Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Normally, being a little extra might be
0:02
a bit much, but not when it
0:04
comes to healthcare. That's why UnitedHealthcare's Health
0:06
Protector Guard fixed indemnity insurance plans, underwritten
0:08
by Golden Rule Insurance Company, supplement your
0:11
primary plan so you manage out-of-pocket costs.
0:13
Learn more at uh1.com. If you're struggling to
0:16
lose weight, you've probably heard about weight
0:18
loss medications like Wigovi or Zepbond. And
0:20
you might be wondering if they're right
0:22
for you. The.
0:24
Leading Tell Health Provider with doctors who were
0:27
there for you day and night to partner
0:29
with you in your weight loss journey. If.
0:31
You qualify they can safely prescribed
0:33
medication from the comfort of your
0:36
own home. To get started, visit
0:38
plushcare.com/ Weight loss. That's
0:40
plushcare.com/weight loss. plushcare.com/weight
0:43
loss. When
0:58
someone mentions the Roman army, your mind
1:00
might immediately think of the legionaries. The
1:02
Roman citizen soldiers that became
1:04
some of the most feared
1:07
professional fighters of antiquity. Particularly
1:09
during the early imperial period,
1:11
roughly 2,000 years ago, equipped
1:13
with their iconic banded iron
1:15
Lorica segmentata armour, their short
1:17
gladdiest stabbing swords, large scutum
1:19
shields, helmets and so on. However,
1:23
the legionaries couldn't win Rome's wars on
1:25
their own. Just as important
1:27
to the success of the Roman army, if
1:29
not more important, were another key troop
1:31
type. The auxiliaries. Recruited
1:35
from across the empire, auxiliary soldiers could
1:37
be cavalry, they could be infantry, they
1:39
could be skirmishers. They served
1:41
various roles from front line troops
1:43
to garrison border guards along frontiers
1:45
like Hadrian's Wolf. The
1:48
stories of these soldiers, who they were, where they
1:50
came from and where they served in the empire
1:52
are amazing. And to talk
1:54
through what we know, well I was delighted to
1:56
interview fan favourite and historical fiction heavyweight,
1:59
Dr Ben. Now,
2:01
Ben, he knows all the things about
2:03
the Roman army, from cavalry to tombstones,
2:05
and I really do hope you enjoy.
2:13
Ben, great to have you on
2:15
the podcast as always. Welcome back. Thank
2:17
you, Justin. Lovely to be here. Looking
2:19
forward to this. Now, especially after the
2:21
success of our chat about the Roman
2:23
Legion, we had to do that other
2:25
key part of the Roman army, the
2:27
story of the Roman auxiliary. It always
2:29
feels as if the Legionary gets the
2:31
limelight. However, these other units,
2:34
they were equally, if not more
2:36
important in the whole creating and
2:38
sustaining of the Roman Empire. Indeed,
2:40
like any empire, the
2:42
Romans relied on non-citizen people to
2:44
fight in their armies, both
2:46
for numbers, but also in particular types
2:48
of situation where they needed missile troops
2:50
or whatever. They played a
2:52
huge role in the Roman army, and
2:55
very frustratingly, we know very little about
2:57
them. So there are lots of details
2:59
that we know, but nitty gritty. There'll
3:02
be a lot of times during this podcast where I'll say,
3:04
well, we think this, but we're not really sure. So we're
3:08
all prepared for that. Don't you worry, my
3:10
friend, you'll provide more than enough information anyway.
3:12
I'm no doubt at all. First
3:14
of all, when talking about the auxiliary
3:16
soldier, what do we mean by
3:19
an auxiliary? In
3:21
terms of the Romans from the Republic through
3:24
to the Empire, we
3:26
literally mean a non-citizen soldier generally.
3:28
They could be foot soldiers and
3:30
they could be cavalry. And
3:33
then there's lots more detail, but the simplest
3:35
explanation is a non-citizen soldier. And so someone
3:37
who wasn't a citizen of the Roman Empire,
3:40
and remember that for most of
3:42
Rome's history, because most of Rome's history
3:44
was before the Empire, during the Republic,
3:47
maybe non-citizens would have been regarded as
3:49
socially inferior to Romans, quite likely afterwards
3:52
as well. But there was a definite
3:54
difference in status between a legionary and
3:56
an auxiliary soldier or a Roman cavalryman.
4:00
in non-Roman cavalrymen. It's worth mentioning
4:02
that during the Middle Republic,
4:04
for example, during the wars against Hannibal,
4:06
that Rome's cavalry was formed of young
4:08
noblemen, citizens and also soci, people from
4:10
the peninsula of Italy who were subjugated
4:12
by Rome but were fighting for Rome.
4:15
Would it almost felt as if the
4:17
auxiliary was seen as a second-class soldier
4:19
compared to the legionary at the top?
4:21
Yeah, definitely. In Britain, just
4:23
because of the British podcast, it's
4:26
worth mentioning, the British Empire used
4:28
to use its non-citizen troops as
4:30
much more expendable than British
4:32
troops. So there were significant numbers of troops
4:34
from India and Africa in both World War
4:36
I and World War II. And
4:39
I think it's, to give you an idea, and I'm
4:41
not throwing stones here at all, but the
4:43
British Department of the War Office, whatever the name
4:46
of it is, the government ministry that deals with
4:48
the war, Department of Defense,
4:50
did not actually record the names of
4:52
the African soldiers who died in the
4:54
British Army in World War II. That's
4:58
only 70 or 80 years ago, and they didn't
5:00
bother recording them. So that shows you
5:03
the attitude that they're great, but we
5:05
don't need to record their names. And
5:07
so, with nothing like that from Roman
5:09
times, but social attitudes
5:11
were much more hard-line two thousand
5:13
years ago. For example, your average
5:15
Roman was misogynistic and homophobic and
5:17
racist. And so, I
5:20
have no doubt that your average
5:22
legionary and your average legionary officer,
5:24
particularly noblemen, would have looked down
5:26
on auxiliary soldiers.
5:28
And yet, what's interesting is, when we talk
5:31
about the pre-incupate, the commanding
5:33
officers will come into the reason why,
5:35
maybe later, but the commanding officers of
5:37
auxiliary units were Romans. So
5:40
you would have had a real difference there. You
5:42
would have had young Roman
5:44
nobles in their mid-twenties, potentially
5:46
even only teenagers, catapulted into
5:49
command a
5:51
cohort, 480 infantry, who spoke a
5:53
different language and weren't Roman citizens.
5:55
And there may have been real
5:58
problems there with a young nobleman. dealing
6:00
with those men and the centurions of
6:02
that unit would have been natives as
6:04
well, if you like. And
6:06
they might have had chips on their shoulders
6:08
against young noblemen. And to look at
6:10
a British Army unit in World War II, say, you
6:12
get a young lieutenant comes in and he's 21 years
6:14
old, and he's got a grizzled old sergeant who knows
6:17
10 times more than he does. And if he doesn't
6:19
get on with the sergeant, then things aren't going to
6:21
go very well, are they? So you've got all those
6:23
kind of possibilities that must have existed.
6:25
I guess before we go on to the origins,
6:27
I mean, for looking at the auxiliaries, and I
6:29
know you include auxiliaries in various books that you've
6:31
written about the Roman Empire and the Roman Army.
6:34
What types of sources do you have available to
6:37
try and learn more about these
6:39
units, how they fought, how they were organized
6:41
and so on? So the sources, like
6:43
they are with everything to do with
6:45
the Roman military or the Roman civilization,
6:47
consisted of two main prongs. One is
6:50
archaeological evidence, and then the second is
6:52
written evidence that has come down to
6:54
us frequently through multiple
6:56
translations and potentially not
6:59
what it was originally, but you can only
7:01
use what you've got. And so,
7:03
for example, the units that we know existed,
7:05
the reason we know about a lot of
7:07
the units is because in
7:09
specific Roman forts, and a really good
7:12
example of this is the forts along
7:14
Hadrian's Wall, because auxiliaries
7:16
were used in border defense.
7:19
If you need men to protect your borders, the
7:21
legions are busy building roads and
7:23
bridges and aqueducts. They were kept
7:25
back, for example, close to
7:28
Hadrian's Wall. The nearest legion was in York, which
7:30
is a significant distance. I'm going to say it's
7:32
at least 80 miles or 100 miles south of
7:35
Hadrian's Wall, but the forts
7:38
all along Hadrian's Wall, which were every five
7:40
to eight miles and were either
7:42
cohort or double cohort in strength,
7:45
those were manned by auxiliaries. And
7:48
that was their primary role. And the limes,
7:50
which is essentially the border area along the
7:52
Rhine and the Danube, and the gap between,
7:55
which was obviously where barbarians could come in
7:57
more easily than having to cross those rivers.
8:00
The forts along those frontiers were
8:02
also manned by auxiliary and
8:05
for example tombstone this one of the most common
8:07
ways we know on Romans
8:09
whether they were civilian or military would
8:11
record the profession because they wanted you
8:13
the person looking at their gravestone to
8:15
know what they'd done Roman
8:17
gravestones were very much about being
8:19
seen so Your
8:21
listeners may know that Romans were not allowed to
8:24
be buried within the confines of a town or
8:26
a fort They have to be buried outside because
8:28
it was regarded as very bad luck so
8:30
the roads into Rome and Pompeii and
8:33
any Roman town were lined with tombs
8:35
and You only have to go
8:37
to Pompeii to see the size of some of
8:39
the tombs to realize how important it was For
8:42
status after death. So the best
8:44
example I can actually think of
8:46
is in Cologne There
8:48
is the tomb of an ordinary legionary soldier
8:50
who'd obviously done well my son as you'd
8:52
say in England He'd done really well for
8:55
himself and probably become the equivalent of a
8:57
millionaire because his tombstones 50 feet high And
9:00
there's a statue of him on the top of it So
9:02
you would have seen it for about a mile or
9:04
two before you got to it and at
9:06
the bottom industry He's an ordinary soldier. But
9:08
anyway come back to auxiliary tombstone so frequently
9:10
you will have the name of a man
9:13
the unit he was in and The
9:16
number of years he served and when he died
9:18
or how he died whether he was killed or
9:20
in war whether he drowned or something And if
9:22
he was a cavalryman, he'll usually be on a
9:24
horse trampling a naked barbarian And
9:26
if he was an infantryman, he'll be
9:28
shown as an infantryman the auxiliaries used
9:31
oval shields Not your curved shields like
9:33
legionaries And if he was
9:35
an archer He will have arrows and a
9:37
bow like the tombstone of a Syrian Archer
9:40
which was found near Hadrian's Wall So,
9:42
you know, there were Syrians serving in Hadrian's Wall.
9:45
There were Belgians. There were Gauls. There were Thracians
9:47
There were people from all over the empire something
9:50
the Romans learned in the Batavian
9:52
revolt of the late 60s A.D.
9:56
Batavians being a tribe from modern-day Germany
9:59
and they were auxiliaries serving in their own
10:01
area. The British learned this the
10:03
hard way as well. They've forgotten what
10:05
the Romans had learned is that it's not
10:07
a very good idea to have men who
10:09
are trained soldiers in their own area because
10:11
if they've become unhappy with rule, as the
10:13
Batavians did, they started a revolt that actually
10:15
set up an independent kingdom and took about
10:17
three years to quell. After
10:19
that, the Romans pretty much never
10:21
stationed auxiliaries in the regions they
10:24
were from. We think
10:26
that's also why they replaced their
10:28
commanders because up to that point,
10:30
roughly, the auxiliary units
10:32
had been commanded by essentially chieftains of
10:35
the tribe they were from. Like Arminius
10:37
and his cavalry, right? Indeed, exactly, in
10:39
AD9. That's a prime example. The Romans
10:41
were very wary of that. There was
10:43
Jogurtha or Jogurtha in North Africa who
10:45
led auxiliaries there and then led a
10:48
rebellion. There were examples from all around
10:50
the Roman Empire. After that, the commanders
10:52
were a Roman nobleman, not from the
10:54
tribe that the unit was raised from,
10:56
if you like. I remember seeing one
10:58
of those tombstone examples in the UK,
11:01
not in Hadrian's rule, but at the
11:03
Colchis Museum. As you say, it's this auxiliary
11:05
cavalryman trampling a barbarian beneath. It's very interesting.
11:07
You can see the details on the armour
11:09
and so on. It's a lot of attention
11:11
that has put in it. That
11:14
would have been painted as well. It would have been
11:16
painted, yes. It's important to mention that all those tombstones
11:18
were painted and the statues
11:20
of gods and goddesses, the
11:22
50-foot-high statues of Augustus, they were painted
11:24
to look realistic. All the buildings
11:27
were as well. How do we
11:29
know that? Because archaeological finds
11:31
from places like Pompeii and
11:33
Herculaneum, and I'm not a
11:35
geologist or archaeologist, so I don't know the
11:37
exact reason, but it's to do with the
11:39
lack of oxygen. Sometimes you will get paint
11:42
surviving, like whole paintings in Pompeii. Other times
11:44
you just get traces and
11:46
advances over the last ten years where
11:48
scientists use fractured light. So they break
11:50
light into its constituent colours to look
11:53
at these stone works. They can actually
11:55
work out the colours of the paint
11:57
that were used on the individual parts
11:59
of the world. cavalrymen, for example. And
12:02
so if you go to somewhere like
12:04
Zanten in Germany, which is an incredible
12:06
archaeological site, it is the town of
12:08
Vettora, later Colonia Opia Triana, but it
12:11
was the base of two of the
12:13
legions that went and were slaughtered at
12:15
the Teutoburg Forest. And outside
12:17
the three-storey town gate there that
12:19
they've rebuilt, there are painted tombstones.
12:22
You could argue that they're not representative, but
12:24
they've tried to do it accurately. And they're
12:26
far more vivid when it's a guy on
12:28
a horse in all his armors coloured and
12:30
the horse's nostrils are flaring and flesh covered
12:33
and there's blood on the person that he's
12:35
trampling and so on. If
12:37
we take a step back, like before
12:39
the time of these classic auxiliaries in
12:41
the Imperial period of Rome, if
12:44
we go 100 years before, hundreds of years
12:46
before, let's say time, the Punic Wars and
12:48
the Republic, what do
12:50
we know about non-Roman
12:52
soldiers in the Roman army in this
12:54
early stage of the Roman Empire, let's
12:57
say as they're expanding in Italy? So
13:00
we know, we actually know very little
13:02
about the Roman armies through much of
13:04
the period. I mean, there are descriptions
13:06
of the Roman Legion from Polybius during
13:08
the Punic Wars, but
13:10
I would immediately caveat this with I'm
13:12
not a Roman academic, but I've spent
13:15
nearly 20 years writing about Rome and
13:17
I've written 14 novels set in that
13:19
period and have hundreds of textbooks. So
13:22
I've read a lot about the whole
13:24
Roman world and particularly the military and
13:27
my only awareness of non-citizen
13:30
troops during
13:32
the mid-Republic is
13:34
just reference to their use in
13:37
a particular campaign. So
13:39
for example, when Scipio who became
13:41
Afrikanis went to North Africa and
13:43
bearded the lion in his den
13:46
and beat Hannibal at his own game, he
13:49
had Numidian cavalry. He was able to pay more
13:51
money. He got the best Numidian cavalry and Hannibal
13:53
was left with the dregs. And
13:55
there are examples as well, for example,
13:57
in the very late Republic of Caesar,
14:00
Julius Caesar, in his
14:02
campaigns in Gaul, using
14:04
Spanish, Iberian cavalry, Gaulish
14:07
cavalry, German cavalry. By
14:10
this stage, just alluding back to what I
14:12
mentioned briefly, the cavalry was no longer made
14:14
up of young noblemen, and there's a very
14:16
interesting textbook by Jeremiah McCall that I read
14:18
on the theory behind that. Why did they
14:20
stop? But it's just
14:22
literally reference to those men. There isn't
14:24
reference to unit size. There isn't reference
14:27
to commanders, although it's highly likely their
14:29
commanders would have been their own people,
14:31
and they were fighting for money, and they
14:34
weren't fighting in uniform like later auxiliaries were.
14:36
They were indeed very similar in appearance to
14:38
Roman legionaries, but during the Puget Wars and
14:40
then say under Julius Caesar, first century BC,
14:42
you wouldn't have known they were any different
14:44
to sometimes the men they were fighting. So
14:47
if they were Gaulish and they were fighting
14:49
in Gaul, they quite possibly looked like the guys
14:51
they were fighting. It's just they were fighting beside
14:53
the legionaries. How did they get identified from friend
14:55
from foe in the middle of a battle? Good
14:57
question. We don't know. We
14:59
don't know, and it's quite interesting when you look
15:02
at the Hellenistic period, you look at Hellenistic armies
15:04
which recruited, let's say, Galatians and Gauls, and they
15:06
were very clearly identified as mercenaries
15:08
in the surviving sources fighting alongside
15:11
the phalanx or the Seleucids or the Macedonians.
15:14
It almost feels as if these non-Roman
15:16
allies, whether they're Numidians or
15:19
they could be Cretan archers
15:21
or slingers or Gallic fighters.
15:24
Can we distinguish them from the types of
15:26
mercenaries? Yeah, they were mercenaries. There
15:29
wasn't the promise of citizenship at the end
15:31
either. There was during the Printer Page. They
15:33
were literally just fighting for money and
15:36
make no bones about it. When
15:38
they won a battle, they would have taken whatever they found,
15:40
whether that be on a battlefield or in a town. Legionaries
15:43
were supposed to hand in what they found, but
15:45
of course they didn't. You just look up wars
15:47
up until the modern day. There were British
15:50
soldiers coming back from Afghanistan with Kalashnikovs in
15:52
their luggage. The kind of thing people do.
15:55
And going on from that, the
15:57
formal auxiliaries don't emerge until you
15:59
get... the early Imperial period before that
16:01
you have these units and then also names
16:03
like the Socie as well. Yeah, so to
16:06
try and describe it in the timeline, during
16:09
the Middle Republic, which is the Arpunic Wars, and
16:11
we won't go much further than that because we
16:13
know even less, you will have
16:15
had mercenaries fighting with
16:17
the Roman armies in different
16:19
campaigns and in different battlefield
16:22
situations, literally recruited locally, fighting
16:24
locally, probably not going away
16:27
from that area, just disbanded whenever
16:29
they weren't needed. The
16:31
cavalry of the Roman Empire at that
16:33
time when a consular army, there were
16:35
two consular armies that were fielded each
16:38
year and until Hannibal, when they had to
16:40
expand big time, that's all the Romans used
16:42
to have generally. They had
16:44
cavalry that fought with them and they
16:46
were citizen cavalry, young noblemen, and there
16:48
were 300 of them to each legion,
16:50
so 4,200 Polybian legionaries and 300 cavalry.
16:56
The Socie were the non-citizen
16:58
troops forcibly provided to the
17:01
Republic of Rome by its
17:03
subjugated allies in
17:06
Peninsular Italy. So I'm talking
17:08
Samnites, Campanians, Brutians, Lechanians, Etruscans.
17:11
There were literally all the peoples of
17:13
Italy that had gradually been conquered by
17:15
Rome as it expanded in the 4th
17:18
and 3rd and even 2nd centuries BC.
17:21
They had to provide as part of their
17:23
tribute to Rome, if you like, troops when
17:25
there was a war and they had to
17:27
provide the same number as you had in
17:29
a legion. So for every 4,200 legionaries
17:31
and 300 cavalry, you had 4,200 Socie infantry and
17:33
cavalry and they
17:40
were largely, we believe,
17:43
equipped and armed the same way as the
17:45
Romans were. There was very little difference between
17:47
them. You then move forward
17:49
in history to the 1st century
17:51
BC and by then, Romans
17:54
did not serve as cavalry anymore.
17:56
And Jeremiah McCall's theory is that
17:58
young noblemen could see a... Are
18:00
quicker route to wealth and political success
18:02
by staying in Rome and particularly when
18:04
the with an emperor you know climbing
18:06
the greasy pole in the last. And
18:09
it's a theory, but it's of reason. Be
18:11
good when I think. But anyway, by then. The
18:14
cavalry was non roman, exclusively on his.
18:16
it's shrunk to one hundred and twenty
18:18
men are legion, So there were four
18:20
thousand, Eight hundred legionaries. Alright, sometimes or
18:22
more you could argue in the mid
18:24
fifties, up to five thousand men, but
18:27
about five thousand infantry and one hundred
18:29
and twenty cavalry. They. Were broken
18:31
down into term May a term as
18:33
the singular thirty man term As a
18:35
for term may in a legion. Each
18:38
term are led by to curie and and
18:40
they were non citizens, they were Spanish, they
18:42
were goal or saber German. They were basically
18:44
wherever they could get good horseman. But.
18:46
The were also auxiliary see did other things
18:48
like as you mentioned the archers. We know
18:50
battles in the one thirties where the Romans
18:53
had archers and they'd line them up behind
18:55
the infantry to lob the arrows overhead before
18:57
the infantry attacked. The are images
18:59
and Trajan's call him a Slingers and the
19:01
famous singers were the ones from the by
19:04
the Eric islands who famously. As children
19:06
didn't get fed and their target the have to
19:08
learn to hit age six or seven was a
19:10
loaf of bread on a pole and the didn't
19:12
eat in the say hit the loaf of bread.
19:16
They were either apparently could hit a
19:18
straw bale at six hundred paces spots
19:20
the archer units as I mentioned concrete
19:23
from Syria there or cavalry units and.
19:25
We don't know exactly when, but some
19:27
time either during the reign of Augustus up
19:30
until the reign of Claudius. The.
19:32
Auxiliary were formerly drawn up
19:34
in to units. And. They became
19:36
defined size and we know something
19:38
about that and that's what they
19:40
remained for at least you know,
19:42
another hundred hundred and fifty years
19:44
until you get into the later
19:46
Roman period and everything started going
19:49
wrong. flu seventy Explore the say
19:51
to sling isn't listening Shockers got
19:53
to read examples of. These.
19:55
Making a consensual in front of us the before?
19:57
then? let's kind of. Keep. On days
19:59
before. of either Augustus or going up to
20:01
Claudius. You said we know a bit about
20:03
this, so what do we know about the
20:05
structure of the official auxiliary? Yeah. So
20:08
we know that there were three types
20:10
of auxiliary units. There were infantry
20:13
units, there were cavalry
20:15
units, and there were mixed infantry
20:17
and cavalry units. And then
20:19
there were two types of those each. So
20:21
there were six types of auxiliary units. So
20:24
your typical cohort, as it was called,
20:26
was 480 infantry.
20:28
And that's, as your listeners, I'm sure, will be
20:31
aware, a century of Roman
20:33
soldiers was only 80 men. We don't know
20:35
why. Originally, probably sixth, seventh century BC, it
20:37
may well have been 100 men, but it
20:40
was cut to 80 and nobody knows why,
20:42
but the name remained the same. So six
20:44
centuries of 80 men, each commanded
20:47
by a centurion, centurion number one being
20:49
the most important, just like in the
20:52
Legion down to number six. So the
20:54
centurion number one, he would
20:56
have been a man of maybe 20 or
20:59
30 years experience, whereas the most junior centurion
21:01
might have only just been promoted to the
21:03
centurion. And they
21:05
would have been armed
21:07
very similarly to Roman
21:10
legionaries, i.e. they had
21:12
male shirts. They didn't wear the
21:14
plated armor, the Lorca segmentata. So
21:16
when that came in, you might
21:18
have been able to quite easily
21:20
distinguish a legionary from an auxiliary
21:22
infantryman. They had the Gladius
21:24
sword, the shield, as I mentioned earlier, were
21:27
oval and flat, possibly sometimes
21:29
hexagonal, but definitely not the curved shape
21:31
of the legionary. So that was another
21:33
way you could tell the difference. Helmets
21:35
varied would have been possibly cheaper than
21:38
the legionaries ones, but also look very
21:40
similar. And they would have had a
21:42
dagger as well. And they weren't armed
21:44
with a pilum like legionaries were, you
21:47
could have a double cohort.
21:49
So the two types, and again,
21:51
forgive my pronunciation, a normal cohort
21:54
was a quingunary Q-U-I-N-G-E-N-A-R-Y. And
21:56
a double cohort was called a miliary cohort.
21:58
And that was essentially 960 soldiers,
22:02
even though it sounds like a thousand, it was 960. And
22:05
then it gets more confusing when you go
22:08
into the cavalry. So the cavalry cohorts were
22:10
known as ale, so singular, a la as
22:12
in wing in Latin, because cavalry fight on
22:14
the wings, a splurrow ale.
22:17
And the subunit of 30 men
22:19
had become 32 men by this stage, we
22:21
don't know why. And in normal
22:24
sized a la was 480 men, which was 16
22:26
files of 32. So
22:31
it was just, sorry, it was 512 men, a piggy pardon, 16 times
22:33
32 is 512. So
22:37
it was slightly larger than 500. And
22:40
then, bizarrely, and I just remember I
22:42
got it wrong, the infantry double size cohort was
22:44
10 centuries, not 12, it was only 800 men.
22:48
So you'd logically think it was six double this, but
22:50
it wasn't, it was 10 centuries, and it was only
22:52
800 men. And the same
22:54
in the cavalry, it was not your
22:56
doubling of numbers. So a double sized,
22:59
a miliary cavalry a la was 768
23:01
soldiers on horseback. Your
23:05
mixed cohorts then, and they were
23:07
called cohorts equitata, and they were
23:10
perfect for use in areas like
23:12
Hadrian's Wall. For those of you
23:14
who don't know the geography around Hadrian's Wall, it's
23:16
very rolling countryside with a lot of
23:18
ups and downs. And moving
23:21
fast is not possible on
23:23
foot. So when you've got
23:25
potentially mobile raiders, tribesmen on
23:27
horses, being able to use
23:30
cavalry units of your own is very
23:32
important. So there were a lot of
23:34
auxiliary cavalry along Hadrian's Wall. And
23:36
a mixed infantry cavalry force is like a mini
23:38
army, you're able to do lots of things rather
23:40
than just one or the other. So
23:43
a mixed cohort could either be one
23:45
cohort in size or double cohort in
23:47
size. The figures on that
23:49
are far less clear. But the
23:52
assumption is, it's the same as it would have
23:54
been if it were one of the types, you
23:56
just double it up, but we don't actually know.
23:59
The command commanders of those cohorts, whether
24:01
they were cavalry or infantry, were called
24:03
prefects and they were Roman
24:06
noblemen who were, as I
24:08
mentioned earlier, probably only in their
24:10
early to mid-twenties and would have
24:12
been literally parachuted in. There
24:14
you go. You're going to do that for a number of
24:16
years. And I mean, a lot of them probably were from
24:19
military families, but if they weren't, it
24:21
would have been like hell on earth being
24:23
sent from somewhere very civilized, like Roman Gaul
24:25
or even Italy or Roman Spain, which is
24:27
very civilized by the second century AD, to
24:29
serve on Hadrian's Wall, commanding a
24:32
crowd of savage, you know, savage ghouls
24:34
or Thracians or something like that. Ryan
24:44
Reynolds here for Mint Mobile. With the price
24:46
of just about everything going up during inflation,
24:49
we thought we'd bring our prices down. So
24:51
to help us, we brought in a reverse auctioneer, which
24:54
is apparently a thing. Mint Mobile Unlimited Premium Wireless. You
24:56
better get 30, 30, better get 30, better get 20,
24:58
20, better get 20, 20, better get 15,
25:03
15, 15, 15, just 15 bucks a month. Sold! Give
25:05
it a try at mintmobile.com/switch. $45 up
25:08
front for 3 months plus taxes and fees. Promote
25:10
for new customers for a limited time. Unlimited more than 40GB
25:12
per month. Slows. mintmobile.com. for your
25:14
next trip? Elevate your travel style with
25:16
Quince. Quince has all the jet-setting essentials
25:19
you'll want for your next getaway, like
25:21
European linen, premium luggage options, buttery soft
25:23
Italian leather bags, and so much more.
25:25
And it's all priced at 50 to
25:28
80 percent less than similar brands. Plus,
25:30
Quince only works with factories that use
25:32
safe and ethical manufacturing practices. Pack your
25:35
bags with high-quality essentials you'll be wearing
25:37
for vacations to come with Quince. Go
25:39
to quince.com/trip for free shipping and 365
25:41
day returns. There's never
25:43
been a faster or easier way to start
25:45
your weight loss journey than with Plushcare. Plushcare
25:48
accepts most insurance plans and gives
25:51
you online access to board-certified physicians
25:53
who can prescribe FDA-approved weight loss
25:55
medications like Wigovi and ZepBound for
25:57
those who qualify. of
26:00
your health and speak with a board-certified physician
26:02
about a weight loss plan that's right for
26:04
you. Get started today at
26:06
plushcare.com. That's plushcare.com. When
26:27
talking about whether these auxiliaries were
26:29
Gauls or Thracians or Syrians and
26:32
so on, with the Roman
26:34
legionaries, was there almost a
26:37
threshold as to you had to,
26:39
in the Republic, be above a
26:42
certain amount of wealth before you could apply to
26:44
be an auxiliary? Do we know whether
26:46
they had to pass a certain threshold if you're
26:48
a non-Roman citizen to apply to join the Auxilia?
26:50
Were there any type of qualifications
26:54
that someone needed to be able to join a group of
26:56
the Auxilia? I'm aware of nothing like
26:58
that. There will have been, but we don't know.
27:00
It's one of those really annoying questions. We just
27:02
touched on it before we started the talk. For
27:06
example, one of the forts on Hadrian's Wall
27:08
had a unit of Tungrians serving
27:10
there. Tungria is modern-day
27:13
Tongeren in Belgium. How
27:17
did men make their way from Tongeren to
27:19
Hadrian's Wall? How
27:22
often did recruiting officers go there and
27:24
say, join the Romans? Come and fight
27:26
for us. 25 years. Why
27:28
did men do it? Well, in the 25-year service, they
27:31
got Roman citizenship. When they got
27:33
married after they'd left, all their children, or
27:35
if they had a common-law wife and then
27:37
married legally after they left, because Roman soldiers
27:39
weren't allowed to marry and neither were auxiliaries
27:42
until 212 AD, your children
27:44
instantly became citizens and so did your wife.
27:46
That was a huge thing, a very desired
27:48
thing. We don't have any knowledge of how
27:50
that went on, but it must have. It
27:53
didn't continue though, because just like I'm
27:55
going to say the Gordon Highlanders. I don't know
27:58
why that popped into my mind in the... British
28:00
Army, but when a British Army regiment
28:02
from, say, Scotland or Ireland or somewhere
28:05
else gets moved to a base in
28:07
Germany and is there for years, men
28:10
join it who aren't from wherever the
28:12
Gordon Highlanders started. So that
28:14
very naturally happened on Hadrian's Wall
28:17
because, as your listeners will know, settlements
28:20
would spring up outside every Roman force. It
28:22
was called a vicus, and basically locals would
28:24
come to buy and sell and trade and
28:27
open taverns, restaurants, making stuff that Roman soldiers needed
28:29
just because they were soldiers didn't mean they didn't
28:31
need all the things that people need from day
28:33
to day living. And inevitably
28:35
relationships would start and men would have common
28:38
old wives and families and so on. And
28:41
what was quite common in Roman times was
28:43
that when a man finished his service, was
28:45
he just stayed where he was? Because if
28:47
he had a local wife and kids, why
28:50
would he go back to Tungria? He might well
28:52
just stay there, especially if he wanted to open
28:54
a business and talk to his other veteran friends.
28:56
So what happened then, there
28:58
was a big tradition in the Roman
29:01
Empire, just like there is among military
29:03
families in any country today, of sons
29:05
joining the same regiment that their father had been
29:08
in. So when you had
29:10
a half British, half Tungrian man
29:13
joining the unit, and then
29:15
you had the son of that guy, you had
29:17
a quarter, and so on it went. So within
29:19
say 60, 80, 100 years, you
29:21
had men in units that
29:23
were called Tungrian or Thracian or whatever,
29:25
but they weren't anymore. They would have
29:27
been Romano-British, but the name of
29:30
the unit continued. What we don't
29:32
know is whether you still had fresh blood
29:34
coming in from those areas. Maybe you did,
29:36
but it's one of those again, we just
29:39
don't know. If we focus in on certain
29:41
classes of fighters, of auxiliaries that we
29:43
have, you already mentioned like the spear,
29:45
rams, melee, infantry men, chain mail and
29:48
the spear and the oval shield. You
29:51
did highlight earlier the slingers. I mean, let's
29:53
talk about some of these missile infantry because
29:55
it almost feels like the missile
29:57
infantry became almost completely.
30:00
completely non-Roman, auxiliary troops
30:02
for a large part of the
30:04
imperial period? Yeah, that's true.
30:06
I get asked that in talks a lot. Why
30:08
did the Romans not have archers? The
30:11
simple answer is they did, but just
30:13
not very often. It's difficult
30:15
to answer why, because again, we don't
30:17
know. But there are examples, like you've
30:19
mentioned, of Cretan archers fighting for Caesar,
30:21
I think it is, and Arian
30:24
writing in the second
30:26
century AD referring to wars in the
30:28
Middle East, I think, talks about the
30:30
Romans having archers that I refer to
30:32
shooting over the heads of the advancing
30:35
legionaries, a bit like Agincourt, to
30:37
hit whatever they hit. If the enemy are
30:39
packed densely enough, it doesn't matter. And
30:41
there are images of slingers on Trajan's
30:44
Column, which is about the invasion of
30:46
Dacia in the early second century. But
30:49
there's very little mention of it in the
30:51
text, just images of them. And interestingly, those
30:53
slingers have their stones in a fold
30:55
of their tunic, which is striking is
30:58
very impractical, because early aric slingers had
31:00
a pouch. So slingers
31:02
were not used very much,
31:04
though, because they're not very effective when you're
31:06
wearing a lot of armor. I
31:09
know it's not slingers, but there's an example of when you
31:11
haven't got armor at the Battle of Telemons in 225 BC.
31:15
There were a Berserker Gaul, if you like,
31:17
who ran naked against the Roman infantry and
31:19
who were only armed with light spears. But
31:21
apparently they butchered those Gauls because they didn't
31:23
have any armor. So
31:26
if you had a decent helmet on,
31:28
sling bullets generally only weigh between 30
31:30
and 90 grams, that's between one and
31:32
three ounces. If you're not wearing
31:34
a helmet, it'll kill you quite easily. And the
31:36
ones that we've got here on the table, I
31:38
mean, they're much smaller. But if they
31:40
hit you in the eye, or if you're
31:43
not wearing a helmet, you could still get
31:45
concussion. But if I'd been a Roman Legionary,
31:47
I would have looked down on them because you pretty much
31:49
can't hurt me with your sling bullets. I mean, they did
31:51
use them, didn't they? They used them in the Civil War.
31:53
You've got those famous sling bullets from Italy,
31:55
and there are references to ladies' private
31:57
parts and ouch and things like that.
32:00
literally inscribed on them, found outside town
32:02
walls of Italy, but they
32:04
weren't a large part of the Romans. I think
32:06
they more used archers. But again, they
32:08
didn't use them a lot. And I only know
32:11
that battle I've referred to with Arian and the
32:13
unit on Hadrian's wall, but generally the
32:15
battering ram of the legionaries was
32:18
so effective. And remember their javelins,
32:20
their pela, they carried either one
32:22
or two, depending on which historian
32:25
you believe. And
32:27
they released them at 50 paces.
32:31
And we don't know, but you know, reenactors and
32:33
historians like to try and work these things out.
32:35
But a reasonable way that
32:37
they might have attacked is for the
32:39
first, say five or six ranks to
32:41
throw their javelins, and they
32:43
start running. And then the
32:45
men behind them throw as well. And you
32:47
potentially got javelins from
32:49
10 ranks of men landing as
32:52
you've got a charging tide of
32:54
legionaries coming in. And
32:56
I saw a really funny video by a
32:58
reenactor where he got his neighborhood street, he
33:00
just talked to all the local kids, American
33:02
guy. And you know, the one of the
33:04
things when you're in a swimming pool that
33:06
you can walk a water after
33:08
the little foam strip, you can put your arms
33:10
over and float on in the swimming pool if
33:12
you don't want to swim for learning to swim.
33:15
But you know, if you're at a barbecue party,
33:17
and you're just there enjoying yourself, you have one
33:19
of them, he got like 50 of
33:21
them. And he got all these little kids, he
33:23
put on his Roman armor, and he stood
33:26
there. And obviously, they've never thrown spears or
33:28
woggles. But he got them to throw them
33:30
at him practice in rows.
33:33
And he said, it was absolutely terrifying
33:35
when you had 10 or 15 of them
33:38
coming in at any one time, he didn't
33:40
know what to do. So he
33:42
was just theorizing, you know, imagine that
33:44
was Pila javelins coming in with a
33:46
line of legionaries who are all armed
33:48
and armored better than you are, because
33:51
generally the Romans were, you
33:53
know, battles were potentially won just from
33:55
the javelins. Because when you look
33:57
at the perception of the auxiliary sometimes is
33:59
provided. you know, specialist troops, singers
34:01
or archers and so on and so forth. But
34:04
actually, as you've highlighted there, with the legionaries
34:06
being so central and
34:08
so powerful to overwhelm many
34:10
different enemies, do we actually
34:13
hear of auxiliary soldiers being
34:15
critical to certain Roman victories?
34:17
Yeah. Oh, yeah. People
34:19
might think of auxiliaries as those missile
34:21
troops or whatever, but the majority of
34:24
auxiliaries are either infantry or cavalry. It's
34:27
worth talking about the auxiliary cavalry in
34:29
a minute. But the auxiliary infantry, looking
34:31
fairly identical to the legionaries, apart
34:33
from their oval shields, there's a brilliant example.
34:36
So the Battle of Mons Gropius, which took
34:38
place in northern Scotland. If
34:40
you ever have a Scottish person tell you that
34:42
the Romans didn't conquer Scotland, just say one word
34:44
to them, Agricola. Agricola was the
34:47
Roman general who led an army up
34:49
into Scotland with a fleet following him
34:51
up the east coast of England and
34:53
up past Edinburgh. And he took three
34:55
years to literally lay waste to Scotland.
34:58
And he beat everybody he fought. And
35:00
at the Battle of Mons Gropius, which
35:03
is potentially as far north as Inverness,
35:05
which is very far north, indeed, this
35:07
campaign has been confirmed with aerial footage
35:10
of marching camps all the way up
35:12
there. And that was a
35:14
battle where 30,000 Caledonian tribesmen,
35:16
which is a lot of warriors,
35:19
came to face Agricola. And
35:21
I'm not sure of his numbers. He
35:23
may have had fewer than that, but
35:25
he certainly he wasn't very outnumbered. But
35:28
it's remarkable that at number one, he
35:30
deployed only the auxiliaries at the beginning
35:33
of the battle. And number two, they
35:35
won the battle on their own. So they
35:37
were just sent in as infantry and are
35:40
recorded as having killed most of the 30,000
35:42
Caledonian with the loss of only a
35:44
few hundred men. Now, if you take away
35:46
the likely highly exaggerated, I was fishing and
35:48
I caught a fish this big and you
35:51
all know the gesture I'm making. Roman
35:53
histories are very biased. Even if you I
35:55
like to divide the figures by between two
35:57
and four, even if you divide it by four.
36:00
It's still 7,500 Caledonian tribesmen with the loss of
36:02
300 Roman, well, auxiliaries. No
36:06
legionaries were harmed in the filming of this battle. So
36:09
there's a really good example. And what's worth mentioning
36:11
about that battle as well is that
36:13
it's one of the only examples that
36:16
we have of a specific maneuver, training
36:18
maneuver that Roman soldiers will have been
36:20
taught because it won't just have been
36:22
the auxiliaries. Sadly, for
36:24
those of you that are interested in
36:26
me writing all my novels about the
36:28
Roman army, there is no Roman training
36:31
manual for the army that survived. I'm
36:33
making a joke here, but it would be
36:35
brilliant. But people who were writing history 2000
36:38
years ago didn't think of writing anything like this
36:41
because they expected you to know it. If you
36:43
were writing a novel set today,
36:45
you wouldn't describe what electricity is or
36:47
a car or a mobile phone is
36:49
because everyone really knows. It was the
36:51
same 2000 years ago. So
36:54
the point is about this battle, that the maneuver
36:56
that I use this in every talk I ever
36:58
give, a Roman shield has a great big
37:00
metal boss in the center of it. And the
37:02
hand grips behind that. I'm sure you're all familiar
37:05
with what it looks like. You could polish it
37:07
highly and potentially use it as a mirror
37:09
because most ordinary men wouldn't have had them, but
37:11
it was used as a weapon. So this maneuver
37:14
was to punch at the face of
37:16
your enemy with the boss. And
37:18
if you hit him in the face, you're
37:20
going to break his nose or his jaw
37:22
because of the impact and he'll reel back
37:25
bleeding and then you stick him with your
37:27
sword. If he dodged
37:29
the move by throwing his head
37:31
back, which is your instinct when someone's throwing a
37:33
punch or waving a great big shield boss in
37:36
your face, they stab them in the throat. So
37:39
it was this one, two, one, two. So
37:41
the shield was a weapon as well. It
37:43
wasn't just a very protective piece of equipment.
37:46
So that's a really good example of the
37:48
auxiliaries being used in a frontline role and
37:51
winning a battle without the loss of any citizens.
37:53
Because as I mentioned at the beginning, they would
37:55
have been valued far less than Roman soldiers. Were
37:58
they paid less? We think... So we don't
38:00
again know but it's thought that they
38:03
were paid between Half and
38:05
three-quarters of what a Roman soldier was paid
38:07
but bearing in mind that Roman soldier was
38:09
very well paid That was potentially still very
38:11
good money if you're a tribesman from Thrace
38:13
or somewhere like that What did
38:15
an auxiliary expect after they signed up? You know
38:18
obviously with a legionary some 25 years of service
38:20
and then land and property at the end I
38:22
mean, no, they didn't get land or
38:24
property. That was the benefit of the legionary. They
38:27
just got citizenship, right? So that's where it differs.
38:29
So yes, could they expect instead? It's funny I
38:31
was trying to think about it today the benefits
38:33
of having a British or my case an Irish
38:35
passport I mean, it means I can travel anywhere
38:38
in the world, you know without making having to
38:40
get visas and so on But that doesn't quite
38:42
get across becoming a Roman citizen was a huge
38:44
step up in your social status Because
38:47
it meant you could vote and you could advance
38:49
your social career and climb the social ladder And
38:52
not every auxiliary wanted that I mean presumably a
38:54
lot of them just went back to where
38:56
they came from and what people Made of them
38:58
being a Roman citizen. We don't know but
39:00
they went so what? but Becoming
39:03
a Roman citizen was clearly a big draw
39:05
Because of the number of auxiliary units that
39:07
there were and the fact that it was
39:09
something that's recorded on tombstones and so on
39:12
But after 25 years, which it
39:14
has to be mentioned is longer
39:16
than Romans had to serve Although
39:18
there are periods on Romans had to serve 25 years
39:21
there are plenty of periods of Roman history when it was only 16
39:24
years or 20 and As
39:26
I said in a school that I was giving
39:28
a talk to yesterday that could change at the
39:30
Emperor's Whim so we know of times in the
39:32
first century the under Augustus when there was a
39:34
shortage of manpower and There
39:38
was a decree that all you guys that
39:40
think you're retiring next year You're not you're staying
39:42
in for another five years because we need the
39:44
soldiers and there was a mutiny actually It's one
39:46
of the only mutinies against bad treatment on the
39:48
Rhine but when they were
39:50
discharged from the Legion, they were
39:52
given a diploma and Some
39:55
of these have survived these would have been enormous
39:57
big plaques on walls in Rome, but then they
39:59
were given individual ones as soldiers and
40:02
several hundred of them have survived both
40:04
for legionaries and auxiliaries and for me
40:06
one of the my most favorite things
40:08
to see because they're little pieces of
40:10
bronze rectangular in shape about five
40:12
inches by three and there are two of
40:14
them and they have holes in them so
40:16
they can be tied together with wire so
40:19
they can close like a little book and this
40:22
is important to mention that an individual
40:24
Roman legionary would get an individual diploma
40:27
but auxiliary units only got
40:29
units diplomas so it the whole unit
40:31
of Thracians get citizenship and they'll all
40:33
have just been given the same thing
40:35
not a different guy's name on each
40:37
one but they were a very important
40:40
legal document that they would have been
40:42
very proud possessions of and it had
40:44
the name the unit where they served
40:46
and so on and so on but
40:48
to be seven witnesses whose names are
40:50
inscribed on it as well and there
40:52
are examples of those for auxiliaries they're
40:55
just wonderful pieces of information that open
40:57
up history they pull aside the curtain if
40:59
you like in a much bigger way than a
41:02
piece of a Roman belt or a sword or
41:04
something like that because they're very personal even
41:07
though their unit rather than particular
41:09
individual soldiers. Alright well let's
41:11
have a look at some of these particular
41:13
soldiers whether they're from Thracian or their Tungrians
41:15
and I'd like to ask before
41:18
we completely wrap up because you did mention them
41:20
earlier and I don't think we've really covered this
41:22
class in depth at least following the
41:25
Augustine or Claudian introductions to the
41:27
auxiliaries. Talk to me about
41:30
auxiliary cavalry and the role
41:32
that they would have played
41:35
for the Roman Legion in the Imperial period. So
41:37
to be fair the cavalry were
41:40
a force that the Roman army
41:42
never relied on massively
41:44
the way other civilizations did or
41:46
other peoples did so when
41:48
they went to Parthia they were completely undone because
41:50
the Parthians were all on horses for
41:53
example and again we don't know
41:55
but cavalry were integral to an
41:58
army because they're fast-moving so They
42:00
acted as scouts. They were
42:02
able to do reconnaissance and warn
42:04
of ambushes potentially, also find sources
42:06
of food quicker than men
42:08
on foot could. They would be used to
42:10
go up and down the army column as
42:13
well. You need to remember that an army
42:15
column in Roman times is sometimes up to
42:17
10 or even more miles in length. So
42:20
the front of the army, people in the middle and
42:22
the back have absolutely no idea what's going on, unless
42:24
there's a horse coming to tell them, or a man
42:26
on a horse. They
42:28
were a very important part of the
42:30
army, but when battles happened, they
42:33
were deployed, but
42:35
it wasn't uncommon for the Romans
42:37
to face enemies whose cavalry was
42:39
actually superior to theirs, Parthians
42:42
being an example and the best
42:45
example, maybe Numidians as well. So
42:47
in battles, they weren't as important,
42:49
but it is worth mentioning here
42:51
that something that the Roman
42:53
cavalry used to use, a couple
42:55
of things, and wear did potentially
42:58
mean they were good hammer blows
43:00
to people that weren't expecting it.
43:03
So Hadrian, when he was touring
43:05
his empire, saw a famous cavalry display
43:07
at Lambisis in North Africa and he
43:09
wrote it down. He wrote down what
43:11
he saw. We know
43:13
that the cavalrymen were doing all these
43:16
various drills and throwing spears and feats
43:18
of horsemanship and so on, and they
43:20
were wearing their parade dress. Quite
43:23
a few of you will be familiar
43:25
with the Roman cavalry helmet that has
43:27
a face piece that can be lifted
43:29
up and put down
43:31
to cover the face entirely. And
43:34
these would have been used in parades. What's
43:37
interesting is that quite a few of
43:39
them have been found. One of the
43:41
densest number of finds of these helmets
43:43
is at a place called Nijmegen in
43:46
Holland, Netherlands where there must
43:48
have been a cavalry unit because they
43:50
found maybe 10 or 15 of
43:52
these helmets. The helmets were commonly tinned
43:55
so that it looked like there was hair forming
43:57
the back and sides and top of the helmet.
44:00
A lot of them actually had braided horse hair
44:02
on the helmet as well, so it looked like
44:04
a real person's head. And
44:06
the face piece was commonly covered
44:08
in a very fine layer of
44:11
silver, real silver foil. And
44:14
if you Google that image, if you're not familiar with it,
44:16
it's terrifying. I've known
44:18
this for years because Roman reenactors wear these
44:20
when they're fighting, and they have no problem.
44:23
Think of knights in the Middle Ages. They
44:25
were fighting with these tiny little visor helmets.
44:28
They've actually found some of these helmets now
44:30
with dents in them and
44:32
scratches and things like that.
44:34
So injuries from actual something
44:36
hitting them, probably in combat.
44:38
So personally, and any Roman reenactor
44:40
I know who's a cavalryman, and they ride
44:43
without stirrups and glad about it, can throw
44:45
spears and hit bales of straw, reckon
44:48
that they probably use them in battle as
44:50
well. And it's worth mentioning here the Draco,
44:52
which is a standard used
44:54
by Roman cavalry of the period. That gives
44:56
rise to the word dragon. And
44:59
it was a pole on the
45:01
top of which was carved a
45:03
metal ravening mouth of a mythical
45:05
beast. And there was a strip
45:07
of colored fabric that came off the open back
45:09
of that. And when you ride
45:11
into battle, because they've reconstructed them, when you
45:13
ride a horse fast holding one of them,
45:16
it makes a horrible noise. So
45:18
a bit like the Carnixes, which were
45:21
the vertical battle trumpets that the Gauls
45:23
used in Britain and in Lake Trasimene,
45:25
which is one of Hannibal's great victories,
45:28
look up Voice of the Carnix by John
45:30
Kenny on YouTube. And so they've reconstructed them.
45:33
The noise they make is terrifying. So a
45:35
bit like those, it's highly likely
45:37
that the cavalry will have been used in
45:39
battles and that that could have been a
45:41
real psychological weapon. If you're a misty morning
45:43
and 120 guys come riding out of the
45:45
fog making a noise like that and they
45:47
all look like aliens, you know, people
45:50
might run away. So their
45:52
main weapons in this period were a
45:54
one handed thrusting spear and a bundle
45:56
of light throwing spears, but they also
45:59
probably... almost definitely had a
46:01
spaffa as well, which is a long
46:03
slashing sword. It's anywhere in length from
46:06
26 inches to 36 inches blade only,
46:08
so very long indeed, and you know
46:10
much better reaching down from a horse
46:12
to chop someone's arm off or something.
46:14
So they were without doubt used
46:16
in battles, but not
46:19
in the sort of way that Battle
46:21
of Canay 6000 cavalry
46:24
divided on 3000 on each wing
46:26
against Hannibal's cavalry, where they were a big part
46:28
of the battle. There just weren't enough of them
46:30
to do that, which is why my
46:32
feeling is that they were more scouts
46:35
and shock attack, rather than an important
46:37
part of a big full
46:39
on thousands of men against thousands of men
46:42
battle. Well Ben, this has been great, a
46:44
very comprehensive detailed chat.
46:46
Last but certainly not least, you have
46:48
written many, many books all about the
46:50
Roman army, which includes talks about the
46:53
auxiliary units. They are all about these
46:55
books, aren't they? Yeah, so I
46:57
kind of forget now, I've had 17 or 18 books,
47:00
14 set in ancient Rome. So
47:02
a trilogy about Crassus' disastrous
47:04
invasion of Parthia in 53
47:06
BC, 20,000
47:09
legionaries killed in one day by
47:11
arrows, and I've written two books
47:13
about Spartacus, the most famous slave
47:15
that ever existed. I have had a
47:18
trilogy about Hannibal, about the war
47:20
between Roman Carthage in the second
47:22
one, and I haven't finished that yet,
47:24
finishing that in a couple of years. I've
47:26
written a trilogy about the Varian
47:28
disaster and Germanicus' campaigns into Germania
47:30
in 1415 and 16 AD.
47:33
They were amazing to write, and I've
47:35
also written a duology of books about
47:38
the Roman invasion of Macedon and
47:40
Greece, literally 18 months
47:43
after the Battle of Zama. Imagine
47:45
America or Britain deciding to go into
47:47
a major world war, 18 months
47:49
after World War II, I don't think it
47:52
would have gone down too well with the population, but that's what
47:54
Rome did in 200 BC and
47:56
they conquered Macedon. I've also had
47:58
a book of short stories, one of which is... about
48:00
that lovely emperor called Caligula. Alright
48:03
Ben, we get the message, you written a lot
48:05
on this topic. Alright, okay, fair enough. It
48:08
just goes for me to say thank you so much for taking the
48:10
time to come back on the forecast today. Oh, thank you and I
48:12
hope your listeners enjoy this. Well,
48:16
there you go. There was Dr. Ben Kane
48:18
talking all the things the Roman auxiliary soldier
48:20
and why these people were so critical to
48:22
the success of the Roman army. It wasn't
48:25
just the legionary soldiers. I hope you enjoyed
48:27
today's episode. It's always a pleasure having Dr.
48:29
Ben Kane on the show. He is a
48:31
fan favourite. And don't you worry, we will
48:33
be doing more on the Roman army in
48:36
the months ahead, particularly a
48:38
horrific massive defeat that they suffered
48:40
in the forests of Germania in
48:42
the Teutoburg Forest in 9 AD.
48:46
Varus, give me back my legion. That's
48:48
all to come on the ancients in the months
48:50
ahead. Last thing for me, wherever
48:52
you listen to the ancients, whether that be on
48:54
Spotify or on Apple Podcasts, make sure that you
48:57
are following the podcast, that you are subscribed, so
48:59
that you don't miss out when we release new
49:02
episodes twice every week. But that's
49:04
enough from me and I will see you in the
49:06
next episode. I'm
49:26
Ina Garten. Welcome to Be My Guest, the
49:28
podcast. One of the best gifts
49:30
you can give friends is spending time together. But
49:33
what's even better than that? Cooking with them. On
49:35
Be My Guest, the podcast. New friends
49:38
and old stop on my barn
49:40
for some conversation and great cooking.
49:42
We talk about food, life
49:45
and everything in between. Listen to
49:47
Be My Guest, the podcast with me,
49:49
Ina Garten, and join us wherever you
49:51
get your podcasts. Thank
49:58
you. creators launch,
50:01
grow and monitor the
50:03
broadcast everywhere. acast.com
50:08
Thank you for listening to this episode of The
50:11
Ancients. Please follow this show wherever you get your
50:13
podcasts. It really helps us and you'll be doing
50:15
us a big favour. Don't forget
50:17
you can also listen to all
50:19
of these podcasts ad free and
50:21
watch hundreds of documentaries when you
50:24
subscribe at historyhit.com/subscribe. As
50:26
a special gift, you can also get your first three months
50:28
for just £1 a month when you use
50:31
code ANCHANCE at checkout.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More