Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:03
About half of US states
0:05
have legalized recreational cannabis, but
0:08
studying it is still very tricky
0:10
business. When we first
0:12
started thinking about doing cannabis research, we thought
0:14
we're going to bring people into the
0:16
lab and give them different products and see
0:19
what happens. And we very quickly
0:21
learned that it turns out that is illegal.
0:24
It's Monday, May 28th, and this is
0:26
Science Friday. I'm SciFry
0:28
producer Rasha Aredi. Earlier
0:30
this month, the Department of Justice proposed
0:32
that cannabis should be changed from Schedule
0:34
1 to Schedule 3, knocking
0:37
it down a couple of pegs in
0:39
the hierarchy of restricted drugs. So,
0:41
could this affect how scientists research
0:43
cannabis? SciFry digital producer Emma
0:46
Gomez and I dug into this question.
0:50
The Department of Justice is moving to
0:52
reclassify cannabis as a less dangerous drug
0:54
under the Controlled Substances Act. Although
0:57
if you asked my dad, he would probably say they
0:59
should make an entirely new, even more
1:02
dangerous category for weed. Anyway,
1:04
cannabis is legal in some form or another
1:06
in over half of the US, including where
1:08
I live in New York. And
1:10
where I live in Washington, DC. But
1:13
federally, it's illegal and considered
1:15
a Schedule 1 substance, meaning
1:17
that the Drug Enforcement Agency,
1:19
or the DEA, says that
1:21
it has no accepted medical use and a
1:23
high potential for abuse. In
1:26
this category, alongside cannabis, are drugs like
1:28
heroin and ecstasy. But if
1:30
this plan goes through, cannabis will drop down to
1:32
a Schedule 3 drug, putting it
1:34
on the same level as drugs like
1:36
ketamine and some steroids. The
1:39
DEA says drugs in this category
1:41
have a moderate to low potential
1:43
for dependence. And it's
1:45
kind of set the cannabis industry abuzz.
1:47
To my parents listening, this change
1:50
will not affect me, nor my
1:52
esteemed colleague Rasha. We would
1:54
never consider doing anything federally illegal, even if
1:56
it is legal in my state. Right, Rasha?
1:59
Yes, Of course. Wouldn't dare Mom and
2:01
Dad wouldn't dare. Let's
2:05
go back to your history books. We'd
2:07
wasn't supposed to be a schedule
2:09
one drug in the first place.
2:11
In Nineteen Seventy, President Nixon's line
2:13
to the Controlled Substances Act into
2:16
law canada classified as a schedule
2:18
one drug just temporarily until his
2:20
commission could review that science is
2:22
to make a recommendation. And they
2:25
did. They said that we should
2:27
be decriminalize altogether ak a he
2:29
can of the list completely just
2:31
like alcohol is. But Nixon ignored
2:34
that recommendation and continue to wage
2:36
this. War on Drugs, one that
2:38
spanned through many administration's now. So
2:40
as a result, Wheat has been
2:42
at the top of the drug
2:44
classification pyramid for decades now. Now.
2:48
This move wouldn't decriminalize cannabis, it mostly
2:50
just acknowledges that it had shown the
2:53
proved medical uses and doctors would be
2:55
allowed to prescribe it instead of just
2:57
recommending it like they do now. But.
3:00
Having it without a prescription but still be illegal under
3:02
federal law. So. How do
3:04
scientists study cannabis use now? And
3:06
would this reclassification make research more
3:08
accessible are easier for them? Because.
3:11
As you can imagine, Giving. Someone in
3:13
a legal substance and studying what happens
3:15
to them. It's a challenging. Last
3:18
fall a man I went out
3:20
to Colorado which was the very
3:22
first date alongside Washington to legalize
3:24
recreational cannabis. And then I talked
3:27
with scientists at the University of
3:29
Colorado Schemes lab in Boulder which
3:31
that is cannabis use and they
3:33
come up with the way to
3:35
skirt around these really strict federal
3:37
road blocks in order to study
3:40
what's going on the market. Enter
3:42
the See You Change Mobile Lab
3:44
affectionately known as the Canavan. At
3:51
the helm of this project or
3:53
psychologist Dr. Cinnamon Bedwell and Doctor
3:55
Angela Bryan, we sat down with
3:58
Angela. When we say. Started
4:00
thinking about doing cannabis research and in
4:02
a legalization had just happened and we
4:05
thought wow it's this brave new world
4:07
of doing research on the potential risks
4:09
and benefits of cannabis legalization. We're going
4:11
to bring people into the lab and
4:14
give them different products and see what
4:16
happens and we very quickly learned that
4:18
it turns out that is illegal arms
4:21
so we landed on the solution of
4:23
well as we can't bring the people
4:25
to the lab will bring the lab
4:28
to the people. These vans basically
4:30
have a built in lab. One.
4:32
Damn belong to a project that has
4:34
how different levels of Thc or Cbd
4:36
affect how you remember information. If
4:38
you sign up to participate, the team will drive over
4:40
to your place and you'll meet them inside the then.
4:43
Eventually Lopez is a research assistant at the
4:45
lab. And that day. I. Was
4:47
her guinea pig? Have you had
4:49
caffeine or tobacco in the last four hours? I've
4:52
had caffeine and last for hours. In
4:54
that scenario we would say and have
4:56
to reschedule. You and for him.
4:59
Try to make sure that
5:01
everyone that like very natural
5:03
baseline and and then and
5:05
nevermind a survey. And
5:08
you will also as if our but
5:10
has there has any alcohol or cannabis
5:12
for the last twenty four hour. Out
5:15
of the Last Night Live. Twice?
5:20
Okay. If.
5:23
This was really part of the experiment. I would have done
5:26
a blood test and then in. Eg, which measures
5:28
electrical activity in the brain. At.
5:30
This point I'd hypothetically go home and
5:33
use the we're This lab work said
5:35
local dispenser used to monitor who gets
5:37
what kind of cannabis products so they
5:39
can control experiments And so after I
5:41
pretend passed on my mind blind I
5:43
go back to the van and repeat
5:45
oldest have to get. And. How
5:49
we'd have. Enough money
5:51
for a few years ago. They compared
5:53
how different strength the cannabis products ranging
5:55
from sixteen to nineteen. A
6:00
huge. Difference and potency. The T
6:03
V impair people's memories and a
6:05
similar way. Okay,
6:07
So studying memory is one way
6:09
this team is trying to unravel
6:11
how we'd affect the body. Another
6:13
set of experiments is looking at
6:15
aging, specifically with adults older than
6:17
sixty. They're one of the fastest
6:19
growing demographics of cannabis users in
6:21
the U S. Since we'd can
6:23
help with fleet Joint pain mood
6:25
anxiety. Doctor Angel Bryant, the leader
6:27
of this project has some questions
6:29
about it. First. Of all,
6:31
do they see any benefits from using
6:34
these products for those and outcomes. But
6:36
also what risks do we need to
6:38
think about with older adults? I'm using
6:40
cannabis sell For older adults I would
6:42
ask about things like are you dizzy?
6:44
Are you gonna fall down We know
6:46
that falls are one of the things
6:48
that compromises quality of life more than
6:51
just about anything else. For older adults,
6:53
you know we're looking at things like
6:55
balance and memories and shan and cognitive
6:57
function And then we look at the
6:59
potential benefits that they're experiencing. Arm based
7:01
on which product they're taking. This project
7:03
measures the health effects of weed on
7:05
older adults and it's research assistant Have
7:07
seen just how much it affects protests
7:09
and on a personal level. Year on
7:12
Madeleines Singer and for me. So for.
7:14
The. we had of her to settle on while ago who.
7:17
They. Hide. I think they had. Had throat
7:19
cancer or something like that. Answer: yeah lot
7:21
of on like nerve damage from surgeries and
7:23
he had been on all kinds of different
7:25
prescriptions and then he tried his product and
7:28
he was like i don't feel it anymore
7:30
Really cool stories like that. A really great
7:32
the I like it when people tell me
7:34
is not working either because like we need
7:37
to know like the whole point is Snelling
7:39
what's working, what's not working. Why are we
7:41
missing? Like what do we are in know
7:43
things like that. Okay so. We've talked about
7:46
how the food. Chain scientists are digging
7:48
into the effects. Of Cannabis on
7:50
memory on older adults and the
7:52
Last Element. We're. Going. To get into
7:54
is the effect on exercise. And.
7:56
I know you're thinking that smoking weed would
7:59
usually make someone. Lay down and take a
8:01
long nap. Not. Run a marathon.
8:03
But. The face of it might surprise you.
8:06
Your. To Angela again. One. Of
8:08
the things on canvas legalization happens for
8:10
me was oh my gosh. I mean
8:13
I have the same stereotypes everybody else
8:15
does is everyone's gonna be using a
8:17
lot of cannabis and sitting on the
8:20
couch eating doritos? What is that? the
8:22
the physical activity and Fiat. But I
8:24
quickly learned that actually there's this interesting
8:27
paradox that cannabis use said cannabis users
8:29
in big epidemiological studies stay have lower
8:31
risk for type two diabetes, lower be
8:34
am I better ways to hip ratio
8:36
better and son function. And
8:38
I was like why it's so
8:40
It's this interesting paradox, right? Do
8:42
we know the mechanism of how
8:44
that happened? We don't We don't.
8:46
What I will tell you is
8:49
that a lot of the recent
8:51
work that selling associations between said
8:53
have it's uses Physical activity in
8:55
particular have been done in states
8:57
that have legalized Colorado. California.
9:00
Oregon, Washington, Washington D C what
9:02
is a states also have in
9:04
common highest rates of physical activity
9:06
in the nation So I say
9:08
all this with a bit of
9:10
a grain of salt because we
9:12
don't know if this association holds
9:14
across the whole country in every
9:16
state on but that said graduate
9:18
student who just finished and did
9:20
a study where we use of
9:22
hands you go to people's houses
9:24
we drew blood day went inside
9:26
and use their flower cannabis products.
9:28
We drove. Them back to the lab
9:30
and they ran on a treadmill for
9:32
thirty minutes. Why? And we did that
9:34
with. These
9:37
were people who were experience at
9:39
doing that. So we recruited people
9:41
who use Yahoo their runners They
9:43
use cannabis, so they did this
9:45
once under the influence of either
9:48
a Thc product or a Cbd
9:50
products and then once without using
9:52
cannabis and we compared their experience.
9:54
They had a better experience. stay
9:56
on salt, more of the runner's
9:58
high ceiling. Even. Though they were. doing the
10:00
exact same running activity at the exact
10:03
same intensity, the two sessions.
10:05
So we think there might be something
10:07
about the experience of physical activity during
10:09
cannabis use that makes the
10:12
two have a linkage. But
10:16
again, we're some of the first people to be
10:18
doing that work because we have the VAN technology
10:20
to be able to do it, but it's really
10:22
exciting to think about. So that's one
10:25
of the- You're just breaking my brain here. Everything
10:28
I know is a lie. I know,
10:30
I know. The
10:33
folks at CU Change are clearly working to
10:35
get a lot of answers to a lot
10:37
of questions. So what happens next?
10:39
And what do they do with this information?
10:42
There are a few different constituencies that we think
10:44
about in all of this work. Most
10:47
important are the people who are using
10:49
these products. I think, you know, whether
10:51
you're using them recreationally or there's some
10:54
medical benefit that you'd like to
10:56
get from using these products, I think
10:58
we need more information to be able
11:00
to tell you what are the potential
11:02
harms and benefits of different kinds of
11:04
preparations of different levels of THC and
11:06
CBD. The
11:09
other constituency is medical providers.
11:11
So in the context of
11:13
people who are wanting to use medicinally, they'll go
11:15
to their providers and they'll say, you know, I
11:17
think I want to try cannabis for my pain.
11:20
And for the most part, the data
11:22
show that doctors respond to that favorably,
11:25
but the answer is, okay,
11:27
sounds good. I don't know
11:29
what to tell you. Oh no, not what you want
11:32
to hear from a doctor. Not what you want to
11:34
hear from a doctor. And especially if you're a cancer
11:36
patient. So we'd like
11:38
for medical providers to have more
11:40
information. And then the third constituency
11:42
is the regulatory bodies, right? So
11:45
people who are making the rules about, you know, maybe
11:47
it's not a good idea that we have 95% THC
11:49
concentrates on
11:52
the market. Maybe that's too much, but
11:54
we don't know. Because we don't have
11:56
those data yet. And, you know, in terms
11:58
of the products that people can purchase. if
12:00
I'm going to buy a topical or
12:02
a tincture or whatever, I'd
12:05
like to know, well, is that going to do
12:07
anything for me? Or am I spending money for
12:09
something that really isn't going to have any impact?
12:11
Like gimmicky. Exactly. Just
12:15
this week, a new study from the
12:17
National Survey on Drug Use and Health
12:19
reported that more people are consuming weed
12:21
every day than there are people drinking
12:23
alcohol on a daily basis. So
12:25
untangling the science is more important than ever.
12:28
But why haven't we figured it out yet? Part
12:31
of it basically boils down to having very
12:33
tight rules. It's because of
12:35
the way the National Institutes of Health sets
12:37
up the funding structure for this work. Because
12:40
cannabis was put on the Schedule
12:43
I list of drugs, we
12:45
were really for many years only
12:47
able to study it in the
12:49
context of abuse. And
12:51
we were also only allowed to
12:54
study the product that's grown by
12:56
the National Institute on Drug Abuse on
12:59
one specific farm in Mississippi. So if you wanted
13:01
to study weed, you would have had to special
13:03
order it from this one farm at the
13:05
University of Mississippi. But the
13:07
quality of their product wasn't good.
13:09
One scientist described it as a
13:11
mishmash of stems, sticks, and leaves
13:14
and claimed that it had yeast and mold growing on
13:16
it. Angela tried it in an
13:18
experiment once. We
13:21
used that substance and promised ourselves after that,
13:24
we wouldn't study cannabis anymore because it
13:26
was so awful. Participants
13:29
were vomiting. And these were regular
13:31
cannabis users. So not
13:33
only was the quality really poor, the
13:35
THC in it was a lot lower
13:37
than the products you'd find in a dispensary.
13:40
One study from 2017 found that the cannabis
13:42
grown at that farm in Mississippi contained
13:44
about 5% THC, whereas
13:47
products and dispensaries around the country could contain
13:49
about 15 to 20%. So
13:53
the government grown weed doesn't really give you a full picture
13:56
and also you might vomit. Earlier
13:58
in Biden's tenure, the DEA... more
14:00
growers than just that one Mississippi farm, which
14:02
could mean more options for research. But
14:05
the registration and transaction processes to
14:07
get research-grade cannabis are no joke.
14:10
It takes time, effort, and cash
14:12
to get cannabis products for human
14:15
experiments. Not to mention approval
14:17
from the FDA, the IRB, and sometimes
14:19
local narcotics boards. It's the way that
14:21
the federal regulations were written that
14:23
prevented us from doing all
14:26
the work that needed to be done. So
14:28
it's really legalization that's opened up the
14:30
opportunity for us to study these products
14:32
that people are using. I'm just
14:35
so surprised at how bad the government
14:37
weed is, so to call it. Yeah,
14:39
and I will say it's definitely getting
14:41
better. But the problem is,
14:43
you know, if you look at the commercialization
14:46
of cannabis, right, like I'm, I don't know
14:48
if you're gonna go to dispensaries while you're
14:50
here, but you walk in and there's hundreds
14:53
of products, right? And people are
14:55
making a lot of money designing
14:57
all kinds of different cannabis products.
14:59
There's no way the federal government
15:01
is gonna keep up with that
15:03
kind of commercialization. And so
15:05
they're just so far behind this multi-million
15:08
dollar industry that I just, I don't
15:10
see them catching up. And so I
15:12
feel like the way forward really is
15:14
to study the products that exist on
15:16
the legal market that people can, you
15:19
know, we can go to any dispensary
15:21
in town and have our pick of.
15:23
Those are the things we need to
15:25
be studying, not the things that, the
15:27
limited range of things now that are
15:30
being grown by the government. So
15:32
this brings us back to the question, will
15:35
the reclassification of cannabis from a Schedule 1
15:37
drug to a Schedule 3 change anything
15:39
for researchers like Angela? She says no.
15:42
I wish I could
15:45
say I'm optimistic about
15:47
legislation because if it's on the schedule
15:49
we have to keep doing what we're doing. So
15:52
unless it's completely taken off, it won't
15:54
change for us. What I hope happens
15:56
is that it's regulated in much the
15:58
same way that alcohol halls regulated. So
16:02
it's interesting because we've we and
16:04
lots of other labs around the
16:06
country have done work where
16:08
we bring people in we give them you
16:10
know a measured dose of alcohol and we
16:12
look at how it impacts the brain and
16:14
and performance on tasks and social behavior and
16:17
things like that. And so
16:19
I would love it if cannabis
16:21
regulations allowed us to do that
16:23
same kind of research with cannabis products.
16:27
But this reclassification might make it easier for
16:29
scientists to study the weed grown from that
16:31
list of the DEA's approved growers. But
16:34
one of the biggest changes might actually
16:36
come from the FDA. So you'll remember
16:38
that when a drug is classified as
16:40
Schedule 1 there are no accepted medical
16:42
uses for it. So the FDA
16:44
hasn't made any standards for its production. But
16:47
if it becomes Schedule 3 that
16:49
acknowledges that there can be acceptable medical
16:51
uses for that drug. So the
16:54
FDA can finally come in and say hey these are
16:57
some guidelines for how to produce medical cannabis
16:59
in a way that we say is safe
17:01
for human consumption. On
17:04
the business side of things this reclassification
17:06
is a major deal. Folks in the
17:08
industry will be able to access normal
17:11
banking and credit and it'll ease up
17:13
on the tax burden for cannabis businesses
17:15
or canna businesses which could
17:18
make it ultimately a little more affordable
17:20
for customers. To learn more about
17:22
how federal rules affect research on
17:24
cannabis check out our reporting
17:26
at science friday.com/cannabis. Special
17:29
thanks to all the researchers we spoke with
17:31
in Colorado, Dr. Ziva Cooper and to D.
17:33
Peter Schmidt for composing the music. I'm
17:35
Emma Gomez. And I'm Rasha Uridi.
17:38
Thanks to all the folks who
17:40
helped make this show happen including
17:42
Eframi Santiago Flores, Diana
17:44
Plaster, John Dankoski,
17:46
Robin Kasmer. On tomorrow's
17:49
episode we check in on the state
17:51
of high-speed railroads. Join us.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More