Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
This message comes from NPR sponsor,
0:02
Spectrum Business, who understands that
0:04
small businesses are the heartbeat of our communities.
0:07
That's why they're committed to delivering reliable
0:09
Internet, business phone, and mobile services
0:11
for
0:12
less. Learn more at spectrum dot com
0:14
slash business.
0:16
Hey,
0:16
everyone. A quick announcement before the
0:18
show. We wanna check-in with you to
0:20
see what we at Planet Money are doing
0:23
well and what we could improve. So
0:25
we've set up a short anonymous survey at
0:27
n dot p r slash p m survey.
0:29
It takes less than ten minutes and you'd be doing
0:32
all of a set plan of money a huge favor
0:34
by filling it
0:34
out. That's n dot p r slash
0:37
p m survey. Thanks.
0:40
This is Planet Money from NPR.
0:45
If you are a senator or
0:47
a member of congress and you have some, like,
0:49
great idea about a new piece of
0:51
legislation, at some point,
0:54
someone will have to say, okay,
0:57
this is how much your
0:59
amazing piece of legislation would
1:01
cost.
1:02
And back in the day, it used to be that
1:04
the White House gave you that cost estimate.
1:07
But in the nineteen seventies, There were
1:09
some members of Congress who started to say,
1:12
how do we know we could trust the White House
1:14
Office of Management and
1:16
Budget? This was when Richard
1:18
Nixon was in the White House. This
1:20
is pre watergate, but already, trust
1:23
was not exactly at an all time high between
1:25
the legislative and executive branches. Congress
1:27
wanted its own non partisan
1:30
agency independent of the White House
1:32
to tell them how much proposed
1:34
legislation would
1:35
cost. And since they were congress,
1:37
they could just pass a law to
1:40
create that. And so in the summer
1:42
of nineteen seventy four, they did.
1:44
They created the congressional budget
1:47
office, the CBO.
1:49
Today, nearly every bill that
1:51
passes a full committee
1:53
So any bill that has a chance of
1:55
getting voted on has to get priced
1:57
by the CBO. Congress generally
2:00
does not vote on a bill until
2:02
the CBO says this is how much it would
2:04
cost. And and it's easy to assume
2:06
the CBO is just a bunch of economists
2:09
and people who are really good at
2:10
math, who crunch numbers, and move things around
2:12
on spreadsheets all day. And it's
2:15
not not that. Yeah. But
2:17
in its finest moments, the
2:19
CBO is so much more than
2:21
that. It is an entire agency devoted
2:24
to predicting the future.
2:26
Its job at its core is
2:28
to imagine things that
2:30
don't even exist
2:32
yet. So they can tell us how
2:34
much it would cost if they
2:36
did exist.
2:37
Congressional budget office, you say? More
2:40
like crystal ball office.
2:43
Okay. Hello,
2:45
and welcome to Planet Money. I'm Sarah Gonzalez.
2:47
And I'm Kenny Malone. Today on the
2:50
show, we bring you the story of
2:52
the CBO as they attempted
2:54
to price one giant specific
2:57
piece of legislation. To understand,
2:59
like, just how incredibly tricky
3:01
and complicated this job can
3:04
be. It was a bill so complex.
3:06
It would take the CBO a year and
3:08
a half to come up with a cost estimate.
3:11
In that whole process, it really reveals
3:14
the the sometimes very weird
3:16
relationship. The has
3:18
with the very congress that created
3:21
the
3:21
CBO. This story involves a
3:23
doughnut hole. A death spiral.
3:26
And secret drugs from the future.
3:32
Okay. The does two main things.
3:35
When it does economic analysis or like a
3:37
pink tank. They said, all these things Congress
3:39
is interested in, like, what would happen
3:41
to the economy if we increase the
3:43
federal minimum wage. And they go like, well,
3:45
it will be good in these ways, it will be bad in
3:47
these ways. Boom. And then two, the CBO
3:49
estimates the cost of nearly
3:52
every bill that gets a full floor
3:54
vote.
3:55
Now most of those bills
3:57
that the CPO is pricing are not exactly
3:59
earth shattering pieces of legislation. Most
4:02
of the time, the CBO is
4:04
grinding away, running the prices
4:07
of pretty simple
4:08
stuff. Like, you're renaming a post
4:10
office, there is no federal cost. If
4:12
you're renaming a post office? Yeah.
4:14
It's a de minimis cost. It does not cost
4:16
much to rename post office. Doug Holtaicin
4:18
used to be the director of the CBL they had.
4:21
And apparently, Congress renamed
4:24
post offices a lot. When Doug
4:26
was there, almost twenty percent of
4:28
enacted legislation was post
4:30
office
4:30
renaming. You know, the Gerald Putnam
4:33
post office and
4:34
things like that. It must be in really small
4:36
letters on the building because I've never noticed
4:39
it. Okay. Okay.
4:41
It's like a little plaque. And yet
4:43
basically every time that some member wants
4:45
to rename a post office with this little
4:47
plaque, the CBOhhhh has to weigh and they
4:49
say, Okay. It will cost
4:52
this much.
4:53
Boring. It can be very boring. Yeah.
4:55
It can be very boring. You do not to become
4:57
the director of the CBO. Because you
5:00
love pricing post office plaques. No.
5:02
You take this job because maybe
5:04
two or three times a year, Doug
5:06
says, the CBO will get to
5:08
do something really hard, complicated
5:11
something very fun, where
5:13
you have put a price tag on something that
5:16
has never been priced before.
5:18
Doug says, this is where the CBO
5:21
shines. That's when I think it's at its best.
5:24
You've been asked to answer What
5:26
is the cost of doing this thing that has never before
5:28
been done and does not exist in
5:29
nature, but you can go into your fantasy land
5:31
and figure it out.
5:32
This is the best place to be at the CBO.
5:35
In fantasy land.
5:37
Yes. Absolutely. Yes.
5:40
It is so much better than real life land.
5:42
Way better. Now
5:45
Doug's favorite example of this
5:47
special twice in year fantasy land
5:49
project. It landed in his
5:51
lap a couple of decades ago. It's the
5:53
early two thousands. Senior citizens
5:55
are spending an unbelievable amount
5:58
of money on prescription drugs.
6:00
Like, yes, they had Medicare,
6:02
but at this time, Medicare did
6:05
not cover prescription
6:07
drugs. Not not really at least. Medicare
6:09
at this time only covered hospitals
6:11
days and certain doctors visits.
6:14
And like, yes, if you were given drugs
6:16
while you were hospitalized, it covered that.
6:18
But If you needed some heart medicine
6:20
once you were out of the hospital in the real
6:23
world, no, no drug coverage. Which
6:25
you might assume would leave senior citizens
6:27
looking for drug coverage from private
6:29
insurance companies. And and there was a little
6:32
of that, but there was no real robust
6:34
market of private companies offering
6:37
prescription drug
6:37
coverage, not for seniors, because it
6:40
is a remarkably risky insurance
6:42
to offer. So you
6:43
just always paid out of pocket for your
6:45
drugs.
6:46
Out of pocket. Yes. It's for seniors here.
6:48
Seniors. For seniors. Yeah. And so,
6:50
In two thousand three, Republicans in
6:52
Congress and president George W.
6:54
Bush who was running for reelection proposed
6:58
throwing a bunch of money at
7:00
this
7:00
problem. They're thinking if the government
7:02
subsidizes prescription drug insurance,
7:05
maybe maybe that will make private
7:07
insurance companies say, okay,
7:10
yeah, maybe now senior drug insurance
7:12
is a good business to be in because you know, will
7:15
sell insurance to seniors. The government
7:17
will help pay for it, so we make
7:19
money. Yeah, and to be clear, the intent was
7:21
not for Medicare or the government to
7:23
fully cover drugs. The goal was
7:26
to subsidize drug insurance enough
7:28
to encourage a private sector to pop
7:30
up and finally offer
7:32
these drug plans. And Republicans
7:34
were like, hey, this new untested
7:37
giant policy Four hundred
7:39
billion dollars. That seems like a good number
7:41
for us to spend on this four hundred
7:44
billion dollars.
7:45
B's billion. Billing. Billing.
7:46
Yeah. Billing. Yes. Doug
7:48
says a big number like this. Looks looks pretty
7:50
good to the president's campaign people.
7:52
Oh, like they wanted to be able to say, look how
7:54
much He is devoting us to
7:56
be honest with you. Yes. Billions means
7:58
love. Billions means love.
8:01
A
8:01
billions means love. That's that's
8:04
how that works. Okay.
8:07
The four hundred billion dollars, to be clear,
8:09
would actually also go to improve a
8:11
few other things in the Medicare system, but but
8:13
the overwhelming majority of that money
8:16
was to try and create prescription
8:18
drug coverage.
8:19
This is where the CBO comes in.
8:21
The CBO's job here is to kinda
8:24
tether congress to reality a
8:26
little bit. CBO economists are the ones
8:28
who say, we'll tell you if
8:31
four hundred billion dollars will actually
8:33
achieve the thing you want to achieve.
8:36
This is what Doug loves.
8:38
Because now, to figure all this out,
8:41
The CBO is gonna have to
8:43
construct
8:44
this prescription drug
8:46
insurance fantasy land. Yeah.
8:48
A little imaginary world with
8:50
imaginary seniors, imaginary drug
8:53
insurers, imaginary drug companies where
8:55
the CBO can kinda like move all the little
8:58
pieces around and see how everyone
9:00
would behave in this fake future
9:02
world. Yeah. I I like to imagine it is one of
9:04
those miniature toy villages. Remember, mister
9:07
Rogers neighborhood of make
9:08
believe. You got your little your little miniature
9:10
senior citizens are in there moving around.
9:13
Your little your little mini drug
9:15
stores, the town square
9:16
Yeah. -- like ice cream part no. Nothing
9:18
like it's it's in computers. But
9:21
but the CBO does half to
9:23
build all of this from scratch. And
9:25
so one of the first things the CBO
9:27
is gonna need to model and predict is
9:30
How will senior citizens behave
9:33
in this fantasy land where the government
9:35
is subsidizing drug insurance?
9:37
I know you're having to look at, like, how many seniors
9:39
are there? How many have prescription drugs? How much do
9:41
they cost? What else is going into
9:44
this like we're creating a
9:45
world. That doesn't exist. We
9:47
we we need to know some things
9:49
about seniors and their habits in buying insurance.
9:51
How sensitive are they to premiums? If premiums go
9:54
up and down, how many people are gonna drop out
9:56
because it's too expensive?
9:57
Yeah, unlike some parts of Medicare,
9:59
seniors would have to sign up.
10:01
And pay some money for this
10:03
kind of insurance. And the CBO has to
10:05
predict, you know, will seniors
10:07
actually do this? Will they sign
10:09
up? Yep. So the the CBO pulls
10:12
some of the government's Medicare data
10:14
about seniors and their drug
10:16
buying behavior. Which then lets the CBO
10:18
kind of, like, you know, populate this fictional
10:21
world with these different imaginary
10:23
characters. Yeah. Like, they actually
10:25
have, you know, statistical senior
10:28
Susie over here, and they're like, okay, we know
10:30
how much Susie spends on
10:32
drugs a lot. And if the government
10:34
starts paying a big chunk of Susie's
10:37
drug costs, she will probably
10:39
spend even more. And then they have, like, statistical
10:41
senior, Ben over there who
10:44
they know spends nothing on drugs. But
10:46
if the government starts throwing money
10:48
at him, they're like Ben will probably
10:51
be
10:51
like, oh, okay. Maybe I will
10:53
get this heart medicine I've been needing
10:55
Ben. Yeah. And and then how do Ben and
10:57
Susie act when The subsidy is
10:59
more or less. You know, Doug's playing around
11:02
with the dials in this new
11:03
world. But the senior
11:05
citizens, they they are only part of this
11:07
fantasy land. Then you have to profile the insurers
11:10
and figure out what are they going to do. How do
11:12
they make the insurers that don't exist yet?
11:14
That don't exist That's
11:15
cool. When they come in, but when they come in, this
11:17
is what they're gonna be. You know? How do they make money?
11:19
What do they like to do in the way of pricing? You
11:22
know, there there are all sorts of games, insurers,
11:24
like to play because they make the most
11:27
money if they can get people to buy their insurance
11:29
who then don't need
11:30
drugs. That's ideal. Yeah.
11:32
Insurers want as many people as
11:35
possible to sign up. And
11:37
the insurers were kind
11:39
of the big question mark. About
11:41
whether this fantasy land would work
11:43
or
11:44
not. Because remember, in the real world,
11:46
insurance companies were basically not
11:48
willing to offer prescription drug insurance
11:51
to seniors at time because they
11:53
were scared of one really
11:55
big thing that too many
11:57
seniors who are sick would sign
12:00
up and then not enough healthy
12:02
seniors would sign
12:03
up. Yeah, that would not be a
12:05
sustainable market. You do not want
12:07
just sick people who need prescription
12:09
drugs signing up. That leads to what is
12:11
called an insurance death spiral.
12:14
Only the sick people sign up, so their premiums
12:16
are too high and they eventually just drop out.
12:18
And the whole thing implodes on itself. It's
12:20
a death spiral. What you want is seniors
12:23
who don't need drugs to sign up
12:25
because it is just like such a good deal that
12:27
they sign up just in case they might
12:29
need drugs later
12:30
on. So the CPO is like, okay, what will
12:32
cause that to happen?
12:34
That is what the CBO has to test
12:36
in their fantasy land. And and really that boils
12:38
down to how much does the government
12:41
have to subsidize insurance
12:43
in order to convince enough healthy
12:45
seniors to sign up, which
12:47
would then convince insurance companies
12:50
that a death spiral will not
12:52
happen. But they can't feel really,
12:54
really confident about what
12:56
that number is, what the subsidy is,
12:59
Without first figuring out how these
13:01
other characters in drug fantasyland
13:03
are going to
13:04
act, the drug companies. What are these
13:06
drug companies can be making? Where they gonna
13:08
be selling? There's now all
13:10
these new customers the potential out there. What are they
13:12
gonna do? And and this this is where the CBO
13:14
really gets to be. The crystal ball
13:16
office because to build this
13:18
fantasy land Doug and his colleagues have to
13:20
predict the price of prescription
13:23
drugs, not just over the next year or two,
13:25
but ten years from now.
13:27
Yeah. The CVS cost estimates are generally for
13:29
like ten years out. And this is
13:31
kind of impossible to do. Right?
13:33
Because, like, They don't even know what drugs
13:35
will exist in ten years, what scientific
13:37
breakthroughs would
13:38
happen. So, like, how do you price
13:41
imaginary drugs.
13:42
We signed non disclosure agreements with the major
13:45
pharmaceutical companies and and
13:47
asked them --
13:48
No. --
13:48
what they were developing.
13:50
And they tell you? They show us everything.
13:53
What what motivation do they have that that the
13:55
government's gonna start subsidizing the things
13:57
that they make? Looks they're about to throw four hundred
13:59
billion dollars on the table. Right? You know, they
14:01
wanted this to happen. I have a promise you
14:03
about that.
14:04
Right. Right. Right. The CBO
14:06
gets all the goods from the big drug makers.
14:08
Like, okay, we're gonna have this new heart
14:10
medicine. In five years, we've got a patent
14:12
on this other one, and the CBO just promised
14:14
them that no one else would see these
14:16
documents promise. We have safes
14:19
and we had secured networks that were air gapped
14:21
and no one could get in. And, you know, to to
14:23
a lot security precautions,
14:24
And at some point, some members of
14:26
Congress were like, wait, can you, like, can
14:29
you share this future drug info
14:31
with
14:31
us? And and technically, Doug says,
14:33
Congress is the CBO's boss.
14:35
They could have just taken the drug data from
14:37
him. Like, I really couldn't have stopped them.
14:39
So my only defense was if
14:42
you ever asked me to disclose
14:44
this stuff, I promised not to disclose, CBO
14:46
will never get any data from anybody ever
14:48
again. And you will get terrible
14:50
cost estimates and and not know what's going
14:52
on to your
14:53
legislation. And they understood that. We never
14:55
had any trouble. All the secrets were
14:57
safe. And after a year and a half of
14:59
playing out every scenario they can think
15:01
of, they've moved all little pieces
15:03
around the Fantasy Land Village of Zillion
15:06
times and they arrive at an answer.
15:09
Yes, Congress. This can
15:11
work, the way that you want it to work.
15:13
We have enough money to incentivize enough
15:15
seniors to sign up that
15:17
private insurers would be willing
15:19
to enter the market.
15:21
And the good news is according to the
15:23
CBO's calculations, it won't even take four
15:25
hundred billion dollars to do
15:27
this. It would only cost taxpayers
15:29
three hundred and forty billion.
15:32
Doug's done. He's
15:34
feeling pretty good. And
15:36
that's when the phone rings.
15:39
It's a member of Congress and he does
15:41
not like Doug's number.
15:43
That's after the break.
15:49
So the CBOhhhh has arrived at a
15:51
cost estimate they feel good about.
15:53
This new Medicare drug insurance
15:56
plus some other little tweaks to Medicare will
15:58
cost three hundred and forty billion
16:00
dollars. That's what Doug says.
16:02
Now it could go to a vote. Now
16:04
Congress can decide if they want this to become
16:06
a law.
16:07
That's when Doug gets the call. The weekend
16:09
before the final vote, Lazyme's
16:11
chairman Bill Thomas, who was the lead on
16:13
this, called me at my home and he
16:15
goes, we got a problem. So what
16:17
do you mean? He goes, the last iteration only
16:19
costs three hundred and forty billion
16:20
dollars. That's too little. My guys are gonna be upset. We gotta
16:22
spend more.
16:23
Oh, because they were like, we want we want
16:25
the four hundred billion. Billions
16:27
is love. Billions is love. We were
16:29
fifty five billion short on love.
16:32
We so he actually said, like, this is
16:34
this is too, like, we need to spend cheap.
16:36
He's like he's like how can we spend another forty
16:38
five, fifty billion dollars? Do
16:41
you remember this? Well,
16:44
yes.
16:47
This is the congressman who called Doug. This
16:49
is Bill. Hey. I'm Bill Thomas. Alright.
16:51
Take real time. Bill says, yeah,
16:53
he told Doug to go back to the report and
16:55
get the math closer to four
16:57
hundred billion dollars. But because
17:00
we didn't do enough.
17:01
Billing less money means
17:03
less help for seniors, not good. And the
17:05
White House and Congress have said they'd be
17:07
willing to devote four hundred billion dollars
17:09
to this. So Bill Thomas wanted
17:12
to spend four hundred billion
17:13
dollars. He actually thought that he wouldn't have
17:15
the votes if he didn't spend everything he could.
17:18
Why would I spend all that time
17:20
and energy to create something
17:22
that wouldn't pass?
17:24
And Bill and Doug and some
17:27
other ex CBO or as we spoke
17:29
to said, there's nothing like super shady
17:31
about
17:31
this. Right? Congress had four hundred billion
17:34
dollars to spend, so they wanted to spend
17:36
that amount.
17:36
And so the CBO is like, alright. Well, if this
17:38
program is already gonna work at three
17:40
forty, it'll still work at four hundred, it
17:43
can just pay for more stuff for seniors.
17:45
And it wasn't even that hard to figure out how to spend more
17:47
Doug says. At this
17:48
point, we know every lever
17:50
in the program does it raise your lower costs
17:53
and by how much. And so this I
17:55
I literally don't know what they changed, but the staff
17:57
was like, we got
17:57
this. They're
17:58
tweaking those knobs, like, a little more here,
18:00
little more there. Okay. What,
18:02
you know, if we do this business. Oh, that's
18:04
four hundred ten billions. Okay. How about Internet?
18:06
No.
18:06
That's three ninety five. Keep
18:08
keep it down. Five. Done. Doug honestly
18:10
doesn't remember exactly how they got.
18:12
To three hundred and ninety five billion. But
18:14
he says they probably just increased the subsidy
18:16
a little
18:16
bit. Here's what the subsidy ended up being.
18:19
The government basically said, alright,
18:21
insurance companies, whatever
18:23
you think your costs are gonna
18:25
be to offer this, your your administrative
18:28
costs, how much you'll spend on drugs,
18:30
some profit for yourself, whatever
18:33
your costs are, we're gonna pay
18:35
seventy five percent of it. And then
18:37
seniors will pay the remaining twenty five
18:39
percent. There was a formal process, but
18:41
it was basically that. So that is like a
18:43
huge amount of guaranteed money
18:46
from the
18:46
government. Of course, insurers were gonna enter
18:48
this market. And all the CBO
18:51
had to do to get this to cost three
18:53
ninety five billion dollars
18:54
was. Tweak those knobs,
18:56
like, just a little bit. For people who might
18:58
hear that and think, like, how can we trust
19:01
anything? What what would
19:03
you say to to those people?
19:05
We I mean, in in both cases,
19:07
we gave him an accurate estimate. We gave him an
19:09
accurate estimate with low subsidies and with
19:11
higher subsidies. One was three
19:13
forty, one was three ninety five. They
19:15
get to decide how big they want the subsidies to be.
19:17
That's their call. And now here's the thing.
19:20
You know, yes, that's that's
19:23
either weird or highly political whatever
19:25
you want to think of But it also has nothing to do
19:27
with science because we had
19:29
no idea if it was really gonna be three hundred ninety
19:32
five billion. Super uncertain as I pointed
19:34
out this imaginary lens. This product did not
19:36
exist in nature. Right? So so
19:38
we're tweaking down to the decimal
19:40
point something that doesn't
19:41
exist. As if we really know what's
19:43
gonna happen. Now, some people
19:46
might argue, the best version of
19:48
this whole process we've walked through would
19:50
be that Congress comes up
19:52
with a policy idea, then CBO
19:55
estimates cost, and then Congress
19:57
writes a check for that
19:58
amount. And sometimes it happens like that.
20:00
But a lot of the time it happens like how
20:02
it happened with this prescription drug thing. Congress
20:05
had an idea. They said this is how much
20:07
we want to spend on this. And then they handed
20:09
it to the CBO to figure out the
20:11
math. And then the CBO has to go, like, back and forth,
20:13
back and forth with Congress. Yeah. And the the reality
20:15
is that when you do it this way,
20:18
you end up sometimes with the policy that
20:20
technically works, but it is maybe
20:22
a little funky, which is how
20:24
the senior prescription
20:26
policy wound up with a very
20:28
strange hole in the drug coverage.
20:30
Yeah. To make this policy work for anything
20:33
close to four hundred billion dollars, this
20:35
is what the policy had to be. Yes,
20:37
seniors get this, honestly, pretty
20:39
great deal on insurance, but
20:41
only for the first two thousand two hundred
20:44
and fifty dollars worth of drugs each
20:46
year, then they fall in
20:48
a hole and start paying the full cost
20:50
of drugs until they rack up so much
20:52
in out of pocket cost that they get to crawl
20:55
out of the hole for insurance to
20:57
once again kick
20:58
in. So so
20:59
there
20:59
was a hole in the coverage. You
21:00
had to leave that doughnut hole because you didn't have enough
21:02
money to fill it. That's because we only have four hundred
21:04
billion dollars
21:05
to work with.
21:05
Wait. Is the doughnut hole? Are those real
21:07
terms?
21:08
The the doughnut hole is what we call it. Yes.
21:11
Called it the donut hole because that's the insurance policy
21:13
looked like donut had a big hole in the middle. And
21:16
that's a weird insurance policy. But That
21:19
is the insurance policy that four hundred
21:21
billion dollars could build. Or at least
21:23
that was the CPO's best guess in two thousand
21:25
three. Now, it could get
21:28
voted on. Let me begin by saying that
21:30
That is Bill Thomas. Happy,
21:33
of course, to present the full four hundred
21:35
billion ish dollar version
21:37
of this plan to the world.
21:39
Seniors and taxpayers have been waiting
21:41
a long time for this day.
21:43
The prescription drug bill pass house
21:45
on the Senate in two thousand three, and George W.
21:47
Bush signs the very nearly
21:49
four hundred billion dollar Medicare Modernization
21:52
Act into law.
21:53
Now, just a couple miles away.
21:56
The White House Office of Management and
21:58
Budget was actually running their own numbers
22:00
on this thing and they thought that
22:02
this whole plan would cost way more
22:05
than what the CBO estimated. The White
22:07
House was saying it would cost five
22:09
hundred and thirty four billion
22:12
dollars. And today, we know what the real
22:14
number was, the answer to what actually
22:17
happened when this program lived in
22:19
the real world. It turned out
22:21
both the OMB and the Cboe's
22:23
estimates were pretty off.
22:26
Subsidizing insurance for seniors was
22:28
actually way cheaper than
22:30
anyone had
22:31
predicted.
22:31
It came in about twenty five percent below
22:34
what we thought. It's a hundred billion dollars.
22:36
A
22:36
hundred billion? It's a hundred billion
22:37
dollars. Yeah. It's lot cheaper. And it's and it was because
22:40
generics became more plentiful and cheaper
22:42
than we anticipated by and large.
22:44
Yes. Generic drugs.
22:47
Of course, that was a huge part of this.
22:49
You know, the CBO had tried to factor
22:51
in the effect of people switching
22:54
from brand name drugs to generic drugs,
22:56
which brings prices down, but they simply
22:59
hadn't predicted how popular
23:01
generic drugs would
23:02
become.
23:02
Does it often work this way that that
23:05
you guys the math is like a little
23:07
I mean, I imagine the math is always off because
23:09
how do you get
23:10
It is always off.
23:11
It is always off? No one can tell the future. So
23:13
yes, it's always off. It it comes
23:15
with the turf. You you can't forecast
23:17
the future. Everything about the future is different. The
23:19
economy is different. The congress is different. They
23:21
change the laws on you.
23:22
And, you know, so it never works
23:24
out the way you thought. So you just have to give it
23:26
your best effort and then move on.
23:36
Before we go, a quick reminder that
23:38
we wanna hear from you about what we
23:40
are doing well at Planet Money, what
23:42
we could improve. We've got a short
23:44
anonymous survey at n dot
23:47
r slash PM survey.
23:49
It takes less than ten minutes and it'd be
23:51
really big help to us if you build it out.
23:53
That is en dot
23:56
PRPM survey. Thanks.
24:04
Today show was produced by Willa Rubin and
24:06
Dave Blanchard with engineering help from Josh
24:08
Newell. It was edited by Keith Rohmer
24:10
and fact checked by Sierra Waters. Just
24:13
Zhang is planet money's acting executive
24:15
producer. We wanna give a super
24:17
special thank you to Phil Ellis.
24:19
For helping us understand this
24:20
very, very complicated health policy and
24:22
thanks also to Wendy Elberg. I'm Sarah
24:25
Montales. And I'm Kenny Malone.
24:27
This is NPR. Thanks for listening.
24:36
A special thanks to our funder, the Alfred
24:38
Peace Loan Foundation, for helping to support
24:41
this podcast. This message comes
24:43
from Jackson.seek clarity in retirement
24:45
planning at jackson dot com. Jackson
24:48
is short for Jackson Financial Inc.
24:50
Jackson National Life Insurance Company
24:52
Lansing, Michigan. And Jackson National
24:54
Life Insurance Company of New York purchased
24:56
New York.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More