Podchaser Logo
Home
Friday June 28 Hour 3 – Liberals Under Seige

Friday June 28 Hour 3 – Liberals Under Seige

Released Saturday, 29th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Friday June 28 Hour 3 – Liberals Under Seige

Friday June 28 Hour 3 – Liberals Under Seige

Friday June 28 Hour 3 – Liberals Under Seige

Friday June 28 Hour 3 – Liberals Under Seige

Saturday, 29th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:05

This is News Talk Tonight

0:07

on the iHeartRadio Talk Network.

0:11

Welcome back everybody. I'm Richard Krause sitting in for

0:13

the great Jim Richards. He will be back in

0:15

the big chair on Monday. It's

0:18

time to have a look at what's going on in Ottawa.

0:20

It was the week that was with

0:23

Mike Le Couture. Listen,

0:25

Mike, all week we've

0:28

been talking about the by-election in St.

0:30

Paul's in Toronto. And I've been hosting

0:32

this national show. And at first I

0:34

didn't think we should be talking about

0:37

this by-election in this city that I'm

0:39

sitting in because we're heard across the

0:41

country and kind of who cares, but

0:44

this has a seismic effect across the

0:46

country. We've had a riding

0:49

that was liberal for 25

0:51

years, get flipped over to

0:53

Conservative. And tell me

0:55

what you think the fallout from that.

0:57

How significant is this? Yeah, I think

0:59

people need to understand what Fortress 416

1:01

is. 416

1:04

obviously being the area code of Toronto.

1:06

The fact that the Liberals were able

1:09

to keep that area red for so

1:11

long and deeply red, right? I mean,

1:13

let's think about Carolyn Bennett when she

1:16

won this in the last election. She

1:18

had, you know, a significant

1:20

lead, you know, over 20 point lead

1:22

over... I think it was 24 points.

1:24

That was the flip in this one,

1:26

right? So the fact that it was

1:28

that large and then flipped and yes,

1:30

it wasn't a huge margin that the

1:32

Conservatives won by, but that's the issue,

1:34

right? You said it perfectly there, a

1:36

24 point flip for

1:39

this by-election. This is not

1:42

a crack in Fortress, you know,

1:44

Fortress Toronto and GTA. This

1:46

is a serious issue now for

1:48

the Liberals. You know, a

1:50

lot of people have been saying if they can

1:52

lose this, then which other riding really is safe?

1:55

You think of some of those ones on the

1:57

island of Montreal, you think of

1:59

a lot of other... that are now in

2:01

play. I've heard from the NDP saying, hey

2:03

look this is good news for us as

2:05

well, but they didn't do well in that

2:07

by-election. But for Canadians to understand this, this

2:10

is something that the Liberal government now needs

2:12

to look at. The Prime Minister, he is

2:14

not gonna be, you know,

2:16

spending Canada Day with fireworks

2:19

and and popping champagne here. They are

2:21

going to be in a serious mode

2:23

right now looking at, okay what do

2:25

we do now? Because if this one

2:27

goes, then what else happens? And yes,

2:29

we are not going to have a

2:31

general election any time soon, but there

2:33

are other by-elections that are coming up

2:35

across this country and those will

2:37

be other barometers for this government to look

2:40

at and to get an idea of how

2:42

people feel about them, but also about Justin

2:44

Trudeau. And I think that that's a key

2:46

thing. People going into this said this is

2:48

gonna be a referendum not only on the

2:50

Liberal government but on Justin Trudeau. And

2:52

that level of dissatisfaction with him and

2:54

people who have this anger towards him

2:56

that is really palpable now. I mean

2:59

we had seen it in a lot

3:01

of the reporting, my colleague Judy Trinh,

3:03

going to the riding of Toronto St.

3:05

Paul's and people in there saying, love

3:07

Leslie Church, who was the candidate there,

3:10

hate Justin Trudeau. And was

3:12

that what, you know, was that their

3:14

undoing? And I think that is something

3:16

that a lot of people inside the

3:18

Liberal Party are having hard conversations about

3:20

right now. Do you

3:22

think that it is part and parcel?

3:24

I mean I've never seen this kind

3:27

of organized hate against almost any politician,

3:29

let alone a Prime Minister with the

3:31

flags and you know the the bumper

3:33

stickers and everything. I mean there have

3:35

been tastes of it here and there

3:37

over the last, you know, number

3:40

of decades, but this is unlike anything

3:42

I've ever seen before. So there's definitely

3:44

that faction, but do you think that

3:46

part of it could be that he's

3:49

simply, he's been the Liberal leader for

3:51

11 years and people tire

3:54

of the same old in politics after

3:56

that amount of time? Yeah

3:58

they really do and you know we saw it with our

4:00

Harper government when Harper was in

4:02

the last few months of his mandate

4:04

and there was a movement

4:08

that you could hear that people didn't

4:10

like Harper. They wanted him gone. I

4:12

think there was a really funny

4:14

sort of anecdote about this. Rona Ambrose who

4:16

was the interim leader at the time at

4:19

the press gallery dinner which is now on the

4:21

record so you can even look this up. She

4:24

had given a speech and she had said

4:26

we're trying out some new slogans for the

4:28

conservative party and one of them was the

4:30

conservative party don't worry the bad man

4:32

is gone. That was

4:34

the sort of level that people were feeling at

4:36

the time in terms of

4:39

their feelings towards Stephen Harper. This

4:41

is like that on steroids and

4:44

it is clear now yes during

4:47

that so-called freedom convoy that

4:49

came and occupied Parliament Hill you saw

4:51

the flags you saw the anger that

4:54

hasn't gone away. It's just not on Parliament

4:56

Hill on Wellington Street anymore. You're seeing it

4:58

around Ottawa you're seeing it around everybody's

5:00

hometown. He's at the bumper stickers that

5:03

you know have expletive Trudeau on it

5:06

and that type of thing and that

5:08

type of sentiment is out there and

5:10

again it comes back to you know

5:12

this was a party that was

5:14

rebuilt around Justin Trudeau. Let's

5:16

not forget that he rescued

5:19

them from third place in

5:21

2015. It has been a

5:23

party that became the Trudeau Liberals that really

5:25

is built around him at this point. So

5:27

there is a bit of a division within

5:29

caucus right now. Some people that say he

5:31

got us here do we need to let

5:33

him go out on his terms and how

5:36

he wants to do it and others who

5:38

are sitting there going you know what it's

5:40

time for him to go or else we're

5:42

all going down. You know there

5:44

is some interesting polling out there as

5:46

well Richard that some people wonder whether

5:48

or not if he hands it over

5:50

to someone else. Will this be a

5:52

repeat of 93 where Mulroney handed it

5:54

to Kim Campbell. They went down to

5:56

two seats as the Progressive Conservatives or

5:59

is it going to be that

6:01

thing where Justin Trudeau hangs on,

6:04

stays around, saves a few

6:06

of these riotings that maybe they think they can

6:08

hold on to with Justin Trudeau as the leader,

6:11

and then walks off and then has

6:13

a clean slate for the new leader.

6:15

This is all speculation, this is all

6:17

the chatter, but it certainly is not

6:19

going to be a quiet summer in

6:21

terms of politics. No, it was a

6:23

summer that I thought that perhaps, you

6:25

know, Trudeau and the Liberals would look

6:27

at rebuilding, look at, you know, trying

6:29

to make some changes, but now it

6:31

just feels like they're under siege. I'm

6:33

in conversation with Mike Locator, senior political

6:36

correspondent, CTV News Channel.

6:39

So, there's a Nanos poll that

6:41

says that, well, just what I just

6:43

said, Trudeau Liberals feel under siege across

6:45

the country. So, it's not just in

6:47

St. Paul's in Toronto. That

6:49

was a, I wouldn't say

6:52

fairly easy flip from Liberal to Conservative,

6:54

but it took some work. But

6:56

it looks like, you know, Nanos

6:58

is projecting that, you know, this is just

7:00

the first of many. I mean, is there

7:03

any way, any way of turning

7:05

this around short of changing

7:07

up the leaders or turning back time

7:09

somehow with a big magical mystical machine

7:11

that can make everything better for Justin

7:13

Trudeau? Yeah, the question is, is it

7:15

the politician at the head of the

7:17

party or is it the policy that

7:19

the party continues to push out there?

7:21

And if you're not going to change,

7:23

the leader will then do you look

7:25

to some of what you have in

7:27

the window. A lot of people have

7:29

been asking the question, do they reverse

7:31

course on the, you

7:34

know, that new tax that of course Pierre Poliev has

7:36

been pushing out there and everything

7:38

around the capital gains? That is something

7:40

that the Conservatives have dined

7:42

out on recently. Do they U-turn on

7:45

that one? Even though you've had Christopher

7:47

Freeland, the Deputy Prime Minister and Finance

7:49

Minister say this will only affect 0.13%

7:51

of the population in Canada. And they

7:53

are just

7:56

trying to, you know, basically tax the

7:58

people who would be benefiting the most.

8:00

off of their capital gains. The other

8:02

one that you have to wonder about

8:04

is the carbon tax. You have had

8:06

Pierre Poliev dining out

8:09

on this literally and figuratively. He

8:11

has been going around with this

8:13

acts the tax type of slogan

8:15

and it is riling up crowds

8:18

and really the liberals have had

8:20

a failure to try and communicate

8:22

to Canadians why it's so important,

8:24

why they need to hold on

8:27

to it. Will they try at

8:29

some point not to backtrack on it but certainly

8:31

there was a carve out for Atlantic

8:34

Canadians. Will they try and do

8:36

something else with that? Do they

8:38

try and move a little bit

8:40

on that to ease that type

8:42

of pressure or are they just

8:44

abandoning such a cornerstone of their

8:46

policy that it would be the

8:48

liberals are diluting everything that they've

8:50

done just to remain in power

8:53

and certainly the Conservatives are probably waiting and waiting

8:55

to pounce because if they do change on the

8:57

carbon tax then they're going to say well these

8:59

guys just want to stay in power. They don't

9:01

care. They're not standing for anything so they'll fall

9:03

for anything. They'll fall for everything. So

9:06

I think that's one of the questions that

9:08

a lot of people are also looking at

9:11

Richard. If Justin Trudeau doesn't go then which

9:13

one of his policies may he try and

9:15

tinker with or is it a cabinet shuffle?

9:17

Is it a cabinet tinkering? Who knows? These

9:19

are all the questions that I think a

9:22

lot of people are wondering and you know

9:24

when will this happen? Will

9:26

he try and do something in some sort of

9:28

a reset in the next couple of weeks? If

9:30

it's not him taking that proverbial walk in the

9:32

sand or the snow or is

9:35

it a paddle in his canoe? Who

9:37

knows at this point but something clearly has to

9:39

change because of all those polls that we're seeing

9:41

from Nick Nanos and others. That's

9:44

Mike Luchatore. We're talking with him. He

9:46

is the senior political correspondent for CTV

9:48

News Channel. When we come back we're

9:50

going to talk about how some liberal

9:52

insiders worried that they're seen as too

9:54

woke under Justin Trudeau. Stay with us.

10:04

You're listening to News Talk

10:06

Tonight on the iHeartRadio Talk

10:08

Network. Welcome back everybody.

10:10

I'm Richard Krause sitting in for Jim

10:12

Richards. Jim will be back on Monday

10:15

sitting in the big chair bringing with

10:17

him his own unique style of vocalese.

10:19

I know you're all looking forward to

10:21

having him back. Right

10:23

now though, it's the week that

10:25

was with Mike LeCateur, the senior

10:27

political correspondent of CTV News Channel.

10:31

And Mike, a story kind of grabbed my eye

10:33

here and I thought I'd run this past you

10:35

to see what you thought. Some

10:37

liberal insiders worry that they're seen

10:39

as too woke under Justin Trudeau

10:41

and that it may be too

10:43

late for him to go. There's

10:46

a guy called Marcus Palowowski, a

10:48

liberal MP from Northern Ontario, and

10:50

he says that part of the

10:52

problem is public perception, which he

10:54

thinks is wrong, that the party

10:57

is connected with a closed-minded political

10:59

correctness that prioritizes identity politics over

11:01

universal human values. And he goes

11:03

on to say

11:06

that, you know, this

11:09

type of politics includes cancel culture in

11:11

which people are shamed for expressing certain

11:13

opinions, blah, blah, blah, and he's connecting

11:15

it back to people's perceptions

11:17

of the liberal party. Is

11:19

this something you think that is accurate? I

11:22

mean, I think that's for a certain percentage

11:25

of the population, the people with the

11:27

flags and the bumper stickers,

11:29

I think this is probably at the heart

11:31

of their issue. It really is. And,

11:34

you know, we've seen this from either, you

11:36

know, the far right that have said

11:38

this or other people that have sometimes

11:40

been a little more conservative leaning. Interesting

11:43

that we're seeing this from former liberals who

11:45

are coming out and saying this as well.

11:48

You know, and whether or not those are sort of

11:51

the so-called blue liberals who are

11:53

maybe a little more centrist. But, you know,

11:55

the calls for this party to maybe slide

11:57

a little more to the political center as

11:59

opposed to how it's drifted to the left.

12:01

We remember 2015, you know,

12:04

a lot of people had said

12:06

that look, the Liberals under Justin

12:08

Trudeau essentially outflanked the NDP under

12:10

Thomas Mulcair in saying that they

12:12

would spend a lot of money

12:15

and not have balanced budgets and then

12:17

really sort of digging in to

12:19

that sort of left side

12:21

of the political landscape. And you

12:24

know, a number of Liberals have

12:26

said that maybe they've drifted too

12:28

far there, maybe they need somebody

12:30

to bring it back to the centre. And

12:33

I always find it interesting, Richard, you know,

12:35

when people say too woke and the cancel

12:37

culture because you sort of have to sit

12:39

back and go, well, what do you mean

12:41

about that? Like, what is that about? Is

12:43

that something that when

12:45

you think about woke, when you think about cancel

12:47

culture, well, you know, the fact that we now

12:49

know that some of our

12:51

former Prime Ministers or former leaders

12:53

of this country had done pretty

12:55

bad things in the past to

12:58

different segments of the population. You're thinking

13:01

about, you know, Indigenous communities and

13:04

some of that sort of thing. Is that

13:06

too woke? Is that cancel culture when we

13:08

decide that we're gonna put an extra plaque

13:10

next to, you know, that of

13:12

a former Prime Minister or that of somebody

13:14

who has been heralded as a Canadian hero

13:17

in the past just to add that context?

13:19

And I think that those are live

13:21

discussions that people continue to have about

13:24

it, but certainly bringing it back to

13:26

the Liberals and the Liberal Party and

13:29

where they've gone. I don't think

13:31

anybody can really doubt, especially when

13:33

you consider that they, in 2022,

13:35

had the supply and confidence agreement

13:38

with the NDP. Now, their policies

13:40

that the Liberals have because of

13:42

that agreement certainly look very socialist.

13:44

They certainly, you know, quack very

13:46

socialist. So are they the socialist

13:48

duck now in, you

13:50

know, in Parliament? And I think

13:53

people rightly now are going to sort of

13:55

mix those two together and they're gonna say,

13:57

well, this was under that Liberal government. So

13:59

if they didn't... believe in that, then

14:01

why would they still, you know, have that policy?

14:04

And I think it's, this is something that

14:06

some liberals, because the liberals are so diverse

14:09

as a party, they're obviously not a monolith

14:11

and, you know, there's a number of people

14:13

in there, like I said, they're either blue

14:15

liberals or a little more red or, you

14:17

know, maybe leaning a little more left as

14:20

well, that Justin Trudeau has sort of created

14:22

with his coalition of

14:24

liberal MPs. So some people may look at

14:26

that and go, well, maybe it's a little

14:28

too left for me. You

14:30

know, whether or not that, you know,

14:33

former MP is going to be somebody

14:35

who would try and re-up again for

14:37

the liberals, unclear, but there has been

14:39

a number of people, and there

14:41

continues to be a number of people who think that

14:43

the liberal party needs to go a little more to

14:46

the center. And what about

14:48

the NDP? I mean, how long do you think

14:50

that this alliance will last? Because it feels to

14:52

me, if we look at the by-election in St.

14:54

Paul's that we were talking about in the last

14:56

segment, the NDP did not fare

14:59

particularly well there. Do you think that they're being

15:01

tarred with the same brush? It's

15:03

interesting you say that, because I had

15:05

conversations with people within the NDP, and

15:08

they have said, well, if anything that

15:10

this election in the

15:13

by-election in Toronto, St. Paul's has shown us,

15:15

is that people are abandoning the liberals and,

15:17

you know, they're looking for another option, and

15:20

we're ready and willing to be that option.

15:22

They were telling me that their internal polling,

15:24

Richard, is showing that they have a

15:27

wider available voter pool than the

15:29

liberals, i.e. more people are looking

15:31

at the NDP as an option.

15:34

I'm not saying that I disagree with them,

15:36

however, I put it to

15:38

them, but what about Toronto St. Paul's? Yeah, we

15:41

didn't see it. You didn't see it there, did

15:43

you? And their answer was, well, you know, that

15:45

was never one of our seats. Well, if you

15:47

want to take the provincial riding map and overlap

15:49

it there, it is their seat.

15:51

So you can't say that the NDP

15:53

is not popular there as well. So

15:56

it's an interesting question. We all

15:58

know that, look. Jagmeet Singh at

16:00

some point between now and October

16:02

2025 when we expect the next

16:04

election to happen, which actually I'll

16:06

correct myself, between now and June

16:08

2025 has to

16:10

distance himself from the liberals. And I say

16:13

June 2025, that is when their supply and

16:15

confidence agreement expires with this liberal party. Between

16:17

now and then, he's got to show some

16:20

distance between himself and the Prime Minister. So

16:22

does he let it expire or

16:24

does he pull out of it sooner and say, I

16:27

am no longer with these losers to quote

16:29

President Biden yesterday because that was thrown around

16:31

quite a bit during the US presidential debate.

16:33

Is he going to say, I'm no longer

16:36

with these guys and we're going to leave

16:38

him in the dust? When

16:40

he does that, unclear, but he has to

16:42

do it at some point to create that

16:44

space. And for people now on the doorstep

16:46

to say, oh, weren't you

16:49

with Justin Trudeau in this quasi

16:51

coalition and propping him up? He

16:53

has to now create this narrative

16:55

that he's no longer going to

16:57

be there with beside the prime

17:00

minister having those same types of

17:02

policies. And whether or not

17:04

he'll be able to punch through and

17:06

convince voters that everything that came out

17:09

of that supply and confidence agreement, pharmacare

17:11

and dental care that they were pushing for,

17:14

whether or not Jagmeet Singh will be able

17:16

to truly put the NDP

17:18

stamp on those policies. That is to be

17:20

determined because I think a lot of Canadians

17:22

right now look at it and go, well,

17:24

I thought that was the Liberals that did

17:26

that. And Jagmeet Singh will have to convince

17:29

everybody, even though he's been saying it a

17:31

lot, that it was because of the NDP

17:33

that those actually got passed. We

17:36

just have a couple of minutes left, but

17:38

I think we should touch on the presidential

17:40

debate of yesterday. Joe Biden appeared at a

17:43

rally in Raleigh this

17:45

afternoon and sounded great. He

17:47

sounded in control, that raspiness

17:49

in his voice. Someone,

17:51

and I can't remember who, said he didn't have

17:53

a frog of his sword. He

17:55

had a whole amphibian farm down there. Could

17:58

barely get the words out. unfocused,

18:00

seemed old, that seemed to

18:03

be erased today by this rally and

18:05

Raleigh that he really stepped up to.

18:07

Um, but do you think it's too

18:09

little too late? I, I have a

18:12

feeling that last night kind of torpedoed

18:14

a lot of people's ideas of voting

18:16

for Joe Biden. Yeah. It,

18:18

you know, whatever cold medication he was

18:20

on, because the Democrats have said that

18:22

he had a cold, I would love

18:24

some of that stuff because if it

18:27

could get rid of whatever he had

18:29

last night in 24 hours, they need

18:31

to market that. I mean, seriously, no,

18:33

Richard, I think after what we saw

18:35

last night, no matter what anybody sees

18:37

from here on out that the, the,

18:40

the die is cast. People are looking

18:42

at Joe Biden now and saying, okay,

18:44

I think it's time to go. The

18:46

question is kind of like Justin Trudeau.

18:48

Where does the call come from and

18:51

who can actually convince him to walk

18:53

away from this? I mean, you have

18:55

to wonder whether or not there is

18:57

the time according to the Democratic, uh,

18:59

party and what they're able to do.

19:02

This is before the convention where they were supposed

19:04

to, you know, officially nominate

19:06

him. It's possible, but here's the

19:08

question that I think a lot

19:10

of people want, uh, need to

19:13

understand, right? So yes, their

19:15

election is in November. That's not a

19:17

lot of time between now and then

19:19

to bring in somebody new and to

19:21

introduce them to the rest of the

19:23

United States of America so that the

19:25

Democrats can say, this is our new

19:27

person and this is the person that

19:29

you should vote for. You

19:32

know, in politics, obviously a day is a long

19:34

time. A week is forever. And of course a

19:36

month is an eternity, but in the minds of

19:38

voters, they're going to have to get to know

19:40

somebody and they're going to have to have the

19:43

Democratic party rally behind this new

19:45

person. Very, very quick. Mike, we

19:47

have to leave it there. Thanks so much

19:49

for this. That was the week that was

19:51

with Mike Luckett or the senior political correspondent

19:53

of CTV news channel. I'm Richard Krause sitting

19:55

in for Jim Richards. Stay with me. Lots

19:57

more show to come. one

24:00

show on the fifth, two shows on the

24:02

sixth. Check out Comedy

24:04

Bar's website for more information and

24:08

those promised to be great shows. And

24:11

like you said, two are gonna be

24:13

winners and one's gonna be the whammy.

24:16

So you grew up in Milwaukee. Tell me a little

24:18

bit about your first exposure to stand up. Did

24:21

your parents have the George Carlin albums kicking

24:23

around and that's what did it or

24:25

was it from television? What was it? You

24:29

know, it was, there was like

24:31

the peripheral experience which

24:34

where I was, you know, like

24:36

my father had the Steve Martin

24:38

record. But you

24:41

know, my first exposure to the

24:43

first comedian that I just was

24:45

like, I couldn't stop laughing at

24:48

was Louis Anderson. And

24:51

then you know, then it became Robin Williams for me.

24:54

But when I watched Louis Anderson as a kid and he

24:56

would do an impression of his mother, I

24:59

just as a kid thought it was

25:01

the funniest thing I'd ever heard. And

25:04

then I, you know, Milwaukee, I didn't, I

25:07

didn't really start doing stand up until, you

25:10

know, my like late 20s really. I

25:13

spent a lot of time doing improv and they

25:15

had a, there was a good club in Milwaukee

25:17

called Comedy Sports, which is actually based around off

25:19

of theater sports which I think has

25:21

Canadian roots. Yeah, I think it started here. I

25:24

believe so. And like most things,

25:26

we have taken it and the United

25:28

States pretended like it never happened. But

25:33

yeah, so, but my first exposure

25:35

was kind of just watching like,

25:37

you know, Louis Anderson, Robin Williams.

25:40

And then I started to, you know, the

25:42

first time I saw George Carlin to your

25:44

question, I was like, what is actually happening?

25:47

Like there's, you know, some

25:49

really brilliant stuff out there, obviously. Yeah,

25:51

it's kind of the difference between hearing

25:53

Kenny G first and then, you know,

25:55

hearing John Coltrane or something afterwards when

25:58

you hear Carlin. know that Kenny G's

26:00

as good as the kids right. There's

26:03

nowhere to go but up. So tell me

26:05

how goldie goldie locks

26:08

and the three bears in

26:10

French doing that

26:12

influence to your career. Oh,

26:15

that's so funny. You know, what is also funny

26:17

is I'm like, where the hell do I say

26:19

these things? That's great reason. You

26:22

know, I, I often

26:24

say this to people who, you know, when I

26:26

was in college or when I was in high

26:28

school, people didn't know what they wanted to do.

26:31

I was like, I recognize how

26:33

enviable my position was because when I

26:35

first did a production in French

26:38

of goldie locks and the three bears,

26:42

I was the baby bear. And I

26:44

just remember I don't you know, I mean, I don't remember

26:46

what the hell I said, but I, I remember

26:49

getting the first laugh. And

26:51

I remember the electricity that kind

26:53

of went through me in a

26:57

way where I thought, I don't know,

27:00

it fully imprinted on me. And I was seriously,

27:03

you know, six or seven or something

27:05

like that. And it just, it hit

27:07

me. It just really like, I never

27:09

forgot it. I read, you know, it

27:11

is like a muscle memory. I still

27:13

have to this day, which is yet

27:16

it never changed. I knew, I knew

27:18

what I wanted to do. I didn't

27:20

know what it was. But I

27:23

knew the feeling I wanted to chase. Well,

27:25

you may or may not know that French

27:27

is our second language here in Canada. So

27:29

maybe you go on one of those shows

27:32

that isn't going so well. You

27:34

can whip out the baby bear in French and

27:36

see what happens. I think

27:38

that's for the whammy show. That's when

27:40

I'm already circling the drain. I'll just

27:42

dive deeper. Absolutely. So tell

27:46

me then about standing, starting doing stand

27:48

up comedy because improv is different. You're

27:50

not a stand up comedian. It is,

27:52

it's got its own unique set of

27:55

rules. And that was sort of the

27:57

Milwaukee phase of your career. It wasn't

27:59

I don't think until you went to

28:01

Los Angeles that you started doing stand-up

28:03

and Tell me about

28:05

being alone up there because when you

28:08

are doing stand-up, you've got a little

28:10

team around you generally speaking Stand-up

28:13

is a much different thing. Was it terrifying at

28:15

first? Absolutely

28:18

to what you're saying I mean I in Private

28:20

was like, you know you would if if a

28:22

show didn't go well You would have five or

28:25

six people to go like what the hell was

28:27

that to each other? You know, you got you

28:29

kind of lived or died with each other and

28:31

there was there was some comfort in those numbers

28:33

and Not

28:36

only is it alone when

28:38

you're on stage, but when you get off stage if it

28:40

doesn't go well You know, there

28:43

isn't air to other comedians

28:45

where they almost celebrate in your

28:47

bombing in the early phases So

28:50

it's totally opposite and and the truth

28:52

is that it you know, it scared

28:54

me off of stand-up repeatedly There

28:57

I had to get back into

28:59

stand-up, you know four or five times before

29:01

I finally You

29:04

know went through the grind of getting out

29:06

of the bombing phase But

29:08

when you are I mean it is it

29:10

is lonely. I want time bombed at the

29:12

improv and I walked

29:14

off the stage and

29:16

without saying a word to anyone walked

29:18

through the club out the door to

29:21

my car I didn't say another word

29:23

to a person. I just was thinking

29:25

what what just happened? Yeah, the whole

29:27

time and why do I put myself

29:29

very lonely? Yeah. Yeah, I'm speaking Yeah,

29:32

I'm speaking with Gareth Reynolds who is

29:34

on the line From

29:36

Los Angeles. He is doing

29:39

two shows in Toronto at the

29:41

comedy bar on the Danforth July

29:43

5th and July 6th Check

29:45

it out. You can find out more on the comedy

29:48

bar Website when we

29:50

come back We'll find out about what

29:52

it was like writing behind the scenes

29:54

on arrested development and appearing on the

29:56

Marron show and all sorts of other

29:58

Things from my guest Gareth Reynolds.

30:00

Stay with me. Lots more to come. News

30:09

Talk Tonight continues on

30:11

the iHeartRadio Talk Network. Welcome

30:14

back everybody. I'm Richard Krause sitting in for

30:16

Jim Richards. My pleasure to

30:18

welcome Gareth Reynolds to

30:20

the broadcast tonight. And I mean

30:22

it's such a varied and interesting

30:24

resume that I'm looking at here.

30:27

You'll be able to see Gareth do stand

30:29

up at the Comedy Bar in Toronto on

30:32

the Danforth on July 5th and 6th. One

30:35

show on July 5th. Two shows on

30:37

July 6th. Find out more at the

30:39

Comedy Bar website. But when I look

30:41

at this, this kind

30:43

of like extensive

30:46

and really interesting resume,

30:48

I don't even really know where to start.

30:50

Gareth has written on Arrested Development on

30:53

Hoops for Netflix as well as You're

30:55

the Worst on FX I'm Sorry for

30:57

True TV. His

30:59

stand up debut album Riddled with Disease that

31:01

came out in 2019 just

31:04

before everything turned crappy in the world.

31:06

Reach number one on the Billboard charts

31:08

that week. And there's

31:10

so much more. So welcome

31:12

back to the show. Gareth, nice to have you. Thank

31:15

you. So tell me a

31:17

little bit about being a writer on

31:20

a show like Arrested Development because I

31:22

think that writing stand up for yourself

31:25

and then being funny on a television

31:27

show when you're writing for characters pre

31:29

established are two very different things.

31:31

Is it a different muscle for you? Yeah,

31:35

it definitely it kind of goes more a

31:37

little more in the improv direction in a

31:39

way because you know, you're kind of you're

31:42

kind of delivering the dialogue like how

31:45

would people react to those things. But

31:48

on a show like Arrested Development or even

31:51

on You're the Worst when the characters are

31:53

so well defined like on Arrested Development. I

31:55

mean, you know, when I was

31:57

in the writer's room with mature with the creator

31:59

and he was start doing impressions

32:01

of the characters, you just start

32:04

eventually doing that yourself. You

32:07

know, kind of when you're pitching dialogue or you're pitching

32:09

jokes. But

32:11

it is. It's a totally different muscle. It's, and again,

32:13

goes back to improv a little bit more because it's

32:15

a much more collaborative thing. You

32:18

know, you're there with a number of people and, you

32:21

know, you get very good at sort of

32:23

best idea wins and celebrating, you know, just

32:26

the best idea or the best joke. So

32:29

writing on Arrested Development was such a trip because,

32:32

you know, I mean, I, that show was, I

32:34

mean, just to me, one of the greatest shows of all time

32:36

and one of the funniest shows of all time. And then

32:39

to be, you know, they're doing

32:41

it was, was so crazy. It's

32:43

a gold standard kind of show. And

32:46

you know, people say, Oh, it was, it

32:48

wasn't quite as popular as it might have

32:50

been. It doesn't matter. In

32:52

reruns, you watch that thing and there's

32:54

gold in every single episode. Yeah,

32:57

I think to some extent they

33:00

even acknowledged that the show was

33:02

so packed that it

33:04

almost just was too funny at times. You

33:07

know, I mean, it's definitely,

33:09

I mean, the fan base is enormous

33:11

and, you know, and writing on that

33:13

show really changed my writing career because,

33:16

you know, that was not only a show

33:18

that everyone recognized, it was a show that

33:20

in every writers meeting after that to work

33:22

on a show, you know, people wanted to

33:24

talk about Arrested Development. So, you know, it's

33:26

kind of a good touch point, but, but

33:29

yeah, no, it, it, it really was it

33:31

like it, you know, I

33:34

wouldn't say struggled, but it was always

33:36

battling to find an audience consistently. But

33:38

when you go back and watch it

33:40

now, you go, there's just, I

33:42

don't know if there's ever been a show that

33:45

is that full of that many good jokes. You

33:48

also do a really cool podcast called

33:50

The Dollop. And

33:52

is this right? Because this is a big

33:54

number. You do it with

33:56

Dave Anthony and it gets 5 million

33:59

down. unloads every month? Well

34:02

that number was back in

34:04

the day. It does not get that

34:07

many anymore but it's still it you

34:10

know it has we just did our

34:12

tenth year of the

34:14

show and so you know we've gone

34:16

through many ups and downs with the

34:18

show as far as you

34:20

know the way in the ten years we've been

34:23

doing the show the way they've started to count

34:25

numbers has become different and the market obviously has

34:28

changed dramatically but it still is a

34:30

show that most podcast

34:32

most you know hardcore podcast

34:34

fans have heard of

34:37

the dollop and you know we've been

34:39

doing we like I said we just

34:42

did our 10th anniversary show like two

34:44

months ago. Yeah that would mean

34:46

crazy really that you started before everybody

34:48

else had podcast right I mean there's

34:50

something like seven hundred thousand podcasts in

34:52

the world right now ten years ago

34:54

it was a much smaller market

34:57

right? Totally it you know

35:00

our show the the ruse of our show

35:02

is that I know

35:04

nothing about history and the guy

35:06

who I do the show with knows a ton

35:08

about history and he sort of prepares a lesson

35:10

each week and he kind of teaches me a

35:12

crazy story from mostly American history and

35:15

I just kind of react to it and riff on it

35:17

and things like that and that format

35:19

was kind of again I would never be

35:21

like we've made that but if we we

35:23

were not copying anything we just were lucky

35:25

that I knew nothing about history he knew

35:27

a lot about history I mean

35:30

I on the show one time was like I

35:32

was like well when Benjamin Franklin was a president

35:34

and he was like whoa whoa whoa nobody no

35:36

you know like what he's on 100

35:40

so but that format has kind of been replicated

35:42

in many you know there's sports versions of

35:44

it there's murder versions that like there's all

35:46

these true crime versions of it but

35:49

yeah we were really there like you know Marin

35:51

beat us to the punch and a few others

35:53

but you know we got in you know

35:56

before it became the thing and and

35:58

I think that really helped of the

36:00

show as well as the quality of the show but

36:02

that definitely helps. 10 years is

36:04

a long haul for for any show,

36:06

a podcast or anything. So congratulations on

36:08

that. Well, thank you. Yeah,

36:11

it's crazy. We we're we find it crazy.

36:13

The shows that you're doing in Toronto are

36:15

your Toronto debut. Are they your Canadian debut

36:18

as well? No,

36:20

you know, I was in Vancouver, maybe

36:23

three years ago. I

36:27

was working on my special that I recorded called

36:29

England Weed and the Rest, which is it's a

36:31

lot that you will never guess what it's about.

36:34

And, and so

36:36

I did I did some dates in

36:39

Vancouver, but this will be my first

36:41

headlining gig in Toronto. Absolutely.

36:43

And by the way, I have to

36:45

say I, I love to

36:47

run such a Toronto fan. I

36:50

just I remember the first I went there when I was

36:52

18 for the first time and I was like, this is

36:54

my town. Well, it's gonna be hot

36:56

when you're here. So just get ready for that. Terrible

37:00

news. So tell me a little

37:03

bit then about being on the road, you talked

37:05

about honing and fine tuning

37:07

jokes, finding the rhythm, but audiences

37:09

are different, right? And particularly perhaps

37:11

between the US and Canada and

37:13

whatever other country you may, I

37:15

know England is like a blood

37:17

sport almost doing stand up over

37:19

there. But tell me a

37:22

little bit about audiences. Do they really differ

37:24

from city to city? You

37:27

know, they they do. I mean, there's so

37:29

many things that kind of are

37:31

our impactful on a show. What time does it

37:33

start? What day of the week it is? You

37:37

know what? Yeah, what city you're in?

37:40

There's definitely jokes that play stronger in

37:42

certain places. And there's definitely, you know,

37:45

material that you're sort of like, well,

37:47

maybe that won't work here. But, you

37:50

know, for the most part, I don't really pay

37:53

as much attention to that. If I

37:55

want to work on something, or I

37:57

want to try something, you know, I'll

37:59

have the kind of the killer slot

38:01

in it in to make sure that

38:03

there's enough that makes people enjoy the

38:05

show. And then outside of that, I

38:07

really am just trying to either find

38:09

the rhythm of your new joke or

38:11

make a new joke better or chatting

38:13

with the crowd for some clips online

38:15

or whatever it is. I

38:18

try to make sure that I'm getting

38:20

the ones for me to help me get a

38:22

joke closer to done and then getting ones that

38:24

I know people will like. You

38:27

know, I always try to close strong, open strong and then the

38:29

middle gets to be a bit of a weird

38:31

jelly filling at times. That's when you haul

38:33

out Goldilocks and the three bears in French

38:36

for the Canadian audience. Gary, thanks so much

38:38

for this. It's when

38:40

Bob Dylan's playing the new stuff. Yeah, that's right. That's

38:43

right. Gary, thanks so much for this.

38:45

I appreciate it. I appreciate

38:47

it too. Thank you very much for having me on.

38:49

And yeah, remember, come to those shows in Toronto, one

38:52

will be a nightmare. As

38:54

Gareth Reynolds find up at the Comedy Bar

38:56

on the Danforth in Toronto, July 5th and

38:59

6th. Stay with me. Lots

39:01

more to come on News Talk

39:05

tonight. Is it Friday yet? That's part of my job

39:07

here as host is to tell you what day of

39:09

the week it is. My favorite day of the week

39:11

is Friday. What day is today? Friday.

39:13

You know what that means? I want to be

39:15

a DJ. You do? Let's

39:17

go to work. The boss. It's Friday.

39:19

Of course. It's freaking Friday. It is

39:22

Friday. Everybody got big plans for the

39:24

weekend? A fantastic show. Let's get to

39:26

it. Showtime. This is

39:28

News Talk tonight on the iHeartRadio

39:30

Talk Network. Welcome back everybody. I'm

39:32

Richard Krause sitting in for Jim

39:34

Richards. Jim will be back on

39:36

Monday. It's that time in the

39:39

show when we talk about news

39:41

that maybe isn't at the top of

39:43

the news cycle. It's slow

39:45

news day with producer Tony. Tony, what

39:47

is the first story? Let's start with

39:49

the there I ruined it guy. You've

39:51

heard his music before. He's made another

39:53

song. This time it features

39:55

the word baby from several hit songs.

39:58

Enjoy it baby. Baby

40:00

Baby Baby Baby Baby Baby

40:03

Baby Baby Baby Baby Baby

40:05

Baby Baby Baby Baby Baby

40:07

Baby Baby Baby Baby... Now

40:25

I don't know if that's news but it's

40:28

a catchy song. It is catchy baby. There

40:30

you go. A manure

40:32

truck rolled over in a Connecticut

40:34

neighborhood on Tuesday. Sounds like a

40:36

smelly one. After an accident at

40:38

an intersection it sent manure everywhere.

40:41

Here is Ann Baddard talking about

40:43

how it affected her house and

40:45

yard. We can guess. I

40:48

heard bang, like bang, bang. Loud

40:50

metal. The truck was upside down

40:52

and it finally came to a

40:54

stop after it hit my neighbor's

40:56

car. Literally a waterfall of brown.

40:59

All of a sudden we see

41:01

the sewer come out of the truck

41:04

and it just flooded down our property.

41:06

Everybody kept asking, you know, is it

41:08

really bad? Does it foul? And I'm

41:10

like, no, seriously, the windows were open.

41:15

That is really bad news for that person.

41:18

I was going to try and find a

41:20

way to make a joke with a word

41:22

that I can't say on the radio. But

41:24

I'm not going to do that because I'm

41:26

better than that. Well, I'm going to use

41:28

the word stinky news. Stinky news right there.

41:31

A California family had a bear

41:34

sneak into their minivan and wreck

41:36

the vehicle while they were camping.

41:38

That's all. Here is the owner

41:40

of the vehicle, Eric Edens,

41:42

talking about what he witnessed.

41:45

And I noticed there was something moving in the

41:47

car and asking a silhouette to the bear through

41:49

the back windows. Like, oh, we can't. There's a

41:51

bear in our car. And he was trapped in

41:53

there and probably start freaking out and start tearing

41:55

the place apart beyond all the damage to do

41:57

to death. That's causing destroying the car. He

42:00

also defecated and urinated in the car. So

42:02

it stinks in there. I'm sensing

42:04

a theme, uh, in the, uh, new stories

42:06

that you're presenting today, Tony. Uh, just a

42:08

little poopy there, but, uh, yeah, I mean,

42:11

Hey, at least it was just the

42:13

minivan and not the family. They usually,

42:15

when you're camping, go after your food.

42:17

Yeah. Yeah. Well, I grew up in

42:20

a rural kind of place and there were,

42:22

like, we were, you know, taught if you

42:24

see a bear and here's the thing. I

42:26

can't remember which is which,

42:29

but there's brown bears and there's black bears. And

42:31

I can't remember one you're supposed to run and

42:33

the other one you're just supposed to stand very

42:35

still. Trouble is I can't remember what it was.

42:37

I also was told that if you have a

42:39

package of matches on you, you like the matches

42:41

and you throw them behind you as you run

42:43

away because they don't like the smell of sulfur.

42:45

But do not take that advice, uh, for

42:47

real. Cause I don't know whether it's true or not.

42:50

I've never done it. Yeah. Brown, black,

42:52

orange, yellow. I don't care what

42:54

the color of that bear is.

42:56

I'm running. Yeah. I'm running a

42:58

candidate for the County board in

43:00

Minnesota was jailed on assault charges

43:03

after throwing a live tarantula during

43:05

an argument with a renter. Here

43:07

is Marissa Christina Simonetti defending herself

43:09

against the tarantula or against the

43:12

guy. Yeah. Fifth degree

43:14

assault means someone only has to feel

43:16

fear or claim that they feel afraid

43:18

of bodily harm. So I never hit

43:20

anybody. I never touched anybody. Hmm.

43:24

Hmm. I didn't know that there was a

43:27

fifth degree assault that just meant that you,

43:29

if you felt fearful, Yes. This is a

43:32

us story by the way. So we don't

43:34

know if the law applies here, but imagine

43:37

like defending yourself against

43:39

charges for throwing spiders.

43:42

Yeah. I, yeah. I'm

43:45

not sure that that doesn't look

43:47

great on a resume. You know, if you're

43:49

trying to get a job at McDonald's, you're like, wherever

43:51

you've been, well, I was in jail for a little

43:53

while. Cause I threw spiders at people. Or for that

43:55

matter, the County board in Minnesota,

43:57

a fortune teller in Florida is

44:00

charges for robbing a

44:02

client at gunpoint. Police

44:05

say she's been using her services as

44:07

a ruse to get into people's homes

44:09

and steal cash and jewelry.

44:11

Here is one of the victims, Judith

44:14

Ramirez, talking about what

44:17

Carola Mitchell did to

44:19

them. She said something

44:21

about that she could read her hand,

44:23

so I was just like I'm not interested in that.

44:26

So she started reading my forehead. I was just like

44:28

okay she told her that if

44:30

she doesn't give you the money she was

44:32

gonna hurt us too my baby

44:35

and I and then she's like

44:37

okay so she gave her the money. So

44:40

she's gonna read your

44:42

forehead? Yes. That's the point.

44:44

She's gonna come into your home Richard

44:47

and she's gonna say I'm gonna read you your future

44:49

and I'm gonna read it from

44:52

your forehead but can you tell

44:54

me where the money is first? I would be you

44:57

know what my forehead is telling you? Something

45:01

else I can't say on the radio. Something

45:03

else. I get a theme here Richard today

45:06

with the things you can't say on the

45:08

radio. A Missouri woman

45:10

named Michelle Y. Peters is

45:13

accused of attempting to poison

45:15

her husband by spiking his

45:17

Mountain Dew with Roundup. That's

45:19

the weed killer stuff. Here

45:21

is Jackie Sproat who owns

45:23

a business next to the

45:25

accused and County Sheriff David

45:28

Millsap talking about this crime.

45:30

Wow that's all I can

45:32

say. I just recently found out

45:34

that she was working next door to me

45:36

but that doesn't make a difference. Is there

45:38

more to the story? Yes there is and

45:41

all that comes out in court. I just hope

45:44

things work out the way it's supposed to through

45:46

the judicial system. I

45:48

just hope things work out. I would if

45:50

I was that guy I would never drink

45:52

anything again. If you couldn't taste that

45:55

there was like bug killer in your

45:57

Mountain Dew you've got dead taste buds.

45:59

Right. At least I hope his lawn

46:01

is nice and green now, right? Okay,

46:04

there we go. TikTokers are promoting rice

46:06

zempic, a concoction of rice, water,

46:09

and lime juice as a

46:11

cheap alternative to medications like

46:13

Ozempic. Here is one of the

46:16

TikTokers that claimed she lost seven

46:18

pounds in a week using

46:21

this concoction. So

46:23

I lost 7.2 pounds in seven days.

46:25

Other benefits I've experienced throughout the week

46:28

are a curve to my appetite, a

46:30

decrease in my cravings for sweet things,

46:32

higher energy levels throughout the day, and

46:35

less bloating. The thing

46:37

about this, because you hear these fad diets all

46:39

the time, and it's like, oh, yeah, I totally

46:41

lost 20 pounds, you know,

46:43

only eating bubble gum, you know, or

46:45

whatever it is. But the thing is,

46:48

wait two weeks from there and

46:50

then see what happens. Right. So

46:53

you put that seven pounds right back on. Do you

46:55

get so sick of eating rice and lime that you

46:57

can't even look at rice ever again for the rest

46:59

of your life? Well, that's probably the trick. You don't

47:01

want to eat the rice and lime again, so you

47:03

just don't eat anything and lose weight. There you go.

47:06

The host of The Price Is Right,

47:08

Drew Carey, revealed in a recent interview

47:11

that there have been contestants on the

47:13

show that were under the

47:15

influence. Now, I'm not gonna say that

47:17

I've ever watched the show like that.

47:19

He said he smelled booze on their

47:21

breath, that some have eaten gummies before

47:23

the show, and one guy was high

47:26

on mushrooms. That clip is on YouTube, and here

47:28

it is. Big Papa hat, Dolly

47:31

Parton shirt, bit of dollar. I'm

47:34

a mystery, dude. Raptor and enigma, get

47:36

used to it. Joshua,

47:40

I can't wait to hear, what'd he do for

47:42

a living? I'm a skateboard rabbi. You

47:47

know what? I'll take it. Skateboard

47:51

rabbi. That

47:55

guy should just win. You should just give him the

47:57

prize for having the... coolest

48:00

job or the most unusual job.

48:03

Yeah, what is a skateboard? I guess they... I

48:05

don't know. I mean, it's like a mobile

48:07

rabbi, I think. You can get

48:09

quickly from one place to another. Listen,

48:11

I do not disbelieve for a

48:14

minute that people on the Price is

48:16

Right have been drinking or doing edibles.

48:18

Under the influence of something. Under the

48:20

influence. Because they are so

48:22

hyped up so often that you think, okay, there's

48:24

got to be something unusual there. And

48:26

I know that from my experience

48:28

in television that there was once a television

48:30

show done here in Toronto while I was

48:33

working in a bar that they used to

48:35

bring every... all the guests to beforehand,

48:37

get them all juiced up and sloppy

48:39

and then send them back to make

48:41

TV because it was better if the

48:43

people were kind of hammered. Tony,

48:46

thanks a lot for this. Oh, thank you. That

48:49

was Slow News Day with producer Tony having

48:51

a look at some of the stories that

48:53

didn't make it to the top of the

48:55

news carousel. I'm Richard Krause, sitting in for

48:57

Jim Richards. Jim will be back on News

48:59

Talk tonight on Monday. Stay with me, more

49:01

to come.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features