinated in the car. So
42:02
it stinks in there. I'm sensing
42:04
a theme, uh, in the, uh, new stories
42:06
that you're presenting today, Tony. Uh, just a
42:08
little poopy there, but, uh, yeah, I mean,
42:11
Hey, at least it was just the
42:13
minivan and not the family. They usually,
42:15
when you're camping, go after your food.
42:17
Yeah. Yeah. Well, I grew up in
42:20
a rural kind of place and there were,
42:22
like, we were, you know, taught if you
42:24
see a bear and here's the thing. I
42:26
can't remember which is which,
42:29
but there's brown bears and there's black bears. And
42:31
I can't remember one you're supposed to run and
42:33
the other one you're just supposed to stand very
42:35
still. Trouble is I can't remember what it was.
42:37
I also was told that if you have a
42:39
package of matches on you, you like the matches
42:41
and you throw them behind you as you run
42:43
away because they don't like the smell of sulfur.
42:45
But do not take that advice, uh, for
42:47
real. Cause I don't know whether it's true or not.
42:50
I've never done it. Yeah. Brown, black,
42:52
orange, yellow. I don't care what
42:54
the color of that bear is.
42:56
I'm running. Yeah. I'm running a
42:58
candidate for the County board in
43:00
Minnesota was jailed on assault charges
43:03
after throwing a live tarantula during
43:05
an argument with a renter. Here
43:07
is Marissa Christina Simonetti defending herself
43:09
against the tarantula or against the
43:12
guy. Yeah. Fifth degree
43:14
assault means someone only has to feel
43:16
fear or claim that they feel afraid
43:18
of bodily harm. So I never hit
43:20
anybody. I never touched anybody. Hmm.
43:24
Hmm. I didn't know that there was a
43:27
fifth degree assault that just meant that you,
43:29
if you felt fearful, Yes. This is a
43:32
us story by the way. So we don't
43:34
know if the law applies here, but imagine
43:37
like defending yourself against
43:39
charges for throwing spiders.
43:42
Yeah. I, yeah. I'm
43:45
not sure that that doesn't look
43:47
great on a resume. You know, if you're
43:49
trying to get a job at McDonald's, you're like, wherever
43:51
you've been, well, I was in jail for a little
43:53
while. Cause I threw spiders at people. Or for that
43:55
matter, the County board in Minnesota,
43:57
a fortune teller in Florida is
44:00
charges for robbing a
44:02
client at gunpoint. Police
44:05
say she's been using her services as
44:07
a ruse to get into people's homes
44:09
and steal cash and jewelry.
44:11
Here is one of the victims, Judith
44:14
Ramirez, talking about what
44:17
Carola Mitchell did to
44:19
them. She said something
44:21
about that she could read her hand,
44:23
so I was just like I'm not interested in that.
44:26
So she started reading my forehead. I was just like
44:28
okay she told her that if
44:30
she doesn't give you the money she was
44:32
gonna hurt us too my baby
44:35
and I and then she's like
44:37
okay so she gave her the money. So
44:40
she's gonna read your
44:42
forehead? Yes. That's the point.
44:44
She's gonna come into your home Richard
44:47
and she's gonna say I'm gonna read you your future
44:49
and I'm gonna read it from
44:52
your forehead but can you tell
44:54
me where the money is first? I would be you
44:57
know what my forehead is telling you? Something
45:01
else I can't say on the radio. Something
45:03
else. I get a theme here Richard today
45:06
with the things you can't say on the
45:08
radio. A Missouri woman
45:10
named Michelle Y. Peters is
45:13
accused of attempting to poison
45:15
her husband by spiking his
45:17
Mountain Dew with Roundup. That's
45:19
the weed killer stuff. Here
45:21
is Jackie Sproat who owns
45:23
a business next to the
45:25
accused and County Sheriff David
45:28
Millsap talking about this crime.
45:30
Wow that's all I can
45:32
say. I just recently found out
45:34
that she was working next door to me
45:36
but that doesn't make a difference. Is there
45:38
more to the story? Yes there is and
45:41
all that comes out in court. I just hope
45:44
things work out the way it's supposed to through
45:46
the judicial system. I
45:48
just hope things work out. I would if
45:50
I was that guy I would never drink
45:52
anything again. If you couldn't taste that
45:55
there was like bug killer in your
45:57
Mountain Dew you've got dead taste buds.
45:59
Right. At least I hope his lawn
46:01
is nice and green now, right? Okay,
46:04
there we go. TikTokers are promoting rice
46:06
zempic, a concoction of rice, water,
46:09
and lime juice as a
46:11
cheap alternative to medications like
46:13
Ozempic. Here is one of the
46:16
TikTokers that claimed she lost seven
46:18
pounds in a week using
46:21
this concoction. So
46:23
I lost 7.2 pounds in seven days.
46:25
Other benefits I've experienced throughout the week
46:28
are a curve to my appetite, a
46:30
decrease in my cravings for sweet things,
46:32
higher energy levels throughout the day, and
46:35
less bloating. The thing
46:37
about this, because you hear these fad diets all
46:39
the time, and it's like, oh, yeah, I totally
46:41
lost 20 pounds, you know,
46:43
only eating bubble gum, you know, or
46:45
whatever it is. But the thing is,
46:48
wait two weeks from there and
46:50
then see what happens. Right. So
46:53
you put that seven pounds right back on. Do you
46:55
get so sick of eating rice and lime that you
46:57
can't even look at rice ever again for the rest
46:59
of your life? Well, that's probably the trick. You don't
47:01
want to eat the rice and lime again, so you
47:03
just don't eat anything and lose weight. There you go.
47:06
The host of The Price Is Right,
47:08
Drew Carey, revealed in a recent interview
47:11
that there have been contestants on the
47:13
show that were under the
47:15
influence. Now, I'm not gonna say that
47:17
I've ever watched the show like that.
47:19
He said he smelled booze on their
47:21
breath, that some have eaten gummies before
47:23
the show, and one guy was high
47:26
on mushrooms. That clip is on YouTube, and here
47:28
it is. Big Papa hat, Dolly
47:31
Parton shirt, bit of dollar. I'm
47:34
a mystery, dude. Raptor and enigma, get
47:36
used to it. Joshua,
47:40
I can't wait to hear, what'd he do for
47:42
a living? I'm a skateboard rabbi. You
47:47
know what? I'll take it. Skateboard
47:51
rabbi. That
47:55
guy should just win. You should just give him the
47:57
prize for having the... coolest
48:00
job or the most unusual job.
48:03
Yeah, what is a skateboard? I guess they... I
48:05
don't know. I mean, it's like a mobile
48:07
rabbi, I think. You can get
48:09
quickly from one place to another. Listen,
48:11
I do not disbelieve for a
48:14
minute that people on the Price is
48:16
Right have been drinking or doing edibles.
48:18
Under the influence of something. Under the
48:20
influence. Because they are so
48:22
hyped up so often that you think, okay, there's
48:24
got to be something unusual there. And
48:26
I know that from my experience
48:28
in television that there was once a television
48:30
show done here in Toronto while I was
48:33
working in a bar that they used to
48:35
bring every... all the guests to beforehand,
48:37
get them all juiced up and sloppy
48:39
and then send them back to make
48:41
TV because it was better if the
48:43
people were kind of hammered. Tony,
48:46
thanks a lot for this. Oh, thank you. That
48:49
was Slow News Day with producer Tony having
48:51
a look at some of the stories that
48:53
didn't make it to the top of the
48:55
news carousel. I'm Richard Krause, sitting in for
48:57
Jim Richards. Jim will be back on News
48:59
Talk tonight on Monday. Stay with me, more
49:01
to come.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More