Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Douglas is one of many who found a
0:02
new life through Seattle's Union Gospel Mission. I
0:05
was living on the streets when I heard
0:07
this guy talk about how he got clean
0:09
and sober at the mission. So
0:11
I decided to give it a try. I
0:13
could feel something working inside of me and
0:16
I knew I was getting better. Today my
0:18
number one goal is to stay clean and
0:20
sober. To
0:26
hear more, volunteer or donate, visit
0:29
ugm.org. You're
0:35
supported. WNYC Studios. Hey, Lulu
0:37
here. Whether
0:40
we are romping through science, music,
0:43
politics, technology or feelings, we seek
0:45
to leave you seeing the world
0:47
anew. Radiolab adventures right
0:49
on the edge of what we think we
0:51
know. Wherever you get podcasts.
0:58
If you're someone working at the city or municipal
1:00
level, moving the needle on a global
1:02
issue like climate change is harder than
1:04
it sounds. It was just like
1:06
a lot of whereas is. Whereas,
1:08
whereas, we're going to do this, this and this and
1:11
then it was more how do we make this real?
1:14
It's Monday, June 24th and you're
1:16
listening to Science Friday. I'm
1:19
Sci-fi producer Charles Bergquist. After
1:21
the Kyoto Protocol climate agreement of the 1990s,
1:24
many cities and municipalities developed
1:26
some kind of climate or
1:28
sustainability action plans. But
1:30
have they made a difference? This episode,
1:33
we'll talk about the challenge of bringing climate
1:35
goals to the local front. Here's
1:37
Sci-fi's John Dankoski. Climate
1:41
change is a global issue. And
1:43
so when we think about getting
1:45
carbon out of the atmosphere, we
1:47
often think about really big policies.
1:50
I'm talking about international treaties and
1:52
federal infrastructure bills worth billions of
1:54
dollars. But. Good
1:57
evening, everyone. And welcome to Pittsburgh. City
2:00
Council's public hearing for today. Climate policy
2:02
happens closer to home too. Bill
2:05
2028 resolution adopting
2:07
the Pittsburgh Climate Action
2:09
Plan which identifies targets
2:11
and strategies for greenhouse
2:13
gas emissions for the
2:16
city of Pittsburgh. Over the last 30
2:18
years, hundreds of cities across the U.S.
2:20
have adopted their own plans to cut
2:22
emissions. But are city governments on track
2:24
to meet these commitments? And what can
2:27
one city really do about a global
2:29
problem? Susan Scott Peterson is
2:31
a climate reporter in Pittsburgh who's been covering
2:33
this. Welcome to Science Friday, Susan. Thanks so
2:35
much for having me. Okay, to start off,
2:38
tell me why exactly you've been reporting on
2:40
climate policy in cities. Well,
2:42
it actually started because I had something
2:44
I was curious about about my past
2:46
because I used to work in city government.
2:49
This was back when I was in my
2:51
20s and I was in Austin and so
2:53
young and naive and wearing business casual to
2:55
the office every day. And this was back
2:57
in 2008 and we had a climate protection
3:01
plan for the city. And
3:03
I remember feeling at the time like
3:05
climate change is huge and big and
3:07
scary and urgent, but we
3:09
have a plan, right? And so a
3:12
few years later, 2020 came around and
3:14
I just remember wondering like, whatever happened to that?
3:16
Did we ever meet any of those goals? You
3:19
know, it's a great question because I remember
3:22
having the same questions when I started to
3:24
see these goals come across from different cities
3:26
because climate change is a global issue. So what
3:28
difference do you think a city climate plan can
3:30
actually make? Okay, I'm going to start
3:32
by just telling you a little bit about the history of
3:35
this. It kind of got started back in 2005 when
3:38
the world ratified the Kyoto Protocol, which
3:40
was the first big international climate treaty,
3:43
but the US didn't ratify it.
3:45
And that's how cities kind of
3:47
got involved. I talked to
3:49
this woman named Hillary Varnador. Hillary is
3:52
like hilarious. H-I-L-A-R-I and then Varnador is
3:54
via in Victor. And she is the
3:56
vice president for cities at the US
3:58
Green Building Council. And she told
4:00
me when the US didn't ratify Kyoto, that
4:03
was when city mayors all over the country decided
4:05
to do something about it. So they
4:07
got together and they signed on to an agreement
4:09
that was kind of like their own mini Kyoto
4:11
protocol, and they made climate
4:13
promises for their cities. So this
4:16
was like our first big wave
4:18
of mayors saying, even if our
4:20
country isn't gonna sign on and
4:22
participate, we're right here in the front
4:24
lines. And so all of this happened almost 20
4:26
years ago now. And today there
4:28
are hundreds of cities across the US that have
4:31
their own climate policies. Okay, so
4:33
the idea of this is a bunch of
4:35
cities with climate targets is better than nothing.
4:37
Yeah, I think that's kind of it, but I also think
4:39
there are other good reasons for cities to have climate plans.
4:42
One of them is that something like 70% of
4:45
greenhouse gas emissions come from cities. And so if
4:47
you wanna go after climate change, you really need
4:49
policies at the city level. And
4:52
the other thing is that cities are also
4:54
where a lot of the climate impacts are
4:56
happening. There are a lot of people living in
4:58
cities. There's a lot of expensive infrastructure
5:00
and resources to support them. And so when
5:03
there's something like a heat wave or a
5:05
flood or a hurricane, cities are really vulnerable.
5:08
Okay, so when we're talking about a city climate plan,
5:10
what exactly is it? What is one of these things
5:12
look like? So in the beginning,
5:14
it was mostly mayors making proclamations and
5:16
resolutions. This is Hilary Barnador again. It
5:19
was just like a lot of whereas
5:21
is, whereas, whereas, we're gonna
5:23
do this, this, and this. And then it was
5:25
more, how do we make this real? So
5:27
eventually, cities needed to put someone in charge
5:29
of actually doing something. And so
5:32
they created a totally new job. My
5:34
name is Vivian Satterfield, and I'm
5:36
the chief sustainability officer at the
5:38
city of Portland. Ava Richardson, sustainability
5:40
director for the Baltimore City Office.
5:42
My name is Elizabeth Babcock. I'm
5:44
the executive director of Denver's Office
5:46
of Climate Action Sustainability. I'm Flor
5:49
Marion. I'm the assistant director for
5:51
Sustainability and Resilience. And these
5:53
city sustainability officers were in charge of
5:55
figuring out how to turn the mayor's
5:57
resolutions. I call them the whereas's,
5:59
actually. do. Into this
6:01
thing we call a climate action plan, which
6:04
is basically a document with a bunch of
6:06
different strategies like adding renewable
6:08
energy or building bike infrastructure or capturing
6:11
methane from landfills. And all
6:13
of those strategies roll up to a climate goal. Okay,
6:16
a climate goal, what exactly is a climate goal? So it's
6:19
usually a decarbonization goal with a deadline.
6:21
So for example, a lot of cities
6:23
have an 80 by 50 goal, and that
6:25
means an 80% reduction in carbon emissions
6:27
by the year 2050. Okay, I've heard of
6:29
a lot of these. What exactly is a
6:31
target like that based on? I mean, is
6:34
there any science that goes into making these
6:36
goals? Yeah, so the 80 by
6:38
50 goals are roughly aligned with what scientists
6:40
said would limit global warming to about two
6:42
degrees Celsius. But this was back around the
6:45
time of the Kyoto Protocol, and
6:47
the science has changed. So now scientists say we
6:49
should limit warming to one and a half degrees
6:51
Celsius. And so to get there, global
6:54
emissions have to be cut as soon as possible
6:56
to net zero by the year 2050. And most
6:59
cities haven't adopted that target yet. Yeah,
7:02
we see this in a lot of
7:04
areas of science policy, there's this huge
7:06
lag time between the science and the
7:08
actual policy. Right. And I guess I'll
7:10
also add that it is hard for
7:12
cities to update their carbon targets when
7:14
they're in the middle of dealing increasingly
7:16
with actual climate change all at the
7:18
same time. We have
7:20
lots of greenways and urban forests. We're
7:22
very lucky in that sense. Flormarian directs
7:24
sustainability in Pittsburgh, which is where I
7:26
live. And she told me about a
7:28
climate related issue that's started cropping up
7:31
here. But it also
7:33
comes with lots of issues around
7:35
invasive species and precipitation. And
7:37
so the amount of landslide happening around
7:39
the city are increasing. And that's a
7:41
huge budget cost for us. And that
7:43
really struck me what she said about
7:46
landslides being a huge budget cost. Because
7:48
I feel like one of the old cliches about
7:50
city government is that all they do is run
7:52
around fixing potholes. But it's
7:55
almost like landslides are becoming the
7:57
new potholes along with drought and heat
7:59
domes. even
10:00
more complicated is that these cities
10:02
are counting carbon emissions differently. Like
10:05
some cities are only tracking carbon
10:07
from their city government operations, like
10:09
municipal buildings and city vehicle fleets.
10:12
Other places are tracking whole city emissions,
10:14
but they all have their own methodologies.
10:17
So what you're saying is that Portland
10:19
and Pittsburgh aren't even counting the same
10:21
things. Right. So that means
10:23
that you can't compare these cities to each other and you
10:26
really can't make any statements about them overall
10:28
as a group. But what I
10:30
can tell you is what the people in the
10:32
four individual cities I reported on told me. This
10:35
is Kyle Deisner, who is a climate policy analyst for
10:37
the city of Portland. So our
10:39
emissions currently are 21 percent below
10:41
1990 levels. But
10:44
I think it's helpful to understand that from 1990
10:47
our emissions continued to climb until
10:49
2000 and they've
10:51
been falling ever since 2000. So we're
10:53
actually 30 percent below the 2000 peak.
10:56
And so what Portland is reporting here is roughly
10:59
in line with what I heard from the other
11:01
cities, Denver and Pittsburgh and Baltimore. They
11:03
also told me they've cut emissions by between 20 and 30 percent. So
11:07
I don't know. That sounds like pretty good news, doesn't
11:09
it? But is that enough?
11:11
I mean, are we going to save the planet
11:13
with cities cutting 20 and 30 percent of emissions?
11:16
No, no, we're not. We're
11:19
not, of course. So this does not surprise me.
11:21
But tell me more. Yeah. So I
11:23
think the sense I got from my reporting is that
11:25
a lot of the low hanging fruit has already been
11:27
gathered. It gets harder and harder
11:30
to make deeper cuts from here. It's getting
11:32
more urgent. And cities are really running up
11:34
against a lot of barriers. Okay. Like what
11:36
kind of barriers? Well, some of it's just
11:39
political cycles. Like these targets are big public
11:41
mayoral announcements. But then eventually a new mayor
11:43
gets elected and their administration may have different
11:45
priorities. Yeah. I mean, that makes sense, right?
11:48
Different priorities with the administration. Yeah. But so
11:50
there's this other thing that I heard about when I
11:52
was reporting, and it seems very mundane,
11:55
but it's actually a really big deal. And
11:57
that's just that these sustainability directors are spending.
18:00
and I have never met anyone that was just
18:02
there for ease or
18:05
whatever people assumptions are.
18:07
Everybody is really working
18:09
tirelessly to make the city a better
18:11
place for everyone. And that's, I'm
18:14
really proud to work with these people. I
18:16
don't know if we're gonna do all of the work on time, but
18:19
making sure we're bringing joy to
18:22
our community right now is important.
18:26
I asked her where she's finding joy right now. And
18:29
she said that one of the things is the
18:31
new stormwater code. And I
18:34
have to say that as a former city government employee,
18:36
that is my kind of joy. That's
18:39
great, Susan. Thanks so much for your reporting, I
18:41
appreciate it. Thank you for having me. Susan
18:44
Scott Peterson is a climate reporter
18:47
in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. You can read
18:49
more about this issue and what
18:51
cities are doing about it on
18:54
our website, sciencefriday.com/climate policy. That's
18:56
all the time we have for now.
18:59
A lot of folks helped make the
19:01
show happen this week, including. Rasha Uridi.
19:03
Dean Petersmith. Sandy Roberts. Shoshana Buxbaum. And
19:06
many more. Next time, Lost
19:08
Birds, how researchers are harnessing
19:10
crowdsourced data to identify and locate birds
19:13
that haven't been spotted in over a
19:15
decade. But for now,
19:17
I'm Sci-fi producer Charles Bergquist. Thanks for
19:19
listening, we'll see you soon. Douglas
19:25
is one of many who found a new life through
19:28
Seattle's Union Gospel Mission. I was living on
19:30
the streets when I heard this guy talk
19:33
about how he got clean and sober at
19:35
the mission. So I decided to give it
19:37
a try. I could feel something working inside
19:40
of me and I knew I was getting
19:42
better. Today, my number one goal is to
19:44
stay clean and sober. And
19:47
grace will lead me
19:49
home. To hear more,
19:51
volunteer or donate, visit
19:53
ugm.org. No
20:05
matter what tasty choice you make, you'll enjoy
20:07
our everyday low prices. Plus, extra ways to
20:09
save, like digital coupons worth over $600 each
20:11
week. You can
20:14
also save up to $1 off per gallon at
20:16
the pump with fuel points. More
20:18
savings and more inspiring flavors. apply.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More