Podchaser Logo
Home
#247: Professional Development, Analytically Speaking with Helen Crossley

#247: Professional Development, Analytically Speaking with Helen Crossley

Released Tuesday, 11th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
#247: Professional Development, Analytically Speaking with Helen Crossley

#247: Professional Development, Analytically Speaking with Helen Crossley

#247: Professional Development, Analytically Speaking with Helen Crossley

#247: Professional Development, Analytically Speaking with Helen Crossley

Tuesday, 11th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

All right. Before we start the show, we have an announcement and a

0:03

request. Val, would you want to explain what that is to me and

0:07

to our listeners? I would love to, Tim. So we wanna hear from

0:11

you, dear listeners. So we're conducting a survey and logistically we've

0:15

made things as easy as possible for you. Survey.

0:20

I mean, I kind of like just pretending I knew what listeners were

0:22

thinking, but sure, fine. We can do it your way. And I'm assuming

0:26

that because it's you, that there's probably a short URL and there's probably

0:30

a nice little Google Form, that's mobile friendly that listeners can go

0:33

to, to actually give us this information. Ah, Tim, you know me so

0:38

well. You bet. And so starting today, the survey will be live at

0:42

bitly/aph survey. So putting my listener cap on. So, we want something from

0:49

them. We're not going to actually give them anything in return.

0:53

Are we? We sure are. At the end of the survey,

0:56

there'll be an opportunity for you to give us your address,

0:59

so we can get a laptop sticker off in the mail to you.

1:02

And also you can choose to enter a raffle for some sweet sweet

1:06

power hour swag. I don't know who approved this expense, but fine. So

1:11

this means, I mean, I'll take it 'cause we can now kind of get

1:13

rid of those old, branded mouse pads and BlackBerry covers.

1:18

No, Tim, we'll leave those to you to still use as your stocking

1:21

stuffers. This is actually gonna be way better, think comfy, cozy hoodies

1:26

just in time for summer. Hoodies for summer. Good planning. I'll take mine

1:30

and just rip the sleeves off and rock those Analytics guns through the

1:35

summer. Your finance bro look? Yeah. That's right. I've been, I think I'm

1:40

ready. So how long, I mean they've gotta do this sometime before summer,

1:44

so how long do listeners actually have to participate? Yeah. So the survey

1:48

opens today, May 28th and this is 2024, just in case you're living

1:52

in our future and listening back to some old episodes. And we're gonna

1:55

keep it open through the month of June. Okay. So if I was

1:58

paying attention, listeners should visit bitly/aph survey, before June 30th

2:07

in the year 2024, to share their opinions and maybe actually get some

2:11

pretty cool swag? You got it. Sounds good. Now onto the show.

2:21

Welcome to the Analytics Power Hour. Analytics topics covered conversationally

2:26

and sometimes with explicit language. Hi everyone. Welcome. It's the analytics

2:31

Power Hour. This is episode 247. You know, as you progress in your

2:37

analytics career, you'll soon find yourself probably as a manager of someone

2:41

or a team of someone's. And what you learn pretty quickly is that

2:45

all the skills required to be a good manager or leader are honestly

2:49

nothing like the skills you've built, being a good analyst. And sure,

2:53

I mean, there's some crossover but it's really a whole different job,

2:57

and yet it's super important to get it right and be a great

3:01

manager. And maybe you're not a manager today and don't wanna be,

3:04

but this episode will still be useful, because

3:08

this might help you know what to look for as you develop in

3:10

your career and find good managers. Luckily, I am joined by my co

3:15

hosts who are also both amazing leaders and managers. And let me introduce

3:19

them right now. So Moe Kiss, who is joining us. Welcome.

3:24

Welcome. Thank you. You Are actually a really good manager. I've heard people

3:28

on your team say so. So, like. Oh, well that's very nice to hear. There's

3:31

third party verification. Yeah. I was only paying them a little bit.

3:35

And Val Kroll. Also welcome. Thank you. Thank you. Excited to be here.

3:41

And I've realized Val, technically when we were both serving on the DEA,

3:44

you were kind of my manage. So I feel like I've been managed

3:48

by you and I can say you're a great manager, so that's pretty

3:51

awesome. Well, and I have been managed by you Michael, and I can

3:53

speak very highly of that experience as well. Look at this,

3:56

good management all around. Okay. This is now starting like a paid advertisement.

4:00

Okay, that's great. And I'm Michael Helbling. We also are excited because

4:05

we do have a guest. Helen Crossley, is a senior director of marketing

4:08

science at Meta and she's also held data leadership positions at Procter &

4:12

Gamble. She's also an international speaker and mentor. And today she is

4:16

our guest. Welcome to the show, Helen. Thank you so much for having

4:20

me. Excited to be here. Oh, we're so excited to have you as

4:23

well. And I think it's really cool 'cause I know, you were introduced

4:27

to us through Moe, and Moe do you wanna

4:30

kick off kind of like how this all came about and then we

4:33

can jump into some conversations about professional development and leadership?

4:37

Yeah. So, I was lucky enough to get introduced to Helen and she's

4:41

part of my sort of my professional network now. And if you are

4:45

a people manager and you don't have a good network of people outside

4:48

of your company, that's probably tip number one,

4:51

because you do often need to talk about some pretty gnarly situations or

4:56

get some advice, external to your own company. And Helen has been able

5:00

to provide that for me. And so I wanted our lovely listeners to

5:04

all get to benefit from some of the amazing conversations I've had with

5:08

Helen over the last weeks and months, about all sorts of great things

5:13

like development goals and team members and, how we kind of grow that

5:18

analytical skillset and do that simultaneously with communication skills.

5:22

So that's kind of the background. I wouldn't mind just like diving right

5:28

in. I think what I love about Helen's approach is she's pretty direct,

5:34

I would say, as an Australian. So we might kick off and talk

5:40

a little bit about what good development goals look like. Helen, we had

5:45

a sort of an experience where I shared mine with you and you gave me

5:49

some, pretty good feedback. I think I said that they were

5:53

a bit crap to begin with, Moe but we went from there. I'm

5:57

sorry if I said the sharing. Yeah, they were a bit crap to

6:02

begin with. But there was a few points in particular that I thought

6:05

were really useful in terms of the feedback.

6:09

So can you tell me like when you are working with someone,

6:13

what do good goals look like to you? I think for me good goals are things that are obviously linked into

6:21

the business objectives and what the business overall is trying to achieve.

6:25

But beyond that, they have to be something that you actually want to

6:28

do. All too often I see goals, which are just a to do list of

6:34

projects. I have to launch this, ship that, analyze this. And those are

6:39

not goals. Those are your to do list. They might be milestones under

6:44

a goal, but for me a great goal is something where you can

6:48

look at it and say, Hey, if in six and 12 months I've

6:51

achieved this I will be in a better place, the business will be

6:55

in a better place and that is something that I really do want

6:59

to achieve. And I think that motivation is a really critical part of

7:02

it. So a lot of times what I see in organizations is goal

7:07

setting that starts from above and then there's that cascading and waterfall

7:10

down to the different departments and down to individuals. Do you think

7:13

what you're talking about here, about setting goals for yourself as an individual,

7:17

is kind of separate from this task or activity? Or do you recommend

7:21

trying to find a way to weave the two together?

7:25

Personally, I really recommend weaving the two together. I think it's absolutely

7:29

fine if you have goals which are more personal and not linked to

7:33

the business at all. You want to achieve something for yourself in your

7:36

life. And sometimes that can be linked into your analytics career.

7:40

If you wanna learn a new skill that's maybe gonna take your career

7:43

in a different direction, but it's not linked to your day to day

7:46

job. But for business goals or goals related to your work every single

7:52

day, I think they absolutely have to be intertwined. If you are not

7:56

thinking about, what does my manager care about? What does their manager

8:00

care about? What does the company care about? Then there is a very

8:04

good chance that you get to the end of the year, you achieve all your goals. And people are sitting around saying,

8:10

Well what did you actually do? Why should I care? And so absolutely,

8:15

I really do recommend that they be intertwined and that you can really

8:19

draw a very bright line between what your goal is and the company

8:24

or business that you're supporting's ultimate mission. And if you can't

8:27

do that, then really go back and ask yourself, Why am I launching

8:32

this project? Why am I doing that piece of analysis? If no one

8:35

cares, if it doesn't connect into the business, if it's not part of

8:40

a bigger piece of work, then is that even a priority for me,

8:43

let alone a goal? That's actually where I thought you were gonna go

8:47

with it. And I'll say that with some of my past experiences in

8:51

consulting, one of the things that made it a little bit tricky,

8:54

and this was a kind of a complaint that we heard a lot

8:57

of times from some, especially some of the junior analysts was,

9:00

I'm not sure what clients I'm gonna be staffed on over the next

9:03

three months or six months. How can I pin something down?

9:08

Whether it's learning, diving into you are, maybe the next couple of clients

9:12

that you're on really don't have any needs in that direction.

9:15

So balancing some of that uncertainty, obviously, you still need to think

9:19

about the needs of the business of where you work, but if the

9:23

majority of your work is really tied in with the success of other

9:26

organizations, do you have any advice on how to like square that,

9:29

square those two things together? Yeah, absolutely. And I think this is

9:33

quite common. A lot of analysts also have a lot of ad hoc

9:36

work, even if it's not, you know, client based things pop up all through

9:40

the year. How do you think about those? How do you quantify those

9:43

and turn that into a goal? And my experience here, obviously I don't

9:46

have all the answers, but, my experience is a lot of times with those

9:49

more junior folks, their goals aren't aggressive enough, they're not thinking

9:53

big enough, they don't want to put a line in the sand and

9:56

say, my goal is to get my client, whoever that might be,

9:59

or to get the team that I'm working with to think more about,

10:03

you know, this big topic growth, how do I transform the way this

10:08

organization thinks about growth? And that's my goal. And within that I'm

10:12

gonna have a bunch of sub goals, which maybe will change and

10:17

maybe I don't hit all of them or those milestones within it.

10:20

But oftentimes when I see what you're talking about, it's 'cause the goal

10:23

is too small, frankly. Too narrow? That makes sense. Too narrow. Too small.

10:29

And it also is not a disservice to you as the individual,

10:32

if your goals are so narrow. Because if you make them a little

10:35

bit bigger, a little bit more expansive in your thinking, A,

10:38

you are gonna unlock more growth for you and for your business.

10:43

But B, it also gives you more flexibility and how are you gonna

10:47

hit that goal? So rather than launch project X, if my goal is

10:51

to drive growth, project X turned out to be a big fat flop.

10:55

Doesn't matter, because my goal is something that I'm working to achieve.

10:59

And there are five other ways I can work towards that goal,

11:02

even if that one project doesn't work out.

11:05

And that's something I see particularly, particularly with more junior team

11:09

members, who don't want to put themselves out there and really claim a

11:13

big bold goal, because they think it's not their position or they shouldn't

11:17

be doing that. And I always say do it. That is absolutely the

11:21

goal. And if you smash that, then congratulations.

11:26

It's time to step away from the show for a quick word about

11:29

Piwik PRO. Tim, tell us about it. Well, Piwik PRO has really exploded

11:34

in popularity and keeps adding new functionality. They sure have. They've

11:38

got an easy to use interface, a full set of features with capabilities

11:43

like custom reports, enhanced e commerce tracking, and a customer data platform.

11:48

We love running Piwik PRO's free plan on the podcast website,

11:52

but they also have a paid plan that adds scale and some additional

11:55

features. Yeah. Head over to Piwik.pro and check them out for yourself.

12:00

You can get started with their free plan. That's Piwik.pro. And now let's

12:05

get back to the show. I am loving this. I feel like I'm

12:10

gonna... I actually do have to go back and revisit my goals,

12:12

but I'm probably going to do it again. I was thinking in the lead up to this episode a lot about

12:18

the tension with analysts and data scientists around, we have the technical

12:23

skills and we have the communication or like stakeholder stuff.

12:27

And I was actually, I guess my perspective was that we are a

12:31

little bit unique because if you're a backend engineer, you have a PM

12:35

who's going to interface with the business. So improving the software skills

12:39

is not, I don't think as big of a priority for lots of

12:42

other areas of the business as it often is for data folks 'cause

12:45

we're doing that interfacing ourselves. And then I'm thinking of goals often,

12:50

especially with juniors, it's like improve communication skills,

12:54

full stop. And. For the audience, Helen is vehemently shaking her head now.

13:04

Okay. I'm just gonna, I'm gonna pose that and hand over to you

13:08

about, like you have a junior person who comes to you,

13:10

improve communication skills. How would you tackle that?

13:15

Why do you wanna do that? Why do you wanna improve your communication

13:17

skills, Moe? What's that going to drive? To have more influence,

13:21

to be a better presenter. I'm trying to think of like stuff people

13:23

have said to me. Fantastic. I love that you wanna be more influential.

13:28

What do you wanna influence? Whoa, oh. See? See, everyone? This is... I

13:35

wanna help them make better decisions. Fantastic. It sounds like your goal

13:39

is to make this organization a more data driven decision making organization.

13:45

And The way that you're going to do that, is by having phenomenal

13:49

technical skills as you do. And you can't influence them in that way

13:53

if the data is not robust, but you also will need to improve

13:56

your communication and influence skills to drive that goal of changing the

14:00

organization to be more data driven. That should be your goal,

14:04

not improve communication skills. Should we just end the episode here?

14:08

Yeah. I think we're good. This is good. I think we're all set.

14:12

I love it. Damn, that was good. But let me say,

14:17

as you're describing this and playing through it, this is the observationally,

14:23

I'm seeing you kind of abstract out a couple of layers to say,

14:26

Hey, think bigger thoughts or end it to your point before.

14:29

Try to be a little more big picture or aggressive with your thinking,

14:33

which I think is just such a really good set of advice for

14:37

anybody at any level. And maybe talk a little bit about that perspective

14:42

or how you, you obviously demonstrated that how you help people set goals,

14:46

but as a leader, how are you inculcating that and how are you

14:50

bracing that yourself or where does that come from? I don't know if

14:53

I'm asking a very coherent question at this point, but. So the question

14:57

is really, how do we encourage folks to think bigger and take bigger

15:01

risks? Is that? Yeah. I think that's maybe where I'm headed with that.

15:05

Yeah. I think it's about allowing it, empowering it, saying it's okay.

15:11

It's okay to be your best self and to go

15:15

hit some big goals. And oftentimes people just need to know

15:19

that. And you would be amazed, amazed at how much potential people have

15:26

when they have permission. And it's sad that they think that they need

15:30

to ask for permission, but it's reality for a lot of people.

15:34

They don't wanna step on toes. Maybe they're new to the organization.

15:37

It's not necessarily about being junior. It's just, Hey, I'm still finding

15:40

my way and I don't know what I don't know. And to say

15:44

to someone, it's okay to think big and be bold is sometimes enough,

15:48

but often also as a manager back it up with, and by the

15:51

way, if you do do that, I've got your back and I support

15:55

you and I believe in you and I can do, you know, I

15:57

know that you can do these things if we get these goals right

16:01

and we know what you need to get there. So, I think that's how I approach it. I know there are lots

16:07

of different other approaches, but for me, it's about saying, how do I

16:10

empower that thinking and not think small. And what happens when

16:17

people come from lots of different organizations and have had other managers

16:21

and things like that. And sometimes I've certainly experienced where people

16:25

have had really negative experiences, where maybe they've set those goals

16:29

and then didn't hit them. And then what happens in the org?

16:34

Like how do you communicate set that aggressive goal? 'cause

16:37

my mentality is, Hey, if you shoot for the stars and you only

16:40

make it to the moon, you still made it to the moon. That's awesome. Oh wow. That is the corniest shit ever. Yeah. But I

16:47

figured, I am corny as get out, all get out. That's, I own

16:51

that. But, look, some organizations and frankly some

16:56

not great managers will look at you at the end of the year

16:59

and be like, Well you set this goal and you didn't hit it

17:01

so you failed. And it's like, Okay, well I learned my lesson.

17:05

Don't set aggressive goals anymore. And so that mentality is both culturally

17:09

driven as well. I'm just wondering have you experienced where, having you

17:13

had to kind of help people reset those

17:16

as they've entered your team or, you've worked with them as a mentor

17:19

maybe? Yeah, and I recognise I'm in a very unique position at Meta where,

17:24

we have a CEO who says things like, Hey, if you're hitting all your goals,

17:28

they're not aggressive enough. That means you're not taking big enough risks

17:31

and vets and... That's helpful. We shouldn't be hitting all our goals.

17:35

And so definitely I'm in a unique environment and I recognise that not

17:39

all workplaces are like that. But I think what you're touching on Michael,

17:42

is the need to quantify, measure, set some measurable impact. So when we

17:50

talk about, you know, the example we gave earlier, I want the organization

17:54

I support to be more data driven in their decision making.

17:57

How do I quantify that or put a metric around that?

17:59

How do I know if I've hit that? And if I don't quantify it, then the scenario you are talking about,

18:06

where failure is much more likely because we don't know if I hit

18:11

it or if I didn't hit it or we have to rely on

18:14

qualitative feedback. And sometimes our teams around us, as data scientists

18:19

and analytics professionals, we all know that we sometimes have to be the

18:23

bad cop. So they might not love giving that feedback. And so,

18:27

that is definitely something that you need to think about. How do I

18:31

measure this goal? How do I know if I'm making progress toward it? And

18:35

how do I check in on it regularly? So that at the end

18:38

of the year, I'm not getting a surprise, my manager is not getting a surprise,

18:42

if I don't hit it. Yeah, even outside of the psychological safety that

18:46

you're talking about, Helen, with giving people permission to swing big,

18:51

I also think that the quantification piece is huge, because it's so much

18:55

easier to say, "Project was released on time within budget.

19:00

This many users were impacted as planned or whatever." So it's so much

19:03

easier to go to an output to be able to say,

19:06

"Yep, that was achieved." Versus something that's like a little squishier,

19:10

a little bigger, involves other people. It's like outside your own sphere

19:13

of influence, which is that a factor of why you see people tend

19:17

to lean on some of those more project or task list related things?

19:21

I think that's right. But I would say all of those things that

19:25

you're talking about, those quantified projects, those are all great examples

19:30

of the impact or the evidence that shows, "Hey, yeah, I'm making progress

19:33

toward those goals." And so really having the sub milestones is important

19:38

to ensure that you are progressing on them, and that you have the

19:41

evidence that you are actually driving it. That's my kind of mental model,

19:45

Moe, is those things are important, yes, I ship the thing. And knowing

19:49

how does that ladder up to the final goal. That's the part that's

19:52

often missing. I shipped a ton of things and so what?

19:56

So what? I feel like there's a tendency, as data people,

20:00

we do generally wanna have measures, and you did touch on it.

20:04

I have noticed a bit of a theme lately where everyone feels like the only way to get measures of success,

20:12

is to ask their stakeholders for qualitative feedback. And

20:17

I have had a bit of a visceral reaction because I'm like,

20:20

you are then putting the burden on your stakeholders to basically to tell

20:24

you whether or not you did a good job, but you're also asking more of them, which you can't do that for every piece of work,

20:30

right? What are some of the ways that you can...

20:33

And I've realized this is a hard thing to do, but like, what

20:36

are some of the ways that we can measure success without necessarily needing

20:40

to go back to stakeholders? I'd say two things on that.

20:43

And I think one that I'm a big fan of is joint goals. So

20:47

you and your stakeholder have the exact same goal or a same version

20:51

of a goal that you both are working on together, and you agree

20:55

is a good goal. Hey, we both want to drive growth in this

20:59

way. I'm going to do it and here's my sub milestones,

21:02

and this... By owning these elements, you are gonna do it by owning

21:05

those elements. And then we're gonna agree on how do we know if

21:08

that actually happened or not. That's definitely one area. I think in terms

21:13

of the other point I would make though on how can you quantify

21:16

it? Honestly, I think this is where data people have to get creative

21:20

and often do not spend enough time, effort, thought on measuring themselves.

21:25

Very good at measuring other people. Very, very good. Yeah. I'm very good.

21:30

Not very good at measuring ourselves. And that doesn't mean we don't have

21:35

the capability to do it, but I think it's just a time and

21:39

effort thing personally, although happy to be... That to be a debate.

21:46

So let's go back to that discussion about old mate who wants to

21:51

improve their communication skills. And we've kind of evolved their goal

21:54

now to make the business more data driven. I think, was that the

21:58

exact words? Yeah. I think there was a slight tweak on words. Something,

22:02

exactly. And we have a series of milestones,

22:05

to put you completely on the spot. What are some of the ways

22:10

we could measure that? I feel like that one maybe you're looking for

22:15

evidence of a change in behavior in stakeholders. Like that's kind of what

22:19

my intuition says. What are your thoughts? Yeah. So in that sort of a scenario,

22:23

I would say some of the sub milestones should be,

22:27

Hey, I'm producing the data and is it actually being used?

22:31

How do I... If it's a dashboard, how many people are using it

22:34

on a regular basis? How sticky is it? Are they coming back and

22:38

using it time and time again? Same thing, if it's a report,

22:42

is this something that people actually care about? And sometimes you do

22:46

need to get qualitative feedback. There's no kind of bones about it.

22:49

If you don't have the right tracking mechanisms in place, you do have

22:52

to just ask, "Hey, was this helpful? Was it not?" But do that

22:55

the first time you send it out, not the 12th time you send

22:58

it out, and get the feedback. And if it wasn't helpful,

23:01

wasn't useful, then what would it take for it to become more useful?

23:06

Sorry, why did you say the first time and not the 12th? Well,

23:09

you don't wanna send a report 12 times that no one cares about.

23:13

Oh, got it. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. I'm with you. I'm with you.

23:15

'Cause ideally if it wasn't helpful, then you've gotten feedback and iterated

23:20

and made it better by the time you send it the next time.

23:22

Yep. Okay. I'm with you. Tracking. And a lot of times if your

23:28

business partners are making this request of the data team, it's to help

23:33

inform a question or decision. And so hopefully you're a part of,

23:37

so did you do that? Did you kind of follow through on some

23:40

of the recommendations? Like hopefully you're somewhat in tune with some

23:45

of the decisions or next actions that were taken. And that in every

23:48

case, especially if it's like a dashboard or it's a little bit more

23:51

independent, but supporting some of those decisions. Like I think that that

23:55

might be one of the easy ways to tell a story about impact.

23:57

Like you were kind of nudging us towards earlier about the,

24:01

"What does it do for the business?" And so taking that story all

24:04

the way up, that could be a good way to do it too.

24:07

Yeah. And I think you're making a great point, Val, around when these

24:10

ad hoc requests come, we all guide our teams, I'm sure to do

24:15

the due diligence of, "What are you gonna use that for?"

24:18

But then not always the follow up of, "And did you?" So I

24:21

really think that's a great point. Okay. I wanna turn a little bit.

24:25

It's funny because Helen's exact example then before is an exact professional

24:30

development goal conversation I had with someone recently. And I was like,

24:33

Oh wow. Those are the exact points that we hit, which is very

24:36

entertaining. But, I do wanna talk a little bit about junior team members

24:40

and their professional development more broadly. I think goals is obviously

24:44

an important component, but I guess my expectations are, when you're a senior

24:48

team member, you are very much driving your own development goals.

24:52

You have a clear idea of where you want to go and sometimes

24:55

they need to bounce off you, but you are leading your development.

24:59

And with junior team members, that's a lot harder. I find sometimes they're,

25:03

I don't wanna say lost, but they don't even... They don't know what

25:06

they don't know. So they don't know what's possible.

25:09

And yes, they need more guidance, but it's also, they're still in that

25:13

heavy learning stage. So they're not necessarily thinking about two years

25:17

or three years down the track. Do you feel Helen, like there is

25:20

a different approach that needs to happen there. Or sometimes they're like,

25:24

"What should I do? Should I focus on my technical skills?

25:26

Should I focus on my communication skills? And they really need a lot

25:30

more guidance. So I think there's a couple of things to unpack there.

25:35

I think, again, personally my approach that nothing gives me more joy than

25:40

having a new person come onto a team.

25:43

Not really giving them that much direction, not that much guide rails,

25:47

but giving them a lot of permission and being surprised and delighted by what they come back with.

25:54

And I think too often we handhold a little bit too much or put

26:00

a barrier around people, which actually is not that helpful and they can

26:04

do a lot more if they're empowered to do that. So my approach

26:08

is typically to kind of get out of the way a little bit,

26:11

particularly for the first few months. Obviously they need a lot of support

26:14

in learning the business, the methods, whatever else they need to onboard

26:18

to. And tons of support there. But a little bit less in terms

26:22

of the professional goals. 'Cause I honestly wouldn't know either. I don't

26:25

know what your next big leap is gonna be. We're gonna have to

26:30

work on that together. I don't know enough about that person to make

26:33

a judgment call on that within the first three, six, sometimes even 12

26:37

months. We'll have discussions around it along the way, but I think being

26:42

a little bit less prescriptive in 'the how' of the work that they're

26:47

doing. Obviously they need prescriptive guidance when it comes to what has

26:52

to happen or what the job scope is, but a little bit less

26:55

on the how is typically how I approach it. But

26:58

I think that doesn't work for all people. And I don't know if Val or Michael,

27:02

you have other ideas or examples of where it has or hasn't worked for folks

27:06

on your teams? Yeah. I mean, I definitely agree with what you're saying.

27:11

It's hard to do what you just said

27:14

a lot of times, 'cause you feel like, "Oh, I've gotta give them

27:17

everything they need to start and be successful and tell them what everything

27:21

is and all the expectations". But a little bit of area to roam is

27:25

actually good for both of you. And I don't know if you've found

27:30

this, Helen, I feel like sometimes that's also personality driven.

27:34

Where I'll have people come back to me and be like,

27:36

"Okay, I need more structure around this, or I don't know what to

27:39

do". And then other folks are more like, "Oh, cool, I'll just jump

27:43

in there and figure it out and I'll see you in three months

27:46

when we do a check in or something". And, it's just totally different by the person sometimes. Yeah. I'm not sure

27:53

what you're... Yeah. You've experienced. I totally agree with that and that's

27:58

great. And I wouldn't wanna get in the way of the person who is like,

28:00

I got it, let me run with it and grow my wings and

28:04

soar. And for the person who does need more structure,

28:07

that's fantastic and happy to give it. And thank you for giving me

28:11

the feedback. Yeah. And by the way, in 12 months time,

28:15

your development goal might be around for a bit more autonomy, a little

28:18

bit more self directed leadership, but we'll get there, for now...

28:22

Yeah. Yeah. Let's work on what structure is helpful for you?

28:25

How do you operate, how to empower that person. Yeah. A lot of

28:28

times I find myself telling junior people, your primary job is to make

28:32

sure you have clarity. If you don't understand something that, you need

28:37

to make sure you're getting what you need to be clear on the

28:40

direction, the approach, the task, whatever it is.

28:43

And sometimes that's helpful. But, yeah. I think that's such a hard thing

28:47

too, though. It's something that I have noticed a little bit lately.

28:51

I don't know, like you said, Helen, it's not the permission,

28:55

but them knowing that they can ask more questions if they don't understand

28:59

something, and it's a really hard cultural thing to influence of like,

29:02

No, I want you to keep asking until you understand when you're a

29:05

junior person who inevitably in the data space is sitting in front of

29:09

a very senior stakeholder. When we think about

29:14

new team members, and, I say new team members 'cause it can be

29:17

in any level, junior or senior, how do we ensure that

29:22

they are set up for success and getting the support that they need?

29:27

And I think there's actually less work to be done in that regard

29:30

with the individual team member coming in. The work is done over days,

29:35

months, and years with the whole rest of the team. So personally,

29:39

I incentivize the rest of my team to help. You are incentivised, I

29:44

encourage you, I recognise those who are putting their hand up to help

29:48

new folks on the team. That's something that I would reward.

29:51

And so we have a collaboration by default, it's about the team,

29:56

not the individuals. And that is the team culture that I wanna foster.

30:00

And yes, it has something to do with new folks coming in,

30:03

obviously, but, you can sense that around you as a new team member,

30:08

whether people are, "Me, me, me" Or "We, we, we". And the team

30:13

culture I wanna encourage and develop is always that I will notice

30:19

people who are helping out new folks. I will recognise it,

30:22

I will make sure that we are supporting those people and encourage them.

30:27

And that new folks should feel extremely welcome and then have a large

30:32

network. Because if the whole team does that, you've got now 10,

30:36

15 people who you can go to. And it's not all,

30:39

"Well by one mentor who's the only person who is being incentivised to

30:44

help me. I feel like I can't go to them 50 times a

30:47

day. Well now I've got a whole team of people, who are being

30:50

rewarded for helping me and I feel like I can go to whoever

30:53

I need to, whenever I need to". So that's how I like to

30:56

approach it. Obviously a buddy is still helpful for a lot of things,

30:59

but, it should be on everyone. It should not be the responsibility of

31:03

the new team member to ask the question. It should be the responsibility

31:06

of the team to reach out and support them.

31:09

Oh, I love that. That's great. I actually just have a new team

31:12

member, so I'm like, can't wait to put this into practice. It's nice.

31:16

One thing I'm curious about, your opinions on, Helen is when it is

31:20

a newer team member or sometimes, I guess I'm also kind of thinking

31:24

the more junior team member with this question is,

31:27

how do you balance getting them excited about taking those aggressive big

31:32

swings versus just being like, collect some experiences. Like enjoy the

31:38

process, explore it. Like, "I'm your safety net. You're never gonna fly

31:43

without that". But just kind of explore. So do you put goals around

31:48

something like that or, I'm just interested your take. Typically,

31:52

and this is going a little against what I said earlier, but typically

31:56

in the interview process, I have a good sense of

32:00

what strengths someone might have or what they bring to the table that's

32:04

unique. And I like to not tell them that I'm setting them up

32:10

with a quick win, but set them up with a quick win. Based

32:13

on everything I know about you and what you're bringing to the table.

32:15

I have a problem here that I'm 90% confident you can smash out

32:20

the park and I'm gonna give you that. I'm not gonna tell you

32:23

that I think you can smash it out of the park. That's. I love this. But

32:26

I'm gonna give you this problem knowing that it'll give you the experience

32:31

and get the wheels in motion and get you riding that bike to

32:34

say, "Okay, well once I've got one win under my belt and I

32:37

know how that works now let me go find some more".

32:40

So that's how I like to do it. But it's not always

32:44

that neat and possible, but finding a quick win for everyone on a

32:48

team is something that I'm very supportive of. What is

32:52

their thing gonna be where in six weeks, 12 weeks, they can come

32:55

back and give a presentation to the rest of the team or feel like

32:58

they've got some runs on the board and they know what they're doing.

33:02

See how fucking good is this? Amazing. Yeah. I'm like... Okay guys,

33:08

I've really got to change tact because I have been dying to talk

33:11

about this for weeks and weeks and weeks, because it's something that's so top of mind.

33:17

I wanna talk about middle management. We've spent a lot of time talking

33:20

kind of about juniors and that sort of thing, but I think the

33:23

middle management step is one that is quite bumpy for most people when

33:29

you go from being an individual contributor to leading a team,

33:33

a small team or that sort of thing. And really making that transition when you start to find out how the

33:40

sausage is made and getting exposure to some of the, I guess,

33:44

the problems or difficulties that happen more at the leadership level.

33:48

And then balancing like the need to shield your team with also listening

33:52

to them. And Helen, what I'm really curious to hear,

33:57

do you think that is just like a growing pain that people go

34:00

through and you have to accept it's gonna be bumpy? Or do you

34:03

think there are ways that you can make that transition

34:06

easier for people that are going into to management?

34:10

So I mean, firstly I'll say I don't love the terminology of middle

34:13

management, because I think everyone is a middle management unless you're

34:16

in the C suite. And so every manager needs to think of themself as

34:21

a leader of the team and a manager of the team,

34:24

no matter what the level or the size of company or anything of

34:27

that nature is. But in terms of someone, I think what you're getting

34:31

at Moe is like, Hey, first time managers that transition from being an

34:35

individual team member into being a manager. How do we make that easier

34:39

for folks? Is that really kind of the crux of what you're getting

34:42

at? Yes, but it's also, I suppose it probably a little bit more

34:47

narrow in terms of you are then balancing sometimes

34:53

the downward pressure in reality. So like hypothetically there's a decision

34:57

you don't agree with, but you're gonna have to communicate that to your

35:00

team. Whereas before you would've been on the receiving end, you could have

35:03

been like, "This is bullshit, I don't agree with it". Now it's like,

35:05

"I don't agree with it, but I'm still going to have to get

35:07

other people to support it". So, it's the tension

35:11

that starts to come up from moving into that role. Got it.

35:16

So I'm a big believer in authenticity and not sugarcoating things,

35:22

but for me personally, it's extremely... I can't think of a single situation

35:27

where that has really happened to me, where I really said like, I

35:30

fully disagree with this. I do not understand it.

35:33

You can disagree with a decision, but you can understand it.

35:37

And so that is what I've be communicating to my team.

35:40

Why are we doing this? Because I understand why we're doing this,

35:43

it's something that's important to me. Now, my personal opinion may or may

35:47

not be aligned to that fully, but if I can understand why as

35:50

a company we are doing it, and that is why I'm communicating that, I

35:54

would tend to leave my personal opinions out of it in that scenario

35:58

if I really did disagree. But I think it's extremely rare and

36:01

I would encourage folks seek to understand because oftentimes, so many times

36:06

we have seen situations like that, what's actually happening is that new

36:09

managers doesn't have all of the context. They don't have all of the

36:12

context on the business, the realities, maybe it's the cost structure that

36:16

they're not fully across. Maybe there's a competitor coming in. There's

36:20

something that they are not seeing, it's pretty rare that senior management,

36:24

and it just makes terrible decisions, obviously it does happen. But normally

36:29

that's reality is, "Hey, I don't have all of the context that my

36:32

manager has. How do I get that context so I can do a

36:35

better job of relaying these decisions and the importance of them to my

36:39

team?" I loved hearing what you just said, Helen. I have literally on

36:44

my desk right now a little post it note that is the two

36:47

triangles. As your responsibilities grow, your rights get smaller.

36:54

So that's something that is kind of true where you're not allowed to

36:59

complain to your team, you're not allowed to

37:02

express your opinions necessarily. I think I agree wholeheartedly with the

37:06

concept of being authentic, but you have to have these checks and balances

37:11

within yourself to not sort of... Does an individual contributor, like if

37:14

you're upset about something, you just can say it, as a manager you

37:18

have to think, What is the impact to my team, if I

37:21

say these things or if I open my mouth about this stuff or

37:24

if I badmouth this department or whatever the case may be.

37:29

And so that's sort of the way I think about it is you

37:32

own not just yourself, but you kind of own a perception that you

37:38

wanna build in your team so that your team

37:40

continues to have the culture you want from it, of the all the

37:44

things we've talked about before. Right? So I don't know. Yeah.

37:47

I've never really thought of it as having less rights is moral responsibility.

37:51

I think it's. It is not having them, it's more like not

37:57

choosing not to exercise them. Maybe in certain scenarios. I'll have to

38:02

sit with that one. Yeah. Maybe I'm, I don't know. Somebody told that

38:06

to me and I thought it was good in the moment, so I wrote it down and, it's sitting on my desk right there,

38:10

so. I can definitely say that was one of the first mistakes I

38:13

made when I became a first time manager is I was like,

38:17

let's start every day at the top of the rollercoaster and as I

38:20

go to meetings and come across new information, I'm gonna drag everyone

38:24

up and down with me. Yeah. And it was like, I'm not being

38:26

a good shit umbrella, to not take, to

38:30

unload my stress of this situation or scenario, the decisions I have to

38:33

make onto my team. So I definitely had to get that in check.

38:36

That was that was a lesson learned the hard way, I have to say.

38:39

So apologies to those teammates. I think about you to this day.

38:45

I definitely approached management early on as sort of us against the org

38:50

kind of mentality. Like this gorilla warfare. Like, we're over here doing

38:54

our thing, I'll take care of you, but all of these other people

38:57

are really bad and dangerous. And that was a process I had to

39:02

go through to start to like look at the rest of the org as not

39:05

an enemy and bring my team into that as well. So it was

39:09

growth I had to do. I think what you're touching on Michael is

39:12

an interesting one. I think sometimes I've seen new managers want to

39:17

kind of showcase that they are still one of the team.

39:21

Yeah, yeah. I'm still one of you. Yeah. I'm still one of you. Yeah. And I think that is quite dangerous,

39:27

for all of the reasons that you just said. There's a tendency to

39:30

kind of maybe bad mouth other departments or decisions and I think that

39:34

is a dangerous place to be. And I see that as well in

39:38

terms of, for someone who's maybe gone from being a peer to being

39:42

a manager, and they want to continue to be buddy buddy and that

39:45

makes it really difficult to then turn around and have to give that

39:49

person some feedback that's maybe constructive, or some direction or guidance,

39:53

that maybe that person doesn't love. So I think

39:56

there is a a point when you go from being an individual to

39:59

being a manager within a team, that you really do have to see

40:03

that as a new job. I am not still... I'm leading this team.

40:08

What does it mean to be a leader? And you can lead in

40:11

every single different way. Lead from behind, lead from the trenches,

40:14

be in the work with them, but you cannot be the leader and

40:19

be the team member at the same time. That doesn't work.

40:23

How do you think that we coach people through that? 'Cause I don't

40:26

think people are always ready for that transition... And it's funny,

40:30

I actually, I think about the military a lot because I had a

40:33

friend once that I said to him, I was like, why did you go in as a soldier? Like, I don't know, he had a university

40:37

degree. He was really smart. I'm why wouldn't you have gone through the

40:39

officer ranks? I was just very genuinely interested. And he was like,

40:43

Because I wanna be buddies with everyone, that's my job. Like if I'm

40:47

the officer, I can't be buddies with everyone. I'm the person that's in

40:50

charge. And I feel like the military has that ingrained in them.

40:54

They so get that. But I think especially when you're in the workplace

40:58

and you go from one to the other, it is a transition and

41:03

you have to find other ways to have your buddies. And they might

41:07

be the lead from another team or like, you have to find those

41:10

relationships in another way. But as the coach of, or the manager of

41:15

the person who's just the manager, like, how else do we support them

41:18

with that do you think? Yeah. I mean, they say leadership is lonely

41:21

for a reason. And I know it's kind of trite and corny,

41:24

but I think there's a grain of truth there for sure.

41:28

I think the set of questions I like to ask people,

41:32

tell me about the best manager you've ever had, and tell me about

41:35

the worst manager you've ever had. So for every new manager and write

41:38

it down, what did that person, who was the best manager for you

41:41

do? What did they not do? And really then using that as the

41:46

basis to have a conversation with that person around what does good management

41:50

mean to them? How do they start to apply a management philosophy and

41:54

grow as a their own kind of thoughts and principles in this?

41:57

Because there's always the same kind of common themes. The best manager

42:01

I ever had empowered me, listened to me, was not my best friend,

42:06

was someone who I looked, like just using that self reflection tool for

42:11

folks. And always, I mean the worst manager, and I'm curious for all

42:16

of three of you, if you, without naming any names, think about the

42:20

worst manager you ever had. I almost guarantee they were a micromanager.

42:24

They were in your hair on things. It's the same themes over and

42:29

over that tend to come up, because that's another really big track that

42:33

a lot of new managers fall into is, I know I can do

42:36

this job 'cause I was doing it last week, so let me tell

42:39

you how you should now do this job in very minute detail.

42:43

That's another, I know that's my safe space. I know how to do

42:46

this technical work, so I'm gonna tell you how to. And that is,

42:49

I mean, people hate it, right? Starting off as a new manager of that

42:52

is just a recipe, the disaster. Well, and that's really great.

42:57

And it's such a hard thing to let go sometimes as that new

43:00

manager, because you aren't good at necessarily shaping how like the quality

43:06

of that thing will come out from this person does it versus when

43:09

I do it. And so you have this letting go

43:13

that has to happen in that moment as well, which I, that's really

43:16

awesome. It's really hard. And you're not yet good at your new job,

43:19

but you are good at the job that you can't do anymore,

43:22

because it will just piss everyone off and it's a really tricky,

43:26

tricky place to be. Yeah. Completely. Yeah. Yeah. I've had a boss pull me

43:30

aside as a manager one time because I was still trying to do

43:34

too much of the old work. Yeah. And they're like, that's not what

43:37

you're here for anymore. You've gotta step out of that, but it feels

43:40

comfortable. Right? You know how to do that. And all the stuff you're

43:43

learning and doing in this new role you're not comfortable in.

43:47

And so it's like, well, maybe I could just spend part of my

43:49

day doing this so I could do something. But. And it's also like,

43:52

I can do it faster. Or like better or whatever. Yeah, sure.

43:56

So, I'm just gonna do that 'cause it'll be quicker than teaching someone

43:58

and you're like, Oh, no. Yeah. I've coached some really strong performers

44:04

at my last company who had this tendency, but not out of

44:07

the urges that we're talking about here, where they, it's more comfortable

44:11

or they wanna do it faster and better, but it was,

44:13

I don't wanna get outta touch with the skill. Like maybe I've only

44:18

done this one type of analysis once before, but it doesn't come up

44:21

very often and a second opportunity has arisen and I wanna jump in

44:25

it so that I don't get too far removed from it.

44:28

And it feels like what would happen if

44:31

I'm not as proficient as I used to be in this skill.

44:34

And so like the concept of making space on your coattails and coaching

44:38

other people and doing it. And so again, like some of those newer

44:40

skills, Michael, that you were talking about, but it can be uncomfortable

44:43

for that reason too, for an analyst, especially when it comes to something

44:46

more technical. Yeah. And I think that's a great opportunity to set up

44:50

a review or one of those processes I can set up as a

44:54

team manager that ensure that the work is really robust, but I'm not

44:57

in everyone's hair. I can stay in touch with what are they doing

45:01

and set people up for success by doing really great review process,

45:06

really great, whether that's peer review, manager review. But yeah, I think

45:10

that's a little bit of a trickier one. And I will put both hands up to be a little rusty

45:17

on some of my technical capabilities as yes. Do you think it's just

45:21

you, do you just get to a point where you start being like,

45:25

I accept that I am, my technical skills are going to atrophy because I

45:30

feel like it's constantly a discussion and I often get asked like, how

45:33

do you stay in touch? And I'm like, I don't. I haven't written

45:37

a line of code now in, I genuinely can't tell you the last

45:40

time I wrote a line of code. Is it just that you start

45:43

to accept it and you, yeah. Like you do learn about the concepts

45:47

through your team, but you are not the one applying them and you

45:49

just have to accept that that's reality?? I think maybe, I mean, it's sad

45:57

to say I do still love it sometimes when someone goes on parental

46:01

leave and I get a chance to do a little bit of work

46:03

every now and then, even though it's not my day job. But yeah, I think there is a little bit of accepting that

46:12

I also learn a lot from my team members really. And some of

46:17

I, there's a a saying around Meta Facebook ways, like, You should only

46:22

ever hire people who you would be happy to work for yourself.

46:25

And I can tell you that it's true of my team. They are brilliant, absolutely, technically brilliant, much, much better

46:31

than I am. And I learn a lot from them. And I think

46:34

that leaning into that is good for everyone. So, having the team now

46:38

teach me is good for them and for me. Yeah.

46:43

I think I turned a corner mode too when I started looking at

46:46

learning how to be a leader as something to pursue as opposed to

46:49

like more the loss of other things. So sort of like,

46:53

Hey, why don't I just focus on trying to get as good as

46:55

I can at this thing that I'm now into?

46:58

And not necessarily always sort of looking over my shoulder like,

47:01

oh, I'm losing these skills, or I don't know if I'm still as in

47:04

touch with this thing I used to do.

47:07

I don't know if that's good for everybody, but that helped me a

47:10

little bit in that journey. Not mourning the loss as much?

47:14

Well, trying to pursue this... Yeah. Actively going after it. Yeah. And

47:18

being like, how do I be really good at it as best as

47:21

I can? And I think everyone's got a different style. My style is

47:25

to make every mistake possible and then slowly arrange and then arrange

47:30

around it down experiential learning of like, Okay, so I screwed that up.

47:34

Now how do I not screw it up next time? And so I'm

47:38

a little slower than most, but you know? I want to change gears

47:43

a little bit. We alluded to this before, but feedback is such an

47:46

important part of helping people develop and being a leader. Helen, how

47:51

do you approach that process with your teams and even with people you

47:55

mentor as well? I mean, I think most of it at the top, I'm

47:58

very direct and I think a lot of frequent feedback, lighter weight is

48:04

what typically works for me. Obviously doesn't matter. We have a standard

48:07

kind of feedback process and timeline. But I, particularly for newer managers,

48:12

one of the big mistakes I see people often make is,

48:15

not giving feedback fast enough or thinking about

48:20

not being sure of themselves. I wanna see more evidence, or maybe they're

48:23

just having a bad day, or maybe I just need to step up

48:27

myself as a manager and not trusting their gut early enough.

48:31

And so it doesn't need to be this big heavy thing.

48:34

Oftentimes feedback can just be a question, how do you think you're doing

48:38

on X or Y or Z and let's have a conversation about this.

48:42

This is what I'm seeing, but maybe I'm not seeing everything.

48:44

Help me understand, how do you think you're doing? So that more frequent

48:49

lighter weight is I think what I tend towards, but it's a muscle

48:54

that you built, I think. One of the things actually that Helen has

48:58

helped me kind of have a bit of an epiphany about on feedback,

49:03

like reality is we all think we're doing great and it's like regular

49:07

and yada, yada yada. And everyone says they love feedback, which also sometimes

49:12

is a crock of shit. But I'll give you guys kind of a

49:16

scenario of, let's say someone did a presentation or something and you kind

49:20

of get into the weeds a little bit and you're like, Oh, you could have done this to make this better or you could

49:24

have adjusted this. And I think the bit that has kind of clicked

49:28

to me is also letting them know what the standard is it should

49:32

be. So it's not just about like the tactical feedback on the work.

49:36

It's like for the level that you are at, my expectation is that

49:40

this presentation has these qualities or is done in this particular way.

49:45

And so like you're showing that this is where the work is and

49:48

this is where it should be. And I feel like through some of

49:51

the conversations I've had with Helen, I've actually gotten better at being

49:54

a little bit more direct about that because otherwise they're just like,

49:57

Oh, these are some improvements I can make. Not I need to,

50:00

like, there's not a big jump here, but like, they don't know where

50:03

the bar is that they're trying to get to.

50:06

And it's something about fit. Like it has really been churning in my

50:09

mind of late. And yeah, Helen is very, very good at direct feedback,

50:14

I will say. Sorry. No No, it's a positive.

50:19

Yeah, it's great. And not always, I will say I think sometimes I

50:23

fall into the same patterns with my own team, particularly if we've been

50:26

managing folks for a long time or it's easy to get sucked up

50:31

into the day to day and the week to week work. And so I think that it is easier when you're in a kind of more

50:36

of a coaching, mentoring relationship to have that discipline around feedback.

50:40

That's why we're there to talk about it. So yeah, I think yes, expectation... Like letting people know what type

50:48

of feedback they're getting is a helpful thing. Let's do some big signposts.

50:51

I am giving you feedback that this is missing the mark.

50:54

My expectation was X what I saw as you delivered Y. Do you

50:58

agree with that? Do you not? Am I missing something here?

51:02

As opposed to just like, Oh, you did a great job,

51:05

next time you could do something else, but you know. That's really not

51:08

that helpful if you are actually trying to give feedback. I want you

51:11

to grow. I believe in you, I really want you to be successful

51:15

and next time you will be more successful if this is the feedback

51:20

which will help you get there. I'm curious, and this is a personal

51:25

question. Very much so I find... And you might say like,

51:29

well, all of those milestones that you had in your head were shit

51:32

milestones and goals So that's fair. But I'm very extrinsically motivated,

51:38

and so I oftentimes find value in my work through the eyes of

51:42

other people giving it praise or accolades, or saying that this was valuable

51:47

or helpful. And so, I always thought that a way to measure that

51:50

success was to say, well, I should have director in my title before

51:53

I'm 30, because that means someone in a position of power thinks that

51:58

I should be able to operate at that level and make those types

52:00

of decisions for the business. Or even when I came to Search Discovery

52:03

Michael, can back this up, that I said, I wanna run a test

52:06

that makes a client a million dollars. And that's the way that

52:10

I'm gonna help make sure that I'm feeling some of those successes.

52:12

And I have to say that, I know we talked a lot about

52:15

the juniors and some of the ways that they think about those visible

52:19

signs of progress or ways of setting goals. And I actually think it's getting

52:23

harder for me, the further I get into my career to think about

52:27

discreetly what are the things, what are the line in the sand thinking

52:31

further out three years on the line. Like, what do I want to say

52:33

I've been able to accomplish? And so maybe this is just like a

52:38

little bit of a rut that I'm in, but have you noticed that

52:40

at all that like there's differences in what's hard about setting goals

52:45

for juniors versus more senior people? Or maybe I just have a complete

52:50

I need to come up with a better way to set some metrics

52:53

against the things that I do, set some goals against.

52:57

I think two things. So firstly, hopefully your business partners know that

53:02

you like feedback and thrive off it. And hopefully you've said to them,

53:06

Hey, I'm just the sort of person, if you give me a positive piece of

53:09

feedback, I will cherish that. It will make my day, I will hug it

53:13

all day long and you will absolutely like

53:16

that is what I thrive off of. So that you are getting that

53:18

on a regular basis. If you tell people that, they will give you

53:21

that is my experience. So hopefully you've done that. But in terms of

53:25

like your particular goals as you get more senior, I think it just

53:27

becomes less linear. So as someone new into the business, hey,

53:31

the next milestone is the promotion, which is like two to three years

53:35

or the next thing and the next thing, and then I wanna be

53:37

a manager. And then... It starts out oftentimes with people being very linear.

53:41

And then as you become more senior, I think you have to be

53:43

much more flexible. What is my goal? Maybe it's to experience managing a

53:49

very large team or experience working in a different type of company,

53:53

or what are the experiences I wanna develop, and then being extremely flexible

54:00

on how I get them. So that might mean, I lose the director

54:04

title if I gain that experience. That might mean I go

54:08

take a pay cut or work at a very different company or do

54:11

something entirely different with my life. But prioritising what experiences

54:15

you wanna gain is something I think that becomes more important as you

54:18

become more senior. If it's always just getting to that next level.

54:22

I mean, you're gonna run outta levels pretty soon. It's not something that

54:26

goes and goes forever. And so you can't just keep it being the

54:29

next level, the next level, I think is what you're kind of putting

54:32

at there. Yeah. Yeah. Just wanted to make sure that that wasn't

54:37

too far off. 'cause I, I'm not some super senior, but

54:41

I don't, I'm not, I don't feel like I'm... I'm not a spring chicken. I'm not 10 years outta college or less anymore, so Yeah. And I

54:47

don't have all the answers here either. I think it's for me as

54:50

well, something I think about what are the experiences I want to gain next

54:53

in my career, so. Happy to chat some other time, Val on this for

54:57

each other. Woo hoo, Moe I'm gonna bogart your

55:01

girl That's right. No, you're incredible Helen. I love it. No, this is

55:06

excellent. All right, well we are running out of time so we have

55:09

to start to wrap up. This is incredible and actually so many things

55:13

Helen, you've shared have been so right on the mark. And so thank

55:16

you so much for sharing some of your insights and lessons learned with

55:21

us and our listeners. So one of the things we like to do

55:24

on the show is do go around the horn and share a last

55:27

call. Something we find interesting that maybe our listeners will too.

55:31

And Helen, you're our guest. Do you have a last call you'd like

55:33

to share? My last call is, I recently went on vacation.

55:38

And truly, take your vacation time people, it makes such a difference.

55:43

That is, I know it's not the most insightful new tool out there

55:47

in the world, but that was my big insight for the week is

55:51

take a holiday. I love that. Take a holiday folks. I love it.

55:54

And an actual holiday. Yes. Disconnect. Go on a place where the WiFi is

55:59

a little bit crap. It's a good idea. I've got it planned.

56:04

I know when we're taking it and I can't wait. Oh, good for you. Yeah,

56:07

that's important. That's awesome. All right Moe what about you? What's your

56:11

last call? I am so excited. Oh that's right. You know when you

56:15

find something and I'm sure every single person in the world probably knows

56:18

about it, but when you find something you're like, Shit, how did I

56:21

not know about this? This is insane. It's called Goblin Tools.

56:27

Have you guys, is everyone aware of Goblin Tools? Okay, great.

56:30

I'm excited. So it has a few different things that it does.

56:35

One is magic to do. So you put in a task like I

56:38

need to install tracking for Google Analytics 4, and it will break it

56:41

down into the tasks that you need to do in order to do

56:45

that. Or I need to write a brief for a client.

56:48

It will be like, Here are all the steps you need to do. It has a formaliser. I never ever recommend using that. There is never

56:54

a good occasion to take your written work and make it more formal.

56:58

But there is one called the Judge where you can put in say

57:02

like a message or an email that someone sent you

57:04

to see if you are misconstruing the tone and it will help you

57:08

understand if there's like... Interesting. Yeah, I know. That's cool. Because

57:13

sometimes you get a message from someone and you're like, Wow they're being

57:15

such a dick. And now you can put it in the judge and

57:17

it will tell you basically whether there is a tone there.

57:22

Then there's the estimator, which will help you break down a task into

57:27

like how long it estimates it's gonna take. There's one called the compiler. Oh yeah. You basically put a brain dump

57:34

in and it will break it into like a list of tasks and

57:37

then there's the chef, which is like, you put your ingredients in and

57:40

I'll tell you what to cook. So it's just like this tool that

57:44

I am, feel like I'm gonna be like using constantly and I'm really

57:48

excited about. So, yeah. Yeah. Where has this been all my life?

57:53

The judge would've saved me so many hours of therapy. I know, right?

57:59

It is like 15 years of trying to figure out how to handle

58:04

emails the right way. And I do have to say thank you to

58:07

Stefan. He presented at our Analytics meetup recently and he shared this

58:11

and I just was like, Pooh. Amazing. Sorry. That's pretty awesome.

58:15

Awesome. Thank you. All right Val, what about you? What's your last call?

58:19

All right, so this one's a little left field but I was pretty

58:23

excited about it as well. My favorite type of music is classic rock

58:27

and so here in Chicago I listen to 97.1FM The Drive and they

58:32

have a podcast called Behind the Song and they did one recently on

58:38

the ELO song that is scientifically proven to make you happy and it's

58:42

just a fun song and, I love like breaking it down and like understanding

58:46

how they recorded it and the inspiration for it. So that's always fun

58:50

part of the podcast. But the thing that I was the tie in

58:53

here to the show, I swear it's there is the study about what

58:57

makes songs make you happy. Like what is the happiest song in the

59:01

world and I guess it's this perfect combination of using Major keys seventh

59:06

chords, 137 BPM A strong beat and four beats in every bar.

59:11

So it's thousands of songs were tested over years and years.

59:16

And they evaluated it and this is still to this day the happiest

59:19

song in the world. So if you're having a bad day or you

59:22

aren't in a place to take your vacation yet, while you're planning it,

59:27

listen to the ELO song Mr. Blue Sky. Oh. It's in like tons

59:33

of commercials. As soon as you listen to it you'll be like, oh

59:35

yeah. So. All right. What about you Michael?

59:39

Well, mine is not as good but actually it's funny 'cause Tim sent this

59:44

to me and I was looking through it and I was like, oh this is be my last call. So thanks Tim. Shout out

59:49

So there's a venture capitalist named Sriram Krishnan who actually used

59:53

to work at Meta in the engineering, I think. And he collects corporate

59:58

memos and governmental memos and things like that. And they're all these

1:00:01

different kinds and styles and he puts them out on his webpage. And

1:00:05

so it's a really cool page. It just has a bunch of different

1:00:09

memos and it's kind of interesting because a lot of them are a

1:00:12

more like intimate reflection of the moment that that person or a company

1:00:16

or leader was in. And so they're kind of fun to read,

1:00:18

sort of kind of a fun thing. I was reading through it and

1:00:22

I read the one Howard Schultz wrote back in 2008 about Starbucks and

1:00:25

I was like, well they should have done something with that memo 'cause

1:00:28

he was absolutely spot on and they haven't really capitalized, but those

1:00:35

kinds of things. Anyways, it's fun if you like that sort of thing.

1:00:38

Anyway, so that's my last call. All right, well as you've been listening,

1:00:43

you're probably thinking to yourself, oh, I have a question or I have

1:00:46

a thought about this. We would love to hear from you and it's

1:00:49

easy to do that you can reach out to us through LinkedIn or

1:00:53

on the Measure Chat Slack group or via email at contact@analyticshour.io.

1:00:59

So we happy to hear from you and please do. And of course

1:01:04

no show would be complete without a huge shout out to our producer

1:01:08

Josh Crowhurst. Thank you Josh for all you do for the show.

1:01:11

All right once again, Helen, thank you so much. Thanks for coming on

1:01:16

and sharing with us. Thank you. Yeah, thank you. Awesome. All right, so

1:01:21

no matter where you are in your leadership journey, you can lead from

1:01:25

anywhere. Just remember that I think I speak for both of my co

1:01:29

hosts, Moe and Val, when I say, no matter what kind of leader

1:01:33

you are or your leadership style, keep analyzing.

1:01:38

Thanks for listening. Let's keep the conversation going with your comments,

1:01:42

suggestions, and questions on Twitter at @analytics hour, on the web @analyticshour.io,

1:01:48

our LinkedIn group and the Measured Chat Slack group. Music for the podcast

1:01:54

by Josh Crowhurst. So smart guys want to fit in. So they made

1:01:59

up a term called analytics. Analytics don't work.

1:02:03

I love Venn diagrams. It's just something about those three circles and

1:02:08

the analysis about where there is the intersection. Right?

1:02:13

Tim usually does that without telling anyone Val to try to catch me

1:02:17

and telling an embarrassing story. So. That's good that you let us know.

1:02:21

All right. I'm trying to go for miss Congeniality this year

1:02:24

for the APH award. So Oh, hey. That's a good idea.

1:02:30

The atheist. The atheist invented right here. Mr. Blue Sky. Or I could just

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features