Podchaser Logo
Home
The MAGA Plot to Jail Democrats

The MAGA Plot to Jail Democrats

Released Friday, 7th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
The MAGA Plot to Jail Democrats

The MAGA Plot to Jail Democrats

The MAGA Plot to Jail Democrats

The MAGA Plot to Jail Democrats

Friday, 7th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:20

Welcome to Potsave America, I'm Jon Favreau. I'm

0:22

Dan Pfeiffer. On today's show, Donald Trump and

0:24

his goons are planning to lock up Democrats

0:26

if they win. One of

0:28

those goons, Steve Bannon, is finally going to jail.

0:31

Joe Biden makes the case for

0:33

democracy at the D-Day anniversary in

0:35

Normandy, and Republicans block a bill

0:37

that would protect access to birth control.

0:40

But first, it has been a

0:42

week now since a jury unanimously found

0:44

Donald Trump guilty of committing 34 felonies.

0:48

This comes after another jury found

0:51

the Trump Organization guilty of 17 felonies, and two

0:54

separate juries found Trump liable for

0:56

sexual abuse and defamation. All

0:59

unanimous verdicts as well. He's not doing so

1:01

well with the juries, Dan. That's

1:03

a lot of jurors. That's a lot of jurors

1:05

and four different juries. Just nah, he's struck out.

1:08

He's owing 42 jurors. Did

1:11

you just do some fast math there? I

1:13

think so. We'll see if it's right or not. It's definitely not

1:15

right. Does it have to be a multiple of 12? You

1:19

know, it's fine. We'll

1:22

take care of it in post. And

1:24

we're finally starting to see some evidence that

1:26

the small slice of persuadable voters who hadn't

1:29

yet made up their mind about the election

1:31

might not want to reward an

1:34

unrepentant criminal with the job of running

1:36

the country. The New

1:38

York Times re-interviewed nearly 2,000 swing

1:41

state voters who participated in their

1:43

last poll and found that Trump

1:45

lost 7% of his voters. 3%

1:50

said they're now backing Biden. 4%

1:52

said they're now undecided, taking Trump's

1:54

previously three-point lead down to one point.

1:58

The Times also interviewed some... of these

2:00

voters and did a separate focus group

2:02

of undecided voters, as did our

2:04

friend Sarah Longwell, all of which we

2:06

can talk about. But first, what's

2:09

your take on the post verdict

2:11

polling? And more

2:13

importantly, does it tell you anything about how

2:16

we should talk about the verdict with

2:18

undecided voters? Yeah, there are a

2:20

couple of interesting things from the polls. One, we should

2:22

be, even though the numbers are smaller than

2:25

common sense or common decency would suggest in

2:27

terms of wanting a convicted

2:29

felon to be President of the United States,

2:32

it should be encouraging to everyone that things

2:34

matter, right? This does actually matter. It's 70%

2:36

of voters, not a lot of voters,

2:38

but it is more than enough to tip the White

2:40

House one direction or the other. So

2:42

in that sense, it's a very big

2:45

deal. The overall magnitude is not great,

2:47

but the impact in a race this

2:49

close is seismic, potentially. Now

2:52

if you look across all the polls, one

2:54

of the main takeaways is that Biden's number doesn't

2:56

really move. Maybe it goes up a point, a

2:58

lot of times it stays the same. What is

3:00

happening is that Trump is losing voters and most

3:02

of them are going in either into the undecided

3:04

column, right? Even undecided in this case could mean

3:06

maybe they're going to back Trump again. Maybe

3:09

they're going to back a third party candidate like RFK Jr.

3:11

Maybe they're not going to vote at all. That might be

3:13

the most likely scenario, or they might vote for Biden. Now,

3:16

Trump losing a voter is

3:18

a minus one for him, right?

3:20

It's a net vote gain for Biden. If

3:23

Biden gets that voter, it's a net

3:25

to vote gain for Biden. So that

3:28

is what we want. We want to move them, not

3:30

just undecided, we want to move them to pro bite.

3:32

And so which my takeaway from this is we have

3:34

a lot of work to do, right? That there is

3:36

an opportunity here. It is not going to be realized

3:39

right immediately because not only are these folks moving to

3:41

undecided, in the data for progress

3:43

poll that Tommy and Odysseus talked about on

3:45

Wednesday's podcast, 60% of their

3:48

swing, identified swing voter universe are not paying close

3:50

attention to the trial. That is a much larger

3:52

percentage in the overall electorate. So the voters we

3:54

need the most are paying the least attention. But

3:57

what we have seen is the, when those voters hear

4:00

about it, it causes them to rethink Trump. So

4:02

that is an argument for Democrats to keep talking

4:04

about this, to keep hammering it, to keep making

4:06

it part of the larger argument against Trump. Yeah.

4:10

And in the New York Times survey of the

4:13

2000 people that had already polled

4:15

a couple of weeks ago, a sizable

4:17

share of that group, 16%, said

4:21

they hadn't heard enough about the verdict

4:23

to say whether they approved or disapproved.

4:26

And more than a quarter of

4:28

those voters paid little or no attention at

4:30

all to the trial. The

4:33

other interesting thing is the most likely

4:35

people to switch their votes away from

4:37

Trump and also towards Biden, younger

4:40

voters, nonwhite voters, disengaged

4:43

voters, people who hadn't followed,

4:46

who haven't been following the news that closely, Biden

4:49

2020 voters who had previously said they

4:51

were voting for Trump and

4:54

the double haters. So the voters

4:56

who said that they disapprove of both Trump and

4:58

Biden. So the very voters

5:00

that Biden had been struggling

5:02

with in a lot of these polls are

5:05

the voters who when they heard about the

5:07

verdict, tended to

5:09

have second thoughts about voting for Trump,

5:12

which I thought was very interesting. I also

5:14

want to dig into sort of why people switched, which

5:17

again, the New York Times did

5:19

interviews with some of these voters that they polled. They

5:21

also had, there was another focus group as well. You

5:24

know me, I love, love focus groups. Why

5:26

do you love focus groups, Sean? Because I

5:28

host another podcast called The Wilderness. You should check

5:31

out this Sunday. We have another episode of The

5:33

Wilderness coming. This is going

5:35

to focus on black voters, persuadable black

5:37

voters who have not yet decided

5:39

who they're going to support. So tune

5:41

in guys, tune in. So

5:43

some of the, some of the reasons people switched. One

5:46

guy in Nevada said that he

5:48

actually wants to see if Trump gets jail

5:50

time or not. And that's really, he's, he's,

5:52

he's now undecided. He's gone from pro-Trump to

5:54

undecided. And I think if Trump gets jail

5:57

time, he's going to be more likely. This

5:59

is a Christ. and Soltis Anderson is a Republican

6:01

poster. She wrote a whole piece about this in the

6:03

New York Times that there's actually a lot of voters

6:05

who jail time will make the difference for them. So

6:07

I thought that was interesting. Well, I would fucking hope

6:09

so. I

6:11

mean, but my thing is like, why do

6:13

you need the jail? The conviction seems like

6:15

it should be enough. Even if you were

6:17

like kind of iffy on maybe was a

6:19

fair trial if you care that much about

6:21

falsifying business records to interfere in an election,

6:25

a president in prison seems like

6:27

kind of a monkey wrench in the

6:29

works here. I

6:32

think for people who weren't paying attention to the trial or

6:34

who still haven't paid attention that much, jail

6:36

is a signifier that it is a more serious

6:38

offense. Yes. Oh, you get like, you know,

6:41

community service or whatever. A guy

6:43

in Georgia said, my thing is just go ahead

6:45

and be honest. We as Americans, we can respect

6:47

that. A lot of people make mistakes. And

6:50

he said he's very worried that Trump would seek

6:52

retribution against Democrats, which we're gonna talk about. But

6:55

that is interesting too. It's sort of why I

6:57

was, I keep calling him an unrepentant criminal. There

6:59

are people who you look at Donald Trump and

7:01

he's just showed, he's showed no remorse. He has

7:03

admitted nothing. He has said that he's made no

7:05

mistakes. It's just like victim, victim, victim. And I

7:07

think that probably doesn't land well with a lot

7:10

of people. And then there was an interesting, there

7:12

was a woman in Pennsylvania who volunteers with

7:14

people who've been incarcerated. You don't wanna

7:16

dig in too much on this woman because

7:19

they said that she was a Biden voter

7:21

who then decided she was gonna vote for

7:23

Trump because Joe Biden allowed Roe

7:25

v. Wade to be overturned and didn't

7:28

do anything about it. That's

7:31

right. So just, you

7:33

know? But she

7:35

said, if a person who received 34

7:37

felony convictions in one day can still run for

7:39

president, why can my guy not apply for a

7:42

job at a gas station? It's not that Trump's

7:44

guilty. It's the fact that he can still carry

7:46

on his life without any kind of hurdles. This

7:48

to me is, I think,

7:50

maybe the most salient argument

7:53

for a lot of people. And

7:55

this goes to Trump

7:57

trying to say, oh, you know, there's a lot

7:59

of... black Americans who identify with me now and

8:01

who are gonna vote for me because they've

8:04

experienced unfairness with the criminal justice

8:06

system. And he's trying to

8:08

say that the unfairness in the

8:10

criminal justice system, which a lot of people will believe

8:12

it's unfair, that he's trying to

8:15

make himself be part of that, to

8:17

get sympathy. And I think

8:19

you have to separate him from most

8:22

other defendants, most other people

8:24

who've been convicted, most other people

8:26

who've gone to jail. Because Donald

8:28

Trump, he plays by a different set

8:30

of rules from everyone else, right? He's

8:33

just been charged and convicted of 34 felonies. He's

8:36

got another 54 felony charges

8:38

that he's awaiting. And

8:41

he might not have to go to jail.

8:44

He gets to be President of the United States.

8:47

And most people can't even, when they leave jail, they can't

8:49

even vote, they can't get a job. And

8:51

Donald Trump gets to do whatever he wants because he's Donald Trump.

8:53

Like I do think that's a pretty powerful argument. The

8:56

idea, well, I'm not sure this is the right

8:58

public message, but just as a point. Imagine

9:01

how blatant and stupid a criminal

9:03

you have to be to be

9:06

one of the richest, most politically connected white

9:08

men in America and still get convicted on

9:10

34 felonies in like six seconds. It's

9:13

just that it is right there. I

9:16

think one of the things about how we talk about

9:18

this is it's

9:22

not enough just to call him a convicted felon. Although

9:24

I think we should do that because people

9:26

have not yet paid attention. So we cannot

9:28

allow this to be memory hold like so

9:30

many other previous transgressions, but

9:34

it should not be about saying what

9:37

kind of person Trump is. Because that is

9:39

baked into the cake. People, they're either gonna vote for

9:41

an asshole, they're not gonna vote for a selfish asshole.

9:44

They know that about him. So you have to spin it

9:46

forward to make it be about what kind of President Trump

9:48

will be. As evidence of the

9:50

core part of the argument, that

9:53

Trump is only in this for

9:55

himself. And his presidency is gonna

9:57

be about avoiding further legal accountability,

9:59

helping himself. able

12:00

to cover up $130,000 bribe to Daniels. If

12:03

he can't pull that off, I'm not going to

12:05

trust him with a nuclear football. So that person

12:07

is now voting for Biden because Trump is not

12:09

a good criminal? Yes. OK. Good.

12:11

You know what? You know what? We'll

12:13

take the votes wherever we can get them. Every

12:15

vote counts the same. Just

12:19

voters, you know? It's amazing. Well, before we

12:21

change this, have you seen the ad that

12:23

the Republican voters against Trump did a few

12:25

months ago, where they tried to

12:29

get jobs working at a shopping mall

12:32

with Trump's resume? No.

12:34

This is pre-conviction. It's

12:37

not like actors. They sent real people in, and

12:39

they blurred out the faces saying, could I work

12:41

here if I was convicted, if a court found

12:43

me guilty, liable for sexual assault, or all of

12:45

the other things that Trump did? And

12:47

I think it's a really interesting way to

12:49

sort of just make

12:52

it feel real to people, like

12:55

what the actual impact is. In two ways, right? It

12:58

seems like, to a lot of people, it's political, and it's

13:00

out there, and it's New York and all this, but

13:03

it brings it down to the level of, would

13:05

you hire a person who had just been convicted

13:07

of this exact crime to do things like, oh,

13:09

I don't know, manage the economy for somebody who

13:11

just was convicted of 34 counts of falsifying business

13:13

records? And it also shows, then

13:16

it gets to the second point you highlighted, which is a

13:19

normal person couldn't get a job at a mall with this

13:21

on their record. And Donald Trump gets to be president of

13:23

the United States, and that there is this two-tiered system of

13:25

justice where rich, powerful people like Donald Trump were above law.

13:27

And that's a system he wants to perpetuate. Just

13:30

on stage today in Arizona, he was

13:32

doing, he brought on stage Sheriff Joe

13:34

Arpaio, a person convicted of crimes that

13:36

he pardoned, because he was

13:38

a political crony of Donald Trump's. And

13:40

so that sort of crony

13:42

is a political crony is a corruption is a helpful argument

13:45

that can be tied to this as well. Convicted

13:47

of crimes, Joe

13:49

Arpaio, just again, everything gets

13:52

memory hold. He brings

13:54

Joe Arpaio on stage, Joe Arpaio up on

13:56

stage. He kisses him. He

13:58

says, I don't kiss men, but I'm kissing. Joe

14:00

Arpaio, I guess, like, happy pride. Did you watch

14:02

the video? I did watch the video. There

14:05

was a kiss. The

14:07

team said, we should play this clip, and I said, well,

14:09

you know, it's an audio medium, but maybe we should put

14:11

it on social media. But

14:13

the less funny point is, Joe

14:16

Arpaio, like, bragged that

14:18

his jails that he ran were

14:21

concentration camps. He literally said that he was

14:23

proud that they were concentration camps. He

14:25

denied food and medical care to prisoners. He

14:28

was found by the courts to violate the

14:30

Eighth Amendment against cruel and unusual punishment. He

14:33

installed a live video feed camera

14:35

in the woman's holding cell. I

14:38

mean, it was torture, what Joe Arpaio

14:40

did. He would not just racially

14:43

profile, he would like lock up people

14:45

just because they spoke Spanish, and so he suspected

14:47

that they might be undocumented immigrants, even if they

14:49

were citizens. I

14:52

mean, it's just, and then found guilty of a whole bunch

14:54

of crimes, and then of course pardoned by one

14:57

convicted felon, pardon, now by another convicted felon,

14:59

Donald Trump. And he brings him up on

15:01

stage. That's who Donald Trump is.

15:03

That's what we got to, that's what we're

15:05

working with here. All right, before we break,

15:08

we are officially less than three

15:10

weeks away from the publication

15:12

of our book, Democracy or Else, How to

15:15

Save America in 10 Easy Steps. June

15:18

25th, Dan, we're so

15:20

close. It's here,

15:22

it is here. Big news too, our book

15:24

event in Boston. Guess who it's gonna be

15:26

moderated by, Dan Pfeiffer. I

15:29

would say, I was only a little

15:31

offended as you went through, that was

15:33

on all the emails where everyone you wanted

15:35

was not available.

15:38

And then you finally asked the guy who was already

15:40

staying in the same hotel as you. I

15:43

honestly, I didn't even think about

15:45

it, and then part of it was like, we just

15:47

asked you to do so much, I'm like, why are we asking Dan to

15:49

do this fucking book event? It would be like his one night off. I'm

15:52

happy to do it, you guys did many of my

15:54

book events. We appreciate that. If you're

15:56

in New York or Boston, we have jam-packed week

15:59

of events. On June 25th, Alyssa

16:02

will be moderating, Alyssa Mastromonaco,

16:04

I just, will be

16:06

moderating a book launch discussion with me, Lovett,

16:08

and Tommy at Symphony Space in New York

16:10

City on June 26th. We're

16:12

kicking off the Pod Save America Live Tour at

16:15

the Brooklyn Paramount Theater with very

16:17

special guest host, Stacey Abrams.

16:19

That's exciting. On June

16:21

27th at 6 p.m. in Boston, this

16:24

is the Dan event. We're gonna be

16:26

pre-gaming the Trump-Biden debate with a book

16:28

chat at First Parish Church. So

16:30

that's exciting. Dan's gonna have plenty of survivor

16:33

questions for Lovett that he'll probably not be able to

16:35

answer. If he's back by then, who knows? And

16:39

then on June 28th, Pod Save America will

16:41

be live at the Wilbur, Boston for a

16:43

post-debate show with guest host, Mehdi Hassan, followed

16:45

by a late night Love It or Leave

16:47

It with guests Kathleen Turner and Jay Jordan,

16:49

also at the Wilbur. Wow, that's gonna be

16:52

a busy week. It's a busy week. You

16:54

can get tickets to all of these events

16:56

at cricket.com/events right now. And if you're not

16:58

in New York or Boston, you can still

17:00

pre-order your copy of Democracy or Else wherever

17:03

you get your books. Please go

17:05

pre-order our book. We gotta get on top of that

17:07

New York Times bestseller list, Dan. And

17:10

now, we just gotta get on it, really. And

17:12

now it's crunch time. I

17:15

think we're already, maybe we'll beat Kristi Noem,

17:17

maybe we'll beat the Dog Killer, but there's

17:19

always gonna be some kind of right-wing kook

17:21

that we're trying to beat out on the

17:23

New York Times bestseller list, so

17:26

please go order Democracy or Else. And guess what?

17:28

If you order it, the proceeds are

17:30

going to Vote Save America. So you're gonna be

17:32

helping actually save democracy, and then

17:34

you get a fun book to read with

17:37

great jokes, great advice, and real

17:39

smart advice from really

17:41

smart people like Dan. Look, people, buy

17:44

the book, buy it early. You're gonna

17:46

like the book. You're gonna like helping

17:48

Vote Save America. You're gonna feel good about beating

17:50

Kristi Noem and what other right-wing

17:52

MAGA nut is trying to

17:54

rig the bestseller list because that's what the right does.

17:58

They buy books in bulk to. The

22:00

reason, like your original question was, will Donald Trump

22:02

have the power and desire to do this? Of

22:05

course, he had the desire to do it last time.

22:07

There is all the reporting and all the

22:09

books talked about him wanting to investigate his

22:11

rivals, right? He spun up the Durham report

22:14

to try to go after the people investigating

22:16

him for collusion with Russia.

22:18

He talked about jailing opponents. Jeff

22:21

Sessions told investigators, told Mueller's

22:24

investigators that Trump wanted him to investigate

22:26

and prosecute Hillary Clinton. If you remember,

22:28

Jeff Sessions recused himself. Trump was angry

22:31

because he, and that's what Sessions testified.

22:33

He wanted him to investigate and prosecute

22:35

Hillary Clinton. And that's when Sessions replacement

22:38

Bill Barr had John Durham open up

22:40

an investigation that eventually led to the

22:42

Clinton campaign. Reports about him

22:44

fulminating about the IRS auditing opponents, right?

22:46

All of these we knew we wanted

22:48

to do. And the only reason it

22:50

didn't happen, and it really is sort

22:52

of by the grace of God,

22:54

is there were people in power

22:57

who were as bad as they were, right?

22:59

Like we're relying on the gravitas

23:02

and morality of Jeff Sessions preventing it

23:04

from happening, right? Jeff Sessions, Bill Barr,

23:07

John Bolton, these sorts of people, right? These

23:09

are not heroes of democracy by any choice

23:11

in imagination, but they did not follow

23:13

through on Trump's orders. And there

23:15

was also a sense that the rest of the Republican

23:18

party, particularly the folks in Congress, would not go

23:20

along with this sort of stuff, right? That this was

23:22

a bridge too far for them. Well, flash

23:24

forward to 2025, and all

23:26

of those safeguards are gone. Every person Trump hires

23:28

will be an extreme loyalist

23:30

willing to go to the hilt

23:32

to implement whatever Trump's desires are. And

23:36

then the reaction within the party

23:38

to Trump's conviction in these investigations

23:41

is that retribution against political

23:43

opponents is now that

23:45

is an accepted Republican party policy. And one

23:48

of the most disturbing things was, this was

23:50

mentioned in the New York Times article from

23:52

Maggie Haberman, Jonathan Swan, and Charlie Savage, sort

23:54

of detailing some of these conversations in the

23:56

party, is this

23:58

article from John Yee. I

30:00

really do think you can fit all of these issues and

30:02

all of these moves that Republicans have made over the last

30:04

several years into this bucket of,

30:06

they want to take away your freedoms

30:08

if you don't agree with everything they

30:11

agree with. The Biden campaign

30:13

is gonna air an ad on

30:15

Thursday night during the NBA

30:17

finals that is about, it's

30:20

called flag, it's about freedom and democracy. It doesn't address

30:22

this specifically, but it is about, this

30:25

election is a battle for freedom

30:27

and democracy and American values against this extremist

30:29

movement that wants to overturn elections, take away

30:31

your freedoms. And that is like, you

30:34

will have to build this story into it, but that

30:36

is the larger frame. I think it's a very good

30:38

spot. And then the other thing is, again, the

30:41

reason it didn't happen last time is because he

30:43

didn't have the right people in place.

30:45

Trump will next time have plenty of

30:47

administration officials and outside advisors encouraging him

30:49

to take revenge. Stephen Miller, who

30:52

has been floated as Trump's next White House chief

30:54

of staff, potentially, how fun would that be? Good

30:56

times. Is urging Republican

30:58

district attorneys openly to start prosecuting

31:01

Democrats now. As you

31:03

mentioned, potential vice president Marco Rubio tweeted

31:05

that it's time to fight fire with

31:07

flame emoji, flame emoji, flame emoji. And

31:11

here's MAGA podcaster Tim Poole

31:13

and self-described Islamophobe Laura Loomer

31:16

talking about jailing and executing Democrats.

31:18

Should Democrats be in jail? No

31:20

question. When Donald Trump gets elected,

31:22

should he start locking them up? No question. Should

31:25

there be lists of Democrats that need to go to jail? If

31:28

they go to the Texas jail, they should get the death penalty. You

31:30

know, we actually used to have the punishment for treason in this country.

31:33

Death penalty. A reminder,

31:35

Trump lets Laura Loomer ride around with him on

31:38

his plane. It calls her very

31:40

special. Tried to hire her to

31:42

work on the campaign until some of

31:44

his staff found out and they put the kibosh

31:46

on it last minute. She

31:49

said she wants to be press secretary in the

31:51

next Trump White House. Does this seem

31:53

like information we should get in front of

31:55

American voters about all these kooks connected to

31:57

Trump? We just talked about Joe Arpaio.

42:00

in half of the election could be

42:02

Trump on trial for January 6th and

42:04

we might not get a verdict till afterwards. So like we

42:06

don't really know how this is

42:08

gonna go. Oh, I don't think they're gonna succeed. They

42:10

may not succeed in completely delaying

42:13

the case until after the election,

42:15

but certainly it's not gonna be

42:17

very timely at this point. So

42:20

let's talk about the other president running for

42:22

a second term who hasn't been charged or

42:24

convicted of any crimes. That's

42:27

the low bar there. Joe Biden, president

42:29

is in France right now with other world

42:32

leaders to commemorate the 80th anniversary of D-Day.

42:35

He sat down with ABC's David Muir

42:37

for an interview where he pledged not

42:39

to pardon his son Hunter if he's

42:41

convicted. He also said that Trump

42:43

got a fair trial. He also gave

42:46

a nice speech on Thursday. Let's hear a

42:48

clip. And make no mistake, the autocrats of

42:50

the world are watching closely to

42:52

see what happens in Ukraine, to

42:55

see if we let this illegal

42:57

aggression go unchecked. We

43:00

cannot let that happen. To

43:03

surrender to bullies, to bow

43:05

down to dictators is simply

43:07

unthinkable. And

43:10

where we should do that, it

43:17

means we'd be forgetting what happened here in these

43:19

hollow beaches. Make no

43:21

mistake, we will not bow down.

43:24

We will not forget. So

43:26

Politico reports that Biden aides have

43:30

been pretty open about their desire to see Biden

43:32

compared to Ronald Reagan who delivered the

43:34

famous boys of Ponda Hawk speech at the

43:36

D-Day anniversary in 1984. One

43:39

of the better speeches, one of the better presidential speeches

43:41

I would say. Why do you think

43:43

they want that comparison? The New York Times also just wrote

43:45

a piece about this as well. I think you sent it

43:47

to me. There was always

43:50

a tension between the communications

43:52

department's desire to get the

43:54

speech coverage and the

43:56

speech writer's desire to manage expectations for said

43:58

speech. Like you are

44:00

a very level-headed guy. You're frankly a

44:02

pleasure to work with in any environment,

44:05

White House, media company. But

44:07

the times when you would get a little heated would

44:09

be when you felt like we

44:12

were overselling the speech. And

44:14

I can imagine this is just really putting a lot of

44:16

pressure on it. Oftentimes you oversell the speech. Well,

44:20

you know what? Trying to keep your tree from falling in

44:22

the woods and no one hearing it. It

44:28

just feels like we're so, even

44:30

from when we were in the White House,

44:32

we're like so, the media environment is just

44:34

so different now. Just the idea that, because

44:37

I saw that the campaign sees this is

44:39

like a tent pole event for the campaign.

44:42

This Normandy thing. It's like, I mean, I wish

44:44

that were so, but like we

44:46

can barely get, you know, prime time speeches. His

44:49

State of the Union, which was excellent. The

44:51

new cycle was like a day after that. No.

44:54

And like now we're gonna get a Normandy speech is

44:56

a bit, I mean, it's just, it's tough. Like

44:59

I had some real like White House

45:02

PTSD over this whole thing.

45:04

Cause there is just

45:07

in general, if you were

45:09

someone who works, who's were domestic political considerations

45:11

in an election year or part of your

45:13

job portfolio and the president

45:16

is headed to France for five days, like

45:18

that drives you insane. And then

45:20

you're always working with

45:22

the national security folks, always been

45:25

in Tommy to try to find

45:27

a way to reverse engineer some

45:30

domestic thing in there of value, even though the time zones

45:32

all fucked up. Your speech is in the middle of

45:34

the day, or if you're in Asia in the middle of

45:36

the night, no one ever sees it. You know, like

45:38

we're gonna go visit a place where they're, you

45:41

know, they're offloading cars made in America, or we're

45:43

gonna like, we went to Ireland to

45:45

do a thing at an Irish pub because there are

45:47

a lot of Irish voters in Pennsylvania,

45:49

right, or whatever. And

45:51

so you're always trying to do it. I can't imagine

45:54

this is actually anyone believes is to actually be a

45:56

tent pole, but I will say there was

45:58

a CNN story. That's

48:00

what I would say. It is, I mean, we

48:02

talk about the difference between... And I'm speaking, by

48:04

the way, where this, you're gonna hear this on

48:06

Friday, everyone. You're hearing this on Friday. And that's when

48:08

Biden gives the big Ponda Hawk

48:10

speech. He gave one on Thursday as well.

48:12

That was the clip you just heard. But you're

48:14

right. I think the effort that you mentioned that

48:17

CNN reported on, that they're reaching out

48:19

to Republicans, because a lot of these like never

48:21

Trump Republicans, whether you're Adam Kinzinger,

48:24

Liz Cheney, or whatever,

48:26

Chris Christie, have talked

48:28

about how the Biden White House or

48:30

campaign more likely hasn't really reached out

48:32

to them. And it's good that that

48:34

process has begun, I think. Because

48:37

you're gonna need a big tent and

48:39

every last voter to beat Donald Trump. Finally,

48:42

and yet another reminder of what's at stake

48:44

in this election, Donald Trump's Senate loyalists blocked

48:46

for the second time a bill that would

48:48

protect access to birth control for all Americans.

48:51

Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski were the

48:53

only Republicans to join Democrats in supporting

48:55

the bill. In case

48:58

you're wondering why there's a need

49:00

to protect access to birth control,

49:02

Republican legislatures in Missouri and Idaho

49:04

are already pushing bills to block

49:06

plan B and IUDs, while Republicans

49:08

in Nevada, Virginia, Arizona, and Wisconsin

49:10

have also blocked bills that would

49:13

protect birth control in those states.

49:15

Republicans in the Senate gave several reasons

49:17

for not supporting the bill that include

49:19

the claim that it would force Catholic

49:21

schools to hand out condoms to little

49:24

kids. It would not. It

49:26

could be used by a judge to

49:28

mandate gender change procedures. That

49:31

was from Marco Rubio, also not true. And

49:33

that the bill is unnecessary because there's just no

49:35

real threat to birth control. What do you think,

49:37

Dan? No real threat? Well,

49:40

I'd say politicians are

49:42

political animals, right? And the right

49:44

to contraception polls at like 80%. So

49:46

if there was no real threat and a

49:48

poll at 8%, it really kind of makes you wonder why they wouldn't just

49:50

vote for it. Maybe it's

49:52

because they don't wanna protect contraception

49:54

and they wanna take it away and they wanna leave

49:57

them that out. I

50:00

mean, you know what? You can go through

50:02

plenty of quotes from people, oh,

50:05

abortion safe, Roe was safe,

50:07

it's not gonna go away, it's never gonna go away,

50:09

and then dobbed happens. And if you,

50:11

again, you've gotta look at some of these, like

50:14

the real red states, the super

50:17

red legislatures, states like Idaho, where

50:19

you're starting to see some interest

50:21

groups, some activists, some super right-wing

50:24

legislators, and they're

50:26

starting with IUDs and

50:28

Plan B, because there's real

50:31

hardcore anti-abortion advocates who believe that

50:33

life begins at fertilization,

50:36

and so that's how they'll start targeting it,

50:38

and it's just gonna go from there. And

50:40

the fact that Republicans, look,

50:43

if Republicans are running around saying,

50:45

this is just fear-mongering, and we actually support

50:47

birth control, and this is crazy, and Democrats

50:50

are just trying to score political points, okay,

50:52

well then, vote

50:54

for a bill that would protect birth control access. Seems

50:56

pretty obvious, I mean, Roe was

50:59

first, and Griswold v. Connecticut

51:01

is second. That's the original decision

51:03

which ensured the right

51:05

to access contraception. The right

51:07

has been talking about going after that for a long

51:09

time, and some of the discussion after dobs, that was

51:11

seen as what is next, and so no

51:14

one should be surprised if the

51:16

court is hearing a case about the right

51:18

to contraception in the first couple years

51:20

of the Donald Trump presidency, and think about what happens

51:23

if Donald Trump gets to appoint three new judges, right?

51:25

Which is a real possibility. Who

51:28

I'll think, like Clarence Thomas did, that we

51:30

should reconsider Griswold. And also,

51:32

you know, because Trump can say whatever he

51:34

wants. Trump's like, oh, no, I like birth

51:36

control. You know, just today, just before he

51:38

brought Joe Arpaio up on stage

51:40

for a kiss, he was introduced

51:42

at the Turning Points USA town hall

51:45

by Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning

51:47

Points USA. Charlie Kirk, who

51:49

says, birth control, quote, screws up

51:51

female brains and creates a

51:53

bitterness that leads them to become Democrats.

51:56

And then he told people to make sure their loved

51:58

ones aren't on birth control. Trump said

52:00

he's great. Charlie Kirk also, by the

52:02

way, said that Martin Luther King Jr. was awful and

52:05

that the Civil Rights Act was a

52:07

mistake. These are the people around Donald

52:09

Trump. Where are they

52:12

gonna end up if he's president? Some in the

52:14

White House, some in the administration, some

52:16

will be in all of the agencies when he

52:18

purges all of the non-political

52:20

appointees in the federal government and replaces them

52:23

with MAGA loyalists, and of course, some of

52:25

them will just be his media allies outside.

52:28

So that's what we got, that's what we

52:30

got. Hey everyone, Vote Save America, check it

52:32

out. If you haven't signed up, go

52:34

sign up. You wanna be Team

52:37

East, Team West. Vote Save America folks

52:39

will give you plenty of work to do. You

52:41

can help volunteer, you can talk to voters

52:44

who are like some of the voters that

52:46

we have talked about today. Maybe they're undecided

52:48

now. Maybe they were Trump curious

52:50

and now the verdict's making them question things, but they're

52:52

still not ready. Maybe they're thinking about

52:54

voting for RFK Jr. now and

52:57

you can convince them to vote for Joe Biden. Either

52:59

way, Vote Save America will have

53:01

stuff for you to do. So go ahead, votesaveamerica.com/2024,

53:03

sign up. And

53:06

everyone else have a fantastic weekend

53:08

and we'll all see you next week. Bye everyone.

53:12

If you wanna get ad-free episodes, exclusive

53:14

content and more, consider joining our friends

53:16

of the Pod subscription community at crooked.com/friends.

53:18

And if you're already doom scrolling, don't

53:21

forget to follow us at Pod Save

53:23

America on Instagram, Twitter and YouTube for

53:25

access to full episodes, bonus content and

53:27

more. Plus, if you're as opinionated as

53:29

we are, consider dropping us a review. Pod

53:32

Save America is a crooked media production.

53:34

Our show is produced by Olivia Martinez

53:36

and David Toledo. Our associate

53:38

producers are Saul Rubin and Farrah Safari.

53:40

Kira Joakim is our senior producer. Reed

53:42

Churlin is our executive producer. The show

53:45

is mixed and edited by Andrew Chadwick.

53:47

Jordan Cantor is our sound engineer with

53:49

audio support from Kyle Seglen and Charlotte

53:51

Landis. Writing support by Halle Kiefer.

53:54

Madeline Harringer is our head of news and

53:56

programming. Matt DeGroat is our head of production.

53:58

Andy Taft is our executive. assistant. Thanks

54:00

to our digital team Elijah Cohn,

54:02

Haley Jones, Mia Kelman, David Tols,

54:04

Kiro Pel Aviv, and Molly Lobel.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features