Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Hi everyone, this is Katya Rogers, OTM's
0:02
executive producer, just popping in here to update
0:05
you on how our full fundraising is going. And
0:07
I have great
0:07
news. We set the challenge
0:09
a couple of weeks ago at 250 donors, and
0:13
we are currently at almost 700. That
0:15
means almost 700 of you listening
0:18
have pledged to support this show. We
0:20
are speechless, I can't even tell you. Thank you so much.
0:23
New challenge, do you think we can get to 800
0:26
donations by the end of November? We've
0:28
got two weeks
0:30
to go. I
0:30
think we can do it. Prove me right.
0:33
Hey, and don't forget, with a monthly donation of $12, you
0:36
could be wearing the OTM t-shirt, which by the
0:38
way, won't be available after the
0:40
end of this year. It's exclusive.
0:42
Listen, it's
0:44
easy. Just do it now, get
0:46
it out of the way, go to onthemedia.org
0:49
and pledge your support for this show.
0:51
We appreciate you. To
0:53
the extent that there was a message in the polling, it
0:56
was a message to the editors
0:58
of our largest news organization saying, the
1:00
American public seems to be confused about
1:02
a lot of stuff. What the press is still
1:05
getting wrong in its reporting about Donald
1:07
Trump. From WNYC
1:09
in New York, this is On the Media. Also
1:12
on this week's show, how Apple was there
1:14
at the creation of, and remains
1:16
vital to, the podcast ecosystem.
1:19
The first inflection point was iTunes. The
1:21
second big inflection point was when
1:23
the iPhone was released. And then the third
1:25
inflection point is not serial, it's iOS 8
1:28
going native on the iPhone. Plus,
1:31
we take a close look at podcasting's
1:33
first boom and bust cycle. What
1:36
happened to you at WNYC is not what happened
1:38
to Pushkin. It's not what happened to
1:40
Gimlet, right? Everybody comes in from a very
1:42
different category, but everybody's depressed
1:44
by the same larger macroeconomic conditions.
1:47
It's all coming up
1:48
after this.
1:57
Listener supported. WNYC.
2:00
studios.
2:02
This week on the New Yorker Radio Hour, a government
2:04
lawsuit calls Amazon a monopoly,
2:07
and the chair of the FTC won't rule out breaking
2:09
up the company. I'll talk with Lena Khan
2:11
on the New Yorker Radio Hour wherever you
2:13
listen to podcasts.
2:19
From WNYC in New York, this is
2:21
On the Media. I'm Michael Loehlinger. This
2:25
week, a mixed bag of narratives
2:27
about the GOP and its presumptive
2:29
nominee. On Tuesday, Republicans
2:32
suffered a raft of defeats at
2:34
the polls. Overnight Democrats
2:36
celebrating a series of key victories with
2:38
Ohioans voting to guarantee abortion
2:41
access and shroting that right into
2:43
the state's constitution.
2:45
Meanwhile in Kentucky, incumbent Democratic
2:47
Governor Andy Beshear, bending off
2:49
a challenge from Republican Attorney General
2:51
Daniel Cameron.
2:52
The Democrats won decisively
2:55
in Virginia, even flipped a
2:57
chamber in an off-year election.
3:00
That's unheard of.
3:01
Last night, all four candidates endorsed
3:04
by Moms for Liberty in one Minnesota district
3:07
lost to Democrats. In North Carolina,
3:09
the candidate the group supported in a contested
3:11
district also lost to a Democrat.
3:14
In Iowa, 12 of the 13
3:16
candidates backed by Moms for Liberty were
3:18
wiped out. Both banning is unpopular.
3:21
Who knew? Meanwhile, the Republican
3:23
presidential front-runner Donald Trump
3:25
spent his week back in court. He's
3:28
there a lot these days, although he hasn't
3:30
exactly gone quietly.
3:31
Trump took a combative stance on
3:34
the witness stand yesterday, attacking the judge,
3:36
the prosecutors and the case itself.
3:38
There was an extraordinary moment in that courtroom
3:41
yesterday. The former president bringing the grievances
3:43
heard from him so often on social media
3:46
into live testimony from the witness stand. At one
3:48
point, Judge Ngorin reminded Trump, this
3:51
is not a political rally. This is
3:53
a courtroom.
3:54
The former president has racked
3:56
up 91 felony charges
3:58
across four criminal cases. in New
4:00
York, Florida, Georgia, and Washington,
4:03
D.C. Not that all those hours
4:05
in court, or under gag orders, has
4:07
toned down his talk of 2024. 2024 is
4:10
our final battle. Stand
4:14
with me in the fight. We
4:16
will finish the job that we started so
4:18
brilliantly. And that job, as
4:20
reported by the Washington Post this week, consists
4:23
of a plan to fill the swamp. Trump
4:25
and his allies are mapping out ways to fill the Justice
4:28
Department with lackeys to investigate
4:30
Trump critics, working on plans to potentially
4:32
invoke the Insurrection Act on his first day in office
4:34
to allow him to deploy the military against
4:36
civil demonstrations. Despite
4:39
all that, according to a much-discussed
4:41
poll from Siena College and The New York Times
4:43
this week, if the election were
4:45
held today, Donald Trump would win.
4:48
The bottom line is that The New York Times has Joe Biden
4:50
down in five and six swing states that he
4:52
won in 2020 to Donald Trump. The poll
4:54
also shows that nearly one quarter of black voters
4:57
support President Trump. That's an unheard of number.
5:00
We've said this so many times on the show,
5:02
but it bears repeating. General election
5:04
polls a year out are not
5:07
reliable.
5:08
The thing to keep in mind is that polls are like
5:11
candy for reporters. They can't
5:13
get enough of them, and they love
5:15
gorging on them, whether or not they're really
5:17
significant. Dan Frumkin is the editor
5:20
of PressWatchers.org, an independent
5:22
nonprofit site about political journalism.
5:25
He's been writing about how the press are
5:27
failing news consumers. To
5:29
the extent that there was a message in the polling, to
5:31
me, it was a message to the editors
5:34
of our largest news organization saying, the
5:37
American public
5:38
seems to be confused about a lot of stuff, because
5:42
practically speaking, if they think that Donald
5:44
Trump could do a better job with the economy than Joe
5:46
Biden, they're probably under the impression
5:49
that the economy is in the toilet right now, and it's not.
5:51
I guess I do have trouble on this
5:54
point, though, that there is a disconnect
5:56
between, quote-unquote, how the economy is doing
5:58
and how that is.
5:59
relating to people's expenses
6:02
the amount of money they have in their bank account You
6:05
know we live in a country with deep
6:07
income inequality a lack of social safety
6:09
net is it possible that both are
6:12
true
6:12
Yeah, no, I think you raised a very good point I'm not
6:15
saying the economy is great for everybody, but
6:18
what's happened is that the Republican
6:20
talking points that the
6:22
economy is in the toilet that Inflation
6:25
is destroying people's lives
6:28
is an exaggeration and yet it gets picked
6:30
up by the press and certainly doesn't get disavowed by
6:32
the press
6:33
On press watch your site you wrote
6:36
about some recent reporting from the New York Times and the
6:38
Washington Post looking into
6:40
Trump's intention to select
6:42
political appointees who will unquestioningly
6:46
follow his orders and turn
6:48
the prosecutorial power of the Justice
6:51
Department against his political opponents this
6:53
was essential reporting of What
6:56
he plans to do on day one
6:59
if he's reelected, but at the same time you
7:01
felt that something was lacking from this coverage
7:04
These two articles were fantastic
7:06
in some ways in that they really looked at how
7:08
would Trump govern How would Trump be the president
7:11
which is something that is too often overlooked in
7:13
the data and down incremental horseman coverage
7:16
But what you're seeing is that elite journalists
7:19
at our top Institutions lack
7:21
the vocabulary and the mechanics that
7:23
are really necessary to accurately cover Trump right
7:25
now that they can't bring themselves to
7:27
say That he's delusional
7:30
They can't bring themselves to say that he's a would-be dictator
7:32
these articles if you read them to
7:34
a discerning reader Described Trump's
7:37
plans pretty alarmingly They're
7:39
getting rid of any obstacle to the abuse of power
7:42
gearing up to throw political opponents
7:44
in prison Preparing to unleash the military
7:47
on peaceful domestic protests using
7:50
the insurrection act using the insurrection act But
7:52
the language was so understated in
7:55
journalism We often look for what's called nutgraph
7:57
was sort of like the summary paragraph and
7:59
in this case the end of the nutgraph was, and
8:01
I have it right here, quote, critics have called
8:04
such ideas dangerous and unconstitutional.
8:07
That's the construction of a story
8:09
that has two sides that are equally valid. And
8:12
one is, person A says this, and
8:14
critics say he's wrong. That's
8:16
no longer adequate construction for what's
8:18
going on in this political climate.
8:21
How do you do a better job writing that story?
8:23
Well, I did, in Press Watch. I actually
8:25
literally rewrote the tops of both of those stories.
8:28
And you write things like, close allies
8:30
of Donald Trump are paving the way for dictatorship.
8:33
Should he win a second term in office in 2024?
8:35
You don't think that's too strong.
8:37
I don't think it's too strong if you then back it up. What
8:39
I'm looking for is not hysteria,
8:43
it's not hyperbole, it's accuracy.
8:45
And I don't think it's accurate to say
8:48
that it's just critics who have slight concerns over
8:50
what Trump is doing. What is accurate
8:53
is that what he's talking about doing would
8:55
close 250 years of history, would
8:58
violate 50 years of standards
9:00
that we've established since Watergate. These
9:03
are absolutely essential facts that are
9:05
hidden when the language is tame
9:08
and the criticism is meek.
9:10
I want to ask you about the coverage of Trump's
9:13
civil fraud case this week. For
9:15
those who haven't been following it, the
9:17
New York Attorney General has already proven
9:20
fraud that Trump knowingly overinflated
9:22
the value of his properties to get loans from banks,
9:25
and what is being decided now
9:27
by the judge is how much
9:30
he will pay in penalties. And on
9:32
Monday, he took the stand under oath.
9:34
This was a historic event. How
9:37
was the coverage? If you were following it
9:39
in like the live blogs on social media,
9:42
what you heard was an astonishing story
9:44
of somebody who was completely unhinged, who
9:46
was completely delusional, who was smirking,
9:49
who was making faces, who was being provocative,
9:51
who was taunting the judge. But then
9:53
the articles all came out and they said things like, Trump
9:56
defends himself and attacks judge.
9:59
What's essentially. happening is these articles
10:01
cover up for Trump's
10:04
unhingedness. They basically
10:07
summarize a lot of things that were crazy
10:09
into a few sentences that aren't crazy. And
10:12
so I think it's very deceptive. I
10:14
think that people who read the main story the next morning
10:16
had no idea what really happened that day.
10:19
On one hand he gets to put on a show,
10:21
make it seem like it's a witch hunt, rile
10:24
up consumers of the right-wing media
10:26
who would be happy to see that he
10:30
was barking like a mad dog at
10:32
the judge and at the Attorney General.
10:34
But for the legitimate
10:36
press it kind of just seems like
10:39
well yeah if you're a defendant then you're angry
10:41
and you make a case for yourself right?
10:44
I mean I remember watching the coverage of
10:47
the COVID pandemic under Trump
10:49
and he'd get up and he'd say something completely nonsensical.
10:52
Reporters would follow themselves trying to sort of make
10:55
sense of it and explain what he just said as opposed
10:58
to reporting Donald Trump just
11:00
said a bunch of stuff that made no sense. My
11:02
take right now is that
11:05
people are less interested
11:08
in covering his unhinged statements because they're afraid
11:10
that they'll be giving him publicity.
11:12
They'll be helping him spread disinformation and misinformation.
11:15
But that was one of the lessons from the Trump era
11:17
right? Like don't just cover everything
11:20
he says.
11:20
Amplifying him does reward him and does
11:23
risk even further radicalizing his supporters. But
11:25
you can't ignore it when this guy who could be the
11:28
president is saying things that are just nuts.
11:31
I have a proposal here which I've made in my
11:33
website which is that when he's
11:35
unhinged yes you report what he said. What
11:38
you do that is you go and you talk to his
11:40
supporters. You go talk to the Republican
11:43
leaders and to his base and the people who support
11:45
him and say do you agree with what he just said?
11:47
How can that be? What's going on there? Is
11:50
there no limit to what he could say and you'd still support
11:52
him? The news value to me
11:54
of an incremental unhinged statement by
11:56
Donald Trump is he said this and
11:59
the Republican party still supports him, because
12:01
that's astonishing.
12:03
Dan, this feels like deja vu all over again.
12:05
I mean, we've been hearing warnings from press critics
12:07
for years now about how
12:09
to cover Donald Trump in the right way. Just
12:12
this week, Margaret Sullivan published a piece in
12:14
The Guardian titled, The Public Doesn't
12:17
Understand the Risks of a Trump Victory.
12:19
That's the media's fault.
12:21
Great piece.
12:22
I agree that we have culpability
12:24
here and that we could do it better. But
12:27
it's also the case that facts
12:29
don't seem to change minds like
12:31
they used to. There have been warnings
12:34
of his dangers to our democracy.
12:37
And you could argue there aren't enough,
12:39
but perhaps they're just not sticking.
12:42
The press critics have been saying stuff like this for
12:44
years now. That's absolutely correct. And they've not
12:46
been heard. But I think that at some
12:49
point, it may sink in. We
12:51
may have to wait until the next generation of editors.
12:54
The leaders of our newsrooms have just gotten used
12:56
to still covering what is basically
12:58
an asymmetrical political climate
13:01
as if there are two equal parties involved in the
13:03
discussion. My feeling is at some
13:05
point, one of these editors is going to
13:08
wake up, look in the mirror and say, wait a minute,
13:10
we're not doing this right. We need to reset
13:12
because we are not successfully
13:15
informing the American electorate. I
13:17
felt this way back when two-thirds of
13:20
Americans believed that Saddam Hussein was behind
13:22
9-11. News organizations
13:24
at some point need to say, whoa, what we're doing
13:26
isn't working.
13:28
That's what I think people like Margaret Sullivan
13:31
and Jay Rosen and I
13:33
and a whole bunch of other people who have been saying
13:36
this for a while are saying, stop
13:38
what you're doing. Realize that it's
13:40
not actually getting the job
13:43
done of informing the American people and
13:45
figure out how else to do it. Stan,
13:48
thank you very much. Thank you. Stan
13:50
Frumkin is the editor of Press
13:52
Watch, an independent nonprofit site
13:54
about political journalism.
14:00
first boom and bust cycle.
14:02
This is On The Media.
14:06
On The Media is supported by NetSuite.
14:08
Your business gets to a certain size and
14:11
the cracks start to emerge. Things you
14:13
used to do in a day are taking a week. You have
14:15
too many manual processes. If
14:17
this is you, you should know these three
14:19
numbers. 37,000, 25, 1. 37,000. That's
14:26
the number of businesses which have upgraded to NetSuite
14:28
by Oracle. NetSuite is the number
14:30
one cloud financial system, streamlining
14:32
accounting, financial management, inventory,
14:35
HR, and more. 25, NetSuite
14:38
turns 25 this year. That's 25 years
14:41
of helping businesses do more with less, close
14:43
their books in days, not weeks, and drive
14:46
down costs. 1. Because
14:48
your business is one of a kind. So you
14:50
get a customized solution for all of your
14:52
KPIs, key performance indicators,
14:55
in one efficient system with one source of
14:57
truth. Manage risk, get
14:59
reliable forecasts, and improve margins.
15:02
Everything you need to grow all in one place. Right
15:05
now, download NetSuite's popular KPI
15:08
checklist designed to give you consistently
15:10
excellent performance absolutely free
15:12
at netsuite.com slash otm.
15:15
That's netsuite.com slash otm
15:17
to get your own KPI checklist. NetSuite.com
15:21
slash otm.
15:23
I'm Alex Schwartz. I'm Nomi Frey. I'm
15:25
Vincent Cunningham, and this is Critics at
15:27
Large, a New Yorker podcast for the culturally
15:30
curious. Each week, we're going to talk about
15:32
a big idea that's showing up across the cultural
15:34
landscape, and we'll trace it through all the mediums
15:36
we love. Books, movies, television,
15:39
music, art. And I always want to talk about
15:41
celebrity gossip too, of course. We
15:44
hope you'll join us for new episodes each Thursday. Follow
15:46
Critics at Large today wherever you
15:48
get podcasts.
16:00
So great. NPR claiming to lay off
16:02
about 10% of his current staff due to
16:04
the soft ad market. It's a wrenching
16:06
time here in the newsroom due to what NPR's
16:09
chief executive calls an existential
16:11
threat. Those layoffs and marks
16:14
were followed in the fall by a string
16:16
of cuts at WNYC,
16:18
our producing station. On
16:20
the media's team shrunk. Many
16:23
great shows across the industry have been canceled
16:25
altogether, which we'll get to. It's
16:28
a depressing reversal of an extraordinary
16:31
boom in podcasting that
16:33
saw the expansion of meaningful deep
16:35
dive reporting, a generation
16:37
of new celebrities, and for a select
16:40
few, staggering payouts.
16:42
Podcasting is a
16:44
rich and varied part of the media
16:46
industry nowadays. But we wanted
16:48
to take stock of where our particular
16:51
slice of the industry is today and
16:53
how we got here. Because podcasting
16:55
transformed our sleepy world of
16:57
public radio. And we transformed
17:00
podcasting. But first, we're
17:03
going to take a look at the unlikely story
17:05
of how the medium became a thing in the first place
17:08
and the company at the center of it all. Producer
17:11
Molly Rosen has the story.
17:13
It's impossible to tell the story of how podcasting
17:16
came to be without Apple. And
17:19
about a month ago, the company rolled out a new
17:21
operating
17:21
system. iOS 17 for iPhone
17:23
is now out for everyone.
17:25
And some of the updates might have an impact
17:27
on how you're listening
17:28
to this show right now. And
17:30
there's actually huge changes to the Apple Podcasts
17:33
app. You can now create custom episode artwork
17:35
that's prominently featured on the Listen Now and
17:37
your show page. There's updates to how to do that.
17:38
The update to the Apple Podcasts app also
17:41
includes a tweak to how podcast downloads
17:43
work. It's a small change that might
17:46
mean fewer automatic downloads of a podcast
17:48
back catalog. As a podcast
17:50
user, you're free to shrug and move
17:52
on. But for podcast creators,
17:55
this could be a big deal. Lower numbers,
17:58
while a more accurate reflection.
17:59
of listenership
18:01
could translate into less ad money. Less
18:03
ad money means fewer podcasts. We'll
18:06
get to that later in the show. But
18:08
I wanted to know how a small change in Apple
18:10
software is capable of sending ripple effects
18:13
across an entire industry. The
18:15
story starts in the early 2000s. The
18:17
same year the iPod launched
18:19
in 2003, one of us still working on Apple, there
18:21
was this group doing audio blogging. Kevin Marks
18:24
is a software engineer.
18:25
He worked at Apple from 1998 to 2003. He was trying
18:28
to solve the problem of streaming
18:30
audio and video on the internet. The
18:33
problem being, it didn't work. The
18:35
files were too big. They needed too much bandwidth.
18:38
More than early 2000s internet could handle.
18:41
So he became very interested in what those
18:43
audio bloggers were doing. The power
18:46
of your intellect. They'd
18:48
record a radio show, put that on
18:50
their blog as an MP3 file, and then twit from the blog.
18:53
Dominating world leaders. Welcome to The Daily Source
18:56
Code. I'm Adam Curry. Coming to you from Amsterdam,
18:59
The Netherlands. The Daily Source Code,
19:01
hosted by the DJ Adam Curry, was
19:03
one of the first podcasts ever made. The
19:06
term itself was coined by a Guardian journalist,
19:08
mashing up iPod and broadcast podcast.
19:12
Adam Curry with Dave Weiner, a software
19:14
engineer, came up with the idea of sending sound
19:16
files like a blog post down
19:19
in RSS feed. In the early
19:21
days you'd listen to these podcasts on the computer,
19:23
like reading a blog. But then in October 2003,
19:25
the programmer and blogger
19:27
Kevin Marks wrote
19:29
a script that would download podcasts,
19:32
copy them to iTunes, and sync them to his
19:34
iPad so he could listen
19:35
on the go, like people do today.
19:38
He demoed the script at a blogger conference at Harvard.
19:41
I mean, there was a dozen people in the room. They were
19:44
like, oh, that's a good idea. Yeah.
19:46
And
19:47
then in 2005, Apple
19:50
launched integration of podcast into iTunes. Podcasting
19:53
started off as Wayne's World
19:55
for Radio. This
19:56
is Steve Jobs on a stage at the All Things
19:58
Digital Conference in May, 2003.
20:01
2005. He's in his trademark look,
20:02
jeans and a black long-sleeve shirt, brimming
20:05
with founder energy.
20:07
He pulls up iTunes. And there's
20:09
a little thing called podcasts right here. You click that
20:11
and we've got a page full of podcasts. All
20:13
these things sync up with your iPod every
20:16
time you sync your iPod. And remember,
20:18
this has been really hard to do so far. You've got
20:20
to download this third-party app and already
20:23
millions of people are subscribing to these
20:25
podcasts. And I think this is just going to send it into
20:27
orbit. Can you tell me about your experience
20:30
before
20:30
Apple really got in the game and then
20:32
how Apple changed things?
20:34
There was no guarantee that
20:36
podcasting was going to succeed before Apple got
20:38
into it. Rob
20:39
Walsh is the VP of podcast relations
20:41
at Libsyn,
20:42
one of the first hosting
20:43
platforms.
20:44
I always say there's three inflection points in
20:46
podcasting. The first inflection point was
20:49
September 2005 and that was iTunes.
20:52
The second big inflection point was due 2007,
20:55
which would have been when the iPhone was released.
20:58
And then the third inflection point is
21:00
not serial.
21:02
It's iOS 8 going native on
21:04
the iPhone. When you
21:05
say native, what do you mean?
21:07
You buy a phone, what's on that phone?
21:10
Native. What apps are on there? iOS 8 went
21:12
native about a month before serial came out.
21:15
And you can look at the numbers of where
21:17
podcasting grew. It grew
21:19
on the iOS side. It didn't grow on the Android
21:22
side. If it was serial, it would have grown on both sides.
21:24
But it grew on the iOS side. Android
21:26
has never had a native podcast
21:29
app. They still don't have a native podcast
21:31
app. Apple Podcasts app, this
21:33
past week 56%, 57% downloads
21:37
directly across all Libsyn's platforms
21:40
went directly to Apple Podcasts app.
21:42
Spotify was 15% number two. And
21:46
then there's YouTube.
21:47
More and more podcasters are posting their interviews
21:50
to YouTube as videos. And
21:52
more and more listeners or viewers
21:54
are finding them there.
21:56
But whether YouTube videos actually count as
21:58
podcasts depends on who you want to be.
21:59
ask. People don't like it, but my definition
22:02
of a podcast is you have
22:04
an RSS 2.0 compliant feed
22:06
and it is in Apple
22:09
podcasts. Because if you're not in Apple podcasts,
22:11
then you're not in all those different apps.
22:13
He's referring to Apple's directory, which
22:16
they made public back in 2005.
22:18
It's like a centralized podcast
22:21
library. As long as you meet Apple's
22:23
specifications, you can submit your
22:25
podcast to it. And then the podcast
22:27
is there for any potential listener to
22:30
find in any app.
22:32
Without Apple, none of that would be possible.
22:34
Now, I'll say this, Steve Jobs
22:36
and Apple had an ulterior motive and people
22:39
don't realize why Apple did support
22:41
us. And that was because they wanted to sell iPods.
22:43
If you're going to sell an iPod in all these countries
22:46
around the world, you have to have something to put on it. Well,
22:48
in a lot of the countries, they didn't have rights yet. And
22:50
here is this medium called podcasting, which
22:53
has universal global rights. So
22:55
they can have iPods for sale in
22:58
Albania and have an Albanian iTunes
23:01
store
23:01
that has nothing but podcasts because they don't have the rights
23:03
yet for music. I hear what you're saying that
23:06
overall, with
23:07
Apple's role, it's generally been
23:09
a very open ecosystem. And
23:11
they've been good custodians of the medium,
23:14
you would say, yes, does it ever concern
23:16
you that
23:17
things could go a different way in
23:19
the future? And that one company has this
23:22
kind of power over the standards of the medium.
23:24
I'm not concerned that it's Apple. What I'm concerned is other
23:26
companies haven't been able to move up.
23:29
And I felt that Google Podcast was
23:31
going to be the next inflection point. Once Google made
23:33
that native, I felt we would see
23:35
a bump like we saw with iOS. And I
23:37
was obviously dead wrong.
23:39
So Apple's going to continue
23:41
to be that dominant player in the space. And people
23:43
have to remember, podcasting ecosystem
23:46
is such a tiny percentage
23:48
of Apple's revenue. The amount of revenue that Apple makes
23:50
from podcasting,
23:52
even with the subscriptions, is
23:54
less than the interest they earned while
23:56
we've been talking for this hour.
23:58
I that is part of what's interesting. to
24:00
me though, because I don't necessarily see it
24:02
as a bad thing, but I do see this imbalance.
24:05
How much
24:06
podcasting matters to Apple? In
24:08
terms of making money, it's just not
24:10
that important, I think. But how much Apple
24:13
matters to podcasting is a lot.
24:15
I would be more concerned if Apple
24:18
cared about making money from podcasting. That
24:20
would be my concern. As long
24:22
as Apple goes with podcasting
24:24
is a great thing for our consumers, and
24:27
we like podcasting because people
24:29
that own iPhones like podcasts,
24:32
I think we're fine.
24:34
And Apple's been a really good steward in this space,
24:37
and I believe they're going to continue to
24:39
be a very good steward in the space, as long
24:41
as they don't want it to become a profit center.
24:43
Now, in 2023, podcast
24:46
technology works pretty much the same as
24:49
when Kevin Marks wrote the first code to feed
24:51
podcasts onto iTunes 20 years
24:53
ago. You
24:54
have a feed and the feed links to a file on
24:56
a server, you download the file.
24:58
Do you feel like its development was a
25:00
little bit random, and then it just stuck?
25:03
Or do you think there was a
25:05
logic to why
25:07
the RSS MP3 combination
25:09
is still what we use today? It's a little
25:11
bit random, yeah. I think the point was
25:14
it fitted neatly with the episodic nature
25:16
of blogs anyway. And there was a huge,
25:19
ridiculous standards war between different
25:21
kinds of feeds, and
25:23
you could make a serial length drama about that. Standards
25:26
do tend to persist, and a big chunk of that
25:28
is that they become harder to change
25:30
when you've got lots of people both writing and reading them.
25:33
We've interviewed Corey Doctorow
25:35
on the show, somewhat recently, about his
25:38
theory of the en-de-ification of
25:40
the internet, which we always have to bleep because it's public
25:42
reading.
25:44
He said that there's
25:46
one part
25:47
of the internet that it's en-de-ification
25:49
resistant. Well, I've got some good news
25:51
for you, Brooke, which is that podcasting has
25:53
thus far been very en-de-ification
25:56
resistant. Really? Yeah,
25:58
it's pretty cool.
25:59
Which isn't to say that people aren't trying.
26:02
Do you agree with that? And why do you think it's remained
26:04
such an open ecosystem?
26:06
Yeah, it was this fairly simple standard
26:08
that anyone could adopt. So there was a large ecosystem
26:10
of people doing different bits of it. And every now
26:12
and then somebody does try and privatize it.
26:15
And there's been lots of attempts
26:17
to replace the feed formats with new feed formats. But
26:21
they're still there and they still work.
26:23
The same thing that's made podcast
26:25
technology a little wonky and
26:27
a little random has also kept it
26:29
on this different path than other digital
26:32
media. It was coded by techies
26:34
to solve a delivery problem and
26:36
then given a home by Apple to sell hardware.
26:39
And for listeners, well, we
26:41
can subscribe to a gazillion podcasts
26:44
for free from the app of our choice.
26:45
What could possibly
26:48
go wrong?
26:49
For On The Media, I'm Molly
26:51
Rosen. Coming
26:53
up, what went wrong? This
26:56
is On The Media.
26:59
On The Media is supported by NetSuite. Your business gets to
27:01
a certain
27:01
size and the cracks start to emerge. Things you used to
27:03
do in a day are taking a week.
27:05
You have too many manual processes.
27:10
If this is you, you should know these three
27:12
numbers. 37,000, 25, 1, 37,000.
27:17
That's the
27:19
number of businesses which have upgraded to NetSuite by Oracle. NetSuite
27:21
is the number one cloud financial system, streamlining
27:23
accounting, financial management, and inventory,
27:28
HR, and more. 25, NetSuite turns 25 this year.
27:31
That's 25 years of helping businesses do
27:35
more with less, close their books in days,
27:37
not weeks, and drive down costs.
27:40
One, because your business is one
27:42
of a kind.
27:42
So you get a customized solution
27:44
for all of your KPIs, key
27:47
performance indicators in one efficient
27:49
system with one
27:50
source of truth.
27:51
Manage risk, get reliable forecasts,
27:54
and improve
27:54
margins. Everything you need
27:56
to grow all in one place.
27:58
Right now, download NetSuite's
27:59
popular KPI checklist designed
28:02
to give you consistently excellent performance absolutely
28:05
free at netsuite.com slash
28:07
OTM. That's netsuite.com
28:09
slash OTM to get your own KPI
28:12
checklist. Netsuite.com slash
28:14
OTM.
28:15
This is On The Media, I'm Michael Ellinger.
28:18
Now we dive into podcasting's
28:20
first boom and bust cycle.
28:24
Fun fact, OTM was among
28:26
the first public radio shows to release
28:28
entire episodes as a podcast back
28:30
in 2005. By 2014,
28:33
when this story begins, all the cool
28:35
kids were doing it. This
28:38
American Life had been publishing as
28:40
a podcast in addition to a radio show for many
28:43
years by that point. This is Nick Kwa,
28:45
he's basically the podcast
28:47
critic. He writes for New York Magazine. As
28:50
Nick points out, This American Life was still
28:52
very much radio first. The form
28:55
and content were limited by the radio
28:57
listening experience. Because when you behold
28:59
into the classic broadcast radio model,
29:02
it's hard to tell a serialized story because
29:04
if you were a radio listener and you caught
29:06
an episode in minute 22 without the context
29:09
of the 22 minutes beforehand, it's a little bit difficult
29:11
to get to be sticky. You probably see
29:14
where he's going with this. In 2014,
29:17
the team released Serial, hosted by
29:19
This American Life reporter Sarah Koenig.
29:22
A 13 episode season investigating
29:25
the murder of Hae Min Lee and her convicted
29:27
killer Adnan Syed, then just a high
29:30
school student. It showed that you could
29:32
use a podcast to do serious
29:34
in the weeds investigative journalism and
29:36
attract an enormous audience. Serial,
29:39
the most successful podcast ever.
29:42
It averages more than 2 million visitors per episode.
29:45
It's a real life murder mystery that
29:47
has those millions of fans hanging
29:49
on every clue. Audio is hot again
29:52
thanks to the smash success of a series called Serial.
29:54
The more and more people are listening, binge
29:57
listening even to pod serial show
29:59
that this kind of stuff.
29:59
as possible and that was an appetite for it.
30:03
But the question has always been like,
30:06
can you make a real business out of it?
30:08
Probably the most famous attempt was
30:11
Gimlet.
30:11
I watched Gimlet starting.
30:13
I was like, this is a new kind of company.
30:16
This is a company that makes public radio
30:18
style podcasts that
30:21
isn't sort of in the system.
30:23
Alex Sujang Lachlan produces
30:25
the podcast Normal Gossip and
30:28
recently wrote about the early days of Gimlet
30:30
for Defector. But back in 2014,
30:33
she was one of a wave of journalists
30:36
entering the industry who were inspired by
30:38
serial and long form narrative shows on
30:40
Gimlet. It
30:41
really expanded the world of podcasts
30:43
that made the world a lot bigger. Started
30:45
by This American Life alum Alex Bloomberg
30:48
and co-founder Matt Lieber, Gimlet
30:50
burst onto the scene with a list of plucky
30:53
shows.
30:54
Reply All, which was a spinoff of
30:56
a WNYC show.
30:58
And On the Media show, no less. And
31:00
On the Media show. Yes. Oh my God.
31:02
TLDR.
31:03
TLDR, yes. So
31:05
yeah, Reply All was the big one. It
31:08
was a podcast about the
31:10
internet and internet culture. There's
31:12
Mystery Show hosted by
31:14
Starley Kine, which was a quirky,
31:18
weird show where Starley played a
31:20
detective trying to solve really
31:23
mundane mysteries. And it was incredibly
31:25
charming. God, I sound like such a fangirl.
31:28
And then you had
31:29
Startup, Alex Bloomberg's meta
31:31
podcast about starting Gimlet.
31:33
The
31:34
first episode of Startup called
31:36
How to Pitch a Billionaire. It was him
31:38
pitching Chris Saka, who's a
31:40
tech VC guy
31:43
billionaire.
31:43
If I were calling an Uber right
31:45
now and it said it's going to be here
31:47
in two minutes, and that
31:49
was all the time you had, what
31:51
are you doing? So I'm
31:54
making a network of digital
31:57
podcasts that
31:59
we will monitor that.
31:59
that will that will that is going
32:02
to meet. He was
32:04
willing to make himself look bad on the show,
32:06
I think, because it made him a more compelling
32:08
protagonist
32:09
that warts and all honesty, hooked
32:12
listeners and investors. I
32:14
don't know what it is, but somehow a podcast about
32:16
me failing to generate FOMO and potential
32:18
investors generated a lot of FOMO
32:20
and potential investors. They raised over 28
32:23
million dollars and you could hear that
32:26
influx of cash on its shows.
32:28
There is an episode of reply all
32:30
where Alex Goldman called
32:33
back a telemarketer and
32:35
then hunted him down like flew
32:37
to whatever country he was
32:38
in. It was India. Yeah.
32:39
Yeah. I went to the building where his
32:42
office was. I know
32:43
where your front door is.
32:46
I wanted to know who was the person who called me and tried
32:48
to scam me and I figured it out. I
32:51
want you to admit that you guys are
32:53
scammers and that
32:56
you steal money from people.
32:58
And I remember being so enchanted
33:00
with that episode because it took an everyday
33:03
thing and took it to the furthest
33:05
degree possible. And I think that
33:07
was only possible because of the budget, the money
33:10
that they had.
33:11
Audible, I Heart Media, Pineapple
33:14
Street, Sony, Pushkin Industries,
33:17
companies new and old jumped
33:19
in to get a piece of the narrative podcast
33:21
boom. There was a succession of shows during
33:24
that 2014 to I want to see 2017, 18 stretch
33:27
where there was a string of hits,
33:29
right? That was the signatures at Simmons. Revisionist
33:31
history from Malcolm Brabell. You could argue actually
33:34
I kind of felt that Death, Sex and Money for you
33:36
guys had a little bit of heat when it came out even
33:38
though that's a weekly show. I will tell you Micah,
33:40
it was so fun.
33:43
Anna Sale is the host and creator
33:45
of Death, Sex and Money, a show made
33:47
by WNYC Studios.
33:49
When I started the show I was 33 years
33:51
old. I was
33:54
a single woman living in New York City.
33:56
I wasn't the demographic profile
33:59
of most people.
33:59
public radio with established shows.
34:01
In May 2014, the first
34:03
episode of Death, Sex and Money dropped. Who
34:06
in the world would come up with a title
34:08
like this? The musician
34:10
Bill Withers was her first guest, and
34:12
it was the kind of offbeat probing
34:15
conversation Anna would become known
34:17
for. It's all the essential stuff, right?
34:19
Yeah, yeah. The third episode
34:22
of Anna's show featured a painful
34:24
dilemma. Her relationship with
34:26
her on-again, off-again boyfriend,
34:28
Arthur.
34:29
We'd broken up because we didn't live
34:30
in the same place, and then my ex
34:33
wanted to get back together, and I was like,
34:35
how do we do this? Arthur knew that
34:37
Anna loved interviewing Wyoming Senator
34:39
Alan Simpson during her days as a politics
34:42
reporter on the campaign trail.
34:44
And Arthur was like, I
34:46
have an idea. If I write Alan Simpson a letter,
34:49
maybe he'll call Anna and it'll make her laugh.
34:52
It's such a funny premise. So what did the
34:54
letter say? He said, help me get this
34:56
woman back? Basically.
34:58
Here goes. The love of my life, Ms.
35:00
Anna Sale, lives in New York City. A
35:03
month ago, Anna stopped believing I would
35:05
ever close the distance to be with her, and
35:07
she cut me loose. I don't
35:09
blame her. I was being a fool, and I took her
35:11
for granted.
35:12
And what he didn't know was that
35:15
Al Simpson is also married to this incredible
35:17
woman named Anne Simpson, who when
35:20
Al Simpson did in fact
35:21
call me, I heard Anne talking in the
35:23
background. This is just the
35:25
sweetest letter. And I said, well,
35:27
what's Anne think I should do? And she got on. So
35:30
it is like a weird story. And it worked.
35:33
It worked.
35:34
It definitely worked. You're such a mark. I
35:36
know. I know. Anna
35:39
and Arthur have been married since 2015. They
35:41
have two children together. That story,
35:43
by the way, was picked up by This American Life and
35:46
helped make death, sex, and money a hit.
35:48
It was just like
35:49
having your wildest dreams
35:52
constantly expanded because
35:54
not
35:54
only were listeners hungry
35:57
and showing up, but also
35:59
as a make-up. It was just like blowing
36:02
up all of my ideas
36:04
of what was possible. WNYC
36:06
was jazz too. Public radio
36:09
stations had long been limited to just
36:11
three ways of bringing in the dough. Sponsorship,
36:14
what we call radio ads. Membership,
36:17
donations from listeners. And grants
36:19
from foundations. WNYC's
36:22
a little different. We also have a distribution arm.
36:24
And we collect syndication fees for nationally
36:26
distributed shows like OTM.
36:29
Now WNYC could sell podcast
36:31
ads without having to jostle for a slot
36:33
on the crowded radio schedule. It
36:36
was an electric time for the podcast
36:38
industry. It felt like a new form
36:40
of art and journalism was being built
36:42
in real time. And Hollywood
36:44
was paying attention. Tomorrow is my
36:47
first official day as the boss of my new
36:49
podcast company. This is Alex
36:51
Inc., a 2018 ABC TV
36:53
show based on startup, the podcast
36:56
based on the founding of Gimlet. Alex
36:59
Bloomberg is played by Zach Breath. There
37:12
were a bunch of these TV shows based on podcasts.
37:16
Dirty John on Bravo, Two Dough
37:18
Queens on HBO, Doctor Death on Peacock,
37:20
Song Exploder on Netflix. Podcasts
37:23
were shiny. And those of us making them
37:25
were suddenly in demand. The podcast
37:27
boom was kind of crazy for us because all of a
37:29
sudden people that work for us were just getting
37:32
offered $150,000 a year or whatever. This
37:34
is Jesse Thorn, host of Bullseye, speaking
37:37
here with reporter Emily Russell for
37:39
her audio piece for Columbia Journalism
37:41
Review. One of her big revelations,
37:44
the math on these beautiful serialized
37:46
shows just wasn't working. Here's
37:50
Emily.
37:50
For a narrative audio documentary project,
37:53
budgets from the major buyers,
37:56
such as Audible Iheart and
37:58
Sony could range from a
38:00
quarter to half a million dollars,
38:03
but projected revenue during a show's
38:05
release might be closer to $200,000.
38:09
And that's for the rare show with
38:12
a million listeners.
38:13
The fact is, Gimlet's specialty, our
38:16
business model basically, had been to make
38:18
a kind of podcast that costs a lot of money.
38:20
Alex Bloomberg again in a 2019 episode of Startup, in
38:25
which he's reflecting on how five
38:27
years after Gimlet's launch, the company
38:29
was in dire financial straits. A
38:31
lot of the things we assumed would happen
38:33
didn't.
38:34
We assumed audiences would grow, but instead they plateaued.
38:37
Our launches had not done as well as they had in the past.
38:40
And some of our biggest shows with the largest audiences
38:42
still weren't making money because we couldn't sell
38:45
ads on them.
38:46
There was another kind of show that was getting more and more popular,
38:48
a kind of show that wasn't what we specialized in. Shows
38:51
like Pod Save America and My Favorite
38:53
Murder and The Dax Shepard podcast. These
38:56
shows rely on a charismatic host connecting
38:58
with fans, and they're much cheaper to
39:00
produce. And the audiences for these shows
39:03
are huge,
39:04
way bigger than the audience for any Gimlet podcast.
39:07
He's describing the Always On
39:09
podcast. They release consistently
39:11
without breaks, unlike a seasonal narrative
39:14
like Serial that takes months to make
39:17
and only runs for a handful of weeks. Those
39:19
Gabfest type podcasts are fun
39:21
to listen to because you feel like you're hanging out with a group
39:24
of friends just shooting the breeze. It's
39:26
a part-time job for me and for my co-hosts.
39:29
We come into the studio, we
39:32
chat to each other for an hour. We have
39:34
a producer who edits it and puts it up. Felix
39:36
Salmon is a financial journalist at
39:39
Axios and a co-host of the
39:41
Slate Money podcast. The amount
39:43
of work that goes into Slate
39:46
Money every week is absolutely tiny
39:49
compared to the amount of work that goes into a super
39:51
produced and edited and
39:53
scripted in many ways podcast
39:55
from WNYC or Gimlet. Despite
39:58
the apparent troubles with Gimlet's business,
39:59
this model, in 2019, this
40:02
crazy thing happened.
40:03
By
40:17
exclusively
40:18
hosting Joe Rogan, Kim Kardashian,
40:21
and Gimlet shows like Reply All and
40:23
Heavyweight, Spotify thought it could differentiate
40:25
itself from other music streamers. Others
40:28
of Gimlet stood to make millions. It
40:47
was the last burst of hot air
40:49
in the prestige podcast bubble. Within
40:52
just a few years, Spotify appeared
40:54
to change its mind as financial
40:56
uncertainty swept the tech industry.
40:58
Spotify is laying off 200 workers
41:01
or about 2% of its employees worldwide.
41:04
The cutbacks will be in Spotify's podcasting
41:06
unit. In addition to another round of layoffs at Spotify,
41:09
the Gimlet brand is being sort of hoover into
41:11
a larger Spotify Studios banner. Ne
41:14
qua. So functionally, Gimlet
41:16
media as a brand doesn't
41:17
quite exist anymore, which is kind of like
41:19
the symbolic end of this era. And
41:22
then this year, NPR sent
41:24
layoff notices to about a tenth
41:27
of its employees this week. The network
41:29
also announced the cancellation of four podcasts.
41:32
Some of them are pretty familiar to a lot of folks in Visibilia,
41:35
louder than a riot about hip hop. You
41:37
have rough translation. And there
41:39
will also be layoffs at the satellite
41:41
radio company SiriusXM. They're
41:44
eliminating 475 jobs. That's 8%
41:47
of its staff. Pushkin Industries,
41:49
Malcolm Gladwell's podcast company, cut 30%
41:51
of its staff. LAist,
41:54
formerly known as KPCC, got
41:56
rid of some of its podcast-only shows. So
41:59
did OTM's producing station WNYC,
42:02
which canceled More Perfect and LaBrega
42:04
and cut staff members from Radiolab
42:07
and the New Yorker Radio Hour and OTM.
42:10
The company may also sunset Anna
42:12
Sales' Death, Sex and Money. We are
42:14
continuing to produce the show with our
42:16
current team as New
42:17
York Public Radio employees through the end
42:19
of this year.
42:21
And then something has to change.
42:23
The show will stick around, she says, if
42:25
the company can find a financial partner
42:27
to support its costs, which could
42:30
be seen as part of a wider reshuffling
42:32
of public radio podcasts, like
42:34
how the New Yorker bought In the Dark,
42:36
the investigative podcast from American
42:38
Public Media, or how Mother Jones
42:41
is reportedly in talks to buy reveal
42:44
from the Center for Investigative Reporting.
42:46
WNYC and I are talking
42:48
to lots of people about new partnerships
42:51
and potentially a new production home for
42:53
the show.
42:54
What went through your mind when you found
42:57
out that the future of Death,
42:59
Sex and Money was up in the air?
43:01
I didn't feel
43:03
angry. I
43:05
felt like, okay,
43:07
the status quo is changing.
43:10
That's like kind of scary and
43:12
sad. It
43:14
was interesting to me that
43:17
for like the first couple of weeks when I would like
43:19
be talking about it, it's like I
43:21
would just get this like catch in my throat and I'd start
43:23
crying whenever I talked about my
43:26
team. And when
43:28
you're making me do it, my team and
43:31
our listeners,
43:33
and I don't want to let them down.
43:35
Do you think
43:37
the team will stay intact? Like, do you think they'll be able
43:39
to come with you wherever you go next?
43:42
I don't know.
43:44
This has been the most
43:46
challenged year for the podcast industry
43:48
of at large, the podcast ecosystem since
43:51
I started covering it, which is 2014.
43:53
When I asked Nick Kwa what accounted for
43:55
this flurry of layoffs, he quoted
43:57
Leo Tolstoy. Happy families.
44:00
families are all alike. Every
44:02
unhappy family is unhappy in
44:04
its own way. What happened to you
44:06
at WNYC is not what happened to Pushkin. It's
44:09
not what happened to Gimlet, right? Everybody
44:11
comes in from a very different category, but
44:13
everybody's depressed by the same larger macroeconomic
44:15
conditions. As I was speaking with Nick
44:18
Kwa, a podcast expert, and
44:20
Felix Salmon, a financial journalist,
44:23
about what was happening in our industry and
44:25
in public radio, I came up against
44:27
three contradictions. Prediction
44:30
one,
44:31
prestige podcasts are shrinking,
44:34
but podcast sting is growing.
44:36
The podcast ecosystem, just looking
44:39
at it from an economic point of view,
44:41
is still growing at a really quite
44:43
objectively impressive rate. We
44:45
are going to surpass $2 billion of podcast ad
44:50
revenue in 2023. That's billion with a B. And in 2025, it's going to
44:52
hit nearly $4 billion. The
44:58
water sounds really warm.
45:00
Why are my friends getting
45:02
laid off? Why are some of my favorite
45:05
shows getting shut down? It doesn't
45:07
make a lot of sense. Really good question. The
45:10
only real explanation for it is that the water is very
45:12
warm, but it's not quite as warm as people
45:14
thought it would be. According to the Interactive
45:17
Advertising Bureau's latest report, overall
45:20
podcast ad revenue has never
45:22
been better, especially for sports and comedy
45:25
podcasts. But news podcasts
45:27
saw a small drop in ad revenue in
45:30
the past year. Podcasts are
45:32
still being made and making money, but
45:34
it's only a certain kind of podcast that's making the
45:36
biggest sums of that money. Nick Kwa, we're
45:39
talking primarily
45:39
about personality-driven talk
45:42
shows, the Joe Rogan's, the Call Her Daddies,
45:44
the Mark Maron's, that is just an engine
45:46
that keeps printing money. It's a very
45:49
efficient business model. Whereas
45:51
the long-form narrative podcast format
45:54
that I love, it's not dead. The
45:56
dream of it has become harder.
45:59
Number two, advertising for news shows
46:02
is going down because the economy is weird,
46:04
but actually the economy is doing
46:07
okay.
46:08
The economy is doing great. We just had the
46:10
third quarter GDP figures come out. We
46:12
grew at 4.9%, which is
46:14
crazy, like super fast economic
46:17
growth. There was a little
46:19
bit of a pullback
46:21
towards the end of last year where
46:24
people were worried about a recession.
46:26
I talked about that with Brooke on the story
46:28
show. And in
46:30
anticipation of
46:32
this expected recession,
46:34
a bunch of advertisers said, well, the
46:36
first thing we want to cut is our advertising.
46:38
We saw a $7 million
46:40
drop in sponsorship sales
46:43
between our fiscal year 22 and FY23.
46:47
This is LaFontaine Oliver, New York Public Radio's
46:50
president, speaking last month on
46:52
WNYC's daily call-in show hosted
46:54
by Brian Lehrer. Oliver declined
46:57
OTM's request for an interview. For
46:59
us as a nonprofit, that is significant.
47:03
We've had to, unfortunately, take steps
47:06
in saying goodbye to some of our
47:08
wonderful colleagues. We are focusing
47:11
on the shows that can
47:13
serve both our radio and
47:15
our podcast audiences, our
47:17
multi-platform
47:17
shows, our national
47:19
shows like On the Media
47:21
and The New Yorker Radio Hour.
47:25
My rights program, Notes from America
47:27
and Radio Lab.
47:28
LaFontaine Oliver's multi-platform
47:31
audio strategy brings us to contradiction
47:33
number three. Radio is becoming
47:35
more important even as its listenership
47:38
declines. Look at The New York Times,
47:40
which has begun syndicating two of its popular
47:43
podcasts, The Daily and Ezra Klein
47:45
Show, on public radio. Vox
47:47
has done the same with its show Today Explained.
47:50
I think of it as just
47:52
very
47:53
sensible business, which
47:55
is you want to maximize the
47:58
number of revenue streams.
47:59
associated with any piece of, and I'm going
48:02
to use a terrible term here, IP, right?
48:04
If you just have a podcast, really
48:07
the only way you can monetize that audio
48:09
is by selling ads against the podcast.
48:12
But what if I said to you, you can just take exactly
48:14
the same piece of audio and get
48:16
two more revenue streams from it. You
48:19
can sell ads on the radio.
48:22
And as you say, you can syndicate
48:24
that show to other radio stations who pay you cash
48:27
to put your show on their air.
48:29
So that's now three different revenue streams
48:31
from the same piece of audio. And that's got
48:33
to be a much more attractive business than just
48:36
only having one. But
48:39
the radio listenership tends
48:41
to skew older, tends to skew
48:43
less diverse. The numbers
48:46
for the radio listenership are
48:49
depending on what market you're looking at,
48:51
steady, but
48:53
pretty clearly trending downward.
48:55
It's no TikTok, right?
48:57
Radio is
48:59
orders of magnitude larger than
49:01
podcasting. It reaches millions
49:03
of people at all times of the day or night. It
49:05
is a massive business. There is a trend
49:08
there. It's probably downwards, but
49:10
it's slowly downwards and it's predictably
49:12
downwards. And what we've learned
49:14
over the past couple of years in podcasting
49:17
is that it's much less predictable
49:20
than radio is. Nick Kwa feels
49:22
that by cutting much of their podcast
49:24
only shows, NPR and
49:27
WNYC are setting themselves
49:29
up for future failure. It feels
49:31
like
49:32
both organizations are receding deeper
49:35
and deeper into itself when it should be
49:37
unfolding wider and expanding and
49:40
trying to really reinvent itself
49:43
for the changing media landscape
49:46
demographic and the world that it exists
49:48
in. If you are not reaching
49:51
new people where they are, you
49:53
will not be here in 20 years. It
49:56
is as simple as that.
49:58
I'm sorry, I feel like I'm very.
49:59
I'm coming up very angry and
50:02
I am, but it's like, boy, nobody's asked
50:04
me about this stuff for a while. And I'm like,
50:06
I'm really pissed about this. Why are you pissed?
50:09
Because I value public radio. I really
50:11
value the enterprise of producing journalism
50:14
and creative work that is for
50:16
the public that is
50:19
to a meaningful extent, this
50:21
entangle from a pure for-profit,
50:24
carpalistic structure. You are in
50:26
the position to produce more interesting and better
50:28
work. A lot of media is like one of the greatest shows of all
50:30
time. If nobody is out here being
50:32
angry, trying to defend it and think
50:34
about its future, then what the f*** are we doing?
50:36
NPR, WNYC,
50:38
LAist,
50:41
these guys have been in the podcast game for a long
50:43
time, right? They didn't just dip their
50:45
toes.
50:46
And they're saying 10 years
50:49
on
50:50
of experimenting with podcasts,
50:53
they're really expensive to make. You
50:55
got to pay those hosts so much money. You got to fly them all around the place
50:57
to report these fancy stories.
51:00
It didn't work. So
51:03
why are we chasing a unicorn
51:06
when we've got old reliable over on 93.9?
51:10
Two things. One, old reliable is not
51:12
going to be reliable forever. Something
51:14
feels different about how fast things are changing
51:16
in a way that we're moving today. And the second
51:19
thing I'll say about it is that, did it fail
51:21
because of
51:23
the theory or did it fail because of the execution?
51:26
I would argue the execution.
51:28
I'll say it out loud. It does feel to the logic set
51:30
like budget mismanagement, right? You're
51:34
focusing on all the executives that
51:36
you want to pay lucrative salaries to, right, in relation
51:38
to your newsroom. The model works
51:41
within the context of an organization
51:44
that's able to support it. According to public
51:46
data from 2021, keep in mind
51:48
there's a two year lag for nonprofit
51:50
tax records. New York Public Radio's
51:53
last president made $749,000 a year, including bonuses
51:55
compared to
51:59
NPR's. president at the time, who made $466,000
52:01
a year. NPR
52:04
is around twice the size of New York Public
52:07
Radio, and yet our last president
52:09
made $280,000 more. So
52:11
back in June, even before we
52:14
started talking about the possibilities
52:16
of layoffs, I made the decision to cut executive
52:18
bonuses for the year. Current New
52:21
York Public Radio president LaFontaine Oliver,
52:23
explaining to WNYC host Brian
52:26
Lehrer why he chose not to
52:28
reduce executive base salaries
52:29
in response to our $10 million
52:32
deficit. We did not feel
52:34
some executive roles to keep our overall
52:37
executive salary pool lower.
52:40
And as there's been turnover, we've hired
52:42
people at lower salaries than their predecessors,
52:45
myself included.
52:46
And how did you decide to not cut
52:48
our local news team? Local news
52:52
is our stock and trade. And
52:55
going into an election
52:57
year and also thinking
53:00
about the legacy and the history specifically
53:03
of WNYC, going
53:05
back 99 years,
53:08
being focused on serving the local
53:11
news needs of New Yorkers,
53:15
that was just really important
53:16
to us.
53:17
After years of incubating and
53:19
betting on the podcast economy, New
53:22
York Public Radio appears to be changing
53:24
course.
53:25
But Nick Kwa believes that podcast
53:27
fans should remain hopeful. The sort of fact
53:29
remains that like podcasting is here to say,
53:32
right? People want this stuff. People
53:34
want to make this stuff. It's becoming a
53:36
bigger part of a lot of people's media
53:38
habits, media diets. This is something
53:40
that every television studio has already known,
53:42
every film studio has every note, every music label has
53:45
already known that there are ups and there are downs. This
53:47
is podcasting's first big down. And
53:49
I think there's going to be a generation of talent that's going to come
53:51
out of the site,
53:52
all the stronger for it. And maybe all
53:54
the smarter, hopefully.
53:56
One of the big lessons of the podcast
53:58
industry and digital media in general is that we're general
54:00
is that if you think you can get rich off of journalism,
54:03
you will either
54:04
fail or cash out at other
54:06
people's expense. When
54:08
it comes to public media, the challenge
54:10
we face is experimenting sustainably,
54:13
taking risks and giving new
54:16
shows space to grow while balancing
54:18
the books. Good audio
54:20
journalism takes time. It's also
54:22
expensive, which is not a bad thing,
54:25
just a fact. It's what our
54:27
listeners pay to support. The
54:30
profit centers of the podcasting world will
54:32
zoom past public media, past
54:34
hard news, past radio. Their
54:37
water is hot. Hours
54:39
is lukewarm. But
54:42
it's actually kind of fine once you
54:44
get used to it.
54:54
That's it for this week's show. On the Media
54:56
is produced by Eloise Blondio, Molly
54:58
Rosen, Rebecca Clark Callender, and
55:00
Candice Wong, with help from Sean
55:02
Merchant. And our show was edited
55:05
by Katia Rogers, our executive producer.
55:07
Our technical director is Jennifer Munson.
55:10
Our engineer this week was Andrew Nerviano.
55:13
On the Media is a production of WNYC
55:15
Studios. I'm Michael O'ONGER.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More