Podchaser Logo
Home
RD - Accent Hour

RD - Accent Hour

Released Wednesday, 18th January 2023
 1 person rated this episode
RD - Accent Hour

RD - Accent Hour

RD - Accent Hour

RD - Accent Hour

Wednesday, 18th January 2023
 1 person rated this episode
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:06

This is Corolla Digital This

0:15

is a reasonable doubt with

0:17

your hosts, Mark Garagas, and

0:20

Adam Corolla. Yeah.

0:22

Get it on. Get it on. Get it on. Get it on. The church. We'll get it on

0:24

Monday. Get it on one of the best hour or

0:27

so in the universe. It's a reasonable

0:29

doubt, Adam Crow, that's Mark. Hard

0:31

out. Soft taco,

0:33

Garigos. Coming from New York

0:35

City. What's on your mind, Mark?

0:38

Well, you got a a compliment today,

0:40

my I've been on Zoom

0:43

depositions all day, and

0:46

people are walking in and out of this

0:48

this office that I use here.

0:51

And somebody who will remain

0:54

nameless who you know very well said,

0:56

You know, your style has been

0:58

influenced by Adam. Oh. My

1:01

style has been influenced by Adam. And

1:04

he said, you tend to

1:06

you tend to you always tend to

1:08

kind of

1:09

steamroll, but now you steamroll

1:11

with a certain sidewalk fare. Nice

1:13

enough.

1:14

I'll tell Adam, he'll be very gay. I think

1:16

you'll be laddered by that.

1:19

The French steamroller. French

1:22

Hard out. Soft taco, French

1:24

steamroller, Garagos. We're

1:27

gonna keep piling up those nicknames. Where

1:31

do we begin? There's so many good things

1:33

going on. As we speak,

1:35

I think they filed murder

1:38

charges or improper transportation

1:41

of a body. Gary, can you check that out? Somebody

1:43

told me that and I just can't even believe it. This

1:45

Massachusetts mom case, which

1:47

is kind of the missing white woman

1:49

dujure, and you

1:52

know, I as I indicated you

1:54

before, Adam, we're we you know,

1:56

we're in the back to the pre Trump era

1:59

Right.

1:59

Mhmm. Yeah. Gary. The

2:01

is this it, Gary?

2:02

Yeah. This is the the Norfolk District Attorney

2:05

announcing it. It's about a minute. We can watch it.

2:07

Okay. The detectives in the cohesive police

2:10

department and the Massachusetts State Police detectives

2:12

assigned to the Norfolk Artistic Attorney's Office

2:15

have been involved in an intensive investigation

2:17

into the fate of Anna Walsh, a

2:19

thirty nine year old co housing mother of three

2:22

since she has first missing on January

2:24

fourth. Earlier this investigation,

2:26

the police developed probable cause to

2:28

believe that her husband, Brian Walsh,

2:30

aged forty seven, At Missled, police

2:33

investigators on material matters important

2:35

to the search for Anna Walsh. He

2:38

has put not guilty of those charges and is

2:40

currently being held at the Norfolk County

2:42

House of Correction. A

2:44

continued investigation is now a lot pleased

2:46

to obtain in the restaurant, charging

2:48

Brian Walsh with the murder of his wife.

2:51

Mister Walsh will be transported to the Queen's

2:53

District Court for arraignment, the

2:55

charge of murder. Additional details

2:57

in investigation and the evidence in

2:59

support of those charges are likely to be presented

3:01

at arraignment, but will not be disclosed

3:03

at this time. This marks the

3:05

second allegation of domestic violence automasizing

3:08

off White County less than a

3:09

month. I thought so very much

3:11

for the family these crimes have left

3:13

behind.

3:15

You know, I First

3:17

of all, I love that accent, May

3:19

ten. I just wanna say that it's That's why I wanna

3:21

deploy it, which is for the accent. Yeah.

3:23

Reminds me, like, Dickie word from

3:25

Los Angeles. Say I

3:28

wanna say we arrested him after he popped

3:30

his car, but the the

3:33

the interesting thing about that I

3:35

get the guy a certain amount of kudos because that's

3:37

basically he encapsulated a

3:40

whole lot of information and he didn't

3:42

go overboard. You know, he

3:44

He talked about the arrest warrant,

3:46

the probable cause. He gave the

3:48

background. He said it's sealed

3:51

and told the arraignment tomorrow. And

3:54

I and you probably should have

3:56

said he's presumed innocent, but, you know, I

3:58

you can't have everything. And

4:00

his heart send goes out to the family

4:03

as the second incident of domestic

4:05

violence. So pretty much a primer

4:07

for all you prosecutors or,

4:10

you know, retired domestic federal

4:12

prosecutors. You

4:14

could you could learn from that. That was

4:16

probably, I give I give him a

4:18

ninety two on that. So

4:20

sync, well done. And

4:23

except for the pronunciation of the word,

4:26

charge, versus charge.

4:28

But, you know, who are we? Because words

4:31

are different everywhere all the

4:33

time, and I'm not judging. So,

4:35

what else? Gary, maybe you should find Gary,

4:37

while Adam and I were talking, there is

4:39

something that I thought on the Internet about a

4:41

woman trying to say with her accent.

4:43

New Hampshire. And she

4:46

it's a reporter. And if you could find that, I

4:48

I'd love for you to play it because she repeats

4:50

it a number of times. But the the

4:53

the the MA connection to

4:56

this case

4:58

is apparently there was

5:00

a West Hollywood art gallery

5:02

that was duped if you

5:04

believe what's being reported by

5:07

the husband on some

5:10

paintings and then the wife or for those

5:12

who weren't in the weeds here or the the

5:14

wife supposedly according

5:16

to the husband had left on January first

5:18

was gonna go down. She works during the week

5:20

down in Washington, D. C. And said

5:22

she was leaving. And the

5:25

false statements was he

5:27

said that his He

5:29

was taking machines out for ice cream and

5:31

apparently they triangulated him

5:33

cell phones to somewhere else. Well, it's an

5:35

interesting case and it's kind of captured

5:38

the imagination, not the least of which because

5:40

they don't have a body yet. So there's

5:42

the gone girl aspect. And then they

5:44

did apparently, if you believe what's been

5:46

leaked out there, find hacksaws and

5:49

other tools with blood

5:51

and DNA presumably contain

5:55

on there in addition to the contained

5:57

in the blood and also

6:00

in this, it's been variously

6:02

reported that this guy is been

6:05

referred to as the sociopath and has

6:07

been institutionalized. So

6:09

you've got all kinds of cross

6:11

currents here. Plus, She's a pretty

6:13

white woman, which checks the box

6:15

for cable news wall

6:17

to wall coverage. What is the

6:19

rules with the triangulation of the

6:21

cell phones? Because I always think about you

6:23

and Scott Peterson twenty

6:25

years ago

6:26

now. Been twenty years? What

6:28

do you almost twenty two

6:31

years. So almost twenty two years ago

6:33

where you couldn't get that

6:34

information. Right? Well,

6:36

you got the information, but boy, that

6:38

was kind of Indian substant

6:40

stages. I mean, they they

6:43

we did a a

6:45

hearing that lasted well over

6:47

a week on on that.

6:49

And then during the trial itself, we

6:51

spent quite a bit of time on it because back

6:53

then they were just kind

6:55

of scratching the surface of that and

6:57

mitochondrial DNA, dogs

7:00

sent evidence, all of those

7:02

things that you had to have hearings

7:04

that would test that stuff

7:06

and I'll never forget some

7:08

of the things where they said

7:11

that the that's where I

7:13

discovered. I had another case ten years ago

7:15

in Northern California, where it

7:17

was the same kind of test

7:19

where it became apparent

7:22

that it's not like a

7:24

GPS where you

7:26

have a very sophisticated, you

7:30

know, somebody does find my phone

7:32

or they do maps. And it's

7:34

your location. Now you look at that

7:36

and you can kind of drill

7:38

down and you get within basically

7:40

an eight foot radius. The

7:43

cell phones are different because

7:45

depending on where you are, I could be sitting here

7:47

on Fifth Avenue. And they're my

7:49

cell phone. I could be using this cell

7:52

phone. But depending on what

7:54

the traffic is, it may

7:56

hit in one part of my conversation

7:59

with an an antenna that's in Madison

8:01

Square Park. It could then bounce

8:03

if it gets too busy there to

8:05

some place by the Empire State Building,

8:08

even go up town. So you could it

8:10

could look like you're bouncing between and

8:14

cell phone antennae and

8:16

that you're moving and you could be sitting in the

8:18

exact same spot. So

8:20

that is not as good

8:22

as one would fact, in

8:25

terms of the locations,

8:29

I'm told, I don't know there's

8:31

been ported yet, but I'm told in this

8:33

Massachusetts' mom case

8:36

that they have the

8:38

softballed tower or locations

8:41

of the husband, the accused, the

8:44

defendant as of tomorrow morning.

8:46

And that those locations I

8:49

mean, I hate to break the news here,

8:51

but they I'm told that those

8:53

locations correspond to

8:55

where they found evidence,

8:59

and that's why they were so confident,

9:01

and why they felt like they

9:03

could file the charges. Because remember they without

9:05

a body, and the fact that he's being

9:07

held already. What's the

9:09

rush you would say? Well, I would

9:11

suspect that they found something,

9:13

that they thought, hey, we've got a

9:15

high degree of confidence now.

9:17

So it's time that we file these charges and

9:19

get it on the road. has also been

9:21

reported that some of the places

9:23

that he traveled to were outside of

9:25

the zone he was allowed to for

9:27

his already his current

9:29

home confinement for the last

9:31

art

9:32

charge, which is a

9:34

great point, Kerry, because for

9:36

those who don't know, he had a

9:38

didn't he have a monitoring device

9:40

on him -- Correct. -- which was

9:43

that is a GPS device.

9:45

So unlike your phone, the

9:48

ankle bracelet has one of the

9:50

GPS's, which is

9:52

different than what it is to track

9:54

somebody by the cellphone antennas

9:56

and the cellphone travel.

9:59

So, you know, you would think

10:01

that this guy would have would have had

10:03

enough sense to have not

10:05

only not traveled out his side of his

10:07

GPS micro

10:09

geo targeted area but

10:11

also not to them engage

10:13

and start talking and

10:15

give bad information to somebody when

10:17

they're asking We have the

10:19

reporter accent ready. Gary

10:21

found it. Okay. Yep. Which

10:23

I haven't heard. Parts

10:27

of this bill are similar to the executive

10:29

orders that have already been put in place

10:31

in New Hampshire, New

10:33

Hampshire. Kerry

10:40

one more time. I just think it's Yeah. I mean,

10:42

if she's an enduring -- Right.

10:45

-- story. Parts of this bill are

10:47

similar to the executive orders that have

10:49

already been put in place in New

10:51

Hampshire, New Hampshire. But

10:55

who who's letting the tape

10:57

out? Is that the

10:59

cameraman who I'm

11:01

I'm guessing that there's some

11:03

guy who works with her

11:05

who got thwarted

11:07

from a date. And so -- Businesses.

11:09

-- payback. But

11:11

be careful because I think

11:13

it's

11:13

endearing. In fact, I think even the governor of

11:16

New Hampshire Sunruno, I think he

11:18

said you're welcome to say you have

11:20

Shai anytime. Yeah. She's been killing it

11:22

on social media since this got out there.

11:24

She she has owned it and just

11:26

started retweeting

11:26

people, and she's all about it. Alright.

11:28

What other cases are we looking

11:31

at? Gary and or Mark?

11:33

Yeah. Gary, what about Bernadotte?

11:35

Try try trial next week?

11:37

Yeah. That's my read.

11:39

Yeah. Burdagh. Trial next week.

11:41

Burdagh, you remember, this is the guy

11:43

who comes from a long line of lawyers

11:46

slash prosecutors in

11:48

that particular region

11:50

of South Carolina, Dick

11:53

Carpoolian. Who I know is a great

11:55

lawyer is defending

11:58

him. I

12:00

I think that there will be

12:02

you know, rumor has that there will be a very robust

12:05

defense to that case. Is

12:07

that the story of where the kid

12:09

died in the boat? Which who

12:11

may have been over the legal limit. And

12:13

then later

12:13

on, there was another killing, and then the

12:16

cops ran him down, and then he tried to

12:18

kill himself. Tried to yeah. He

12:20

he botched a a murder for hire

12:22

thing. He his wife

12:24

and son were found murdered

12:26

literally with different weapons at one of their

12:28

homes, then it turned out he had

12:30

embezzled a bunch of money from their

12:32

former housekeeper, and then there was just I

12:34

mean, it just it kept on folding him. But then

12:36

he attempted to kill himself when the

12:38

cops surrounded him? Or am

12:40

I making that up? He got out of his

12:43

car. Here's the lady. He

12:45

claimed this is

12:47

the prosecution theory.

12:49

He had been called in a

12:52

that basically, he had a ex

12:55

client kind of do

12:57

a a staged

12:59

card jacket where he was gonna

13:01

get killed surviving son would get the

13:03

insurance proceeds. But -- Mhmm. -- I was

13:05

just to compliment you. As a

13:07

retired federal prosecutor, you really have your

13:09

hand or finger on the pulse

13:11

of the state court cable news

13:14

staples. I I'm very

13:16

impressed. I know nothing of the case

13:18

other than what you spoke

13:20

of it. Several years ago, but

13:22

I do remember a boating

13:24

accident of someone

13:26

was over served. They never looked

13:28

into it, then there was murder, and then a

13:30

sort of fleeing that

13:32

involved an attempted suicide or

13:34

a fake suicide or something.

13:37

But he's that

13:39

trial is is beginning now.

13:41

Yeah. And that's I we will

13:43

cover that because I think it's

13:45

a fascinating It's got everything you'd

13:47

ever want. It's got drugs and

13:49

sex and housekeepers and

13:51

it's I mean, it just it's got

13:53

the a wide it's got

13:55

a wide range. It's quite

13:58

a quite a wide gamut of

14:01

subjects. I think

14:04

one of the others that's kind of

14:07

captured the imagination, the

14:10

in the tabloid chronicles,

14:12

is this case involving

14:15

the Idaho fours, they call it, they

14:17

brutal and horrific homicides of these four

14:19

college students. That

14:21

is interesting to me for a variety

14:23

of reasons. I've already talked with

14:25

you about some of the problems I

14:27

see or what the defense is gonna be

14:29

concentrating on in terms of the prosecution

14:31

evidence. Now there's all kinds of

14:33

other theories making the rounds on

14:35

the Internet amongst the

14:38

true crime, true crime sleuth.

14:40

One of which is there

14:42

was you might remember there

14:44

was a body cam footage in

14:47

Indiana of

14:49

the father and son, miss Bryant,

14:51

who's the defendant. They were apparently

14:53

driving the Alantra from

14:56

the Washington to Pennsylvania where

14:58

he was later arrested. They

15:00

were stopped not once but twice by

15:02

the Indiana authorities.

15:04

And one of the body cams that are

15:06

talking about a SWAT shooting. I

15:08

don't know if you remember that. Gary

15:10

may remember, well,

15:12

now the latest theory

15:14

is is the

15:16

SWAT shooting involved a

15:18

security guard, and it took

15:20

place in in I

15:24

believe in Idaho or

15:26

Washington. And that

15:28

security guard, they're

15:30

now saying, and the SWAT

15:32

killing of him is somehow

15:34

related to Brian

15:36

Colbert. And there are people who are

15:38

saying it's even that that

15:40

was the person that that's what they're covering

15:42

one of the reasons now that there's all

15:44

the speculation is, as

15:46

I mentioned before, there was a

15:48

ceiling of the search warrant

15:51

on Colburger's apartment.

15:53

And one of the reasons they

15:55

gave for the ceiling was

15:57

that it would bring

15:59

threats to law enforcement. Well,

16:01

I can tell you that that's a very

16:03

unusual statement. In fact, it's

16:05

interesting that the Massachusetts mom missing

16:08

That's just its mom case. Talk about

16:10

alliteration, as Gary would say. They

16:12

they have a sealing order there, but the sealing

16:14

order just not invoked throughout the

16:17

law. Well, this

16:17

case also involve

16:18

triangulations of cellphones.

16:21

Right? Exactly. Exactly.

16:24

Bouncing back and forth, and

16:26

the fact that the cell phone was

16:28

was not pinging on any cell

16:30

towers during the three to five

16:32

AM time period when they believe the

16:34

murder was committed. Also, just

16:37

throwing another little monkey wrench into

16:39

the prosecution theory. Remember

16:41

when they first started this case, they

16:43

were saying that the murder happened between

16:45

three and four. We're now learning

16:47

that they're they're kind of moving

16:49

that just like they were moving the year

16:51

of the Elantra. They're moving that now to

16:53

between four and four twenty three

16:55

because they've got a door dash delivery at

16:57

four o'clock. They've got

16:59

a talk used by one

17:01

of the people in the House of four twelve, and

17:03

they've got a video or

17:05

a ring camera or

17:08

something that's fifty feet away picking up

17:10

a dog barking at four

17:12

seventeen. So and then

17:14

they a a triangulation

17:16

of the cell phone sometime well

17:18

after that. And they

17:20

now have gone back to the cell

17:22

phone records and they've got I

17:24

believe the day before they think that their enlantra

17:27

or the fold was in the vicinity.

17:29

So they're saying there was there

17:31

was some stocking It's also being

17:34

reported today just

17:36

right before we got in the air that

17:38

there is a connection between

17:40

cold burger and one of the

17:42

victims by direct message,

17:44

I believe. Garrity may have that. I'm

17:46

not sure if I gave him

17:49

Yes. I I do have that. So basically, what they're saying

17:51

is is that they don't even know if

17:53

the victim was aware that he was trying to slide

17:55

into her d m's because you

17:57

don't get alerted unless you follow that person. So

18:00

if, you know, a random person was

18:02

the DMU or me on in

18:04

gram. It would go separate folder than if what someone we

18:06

follow were to DM us. So they don't know

18:08

if she was even aware, but apparently, he

18:10

sent several messages over and over

18:13

again nothing aggressive, but he

18:15

was described as persistent.

18:18

So why would they seal his

18:20

apartment or seal the evidence

18:22

from his

18:23

apartment? What she says is very atypical. I be

18:26

when they invoke the fact that it's a

18:28

threat to law enforcement, you'll remember

18:30

early on, people were railing

18:33

and just ragging

18:35

all over law enforcement, the local

18:37

law enforcement in this case. My

18:39

guess is, and I'm gonna say, oh, I'll

18:41

be very upfront. I think it's a guess I'm speculating. But the

18:44

fact that they invoke threats to law

18:46

enforcement leads me to believe

18:48

that when they came out and said there were a hundred

18:50

percent sure nobody else was involved and

18:53

blah blah blah, that now there appears

18:55

that there were some other things that

18:57

either were missed or that the

18:59

statements were a little bit too or

19:02

uttered with too much certitude, if you know

19:04

what I mean. Maybe there was

19:06

somebody else who either a company

19:08

knew about before or after,

19:10

I don't know. I mean, like I say,

19:13

it's a speculation is just a telltale sign

19:15

is when they say threats to law

19:17

enforcement because who's gonna why

19:19

would you perceive a threat to law enforcement

19:22

when you've arrested somebody and you've charged somebody

19:24

and presumably on the basis of

19:26

a affidavit, you've got a circumstantial case

19:29

against that person. It's

19:31

interesting to me. And then there was his public

19:34

defender out of

19:36

Pennsylvania. I remind you, this guy was

19:38

interviewed yesterday. And

19:40

he was saying they were I saw

19:42

being asked, did

19:44

he tell you about the facts of

19:46

the case? Not a bad

19:48

answer by him. No. And I didn't want to

19:50

hear him. Because and he

19:52

said, he tried to tell me a couple of

19:54

times. I said, no. That tells me a

19:56

guy who's experienced and and it's been

19:58

around the block a couple of times in criminal

20:00

defense. Because the last thing you wanna

20:02

do is have somebody, especially when

20:04

you're defending the person, just

20:06

on extradition, which is a different

20:09

task than on the case

20:11

itself, the case in cheap, the

20:13

underlying case. That he was gonna get for.

20:15

The last thing you wanna do is lock

20:17

yourself into a story that the client's telling

20:19

you before you know what the prosecution's

20:22

already Because you put yourself

20:24

into a predicament, an

20:26

ethical dilemma when you do

20:28

that. And number number two,

20:30

you don't wanna really kind

20:32

of have yet until

20:34

you see what the prosecution's got. I

20:36

mean, that, you you know, the the way the

20:38

system is set up is you're

20:40

there as the defense lawyer, and your

20:42

job is to literally

20:44

make the prosecution jump

20:46

over the hurdles or jump through hoops,

20:48

whatever cliche you wanna use, you

20:50

were there to hold their feet to the fire. That's

20:52

another good cliche. But

20:55

you do not want to

20:58

necessarily go into it

21:00

and wed your client to

21:02

a certain story because that may foreclose

21:04

you from putting them on the stand at

21:06

a later point. And so he was saying

21:08

the same thing that the client was

21:12

adamant that he wanted to Brian

21:14

Colbert exonerate himself,

21:17

which suggests that that he felt

21:20

like that he was surprised

21:22

or shocked that he was being charged

21:24

with these crimes. Well,

21:28

would the defender

21:31

for Colberger might

21:34

he say tell

21:36

me all about it. And then when the press

21:38

asked him, did you talk to your client

21:40

about it? He'd say no. You

21:43

and it brings up a great point

21:45

because I he came very

21:47

close to disclosing the attorney

21:50

client, and you can get into

21:52

trouble because you could you

21:55

could do a waiver. The privilege

21:57

of your conversation with the client is

21:59

helped by the client. Unless the

22:01

client authorizes you to

22:04

to waive that privilege,

22:07

you've got a duty, a

22:09

sworn duty to not reveal

22:11

what the client has told you at all

22:13

peril to yourself. So

22:15

the client can say, look, I'm gonna tell you, but

22:17

don't tell anybody. That's I

22:20

could see that. What's breaking

22:23

in the Joe Biden classified

22:26

docs situation. Is

22:28

there any more news here? Maybe

22:30

we do one ad and and and

22:32

Jesus. There's a lot here. Oh, really?

22:34

Alright. Let me tell you about green

22:36

shaft. Wanna kick start. Kido, and

22:38

the New Year Green Chef makes it easier

22:40

than ever. With their new

22:43

limited time, Kido kickoff two

22:45

thousand twenty three, Kido rests recipes

22:47

for breakfast, lunch, dinner,

22:49

plus meal bundles as well, expanded

22:52

menu. Choose from thirty

22:54

recipes weekly, with

22:56

the option to a mix and match

22:58

from different diets in the

23:00

same box without changing your

23:02

plan. A vegan one day,

23:04

keto the next, plus more

23:06

customization than ever.

23:08

Swap the protein in any meal,

23:10

also add chicken or fish,

23:12

to selected vegan and vegetarian recipes

23:15

for added protein, only

23:17

meal kit that's carbon

23:20

and plastic offset. So if you

23:22

like your environment, this

23:24

is for you. And if you like your waistline,

23:26

this is for you. As

23:28

well. Creamy Italian pork soup. That is

23:30

my favorite that I've tried so far,

23:32

and it is

23:33

delectable. It is Green

23:36

jeff. Right? Gary? Go to green jeff

23:38

dot com slash doubt sixty and use code doubt

23:40

sixty to get sixty percent off plus free

23:42

shipping. That's green jeff dot com

23:44

slash doubt sixty and use code doubt sixty to get sixty

23:46

percent off plus free shipping greenshave,

23:48

the number one meal kit for eating

23:50

well. Alright. So the

23:52

latest with the Joe Biden

23:54

and

23:54

and the dynamic.

23:55

You have a video you

23:57

have a video clip

24:00

for this.

24:01

Is there one you're thinking of?

24:04

That there was something that came

24:06

out very recently you

24:09

know, they you're now at the point,

24:11

by the way, for those who

24:13

aren't in the weeds on this.

24:15

You'll remember that there

24:17

was a a brouhaha about

24:21

classified documents being found

24:24

at Barlogo. You might also

24:26

remember, yeah, there you go. And I

24:28

was just when you saw the

24:30

photograph of

24:32

the top secret documents laid out on the floor at

24:34

Mar a Lago. What did you think to yourself?

24:37

Looking at that image. How

24:40

that could possibly happen,

24:43

how why anyone could be that irresponsible.

24:46

And I thought what data was in there that may

24:49

compromise sources and methods. By

24:51

that, I mean, names of people who

24:53

helped or etcetera. And

24:55

it's just totally

24:58

irresponsible. Yeah.

25:00

But you you remember, Adam,

25:02

and I got you know, the

25:05

usual blowback from people

25:08

who are

25:11

Joe Biden supporters because at the

25:13

time, people said, well, you're

25:15

defending Trump. And I said, no. I I think I

25:17

made the distinction. He

25:19

said, look, he's

25:21

not above the law.

25:23

He is the president

25:26

and the classification system

25:28

is such that he's at

25:30

the top of the pyramid here

25:33

for classified documents.

25:35

So stop talking about, you

25:37

know, this false equivalency, though, well,

25:39

if reality winner had done

25:41

it or if somebody else had done

25:43

it, they'd be in prison. Right? But

25:45

they weren't the the

25:47

United States. There is

25:49

a reason why we have a

25:51

president, a classification system

25:53

that goes up the the pyramid,

25:55

so to speak. And we had a lot

25:57

of blowback for that. And the

26:00

same thing here, oh my god,

26:02

even the the current

26:04

president is It's so irresponsible.

26:06

It's methods and and this or that.

26:08

And I I believe at the time we

26:11

also said, by the way, when

26:13

people were saying Trump

26:15

had it in a closet with a

26:17

kind of a crummy lock. And I think

26:19

you and I Well, it's not like he doesn't have

26:21

a a secret service

26:24

contingent that's there at

26:26

Marlago. There's not like people are

26:28

rummaging around without any

26:30

kind of federal law enforcement presence.

26:33

And I remember some

26:35

rather caustic remarks about

26:37

that. it sure has

26:39

changed, hasn't it? Because not

26:41

once, not twice, but

26:43

three times, they're now

26:45

finding documents not just at

26:47

the vice presidential kind

26:49

of think tank area, but

26:51

in the garage next to the corvette, I

26:53

think in the last two

26:55

locations. Right? Yeah. Except for I'm

26:58

unclear. You know, I've seen

27:00

it like they go. You

27:02

can see Biden backing the corvette up

27:04

on an episode of Jay Leno's Garage and

27:06

see these boxes in the

27:09

back Those are the classified documents, and

27:11

I'm like, or it's the recycler

27:14

newspaper from nineteen seventy

27:16

seven. Like, how do you know in

27:18

those boxes in the corner?

27:20

Now somebody just decided those

27:22

were the actual documents

27:25

behind the corvette in the corner of the garage by

27:27

the garage door hinge,

27:30

but I'm like, I don't know

27:32

that that's them. Not not that it

27:35

makes a difference, but there's a

27:37

pile of junk, you know, like a

27:39

lampshade and some photo albums

27:41

and some cardboard boxes. That

27:43

are in the back of the garage piled up. Now,

27:46

they could be the documents or

27:48

they could just be a bunch of

27:51

shits scattered around a garage. We

27:53

don't we don't know. Either way, they're in the

27:55

garage. It's it's

27:58

not an skews, and it's not secure, but to

28:00

circle a pile of junk and

28:02

go, these are the documents.

28:04

I think they're playing a little fast

28:07

and loose with the truth there. It's a sort

28:09

of theatrics at that

28:11

point. But -- Yeah. -- a brick

28:13

a bridge too far. But by the way, Can

28:15

we talk about his corvette for a second? Because I it's

28:17

always been one of my favorites. What year is

28:19

that? Do you believe? Sixty seven? Sixty

28:21

seven, they say. In that

28:24

parking upon Hunter Green with

28:27

the with the face interior. Now

28:31

they call that isn't that the

28:34

build blast edition?

28:36

Right? Or I've got

28:39

Maybe that's blue with the tan. But that's

28:41

a heck of a car. I've always I've always loved

28:43

that car. Yeah. I like it too.

28:45

I always you know, the thing that was

28:48

funny about about

28:50

politicians now that I I find funny

28:52

about every every politician,

28:54

every musician, every thing. Everyone

28:56

has to explain that for a while they lived out

28:58

of their car. That's that's one

29:01

story. You know, everyone has to claim

29:03

poverty for some reason or you

29:05

have no street cred.

29:07

So the rap version of this is you

29:09

grew up in South Central. You dealt

29:11

drugs. You're in a gang. You know,

29:13

you had to pop a cap and a

29:15

few ass is, but you've left it

29:17

behind you. And then the white guy version is

29:19

is, we grew up poor.

29:21

We didn't have money. I had to sleep in my

29:23

car for a while when I moved out to

29:25

Los Angeles. And the thing that was

29:27

funny about Biden was I was caught on

29:29

to what because I saw that episode of Jay

29:31

Leno's Garage where he

29:33

was very proudly showing off a

29:35

sixty seven convertible corvette.

29:37

He was like, you know, Scranton Joe

29:39

grew up, hard Scrubble,

29:42

Family, just enough to make ends meet.

29:44

Anyway, as my wedding

29:46

gift when I was twenty two, I got

29:48

this brand new convertible corvette.

29:51

And I Now here's all I'm

29:53

saying, everybody. You could

29:55

just say we're pretty middle class

29:57

and I got a my

29:59

dad cashed it in and bought me a corvette. But you you

30:01

can't say sort of hard scrabble,

30:03

ham and egger from

30:05

Sprint and got a

30:08

corvette. On my wedding day

30:10

at age twenty three because

30:12

I don't know anybody who got

30:14

a brand new corvette for the wedding.

30:16

I may have gotten like

30:18

ten speed blender or toaster

30:21

oven or something or nothing. It's it's

30:23

unclear. I I don't know

30:25

anyone who got a corvette but I certainly

30:27

don't know any poor blue collar

30:29

hard scrabble folks that got a

30:31

brand new corvette for

30:35

their wedding gift from their parents

30:37

in their very early twenties?

30:39

I'm with you. I'm

30:42

with you. But circling

30:45

back to the classified documents, now

30:47

that they're finding them, I

30:51

think Gary had mentioned on Bard the other day that

30:55

friend of the show, Karen Magnifolo,

30:58

was saying, This basically sticks

31:00

up pork in the Marlago prosecution.

31:04

And I couldn't agree more

31:06

because how in the world are

31:08

you going to with a straight

31:11

face if you're a

31:13

special counsel indite

31:15

Trump for that when

31:17

it seems like you've got every

31:19

couple of days more

31:22

documents turning up unless,

31:24

of course, you're one of the apologists for

31:27

this, who now want to

31:29

compare the degree of

31:31

documents or the quantity of documents

31:34

and how many were top

31:36

secret that Trump had versus how

31:38

many that were top secret that

31:40

Biden That

31:42

tells me points out just

31:44

that you've elevated the sublime

31:46

to the ridiculous in terms of

31:48

this whole thing. I would say,

31:51

the idea at this point that

31:53

you're still going to pursue this

31:55

by virtue of special counsel or whatever

31:57

else. By the way, the lawyers

32:00

for Trump were in the crosshairs

32:03

of the Department of

32:05

Justice before they appointed

32:07

a special counsel Remember all the people

32:09

who are saying, oh, the lawyers, they got

32:12

obstruction blah blah blah

32:14

because they signed a declaration or

32:16

they represented the DOJ. Well,

32:19

guess what there's private

32:21

lawyers on Biden's team who

32:23

are finding or discovering

32:25

these documents and turning them over

32:28

too. What are they gonna do? What are you gonna say, oh, you

32:30

turned off after document dump

32:32

number two. You're gonna say what happened

32:34

between that and document dump

32:36

classified dump number three. It

32:38

really kind of points out this idea

32:40

that the criminalization of

32:43

the political sphere I

32:46

THINK HAS JUST GOT TO BE RADE

32:48

IN TO SOME DEGREE.

32:50

Andrew: WELL, ALSO, IT

32:53

STRIKS ME THAT It's why

32:55

people need to be a little more

32:57

measured. And what I'm saying

32:59

is is it kinda reminds

33:02

me of I think it James

33:04

Franco, and I'll tell you

33:06

why actor James Franco.

33:09

When we're we're in the throes

33:11

of times up in me

33:13

too. Remember? And Al

33:15

Franklin would get caught for nothing

33:17

burger, and everyone would just pile on.

33:20

Right? And nobody ever said, you know, let's put

33:22

things into context here, not

33:24

everyone's Harvey Weinstein, you

33:26

know, slow your roll just a

33:28

little bit. And at some

33:30

point, they would pile on. They'd

33:32

go, yeah, I have zero tolerance for this

33:34

stuff. What Al Franklin did

33:36

was the gusting. He should be

33:38

relieved of his duties, as a congressman,

33:40

blah blah blah, and then loam behold some

33:42

picture of you, what what

33:44

we'd find. Or you'd be

33:46

talking about Black

33:48

Lives Matter endlessly, and then we'd

33:50

find some picture you at a Halloween party

33:52

from nineteen ninety two going as

33:54

one of milli and

33:56

Orphanilei. You know what I mean? And the problem

33:58

is is you didn't give a measured

34:00

response the first time. And

34:02

so Biden does a sixty minutes

34:04

interview and they go, what about Marilago

34:06

and Class A note that's irresponsible. It's

34:08

discussing who could possibly

34:11

do this. And what kind of jeopardy could it cost?

34:13

He now if he had said and

34:15

I'm telling you they play that tape

34:17

ad nauseam now. It's no boy.

34:19

Here we go. How irresponsible. Standards and

34:21

methods and practices and and and and

34:24

peril and danger and

34:26

irresponsible. And who could be

34:28

so irresponsible? If

34:30

if these guys could answer a question like,

34:33

what about Trump and Marillago?

34:35

Well, I haven't seen all

34:37

the evidence yet. It doesn't

34:40

look good, but it does happen

34:42

quite frequently. Historically,

34:44

the president's take stuff back and

34:46

some of it's classified and they have the power to declassify and

34:48

we're not sure if that's the

34:50

that's the case here, but he's

34:54

not setting a precedent

34:56

by doing this as a precedent part

34:58

in the almost pun.

35:00

This is a pretty

35:02

frequent practice I don't agree with it, but it does happen a lot on

35:04

both sides of the If you give us some sort of

35:06

answer like that, then we cannot do

35:08

the uh-huh.

35:10

When we find your boxes in your garage because it

35:13

is quite frequent and it

35:15

does happen at nauseam. In

35:19

Washington. So if you'd start giving a little more measured

35:23

non bullshit responses, Then

35:26

later on when we find out that you

35:28

grabbed a titty in junior

35:30

high because ten minutes ago, you

35:32

were sitting down explaining you had

35:34

zero tolerance for any any

35:36

time a man touch. And now we got

35:38

somebody coming out of woodworks saying you grab

35:40

their titti. In the

35:42

quad, in the ninth grade, in

35:44

nineteen eighty seven, it's gonna

35:46

bite you in the ass. So please be a

35:48

little more measured with your answers because they do

35:50

come around and bite you in the

35:52

ass. Nope. I couldn't I couldn't

35:54

agree more. And I

35:56

guess it's kind of

35:58

the same thing that I like

36:00

to try to counsel that

36:02

there is a presumption of innocence

36:04

before you. I know everybody loves

36:06

a good you know,

36:08

prosecutorial or

36:10

gang bangs, I like to say, but at

36:12

the same time, you you be

36:14

careful because it can boomerang on you. I

36:16

want Mark, Gary. What do you what do you mean? Yeah. What's

36:18

interesting? I didn't send it to Gary,

36:20

but I know he'll be interested. Elon

36:26

Musk is in trial in the

36:28

Northern District Federal Court.

36:30

And it revolves around

36:32

that tweet where he was

36:34

saying that he might take Tesla private.

36:36

And so he was being

36:38

sued for, yeah, I believe in a

36:40

class action by shareholders

36:42

and they're picking a jury. And

36:44

the they brought in

36:46

or that I think they did some engineers.

36:48

And it's amazing and it was in San Francisco and

36:50

the lawyers from us wanted to

36:53

change a venue, but not the

36:55

least of which is because They

36:58

believed, I think, validly,

37:01

that mustn't get a fair

37:03

trial in San Francisco, especially in

37:05

the Silicon Valley because

37:08

when he moved from there, there

37:10

was a great deal of blowback.

37:14

And watching some of these

37:16

the what's being

37:20

reported jurors are saying in San Francisco about

37:23

Elon Musk tends to

37:25

give some creds to

37:27

the fact that it may

37:29

be somewhat hard to find a jury that's

37:32

going to not be judgmental going

37:34

into it about Musk

37:36

because the judge

37:38

himself characterized various of the jurors as being

37:40

radioactive. Mhmm. And but

37:42

that was interesting. And it's an interesting

37:46

phenomena. That here's a

37:48

guy, Musk, who whatever you think

37:50

about him is clearly

37:53

a great innovator

37:55

who will be remembered it, the very least for

37:57

that. But how quickly kind

38:00

of he he turned from

38:02

a darling of one

38:04

side to kind of the bookie bit

38:06

ahead of the same side. You know what I mean? Well, I feel the same way

38:08

about the left going nuts

38:12

over getting to the bottom of the FBI's involvement

38:15

in elections or Hunter Biden laptops

38:17

as I do with Elon

38:20

Musk buying Twitter

38:22

and saying, I'm gonna open the floodgates

38:24

and let all the information out there.

38:26

All of a sudden, the free speech activists

38:29

and the people that were very suspicious

38:32

of not only the

38:34

government FBI's and

38:36

the CIA's who have now

38:38

become a huge advocate for big pharma, the FBI,

38:41

the CIA, big

38:44

government and hate guys

38:46

like Elon Musk for opening

38:48

up Twitter. It's making me a

38:51

little I should say. And

38:53

it's really upside down world and you guy you

38:56

and I bring it up every ten minutes and I

38:58

talk to Drew about it all the time because you

39:00

have to be

39:02

old enough to grow up as I did with a sort of hippie

39:04

mom who hated big

39:06

pharma, hated the government, hated

39:08

the FBI, hated

39:10

the CIA, did not trust any of

39:12

these entities. And now that

39:15

was the the domain

39:17

of domain of the right in the

39:20

Republicans who champion the CIA, the

39:22

FBI, big government, and

39:24

big pharma, And now we've

39:26

done a complete one eighty

39:28

and free speech. Free

39:30

speech was always a let your

39:32

freak flag fly thing on the left. Now

39:34

we have to have information ambassadors

39:37

to make sure that speech

39:39

is vetted and California

39:42

has to have doctors that

39:44

comply with known COVID

39:46

therapeutics. Otherwise, they'll be shipped.

39:48

No COVID speech zone. Right.

39:50

I it's it's it's

39:53

it's completely been flipped. And a

39:55

and a guy like Elon Musk in

39:57

the seventies to my mom

39:59

would have been considered an innovator and a free

40:02

speech, absolute, absolutist,

40:04

and she would have been all in

40:07

for him. Now Of course,

40:09

the fact that they attack Elon Musk because he

40:12

says he's opening up

40:14

Twitter suggests

40:16

that Twitter was in your hip pocket in doing your

40:18

bidding. Otherwise, you'd have either no

40:21

opinion or be

40:24

happy. That and to hide behind the, you know, open it

40:26

up for hate speech, that's such a thin

40:29

veneer. That that

40:31

is such a frivelous

40:34

excuse for why you're

40:36

pushing back on what Elon

40:38

Musk is is doing. Spurious

40:40

is the word I was looking

40:43

for. So it is interesting that

40:45

he's drawn the ire of everyone on

40:47

the left after being a hero of

40:49

everyone on the left. Simply

40:52

by saying we're opening up

40:54

Twitter and we're gonna release all

40:56

the data that shows

40:58

that your government and your FBI

41:00

and your CDC and your Fouches and all the rest

41:02

of them were communicating with them in

41:04

a deliberate attempt to shut down

41:08

any voices that

41:10

arose asking questions about vaccinations

41:12

or safety or any

41:16

any protocols It's it's exactly upside down. My mom would have

41:18

been all about it as an

41:20

original sort of crosbie stills

41:22

and nash

41:24

HIPPY GIRL. SHE WOULD HAVE BEEN ALL ABOUT WHAT HE'S DOING AND

41:26

WANTING TO BLOW THE LID OFF OF

41:28

ANY INVOLVEMENT WITH THE FBI CIA,

41:30

BIG GOVERNMENT AND BIG Pharma.

41:34

That's

41:34

the part. I finally have to go back to the seventies. You got

41:36

you could go back seven years. I mean, it's

41:39

it's amazing what has transpired in

41:41

the last seven years. Yeah,

41:43

and I don't think he could get a fair

41:45

shake in San

41:46

Francisco. And we'll

41:49

be fascinating to watch this

41:51

trial take place. I knew

41:52

But where where would the venue

41:55

move to?

41:55

It's not good. He's it's

41:58

clear that the judge

42:00

feels like he can one of the things you do with change of

42:02

venues is the judge

42:04

inevitably, with

42:06

a couple of exceptions, one of

42:09

my cases is one of them. But, inevitably, you say, we'll sort

42:11

that out during jury selection, and that's

42:13

exactly what Judge Chen

42:16

is doing. He's sorting it out in jury selection. And as long

42:18

as they think they can find twelve

42:20

jurors and however a number of

42:22

alternatives to say,

42:24

yes, I I've heard about it,

42:26

obviously, and I can be fair, and I can

42:28

set it aside. It's all they care

42:30

about. Alright. Well, this

42:32

weekend, I'll be with John Papa and Dallas

42:34

Texas doing live shows, music, all

42:36

the hits to stand up, meet and

42:38

greets. We're gonna watch some of the k

42:42

rock doc. Putting that

42:44

together. So a little sneak preview of that,

42:46

Mark. I know you're interested in that. Oh, I really

42:48

right. I'm very interested in that.

42:50

So you can't you can't find

42:52

can't find one of your ducks that I'm more interested in that. That's

42:54

gonna be at the Dallas

42:57

Sheridan. We'll be there. We'll do it on

42:59

a live show on the twenty

43:02

first. I think it's the

43:04

twenty first. Yeah. That's

43:06

a live live music show and

43:08

stand up you can get tickets to that or you can hang out

43:10

for the whole weekend. Just go to am pro dot com

43:12

for all the info. What do you got,

43:15

Mark? I was just gonna give a

43:17

little plug to since coming up. Alex and

43:19

Annie, the decadent box of

43:21

chocolates collection from Alex and Annie

43:23

for Valentine's Day. Go to

43:25

Alex and Annie. ALEXAMDANI

43:32

and plug in a chocolate

43:34

gold jewelry.

43:36

Say affordable and

43:38

you'll be a winner. You may even get lucky

43:40

on Valentine's

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features