Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:03
Hi, and welcome to season two
0:05
of the Team Deacons podcast, a
0:08
collection of informal conversations between Roger
0:10
and James Deacons and a guest.
0:14
We never know where the conversation will take
0:16
us, so listen in and see where it
0:18
goes. This
0:22
episode is sponsored by Aputure, a
0:25
global company pioneering LED lighting
0:27
technology for cinema with cutting
0:30
edge hardware and software solutions.
0:33
Recently, Aputure expanded its lighting
0:35
ecosystem with the new Infinimat
0:37
series of matte lights. They
0:40
offer unmatched output, IP65
0:43
weatherproofing, and full pixel
0:45
control over DMX. Discover
0:47
more about the Infinimat and
0:50
Aputure's lighting ecosystem at
0:52
aperture.com. Today
0:56
we're doing something different. We're looking
0:59
into the world of commercial production.
1:01
We're speaking with a cinematographer who
1:03
not only has vast experience, but
1:05
has also designed devices along the way.
1:08
We're pleased to welcome Bill Bennett. Bill,
1:10
thank you for doing this. I
1:13
am so happy to be here. It's an honor. Yeah,
1:16
we want to start with our normal question,
1:18
which is, how did you
1:20
get to where you are today? Is this
1:22
something you always had in mind doing, or
1:25
did you start out on another path and
1:27
then find this? What's your story? Kind
1:30
of a little of both. My
1:32
father was an Air Force
1:34
career pilot, spent 30 years
1:37
flying airplanes, transport airplanes for the Air Force.
1:39
And because of that, we moved all over
1:41
the country, lived in some really amazing places
1:44
like Alaska. My mom,
1:46
once the children were a little bit older
1:48
and she had more time on her hands, started taking
1:51
art lessons. And
1:53
I remember sitting there on my
1:56
mom's and dad's bed in their
1:58
bedroom where her studio was. and
2:00
she would describe to me what she was
2:02
learning because she was just starting
2:04
out, but her instructors were teaching her about
2:07
line and composition and color and contrast. And
2:09
I was, you know, 12 at
2:11
the time, but it had a big
2:13
impact on me because I watched her develop
2:16
as an artist. Then on the
2:18
other hand, my father had an engineering
2:20
degree and my grandfather, for
2:22
God's sake, went to MIT. So I have,
2:27
luckily because of my upbringing, sort of
2:29
the perfect mix. I'm
2:31
not telling you guys anything. You don't know
2:34
that cinematography is a blend
2:36
of artistry and technology. And
2:39
if you're really good at one, but not so
2:41
good at the other, you don't tend
2:43
to be successful because
2:45
if you're really good artistically, but you can't
2:47
understand the technology, you just can't get
2:49
your ideas, your concepts onto the screen
2:51
or vice versa. There's lots of people
2:53
out there that are really good technologists,
2:55
but unfortunately just don't have
2:58
that artistic side to them and
3:00
their work though technically correct, just
3:03
has no soul. So
3:05
I was lucky enough to end up there,
3:08
but at that time in my life, you
3:10
know, elementary school and the
3:12
beginning of high school, I
3:14
had no idea what I wanted to do. My
3:16
dad did ask me, hey, do you want to
3:18
go to the Air Force Academy? I, you know,
3:20
I sort of had enough of the military by
3:22
association being on military bases, all of
3:24
my upbringing. So I really didn't want to do
3:27
that. So when
3:29
I was in high school, I just happened to see
3:32
a event that
3:34
they brought in, I think it might've been
3:36
an anti-drug campaign, something like that. And this
3:38
group came in and they showed what we
3:40
called at the time, a multimedia
3:42
production, which was, I don't
3:45
know, I think nine, maybe an
3:48
array of nine, maybe even more, 12
3:51
35 millimeter slide projectors, all
3:53
synchronized, all showing images up on the
3:55
screen, along with a
3:57
soundtrack and maybe some dialogue too.
4:00
Me being, I probably would have been diagnosed
4:02
as ADD, but that didn't exist at that
4:04
time. But my mind went in 27 directions
4:07
all at the same time. And the fact that
4:09
all of these images were just
4:12
appearing and then changing and stuff like that
4:15
really attracted me. And I said, you know what? I
4:17
can do that. So I started
4:19
doing them for my high school, for various clubs
4:21
and programs and stuff like that. They had a
4:24
little bit of budget and it wasn't too expensive.
4:26
My dad would loan me his camera and I
4:28
would go shoot various things. And
4:31
then I got noticed by a
4:33
local production company in, this
4:35
was San Antonio, Texas, where my dad was stationed at that
4:37
time and I was going to high school. And
4:40
they, this
4:42
local production company took notice of me and hired
4:45
me kind of as an intern and then later
4:47
as a part-time employee. And
4:49
the beauty of that was they had their own
4:52
color transparency lab
4:54
processing Ectochrome. And
4:57
their deal was as long as I paid
4:59
for the film, I could do the processing
5:01
there for free. Because I kind of
5:03
ran the lab, I did the processing. So
5:05
this just opened up my ability to just shoot
5:07
as much as I wanted. And we started putting
5:09
together our own multimedia shows.
5:11
They also had a 16 millimeter
5:14
BOLU. So I,
5:17
again, as long as I paid for the film and
5:19
processing, I could use that. So I
5:21
started blending film into these
5:24
multimedia projections with make one or
5:26
two film projectors and several slide
5:28
projectors. And then, you know,
5:30
about this time I enter college and
5:33
I naively entered thinking I was going
5:35
to study engineering because my
5:37
dad was an engineer. And I mentioned my grandfather was
5:39
an engineer and I have uncles that are engineers. Everybody
5:42
figured, well, Bill's going to be an engineer.
5:44
So I entered and I ran into a
5:47
significant stumbling block. I don't know if you guys
5:49
can relate. Me being
5:51
a very visual person,
5:53
I could not understand
5:55
abstract math, like advanced
5:57
calculus. If I can visualize it,
6:00
it, I can
6:02
understand it. But if I can't visualize
6:04
it, I cannot understand it. And by
6:06
definition, abstract math
6:08
is abstract. So I was failing
6:10
miserably at math, I was doing
6:12
really well in the mechanical
6:14
and physical part, because that partly understood, you know,
6:16
if they're talking about the length of a lever
6:18
and the moment arm, you can picture that all
6:20
in your mind, or you can do an experiment,
6:23
a physical experiment, loved all of that. And then
6:25
I noticed, on the other side of the
6:27
campus, in the theater building,
6:29
the theater, the live theater students were just
6:31
having a blast. And I would go
6:33
over there and kind of volunteer because
6:35
they never had enough help in
6:38
their setting up their productions on the technical
6:40
side. Then I was
6:44
decided I needed to change my major. This was kind
6:46
of at the end of my first first year,
6:48
freshman year. And this is not unusual. I
6:51
tell a lot of people I know that are younger that
6:53
are entering college, hey, don't be afraid to change, because you
6:55
know, you discover that what you thought you wanted to do
6:57
isn't what you want to do, or in my
7:00
case, incapable of doing. So
7:03
I was terrified to tell my father,
7:05
because he was, you know, Air Force
7:07
officer, quite the
7:09
slave driver. So I told my
7:11
mom, you know, my mom was in the kitchen
7:13
by herself and I said, hey, I want to
7:15
change my major. And she says, well, what do
7:18
you want to change to? And I said, live
7:20
theater. And she says, that's okay.
7:22
As long as you get a four-year college
7:25
degree, neither of them, when
7:27
they were young
7:29
people out of high school, got their college
7:31
degree. My dad got in the Air Force
7:33
because of the Second World War. And they
7:35
took anybody who was an experienced pilot at
7:37
that point, he'd already knew how to fly.
7:40
And then they later, while he
7:43
was in the service, allowed him to
7:45
go back to school and he got an engineering
7:47
degree at the University of Pittsburgh. So he did
7:49
get a college degree, but not as at the
7:51
normal age. And their goal was that all
7:54
of their children would have a college degree. So
7:56
my mom said, as long as you get a
7:58
valid four-year college degree, you can you didn't do
8:00
any major you want. And this
8:03
is a little emotional to me. My dad, you
8:05
know how you evolve as
8:07
a parent-child relationship? And then later on,
8:10
you have a more adult-to-adult relationship. And
8:12
many years later, I was
8:15
well-established in my career at that point. And
8:17
I asked my dad, I asked the question, when
8:20
I wanted to change majors, I
8:22
expected that you would resist it and you didn't.
8:25
And his answer was interesting. He said, when
8:28
a child from birth to about six years old as
8:30
a parent, and you guys are parents, so you can
8:32
relate, that's when you do
8:34
all the forning. Oh, you're right.
8:36
Okay. That's really interesting. Okay,
8:39
well then, people who do
8:42
have children can relate. And that my father said
8:44
to me, during the first
8:46
six years of a child's life, that's when
8:48
you can do all the significant steering to
8:50
what they can become. And then
8:52
after that, basically you're making
8:54
your own decisions to greater and greater
8:56
extent. And you were
8:59
deciding what you wanted to do with the
9:01
rest of your life. It was my position
9:03
to interfere. And I thought that
9:05
was pretty fantastic. Yeah. So
9:10
in college, I started doing live
9:13
theater shows. I pretty much worked over on
9:15
the technical side, though we
9:17
were required to take acting, directing,
9:19
speech. And those ended
9:21
up being extremely valuable in
9:23
that later on, I mean,
9:25
even working as a cinematographer, I could
9:27
relate to the challenges actors would
9:30
have in front of the
9:32
camera, and could be sympathetic
9:34
to some of their needs that someone
9:36
who'd never taken any acting training wouldn't even be
9:38
aware. And then
9:40
the directing classes were really, really good.
9:43
The one thing, a lot of people will
9:45
get to later, my career ended up going
9:48
down the path of doing television commercials from
9:50
pretty much my entire career. But
9:52
one of the things I noticed along the
9:54
way, a lot of commercial directors don't
9:57
have any directing training. They come from
9:59
agency. house
18:00
that I've built into offices
18:02
and the stage in the back, can you
18:04
come over and help me put up some
18:06
walls? And essentially it
18:09
was a gig for half a day.
18:11
I literally went over to the foreman
18:13
and the people at the set construction
18:15
company were very sympathetic to me. They
18:17
knew that I wanted to eventually get
18:19
into film shooting but they
18:22
would always put me as a standby carpenter on the
18:24
real shoot so I could watch films crews work. So
18:28
I went to them and said, I've got this opportunity.
18:30
And he said, go, go. I
18:32
went for one afternoon, I stayed there six
18:35
years. Ron
18:38
was an amazing guy when he
18:40
was shooting. He owned all his own
18:42
gear. He had a
18:44
machine shop. He had all the
18:46
carpentry tools. And I kind
18:48
of like fit right into his kamikaze
18:51
method of making whatever he needed
18:53
to get a shot to work,
18:55
work. And along the way,
18:57
I was working for him at
18:59
first started as a grip, then became his key
19:01
grip, then moved over to second
19:03
assistant. And then when his first assistant moved
19:06
on to be a DP, I
19:08
then became his first assistant. Now,
19:11
Ron, the nature of the work that he
19:13
did was a lot of sports commercials or
19:16
commercials with a lot of animals. So
19:18
like the Budweiser, Clydesdales and Monument Valley
19:21
or pole vaulters or swimmers or high
19:23
divers. And in all of
19:25
these situations, they weren't gonna
19:27
do it very many times. So Ron, I
19:29
think he might've owned like nine 35 millimeter
19:31
cameras. Many of them were two C's, Mitchell's,
19:33
things like that. And so he
19:35
would wanna shoot a lot of cameras
19:37
for whatever, say the pole vaulter, pole
19:39
vaulting, whatever. And he
19:42
would let almost anybody shoot. And
19:44
this was really interesting. And again, formative
19:46
in my career, he said, I
19:49
only have one rule. I don't mind seeing
19:51
the mistake and take one. I
19:53
just don't wanna see the mistake and take two. Now,
19:57
this was a time and Roger. remember
20:00
this time when the only person that saw
20:02
the shot was the camera operator. There
20:05
were no video taps, so there's nobody looking over
20:07
your shoulder, looking at the edges of the frame
20:09
to see if there's a C-stand in the shot,
20:11
things like that. So you had
20:13
to learn under fire, and it was
20:16
perfect because I'm shooting now on national
20:19
big budget television commercials. We'd go on
20:21
the road for, say, a month doing
20:23
Budweiser beer and follow the Clydesdales around
20:27
and ultimately end up in Monument Valley. And
20:29
that played out, are stories
20:31
allowed with no names? Yes. Okay.
20:35
Absolutely. I was hoping to become one of
20:38
Ron's paid operators
20:40
rather than first
20:42
assistant elevated, which I didn't mind at
20:44
all because I knew I was getting
20:47
all this fantastic experience. I didn't mind
20:49
getting paid as an assistant yet working
20:51
occasionally as an operator. So he hired
20:53
an operator for this big Monument Valley
20:55
job with the Clydesdales. And
20:58
as an aside, none
21:00
of us get residuals for our work. If
21:04
we did, I would be a
21:06
multi-billionaire because I did
21:08
a shot that I'm about to describe that
21:10
is still used in Budweiser commercial to this
21:13
day, add the tag. So
21:15
the setup was it's at sunset. We're
21:17
only going to have a few shots
21:19
at this because the Clydesdales are going
21:21
to ride along a mesa against
21:24
the sunset with the setting sun. And
21:27
then we're on the next mesa over about
21:29
eighth of a mile, couple of hundred yards
21:31
away. And I was
21:34
giving the assignment of basically
21:36
just the wide shot. Mine was a lock off,
21:38
right? Of just the horizon with
21:41
the horses riding along the bottom of the frame. That
21:44
is used in the logo at the tag
21:46
of every Budweiser commercial to this day, down
21:48
at the bottom, you see the silhouette of
21:50
the Clydesdales right along. That's
21:52
my shot. I don't get any extra money.
21:55
So anyway, the hired
21:57
operator who theoretically was quite talented
21:59
and So
24:01
we would ride the lift
24:03
up and the snowmobile, snow cats would
24:05
pull all our gear up to the
24:07
top of this run that Ron wanted
24:09
to shoot. And then with Ron kind
24:11
of carrying our cameras and the ski
24:13
patrol were helping us bringing the gear
24:15
down in their emergency sleds that
24:17
they would bring injured people down the mountain.
24:19
They would ski, we'd all slowly ski down
24:21
the mountain to different places and Ron would
24:23
pick spots for each camera going down the
24:25
hill. And there's about four of us arranged
24:28
down the hill. And we're gonna
24:30
film these kids skiing, kids I
24:32
say teenagers, right? And we
24:35
wanted them to look and be really kind of
24:37
cool, bright clothing, but it was
24:39
cold. So all the people, the
24:42
actors, skiers, actors were wearing all these extra
24:44
coats and hats and all this kind of
24:46
stuff. So at the beginning of
24:48
the take, a PA who was also, everybody
24:51
had to ski, right? A PA who was
24:53
also skiing would take
24:55
all their coats and hats and put on as many
24:57
of the hats as they could and gather as many
24:59
of the coat and grab all the coats and they
25:01
would ski down to the bottom to be
25:03
waiting at the bottom with all this stuff. Well,
25:05
naturally we saw that, we
25:08
all rolled on that, all
25:10
of us, right? Except for Ron,
25:12
because that wasn't the commercial, right?
25:14
We all rolled on it at 120 frames per second, right? Oh,
25:18
wow. Yeah, so
25:20
it consumed like whole magazine
25:22
of film and then reloaded while we're waiting for the
25:25
kids to get ready, right? Because we thought it was
25:27
cool. So now
25:29
fast forward, we're in dailies, right? I'm
25:31
like the C camera. The
25:34
A camera shows up, the first shot is
25:36
this kid with the
25:38
clothes and all the stack of hats going through
25:40
in slow motion and Ron's not happy. B
25:44
camera, you know, then luckily A camera had the
25:47
shots of the real actors skiing and it was
25:49
all great. But Ron was just
25:51
not happy that we're wasting his film and all
25:53
that kind of stuff. So then B camera comes
25:55
up, they do the same thing, Ron's like losing
25:57
it next to me. And I know
25:59
I'm next. And
26:01
I know that I shot the same thing. Same
26:04
thing. Same thing. So,
26:06
now, C-CAMER comes up, and this is besides itself, get some
26:08
of the sorbs out of the room. Well,
26:10
the joke is on Ron, and he laughed about
26:12
it later, in that when they cut the commercial,
26:15
that was one of the scenes they used in
26:17
the commercial. Really? Of the kid wearing all the
26:19
hats and stuff. Because it was just a zany
26:22
commercial of a bunch of people out on the
26:24
slopes having fun. They used
26:26
the shot. So we never let Ron
26:28
forget that. That's
26:30
hilarious. Yeah. So,
26:32
brilliant. So,
26:35
then, you, after six years with Ron,
26:37
then you went out on your own.
26:39
Did you? Yes. How
26:42
did that happen? Ron inspired in me one
26:44
thing that I carry with me to this
26:46
day, in that he never accepted the
26:48
gear that's made by the various manufacturers
26:51
at face value. If he wanted it to do
26:53
something different, he would modify it. Either you'd ask
26:55
the manufacturers to modify it, or in his machine
26:57
shop, he would do it himself. And
27:00
to this day, I have a machine shop. I
27:02
was just out there yesterday making lens adaption parts
27:05
with optics and everything in there to get a
27:07
lens to do something I needed it to do.
27:09
And I carried that with me forward. And it
27:11
actually served me well. Whenever you're
27:13
starting in this business, and many people listen to your
27:15
podcast are probably wondering, how do I get an edge?
27:18
And one thing to get an edge is has something
27:20
that you can do that other people don't do. And
27:23
that was one of my edges, in that I could modify
27:25
and make equipment to get
27:27
a shot. And I then moved on
27:30
from there and got hired by a guy
27:32
named Sid Avery. He was the director. He
27:35
used to be a very famous still photographer
27:37
in the studio system. Like
27:39
one of his jobs was he was on
27:41
the set of giant. And
27:43
all those shots of James Dean on
27:45
the set of giant were Sid Avery.
27:47
He was the studio still shooter on
27:49
that job. So very talented guy, ego
27:52
nine miles wide. So he wanted
27:54
to be billed as both the director and
27:57
the cinematographer on these. and
28:01
then I was hired as the operator, but
28:03
he wanted to schmooze with the agency, so
28:05
I would end up lighting the set and
28:08
basically planning the camera moves, and it was
28:11
great. It was a similar situation in that
28:13
I was being paid as a operator, but
28:15
I was really doing the job of a
28:17
director of photography, and I didn't
28:19
complain about that, because it was like you're being paid
28:21
to go to school by this guy who was a
28:23
master. So I
28:26
did all that, he would come in and he would tweak
28:28
a few things, and we'd shoot, and eventually I got better
28:30
and better at it to where he would actually do very,
28:32
very little. I never complained about the
28:35
fact that I was getting paid as an operator, but
28:37
doing the DP's work. But then the britty of
28:39
that, and there's amazing coincidence that occur in
28:41
our business, you gotta be, I love
28:44
a saying, I don't know who, it's not me, I
28:46
didn't invent it. The saying is you make your own
28:48
luck, meaning when
28:51
a lucky opportunity arrives, you've got to
28:53
be prepared by your previous experience and
28:55
training and what you've learned to take
28:58
proper advantage of it to do a
29:00
good job. Because as we
29:02
said five minutes ago, if you do something
29:04
and fail at it, this business is very
29:07
unforgiving. So consequently, there was a commercial that
29:09
ran in 1984 that
29:11
introduced the Macintosh computer. It
29:14
was a very famous commercial shot by
29:16
Ridley Scott, this
29:18
young woman in like a superwoman
29:21
suit running through this mass of
29:23
gray bald-headed guys standing
29:25
there staring at a screen, and she
29:27
spins around and throws a hammer and
29:29
shatters the screen. Well, for commercials at
29:31
that point in time, that was like
29:33
mind-blowingly revolutionary. It played
29:35
only one time at the Super Bowl. I
29:37
remember watching it, my chin hit the floor
29:39
going, what did I just see?
29:42
And it introduced the Macintosh computer. So
29:45
that production designer of that
29:48
commercial, agency art director is
29:50
what his title was, then used
29:52
that as a springboard to become a director. And
29:56
he ended up at Brent Thomas' shop,
29:58
right? As one of the other... directors besides
30:01
not Brent, his name was Brent Thomas, but he
30:04
ended up at Sid Avery shop, excuse me, as
30:07
a new director. And so early
30:09
on, they assigned me to work
30:11
with him. And I remember
30:13
the first spot I did with him was
30:15
a hamburger commercial. And I'd gotten tired of
30:17
all these static close up shots of hamburgers.
30:19
So I built this rig that would smoothly
30:21
move around the hamburger, also keeping it at
30:23
the center of the radius of all the
30:25
axes. And it blew the agency
30:28
away because they didn't ask for it. And it blew
30:30
him away. So then I started working more
30:32
and more with him. The guy
30:34
was a brilliant designer. And
30:36
it's another lesson I learned along the way
30:38
in that if the
30:40
designers, the production designers, and I'm sure
30:42
Roger and James can relate to this,
30:45
if the production designers are putting ugly
30:48
stuff in front of the camera, you could be
30:50
the best lighting person in the world and it'll
30:52
be ugly. And everybody will think
30:54
that the cinematography is ugly when in reality, the
30:56
art direction is ugly. Whereas if
30:58
there's really beautiful art direction put, whether it
31:00
be a bunker, you know,
31:02
that has amazing design or whatever
31:05
it is, if it's beautiful, then
31:07
you do a decent job of lighting it,
31:09
people just fall all over themselves saying, oh
31:11
my God, what amazing cinematography. So
31:14
as I was learning how
31:17
to light, this guy was doing
31:19
fantastic sets. They had the money to
31:21
build them. Because he had come from Shai'a
31:23
day, he would be handed
31:25
these major A level jobs, much
31:28
more than a new director would normally get because
31:30
he's buddies with all those people they trusted him
31:32
that he would come up with something. So
31:35
we ended up doing like Coca-Cola and
31:37
BMW, I mean, major jobs
31:39
like that. And
31:42
he would design these amazing sets and they
31:44
had the money to build them. And
31:46
I would sometimes just set up like a 20 by
31:48
20 light grid out there and put
31:50
some nine lights behind it and wash soft light across it. Everybody
31:54
would follow themselves about how gorgeous
31:57
the cinematography was. And in reality, we're seeing a lot of
31:59
great sets. blend
34:01
that all together, it just blew
34:03
my mind how he would do that. And
34:06
the secret to him, and I
34:09
always appreciated the best directors
34:11
I ever worked for, let's not say maybe
34:13
the, he was good, maybe the easiest I
34:15
ever worked for used to be editors. Right?
34:19
And because of that, they
34:21
knew exactly what they wanted because they
34:23
had it all cut together in their
34:25
head and they firmly understood screen direction
34:27
and what size the shots should
34:29
be. Whereas there's a lot of directors, and I
34:32
guess Rogers probably had experience with this too, that
34:34
don't really know what they want so they tend
34:36
to overshoot. And then what
34:38
ends up happening is the editor ends
34:41
up directing the movie. Right? Because
34:43
now you have all these options and the editor
34:45
basically puts it all together. So. And
34:48
also that you're shooting so many
34:50
different things instead of focusing on
34:52
three major shots and putting all
34:54
your all into that. You're having
34:57
to do 10. That
34:59
is absolutely correct. In that as
35:02
a cinematography, you're kind of frustrated because you only
35:04
have a limited amount of time, the sun's gonna
35:06
go down and, or the
35:08
clock's gonna run out and the producer's gonna tap you on the
35:10
shoulder and say, okay, we're done. And you're
35:12
absolutely right in that if there's 60
35:15
different shots being made for what's gonna be
35:17
an eight shot commercial, you
35:19
don't know which ones are gonna use, you have to
35:21
do your best you possibly can, but there's no time.
35:23
Whereas if the director is doing like eight or nine
35:26
shots for an eight shot commercial, you
35:28
can put all your effort into making them really,
35:30
really good because you've got the time. So you
35:32
hit James, you hit the nail on the head.
35:34
It was very frustrating for cinematographers. We used to
35:36
call those guys 10,000 foot a day per
35:39
camera guys, where they would just hose film. A
35:42
commercial was 45 feet long, 90, 30 seconds, 90
35:46
feet a minute, half a second, 30 seconds, 45 feet long. And
35:49
we'd be like marveling in the loading room
35:51
afterwards of these stacks of cans to end
35:53
up with 45 feet. It
35:56
happened all the time, all
35:58
the time. Yeah. So, you know, then I
36:00
was basically moving into an
36:02
area. And
36:06
again, a serendipitous
36:08
thing happened in my career. You
36:10
know, luck, but I was observant while
36:13
the luck was happening. I
36:15
was a union cinematographer at that
36:17
time and a commercial cinematographer,
36:22
or here's a director cameraman, wanted to
36:24
shoot on the universal backlot for a
36:26
car commercial, right? And I'd
36:28
never really done a car commercial at
36:30
that point, but they needed to have
36:33
a standby union cinematographer to be there
36:35
present to satisfy the union rules. So
36:37
I was hired as the standby cinematographer. Now this was
36:40
a night commercial, right? And they were gonna shoot these
36:42
cars and light them at night. I
36:44
was really watching what this person was doing. And
36:47
the secret of lighting cars, and I
36:49
do seminars now at both AFI and
36:51
for the ASC and down at LMU,
36:53
where I teach people how to light
36:55
reflective objects. When you are lighting something
36:57
that's highly reflective, you can't point any
36:59
lights at it because you just see
37:01
the reflection of the light in the
37:03
car. It just looks nasty. You actually
37:05
build big white surfaces and you reflect
37:07
those in the car, right? Well,
37:09
I was watching him do this and
37:11
it was like magical. I'm like seeing them build
37:13
these big things with, you know, stretch taffeta and
37:15
they were lighting them. And then
37:17
they would pull the car in underneath it. And
37:19
all of a sudden I'm going, oh my God,
37:22
that's gorgeous, right? And I didn't touch a camera
37:24
the whole night. I could have gone into the
37:26
trailer and gone to sleep. Really,
37:28
I just needed to physically be there
37:30
to satisfy. But I was
37:32
watching. And so I
37:35
had the opportunity fast forward about
37:37
eight months. I'm now
37:40
working with Brent Thomas. He gets a BMW
37:42
commercial because that was one of the shot
37:44
days, major clients. And I,
37:46
because I had worked with this other guy, got together
37:49
with my key grip. I took some pictures of
37:51
this guy's lighting setups and we started developing
37:53
that and expanding upon that. And it turned
37:55
out well. And then ultimately at the end
37:57
of the day, I became known as the
37:59
car. servo
40:00
motor control that fits this, that would drive the
40:02
J4 zoom motor, but smoothly. And he'd look at
40:04
it and says, oh yeah, yeah, I can do
40:06
that. And came back the next day with a
40:08
circuit diagram and I made a big breadboard of
40:10
it. And the next shoot I used it on
40:13
was a stage shoot because you got this big
40:15
honking thing that was not practical. And I like
40:17
doing the zooms and everybody was just, I
40:19
mean, Ron was just like going, oh my God, that's
40:21
just fantastic how well that's working.
40:23
So we smallerized it and
40:25
took two prototypes and put them on a
40:27
movie called Poltergeist. Lee and Eddie
40:30
had his own camera if you remember, he had
40:32
a camera called the UltraCam, right? And
40:35
because of that, he wanted to have a
40:37
zoom control companion. So we literally gave him
40:39
two prototypes to use on that show and
40:42
the rest is history. It became the
40:44
thing that everybody used. There
40:46
was some novel things in it, like you could
40:48
start and stop the camera from the zoom control,
40:50
that was never done before. So you could actually,
40:52
if your second assistant wasn't around, you could actually
40:54
step out in front of the camera holding the
40:56
zoom control in your hand and put
40:59
the start slate on the camera. That's how long
41:01
the cable for it was, was at
41:03
the minimum focus distance of the 10 to one. So
41:06
you could step out there. Also
41:08
the minimum speed, Ron called me up in the
41:10
middle of the night, he's designing the circuitry and
41:12
he says, what's the slowest speed need
41:14
to be? I think about it, I go
41:16
11 minutes. And he says,
41:19
why 11 minutes? And I said, that's the
41:21
length of a thousand foot magazine running at
41:23
24 frames per second. Nobody's gonna let it,
41:25
nobody's gonna need a zoom longer than that.
41:27
And they're gonna run out of film, right?
41:30
So if you're gonna zoom from
41:32
one end to the other, 10 to ones, he did
41:34
the math, it's 11 minutes. So that was one thing
41:36
that I built that proved to
41:38
be useful to many, many people in the
41:41
business. And then the other thing was, Ron
41:43
was good friends with Robert Dalva. Robert
41:46
Dalva was tasked as a, he was
41:48
really an editor. I
41:50
think he worked on Godfathers I and
41:52
II and cut them. And
41:54
he wanted to direct. So he had the
41:56
opportunity to direct this movie called the Black
41:59
Stallion Returns. which is about
42:01
a young kid and it's a fantastic
42:04
adventure that happens in North Africa. And
42:06
there's all these horse races that take
42:08
place across the open desert. And
42:11
at this point in time, Steadicam was
42:13
just barely being invented and they needed
42:15
a way to reach out close to
42:17
the horses because horses are scared of
42:19
vehicles. They reach out close to the
42:21
horses and smoothly film like details of
42:23
the rider or the horse's head and
42:25
things like that. And Ron
42:27
invented this thing that later we called
42:30
the Terra Flight, which was basically this
42:32
stabilized camera system with a camera out
42:34
at the end of a, with a
42:36
pan tilt head that had a video
42:38
tap and follow focus. None of those
42:41
things existed at the time. Video taps
42:43
had just been invented. So Ron and
42:45
I built it in his machine shop.
42:47
I had to build a follow focus
42:49
system from scratch, put gears on
42:51
the lenses, design motors that engage the gears,
42:54
and then had Howard design a circuit where
42:56
I could control the focus
42:58
of these lenses and actually had to
43:00
invent the interchangeable rings with the focus marks
43:02
on them that now every follow focus system
43:04
has. So we're basically making this stuff from
43:06
scratch. And then it was a great adventure
43:08
for me because I ended up taking this
43:10
thing to Morocco, which was the first time
43:12
I'd really been outside the country
43:14
other than like Mexico or Canada and
43:17
was there for three months working on this
43:19
film. And then that led to it being
43:22
used on Silverado with John Bailey
43:24
and to live and die in
43:27
LA. Billy Friedkin was the director.
43:29
And we basically just
43:31
had a blast and it just elevated my career
43:33
to now all of a sudden, you
43:35
know, I'm working with Robbie Mueller on
43:37
these things, having conversations, you know, terrifying,
43:41
terrifying my camera assistant, because, you know, some
43:43
of the stunts we did on to live and
43:45
die in LA were one take deals. They
43:47
were going to crash the cars, the intersection, and
43:50
there wasn't going to be another take. I
43:52
remember there's this one shot, the sixth street
43:54
bridge is now gone and they've replaced it.
43:56
But so many movies were shot in and
43:58
above. or under the 6th
44:00
Street Bridge, and one of them was to live and
44:03
die in LA. And the shot that they laid out
44:05
for me was kind of terrifying. The
44:08
bad guys are up above on the upper part of
44:10
the bridge, and the good guys are down below chasing
44:12
them. And I start out looking
44:14
through the bridge pilings on the lower road
44:16
on the opposite side of the bridge, tracking
44:19
with the good guy's car. And
44:21
then when my view is blocked by
44:23
the concrete bridge now, I'm
44:25
supposed to rise up and find the
44:28
bad guy's car. So the audience
44:30
goes, oh my God, they're almost next to each
44:32
other. And then they meet at
44:34
the intersection down below and a collision occurs.
44:36
Right? Well,
44:40
there's two terrifying things that are going
44:42
on. Number one, you've
44:45
operated remote head before, Roger. And
44:48
when your view is obscured for a
44:50
while, and then you reveal and
44:52
your framing has to be perfect, it's
44:55
terrifying because you don't know and you don't
44:57
dare do anything. Or maybe you've rehearsed the
44:59
number of wheel turns that are going to
45:01
get you to where you need to be,
45:03
but there's no guarantees. So
45:06
I was the happiest man on earth
45:08
when my grips raised the terra-flight arm
45:10
up to the top and I could
45:12
see the other car. And
45:15
I also didn't have to do that oh so awful
45:17
thing that every operator in the world goes, oh that's
45:19
shit. Were you re-correct? I
45:22
didn't have to do that. I was in the frame. So
45:25
I rose up and there it was and I'm
45:27
going, holy shit, there it is. And
45:30
we come down and I'm praying
45:32
now that we don't misframe the
45:34
car crash and the car crash
45:36
collides and the AD yells,
45:38
that's a cut, that's a cut. And
45:41
they yell, everybody check the gates. I
45:43
remember my camera assistant's hands were shaking
45:46
because she had to pull focus from
45:48
the distant car, which was probably a
45:50
hundred yards away, to the much
45:53
closer car, which is now 25 feet away, right? And
45:58
nail it without really seeing it. Right
46:00
and then practice all down this
46:03
woman Beth Jana fever bless her heart I just distinctly
46:05
remember she's opening the you know, she ran a few
46:07
feet She's opening the eight and their hands are shaky
46:09
because I mean if there was a big honking hair
46:11
in the gate or a scratch It
46:14
didn't matter right? It really didn't matter
46:17
The other funny story that was happening
46:19
there was we were rehearsing this and
46:21
this was right after The
46:23
big crash of a helicopter occurred
46:25
out in Indian dunes for Twilight
46:27
Zone So everybody was
46:30
super scared of accidents occurring and we
46:32
were with Bill Friedkin and we were
46:34
rehearsing this very complex scene on a
46:36
weekday Right
46:39
and we theoretically had all
46:41
the streets blocked and we're doing this thing and it's
46:44
the warehouse district So they had a bunch of
46:46
stunt people who were driving Forklifts
46:48
with boxes because they were part of the
46:51
collision and these empty boxes are supposed to
46:53
go flying That sort of stuff and
46:55
we were rehearsing this thing first at half speed now at
46:57
full speed never to have the collision
46:59
at the end but so everybody and I'm rehearsing
47:01
our move and we're all sweating and then
47:04
all of a sudden the lead
47:06
stunt person yells cot cot cot
47:08
abort abort abort and Those
47:11
running out into the street and points at a
47:13
guy at a forklift and says this
47:15
guy is not with us This
47:18
is just a forklift driver from a nearby warehouse
47:20
in the middle of our shot Who
47:23
has no idea this poor guy is driving down the
47:25
street saying yeah, it's a wild day in Los Angeles
47:27
today All these people are whizzing
47:29
by me and what's going on, right? So
47:32
immediately Friedkin got on the phone and called a
47:34
rap. He says that's it. We're out of here
47:36
We're done. We're done. And so we never rehearsed
47:39
again and stepped on the weekends when all the
47:41
warehouses were closed So that was
47:43
yeah, one of those close calls Could
47:46
have really bad accident could have occurred But
47:48
luckily the stunt person recognized that that's not
47:50
one of my drivers and that's not one
47:52
of our forklifts. Yeah Anyway,
47:55
the terra flight development with Ron
47:57
inventing it me building it got
48:00
me into a whole bunch
48:02
of elevated shows. But then a very
48:04
interesting steering thing started happening. I'm
48:07
sure you guys have related to this,
48:09
where as you move
48:11
into your career, there's certain types of things
48:13
you want to do, and there's
48:15
other types of jobs you would rather not do. I
48:19
was the terra-flight operator, and
48:21
I was good at it, and it was
48:24
a unique piece of equipment. But I also
48:26
knew that other people would
48:29
start wanting me to do that, and I
48:31
would ultimately grow up in my career to
48:33
be the terra-flight operator. And I wanted to
48:35
be a cinematographer. Yeah. Right? Yeah.
48:39
So basically what happened is I started, I
48:41
also knew that I would have to keep
48:43
developing it. Now at this point I was
48:45
spending my own money building it. I
48:48
would need to get outside investors at
48:50
gyroscopes and just make it
48:52
much more sophisticated to keep it moving forward.
48:55
And I really wanted to be
48:57
a cinematographer. So I started soft-pedaling
48:59
that work and started
49:01
taking the commercial shooting jobs that
49:04
I was getting. John Bailey on
49:06
Silverado, even after we got done
49:08
with all the terra-flight work, he allowed
49:10
me to stay on. And I was like
49:13
the sea camera operator for all those big
49:15
stampede scenes and things like that. But I
49:17
was starting to get calls to be a
49:19
director of photography that I was turning down.
49:21
And every week
49:23
John would ask me to stay on for the
49:26
following week. He would get budgetary approval to keep
49:28
me on. And finally I was there for like
49:30
two months in Santa Fe. And finally
49:32
on a Friday he came to me and says,
49:34
hey, can you stay on next week? And I
49:36
said, well, I'm getting a call that I really
49:38
don't want to turn down as DP as
49:41
a cinematographer. And he said, John
49:43
was a great guy. He also passed away
49:46
just recently. He said, no, you should go
49:48
do that. If you're getting calls
49:50
to go do that and you want to do that, you should
49:52
go do that. So he kind of released me from
49:54
that. But again, I was ready
49:57
to step up to that opportunity. I
50:00
took those jobs on and I was able to
50:02
do them. Another steering thing that I
50:04
did was, I was
50:06
really good at tabletop photography. You'll remember the
50:09
hamburger commercial that I did as one of the
50:11
first things that I did. I remember it well,
50:13
yeah. Well, I was really good at that, but
50:16
also I really didn't enjoy it. I,
50:19
you know, your whole world is a three
50:21
by three foot table in a dark studio
50:23
and it's all day long and it's very
50:25
stressful and it just- Really long hours
50:28
too. Yeah, because the sun never goes down,
50:30
right? And it's
50:32
really stressful because agency is really demanding
50:34
because the food has to look perfect.
50:36
You know, the lettuce can't
50:38
be wilting, but the cheese can't be melting and
50:40
the beef has to look, you know, it's like,
50:42
oh my God, just kill me now. So I
50:46
stopped taking, I took all of those
50:48
things off my reel and put on
50:50
things that were more live action, you
50:53
know, character driven commercials and then ultimately
50:55
car commercials. And so I
50:57
steered my career away for that. I'm sure you
51:00
guys have done that too with your career of
51:03
only really accepting or jobs
51:05
that were interesting to you and early
51:07
on you take anything you can get, but
51:09
then eventually you start steering in
51:12
a direction that you enjoy. Otherwise you'd
51:14
be a very, very unhappy person, you
51:17
know. When things started
51:19
going towards digital, how
51:23
did you go with that? Because for one
51:25
thing, everybody can see what you're shooting. Is
51:28
that a good thing for you or a bad thing?
51:31
Did commercials stay on film or
51:33
did they go into digital? It's
51:36
a very good question. And
51:39
enough time has passed to where I think it can be
51:41
honest about it. Ha ha
51:43
ha. Early on commercial,
51:47
cinematar, commercial agencies
51:50
and ad agencies and the clients
51:53
really appreciated how good film looked. And
51:57
we dipped our toe occasionally. into
52:01
digital cameras and
52:03
either shooting tests, I've done countless
52:06
side-by-side tests as these digital cameras
52:08
are being developed. Occasionally
52:10
agencies would say, okay, we wanna
52:12
shoot with that. Ultimately, they
52:15
weren't happy. Many times I would get
52:17
blamed because there was
52:19
a very unusual thing happening in that
52:22
these companies that were inventing these digital
52:24
cinema cameras were investing a lot of
52:26
money and they would
52:28
go around the cinematography. Prior to that,
52:31
any camera company, whether it be
52:33
Ari or Aton or whoever,
52:35
would design a new camera and they would
52:37
present it to somebody like Roger Deakins or
52:40
Ari would give me like the 435 camera
52:42
and say, go out and shoot with this
52:45
and tell us what you think. And then
52:47
if we deemed it sufficiently good
52:49
enough, we would then book it on our
52:51
shows and then it would appear
52:53
in producer's world, this camera that was
52:55
new. The exact opposite thing
52:57
happened with these digital cameras. They went
52:59
around the cinematographers and pitched them to the
53:02
producers as being just as good,
53:04
if not better, and
53:06
also far cheaper. All
53:09
three of those things were lies in
53:11
the early days. And so what
53:14
happened is we had producers insisting
53:16
that we do it and our jobs
53:18
were on the line because we've already established that
53:21
you're only as good as your last shot, right?
53:23
And if you fail at something, then
53:25
it's gonna reflect badly upon your career.
53:27
So we as cinematographers, I don't know
53:30
if this happened over in the feature
53:32
film side, certainly happened in the commercial
53:34
shooting side, were often criticized as being
53:36
Luddites for not wanting to embrace it
53:39
with open arms right from the get-go
53:41
when it wasn't good enough, right?
53:44
Because in the early days, film,
53:46
scan film particularly outperformed these digital
53:49
cameras. It's also too,
53:51
the first digital cameras were difficult
53:54
to work with. It was all
53:56
that excessive cabling. It was big
53:58
pieces of equipment. So
54:00
it's not what we have today. You're
54:03
absolutely right. For years and years,
54:05
I've been a very good friend of Ari and
54:08
I've been part of their design group that they
54:10
reach out to and they will like let me
54:12
in. I sign a big NDA and they'll let
54:14
me in on the development of a camera. I
54:16
had a huge role in what the
54:19
435 became. They
54:21
were going to make this big monstrous camera
54:23
that was gonna be as big as the
54:25
535 and just as heavy and have, you
54:28
know, unique magazines. And it was just horrible.
54:30
And I convinced them through a serendipitous thing
54:32
that the camera needed to be the size
54:35
of the 35.3 but be
54:37
dual pin registered and run 120 frames per second. I
54:40
had been booked on a job for, I was part
54:42
of the design team. I was telling them, no, no,
54:44
no, they were being stubborn. And I was booked on
54:46
a job for ILM and
54:48
they had taken a 35.3, which had
54:51
a registration pin in the wrong hole. So they couldn't
54:53
use film shot on a 35.3 on
54:55
their optical printers, which had the registration pins in
54:58
the proper holes where Mitchell cameras would have. So
55:00
they presented me with this camera. We showed up on location
55:03
and said, we want you to shoot all the plate shots
55:05
with this camera. And I said, well, it's a 35.3. I've
55:08
got two of them in the truck. And they said, no,
55:10
no, open the door. And I opened the door and they
55:12
had installed a Mitchell movement in there with dual pin registration.
55:15
Well, all of a sudden it hit me like a ton of bricks. I'm going,
55:17
oh my God, this is the camera that Airy needs
55:19
to build. And here these guys have already done it.
55:21
So I said, do you mind if they take pictures
55:23
of this camera? And they said, no, no,
55:25
take all the pictures you want. And if you want us to build
55:27
you one, just get us a old Mitchell Mark II and a 35.3.
55:30
We'll do it for you for a thousand dollars. And
55:33
I said, okay. And I took pictures of the camera on
55:35
all sides with the door closed. And I took pictures of
55:37
the door open with the film threaded up and the movement,
55:39
clearly a Mitchell Mark II movement. Fast
55:42
forward six weeks. I go to the next meeting
55:44
over at the Airy offices in Burbank. The German
55:46
engineers have come over from Europe and they brought
55:48
the now a wooden mockup of this monstrosity that
55:50
they were going to build. And they clunk it
55:52
down on the table because it's all weighted to
55:54
be the same weight as what the camera is
55:56
going to be. It was just horrific. And
55:58
I said, this is going to work. We need the camera to be
56:01
the size of the 35.3, do
56:03
at least 120 frames per second, use
56:05
the same magazines. They said that's not
56:07
possible. I had the pictures in my
56:09
pocket. I pulled the pictures out, I
56:11
slide them across the table, and
56:14
I described to them what it was, and
56:16
all of a sudden there's just dead silence in the
56:18
room, and now there's a lot of German on the
56:20
other side of the table back and forth and back
56:22
and forth. Then I stuck the knife in and twisted
56:24
it, then I said, listen,
56:27
if you build this monstrosity, we
56:29
won't buy it. We will take all of
56:31
our 35.3s and have ILM convert them
56:33
with Mitchell Mark II movements for $1,000, and
56:36
we won't buy this thing. To give them
56:38
credit, they went away, they abandoned that camera, took
56:40
an extra year, and came back with the 435,
56:44
which ended up being their most successful film
56:46
camera. I think they sold thousands of them.
56:49
So anyway, I was now in good stead with
56:51
them, and they involved me in the development, this
56:53
is the long story to get to the development
56:55
of the Alexa, where in
56:57
the early days, the only
56:59
engineers that they could hire to build
57:01
digital cinema cameras were video engineers, because
57:04
the people who designed film cameras knew
57:06
nothing about electronics, right? So
57:09
the designers of the interface, I
57:12
was in a meeting in Munich with them, and they were
57:14
talking about what the interface needed
57:17
to do, and it
57:19
was incredibly complex. Think Sony in
57:21
the earlier cameras, they've gotten much
57:23
better now, because
57:26
they've learned from the Alexa. But these
57:28
guys were arguing with me that I
57:30
would make a, they had a prototype
57:32
sitting there, and I would make some settings, and then
57:34
this big red light would come on, and the camera
57:36
wouldn't do what I needed to do, which
57:39
was maybe change a frame rate or change a
57:41
shutter angle, something like that. And I would say
57:43
to them, it won't
57:45
let me do it. And they say, well, you should
57:47
know better because this, this, this, and this thing are
57:49
incompatible. And I was
57:51
frustrated at that point. And
57:54
I was used to film cameras. They had very
57:56
simple controls, and the camera would do what we
57:58
needed it to do. And finally,
58:00
after frustration, they were doing this thing
58:02
where you should know better because you
58:05
should have this vast quantity
58:07
of information about how video cameras work. And
58:09
I said, no, no, no, we're cinematographers. We
58:11
light, we line the camera up, we expect
58:13
what to do for exposure, and then the
58:15
camera does what we need. Right. And
58:17
finally, out of frustration, I held iPhones existed.
58:20
I held up my iPhone and I said,
58:22
my mom lives in San Antonio, Texas. I
58:25
don't know how this cell phone works. I
58:27
don't know how the undersea cable works. I
58:30
don't know how the exchange at the other end
58:32
works, but I can dial 12 numbers. And within
58:34
30 seconds, I'm talking to my mom. Right.
58:37
And they went, okay. And I
58:39
said, it needs to be just like this. It
58:42
needs to be this easy. Right. And
58:44
so they kept refining it and calling me
58:46
back and refining it. And they would eventually,
58:48
you know, they start arguing and all I do
58:50
is hold up my cell phone. Okay.
58:55
And it ended up with the Alexa interface,
58:57
which became now is the standard. It's really
58:59
interesting that all the other camera manufacturers, I
59:01
don't care who they are. They've all kind
59:04
of copied that window with the six buttons
59:06
in the little knob and the
59:08
back and forward button. They've
59:10
all copied that with and the six buttons
59:12
all essentially do the same thing because that
59:15
was a simplified version. And my argument to
59:17
them was this is a supercomputer. What's inside
59:19
here is a supercomputer. If it's
59:22
not happy with incompatible settings, if
59:24
it can make the change itself to get what
59:26
I need without radically changing, just do it. Maybe
59:29
tell me what you just did, but
59:32
then if it's incompatible, put up a warning signal
59:34
and you push an information button and tell me
59:36
what's wrong. That this
59:38
speed is too slow for the sensor or
59:40
there's the media can't accept this
59:43
frame rate. Whatever the problem
59:45
is, tell me what it is so that
59:47
I can fix the problem. Don't just tell
59:49
me no and expect that I'm going to
59:51
know this vast knowledge of information. And they
59:53
took me to heart and the interface was
59:56
very good. And now we're fast forward to a different part
59:58
of the story of the. acceptance of digital
1:00:00
cameras. I
1:00:03
was shooting commercials and I
1:00:06
was on a Honda commercial and
1:00:08
the car we're shooting was
1:00:10
going to be silver, right? And
1:00:12
we're going to be shooting silver cars in downtown
1:00:15
LA driving in and out of sunlight, which
1:00:17
for any digital camera prior to that would
1:00:19
have been death on wheels. Because
1:00:22
if you expose for the shadows when the
1:00:24
car came into the sunlight, it would just
1:00:26
explode in clipping or if you expose for
1:00:28
the highlights in the car when it's in
1:00:30
the sun, in the shadows it would just
1:00:32
be black, right? So I'm tooling up to
1:00:34
do this commercial. I was good friends with
1:00:37
the agency people and I
1:00:39
was offered the first prototype Alexa, the
1:00:42
first one that had come into the United States that was
1:00:44
up to snuff to be able to where they felt like
1:00:46
they could let it out and let somebody shoot with it.
1:00:49
And so I asked the agency
1:00:52
if I could bring this extra camera on with
1:00:54
the second crew to parallel shoot. And
1:00:57
they said, what is it? And I said, well, it's a new
1:00:59
digital camera by the same camera company that makes all the comfy
1:01:01
cameras that we use now. And
1:01:03
they said, well, we have to ask the client. So
1:01:05
they asked the client and Honda is a
1:01:07
very forward thinking company in terms of development.
1:01:10
And so they ran it up the ladder and they
1:01:12
came back down the ladder and they said, absolutely. We
1:01:14
want to know everything there is to know about this.
1:01:17
Say yes, as long as it doesn't cost us any
1:01:19
more money or hold us up in time. So I
1:01:21
brought in my good friend, Kestfun Ostrom,
1:01:23
and we parallel shot the commercial.
1:01:26
So now he was doing the exact same
1:01:28
shots, exact same lenses I was doing, basically
1:01:31
matching the ISO exposures, everything
1:01:34
fast forward to Daley's
1:01:36
or final color correction. Right. We
1:01:39
didn't do Daley's. We just went right into final
1:01:41
color correction because commercials have such a short timeframe.
1:01:44
So we had at this point in
1:01:46
time, all film was scanned and then
1:01:48
existed as digital files. Right. And
1:01:51
the color corrector was digit color correcting these
1:01:53
digital files. And we got done kind of
1:01:55
quickly because the guy was really good.
1:01:58
And we had about two hours left in
1:02:00
the. color correction session and he had already loaded
1:02:02
all the Alexa files into his server in
1:02:05
the other room and he said, let
1:02:07
us see what those files look like. And
1:02:10
so he pulled up the first file and
1:02:12
applied a lot to it and pushed the
1:02:14
wheels a little bit and the first words out of
1:02:16
his mouth was, holy shit, because
1:02:20
it looked like film. The
1:02:22
only difference between, and he was able, in his
1:02:24
color corrector, was able to run the two shots
1:02:26
side by side and the only way
1:02:28
you could tell the film from the digital was the film
1:02:30
head grain. And at that
1:02:33
moment I knew, as the car was driving in
1:02:35
and out of sunlight and all that kind of
1:02:37
stuff, it was performing just as well or better
1:02:40
than the film was. And then
1:02:42
another secret that a lot of people don't understand about
1:02:45
the Alexa and its color science
1:02:47
was the person that designed the
1:02:49
Alexa had previously designed the ARRI
1:02:51
scanner, which was a previous product
1:02:53
for ARRI. They were very
1:02:55
smart in that when the digital revolution was
1:02:57
happening, they didn't first try to build a
1:03:00
camera, they built a scanner because
1:03:02
it was necessary to shoot film, do digital
1:03:05
intermediates and Roger, you were the first person to
1:03:07
do a digital intermediate on Oh Brother,
1:03:09
We're Art Thou and then bring
1:03:11
the film back out to make a
1:03:13
film print. Well, they built the two
1:03:15
things that allowed you to do that,
1:03:17
a scanner and then a film printer,
1:03:19
right? Well, in the process of developing
1:03:21
that scanner, the color scientists kept looking
1:03:23
at what film print looked like and
1:03:25
what the scanner was doing. So
1:03:28
they wanted to emulate film as much as
1:03:30
possible. So then that same person
1:03:32
was kept on and hired to do the
1:03:34
color science for the Alexa. And
1:03:36
that person had thousands of images of how scanned
1:03:39
film looked like and in
1:03:41
their computer and also in their mind and
1:03:44
made the Alexa not only
1:03:46
look like scanned film, but to the
1:03:49
colorist, it behaved like scanned film when
1:03:51
they pushed the wheels. So
1:03:53
other digital cameras, you've been in color
1:03:56
correction sessions with other people's digital cameras,
1:03:58
it does wild things. the wheels
1:04:00
and it's like very unexpected, what's it doing?
1:04:02
These people were all very used to how
1:04:05
film, scan, film behaved. The Alexa behaved just
1:04:07
like that. So the color correction sessions went
1:04:09
really quickly and aided to, that's kind of
1:04:11
a secret thing that nobody's really aware of
1:04:13
unless you've been in color correction sessions, that
1:04:15
it goes really quickly. So that
1:04:18
was the first camera I drove across town right
1:04:20
afterwards, put my money down, a deposit on a
1:04:22
new camera, even though they weren't even offered for
1:04:25
sale yet and said I want one of these.
1:04:27
And I took delivery of one of the very
1:04:29
first ones. So then what
1:04:31
happened is that camera dominated and Roger
1:04:35
took to it quickly and loved it
1:04:37
for various projects that he worked on.
1:04:39
And then what happened is other
1:04:41
digital camera manufacturers ultimately
1:04:44
copied what the Alexa is
1:04:46
and became. And in some cases is
1:04:48
overachieving it now. I mean, it's competition,
1:04:50
it's great. But you can tell that
1:04:52
the other camera manufacturers ultimately were
1:04:55
given the Alexa and say, just copy this camera,
1:04:57
how it looks, how it behaves.
1:04:59
But that was the turning point. I don't know
1:05:01
if I answered my question, it was a long
1:05:03
answer to a simple question. Yeah, I want
1:05:06
to ask you also, I'll shoot at that.
1:05:08
I'll find it really interesting. I
1:05:10
mean, I don't work in commercials,
1:05:12
but when I watch them on
1:05:14
TV or the movies, I'm
1:05:17
very aware now that even
1:05:19
a car commercial, the car might
1:05:21
not actually really be in the
1:05:23
location because of the CGI
1:05:26
work. How is that affected? Would
1:05:29
that famous Budweiser commercial in
1:05:31
the sunset, would
1:05:33
that now be a comp, a
1:05:35
digital creation? Or would
1:05:37
AI be used to create something
1:05:39
like that? I mean, how is
1:05:41
commercials changing? Oh, yeah, radically. I
1:05:43
mean, AI, yes, you
1:05:45
would have trouble finding a LED
1:05:48
volume wall that would let you bring eight
1:05:50
Clydesdales into their stage and poop on the floor and
1:05:52
tromp through. That's a bit of a
1:05:55
stretch. Just imagine them
1:05:57
saying no. But anyway. Yes,
1:06:02
I have actually lit cars in
1:06:04
the CGI world because
1:06:06
the lighting rules still remain the same. They
1:06:09
wrote that software that allows you to
1:06:11
light things in the virtual world to
1:06:13
behave just like light behaves and light
1:06:15
sources behave like light behave. I've
1:06:18
done some of the very first times
1:06:20
when a commercial had a CG car
1:06:22
in it. Sometimes it was a
1:06:24
paint job that had to be changed early on
1:06:26
of a Dodge Viper. We
1:06:29
had shot it with some stripes on it and
1:06:31
they decided they weren't going to do the stripes in the
1:06:33
finished car. At first we're
1:06:35
trying to remove the stripes, but
1:06:37
then they had a 3D model of
1:06:39
the car and they ultimately said, no,
1:06:41
no, let's just reconstitute
1:06:44
the car from the model that
1:06:47
we have. The guy was struggling
1:06:49
to light it. They called me up and
1:06:51
said, hey, can you come down here? I said,
1:06:53
can you zoom out and reveal to me
1:06:55
where your lights are? I
1:06:58
can see them and he did and I said going, oh my
1:07:00
God, they're all in the wrong places. He also had too many
1:07:02
of them. I said, get
1:07:05
rid of this one, get this one, move this one here.
1:07:07
I did basically lit the car as I would on stage
1:07:09
and then he rendered a frame and oh my God, it was in
1:07:12
general. The
1:07:14
rules are still the same. I've been doing
1:07:16
that for CG cars. As a matter of
1:07:18
fact, I did a commercial where we shot
1:07:20
in Valencia, Spain and the
1:07:22
product was a Lincoln car that
1:07:24
didn't exist at the time. It
1:07:27
was still a prototype. They didn't have a driving version of
1:07:29
it, but they wanted to start making a commercial about it.
1:07:32
We shot a BMW car
1:07:35
and then they placed the 3D
1:07:38
CG car on top of it. When
1:07:40
you see the spot, you have no idea. Then
1:07:43
people say, but you didn't light that car and
1:07:45
I say, yes, I did. The reason why is
1:07:47
I picked where we were because shooting cars outside
1:07:49
is picking the light and the angle and being
1:07:51
in the right place at the right time. It's
1:07:53
all about the reflections of that light in the
1:07:55
car. After we would
1:07:57
drive through, we shot normally with a camera.
1:08:00
car and an arm, after we would
1:08:02
drive through, then there was the environment
1:08:04
team that had a camera looking straight
1:08:06
up with a fisheye lens
1:08:08
that recorded the entire environment. So after we
1:08:10
had passed through, they were just around the
1:08:12
corner. Moments later, we'd be going to the
1:08:15
next location. They would drive through and record
1:08:17
the lighting environment. And then what the CG
1:08:19
people would do is they would take that
1:08:21
image, which is a round image in
1:08:24
the image, and they would
1:08:26
map that on the inside of a hemisphere
1:08:28
that they would place over the CG car,
1:08:31
and then in the software, they'd instruct the
1:08:33
CG car to reflect that environment. That's
1:08:36
great, isn't it? That's how my
1:08:38
lighting lit that car. A
1:08:40
lot of people will cry for it. Doesn't it take all
1:08:42
the fun out of it, though? Doesn't it take the fun
1:08:44
out of it? You soon won't be going to Spain either.
1:08:46
Spain will be on the wall in the studio and the
1:08:48
whole thing will be. Yeah. I
1:08:51
mean, people ask me to predict how
1:08:53
AI is going to go. It's hard
1:08:55
to know. Yeah. I'm asking you now.
1:08:57
Yeah. I just read today in Adweek
1:08:59
that some clients
1:09:02
are nervous about the liability aspect
1:09:04
and are instructing their agencies to
1:09:07
not use any AI. Because
1:09:09
I think what the other shoe
1:09:11
that's going to drop, and I could be
1:09:13
wrong here, I'm no lawyer, but
1:09:15
the other shoe that's going to drop is the
1:09:18
lawsuits that are going to occur. There's
1:09:20
already been a spot done for Under
1:09:23
Armour where they used previous work
1:09:25
to make a spot that looked a hell
1:09:27
of a lot like the previous work, but
1:09:29
none of the crew was hired again and
1:09:31
the cinematographer and the director, the
1:09:33
agency just did it all themselves very proudly
1:09:35
and put it up and proudly said, this
1:09:37
is all our work. We did
1:09:39
it all with AI. But in reality, it's other
1:09:41
people's work that they ripped,
1:09:44
for lack of a better term. Right. But
1:09:47
that's an interesting concept, isn't it? Because
1:09:49
you don't get any residuals for
1:09:51
shooting the Budweiser sunset. Yes, exactly.
1:09:55
Where is that going to fall? Can they recreate
1:09:57
that sunset exactly as it is? What
1:10:00
do you get for it? It's kind of it
1:10:02
just it's a new well very a whole new
1:10:04
world and the shoe hasn't dropped yet I think
1:10:07
right now everybody's being cautious Google
1:10:10
Getty images Set out a
1:10:12
thing saying we don't want to accept any images
1:10:14
that are whole or in part Invented with you
1:10:17
know created with AI because they also don't want
1:10:19
to have somebody sue them Yeah, you know I
1:10:21
think right now the legal aspect all this needs
1:10:23
to be sorted out and that'll probably take a
1:10:26
year or two But I
1:10:28
find it absolutely fascinating some of the stuff that I'm
1:10:30
seeing Yeah,
1:10:33
yeah lovely. Hey, yeah, this
1:10:35
is being great. It's really interesting. I hope I
1:10:37
have a doctor guys heads off. I mean I
1:10:40
took off I've
1:10:42
been fascinated It's
1:10:45
been really interesting The
1:10:50
way you introduced the
1:10:53
idea of Creativity
1:10:56
creativity and technology working
1:10:58
hand-in-hand which is exactly
1:11:00
Hmm what both
1:11:02
all of us love about the industry really?
1:11:04
I you know, yeah, I think that's a
1:11:07
great thing And I've been
1:11:09
long a great fan of your guys work.
1:11:11
So I Admire everything
1:11:13
you do so I hope you
1:11:15
like our podcast Love
1:11:18
the podcast and I'm honored to be a part
1:11:20
of it I know many people have learned a
1:11:22
lot from your other guests and
1:11:25
it's a fantastic opportunity You guys put all
1:11:27
this effort because it's no small amount of effort you
1:11:29
guys put into this No, it's really not Fun
1:11:52
If you'd like to sponsor the team
1:11:54
deacons podcast let us know at pod
1:11:56
at team deacons calm Thanks
1:12:01
for listening. If you want
1:12:03
more information and further discussion, check
1:12:05
out the forums at www.rogerdeakins.com.
1:12:12
Becoming a member is free and you
1:12:14
can ask follow-up questions there. And be
1:12:18
sure to subscribe to the podcast for more
1:12:20
new questions and topics. Also,
1:12:22
check us out on Instagram at
1:12:25
team.deakins. See
1:12:28
you next time!
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More