Podchaser Logo
Home
How do we survive the media apocalypse?

How do we survive the media apocalypse?

Released Friday, 15th March 2024
 2 people rated this episode
How do we survive the media apocalypse?

How do we survive the media apocalypse?

How do we survive the media apocalypse?

How do we survive the media apocalypse?

Friday, 15th March 2024
 2 people rated this episode
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Welcome. To search engine and Pj vote. Every.

0:02

Week on the show. Answer a question we

0:04

have that the world. No question. too big.

0:06

No question too small. This week. Should.

0:09

We be concerned that the news web sites

0:11

all seem to be disappearing. That.

0:13

Address man's. Search.

0:16

Engine is brought to you by Discover. When it comes

0:18

to your finances, go for the credit card that's always

0:21

there for you. With. Twenty Four seven

0:23

Us based live customer service from Discover. Everyone

0:25

has the option to talk to real person

0:27

any time, day or night. Yep, that

0:29

means no more waiting for quote normal

0:31

business hours just to get a hold of

0:34

someone pretending real service from real people whenever

0:36

he needed. Get the customer service you deserve

0:38

with Discover! Limitations. Apply see

0:40

terms at discover.com Such credit card.

0:43

I'm. Glen Entire other than tamed and

0:45

host of the podcast. He can do

0:48

hard things on. We Can do hard

0:50

things. My wife, Abby, my sister, Amanda

0:52

and I talk honestly about the hard

0:54

parts of life. join us and guests

0:57

like Michelle Obama, Tracy, Alice Ross and

0:59

Burn A Brown as we have refreshingly

1:01

honest conversations. New episodes or out every

1:04

to see their sex and listen to

1:06

and follow. We Can Do Hard Things

1:08

In Odyssey Podcast available now for Fi

1:10

An Odyssey out and everywhere you get

1:13

your podcasts. Are

1:39

given region intro eyebrows I haven't

1:42

even. Totally. Settled on the

1:44

question here which is fine right now my

1:46

of beauty of fact that have better for

1:48

it should we be concerned that the news

1:50

website seem to be disappearing. Is meteor factors

1:52

better Honestly. From want

1:54

a curse? or get your the

1:56

intro. In mid January,

1:59

much of the. That on the media

2:01

curvy website Pitchfork was laid off. It was

2:03

increasingly familiar. Moment on my corner, the internet.

2:06

A. Lot of news and news you website

2:08

said felt like institutions are dying. I've

2:11

been shut down or losing most of

2:13

their Sat and then continuing in an

2:15

under new management, but it's mostly freelancers

2:17

or artificial intelligence sort of where. There's.

2:21

A long list of destroyed and decimated

2:23

website the people up and reciting. Buyouts:

2:26

At the Washington Post lay offs as L

2:28

A times as feed news is gone, Sports

2:30

Illustrated has been gutted. Gawker has been raised

2:32

from the dead and killed again three times

2:35

since I started recording this intro. To.

2:37

Do a Lot written about This A

2:39

lot of anguish by journalists who are

2:42

understandably upset that their industry is being

2:44

seemingly destroyed. In a

2:46

New Yorker writer Claire, my own ass

2:48

is media is prepared for quote and

2:50

extinction level event. The illustration was a

2:52

picture of a comet hitting the earth.

2:55

The dinosaurs were all named after publications.

2:57

A slight trade. As

2:59

journalists obviously bothers me, but I

3:01

get that non journalists might not

3:04

immediately care. I

3:06

wanted to have a conversation about what

3:08

all this mean. So for people who depend

3:10

on journalism to understand the world which

3:12

is everybody, whether they directly consume journalism

3:14

or not. When. Pitchfork

3:16

was decimated. There were a string of

3:18

lovely eulogies from journalists about with the

3:20

sediment. Them. As. A New

3:23

York Times writer as Reclaimer this piece

3:25

of is not just about Pitchfork exactly

3:27

but also about this strange moment are

3:29

experiencing. It. Seem to capture what

3:31

may be sitting under our feet right now. As

3:34

Or is a host of the As Or

3:36

klein out a repeat search engine guests returning

3:38

to the Octagon. I wanted

3:40

to ask him about what he thinks may be happening.

3:43

And whether he has a plan for how we're

3:45

supposed to get reliable information in road where they're

3:48

firing the journalists and to leading the web sites

3:50

they wrote for. As.

3:52

I. Was. A message I'm devastated

3:54

to beat. or think I prefer a

3:56

fast You don't seem totally concerned. I

3:58

don't seem to. I. Don't think

4:00

concerned, you just seem smiley this morning. I guess you

4:02

can the have bus Young's the same time. I

4:06

think our i mean my whole job is

4:08

covering things that are bad in the world.

4:10

You have to maintain a separate in interpersonal

4:13

aspect, right is how walk around to Psych.

4:15

I'd be happy to see you and not

4:17

happy about the destruction of my industry. You

4:19

don't have to be a media.is my first

4:21

that and so we've talked about. As a

4:23

little bit offline, I emailed you without my

4:25

concerns you send me some a mix of

4:28

its notes were you disagree with our to

4:30

my premise. I'm before you know

4:32

that I just want a lake set

4:34

up have like the backstory that us

4:36

to. As the weather's like

4:38

ludicrously early. In. The argument is

4:41

that where moment where the internet is Angie Media

4:43

I soon as you at the first time that

4:45

happens there's a time for either of us are

4:47

to media where the news business was a very

4:49

good business is like a series of. Relatively

4:52

profitable local monopolies. Key, just like

4:54

Dramatize, have a tap on. Yeah.

4:57

I think it's helpful actually to

4:59

to commit this from the perspective

5:01

of competitions. okay and competition and

5:03

it or one of the media's

5:06

main villains Peter T over the

5:08

whole book about this competition which

5:10

com is like. Is. Bad

5:12

William that everywhere it's greets lot

5:14

of innovation result of efficiency, but

5:16

in a perfectly competitive market, the

5:18

marginal profit goes down to functionally

5:20

zero. right? The more profit

5:22

you have in a market, the more

5:25

inefficiency you haven't. A market. Monopolies create

5:27

a lot of profit. Patents create a

5:29

lot of process. What was. The.

5:32

Rain, in fact of media for very

5:34

long time was that space had created

5:36

in efficiency. Me, no different newspapers dominated

5:38

different places. Right times dominated along with

5:40

The Post and the Daily News New

5:43

York, The L A Times I'm in

5:45

Southern California. I also the Oh She

5:47

Register where I grew up. Newspapers part

5:49

to be have local monopolies and that

5:51

gave them a business model. If you

5:54

were an advertiser who wanted to tell

5:56

people about shoes you advertise in the

5:58

Alley Times, The L A Times took

6:00

your money. That was about trying to

6:02

get people to buy shoes and use

6:04

that to fund like a dozen foreign

6:07

bureaus. It it was very strange business

6:09

by, but it worked very well. See

6:12

you had a period in the news

6:14

but most of the period than the

6:17

news but definitely people think of as

6:19

the the heyday of profits were what

6:21

the news business was selling was a

6:24

local advertising monopoly the Us and that

6:26

was very profitable and crucially that sustain

6:28

a lot of different players who are

6:30

not really in competition with each other.

6:33

When I grew up in Southern California

6:35

been York Times is probably net net

6:37

a better paper than the only times.

6:40

I never ever read a New York Times, right?

6:43

I barely ever saw one occasionally go to like

6:45

the bookstore and sometimes they would have a Sunday

6:47

New York Times for weirdos who had to spend

6:49

money on that, but it just had. The New

6:51

York Times had no relevance in my life. Yes,

6:54

Now the New York Times is I

6:56

think the biggest paper in California. The.

6:59

Key thing happening right now is all the

7:01

general interest players are in competition with each

7:04

other and that's going to have a kind

7:06

of natural a fact of if you're only

7:08

Mrs cab to one large news bundle, going

7:10

to the to the largest news bundle. You

7:13

went from a situation where the Baltimore Sun and

7:15

the L A Times and the New York Times

7:18

and like the Dallas Morning News for not competing

7:20

with each other D S to a situation where

7:22

they were sending eat are often hear people say

7:24

in American society as. Lucky as

7:27

it used as as competition. Was

7:29

kind of in someplace a bad thing, and

7:31

monopoly was kind of, in some ways a

7:34

good thing historically. Yes, Surprising.

7:36

Thing to say. Yeah.

7:39

It shouldn't be that surprising. Why?

7:41

armor? I'm not saying

7:43

monopoly is great and yeah, we're a

7:45

lot of problems with those kind of

7:48

local monopoly papers and who are the

7:50

gatekeepers and who made the decisions about

7:52

what was in the news. But in

7:54

efficiency is often good rom I sometimes

7:56

described as as benevolent inefficiency or benign

7:58

and efficiency you don't. One, everything optimized

8:00

within an inch of it's life Because

8:03

you need things that maybe don't immediately

8:05

net out in terms of how much

8:07

money they make The i have other

8:09

kinds of social guy that so when

8:11

it is a fundamental facts about journalism.

8:14

That. Is very unnerving. Is

8:17

it the most profitable kinds

8:19

of journalism? Are.

8:22

Often. Times, the least important kinds

8:24

of journalism and the most important

8:27

kind of journalism are often the

8:29

least profitable kinds of journalism. So

8:31

to give a a just canonical

8:34

example here: Warm Reporting Yeah, two

8:36

things about War bring it is

8:38

incredibly incredibly fucking expensive. You are

8:40

sending people. Into combat

8:43

zones you need to equip

8:45

them. Train. Them. Protect.

8:48

Them. Offered. As pay for

8:50

their lodging, their food, their travel

8:52

back and forth, their therapy, their

8:54

trauma therapy. Yeah, you can imagine

8:56

a hundred reasons why reporting is

8:58

is costly, but also. Know.

9:00

Advertiser wants to be on a war

9:02

story right? It's not like Coca Cola

9:05

don't like excited to be on this

9:07

story about war crime Seattle like says

9:09

December to remember having when deciding a

9:11

bomb of and did not happen exactly

9:14

so you have here I think just

9:16

fundamentally the most important work we do

9:18

the most costly work we do it

9:20

almost treasure Ways Rice. So what you

9:23

need is a business a can cross

9:25

subsidise. right? So you have the

9:27

war reporting which is expensive and loses money but

9:29

you believe is socially importance and then you have

9:31

say like in the olden days a big movies

9:34

sex and and like you have a lot of

9:36

movie reviews partly because people want to know which

9:38

movies are good but also because dead movie to

9:40

servers will pay for on of as I used

9:43

to find out what movies were playing the I

9:45

turned to the listing Sex and of the New

9:47

York Times with a local teams had paid money

9:49

to for the listing so now I do that

9:52

on fandango right. right? Answer the

9:54

problem as as things become unbundled

9:56

and more competitive, your ability to

9:58

have an inefficient and. Well, products

10:00

were be important and costly. Things are

10:03

paid for by the frivolous and profitable

10:05

things. access ago at Yeah and I

10:07

don't want to call all the possible

10:09

things frivolous, many them or or grade

10:12

or important or useful But investigative journalism

10:14

slow, difficult, like you need really skill

10:16

journalists to do that. Yeah takes a

10:19

long time. You don't make money off

10:21

of investigative journalism is why Propublica is

10:23

a philanthropic be funded publication. They are

10:26

amazing, but that is not a thing

10:28

capitalism will creates and this. Is why

10:30

as much as was good things happening on

10:32

Sub Stack and I'm not fundamentally optimistic about

10:35

Subsonic in other news that are companies as

10:37

any kind of savior here because what they're

10:39

actually doing is on bundling the stuff that

10:41

makes money from the stuff that doesn't. You

10:43

can make a lotta money. not I'm I'm

10:45

not that many people really do make a

10:48

lot of money doing this, but you can

10:50

make money if you're in an excellent takes

10:52

writer. Unsubsidized? Yes, but every Sub stacker who

10:54

makes any money will tell you it is

10:56

a volume. Games vs. So. To.

10:59

Than has people. Who.

11:01

Are doing slow, not profitable

11:03

work. He just doesn't work

11:05

right. It also as a distribution mechanism do

11:07

at as do not allow you to have

11:09

high volume Sprite. It's fine to get one

11:12

email from some new that are day you

11:14

know on fifteen from our newsletter. see how

11:16

this problem where it like. All.

11:18

Of that cross subsidies gone, it's

11:20

been taken by others, it's been

11:22

unbundled on. The different revenue streams

11:24

are getting chewed up, classified. you

11:26

know, when to Craigslist. Like all

11:28

these different things and all, this

11:30

was contributing to a situation where

11:33

the media was in this bizarre

11:35

business. Of selling Sue

11:37

adds to fund war reporting right? a

11:39

telling you which movies for playing defined

11:41

investigations into corruption at City Hall than

11:44

one other thing happened with yeah you

11:46

really should not underestimate and like I

11:48

will talk about this as long as

11:50

you want who has unearthed access The

11:52

platforms came and took all the my.

11:55

The. The whole period this sort of

11:57

explosion of often them that I was part

12:00

of in building box that we could build

12:02

a whole new set of digital first news

12:04

behemoths re that we could create not a

12:07

sites that people would read and and make

12:09

both the great things that will ultimately be

12:11

on the level of like the L A

12:13

Times or have been at the Washington Post

12:16

it would be able to sustain that many

12:18

riders that much reporting. this is based on

12:20

a theory that you could turn be huge

12:22

scale of digital media right all the sudden

12:25

more people reading you then you know had

12:27

ever read any news organization ever before you

12:29

tournaments. Money. But. The

12:31

scale is mediated by Google right? People

12:34

find you by searching something on Google.

12:36

What time is a Super Bowl? Famously

12:38

people would find you on Facebook. They

12:40

would find you on Twitter. Yeah! And

12:42

the idea was that in getting all

12:44

these new readers you would eventually turn

12:47

all these new readers into new advertising

12:49

dollars because of the platforms had the

12:51

audience. If you put your stuff on

12:53

the platforms they would send the audience

12:55

over and draw the an ad for

12:58

something and to Vox will make. A

13:00

few pennies and like that What? That's what

13:02

the plan was. slow and ideally I mean

13:04

price per any one person or another. you

13:06

know, few pennies of that. But but it

13:09

it was all the see a premium advertising

13:11

wouldn't would migrate brave. You know the magazines

13:13

and newspapers really go away or least become

13:15

diminished what they once were and you'd have

13:17

like nice as for blacks as cars and

13:19

right like with the stuff that really makes

13:21

money would. Yeah, not the sort of direct

13:23

consumer you know. One tricky get rid of

13:25

your belly fat is how do you feel

13:27

Dustin A background way about Coca Cola right?

13:29

The skull brand advertising. And

13:32

apart from Stop that. The. Thing that

13:34

broke in the media this is a big

13:36

point of his be sort of a pitchfork

13:38

one of things. It frustrates me every time

13:40

I see a of. Organization. Getting

13:42

got it is a tendency to focus

13:44

very tightly on their individual editorial decisions

13:47

and but then as they're laying people

13:49

off are getting folded into Gq or

13:51

whatever begin to look like mistakes, right?

13:54

If only they'd on x fact it's

13:56

happening to somebody. Different groups had the

13:58

same time suggested it's structural right and

14:00

the the keeping their is that. The.

14:04

Big. Platforms kept the advertising revenue

14:07

and this whole explosion of faith

14:09

that we can do this was

14:11

built on the idea that. You.

14:14

Could build this new audiences and turn them

14:16

into money and he couldn't He didn't control

14:18

the audience and the platform could host or

14:20

that advertising on itself. It could target that

14:22

advertising at the consumer better than you could

14:24

and I would like. the business model never

14:26

net it out. People keep want to look

14:29

at the editorials like is us apart. They

14:31

feel like they experience and that they have

14:33

expertise and right if you're a journalist or

14:35

you're a reader you five a lot of

14:37

views on the editorial of the things that

14:39

you consume. But what is actually happening is

14:41

of the business model didn't come together. So

14:43

it's like because. All these. Beloved.

14:46

Midsize. Web sites are either

14:49

late. Dying or doing some. it looks

14:51

like die. And you're saying in the cases me like

14:53

pitchfork. Are. Bias is to

14:55

say like oh well, if Pitchforks head

14:57

covered more the seven music or if

14:59

they covered this music differently or whenever

15:01

we look at bat and it's like

15:03

our eyes off the ball because if

15:05

the real question is whether dismantle and

15:08

structural those decisions even other easier for

15:10

us to understand are you about? they're

15:12

not the decisions that decided whether or

15:14

not the sink and he to access

15:16

and also the fact that it's happening

15:18

across so many different kinds of publication

15:20

suggest said it's you know. We

15:22

can all be making huge editorial mistakes right?

15:24

for the can be as we always are

15:27

on some level, but we were before to

15:29

yeah, we're in the taser, are making money

15:31

also Yes, and. It. The

15:33

editorial decisions are visible and legible

15:35

to the audience, and the P

15:37

and L statement is not rape

15:39

or so much happening on the

15:41

business side there, and it's very,

15:43

very hard for people to see

15:45

it. So the two things have

15:47

happened are everybody ended up in

15:49

competition with each other, which wasn't

15:51

how it used to be. Right?

15:53

Like every single content provider of

15:55

any kind. Is. In competition

15:58

with each other simultaneously? Yeah. The

16:00

contract profit downgrade names like Core

16:02

Economics he come on a one

16:04

and then at the same time

16:06

the platforms came into the middle

16:08

and just. Talk. The odd to

16:11

took the money like it didn't make any

16:13

sense but we had basically. Created.

16:15

This Rube Goldberg machine that worked

16:17

as a business. Then

16:20

the business became efficient and it wrecked the

16:22

business. Then there was a hope that we

16:24

could build it again or mine because Will

16:26

look. We had lost a bunch of the

16:28

revenue streams, but now we had so much

16:31

more audience, more audience and we had ever

16:33

imagine having ever before. Because like when we're

16:35

selling subscriptions and like and a little local

16:37

market right? Those nothing like what can happen

16:40

when an article on viral and all the

16:42

seven seven million people reddit Cf. But.

16:44

It turner Facebook at the Money from seven

16:46

million people reading it. But

16:48

as where we are, so there's there's.

16:51

like Erawan, they're beautiful, inefficient, noncombative, been

16:53

ah played that we all benefited from.

16:55

There's Era, to which is we all

16:57

thought we could make money on the

16:59

internet, but it turns out we are

17:01

sort of wrong. Why in your opinion,

17:03

did Era to. Work. For as

17:06

long as deadly. As like our capital Flows

17:08

adventure have announcers all venture capital. but it

17:10

was all venture capital. Far as venture capital,

17:12

no interest rates. We were not making money

17:14

right. Slow speed, was not making money rights

17:17

Like I know more than I can say

17:19

about the balance sheets of a bunch of

17:21

these places in the boom years. Yeah, there's

17:23

some as making a bit of money more

17:25

often losing a lot of money. Or

17:28

oftentimes is losing some money. Yeah, but

17:30

they were being pumped up by venture

17:32

capital and a low interest rate environment.

17:35

It is not a coincidence that the

17:37

tide went out on this era of

17:39

media when the sped began hiking interest

17:42

rates because when money had to pay

17:44

off more. It's. Stop

17:46

going into media and are to be fair.

17:48

This also coincided with and the end of

17:50

the view that. These. Bt companies

17:53

were going to become big sale players. If

17:55

you want to see an interesting document on

17:57

this. Andreessen Horowitz

17:59

the. The mentor from had a

18:01

at least fifty million dollar investment in

18:03

Buzz Feed via As years back and

18:05

they wrote a thing explaining their investment

18:08

on their site, even price to find

18:10

it somewhere and what they're basically saying

18:12

is it they think you can create

18:14

the site Crazy kind of scale play.

18:17

And what was his was a look like

18:19

like what was said profitable. This all makes

18:21

sense and reason or it's view of bus

18:23

it is a bus you desire is interesting

18:26

that from a couple prospectus but one of

18:28

the perspectives was bus feed didn't do advertising

18:30

where the other players did advertising at least

18:33

for a long time. be them to sell

18:35

ads to whomever they made their ads for

18:37

everything. Kind of felt like buzzy. Proceed had

18:39

a very big creative agency the the Adhd

18:42

he was in house Yes and so what

18:44

they were doing that was Proceed was demonstrating

18:46

it's extraordinary competence. At creating viral.

18:48

That's right. You can understand

18:50

the entire buzz feed operation

18:52

from a business perspective as.

18:55

A. Demo of what they could do for

18:57

advertisers to what they were saying is like

19:00

like we're going to do the same way

19:02

we said he around fire with itis top

19:04

ten list of whatever we can do that

19:06

for you you know lever and we can

19:08

have a list to call that is like

19:11

does soap and they actually pull that off

19:13

while times that was the idea. So that

19:15

the theory was it, Buzz Feed was going

19:17

to master the social media air of the

19:19

news. They were gonna be better at distributing

19:21

the content through social, better at then distributing

19:24

and creating advertising content through social. And

19:26

that you'd previous flywheel, it would be

19:28

like more audience, more money, more journalism

19:30

Or audience more money, more journalism entertainment

19:32

right? Those lot entertainment of us feel

19:35

obviously. And like

19:37

that was why they put money on it

19:39

wasn't drives me crazy. Later on when all

19:41

these people at Andreessen Horowitz complain about the

19:43

click bait era affect the sentimental value as

19:45

well as a as a Andreessen was both

19:47

on the board of Facebook still is in

19:49

fact med I guess we call it now

19:51

and was funding bus I where all this

19:53

click bait I can I can walk into

19:55

about Alex behalf of handling him I was

19:57

I was here I was watch out as.

20:00

I was Emmy Industry you are reshaping valuable

20:03

retrieve a guy like sorry you were surprised

20:05

at the that of Epicenter. Enjoy! It actually

20:07

drives me nuts but. That.

20:09

Was the theory you could turn scale into money

20:11

the you couldn't turn into more capacity because then

20:14

turned into more scale which he couldn't find it

20:16

More money. We have our own versions of this

20:18

Vox like. And it's just

20:20

not what happens on that. We just

20:22

couldn't do it though. Platforms kept too

20:24

much of the money to. Basically what

20:26

you're saying is like this era and

20:28

are even know how long it lasted.

20:30

But like that the era of web

20:32

first. Exciting, interesting staff that felt like

20:34

he could replace or even like ads

20:36

what came before as it was basically

20:38

investors may have bad about what might

20:40

work on the internet. a lot of

20:42

stuff getting made with the money from

20:44

that bad but that that never had

20:47

it never paid off. It was a

20:49

rough draft. And now. The. Rough

20:51

draft is kind of getting thrown away. Yeah.

20:53

And that doesn't mean you can't make any

20:55

money at it. I mean a bunch of

20:57

these players are still around to get work. like

20:59

Vox Media which is where I used to work

21:01

like a stone by think like You and

21:03

Great Arm But I mean I think some

21:05

of the dreams of ten years ago or

21:07

eight years ago have been trimmed. Me they

21:09

pie wouldn't agree with that. but if you look

21:12

at the work boxes doing that, the verge is

21:14

doing that either is doing that York Magazine

21:16

is doing. I mean it's great work. The

21:18

problem is like this dream of like the

21:20

rocket ship in Gone and when a dream

21:22

the rocket ship laughed. So did the money that

21:24

was coming with a dream of the rocket ship

21:26

rather than you just kind of in this much

21:28

one normal media business I mean that are visible

21:31

our say and I say it was like a

21:33

lot of Greece. The fundamental fact of what we've

21:35

learned in the media is the business is the

21:37

same is it was fifteen years ago to City

21:39

of. The. You're still

21:41

just dealing with a mix of

21:44

advertising revenue, subscriptions and maybe events,

21:46

but the Potters have taken more

21:48

of the advertising money subscriptions. You're

21:50

in competition with everybody else simultaneously.

21:54

And mean events or events but also lot

21:56

of events businesses got destroyed by covered. Do.

21:59

I still feel couture edu of

22:01

of ah ha. I

22:04

still feel a little to brave and

22:06

the now it is now. Thanks for

22:08

the summer job! As if it's Monday

22:11

morning at nine forty six, everything feels

22:13

totally fucked up. So okay. So. Last

22:16

time we spoke I was like what do you

22:18

get on the internet as right near as you know

22:20

what? I'm bummed Million Civilians is like have a good

22:22

time Another, these are sounds sad Little I time I

22:24

phone for Pitchfork and like a Pitchfork reviews like.

22:27

If I'd as you in December. Paid

22:29

for.com Like how many years do you

22:32

think this institution will exist in essentially

22:34

it's current form or publishes you know,

22:36

by music of use a day. In

22:39

December? What would you sad? I don't know enough

22:41

about the internals of Pitchfork. I would not have

22:43

thought and stood on thing patrol. Despite that expensive

22:45

to run the air and things can survive, it's

22:47

about whether or not they can thrive mean a

22:49

lot of things are able to survive at some

22:51

level. But. I think something you

22:53

can probably still find online. Is.

22:55

Something that is providing a service to the audience.

22:57

Ago, a real problem to me about Pitchfork is

23:00

why can I never give them money. For.

23:02

What was Korea service to me? Yeah I

23:04

want somebody out there hunting down great music

23:06

and and and finding it from yeah nice

23:08

has come to different subs. Ducks A Do

23:11

this I mean I love are filled Sherborne

23:13

Sub Stack features and restated. There's another one

23:15

called.a strain it is finds great music in

23:17

Brooklyn. I pay for that one So happily

23:19

right is fantastic. If you wanna like, learn

23:22

about does I will. Cool shows and what's

23:24

happening the Brooklyn be a music community. I

23:26

think at a at a kind of modest

23:28

level there is still a lot of space

23:30

to to do great things with subscription. And

23:33

I think was a mistake of Pitchfork to

23:35

not be subscription or he did earlier because

23:37

people like me they're doing something very specific

23:39

and I think one lesson, if you look

23:41

at things you do make money difficult to

23:43

do that as ugly tend to be quite

23:45

specific. My worry is about the ability of

23:47

things to move out of the specific and

23:49

into the general and we should. I am

23:51

not completely doom and gloom. I expected to

23:53

be a kind of renewal of certain forms

23:55

of media within the next five years and

23:57

I can talk about like what I think

23:59

that. Those and what I would expect.

24:01

I'm like what I would be starting

24:04

today if I was starting media organizations

24:06

because in a kind of paradoxically I

24:08

think is actually great time to start

24:10

things. But for what has been there

24:12

I think the most dangerous position to

24:15

be and right now is to be

24:17

a mid sized ambitious place that was

24:19

hooked on the business model does failed

24:21

in the twenty tense and early twenties

24:23

rates the things like Pitchfork that believed

24:26

you would do the scale plays into

24:28

digital advertising online and unlike the. Test

24:30

the stress of that got kicked out from under

24:32

you. write. One. Of the things that

24:34

you said about Pitchfork that I found

24:36

really interesting is that east you said

24:38

that you saw this is not a

24:40

story the to be under said as

24:42

just about a bunch of individual and

24:44

it for our choices at one specific

24:46

website. it's about sectoral change and at

24:48

the trend you see happening which feels

24:50

right to me both across media and

24:52

weirdly like across many forms of things

24:55

that try to get attention. Is that

24:57

like. A small things are surviving

24:59

here. you have a sub, sacks and this

25:01

huge battleships like to New York and are

25:03

surviving and then everything in the middle of

25:05

getting crushed. Like why? What is it about

25:07

all these factors that kills the middle? I

25:10

don't totally understand that. Everything in

25:12

the middle compete with everything at the top. right?

25:15

You gotta look at it from both a business side

25:17

and the audience sides of the business side. first. It's.

25:20

Just really hard to make money advertising. As

25:23

a meat organizations. You're. Not like

25:25

they're The issue is not the compete with

25:27

a New York Times if you're competing with

25:29

Spacewalk. You're. Competing with

25:31

google. You're competing with

25:33

Tipped Off. right? You're

25:35

competing with Netflix Yes, so that's

25:37

really tough for a So What?

25:40

Is your. Differentiated.

25:42

Proposal to the advertiser. So.

25:45

In the past the my be. I'm how

25:47

you reach the people of Indianapolis and you want

25:49

to be to people to Indianapolis. but you know,

25:51

who knows when people are in Indianapolis. Metal.

25:54

Right? Google right? They know when people are in Indianapolis

25:57

and a know how to follow them all around the

25:59

internet so that's. That's one thing. Then.

26:02

The next saying is that arms. You.

26:04

Are you know if you're doing anything kind

26:07

of general interest? You're

26:09

competing with everybody, right? You're competing with

26:11

the New York Times with The Washington

26:13

Post. With every one, you're competing with

26:15

everybody on you Tube. And this

26:17

is one of the the paradoxes of this

26:20

era. The audience probably has more access the

26:22

high quality journalism they have ever had in

26:24

human history. Ever. Rate.

26:27

Compared to when I grew up with like Id

26:29

l a times op ed page of i wanted

26:31

to be Political opinion that was it. Like that

26:34

was all the political opinion all had access to.

26:38

It wasn't much. Now. Found

26:40

political opinion. A. To around inept

26:42

right to privacy create a might have

26:44

been Fsf I drown in it, right?

26:46

You know I would be growing up

26:48

now in Southern California and like listening

26:50

the whatever pod Save America and reading.

26:53

Political. Sub stacks and magazines and the

26:55

New York Times opinion page if you

26:57

know, and like a million other things

26:59

like this is endless. Rather much people

27:01

can have. see. you're having to fight

27:04

against all of that. To get somebody

27:06

is fundamentally the subscriber dollars. A: How

27:08

much money do people want to spend

27:10

out of their pocket a month on

27:12

media? Or they're already probably like subscribe

27:14

Now that Netflix or Max or Amazon

27:16

Prime area? Who's Disney? Pos? Whatever. Some

27:18

combo of those like that in their

27:21

kind of media budget? Maybe they're going

27:23

to. Describe side one wheel news thing Maybe

27:25

right? That's probably going to be the New

27:27

York Times right on the save. A real

27:29

reason to be subscribing to the Journal or

27:31

the Financial Times. Most of what people want

27:33

is not local news. Yeah most of what

27:35

they want is is kind of mix of

27:37

this being uninformed citizen and also having to

27:39

stuff they enjoy reading. So they're going to

27:41

go for when a big players on. You're.

27:45

Competing for what's left after all that,

27:47

right? So on some stack like maybe

27:49

they really like you like I really

27:51

like Pj. That's the reason people subscribe

27:53

raid they're they're not actually subscribing because

27:56

it is on a cost benefit level.

27:59

Like. The most content for their buck a

28:01

subscribing because if you wanna support the percent

28:03

right that they're kind of individual personalize relationship

28:05

is really important. But if you're trying to

28:08

be something that is growing and so can

28:10

be quite that personalized right you want to

28:12

have a hundred or two hundred journalists. That's

28:14

like this really hard space because at that

28:17

level you really are competing with Time Magazine

28:19

and the Washington Post couple of a very

28:21

big players. So once you put that can

28:24

a midsize publication in competition with old very

28:26

big players who also if it begins doing

28:28

something interesting will begin immediately seeing. That

28:30

possibly hard way. it's a talent

28:32

copying at Rice, it's very hard

28:34

to thrive. It's not that nobody

28:36

can, and some people do, but

28:39

it is just an incredibly hard

28:41

business to sustain an. End

28:43

to the notice If if I'm just

28:45

like a media nihilists and I say

28:48

fine birds and a half like like

28:50

the New York Times going to be

28:52

the one newspaper in America s.a great

28:54

Philadelphia bureau and or a Cleveland bureau

28:56

and then people can prescribe tube some

28:58

smart sub sachs from analysis and takes

29:00

and to very specialized reporting. Why is

29:02

that that? Why do we not want

29:05

a journalism that has no middle. I

29:08

think a couple things. One is that. As.

29:10

Much as I love the Your Times and work

29:13

there myself, obviously the New York Times is not

29:15

capable for placing a local paper. It

29:17

just isn't it doesn't have. Even if it has

29:19

a Philly bureau doesn't cover Philadelphia the way the

29:21

Philadelphia Inquirer does. nobody than York Times would say

29:24

it does. It's like not part of our offering.

29:26

Maybe one day it should be great. I mean

29:28

I don't make that decision but you can imagine

29:30

actually trying to nationalize local news. or you can

29:32

imagine trying to have some kind of player that

29:35

as a opposite of franchise model for local news

29:37

by and we don't really have that right now

29:39

we're gonna says important, it just is not as

29:41

local news. I think one mistake or to down

29:43

the philanthropic side has been trying to make local

29:46

news too much of eat. Your vegetables kind

29:48

of thing but that was never the

29:50

same. People primarily wanted local news be

29:52

kept coming back for sports for restaurants

29:54

for does the connection to their community

29:57

and what might be happening in In

29:59

and what. They might like in it

30:01

and the fact they are coming back than

30:03

men when you were ported on crops in

30:05

city hall. They also saw that and that

30:08

gave the crops and reporting power Be Can't

30:10

just be trying to. Report.

30:12

On crops in the city hall that doesn't really have

30:14

a audience, the F but has the audience is like

30:16

the cash into the place, the. In.

30:19

This role but there's no metals. You.

30:21

Just lost too much local news, right? and it

30:23

never got replaced. It turned out that was one

30:25

of the things being subsidized. Their

30:27

know? I think this is other issue

30:29

which is the middle is where a

30:31

lot of interesting experimentation happens, where a

30:34

lot of great journals are trained up,

30:36

where things happen that you wouldn't expect,

30:38

it's not going to be a healthy

30:40

industries long term content wise if you

30:42

don't have a lot of different kinds

30:44

of things happening in it. I mean

30:46

when we were talk about Pitchfork, which

30:48

is very specific, it's like. You

30:50

want the things that be simultaneously

30:52

tuned to assert an audience, but

30:55

with the scale like the modest

30:57

but real scale of journalists and

30:59

money and and capital and and

31:01

time to do ambitious work? Yes,

31:03

and if you don't have that

31:05

than a lot of the best

31:08

work. Adrenaline does not happen. And

31:10

so you're losing local news. You're

31:12

losing interesting kinds of experiments. You

31:14

just lose a lot. For.

31:22

A short break for sir adds. When

31:24

we come back as Refine believes

31:27

we have to fundamentally change how

31:29

we think about consuming information on

31:31

I. He also believes that why

31:33

the words I just said in

31:35

a previous and is basically a

31:37

bad word says radical arguments and

31:40

the dirty word after break. Sergeant.

32:01

In is sponsored by The Ori. Theory

32:03

is a new perspective on performance apparel.

32:05

It's perfect if you're sick and tired

32:07

of traditional workout gear. Everything

32:09

is design work out in it. doesn't

32:11

feel or look like an extremely comfortable

32:14

to wear it all the time. A

32:16

prophecy what is more comfortable them in

32:18

every way. Right now the product is

32:20

incredibly versatile. him used for just about

32:22

any activity running, training, swimming, yoga is

32:25

also great for my favorite form of

32:27

exercise which is landing on a sofa.

32:29

Also very is one hundred percent are

32:31

sitting there Carbon footprint. They're using better

32:33

sustainable materials for their products to empower

32:36

your best active life. Fiore his investments

32:38

in your happiness. For our

32:40

listeners theory is offering twenty percent

32:42

off your first purchase it yourself

32:45

some of the most comfortable and

32:47

versatile closing on the planet at

32:49

V or A.com/pj search that V

32:52

Henri see you owe our I.com/pj

32:54

search. Not only will you receive

32:56

twenty percent of your first purchase

32:59

but you also enjoy free shipping

33:01

on any Us orders over seventy

33:03

five bucks and free returns could

33:06

have your a dot com/Pj search

33:08

and December the versatility. Of the

33:10

Ori clothing whether you have a few weeks

33:12

old puppy or a senior who seen multiple

33:14

decades any dog person knows the most valuable

33:17

thing the world is spending time with her

33:19

bed. The farmers dog makes it easy to

33:21

keep them healthy was in give you more

33:23

quality years of them. Tomorrow.

33:25

Dog makes and delivers fresh healthy dog

33:27

food is are going to buy that's

33:29

nutritionally balanced and made from human grade

33:32

ingredients and safe clean kitchens. I have

33:34

said my dog the Starboard I think

33:36

you are than like said. It's

33:39

the best option for dogs at all

33:41

life stages because it's not cable. It's

33:43

not candid do it's just actual real

33:45

food. A fresh diet has

33:47

been found have all sorts of benefits

33:50

from healthier code and skyn to better

33:52

brass, even easier digestion and smaller better

33:54

poops. It doesn't matter if

33:56

your dog is young or old is always the right time

33:58

to and investing in their how. How do

34:00

you have more healthy, happy, and four years

34:02

together? Get fifty percent

34:05

of your first box at the Farmers

34:07

dog.com/search and let the Farmers Dog know

34:09

he said new user code or for

34:11

podcast after you sign up for your

34:13

first backs. Assuming

34:24

a hundred years had our history bikes I

34:26

have this year that were annoyed by corny

34:29

say there's his first error the internet where.

34:32

Everybody he get information from anymore places all

34:34

a suddenly had to be much better information

34:36

consumers like. She's analogy. Instead

34:38

of basically one grocery store you go

34:41

to engage your apple's sounds like you

34:43

had to identify what a good apple

34:45

is and if you eat the wrong

34:47

and of apple A can make you

34:49

natural sex scenes or can make you

34:51

kind of races are you may you

34:53

think like the election didn't happen or

34:55

whatever and I think if you look

34:57

at how we as news consumers navigated

34:59

that new media environment I don't the

35:01

we did a great job like I

35:03

don't think people's literacy when it kinda

35:06

finding good information really. Met.

35:08

The task at hand very well. My.

35:11

Fear is now as more

35:13

website disappear. That job

35:15

is getting harder and our ability to

35:17

do so it's is not getting better

35:19

and that's that's for of but I

35:22

feel afraid of right now. One

35:24

of the things I think I object to

35:26

in analogy and I think is been poisonous

35:28

across media for a long time is Edu.

35:30

The where you are are mine are as

35:32

a person as a consumer. Debt

35:35

is is kind of passive consumption unique. gotta

35:37

figure out which apple's gonna be no in

35:40

fact you with anti vaccine sentimental whenever. I

35:43

think it. Over.

35:46

Time. One of the

35:48

things that we're gonna have to discover. Is

35:51

an identity of ourselves as

35:53

generators of. The. Internet

35:56

Not consumers of the

35:58

Internet Meaningless meeting. On

36:01

a small level every time you read.

36:03

One. Thing or over another or watch

36:06

or listen to spend time on

36:08

you are creating more of that

36:10

thing and less of other things

36:12

right? There is still some money.

36:15

That. Comes from just like your attention then

36:17

at a level above that when you

36:19

pay for anything. We. Com

36:21

a member subscriber, then you're really sending

36:23

a signal to generate more of that

36:25

thing. And out of the other thing

36:27

like what we paid engine to on

36:29

mine we're willing into existence where we

36:31

ignore a mine we are asking to

36:33

die. Yes I think that we have

36:35

come to see. What

36:37

we do a mine a sort

36:40

of morally neutral with the only

36:42

moral decisions being made. By.

36:45

The providers of the content. So.

36:47

It matters like what?

36:49

decisions? The. Washington Post or Meadow

36:51

or whoever it matters. what decisions us companies

36:53

make right, they're giving of stuff we like

36:56

are we don't like and we can be

36:58

mad at them Are not mad at them.

37:00

But what we are clicking on reading where

37:02

we are spending our time, We we're spending

37:04

our money. I will. We can be blamed

37:06

for that. It's click bait right if you

37:08

want local news to exist. You.

37:11

Have to subscribe to local this. Write and

37:13

read it right and spend time. They're like,

37:15

you have to make that vibrant by your

37:18

presence and your decisions. Nobody else him. he

37:20

may be slanted. This will do it for

37:22

you, but you deathly can't trust them to

37:25

do it for you if you want like

37:27

Pitchfork to exist. You

37:29

need to read it if you decide that

37:31

the way you are going to access the

37:33

entirety of the internet is by spending time

37:36

on social media sites and occasionally clicking the

37:38

link than what you will. Dad is an

37:40

internet composed of social media sites which is

37:42

more or less what we have now. I

37:45

wish I had like a better answer. it

37:47

would be better of to Venture capital had

37:49

just found a bunch of like the fantastic

37:51

business models cf but at some point if

37:53

we don't want this. If people

37:56

don't want this, then they have to

37:58

do something else exists, choosing to. Then

38:00

to search engine. Means. There

38:02

is more search engines bright shooting Wilson Vs

38:04

or Klein show means was more as a

38:06

poncho. choosing not to listen on some level

38:08

like means there's less of it and a

38:10

pretty something should be listened to. Everything or

38:12

everything should be pure for to but. It.

38:15

Is worth asking if you find what I'm saying

38:17

here bad. but you do not subscribe to any

38:19

local news you are not neutral in as you

38:21

are the problem in a. Santa.

38:23

I just don't think people absorb that.

38:25

I actually think the left has become

38:27

allergic to any sense that there was

38:29

like individual responsibility and collective problems that

38:32

like the decisions you make individually relating

38:34

to. Fly. Med or animals

38:36

or news or anything. It's like

38:38

this some view that everything to

38:41

be solved by a policy yeah

38:43

but particular and things that are

38:45

driven by capitalism. Is. A

38:47

what's the people do is what decides what

38:49

there is more and less of a can

38:51

do different things like you can do policies

38:53

and I were I have policies of I

38:55

would like to see done but it is

38:58

not actually neutral but we do like weird

39:00

generators of the internet. we are generators of

39:02

the media. What we give our time attention

39:04

money to is what drives and what doesn't

39:06

get it is what die so if you

39:08

look around you like Athena like this mix

39:10

of what is currently thriving a dying on

39:12

the internet traffic like it's security because I

39:14

feel if you don't village. I.

39:17

Don't have another answer. I mean collectively

39:19

at some point it us be worth

39:21

it to create and fun. The the

39:23

kind of journalism people wanna see in

39:25

the world to what you're saying. his

39:27

legs whether you'll save your semis were

39:29

ah there's no ethical consumption and recap

39:31

of marriage. Actually there is ethical gets

39:33

hubs and under Catalan there's more ethical

39:35

consumption. There's less article consumption and your

39:37

attention as a kind of consumption to

39:39

for you. The most frustrating person in

39:41

this paradigm is like the Vs on

39:43

Twitter campaign that twitter like dude it's

39:46

like you're sending money. Ted Elon

39:48

musk and complaining about your unmask as you

39:50

like paper twenty dollars and put in that

39:52

now my fury of people complain about whether

39:54

yes oh yeah, Twitter right? Yes If you

39:56

don't want to be more twitter more you

39:59

on mosques acts. But. You are

40:01

sitting there all day. Reading.

40:03

And then adding value to you on

40:05

mosques. Axe. Then. Actually, what

40:07

you want his effort to be more

40:09

Elon musks backs right? you're voting for

40:12

with your you are voting for your

40:14

attention. Any up, No ethical consumption of

40:16

capitalism. People that's a kind of personal

40:18

absolution. See, don't have to think about

40:20

anything. Yeah, like I can tell you

40:22

that there is more and less ethical

40:24

consumption under capitalism If you are buying

40:27

lot of factory farmed meet super cheap

40:29

chicken. were those chickens if unbelievably horrible

40:31

monstrous lies Because the only thing that

40:33

you see at the market is how

40:35

to keep the chicken breast. Is. I

40:38

can tales and unethical decisions right? And you're

40:40

creating more. Her fine treatment

40:43

for chickens whereas I give you try to

40:45

buy better things are you create more market

40:47

for better things. And that ought

40:49

to be might also help lead to policy

40:51

change or whatever I often say. like with

40:53

in his presence consumption people to think of

40:55

themselves, the individual know it's for collective taints,

40:57

Meaningless meaning that your decisions don't matter so

40:59

much because or their your decisions Any one

41:01

of us as a small part of this

41:03

very very large hole. but. The. Decisions

41:06

you make it influence the people around

41:08

you. Human beings her or social but

41:10

we do is contagious. You know, Like,

41:12

you should understand that there is a

41:15

relationship between like individual decisions and positive

41:17

outcomes. Again, I want to be very

41:19

clear that I'm not saying at all.

41:23

That. What happened in media is that

41:25

like individual people made a bunch of

41:27

bad decisions and this is the fault

41:29

of the consumer. Like the business models

41:31

gop wracked. By. Platforms

41:34

by bad venture capital, decisions by a

41:36

lot of forces are out of our

41:39

control, right? and we were like we

41:41

were not prepared for it. We had

41:43

no immune system like we're being given.

41:45

You know, Curiosity beat

41:48

headlines and serve things for I really like

41:50

the didn't see it all but at some

41:52

point you have to start. If

41:54

you think this is going badly and say okay.

41:58

Now what? These are you

42:00

using is our fault, but solving it might

42:03

still be our responsibility. Yeah, this is a

42:05

position of retreat here. right? like this is

42:07

like a last gasp you're saying in your

42:09

intro about you know is a media ready

42:12

for an extinction level event. This

42:14

isn't where I was ten years ago. I mean

42:16

like I will say, like I started a number

42:18

of media organizations. Yeah, I started Want Blog. I

42:21

was a cofounder A Box of Suffers Editor in

42:23

Chief. A Box Inbox is still there like doing

42:25

great works, but. I. Am looking around

42:27

me and I'm seeing things die.

42:30

I. Am seen great things in great journalists

42:32

get got it they are and something

42:34

like. Recoils. And me from

42:36

to seen people complain about it on social

42:38

media you know I was on the show

42:40

last talk about how use the internet Saintly

42:42

yeah I think one thing you're hearing from

42:45

be here is I think a harder questions

42:47

had easy internet ethically right. I.

42:49

Don't know what it means. To

42:51

use the internet ethically like I don't have a

42:53

great answer to this will give you an example.

42:55

This one of things have been trying to think

42:57

about over the past year year, year and a

42:59

half as a pet I use can a smaller

43:01

products the just kind of interesting doing something different.

43:03

One of things are tried using this period was

43:06

a really interesting browser experiment called Arc. On

43:08

the Ark Browser and they had a bunch of

43:10

cool ideas inside of it. I'm Yeah Was a

43:12

small group. And. It recently got a bunch

43:14

of puffer. It's. For creating a

43:16

kind of search product is built on

43:19

a eyes and what was going out.

43:21

What this project does is when you

43:23

search for something be a I basically

43:25

weeds a bunch of relevant web pages

43:27

and then assembles an entirely new web

43:29

page for you like past East out

43:31

of the stuff it is read giving

43:33

you the answer to think of searched

43:35

on This was okay. so this was

43:37

a similar product called Perplexity as it

43:39

does the same thing and I had

43:41

a real moment of Utley as a

43:43

person who honestly I'm not very doom

43:45

and gloom. About anything I tend to

43:47

think like I am a and perhaps

43:49

too lazy citizen were a lot of

43:52

big problems I might smart people who

43:54

care of when figured out it's gonna

43:56

be fine like I can might try

43:58

to stay on the sidelines. and I

44:00

used Perplexity for the first. They asked

44:02

some questions I was in front of

44:05

me as an Ai wrote essentially a

44:07

Wikipedia article specifically for me and it

44:09

cited sources name is like you know

44:11

site His one dinnertime said his into

44:13

and Pr and was giving me all

44:15

this information that journalists had worked to

44:17

provide. It was not sending me to

44:20

the underlying website I thought oh my

44:22

god Google search has really for me

44:24

such for the past few years. Perplexity

44:26

is doing a great job and if

44:28

no one visit says. Web sites and

44:30

no one was that advertising and known

44:33

his with a subscriptions. The underlying saying

44:35

it is mining for information like this

44:37

could be the next comment. Services like

44:39

this could wipe us out at really

44:41

scared me I'd I'd the same response

44:44

to See Newton i think had the

44:46

exact right word in his platform, a

44:48

newsletter and Opus Guest on the so

44:50

we said that he uses with frivolous

44:52

yeah like the level of irresponsibility and

44:55

this and this was a cool little

44:57

companies. By. Noted is trying

44:59

things out right to see interviewed dub have

45:01

ark and years ago we'd have to figure

45:03

you know what, there's no I think ethical

45:06

added to this actually arm us and so

45:08

I really find the question of how to

45:10

ethically. Use. Internet right now

45:12

had an ethically be a person consuming

45:15

media. Difficult. And

45:17

it. I really wish you

45:19

would have me on some time for something fine

45:21

and not gonna like a wonderful person. The. But.

45:25

If you can't you can't just retreat from and this

45:28

is. What? It is made. I

45:30

don't believe in turning away from what the world

45:32

actually is. It. Even

45:34

seems that you think are gonna

45:36

be a good option. Over.

45:39

Time. I mean you know Cory Doctorow causes the

45:41

instead of the case and cycle where something begins

45:43

by giving a lot of value to you, the

45:45

use or like think of early Google and eventually

45:47

trying to extract a of value from you the

45:49

user. So the other thing about things like perplexity

45:51

is right now they're funded by venture capital. They

45:53

don't need to make money when they do need

45:55

to make money like God knows what they're going

45:57

to do to do that to us. And so.

46:00

It. Is very hard. I.

46:02

Find this really tough like I look around

46:04

and I see it getting worse and worse

46:07

and I see what's coming the like the

46:09

kind of a I. It.

46:11

Feels rapacious to me. Yeah,

46:13

It. Feels like these companies. I know people These

46:16

companies. I like people these companies and I

46:18

believe that they are there because you're trying

46:20

to create a super intelligence that if it

46:22

doesn't you know seven percent odds like destroy

46:24

the entire world is gonna really solve a

46:26

lot of and that are all access. I

46:28

get it. I know what they're doing like

46:30

their idealists but in the meantime what they're

46:32

doing is they're taking. Like. The

46:35

sum total. Of. Human cognitive

46:37

labour available to them. Be.

46:39

Are feeding it into a machine. They.

46:42

Are training them seen on it. And.

46:44

The they're going to turn around and

46:47

monetize the output of all that human

46:49

labor. For. Themselves. And.

46:53

All. The people who did the graphic

46:55

design that led to Dolly and all

46:57

the people who are doing like the

46:59

news gathering that are informing you know

47:01

Gb Three and Gemini. They.

47:03

Have no fucking idea what's gonna happen to be

47:05

people. the arm I don't want to see the

47:08

don't care but they don't think it is their

47:10

responsibility and maybe it's not raid. I mean. In.

47:13

Some ways it easier to imagine ethical consumption

47:15

under capitalism than it is too much an

47:17

ethical production under capitalism price. You are to

47:19

try to compete with the other guys over

47:21

there and if you don't they're gonna win

47:24

now. and like I mean right now it's

47:26

like there's two moons as he having an

47:28

era and one is like whoa look at

47:30

this is amazing. Like opening I release their

47:32

sore I demo where they do the image

47:34

generation same but with video in your i

47:36

got my got six months from now. Apply

47:39

beyond make a Pixar movie everyday. do that

47:41

and that's really cool and really went ahead.

47:43

And then I have friends be right on

47:45

the internet people I don't know and that

47:47

who like. If. You.

47:50

Input. A prompt and one of

47:52

these services your centrally like inviting the

47:54

devil into our homes and I get

47:56

why they feel that way and I

47:58

also feel like asking. People to not

48:00

participate in a useful an exciting piece

48:02

of technology feels like. Probably.

48:05

Not our gonna solve. So this is

48:07

where I do think at some point

48:10

you get into this question of policy.

48:12

I. Think for things that. Capitalism

48:15

is not going to fun this. If

48:17

we think they are important, we're going

48:19

to have to fund them some other

48:21

way. Philanthropy as one way. And I

48:23

think there's certain things. Philanthropists were fun,

48:25

but. I. Don't know. I mean at

48:28

some point and you see this and other

48:30

countries like do you want to have publicly

48:32

supported media like much more than what would

48:34

it even mean to do that? Like who

48:36

gets it Like how do you think about

48:38

that? The politicization of that it raises very

48:41

difficult questions. Yes, But.

48:43

So does all the rest of the stuff

48:45

and were just letting a barrel forward without

48:47

the himself. He has a step of Ff

48:49

Ff and so. I.

48:53

I think we're going to lose

48:55

a lot very quickly. And

48:58

not a lot of everything. Again I

49:00

think people have access to say better

49:02

foreign news and they've ever had in

49:04

the entire some toll of human existence

49:06

which is great but like a whole

49:08

see information which monkeys and ecosystem like

49:10

requires a lot hours for to get

49:12

people to think in terms of the

49:14

comments are we putting the informational comments?

49:16

are we in reaching the informational com

49:18

and said we have to think about

49:20

this is a broad based way or

49:22

something we all or part us and

49:24

we haven't had to think about it

49:27

that way because. This very weird

49:29

thing supported us. And

49:32

that worked because we don't want to

49:34

pay months and also like we're financially

49:36

strapped than and so the sack it

49:39

news seemed almost fleas. Was. Grade.

49:41

Like. Why would you pay for news if

49:44

it's free? Until

49:46

it's not great. That was a good deal

49:48

with the advertisers, but the advertisers weren't there

49:50

to support the news. The advertisers are there to

49:52

sell you stuff. Yeah, and when they can

49:54

sell use of somewhere else, they, well, and

49:56

capitalism is great. like I'm a capitalist celebrity.

49:58

Like said about me by. In a

50:00

places were capitalism should work but not everything

50:03

should be capitals of not everything is a

50:05

market, not everything is a well structured market

50:07

Rate Something's will not be supported by this

50:09

is a really good to me. Like all

50:11

this is a little bit radicalizing. requires very

50:13

different kinds of kinds of thoughts. like it's

50:16

as it's very it added. Do.

50:18

Something as a collective to.

50:21

And in someone's reason, I actually often focus

50:23

on individual action, as if it gets easier

50:25

to act collectively when you're acting individually. What

50:27

he means? I don't think people typically. Vote.

50:30

In ways the don't align how they act.

50:33

It. Is a lot easier to believe

50:35

in strong protections for animals and

50:38

slaughterhouses when you don't eat much

50:40

meat. When. You're a we the

50:42

lot of meat. Probably cheap, factory farmed

50:44

meet sexy. Harder to believe that. like.

50:48

You share strong protections a could lead

50:50

to that meet becoming costlier. Like recognizing

50:52

that you don't need that all the

50:54

time. Helps you get to

50:56

the point we can imagine like something else

50:58

because if you've already kind of me like

51:00

the internal cyst on people don't tend to

51:02

vote for radical. New Worlds are not the

51:05

one that they are willing to live and

51:07

if it's going to change their life, they

51:09

tend to change her life. And info for

51:11

the Radical New world, right? It's like a

51:14

friend of mine used to say about exercise.

51:16

see the issue is like an ass and

51:18

proceed part of a sudden guess. It's like

51:20

having change proceeds, like wanting a different world,

51:22

in which those habits would make sense. Yes.

51:25

setting. This idea that policy will save us we

51:27

have to do nothing is as like not really

51:29

how things alternately work. both things have to have

51:31

and buildings have to happen. Again,

51:38

take one more quick break and then

51:40

if we the people who read things

51:42

on the internet and listen to things

51:44

on the internet has to same some

51:46

of our habits to preserve what we

51:48

love. Ah, what exactly

51:50

do you have to do? That

51:54

that isn't it. Search

52:18

engine is brought to you by

52:20

nerd wallet nerd. While it lets

52:22

you compare top travel credit cards

52:24

side by side to maximize your

52:27

spending, some even offer ten X

52:29

points on your spending. So what

52:31

could future you do with better

52:33

rewards? A free fight room upgrades

52:35

I personally would really like to

52:37

fly somewhere for for it had

52:39

sounds fantastic Future me would really

52:41

appreciate it. You can compare and

52:43

find smarter credit cards, savings accounts

52:45

and more today at Nerd While

52:47

it.com. Nerd wallet. Finance

52:50

Smarter Reminder credit is subject

52:52

to lender approval and terms

52:54

apply. Imagine the softest either felt.

52:56

Now imagine them getting even softer over

52:59

time. I had to tell you about

53:01

Bolland Branch seats. in a recent customer

53:03

survey. ninety six percent replied that Bolland

53:06

Branch seats get softer with every loss

53:08

there. made some the rarest organic cotton

53:10

and designed to get even software overtime.

53:13

Try their seats with a thirty night

53:15

guarantee plus sixteen percent off your first

53:17

order with Code Odyssey. Cel had to

53:20

be L L L and branch.com today

53:22

Exclusions a plank see think the details.

53:38

Okay so what might enjoy as

53:40

a things are bad. That.

53:44

Some of this is about as was

53:46

real was you. As much as it

53:48

feels like being told to become like

53:50

an internet v and we have responsibility

53:52

here are like what we consume matters,

53:54

what we pay for matters will be

53:56

Ignore me. My mother delivers the the

53:58

identity the person identive consumer. Etti

54:01

of a kind of cattle. Right is

54:03

a passive identity. Of

54:06

be. Whatever you want to be

54:08

an Internet began as a long time

54:10

figgins like a lot of my life.

54:12

nobody likes of against very unfortunate but

54:14

don't be passes. Played. Songs.

54:18

Act like. A lot of

54:20

is is happening to us. But. It's

54:22

gonna keep happening to has if everybody does

54:24

keeps acting like it happening to us. Yeah,

54:27

and like if you're willing to be treated

54:29

as cattle, you will be treated as cattle.

54:31

They are a good like. That's the end

54:33

result here. If you're not willing to do

54:36

something else than like I hope nobody likes

54:38

his colleagues to was it looks likely good

54:40

for you. In this world

54:42

you're trying to model in which we don't

54:44

think of ourselves as news consumers, We think

54:47

of ourselves as to like attention generators and

54:49

we are. Somewhat.

54:51

As a call in what we paid has into

54:53

and what we ignore and what we pay for

54:55

smoke. More. You subscribed to?

54:57

Are you spending like four hundred dollars a month

54:59

on local news exceptions like that? Are you doing?

55:01

I'm an Isis had to net any say live

55:03

in Yet I want to The New York Times

55:06

so both get a subscription to the thing I

55:08

work for and it's a local news source Steve,

55:10

you don't pay for the near tenth that you

55:12

work at dusk. I were to give you a

55:14

seat. There were people who were saying members of

55:16

Debbie I Say and I was like both Empress

55:18

and computers like they're just stare giving you money

55:20

that is just fit. In fact that he's to

55:22

take a slight break up probably. I still subscribe

55:24

a my household so surprised to a bunch of

55:26

local California. Things and also some local New

55:28

York things but I'm some as a don't

55:30

want out like I'm a media professional and

55:32

I'm just going to have a different way

55:35

information habit on the some other people do.

55:37

I honestly think that wonders good place to

55:39

start is not trying to mimic like anybody

55:41

else is pattern to sick. In.

55:43

Your max there should be. Local.

55:45

News: If your news consumer Local Lucid exists

55:47

somewhere in that the I: even if you're

55:49

not subscribe to it, you're just actually does

55:52

reading at you. Get the email newsletter and

55:54

open it up your local paper. That's really

55:56

something right? Then you know a little bit

55:58

more about it and they can the be

56:00

advertising off of that on. I get a

56:02

bunch of music newsletters that I love, like

56:05

features and restated. odd.a strain flow stayed arm

56:07

us and I read these and I picks

56:09

up a bunch of my time and it's

56:11

grade I: the Kindle app like I read

56:13

all the books I like Box actually like

56:15

carrying around magazines. I still kind of. Magazines

56:18

are my favorite single format for consuming media

56:20

in. I feel healthier when I do it.

56:22

Too if we're losing them at all. And.

56:25

We're entering a new era where like

56:27

things are crammed but like different things

56:29

may become possible. What? De Saint. The

56:32

next wave of. Experimental.

56:34

Successful possible Me organizations

56:36

or. Media individuals

56:38

might look like the So it is

56:40

a really important to me to not.

56:43

Make. The sound to like more place everything

56:45

with last arm I think we're in like

56:47

a kind of declined but but us can

56:49

have ups and downs and I do think.

56:52

I'm. Very. Strange eating. This is

56:55

a great time. To start

56:57

media organizations slice. One

56:59

I think that one of the things that

57:01

went wrong the last time is we just

57:04

believed in business model that wasn't real and

57:06

I we built for business model the wasn't

57:08

real and them and abysmal the became not

57:10

real. The things built on top of it

57:12

began to collapse. I think people actually have

57:15

a more realistic view right now it's like

57:17

they're few real business models. He get people

57:19

to pay for something rather. me the great

57:21

innovation a sub stack is. It turned out

57:23

that you could get people to pay more

57:26

for an individual rider than anybody thought the

57:28

F Re people would pay. Sixty eighty. A

57:30

hundred dollars a year to for somebody they

57:32

liked. and then you didn't need that many

57:34

those people, right? If you have five thousand

57:36

of them, had thousand of them, That's you.

57:38

Know that's I could support a newsroom of

57:40

Twenty, but it does support something real. One

57:43

thing about the social media scale plays

57:45

is that they pushed towards. Generalities:

57:50

right? You are trying to compete with

57:52

everything and be like viral waves like

57:54

washing was popping. All I think this

57:56

era of the media is gonna push

57:58

toward specificity you wanted. Very specific

58:00

things the ten or fifteen or twenty

58:02

or twenty five thousand people will find

58:04

of immense value to them and pay

58:07

money for. and that's how lot of

58:09

media traditionally work That me there a

58:11

of really important magazines it always have

58:13

like low tens of thousands of scriber

58:15

as the your public washroom of the

58:17

The American Prospect than Us interview or

58:19

incredibly Important in American Life and make

58:21

is still are. I think there's a

58:23

lot of philanthropic interest right now and

58:25

local news and I think you could

58:27

create a lot of really amazing local

58:29

news. Products: I think that we now know

58:31

how to do subscriptions much better than we did

58:33

ten years ago. I think we've more distribution possibilities

58:35

are that we've learned more about how to write

58:37

for people online. Race: I think there's a lot

58:39

of room for things that do not need to

58:42

attain scale like I think you're gonna have a

58:44

lot of things that are five, ten twenty people

58:46

and are not trying to get bigger than that.

58:48

Cf. And. Because and I'll try to get

58:50

bigger than that they can do with the doing

58:52

well at a reasonable cost. and like people can

58:54

get a tremendous amount of value from those products.

58:57

Fifty people like you can do a lot with

58:59

that. Most the new things I love with like

59:01

that like for for media which seem like really

59:03

amazing tech coverage that for people to sources of.

59:06

I read right now like a really Blackbirds by

59:08

plane was like a sub sank that about men's

59:10

fashion I don't know how to wear clothes are

59:12

my close to where I'd never bought an article

59:14

of clothing because I read about in Blackbirds by

59:17

Plane. I think that because I was thinking. When

59:19

they have dress better it hasn't happened.

59:21

but like I did enjoy a voice

59:23

he specific saying about a world that

59:25

I'm enjoying being of layer and you

59:28

know he has. It's a difficult thing

59:30

that I think is unsolved for this

59:32

period is distribution at the beginning so

59:34

that the part of this the I

59:36

think is gonna be once we figure

59:38

it out. The click that makes a

59:40

lot of this flower is okay. you

59:42

started the specific things. How. Do

59:44

get it out there. Because. That's what

59:46

search engine optimization and social media where

59:48

the answers to for a while For

59:50

a they told you how to go

59:52

from nowhere to an audience. Like

59:54

you were hooking on to these distribution

59:57

platforms that already existed as if oldest

59:59

gotten worse. No, really, it's

1:00:01

much harder to do that right. I mean,

1:00:03

he many people may. The pointed sub stack

1:00:05

was very fundamental way for people to monetize

1:00:08

twitter audiences. See as twitter breaks down,

1:00:10

he can't do that as effectively. So. Right

1:00:12

now I think how you have a

1:00:15

finance relationship with the noughties Israeli solves.

1:00:17

I think that the editorial opportunities are

1:00:19

really they're I think there is gonna

1:00:21

be at least some money in terms

1:00:23

of like subscription and Slim brought arm

1:00:25

and to some degree advertising which can

1:00:28

support quite a lot more at least.

1:00:30

And it is supporting currently. and the

1:00:32

the hard question of this era is

1:00:34

distribution. Like how do you go from

1:00:36

nobody reads this thing or knows about

1:00:39

it to. Fifty

1:00:41

thousand was like not very much for the

1:00:43

internet by like but it is enough. maybe

1:00:45

get a thousand subscribers. If you're doing a

1:00:47

great job at he get there. Once.

1:00:49

You figure that out. I think you're going to see a lot of things built.

1:00:59

As or Climb Media got in

1:01:01

at V and host of the

1:01:03

podcast be as reclines out Also

1:01:06

I promise of the New York

1:01:08

Times as or thank you thank

1:01:10

you for this was troubling. A

1:01:12

pleasant ah. Urgent

1:02:01

in his presentation of Odyssey and six

1:02:04

average accessed. If you liked this episode

1:02:06

and you want to help fund our

1:02:08

so please add up for our paid

1:02:11

a premium Sees at search engine that

1:02:13

show you had all sorts of benefits

1:02:15

including sonus interviews and audio you to

1:02:17

learn more as search engine. Search

1:02:21

engine was created by me Pg about and

1:02:23

true the Bit of Money as Bruce by

1:02:25

dared to him and know John Sasha him

1:02:27

this week by Shown isn't theme original composition

1:02:29

and mixing by our members are. An

1:02:31

executive producers are Generalize Berman and

1:02:34

Leah Resellers hastens him exhausts as

1:02:36

kidney which proud of the judge

1:02:38

that and the team and Odyssey

1:02:40

Jedi trolley problem and he had

1:02:43

talks Eric Donnelly to Hutchison. met

1:02:45

Casey Marker and says it is

1:02:47

offenses are Courtney in L Rida

1:02:49

Follow and listen to search engine

1:02:51

with Pj Vote now for free

1:02:54

on Odyssey app or wherever you

1:02:56

get your podcasts and again if

1:02:58

you like to help support this

1:03:00

show. Humor. Com if he'd subscriber

1:03:03

at search engine such as

1:03:05

also some. City.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features