Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:03
Hey, hey, hey, it's Al Letzen, host
0:05
of Reveal. We're dipping into
0:07
the podcast midweek to bring you
0:10
something special, an episode from one of
0:12
my other favorite podcasts, NPR's Code Switch.
0:15
Code Switch explores how race affects
0:17
every part of our society, from politics
0:20
and pop culture to history and
0:22
food. If you don't already
0:24
subscribe, I highly recommend it. Recently,
0:27
the team at Code Switch did a
0:29
deep dive into language. It's
0:31
an essential building block for any culture, but
0:34
what happens when a language begins to
0:36
fade? This question has
0:39
a special urgency for the Lakota
0:41
people, whose lands stretch across North
0:43
and South Dakota. It's
0:45
reported that there are fewer than 1,500 fluent
0:49
Lakota speakers today. And
0:51
while many Lakota people agree it's vital
0:54
to save the language, there's
0:56
a debate over how best to do it. And
0:59
it's not just debate, but a legal
1:01
battle. Code Switch
1:03
made an episode about it, and today we
1:05
want to share their story with you. It
1:08
explores a complex fight that's been
1:10
unfolding in the Lakota nation, from
1:12
Standing Rock to Pine Ridge. Here's
1:16
the episode. Hey everyone,
1:18
you're listening to Code Switch. I'm B.A.
1:20
Parker, and today I have our
1:23
senior producer, Christina Colla. Hey Christina.
1:25
Hey Parker. Alright, so
1:27
what do you have for us today? Two
1:29
years ago, I started reading
1:32
about a complex, multi-generational fight over
1:34
language that's going on in the
1:36
Lakota nation. The average speaker
1:38
age of Lakota is over 75. There's
1:40
just not a lot of time to, you
1:43
know, fight internally when there's so
1:45
much work to do, and this
1:47
language is highly endangered. A
1:50
puzzle over ownership that can't fully
1:52
be solved by the U.S. legal
1:54
system. We're making things into property
1:57
that perhaps should never... be
2:00
considered property in the first place. And
2:03
two educators who are desperately working
2:05
with their language, but
2:07
who have found themselves completely at
2:09
odds. For me, the
2:12
overlying mission is
2:14
to do what's best for the language. And
2:17
dividing our people is not what's
2:19
best for the language. They're still
2:21
selling my grandmother's sentences, our
2:23
family's oral history and our oral
2:26
knowledge. And
2:29
Parker, to tell that story, I
2:32
want to start with that grandmother,
2:34
whose legacy has been at the center of
2:36
this fight. Her name
2:38
is Dolores Taken Alive. When
2:41
I graduated from high
2:43
school, my grandfather, he said,
2:47
don't ever lose your Lakota language.
2:50
Dolores was born on Standing Rock in South
2:52
Dakota in 1933, and
2:55
she was a fluent Lakota speaker. She
2:58
cared about her language a lot, just
3:00
like her grandfather taught her. Always
3:03
remember and speak your Lakota
3:05
language, because that is
3:07
your language. So, and
3:09
then the white man's language will be
3:12
your second language. And
3:14
then he said to me, no
3:16
matter how educated you are, in
3:19
order for you to translate our
3:21
Lakota language, which is ours,
3:25
but if I speak my truest
3:28
Lakota language, you will be
3:30
able to translate that, he
3:32
said to me. Maintaining
3:34
a language seems like a lot of
3:37
responsibility. It does. Dolores
3:40
learned and spoke Lakota in everyday life.
3:43
While she was searching for choke cherries
3:45
with her brother, plowing the land for
3:47
her dad, horseback riding, she
3:49
was also practicing her language. I used to
3:52
say to my mother,
3:54
mom, can I go sleep at
3:56
Grandpa's tonight? Okay,
3:58
and we used to sleep on the phone. and
4:01
grandpa would be telling
4:03
us stories. So you know this oral
4:06
tradition is very important. Delores
4:10
taught at different schools in Standing Rock for
4:12
over 40 years. And
4:14
at the age of 84, she started
4:16
hosting a weekly radio show in Lakota.
4:19
Her show was called, It's Good to
4:21
Speak Lakota. I mean, that's a pretty
4:23
apt title. Yeah, she
4:26
also recorded stories with a bunch of
4:28
different organizations. She taped all 48 episodes
4:31
of her radio show. She recorded with
4:33
Standing Rock. She recorded with an education
4:35
nonprofit called Well Lakota Project. That's where
4:37
this audio is from. She
4:40
shared this one story about a time she
4:42
talked to her sister in Lakota in front
4:44
of a classroom full of students. They
4:46
were so amazed at
4:49
how Lakota language could be so,
4:52
you know, cherishing and yet
4:54
so loving because you can speak it.
4:58
Not everyone had the
5:00
same experience. Right, I mean,
5:02
boarding schools existed in her lifetime, which we've
5:05
talked about before on Code Switch. They
5:07
were basically designed to strip
5:09
indigenous kids of their culture and
5:12
their English only policy is responsible for
5:15
the extinction or endangerment of
5:17
hundreds of native languages. And
5:20
the US policy protecting indigenous languages in
5:22
school wasn't passed until what? 1990,
5:25
that's the Native American Language Act. Standing
5:28
Rock wants Lakota to be the first language
5:30
citizens speak at home by 2045. But
5:34
according to one article, in 2020, they
5:36
only counted 230 native Dakota and
5:39
Lakota speakers in Standing Rock. That's
5:41
down from 350 in 2006. So
5:44
they have their work cut out for them. Right,
5:47
which is partially why, even
5:50
though Lakota is more of a
5:52
culture of oral tradition, Dolores
5:54
worked hard to make the language more accessible
5:56
in a bunch of different ways. And
5:59
she was the perfect... person to do that.
6:01
According to the Society for the Study of
6:04
the Indigenous Languages of the Americas, she
6:06
was considered, quote, one of the most
6:08
eloquent Lakota speakers of her time. Even
6:11
other fluent speakers, when they had questions
6:13
about the intricacies of their language, would
6:16
say, Dolores will know. Words
6:18
can hardly describe the incredible contribution
6:21
made to the dictionary by Dolores
6:23
Taken Live. So that's
6:25
Jan Ulrich. He's a linguist from the
6:28
Czech Republic who's been speaking Lakota for
6:30
about 40 years. He
6:32
stumbled on an old Lakota dictionary while
6:34
the Czech Republic was still under Soviet
6:36
rule, and he decided to start learning
6:38
Lakota. Jan
6:45
worked with Dolores and others to create
6:47
a Lakota dictionary as a founder and
6:49
head linguist for this influential
6:51
nonprofit called the Lakota
6:53
Language Consortium, or the
6:56
LLC. That tape we
6:58
heard is from a Lakota Language Consortium
7:00
video. Okay, so
7:02
what is the Lakota
7:04
Language Consortium? So
7:07
the LLC is made up of
7:10
a team of mostly native staff.
7:12
We should clarify, it's not actually
7:14
an LLC in the corporate sense.
7:16
That helps. It's a nonprofit
7:18
that's been around for 20 years. And aside
7:21
from their Lakota dictionary, they publish books
7:24
and host learning weeks with Lakota elders.
7:26
Their mission is to revitalize
7:29
Lakota by creating a new
7:31
generation of Lakota speakers. That
7:46
was Wilhelm Meijer. He founded the LLC with Jan
7:48
in 2004, and they ran it together for 20
7:51
years. Wilhelm
7:53
was born in Austria but grew up in the
7:55
States. He studied at a Gla-la-la-Kota
7:58
college on the Pine Ridge Reservation. That's
8:00
where he first started to learn Lakota
8:02
and became deeply interested in Lakota culture.
8:05
Yann and Wilhelm also founded
8:07
a larger nonprofit. It's called
8:09
the Language Conservancy, and
8:11
it works with over 50 other
8:13
native languages. On
8:16
the bottom of that website,
8:18
there is a logo saying
8:20
they have special consultative status
8:22
with the United Nations Economic
8:24
and Social Council. That sounds
8:26
legit. It does. It's
8:28
definitely power players in the language
8:31
preservation, revitalization space in a way
8:33
that kind of makes me think
8:35
of Raya, Raya la Cademia Espanola.
8:37
Like the OED or Webster's. Yeah.
8:41
And with Lakota, the LLC has said they're
8:43
not trying to be the one authority on
8:45
the language, but they are
8:47
trying to quote, create and
8:49
maintain Lakota resources that are
8:51
reliable, evidence-based, text corpus-based, and
8:53
that can be confidently referenced
8:55
by Lakota language teachers and learners,
8:58
end quote. And the new
9:00
Lakota dictionary is one of those resources.
9:03
So are people actually using the dictionary to
9:05
try to learn Lakota? Some
9:07
are. So I talked to
9:09
Alex Firethunder a few times about
9:11
his relationship with his language. Alex
9:15
is an enrolled member of the Aglala
9:17
Sioux tribe. And when Alex
9:19
started seriously studying Lakota in 2013,
9:21
he used the LLC dictionary. He
9:24
remembers seeing it for the very first
9:26
time and feeling
9:28
overwhelmed. As
9:30
a beginner learner, that's a lot of words I have to
9:33
learn, you know. But
9:35
in retrospect, it makes you realize
9:37
how complex and how rich
9:39
our language is. Alex
9:43
lives in Pine Ridge now, but he grew
9:45
up in New York. And while he knew
9:47
some Lakota words, he didn't speak it at
9:49
home, really. My mom is a
9:52
speaker, but she didn't teach me or
9:54
my siblings to speak Lakota. Everybody else
9:56
spoke English. No, I
9:58
just think that it was just, it wasn't practical. And
10:00
it's a similar story to my generation here
10:03
on the res as well. English
10:05
just kind of took over. I
10:08
remember like talking to my older brother when we were
10:10
teenagers like, we should learn to speak
10:12
Lakota so that we can talk to mom in Lakota.
10:14
How cool would that be? At
10:17
age 22, he signed up for
10:19
Lakota classes. And right
10:21
away, I, everything I was learning class, I
10:24
would call my mom after and, you know,
10:26
try to practice. She would laugh at me
10:28
when I would say things funny or say things wrong. I'd
10:31
be like, and
10:34
all like robotic and like, like syllable
10:36
by syllable. And
10:39
so she'd laugh and say, what's wrong with that? Is
10:42
this evening, or this evening, and
10:48
then she'd say, it's So
10:51
is the fast way of
10:53
pronouncing that. And then she would say, after
10:59
a few years of studying, Alex became a Lakota
11:01
language teacher himself. And
11:04
then he took a job with the Lakota
11:06
Language Consortium. He runs classes at
11:08
the LLC Summer Institute, teaches,
11:11
works as a linguist, hosts a podcast.
11:15
Of course. Yep. He
11:17
records elders in their communities and
11:19
documents previously undocumented but words
11:21
that are used by our speakers that have
11:23
never been written before. Well, then he's
11:26
working as hard as Delores. He is. And
11:28
he said in the latest edition,
11:30
the third edition of the new
11:33
Lakota dictionary, they added roughly 10,000
11:36
more words than the first one. And so
11:38
like one example is pajamas.
11:41
Pajamas is, in
11:45
the dictionary, it's always been ish, I
11:48
think it's ish-ti-ma-pi, or ish-ti-ma-hay-api, which
11:51
just means like, when sleeping clothes. But
11:54
my mom was like, I never heard that. And
11:56
she gave it to me. Ugh-pah-api. Ugh-pah-pi.
12:00
I was like, that's not in the dictionary. And
12:02
I asked around some other elders and
12:05
now it's in the dictionary. It looks like me.
12:10
That makes me feel proud. You
12:13
know, being the first generation to not
12:15
be the speaker, it makes me
12:17
feel like I'm mending like some
12:19
kind of poop that's been broken. Not to be
12:21
cheesy, I know that's usually, you know, a
12:24
lot of our people like to tuck the medicine wheel
12:26
and hoops and stuff like that. But
12:28
it is, you know, a circle is a
12:30
sacred symbol to our people
12:33
and it really is
12:35
meaningful to continue that
12:37
cycle. Continuing
12:39
that cycle is especially important as
12:41
the number of native Lakota speakers
12:44
continues to shrink. I
12:47
always pray to creator, that's to
12:49
give me more life, give
12:52
me health, give me good health.
12:54
I'm still needed, I can still
12:56
help. I wanna live
12:58
more, you know, like that because I can
13:00
help my people, my students, my
13:03
talk, always. Dolores
13:07
Taken Alive died in 2020, but
13:11
so much of her work lives on.
13:14
In recordings, in books, in
13:17
stories that she shared so the next
13:19
seven generations can keep learning. It
13:22
lives on in people who decided to
13:24
take up Dolores' mantle as well. Like
13:27
Alex? Well,
13:30
yes and no. It
13:35
depends on who you ask because
13:37
Parker, as you
13:39
know, nothing in life
13:41
is ever that clean or easy.
13:45
They're still selling my grandmother's
13:47
sentences, our family's
13:49
oral history and our oral knowledge.
13:51
So have we been given my
13:54
grandmother's stuff back yet? That's
13:56
coming up. Hey, it's
13:59
Al again. And we're sharing this
14:01
episode from the Code Switch podcast from
14:03
NPR because we think it'll resonate with
14:05
Reveal listeners. Reveal deals
14:07
with big, complicated issues like race and
14:10
identity, and that's what Code Switch is
14:12
all about. I hope you're
14:14
enjoying it, and here again is Christina
14:16
Kala and B.A. Parker.
14:19
Parker. Christina. Code
14:21
Switch. So, Parker. Hmm.
14:24
So, Parker. Hmm. Before
14:26
the break, we heard about Dolores taking
14:28
alive's work to keep the Lakota language
14:30
alive. And she
14:32
worked tirelessly to do that, including
14:35
with the Lakota Language Consortium, who
14:37
she believed had the same mission as her. But
14:41
not everyone shares that belief. In
14:44
fact, some people thought that
14:47
they saw something much more sinister
14:49
going on. A lot
14:51
of people in Indian Country, including me,
14:53
itself thought that Wilhelmiya and Jan Ulrich
14:55
were sent from heaven for
14:58
us. This is Nicole
15:00
E. Duchino. She's
15:02
Cheyenne River Lakota. And
15:05
in June 2023, in a hearing room
15:07
in Pierre, South Dakota, she
15:09
was talking about her language. Two
15:12
preeminent linguists who were willing to
15:14
travel thousands of miles away to
15:16
our reservations here in South Dakota
15:18
and donate their time, donate their
15:21
time and expertise to helping us
15:23
save our endangered Lakota language. And
15:26
we as Indian people thought that they viewed
15:28
our language and our culture as a shared
15:31
resource that could be neither bought
15:33
nor sold. Nicole
15:35
was representing Ray Taken Alive,
15:38
Dolores Taken Alive's grandson. And
15:40
Nicole was raised defense through a
15:43
six-hour hearing with the South Dakota
15:45
Education Department. Ray learned in
15:47
2021 that in fact our ancient
15:49
and sacred Lakota language that had
15:52
barely survived small talks, barely
15:55
survived war and forced assimilation, and
15:57
which Ray's grandmother Dolores Taken alive
15:59
had innocently and proudly shared with
16:01
Yawn and Will for the good
16:04
of her people had been
16:06
copyrighted by the LLC.
16:09
Ray's grandma's image had been copyrighted by the
16:11
LLC. The
16:13
way that Ray saw it, our mother
16:15
tongue and wisdom that were passed down
16:17
by his ancestors now belong to Yawn
16:20
and Will. And
16:24
Ray doesn't think that's right. He
16:27
thinks that's illegal. He
16:29
thinks the LLC is stealing our language and
16:31
our culture. It's
16:34
too long in language revitalization our people
16:36
have been removed from from
16:39
our language. It's constantly tried to be separated.
16:42
That last voice is Ray taken alive. Right,
16:45
we heard him right before the break and
16:47
it sounded like he was not that thrilled
16:49
about what the Lakota language consortium is doing.
16:52
He is not a fan. And
16:55
you heard a little about Y from
16:57
his lawyer. Here's how Ray
16:59
explains it. Hello.
17:24
Hey, Ray. Ray and I
17:27
talked multiple times, so some of his tape
17:29
might sound a little different. How's
17:31
it going? Good, how are you? What
17:33
are you up to today? I'm
17:35
doing good. We're going to head out in the
17:37
river today. Later
17:40
on when it warms up. Ray
17:42
is a Standing Rock citizen. He
17:44
teaches Lakota language at the McLaughlin Public
17:46
School in McLaughlin, South Dakota. He's
17:49
also the Lakota language and culture coordinator for
17:51
his school, which means
17:53
he helps make curriculum. That
17:55
was my dream to work in the school. And
17:58
Ray comes from a long a long
18:00
line of teachers. Like Dolores.
18:02
Yeah. Which is one
18:04
reason why he's passionate about helping young
18:06
Lakota people learn to speak Lakota as
18:09
part of their everyday lives. I
18:11
believe that our culture and
18:13
our language is life-giving.
18:17
I want to give them the tools to dream and do
18:20
whatever they want to do. And
18:22
Ray has spent the past three years
18:25
fighting the Lakota Language Consortium. Wait,
18:28
Christina, it sounds like
18:30
Ray has the same goal as
18:32
the LLC to keep teaching the
18:34
language. I mean, he does
18:37
to a certain degree, but
18:39
there are some key differences in
18:41
how Ray and the LLC conceptualize
18:43
their work. So Ray has three
18:45
main issues with the LLC that
18:48
have to do with messaging, authority,
18:50
and ownership. Oh, okay. Yes. Let's
18:53
get into it. So when it
18:55
comes to messaging, Ray is asking, is
18:57
the threat of the Lakota language dying
19:00
off, being used to
19:02
convince people to get on board with
19:04
the LLC's learning system? Like, is
19:07
the LLC catastrophizing? That's
19:09
what he was referring to when it comes to selling
19:11
the disease and the cure. Yep.
19:14
And one other key piece of that is
19:16
selling. In order to
19:18
sell something, you need people to
19:20
want to buy it, which is
19:22
why he cares about authority. Okay.
19:26
So as I said before,
19:28
the Lakota Language Consortium materials
19:30
standardize one clear way
19:33
to speak and write Lakota. Like,
19:35
this is the vocabulary. These are
19:38
the diacritical marks. This
19:40
is how the grammar is structured. I
19:43
could see how that could feel
19:45
like the best chance to revitalize
19:47
the language, to standardize it?
19:50
That's what supporters of the LLC would say for
19:52
sure. This work is
19:54
needed now, and the LLC has the
19:56
resources and the know-how to do it.
20:00
But when it comes to who
20:02
has authority, Ray and others are
20:04
asking like, with the living
20:06
language that doesn't have one clear
20:08
standardized writing system already, who
20:11
gets to decide the correct way to
20:13
write and speak the language? Especially
20:16
when there are so many regional
20:18
and generational differences. But even
20:21
more fundamentally, some
20:23
Lakota people feel like maybe
20:26
they don't need one standardized
20:28
writing system. A
20:30
bunch already exist. And
20:33
having a variety of systems and
20:35
materials has worked for some people,
20:38
like Ray. What I use personally is
20:40
I typed up, me and a friend of mine,
20:43
we typed up all the
20:45
texts that we could basically find. And I
20:47
keep it in this huge PDF document. He
20:50
says a lot of people
20:53
don't know how many resources
20:55
exist from tribal colleges, elders,
20:57
tribes, curricula, dictionaries,
21:00
books. They're all out
21:02
there. One thing I like to do is
21:05
I get on the online databases or
21:07
Google Scholar or whatever, and I look for
21:09
whatever I can find on
21:11
there. And then also
21:14
I get on eBay. He found some
21:16
cassette tapes that way. I
21:19
bought them and then I put them in. This
21:22
old radio that my
21:24
dad gave me and I played
21:26
it. And it was the tapes
21:29
to these Black Hills
21:31
State University language
21:33
curriculum. Okay,
21:37
Christina, I totally understand
21:40
what Ray is doing and
21:42
why it feels more organic to
21:44
the way the Lakota language has
21:47
actually worked throughout time. But
21:49
having one place you go
21:51
to and
21:54
know that you're learning the right things might
21:57
just be more convenient. Like...
22:00
Not everyone is going to have the time
22:03
and motivation to find cassette tapes on eBay
22:05
or know how to use cassette tapes. I
22:08
mean, that's a good point. And
22:10
actually, one elder who worked with
22:12
the LLC remarked that
22:14
two generations of Lakota language students
22:16
on Standing Rock have
22:18
learned using LLC materials. At
22:22
this point, maybe removing them would
22:24
be detrimental to those students' learning.
22:27
For people like Alex Firethunder, who
22:29
lives on Pine Ridge, having one
22:32
standardized system has been incredibly helpful
22:34
in learning Lakota. In the LLC
22:36
materials, every word has the stress
22:38
marked where it goes. So
22:41
you know there's no guesswork, and
22:43
that really developed a confidence in
22:45
my speaking. So this
22:48
stuff works for some people, but
22:51
Parker, people like Ray are
22:53
really worried about trading convenience
22:56
for ownership. And the
22:58
bigger question here is
23:01
if Lakota people are involved in
23:03
making LLC materials, why should this
23:05
separate company have control over those
23:08
materials, not the elder speakers or
23:10
tribes? And if
23:12
the LLC controls those
23:14
recordings, etc., does the
23:16
language still belong to the Lakota
23:18
people? And this has
23:21
become another giant part of
23:23
this discussion. A language cannot
23:25
be copyrighted in general. It's
23:27
not a thing that is
23:29
like that. That's Wilhelm
23:31
Meijer again. Remember, he's one
23:33
of the original founders of the LLC,
23:36
and technically you cannot
23:38
copyright a language. But
23:42
there are ways even that
23:44
basic fact gets
23:46
complicated. Because
23:50
you can copyright materials
23:54
in that language. And
23:56
maybe if you copyright enough materials
23:58
of something like Lakota, that
24:00
doesn't have a standardized version. You
24:03
can end up owning a
24:06
language. Essentially, in that
24:08
you can control how it's taught
24:10
or learned, who has access to
24:12
materials. There's a broader
24:14
discussion about this all over the world,
24:16
but I want to share one example.
24:19
So something like this happened
24:21
with the Penobscot Nation in Maine, where
24:24
one linguist basically ended up copywriting so
24:26
much of their language materials that
24:28
it was pretty much like he owned it. And
24:31
that ownership didn't go back to the tribe
24:33
once that linguist died. The way copyright law
24:35
works, it will eventually go into the public
24:37
domain, and that's not what
24:40
a lot of tribes want, either. So
24:42
going back to the LLC, they
24:44
control more than just the written
24:46
works that they've copyrighted. When they
24:49
record Lakota speakers, they have
24:51
speakers sign release forms. That's how
24:53
it usually goes, right? It is. But
24:56
for a while, the LLC was
24:58
on the far end of the
25:00
spectrum, because until Alex Firethunder joined
25:02
the organization, the LLC was
25:05
the sole owner of the materials they
25:07
gathered. Now, speakers have
25:09
more choice when it comes to
25:11
who ultimately owns the recording, but
25:13
before, through those previous forms, the
25:15
LLC was asserting ownership over an
25:18
initial recording, as well as whatever
25:20
was shared and whatever was developed
25:22
from that original source material, including
25:25
things like stories that Ray's grandmother
25:27
told, or pictures the LLC shot
25:29
of Dolores. I
25:32
was completely shocked. I
25:35
was really hurt by that. How
25:39
can an outside
25:41
entity keep my grandmother
25:43
from me? Ray,
25:45
as the appointed spokesman for his family
25:48
on the issue, has been trying to
25:50
get his grandmother's materials from the LLC.
25:54
What I want is all of the
25:56
intellectual property rights given back to our
25:59
family. All
26:01
the audio, the recordings,
26:04
the pictures, the licensing,
26:06
everything. The full assignment of
26:08
rights being given back to our family. The
26:13
LLC says they did share Dolores'
26:15
recordings with Ray's family. According
26:18
to a post on their website, they returned recordings to
26:20
Ray's family in September of 2020 and again in September
26:22
of 2021. The
26:27
more fundamental point of tension seems
26:29
to be that Ray's
26:31
version of getting those materials
26:33
back and the LLC's version
26:36
differ. Ray says
26:38
the LLC gave him copies. He
26:41
wants the originals. Ray
26:43
says he wants Dolores' voice and her
26:45
image to be protected under federal and
26:47
tribal law so no one can exploit
26:50
or make money off of them. Because
26:53
without the originals, it's still someone
26:55
else's call about what can be
26:57
done with the materials. Who
26:59
can use them? How they can be referenced.
27:05
We cannot withdraw the copyright unless
27:07
we're given a perpetual license to
27:10
continue to use the material because
27:12
the dictionary… During the hearing,
27:14
Jan said the LLC is a publishing
27:16
house and they've published their dictionary, their
27:19
grammar book, their textbooks. They
27:21
do offer some materials for free,
27:23
like their dictionary app, but withdrawing
27:26
copyrights would mean
27:29
stopping the presses. Who's
27:31
going to benefit from that? Are the schools going
27:33
to benefit from the fact that we have to
27:35
stop printing the dictionary that Dolores Dechmoye wanted to
27:37
be printed for? We
27:40
sell it because it costs money to print and
27:42
people buy them for our
27:45
schools. They have to buy textbooks and things.
27:48
But really I couldn't put a price tag on it for
27:50
you. It's invaluable to me. These
27:53
language materials are invaluable to
27:55
Alex, but Dolores's
27:57
recordings are invaluable to me. Ray
28:00
too. You know, my grandma
28:02
would say things and she would give me a
28:04
word and she'd say, takouja, that one's not in
28:06
the dictionary. And
28:08
I wish I could hold on to those. I wish I would have
28:10
really sunk my teeth into those and
28:12
held on to those. So
28:16
what's he doing to get his grandma back?
28:19
So for the past three years,
28:22
Ray has been pushing some
28:24
boundaries. He asked
28:26
the LLC in private messages and
28:28
emails, as well as through social
28:30
media to stop using Dolores' materials.
28:33
He shared videos calling out the
28:35
LLC and publicizing what's happening. And
28:38
in October 2021, Ray confronted
28:41
the LLC at an indigenous
28:43
education conference. That's my grandma.
28:46
You don't have permission to do this. Ray
28:48
grabbed stacks of pamphlets with Dolores' image
28:50
on them from an LLC table. This
28:53
was all recorded. He
28:55
posted that video online, which wound
28:58
up ruffling some feathers. All
29:00
of this escalated to a cease and desist
29:02
letter from the LLC and later a 23-page
29:04
complaint against
29:08
Ray with the South Dakota Education
29:10
Department's ethics board. Mr. Tingled will
29:12
testify that my clients were improperly
29:14
displaying an image of his grandmother
29:17
Dolores taking a life on two
29:19
of their sets of materials. Which
29:22
is how we ended up at that
29:24
ethics hearing in Pierre, South Dakota. Yeah,
29:27
that was the LLC's lawyer you just
29:30
heard, Matthew Minsky, laying out their case
29:32
against Ray. In the
29:34
most extreme scenario for Ray, because
29:36
of the LLC's complaint, Ray
29:39
could have lost his teaching license. He
29:42
decided to create his own set of Lakota learning
29:44
materials and introduce
29:46
them at McLaughlin's School District. Mainly,
29:49
Mr. Tingled's conduct constitutes theft. Since this occurred
29:51
in Nebraska, we have to look at the
29:54
LLC's Hold up. The
29:56
LLC was accusing Ray of
29:58
theft for making
30:00
language materials with copyrighted
30:03
LLC stuff? It sure
30:05
sounds like it, which was one of Ray's
30:07
big issues from the beginning. The
30:09
idea that he could be given his
30:12
grandmother's stuff back, but still not be
30:14
entitled to use it. That's like
30:16
saying we gave you your land
30:18
back, and then accusing you of
30:20
trespassing. Did you really get your land back? This
30:23
is like Shakespearean intrigue.
30:26
The theft, the betrayal, the
30:28
fight over a family legacy. But,
30:32
Christina, after
30:35
hearing these different people express
30:37
their perspectives, I guess I'm wondering
30:39
like, who's
30:42
right? Yeah. Is
30:45
Ray justified in wanting his grandmother's
30:47
materials back and wanting the
30:49
tribe to have control over the Lakota
30:51
language? Or is the
30:54
LLC justified in wanting to hold
30:56
tight to these copyrights so
30:58
that they can continue producing
31:00
language materials that do benefit
31:02
communities? Oof.
31:07
So it depends on how
31:09
you look at that. You
31:12
can analyze it in legal terms,
31:15
in practical terms, in
31:17
ethical terms. One of
31:19
the challenges of copyright law is that
31:21
we're working within a realm
31:23
of property and making things
31:26
into property that perhaps
31:29
should never be
31:31
considered property in the first place. That's
31:34
Jane Anderson. She's a lawyer
31:36
who specializes in copyright law and
31:38
issues of indigenous sovereignty. And
31:41
so copyright law upholds a certain kind
31:43
of property logic and
31:47
that runs counter to
31:50
how indigenous peoples and
31:52
communities understand their language
31:54
materials, for instance, not
31:56
as property, but as a
31:59
culture. cultural gifts
32:02
that continue from the ancestors
32:04
into the future. That's not
32:06
property. So
32:10
Parker, there are laws
32:12
and regulations that were specifically
32:15
designed to protect Indigenous cultures.
32:18
The United Nations Declaration on the
32:20
Rights of Indigenous Peoples says, Indigenous
32:23
peoples have the right to revitalize,
32:25
use, develop and transmit their histories,
32:28
languages, oral traditions, philosophies,
32:31
writing systems, literatures. Then
32:33
there's the Native American Language Act of 1990, and
32:37
it states that it's U.S. policy to
32:39
promote the rights of Native Americans to
32:41
use, practice and develop Native American languages.
32:45
And tribal nations also have their own
32:47
protections and their own laws. In
32:49
the case of the Standing Rock Sioux Nation, where
32:51
Ray is a citizen, where Dolores was a citizen,
32:54
there's a language resolution that was passed by
32:56
tribal council, resolution 15022, in
33:00
which Standing Rock asserts,
33:02
quote, inherent retained intellectual
33:04
property rights, end
33:07
quote, in perpetuity. So forever
33:11
for anything related to the
33:13
language and anything recorded or
33:15
photos taken of any tribal member
33:18
and their descendants. That
33:21
seems pointed. It
33:23
is. Copyright law really
33:26
was not developed as a tool
33:28
to support oral cultures or
33:30
Indigenous people generally. It
33:33
was a tool to support written
33:37
cultures and to
33:39
exploit knowledge. There's already
33:41
an inherent imbalance that
33:43
sits within the law. So
33:47
all of these questions about, you
33:49
know, who controls the
33:51
Lakota language, who does it belong
33:53
to, maybe it's not
33:55
just a legal problem. It's
33:58
an ethical, it's an equity. It's
34:00
a historical justice problem.
34:05
This conversation around ownership is happening
34:08
in a lot of different
34:10
spaces. And it's changing
34:12
quickly. Jay noted that
34:14
in asking who owns the language,
34:17
we're maybe using the wrong kinds
34:19
of words and concepts. Okay,
34:22
so what would she suggest instead?
34:25
Stewardship. Hmm. And
34:28
with stewardship, a
34:31
different combination of people can be part
34:34
of decision making. Tribal
34:36
council, elders, they
34:38
can all weigh in with different levels of
34:40
authority, which leads to a
34:43
different kind of relationship, but also
34:45
different kinds of questions. How
34:47
do you look after the
34:50
ecosystem around language-speaking,
34:55
cultural knowledge that comes from language
34:58
that is a lot bigger than
35:00
just, you know, who
35:03
owns this tape? So
35:07
where does this leave Ray and Alex
35:09
right now? So Ray
35:12
got to keep his teaching license, going back
35:14
to that hearing. Alright. Yeah,
35:17
he's still doing curriculum work.
35:19
He's actually working with Marvel
35:22
to create a Lakota language dub of
35:24
the Avengers through Standing Rock. But
35:28
Ray still doesn't have the rights
35:31
to his grandmother's materials. So
35:34
he's still working with Standing Rock to figure out
35:36
a way to get them. Like
35:39
that very small and
35:41
also very big fight is
35:44
very much still happening. Alright,
35:48
what about Alex? The
36:00
Oglala Sioux Tribe passed
36:02
a resolution in January
36:04
seeking funding for LLC
36:06
programming. But Alex
36:09
is now dealing with the same big
36:11
questions that Yann was about
36:14
how to both share ownership and
36:16
maintain copyright so you can print
36:19
materials. So Ray and
36:21
Alex are kind of at
36:24
an impasse. They kind of are at an
36:26
impasse and in a way so
36:29
is the language. For
36:31
all of the work that Alex
36:34
and Ray are both doing individually,
36:36
the number of
36:38
fluent Lakota speakers has
36:40
gone down and that's
36:42
frustrating. We wouldn't be
36:44
in this situation with our language if
36:47
it weren't for the colonial systems that have been imposed on
36:49
us. For me,
36:51
the overlying mission is
36:54
to do what's best for the language and
36:57
dividing our people is not what's best for the
36:59
language. You
37:03
know, we've been talking to the
37:06
younger generation who is part of this
37:08
story now but all
37:10
of this makes me think of Dolores
37:12
again and some of what her grandfather
37:14
told her. Don't ever lose your Lakota
37:16
language. Always
37:18
remember and speak your Lakota language.
37:21
I feel like Ray and Alex
37:23
are both kind of holding fast
37:26
to that. In their own ways,
37:28
they are. But
37:30
they're focusing on different parts of the message.
37:34
Alex is focused on the don't lose it
37:36
part. He's doing everything
37:38
he can to make sure that the
37:41
Lakota language is codified and written
37:43
down and preserved so it can never
37:45
be lost. But
37:48
for Ray, it seems like the
37:50
focus is on the idea that
37:52
Lakota, this is his language. And
37:55
this language, the Lakota language, it
37:58
belongs to the Lakota people. Here's
38:01
the Lorus again. No matter
38:03
how educated you are, in
38:06
order for you to translate our
38:08
Lakota language, which is
38:11
ours, but if I speak
38:13
my truest Lakota language,
38:16
you will be able to translate
38:18
that. And
38:21
that's worth remembering too, that different
38:24
people, Jan, Wilhelm, Jane,
38:26
you, me, we can all
38:30
think about the situation and try to make
38:32
sense of it and debate who's right and
38:34
who's wrong, but maybe
38:37
there's a truer, deeper,
38:39
more fundamental part of the
38:41
story that we'll never be able
38:43
to quite capture because
38:46
it's not ours and
38:48
we don't have the words to hear it. Thanks
38:57
to our friends at NPR's Code Switch
38:59
Podcast for bringing us this important story
39:02
and check out their upcoming series
39:04
digging into the nationwide battles over
39:06
book bands. They'll be asking,
39:08
what are we fighting over and who's
39:10
engaged in the fights? And be sure
39:12
to subscribe to Code Switch wherever you
39:14
get your podcasts. This
39:17
episode was produced by Xavier Lopez,
39:19
Courtney Stein, and Christina Kala. It
39:21
was edited by Leah Danella and
39:23
Courtney Stein. Robert Rodriguez was the
39:25
engineer. A big shout out
39:27
to the rest of the Code Switch
39:30
team, Jess Kung, Dahlia Mortanda, Varylyn Williams,
39:32
Jean Denby, and Lori Lizzarraga. And
39:35
before we go, just a reminder that in a
39:37
few days, we'll be launching our new series, 40
39:40
Acres and a Lie. It's about
39:42
a pivotal period in history after the
39:44
Civil War and promises that were made
39:46
to newly freed black people and then
39:49
broken. It's a moment in
39:51
time that I thought I understood, but really
39:53
didn't. I think you'll be surprised too. Be
39:56
sure to listen starting June 15th. I'm
39:59
Al Ledson. And remember, there
40:01
is always more to the story.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More