Podchaser Logo
Home
 Overtime – Episode #663: Charlamagne Tha God, Ana Navarro, Joel Stein

Overtime – Episode #663: Charlamagne Tha God, Ana Navarro, Joel Stein

Released Tuesday, 18th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
 Overtime – Episode #663: Charlamagne Tha God, Ana Navarro, Joel Stein

Overtime – Episode #663: Charlamagne Tha God, Ana Navarro, Joel Stein

 Overtime – Episode #663: Charlamagne Tha God, Ana Navarro, Joel Stein

Overtime – Episode #663: Charlamagne Tha God, Ana Navarro, Joel Stein

Tuesday, 18th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:09

No matter what tasty choice you make, you'll

0:11

enjoy our everyday low prices. Plus, extra ways

0:13

to save, like digital coupons worth over $600

0:16

each week. You

0:18

can also save up to $1 off per gallon

0:20

at the pump with fuel points. More

0:22

savings and more inspiring flavors. And

8:05

yet on the same day they ruled unanimously

8:07

for the abortion pill. No they didn't. They

8:09

ruled that they didn't have standing. They didn't

8:11

rule on the issue. But isn't that essentially

8:13

saying that... No. It means

8:16

that the people who brought the legal action

8:18

had not suffered any harm. It's

8:20

like, you know, it's like this audience bringing

8:22

an action for X, Y, or

8:24

Z. Have a look, man. I gave them a

8:26

rule. I don't buy that argument. I think the

8:28

law is whatever anybody says they are. It's what

8:30

they want to rule on and then they will

8:32

find a reason. There is a whole fucking wall

8:34

of books behind them. If you can't find some

8:36

law in there to back up

8:38

what you really want to say in your ruling, then you're

8:41

not a good lawyer. And they do it all the time.

8:43

So if they, for some reason, they wanted to keep... The

8:49

difference is though that by not ruling

8:51

on the actual legal issue, that legal

8:53

issue could come up again if it

8:55

is brought by folks who do have

8:57

standing and who can prove that they've

8:59

somehow been harmed by it. What is

9:01

the reason why anyone would need a

9:04

gun to fire that many rounds? I mean... A

9:07

mass shooting. Well, but you can't

9:09

really give that reason. I'm just saying, what is

9:11

the... That's the reason. What is the rationale? But

9:13

if you're going into... If you're arguing

9:15

this in court and you were saying, you know, we

9:17

really need these bomb stocks because, I don't

9:20

know, my house is being attacked by the North

9:22

Korean army. I

9:25

need to shoot a thousand of something when

9:27

I go out hunting. I

9:30

don't understand where you even get that rationale. It

9:32

would be something involving some type of fear. I

9:34

don't know what the fear would be, but it

9:36

would be something involving this person is afraid of

9:38

something. Zombies. Zombies. Okay.

9:41

Right. God damn America. We used to

9:44

be a proper country. Yeah, we did. We

9:46

used to be a proper country. There's a flag for that.

9:48

Does Hillary Clinton... There's a flag

9:50

for that. Does Hillary Clinton... Well,

9:52

it would be nice if that was a question on

9:54

the form. What? In addition to asking

9:57

if you're on drugs while you're buying the gun, why are

9:59

you...

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features