Podchaser Logo
Home
Elon’s Texts, TikTok’s Wins and Fails in Europe, and Guest Gabriel Debenedetti

Elon’s Texts, TikTok’s Wins and Fails in Europe, and Guest Gabriel Debenedetti

Released Tuesday, 4th October 2022
 1 person rated this episode
Elon’s Texts, TikTok’s Wins and Fails in Europe, and Guest Gabriel Debenedetti

Elon’s Texts, TikTok’s Wins and Fails in Europe, and Guest Gabriel Debenedetti

Elon’s Texts, TikTok’s Wins and Fails in Europe, and Guest Gabriel Debenedetti

Elon’s Texts, TikTok’s Wins and Fails in Europe, and Guest Gabriel Debenedetti

Tuesday, 4th October 2022
 1 person rated this episode
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

If

0:01

you wanna build a successful e commerce business,

0:03

you don't want just new customers. You want customers

0:06

for life, and PlayDEO is here to help.

0:08

Clavio is an email marketing platform that

0:10

brings all your customer data into one

0:12

place. The Clavio platform allows you

0:14

to drive successful marketing campaigns with

0:17

pre built behavior triggered automation so

0:19

you can develop long term customer loyalty.

0:22

It's time to talk to your customers like you

0:24

know them because you do with Clavio.

0:26

learn more at clavio dot com.

0:28

That's KLAVIY0

0:32

dot com.

0:37

This episode is brought to you by Kohler

0:39

Home Generators. Nothing makes you realize

0:41

just how much you rely on electricity. like

0:44

a power outage from smart home

0:46

devices to streaming when the lights go out,

0:48

everything grinds to a halt, but cooler

0:50

home Generators kick into

0:52

action and seconds automatically providing

0:54

reliable backup power no matter the weather.

0:56

With heavy duty commercial grade engines,

0:59

and no refueling necessary. Coler can

1:01

make those lights out in moments thing of the past.

1:03

And if you purchase a Coler Home generator

1:05

now, you can get a free ten year

1:07

extended warranty and up to seven

1:09

hundred fifty dollars off. Visit

1:11

kolerhomegenerators dot com slash pivot

1:13

to learn more. That's K0LER

1:16

home generators dot com slash pivot

1:18

colon, the power to live

1:20

boldly.

1:27

Hi,

1:27

everyone. This is Pivot from New York Magazine

1:29

and Box Media Podcast Network. I'm Kara

1:31

Swisher.

1:31

And I was kinda gonna lie.

1:34

So what's going on with the with the

1:36

economy over there? Trust looks like she's

1:38

shifting again. What's what's happening? I need an

1:40

update from London.

1:42

So effectively, they've gone back. They've

1:44

decided to not change. What they had

1:46

decided to do was

1:48

eliminate the top tax rate. So

1:50

the idea, again, trickle down Reaganomics,

1:53

that if we have our most productive citizens,

1:55

give them more money, it'll all trickle down

1:57

to people. And Right. the market

1:59

threw up on the idea. And, also,

2:01

I like this move, and I I wanna

2:04

applaud the prime minister. I think

2:06

a a step back from the wrong direction, a step

2:08

in the right direction. So I I'm

2:10

not I see a lot of Twitter activity like, you

2:12

know, what an idiot? You know, that was

2:14

that was quick. You know what? What I

2:16

like about what she's done --

2:18

Mhmm. -- the majority of our leaders in the

2:20

US would double down. Oh, it's inflamed the other

2:22

side. I'll double down. I think

2:24

it's okay to say we screwed up. I like

2:26

this move. It was a bad move, and she's

2:28

undoing it. Good for her. Right. Yeah. There's a lot of economic

2:31

pain coming. you know, in the in the And the pound

2:33

recovered a little bit. Yeah. The market likes

2:35

it. Yeah. That's something Margaret Thatcher might not have

2:37

done. Anyway, I had a lovely weekend, miss Clara's

2:39

third birthday. Hatted

2:40

lovely. She's not a great party. Yeah.

2:42

Mhmm. Wow. Yeah. Yeah.

2:44

It starts to get good from here.

2:46

It

2:46

starts to get good. Well, yeah. And then

2:49

she she's good the whole time. And then, well, it's

2:51

my wedding anniversary. I took my lovely wife out

2:53

to a dinner at a beautiful restaurant, six

2:55

course meal. You guys have been married. How long?

2:57

Two years. Two years.

2:59

Yes. Two years. Right? Yeah. Yeah. We've

3:01

been together longer than that. But, yeah, wedding. We

3:03

had a little outdoor wedding during the

3:04

pandemic. So today is our

3:07

actual anniversary. Same thing as Barack

3:08

Obama's and Michelle Obama's just

3:10

so you're aware. I'm gonna just impress

3:12

you. Remember your your anniversary. I

3:14

couldn't tell you on my anniversary of us.

3:16

Oh,

3:17

no. We had a lovely meal. It was really

3:19

very fancy. It had a wine pairing. It was

3:21

very nice. So I want you to wish Amanda,

3:23

happy anniversary

3:23

and Claire. Happy birthday. Happy anniversary,

3:26

Amanda. Thanks for jumping on that grenade. What

3:29

about Claire?

3:29

You can get Claire one. But

3:32

Goldenchild, give her her due.

3:34

She's three. She got a lovely present.

3:36

She got a high see on Golden Dot. Come

3:38

to London. Yeah.

3:39

I'm the London. Yeah. I'm still She

3:41

she got a t set and a

3:43

real a real t set and also

3:45

a bike a a balanced bike.

3:47

So she's very excited. very good.

3:50

She doesn't listen to this podcast, so I will say

3:52

we haven't it's not her actual birthday for a

3:54

day or two, but this is when the party was I got

3:56

her headset headphones.

3:58

she's gonna love me more

3:59

than ever. That's really shocking

4:02

because the cracks in the vox research

4:04

department came back and said that our two muscular

4:06

viewers are tech pros and three year old girls.

4:10

I also got you frozen

4:12

headphones for Christmas, so I'm so excited

4:15

to give it to you. Anyway

4:16

I would wear those. Just You what? Just as

4:18

a conversation starter. They're very humbling.

4:20

They'd show up well on that paint of

4:22

yours. That paint Otherwise, I fought

4:24

against people who don't like Scott Galloway this weekend was

4:26

stupid of me, but I can't stand them on there. It

4:28

doesn't mean to you. I don't like it. I'm sorry.

4:30

Yeah. You know what? I was really

4:32

flattered what Carrie is referring to is

4:34

I wrote a a blog post,

4:36

numerous analysis on identity. And essentially,

4:39

one of the things After

4:42

writing this book where I'm trying to identify

4:44

the issues -- Yeah. -- ailing America so so we

4:46

can talk about solutions. I

4:48

generally think our biggest problem -- Yeah. --

4:50

what I recognize is I think we've never been

4:52

stronger geopolitically. I think if you're an honest

4:54

appraiser of where America is right now is where

4:56

some are good to great. externally

4:58

relative to our competitive set. Food

5:01

independent, energy independent, GDP, consistent

5:03

GDP growth, everybody wants to come here.

5:05

I think what really ails us our biggest

5:07

problem is we don't like each

5:09

other. We're turning on each other.

5:11

Yeah. And we no longer believe that

5:13

Americans greatest allies or other Americans

5:15

-- Mhmm. -- that if we're a horror movie,

5:17

the call's coming from inside of the house. And --

5:19

Yeah. -- I said, is there a

5:21

way to enforce some

5:23

sort of third party -- Yeah. -- or --

5:25

Yeah. -- or decentralized identity

5:27

such that if Russian or

5:29

Chinese troll farms come in and just

5:31

try and create incendiary content

5:34

that pits us against one another. Could you

5:36

more easily figure that out and then screen

5:38

out that shit? Or or

5:40

vial content or what have you or promoting

5:43

a cryptocurrency through thousands

5:45

of bots? Yeah. You

5:46

just put out some ideas. some of

5:48

which people disagree with, which you noted,

5:50

which you noted.

5:50

Yeah. And and what I find is similar to

5:53

whenever you talk about two thirty or a

5:55

crypto. there's an absolutest mentality

5:57

where it's not let's discuss the

5:59

issue.

5:59

It's like, okay, you insanely rich shithead.

6:02

Yeah. I agree.

6:03

That's what pissed me off. they

6:05

kinda go after stop. You can't respond.

6:08

Like,

6:08

easy for you to say a personal privilege that

6:10

doesn't live in China. It's like, okay. How do I respond

6:13

to that? Yeah. Mama Bear came out

6:15

swinging.

6:15

I did. I was like, you know what? Here's

6:17

the thing. He's an insanely rich idiot,

6:19

but he's my insanely rich idiot. There you

6:21

go. First of all, And secondly, like, that's

6:23

exactly right. It was like, don't agree with him,

6:25

but and then he's like, because Scott influences Scabs

6:28

of companies. I was like, why don't you write

6:30

about, like, I don't know, Tim Cook or you

6:32

know,

6:32

keep up a chai. Everyone everywhere

6:35

listens to me. It's a

6:36

god. Oh, like, really? Really?

6:39

Like, Come on. Like, I wasn't saying minimizing

6:41

you, but I was like, okay. First of all, you're

6:43

using insanely rich excuse, which

6:45

I'm like weak. week, like, haven't

6:47

our actual debate. And this is a guy I

6:49

respect Mike Masnack, and he and I have

6:50

argued about two thirty.

6:51

Well, I tend to be on his side on this issue

6:53

too. And then, you know, like, the

6:55

the Jeff Jarvis as the world came out and had to

6:57

have their say patronizingly. But

7:00

it's it was really weird. I was like, let's ever

7:02

actual debate about this in time?

7:03

No. They're not interested in that.

7:04

Well, he's usually I find some

7:07

of his analysis, but lately, he's been, like,

7:09

Amy Glover shares an idiot. You're an idiot.

7:11

I'm, like, You know what? Actually, I'd like to have

7:13

an actual debate, and I tend to be on his side

7:15

on a lot of things compared to you. Like,

7:17

I disagreed with you last week because of that. But

7:19

nonetheless, no one's gonna do

7:20

that. But but let's just screen the sound. We was

7:22

we do try to, like, reverse engineer

7:25

to a learning here for a younger person. Correct.

7:27

That is correct. The learning here for me is

7:29

-- Mhmm. -- if you're not,

7:31

I consider myself a thought leader, and I realize how

7:33

arrogant that statement is. If you're not on a regular

7:36

basis saying things that really gets

7:38

a lot of pushback, then you're not saying anything.

7:40

Right. Yeah. And the key isn't to be right or

7:42

wrong. The key is to catalyze a conversation

7:44

and that might result in productive dialogue that

7:46

shapes and reshapes better solutions.

7:49

Right. And I get it wrong all the time. And by the

7:51

way, you say I just didn't have the

7:53

energy to go on last time respond. That's okay. I

7:55

did it for you. What I would say is, I wouldn't get

7:57

back in this phase. I'd say boss, post

7:59

where I got it wrong in the studies, and I'll

8:01

retweet it. I I wanna get to

8:03

a better solution. I I realized I don't

8:05

have a monopoly on the truth here. Yeah.

8:07

But there has to be some it's

8:10

worth thinking about right now. Agree.

8:12

Because there are too many people. I mean, you

8:14

saw what happened with the women's march -- Mhmm.

8:16

-- how that actor's got in there and basically

8:18

ruined a woman's career and started reshaping

8:20

people's view of the women's march. Mhmm.

8:23

There's gotta be a technical solution

8:25

for new

8:25

incentives to screen that stuff

8:27

out. There's gotta be a way to I would agree.

8:29

It's a complex topic, but nonetheless,

8:31

you're a rich guy who's flying around, like, some

8:34

like, if insane. Like, I was like, that's you've lost

8:36

me on this one. Anyway, I defended you, and I

8:37

think you shouldn't. And I don't always agree with

8:40

you. By the way, FYI. I

8:42

don't always agree with me.

8:43

I know exactly.

8:44

Sometimes I write shit and I'm like, well, I don't

8:46

know about this.

8:47

I was actually I was doing some

8:49

of it from the three

8:50

year old party. I was like fuck you. Oh, would

8:52

you like a cupcake? That's why you were angry.

8:54

Now I understand why you came in so

8:56

high. No.

8:56

No. No. I was just annoyed by that. I was super

8:59

annoyed because we try to come get to comedy here,

9:01

which is really good. Anyway, there's

9:03

a lot going on. Also, Amazon is

9:05

facing lawmakers led by

9:07

center,

9:07

Elizabeth Warren, one of the FTC to block the company's

9:10

acquisition of iRobot, which

9:11

was interesting Warren since the company's coach

9:13

shouldn't be allowed to just buy their way out of

9:15

competing and Amazon spokesperson said of the

9:17

letter request. The letter contains a number

9:19

of falsehoods and is broadly inaccurate,

9:21

which, of course, they don't point to anything.

9:23

But we talked

9:24

about this. I don't know if the FTC will do

9:26

this because it's quite a competitive arena.

9:29

Again, Amazon's being very candy and

9:31

what it's buying, MGM, tough kinda

9:33

competitive in the instrument business, tough in

9:35

the in the robot well,

9:37

vacuum business, I guess, was that what they're

9:39

doing there? home

9:40

presence. I don't know what to call it.

9:42

This

9:42

is a master class. I

9:44

I like senator I don't like senator

9:46

I think she's fighting a good fight. But

9:49

I think she's

9:50

more right than effective. And I just

9:52

don't think this is where they should be focusing their

9:55

energy. Yep. In terms of the

9:57

the antitrust case to go after. And what's

9:59

gonna happen is she's gonna spend her

10:01

political capital railing against Amazon

10:04

because they're big and powerful and that's not what

10:06

antitrust is about. You're allowed to be big and powerful.

10:08

Does this make the market less competitive?

10:10

Mhmm. And I'm I don't

10:12

know much about home appliances but

10:14

my my

10:14

my nascent knowledge of the home

10:17

appliance market is it's there's no

10:19

monopoly that's emerged, that

10:21

there's Dyson, there's Hoover, there's there's a

10:23

lot of them. Mhmm. And

10:25

this is where she decides to put her wood. drone

10:27

one. There's I don't even know of another one.

10:29

Maybe there's some from China. This is a

10:31

very specific time. With the picker upper.

10:33

I

10:34

don't know. I know. But there's not that many drone

10:36

ones. There's not that many

10:36

drone. I don't know quite why this is the one

10:39

there. Speaking of other legal issues, Kim

10:41

Kardashian is settling a charge for

10:43

promoting a crypto called Ethereum Max

10:45

without disclosing that it was an ad.

10:47

Kardashian was paid two hundred and

10:49

fifty thousand dollars for the post, Incredible. As

10:51

part of the settlement, she's agreed to pay one

10:53

point two six million dollars and

10:55

not promote any cryptocurrencies for three

10:57

years. First shot across the bow on this one. There's a lot

10:59

of celebrities. sucked into this. I

11:01

think this is foreplay to what will

11:03

be a much bigger set of

11:05

fines and investigations around

11:08

people who are not transparent around

11:10

their intentions when they go on

11:12

media to try and pump the value

11:14

of something. And her what's

11:16

different here here is my understanding

11:18

is she didn't disclose that

11:20

that she had a position here or that she was

11:22

getting paid. Right. But

11:24

I think this is a tip of the iceberg. And I

11:26

think when we're gonna stare down, when we do the

11:28

analysis, especially around specs, and we had

11:30

all of these individuals going on media

11:32

platforms, and using massive

11:34

Twitter following. So, essentially, pump

11:36

and then dot -- Mhmm. -- I think

11:38

that there's gonna be some sort of regulation, and

11:40

I think it'll be warranted that says, alright.

11:42

if you own over x percent of a company

11:45

and you're on CNBC making a

11:48

compelling argument and then using your Twitter

11:50

followership to promote it and

11:52

go after anyone who dares question you.

11:54

And at the same time,

11:56

you are selling like there's no

11:58

tomorrow that people

11:59

should have transparency into

12:02

that. What I think the the

12:04

rub here is that we're gonna find out so

12:06

many people made hundreds of millions or even

12:08

billions. Yeah. as others lost

12:10

money. And that is the Adam Neumann effect. Should

12:12

you get a commission on

12:14

other people's losses? Yep.

12:16

And it's it was the same algorithm. I have a big

12:18

Twitter following. I'm very charismatic. Media

12:20

loves me on because I say provocative things.

12:23

I make it such that I'm not on the board of the

12:25

company so I can sell stock without making

12:27

disclosures. Oh, she's a paid she's a

12:29

paid celebrity spokesperson model. sense. This is

12:31

different because she she should disclose that.

12:33

Right? But I think this is a bridge to

12:35

a broader conversation -- Mhmm.

12:37

-- around how do we ensure people

12:40

understand not only your incentives but your

12:42

actions when they're on CNBC pumping

12:44

a stock, and that afternoon's selling

12:46

it. This is interesting. Gary Gensler

12:48

said Kardashian's case serves as a reminder

12:50

to celebrities and others that the law requires them

12:52

to disclose the public when and how they are paid

12:54

to promote investing in securities.

12:56

There's lots of Floyd Mary weather was involved and there's

12:58

lots of celebrity sound. This is interesting.

13:00

Her attorney said miss

13:01

Kardashian fully cooperated with the SEC

13:03

from the very beginning, she remains willing to do whatever she

13:05

do can assist this SEC in this manner. She

13:07

wanted to get this matter behind her to avoid a protracted

13:10

dispute. The ARC Agreement

13:12

reached with the SEC allows her to do that so she can move

13:14

forward with many different business pursuits. That also

13:16

includes she just co founded a consumer

13:18

focused private equity firm with a with a

13:20

former Carlyle group partner. and they're

13:22

looking to do a debut firm. She's doing

13:24

a lot of stuff, actually. And

13:26

so, yeah, I agree. I mean, she she they

13:28

have gotten into trouble for versions of

13:30

this

13:30

before. but a lot more

13:31

here. There's a lot more here. And I agree in

13:34

this facts area. You've been very

13:37

vocal on this issue.

13:39

But

13:39

you said this, it's easy to

13:42

stereotype Kim Kardashian

13:44

because of her physical appearance and just have Hot

13:46

she is. I think she's actually a pretty

13:48

savvy business woman. Yeah. She knew to get

13:50

out of this. But did but

13:52

she handled it well? She knew she

13:55

was wrong. She didn't double down. She didn't

13:57

appeal it. She said she basically said, you're

13:59

right. I'm wrong. Here's the fine.

14:01

I apologize. Let's all move on. That

14:03

she didn't have to admit wrongdoing. Yeah.

14:05

She acknowledged the issue and she's she's

14:07

paying it. She's not I think

14:09

it was poor judgment. I mean, it goes back to the

14:11

trust thing. Mhmm. Everybody

14:13

fucked up. The the key

14:15

is you don't necessarily need to double

14:17

down. the FCC, the

14:19

populate everybody loves to forgive. Admits

14:22

you are wrong. Pay the fine. Move

14:24

on. Yep. Yep. And

14:25

they they can make a case ever to scare other people.

14:27

And there'll be a lot more you'll see a lot more of

14:30

this. It's very easy for the SEC to do

14:32

these, by they can they can make

14:34

some money and settle very quickly with most

14:36

people. Alright. Let's get to our

14:38

first big story.

14:41

Another

14:42

big week in the world of Elon Musk.

14:44

First, the court documents revealed private text

14:47

messages between Musk and tech a listers like

14:49

Jack Dorsey and Joe Lonsdale in which

14:51

they discussed the Twitter deal. Joe Rogen, as

14:53

we've talked about before, and even Gail King, we're in the

14:55

mix among the revelation. Matayas

14:57

Dopner of Axel Springer wanted to be

14:59

Twitter's CEO. Elon

15:01

pitched Oprah as a potential board

15:03

member. By the way, that's been pitched before by Jack

15:05

Dorothy. He said that he shouldn't be

15:07

anyone's boss he also was

15:09

in a discussion with Brett

15:11

Taylor about bots, and that was to

15:13

me the more important thing. Some of this stuff is just

15:15

kind of fun and games. of them

15:17

talking. But two weeks before he

15:19

signed the merger agreement, he wrote to Brett

15:21

Taylor, purging fake users will

15:23

make the numbers look terrible So restructuring should

15:25

be done as a private company. And

15:27

so I think it puts him in a

15:29

very bad position in this court case.

15:30

He's got to settle and figure out this

15:33

eleven billion dollar difference between what he agreed

15:34

to pay for it and what Twitter's worth right

15:36

now. He's he's got this some

15:38

of these texts are, as I said,

15:40

silly. The others are very

15:43

significant, I think. Howard Bauchner: Well, I

15:44

think you've zeroed on. And that is - this is

15:47

Celebrity porn and it has some

15:49

- it's illuminating about rich

15:51

people in society, but the substance is

15:53

exactly

15:53

what you said that he knew about the bots.

15:55

He was planning to address the bots. It was

15:57

a key component of why he was drawn

15:59

to the platform was he thought that one of the ways he could

16:01

add value was cleaning it up. This will be

16:03

the text you just referenced will be exhibit number

16:06

one -- Yeah. -- that WACTel will put

16:08

forward on behalf of Twitter's case. that the notion

16:10

that he somehow was shocked

16:12

by the number of bots

16:14

that -- Yeah. -- he knew about it and that

16:16

he, you know, his interest in this thing

16:18

waned when he came off his panic episode and

16:20

realized he was paying forty five

16:22

billion dollars worth for something worth probably

16:24

eighteen billion. The I

16:26

mean, I'm curious to get your take. And when I read these texts, at

16:28

first, I thought I should I be reading the text of other people

16:30

commenting on that, well, it's part of a case. It's it's a

16:32

legal case. Sure. Yeah. A few things

16:35

really struck me. The

16:36

first is just

16:39

income inequality. And I I know that

16:41

sounds classless, but Larry

16:43

Ellison offering a billion

16:45

dollars on a deal he hasn't looked at over

16:47

text. Mhmm. It's like Well, Sam

16:49

Bank and Fried also wanted to give

16:51

money -- Five billion.

16:52

-- with that just he come and fly out

16:54

there and then it'll be a hammer. And

16:55

you get five or ten billion dollars? Yeah. It's

16:57

just like I mean I mean, Kara, who hasn't had

16:59

a friend offer him a billion dollars over tax.

17:01

Would you fly here and give me

17:03

money? It's not I mean, really? So

17:04

I just wanna I was I was wanna

17:06

bring this back to me. In late, I

17:08

think it was ninety nine.

17:11

or

17:11

two thousand. My company read envelope was struggling

17:13

and we had to raise more money and Sequoia

17:15

came in and smelled blood and said, okay, let's wash

17:17

out the founders and do a rights offering.

17:19

and I didn't have any money to defend my position in

17:21

the company. Mhmm. And my friends, Greg and

17:23

Cindy Show, I'm I'll I'll always

17:26

remember was really stressed out. I was going through a divorce. I was

17:28

broke and I was about to get washed out of a company

17:30

I'd started. You know, kind of the classic

17:32

the Silicon Valley store you don't hear

17:34

about. in in fast company.

17:36

And I was just so stressed

17:38

and disappointed on a number of personal and

17:40

professional things going on in my life. And

17:42

my friends, Greg and Cindy Show, called me from

17:44

the car and they said, hey, we were talking about you and they

17:47

said, could you use a million

17:49

dollars?

17:49

What? Can

17:50

you imagine that? mean, they're good friends. Yeah. But

17:52

they called me and said, could you use a million dollars? And

17:54

you know what I said? Yes.

17:57

Oh. And they wired me the

17:59

money. No

17:59

agreement. This is a rich guy's thing.

18:02

This is a rich guy's story. And I paid them

18:04

back I paid them back with interest, but I

18:06

remember thinking loan, they loan. That was the

18:08

most crazy generous

18:10

thing. Yeah. And I I and they have

18:12

taught me. I've tried to pay it forward on a regular

18:14

basis, and now I'm virtue signaling I

18:16

call and offer people money when I get the sense they're stressed about money.

18:19

Oh, hey. I understand. I'm very

18:21

stressed about money. Nice

18:26

dry. Nice dry. Love. You

18:28

got a three year old. a new pair of

18:30

shoes. No. That's right. anniversary gift. See the kids

18:32

again. I forgot the anniversary. I got

18:33

a beautiful gift. And I thought

18:35

that was the most and it was extraordinary

18:37

thing that had ever happened to me.

18:39

on a, like, a friendship money

18:41

level. Uh-huh.

18:42

This is

18:43

Larry Ellison offering -- Yeah. -- a thousand

18:45

times that offering. Although he was

18:48

sort of pushing him off. Like, I'll get to

18:50

you. Like, that kind of thing. That's how little it

18:52

mattered to him. Like, I think these

18:54

people You wanna talk about playing on a

18:56

different level, so the first thing is and I don't know what to do about

18:58

it. And I realize I'm coming this is class

19:00

warfare, but I'm like Jesus Christ. These people

19:02

really have this much money.

19:03

Yeah. Well, they all want a piece of Twitter. They all want a piece of they

19:06

were like, oh, I'd like to get a a good

19:08

idea. Like a piece of Twitter. I could see

19:10

that going through their little brain because they can't

19:12

own they can buy almost anything else. This,

19:14

they can't buy.

19:14

So The the second thing is the

19:17

Achilles heel. of

19:19

every really famous wealthy person

19:21

is they become

19:24

so

19:24

entrenched in their own bubble and

19:26

they have so many people around them telling them they're amazing. They

19:28

just lose touch. Yeah. And the

19:30

sick of infection data. Yeah.

19:33

There's so overwhelming. Yeah.

19:36

Just how I mean, it's just like

19:38

let's just give everyone a moment to take

19:40

his dick out of your mouth. I mean, it's just

19:42

like, my god. Yeah. There

19:44

was a lot of it. There was a lot of that. But again, it doesn't matter

19:46

the one to Brett Taylor. I think I wrote him whoa.

19:48

I wanna do an interview. I think that's what I wrote

19:50

text. I mean, I didn't text him. I think I emailed

19:53

him. away from all of this and the Oprah on the

19:55

board. And again, Jack Dorothy, many years ago,

19:57

wanted to bring Oprah. Many times have they thought

19:59

about Oprah on the board

19:59

of Twitter -- Mhmm. -- when they were looking for

20:02

a lady. but she's never she's not

20:04

getting near this. Let's just say Oprah's a

20:06

little smarter. The most interesting story

20:08

is about my stalker in those

20:10

texts. Mhmm. Jason Calcannas.

20:12

Well, they're very close friends just so you know.

20:14

Okay. It's close friend. Two or three months

20:16

ago, Matt Levine wrote that Jason was out there

20:18

marketing access to the Twitter deal.

20:20

He's saying that I can get you into the Twitter deal. And he was

20:23

gonna take a fee for it and then

20:25

ten percent of the upside. And and then and

20:28

like, That sounds desperate. We even said on this show, I

20:30

said, that sounds kind of desperate. Did

20:32

Elon has to get Jason Cal

20:34

candidates who deals in pretty small checks to raise

20:36

money for a forty five billion dollar deal.

20:38

Mhmm. Here are the

20:40

techs, must to Calcannas. What's going

20:42

on with you marketing an SPV

20:44

to Randos? This is

20:46

not okay. Not Randoll's. I have the

20:48

largest Angel syndicate. That's how I

20:50

invest. We've done two hundred fifty plus

20:52

deals. And then he goes on to say, Morgan Stanley

20:54

and Jared think you are using our

20:56

friendship not in a good way. Yeah. This

20:58

makes it seem like I'm desperate.

21:00

Please stop.

21:01

Yeah. So

21:02

Jason was out there marketing

21:06

access to a security that he

21:08

did not have permission to

21:10

market. Right. To me, that is

21:10

I think that was good for Elon,

21:12

though. He he him I mean, in that case, I

21:14

was, like, good on Elon for doing that. I

21:16

think these

21:16

texts on the whole actually

21:19

reflect fairly well on Elon. I

21:21

would agree. I would agree. Who they reflect

21:23

poorly on is his All his

21:25

hangers on her and friends and who were trying to

21:27

get in on Dan Jason goes on to sail. I'll

21:30

die for the sword fuel, I'll jump on a grenade. He

21:32

comes across like a

21:34

man who gets caught stealing his watch and

21:36

then drops to his knees, hoping if he collates

21:38

him, he'll forget about the watch he's

21:40

just trying to steal. Too much. Yes. A

21:42

little bit of it. That's very that that's how

21:44

he talks. But In any case, I think what he's gotta wonder

21:47

is like who's his friends and who's not his

21:49

friends. And I think that's hard when you're

21:51

that rich. It doesn't matter. No matter

21:53

what I said this to so many of these billionaires. I'm like, I'm

21:55

your best friend because I don't care, like, kind of

21:57

thing. I just want the interview, of course. Anyway, one

21:59

of the things that he does was he openly sparred

22:01

with Parag Agarwal yeah. He obviously,

22:04

if he is forced to buy at par, we'll

22:06

not have the job. I continue to believe and

22:08

I've been texting with people who know

22:10

You know, Ari Emmanuel, like, enter

22:12

the picture. That's a probably a good idea to

22:14

have someone who's not a who's a who's close to

22:17

Elon and who will he's very convincing and

22:19

charming. There's all these relationships,

22:21

Ari, between Ari and Egan Durban who's

22:23

on the board of Twitter or what's he's

22:25

on the board of Twitter still. And

22:27

he also was, I think, on he was very close to Ari through

22:29

the WME deal. I believe he's still on

22:31

the board there. He may not still be. But he

22:33

was very integral to that deal. There's

22:36

all kinds of inter personal relationships here. If

22:38

they if Elon was smart, he would

22:40

let people who are

22:41

smarter make deals. make

22:44

smarter on this stuff, make the deal, and and

22:46

get the hell out of it. There's an eleven billion

22:48

dollar delta. So somewhere

22:50

between zero and eleven billion

22:52

dollars, there's a number that he should take and

22:54

run as soon as he

22:54

can. But you bring up another key point. Is

22:57

that in addition to trusting people

22:59

or having third parties who do I used to think when

23:01

I was younger, too smart. And when I did an M A deal that I, like,

23:03

I would do the deal myself and I quickly learned

23:05

that's really stupid. You there there's a reason

23:07

why investment bankers make so much money.

23:10

and third parties are better at representing you than

23:12

you are yourself. Right. There's

23:14

another lesson here

23:15

and that is you have

23:18

to have in your circle, people who are

23:20

prone to disagree with you.

23:22

Yeah. And if you look at

23:24

corporate governance history, whether it's

23:26

Theranos, whether it's Enron, the

23:28

boards all had one thing in common. They all

23:31

got along too well. They all

23:33

agreed with each other on everything.

23:35

All the board meetings We're

23:37

super civil, great point. That's what we

23:39

should do. Never questioning the CEO.

23:42

Yeah. Just go along, get along. And this

23:44

guy has Absolutely. No

23:46

garbage out of you. That's not true. There's

23:47

a few people around them that do. I I just hope

23:49

they get some voice.

23:50

They're not texting

23:51

them. No. But I

23:54

think Ari Emmanuel and Egan Durbin will

23:56

probably they all wanna have good

23:58

relationships with him, but I suspect they

23:59

will be Arie will be charming and

24:02

also tough. And so because

24:04

he's always looking for the angle. Right?

24:05

And same thing with the even very smart

24:08

investor from silver. Like, just I

24:10

would Elon,

24:11

if you're listening, please listen to them.

24:13

Just do get

24:14

get to a settlement here

24:17

because if not, it's gonna just drag

24:19

on and gonna gonna occupy your life. I don't

24:21

think

24:21

it can. I think

24:22

it can. I think it can. Through these texts, I

24:24

was like, oh, there's the Elad, I

24:25

know. There's the Elad. I But

24:28

play it out but play it out here. I'd say he offers

24:30

him ten billion dollars. Mhmm.

24:32

The shareholders go, no.

24:34

This deal his this legal case against

24:36

him that he's gonna lose is worth twenty

24:38

billion. And I don't think he's gonna pay that. Well,

24:40

there's an eleven billion dollar delta.

24:42

So I don't know. I think everyone's gonna wanna like, if

24:44

not, they're gonna end up with nothing, everyone's gotta

24:46

be very clear. If they

24:47

if they keep going at this, they're gonna end up,

24:49

you know, they keep fighting, everyone's gonna

24:51

end up without anything.

24:53

So two other observations. Okay. I

24:55

haven't been involved in a deal this big, but I've been

24:57

in the center of like multi hundred

24:59

million dollar and low single digit billion

25:01

dollar deals, Elon went from going on the

25:03

board to deciding who's gonna acquire the

25:06

firm. when he decided he was gonna acquire the firm and no longer

25:08

want to be inside the tent, he put out a tweet

25:11

saying his Twitter dying. And then

25:12

Parag, I thought

25:14

sent exactly the right email. They said, look,

25:16

boss. You can say what you want, but you're

25:18

not helping. Mhmm. I thought that

25:20

was direct. I thought that was CEO behavior. drugs

25:23

like that. That's his nature too,

25:25

Barry. And Elon wrote back, what have

25:27

you done this week? What have you gone to come

25:29

this week? And I thought, yeah, that that that was

25:31

kind of an asshole move. You don't fucking in

25:33

most I've dealt with

25:35

corporators who are very aggressive. They

25:37

maintain a certain level of decorum

25:39

respect for other people. Yeah. Yeah. It's

25:41

not like This is very direct. And

25:43

Elon doesn't do that. The other big

25:45

observation -- Mhmm. -- I believe if you got a

25:47

room of people who make okay

25:49

living, but aren't rich, and then you

25:51

got a room of millionaires together.

25:53

And I I realize this doesn't sound great. I

25:55

think you could immediately figure out which room are

25:57

the millionaires and which room where

25:59

the people who who just doing okay. I think if you had

26:01

two

26:01

rooms with millionaires and one with billionaires, you

26:04

wouldn't be able to tell the difference. And

26:07

thing that comes out here is people are playing checkers,

26:09

not chess. They're impressive

26:12

people, but the reason they're billionaires and not

26:14

millionaires is mostly luck. It's mostly not

26:16

their fault. And when you

26:17

see the way they behave, the way they equip

26:20

themselves, it's pretty obvious.

26:21

There's no secret sauce there

26:23

other than being born at the right place and

26:25

the right time.

26:26

I don't know about that. I some of the people I was listening

26:29

to an interview that I'd forgotten that

26:31

Steve Jobs did with Walt and I, and it's so

26:33

smart. This this this he

26:35

was talking about making mistakes

26:38

and also iterations in tech. And I'm

26:40

gonna send it to you because I was like, oh

26:41

my god. This is this guy really

26:43

did have a big mind, like, in terms

26:45

of thinking practically, and he was

26:47

talking about, oh, it was really good

26:50

about where to

26:51

make the risk, where not to make the

26:53

risk. It was so well thought out. think some of them are and

26:55

I think among these people, when you

26:57

get him going, when he's not in this

26:59

weird celebrity

27:00

bubble, he is very

27:02

smart like that. You can

27:03

have a really fascinating discussion. I think

27:05

the problem is this these suckups that

27:08

these techs showed you. You should see this all day long.

27:10

Alright. Hey, dude. Hey bro.

27:12

Good job. Woo. That kind of stuff.

27:14

And sometimes, you know, he deserves a

27:16

good job, like, landing that

27:18

rocket on a thing. I

27:19

Sure. I sent him a text and said,

27:20

fucking impressive. Like -- Yeah. -- but it's not

27:22

that it's not because I wanted

27:23

anything from him. It just was, and you should acknowledge

27:26

that. The relationship between intelligence

27:28

and wealth is positive. There's a

27:30

correlation. But it tops out at about a hundred and ten

27:32

or a hundred and twenty IQ. The difference between

27:34

intelligent people and geniuses, there's no correlation

27:36

with wealth. And I think that

27:38

there are a lot of really

27:40

impressive comments you just highlighted

27:42

from Steve Jobs. I can find you a

27:44

lot of people who are just so

27:46

strikingly impressive and they've made a really

27:48

good living. Mhmm. I have never been able

27:50

to discern the difference between someone who is

27:52

successful and someone who is

27:54

a billionaire. other

27:54

than luck. Yeah. That's the problem here

27:55

with me. Right? That's the thing. Brilliant. Well,

27:58

anyway, why isn't she a billionaire?

27:59

Okay. Some points. case

28:03

employees. Anyways -- Alright. -- they

28:05

put their they put their pants on one leg

28:07

at a time. You know? You know, whenever I get I

28:09

don't know about you. whenever I get occasionally,

28:11

I get an offer someone will say, my husband

28:13

loves the show and he's dying to meet you and wants

28:15

advice and I'll I'll donate extra charity. I never

28:17

send out because I'm they're gonna

28:19

be disappointed. Your your husband has

28:21

this vision of me that's just not reality. Don't

28:23

don't be mean. I meet with everybody. Nothing

28:26

mean. Nothing

28:26

mean. Be nice to your fans.

28:29

Nice. Your fans are nice to you.

28:31

Anyway, let's go on a quick break. We

28:33

come back. Dick

28:35

Doug's European numbers are out.

28:37

and they're huge, and we'll speak with a friend of pivot,

28:39

Gabriel De Benadetti, about the hidden

28:41

sides of the Biden Obama relationship.

28:44

It

28:46

may

28:47

have

28:49

seemed impossible a few years

28:51

ago, finally happening. Insurance is front and center

28:53

for tech companies who are finally commanding the space

28:55

they occupy in every other

28:58

industry at the Center of that

29:00

disruption is covered generously in SureTech for embedded insurance

29:02

that protects the customers of the world's largest

29:04

digital companies available at Amazon,

29:06

Intuit flipkart eBay, Booking

29:09

dot com's SkyScanner, Ryanair, and Southeast

29:11

Asia's largest company, Shopee.

29:13

Cover Genius's platform makes it easy for

29:15

their global partners to embed insurance and

29:17

warranty bundles in specialty bundles. Thanks

29:19

very much for that within their booking

29:22

path or sign up connecting customers with the

29:24

protection they need and with global

29:26

licensing and end to end capabilities across

29:28

all industries. From property to

29:30

travel fintech logistics to gig

29:32

economy and retail, cover genius can

29:34

build and distribute any kind of insurance and

29:36

process claims and offer states in a more than sixty

29:38

countries, all through a single integration

29:40

because your customers are at the center of

29:42

everything covered in a space claims instantly and

29:44

maintains an NPS of sixty

29:46

five plus the highest in an industry where traditional insurers

29:49

rely on paper forms missed calls and mail

29:51

checks to deliver NPS below.

29:53

Zero. Did not know that,

29:55

Give your customers the peace of mind

29:57

they deserve head over to cover genius dot

29:59

com slash pivot today to

30:01

learn more. Cover genius, the

30:03

InsurTech for embedded insurance. Working

30:07

remotely

30:09

is the best except when it's the

30:11

worst. There's no commuting. You can hang out with your

30:13

dog, make lunch in your own kitchen. But

30:15

then there's the trying to stay in sync and

30:17

on task with your team, especially when they're

30:19

spread out across the country. Luckily,

30:22

there's a tool that can help make remote work

30:25

seamless. Kota is the dock that brings it all

30:27

together. It's endlessly customizable

30:29

and connected. There are templates for

30:31

everything, including remote onboarding, goal

30:33

trackers, and meeting notes. Kota makes it easy to

30:35

stay on top of your task and in sync

30:37

with your team. Make an update in a table

30:39

and it automatically shows everywhere. No more relying

30:41

on copy and paste to get important projects

30:44

current. That way, you can get back to

30:46

enjoying the freedom of working from

30:48

anywhere quickly and efficiently without the hassle with

30:50

Koda, you can stall for just about

30:52

anything. And right now, you can get started having

30:54

your team all working to get on the

30:57

same page for free at

30:59

dakota dot i o slash

31:01

pivot dot C0DA

31:03

dot i o to get started for

31:05

free. Kota i o slash

31:08

pivot.

31:10

Scott, we're

31:12

back

31:12

TikTok is tallying up some huge gains and losses

31:14

in Europe and filings with the UK. The app

31:17

reported close to a billion dollars in turnover for

31:19

twenty twenty one according to

31:21

Financial Times. That's nearly six times its

31:23

previous take in Europe. On the other hand, it lost

31:25

nearly nine hundred million dollars. The

31:27

company says the staff compensation was the primary cause

31:29

it's been higher and like crazy. I spoke with TikTok's

31:31

COO, Vanessa Pappas, out getting

31:33

certified by the committee on foreign investment

31:35

in the US, should

31:37

TikTok go through a similar process for

31:39

its European businesses. I did ask her

31:41

and she didn't

31:42

answer. She was much firmer. I asked her what

31:44

she would have said to Josh Holly if she had thought

31:46

a little harder. She was talking about the reductive nature of those things

31:48

and everything else. She did a pretty she was pretty good in

31:50

this interview, very strong. They're thriving in

31:53

Europe. They're thriving over there, they're losing

31:55

money. Certainly, but it's certainly a business

31:57

on the upswing and

31:59

certainly would be able to

31:59

be profitable presumably as

32:02

long as they get these go aheads in these

32:04

countries. What do you think? It's

32:06

it's

32:06

not precedent. This firm I mean, keep

32:08

in mind, okay, a billion dollars and still

32:10

losing money the year before. Years,

32:12

you know, years go click by pretty

32:15

quickly. they grew hundred percent. This firm

32:17

-- Yeah. -- is growing much faster.

32:20

Revenue wise, different

32:22

revenues Users,

32:23

daily active

32:26

users, are all growing faster

32:28

than Google or Facebook did

32:30

at a similar point in those company's

32:33

history. So if you just take a straight line

32:35

out, this company should be

32:37

if it can maintain this trajectory, it

32:39

should be one of the three or four most valuable companies

32:41

in the world. to ten years. Yeah.

32:43

I agree with you. I think it's really interesting. I think that

32:46

they I think they're gonna be a little more

32:48

aggressive

32:48

on the attacks like you saying they

32:50

should be banned. A very impressive executive

32:52

from Google, was former Google executive worked at

32:55

YouTube, really does know this, creator

32:57

economy, very well. Perfect choice

32:59

for them in lots of ways. How did she surprise you? I'm

33:01

curious, what was your takeaway after Tati

33:03

speaking to her about all this? She was quite

33:04

forthright about their efforts. And I

33:07

thought, she could have done Facebook thing, and she did

33:09

very canny person, I think. I

33:11

think she answered pretty much every question, and I there

33:13

were a lot of tough ones in there about the banning. And Does

33:16

she wanna

33:16

spend? It seems to me that would be

33:18

the answer.

33:18

No. They do not. That's not where they're going. It's

33:21

gonna be owned by ByteDance. I think that's

33:23

not where they're going. I think, of course, she didn't

33:25

answer the IPO question. because, of

33:27

course, she'll do very well and others. I she

33:29

she was a a little lighter on who's really

33:31

running it and who has things, but she

33:33

said they don't have control of it in just

33:35

US decisions in China. That said,

33:37

she had a better answer about the

33:39

Chinese Communist Party members.

33:42

as we talked about, you know, Apple has probably

33:44

has a few. She can't ask them that. It'd

33:46

be silly not to say they aren't there

33:48

because there's lots of people in China. I

33:50

thought she answered I think they will pass

33:53

the US rules that they need

33:55

to with adequate protections.

33:58

and I don't know what'll

33:59

happen after that. I don't I she'd seem to

34:02

push off an IPO or spin

34:04

off right

34:04

now. But let me ask you, you know

34:06

I I think you you sort of have an inside -- Mhmm. -- tracker

34:09

view into a lot of different parties

34:11

around this issue. Mhmm. Do you

34:13

think ByteDance ever gets public in its

34:15

current form without severe. Does this

34:18

happen? Did you ask about that supposedly the deal

34:20

they're working on with Biden? I've heard

34:22

rumors there.

34:23

Yes. Yeah. Yeah. No. She said they're working on it, and it's

34:25

gonna come to she was very clear. She's like, they're

34:27

gonna have a deal where they're it's gonna be safe.

34:29

This the information is safe,

34:31

she said, and it will be very clear and transparent, safe. She no.

34:33

She didn't pretend there weren't issues on

34:36

TikTok, and it's the friendly.

34:36

She goes, we are trying to be

34:39

the friendly in retainment brand. And we're gonna get all kinds

34:41

of the same crap that ends up on Twitter

34:44

or Facebook we're gonna get, and we have to

34:46

move towards getting rid

34:48

of it. she very

34:50

clearly understood the worries

34:52

and was not acting

34:53

like it was stupid any of it. And, of course, that's

34:56

what she should do. So there you go. It's an impressive

34:58

woman. She was very impressive. One of

35:00

the things that she did note that a lot of

35:02

the ownership is foreign. I brought up

35:04

the issue. There's a branch of ByteDance that ByteDance

35:06

Tech that the government official sits on

35:09

the board. This is one of the

35:11

divisions, separate division of it. And she's

35:13

she made the also salient point that lot of ByteDance and and

35:16

this company is owned by US

35:18

owners.

35:18

There's all kinds of US owners of

35:22

this thing. you still believe in a ban if they're approved by the government?

35:24

Like the US government with this administration,

35:26

I find them to be very thoughtful. I had

35:28

a chance to sit down with some representatives of

35:30

our cyber command

35:32

at the code. Mhmm. I think

35:34

they're smart, thoughtful people. If they sign up

35:36

on something, I wouldn't you know, I would

35:39

just be prone to to

35:41

say, I think they've done the homework. And

35:43

also, you know, when you're

35:46

on code, on stage on

35:49

Bill Mar, and this is one of the many

35:51

things I need to work on. I'm prone to

35:53

being provocative to get attention.

35:55

You are. Yeah. I don't I Lots of people said the

35:57

same thing, quote, not just you, but I know. But what

36:00

I what I'm increasingly uncomfortable with is

36:02

the idea of using the terms band and media and

36:04

the same

36:06

Yeah. You've seen that. It's a bit of a shift. Yeah. And I think

36:08

that there is there's gotta be some

36:10

sunlight in between here. But

36:12

I still go back to the notion that

36:16

have to separate the product and the ownership, but

36:18

the ownership has a direct

36:20

influence over or the CCP has

36:22

influence over it. I just Or

36:24

could. I can't get

36:26

over how powerful this thing

36:27

is. Anyway, let's bring in our friend of pivot.

36:34

Gabriel De Benedetti is the

36:35

National Correspondent for New York

36:37

Magazine and the author of the Long Alliance,

36:39

The Imperfect Union of Joe Biden and

36:42

Barack Obama,

36:44

which looks at the often misunderstood relationship between the two presidents.

36:46

Welcome Gabriel. It's great to

36:48

be here. Thanks

36:49

for having me. So

36:50

why don't we get about the Obama

36:53

Biden relationship? Because people tend

36:55

to have their thoughts

36:56

about it. We think of it as warm and friendly. They

36:58

did all those videos, getting ice creams,

37:01

things like that. Can you talk about it? I was having a

37:03

discussion with someone about vice

37:04

presidents, including vice president and Harris. I'm

37:06

like,

37:06

they never really get along.

37:08

They're there to replace them. But what

37:10

are your

37:11

thoughts? Yeah. I think you're sort of touching

37:13

on the central tension here. The public perception

37:15

of this relationship is

37:18

a bromance. That's what people have called it for a long time. That's -- Mhmm.

37:20

-- partially true. It's definitely true as I've come

37:22

to see it that it's the closest relationship

37:24

between a president and vice president or

37:27

president and former president, you know, in

37:29

modern history. But that's a really

37:31

low bar. And the reality here is that they

37:33

are friends, which is unusual.

37:35

but it's a political relationship before anything else and it has

37:38

been for over twenty years now. You

37:40

know, these are two men whose relationship

37:42

has fluctuated wildly often by the

37:44

scenes in ways that are not

37:45

known to the public, and who see the world very

37:48

differently at times, whose perceptions

37:50

of, you know, ways that you make change

37:52

are very different. even to this day, it's

37:54

not as if Biden is calling Obama that often

37:56

for advice. They still do talk, but it's much

37:58

more like therapy than it is,

37:59

you know, what should I

38:02

do on this bill or who should I be

38:04

calling on this? So, you know, they're they're

38:06

vastly different men as we've come to see by their

38:08

times as president, and that is born

38:10

out over you know, they're they're twenty years of knowing each other now.

38:12

So for me, the reason that I

38:14

decided to write this was basically, you

38:16

know, when Biden won, so many people

38:18

were saying,

38:20

this is going to be the third term of Obama or at least the tone the coverage

38:22

was, Obama's back baby, you know, the

38:24

last four years didn't happen. As we've

38:26

seen now for two years, that's clearly

38:29

it. No. They're not at all the same. I'm just curious. And

38:31

then Scott will have a question. Is, you know,

38:33

Bush and Cheney certainly had a close relation,

38:35

but that was more like like, master and

38:37

submissive sound it felt like. Sure. So

38:38

by the end of their

38:40

time together, they really didn't have much of a

38:42

relationship. you

38:44

know, if you look back, Gaurin Clinton, obviously,

38:46

same sort of idea. They did not have a good

38:48

relationship by the end. You know, the only other

38:50

one that you can kind of compare this

38:53

to in terms of former president, not president and

38:55

VP, is the bushes. But, of course, they had

38:57

a very complicated relationship too. And, you

38:59

know, obviously, they're father and son.

39:02

So different different to start here.

39:04

Mhmm. But there's, you know, like

39:06

you alluded to at the beginning, the fact of the

39:08

Biden Obama relationship being this one that we sort

39:10

of hold up in the public consciousness is what it's

39:12

supposed to be. It's really sort of been

39:14

unfortunate for the for the Harris

39:16

vice presidency. because so many people

39:18

say, well, why aren't they so close? Well, the

39:20

expectation was never that they were gonna be best

39:22

friends until the Obama and Biden years. But we can

39:24

talk more about that. is not a

39:26

relationship that's set up to fail because

39:28

you what you have is two adversaries

39:30

that you choose your VP, not because it's

39:32

someone you're gonna get along with. You choose your VP

39:34

because it's someone who's shown the

39:36

ability. I mean, I think

39:38

I think vice president,

39:39

Harris is vice president. She got

39:41

on the debate stage because incredibly

39:44

impressive or at least her resume. But

39:46

the reason she was chosen as vice president

39:48

was she she really

39:50

went after Biden

39:52

was effective mean, doesn't the relationship just start from a position of

39:54

failure? Well, these

39:56

two certainly

39:56

didn't have a relationship that started.

39:58

It wasn't even that

39:59

it was failure from the beginning. It was, like, a nonentity

40:02

disrelationship. They they knew each other in the Senate,

40:04

obviously. But they just didn't have any

40:06

reason to really

40:08

care about each other for the longest Biden's

40:10

foreign relations committee. So it took a

40:12

really long time. And you know when when Obama essentially

40:14

decided he did want Biden

40:18

to be the one to to be his vice president. First off, Biden

40:20

didn't really wanna be considered partially,

40:22

you know, artifice, but the reality was he

40:24

didn't think he'd be a very good

40:27

too. He'd been in the Senate for thirty six years. You know, why

40:29

would he wanna for the first time in his life

40:31

be someone's second in command? He thought he could be

40:33

secretary of state, which is a much better job in

40:35

terms of autonomy, at least. But then,

40:37

you know, when it came time for them to actually

40:39

have their first conversation about this, Obama said to

40:42

Biden, I need you to just promise me that

40:44

this is the capstone of your career. That's the only

40:46

way this is gonna work. Biden's response

40:48

was, oh, not the tombstone.

40:50

The joke being, okay, this is the end of the

40:52

career, obviously. But they never

40:54

really hatched that out in a series way. And in fact, if you look at

40:56

the New York Times story from the morning after

40:58

Biden was chosen. One of the final lines says

41:00

something to the effect of, you know, it's really convenient for

41:02

Obama that he's not gonna have to worry

41:04

about Biden's political posturing because obviously Biden is

41:06

gonna be too old to run for president after their eight

41:08

years together, you know. At the time, that

41:10

was conventional wisdom. That certainly was violent

41:13

thought. Almost immediately though, their their different views

41:15

of politics, it's true that they

41:18

agreed over the long term on a

41:20

lot of policy points, but they definitely disagreed a lot over

41:22

their eight years together in terms of how to actually

41:24

achieve those goals. So, Gabriel, what's the

41:26

actual

41:27

stated relationship today? And

41:29

how how helpful can he be to

41:31

to Biden Obama in twenty

41:33

twenty four? Obama's sort of

41:35

been wandering around doing podcast

41:37

deals and being a friendly guy, but

41:39

not particularly political, I would say. Yeah. He's doing a little bit more than

41:42

he expected to be doing at this point in his

41:44

post presidency, but that's a Trump thing,

41:46

not about Yeah. This is a

41:48

reaction to the Trump years. There's a few

41:50

different answers. This is a short version

41:52

of what the relationship is like now. You

41:54

know, Obama took a long time to

41:56

get involved with Biden twenty twenty, but

41:58

he eventually did and was very useful to him.

42:00

And at this point, they're sort of talking

42:02

every few weeks or so, but it's

42:04

very informal. unlike any other call that Biden has, except for a

42:06

family member, no one else is on the call when he

42:08

does these calls. So it's very hard to get a readout of what

42:10

they are. Because they are

42:12

personal conversations. it's much more

42:14

gut checks. It's like I said someone once referred to

42:16

it to me as political therapy.

42:18

He's not saying, what should I do in Afghanistan?

42:20

What should I do with

42:22

And Obama has said that he's gonna be as useful as

42:24

as Biden wants him to be, and he he's

42:26

not offering advice unprompted.

42:28

He is trying to lift this lift his

42:30

own he's got his own projects. He's trying to be a poster. joke

42:32

or even before he became president that the

42:34

best job in the world wasn't president. It's

42:38

the x president. So, like, he's been thinking about this for a

42:40

long time. What he would do as as a

42:42

post president. But the question of twenty twenty

42:44

four is a really delicate one

42:46

for both And the midterms too, because I've assumed he he's

42:48

got more of a draw for the midterms and

42:50

is Totally. Then Biden does.

42:52

Correct? No doubt. And he's gonna be out

42:54

there. He's said that he's gonna be out

42:56

there campaigning for folks. He's endorsing

42:58

people. He's cutting ads. You know, same as

43:00

always with him in the midterm. Same thing he did in

43:02

twenty eighteen. because that this time

43:04

he's he's talked a little bit more about to

43:06

people who are, you know, trying to figure out what his

43:08

presence is gonna look like. He's talked

43:10

about more what it would look like for him to

43:12

have more of a presence when it comes to talk me about the future of the democracy issues. He talks about

43:14

this information a lot. Yes. And one thing I think

43:16

we're gonna see him do is

43:19

campaign for or cut ads for or endorse even

43:21

secretary of state candidates in the midterms, you know, all

43:23

the way down the ballot to that because those are the

43:25

people who are administering the elections in

43:27

twenty it question of whether Biden should run-in twenty four, you

43:29

know, they actually have not discussed it.

43:32

Mhmm. There's been some reporting to the contrary,

43:34

but they haven't discussed it. And one of the

43:36

reasons is Biden doesn't

43:38

really think it's a question. He thinks he's gonna run

43:40

again. Mhmm. But the more more

43:42

probably important politically

43:44

question is presidential elections are

43:46

difficult for them to talk about. Because the first time they

43:48

had to have this discussion for real was twenty

43:50

sixteen, and that's when Obama

43:52

essentially pushed Clinton to run

43:54

over by Now Biden obviously had the personal mitigating circumstances. His

43:56

son was very ill and then passed

43:58

away. But Biden saw very

44:00

clearly that Obama also had made a political

44:02

calculus, which

44:04

he did. Yeah. Which was I don't think that Biden is the right person to succeed

44:06

me in this moment. He didn't he didn't think he

44:08

was the future of the party

44:10

or of the country. then in twenty twenty, took

44:12

a really long time for Obama to get onboard

44:14

with Biden as well. And at one point, they had

44:16

a conversation. And Obama's version of

44:18

dissuading Biden in twenty twenty was essentially to

44:20

say, I mean, this is late twenty eighteen. He said, you

44:22

know, Joe, you really don't have to do this.

44:25

And Biden essentially said to him, sorry, Trump's

44:27

the president. I think I have a good chance to get a

44:29

good chance to get a good job. Well, I'm

44:31

bad calculation by Obama in my sentiment.

44:33

And, of course, Obama at this time was

44:35

talking to every other person on earth who wanted

44:37

to run for president because he had said that he was

44:40

willing to. So, you know, Biden took a lot of this stuff pretty personally

44:42

even though he tried really hard not

44:44

to. Right. So which is all a

44:46

long way of saying, it's not shouldn't be

44:48

that surprise. they're not talking about

44:50

twenty twenty four. Because if you're

44:52

Biden, you know, the public image might be that

44:54

they're best friends and they're advising each other on

44:56

everything. No. I

44:58

but clearly not. Right? It's not as if he would go to Obama

45:00

as a as a first sort of call for should I

45:02

be doing this again? Yeah. As someone who

45:03

is a Beto fan, Scott, what do you

45:06

think about

45:07

this? So I'm curious, Gabriel, whenever you

45:09

really get to know a relationship between

45:11

two presidents, it's gonna yield insight about

45:13

the individual presidents.

45:16

Is there one or two things you can tell us about Obama

45:18

or president Biden that would

45:20

surprise us or that surprise you?

45:23

Sure. I

45:23

think one of the things about Biden that has

45:25

surprised me is he

45:27

is a lot like the public image

45:29

that he has tried to portray for himself. And what

45:31

I mean by that is he is

45:33

someone who genuinely does do things

45:36

like read Irish poetry and

45:38

think of himself in these historical

45:40

terms at this point. And it took him a really long time to

45:42

do that. he's someone who is and

45:44

this is a related point. Very self conscious, thinks, you know, he's been

45:47

very wary of

45:50

how other people view him his whole career and has been, in fact,

45:52

you know, very self conscious about

45:54

not having an ivy league education for for one

45:56

thing. He talks about that all the time

45:59

behind the scenes still. But at the same time, you

46:02

know, now he has been thinking a lot about

46:04

what am I in history. He doesn't like to say that out

46:06

loud because he understands how

46:08

it sounds. but that is really how he how he I

46:10

think people might not, because

46:12

of the public perception of how his

46:14

post presidency has been, people

46:17

might not understand this, but I think he

46:19

has been changing a lot in his

46:21

post presidency as he thinks about

46:23

what he represented. he obviously still

46:26

thinks that he was a very successful

46:28

president, but I think that he now sees

46:30

himself on this continuum of

46:32

history much more precariously

46:34

than he did before because, of course, the

46:36

Trump experience has, you know, thrown into

46:38

some serious questions where what the, you

46:40

know, what the Obama's like ultimately be especially

46:43

if Trump comes back, but Obama remains this sort of,

46:45

like, singularly self confident figure

46:47

in American politics. And that really comes

46:49

through even as

46:52

they discussed even in their, you know, private conversations over the course of their

46:54

relationship. And even in the earliest days,

46:56

you know, I tell the story in the book, but the

46:58

first time they

47:00

ever met, one on one or ever sat down was when Obama

47:02

wanted to join the foreign relations committee as a brand

47:04

new senator, ninety ninth in seniority.

47:06

Biden invites him over to his office and

47:08

essentially says,

47:10

sure. Yeah. you know, come on over. We'll talk. And, obviously, Biden's gonna

47:12

let him on the committee because he could see that he's a

47:14

rising star even if he's not so sure about him. And

47:16

at the end of this quick conversation,

47:18

Biden says, gotta go to Wilmington. You

47:20

gotta go to Chicago, but this is good. Let's

47:22

let's sit down and have a proper dinner sometime

47:24

we get to know each other. And

47:26

Biden says, know, we can just get cheap

47:28

Italian place here on Capitol Hill. It'll

47:30

be great. And Obama and Biden told the

47:32

version of the story, one of his books, but he didn't

47:35

tell the whole story. Obama sort of rears back up and says, wait a

47:37

minute. You know, what do you mean cheap Italian plates? We

47:39

can go somewhere nice. I can afford it. Because

47:42

Obama is of course thinking, well, for one

47:44

thing, Obama has

47:46

money for for some in his life because the random house is gonna reprint his But

47:48

he's also thinking who is this old school

47:50

guy, this older white senator who thinks

47:52

he can talk down to me and thinks I need to,

47:56

you know, eat at some cheap place. And he says, I can afford

47:58

it. And Biden meanwhile has taken it back then

48:00

and says, well, who does this guy think he

48:02

is? I can't afford it. You know, I'm the

48:04

poorest senator. Did they walk away

48:06

from that first meeting? Both

48:08

thinking, this other guy is so

48:10

presumptuous. Yeah. And they, of course, didn't didn't

48:12

set that dinner date. And it took them a long time to

48:14

really truly understand each Yeah. He

48:16

didn't mean it that way. Of course not. No.

48:18

Anyone know.

48:18

And and a woman is certainly self

48:20

confident, and I don't mean that in a

48:22

positive way. having interviewed him several times. It's

48:24

one of his failings, I think, in a lot of

48:27

ways. So you've also written about Florida's governor's

48:29

race. How will the

48:31

hurricane end response affect that race, especially DeSantis has seen us working with

48:33

Biden on the recovery. He's been as

48:36

complimentary as he can be. Yeah.

48:38

Yeah. Well,

48:38

I think that, you know,

48:40

it's obviously hard to figure out what the political end of this is going to

48:43

be. Usually, governors who

48:45

govern through disasters see some

48:47

political upside for that especially when they work with

48:50

the president for they have

48:52

to. It doesn't always work that way. You know, Charlie

48:54

Chris knows well that in you know, he was Republican

48:56

governor back back in the day,

48:58

and he hugged Obama who when Obama came

49:00

down to Florida to talk

49:03

about economic relief, and that was, of course, the end of Charlie Chris'

49:05

career as a Republican. So he understands well

49:07

that there is some danger here. But, you

49:09

know, DeSantis doesn't seem to be

49:11

getting a lot of blowback in terms of working with the federal

49:14

government. Though, of course, you know, we would I think

49:16

a lot remains to be seen in terms of what

49:18

the pure level of

49:20

devastation is. and, you know, what the amount of federal help is needed

49:22

because he has, of course, not loved these

49:24

headlines obviously about how he had

49:26

voted against federal

49:28

aid in circumstances. Too bad. That's what he did. Alright. So you

49:30

think Biden's in in

49:32

your view, Biden is running again? My

49:34

view is that in Biden's view, Biden

49:36

is running. Yeah. I think a lot

49:38

could change, and I think that people sort of

49:40

underestimate when he says, you know, my

49:42

expectation is that I'm gonna run again,

49:44

except I know that history

49:46

can intervene. you know, he is a man

49:48

who knows a lot about tragedy and a lot about

49:50

mortality and has thought, thinks about that all

49:52

the time. And so I genuinely think that,

49:54

you know, things could change. His health could take a turn. His

49:56

family could go against it. But right now, he's

49:58

certainly operating as if it's a go. And by

49:59

the way, In twenty

50:02

twenty, he knew that it was a go long before he said it

50:04

publicly. Even though he takes forever to make these

50:06

decisions, his staff had to tell him, stop

50:08

talking about this

50:10

so openly. because you're going to trigger the FEC

50:12

rules, and we're gonna have to file your candidacy

50:14

-- Yeah. -- you know, according to the laws. And the same

50:16

thing has happened now. He knows that

50:18

he cannot say, I'm running. He just has to say, I'm mixed feelings. No. He's a hundred

50:20

percent. And by the way,

50:21

much more successful legislatively. I mean,

50:23

obviously, Obamacare

50:24

was very important, but if

50:27

you weigh them one to one, I

50:29

think

50:29

Biden has set the more successful presidency at this

50:31

point. And that's a big part of their relationship. These are the

50:34

scenes. You can imagine they talk about that. Yeah.

50:36

But Obama has more style, apparently. I

50:38

like dark Brandon. I think that's also part of

50:40

him. I don't know. You you and Joe

50:42

both? Yeah. But he's like

50:44

that. I He's like that. I I suspect you guys are genuine.

50:46

Anyway, the

50:46

book is the long alliance, the

50:49

imperfect union of Joe Biden

50:51

and Barack Obama fascinating. it's

50:53

gonna be really interesting. Gabriel De

50:55

Benedetti, thank you so

50:57

much. Thanks, Gabriel. Thank

50:58

you both. Alright. So I think we were, like, Biden, Obama.

51:00

Which one would be Biden? Which one would

51:02

be Obama? You're Obama. I'm

51:04

Obama. I'm shocked. I was shocked that

51:07

you didn't I for the first time, I

51:09

I was learning more about you. I would have thought

51:11

you would you like Obama less than I would have thought. A lot

51:13

less. Yeah. It's not interesting.

51:14

And what? Yeah. I've said Can

51:17

you say more? What is it that you think

51:20

he deserves more scrutiny around? Howard

51:22

Bauchner: The

51:22

success of legislation, I think he

51:25

-- Mhmm. -- a lot style, I think his

51:27

post presidency compared to, like, a Jimmy Carter. He

51:28

has so much power. And he's sort

51:31

of -- Yeah. -- hanging out

51:32

with celebrities. Like, right? He's

51:35

on David Gaffon's boat. Yeah. Yeah. Right? And that's kind of disappointing. And

51:36

I have to say when I interviewed him, he

51:39

didn't like pushback and Biden,

51:41

never that way. comfortable

51:44

with pushback, very comfortable with

51:47

debate. And just

51:49

a more genuine I

51:51

think he doesn't get the credit he gets. That's why I backed

51:53

him way

51:53

back when. I was like, this guy can

51:55

win one, and

51:56

this guy can get things done. And

51:58

I do think that's the case.

51:59

I think making fun of his age. I get it. I get it. And the bomb was

52:02

handsome to all smooth.

52:07

But he reminding me a lot of tech people I covered.

52:09

I

52:09

know it sounds crazy, but -- Oh, that hurts. -- I was

52:11

like -- That hurts. Yeah. Well, I feel good

52:13

about my hero. Don't say that.

52:15

I I

52:16

listen. Historically, such an

52:18

important, historically. I just think

52:21

when the assessments come, I I

52:23

think Biden has had a

52:25

more successful presidency in thus

52:27

far under very difficult

52:30

circumstances. Mhmm. And

52:31

Obama could have done a lot more.

52:33

That's my feeling. I was not as big a fan

52:35

of him as others.

52:38

interesting. Yeah. But I get I get the appeal. I

52:40

get the I'm gonna get, like, strafed, but I've said this

52:42

before. I don't care. I think Biden has been a

52:44

very successful president. under

52:45

it it tear like, listen.

52:47

He's got crazy crazy pants down in Florida

52:49

yelling them every crazy stuff all the time.

52:51

And he's handling with a lot of decorum

52:53

including the the attack on the capital. He could he

52:56

there's lots of ways he could've I always look at

52:58

people's choices. Anyway, but I'm I hope

53:00

Obama's enjoying his

53:02

yacht going. Alright. Scott, one more quick break. We'll be back for and

53:05

fails.

53:09

This

53:11

episode is sponsored by Kohler Home

53:14

Generators. One thing I won't miss about living

53:16

in Florida other than the mosquitoes. Power outages,

53:18

a recent report found that eighty three percent of

53:20

major power outages in the last twenty years were

53:22

due to

53:24

Extreme weather, and thanks to climate change, extreme weather is

53:26

only getting more common. But it's not

53:28

just Florida, all parts of our country

53:31

have been affected. From heat waves to hurricanes to ice

53:33

storms, power grids are taking a beating.

53:35

And when the lights go

53:37

out, everything just stops.

53:40

So why do I have a cholar

53:42

generator? Because in addition to

53:44

bragging or explaining crypto

53:46

to embarrass neighborhood dads,

53:48

I just talk about my cooler generator

53:50

as I rev up my leaf blower.

53:52

That's how the dog rolls. Thankfully,

53:54

Kauler home generators can provide backup power automatically. They

53:56

keep you connected and comfortable. They

53:58

feature heavy duty commercial grade

54:00

engines with no refueling necessary So

54:03

if your house loses electricity, the

54:06

lights, and everything else, and makes life work,

54:08

are back on right away. And if

54:10

you purchase a solar home

54:12

generator now, You can get a free ten

54:14

year extended warranty and up to seven hundred fifty dollars off. There's a cooler home generator

54:16

dot com slash pivot to learn more.

54:20

That's kOH LER

54:22

home generator dot com slash pivot, kolar, the power to live

54:26

boldly.

54:27

Careers

54:28

Swisher here. You may know me as

54:29

the person who made Mark Zuckerberg sweat,

54:31

pushed Kim Kardashian to talk dollars,

54:34

or got secretary mayor

54:36

Pete Buttigieg, to eat a

54:38

juicy strawberry live on

54:40

stage. Okay. That one was

54:42

awkward. But that's what I like to

54:44

do. Make powerful people comfortable with

54:46

being uncomfortable. Now I'll be

54:48

doing that on my new show from New York

54:50

Magazine on with Kara

54:52

Swisher. We'll bring you news and the

54:54

newsmakers I'm paying attention to, and we'll

54:56

do it twice a week on Mondays and

54:58

Thursdays. Go check it out

55:00

on with Cara Swisher wherever you get

55:02

your

55:02

it now

55:04

podcasts.

55:10

Okay, Scott. Let's hear some wins and fails. I'm gonna

55:12

go first that that Bella

55:15

Hadid spray on dress? Loved it.

55:17

Loved it. Yeah. Oh, fast. I didn't

55:19

know where it was

55:21

going. And I was like, what is happening here? And then

55:23

when the person the my favorite part was the person

55:25

who then cut it after they sprayed

55:28

it on, and -- Mhmm. -- and

55:30

then it was a dress. And, of course, like, someone said, I look like a bag of cats if you

55:32

put that on me. But but

55:34

it was it was I

55:37

loved it. It was so techie and interesting. Yeah. It

55:39

was cool. Loved it. It was it it made

55:41

me like clothes. The Internet made

55:43

like, oh, here we are. We're making some clothes, and

55:45

I thought that was kinda cool. don't know

55:47

if that

55:47

was my that was my win.

55:50

You go for your win, and I'll think of a

55:51

fail.

55:52

Well, you foreshadowed my win. My win

55:54

is James Earl Carter Junior, better known

55:56

as president Carter who turned ninety eight this past week?

55:58

Such a good man. This is someone

56:00

who served his country after

56:02

graduating from the naval academy.

56:05

served on several submarines. And then after the death

56:07

of his father, took over a failing peanut farm

56:09

and turned it into

56:11

a thriving business. He, as president, he was

56:13

a dark course or as a candidate, he was a dark course. He started the

56:15

Department of Education, the Department of

56:18

Energy, was critical and saw

56:19

two talks. obviously had to deal

56:22

with stagflation. It was kinda dealt a bad hand

56:24

and then the October surprise that failed

56:26

mission to rescue the

56:28

hostages and Iran. he will go

56:30

down or has gone down as an average to less

56:32

than average successful president, but he

56:34

is by far the most

56:36

successful ex president we've

56:38

ever had. The moment he left office, he began building via

56:40

habitat for humanity. And at the

56:42

age of ninety eight, has been married to his wife

56:44

for Rosland for seventy six

56:48

years. I just don't fantastic. Yeah. I don't

56:50

I think you can't underestimate how

56:54

many wonderful Americans, America produces,

56:58

and this is one of them. And I like the fact that

56:59

he's he's he's been given the

57:02

gift of so much

57:04

praise and what I call overdue

57:06

recognition. I love the fact that he's gotten to

57:08

share his life with the same person for three

57:10

quarters of a century. I think he's a

57:12

fantastic role model for

57:14

young man. talk

57:14

about him. Great post presidency. Now that guy has lots

57:16

of troubles as president and it's hard to

57:18

the the the Reagan train was charming

57:20

and fantastic and I

57:23

voted for again. I mean, the first time

57:25

over Jimmy Carter.

57:26

And I have to

57:28

say, this guy has shown us the way

57:30

to behave as a as a next president. I

57:32

think has had

57:33

the most stellar. I mean, it's cute with George Bush painting, but

57:35

honestly and this guy has

57:38

done stuff.

57:38

has

57:40

done stuff and used his podium in a way

57:42

that is super

57:43

moving and effective. I

57:45

agree with you.

57:46

agreed. So

57:48

my fail is the distinctive

57:52

weddings or the pivot to the metaverse. I think it's

57:54

important that we

57:56

remember that Mehta continues to be a menace to our

57:58

society and not take responsibility this

58:00

week. In the UK, a

58:02

coroner found that harmful online

58:04

content likely to have

58:06

contributed to Mollie

58:08

Russell, a fourteen year old to her death,

58:10

and he put in quotes, and this

58:12

is unusual for a coroner who They

58:14

try to be very careful whenever they

58:16

stray outside of trying to to lay

58:19

responsibility around the death of

58:21

somebody. He said that harmful

58:24

online content likely to have contributed to

58:26

Molly's death in a more a

58:28

more than minimal way. Mhmm. And the

58:30

father has decided to sue the company

58:33

and saying basically saying that

58:36

they're

58:36

monetizing misery. And Monetizing

58:39

misery. What a

58:42

line? Right. You know, there's so much there's this cultural and so

58:44

much attention around this

58:46

notion that has no evidence.

58:48

There's no factual basis.

58:51

someone who's the father of kids who

58:53

spent the majority of their school age years at a

58:55

school in Florida as someone who served on the board

58:57

of their kids school. I have never seen any

58:59

evidence nor is there any peer reviewed evidence that

59:02

teachers are institutionally or systemically

59:04

trying to pull the gay

59:06

or the heterosexual tendencies of children

59:08

out of them. In school. I have never

59:10

seen that. Mhmm. And I think it's a

59:12

culture war meant

59:14

to rouse people, play to

59:16

their worst instincts, but something that is true.

59:19

is

59:19

that when algorithms from

59:22

meta, when a kid

59:23

who is shows no signs

59:25

of mental illness, when a kid who

59:27

was thriving at school, starts getting bullied

59:29

online and starts contemplating suicide and then begins

59:31

the algorithms recognize this

59:33

and no joke

59:36

META and

59:37

Pinterest also

59:38

begin serving her images

59:40

of nooses, pills, and

59:44

razors. So what these organizations are doing, and there's proof

59:46

here, is they're pulling out of girls

59:50

to suicide. suicide To

59:52

normalize

59:53

suicide? Mhmm. He

59:58

we speak so

59:59

much we speak so much about about

1:00:02

NASDAQ

1:00:02

and all this bullshit. Like, what's

1:00:04

the point?

1:00:07

Like, what's the

1:00:09

point of any of this?

1:00:13

Scott. I know how you feel.

1:00:15

I I it's you know,

1:00:17

you have sons. I have a daughter. I

1:00:19

think about it all the time.

1:00:20

all the time now, you know, as

1:00:22

she goes up. And I think your feelings about

1:00:25

it should be, like most parents are

1:00:27

very emotional and it acquire

1:00:29

that level of emotion, you know, what your

1:00:32

the feelings you're

1:00:33

having because it really does matter. And I

1:00:35

think at some point, you

1:00:37

know, these companies have gotta understand. They're

1:00:40

not completely to blame. Certainly, there's

1:00:42

all kinds of societal pressures on girls

1:00:44

and women and things like that. But

1:00:46

this is taken it to a

1:00:48

level that's really very clearly

1:00:50

problematic. And I'm I this this case in

1:00:52

Britain was really interesting. I think it should be more

1:00:54

like it. Let's have it out

1:00:55

in court is how you do it. Let's make the bastards pay. Yeah. And

1:00:57

what I wanna say is

1:00:59

my emotion and my

1:01:00

thoughts and prayers don't mean Fagal.

1:01:03

I hope people google molly

1:01:06

Russell and and get involved

1:01:08

and advocate for holding

1:01:10

these companies

1:01:12

responsible. These are problems that can be fixed. There is no way

1:01:14

the brightest minds in the world couldn't figure

1:01:16

out that this was a young

1:01:18

girl and couldn't figure out that she

1:01:22

was beginning to become comfortable with suicidal content. They

1:01:24

could have figured that out, and they could have

1:01:26

intervened. If you have if you have a kid

1:01:28

in any organization that starts talking

1:01:30

about suicide, Whether

1:01:32

it's a mass shooter and they start drawing images, people

1:01:34

intervene. And these companies absolutely

1:01:36

have the technology and ability

1:01:38

to intervene. Unfortunately, it would reduce

1:01:41

their profits. It would be expensive. And I don't

1:01:43

doubt it would be hard. Mhmm. It

1:01:45

is overdue. Exxon lied to us.

1:01:48

RGR lied to us. Mhmm. The

1:01:50

sacklers lied to us. and the people in

1:01:52

matter are lying to to us.

1:01:54

We we should absolutely hold these firms

1:01:56

accountable. I I think what you

1:01:56

have to do is see it in court. Let's

1:01:58

see it

1:01:59

in court. Let's see it. You know, if they'd say no, let's let's have

1:02:02

a little court time to to have some

1:02:04

proof and go through it. But it should

1:02:06

completely be scrutinized, and I

1:02:08

think it's an important

1:02:10

point you're making here completely. My

1:02:12

fail III don't know if it's a fail

1:02:14

yet, but I I do think we should talk about it on Thursdays.

1:02:16

The Supreme Court is taking up two

1:02:18

cases. around Section two thirty.

1:02:21

They involve terrorist content, but it

1:02:23

could challenge broad immunities as this

1:02:25

happened before. But it's the first time

1:02:27

it's gone to the Supreme Court. much of this

1:02:28

stuff is going to be going to the Supreme Court, by the way, and a lot of

1:02:30

it is, a lot of these cases because it's about

1:02:32

our society as a whole, which is worrisome

1:02:35

given this particular Supreme Court. but

1:02:37

they're decide whether social media companies can be sued

1:02:40

for hosting and recommending terrorist

1:02:41

content. Even though it's not the same, it's

1:02:43

not that different, it's

1:02:46

similar. Right? what can they be sued for. And so we'll see where that

1:02:48

goes. I am worried about this

1:02:50

particular Supreme Court, but I think it might

1:02:52

free them up even more, and we'll get in

1:02:54

Citizens United

1:02:56

kinda thing, you know, in the interests of free speech

1:02:58

kind

1:02:58

of thing. So it's a very

1:03:00

complex

1:03:00

case, but we absolutely have

1:03:03

to be thinking harder about

1:03:05

how we manage these

1:03:07

very important communications things. And,

1:03:10

Scott, it's very appropriate for you to be

1:03:12

upset by

1:03:14

that. There

1:03:14

you go. There you go. Let's go. Polaris three.

1:03:18

She's three. She's three.

1:03:20

She's three. How's all

1:03:23

done? Oh, good. Jolly is ever eating everything in sight.

1:03:26

Just fantastic. He's fantastic.

1:03:28

He's really great. They're all great. Alex

1:03:32

is great. He approved the shoes I

1:03:33

was wearing recently, so that was a big thing. And

1:03:35

he's being very sweet, but it's because he's got

1:03:37

a nice girlfriend, I think. He's he's

1:03:39

in a better mood.

1:03:40

And Louie's coming down this weekend, and

1:03:43

I'm so excited to see him. We're gonna have

1:03:45

we're going Apple picking. We're such a like, we're

1:03:47

such a straight family. It's crazy. So,

1:03:49

yeah, we're picking apples. I'm gonna make some applesauce

1:03:51

for you. We'll send it to in Britain. Really, we

1:03:53

won't, but still I really am very touched by the

1:03:55

way you feel about this. Anyway, we

1:03:58

wanna hear from you. Send us your

1:03:59

questions about business tech or whatever's on your mind.

1:04:02

Go to n y mag dot com

1:04:04

slash pivot. to submit

1:04:04

a question for the show or call 85551

1:04:06

pivot. Scott,

1:04:07

that's the show. We'll be back on

1:04:09

Friday for more. There's always gonna be plenty to

1:04:11

talk about maybe even a settlement

1:04:13

like we talk about with the email. Who knows?

1:04:15

Please read us out. Today's show is

1:04:17

produced by Lara Newman, Evan Angle, and Taylor

1:04:19

Griffin, Ernie and her dot engine into

1:04:21

this episode. Thanks also Drew Bros and

1:04:23

Neil Saverio. Make sure you show where every listen to podcasts. Thanks

1:04:25

for listening to Pivot from New York Magazine

1:04:27

and Box Media. We'll

1:04:30

be back later this week for another breakdown

1:04:32

of all things tech and business. Apple

1:04:36

sauce.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features