16:00

But what you're worried about bots now

16:02

when we know that our nations are

16:04

just as guilty of that same kind

16:06

of Insurrectionist insidious activity

16:08

in China in the Philippines and presumably

16:10

in Russia. That's just standard fare You

16:12

can't condemn them for that. And if

16:14

you can't take a little bit of

16:16

abuse on the internet Well bloody hell

16:18

don't start looking at my ex-feed, baby

16:21

That we stand against that aggression

16:25

That's you know standing behind Ukraine, but also

16:27

standing up for our freedom Right,

16:29

you've got to stand up for our freedom. Thank

16:31

you stand up for our freedom Let's have a

16:33

look then at Kia Stama's role in the persecution

16:35

of Julian Assange If you're watching us on YouTube

16:37

will be there for another a couple of minutes

16:39

if you're not an awakened wonder yet consider becoming

16:41

one So you can be a member of our

16:43

book club So you get first access to brilliant

16:45

interviews like the one with Colonel Douglas McGregor or

16:47

indeed Jonathan Rumi It's up there right now me

16:49

talking to Jesus is my body double the star

16:51

of the chosen Jonathan Rumi who plays our Lord

16:54

and Savior Jesus Christ and

16:56

God knows we need some alternatives right

16:58

now. Let's have a look at what

17:00

Kia Stama said about Assange Or

17:03

rather. Thank you. Thank you most it let's have a

17:05

look before that sure Do you want to see an

17:08

advert you've got to see an advert? Let's have a

17:10

look that this is a quick advert tax network USA

17:12

will be with you for a few seconds the support

17:14

of our partners allows us to keep streaming in the

17:16

face of big tech Censorship stay with us. We're gonna

17:19

come back and we're gonna show you that stama had

17:21

four trips to Washington while head

17:23

of the CPS the Crown Prosecution Service, that's

17:25

like he was the The

17:28

Attorney General for our country. Let's

17:30

have a look at Why

17:33

those records might have been deleted and what it

17:35

might reveal have a look at this first though

17:40

Are you struggling with back taxes

17:42

or unfiled returns the IRS is

17:44

escalating collections adding get this 20,000

17:48

new agents and sending over 5 million

17:50

collection letters to kick off 2024 to

17:52

spend on things that you probably don't

17:54

agree with like wars and measures and

17:57

a total lack of infrastructure in these

17:59

challenging times Your best defense is Tax

18:01

Network USA. Don't let the IRS take

18:03

advantage of you. With over 14 years

18:05

of experience, Tax Network USA have saved

18:08

their clients over $1 billion in back

18:10

taxes. No matter the size of your

18:12

tax issue, their expertise is your advantage.

18:14

They specialize in negotiating with the IRS,

18:16

aiming to significantly reduce your debt. Tax

18:19

Network USA doesn't just negotiate, they

18:21

also protect your assets from IRS

18:23

seizures and manage your yearly returns for

18:25

ongoing compliance. Importantly, they are licensed

18:28

to help you with all state

18:30

tax issues, regardless of where you

18:32

live in the United States. The

18:34

clock is ticking. Don't wait as

18:36

the IRS steps up its game.

18:38

Seize control of your financial future

18:40

now. Contact Tax Network USA for

18:42

immediate relief and expert guidance. Call

18:44

1-800-245-6000 or visit taxnetworkusa.com/brand. Don't let

18:51

tax issues overpower you. Turn to Tax

18:53

Network USA and find your path to

18:55

financial peace of mind. All right, let's

18:57

get back to this content. This

19:00

is some excellent reporting from DC,

19:03

UK, Atlem when we post this

19:05

on X because, I'll tell you

19:07

why, because in Kistama, you have

19:09

the emergence of another globalist. In

19:12

the release of Julian Assange, you

19:14

have a potential victory for free

19:16

speech. And if Julian Assange can

19:19

be freed after revealing the corruption

19:21

of the international establishment, perhaps all

19:24

independent journalists, perhaps all independent thinkers

19:26

might come together and

19:28

apply our shared inquisitiveness, our

19:31

shared spirit of inquiry to,

19:33

well, 9-11, the

19:36

pandemic period, the kind of things we

19:38

talk about all the time. Perhaps it's

19:40

possible that the truth may burst forth

19:42

the way that Julian Assange's liberty has

19:45

punctured the bubble of totalitarianism. So the

19:47

reason it's important to look at a

19:49

figure like Kistama is not because I think

19:51

he's evil, but actually the opposite. I think

19:53

he's kind of neutral and potentially simply a

19:55

tool of the very same kind of establishment

19:57

that puts figures like Rishi Sunak in. in

20:00

positions of power. So let's have a look at

20:02

this story and look at Keir Starmer's connection to

20:04

Julian Assange and the United States of America.

20:06

Fascinating. The Crown Prosecution Service, England

20:08

and Wales's public prosecutor, has deleted

20:10

all records of its former head,

20:12

Keir Starmer's trips to the US.

20:15

It can be revealed. This is,

20:17

there will be their statement. It's

20:19

perfectly normal standard practice to delete

20:21

all of that. It's just standard practice that

20:23

we've deleted all of that. It's standard practice

20:25

to survey people online. It's standard practice to

20:28

deem, amplify, and sense of true information online.

20:30

It's standard practice to control you. It's standard

20:32

practice to move towards authoritarianism. It's standard practice

20:34

to hold elections that don't mean anything, where

20:36

you can choose anyone, as long as it's

20:38

these two people that we already control and

20:41

these two institutions that are already corrupted

20:43

by their finance models. It's standard

20:45

practice. Well, have you considered that maybe

20:47

we need new standards? Yes, that's

20:49

exactly what we're considering right now. Starmer

20:52

served as director of public prosecutions from

20:54

2008 to 2013, a

20:57

period when the body was overseeing Julian

20:59

Assange's proposed extradition to Sweden, where Hillary

21:01

Clinton, by the way, was saying, why can't

21:04

we just drown this guy? Hillary Clinton was

21:06

suggesting just murdering him, as was Mike

21:08

Pompeo, the head of the CIA. He

21:11

was similarly suggesting, why don't we just

21:14

execute him? Well, thank God that man who's

21:16

currently in Australia, where his wife and kid

21:18

wasn't murdered because he was inconvenient to the

21:20

establishment. Remember, remember whoever

21:22

it is you're thinking about voting for, whether it's next

21:25

month or in a few months, I don't remember

21:27

any leading public politician, so

21:29

I can think of a few notable people on

21:31

the left in our country that came out and

21:33

said, hey, this Julian Assange,

21:36

he should not be in jail.

21:39

Did Barack Obama say that? Did he? Did

21:41

Donald Trump say that? Did he? You

21:44

tell me, you might have seen it. I don't know, I don't know.

21:46

You tell me. Did Keir Starmer say it? I don't

21:48

know, did he? Who said it? Because

21:50

if they didn't say it, you know

21:52

what side they're on. During Starmer's

21:54

time in the post, the CPS was

21:56

marred by irregularities surrounding the case of

21:59

the WikiLeaks founder. Notice how they

22:01

have to use even this investigative organization that you've

22:03

got to assume is legit and on it because

22:05

they're reporting on An important story right here for

22:07

sure. They're just an irregularity. It's just an irregularity

22:10

It's pretty much because they're being responsible rather than

22:12

hyperbolic in there in their reporting But hey, man,

22:14

we gotta get some energy going don't we do

22:16

we need to get some energy going or should

22:18

we just? Lethargically just be

22:21

ushered in to a new

22:23

oh look I'm enjoying this new pastel

22:25

shade of tyranny We voted for this

22:27

way. Oh, this is nice this one this

22:29

new bureaucrat tyrants

22:31

got a nice haircut. I notice I like

22:34

the nasal voice of this one Oh, I

22:36

like it when we get a different color

22:38

one Oh, I like it when we have

22:40

a woman one isn't it wonderful the different

22:43

hues and shades and genders of tyranny that

22:45

we're free To choose as long as we

22:47

never expose our question the deep deep homogeneity

22:50

That is just below the surface of

22:53

the apparent diversity true diversity True

22:56

tribal freedom true individual

22:58

sovereignty true Decentralization

23:00

true ability to live as who you are

23:02

if you watch this on YouTube click the link in

23:04

the description in a minute We're gonna blow your mind

23:07

with the story about 9-11 the kind

23:09

of stories that have to be revisited in light

23:11

of the Release of Julian Assange wherever you are

23:13

in the world you deserve to be free whatever

23:15

you believe in politically You have the right to

23:17

discuss it freely whoever you think you have you

23:20

hate right now You have the right to reach

23:22

out to them in peace and in good faith

23:24

And that's what we believe in and that's why

23:26

we're here in rumble We will be streaming live

23:28

for the presidential debates live. I'll be in my

23:30

Jim jams, baby I'm in the UK click the

23:33

link in description get over to rumble

23:35

join us During

23:37

time is the CPS. Oh, yeah, I'll go straight. I'll carry

23:39

on with the story if that's alright guys My

23:42

screens just got something else If

23:44

I may go back to the still of the star which

23:46

I think you're on is it girl The

23:49

CPS was marred by regularities surrounding

23:51

the case of the WikiLeaks founder

23:53

the organization has admitted to destroying

23:56

Destroying key mouse related to

23:58

this mostly covering the

24:01

period when Stama was in charge while the

24:03

CPS lawyer overseeing the case advised the Swedes

24:05

in 2010

24:07

or 2011 not to visit London to

24:10

interview Assange. An interview at that time

24:12

could have prevented the long-running embassy

24:14

standoff. This is of course a reference to the

24:16

fact that Julian Assange was at the inauguration

24:19

of his persecution accused of sex crimes

24:22

in Sweden. We will remember that of

24:24

course. Let's have a look at the

24:26

next I'm in charge of

24:28

this. I'm in charge of this stuff. Excuse me. Let

24:31

me I was wondering who's in charge It's like that

24:33

empty boat thing, isn't it? You know, like if you

24:35

there's a guy asleep in a rowboat

24:37

on a lake Just drifting in

24:39

and out of consciousness and there's a boat

24:41

keeps knocking into him. He's getting all infuriated

24:43

about why is this boat banging into me?

24:45

Why is this boat banging into me? Then

24:48

he's all infuriated then he sort of flies

24:50

his eyes and looks there's no one in

24:52

the boat It's an empty vessel. All of

24:54

us really are connected and united on a

24:56

molecular level Perhaps there are abrasive moments and

24:58

brushes and bumps between us But ultimately are

25:00

we not all children of the same source?

25:02

Are we not all on our journey home?

25:04

Let me know in the chat if you

25:06

believe in that or you or

25:09

you could use your free speech like Sammy

25:11

the soothsayer say Biden eats and fucks babies.

25:13

Vote that sicko and Democrats out save the

25:15

USA for me. It's all the same Jim

25:18

jams haven't heard that so long Russ says Kenzie

25:21

six seven a Sarge

25:23

on WikiLeaks began publishing Classified US diplomatic

25:25

cables in alliance with some of the

25:28

world's largest newspapers in November 2010 in

25:30

the same month Sweden Issued an international

25:32

arrest warrant for Assange over allegations of

25:34

sexual misconduct Leading to

25:36

a protracted legal battle in which the

25:39

CPS was heavily involved I'd like to

25:41

know what Kia Starmer has to say

25:43

on that subject right now What?

25:47

What are the redacted deleted? Emails

25:50

what are the visits to Washington? What

25:52

is his position on Julian Assange? Is he happy

25:54

that Julian Assange is free now? Does he recognize

25:57

that Julian Assange would never have been imprisoned in

25:59

the first place? for one thing,

26:01

he never had a trial, except for of

26:03

course a trial by media, which seems to

26:05

be a way that many dissenting voices can

26:07

be attacked and undermined these days. We've

26:10

seen it time and time again. But while

26:12

there is no longer any official record of what Starma

26:14

did on these four trips on the British side, some

26:16

information has come to light on the US side. US

26:18

record showed on the 9th of November, 2011, the

26:21

US Attorney General, Eric Holder, met with Starma

26:23

at his office at the US Department of

26:25

Justice, the DOJ, for 45 minutes. Starma's

26:28

CPS was then handling

26:30

Assange's proposed extradition to

26:32

Sweden. Declassified

26:35

has previously shown that the UK Home

26:37

Office deployed eight staff on the secret

26:39

operation to seize Assange from his asylum

26:41

at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. This

26:43

was a highly irregular move as Ecuador

26:45

is a friendly country and the

26:48

asylum is a right enshrined in

26:50

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

26:53

I visited Julian Assange in the

26:55

Ecuadorian Embassy during that period. He

26:57

was obviously extremely weary, exhausted from

27:00

what he was carrying, perhaps even

27:02

having an understanding of what trials

27:04

and challenges were yet to come.

27:07

It was curious to meet him there. I

27:10

looked around the Ecuadorian Embassy and at

27:13

the time reflected on the ludicrousness that

27:15

there were a laces and sanctuaries to

27:17

be found in the sort of same

27:19

actual territory in which he

27:21

was being persecuted. We were literally in London,

27:23

but in that building in London, they couldn't

27:26

get him. It was

27:28

like you're playing tag or hide and seek and you're

27:30

in the base. It just made me recognize how temporal

27:33

and abstract some principles actually are.

27:36

I'm not suggesting there aren't universals, but it

27:38

is peculiar to know that Julian Assange found

27:40

himself in sanctuary for that moment.

27:42

He slept behind a bookcase in the corner and

27:45

I asked, can I see that? He goes,

27:47

no, that's where I sleep. That's the last

27:49

bit of privacy that I've got left. As

27:51

Julian Assange himself shared, Mark Zuckerberg has become

27:54

rich and

27:56

has been a part of it. They are two

27:58

massive corporations and potentially sharing it with government. Certainly

28:00

some of them. Edward Snowden's revelations seem to suggest

28:02

that that's precisely the case. Big

28:04

tech communications companies sharing our

28:06

information is an extraordinary to

28:08

learn that privacy in itself

28:11

has become a kind of

28:13

commodity. That technology is supercharging

28:15

state and corporate power to

28:17

the degree where new forms

28:19

of authoritarianism are plainly on

28:21

the horizon. No wonder then

28:23

that people are looking to

28:25

Britain first, America first, France

28:27

first, Germany first, whatever nation

28:29

first, politicians to stop this

28:32

incremental creep of corrupt

28:34

power from swallowing us

28:37

all up. Julian Assange

28:39

went from the Ecuadorian embassy

28:42

straight to Belmarsh without

28:44

trial. Watch what

28:46

our political leaders say now. Watch

28:49

what Biden and Trump say in the debates

28:51

tomorrow night, which we will be streaming live

28:53

by the way. Join us for that. Even

28:56

though it means I'm going to be up

28:58

late in addressing down or confused, maybe smoking

29:00

a fag or baffled and that may

29:02

be in a hairnet with rollers on and everything. Join

29:05

us for that. And watch what

29:07

Kia Starmer eventually says, what Rishi

29:09

Sunak says. What are they going

29:11

to do? Oh, he put American military power. He's

29:13

going to take the Mike Pence route through this.

29:15

Is that route going to be available to him?

29:17

I'm not sure anymore. I'm not sure. It

29:19

will be fascinating. The

29:22

CPS is lack of disclosure of documents

29:24

related to Assange may raise suspicions

29:26

of a cover up while Starmer was still in charge

29:28

in April 2013. The CPS rejected

29:30

Assange's request for the personal data it

29:32

had on him because of the live

29:35

matters still pending. I wonder why Assange

29:37

wasn't given his legal right

29:39

to access under the Free Freedom

29:41

of Information Act to those documents.

29:44

Those documents, why do you want a

29:46

government that's just sort of controlling you

29:49

and censoring you and surveilling you? Is

29:51

there an opportunity for you in the next election

29:54

in your nation to vote against that? Are there

29:56

independent candidates that say that you will run your

29:58

own life? The government will be your servant. We

30:00

will end lobbying, we will end donations, and

30:02

we will ensure that you have as much

30:05

power as possible. We will pull our countries

30:07

out of foreign conflicts immediately.

30:09

Stop this madness. Let's get out of

30:11

these wars. Let's do whatever we can

30:13

to improve your life, to start supporting

30:16

infrastructure. That's the only function of government.

30:18

You don't come to us for ideology.

30:20

We've proven that we're ideologically bankrupt. You

30:22

go to your God or your lack

30:24

of God for ideology, and we'll get

30:26

on with making sure that the trash

30:28

gets collected on time, that your streets

30:30

are clean, that your schools are working, and you can

30:33

get doctor appointments. We'll leave you alone and shut the

30:35

fuck up, which is what we should have done a

30:37

long time ago. Because when it comes to morals, we've

30:39

got nothing really to offer, have we? The

30:41

CPSC is like a disclosure of documents. Oh,

30:44

yeah, I told you that. Even GCHQ, the

30:46

UK's largest spy agency, had granted Assange his

30:48

request for the personal information it held on

30:50

him, which revealed one of its intelligence officers

30:52

calling the Swedish case a fit up. Well,

30:54

what an astonishing revelation that

30:56

was. And that was it was a

30:59

fit up. Let's

31:02

just briefly, Hillary Clinton, though, had

31:04

some interesting views on it. This

31:06

is from Fox. Hillary Clinton inquired,

31:09

can't we just drone this guy?

31:11

Well, thank God she couldn't just

31:13

drone that guy. And whatever Keir

31:15

Starmer, Hillary Clinton knew or didn't

31:18

know, whatever these globalist figures interchangeable,

31:20

in my view, who seem to

31:22

end a public life relatively poor,

31:24

leave public life pretty goddamn rich,

31:27

seem to have another angle. I

31:29

don't know how it works. I'm

31:31

just another person trying to make my

31:33

way in this world. But Julian Assange's

31:35

freedom and release has told us a

31:37

lot about corruption. It's told us a

31:39

lot about the obligations of independent journalism

31:41

and independent journalists. And it's told us

31:43

a lot about the collective power we share.

31:45

Whoever those of you were that were continually

31:47

campaigning for Julian Assange's release, you won. The

31:50

people in Australia, the people in America, people

31:52

across the world that held faith a difficult

31:54

time. I certainly can't claim to be among

31:56

the number that held fast. I was terrified

31:58

when that dude started getting it. visit

34:00

TWC.health/brand and use our code brand to

34:02

save $30 plus get free shipping on

34:04

your Contagion kit. Okay, back to the

34:06

content. I want to tell you something,

34:09

I've known John Oliver for a very

34:11

long time. I've done stand-up gigs with

34:13

John Oliver in front of like 10,

34:15

20, 30

34:17

people, small rooms. That guy 20 years

34:20

ago, I reckon, maybe even longer ago,

34:22

he is a nerd about politics. He

34:24

loved politics. He's interested in it. So

34:26

whatever John Oliver is, he

34:28

really believes I think in what

34:30

he's saying. And I also believe

34:32

he's very, very funny. And his

34:34

success in the United States of

34:36

America is well deserved. But I

34:38

must say that when I saw

34:40

him saying that a victory for

34:42

Keir Starmer would be a victory

34:44

for democracy, even if those weren't

34:46

the literal words he used, I

34:48

felt kind of conflicted. John

34:50

Oliver said that July the 4th was the opportunity

34:53

for British people to have our own Independence Day.

34:55

That the 4th of July needn't mean a kind

34:57

of a moment of embarrassment. Oh, God, that was

34:59

awful. They kicked us out for our taxis without

35:01

representation. You know, it was a good

35:04

premise for a joke. John Oliver, I

35:06

would say, is extremely funny and extremely

35:08

good comedian. But this is

35:10

something I believe is important. And I

35:13

think might be perhaps you tell me

35:15

the most important thing when it comes

35:17

to politics in countries like yours and

35:19

ours. If you're going to vote

35:21

for someone that's ultimately going to do precisely

35:23

the same sort of stuff that the previous

35:25

government did that doesn't have any real ideas,

35:27

and just use the Julian Assange example if

35:29

you want as a kind of thermometer barometer for

35:31

this one. You know, in Keir Starmer, you're

35:33

not voting for a leader who's like, for

35:35

the last four years, we've got to get

35:37

Julian Assange out of that prison. This is

35:39

ridiculous. It's free speech. We've got to have a

35:41

free press. No, you're voting for someone who

35:43

was the head of the CPS that potentially

35:46

collaborated with, maybe even conspired to ensure

35:49

that Julian Assange didn't get a fair

35:51

trial, didn't get freedom, didn't get to

35:53

stay in the Ecuadorian embassy, even though

35:56

that's a very peculiar wish, the grant

35:58

of anybody, some might recall the... Keir

36:00

Stalmer didn't prosecute Jimmy Savile when he

36:02

had the opportunity. So being hysterical, he

36:05

was a brutal sexual

36:07

predator in our country for a while.

36:09

Had interesting ties to the Royal Family

36:11

and all sorts of charities and powerful

36:14

figures. Kind of like a British Epstein

36:16

in a way. You'll note that a

36:18

lot of establishment figures seem to have

36:21

peculiar sex stuff going on. I'm not

36:23

talking about promiscuity. I'm not talking about

36:25

being out there getting amongst it. I'm

36:27

talking about weird stuff that involves trafficking,

36:30

going to islands and people being sort

36:32

of maneuvered around. And peculiar, extraordinary, dark

36:34

shit. What I think is

36:36

fascinating here in this

36:39

John Oliver video is the

36:41

endorsement of keeping politics between

36:43

very narrow lines. Again,

36:45

I like John Oliver as a comedian and

36:47

as a human being actually, as from what I remember

36:49

of him the years ago when I used to know

36:51

him. But the idea that

36:53

British people should be satisfied with

36:56

getting rid of the Conservatives, the

36:58

Tories, our right wing-ish party, is

37:01

laughable, visible and ridiculous and amounts

37:03

to simply championing and

37:06

trumpeting for the establishment to

37:08

get another four years. This

37:10

time in the form of

37:12

another authoritarian, centralist bureaucrat, prosecutor

37:14

of the innocent, I prefer

37:16

Davos to Westminster, Marionette.

37:18

Let's have a look at that

37:21

as a sort of an

37:23

opportunity to examine what people mean

37:25

when they say that organisations like

37:27

HBO ultimately parrot talking points of

37:29

the establishment and even amplify

37:31

their agenda. Think of some of

37:33

Alex Jones's remarks about his HBO

37:35

streamed trials, which of course, extraordinarily,

37:37

continues to use the idea that

37:40

it's the victims of Sandy Hook

37:42

that are being supported. And God

37:44

knows anyone that's lost a child

37:46

that deserve limitless love, limitless support.

37:49

But is the ongoing shutting

37:51

down of info wars and Alex Jones about that? It's a

37:53

question that we can continue to ask. Let's have a look

37:55

at this. to

38:00

self-plead a 14 miserable years of conservative

38:03

rule and is a chance it simply

38:05

must take. If I

38:07

may quote Bill Pullman yelling about aliens,

38:09

if we do this, the

38:11

4th of July will no longer be known

38:13

as just an American holiday, but also as

38:15

the day when Britain looked at the Conservatives

38:18

who've driven the entire country into a ditch

38:21

and said in one voice loud and clear. The

38:24

thing is though that the

38:26

Labour Party will remain in that

38:28

ditch. I wonder what single policy

38:30

could be pointed to as an

38:32

example of how there will be

38:35

change for ordinary British people. I

38:37

wonder what in particular about Keir

38:39

Starmer's past or history or vision

38:41

for the future could be celebrated

38:43

as bringing about the kind of

38:45

change that this piece seems to

38:47

be calling forth beckoning celebrating because

38:49

I don't see that happening. Keir

38:52

Starmer is Tony Blair without the charisma

38:54

and Tony Blair without the charisma is

38:56

just a war criminal. So God knows

38:58

what kind of globalist nightmares may await

39:00

us if people happily go vote for

39:03

Keir Starmer saying well it's not perfect

39:05

it's the best we can do. The

39:07

best we can do is what's gotten

39:09

us in this mess. We need to

39:11

become radical. We need to awaken to

39:13

new possibility. We need to look for

39:16

new alliances. Anything that's a

39:18

vote against the establishment, even if that's

39:20

not voting at all, is better

39:22

than supporting the ongoing establishment tyranny in

39:24

the form of interchangeable bureaucrats. But that's

39:27

just what I think. Why don't

39:29

you let me know what you think.

39:32

Can you think of a single political leader

39:34

that's saying we're going to end the donations,

39:36

we're going to end the lobbying, we're going

39:38

to end the corruption, we're going to end

39:40

the divisiveness, corrupt culturally, we're going to empower

39:42

you individually, we're going to do whatever it

39:45

takes to ensure that your mandates, your referenda

39:47

are what we govern by. We

39:49

are your servants. We are no longer

39:51

your leaders. We can no longer claim

39:53

those principles. We've made too many mistakes

39:55

for too long. You're in charge now.

39:57

Make your own mistakes. Oh

54:00

man, yeah. What happened was this led

54:02

to thousands of people dying

54:05

in those towers, people dying on airplanes, and some

54:07

of you questioned that, and certainly in the subsequent

54:09

wars, just death, death, death, death, death, you just

54:11

become annuished to it, and then you have an

54:13

election, and you get all excited. Which one of

54:15

these warm, hungering bureaucrats? It's

54:17

not even personal, is it? They're

54:19

just nodes in a net. They're

54:22

just points lighting up in the

54:24

circuit. It doesn't matter. They're replaceable.

54:26

They're irrelevant. They're redundant. And until

54:29

we sort of awaken and take

54:31

personal responsibility for the trajectory of

54:33

our kind, then maybe

54:35

we deserve to be tyrannized in this manner.

54:38

At this point indicates the Saudi

54:41

government was complicit in the 9-11

54:43

attacks. Ken Williams is

54:45

a retired FBI agent who led the

54:47

9-11 investigation in Phoenix, where one of

54:49

the- Ken, can you just walk across

54:51

this shot? I don't like it, but

54:53

I'll do it. Would you let us,

54:55

would you walk with another diplomat just

54:57

like an inch behind you? That I

54:59

will not do. I'm a fed, ma'am.

55:01

A hijacker's attended flight school. He's

55:03

also a consultant on the case filed

55:05

by the 9-11 families. In terms of

55:07

all the revelations that have come out

55:10

as part of this 9-11 lawsuit, where

55:12

does this video rank? I think it

55:14

ranks right at the top of the

55:16

pile. The government of Saudi Arabia says

55:19

nothing to see here. This is a tourist video.

55:21

This is a guy out looking at

55:23

the sites in Washington, D.C. I would

55:25

vehemently disagree with that. This is not

55:27

a tourist video. The British- I'm happy

55:29

we can agree that. I'm

55:31

having a lovely holiday. Here are my

55:34

men marching- my friends, I mean marching

55:36

in unison. Here are some significant landmarks.

55:38

There is airport. This is all good

55:40

for the plan. And by plan, I

55:42

mean holiday that I'm having. Police are

55:44

believed to have turned over the video

55:47

to the FBI shortly after 9-11, which

55:49

raises the question. Why, after

55:51

more than 20 years, is it

55:53

just now surfacing? Did somebody really

55:56

mess this up? This seems like a

55:58

really big thing.