Podchaser Logo
Home
Trump Coverage is Still Terrible. Plus, Podcasting’s First Boom and Bust

Trump Coverage is Still Terrible. Plus, Podcasting’s First Boom and Bust

Released Friday, 10th November 2023
 1 person rated this episode
Trump Coverage is Still Terrible. Plus, Podcasting’s First Boom and Bust

Trump Coverage is Still Terrible. Plus, Podcasting’s First Boom and Bust

Trump Coverage is Still Terrible. Plus, Podcasting’s First Boom and Bust

Trump Coverage is Still Terrible. Plus, Podcasting’s First Boom and Bust

Friday, 10th November 2023
 1 person rated this episode
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Hi everyone, this is Katya Rogers, OTM's

0:02

executive producer, just popping in here to update

0:05

you on how our full fundraising is going. And

0:07

I have great

0:07

news. We set the challenge

0:09

a couple of weeks ago at 250 donors, and

0:13

we are currently at almost 700. That

0:15

means almost 700 of you listening

0:18

have pledged to support this show. We

0:20

are speechless, I can't even tell you. Thank you so much.

0:23

New challenge, do you think we can get to 800

0:26

donations by the end of November? We've

0:28

got two weeks

0:30

to go. I

0:30

think we can do it. Prove me right.

0:33

Hey, and don't forget, with a monthly donation of $12, you

0:36

could be wearing the OTM t-shirt, which by the

0:38

way, won't be available after the

0:40

end of this year. It's exclusive.

0:42

Listen, it's

0:44

easy. Just do it now, get

0:46

it out of the way, go to onthemedia.org

0:49

and pledge your support for this show.

0:51

We appreciate you. To

0:53

the extent that there was a message in the polling, it

0:56

was a message to the editors

0:58

of our largest news organization saying, the

1:00

American public seems to be confused about

1:02

a lot of stuff. What the press is still

1:05

getting wrong in its reporting about Donald

1:07

Trump. From WNYC

1:09

in New York, this is On the Media. Also

1:12

on this week's show, how Apple was there

1:14

at the creation of, and remains

1:16

vital to, the podcast ecosystem.

1:19

The first inflection point was iTunes. The

1:21

second big inflection point was when

1:23

the iPhone was released. And then the third

1:25

inflection point is not serial, it's iOS 8

1:28

going native on the iPhone. Plus,

1:31

we take a close look at podcasting's

1:33

first boom and bust cycle. What

1:36

happened to you at WNYC is not what happened

1:38

to Pushkin. It's not what happened to

1:40

Gimlet, right? Everybody comes in from a very

1:42

different category, but everybody's depressed

1:44

by the same larger macroeconomic conditions.

1:47

It's all coming up

1:48

after this.

1:57

Listener supported. WNYC.

2:00

studios.

2:02

This week on the New Yorker Radio Hour, a government

2:04

lawsuit calls Amazon a monopoly,

2:07

and the chair of the FTC won't rule out breaking

2:09

up the company. I'll talk with Lena Khan

2:11

on the New Yorker Radio Hour wherever you

2:13

listen to podcasts.

2:19

From WNYC in New York, this is

2:21

On the Media. I'm Michael Loehlinger. This

2:25

week, a mixed bag of narratives

2:27

about the GOP and its presumptive

2:29

nominee. On Tuesday, Republicans

2:32

suffered a raft of defeats at

2:34

the polls. Overnight Democrats

2:36

celebrating a series of key victories with

2:38

Ohioans voting to guarantee abortion

2:41

access and shroting that right into

2:43

the state's constitution.

2:45

Meanwhile in Kentucky, incumbent Democratic

2:47

Governor Andy Beshear, bending off

2:49

a challenge from Republican Attorney General

2:51

Daniel Cameron.

2:52

The Democrats won decisively

2:55

in Virginia, even flipped a

2:57

chamber in an off-year election.

3:00

That's unheard of.

3:01

Last night, all four candidates endorsed

3:04

by Moms for Liberty in one Minnesota district

3:07

lost to Democrats. In North Carolina,

3:09

the candidate the group supported in a contested

3:11

district also lost to a Democrat.

3:14

In Iowa, 12 of the 13

3:16

candidates backed by Moms for Liberty were

3:18

wiped out. Both banning is unpopular.

3:21

Who knew? Meanwhile, the Republican

3:23

presidential front-runner Donald Trump

3:25

spent his week back in court. He's

3:28

there a lot these days, although he hasn't

3:30

exactly gone quietly.

3:31

Trump took a combative stance on

3:34

the witness stand yesterday, attacking the judge,

3:36

the prosecutors and the case itself.

3:38

There was an extraordinary moment in that courtroom

3:41

yesterday. The former president bringing the grievances

3:43

heard from him so often on social media

3:46

into live testimony from the witness stand. At one

3:48

point, Judge Ngorin reminded Trump, this

3:51

is not a political rally. This is

3:53

a courtroom.

3:54

The former president has racked

3:56

up 91 felony charges

3:58

across four criminal cases. in New

4:00

York, Florida, Georgia, and Washington,

4:03

D.C. Not that all those hours

4:05

in court, or under gag orders, has

4:07

toned down his talk of 2024. 2024 is

4:10

our final battle. Stand

4:14

with me in the fight. We

4:16

will finish the job that we started so

4:18

brilliantly. And that job, as

4:20

reported by the Washington Post this week, consists

4:23

of a plan to fill the swamp. Trump

4:25

and his allies are mapping out ways to fill the Justice

4:28

Department with lackeys to investigate

4:30

Trump critics, working on plans to potentially

4:32

invoke the Insurrection Act on his first day in office

4:34

to allow him to deploy the military against

4:36

civil demonstrations. Despite

4:39

all that, according to a much-discussed

4:41

poll from Siena College and The New York Times

4:43

this week, if the election were

4:45

held today, Donald Trump would win.

4:48

The bottom line is that The New York Times has Joe Biden

4:50

down in five and six swing states that he

4:52

won in 2020 to Donald Trump. The poll

4:54

also shows that nearly one quarter of black voters

4:57

support President Trump. That's an unheard of number.

5:00

We've said this so many times on the show,

5:02

but it bears repeating. General election

5:04

polls a year out are not

5:07

reliable.

5:08

The thing to keep in mind is that polls are like

5:11

candy for reporters. They can't

5:13

get enough of them, and they love

5:15

gorging on them, whether or not they're really

5:17

significant. Dan Frumkin is the editor

5:20

of PressWatchers.org, an independent

5:22

nonprofit site about political journalism.

5:25

He's been writing about how the press are

5:27

failing news consumers. To

5:29

the extent that there was a message in the polling, to

5:31

me, it was a message to the editors

5:34

of our largest news organization saying, the

5:37

American public

5:38

seems to be confused about a lot of stuff, because

5:42

practically speaking, if they think that Donald

5:44

Trump could do a better job with the economy than Joe

5:46

Biden, they're probably under the impression

5:49

that the economy is in the toilet right now, and it's not.

5:51

I guess I do have trouble on this

5:54

point, though, that there is a disconnect

5:56

between, quote-unquote, how the economy is doing

5:58

and how that is.

5:59

relating to people's expenses

6:02

the amount of money they have in their bank account You

6:05

know we live in a country with deep

6:07

income inequality a lack of social safety

6:09

net is it possible that both are

6:12

true

6:12

Yeah, no, I think you raised a very good point I'm not

6:15

saying the economy is great for everybody, but

6:18

what's happened is that the Republican

6:20

talking points that the

6:22

economy is in the toilet that Inflation

6:25

is destroying people's lives

6:28

is an exaggeration and yet it gets picked

6:30

up by the press and certainly doesn't get disavowed by

6:32

the press

6:33

On press watch your site you wrote

6:36

about some recent reporting from the New York Times and the

6:38

Washington Post looking into

6:40

Trump's intention to select

6:42

political appointees who will unquestioningly

6:46

follow his orders and turn

6:48

the prosecutorial power of the Justice

6:51

Department against his political opponents this

6:53

was essential reporting of What

6:56

he plans to do on day one

6:59

if he's reelected, but at the same time you

7:01

felt that something was lacking from this coverage

7:04

These two articles were fantastic

7:06

in some ways in that they really looked at how

7:08

would Trump govern How would Trump be the president

7:11

which is something that is too often overlooked in

7:13

the data and down incremental horseman coverage

7:16

But what you're seeing is that elite journalists

7:19

at our top Institutions lack

7:21

the vocabulary and the mechanics that

7:23

are really necessary to accurately cover Trump right

7:25

now that they can't bring themselves to

7:27

say That he's delusional

7:30

They can't bring themselves to say that he's a would-be dictator

7:32

these articles if you read them to

7:34

a discerning reader Described Trump's

7:37

plans pretty alarmingly They're

7:39

getting rid of any obstacle to the abuse of power

7:42

gearing up to throw political opponents

7:44

in prison Preparing to unleash the military

7:47

on peaceful domestic protests using

7:50

the insurrection act using the insurrection act But

7:52

the language was so understated in

7:55

journalism We often look for what's called nutgraph

7:57

was sort of like the summary paragraph and

7:59

in this case the end of the nutgraph was, and

8:01

I have it right here, quote, critics have called

8:04

such ideas dangerous and unconstitutional.

8:07

That's the construction of a story

8:09

that has two sides that are equally valid. And

8:12

one is, person A says this, and

8:14

critics say he's wrong. That's

8:16

no longer adequate construction for what's

8:18

going on in this political climate.

8:21

How do you do a better job writing that story?

8:23

Well, I did, in Press Watch. I actually

8:25

literally rewrote the tops of both of those stories.

8:28

And you write things like, close allies

8:30

of Donald Trump are paving the way for dictatorship.

8:33

Should he win a second term in office in 2024?

8:35

You don't think that's too strong.

8:37

I don't think it's too strong if you then back it up. What

8:39

I'm looking for is not hysteria,

8:43

it's not hyperbole, it's accuracy.

8:45

And I don't think it's accurate to say

8:48

that it's just critics who have slight concerns over

8:50

what Trump is doing. What is accurate

8:53

is that what he's talking about doing would

8:55

close 250 years of history, would

8:58

violate 50 years of standards

9:00

that we've established since Watergate. These

9:03

are absolutely essential facts that are

9:05

hidden when the language is tame

9:08

and the criticism is meek.

9:10

I want to ask you about the coverage of Trump's

9:13

civil fraud case this week. For

9:15

those who haven't been following it, the

9:17

New York Attorney General has already proven

9:20

fraud that Trump knowingly overinflated

9:22

the value of his properties to get loans from banks,

9:25

and what is being decided now

9:27

by the judge is how much

9:30

he will pay in penalties. And on

9:32

Monday, he took the stand under oath.

9:34

This was a historic event. How

9:37

was the coverage? If you were following it

9:39

in like the live blogs on social media,

9:42

what you heard was an astonishing story

9:44

of somebody who was completely unhinged, who

9:46

was completely delusional, who was smirking,

9:49

who was making faces, who was being provocative,

9:51

who was taunting the judge. But then

9:53

the articles all came out and they said things like, Trump

9:56

defends himself and attacks judge.

9:59

What's essentially. happening is these articles

10:01

cover up for Trump's

10:04

unhingedness. They basically

10:07

summarize a lot of things that were crazy

10:09

into a few sentences that aren't crazy. And

10:12

so I think it's very deceptive. I

10:14

think that people who read the main story the next morning

10:16

had no idea what really happened that day.

10:19

On one hand he gets to put on a show,

10:21

make it seem like it's a witch hunt, rile

10:24

up consumers of the right-wing media

10:26

who would be happy to see that he

10:30

was barking like a mad dog at

10:32

the judge and at the Attorney General.

10:34

But for the legitimate

10:36

press it kind of just seems like

10:39

well yeah if you're a defendant then you're angry

10:41

and you make a case for yourself right?

10:44

I mean I remember watching the coverage of

10:47

the COVID pandemic under Trump

10:49

and he'd get up and he'd say something completely nonsensical.

10:52

Reporters would follow themselves trying to sort of make

10:55

sense of it and explain what he just said as opposed

10:58

to reporting Donald Trump just

11:00

said a bunch of stuff that made no sense. My

11:02

take right now is that

11:05

people are less interested

11:08

in covering his unhinged statements because they're afraid

11:10

that they'll be giving him publicity.

11:12

They'll be helping him spread disinformation and misinformation.

11:15

But that was one of the lessons from the Trump era

11:17

right? Like don't just cover everything

11:20

he says.

11:20

Amplifying him does reward him and does

11:23

risk even further radicalizing his supporters. But

11:25

you can't ignore it when this guy who could be the

11:28

president is saying things that are just nuts.

11:31

I have a proposal here which I've made in my

11:33

website which is that when he's

11:35

unhinged yes you report what he said. What

11:38

you do that is you go and you talk to his

11:40

supporters. You go talk to the Republican

11:43

leaders and to his base and the people who support

11:45

him and say do you agree with what he just said?

11:47

How can that be? What's going on there? Is

11:50

there no limit to what he could say and you'd still support

11:52

him? The news value to me

11:54

of an incremental unhinged statement by

11:56

Donald Trump is he said this and

11:59

the Republican party still supports him, because

12:01

that's astonishing.

12:03

Dan, this feels like deja vu all over again.

12:05

I mean, we've been hearing warnings from press critics

12:07

for years now about how

12:09

to cover Donald Trump in the right way. Just

12:12

this week, Margaret Sullivan published a piece in

12:14

The Guardian titled, The Public Doesn't

12:17

Understand the Risks of a Trump Victory.

12:19

That's the media's fault.

12:21

Great piece.

12:22

I agree that we have culpability

12:24

here and that we could do it better. But

12:27

it's also the case that facts

12:29

don't seem to change minds like

12:31

they used to. There have been warnings

12:34

of his dangers to our democracy.

12:37

And you could argue there aren't enough,

12:39

but perhaps they're just not sticking.

12:42

The press critics have been saying stuff like this for

12:44

years now. That's absolutely correct. And they've not

12:46

been heard. But I think that at some

12:49

point, it may sink in. We

12:51

may have to wait until the next generation of editors.

12:54

The leaders of our newsrooms have just gotten used

12:56

to still covering what is basically

12:58

an asymmetrical political climate

13:01

as if there are two equal parties involved in the

13:03

discussion. My feeling is at some

13:05

point, one of these editors is going to

13:08

wake up, look in the mirror and say, wait a minute,

13:10

we're not doing this right. We need to reset

13:12

because we are not successfully

13:15

informing the American electorate. I

13:17

felt this way back when two-thirds of

13:20

Americans believed that Saddam Hussein was behind

13:22

9-11. News organizations

13:24

at some point need to say, whoa, what we're doing

13:26

isn't working.

13:28

That's what I think people like Margaret Sullivan

13:31

and Jay Rosen and I

13:33

and a whole bunch of other people who have been saying

13:36

this for a while are saying, stop

13:38

what you're doing. Realize that it's

13:40

not actually getting the job

13:43

done of informing the American people and

13:45

figure out how else to do it. Stan,

13:48

thank you very much. Thank you. Stan

13:50

Frumkin is the editor of Press

13:52

Watch, an independent nonprofit site

13:54

about political journalism.

14:00

first boom and bust cycle.

14:02

This is On The Media.

14:06

On The Media is supported by NetSuite.

14:08

Your business gets to a certain size and

14:11

the cracks start to emerge. Things you

14:13

used to do in a day are taking a week. You have

14:15

too many manual processes. If

14:17

this is you, you should know these three

14:19

numbers. 37,000, 25, 1. 37,000. That's

14:26

the number of businesses which have upgraded to NetSuite

14:28

by Oracle. NetSuite is the number

14:30

one cloud financial system, streamlining

14:32

accounting, financial management, inventory,

14:35

HR, and more. 25, NetSuite

14:38

turns 25 this year. That's 25 years

14:41

of helping businesses do more with less, close

14:43

their books in days, not weeks, and drive

14:46

down costs. 1. Because

14:48

your business is one of a kind. So you

14:50

get a customized solution for all of your

14:52

KPIs, key performance indicators,

14:55

in one efficient system with one source of

14:57

truth. Manage risk, get

14:59

reliable forecasts, and improve margins.

15:02

Everything you need to grow all in one place. Right

15:05

now, download NetSuite's popular KPI

15:08

checklist designed to give you consistently

15:10

excellent performance absolutely free

15:12

at netsuite.com slash otm.

15:15

That's netsuite.com slash otm

15:17

to get your own KPI checklist. NetSuite.com

15:21

slash otm.

15:23

I'm Alex Schwartz. I'm Nomi Frey. I'm

15:25

Vincent Cunningham, and this is Critics at

15:27

Large, a New Yorker podcast for the culturally

15:30

curious. Each week, we're going to talk about

15:32

a big idea that's showing up across the cultural

15:34

landscape, and we'll trace it through all the mediums

15:36

we love. Books, movies, television,

15:39

music, art. And I always want to talk about

15:41

celebrity gossip too, of course. We

15:44

hope you'll join us for new episodes each Thursday. Follow

15:46

Critics at Large today wherever you

15:48

get podcasts.

16:00

So great. NPR claiming to lay off

16:02

about 10% of his current staff due to

16:04

the soft ad market. It's a wrenching

16:06

time here in the newsroom due to what NPR's

16:09

chief executive calls an existential

16:11

threat. Those layoffs and marks

16:14

were followed in the fall by a string

16:16

of cuts at WNYC,

16:18

our producing station. On

16:20

the media's team shrunk. Many

16:23

great shows across the industry have been canceled

16:25

altogether, which we'll get to. It's

16:28

a depressing reversal of an extraordinary

16:31

boom in podcasting that

16:33

saw the expansion of meaningful deep

16:35

dive reporting, a generation

16:37

of new celebrities, and for a select

16:40

few, staggering payouts.

16:42

Podcasting is a

16:44

rich and varied part of the media

16:46

industry nowadays. But we wanted

16:48

to take stock of where our particular

16:51

slice of the industry is today and

16:53

how we got here. Because podcasting

16:55

transformed our sleepy world of

16:57

public radio. And we transformed

17:00

podcasting. But first, we're

17:03

going to take a look at the unlikely story

17:05

of how the medium became a thing in the first place

17:08

and the company at the center of it all. Producer

17:11

Molly Rosen has the story.

17:13

It's impossible to tell the story of how podcasting

17:16

came to be without Apple. And

17:19

about a month ago, the company rolled out a new

17:21

operating

17:21

system. iOS 17 for iPhone

17:23

is now out for everyone.

17:25

And some of the updates might have an impact

17:27

on how you're listening

17:28

to this show right now. And

17:30

there's actually huge changes to the Apple Podcasts

17:33

app. You can now create custom episode artwork

17:35

that's prominently featured on the Listen Now and

17:37

your show page. There's updates to how to do that.

17:38

The update to the Apple Podcasts app also

17:41

includes a tweak to how podcast downloads

17:43

work. It's a small change that might

17:46

mean fewer automatic downloads of a podcast

17:48

back catalog. As a podcast

17:50

user, you're free to shrug and move

17:52

on. But for podcast creators,

17:55

this could be a big deal. Lower numbers,

17:58

while a more accurate reflection.

17:59

of listenership

18:01

could translate into less ad money. Less

18:03

ad money means fewer podcasts. We'll

18:06

get to that later in the show. But

18:08

I wanted to know how a small change in Apple

18:10

software is capable of sending ripple effects

18:13

across an entire industry. The

18:15

story starts in the early 2000s. The

18:17

same year the iPod launched

18:19

in 2003, one of us still working on Apple, there

18:21

was this group doing audio blogging. Kevin Marks

18:24

is a software engineer.

18:25

He worked at Apple from 1998 to 2003. He was trying

18:28

to solve the problem of streaming

18:30

audio and video on the internet. The

18:33

problem being, it didn't work. The

18:35

files were too big. They needed too much bandwidth.

18:38

More than early 2000s internet could handle.

18:41

So he became very interested in what those

18:43

audio bloggers were doing. The power

18:46

of your intellect. They'd

18:48

record a radio show, put that on

18:50

their blog as an MP3 file, and then twit from the blog.

18:53

Dominating world leaders. Welcome to The Daily Source

18:56

Code. I'm Adam Curry. Coming to you from Amsterdam,

18:59

The Netherlands. The Daily Source Code,

19:01

hosted by the DJ Adam Curry, was

19:03

one of the first podcasts ever made. The

19:06

term itself was coined by a Guardian journalist,

19:08

mashing up iPod and broadcast podcast.

19:12

Adam Curry with Dave Weiner, a software

19:14

engineer, came up with the idea of sending sound

19:16

files like a blog post down

19:19

in RSS feed. In the early

19:21

days you'd listen to these podcasts on the computer,

19:23

like reading a blog. But then in October 2003,

19:25

the programmer and blogger

19:27

Kevin Marks wrote

19:29

a script that would download podcasts,

19:32

copy them to iTunes, and sync them to his

19:34

iPad so he could listen

19:35

on the go, like people do today.

19:38

He demoed the script at a blogger conference at Harvard.

19:41

I mean, there was a dozen people in the room. They were

19:44

like, oh, that's a good idea. Yeah.

19:46

And

19:47

then in 2005, Apple

19:50

launched integration of podcast into iTunes. Podcasting

19:53

started off as Wayne's World

19:55

for Radio. This

19:56

is Steve Jobs on a stage at the All Things

19:58

Digital Conference in May, 2003.

20:01

2005. He's in his trademark look,

20:02

jeans and a black long-sleeve shirt, brimming

20:05

with founder energy.

20:07

He pulls up iTunes. And there's

20:09

a little thing called podcasts right here. You click that

20:11

and we've got a page full of podcasts. All

20:13

these things sync up with your iPod every

20:16

time you sync your iPod. And remember,

20:18

this has been really hard to do so far. You've got

20:20

to download this third-party app and already

20:23

millions of people are subscribing to these

20:25

podcasts. And I think this is just going to send it into

20:27

orbit. Can you tell me about your experience

20:30

before

20:30

Apple really got in the game and then

20:32

how Apple changed things?

20:34

There was no guarantee that

20:36

podcasting was going to succeed before Apple got

20:38

into it. Rob

20:39

Walsh is the VP of podcast relations

20:41

at Libsyn,

20:42

one of the first hosting

20:43

platforms.

20:44

I always say there's three inflection points in

20:46

podcasting. The first inflection point was

20:49

September 2005 and that was iTunes.

20:52

The second big inflection point was due 2007,

20:55

which would have been when the iPhone was released.

20:58

And then the third inflection point is

21:00

not serial.

21:02

It's iOS 8 going native on

21:04

the iPhone. When you

21:05

say native, what do you mean?

21:07

You buy a phone, what's on that phone?

21:10

Native. What apps are on there? iOS 8 went

21:12

native about a month before serial came out.

21:15

And you can look at the numbers of where

21:17

podcasting grew. It grew

21:19

on the iOS side. It didn't grow on the Android

21:22

side. If it was serial, it would have grown on both sides.

21:24

But it grew on the iOS side. Android

21:26

has never had a native podcast

21:29

app. They still don't have a native podcast

21:31

app. Apple Podcasts app, this

21:33

past week 56%, 57% downloads

21:37

directly across all Libsyn's platforms

21:40

went directly to Apple Podcasts app.

21:42

Spotify was 15% number two. And

21:46

then there's YouTube.

21:47

More and more podcasters are posting their interviews

21:50

to YouTube as videos. And

21:52

more and more listeners or viewers

21:54

are finding them there.

21:56

But whether YouTube videos actually count as

21:58

podcasts depends on who you want to be.

21:59

ask. People don't like it, but my definition

22:02

of a podcast is you have

22:04

an RSS 2.0 compliant feed

22:06

and it is in Apple

22:09

podcasts. Because if you're not in Apple podcasts,

22:11

then you're not in all those different apps.

22:13

He's referring to Apple's directory, which

22:16

they made public back in 2005.

22:18

It's like a centralized podcast

22:21

library. As long as you meet Apple's

22:23

specifications, you can submit your

22:25

podcast to it. And then the podcast

22:27

is there for any potential listener to

22:30

find in any app.

22:32

Without Apple, none of that would be possible.

22:34

Now, I'll say this, Steve Jobs

22:36

and Apple had an ulterior motive and people

22:39

don't realize why Apple did support

22:41

us. And that was because they wanted to sell iPods.

22:43

If you're going to sell an iPod in all these countries

22:46

around the world, you have to have something to put on it. Well,

22:48

in a lot of the countries, they didn't have rights yet. And

22:50

here is this medium called podcasting, which

22:53

has universal global rights. So

22:55

they can have iPods for sale in

22:58

Albania and have an Albanian iTunes

23:01

store

23:01

that has nothing but podcasts because they don't have the rights

23:03

yet for music. I hear what you're saying that

23:06

overall, with

23:07

Apple's role, it's generally been

23:09

a very open ecosystem. And

23:11

they've been good custodians of the medium,

23:14

you would say, yes, does it ever concern

23:16

you that

23:17

things could go a different way in

23:19

the future? And that one company has this

23:22

kind of power over the standards of the medium.

23:24

I'm not concerned that it's Apple. What I'm concerned is other

23:26

companies haven't been able to move up.

23:29

And I felt that Google Podcast was

23:31

going to be the next inflection point. Once Google made

23:33

that native, I felt we would see

23:35

a bump like we saw with iOS. And I

23:37

was obviously dead wrong.

23:39

So Apple's going to continue

23:41

to be that dominant player in the space. And people

23:43

have to remember, podcasting ecosystem

23:46

is such a tiny percentage

23:48

of Apple's revenue. The amount of revenue that Apple makes

23:50

from podcasting,

23:52

even with the subscriptions, is

23:54

less than the interest they earned while

23:56

we've been talking for this hour.

23:58

I that is part of what's interesting. to

24:00

me though, because I don't necessarily see it

24:02

as a bad thing, but I do see this imbalance.

24:05

How much

24:06

podcasting matters to Apple? In

24:08

terms of making money, it's just not

24:10

that important, I think. But how much Apple

24:13

matters to podcasting is a lot.

24:15

I would be more concerned if Apple

24:18

cared about making money from podcasting. That

24:20

would be my concern. As long

24:22

as Apple goes with podcasting

24:24

is a great thing for our consumers, and

24:27

we like podcasting because people

24:29

that own iPhones like podcasts,

24:32

I think we're fine.

24:34

And Apple's been a really good steward in this space,

24:37

and I believe they're going to continue to

24:39

be a very good steward in the space, as long

24:41

as they don't want it to become a profit center.

24:43

Now, in 2023, podcast

24:46

technology works pretty much the same as

24:49

when Kevin Marks wrote the first code to feed

24:51

podcasts onto iTunes 20 years

24:53

ago. You

24:54

have a feed and the feed links to a file on

24:56

a server, you download the file.

24:58

Do you feel like its development was a

25:00

little bit random, and then it just stuck?

25:03

Or do you think there was a

25:05

logic to why

25:07

the RSS MP3 combination

25:09

is still what we use today? It's a little

25:11

bit random, yeah. I think the point was

25:14

it fitted neatly with the episodic nature

25:16

of blogs anyway. And there was a huge,

25:19

ridiculous standards war between different

25:21

kinds of feeds, and

25:23

you could make a serial length drama about that. Standards

25:26

do tend to persist, and a big chunk of that

25:28

is that they become harder to change

25:30

when you've got lots of people both writing and reading them.

25:33

We've interviewed Corey Doctorow

25:35

on the show, somewhat recently, about his

25:38

theory of the en-de-ification of

25:40

the internet, which we always have to bleep because it's public

25:42

reading.

25:44

He said that there's

25:46

one part

25:47

of the internet that it's en-de-ification

25:49

resistant. Well, I've got some good news

25:51

for you, Brooke, which is that podcasting has

25:53

thus far been very en-de-ification

25:56

resistant. Really? Yeah,

25:58

it's pretty cool.

25:59

Which isn't to say that people aren't trying.

26:02

Do you agree with that? And why do you think it's remained

26:04

such an open ecosystem?

26:06

Yeah, it was this fairly simple standard

26:08

that anyone could adopt. So there was a large ecosystem

26:10

of people doing different bits of it. And every now

26:12

and then somebody does try and privatize it.

26:15

And there's been lots of attempts

26:17

to replace the feed formats with new feed formats. But

26:21

they're still there and they still work.

26:23

The same thing that's made podcast

26:25

technology a little wonky and

26:27

a little random has also kept it

26:29

on this different path than other digital

26:32

media. It was coded by techies

26:34

to solve a delivery problem and

26:36

then given a home by Apple to sell hardware.

26:39

And for listeners, well, we

26:41

can subscribe to a gazillion podcasts

26:44

for free from the app of our choice.

26:45

What could possibly

26:48

go wrong?

26:49

For On The Media, I'm Molly

26:51

Rosen. Coming

26:53

up, what went wrong? This

26:56

is On The Media.

26:59

On The Media is supported by NetSuite. Your business gets to

27:01

a certain

27:01

size and the cracks start to emerge. Things you used to

27:03

do in a day are taking a week.

27:05

You have too many manual processes.

27:10

If this is you, you should know these three

27:12

numbers. 37,000, 25, 1, 37,000.

27:17

That's the

27:19

number of businesses which have upgraded to NetSuite by Oracle. NetSuite

27:21

is the number one cloud financial system, streamlining

27:23

accounting, financial management, and inventory,

27:28

HR, and more. 25, NetSuite turns 25 this year.

27:31

That's 25 years of helping businesses do

27:35

more with less, close their books in days,

27:37

not weeks, and drive down costs.

27:40

One, because your business is one

27:42

of a kind.

27:42

So you get a customized solution

27:44

for all of your KPIs, key

27:47

performance indicators in one efficient

27:49

system with one

27:50

source of truth.

27:51

Manage risk, get reliable forecasts,

27:54

and improve

27:54

margins. Everything you need

27:56

to grow all in one place.

27:58

Right now, download NetSuite's

27:59

popular KPI checklist designed

28:02

to give you consistently excellent performance absolutely

28:05

free at netsuite.com slash

28:07

OTM. That's netsuite.com

28:09

slash OTM to get your own KPI

28:12

checklist. Netsuite.com slash

28:14

OTM.

28:15

This is On The Media, I'm Michael Ellinger.

28:18

Now we dive into podcasting's

28:20

first boom and bust cycle.

28:24

Fun fact, OTM was among

28:26

the first public radio shows to release

28:28

entire episodes as a podcast back

28:30

in 2005. By 2014,

28:33

when this story begins, all the cool

28:35

kids were doing it. This

28:38

American Life had been publishing as

28:40

a podcast in addition to a radio show for many

28:43

years by that point. This is Nick Kwa,

28:45

he's basically the podcast

28:47

critic. He writes for New York Magazine. As

28:50

Nick points out, This American Life was still

28:52

very much radio first. The form

28:55

and content were limited by the radio

28:57

listening experience. Because when you behold

28:59

into the classic broadcast radio model,

29:02

it's hard to tell a serialized story because

29:04

if you were a radio listener and you caught

29:06

an episode in minute 22 without the context

29:09

of the 22 minutes beforehand, it's a little bit difficult

29:11

to get to be sticky. You probably see

29:14

where he's going with this. In 2014,

29:17

the team released Serial, hosted by

29:19

This American Life reporter Sarah Koenig.

29:22

A 13 episode season investigating

29:25

the murder of Hae Min Lee and her convicted

29:27

killer Adnan Syed, then just a high

29:30

school student. It showed that you could

29:32

use a podcast to do serious

29:34

in the weeds investigative journalism and

29:36

attract an enormous audience. Serial,

29:39

the most successful podcast ever.

29:42

It averages more than 2 million visitors per episode.

29:45

It's a real life murder mystery that

29:47

has those millions of fans hanging

29:49

on every clue. Audio is hot again

29:52

thanks to the smash success of a series called Serial.

29:54

The more and more people are listening, binge

29:57

listening even to pod serial show

29:59

that this kind of stuff.

29:59

as possible and that was an appetite for it.

30:03

But the question has always been like,

30:06

can you make a real business out of it?

30:08

Probably the most famous attempt was

30:11

Gimlet.

30:11

I watched Gimlet starting.

30:13

I was like, this is a new kind of company.

30:16

This is a company that makes public radio

30:18

style podcasts that

30:21

isn't sort of in the system.

30:23

Alex Sujang Lachlan produces

30:25

the podcast Normal Gossip and

30:28

recently wrote about the early days of Gimlet

30:30

for Defector. But back in 2014,

30:33

she was one of a wave of journalists

30:36

entering the industry who were inspired by

30:38

serial and long form narrative shows on

30:40

Gimlet. It

30:41

really expanded the world of podcasts

30:43

that made the world a lot bigger. Started

30:45

by This American Life alum Alex Bloomberg

30:48

and co-founder Matt Lieber, Gimlet

30:50

burst onto the scene with a list of plucky

30:53

shows.

30:54

Reply All, which was a spinoff of

30:56

a WNYC show.

30:58

And On the Media show, no less. And

31:00

On the Media show. Yes. Oh my God.

31:02

TLDR.

31:03

TLDR, yes. So

31:05

yeah, Reply All was the big one. It

31:08

was a podcast about the

31:10

internet and internet culture. There's

31:12

Mystery Show hosted by

31:14

Starley Kine, which was a quirky,

31:18

weird show where Starley played a

31:20

detective trying to solve really

31:23

mundane mysteries. And it was incredibly

31:25

charming. God, I sound like such a fangirl.

31:28

And then you had

31:29

Startup, Alex Bloomberg's meta

31:31

podcast about starting Gimlet.

31:33

The

31:34

first episode of Startup called

31:36

How to Pitch a Billionaire. It was him

31:38

pitching Chris Saka, who's a

31:40

tech VC guy

31:43

billionaire.

31:43

If I were calling an Uber right

31:45

now and it said it's going to be here

31:47

in two minutes, and that

31:49

was all the time you had, what

31:51

are you doing? So I'm

31:54

making a network of digital

31:57

podcasts that

31:59

we will monitor that.

31:59

that will that will that is going

32:02

to meet. He was

32:04

willing to make himself look bad on the show,

32:06

I think, because it made him a more compelling

32:08

protagonist

32:09

that warts and all honesty, hooked

32:12

listeners and investors. I

32:14

don't know what it is, but somehow a podcast about

32:16

me failing to generate FOMO and potential

32:18

investors generated a lot of FOMO

32:20

and potential investors. They raised over 28

32:23

million dollars and you could hear that

32:26

influx of cash on its shows.

32:28

There is an episode of reply all

32:30

where Alex Goldman called

32:33

back a telemarketer and

32:35

then hunted him down like flew

32:37

to whatever country he was

32:38

in. It was India. Yeah.

32:39

Yeah. I went to the building where his

32:42

office was. I know

32:43

where your front door is.

32:46

I wanted to know who was the person who called me and tried

32:48

to scam me and I figured it out. I

32:51

want you to admit that you guys are

32:53

scammers and that

32:56

you steal money from people.

32:58

And I remember being so enchanted

33:00

with that episode because it took an everyday

33:03

thing and took it to the furthest

33:05

degree possible. And I think that

33:07

was only possible because of the budget, the money

33:10

that they had.

33:11

Audible, I Heart Media, Pineapple

33:14

Street, Sony, Pushkin Industries,

33:17

companies new and old jumped

33:19

in to get a piece of the narrative podcast

33:21

boom. There was a succession of shows during

33:24

that 2014 to I want to see 2017, 18 stretch

33:27

where there was a string of hits,

33:29

right? That was the signatures at Simmons. Revisionist

33:31

history from Malcolm Brabell. You could argue actually

33:34

I kind of felt that Death, Sex and Money for you

33:36

guys had a little bit of heat when it came out even

33:38

though that's a weekly show. I will tell you Micah,

33:40

it was so fun.

33:43

Anna Sale is the host and creator

33:45

of Death, Sex and Money, a show made

33:47

by WNYC Studios.

33:49

When I started the show I was 33 years

33:51

old. I was

33:54

a single woman living in New York City.

33:56

I wasn't the demographic profile

33:59

of most people.

33:59

public radio with established shows.

34:01

In May 2014, the first

34:03

episode of Death, Sex and Money dropped. Who

34:06

in the world would come up with a title

34:08

like this? The musician

34:10

Bill Withers was her first guest, and

34:12

it was the kind of offbeat probing

34:15

conversation Anna would become known

34:17

for. It's all the essential stuff, right?

34:19

Yeah, yeah. The third episode

34:22

of Anna's show featured a painful

34:24

dilemma. Her relationship with

34:26

her on-again, off-again boyfriend,

34:28

Arthur.

34:29

We'd broken up because we didn't live

34:30

in the same place, and then my ex

34:33

wanted to get back together, and I was like,

34:35

how do we do this? Arthur knew that

34:37

Anna loved interviewing Wyoming Senator

34:39

Alan Simpson during her days as a politics

34:42

reporter on the campaign trail.

34:44

And Arthur was like, I

34:46

have an idea. If I write Alan Simpson a letter,

34:49

maybe he'll call Anna and it'll make her laugh.

34:52

It's such a funny premise. So what did the

34:54

letter say? He said, help me get this

34:56

woman back? Basically.

34:58

Here goes. The love of my life, Ms.

35:00

Anna Sale, lives in New York City. A

35:03

month ago, Anna stopped believing I would

35:05

ever close the distance to be with her, and

35:07

she cut me loose. I don't

35:09

blame her. I was being a fool, and I took her

35:11

for granted.

35:12

And what he didn't know was that

35:15

Al Simpson is also married to this incredible

35:17

woman named Anne Simpson, who when

35:20

Al Simpson did in fact

35:21

call me, I heard Anne talking in the

35:23

background. This is just the

35:25

sweetest letter. And I said, well,

35:27

what's Anne think I should do? And she got on. So

35:30

it is like a weird story. And it worked.

35:33

It worked.

35:34

It definitely worked. You're such a mark. I

35:36

know. I know. Anna

35:39

and Arthur have been married since 2015. They

35:41

have two children together. That story,

35:43

by the way, was picked up by This American Life and

35:46

helped make death, sex, and money a hit.

35:48

It was just like

35:49

having your wildest dreams

35:52

constantly expanded because

35:54

not

35:54

only were listeners hungry

35:57

and showing up, but also

35:59

as a make-up. It was just like blowing

36:02

up all of my ideas

36:04

of what was possible. WNYC

36:06

was jazz too. Public radio

36:09

stations had long been limited to just

36:11

three ways of bringing in the dough. Sponsorship,

36:14

what we call radio ads. Membership,

36:17

donations from listeners. And grants

36:19

from foundations. WNYC's

36:22

a little different. We also have a distribution arm.

36:24

And we collect syndication fees for nationally

36:26

distributed shows like OTM.

36:29

Now WNYC could sell podcast

36:31

ads without having to jostle for a slot

36:33

on the crowded radio schedule. It

36:36

was an electric time for the podcast

36:38

industry. It felt like a new form

36:40

of art and journalism was being built

36:42

in real time. And Hollywood

36:44

was paying attention. Tomorrow is my

36:47

first official day as the boss of my new

36:49

podcast company. This is Alex

36:51

Inc., a 2018 ABC TV

36:53

show based on startup, the podcast

36:56

based on the founding of Gimlet. Alex

36:59

Bloomberg is played by Zach Breath. There

37:12

were a bunch of these TV shows based on podcasts.

37:16

Dirty John on Bravo, Two Dough

37:18

Queens on HBO, Doctor Death on Peacock,

37:20

Song Exploder on Netflix. Podcasts

37:23

were shiny. And those of us making them

37:25

were suddenly in demand. The podcast

37:27

boom was kind of crazy for us because all of a

37:29

sudden people that work for us were just getting

37:32

offered $150,000 a year or whatever. This

37:34

is Jesse Thorn, host of Bullseye, speaking

37:37

here with reporter Emily Russell for

37:39

her audio piece for Columbia Journalism

37:41

Review. One of her big revelations,

37:44

the math on these beautiful serialized

37:46

shows just wasn't working. Here's

37:50

Emily.

37:50

For a narrative audio documentary project,

37:53

budgets from the major buyers,

37:56

such as Audible Iheart and

37:58

Sony could range from a

38:00

quarter to half a million dollars,

38:03

but projected revenue during a show's

38:05

release might be closer to $200,000.

38:09

And that's for the rare show with

38:12

a million listeners.

38:13

The fact is, Gimlet's specialty, our

38:16

business model basically, had been to make

38:18

a kind of podcast that costs a lot of money.

38:20

Alex Bloomberg again in a 2019 episode of Startup, in

38:25

which he's reflecting on how five

38:27

years after Gimlet's launch, the company

38:29

was in dire financial straits. A

38:31

lot of the things we assumed would happen

38:33

didn't.

38:34

We assumed audiences would grow, but instead they plateaued.

38:37

Our launches had not done as well as they had in the past.

38:40

And some of our biggest shows with the largest audiences

38:42

still weren't making money because we couldn't sell

38:45

ads on them.

38:46

There was another kind of show that was getting more and more popular,

38:48

a kind of show that wasn't what we specialized in. Shows

38:51

like Pod Save America and My Favorite

38:53

Murder and The Dax Shepard podcast. These

38:56

shows rely on a charismatic host connecting

38:58

with fans, and they're much cheaper to

39:00

produce. And the audiences for these shows

39:03

are huge,

39:04

way bigger than the audience for any Gimlet podcast.

39:07

He's describing the Always On

39:09

podcast. They release consistently

39:11

without breaks, unlike a seasonal narrative

39:14

like Serial that takes months to make

39:17

and only runs for a handful of weeks. Those

39:19

Gabfest type podcasts are fun

39:21

to listen to because you feel like you're hanging out with a group

39:24

of friends just shooting the breeze. It's

39:26

a part-time job for me and for my co-hosts.

39:29

We come into the studio, we

39:32

chat to each other for an hour. We have

39:34

a producer who edits it and puts it up. Felix

39:36

Salmon is a financial journalist at

39:39

Axios and a co-host of the

39:41

Slate Money podcast. The amount

39:43

of work that goes into Slate

39:46

Money every week is absolutely tiny

39:49

compared to the amount of work that goes into a super

39:51

produced and edited and

39:53

scripted in many ways podcast

39:55

from WNYC or Gimlet. Despite

39:58

the apparent troubles with Gimlet's business,

39:59

this model, in 2019, this

40:02

crazy thing happened.

40:03

By

40:17

exclusively

40:18

hosting Joe Rogan, Kim Kardashian,

40:21

and Gimlet shows like Reply All and

40:23

Heavyweight, Spotify thought it could differentiate

40:25

itself from other music streamers. Others

40:28

of Gimlet stood to make millions. It

40:47

was the last burst of hot air

40:49

in the prestige podcast bubble. Within

40:52

just a few years, Spotify appeared

40:54

to change its mind as financial

40:56

uncertainty swept the tech industry.

40:58

Spotify is laying off 200 workers

41:01

or about 2% of its employees worldwide.

41:04

The cutbacks will be in Spotify's podcasting

41:06

unit. In addition to another round of layoffs at Spotify,

41:09

the Gimlet brand is being sort of hoover into

41:11

a larger Spotify Studios banner. Ne

41:14

qua. So functionally, Gimlet

41:16

media as a brand doesn't

41:17

quite exist anymore, which is kind of like

41:19

the symbolic end of this era. And

41:22

then this year, NPR sent

41:24

layoff notices to about a tenth

41:27

of its employees this week. The network

41:29

also announced the cancellation of four podcasts.

41:32

Some of them are pretty familiar to a lot of folks in Visibilia,

41:35

louder than a riot about hip hop. You

41:37

have rough translation. And there

41:39

will also be layoffs at the satellite

41:41

radio company SiriusXM. They're

41:44

eliminating 475 jobs. That's 8%

41:47

of its staff. Pushkin Industries,

41:49

Malcolm Gladwell's podcast company, cut 30%

41:51

of its staff. LAist,

41:54

formerly known as KPCC, got

41:56

rid of some of its podcast-only shows. So

41:59

did OTM's producing station WNYC,

42:02

which canceled More Perfect and LaBrega

42:04

and cut staff members from Radiolab

42:07

and the New Yorker Radio Hour and OTM.

42:10

The company may also sunset Anna

42:12

Sales' Death, Sex and Money. We are

42:14

continuing to produce the show with our

42:16

current team as New

42:17

York Public Radio employees through the end

42:19

of this year.

42:21

And then something has to change.

42:23

The show will stick around, she says, if

42:25

the company can find a financial partner

42:27

to support its costs, which could

42:30

be seen as part of a wider reshuffling

42:32

of public radio podcasts, like

42:34

how the New Yorker bought In the Dark,

42:36

the investigative podcast from American

42:38

Public Media, or how Mother Jones

42:41

is reportedly in talks to buy reveal

42:44

from the Center for Investigative Reporting.

42:46

WNYC and I are talking

42:48

to lots of people about new partnerships

42:51

and potentially a new production home for

42:53

the show.

42:54

What went through your mind when you found

42:57

out that the future of Death,

42:59

Sex and Money was up in the air?

43:01

I didn't feel

43:03

angry. I

43:05

felt like, okay,

43:07

the status quo is changing.

43:10

That's like kind of scary and

43:12

sad. It

43:14

was interesting to me that

43:17

for like the first couple of weeks when I would like

43:19

be talking about it, it's like I

43:21

would just get this like catch in my throat and I'd start

43:23

crying whenever I talked about my

43:26

team. And when

43:28

you're making me do it, my team and

43:31

our listeners,

43:33

and I don't want to let them down.

43:35

Do you think

43:37

the team will stay intact? Like, do you think they'll be able

43:39

to come with you wherever you go next?

43:42

I don't know.

43:44

This has been the most

43:46

challenged year for the podcast industry

43:48

of at large, the podcast ecosystem since

43:51

I started covering it, which is 2014.

43:53

When I asked Nick Kwa what accounted for

43:55

this flurry of layoffs, he quoted

43:57

Leo Tolstoy. Happy families.

44:00

families are all alike. Every

44:02

unhappy family is unhappy in

44:04

its own way. What happened to you

44:06

at WNYC is not what happened to Pushkin. It's

44:09

not what happened to Gimlet, right? Everybody

44:11

comes in from a very different category, but

44:13

everybody's depressed by the same larger macroeconomic

44:15

conditions. As I was speaking with Nick

44:18

Kwa, a podcast expert, and

44:20

Felix Salmon, a financial journalist,

44:23

about what was happening in our industry and

44:25

in public radio, I came up against

44:27

three contradictions. Prediction

44:30

one,

44:31

prestige podcasts are shrinking,

44:34

but podcast sting is growing.

44:36

The podcast ecosystem, just looking

44:39

at it from an economic point of view,

44:41

is still growing at a really quite

44:43

objectively impressive rate. We

44:45

are going to surpass $2 billion of podcast ad

44:50

revenue in 2023. That's billion with a B. And in 2025, it's going to

44:52

hit nearly $4 billion. The

44:58

water sounds really warm.

45:00

Why are my friends getting

45:02

laid off? Why are some of my favorite

45:05

shows getting shut down? It doesn't

45:07

make a lot of sense. Really good question. The

45:10

only real explanation for it is that the water is very

45:12

warm, but it's not quite as warm as people

45:14

thought it would be. According to the Interactive

45:17

Advertising Bureau's latest report, overall

45:20

podcast ad revenue has never

45:22

been better, especially for sports and comedy

45:25

podcasts. But news podcasts

45:27

saw a small drop in ad revenue in

45:30

the past year. Podcasts are

45:32

still being made and making money, but

45:34

it's only a certain kind of podcast that's making the

45:36

biggest sums of that money. Nick Kwa, we're

45:39

talking primarily

45:39

about personality-driven talk

45:42

shows, the Joe Rogan's, the Call Her Daddies,

45:44

the Mark Maron's, that is just an engine

45:46

that keeps printing money. It's a very

45:49

efficient business model. Whereas

45:51

the long-form narrative podcast format

45:54

that I love, it's not dead. The

45:56

dream of it has become harder.

45:59

Number two, advertising for news shows

46:02

is going down because the economy is weird,

46:04

but actually the economy is doing

46:07

okay.

46:08

The economy is doing great. We just had the

46:10

third quarter GDP figures come out. We

46:12

grew at 4.9%, which is

46:14

crazy, like super fast economic

46:17

growth. There was a little

46:19

bit of a pullback

46:21

towards the end of last year where

46:24

people were worried about a recession.

46:26

I talked about that with Brooke on the story

46:28

show. And in

46:30

anticipation of

46:32

this expected recession,

46:34

a bunch of advertisers said, well, the

46:36

first thing we want to cut is our advertising.

46:38

We saw a $7 million

46:40

drop in sponsorship sales

46:43

between our fiscal year 22 and FY23.

46:47

This is LaFontaine Oliver, New York Public Radio's

46:50

president, speaking last month on

46:52

WNYC's daily call-in show hosted

46:54

by Brian Lehrer. Oliver declined

46:57

OTM's request for an interview. For

46:59

us as a nonprofit, that is significant.

47:03

We've had to, unfortunately, take steps

47:06

in saying goodbye to some of our

47:08

wonderful colleagues. We are focusing

47:11

on the shows that can

47:13

serve both our radio and

47:15

our podcast audiences, our

47:17

multi-platform

47:17

shows, our national

47:19

shows like On the Media

47:21

and The New Yorker Radio Hour.

47:25

My rights program, Notes from America

47:27

and Radio Lab.

47:28

LaFontaine Oliver's multi-platform

47:31

audio strategy brings us to contradiction

47:33

number three. Radio is becoming

47:35

more important even as its listenership

47:38

declines. Look at The New York Times,

47:40

which has begun syndicating two of its popular

47:43

podcasts, The Daily and Ezra Klein

47:45

Show, on public radio. Vox

47:47

has done the same with its show Today Explained.

47:50

I think of it as just

47:52

very

47:53

sensible business, which

47:55

is you want to maximize the

47:58

number of revenue streams.

47:59

associated with any piece of, and I'm going

48:02

to use a terrible term here, IP, right?

48:04

If you just have a podcast, really

48:07

the only way you can monetize that audio

48:09

is by selling ads against the podcast.

48:12

But what if I said to you, you can just take exactly

48:14

the same piece of audio and get

48:16

two more revenue streams from it. You

48:19

can sell ads on the radio.

48:22

And as you say, you can syndicate

48:24

that show to other radio stations who pay you cash

48:27

to put your show on their air.

48:29

So that's now three different revenue streams

48:31

from the same piece of audio. And that's got

48:33

to be a much more attractive business than just

48:36

only having one. But

48:39

the radio listenership tends

48:41

to skew older, tends to skew

48:43

less diverse. The numbers

48:46

for the radio listenership are

48:49

depending on what market you're looking at,

48:51

steady, but

48:53

pretty clearly trending downward.

48:55

It's no TikTok, right?

48:57

Radio is

48:59

orders of magnitude larger than

49:01

podcasting. It reaches millions

49:03

of people at all times of the day or night. It

49:05

is a massive business. There is a trend

49:08

there. It's probably downwards, but

49:10

it's slowly downwards and it's predictably

49:12

downwards. And what we've learned

49:14

over the past couple of years in podcasting

49:17

is that it's much less predictable

49:20

than radio is. Nick Kwa feels

49:22

that by cutting much of their podcast

49:24

only shows, NPR and

49:27

WNYC are setting themselves

49:29

up for future failure. It feels

49:31

like

49:32

both organizations are receding deeper

49:35

and deeper into itself when it should be

49:37

unfolding wider and expanding and

49:40

trying to really reinvent itself

49:43

for the changing media landscape

49:46

demographic and the world that it exists

49:48

in. If you are not reaching

49:51

new people where they are, you

49:53

will not be here in 20 years. It

49:56

is as simple as that.

49:58

I'm sorry, I feel like I'm very.

49:59

I'm coming up very angry and

50:02

I am, but it's like, boy, nobody's asked

50:04

me about this stuff for a while. And I'm like,

50:06

I'm really pissed about this. Why are you pissed?

50:09

Because I value public radio. I really

50:11

value the enterprise of producing journalism

50:14

and creative work that is for

50:16

the public that is

50:19

to a meaningful extent, this

50:21

entangle from a pure for-profit,

50:24

carpalistic structure. You are in

50:26

the position to produce more interesting and better

50:28

work. A lot of media is like one of the greatest shows of all

50:30

time. If nobody is out here being

50:32

angry, trying to defend it and think

50:34

about its future, then what the f*** are we doing?

50:36

NPR, WNYC,

50:38

LAist,

50:41

these guys have been in the podcast game for a long

50:43

time, right? They didn't just dip their

50:45

toes.

50:46

And they're saying 10 years

50:49

on

50:50

of experimenting with podcasts,

50:53

they're really expensive to make. You

50:55

got to pay those hosts so much money. You got to fly them all around the place

50:57

to report these fancy stories.

51:00

It didn't work. So

51:03

why are we chasing a unicorn

51:06

when we've got old reliable over on 93.9?

51:10

Two things. One, old reliable is not

51:12

going to be reliable forever. Something

51:14

feels different about how fast things are changing

51:16

in a way that we're moving today. And the second

51:19

thing I'll say about it is that, did it fail

51:21

because of

51:23

the theory or did it fail because of the execution?

51:26

I would argue the execution.

51:28

I'll say it out loud. It does feel to the logic set

51:30

like budget mismanagement, right? You're

51:34

focusing on all the executives that

51:36

you want to pay lucrative salaries to, right, in relation

51:38

to your newsroom. The model works

51:41

within the context of an organization

51:44

that's able to support it. According to public

51:46

data from 2021, keep in mind

51:48

there's a two year lag for nonprofit

51:50

tax records. New York Public Radio's

51:53

last president made $749,000 a year, including bonuses

51:55

compared to

51:59

NPR's. president at the time, who made $466,000

52:01

a year. NPR

52:04

is around twice the size of New York Public

52:07

Radio, and yet our last president

52:09

made $280,000 more. So

52:11

back in June, even before we

52:14

started talking about the possibilities

52:16

of layoffs, I made the decision to cut executive

52:18

bonuses for the year. Current New

52:21

York Public Radio president LaFontaine Oliver,

52:23

explaining to WNYC host Brian

52:26

Lehrer why he chose not to

52:28

reduce executive base salaries

52:29

in response to our $10 million

52:32

deficit. We did not feel

52:34

some executive roles to keep our overall

52:37

executive salary pool lower.

52:40

And as there's been turnover, we've hired

52:42

people at lower salaries than their predecessors,

52:45

myself included.

52:46

And how did you decide to not cut

52:48

our local news team? Local news

52:52

is our stock and trade. And

52:55

going into an election

52:57

year and also thinking

53:00

about the legacy and the history specifically

53:03

of WNYC, going

53:05

back 99 years,

53:08

being focused on serving the local

53:11

news needs of New Yorkers,

53:15

that was just really important

53:16

to us.

53:17

After years of incubating and

53:19

betting on the podcast economy, New

53:22

York Public Radio appears to be changing

53:24

course.

53:25

But Nick Kwa believes that podcast

53:27

fans should remain hopeful. The sort of fact

53:29

remains that like podcasting is here to say,

53:32

right? People want this stuff. People

53:34

want to make this stuff. It's becoming a

53:36

bigger part of a lot of people's media

53:38

habits, media diets. This is something

53:40

that every television studio has already known,

53:42

every film studio has every note, every music label has

53:45

already known that there are ups and there are downs. This

53:47

is podcasting's first big down. And

53:49

I think there's going to be a generation of talent that's going to come

53:51

out of the site,

53:52

all the stronger for it. And maybe all

53:54

the smarter, hopefully.

53:56

One of the big lessons of the podcast

53:58

industry and digital media in general is that we're general

54:00

is that if you think you can get rich off of journalism,

54:03

you will either

54:04

fail or cash out at other

54:06

people's expense. When

54:08

it comes to public media, the challenge

54:10

we face is experimenting sustainably,

54:13

taking risks and giving new

54:16

shows space to grow while balancing

54:18

the books. Good audio

54:20

journalism takes time. It's also

54:22

expensive, which is not a bad thing,

54:25

just a fact. It's what our

54:27

listeners pay to support. The

54:30

profit centers of the podcasting world will

54:32

zoom past public media, past

54:34

hard news, past radio. Their

54:37

water is hot. Hours

54:39

is lukewarm. But

54:42

it's actually kind of fine once you

54:44

get used to it.

54:54

That's it for this week's show. On the Media

54:56

is produced by Eloise Blondio, Molly

54:58

Rosen, Rebecca Clark Callender, and

55:00

Candice Wong, with help from Sean

55:02

Merchant. And our show was edited

55:05

by Katia Rogers, our executive producer.

55:07

Our technical director is Jennifer Munson.

55:10

Our engineer this week was Andrew Nerviano.

55:13

On the Media is a production of WNYC

55:15

Studios. I'm Michael O'ONGER.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features