Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
If
0:01
you wanna build a successful e commerce business,
0:03
you don't want just new customers. You want customers
0:06
for life, and PlayDEO is here to help.
0:08
Clavio is an email marketing platform that
0:10
brings all your customer data into one
0:12
place. The Clavio platform allows you
0:14
to drive successful marketing campaigns with
0:17
pre built behavior triggered automation so
0:19
you can develop long term customer loyalty.
0:22
It's time to talk to your customers like you
0:24
know them because you do with Clavio.
0:26
learn more at clavio dot com.
0:28
That's KLAVIY0
0:32
dot com.
0:37
This episode is brought to you by Kohler
0:39
Home Generators. Nothing makes you realize
0:41
just how much you rely on electricity. like
0:44
a power outage from smart home
0:46
devices to streaming when the lights go out,
0:48
everything grinds to a halt, but cooler
0:50
home Generators kick into
0:52
action and seconds automatically providing
0:54
reliable backup power no matter the weather.
0:56
With heavy duty commercial grade engines,
0:59
and no refueling necessary. Coler can
1:01
make those lights out in moments thing of the past.
1:03
And if you purchase a Coler Home generator
1:05
now, you can get a free ten year
1:07
extended warranty and up to seven
1:09
hundred fifty dollars off. Visit
1:11
kolerhomegenerators dot com slash pivot
1:13
to learn more. That's K0LER
1:16
home generators dot com slash pivot
1:18
colon, the power to live
1:20
boldly.
1:27
Hi,
1:27
everyone. This is Pivot from New York Magazine
1:29
and Box Media Podcast Network. I'm Kara
1:31
Swisher.
1:31
And I was kinda gonna lie.
1:34
So what's going on with the with the
1:36
economy over there? Trust looks like she's
1:38
shifting again. What's what's happening? I need an
1:40
update from London.
1:42
So effectively, they've gone back. They've
1:44
decided to not change. What they had
1:46
decided to do was
1:48
eliminate the top tax rate. So
1:50
the idea, again, trickle down Reaganomics,
1:53
that if we have our most productive citizens,
1:55
give them more money, it'll all trickle down
1:57
to people. And Right. the market
1:59
threw up on the idea. And, also,
2:01
I like this move, and I I wanna
2:04
applaud the prime minister. I think
2:06
a a step back from the wrong direction, a step
2:08
in the right direction. So I I'm
2:10
not I see a lot of Twitter activity like, you
2:12
know, what an idiot? You know, that was
2:14
that was quick. You know what? What I
2:16
like about what she's done --
2:18
Mhmm. -- the majority of our leaders in the
2:20
US would double down. Oh, it's inflamed the other
2:22
side. I'll double down. I think
2:24
it's okay to say we screwed up. I like
2:26
this move. It was a bad move, and she's
2:28
undoing it. Good for her. Right. Yeah. There's a lot of economic
2:31
pain coming. you know, in the in the And the pound
2:33
recovered a little bit. Yeah. The market likes
2:35
it. Yeah. That's something Margaret Thatcher might not have
2:37
done. Anyway, I had a lovely weekend, miss Clara's
2:39
third birthday. Hatted
2:40
lovely. She's not a great party. Yeah.
2:42
Mhmm. Wow. Yeah. Yeah.
2:44
It starts to get good from here.
2:46
It
2:46
starts to get good. Well, yeah. And then
2:49
she she's good the whole time. And then, well, it's
2:51
my wedding anniversary. I took my lovely wife out
2:53
to a dinner at a beautiful restaurant, six
2:55
course meal. You guys have been married. How long?
2:57
Two years. Two years.
2:59
Yes. Two years. Right? Yeah. Yeah. We've
3:01
been together longer than that. But, yeah, wedding. We
3:03
had a little outdoor wedding during the
3:04
pandemic. So today is our
3:07
actual anniversary. Same thing as Barack
3:08
Obama's and Michelle Obama's just
3:10
so you're aware. I'm gonna just impress
3:12
you. Remember your your anniversary. I
3:14
couldn't tell you on my anniversary of us.
3:16
Oh,
3:17
no. We had a lovely meal. It was really
3:19
very fancy. It had a wine pairing. It was
3:21
very nice. So I want you to wish Amanda,
3:23
happy anniversary
3:23
and Claire. Happy birthday. Happy anniversary,
3:26
Amanda. Thanks for jumping on that grenade. What
3:29
about Claire?
3:29
You can get Claire one. But
3:32
Goldenchild, give her her due.
3:34
She's three. She got a lovely present.
3:36
She got a high see on Golden Dot. Come
3:38
to London. Yeah.
3:39
I'm the London. Yeah. I'm still She
3:41
she got a t set and a
3:43
real a real t set and also
3:45
a bike a a balanced bike.
3:47
So she's very excited. very good.
3:50
She doesn't listen to this podcast, so I will say
3:52
we haven't it's not her actual birthday for a
3:54
day or two, but this is when the party was I got
3:56
her headset headphones.
3:58
she's gonna love me more
3:59
than ever. That's really shocking
4:02
because the cracks in the vox research
4:04
department came back and said that our two muscular
4:06
viewers are tech pros and three year old girls.
4:10
I also got you frozen
4:12
headphones for Christmas, so I'm so excited
4:15
to give it to you. Anyway
4:16
I would wear those. Just You what? Just as
4:18
a conversation starter. They're very humbling.
4:20
They'd show up well on that paint of
4:22
yours. That paint Otherwise, I fought
4:24
against people who don't like Scott Galloway this weekend was
4:26
stupid of me, but I can't stand them on there. It
4:28
doesn't mean to you. I don't like it. I'm sorry.
4:30
Yeah. You know what? I was really
4:32
flattered what Carrie is referring to is
4:34
I wrote a a blog post,
4:36
numerous analysis on identity. And essentially,
4:39
one of the things After
4:42
writing this book where I'm trying to identify
4:44
the issues -- Yeah. -- ailing America so so we
4:46
can talk about solutions. I
4:48
generally think our biggest problem -- Yeah. --
4:50
what I recognize is I think we've never been
4:52
stronger geopolitically. I think if you're an honest
4:54
appraiser of where America is right now is where
4:56
some are good to great. externally
4:58
relative to our competitive set. Food
5:01
independent, energy independent, GDP, consistent
5:03
GDP growth, everybody wants to come here.
5:05
I think what really ails us our biggest
5:07
problem is we don't like each
5:09
other. We're turning on each other.
5:11
Yeah. And we no longer believe that
5:13
Americans greatest allies or other Americans
5:15
-- Mhmm. -- that if we're a horror movie,
5:17
the call's coming from inside of the house. And --
5:19
Yeah. -- I said, is there a
5:21
way to enforce some
5:23
sort of third party -- Yeah. -- or --
5:25
Yeah. -- or decentralized identity
5:27
such that if Russian or
5:29
Chinese troll farms come in and just
5:31
try and create incendiary content
5:34
that pits us against one another. Could you
5:36
more easily figure that out and then screen
5:38
out that shit? Or or
5:40
vial content or what have you or promoting
5:43
a cryptocurrency through thousands
5:45
of bots? Yeah. You
5:46
just put out some ideas. some of
5:48
which people disagree with, which you noted,
5:50
which you noted.
5:50
Yeah. And and what I find is similar to
5:53
whenever you talk about two thirty or a
5:55
crypto. there's an absolutest mentality
5:57
where it's not let's discuss the
5:59
issue.
5:59
It's like, okay, you insanely rich shithead.
6:02
Yeah. I agree.
6:03
That's what pissed me off. they
6:05
kinda go after stop. You can't respond.
6:08
Like,
6:08
easy for you to say a personal privilege that
6:10
doesn't live in China. It's like, okay. How do I respond
6:13
to that? Yeah. Mama Bear came out
6:15
swinging.
6:15
I did. I was like, you know what? Here's
6:17
the thing. He's an insanely rich idiot,
6:19
but he's my insanely rich idiot. There you
6:21
go. First of all, And secondly, like, that's
6:23
exactly right. It was like, don't agree with him,
6:25
but and then he's like, because Scott influences Scabs
6:28
of companies. I was like, why don't you write
6:30
about, like, I don't know, Tim Cook or you
6:32
know,
6:32
keep up a chai. Everyone everywhere
6:35
listens to me. It's a
6:36
god. Oh, like, really? Really?
6:39
Like, Come on. Like, I wasn't saying minimizing
6:41
you, but I was like, okay. First of all, you're
6:43
using insanely rich excuse, which
6:45
I'm like weak. week, like, haven't
6:47
our actual debate. And this is a guy I
6:49
respect Mike Masnack, and he and I have
6:50
argued about two thirty.
6:51
Well, I tend to be on his side on this issue
6:53
too. And then, you know, like, the
6:55
the Jeff Jarvis as the world came out and had to
6:57
have their say patronizingly. But
7:00
it's it was really weird. I was like, let's ever
7:02
actual debate about this in time?
7:03
No. They're not interested in that.
7:04
Well, he's usually I find some
7:07
of his analysis, but lately, he's been, like,
7:09
Amy Glover shares an idiot. You're an idiot.
7:11
I'm, like, You know what? Actually, I'd like to have
7:13
an actual debate, and I tend to be on his side
7:15
on a lot of things compared to you. Like,
7:17
I disagreed with you last week because of that. But
7:19
nonetheless, no one's gonna do
7:20
that. But but let's just screen the sound. We was
7:22
we do try to, like, reverse engineer
7:25
to a learning here for a younger person. Correct.
7:27
That is correct. The learning here for me is
7:29
-- Mhmm. -- if you're not,
7:31
I consider myself a thought leader, and I realize how
7:33
arrogant that statement is. If you're not on a regular
7:36
basis saying things that really gets
7:38
a lot of pushback, then you're not saying anything.
7:40
Right. Yeah. And the key isn't to be right or
7:42
wrong. The key is to catalyze a conversation
7:44
and that might result in productive dialogue that
7:46
shapes and reshapes better solutions.
7:49
Right. And I get it wrong all the time. And by the
7:51
way, you say I just didn't have the
7:53
energy to go on last time respond. That's okay. I
7:55
did it for you. What I would say is, I wouldn't get
7:57
back in this phase. I'd say boss, post
7:59
where I got it wrong in the studies, and I'll
8:01
retweet it. I I wanna get to
8:03
a better solution. I I realized I don't
8:05
have a monopoly on the truth here. Yeah.
8:07
But there has to be some it's
8:10
worth thinking about right now. Agree.
8:12
Because there are too many people. I mean, you
8:14
saw what happened with the women's march -- Mhmm.
8:16
-- how that actor's got in there and basically
8:18
ruined a woman's career and started reshaping
8:20
people's view of the women's march. Mhmm.
8:23
There's gotta be a technical solution
8:25
for new
8:25
incentives to screen that stuff
8:27
out. There's gotta be a way to I would agree.
8:29
It's a complex topic, but nonetheless,
8:31
you're a rich guy who's flying around, like, some
8:34
like, if insane. Like, I was like, that's you've lost
8:36
me on this one. Anyway, I defended you, and I
8:37
think you shouldn't. And I don't always agree with
8:40
you. By the way, FYI. I
8:42
don't always agree with me.
8:43
I know exactly.
8:44
Sometimes I write shit and I'm like, well, I don't
8:46
know about this.
8:47
I was actually I was doing some
8:49
of it from the three
8:50
year old party. I was like fuck you. Oh, would
8:52
you like a cupcake? That's why you were angry.
8:54
Now I understand why you came in so
8:56
high. No.
8:56
No. No. I was just annoyed by that. I was super
8:59
annoyed because we try to come get to comedy here,
9:01
which is really good. Anyway, there's
9:03
a lot going on. Also, Amazon is
9:05
facing lawmakers led by
9:07
center,
9:07
Elizabeth Warren, one of the FTC to block the company's
9:10
acquisition of iRobot, which
9:11
was interesting Warren since the company's coach
9:13
shouldn't be allowed to just buy their way out of
9:15
competing and Amazon spokesperson said of the
9:17
letter request. The letter contains a number
9:19
of falsehoods and is broadly inaccurate,
9:21
which, of course, they don't point to anything.
9:23
But we talked
9:24
about this. I don't know if the FTC will do
9:26
this because it's quite a competitive arena.
9:29
Again, Amazon's being very candy and
9:31
what it's buying, MGM, tough kinda
9:33
competitive in the instrument business, tough in
9:35
the in the robot well,
9:37
vacuum business, I guess, was that what they're
9:39
doing there? home
9:40
presence. I don't know what to call it.
9:42
This
9:42
is a master class. I
9:44
I like senator I don't like senator
9:46
I think she's fighting a good fight. But
9:49
I think she's
9:50
more right than effective. And I just
9:52
don't think this is where they should be focusing their
9:55
energy. Yep. In terms of the
9:57
the antitrust case to go after. And what's
9:59
gonna happen is she's gonna spend her
10:01
political capital railing against Amazon
10:04
because they're big and powerful and that's not what
10:06
antitrust is about. You're allowed to be big and powerful.
10:08
Does this make the market less competitive?
10:10
Mhmm. And I'm I don't
10:12
know much about home appliances but
10:14
my my
10:14
my nascent knowledge of the home
10:17
appliance market is it's there's no
10:19
monopoly that's emerged, that
10:21
there's Dyson, there's Hoover, there's there's a
10:23
lot of them. Mhmm. And
10:25
this is where she decides to put her wood. drone
10:27
one. There's I don't even know of another one.
10:29
Maybe there's some from China. This is a
10:31
very specific time. With the picker upper.
10:33
I
10:34
don't know. I know. But there's not that many drone
10:36
ones. There's not that many
10:36
drone. I don't know quite why this is the one
10:39
there. Speaking of other legal issues, Kim
10:41
Kardashian is settling a charge for
10:43
promoting a crypto called Ethereum Max
10:45
without disclosing that it was an ad.
10:47
Kardashian was paid two hundred and
10:49
fifty thousand dollars for the post, Incredible. As
10:51
part of the settlement, she's agreed to pay one
10:53
point two six million dollars and
10:55
not promote any cryptocurrencies for three
10:57
years. First shot across the bow on this one. There's a lot
10:59
of celebrities. sucked into this. I
11:01
think this is foreplay to what will
11:03
be a much bigger set of
11:05
fines and investigations around
11:08
people who are not transparent around
11:10
their intentions when they go on
11:12
media to try and pump the value
11:14
of something. And her what's
11:16
different here here is my understanding
11:18
is she didn't disclose that
11:20
that she had a position here or that she was
11:22
getting paid. Right. But
11:24
I think this is a tip of the iceberg. And I
11:26
think when we're gonna stare down, when we do the
11:28
analysis, especially around specs, and we had
11:30
all of these individuals going on media
11:32
platforms, and using massive
11:34
Twitter following. So, essentially, pump
11:36
and then dot -- Mhmm. -- I think
11:38
that there's gonna be some sort of regulation, and
11:40
I think it'll be warranted that says, alright.
11:42
if you own over x percent of a company
11:45
and you're on CNBC making a
11:48
compelling argument and then using your Twitter
11:50
followership to promote it and
11:52
go after anyone who dares question you.
11:54
And at the same time,
11:56
you are selling like there's no
11:58
tomorrow that people
11:59
should have transparency into
12:02
that. What I think the the
12:04
rub here is that we're gonna find out so
12:06
many people made hundreds of millions or even
12:08
billions. Yeah. as others lost
12:10
money. And that is the Adam Neumann effect. Should
12:12
you get a commission on
12:14
other people's losses? Yep.
12:16
And it's it was the same algorithm. I have a big
12:18
Twitter following. I'm very charismatic. Media
12:20
loves me on because I say provocative things.
12:23
I make it such that I'm not on the board of the
12:25
company so I can sell stock without making
12:27
disclosures. Oh, she's a paid she's a
12:29
paid celebrity spokesperson model. sense. This is
12:31
different because she she should disclose that.
12:33
Right? But I think this is a bridge to
12:35
a broader conversation -- Mhmm.
12:37
-- around how do we ensure people
12:40
understand not only your incentives but your
12:42
actions when they're on CNBC pumping
12:44
a stock, and that afternoon's selling
12:46
it. This is interesting. Gary Gensler
12:48
said Kardashian's case serves as a reminder
12:50
to celebrities and others that the law requires them
12:52
to disclose the public when and how they are paid
12:54
to promote investing in securities.
12:56
There's lots of Floyd Mary weather was involved and there's
12:58
lots of celebrity sound. This is interesting.
13:00
Her attorney said miss
13:01
Kardashian fully cooperated with the SEC
13:03
from the very beginning, she remains willing to do whatever she
13:05
do can assist this SEC in this manner. She
13:07
wanted to get this matter behind her to avoid a protracted
13:10
dispute. The ARC Agreement
13:12
reached with the SEC allows her to do that so she can move
13:14
forward with many different business pursuits. That also
13:16
includes she just co founded a consumer
13:18
focused private equity firm with a with a
13:20
former Carlyle group partner. and they're
13:22
looking to do a debut firm. She's doing
13:24
a lot of stuff, actually. And
13:26
so, yeah, I agree. I mean, she she they
13:28
have gotten into trouble for versions of
13:30
this
13:30
before. but a lot more
13:31
here. There's a lot more here. And I agree in
13:34
this facts area. You've been very
13:37
vocal on this issue.
13:39
But
13:39
you said this, it's easy to
13:42
stereotype Kim Kardashian
13:44
because of her physical appearance and just have Hot
13:46
she is. I think she's actually a pretty
13:48
savvy business woman. Yeah. She knew to get
13:50
out of this. But did but
13:52
she handled it well? She knew she
13:55
was wrong. She didn't double down. She didn't
13:57
appeal it. She said she basically said, you're
13:59
right. I'm wrong. Here's the fine.
14:01
I apologize. Let's all move on. That
14:03
she didn't have to admit wrongdoing. Yeah.
14:05
She acknowledged the issue and she's she's
14:07
paying it. She's not I think
14:09
it was poor judgment. I mean, it goes back to the
14:11
trust thing. Mhmm. Everybody
14:13
fucked up. The the key
14:15
is you don't necessarily need to double
14:17
down. the FCC, the
14:19
populate everybody loves to forgive. Admits
14:22
you are wrong. Pay the fine. Move
14:24
on. Yep. Yep. And
14:25
they they can make a case ever to scare other people.
14:27
And there'll be a lot more you'll see a lot more of
14:30
this. It's very easy for the SEC to do
14:32
these, by they can they can make
14:34
some money and settle very quickly with most
14:36
people. Alright. Let's get to our
14:38
first big story.
14:41
Another
14:42
big week in the world of Elon Musk.
14:44
First, the court documents revealed private text
14:47
messages between Musk and tech a listers like
14:49
Jack Dorsey and Joe Lonsdale in which
14:51
they discussed the Twitter deal. Joe Rogen, as
14:53
we've talked about before, and even Gail King, we're in the
14:55
mix among the revelation. Matayas
14:57
Dopner of Axel Springer wanted to be
14:59
Twitter's CEO. Elon
15:01
pitched Oprah as a potential board
15:03
member. By the way, that's been pitched before by Jack
15:05
Dorothy. He said that he shouldn't be
15:07
anyone's boss he also was
15:09
in a discussion with Brett
15:11
Taylor about bots, and that was to
15:13
me the more important thing. Some of this stuff is just
15:15
kind of fun and games. of them
15:17
talking. But two weeks before he
15:19
signed the merger agreement, he wrote to Brett
15:21
Taylor, purging fake users will
15:23
make the numbers look terrible So restructuring should
15:25
be done as a private company. And
15:27
so I think it puts him in a
15:29
very bad position in this court case.
15:30
He's got to settle and figure out this
15:33
eleven billion dollar difference between what he agreed
15:34
to pay for it and what Twitter's worth right
15:36
now. He's he's got this some
15:38
of these texts are, as I said,
15:40
silly. The others are very
15:43
significant, I think. Howard Bauchner: Well, I
15:44
think you've zeroed on. And that is - this is
15:47
Celebrity porn and it has some
15:49
- it's illuminating about rich
15:51
people in society, but the substance is
15:53
exactly
15:53
what you said that he knew about the bots.
15:55
He was planning to address the bots. It was
15:57
a key component of why he was drawn
15:59
to the platform was he thought that one of the ways he could
16:01
add value was cleaning it up. This will be
16:03
the text you just referenced will be exhibit number
16:06
one -- Yeah. -- that WACTel will put
16:08
forward on behalf of Twitter's case. that the notion
16:10
that he somehow was shocked
16:12
by the number of bots
16:14
that -- Yeah. -- he knew about it and that
16:16
he, you know, his interest in this thing
16:18
waned when he came off his panic episode and
16:20
realized he was paying forty five
16:22
billion dollars worth for something worth probably
16:24
eighteen billion. The I
16:26
mean, I'm curious to get your take. And when I read these texts, at
16:28
first, I thought I should I be reading the text of other people
16:30
commenting on that, well, it's part of a case. It's it's a
16:32
legal case. Sure. Yeah. A few things
16:35
really struck me. The
16:36
first is just
16:39
income inequality. And I I know that
16:41
sounds classless, but Larry
16:43
Ellison offering a billion
16:45
dollars on a deal he hasn't looked at over
16:47
text. Mhmm. It's like Well, Sam
16:49
Bank and Fried also wanted to give
16:51
money -- Five billion.
16:52
-- with that just he come and fly out
16:54
there and then it'll be a hammer. And
16:55
you get five or ten billion dollars? Yeah. It's
16:57
just like I mean I mean, Kara, who hasn't had
16:59
a friend offer him a billion dollars over tax.
17:01
Would you fly here and give me
17:03
money? It's not I mean, really? So
17:04
I just wanna I was I was wanna
17:06
bring this back to me. In late, I
17:08
think it was ninety nine.
17:11
or
17:11
two thousand. My company read envelope was struggling
17:13
and we had to raise more money and Sequoia
17:15
came in and smelled blood and said, okay, let's wash
17:17
out the founders and do a rights offering.
17:19
and I didn't have any money to defend my position in
17:21
the company. Mhmm. And my friends, Greg and
17:23
Cindy Show, I'm I'll I'll always
17:26
remember was really stressed out. I was going through a divorce. I was
17:28
broke and I was about to get washed out of a company
17:30
I'd started. You know, kind of the classic
17:32
the Silicon Valley store you don't hear
17:34
about. in in fast company.
17:36
And I was just so stressed
17:38
and disappointed on a number of personal and
17:40
professional things going on in my life. And
17:42
my friends, Greg and Cindy Show, called me from
17:44
the car and they said, hey, we were talking about you and they
17:47
said, could you use a million
17:49
dollars?
17:49
What? Can
17:50
you imagine that? mean, they're good friends. Yeah. But
17:52
they called me and said, could you use a million dollars? And
17:54
you know what I said? Yes.
17:57
Oh. And they wired me the
17:59
money. No
17:59
agreement. This is a rich guy's thing.
18:02
This is a rich guy's story. And I paid them
18:04
back I paid them back with interest, but I
18:06
remember thinking loan, they loan. That was the
18:08
most crazy generous
18:10
thing. Yeah. And I I and they have
18:12
taught me. I've tried to pay it forward on a regular
18:14
basis, and now I'm virtue signaling I
18:16
call and offer people money when I get the sense they're stressed about money.
18:19
Oh, hey. I understand. I'm very
18:21
stressed about money. Nice
18:26
dry. Nice dry. Love. You
18:28
got a three year old. a new pair of
18:30
shoes. No. That's right. anniversary gift. See the kids
18:32
again. I forgot the anniversary. I got
18:33
a beautiful gift. And I thought
18:35
that was the most and it was extraordinary
18:37
thing that had ever happened to me.
18:39
on a, like, a friendship money
18:41
level. Uh-huh.
18:42
This is
18:43
Larry Ellison offering -- Yeah. -- a thousand
18:45
times that offering. Although he was
18:48
sort of pushing him off. Like, I'll get to
18:50
you. Like, that kind of thing. That's how little it
18:52
mattered to him. Like, I think these
18:54
people You wanna talk about playing on a
18:56
different level, so the first thing is and I don't know what to do about
18:58
it. And I realize I'm coming this is class
19:00
warfare, but I'm like Jesus Christ. These people
19:02
really have this much money.
19:03
Yeah. Well, they all want a piece of Twitter. They all want a piece of they
19:06
were like, oh, I'd like to get a a good
19:08
idea. Like a piece of Twitter. I could see
19:10
that going through their little brain because they can't
19:12
own they can buy almost anything else. This,
19:14
they can't buy.
19:14
So The the second thing is the
19:17
Achilles heel. of
19:19
every really famous wealthy person
19:21
is they become
19:24
so
19:24
entrenched in their own bubble and
19:26
they have so many people around them telling them they're amazing. They
19:28
just lose touch. Yeah. And the
19:30
sick of infection data. Yeah.
19:33
There's so overwhelming. Yeah.
19:36
Just how I mean, it's just like
19:38
let's just give everyone a moment to take
19:40
his dick out of your mouth. I mean, it's just
19:42
like, my god. Yeah. There
19:44
was a lot of it. There was a lot of that. But again, it doesn't matter
19:46
the one to Brett Taylor. I think I wrote him whoa.
19:48
I wanna do an interview. I think that's what I wrote
19:50
text. I mean, I didn't text him. I think I emailed
19:53
him. away from all of this and the Oprah on the
19:55
board. And again, Jack Dorothy, many years ago,
19:57
wanted to bring Oprah. Many times have they thought
19:59
about Oprah on the board
19:59
of Twitter -- Mhmm. -- when they were looking for
20:02
a lady. but she's never she's not
20:04
getting near this. Let's just say Oprah's a
20:06
little smarter. The most interesting story
20:08
is about my stalker in those
20:10
texts. Mhmm. Jason Calcannas.
20:12
Well, they're very close friends just so you know.
20:14
Okay. It's close friend. Two or three months
20:16
ago, Matt Levine wrote that Jason was out there
20:18
marketing access to the Twitter deal.
20:20
He's saying that I can get you into the Twitter deal. And he was
20:23
gonna take a fee for it and then
20:25
ten percent of the upside. And and then and
20:28
like, That sounds desperate. We even said on this show, I
20:30
said, that sounds kind of desperate. Did
20:32
Elon has to get Jason Cal
20:34
candidates who deals in pretty small checks to raise
20:36
money for a forty five billion dollar deal.
20:38
Mhmm. Here are the
20:40
techs, must to Calcannas. What's going
20:42
on with you marketing an SPV
20:44
to Randos? This is
20:46
not okay. Not Randoll's. I have the
20:48
largest Angel syndicate. That's how I
20:50
invest. We've done two hundred fifty plus
20:52
deals. And then he goes on to say, Morgan Stanley
20:54
and Jared think you are using our
20:56
friendship not in a good way. Yeah. This
20:58
makes it seem like I'm desperate.
21:00
Please stop.
21:01
Yeah. So
21:02
Jason was out there marketing
21:06
access to a security that he
21:08
did not have permission to
21:10
market. Right. To me, that is
21:10
I think that was good for Elon,
21:12
though. He he him I mean, in that case, I
21:14
was, like, good on Elon for doing that. I
21:16
think these
21:16
texts on the whole actually
21:19
reflect fairly well on Elon. I
21:21
would agree. I would agree. Who they reflect
21:23
poorly on is his All his
21:25
hangers on her and friends and who were trying to
21:27
get in on Dan Jason goes on to sail. I'll
21:30
die for the sword fuel, I'll jump on a grenade. He
21:32
comes across like a
21:34
man who gets caught stealing his watch and
21:36
then drops to his knees, hoping if he collates
21:38
him, he'll forget about the watch he's
21:40
just trying to steal. Too much. Yes. A
21:42
little bit of it. That's very that that's how
21:44
he talks. But In any case, I think what he's gotta wonder
21:47
is like who's his friends and who's not his
21:49
friends. And I think that's hard when you're
21:51
that rich. It doesn't matter. No matter
21:53
what I said this to so many of these billionaires. I'm like, I'm
21:55
your best friend because I don't care, like, kind of
21:57
thing. I just want the interview, of course. Anyway, one
21:59
of the things that he does was he openly sparred
22:01
with Parag Agarwal yeah. He obviously,
22:04
if he is forced to buy at par, we'll
22:06
not have the job. I continue to believe and
22:08
I've been texting with people who know
22:10
You know, Ari Emmanuel, like, enter
22:12
the picture. That's a probably a good idea to
22:14
have someone who's not a who's a who's close to
22:17
Elon and who will he's very convincing and
22:19
charming. There's all these relationships,
22:21
Ari, between Ari and Egan Durban who's
22:23
on the board of Twitter or what's he's
22:25
on the board of Twitter still. And
22:27
he also was, I think, on he was very close to Ari through
22:29
the WME deal. I believe he's still on
22:31
the board there. He may not still be. But he
22:33
was very integral to that deal. There's
22:36
all kinds of inter personal relationships here. If
22:38
they if Elon was smart, he would
22:40
let people who are
22:41
smarter make deals. make
22:44
smarter on this stuff, make the deal, and and
22:46
get the hell out of it. There's an eleven billion
22:48
dollar delta. So somewhere
22:50
between zero and eleven billion
22:52
dollars, there's a number that he should take and
22:54
run as soon as he
22:54
can. But you bring up another key point. Is
22:57
that in addition to trusting people
22:59
or having third parties who do I used to think when
23:01
I was younger, too smart. And when I did an M A deal that I, like,
23:03
I would do the deal myself and I quickly learned
23:05
that's really stupid. You there there's a reason
23:07
why investment bankers make so much money.
23:10
and third parties are better at representing you than
23:12
you are yourself. Right. There's
23:14
another lesson here
23:15
and that is you have
23:18
to have in your circle, people who are
23:20
prone to disagree with you.
23:22
Yeah. And if you look at
23:24
corporate governance history, whether it's
23:26
Theranos, whether it's Enron, the
23:28
boards all had one thing in common. They all
23:31
got along too well. They all
23:33
agreed with each other on everything.
23:35
All the board meetings We're
23:37
super civil, great point. That's what we
23:39
should do. Never questioning the CEO.
23:42
Yeah. Just go along, get along. And this
23:44
guy has Absolutely. No
23:46
garbage out of you. That's not true. There's
23:47
a few people around them that do. I I just hope
23:49
they get some voice.
23:50
They're not texting
23:51
them. No. But I
23:54
think Ari Emmanuel and Egan Durbin will
23:56
probably they all wanna have good
23:58
relationships with him, but I suspect they
23:59
will be Arie will be charming and
24:02
also tough. And so because
24:04
he's always looking for the angle. Right?
24:05
And same thing with the even very smart
24:08
investor from silver. Like, just I
24:10
would Elon,
24:11
if you're listening, please listen to them.
24:13
Just do get
24:14
get to a settlement here
24:17
because if not, it's gonna just drag
24:19
on and gonna gonna occupy your life. I don't
24:21
think
24:21
it can. I think
24:22
it can. I think it can. Through these texts, I
24:24
was like, oh, there's the Elad, I
24:25
know. There's the Elad. I But
24:28
play it out but play it out here. I'd say he offers
24:30
him ten billion dollars. Mhmm.
24:32
The shareholders go, no.
24:34
This deal his this legal case against
24:36
him that he's gonna lose is worth twenty
24:38
billion. And I don't think he's gonna pay that. Well,
24:40
there's an eleven billion dollar delta.
24:42
So I don't know. I think everyone's gonna wanna like, if
24:44
not, they're gonna end up with nothing, everyone's gotta
24:46
be very clear. If they
24:47
if they keep going at this, they're gonna end up,
24:49
you know, they keep fighting, everyone's gonna
24:51
end up without anything.
24:53
So two other observations. Okay. I
24:55
haven't been involved in a deal this big, but I've been
24:57
in the center of like multi hundred
24:59
million dollar and low single digit billion
25:01
dollar deals, Elon went from going on the
25:03
board to deciding who's gonna acquire the
25:06
firm. when he decided he was gonna acquire the firm and no longer
25:08
want to be inside the tent, he put out a tweet
25:11
saying his Twitter dying. And then
25:12
Parag, I thought
25:14
sent exactly the right email. They said, look,
25:16
boss. You can say what you want, but you're
25:18
not helping. Mhmm. I thought that
25:20
was direct. I thought that was CEO behavior. drugs
25:23
like that. That's his nature too,
25:25
Barry. And Elon wrote back, what have
25:27
you done this week? What have you gone to come
25:29
this week? And I thought, yeah, that that that was
25:31
kind of an asshole move. You don't fucking in
25:33
most I've dealt with
25:35
corporators who are very aggressive. They
25:37
maintain a certain level of decorum
25:39
respect for other people. Yeah. Yeah. It's
25:41
not like This is very direct. And
25:43
Elon doesn't do that. The other big
25:45
observation -- Mhmm. -- I believe if you got a
25:47
room of people who make okay
25:49
living, but aren't rich, and then you
25:51
got a room of millionaires together.
25:53
And I I realize this doesn't sound great. I
25:55
think you could immediately figure out which room are
25:57
the millionaires and which room where
25:59
the people who who just doing okay. I think if you had
26:01
two
26:01
rooms with millionaires and one with billionaires, you
26:04
wouldn't be able to tell the difference. And
26:07
thing that comes out here is people are playing checkers,
26:09
not chess. They're impressive
26:12
people, but the reason they're billionaires and not
26:14
millionaires is mostly luck. It's mostly not
26:16
their fault. And when you
26:17
see the way they behave, the way they equip
26:20
themselves, it's pretty obvious.
26:21
There's no secret sauce there
26:23
other than being born at the right place and
26:25
the right time.
26:26
I don't know about that. I some of the people I was listening
26:29
to an interview that I'd forgotten that
26:31
Steve Jobs did with Walt and I, and it's so
26:33
smart. This this this he
26:35
was talking about making mistakes
26:38
and also iterations in tech. And I'm
26:40
gonna send it to you because I was like, oh
26:41
my god. This is this guy really
26:43
did have a big mind, like, in terms
26:45
of thinking practically, and he was
26:47
talking about, oh, it was really good
26:50
about where to
26:51
make the risk, where not to make the
26:53
risk. It was so well thought out. think some of them are and
26:55
I think among these people, when you
26:57
get him going, when he's not in this
26:59
weird celebrity
27:00
bubble, he is very
27:02
smart like that. You can
27:03
have a really fascinating discussion. I think
27:05
the problem is this these suckups that
27:08
these techs showed you. You should see this all day long.
27:10
Alright. Hey, dude. Hey bro.
27:12
Good job. Woo. That kind of stuff.
27:14
And sometimes, you know, he deserves a
27:16
good job, like, landing that
27:18
rocket on a thing. I
27:19
Sure. I sent him a text and said,
27:20
fucking impressive. Like -- Yeah. -- but it's not
27:22
that it's not because I wanted
27:23
anything from him. It just was, and you should acknowledge
27:26
that. The relationship between intelligence
27:28
and wealth is positive. There's a
27:30
correlation. But it tops out at about a hundred and ten
27:32
or a hundred and twenty IQ. The difference between
27:34
intelligent people and geniuses, there's no correlation
27:36
with wealth. And I think that
27:38
there are a lot of really
27:40
impressive comments you just highlighted
27:42
from Steve Jobs. I can find you a
27:44
lot of people who are just so
27:46
strikingly impressive and they've made a really
27:48
good living. Mhmm. I have never been able
27:50
to discern the difference between someone who is
27:52
successful and someone who is
27:54
a billionaire. other
27:54
than luck. Yeah. That's the problem here
27:55
with me. Right? That's the thing. Brilliant. Well,
27:58
anyway, why isn't she a billionaire?
27:59
Okay. Some points. case
28:03
employees. Anyways -- Alright. -- they
28:05
put their they put their pants on one leg
28:07
at a time. You know? You know, whenever I get I
28:09
don't know about you. whenever I get occasionally,
28:11
I get an offer someone will say, my husband
28:13
loves the show and he's dying to meet you and wants
28:15
advice and I'll I'll donate extra charity. I never
28:17
send out because I'm they're gonna
28:19
be disappointed. Your your husband has
28:21
this vision of me that's just not reality. Don't
28:23
don't be mean. I meet with everybody. Nothing
28:26
mean. Nothing
28:26
mean. Be nice to your fans.
28:29
Nice. Your fans are nice to you.
28:31
Anyway, let's go on a quick break. We
28:33
come back. Dick
28:35
Doug's European numbers are out.
28:37
and they're huge, and we'll speak with a friend of pivot,
28:39
Gabriel De Benadetti, about the hidden
28:41
sides of the Biden Obama relationship.
28:44
It
28:46
may
28:47
have
28:49
seemed impossible a few years
28:51
ago, finally happening. Insurance is front and center
28:53
for tech companies who are finally commanding the space
28:55
they occupy in every other
28:58
industry at the Center of that
29:00
disruption is covered generously in SureTech for embedded insurance
29:02
that protects the customers of the world's largest
29:04
digital companies available at Amazon,
29:06
Intuit flipkart eBay, Booking
29:09
dot com's SkyScanner, Ryanair, and Southeast
29:11
Asia's largest company, Shopee.
29:13
Cover Genius's platform makes it easy for
29:15
their global partners to embed insurance and
29:17
warranty bundles in specialty bundles. Thanks
29:19
very much for that within their booking
29:22
path or sign up connecting customers with the
29:24
protection they need and with global
29:26
licensing and end to end capabilities across
29:28
all industries. From property to
29:30
travel fintech logistics to gig
29:32
economy and retail, cover genius can
29:34
build and distribute any kind of insurance and
29:36
process claims and offer states in a more than sixty
29:38
countries, all through a single integration
29:40
because your customers are at the center of
29:42
everything covered in a space claims instantly and
29:44
maintains an NPS of sixty
29:46
five plus the highest in an industry where traditional insurers
29:49
rely on paper forms missed calls and mail
29:51
checks to deliver NPS below.
29:53
Zero. Did not know that,
29:55
Give your customers the peace of mind
29:57
they deserve head over to cover genius dot
29:59
com slash pivot today to
30:01
learn more. Cover genius, the
30:03
InsurTech for embedded insurance. Working
30:07
remotely
30:09
is the best except when it's the
30:11
worst. There's no commuting. You can hang out with your
30:13
dog, make lunch in your own kitchen. But
30:15
then there's the trying to stay in sync and
30:17
on task with your team, especially when they're
30:19
spread out across the country. Luckily,
30:22
there's a tool that can help make remote work
30:25
seamless. Kota is the dock that brings it all
30:27
together. It's endlessly customizable
30:29
and connected. There are templates for
30:31
everything, including remote onboarding, goal
30:33
trackers, and meeting notes. Kota makes it easy to
30:35
stay on top of your task and in sync
30:37
with your team. Make an update in a table
30:39
and it automatically shows everywhere. No more relying
30:41
on copy and paste to get important projects
30:44
current. That way, you can get back to
30:46
enjoying the freedom of working from
30:48
anywhere quickly and efficiently without the hassle with
30:50
Koda, you can stall for just about
30:52
anything. And right now, you can get started having
30:54
your team all working to get on the
30:57
same page for free at
30:59
dakota dot i o slash
31:01
pivot dot C0DA
31:03
dot i o to get started for
31:05
free. Kota i o slash
31:08
pivot.
31:10
Scott, we're
31:12
back
31:12
TikTok is tallying up some huge gains and losses
31:14
in Europe and filings with the UK. The app
31:17
reported close to a billion dollars in turnover for
31:19
twenty twenty one according to
31:21
Financial Times. That's nearly six times its
31:23
previous take in Europe. On the other hand, it lost
31:25
nearly nine hundred million dollars. The
31:27
company says the staff compensation was the primary cause
31:29
it's been higher and like crazy. I spoke with TikTok's
31:31
COO, Vanessa Pappas, out getting
31:33
certified by the committee on foreign investment
31:35
in the US, should
31:37
TikTok go through a similar process for
31:39
its European businesses. I did ask her
31:41
and she didn't
31:42
answer. She was much firmer. I asked her what
31:44
she would have said to Josh Holly if she had thought
31:46
a little harder. She was talking about the reductive nature of those things
31:48
and everything else. She did a pretty she was pretty good in
31:50
this interview, very strong. They're thriving in
31:53
Europe. They're thriving over there, they're losing
31:55
money. Certainly, but it's certainly a business
31:57
on the upswing and
31:59
certainly would be able to
31:59
be profitable presumably as
32:02
long as they get these go aheads in these
32:04
countries. What do you think? It's
32:06
it's
32:06
not precedent. This firm I mean, keep
32:08
in mind, okay, a billion dollars and still
32:10
losing money the year before. Years,
32:12
you know, years go click by pretty
32:15
quickly. they grew hundred percent. This firm
32:17
-- Yeah. -- is growing much faster.
32:20
Revenue wise, different
32:22
revenues Users,
32:23
daily active
32:26
users, are all growing faster
32:28
than Google or Facebook did
32:30
at a similar point in those company's
32:33
history. So if you just take a straight line
32:35
out, this company should be
32:37
if it can maintain this trajectory, it
32:39
should be one of the three or four most valuable companies
32:41
in the world. to ten years. Yeah.
32:43
I agree with you. I think it's really interesting. I think that
32:46
they I think they're gonna be a little more
32:48
aggressive
32:48
on the attacks like you saying they
32:50
should be banned. A very impressive executive
32:52
from Google, was former Google executive worked at
32:55
YouTube, really does know this, creator
32:57
economy, very well. Perfect choice
32:59
for them in lots of ways. How did she surprise you? I'm
33:01
curious, what was your takeaway after Tati
33:03
speaking to her about all this? She was quite
33:04
forthright about their efforts. And I
33:07
thought, she could have done Facebook thing, and she did
33:09
very canny person, I think. I
33:11
think she answered pretty much every question, and I there
33:13
were a lot of tough ones in there about the banning. And Does
33:16
she wanna
33:16
spend? It seems to me that would be
33:18
the answer.
33:18
No. They do not. That's not where they're going. It's
33:21
gonna be owned by ByteDance. I think that's
33:23
not where they're going. I think, of course, she didn't
33:25
answer the IPO question. because, of
33:27
course, she'll do very well and others. I she
33:29
she was a a little lighter on who's really
33:31
running it and who has things, but she
33:33
said they don't have control of it in just
33:35
US decisions in China. That said,
33:37
she had a better answer about the
33:39
Chinese Communist Party members.
33:42
as we talked about, you know, Apple has probably
33:44
has a few. She can't ask them that. It'd
33:46
be silly not to say they aren't there
33:48
because there's lots of people in China. I
33:50
thought she answered I think they will pass
33:53
the US rules that they need
33:55
to with adequate protections.
33:58
and I don't know what'll
33:59
happen after that. I don't I she'd seem to
34:02
push off an IPO or spin
34:04
off right
34:04
now. But let me ask you, you know
34:06
I I think you you sort of have an inside -- Mhmm. -- tracker
34:09
view into a lot of different parties
34:11
around this issue. Mhmm. Do you
34:13
think ByteDance ever gets public in its
34:15
current form without severe. Does this
34:18
happen? Did you ask about that supposedly the deal
34:20
they're working on with Biden? I've heard
34:22
rumors there.
34:23
Yes. Yeah. Yeah. No. She said they're working on it, and it's
34:25
gonna come to she was very clear. She's like, they're
34:27
gonna have a deal where they're it's gonna be safe.
34:29
This the information is safe,
34:31
she said, and it will be very clear and transparent, safe. She no.
34:33
She didn't pretend there weren't issues on
34:36
TikTok, and it's the friendly.
34:36
She goes, we are trying to be
34:39
the friendly in retainment brand. And we're gonna get all kinds
34:41
of the same crap that ends up on Twitter
34:44
or Facebook we're gonna get, and we have to
34:46
move towards getting rid
34:48
of it. she very
34:50
clearly understood the worries
34:52
and was not acting
34:53
like it was stupid any of it. And, of course, that's
34:56
what she should do. So there you go. It's an impressive
34:58
woman. She was very impressive. One of
35:00
the things that she did note that a lot of
35:02
the ownership is foreign. I brought up
35:04
the issue. There's a branch of ByteDance that ByteDance
35:06
Tech that the government official sits on
35:09
the board. This is one of the
35:11
divisions, separate division of it. And she's
35:13
she made the also salient point that lot of ByteDance and and
35:16
this company is owned by US
35:18
owners.
35:18
There's all kinds of US owners of
35:22
this thing. you still believe in a ban if they're approved by the government?
35:24
Like the US government with this administration,
35:26
I find them to be very thoughtful. I had
35:28
a chance to sit down with some representatives of
35:30
our cyber command
35:32
at the code. Mhmm. I think
35:34
they're smart, thoughtful people. If they sign up
35:36
on something, I wouldn't you know, I would
35:39
just be prone to to
35:41
say, I think they've done the homework. And
35:43
also, you know, when you're
35:46
on code, on stage on
35:49
Bill Mar, and this is one of the many
35:51
things I need to work on. I'm prone to
35:53
being provocative to get attention.
35:55
You are. Yeah. I don't I Lots of people said the
35:57
same thing, quote, not just you, but I know. But what
36:00
I what I'm increasingly uncomfortable with is
36:02
the idea of using the terms band and media and
36:04
the same
36:06
Yeah. You've seen that. It's a bit of a shift. Yeah. And I think
36:08
that there is there's gotta be some
36:10
sunlight in between here. But
36:12
I still go back to the notion that
36:16
have to separate the product and the ownership, but
36:18
the ownership has a direct
36:20
influence over or the CCP has
36:22
influence over it. I just Or
36:24
could. I can't get
36:26
over how powerful this thing
36:27
is. Anyway, let's bring in our friend of pivot.
36:34
Gabriel De Benedetti is the
36:35
National Correspondent for New York
36:37
Magazine and the author of the Long Alliance,
36:39
The Imperfect Union of Joe Biden and
36:42
Barack Obama,
36:44
which looks at the often misunderstood relationship between the two presidents.
36:46
Welcome Gabriel. It's great to
36:48
be here. Thanks
36:49
for having me. So
36:50
why don't we get about the Obama
36:53
Biden relationship? Because people tend
36:55
to have their thoughts
36:56
about it. We think of it as warm and friendly. They
36:58
did all those videos, getting ice creams,
37:01
things like that. Can you talk about it? I was having a
37:03
discussion with someone about vice
37:04
presidents, including vice president and Harris. I'm
37:06
like,
37:06
they never really get along.
37:08
They're there to replace them. But what
37:10
are your
37:11
thoughts? Yeah. I think you're sort of touching
37:13
on the central tension here. The public perception
37:15
of this relationship is
37:18
a bromance. That's what people have called it for a long time. That's -- Mhmm.
37:20
-- partially true. It's definitely true as I've come
37:22
to see it that it's the closest relationship
37:24
between a president and vice president or
37:27
president and former president, you know, in
37:29
modern history. But that's a really
37:31
low bar. And the reality here is that they
37:33
are friends, which is unusual.
37:35
but it's a political relationship before anything else and it has
37:38
been for over twenty years now. You
37:40
know, these are two men whose relationship
37:42
has fluctuated wildly often by the
37:44
scenes in ways that are not
37:45
known to the public, and who see the world very
37:48
differently at times, whose perceptions
37:50
of, you know, ways that you make change
37:52
are very different. even to this day, it's
37:54
not as if Biden is calling Obama that often
37:56
for advice. They still do talk, but it's much
37:58
more like therapy than it is,
37:59
you know, what should I
38:02
do on this bill or who should I be
38:04
calling on this? So, you know, they're they're
38:06
vastly different men as we've come to see by their
38:08
times as president, and that is born
38:10
out over you know, they're they're twenty years of knowing each other now.
38:12
So for me, the reason that I
38:14
decided to write this was basically, you
38:16
know, when Biden won, so many people
38:18
were saying,
38:20
this is going to be the third term of Obama or at least the tone the coverage
38:22
was, Obama's back baby, you know, the
38:24
last four years didn't happen. As we've
38:26
seen now for two years, that's clearly
38:29
it. No. They're not at all the same. I'm just curious. And
38:31
then Scott will have a question. Is, you know,
38:33
Bush and Cheney certainly had a close relation,
38:35
but that was more like like, master and
38:37
submissive sound it felt like. Sure. So
38:38
by the end of their
38:40
time together, they really didn't have much of a
38:42
relationship. you
38:44
know, if you look back, Gaurin Clinton, obviously,
38:46
same sort of idea. They did not have a good
38:48
relationship by the end. You know, the only other
38:50
one that you can kind of compare this
38:53
to in terms of former president, not president and
38:55
VP, is the bushes. But, of course, they had
38:57
a very complicated relationship too. And, you
38:59
know, obviously, they're father and son.
39:02
So different different to start here.
39:04
Mhmm. But there's, you know, like
39:06
you alluded to at the beginning, the fact of the
39:08
Biden Obama relationship being this one that we sort
39:10
of hold up in the public consciousness is what it's
39:12
supposed to be. It's really sort of been
39:14
unfortunate for the for the Harris
39:16
vice presidency. because so many people
39:18
say, well, why aren't they so close? Well, the
39:20
expectation was never that they were gonna be best
39:22
friends until the Obama and Biden years. But we can
39:24
talk more about that. is not a
39:26
relationship that's set up to fail because
39:28
you what you have is two adversaries
39:30
that you choose your VP, not because it's
39:32
someone you're gonna get along with. You choose your VP
39:34
because it's someone who's shown the
39:36
ability. I mean, I think
39:38
I think vice president,
39:39
Harris is vice president. She got
39:41
on the debate stage because incredibly
39:44
impressive or at least her resume. But
39:46
the reason she was chosen as vice president
39:48
was she she really
39:50
went after Biden
39:52
was effective mean, doesn't the relationship just start from a position of
39:54
failure? Well, these
39:56
two certainly
39:56
didn't have a relationship that started.
39:58
It wasn't even that
39:59
it was failure from the beginning. It was, like, a nonentity
40:02
disrelationship. They they knew each other in the Senate,
40:04
obviously. But they just didn't have any
40:06
reason to really
40:08
care about each other for the longest Biden's
40:10
foreign relations committee. So it took a
40:12
really long time. And you know when when Obama essentially
40:14
decided he did want Biden
40:18
to be the one to to be his vice president. First off, Biden
40:20
didn't really wanna be considered partially,
40:22
you know, artifice, but the reality was he
40:24
didn't think he'd be a very good
40:27
too. He'd been in the Senate for thirty six years. You know, why
40:29
would he wanna for the first time in his life
40:31
be someone's second in command? He thought he could be
40:33
secretary of state, which is a much better job in
40:35
terms of autonomy, at least. But then,
40:37
you know, when it came time for them to actually
40:39
have their first conversation about this, Obama said to
40:42
Biden, I need you to just promise me that
40:44
this is the capstone of your career. That's the only
40:46
way this is gonna work. Biden's response
40:48
was, oh, not the tombstone.
40:50
The joke being, okay, this is the end of the
40:52
career, obviously. But they never
40:54
really hatched that out in a series way. And in fact, if you look at
40:56
the New York Times story from the morning after
40:58
Biden was chosen. One of the final lines says
41:00
something to the effect of, you know, it's really convenient for
41:02
Obama that he's not gonna have to worry
41:04
about Biden's political posturing because obviously Biden is
41:06
gonna be too old to run for president after their eight
41:08
years together, you know. At the time, that
41:10
was conventional wisdom. That certainly was violent
41:13
thought. Almost immediately though, their their different views
41:15
of politics, it's true that they
41:18
agreed over the long term on a
41:20
lot of policy points, but they definitely disagreed a lot over
41:22
their eight years together in terms of how to actually
41:24
achieve those goals. So, Gabriel, what's the
41:26
actual
41:27
stated relationship today? And
41:29
how how helpful can he be to
41:31
to Biden Obama in twenty
41:33
twenty four? Obama's sort of
41:35
been wandering around doing podcast
41:37
deals and being a friendly guy, but
41:39
not particularly political, I would say. Yeah. He's doing a little bit more than
41:42
he expected to be doing at this point in his
41:44
post presidency, but that's a Trump thing,
41:46
not about Yeah. This is a
41:48
reaction to the Trump years. There's a few
41:50
different answers. This is a short version
41:52
of what the relationship is like now. You
41:54
know, Obama took a long time to
41:56
get involved with Biden twenty twenty, but
41:58
he eventually did and was very useful to him.
42:00
And at this point, they're sort of talking
42:02
every few weeks or so, but it's
42:04
very informal. unlike any other call that Biden has, except for a
42:06
family member, no one else is on the call when he
42:08
does these calls. So it's very hard to get a readout of what
42:10
they are. Because they are
42:12
personal conversations. it's much more
42:14
gut checks. It's like I said someone once referred to
42:16
it to me as political therapy.
42:18
He's not saying, what should I do in Afghanistan?
42:20
What should I do with
42:22
And Obama has said that he's gonna be as useful as
42:24
as Biden wants him to be, and he he's
42:26
not offering advice unprompted.
42:28
He is trying to lift this lift his
42:30
own he's got his own projects. He's trying to be a poster. joke
42:32
or even before he became president that the
42:34
best job in the world wasn't president. It's
42:38
the x president. So, like, he's been thinking about this for a
42:40
long time. What he would do as as a
42:42
post president. But the question of twenty twenty
42:44
four is a really delicate one
42:46
for both And the midterms too, because I've assumed he he's
42:48
got more of a draw for the midterms and
42:50
is Totally. Then Biden does.
42:52
Correct? No doubt. And he's gonna be out
42:54
there. He's said that he's gonna be out
42:56
there campaigning for folks. He's endorsing
42:58
people. He's cutting ads. You know, same as
43:00
always with him in the midterm. Same thing he did in
43:02
twenty eighteen. because that this time
43:04
he's he's talked a little bit more about to
43:06
people who are, you know, trying to figure out what his
43:08
presence is gonna look like. He's talked
43:10
about more what it would look like for him to
43:12
have more of a presence when it comes to talk me about the future of the democracy issues. He talks about
43:14
this information a lot. Yes. And one thing I think
43:16
we're gonna see him do is
43:19
campaign for or cut ads for or endorse even
43:21
secretary of state candidates in the midterms, you know, all
43:23
the way down the ballot to that because those are the
43:25
people who are administering the elections in
43:27
twenty it question of whether Biden should run-in twenty four, you
43:29
know, they actually have not discussed it.
43:32
Mhmm. There's been some reporting to the contrary,
43:34
but they haven't discussed it. And one of the
43:36
reasons is Biden doesn't
43:38
really think it's a question. He thinks he's gonna run
43:40
again. Mhmm. But the more more
43:42
probably important politically
43:44
question is presidential elections are
43:46
difficult for them to talk about. Because the first time they
43:48
had to have this discussion for real was twenty
43:50
sixteen, and that's when Obama
43:52
essentially pushed Clinton to run
43:54
over by Now Biden obviously had the personal mitigating circumstances. His
43:56
son was very ill and then passed
43:58
away. But Biden saw very
44:00
clearly that Obama also had made a political
44:02
calculus, which
44:04
he did. Yeah. Which was I don't think that Biden is the right person to succeed
44:06
me in this moment. He didn't he didn't think he
44:08
was the future of the party
44:10
or of the country. then in twenty twenty, took
44:12
a really long time for Obama to get onboard
44:14
with Biden as well. And at one point, they had
44:16
a conversation. And Obama's version of
44:18
dissuading Biden in twenty twenty was essentially to
44:20
say, I mean, this is late twenty eighteen. He said, you
44:22
know, Joe, you really don't have to do this.
44:25
And Biden essentially said to him, sorry, Trump's
44:27
the president. I think I have a good chance to get a
44:29
good chance to get a good job. Well, I'm
44:31
bad calculation by Obama in my sentiment.
44:33
And, of course, Obama at this time was
44:35
talking to every other person on earth who wanted
44:37
to run for president because he had said that he was
44:40
willing to. So, you know, Biden took a lot of this stuff pretty personally
44:42
even though he tried really hard not
44:44
to. Right. So which is all a
44:46
long way of saying, it's not shouldn't be
44:48
that surprise. they're not talking about
44:50
twenty twenty four. Because if you're
44:52
Biden, you know, the public image might be that
44:54
they're best friends and they're advising each other on
44:56
everything. No. I
44:58
but clearly not. Right? It's not as if he would go to Obama
45:00
as a as a first sort of call for should I
45:02
be doing this again? Yeah. As someone who
45:03
is a Beto fan, Scott, what do you
45:06
think about
45:07
this? So I'm curious, Gabriel, whenever you
45:09
really get to know a relationship between
45:11
two presidents, it's gonna yield insight about
45:13
the individual presidents.
45:16
Is there one or two things you can tell us about Obama
45:18
or president Biden that would
45:20
surprise us or that surprise you?
45:23
Sure. I
45:23
think one of the things about Biden that has
45:25
surprised me is he
45:27
is a lot like the public image
45:29
that he has tried to portray for himself. And what
45:31
I mean by that is he is
45:33
someone who genuinely does do things
45:36
like read Irish poetry and
45:38
think of himself in these historical
45:40
terms at this point. And it took him a really long time to
45:42
do that. he's someone who is and
45:44
this is a related point. Very self conscious, thinks, you know, he's been
45:47
very wary of
45:50
how other people view him his whole career and has been, in fact,
45:52
you know, very self conscious about
45:54
not having an ivy league education for for one
45:56
thing. He talks about that all the time
45:59
behind the scenes still. But at the same time, you
46:02
know, now he has been thinking a lot about
46:04
what am I in history. He doesn't like to say that out
46:06
loud because he understands how
46:08
it sounds. but that is really how he how he I
46:10
think people might not, because
46:12
of the public perception of how his
46:14
post presidency has been, people
46:17
might not understand this, but I think he
46:19
has been changing a lot in his
46:21
post presidency as he thinks about
46:23
what he represented. he obviously still
46:26
thinks that he was a very successful
46:28
president, but I think that he now sees
46:30
himself on this continuum of
46:32
history much more precariously
46:34
than he did before because, of course, the
46:36
Trump experience has, you know, thrown into
46:38
some serious questions where what the, you
46:40
know, what the Obama's like ultimately be especially
46:43
if Trump comes back, but Obama remains this sort of,
46:45
like, singularly self confident figure
46:47
in American politics. And that really comes
46:49
through even as
46:52
they discussed even in their, you know, private conversations over the course of their
46:54
relationship. And even in the earliest days,
46:56
you know, I tell the story in the book, but the
46:58
first time they
47:00
ever met, one on one or ever sat down was when Obama
47:02
wanted to join the foreign relations committee as a brand
47:04
new senator, ninety ninth in seniority.
47:06
Biden invites him over to his office and
47:08
essentially says,
47:10
sure. Yeah. you know, come on over. We'll talk. And, obviously, Biden's gonna
47:12
let him on the committee because he could see that he's a
47:14
rising star even if he's not so sure about him. And
47:16
at the end of this quick conversation,
47:18
Biden says, gotta go to Wilmington. You
47:20
gotta go to Chicago, but this is good. Let's
47:22
let's sit down and have a proper dinner sometime
47:24
we get to know each other. And
47:26
Biden says, know, we can just get cheap
47:28
Italian place here on Capitol Hill. It'll
47:30
be great. And Obama and Biden told the
47:32
version of the story, one of his books, but he didn't
47:35
tell the whole story. Obama sort of rears back up and says, wait a
47:37
minute. You know, what do you mean cheap Italian plates? We
47:39
can go somewhere nice. I can afford it. Because
47:42
Obama is of course thinking, well, for one
47:44
thing, Obama has
47:46
money for for some in his life because the random house is gonna reprint his But
47:48
he's also thinking who is this old school
47:50
guy, this older white senator who thinks
47:52
he can talk down to me and thinks I need to,
47:56
you know, eat at some cheap place. And he says, I can afford
47:58
it. And Biden meanwhile has taken it back then
48:00
and says, well, who does this guy think he
48:02
is? I can't afford it. You know, I'm the
48:04
poorest senator. Did they walk away
48:06
from that first meeting? Both
48:08
thinking, this other guy is so
48:10
presumptuous. Yeah. And they, of course, didn't didn't
48:12
set that dinner date. And it took them a long time to
48:14
really truly understand each Yeah. He
48:16
didn't mean it that way. Of course not. No.
48:18
Anyone know.
48:18
And and a woman is certainly self
48:20
confident, and I don't mean that in a
48:22
positive way. having interviewed him several times. It's
48:24
one of his failings, I think, in a lot of
48:27
ways. So you've also written about Florida's governor's
48:29
race. How will the
48:31
hurricane end response affect that race, especially DeSantis has seen us working with
48:33
Biden on the recovery. He's been as
48:36
complimentary as he can be. Yeah.
48:38
Yeah. Well,
48:38
I think that, you know,
48:40
it's obviously hard to figure out what the political end of this is going to
48:43
be. Usually, governors who
48:45
govern through disasters see some
48:47
political upside for that especially when they work with
48:50
the president for they have
48:52
to. It doesn't always work that way. You know, Charlie
48:54
Chris knows well that in you know, he was Republican
48:56
governor back back in the day,
48:58
and he hugged Obama who when Obama came
49:00
down to Florida to talk
49:03
about economic relief, and that was, of course, the end of Charlie Chris'
49:05
career as a Republican. So he understands well
49:07
that there is some danger here. But, you
49:09
know, DeSantis doesn't seem to be
49:11
getting a lot of blowback in terms of working with the federal
49:14
government. Though, of course, you know, we would I think
49:16
a lot remains to be seen in terms of what
49:18
the pure level of
49:20
devastation is. and, you know, what the amount of federal help is needed
49:22
because he has, of course, not loved these
49:24
headlines obviously about how he had
49:26
voted against federal
49:28
aid in circumstances. Too bad. That's what he did. Alright. So you
49:30
think Biden's in in
49:32
your view, Biden is running again? My
49:34
view is that in Biden's view, Biden
49:36
is running. Yeah. I think a lot
49:38
could change, and I think that people sort of
49:40
underestimate when he says, you know, my
49:42
expectation is that I'm gonna run again,
49:44
except I know that history
49:46
can intervene. you know, he is a man
49:48
who knows a lot about tragedy and a lot about
49:50
mortality and has thought, thinks about that all
49:52
the time. And so I genuinely think that,
49:54
you know, things could change. His health could take a turn. His
49:56
family could go against it. But right now, he's
49:58
certainly operating as if it's a go. And by
49:59
the way, In twenty
50:02
twenty, he knew that it was a go long before he said it
50:04
publicly. Even though he takes forever to make these
50:06
decisions, his staff had to tell him, stop
50:08
talking about this
50:10
so openly. because you're going to trigger the FEC
50:12
rules, and we're gonna have to file your candidacy
50:14
-- Yeah. -- you know, according to the laws. And the same
50:16
thing has happened now. He knows that
50:18
he cannot say, I'm running. He just has to say, I'm mixed feelings. No. He's a hundred
50:20
percent. And by the way,
50:21
much more successful legislatively. I mean,
50:23
obviously, Obamacare
50:24
was very important, but if
50:27
you weigh them one to one, I
50:29
think
50:29
Biden has set the more successful presidency at this
50:31
point. And that's a big part of their relationship. These are the
50:34
scenes. You can imagine they talk about that. Yeah.
50:36
But Obama has more style, apparently. I
50:38
like dark Brandon. I think that's also part of
50:40
him. I don't know. You you and Joe
50:42
both? Yeah. But he's like
50:44
that. I He's like that. I I suspect you guys are genuine.
50:46
Anyway, the
50:46
book is the long alliance, the
50:49
imperfect union of Joe Biden
50:51
and Barack Obama fascinating. it's
50:53
gonna be really interesting. Gabriel De
50:55
Benedetti, thank you so
50:57
much. Thanks, Gabriel. Thank
50:58
you both. Alright. So I think we were, like, Biden, Obama.
51:00
Which one would be Biden? Which one would
51:02
be Obama? You're Obama. I'm
51:04
Obama. I'm shocked. I was shocked that
51:07
you didn't I for the first time, I
51:09
I was learning more about you. I would have thought
51:11
you would you like Obama less than I would have thought. A lot
51:13
less. Yeah. It's not interesting.
51:14
And what? Yeah. I've said Can
51:17
you say more? What is it that you think
51:20
he deserves more scrutiny around? Howard
51:22
Bauchner: The
51:22
success of legislation, I think he
51:25
-- Mhmm. -- a lot style, I think his
51:27
post presidency compared to, like, a Jimmy Carter. He
51:28
has so much power. And he's sort
51:31
of -- Yeah. -- hanging out
51:32
with celebrities. Like, right? He's
51:35
on David Gaffon's boat. Yeah. Yeah. Right? And that's kind of disappointing. And
51:36
I have to say when I interviewed him, he
51:39
didn't like pushback and Biden,
51:41
never that way. comfortable
51:44
with pushback, very comfortable with
51:47
debate. And just
51:49
a more genuine I
51:51
think he doesn't get the credit he gets. That's why I backed
51:53
him way
51:53
back when. I was like, this guy can
51:55
win one, and
51:56
this guy can get things done. And
51:58
I do think that's the case.
51:59
I think making fun of his age. I get it. I get it. And the bomb was
52:02
handsome to all smooth.
52:07
But he reminding me a lot of tech people I covered.
52:09
I
52:09
know it sounds crazy, but -- Oh, that hurts. -- I was
52:11
like -- That hurts. Yeah. Well, I feel good
52:13
about my hero. Don't say that.
52:15
I I
52:16
listen. Historically, such an
52:18
important, historically. I just think
52:21
when the assessments come, I I
52:23
think Biden has had a
52:25
more successful presidency in thus
52:27
far under very difficult
52:30
circumstances. Mhmm. And
52:31
Obama could have done a lot more.
52:33
That's my feeling. I was not as big a fan
52:35
of him as others.
52:38
interesting. Yeah. But I get I get the appeal. I
52:40
get the I'm gonna get, like, strafed, but I've said this
52:42
before. I don't care. I think Biden has been a
52:44
very successful president. under
52:45
it it tear like, listen.
52:47
He's got crazy crazy pants down in Florida
52:49
yelling them every crazy stuff all the time.
52:51
And he's handling with a lot of decorum
52:53
including the the attack on the capital. He could he
52:56
there's lots of ways he could've I always look at
52:58
people's choices. Anyway, but I'm I hope
53:00
Obama's enjoying his
53:02
yacht going. Alright. Scott, one more quick break. We'll be back for and
53:05
fails.
53:09
This
53:11
episode is sponsored by Kohler Home
53:14
Generators. One thing I won't miss about living
53:16
in Florida other than the mosquitoes. Power outages,
53:18
a recent report found that eighty three percent of
53:20
major power outages in the last twenty years were
53:22
due to
53:24
Extreme weather, and thanks to climate change, extreme weather is
53:26
only getting more common. But it's not
53:28
just Florida, all parts of our country
53:31
have been affected. From heat waves to hurricanes to ice
53:33
storms, power grids are taking a beating.
53:35
And when the lights go
53:37
out, everything just stops.
53:40
So why do I have a cholar
53:42
generator? Because in addition to
53:44
bragging or explaining crypto
53:46
to embarrass neighborhood dads,
53:48
I just talk about my cooler generator
53:50
as I rev up my leaf blower.
53:52
That's how the dog rolls. Thankfully,
53:54
Kauler home generators can provide backup power automatically. They
53:56
keep you connected and comfortable. They
53:58
feature heavy duty commercial grade
54:00
engines with no refueling necessary So
54:03
if your house loses electricity, the
54:06
lights, and everything else, and makes life work,
54:08
are back on right away. And if
54:10
you purchase a solar home
54:12
generator now, You can get a free ten
54:14
year extended warranty and up to seven hundred fifty dollars off. There's a cooler home generator
54:16
dot com slash pivot to learn more.
54:20
That's kOH LER
54:22
home generator dot com slash pivot, kolar, the power to live
54:26
boldly.
54:27
Careers
54:28
Swisher here. You may know me as
54:29
the person who made Mark Zuckerberg sweat,
54:31
pushed Kim Kardashian to talk dollars,
54:34
or got secretary mayor
54:36
Pete Buttigieg, to eat a
54:38
juicy strawberry live on
54:40
stage. Okay. That one was
54:42
awkward. But that's what I like to
54:44
do. Make powerful people comfortable with
54:46
being uncomfortable. Now I'll be
54:48
doing that on my new show from New York
54:50
Magazine on with Kara
54:52
Swisher. We'll bring you news and the
54:54
newsmakers I'm paying attention to, and we'll
54:56
do it twice a week on Mondays and
54:58
Thursdays. Go check it out
55:00
on with Cara Swisher wherever you get
55:02
your
55:02
it now
55:04
podcasts.
55:10
Okay, Scott. Let's hear some wins and fails. I'm gonna
55:12
go first that that Bella
55:15
Hadid spray on dress? Loved it.
55:17
Loved it. Yeah. Oh, fast. I didn't
55:19
know where it was
55:21
going. And I was like, what is happening here? And then
55:23
when the person the my favorite part was the person
55:25
who then cut it after they sprayed
55:28
it on, and -- Mhmm. -- and
55:30
then it was a dress. And, of course, like, someone said, I look like a bag of cats if you
55:32
put that on me. But but
55:34
it was it was I
55:37
loved it. It was so techie and interesting. Yeah. It
55:39
was cool. Loved it. It was it it made
55:41
me like clothes. The Internet made
55:43
like, oh, here we are. We're making some clothes, and
55:45
I thought that was kinda cool. don't know
55:47
if that
55:47
was my that was my win.
55:50
You go for your win, and I'll think of a
55:51
fail.
55:52
Well, you foreshadowed my win. My win
55:54
is James Earl Carter Junior, better known
55:56
as president Carter who turned ninety eight this past week?
55:58
Such a good man. This is someone
56:00
who served his country after
56:02
graduating from the naval academy.
56:05
served on several submarines. And then after the death
56:07
of his father, took over a failing peanut farm
56:09
and turned it into
56:11
a thriving business. He, as president, he was
56:13
a dark course or as a candidate, he was a dark course. He started the
56:15
Department of Education, the Department of
56:18
Energy, was critical and saw
56:19
two talks. obviously had to deal
56:22
with stagflation. It was kinda dealt a bad hand
56:24
and then the October surprise that failed
56:26
mission to rescue the
56:28
hostages and Iran. he will go
56:30
down or has gone down as an average to less
56:32
than average successful president, but he
56:34
is by far the most
56:36
successful ex president we've
56:38
ever had. The moment he left office, he began building via
56:40
habitat for humanity. And at the
56:42
age of ninety eight, has been married to his wife
56:44
for Rosland for seventy six
56:48
years. I just don't fantastic. Yeah. I don't
56:50
I think you can't underestimate how
56:54
many wonderful Americans, America produces,
56:58
and this is one of them. And I like the fact that
56:59
he's he's he's been given the
57:02
gift of so much
57:04
praise and what I call overdue
57:06
recognition. I love the fact that he's gotten to
57:08
share his life with the same person for three
57:10
quarters of a century. I think he's a
57:12
fantastic role model for
57:14
young man. talk
57:14
about him. Great post presidency. Now that guy has lots
57:16
of troubles as president and it's hard to
57:18
the the the Reagan train was charming
57:20
and fantastic and I
57:23
voted for again. I mean, the first time
57:25
over Jimmy Carter.
57:26
And I have to
57:28
say, this guy has shown us the way
57:30
to behave as a as a next president. I
57:32
think has had
57:33
the most stellar. I mean, it's cute with George Bush painting, but
57:35
honestly and this guy has
57:38
done stuff.
57:38
has
57:40
done stuff and used his podium in a way
57:42
that is super
57:43
moving and effective. I
57:45
agree with you.
57:46
agreed. So
57:48
my fail is the distinctive
57:52
weddings or the pivot to the metaverse. I think it's
57:54
important that we
57:56
remember that Mehta continues to be a menace to our
57:58
society and not take responsibility this
58:00
week. In the UK, a
58:02
coroner found that harmful online
58:04
content likely to have
58:06
contributed to Mollie
58:08
Russell, a fourteen year old to her death,
58:10
and he put in quotes, and this
58:12
is unusual for a coroner who They
58:14
try to be very careful whenever they
58:16
stray outside of trying to to lay
58:19
responsibility around the death of
58:21
somebody. He said that harmful
58:24
online content likely to have contributed to
58:26
Molly's death in a more a
58:28
more than minimal way. Mhmm. And the
58:30
father has decided to sue the company
58:33
and saying basically saying that
58:36
they're
58:36
monetizing misery. And Monetizing
58:39
misery. What a
58:42
line? Right. You know, there's so much there's this cultural and so
58:44
much attention around this
58:46
notion that has no evidence.
58:48
There's no factual basis.
58:51
someone who's the father of kids who
58:53
spent the majority of their school age years at a
58:55
school in Florida as someone who served on the board
58:57
of their kids school. I have never seen any
58:59
evidence nor is there any peer reviewed evidence that
59:02
teachers are institutionally or systemically
59:04
trying to pull the gay
59:06
or the heterosexual tendencies of children
59:08
out of them. In school. I have never
59:10
seen that. Mhmm. And I think it's a
59:12
culture war meant
59:14
to rouse people, play to
59:16
their worst instincts, but something that is true.
59:19
is
59:19
that when algorithms from
59:22
meta, when a kid
59:23
who is shows no signs
59:25
of mental illness, when a kid who
59:27
was thriving at school, starts getting bullied
59:29
online and starts contemplating suicide and then begins
59:31
the algorithms recognize this
59:33
and no joke
59:36
META and
59:37
Pinterest also
59:38
begin serving her images
59:40
of nooses, pills, and
59:44
razors. So what these organizations are doing, and there's proof
59:46
here, is they're pulling out of girls
59:50
to suicide. suicide To
59:52
normalize
59:53
suicide? Mhmm. He
59:58
we speak so
59:59
much we speak so much about about
1:00:02
NASDAQ
1:00:02
and all this bullshit. Like, what's
1:00:04
the point?
1:00:07
Like, what's the
1:00:09
point of any of this?
1:00:13
Scott. I know how you feel.
1:00:15
I I it's you know,
1:00:17
you have sons. I have a daughter. I
1:00:19
think about it all the time.
1:00:20
all the time now, you know, as
1:00:22
she goes up. And I think your feelings about
1:00:25
it should be, like most parents are
1:00:27
very emotional and it acquire
1:00:29
that level of emotion, you know, what your
1:00:32
the feelings you're
1:00:33
having because it really does matter. And I
1:00:35
think at some point, you
1:00:37
know, these companies have gotta understand. They're
1:00:40
not completely to blame. Certainly, there's
1:00:42
all kinds of societal pressures on girls
1:00:44
and women and things like that. But
1:00:46
this is taken it to a
1:00:48
level that's really very clearly
1:00:50
problematic. And I'm I this this case in
1:00:52
Britain was really interesting. I think it should be more
1:00:54
like it. Let's have it out
1:00:55
in court is how you do it. Let's make the bastards pay. Yeah. And
1:00:57
what I wanna say is
1:00:59
my emotion and my
1:01:00
thoughts and prayers don't mean Fagal.
1:01:03
I hope people google molly
1:01:06
Russell and and get involved
1:01:08
and advocate for holding
1:01:10
these companies
1:01:12
responsible. These are problems that can be fixed. There is no way
1:01:14
the brightest minds in the world couldn't figure
1:01:16
out that this was a young
1:01:18
girl and couldn't figure out that she
1:01:22
was beginning to become comfortable with suicidal content. They
1:01:24
could have figured that out, and they could have
1:01:26
intervened. If you have if you have a kid
1:01:28
in any organization that starts talking
1:01:30
about suicide, Whether
1:01:32
it's a mass shooter and they start drawing images, people
1:01:34
intervene. And these companies absolutely
1:01:36
have the technology and ability
1:01:38
to intervene. Unfortunately, it would reduce
1:01:41
their profits. It would be expensive. And I don't
1:01:43
doubt it would be hard. Mhmm. It
1:01:45
is overdue. Exxon lied to us.
1:01:48
RGR lied to us. Mhmm. The
1:01:50
sacklers lied to us. and the people in
1:01:52
matter are lying to to us.
1:01:54
We we should absolutely hold these firms
1:01:56
accountable. I I think what you
1:01:56
have to do is see it in court. Let's
1:01:58
see it
1:01:59
in court. Let's see it. You know, if they'd say no, let's let's have
1:02:02
a little court time to to have some
1:02:04
proof and go through it. But it should
1:02:06
completely be scrutinized, and I
1:02:08
think it's an important
1:02:10
point you're making here completely. My
1:02:12
fail III don't know if it's a fail
1:02:14
yet, but I I do think we should talk about it on Thursdays.
1:02:16
The Supreme Court is taking up two
1:02:18
cases. around Section two thirty.
1:02:21
They involve terrorist content, but it
1:02:23
could challenge broad immunities as this
1:02:25
happened before. But it's the first time
1:02:27
it's gone to the Supreme Court. much of this
1:02:28
stuff is going to be going to the Supreme Court, by the way, and a lot of
1:02:30
it is, a lot of these cases because it's about
1:02:32
our society as a whole, which is worrisome
1:02:35
given this particular Supreme Court. but
1:02:37
they're decide whether social media companies can be sued
1:02:40
for hosting and recommending terrorist
1:02:41
content. Even though it's not the same, it's
1:02:43
not that different, it's
1:02:46
similar. Right? what can they be sued for. And so we'll see where that
1:02:48
goes. I am worried about this
1:02:50
particular Supreme Court, but I think it might
1:02:52
free them up even more, and we'll get in
1:02:54
Citizens United
1:02:56
kinda thing, you know, in the interests of free speech
1:02:58
kind
1:02:58
of thing. So it's a very
1:03:00
complex
1:03:00
case, but we absolutely have
1:03:03
to be thinking harder about
1:03:05
how we manage these
1:03:07
very important communications things. And,
1:03:10
Scott, it's very appropriate for you to be
1:03:12
upset by
1:03:14
that. There
1:03:14
you go. There you go. Let's go. Polaris three.
1:03:18
She's three. She's three.
1:03:20
She's three. How's all
1:03:23
done? Oh, good. Jolly is ever eating everything in sight.
1:03:26
Just fantastic. He's fantastic.
1:03:28
He's really great. They're all great. Alex
1:03:32
is great. He approved the shoes I
1:03:33
was wearing recently, so that was a big thing. And
1:03:35
he's being very sweet, but it's because he's got
1:03:37
a nice girlfriend, I think. He's he's
1:03:39
in a better mood.
1:03:40
And Louie's coming down this weekend, and
1:03:43
I'm so excited to see him. We're gonna have
1:03:45
we're going Apple picking. We're such a like, we're
1:03:47
such a straight family. It's crazy. So,
1:03:49
yeah, we're picking apples. I'm gonna make some applesauce
1:03:51
for you. We'll send it to in Britain. Really, we
1:03:53
won't, but still I really am very touched by the
1:03:55
way you feel about this. Anyway, we
1:03:58
wanna hear from you. Send us your
1:03:59
questions about business tech or whatever's on your mind.
1:04:02
Go to n y mag dot com
1:04:04
slash pivot. to submit
1:04:04
a question for the show or call 85551
1:04:06
pivot. Scott,
1:04:07
that's the show. We'll be back on
1:04:09
Friday for more. There's always gonna be plenty to
1:04:11
talk about maybe even a settlement
1:04:13
like we talk about with the email. Who knows?
1:04:15
Please read us out. Today's show is
1:04:17
produced by Lara Newman, Evan Angle, and Taylor
1:04:19
Griffin, Ernie and her dot engine into
1:04:21
this episode. Thanks also Drew Bros and
1:04:23
Neil Saverio. Make sure you show where every listen to podcasts. Thanks
1:04:25
for listening to Pivot from New York Magazine
1:04:27
and Box Media. We'll
1:04:30
be back later this week for another breakdown
1:04:32
of all things tech and business. Apple
1:04:36
sauce.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More