Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
in order to provide more value, you need to,
0:03
um, The improve
0:05
the, And in order to provide more value, you
0:07
need to, improve the,
0:10
improve your skills or be able
0:12
to, yeah, essentially just become
0:14
better at what you're doing. And you
0:17
can only do that if you
0:19
spend the time and
0:21
investigate the time and effort. and usually the
0:24
people that are willing to invest that
0:26
much time and effort are people that are passionate
0:29
about a certain, topic in
0:31
this case design. But it applies to everything.
0:34
Because if you just wanna
0:36
do it for the money and you don't
0:38
enjoy the work, then it's
0:41
going to be excruciating to dedicate
0:43
that amount of time to become good at something.
0:45
And I think I do. I'm not idealistic. I
0:48
know there's a balance between, being
0:50
passionate about something and
0:53
being, doing something that you're good at. If
0:55
you're good at something, you are more likely
0:58
to enjoy doing it. If
1:00
you're frustrated and struggling and not
1:03
getting results, then it's not an enjoyable
1:05
experience. And even if it's something
1:07
that, or an yeah,
1:09
an area of interest or something
1:12
that you enjoy seeing doesn't
1:14
mean that it'll automatically translate.
1:17
Trying to better your skills and find
1:19
that sweet spot between Doing something
1:21
that you enjoy and doing something
1:24
that provides value to others and
1:27
being willing to put in the work. There's
1:30
no shortcut, no, no hack.
1:32
At least that I found. Overall, I think that's
1:35
the key. Then we can get into specifics
1:37
like don't know, tactical Decisions
1:40
or what exactly to do at
1:42
a certain point in your career. But
1:45
if that's one piece of advice that I
1:47
would give it would be that
1:48
like that. Yeah. The shortcut in
1:50
life is to realize there are no
1:52
shortcuts and stop looking for shortcuts and
1:54
just do the work. Yeah. I like that.
1:57
So let's talk about brand identity. For
2:00
a startup, what are your thoughts on how
2:02
somebody that's I guess brand identity can go to
2:05
not only a startup, any type of business or
2:07
social media, whatever, like the
2:09
brand specifically. What are your thoughts around maybe
2:11
what are people doing wrong? What
2:14
is the common mistakes and what
2:16
do you see that people could benefit
2:19
from your expertise on that?
2:20
Brand design is a very wide
2:23
topic, but if
2:25
I would have to pick something to
2:27
point out, I think a lot of startups
2:30
are struggling to find
2:32
a happy middle when it comes to brand design.
2:35
Some of them, ignore it almost
2:38
altogether thinking that it's a,
2:40
they need to focus on the product or
2:43
solving a problem. And brand,
2:46
brand design and their brand identity
2:49
is just it's a luxury at that
2:51
point. And they ignore it.
2:53
At the end though, at the other end of
2:55
the spectrum, there are people that invest
2:58
too much time in crafting a
3:00
beautiful brand iden visual brand
3:03
identity or to a
3:06
lot of marketing around their brand.
3:08
And in the detriment of developing
3:11
a product that people actually want. So
3:14
For a startup, I think identity is
3:16
important because that is
3:19
what sets you apart. And
3:21
by brand identity, we don't, I'm not
3:23
referring only to, the visual
3:26
aspect like their logo or
3:28
their visual identity. I'm
3:30
referring to the perception
3:33
they Are helping
3:35
shape in the minds of their customers. Because
3:38
essentially that's, that, that's what
3:40
brand identity is is what
3:42
people think about you not your
3:45
visual identity. I think, for
3:48
the most part you need to invest
3:51
in understanding your customer. On,
3:54
on one side and on the
3:56
other side is defining who you want
3:58
to be. That's where
4:00
brand identity, I think needs
4:02
to be. If you're just thinking about who
4:05
you are and what you wanna express. Then
4:08
and not thinking about the customer, then you're
4:10
not going to design something that's attractive
4:13
to them. And on the
4:15
other end, if you are too concerned with what
4:17
people think about you, and trying to design
4:19
something that doesn't really state
4:22
anything or isn't polarizing in any
4:24
way, then again it is going to be
4:27
very bland and With brand identity,
4:29
you want to have character. You want to stand out
4:32
in a certain way. You want to create a
4:35
an impression. For example I
4:37
was listening to a podcast. It
4:39
was I'm blanking on the the
4:41
name at the moment but. It
4:43
was this marketing pundit that
4:46
was giving the example of a
4:49
of a hotel. A lot of hotels are
4:52
somewhat branded visually. They
4:54
have a logo, they have a website
4:57
but they don't really have a brand identity
4:59
because you don't have any expectations
5:02
on. What you
5:04
will, how your experience with that
5:07
hotel is going to be before you
5:09
book the hotel. So that's
5:11
why a lot of people are just sorting
5:13
by price. Whenever you are looking
5:16
for a hotel you set some
5:18
minimum criteria do you want what
5:21
type of rumor do you want the dates and so on.
5:23
Then you sort by price and then you try
5:25
to find, The lowest price for
5:27
the quality you want. But
5:29
if you would have a hotel that
5:32
is designed, built, and
5:34
run by Apple or by
5:36
Nike, then you
5:39
already can imagine what that hotel
5:41
will look like how it
5:43
will run, what types of features
5:46
or amenities it would have, and so on. If
5:49
you imagine
5:50
the most importantly, the standard
5:52
of quality across the board, right? Standard
5:55
of quality. And in
5:57
the case of apple, for example, you
5:59
would imagine a very high tech place, right?
6:01
Where everything is very user-friendly,
6:03
very easy to use and so
6:05
on. Filled with Apple devices, of
6:08
course. But the overall experience would
6:10
be high tech would be automated
6:12
for the most part, and so on. Organized,
6:15
clean, intuitive, elegant. Yeah. If
6:17
on the other hand, if you are checking in at
6:20
a Nike Run hotel, you expect that
6:22
to be much more energetic focused
6:24
on sports, having an amazing
6:27
gym maybe having a community
6:29
of people there that are all into working
6:31
gout and so on. You will have
6:34
a healthier breakfast filled with,
6:36
I don't know With nutritious food that,
6:39
that, that's tailored to your
6:41
macronutrients or whatever. So you
6:43
can imagine what you would
6:46
experience there. You already have some
6:48
sort of expectations. that's what branding
6:50
is. So that's what we
6:52
create the expectation visually,
6:55
but also with the quality of whatever service or
6:57
product the person gets used to we
6:59
delivering. Sure. So it gets part of
7:01
the part of the branding comes from the actual product
7:04
and service experience.
7:05
Exactly. So a lot of people are
7:08
especially designers, focus on the
7:10
visual aspect of a brand. But
7:13
everyone is branding the company from
7:16
the c e o all the way to people
7:18
in at Cust doing customer support.
7:22
They're influencing the
7:24
People's perception of the brand. So
7:26
they're essentially doing branding. That's why
7:28
they're thought they're they
7:31
re receive a lot of training
7:34
into how to talk to people, how
7:36
to solve issues how
7:39
to I don't know, deal
7:41
with tense situations and
7:43
so on, because The customer's
7:45
experience reflects on the brand, on,
7:48
on their reputation. So
7:50
it's not just what marketing
7:54
materials you put out and how they are designed. It's
7:56
everything. It's your product, it's the
7:58
team the the culture
8:00
that you're building as a company also influences
8:03
the brand because the the
8:05
company's reputation is, largely
8:08
influenced by the people
8:10
working there by the by
8:13
their values and what they're building. Yeah.
8:17
That's perfect. I like that.
8:19
So let's talk a little bit
8:21
about what is scope creep
8:24
and how can we avoid it?
8:26
So scope creep is usually it's
8:29
an unfortunate practice when
8:32
you are designing something and
8:35
deciding what features to build. You start
8:37
off with an idea of what we wanna build,
8:40
and then you just add more and more
8:42
to it. So the
8:45
Why do you add more to it? why
8:47
do people add more to it? What, is there a temptation
8:49
or the idea they have in their head that
8:51
makes them do this?
8:52
I think it comes down to not
8:55
fully understanding what the
8:57
customer actually wants or what the
8:59
user wants. Because if
9:01
you are certain you
9:03
understand the problem the
9:06
user need. And your goal is
9:08
to solve that need, then
9:11
it's very easy to distinguish between
9:14
what's a must have and what's a nice to
9:16
have. And scope creep
9:18
happens when, because
9:22
for the most part, people don't wanna impose
9:24
their will and Spend
9:27
a lot of time and resources on
9:29
something that's just a nice to have that's just
9:31
something that can, it
9:33
would be a good feature, but not critical
9:36
at that point in time. But when
9:39
you're not sure what's the right answer,
9:42
then you start Being
9:44
tempted to add on more
9:47
and more features onto a product
9:50
that may contribute to self
9:52
solving the problem. I think
9:54
that's the simplest definition
9:56
of scope creep. And how to
9:58
fix
9:59
it called scope creep. Like Wes, what
10:01
I, can you explain the why
10:03
the word scope creep?
10:05
So you are referring to the
10:07
scope of a project, what exactly
10:10
that project is about and creep
10:12
because more and more ideas creep
10:15
in and it start expanding
10:17
the scope of a project. So
10:20
it's like moving the goalposts
10:22
all the time or widening
10:25
them and so on. That's
10:27
what I think that's the simplest
10:29
way to explain it. So people
10:31
sometimes think that more is better,
10:33
more feature, and yeah, some, and
10:35
it's very difficult for, I think, humans in almost
10:37
every aspect of life to reduce,
10:40
simplify, that was why Apple,
10:42
the Steve Job era was so amazing. Everything,
10:45
nothing Too many buttons,
10:47
confusing people, too many things
10:49
that don't even work well. 'cause there's so many that
10:52
they're not focused on making something
10:54
really good.
10:55
Exactly. And people
10:57
have good intentions when they're doing this. They
10:59
want to solve the problem, but they're not fully
11:01
understanding what the user needs. And
11:04
it's not easy. I'm not blaming people.
11:06
I know how hard it is to Figure
11:09
out what exactly the right
11:12
solution is because, it
11:14
takes a lot of effort to do the
11:16
research. And it's also, it's
11:18
both a science and an art form
11:20
in a sense because people
11:23
will try to explain what
11:26
the what their problems are and
11:28
what they think the solution the ideal
11:31
solution is. But People
11:33
are not experts in solutions.
11:36
They're experts in their problem. You
11:38
can interview them and
11:41
do user research through
11:43
different methods to try
11:45
to understand the problem. But
11:47
even there, it's not so
11:49
easy to identify because, This
11:51
is a, again a wide topic, but
11:54
people, have a hard time expressing
11:57
exactly their, what their
11:59
problem is. Sometimes they
12:01
give you the answer that they
12:03
think you want to hear and
12:05
so on. So it's definitely not
12:08
easy to identify the
12:10
problem and what the solution
12:12
needs to be. But. In
12:15
order to avoid scope, creep and wasting
12:18
resources, it's something that
12:20
you need to do.
12:21
Got it. Got it. So
12:24
let's talk about design. I
12:26
see I like design. I'm
12:28
not a designer. I didn't study, but I've always had a, I've
12:31
always liked design and I've always had a feeling
12:33
for what's good design, bad design, and
12:36
I see a lot of bad
12:38
design. It seems to be
12:40
something difficult to come across
12:43
a truly good design in any, in
12:45
anything, whether it be like
12:48
a visual thing or a product. Talk
12:50
to about, talk to us about, what are the common design
12:53
mistakes you've seen people make
12:55
entrepreneurs? Yeah.
12:57
I think it ties in with
12:59
what we were talking about earlier,
13:02
in the sense that, a lot of startups
13:05
are making this mistake thinking that
13:08
they need a ton of features for
13:10
something to work or
13:12
it needs a ton of features. To
13:16
be able to be for
13:18
that product to be successful. And
13:21
that is rarely
13:23
the case. It depends what you're developing,
13:26
but for the most part, when
13:28
you are when you are building
13:31
a product, if you know
13:33
your customer, You can
13:35
find that m v p, that minimum
13:38
viable product, that product, that requires
13:41
a minimum amount of effort to build,
13:44
to develop and that will
13:47
solve the customer's problem. Maybe
13:49
not entirely but if
13:52
you're addressing a real need, then
13:54
even a partial solution to a problem
13:57
is going to be successful. Even
13:59
if you are solving a problem halfway, if
14:03
that problem is real, then
14:06
people are going to use
14:08
that solution. Now, it's
14:10
not as easy in real life as
14:12
it may sound because you have
14:15
competitors. You have Some
14:17
problems cannot. If
14:19
they're not solved completely,
14:22
they're not solved at all. So we
14:25
would need to talk specifics about a
14:27
product or a service. But
14:30
I think that's a tendency a lot
14:32
of founding teams have is
14:34
to add more and more
14:36
features because they think they're.
14:39
They're good ideas or they're cool, but
14:42
it's not, they turn up, turn
14:44
out to be just
14:46
fluff that users, can do
14:48
without, or that might
14:51
even get in the way of what users
14:54
actually wanna do with your product. I
14:56
think that's a common mistake.
14:58
Yeah. It's maybe also,
15:01
maybe people wanna. they
15:03
feel, oh, I had this great idea and
15:05
they're in love with the idea.
15:07
And how that makes some
15:09
people, I think, feel get in love with the idea
15:12
and how that idea reflects on their quote
15:14
unquote, brilliance. And they gotta
15:17
get self-absorbed and try to implement
15:20
this idea into something
15:22
else. And then by doing that, they basically
15:25
mess up something that was already working just
15:27
'cause of the ego of Sometimes
15:29
they, I think people get too attached to ideas
15:32
and what do you think about that?
15:35
Yeah I think that happens sometimes
15:37
with founders, especially
15:40
if they raised a lot of money
15:42
and have done a lot of marketing
15:45
around their startup before
15:47
they reached product market fit. So
15:51
they maybe insist
15:53
on developing a product or some
15:55
sort of feature and they
15:59
tie their reputation or their
16:01
brilliance to that idea. It
16:03
might happen and it's very
16:06
rarely turns out Positive.
16:09
It rarely works out. Another
16:11
thing that I see happen
16:14
more often, especially with founding
16:17
teams and non-technical founders, is
16:20
that they experience
16:23
an issue. Let's say they are
16:25
in a different line of work. They experience
16:28
an issue. Then they
16:31
go out and try to launch
16:33
a startup to solve that issue. And
16:36
because they experienced that problem,
16:39
they think they know exactly
16:41
what the solution needs to be because
16:45
they felt it. They know the pain
16:47
and they think they know exactly
16:50
what the solution needs to be. And
16:53
it's very rarely the
16:55
case. It's usually not as
16:57
simple because there
16:59
are multiple perspectives
17:01
that you need to take into account. Sure.
17:04
Starting there is is
17:07
better than just picking a problem
17:09
at random and trying to solve
17:11
it because you already Have
17:14
a better understanding of the problem than
17:16
someone that's that just comes
17:18
in and says, okay, I want to do this or
17:21
that feature, or to develop
17:23
that product. But it's
17:26
usually not as simple
17:29
because if you are solving
17:33
a big enough problem, Then
17:36
you, your perspective, you're
17:39
just you need to, as a founder, you
17:41
need to remind yourself that you're a data point
17:43
of one. And you never
17:46
take real decisions
17:48
with a data point of one. You
17:50
need, you need to do more research
17:53
and get a, like a 360 understanding
17:56
of a problem. You're just one, one
17:59
point in those 360 degrees.
18:02
So doing doing
18:05
research and talking to other
18:07
people that have the same problem, then
18:09
you can then get
18:12
a better picture of what you need to build.
18:15
But it's very enticing. It's very tempting
18:17
to believe that you
18:20
just need to hire a development
18:23
team to materialize
18:26
that idea that you have in your head. And
18:28
it's usually not that simple.
18:30
So we basically overestimate
18:32
our own brilliance, and
18:34
then we underestimate the complexity
18:37
of any situation. we
18:39
think like the model that we made in our
18:41
mind, that's how it's gonna play out in real life.
18:44
And then when it's actually implemented, we
18:46
realize that it was so much more complex. I didn't
18:48
realize all these different things could have happened
18:50
and actually the whole thing could have been done
18:52
this other way. And so it's
18:54
basically having a humbleness and
18:57
an awareness of our own limitations.
18:59
No, ma, no matter how brilliant you are. even
19:02
Steve Jobs has like hundreds of people in
19:04
his design teams and his Products
19:06
that was all constantly, talking and
19:09
giving him ideas and letting the best
19:11
idea win and having that approach
19:14
to it, right?
19:15
Yeah, exactly. I was listening
19:17
to an interview with Johnny.
19:20
Ive the ex chief
19:22
of design at Apple who
19:25
worked a lot with Steve and He
19:28
would, he was telling a story
19:31
that they usually had, they had
19:33
regular meetings and Steve
19:36
would sometimes come
19:38
up with ideas that would just take the
19:40
air out of the room that there would be their
19:43
brilliant ideas. And they,
19:46
there are, there were ideas that were changing
19:48
the company. And sometimes
19:50
they were complete flops. That
19:53
even to someone that.
19:57
Had so much experience and I
20:00
was so brilliant at what they're, they
20:02
were doing. Even they had
20:05
really like completely ridiculously
20:07
bad ideas. Yeah. And they had this
20:10
safety net in place of people,
20:13
of advisors that were
20:16
there to help catch those and
20:19
not let them damage the company. So
20:22
yeah being humble is
20:25
I think an essential trait for a founder
20:28
and also being able to empathize with
20:30
your customers to
20:33
put yourself in their shoes. If
20:35
you are let's say, if
20:38
you wanna solve a problem for childcare,
20:41
let's say, and you are a
20:43
father and you have a wife
20:46
and a couple of kids, you
20:48
might imagine that you,
20:51
your idea of how that
20:53
problem can be solved might.
20:57
You need to realize that might look very different
21:00
from, I don't know a single mother
21:02
raising a child on her
21:04
own and maybe in
21:07
in a neighborhood that is not
21:10
as affluent as the one you're living in.
21:12
Or, and working two jobs and not
21:14
having anyone to help her
21:17
with her chores. So
21:20
being able to empathize with different people
21:22
will help you craft a better solution that
21:24
is going to help more people
21:26
than yourself. So if
21:29
you wanna say, if you want to develop something
21:31
that will be bought by thousands
21:33
of people, you need to take their
21:36
their opinion into account. If
21:39
you're just listening to yourself, then
21:41
you're going to build a product that you alone
21:44
will want to buy. And then you
21:46
don't have a
21:47
business. Yeah. To basically
21:49
put yourself to. Like that,
21:51
as that quote from Michael Corone
21:53
and the godfather that he said to
21:55
try to put yourself and the
21:58
other person and try to see the
22:00
world from their eyes, not, your own
22:02
perspective, how would, like you said, a mother living
22:04
in this situation, how would she
22:08
stink and perceive this? Because
22:11
it's gonna be obviously different than you if you are
22:13
not that.
22:13
Yeah, and it's not it's
22:16
not about all just about
22:19
imagining what this, that situation is
22:21
like. But empathy helps you realize
22:24
that you don't understand
22:26
it, you, that you don't know
22:28
how it feels or what
22:31
the what such a
22:33
person is struggling with. And then
22:35
go out and talk to such people
22:37
and understand their perspective
22:40
and then working that into your product
22:43
or service.
22:44
Yeah, I like that even better than imagining
22:46
it, actually realizing that you
22:48
can't imagine it, and then actually going
22:51
and talking to those people to see the real.
22:54
The reality, right? Because we make some really
22:56
bad assumptions a lot of the times. Exactly.
22:58
Yeah. I like that. And
23:01
also being humble to pivot, right?
23:03
Like Steve Jobs and his iPod
23:06
shuffle. I think it was the third generation where
23:08
they took all, all out, they took all out, all
23:10
the buttons, and it was
23:12
a huge disaster because
23:14
it was like the headphones, like it was a terrible idea.
23:17
The next time they bring the buttons back, Yeah.
23:20
And they say, you know what? We made a mistake, but
23:22
it's much better to accept it, because
23:26
he was obsessed with what's the best
23:28
product. So if you realize it
23:30
wasn't let's change. It doesn't, it is not tied
23:32
into his ego. I'm so brilliant. They came up
23:34
with this device with no buttons. It turns out it's the
23:36
stupidest idea that they've ever made. They
23:39
admitted it, changed it. And
23:41
so it's like that humbleness and obsession
23:43
with creating that best product,
23:46
no matter if the most brilliant
23:48
idea that you thought actually was
23:50
completely stupid doesn't
23:52
matter because that's not the point, right? This is not
23:54
an art show that you're gonna show
23:57
to the world how smart you are, right?
23:59
Yeah. That's the difference between art and design.
24:02
Design needs to solve a problem. Art
24:04
can live on its own and not
24:06
solve a problem, and actually it
24:09
shouldn't. And it's subjective. But
24:12
design is much more
24:14
practical. It has some sort of intersection
24:17
with the art world in the sense that good design
24:19
is also aesthetic, but it
24:22
shows it should solve a problem unlike a
24:25
piece
24:25
of art. I like that. I
24:27
like that. All right, Manu. Colin,
24:29
it's been so nice talking to you, man. I wish
24:32
Likewise. It was very enlightening.
24:35
And so tell us, about your business, your services,
24:37
where people can find you.
24:39
Sure. My website, my studio website
24:41
is Contrast Studio. And
24:44
I'm also on LinkedIn, so if people Google
24:47
or search my name or the
24:49
name of the studio, you will find it. That's
24:52
where I'm mostly active currently
24:55
on between all the social networks.
24:57
If you want any any
24:59
advice or if I can help anyone with
25:02
any sort of design work you can reach out to
25:04
me there and I would be happy
25:06
to help.
25:07
That's very kind of you. So kalan for
25:09
those that might, I don't know, are
25:11
just listening. It's gonna be, everything's gonna
25:13
be in the show notes, but Kalan is spelled c a.
25:16
l i n and
25:18
your last name is spelled B.
25:21
It's Alia, it's, yeah, B
25:24
as in burrito, a
25:27
l e a. So
25:30
yeah, you can put that in link, but
25:31
it's easier if you contrast studio
25:34
is easier to remember. You ju you
25:36
can just search that on LinkedIn or Google
25:39
it and you'll find it.
25:41
Perfect. Alright man, it
25:43
was nice meeting you. Thank you so much for being here and
25:46
we'll keep in touch. Yeah, thank you.
25:48
It was a pleasure.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More