Podchaser Logo
Home
Ep. 1986 - Inside The Biden Plan To STEAL Democracy

Ep. 1986 - Inside The Biden Plan To STEAL Democracy

Released Tuesday, 18th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Ep. 1986 - Inside The Biden Plan To STEAL Democracy

Ep. 1986 - Inside The Biden Plan To STEAL Democracy

Ep. 1986 - Inside The Biden Plan To STEAL Democracy

Ep. 1986 - Inside The Biden Plan To STEAL Democracy

Tuesday, 18th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Start your summer road trip at Midas and get up

0:02

to $30 off your next repair service. Plus, get a

0:04

free closer look vehicle check to make sure you're road

0:06

trip ready. If you need brake service and alignment check

0:09

or tune up, hit up Midas for up to $30

0:11

off. For more details,

0:13

request your appointment at midas.com. The

0:16

polls show that Joe Biden is losing the 2024

0:18

election. It's an unfortunate

0:20

truth for the incumbent president. A

0:23

series of swing state polls now

0:25

out from Redfield-Wilton and the Telegraph

0:27

show that Donald Trump is now

0:30

in the lead in Pennsylvania by

0:32

two, Georgia by five, Michigan by

0:34

one, Arizona by two, North Carolina

0:36

by three, Florida by six. Meanwhile,

0:39

a new poll from the Des Moines Register

0:41

and Seltzer, who is the best pollster in

0:43

the country, she, of course, has to get

0:46

it right because the Iowa caucuses are a

0:48

very important jumping point for every presidential race.

0:51

She's an A plus pollster. I mean, she

0:53

pretty much knows everyone personally in Iowa. She

0:55

currently has Donald Trump up 18 points

0:58

on Joe Biden, 50 to 32. Biden's

1:01

not approval. Is it negative 39 in Iowa? Why

1:05

does that matter? I mean, Trump won Iowa walking

1:07

away last time. He won it by eight, not

1:10

by 18, by eight. So

1:13

there are huge numbers that Trump is racking up

1:15

in places like Iowa. Not just that. A new

1:17

Washington Post study of the so-called

1:19

the deciders. These would be people

1:21

who turn out who turn out to vote sporadically

1:23

or who have switched their vote between Republican and

1:26

Democrat. When it comes to the swing state, about

1:29

61 percent of people

1:31

declare themselves deciders. Those

1:34

would be people who voted

1:36

only one of the last couple presidential elections or

1:38

are between the ages of 18 and 25 or

1:41

registered to vote since 2022 or who did not definitely

1:43

plan to vote for either Biden or Trump this year

1:45

or switch their support between 2016 and 2020. Well,

1:50

among the non-deciders in the swing states, Donald

1:52

Trump is in a very slight lead

1:54

over Joe Biden. 17 percent

1:56

say that they will definitely vote for

1:58

Trump. 15 percent. will definitely vote for

2:00

Biden. That's out of a total of 39% among the

2:02

non-deciders. Among

2:05

the deciders, these are people who are sporadic

2:08

voters or uncommitted voters. If you

2:10

look at the uncommitted voters, probably Trump beats

2:12

probably Biden by a couple of percentage points.

2:15

These are all very close states. And what that means

2:17

that if Donald Trump is leading among

2:19

both the deciders and also the

2:21

non-deciders, then he's just leading overall.

2:25

And right now, if you look at this Washington

2:27

post-polling data, what you see is among all key

2:29

state voters, 31%

2:32

say they would definitely vote for Donald Trump, compared to

2:34

26% who say they would definitely vote for Joe Biden.

2:36

Another 17% say they would probably vote

2:39

for Donald Trump, compared to 15% for Joe Biden. Most

2:43

importantly, in terms of who

2:45

people would definitely not vote for or probably not

2:48

vote for, 55% of voters

2:50

in the key states say they will either

2:52

definitely not or probably not vote for Joe

2:55

Biden, compared to only 49% for Donald Trump.

2:59

This means that right now Donald Trump is pretty

3:01

obviously winning, which again is one of

3:03

the reasons why the Economist, which does a forecast

3:05

on who they believe is going to win, currently

3:07

has Donald Trump's chances of winning the election at

3:09

72%, which is extraordinary. Now,

3:13

again, you'll recall that back in 2016, it

3:16

was thought that Hillary Clinton had 99% chance of

3:18

winning the election and of course, she then lost.

3:20

But the bottom line is if you

3:22

had to put your money on the election today, you would

3:24

be betting on Donald Trump. CNN's

3:26

Harry Enten was stunned yesterday looking at the

3:29

polling data and seeing what percentage of black

3:31

voters, for example, are now examining the possibility

3:33

of voting for President Trump. Here is Harry

3:35

Enten yesterday. Look at black

3:37

voters age 50 and older and

3:39

you'll see look Joe Biden was leading amongst this group

3:41

at this point by 83 points back in 2020.

3:44

Now, it's 74 points. So

3:46

yeah, a slight decline in that margin, but

3:48

nothing out of this world. Look at black

3:50

voters under the age of 50. Holy

3:53

cow folks. Holy cow. Look at this. Joe Biden

3:55

was up by 80 points among this

3:57

group back at this point in 2020. where

4:00

that margin has careened down towards. It's

4:02

now just, get this, 37 points. That

4:06

lead has dropped by more than

4:08

half Mr. Berman. Home, I just

4:11

never seen anything like this. I'm like

4:13

speechless because you always look at history

4:15

and you go, okay, this is a

4:17

historic moment. If this polling is anywhere

4:19

near correct, we are looking at a

4:21

historic moment right now where black voters

4:23

under the age of 50, which have

4:25

historically been such a big part of

4:27

the democratic coalition are leaving it in

4:29

droves. Okay, what that

4:31

means is that the gap for Donald

4:33

Trump is down from 90-10 to about

4:35

70-30. That's

4:38

what that actually shows among young black voters. And Joe Biden is

4:40

in real trouble. We'll get to more on this in just a

4:42

second. First, the cost of living is up almost 20% from 2021.

4:47

Thanks, Joe. And families everywhere are feeling that

4:49

burden. But legacy media keeps telling us the

4:51

economy is fine. Everything's great. In fact, a

4:53

recent Business Insider article makes the case. The

4:55

American people are to blame for this dumpster

4:57

fire economy because it's people's perception of inflation.

5:00

That's a problem, you see. This is Gaslighting

5:02

101. Well, let me help you find

5:04

some ways to save money in this economic climate. One

5:06

way is by switching over to PureTalk. If one

5:08

of many American families looking to cut down on

5:10

your monthly bills, you need to start with your

5:13

cell phone service. I recommend PureTalk because it's both

5:15

affordable and reliable. PureTalk is rapidly becoming the wireless

5:17

company of choice for conservatives. Plus, it's great for

5:19

families because the more lines you add, the more

5:22

you save. Not to mention, PureTalk is veteran-led. Instead

5:24

of funding DEI initiatives, they fund basic services for

5:26

vets who have served this country. And 100% of

5:28

their customer service team is located right here in

5:31

the United States. If you're looking for ways to

5:33

save money for your family, I highly recommend switching

5:35

on over to PureTalk. Visit puretalk.com/Appero to explore their

5:37

offers. When you make the switch, you get an additional 50% off

5:40

your very first month of service.

5:42

Visit puretalk.com/Appero to upgrade your cell

5:45

phone service to America's most dependable

5:47

5G network and save an extra

5:49

50% off your first month of

5:51

coverage. That's puretalk.com/Appero today. Again, puretalk.com/Appero.

5:54

And again, that is due to, as I've said, over and over

5:56

the fact that he's a very bad president, and also due to

5:58

the fact that, particularly for young voters, They look at Joe Biden

6:00

and he does not seem like he is with it. And

6:03

the Biden campaign is trying to walk their way past it.

6:06

Basically, they're now telling you that your

6:08

eyes are lying to you. Here's

6:11

the problem. Your eyes are not lying to you. Just

6:13

in the last 24 hours, we have

6:15

tape of babbling Joe

6:18

at a fundraiser from Los Angeles with Barack Obama.

6:20

This is the same fundraiser we had to be

6:22

led off the stage by the hand by Barack

6:25

Obama. And we have Joe Biden just

6:27

randomly babbling into the microphone. You want to

6:29

know why the Department of Justice will not turn

6:31

over the tape of Joe Biden talking to

6:33

special prosecutor Robert Herr. Because hours

6:35

and hours of Joe Biden mumbling into a microphone

6:37

like a demented old man is not going to

6:39

look good for him in a presidential race. That

6:42

is the only reason they won't release the tape.

6:44

We already have the transcript. It

6:46

probably sounds a lot like this. Here is

6:48

Joe Biden babbling when asked about jobs at

6:50

this fundraiser. Guess what?

6:52

It's growing. The economy is growing. People

6:54

are doing better. We have the highest

6:57

unemployment rate, the highest and lowest unemployment

6:59

rate in 50 years. We

7:01

have more people. We've had over

7:03

15 million people randomly hiring work

7:05

for us. You know,

7:08

my my son says, you

7:10

know, we all have various

7:13

short term descriptions for

7:16

your jobs. What would

7:18

you accomplish? You should say

7:20

Joe Jobs. Oh,

7:22

yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And then there

7:24

was yesterday when Joe Biden was at

7:27

some sort of event at the White House

7:30

and the press started yelling questions to him.

7:32

And so he decided to just yell random

7:34

things back at them. And I don't know

7:36

what's going on here. And

7:44

then he starts grinning like the

7:46

Joker. What in the world was that?

7:49

What was that? Imagine

7:53

that coming at 3 a.m. We've

7:55

been told by the media, of course, that

7:57

there's nothing wrong with Joe Biden. In

8:00

fact, yesterday, the Biden campaign co-chair decided

8:02

to go on national television and suggest

8:04

that no one should be questioning Joe

8:06

Biden's mental acuity. I

8:08

think Donald Trump is a joke. I

8:10

mean, when this guy, when his lips

8:12

are moving, he's lying. And then when

8:14

he tries to confuse, when he tries

8:16

to accuse somebody else of speaking improperly,

8:18

he can't keep two thoughts in his

8:20

mind. I would encourage Americans to go

8:22

listen to Donald Trump's full speeches and

8:24

try to put that word, spaghetti, together.

8:26

And I wonder why anybody is questioning

8:28

Joe Biden's mental acuity. Donald Trump can't string

8:31

two sentences together. I mean, it's the biggest joke in

8:33

the world. You're

8:35

wondering why people are questioning Joe

8:37

Biden's mental acuity. Really,

8:39

are we questioning this? Here

8:41

is a short montage of Joe Biden simply

8:44

getting lost, okay, and having to be

8:46

guided by people. We could have done probably

8:48

an hour of this, but this is the short version. Here

8:53

he is being guided. He has

8:56

to actually be told where to go. This

8:58

is where he lives. It's the White House.

9:00

Here is Barack Obama guiding him by the

9:02

hand like a visiting angel and then guiding

9:04

him by the back as he totters off

9:06

the stage. Here is a secret

9:08

service agent directing Joe Biden to make a right

9:11

turn. But Joe Biden apparently does not understand how

9:13

hand signals work. And so he just sort of

9:15

glides on past into the grass following the secret

9:17

service agent who has no idea Joe Biden

9:19

is following him. Here is another event having

9:21

to be directed toward a specific spot on

9:23

the floor so he can stand next to

9:25

a TV. Here he is

9:27

trying to follow a small child, but then

9:29

having to be told that's not exactly where he

9:31

is actually going. He doesn't know where he's going.

9:33

Try to go here. Sure. I

9:35

suppose although there. Here he was talking to a parish. He

9:38

just doesn't even know he's talking to him. And

9:40

George Maloney, Prime Minister of Italy, having to redirect

9:42

him back into a picture where he looks confusedly.

9:44

Here's the Easter Bunny directing Joe Biden. You remember

9:46

this one. Joe Biden is talking to the press.

9:48

Easter Bunny doesn't want Joe Biden talking to the

9:50

press. Here's Kamala Harris trying

9:52

to redirect the old man so

9:55

that she can't get him to move away. Here

9:57

is Joe Biden simply walking through a group of people.

10:00

I don't know exactly where he's supposed to go. The

10:02

Secret Service points him in the other direction. This

10:05

is the problem. There's tons of

10:07

tape. Your eyes and your ears are not

10:09

deceiving you. The President of the United States

10:11

is in a state of serious decline and

10:14

everybody knows it. But the

10:16

administration doesn't have a solution for this. The campaign doesn't

10:18

have a solution for this because the problem is it's

10:20

true. And so they've decided to try

10:22

it out. Their newest narrative, their newest narrative is

10:24

something they are calling cheap fakes. Get

10:27

it, get it? Because it rhymes with

10:29

deep fakes. These branding geniuses over here,

10:31

the same people behind Bidenomics, which has

10:33

been jabooned for the Biden campaign. So

10:35

now calling them cheap fakes. So Karina

10:37

Jean-Pierre, world's most untalented press secretary. Yesterday,

10:41

she got very, very angry because

10:43

it turns out that people have been

10:45

distributing clips of Joe Biden looking mentally incompetent.

10:47

She says that they're not true. They're all

10:49

taken out of context. Now here's the thing.

10:51

We've played the full tapes and we've explained

10:53

exactly what he is doing. So for example,

10:56

the claim by Democrats was that the tape

10:58

of Joe Biden talking to the parachutist was

11:01

somehow edited to make him look worse. Except

11:03

for the fact that we showed you the

11:05

tape, including the parachutist, who doesn't seem to

11:08

understand that Joe Biden, the president of the

11:10

United States is talking to him. We showed

11:12

you the full tape of Joe Biden waving

11:14

to the crowd before he randomly freezes on

11:16

stage and has to be led by the

11:18

hand, like a small five-year-old child by the

11:20

former president of the United States, Barack Obama.

11:22

We've shown you everything, but apparently it's now

11:24

cheap fakes and deep fakes, according to Corinne

11:26

Jean-Pierre. There seems to

11:28

be a sort of rash of videos

11:31

that have been edited to make the

11:33

president appear especially frail or mentally confused.

11:36

I'm wondering if the White House is especially

11:38

worried about the fact that this appears to

11:40

be a pattern that we're seeing more of.

11:42

Yeah, and I think you all have called

11:44

this the cheap fakes video, and that's exactly

11:47

what they are. They are cheap fakes video.

11:49

They are done in bad faith. And

11:52

some of your news organization have

11:56

been very clear, have stressed, that these right-wing,

11:59

the right-wing, critics of the president have

12:01

a credibility problem because of

12:03

the fact checkers have repeatedly caught

12:05

them pushing misinformation, disinformation. It's not

12:07

misinformation. It's not disinformation. We see

12:09

this and this is something coming

12:11

from from your your part of

12:13

the world calling them cheap fakes

12:15

and misinformation. It's not

12:18

misinformation. It's literally a clip of the

12:20

president of the United States doing things.

12:22

It is not disinformation. It's not Russian propaganda. But

12:24

you can see this narrative being laundered in real

12:26

time. Here's Nicole Wallace on MSNBC doing her job

12:28

as a spokesperson for the White House. There's

12:31

a growing and insidious trend in

12:34

right wing media, broadcast, print and

12:36

social media. It is

12:38

to take highly misleading and

12:40

selectively edited videos of President

12:42

Biden directly from Republican National

12:44

Committee social media accounts and

12:47

then use those videos to

12:49

spread messages virally to cast doubt on

12:51

President Biden's fitness for office. Here is

12:54

this headline from the New York Post

12:56

quote. Biden appears to freeze up, has

12:58

to be led off stage by Obama

13:00

at Mega Bucks L.A. fundraiser. The

13:03

full video posted by Biden finance

13:05

chair on Twitter shows something entirely

13:08

different. Biden reacting to applause

13:10

and then walking off stage with

13:12

former President Obama. It comes

13:14

less than one week after the New

13:16

York Post made a cover out of

13:18

another piece of deceptively edited tape calling

13:21

him meander in chief due to what

13:23

they claim was Biden walking away during

13:25

a skydiving demonstration during the G7 summit

13:27

last week. The only problem is that

13:30

the full video, which emerged almost instantly,

13:32

shows Biden was going over to congratulate

13:34

one of the skydivers who's cropped out

13:36

of the video entirely. Both

13:38

the articles are based on cheap fakes, videos of

13:41

real events that are potentially manipulating. This is so

13:43

ridiculous. Okay. Can I first point out that the

13:45

original video from the fundraiser where Barack Obama has

13:47

to lead him off by the hand was not

13:49

from the RNC. It was from a reporter at

13:52

the Hollywood reporter who subsequently was obviously called by

13:54

the White House and then wrote a follow up

13:56

piece about how everybody was being mean to Joe

13:58

Biden. That's more on the this

14:00

in just a moment. First election year typically

14:02

means chaos for us, for our wallets. Since

14:04

1952, the stock market has typically underperformed during

14:06

election years, averaging a 7% gain.

14:09

The S&P is up so far this year, but who

14:11

the hell knows what's going to happen next? So what's

14:13

a great way to prepare for market volatility? Text Shapiro

14:15

to 200-300 to get

14:17

connected to Masterworks Advisors and find out. You'll

14:20

be able to speak to their expert team

14:22

about potentially investing in the Blue Chip Contemporary

14:24

Art Asset Class, which has had almost no

14:26

correlation to the stock market for the last

14:29

28 years and whose price appreciation has actually

14:31

outpaced the S&P during that same time, according

14:33

to internal data of public auction sales. I've

14:35

been talking about Masterworks for years. They produce

14:38

results. They're up to 23 successful exits now

14:40

with over $60 million in net proceeds distributed

14:42

back to investors. You don't need any kind

14:44

of art expertise or millions of bucks to

14:47

invest. Masterworks has already helped thousands of my

14:49

listeners. You can join them by going to

14:51

masterworks.com/Ben. That's masterworks.com/Ben. Past results are not indicative

14:53

of future performance and do not include unsold

14:56

works. Investing involves risk. I'm not an investor

14:58

with Masterworks. The important regulation, a disclosure is

15:00

at masterworks.com/CD. Here's the thing.

15:02

If the White House's attempt right now is to

15:04

say that the American people cannot believe their own

15:06

eyes, they can't believe their own ears, they can't

15:09

believe their brains, they can't believe their wallets, they

15:11

can't believe any of those things. So if you

15:13

are worried about inflation because you can't pay your

15:15

bills, that's because you don't have the right mindset.

15:17

If you look at Joe Biden and you see

15:19

an incompetent elderly person who should not be in

15:21

the White House, that is because you are being

15:24

lied to via misinformation, disinformation and cheap fakes. If

15:26

you look at the world situation and see a

15:28

world that is on fire and potentially is going

15:30

to grow more on fire as time goes on,

15:32

then that is simply because you don't understand the

15:34

brilliant 4D chess that

15:37

Joe Biden is playing. None of

15:39

this is going to play, by the way. None of this is

15:41

going to play. And so what the Democrats are now doing is

15:43

they are prepping the groundwork for

15:45

saving democracy, saving democracy. Now, the

15:48

word democracy is used by Democrats

15:50

in a way that does not

15:52

mean democracy. Democracy is popular rule.

15:54

When it is used colloquially, it

15:56

can encompass terms like, for example,

15:58

a Democratic Republic. meaning that

16:00

there are checks and balances in the system and

16:02

it's not direct democracy. Typically democracy technically

16:04

means that if we're all in a room together

16:06

and we wanna make a decision, we all vote

16:08

on that specific decision. A republic means

16:10

you have representatives, which means you don't vote

16:13

directly on many of the decisions that are

16:15

being made. You instead delegate the power to

16:17

vote on those decisions to a representative government.

16:20

And typically that representative government has a series

16:22

of checks and balances. So the United States

16:24

is a republic. It is not in fact

16:26

a direct democracy. It's a democracy

16:28

in the broadest sense, which is that we

16:30

vote, but it's not a democracy in the

16:33

technical sense in which you vote on every

16:35

issue or in which a pure majoritarian popular

16:37

will gets to decide every single issue. In

16:39

fact, the founders decried exactly such system. They

16:42

saw that as what they would call a

16:44

mobocracy. That would be

16:46

a problem for them. They would not want everyone

16:48

voting on every single, they wouldn't want just a

16:50

series of referenda on every single issue that go

16:52

to the popular vote, which is why you have

16:54

all of these intervening institutions in the government. It's

16:57

why the Congress is represented on a popular level,

16:59

but the Senate was originally supposed to be represented

17:02

at the state level by the state legislature.

17:04

State legislatures were originally supposed to pick their senators.

17:06

It's why the Senate itself is not proportional. It's

17:08

why Montana has the same number of senators with

17:11

seven people and a cow as California with 45

17:14

million people or whatever it is. It is

17:16

why you have a series of checks and balances

17:18

between the executive branch, the legislative branch, and

17:21

the judiciary. It is why you have an

17:24

electoral college. There are all sorts of institutions

17:26

in our republic that are designed to check

17:28

excesses of the mob. And if

17:30

you read the Federalist Papers, that was very

17:32

much forefront of the founders' concerns. Why

17:35

is that important? Because there was a shift

17:38

in the way that people thought of democracy in the United

17:40

States. And it started in the early 20th century, late 19th

17:42

century. It

17:45

was a takeaway from German progressivism.

17:48

So weirdly enough, much of modern American

17:50

government are structured, particularly the administrative state,

17:52

are drawn from the

17:54

Bismarckian social compact in Germany. One

17:56

of the big admirers of that

17:58

system Woodrow Wilson,

18:01

who was a pointy headed

18:03

professor, obviously he was

18:05

the Dean of Princeton University before

18:07

he ran for President of the United States.

18:10

So Woodrow Wilson wrote extensively about German

18:12

Progressivism and what he saw as his

18:14

vision for what democracy should look like.

18:17

What he believed is that the Constitution of

18:19

the United States had outlived its sell by

18:21

date. Now the Constitution, all these checks and

18:23

balances were useless. He wanted something that was

18:25

more democratic and also less democratic, more democratic

18:28

in the sense that he wanted a popular

18:30

vote for one guy and that one big

18:32

man would get to make all the decisions

18:34

with the help of a bunch of administrative

18:36

bureaucrats who were experts on the issues. In

18:38

other words, he wanted a government of expertise

18:40

and he believed that all the checks and

18:43

balances thwarted that government. So

18:45

for example, in 1908, he famously

18:47

wrote, quote, the president is at liberty, both in

18:49

law and conscience, to be as big a man

18:52

as he can. His capacity will set the limit.

18:54

And if Congress be over born by him, it

18:56

will be no fault to the makers of the

18:58

Constitution. It will be from no lack of constitutional

19:00

powers on his part, but only because the president

19:02

has the nation behind him and Congress has not.

19:05

In other words, Congress has all these checks and

19:07

balances. There's this weird sausage making in the background,

19:09

but the president is elected by the public effectively

19:11

speaking. And that means that he should have as

19:13

much power as humanly possible. Why was that important

19:16

to Woodrow Wilson? Because he believed in the setup

19:18

of an administrative state, an entire branch of the

19:20

government that was effectively independent of the popular will.

19:22

So in 1887, again, Biggenmeyer of what?

19:27

Otto von Bismarck had done in Germany

19:30

with social welfare systems and with a

19:32

government from the top of bureaucrats. He

19:34

wrote, quote, administration lies outside the proper

19:36

sphere of politics. Administrative questions are not

19:39

political questions. Although politics sets the tasks

19:41

for administration, it should not be suffered

19:43

to manipulate its offices. Let

19:45

me say large powers and unhampered discretion

19:48

seem to me the indispensable conditions of

19:50

responsibility. Public attention must be easily

19:52

directed in each case of good or bad administration to

19:54

just the man deserving of praise or blame. There

19:57

is no danger in power. If only it be not irresponsible.

20:00

If it'd be divided, dealt out in shares too

20:02

many, it is obscured. And if it'd be obscured,

20:04

it is made irresponsible. So, to put that in

20:06

simpler language, what he is saying is that there

20:08

should be a series of effectively unaccountable,

20:10

non-elected bureaucrats who are experts, and you can yell

20:13

at them, but you can't get rid of them.

20:15

And they should be given wide discretionary power to

20:17

set how policy is done because they are the

20:19

experts. So when Democrats say democracy,

20:21

this is what they typically mean. They

20:24

do not mean that they respect the institutions

20:26

of the republic. They don't, for example, respect

20:29

the Supreme Court of the United States except

20:31

when it is giving them precisely what they

20:33

want. This is why you have seen this

20:35

bizarre attempt to uphold the Supreme

20:37

Court of the United States by the left at

20:39

the same time as undermining it. So,

20:41

for example, Jill Biden yesterday, she came out and she said,

20:43

Joe and I respect the courts. She said

20:45

this with respect to the conviction of Donald Trump in New

20:48

York, and also purportedly with respect to the conviction of Hunter

20:50

Biden in Delaware, although, again, I think that that sentence is

20:52

very likely to be commuted if he gets any jail time

20:54

at all. Get some more on this in just one moment

20:56

first. When you get home from work, the first thing you

20:58

do, you get out of those work clothes, you put on

21:00

your favorite set of lounge wear. Well, luckily

21:02

for me, I have Tommy John to come home to. I love

21:05

my Tommy John lounge wear. It is soft and comfortable. I could

21:07

fall asleep in it. I do sometimes. It

21:09

is stylish enough to wear out without looking like I just

21:11

rolled out of bed. And, guys, if you're wondering how they

21:13

can get any better, let me tell you, Tommy John underwear

21:15

is the best, like the best. I threw out all my

21:17

other underwear. They're really just that good. If you're not trying

21:20

them, you are missing out. It's

21:22

not just any old box of brief. Tommy

21:24

John's stylish and soft. Second Skin brand underwear

21:26

offers dozens of comfort innovations, including a supportive

21:28

contour pouch, a breathable, lightweight, moisture-wicking fabric, and

21:30

four times the stretch of competing brands. Plus,

21:32

Tommy John's best pair you'll ever wear or

21:34

its free guarantee protects your most valuable assets.

21:36

So what are you waiting for? Try Tommy

21:38

John today. Get 20% off your

21:41

first order right now at tommyjohn.com/Ben.

21:43

Save 20% on Second Skin at

21:45

tommyjohn.com/Ben. tommyjohn.com/Ben. See site for details,

21:47

the best underwear and lounge wear

21:50

in the business. You're not going

21:52

to regret it. Go check them

21:54

out right now. Go to tommyjohn.com/Ben.

21:56

Get 20% off tommyjohn.com/Ben. Joe

22:00

Biden declaring her respect for the courts. Your

22:02

husband, the president has said he wouldn't pardon

22:04

your son. He wouldn't commute his sentence. That's

22:06

correct. As a mother, though, you must

22:08

want to see this burden lifted off your son. Do

22:11

you wish he could do that? Well, Joe

22:13

and I both respect the judicial

22:15

system, and that's the bottom line. Well,

22:18

I mean, they don't, because here's Joe Biden over the weekend

22:20

ripping into the Supreme Court, which is at the apex of

22:22

the American judicial system. The next

22:25

president is likely to have two

22:27

new Supreme Court nominees. Two

22:29

more, two more. He's

22:32

already appointed to that are been very

22:34

negative in terms of the rights of

22:36

individuals. The idea that

22:38

if he's reelected, he's going to

22:41

appoint two more flying flags upside

22:43

down is really, I really

22:46

mean it. Could this

22:48

be the scariest part of all of it? Well,

22:50

I think it is one of the scariest parts

22:52

of it. Look, the Supreme Court

22:54

has never been as out of kilter as

22:57

it is today. I mean, never. I

23:00

taught constitutional law for nine years. This

23:02

guy knows more about it than most. Look,

23:05

in fact, he doesn't. This

23:07

has never been a court that's been this far out of

23:09

step. That is obviously untrue.

23:11

So undermining the court at the same time

23:13

that he's upholding the court's system supposedly. Again,

23:16

the pitch here for Democrats, they like to

23:18

say the word democracy because they want to

23:20

portray Donald Trump as an incipient fascist. And

23:23

so CNN did a big report yesterday

23:26

setting up what will be the terms

23:28

of the debate next week. The

23:30

terms of that debate are going to be very simple. They're

23:33

going to say that Donald Trump is undermining democracy

23:35

while Joe Biden is upholding it. But

23:37

as we're about to discuss, it's actually Joe

23:40

Biden who is hell bent on undermining the

23:42

actual Democratic Republic. So CNN went

23:44

out and they interviewed a bunch of Trump supporters

23:46

and they asked about Donald Trump undermining democracy. And

23:48

the Trump supporters correctly said we don't live in

23:50

a democracy. We live in a republic, which as

23:52

I've explained is technically true. We do live in

23:55

a representative democracy with a series of checks and

23:57

balances that thwart the popular will on a

24:00

regular basis. But here is CNN explaining

24:02

it's very bad to say that we live in a

24:04

republic, not a democracy. These

24:06

words were used in different ways in the

24:08

18th century. And it's true, the founders

24:11

didn't want direct democracy by which they

24:13

meant people gathering on the town square.

24:15

They wanted representative democracy. But I think

24:17

the reason why this conversation about language

24:19

has risen now is because there is

24:22

a part of the Republican Party that

24:24

would like to rule as a minority

24:26

and they need an excuse for why

24:28

that's okay. And so they have begun

24:30

to say we're not a democracy, we're

24:33

a republic. And it's not 100 percent

24:35

clear what that means, but I think they mean

24:38

we want Donald Trump to be able to do whatever he wants.

24:41

OK, this is so Orwellian. The reason this

24:43

is Orwellian is because it's total projection. The

24:46

people who want the president of the United

24:48

States to do whatever he wants, that any

24:50

checks and balances are typically Democrats. It's literally

24:52

the program of Woodrow Wilson going back to

24:55

the early 20th century. Not only that, the

24:57

setup of the administrative state allows Democrats to

24:59

overrule both the democracy at large,

25:02

as well as the institutions of the republic,

25:04

because they are unelected bureaucrats who sit there

25:06

for years on end and literally thwart the

25:08

elected branches of government. And that is exactly

25:10

what Joe Biden is planning. So Democrats are

25:12

looking down the barrel of this 2024 election.

25:15

It does not look good for them. And so they are

25:18

already preparing to do what they want to do if Trump

25:20

were to win. What is that? They

25:23

wish to subvert the institutions of the

25:25

republic. I don't mean that

25:27

in a soft sense. I mean that in a

25:29

very hard, real sense. They are looking to subvert

25:31

the Democratic institutions of the republic. They're

25:34

they're looking to subvert the legislature. They're looking

25:36

to subvert the presidency. They're looking to subvert

25:38

the courts. It is one of the reasons

25:40

why, for example, they are hellbent on ensuring

25:42

that the Supreme Court does not overrule what's

25:45

called Chevron deference, which says that administrative

25:47

agencies are basically unanswerable to other parts

25:50

of the government, including the courts. There's

25:53

an article in The New York Times that

25:55

went largely unmentioned yesterday, but it is unbelievably

25:57

shocking because it is just Democrats saying the

25:59

quiet out loud, quote, the resistance to a

26:01

new Trump administration has already started. Now,

26:04

this is quite insane because it turns

26:06

out that in the United States, there is

26:09

in fact an executive branch. There is no fourth

26:11

branch of American government. Woodrow Wilson

26:13

wanted one, but there isn't one. All of the

26:15

executive agencies work for the president of the United

26:17

States in our constitutional structure. And Donald

26:19

Trump has come into office threatening to

26:22

retitle and reclassify a bunch of federal employees so

26:24

he can fire them, which you should be able

26:26

to do anyway, since they technically work for the

26:28

executive branch, which if he is president again, he

26:31

will be leading. So what are

26:33

Democrats doing? They are looking to subvert all of

26:35

this. Quote, opponents of Donald Trump are

26:37

drafting potential lawsuits in case he is elected in

26:39

November and carries out mass deportations as he has

26:41

vowed. One group

26:43

has hired a new auditor to withstand any

26:45

attempt by a second Trump administration to unleash

26:47

the IRS against them. Democratic run state governments

26:49

are even stockpiling abortion medication. A

26:52

sprawling network of Democratic officials, progressive activists, watchdog

26:54

groups and ex-Republicans has been taking extraordinary steps

26:56

to prepare for potential second Trump presidency drawn

26:58

together by fear that Trump's return to power

27:00

would pose a grave threat, not just to

27:03

their agenda, but to American democracy itself. And

27:05

again, understand how a world or well in

27:07

that is he gets elected president. He's

27:10

going to deal with Congress. That's what he did last time. And

27:12

they are saying that they need to do a

27:14

bunch of non-democratic things in order to save democracy.

27:16

They need to burn down the village in order

27:18

to save the village. So

27:21

apparently one of the things that they are going to do

27:23

is stack the administrative state. That

27:25

is one of their goals. Start

27:28

your summer road trip at Midas and get up

27:30

to $30 off your next repair service. Plus, get

27:32

a free closer look vehicle check to make sure

27:34

you're road trip ready. If you need break service

27:36

and alignment check or tune up, hit up Midas for

27:38

up to $30 off. For

27:40

more details, request your appointment at

27:42

midas.com. Interviews with

27:44

more than 30 officials and leaders of organizations

27:46

about their plans revealed a combination of acute

27:48

exhaustion and acute anxiety. Activist groups

27:51

that spent the four years of Mr. Trump's

27:53

presidency organizing mass protests and pursuing legal challenges,

27:55

ultimately helping channel that energy into persuading voters

27:57

to oust him from power in 2020 are

27:59

now realizing. with great dread, they

28:01

may have to resist him all over again. The

28:04

Biden administration pushed through a flurry of regulations in

28:06

the spring, meeting a deadline to ensure those rules

28:08

could not be summarily overturned next year under

28:10

a 1996 law if Trump wins the election

28:12

and Republicans take total control of Congress. So

28:17

you have various officials inside the

28:19

Biden administration who are attempting to

28:21

enshrine in law and via regulation an

28:24

inability for Trump to change course once

28:26

he's president of the United States. That

28:30

is a thwarting of democracy. That is what that is. And

28:34

it is hilarious to watch all the same people who

28:36

are shouting to the rafters about the evils of Donald

28:38

Trump and his attacks on democracy now attempting all the

28:40

same measures that they say Republicans should never attempt. It's

28:44

an amazing thing to watch. And it

28:47

is all due to the fact that they believe

28:49

that they do in fact rule a quote unquote

28:51

deep state. That there are people who are career

28:53

appointees who must never be touched under any circumstances.

28:57

Those are the people who make most of the policy you see and you say

29:00

to yourself, what the hell is that? So,

29:02

for example, it is the deep state. It is

29:04

career appointees. And,

29:06

for example, the

29:09

Office of the Director of National Intelligence who are doing

29:11

things like celebrating

29:14

Pride Month by inviting agents to have the

29:16

transgender flag painted on their nails, participate in

29:18

a Pride Ally challenge and learn from a

29:20

non-binary Philip Hinks activist who

29:23

has taught children about her non-binary identity, according

29:25

to the Daily Wire. A

29:28

document that was distributed by the

29:30

intelligence agency, which

29:33

oversees the CIA, the FBI, the NSA and

29:35

intelligence components, this

29:37

document says quote, for nail painting, we'll have our

29:39

very, our pro team of FV artists ready

29:42

to decorate you for

29:44

Pride Month with the option of celebrating Pride or trans

29:46

flag colors. If you don't normally paint your nails or

29:49

have never done so, all the better. We'll do everything

29:51

for you. You might just love it. What better way

29:53

to show your allyship to the community? Right?

29:55

It's this sort of stuff that exists in the deep state. I

29:57

mean, and this is the more. I

30:00

would say the less nefarious stuff in the deep

30:02

state. The more nefarious stuff is for example, militarizing

30:04

the FBI against the current president of the United

30:06

States when Donald Trump was president of the United

30:08

States. The

30:10

fact that you have administrative agencies

30:12

that are themselves designing a

30:14

defense mechanism against their boss is

30:17

truly amazing. But you have to understand, this is how the

30:19

left thinks of its institutions. The

30:21

way that the left thinks of its

30:23

institutions is we own these institutions, any

30:25

outside threat to these institutions, including the

30:28

future boss of the institution, must be

30:30

destroyed. So Donald

30:32

Trump coming back in, their idea is

30:34

that he must be thwarted in his presidency.

30:37

Again, when you talk about thwarting democracy, this is what

30:39

we're talking about. We talk about stealing democracy. This is

30:41

what we're talking about. Not just quote unquote stealing elections,

30:44

but actively setting up

30:47

structures that prevent the fundamental working order

30:49

of the government so long as a

30:51

Republican is the person who's running the

30:53

government. But again, it's not just

30:55

relegated to the government. One of the

30:58

most amazing stories that I've ever seen in media is

31:00

happening right now to

31:02

the Washington Post. So the Washington Post has turned into

31:04

Al Jazeera West. It is

31:07

a wildly left-wing publication that repeats

31:10

dumb talking points from Islamists and

31:12

radicals at every possible turn. They

31:16

really are an awful organization. And

31:18

they've been just losing money hand over fist, just

31:20

bleeding money. They have a gusher. And

31:23

so Jeff Bezos has decided to

31:25

replace the editor-in-chief with somebody else.

31:29

The person who is going to be

31:31

replacing that editor-in-chief is

31:34

the supposed new editor, Robert

31:37

Winnet, deputy editor of The Telegraph in

31:39

the UK. So what

31:41

did the Washington Post's current management do in the

31:43

interim before he takes over? They

31:45

went and they got a person who

31:47

was just fired from the

31:49

Washington Post to come back in and lead

31:51

an investigation into the new guy. So

31:55

the career employees at The Washington Post

31:57

are now effectively attempting to get the

31:59

job done. a color revolution against the

32:01

Washington Post to stop Jeff

32:03

Bezos from resetting the agenda there. Because again,

32:05

according to the left, once they have captured

32:08

an institution or remains captured forever, so

32:10

they've released this big investigation titled

32:13

Incoming Post Editor tied to self-described thief

32:15

who claimed role in his reporting on

32:17

published book drafts and other documents raised

32:19

questions about Robert Winnits journalistic record just

32:21

months before he is to assume a

32:23

top newsroom role. Again, this is unprecedented.

32:25

Think about this. Jeff Bezos

32:27

owns the Washington Post. He

32:30

hires a new top editor. And before the

32:32

new top editor can take the helm, a

32:35

bunch of reporters, including the people who are going to

32:37

be ousted, write a series of

32:39

reports ripping into the new top editor and attempt

32:41

to forestall him from taking over the newspaper. It's

32:44

an amazing thing, but it is a window

32:46

into how the left thinks about institutions they

32:48

have captured. It is why it is so

32:51

difficult to take back those institutions and why

32:53

it is so much easier to simply destroy

32:55

those institutions from the outside. Now,

32:58

again, the reality

33:01

here is that the Washington Post, I think is

33:03

unfixable at this point, given the fact that the

33:05

rock goes so deep. But

33:08

it is quite indicative, again, of

33:11

how the left approaches issues that

33:14

they are so all fired, certain

33:16

that their move needs to be to stop

33:18

the Washington Post from moderating even just a

33:20

little bit. And that's, again, the perspective of

33:22

Democrats inside the federal government. This is why

33:24

when they shout democracy, I just look at Joe

33:26

Biden's record where he attempted to use the Occupational

33:28

Safety and Hazard Administration to

33:32

mandate 80 million Americans vaccinate a

33:35

move that was only stopped in part by the Daily Wire

33:37

suing the federal government. I

33:40

just think of Joe Biden, unconstitutionally

33:42

alleviating student loans.

33:45

I think of Joe Biden unconstitutionally holding up

33:47

aid that had already been allocated by Congress.

33:49

And I think to myself, this is the

33:51

guy who's lecturing us on democracy. I think

33:53

not. Alrighty, folks, let's talk about something

33:55

every dude needs in his grooming arsenal, a razor

33:57

that actually works. Jeremy's second-gen are here or there,

34:00

a number one best seller on Amazon. So what

34:02

makes these razors so great? You ask, well, thanks

34:04

for asking. First off, the new second gen razors

34:06

are radically redesigned from top to bottom. The blades

34:08

are sharper and longer lasting, providing you the smoothest

34:10

shave every time. Did I mention they're not made

34:12

in China? With Jeremy's, you have options like the

34:15

Sprint 3, perfect for a quick clean shave, while

34:17

the new and improved Precision 5 is your go-to

34:19

for an exceptionally smooth and close shave. So let

34:21

the other companies spend their money on DEI and

34:23

woke ideologies. Jeremy's razors focuses on what really matters,

34:25

delivering a superior shave. So what are you waiting

34:27

for? Head on over to Amazon right now, grab

34:30

one of these best-selling razors, find even more

34:32

great Jeremy's products. Okay, meanwhile, speaking of the

34:34

misuse and abuse of the democratic

34:37

system, Joe Biden

34:39

magically has now discovered the ability to

34:41

give legal status to illegal immigrants

34:43

in the United States without the approval of Congress. The

34:48

way to think of the, quote unquote, threat to

34:50

democracy question when it comes to

34:52

Trump versus Joe Biden, a lot of people point

34:54

out Trump's activities between November and January, 2020 to

34:56

2021. That

34:59

too is a threat to democracy. Okay, now

35:01

the reality is that Donald Trump said a bunch of

35:03

things that I disagree with, a bunch of things I

35:05

think are dumb and unverified by evidence, between November and

35:07

January of 2021. I made that absolutely clear

35:10

on the show at the time, and I continue to maintain that. However,

35:12

all of that was filtered out by the

35:14

same institutions that he didn't end up threatening.

35:16

They were filtered out by the Senate of

35:19

the United States, for example, and the Electoral

35:21

College, for example, and the state-certifying bodies, for

35:23

example. The way to

35:25

think about Donald Trump's, quote unquote, threats to

35:27

the Republic, if the institutions act as a

35:29

sort of sifter, as sort of

35:31

a colander sifting out the bad attempts

35:34

to thwart the working order

35:36

of the Republic, Donald

35:38

Trump's kind of myriad sillinesses

35:41

amount to giant rocks that immediately get

35:43

sifted out by the sifter or the colander.

35:46

So you got a bunch of great material from

35:48

President Trump and a bunch of stones. Okay,

35:51

the bunch of great material goes right through the

35:53

sifter and ends up as policy. The bunch of

35:55

stones get filtered out by the constitutional system, which

35:57

continues to maintain its working order. Joe

35:59

Biden. Biden is a different story. Joe Biden is a toxic

36:02

brew. He carves

36:04

up his constitutional threats so fine that they

36:06

just go right through the constitutional sifter, right

36:09

through the calendar, and end up as policy. He

36:13

is much more adept at thwarting the Constitution

36:16

and overturning the measures of a Republican government in

36:18

order to get what he wants. So he's doing

36:20

that now with illegal immigration. According to the

36:22

Wall Street Journal, President Biden is

36:24

expected to announce a new immigration program on Tuesday that

36:26

provide a path to citizenship for hundreds of thousands of

36:28

immigrants in the country illegally, who are married to U.S.

36:30

citizens, according to lawmakers and others familiar with the matter.

36:32

Now, I know what you're saying to yourself. Wait, where

36:34

does he get the power to do that? The

36:37

answer is he doesn't have the power to do that. He's going to

36:39

do it anyway. And then he's going to hope that the Supreme Court

36:41

somehow looks the other way on this thing. Biden

36:43

plans to make the announcement at the White

36:45

House alongside members of Congress, immigration advocates, and

36:47

U.S. citizens, who because of arcane immigration rules

36:49

haven't been able to sponsor their spouses for

36:52

green cards. I love how the immigration rules

36:54

become arcane when they are an obstacle to

36:56

illegal immigrants becoming legal. That's

36:58

when they become arcane, according to the Wall Street

37:00

Journal. Again, remember the Wall Street Journal editorial

37:02

page conservative, the Wall Street Journal news page to the left

37:05

of The New York Times. The program has the

37:07

potential to benefit immigrants who have been living in the country at

37:09

least a decade, offering them work permits,

37:11

deportation protections and a route for them to

37:13

apply for green cards, a pathway to citizenship.

37:15

The application process is expected to open by

37:17

the end of the summer, an administration official

37:19

said. This would make it one

37:21

of the largest immigration initiatives started in recent decades,

37:24

rivaled only by DACA. Now, again, it's not

37:26

a shocker that in an election year, Joe Biden thinks

37:28

he's going to buy Latino votes by doing this sort

37:30

of thing. The problem he has is that it turns

37:33

out that the vast majority of Latinos are not in

37:35

favor of this. There's a new poll out that showed

37:37

53 percent of Hispanic Americans believe there

37:39

should be large scale deportations. Start

37:41

your summer road trip at Midas and get up

37:44

to $30 off your next repair service. Plus, get

37:46

a free closer look vehicle check to make sure

37:48

you're road trip ready. If you need break service

37:50

and alignment check or tune up, hit up Midas

37:52

for up to $30 off. For more details, request

37:55

your appointment at Midas dot com. So

37:57

again, Joe Biden attempting to split the baby. He's absolutely.

38:00

He was just a couple of weeks ago. which

38:02

he didn't. And now he's announcing he's gonna legalize

38:04

illegal immigrants, which he will. So

38:07

he's doing all that through the administrative state, through executive

38:09

order. Does any of

38:11

that, any of that pass constitutional

38:13

muster? He doesn't care. Because

38:16

the Democratic Republicans have no interest in it. For Democrats,

38:18

all of this stuff is just a tool to get

38:20

what you want. And meanwhile, I

38:22

am always amused to see the

38:24

level of dispensation politically the

38:29

Democrats receive in the public eye. So

38:32

on Sunday night, the Tonys happened. The Tonys used to

38:34

be an award show that some people watched when they,

38:37

you know, did musicals that people watched on Broadway. Now

38:39

it's basically just a series of

38:41

people doing numbers from rent, punctuated by

38:44

various Democrats showing up for a round of applause. Hillary Clinton

38:46

showed up at the Tonys and she got a standing ovation.

38:48

I only point this out to point out that I don't

38:50

know what you have to do to be cast out of

38:52

the circle of grace in the Democratic Party. It

38:55

is amazing to me that Hillary Clinton is still championed by Democrats as

38:57

some sort of great heroine. She

39:00

lost to Donald Trump, you dullards. I

39:03

mean, it would seem to me that if she lost to Donald Trump, you

39:05

might want to be mad at her. All she

39:07

had to do was visit Michigan, visit like

39:09

Wisconsin and Michigan like once. And she didn't.

39:13

But here she was receiving a standing ovation while wearing a Moo Moo

39:15

at the Tonys. I have

39:17

stood on a lot of stages, but this is

39:19

very special. And

39:22

I know a little bit about

39:24

how hard it is to make change. So

39:28

I'm extremely proud of

39:31

this original American

39:33

musical by Shana

39:36

Taub. Now two-time Tony

39:38

winner. And

39:43

of course it is about some

39:47

American originals. The

39:49

suffragists who fought

39:51

so valiantly for so long

39:53

to give women in our

39:55

country the right to vote.

39:58

It's almost impossible to make change. to

40:00

think about what a challenge that was.

40:03

But now it's an election year and we

40:05

need to be reminded about how important it

40:08

is to vote. Again,

40:12

I will never get over the fact they continue to lionize this

40:14

person. The worst candidate in the

40:16

history of the United States. Yeah, but she's

40:18

just one of the Democrats who's being lionized

40:20

by the media. So, Cori Bush, the BLM

40:22

Congresswoman from Ferguson, Missouri. Horrible

40:25

Congressperson, doesn't know anything, says dumb things

40:27

all the time. It

40:29

turns out that a few years ago, she wrote in a book

40:32

that she had faith healed tumors, which

40:34

I mean, if she did, she's definitely in the

40:36

wrong line of work. And

40:39

think of all the people with cancer who could be cured by Cori Bush.

40:42

Here she was being questioned about this. Look at the

40:44

level of journalistic dispensation

40:46

she's been giving here by PBS for talking

40:48

about the insane proposition that she can literally

40:50

heal people's tumors by putting her hands on

40:53

them. I, along

40:55

with a group of friends,

40:58

we would go out on the street and

41:00

just meet with people and pray with people

41:03

and offer them food. And this lady came

41:05

to us and she had these tumors. I

41:07

mean, she wanted us to like, feel them.

41:10

And I just remember I put my hand on

41:12

her and my hand

41:15

just began to move and the

41:19

lumps that were there were no longer there.

41:21

And she was so happy. And she like

41:25

went on about her day. And I

41:27

never saw her again. So you think the

41:29

tumors disappeared? I do, I do. And this

41:31

woman was unhoused. She's someone who, you know,

41:34

had been sleeping in the shelters and sleeping

41:36

on the street. I

41:38

think we just solved our national healthcare problem, guys. All

41:40

we need is Cori Bush putting her hands on

41:43

randos, which of course was Bill Clinton's

41:45

strategy too, but he didn't heal so many tumors. So

41:47

well done for our mainstream media,

41:49

as always. They're doing just an

41:52

extraordinarily good job. Meanwhile, speaking of

41:54

foreign policy, it turns out that

41:56

the Russians have no intention of

41:58

turning over Wall Street Journal reporter Evan- who's

42:01

been held for pretty much the entirety of the

42:03

Biden administration. The Biden administration

42:05

has done pretty much nothing to secure his release. Obviously,

42:08

listen, we did trade the Lord

42:10

of War, right? We traded like

42:12

an actual arms dealer for

42:15

a WNBA player. So

42:17

that, I mean, that was a great deal. The

42:19

only time a WNBA trade has ever been in

42:21

the news. It's still a bad

42:24

trade, by the way. Well, now,

42:26

apparently, the Russians are going to try

42:28

Evan Gershkovich. He, of course, is

42:30

the Wall Street Journal reporter detained in Russia for over

42:32

a year. That judicial proceeding

42:34

would be held in secret there, accusing him of

42:36

being a spy. He

42:38

was detained by Russia's Federal Security Service while on a reporting

42:41

trip for the journal in March of last year. And those

42:44

officials have designated Gershkovich as wrongfully detained and

42:46

have been working to secure his release. The

42:50

Wall Street Journal said Monday the latest development means

42:52

a sham trial is imminent. He's

42:55

being held in Moscow's Lefortovo prison. Russia

42:58

and the United States have been discussing a possible

43:00

prisoner exchange that could bring his release. Again,

43:03

amazing work by the Biden administration and this reporter. Remember,

43:06

these are the great defenders of the press

43:08

doing an amazing, amazing job, as always.

43:11

Evan Gershkovich remains under

43:13

the tender mercies of Vladimir Putin.

43:16

Now, again, speaking of foreign policy, the

43:19

absolute delusional nature of the Biden administration is

43:22

being made absolutely clear every single day in

43:24

the Middle East. It's truly amazing. So a

43:26

report came out yesterday that finally the Biden

43:28

administration has decided that after Hamas rejected the

43:30

latest ceasefire proposal in the war between Israel

43:32

and Hamas initiated when Hamas killed 1,200 Israelis

43:35

and kidnapped 250 of them and is still

43:37

holding hostages. And only now

43:39

is the Biden administration willing to remove

43:41

its embargo on arms against Israel, which

43:44

shows that they were lying a couple of weeks ago

43:46

when they said that they weren't slow walking the arms

43:48

that are already been allocated to Israel by Congress. All

43:51

of this is happening in the midst of a continuously

43:54

astonished media who

43:56

are always shocked to realize that the

43:58

Palestinian population is radical. has been

44:01

radicalized and that in fact, Palestinian

44:03

identity is formed in opposition to

44:05

Israel's existence. This is

44:07

one of the things to recognize here. There

44:09

are Arabs who lived in British mandate

44:11

Palestine. They did not see themselves as

44:13

a cohesive ethnic or

44:16

historical group until Israel

44:18

was established in 1948. They

44:21

literally did not exist as a group. Many

44:23

considered themselves Turkish or Egyptian. Many

44:26

considered themselves Sunni

44:29

or Shia. But

44:32

no one considered themselves a member of a political

44:34

Palestinian nation as a cohesive entity that only forms

44:36

in the aftermath of the establishment of the state

44:38

of Israel in 4748.

44:41

So it is no surprise then that an identity

44:43

that is rooted solely in hatred of Israel

44:45

and willingness to exterminate it culminates

44:47

in a population that hates Israel and wants to

44:49

exterminate it. Which is why every poll

44:51

ever taken ever in the history

44:54

of this conflict has shown a vast majority

44:56

of Palestinians want to obliterate the Jewish state

44:58

and will not accept any solution in which

45:00

a Jewish state remains in the Middle East.

45:03

So why exactly would anyone be shocked then by the

45:05

Wall Street Journal report that

45:08

a 73 year old doctor named Ahmad Al Jamal

45:10

and his son

45:12

who worked with Al Jazeera were

45:15

holding actual Israelis hostage. These

45:17

are these are the so-called innocent civilians. According to

45:19

the Wall Street Journal, the 73 year old general

45:21

practitioner Ahmed Al Jamal was a fixture of his

45:23

community. He worked mornings at a public clinic in

45:25

the Gaza Strip refugee camp of Nuserat. Another thing

45:28

to understand Nuserat is not a refugee camp. When

45:30

you think of a refugee camp, you're thinking of

45:32

a bunch of FEMA trailers and tents.

45:34

That is not what Nuserat is. It's a city. The

45:37

international community calls it a refugee camp so they can

45:39

pretend that the people who live there are going to

45:41

be granted citizenship in the Jewish

45:43

state, which is not going to happen because

45:46

it would obliterate the existence of the Jewish state. It's

45:48

an absurdity anyway. None of them ever asked

45:50

for Palestinian citizenship in

45:53

an independent Palestinian state. They don't want it.

45:56

In any case, when he finished

45:58

his duty every day, He would return home to the

46:00

apartment he shared with his son, his daughter-in-law and their

46:03

children, and the three Israeli hostages they were hiding there

46:05

for Hamas. It was common knowledge

46:07

in Nusayrat, the Al-Jamaal family who's close

46:09

to Hamas. They said few people

46:11

in an densely populated area of central Gaza knew of

46:13

the secret locked in the small darkened room of the

46:15

family's apartment that is sa- Bull.

46:18

Bull. Few people knew.

46:20

Yeah, I'm sure. You're just hiding

46:22

four Israelis in like a three-block radius, and

46:24

no one knows. Mm-hmm. Sure.

46:30

A few blocks away from the Al-Jamaal home, another family

46:32

with Hamas links called the Abu Nara was holding Noah

46:34

Arghamani. The Abu Nara

46:36

family was also killed in their building, destroyed local residents,

46:38

and said they were less

46:41

prominent in the neighborhood than the Al-Jamaals,

46:43

according to residents. Again,

46:46

the-the-the raid that Israel performed

46:48

to free the hostages is

46:50

just another- is

46:53

just another indicator that everything

46:55

that the West believes about this conflict tends

46:57

to be a lie. It's actually a very

46:59

simple moral conflict. The

47:02

incredible unwillingness to acknowledge

47:04

that reality is

47:06

insane. I mean,

47:08

but by the way, speaking of lies, the entire

47:10

Gaza famine, the idea that people are starving to

47:12

death in Gaza is not true. Israel's been shipping

47:14

in thousands of calories per person per day into

47:16

the Gaza Strip. It

47:19

is not even remotely true. They

47:21

undercounted the number of food trucks going into

47:23

Gaza to deliberately lie to the public. So,

47:28

again, the only reason this matters is because the West that

47:30

lies to itself is likely to be victimized by

47:33

people who are perfectly willing to take advantage of the

47:35

West's stupidity. The reason

47:37

why the Israel-Khamas conflict is important is because if you

47:39

get this one wrong, it is very likely you're going

47:41

to get your own civilization wrong. In

47:43

America, that refuses to get this one right, they

47:45

can't see the moral difference or see this as

47:47

a cycle of violence or has sympathy for the

47:50

group that takes hostages and murders women and children

47:52

and participates in mass rape and civilians

47:54

sheared on, is

47:56

a civilization that is likely to open

47:58

itself wide to terror and violence. infiltration

48:01

and a serious undermining of its of its actual

48:03

principles. All right, folks, coming up, we'll jump into

48:05

the vaunted Ben Shapiro show mailbag. If you're not

48:07

a member, become a member. Use code Shapiro. I

48:09

check out for two months free on all annual

48:11

plans. Click that link in the description and join

48:13

us. Start

48:19

your summer road trip at Midas and get up

48:21

to thirty dollars off your next repair service. Plus,

48:24

get a free closer look vehicle check to make

48:26

sure your road trip ready. If you need brake

48:28

service and alignment check or tune up, hit up

48:30

Midas for up to thirty dollars off. For more

48:32

details, request your appointment at Midas dot com.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features