Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
All right. Before we start the show, we have an announcement and a
0:03
request. Val, would you want to explain what that is to me and
0:07
to our listeners? I would love to, Tim. So we wanna hear from
0:11
you, dear listeners. So we're conducting a survey and logistically we've
0:15
made things as easy as possible for you. Survey.
0:20
I mean, I kind of like just pretending I knew what listeners were
0:22
thinking, but sure, fine. We can do it your way. And I'm assuming
0:26
that because it's you, that there's probably a short URL and there's probably
0:30
a nice little Google Form, that's mobile friendly that listeners can go
0:33
to, to actually give us this information. Ah, Tim, you know me so
0:38
well. You bet. And so starting today, the survey will be live at
0:42
bitly/aph survey. So putting my listener cap on. So, we want something from
0:49
them. We're not going to actually give them anything in return.
0:53
Are we? We sure are. At the end of the survey,
0:56
there'll be an opportunity for you to give us your address,
0:59
so we can get a laptop sticker off in the mail to you.
1:02
And also you can choose to enter a raffle for some sweet sweet
1:06
power hour swag. I don't know who approved this expense, but fine. So
1:11
this means, I mean, I'll take it 'cause we can now kind of get
1:13
rid of those old, branded mouse pads and BlackBerry covers.
1:18
No, Tim, we'll leave those to you to still use as your stocking
1:21
stuffers. This is actually gonna be way better, think comfy, cozy hoodies
1:26
just in time for summer. Hoodies for summer. Good planning. I'll take mine
1:30
and just rip the sleeves off and rock those Analytics guns through the
1:35
summer. Your finance bro look? Yeah. That's right. I've been, I think I'm
1:40
ready. So how long, I mean they've gotta do this sometime before summer,
1:44
so how long do listeners actually have to participate? Yeah. So the survey
1:48
opens today, May 28th and this is 2024, just in case you're living
1:52
in our future and listening back to some old episodes. And we're gonna
1:55
keep it open through the month of June. Okay. So if I was
1:58
paying attention, listeners should visit bitly/aph survey, before June 30th
2:07
in the year 2024, to share their opinions and maybe actually get some
2:11
pretty cool swag? You got it. Sounds good. Now onto the show.
2:21
Welcome to the Analytics Power Hour. Analytics topics covered conversationally
2:26
and sometimes with explicit language. Hi everyone. Welcome. It's the analytics
2:31
Power Hour. This is episode 247. You know, as you progress in your
2:37
analytics career, you'll soon find yourself probably as a manager of someone
2:41
or a team of someone's. And what you learn pretty quickly is that
2:45
all the skills required to be a good manager or leader are honestly
2:49
nothing like the skills you've built, being a good analyst. And sure,
2:53
I mean, there's some crossover but it's really a whole different job,
2:57
and yet it's super important to get it right and be a great
3:01
manager. And maybe you're not a manager today and don't wanna be,
3:04
but this episode will still be useful, because
3:08
this might help you know what to look for as you develop in
3:10
your career and find good managers. Luckily, I am joined by my co
3:15
hosts who are also both amazing leaders and managers. And let me introduce
3:19
them right now. So Moe Kiss, who is joining us. Welcome.
3:24
Welcome. Thank you. You Are actually a really good manager. I've heard people
3:28
on your team say so. So, like. Oh, well that's very nice to hear. There's
3:31
third party verification. Yeah. I was only paying them a little bit.
3:35
And Val Kroll. Also welcome. Thank you. Thank you. Excited to be here.
3:41
And I've realized Val, technically when we were both serving on the DEA,
3:44
you were kind of my manage. So I feel like I've been managed
3:48
by you and I can say you're a great manager, so that's pretty
3:51
awesome. Well, and I have been managed by you Michael, and I can
3:53
speak very highly of that experience as well. Look at this,
3:56
good management all around. Okay. This is now starting like a paid advertisement.
4:00
Okay, that's great. And I'm Michael Helbling. We also are excited because
4:05
we do have a guest. Helen Crossley, is a senior director of marketing
4:08
science at Meta and she's also held data leadership positions at Procter &
4:12
Gamble. She's also an international speaker and mentor. And today she is
4:16
our guest. Welcome to the show, Helen. Thank you so much for having
4:20
me. Excited to be here. Oh, we're so excited to have you as
4:23
well. And I think it's really cool 'cause I know, you were introduced
4:27
to us through Moe, and Moe do you wanna
4:30
kick off kind of like how this all came about and then we
4:33
can jump into some conversations about professional development and leadership?
4:37
Yeah. So, I was lucky enough to get introduced to Helen and she's
4:41
part of my sort of my professional network now. And if you are
4:45
a people manager and you don't have a good network of people outside
4:48
of your company, that's probably tip number one,
4:51
because you do often need to talk about some pretty gnarly situations or
4:56
get some advice, external to your own company. And Helen has been able
5:00
to provide that for me. And so I wanted our lovely listeners to
5:04
all get to benefit from some of the amazing conversations I've had with
5:08
Helen over the last weeks and months, about all sorts of great things
5:13
like development goals and team members and, how we kind of grow that
5:18
analytical skillset and do that simultaneously with communication skills.
5:22
So that's kind of the background. I wouldn't mind just like diving right
5:28
in. I think what I love about Helen's approach is she's pretty direct,
5:34
I would say, as an Australian. So we might kick off and talk
5:40
a little bit about what good development goals look like. Helen, we had
5:45
a sort of an experience where I shared mine with you and you gave me
5:49
some, pretty good feedback. I think I said that they were
5:53
a bit crap to begin with, Moe but we went from there. I'm
5:57
sorry if I said the sharing. Yeah, they were a bit crap to
6:02
begin with. But there was a few points in particular that I thought
6:05
were really useful in terms of the feedback.
6:09
So can you tell me like when you are working with someone,
6:13
what do good goals look like to you? I think for me good goals are things that are obviously linked into
6:21
the business objectives and what the business overall is trying to achieve.
6:25
But beyond that, they have to be something that you actually want to
6:28
do. All too often I see goals, which are just a to do list of
6:34
projects. I have to launch this, ship that, analyze this. And those are
6:39
not goals. Those are your to do list. They might be milestones under
6:44
a goal, but for me a great goal is something where you can
6:48
look at it and say, Hey, if in six and 12 months I've
6:51
achieved this I will be in a better place, the business will be
6:55
in a better place and that is something that I really do want
6:59
to achieve. And I think that motivation is a really critical part of
7:02
it. So a lot of times what I see in organizations is goal
7:07
setting that starts from above and then there's that cascading and waterfall
7:10
down to the different departments and down to individuals. Do you think
7:13
what you're talking about here, about setting goals for yourself as an individual,
7:17
is kind of separate from this task or activity? Or do you recommend
7:21
trying to find a way to weave the two together?
7:25
Personally, I really recommend weaving the two together. I think it's absolutely
7:29
fine if you have goals which are more personal and not linked to
7:33
the business at all. You want to achieve something for yourself in your
7:36
life. And sometimes that can be linked into your analytics career.
7:40
If you wanna learn a new skill that's maybe gonna take your career
7:43
in a different direction, but it's not linked to your day to day
7:46
job. But for business goals or goals related to your work every single
7:52
day, I think they absolutely have to be intertwined. If you are not
7:56
thinking about, what does my manager care about? What does their manager
8:00
care about? What does the company care about? Then there is a very
8:04
good chance that you get to the end of the year, you achieve all your goals. And people are sitting around saying,
8:10
Well what did you actually do? Why should I care? And so absolutely,
8:15
I really do recommend that they be intertwined and that you can really
8:19
draw a very bright line between what your goal is and the company
8:24
or business that you're supporting's ultimate mission. And if you can't
8:27
do that, then really go back and ask yourself, Why am I launching
8:32
this project? Why am I doing that piece of analysis? If no one
8:35
cares, if it doesn't connect into the business, if it's not part of
8:40
a bigger piece of work, then is that even a priority for me,
8:43
let alone a goal? That's actually where I thought you were gonna go
8:47
with it. And I'll say that with some of my past experiences in
8:51
consulting, one of the things that made it a little bit tricky,
8:54
and this was a kind of a complaint that we heard a lot
8:57
of times from some, especially some of the junior analysts was,
9:00
I'm not sure what clients I'm gonna be staffed on over the next
9:03
three months or six months. How can I pin something down?
9:08
Whether it's learning, diving into you are, maybe the next couple of clients
9:12
that you're on really don't have any needs in that direction.
9:15
So balancing some of that uncertainty, obviously, you still need to think
9:19
about the needs of the business of where you work, but if the
9:23
majority of your work is really tied in with the success of other
9:26
organizations, do you have any advice on how to like square that,
9:29
square those two things together? Yeah, absolutely. And I think this is
9:33
quite common. A lot of analysts also have a lot of ad hoc
9:36
work, even if it's not, you know, client based things pop up all through
9:40
the year. How do you think about those? How do you quantify those
9:43
and turn that into a goal? And my experience here, obviously I don't
9:46
have all the answers, but, my experience is a lot of times with those
9:49
more junior folks, their goals aren't aggressive enough, they're not thinking
9:53
big enough, they don't want to put a line in the sand and
9:56
say, my goal is to get my client, whoever that might be,
9:59
or to get the team that I'm working with to think more about,
10:03
you know, this big topic growth, how do I transform the way this
10:08
organization thinks about growth? And that's my goal. And within that I'm
10:12
gonna have a bunch of sub goals, which maybe will change and
10:17
maybe I don't hit all of them or those milestones within it.
10:20
But oftentimes when I see what you're talking about, it's 'cause the goal
10:23
is too small, frankly. Too narrow? That makes sense. Too narrow. Too small.
10:29
And it also is not a disservice to you as the individual,
10:32
if your goals are so narrow. Because if you make them a little
10:35
bit bigger, a little bit more expansive in your thinking, A,
10:38
you are gonna unlock more growth for you and for your business.
10:43
But B, it also gives you more flexibility and how are you gonna
10:47
hit that goal? So rather than launch project X, if my goal is
10:51
to drive growth, project X turned out to be a big fat flop.
10:55
Doesn't matter, because my goal is something that I'm working to achieve.
10:59
And there are five other ways I can work towards that goal,
11:02
even if that one project doesn't work out.
11:05
And that's something I see particularly, particularly with more junior team
11:09
members, who don't want to put themselves out there and really claim a
11:13
big bold goal, because they think it's not their position or they shouldn't
11:17
be doing that. And I always say do it. That is absolutely the
11:21
goal. And if you smash that, then congratulations.
11:26
It's time to step away from the show for a quick word about
11:29
Piwik PRO. Tim, tell us about it. Well, Piwik PRO has really exploded
11:34
in popularity and keeps adding new functionality. They sure have. They've
11:38
got an easy to use interface, a full set of features with capabilities
11:43
like custom reports, enhanced e commerce tracking, and a customer data platform.
11:48
We love running Piwik PRO's free plan on the podcast website,
11:52
but they also have a paid plan that adds scale and some additional
11:55
features. Yeah. Head over to Piwik.pro and check them out for yourself.
12:00
You can get started with their free plan. That's Piwik.pro. And now let's
12:05
get back to the show. I am loving this. I feel like I'm
12:10
gonna... I actually do have to go back and revisit my goals,
12:12
but I'm probably going to do it again. I was thinking in the lead up to this episode a lot about
12:18
the tension with analysts and data scientists around, we have the technical
12:23
skills and we have the communication or like stakeholder stuff.
12:27
And I was actually, I guess my perspective was that we are a
12:31
little bit unique because if you're a backend engineer, you have a PM
12:35
who's going to interface with the business. So improving the software skills
12:39
is not, I don't think as big of a priority for lots of
12:42
other areas of the business as it often is for data folks 'cause
12:45
we're doing that interfacing ourselves. And then I'm thinking of goals often,
12:50
especially with juniors, it's like improve communication skills,
12:54
full stop. And. For the audience, Helen is vehemently shaking her head now.
13:04
Okay. I'm just gonna, I'm gonna pose that and hand over to you
13:08
about, like you have a junior person who comes to you,
13:10
improve communication skills. How would you tackle that?
13:15
Why do you wanna do that? Why do you wanna improve your communication
13:17
skills, Moe? What's that going to drive? To have more influence,
13:21
to be a better presenter. I'm trying to think of like stuff people
13:23
have said to me. Fantastic. I love that you wanna be more influential.
13:28
What do you wanna influence? Whoa, oh. See? See, everyone? This is... I
13:35
wanna help them make better decisions. Fantastic. It sounds like your goal
13:39
is to make this organization a more data driven decision making organization.
13:45
And The way that you're going to do that, is by having phenomenal
13:49
technical skills as you do. And you can't influence them in that way
13:53
if the data is not robust, but you also will need to improve
13:56
your communication and influence skills to drive that goal of changing the
14:00
organization to be more data driven. That should be your goal,
14:04
not improve communication skills. Should we just end the episode here?
14:08
Yeah. I think we're good. This is good. I think we're all set.
14:12
I love it. Damn, that was good. But let me say,
14:17
as you're describing this and playing through it, this is the observationally,
14:23
I'm seeing you kind of abstract out a couple of layers to say,
14:26
Hey, think bigger thoughts or end it to your point before.
14:29
Try to be a little more big picture or aggressive with your thinking,
14:33
which I think is just such a really good set of advice for
14:37
anybody at any level. And maybe talk a little bit about that perspective
14:42
or how you, you obviously demonstrated that how you help people set goals,
14:46
but as a leader, how are you inculcating that and how are you
14:50
bracing that yourself or where does that come from? I don't know if
14:53
I'm asking a very coherent question at this point, but. So the question
14:57
is really, how do we encourage folks to think bigger and take bigger
15:01
risks? Is that? Yeah. I think that's maybe where I'm headed with that.
15:05
Yeah. I think it's about allowing it, empowering it, saying it's okay.
15:11
It's okay to be your best self and to go
15:15
hit some big goals. And oftentimes people just need to know
15:19
that. And you would be amazed, amazed at how much potential people have
15:26
when they have permission. And it's sad that they think that they need
15:30
to ask for permission, but it's reality for a lot of people.
15:34
They don't wanna step on toes. Maybe they're new to the organization.
15:37
It's not necessarily about being junior. It's just, Hey, I'm still finding
15:40
my way and I don't know what I don't know. And to say
15:44
to someone, it's okay to think big and be bold is sometimes enough,
15:48
but often also as a manager back it up with, and by the
15:51
way, if you do do that, I've got your back and I support
15:55
you and I believe in you and I can do, you know, I
15:57
know that you can do these things if we get these goals right
16:01
and we know what you need to get there. So, I think that's how I approach it. I know there are lots
16:07
of different other approaches, but for me, it's about saying, how do I
16:10
empower that thinking and not think small. And what happens when
16:17
people come from lots of different organizations and have had other managers
16:21
and things like that. And sometimes I've certainly experienced where people
16:25
have had really negative experiences, where maybe they've set those goals
16:29
and then didn't hit them. And then what happens in the org?
16:34
Like how do you communicate set that aggressive goal? 'cause
16:37
my mentality is, Hey, if you shoot for the stars and you only
16:40
make it to the moon, you still made it to the moon. That's awesome. Oh wow. That is the corniest shit ever. Yeah. But I
16:47
figured, I am corny as get out, all get out. That's, I own
16:51
that. But, look, some organizations and frankly some
16:56
not great managers will look at you at the end of the year
16:59
and be like, Well you set this goal and you didn't hit it
17:01
so you failed. And it's like, Okay, well I learned my lesson.
17:05
Don't set aggressive goals anymore. And so that mentality is both culturally
17:09
driven as well. I'm just wondering have you experienced where, having you
17:13
had to kind of help people reset those
17:16
as they've entered your team or, you've worked with them as a mentor
17:19
maybe? Yeah, and I recognise I'm in a very unique position at Meta where,
17:24
we have a CEO who says things like, Hey, if you're hitting all your goals,
17:28
they're not aggressive enough. That means you're not taking big enough risks
17:31
and vets and... That's helpful. We shouldn't be hitting all our goals.
17:35
And so definitely I'm in a unique environment and I recognise that not
17:39
all workplaces are like that. But I think what you're touching on Michael,
17:42
is the need to quantify, measure, set some measurable impact. So when we
17:50
talk about, you know, the example we gave earlier, I want the organization
17:54
I support to be more data driven in their decision making.
17:57
How do I quantify that or put a metric around that?
17:59
How do I know if I've hit that? And if I don't quantify it, then the scenario you are talking about,
18:06
where failure is much more likely because we don't know if I hit
18:11
it or if I didn't hit it or we have to rely on
18:14
qualitative feedback. And sometimes our teams around us, as data scientists
18:19
and analytics professionals, we all know that we sometimes have to be the
18:23
bad cop. So they might not love giving that feedback. And so,
18:27
that is definitely something that you need to think about. How do I
18:31
measure this goal? How do I know if I'm making progress toward it? And
18:35
how do I check in on it regularly? So that at the end
18:38
of the year, I'm not getting a surprise, my manager is not getting a surprise,
18:42
if I don't hit it. Yeah, even outside of the psychological safety that
18:46
you're talking about, Helen, with giving people permission to swing big,
18:51
I also think that the quantification piece is huge, because it's so much
18:55
easier to say, "Project was released on time within budget.
19:00
This many users were impacted as planned or whatever." So it's so much
19:03
easier to go to an output to be able to say,
19:06
"Yep, that was achieved." Versus something that's like a little squishier,
19:10
a little bigger, involves other people. It's like outside your own sphere
19:13
of influence, which is that a factor of why you see people tend
19:17
to lean on some of those more project or task list related things?
19:21
I think that's right. But I would say all of those things that
19:25
you're talking about, those quantified projects, those are all great examples
19:30
of the impact or the evidence that shows, "Hey, yeah, I'm making progress
19:33
toward those goals." And so really having the sub milestones is important
19:38
to ensure that you are progressing on them, and that you have the
19:41
evidence that you are actually driving it. That's my kind of mental model,
19:45
Moe, is those things are important, yes, I ship the thing. And knowing
19:49
how does that ladder up to the final goal. That's the part that's
19:52
often missing. I shipped a ton of things and so what?
19:56
So what? I feel like there's a tendency, as data people,
20:00
we do generally wanna have measures, and you did touch on it.
20:04
I have noticed a bit of a theme lately where everyone feels like the only way to get measures of success,
20:12
is to ask their stakeholders for qualitative feedback. And
20:17
I have had a bit of a visceral reaction because I'm like,
20:20
you are then putting the burden on your stakeholders to basically to tell
20:24
you whether or not you did a good job, but you're also asking more of them, which you can't do that for every piece of work,
20:30
right? What are some of the ways that you can...
20:33
And I've realized this is a hard thing to do, but like, what
20:36
are some of the ways that we can measure success without necessarily needing
20:40
to go back to stakeholders? I'd say two things on that.
20:43
And I think one that I'm a big fan of is joint goals. So
20:47
you and your stakeholder have the exact same goal or a same version
20:51
of a goal that you both are working on together, and you agree
20:55
is a good goal. Hey, we both want to drive growth in this
20:59
way. I'm going to do it and here's my sub milestones,
21:02
and this... By owning these elements, you are gonna do it by owning
21:05
those elements. And then we're gonna agree on how do we know if
21:08
that actually happened or not. That's definitely one area. I think in terms
21:13
of the other point I would make though on how can you quantify
21:16
it? Honestly, I think this is where data people have to get creative
21:20
and often do not spend enough time, effort, thought on measuring themselves.
21:25
Very good at measuring other people. Very, very good. Yeah. I'm very good.
21:30
Not very good at measuring ourselves. And that doesn't mean we don't have
21:35
the capability to do it, but I think it's just a time and
21:39
effort thing personally, although happy to be... That to be a debate.
21:46
So let's go back to that discussion about old mate who wants to
21:51
improve their communication skills. And we've kind of evolved their goal
21:54
now to make the business more data driven. I think, was that the
21:58
exact words? Yeah. I think there was a slight tweak on words. Something,
22:02
exactly. And we have a series of milestones,
22:05
to put you completely on the spot. What are some of the ways
22:10
we could measure that? I feel like that one maybe you're looking for
22:15
evidence of a change in behavior in stakeholders. Like that's kind of what
22:19
my intuition says. What are your thoughts? Yeah. So in that sort of a scenario,
22:23
I would say some of the sub milestones should be,
22:27
Hey, I'm producing the data and is it actually being used?
22:31
How do I... If it's a dashboard, how many people are using it
22:34
on a regular basis? How sticky is it? Are they coming back and
22:38
using it time and time again? Same thing, if it's a report,
22:42
is this something that people actually care about? And sometimes you do
22:46
need to get qualitative feedback. There's no kind of bones about it.
22:49
If you don't have the right tracking mechanisms in place, you do have
22:52
to just ask, "Hey, was this helpful? Was it not?" But do that
22:55
the first time you send it out, not the 12th time you send
22:58
it out, and get the feedback. And if it wasn't helpful,
23:01
wasn't useful, then what would it take for it to become more useful?
23:06
Sorry, why did you say the first time and not the 12th? Well,
23:09
you don't wanna send a report 12 times that no one cares about.
23:13
Oh, got it. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. I'm with you. I'm with you.
23:15
'Cause ideally if it wasn't helpful, then you've gotten feedback and iterated
23:20
and made it better by the time you send it the next time.
23:22
Yep. Okay. I'm with you. Tracking. And a lot of times if your
23:28
business partners are making this request of the data team, it's to help
23:33
inform a question or decision. And so hopefully you're a part of,
23:37
so did you do that? Did you kind of follow through on some
23:40
of the recommendations? Like hopefully you're somewhat in tune with some
23:45
of the decisions or next actions that were taken. And that in every
23:48
case, especially if it's like a dashboard or it's a little bit more
23:51
independent, but supporting some of those decisions. Like I think that that
23:55
might be one of the easy ways to tell a story about impact.
23:57
Like you were kind of nudging us towards earlier about the,
24:01
"What does it do for the business?" And so taking that story all
24:04
the way up, that could be a good way to do it too.
24:07
Yeah. And I think you're making a great point, Val, around when these
24:10
ad hoc requests come, we all guide our teams, I'm sure to do
24:15
the due diligence of, "What are you gonna use that for?"
24:18
But then not always the follow up of, "And did you?" So I
24:21
really think that's a great point. Okay. I wanna turn a little bit.
24:25
It's funny because Helen's exact example then before is an exact professional
24:30
development goal conversation I had with someone recently. And I was like,
24:33
Oh wow. Those are the exact points that we hit, which is very
24:36
entertaining. But, I do wanna talk a little bit about junior team members
24:40
and their professional development more broadly. I think goals is obviously
24:44
an important component, but I guess my expectations are, when you're a senior
24:48
team member, you are very much driving your own development goals.
24:52
You have a clear idea of where you want to go and sometimes
24:55
they need to bounce off you, but you are leading your development.
24:59
And with junior team members, that's a lot harder. I find sometimes they're,
25:03
I don't wanna say lost, but they don't even... They don't know what
25:06
they don't know. So they don't know what's possible.
25:09
And yes, they need more guidance, but it's also, they're still in that
25:13
heavy learning stage. So they're not necessarily thinking about two years
25:17
or three years down the track. Do you feel Helen, like there is
25:20
a different approach that needs to happen there. Or sometimes they're like,
25:24
"What should I do? Should I focus on my technical skills?
25:26
Should I focus on my communication skills? And they really need a lot
25:30
more guidance. So I think there's a couple of things to unpack there.
25:35
I think, again, personally my approach that nothing gives me more joy than
25:40
having a new person come onto a team.
25:43
Not really giving them that much direction, not that much guide rails,
25:47
but giving them a lot of permission and being surprised and delighted by what they come back with.
25:54
And I think too often we handhold a little bit too much or put
26:00
a barrier around people, which actually is not that helpful and they can
26:04
do a lot more if they're empowered to do that. So my approach
26:08
is typically to kind of get out of the way a little bit,
26:11
particularly for the first few months. Obviously they need a lot of support
26:14
in learning the business, the methods, whatever else they need to onboard
26:18
to. And tons of support there. But a little bit less in terms
26:22
of the professional goals. 'Cause I honestly wouldn't know either. I don't
26:25
know what your next big leap is gonna be. We're gonna have to
26:30
work on that together. I don't know enough about that person to make
26:33
a judgment call on that within the first three, six, sometimes even 12
26:37
months. We'll have discussions around it along the way, but I think being
26:42
a little bit less prescriptive in 'the how' of the work that they're
26:47
doing. Obviously they need prescriptive guidance when it comes to what has
26:52
to happen or what the job scope is, but a little bit less
26:55
on the how is typically how I approach it. But
26:58
I think that doesn't work for all people. And I don't know if Val or Michael,
27:02
you have other ideas or examples of where it has or hasn't worked for folks
27:06
on your teams? Yeah. I mean, I definitely agree with what you're saying.
27:11
It's hard to do what you just said
27:14
a lot of times, 'cause you feel like, "Oh, I've gotta give them
27:17
everything they need to start and be successful and tell them what everything
27:21
is and all the expectations". But a little bit of area to roam is
27:25
actually good for both of you. And I don't know if you've found
27:30
this, Helen, I feel like sometimes that's also personality driven.
27:34
Where I'll have people come back to me and be like,
27:36
"Okay, I need more structure around this, or I don't know what to
27:39
do". And then other folks are more like, "Oh, cool, I'll just jump
27:43
in there and figure it out and I'll see you in three months
27:46
when we do a check in or something". And, it's just totally different by the person sometimes. Yeah. I'm not sure
27:53
what you're... Yeah. You've experienced. I totally agree with that and that's
27:58
great. And I wouldn't wanna get in the way of the person who is like,
28:00
I got it, let me run with it and grow my wings and
28:04
soar. And for the person who does need more structure,
28:07
that's fantastic and happy to give it. And thank you for giving me
28:11
the feedback. Yeah. And by the way, in 12 months time,
28:15
your development goal might be around for a bit more autonomy, a little
28:18
bit more self directed leadership, but we'll get there, for now...
28:22
Yeah. Yeah. Let's work on what structure is helpful for you?
28:25
How do you operate, how to empower that person. Yeah. A lot of
28:28
times I find myself telling junior people, your primary job is to make
28:32
sure you have clarity. If you don't understand something that, you need
28:37
to make sure you're getting what you need to be clear on the
28:40
direction, the approach, the task, whatever it is.
28:43
And sometimes that's helpful. But, yeah. I think that's such a hard thing
28:47
too, though. It's something that I have noticed a little bit lately.
28:51
I don't know, like you said, Helen, it's not the permission,
28:55
but them knowing that they can ask more questions if they don't understand
28:59
something, and it's a really hard cultural thing to influence of like,
29:02
No, I want you to keep asking until you understand when you're a
29:05
junior person who inevitably in the data space is sitting in front of
29:09
a very senior stakeholder. When we think about
29:14
new team members, and, I say new team members 'cause it can be
29:17
in any level, junior or senior, how do we ensure that
29:22
they are set up for success and getting the support that they need?
29:27
And I think there's actually less work to be done in that regard
29:30
with the individual team member coming in. The work is done over days,
29:35
months, and years with the whole rest of the team. So personally,
29:39
I incentivize the rest of my team to help. You are incentivised, I
29:44
encourage you, I recognise those who are putting their hand up to help
29:48
new folks on the team. That's something that I would reward.
29:51
And so we have a collaboration by default, it's about the team,
29:56
not the individuals. And that is the team culture that I wanna foster.
30:00
And yes, it has something to do with new folks coming in,
30:03
obviously, but, you can sense that around you as a new team member,
30:08
whether people are, "Me, me, me" Or "We, we, we". And the team
30:13
culture I wanna encourage and develop is always that I will notice
30:19
people who are helping out new folks. I will recognise it,
30:22
I will make sure that we are supporting those people and encourage them.
30:27
And that new folks should feel extremely welcome and then have a large
30:32
network. Because if the whole team does that, you've got now 10,
30:36
15 people who you can go to. And it's not all,
30:39
"Well by one mentor who's the only person who is being incentivised to
30:44
help me. I feel like I can't go to them 50 times a
30:47
day. Well now I've got a whole team of people, who are being
30:50
rewarded for helping me and I feel like I can go to whoever
30:53
I need to, whenever I need to". So that's how I like to
30:56
approach it. Obviously a buddy is still helpful for a lot of things,
30:59
but, it should be on everyone. It should not be the responsibility of
31:03
the new team member to ask the question. It should be the responsibility
31:06
of the team to reach out and support them.
31:09
Oh, I love that. That's great. I actually just have a new team
31:12
member, so I'm like, can't wait to put this into practice. It's nice.
31:16
One thing I'm curious about, your opinions on, Helen is when it is
31:20
a newer team member or sometimes, I guess I'm also kind of thinking
31:24
the more junior team member with this question is,
31:27
how do you balance getting them excited about taking those aggressive big
31:32
swings versus just being like, collect some experiences. Like enjoy the
31:38
process, explore it. Like, "I'm your safety net. You're never gonna fly
31:43
without that". But just kind of explore. So do you put goals around
31:48
something like that or, I'm just interested your take. Typically,
31:52
and this is going a little against what I said earlier, but typically
31:56
in the interview process, I have a good sense of
32:00
what strengths someone might have or what they bring to the table that's
32:04
unique. And I like to not tell them that I'm setting them up
32:10
with a quick win, but set them up with a quick win. Based
32:13
on everything I know about you and what you're bringing to the table.
32:15
I have a problem here that I'm 90% confident you can smash out
32:20
the park and I'm gonna give you that. I'm not gonna tell you
32:23
that I think you can smash it out of the park. That's. I love this. But
32:26
I'm gonna give you this problem knowing that it'll give you the experience
32:31
and get the wheels in motion and get you riding that bike to
32:34
say, "Okay, well once I've got one win under my belt and I
32:37
know how that works now let me go find some more".
32:40
So that's how I like to do it. But it's not always
32:44
that neat and possible, but finding a quick win for everyone on a
32:48
team is something that I'm very supportive of. What is
32:52
their thing gonna be where in six weeks, 12 weeks, they can come
32:55
back and give a presentation to the rest of the team or feel like
32:58
they've got some runs on the board and they know what they're doing.
33:02
See how fucking good is this? Amazing. Yeah. I'm like... Okay guys,
33:08
I've really got to change tact because I have been dying to talk
33:11
about this for weeks and weeks and weeks, because it's something that's so top of mind.
33:17
I wanna talk about middle management. We've spent a lot of time talking
33:20
kind of about juniors and that sort of thing, but I think the
33:23
middle management step is one that is quite bumpy for most people when
33:29
you go from being an individual contributor to leading a team,
33:33
a small team or that sort of thing. And really making that transition when you start to find out how the
33:40
sausage is made and getting exposure to some of the, I guess,
33:44
the problems or difficulties that happen more at the leadership level.
33:48
And then balancing like the need to shield your team with also listening
33:52
to them. And Helen, what I'm really curious to hear,
33:57
do you think that is just like a growing pain that people go
34:00
through and you have to accept it's gonna be bumpy? Or do you
34:03
think there are ways that you can make that transition
34:06
easier for people that are going into to management?
34:10
So I mean, firstly I'll say I don't love the terminology of middle
34:13
management, because I think everyone is a middle management unless you're
34:16
in the C suite. And so every manager needs to think of themself as
34:21
a leader of the team and a manager of the team,
34:24
no matter what the level or the size of company or anything of
34:27
that nature is. But in terms of someone, I think what you're getting
34:31
at Moe is like, Hey, first time managers that transition from being an
34:35
individual team member into being a manager. How do we make that easier
34:39
for folks? Is that really kind of the crux of what you're getting
34:42
at? Yes, but it's also, I suppose it probably a little bit more
34:47
narrow in terms of you are then balancing sometimes
34:53
the downward pressure in reality. So like hypothetically there's a decision
34:57
you don't agree with, but you're gonna have to communicate that to your
35:00
team. Whereas before you would've been on the receiving end, you could have
35:03
been like, "This is bullshit, I don't agree with it". Now it's like,
35:05
"I don't agree with it, but I'm still going to have to get
35:07
other people to support it". So, it's the tension
35:11
that starts to come up from moving into that role. Got it.
35:16
So I'm a big believer in authenticity and not sugarcoating things,
35:22
but for me personally, it's extremely... I can't think of a single situation
35:27
where that has really happened to me, where I really said like, I
35:30
fully disagree with this. I do not understand it.
35:33
You can disagree with a decision, but you can understand it.
35:37
And so that is what I've be communicating to my team.
35:40
Why are we doing this? Because I understand why we're doing this,
35:43
it's something that's important to me. Now, my personal opinion may or may
35:47
not be aligned to that fully, but if I can understand why as
35:50
a company we are doing it, and that is why I'm communicating that, I
35:54
would tend to leave my personal opinions out of it in that scenario
35:58
if I really did disagree. But I think it's extremely rare and
36:01
I would encourage folks seek to understand because oftentimes, so many times
36:06
we have seen situations like that, what's actually happening is that new
36:09
managers doesn't have all of the context. They don't have all of the
36:12
context on the business, the realities, maybe it's the cost structure that
36:16
they're not fully across. Maybe there's a competitor coming in. There's
36:20
something that they are not seeing, it's pretty rare that senior management,
36:24
and it just makes terrible decisions, obviously it does happen. But normally
36:29
that's reality is, "Hey, I don't have all of the context that my
36:32
manager has. How do I get that context so I can do a
36:35
better job of relaying these decisions and the importance of them to my
36:39
team?" I loved hearing what you just said, Helen. I have literally on
36:44
my desk right now a little post it note that is the two
36:47
triangles. As your responsibilities grow, your rights get smaller.
36:54
So that's something that is kind of true where you're not allowed to
36:59
complain to your team, you're not allowed to
37:02
express your opinions necessarily. I think I agree wholeheartedly with the
37:06
concept of being authentic, but you have to have these checks and balances
37:11
within yourself to not sort of... Does an individual contributor, like if
37:14
you're upset about something, you just can say it, as a manager you
37:18
have to think, What is the impact to my team, if I
37:21
say these things or if I open my mouth about this stuff or
37:24
if I badmouth this department or whatever the case may be.
37:29
And so that's sort of the way I think about it is you
37:32
own not just yourself, but you kind of own a perception that you
37:38
wanna build in your team so that your team
37:40
continues to have the culture you want from it, of the all the
37:44
things we've talked about before. Right? So I don't know. Yeah.
37:47
I've never really thought of it as having less rights is moral responsibility.
37:51
I think it's. It is not having them, it's more like not
37:57
choosing not to exercise them. Maybe in certain scenarios. I'll have to
38:02
sit with that one. Yeah. Maybe I'm, I don't know. Somebody told that
38:06
to me and I thought it was good in the moment, so I wrote it down and, it's sitting on my desk right there,
38:10
so. I can definitely say that was one of the first mistakes I
38:13
made when I became a first time manager is I was like,
38:17
let's start every day at the top of the rollercoaster and as I
38:20
go to meetings and come across new information, I'm gonna drag everyone
38:24
up and down with me. Yeah. And it was like, I'm not being
38:26
a good shit umbrella, to not take, to
38:30
unload my stress of this situation or scenario, the decisions I have to
38:33
make onto my team. So I definitely had to get that in check.
38:36
That was that was a lesson learned the hard way, I have to say.
38:39
So apologies to those teammates. I think about you to this day.
38:45
I definitely approached management early on as sort of us against the org
38:50
kind of mentality. Like this gorilla warfare. Like, we're over here doing
38:54
our thing, I'll take care of you, but all of these other people
38:57
are really bad and dangerous. And that was a process I had to
39:02
go through to start to like look at the rest of the org as not
39:05
an enemy and bring my team into that as well. So it was
39:09
growth I had to do. I think what you're touching on Michael is
39:12
an interesting one. I think sometimes I've seen new managers want to
39:17
kind of showcase that they are still one of the team.
39:21
Yeah, yeah. I'm still one of you. Yeah. I'm still one of you. Yeah. And I think that is quite dangerous,
39:27
for all of the reasons that you just said. There's a tendency to
39:30
kind of maybe bad mouth other departments or decisions and I think that
39:34
is a dangerous place to be. And I see that as well in
39:38
terms of, for someone who's maybe gone from being a peer to being
39:42
a manager, and they want to continue to be buddy buddy and that
39:45
makes it really difficult to then turn around and have to give that
39:49
person some feedback that's maybe constructive, or some direction or guidance,
39:53
that maybe that person doesn't love. So I think
39:56
there is a a point when you go from being an individual to
39:59
being a manager within a team, that you really do have to see
40:03
that as a new job. I am not still... I'm leading this team.
40:08
What does it mean to be a leader? And you can lead in
40:11
every single different way. Lead from behind, lead from the trenches,
40:14
be in the work with them, but you cannot be the leader and
40:19
be the team member at the same time. That doesn't work.
40:23
How do you think that we coach people through that? 'Cause I don't
40:26
think people are always ready for that transition... And it's funny,
40:30
I actually, I think about the military a lot because I had a
40:33
friend once that I said to him, I was like, why did you go in as a soldier? Like, I don't know, he had a university
40:37
degree. He was really smart. I'm why wouldn't you have gone through the
40:39
officer ranks? I was just very genuinely interested. And he was like,
40:43
Because I wanna be buddies with everyone, that's my job. Like if I'm
40:47
the officer, I can't be buddies with everyone. I'm the person that's in
40:50
charge. And I feel like the military has that ingrained in them.
40:54
They so get that. But I think especially when you're in the workplace
40:58
and you go from one to the other, it is a transition and
41:03
you have to find other ways to have your buddies. And they might
41:07
be the lead from another team or like, you have to find those
41:10
relationships in another way. But as the coach of, or the manager of
41:15
the person who's just the manager, like, how else do we support them
41:18
with that do you think? Yeah. I mean, they say leadership is lonely
41:21
for a reason. And I know it's kind of trite and corny,
41:24
but I think there's a grain of truth there for sure.
41:28
I think the set of questions I like to ask people,
41:32
tell me about the best manager you've ever had, and tell me about
41:35
the worst manager you've ever had. So for every new manager and write
41:38
it down, what did that person, who was the best manager for you
41:41
do? What did they not do? And really then using that as the
41:46
basis to have a conversation with that person around what does good management
41:50
mean to them? How do they start to apply a management philosophy and
41:54
grow as a their own kind of thoughts and principles in this?
41:57
Because there's always the same kind of common themes. The best manager
42:01
I ever had empowered me, listened to me, was not my best friend,
42:06
was someone who I looked, like just using that self reflection tool for
42:11
folks. And always, I mean the worst manager, and I'm curious for all
42:16
of three of you, if you, without naming any names, think about the
42:20
worst manager you ever had. I almost guarantee they were a micromanager.
42:24
They were in your hair on things. It's the same themes over and
42:29
over that tend to come up, because that's another really big track that
42:33
a lot of new managers fall into is, I know I can do
42:36
this job 'cause I was doing it last week, so let me tell
42:39
you how you should now do this job in very minute detail.
42:43
That's another, I know that's my safe space. I know how to do
42:46
this technical work, so I'm gonna tell you how to. And that is,
42:49
I mean, people hate it, right? Starting off as a new manager of that
42:52
is just a recipe, the disaster. Well, and that's really great.
42:57
And it's such a hard thing to let go sometimes as that new
43:00
manager, because you aren't good at necessarily shaping how like the quality
43:06
of that thing will come out from this person does it versus when
43:09
I do it. And so you have this letting go
43:13
that has to happen in that moment as well, which I, that's really
43:16
awesome. It's really hard. And you're not yet good at your new job,
43:19
but you are good at the job that you can't do anymore,
43:22
because it will just piss everyone off and it's a really tricky,
43:26
tricky place to be. Yeah. Completely. Yeah. Yeah. I've had a boss pull me
43:30
aside as a manager one time because I was still trying to do
43:34
too much of the old work. Yeah. And they're like, that's not what
43:37
you're here for anymore. You've gotta step out of that, but it feels
43:40
comfortable. Right? You know how to do that. And all the stuff you're
43:43
learning and doing in this new role you're not comfortable in.
43:47
And so it's like, well, maybe I could just spend part of my
43:49
day doing this so I could do something. But. And it's also like,
43:52
I can do it faster. Or like better or whatever. Yeah, sure.
43:56
So, I'm just gonna do that 'cause it'll be quicker than teaching someone
43:58
and you're like, Oh, no. Yeah. I've coached some really strong performers
44:04
at my last company who had this tendency, but not out of
44:07
the urges that we're talking about here, where they, it's more comfortable
44:11
or they wanna do it faster and better, but it was,
44:13
I don't wanna get outta touch with the skill. Like maybe I've only
44:18
done this one type of analysis once before, but it doesn't come up
44:21
very often and a second opportunity has arisen and I wanna jump in
44:25
it so that I don't get too far removed from it.
44:28
And it feels like what would happen if
44:31
I'm not as proficient as I used to be in this skill.
44:34
And so like the concept of making space on your coattails and coaching
44:38
other people and doing it. And so again, like some of those newer
44:40
skills, Michael, that you were talking about, but it can be uncomfortable
44:43
for that reason too, for an analyst, especially when it comes to something
44:46
more technical. Yeah. And I think that's a great opportunity to set up
44:50
a review or one of those processes I can set up as a
44:54
team manager that ensure that the work is really robust, but I'm not
44:57
in everyone's hair. I can stay in touch with what are they doing
45:01
and set people up for success by doing really great review process,
45:06
really great, whether that's peer review, manager review. But yeah, I think
45:10
that's a little bit of a trickier one. And I will put both hands up to be a little rusty
45:17
on some of my technical capabilities as yes. Do you think it's just
45:21
you, do you just get to a point where you start being like,
45:25
I accept that I am, my technical skills are going to atrophy because I
45:30
feel like it's constantly a discussion and I often get asked like, how
45:33
do you stay in touch? And I'm like, I don't. I haven't written
45:37
a line of code now in, I genuinely can't tell you the last
45:40
time I wrote a line of code. Is it just that you start
45:43
to accept it and you, yeah. Like you do learn about the concepts
45:47
through your team, but you are not the one applying them and you
45:49
just have to accept that that's reality?? I think maybe, I mean, it's sad
45:57
to say I do still love it sometimes when someone goes on parental
46:01
leave and I get a chance to do a little bit of work
46:03
every now and then, even though it's not my day job. But yeah, I think there is a little bit of accepting that
46:12
I also learn a lot from my team members really. And some of
46:17
I, there's a a saying around Meta Facebook ways, like, You should only
46:22
ever hire people who you would be happy to work for yourself.
46:25
And I can tell you that it's true of my team. They are brilliant, absolutely, technically brilliant, much, much better
46:31
than I am. And I learn a lot from them. And I think
46:34
that leaning into that is good for everyone. So, having the team now
46:38
teach me is good for them and for me. Yeah.
46:43
I think I turned a corner mode too when I started looking at
46:46
learning how to be a leader as something to pursue as opposed to
46:49
like more the loss of other things. So sort of like,
46:53
Hey, why don't I just focus on trying to get as good as
46:55
I can at this thing that I'm now into?
46:58
And not necessarily always sort of looking over my shoulder like,
47:01
oh, I'm losing these skills, or I don't know if I'm still as in
47:04
touch with this thing I used to do.
47:07
I don't know if that's good for everybody, but that helped me a
47:10
little bit in that journey. Not mourning the loss as much?
47:14
Well, trying to pursue this... Yeah. Actively going after it. Yeah. And
47:18
being like, how do I be really good at it as best as
47:21
I can? And I think everyone's got a different style. My style is
47:25
to make every mistake possible and then slowly arrange and then arrange
47:30
around it down experiential learning of like, Okay, so I screwed that up.
47:34
Now how do I not screw it up next time? And so I'm
47:38
a little slower than most, but you know? I want to change gears
47:43
a little bit. We alluded to this before, but feedback is such an
47:46
important part of helping people develop and being a leader. Helen, how
47:51
do you approach that process with your teams and even with people you
47:55
mentor as well? I mean, I think most of it at the top, I'm
47:58
very direct and I think a lot of frequent feedback, lighter weight is
48:04
what typically works for me. Obviously doesn't matter. We have a standard
48:07
kind of feedback process and timeline. But I, particularly for newer managers,
48:12
one of the big mistakes I see people often make is,
48:15
not giving feedback fast enough or thinking about
48:20
not being sure of themselves. I wanna see more evidence, or maybe they're
48:23
just having a bad day, or maybe I just need to step up
48:27
myself as a manager and not trusting their gut early enough.
48:31
And so it doesn't need to be this big heavy thing.
48:34
Oftentimes feedback can just be a question, how do you think you're doing
48:38
on X or Y or Z and let's have a conversation about this.
48:42
This is what I'm seeing, but maybe I'm not seeing everything.
48:44
Help me understand, how do you think you're doing? So that more frequent
48:49
lighter weight is I think what I tend towards, but it's a muscle
48:54
that you built, I think. One of the things actually that Helen has
48:58
helped me kind of have a bit of an epiphany about on feedback,
49:03
like reality is we all think we're doing great and it's like regular
49:07
and yada, yada yada. And everyone says they love feedback, which also sometimes
49:12
is a crock of shit. But I'll give you guys kind of a
49:16
scenario of, let's say someone did a presentation or something and you kind
49:20
of get into the weeds a little bit and you're like, Oh, you could have done this to make this better or you could
49:24
have adjusted this. And I think the bit that has kind of clicked
49:28
to me is also letting them know what the standard is it should
49:32
be. So it's not just about like the tactical feedback on the work.
49:36
It's like for the level that you are at, my expectation is that
49:40
this presentation has these qualities or is done in this particular way.
49:45
And so like you're showing that this is where the work is and
49:48
this is where it should be. And I feel like through some of
49:51
the conversations I've had with Helen, I've actually gotten better at being
49:54
a little bit more direct about that because otherwise they're just like,
49:57
Oh, these are some improvements I can make. Not I need to,
50:00
like, there's not a big jump here, but like, they don't know where
50:03
the bar is that they're trying to get to.
50:06
And it's something about fit. Like it has really been churning in my
50:09
mind of late. And yeah, Helen is very, very good at direct feedback,
50:14
I will say. Sorry. No No, it's a positive.
50:19
Yeah, it's great. And not always, I will say I think sometimes I
50:23
fall into the same patterns with my own team, particularly if we've been
50:26
managing folks for a long time or it's easy to get sucked up
50:31
into the day to day and the week to week work. And so I think that it is easier when you're in a kind of more
50:36
of a coaching, mentoring relationship to have that discipline around feedback.
50:40
That's why we're there to talk about it. So yeah, I think yes, expectation... Like letting people know what type
50:48
of feedback they're getting is a helpful thing. Let's do some big signposts.
50:51
I am giving you feedback that this is missing the mark.
50:54
My expectation was X what I saw as you delivered Y. Do you
50:58
agree with that? Do you not? Am I missing something here?
51:02
As opposed to just like, Oh, you did a great job,
51:05
next time you could do something else, but you know. That's really not
51:08
that helpful if you are actually trying to give feedback. I want you
51:11
to grow. I believe in you, I really want you to be successful
51:15
and next time you will be more successful if this is the feedback
51:20
which will help you get there. I'm curious, and this is a personal
51:25
question. Very much so I find... And you might say like,
51:29
well, all of those milestones that you had in your head were shit
51:32
milestones and goals So that's fair. But I'm very extrinsically motivated,
51:38
and so I oftentimes find value in my work through the eyes of
51:42
other people giving it praise or accolades, or saying that this was valuable
51:47
or helpful. And so, I always thought that a way to measure that
51:50
success was to say, well, I should have director in my title before
51:53
I'm 30, because that means someone in a position of power thinks that
51:58
I should be able to operate at that level and make those types
52:00
of decisions for the business. Or even when I came to Search Discovery
52:03
Michael, can back this up, that I said, I wanna run a test
52:06
that makes a client a million dollars. And that's the way that
52:10
I'm gonna help make sure that I'm feeling some of those successes.
52:12
And I have to say that, I know we talked a lot about
52:15
the juniors and some of the ways that they think about those visible
52:19
signs of progress or ways of setting goals. And I actually think it's getting
52:23
harder for me, the further I get into my career to think about
52:27
discreetly what are the things, what are the line in the sand thinking
52:31
further out three years on the line. Like, what do I want to say
52:33
I've been able to accomplish? And so maybe this is just like a
52:38
little bit of a rut that I'm in, but have you noticed that
52:40
at all that like there's differences in what's hard about setting goals
52:45
for juniors versus more senior people? Or maybe I just have a complete
52:50
I need to come up with a better way to set some metrics
52:53
against the things that I do, set some goals against.
52:57
I think two things. So firstly, hopefully your business partners know that
53:02
you like feedback and thrive off it. And hopefully you've said to them,
53:06
Hey, I'm just the sort of person, if you give me a positive piece of
53:09
feedback, I will cherish that. It will make my day, I will hug it
53:13
all day long and you will absolutely like
53:16
that is what I thrive off of. So that you are getting that
53:18
on a regular basis. If you tell people that, they will give you
53:21
that is my experience. So hopefully you've done that. But in terms of
53:25
like your particular goals as you get more senior, I think it just
53:27
becomes less linear. So as someone new into the business, hey,
53:31
the next milestone is the promotion, which is like two to three years
53:35
or the next thing and the next thing, and then I wanna be
53:37
a manager. And then... It starts out oftentimes with people being very linear.
53:41
And then as you become more senior, I think you have to be
53:43
much more flexible. What is my goal? Maybe it's to experience managing a
53:49
very large team or experience working in a different type of company,
53:53
or what are the experiences I wanna develop, and then being extremely flexible
54:00
on how I get them. So that might mean, I lose the director
54:04
title if I gain that experience. That might mean I go
54:08
take a pay cut or work at a very different company or do
54:11
something entirely different with my life. But prioritising what experiences
54:15
you wanna gain is something I think that becomes more important as you
54:18
become more senior. If it's always just getting to that next level.
54:22
I mean, you're gonna run outta levels pretty soon. It's not something that
54:26
goes and goes forever. And so you can't just keep it being the
54:29
next level, the next level, I think is what you're kind of putting
54:32
at there. Yeah. Yeah. Just wanted to make sure that that wasn't
54:37
too far off. 'cause I, I'm not some super senior, but
54:41
I don't, I'm not, I don't feel like I'm... I'm not a spring chicken. I'm not 10 years outta college or less anymore, so Yeah. And I
54:47
don't have all the answers here either. I think it's for me as
54:50
well, something I think about what are the experiences I want to gain next
54:53
in my career, so. Happy to chat some other time, Val on this for
54:57
each other. Woo hoo, Moe I'm gonna bogart your
55:01
girl That's right. No, you're incredible Helen. I love it. No, this is
55:06
excellent. All right, well we are running out of time so we have
55:09
to start to wrap up. This is incredible and actually so many things
55:13
Helen, you've shared have been so right on the mark. And so thank
55:16
you so much for sharing some of your insights and lessons learned with
55:21
us and our listeners. So one of the things we like to do
55:24
on the show is do go around the horn and share a last
55:27
call. Something we find interesting that maybe our listeners will too.
55:31
And Helen, you're our guest. Do you have a last call you'd like
55:33
to share? My last call is, I recently went on vacation.
55:38
And truly, take your vacation time people, it makes such a difference.
55:43
That is, I know it's not the most insightful new tool out there
55:47
in the world, but that was my big insight for the week is
55:51
take a holiday. I love that. Take a holiday folks. I love it.
55:54
And an actual holiday. Yes. Disconnect. Go on a place where the WiFi is
55:59
a little bit crap. It's a good idea. I've got it planned.
56:04
I know when we're taking it and I can't wait. Oh, good for you. Yeah,
56:07
that's important. That's awesome. All right Moe what about you? What's your
56:11
last call? I am so excited. Oh that's right. You know when you
56:15
find something and I'm sure every single person in the world probably knows
56:18
about it, but when you find something you're like, Shit, how did I
56:21
not know about this? This is insane. It's called Goblin Tools.
56:27
Have you guys, is everyone aware of Goblin Tools? Okay, great.
56:30
I'm excited. So it has a few different things that it does.
56:35
One is magic to do. So you put in a task like I
56:38
need to install tracking for Google Analytics 4, and it will break it
56:41
down into the tasks that you need to do in order to do
56:45
that. Or I need to write a brief for a client.
56:48
It will be like, Here are all the steps you need to do. It has a formaliser. I never ever recommend using that. There is never
56:54
a good occasion to take your written work and make it more formal.
56:58
But there is one called the Judge where you can put in say
57:02
like a message or an email that someone sent you
57:04
to see if you are misconstruing the tone and it will help you
57:08
understand if there's like... Interesting. Yeah, I know. That's cool. Because
57:13
sometimes you get a message from someone and you're like, Wow they're being
57:15
such a dick. And now you can put it in the judge and
57:17
it will tell you basically whether there is a tone there.
57:22
Then there's the estimator, which will help you break down a task into
57:27
like how long it estimates it's gonna take. There's one called the compiler. Oh yeah. You basically put a brain dump
57:34
in and it will break it into like a list of tasks and
57:37
then there's the chef, which is like, you put your ingredients in and
57:40
I'll tell you what to cook. So it's just like this tool that
57:44
I am, feel like I'm gonna be like using constantly and I'm really
57:48
excited about. So, yeah. Yeah. Where has this been all my life?
57:53
The judge would've saved me so many hours of therapy. I know, right?
57:59
It is like 15 years of trying to figure out how to handle
58:04
emails the right way. And I do have to say thank you to
58:07
Stefan. He presented at our Analytics meetup recently and he shared this
58:11
and I just was like, Pooh. Amazing. Sorry. That's pretty awesome.
58:15
Awesome. Thank you. All right Val, what about you? What's your last call?
58:19
All right, so this one's a little left field but I was pretty
58:23
excited about it as well. My favorite type of music is classic rock
58:27
and so here in Chicago I listen to 97.1FM The Drive and they
58:32
have a podcast called Behind the Song and they did one recently on
58:38
the ELO song that is scientifically proven to make you happy and it's
58:42
just a fun song and, I love like breaking it down and like understanding
58:46
how they recorded it and the inspiration for it. So that's always fun
58:50
part of the podcast. But the thing that I was the tie in
58:53
here to the show, I swear it's there is the study about what
58:57
makes songs make you happy. Like what is the happiest song in the
59:01
world and I guess it's this perfect combination of using Major keys seventh
59:06
chords, 137 BPM A strong beat and four beats in every bar.
59:11
So it's thousands of songs were tested over years and years.
59:16
And they evaluated it and this is still to this day the happiest
59:19
song in the world. So if you're having a bad day or you
59:22
aren't in a place to take your vacation yet, while you're planning it,
59:27
listen to the ELO song Mr. Blue Sky. Oh. It's in like tons
59:33
of commercials. As soon as you listen to it you'll be like, oh
59:35
yeah. So. All right. What about you Michael?
59:39
Well, mine is not as good but actually it's funny 'cause Tim sent this
59:44
to me and I was looking through it and I was like, oh this is be my last call. So thanks Tim. Shout out
59:49
So there's a venture capitalist named Sriram Krishnan who actually used
59:53
to work at Meta in the engineering, I think. And he collects corporate
59:58
memos and governmental memos and things like that. And they're all these
1:00:01
different kinds and styles and he puts them out on his webpage. And
1:00:05
so it's a really cool page. It just has a bunch of different
1:00:09
memos and it's kind of interesting because a lot of them are a
1:00:12
more like intimate reflection of the moment that that person or a company
1:00:16
or leader was in. And so they're kind of fun to read,
1:00:18
sort of kind of a fun thing. I was reading through it and
1:00:22
I read the one Howard Schultz wrote back in 2008 about Starbucks and
1:00:25
I was like, well they should have done something with that memo 'cause
1:00:28
he was absolutely spot on and they haven't really capitalized, but those
1:00:35
kinds of things. Anyways, it's fun if you like that sort of thing.
1:00:38
Anyway, so that's my last call. All right, well as you've been listening,
1:00:43
you're probably thinking to yourself, oh, I have a question or I have
1:00:46
a thought about this. We would love to hear from you and it's
1:00:49
easy to do that you can reach out to us through LinkedIn or
1:00:53
on the Measure Chat Slack group or via email at contact@analyticshour.io.
1:00:59
So we happy to hear from you and please do. And of course
1:01:04
no show would be complete without a huge shout out to our producer
1:01:08
Josh Crowhurst. Thank you Josh for all you do for the show.
1:01:11
All right once again, Helen, thank you so much. Thanks for coming on
1:01:16
and sharing with us. Thank you. Yeah, thank you. Awesome. All right, so
1:01:21
no matter where you are in your leadership journey, you can lead from
1:01:25
anywhere. Just remember that I think I speak for both of my co
1:01:29
hosts, Moe and Val, when I say, no matter what kind of leader
1:01:33
you are or your leadership style, keep analyzing.
1:01:38
Thanks for listening. Let's keep the conversation going with your comments,
1:01:42
suggestions, and questions on Twitter at @analytics hour, on the web @analyticshour.io,
1:01:48
our LinkedIn group and the Measured Chat Slack group. Music for the podcast
1:01:54
by Josh Crowhurst. So smart guys want to fit in. So they made
1:01:59
up a term called analytics. Analytics don't work.
1:02:03
I love Venn diagrams. It's just something about those three circles and
1:02:08
the analysis about where there is the intersection. Right?
1:02:13
Tim usually does that without telling anyone Val to try to catch me
1:02:17
and telling an embarrassing story. So. That's good that you let us know.
1:02:21
All right. I'm trying to go for miss Congeniality this year
1:02:24
for the APH award. So Oh, hey. That's a good idea.
1:02:30
The atheist. The atheist invented right here. Mr. Blue Sky. Or I could just
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More