Podchaser Logo
Home
US power demand is set to boom. How will we meet it?

US power demand is set to boom. How will we meet it?

Released Thursday, 1st February 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
US power demand is set to boom. How will we meet it?

US power demand is set to boom. How will we meet it?

US power demand is set to boom. How will we meet it?

US power demand is set to boom. How will we meet it?

Thursday, 1st February 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:02

Latitude Media Podcast At the

0:04

Frontier of Climate Technology. Where.

0:07

You either you fall on the ai optimism

0:09

spectrum. I. Just think. That

0:12

we're not as far along

0:14

as everybody is worried that

0:16

we are. I see the

0:18

applications, especially an energy and

0:20

so optimism is my default

0:22

setting. Well. I'm training your voices right

0:24

now. I'm going to replace you in the next

0:26

episode of I'm Just gonna write the commentary. Use

0:28

your voices and we'll see how optimistic you are.

0:31

Date our are going to put data and body.

0:34

Can't replace either of you to fit, but. This

0:39

is the carbon copy. I'm Steven Meisel.

0:43

By Dynamics' the Ai Revolution electrify

0:46

everything he's are more than just

0:48

slogans. They represent real physical changes

0:51

to the world around Us. As

0:53

President Biden screen industrial policies reignite

0:55

the Us manufacturing base. A I

0:58

computing workload, store and machines across

1:00

the economy turn electric. The power

1:02

grid is facing an historic increase

1:05

in demand after almost two decades

1:07

of flat electricity consumption. Suddenly America's

1:09

grid planners are doubling their forecasts

1:12

for demand, raising the. Urgency for

1:14

new infrastructure. We will ask this week

1:16

what is needed and what happens if

1:18

we can't build it. Then some major

1:20

changes in the world of tax Finance

1:23

will look at how transferable tax credits

1:25

are, opening up new kinds of deals

1:27

for clean energy, and take a deeper

1:29

dive into the long awaited and controversial

1:31

details of hydrogen tax credits Catherine Hamilton

1:33

and Shiny Romanov and or with really

1:36

talk about these trends coming right up.

1:45

What? Are you reading to help understand the

1:47

industry? If. Latitude Media's free weekly newsletter

1:49

isn't in the mix. You are missing

1:51

a vital piece of your energy business

1:53

news diet. Latitude Media is of course

1:55

the company that makes this podcast but

1:57

we're so much more were destination for

1:59

best. The business news, research and events

2:01

focused on the new frontiers of clean

2:04

energy and climate technology. When you signed

2:06

up for the newsletter, you'll get all

2:08

their coverage on tax markets and deals

2:10

across renewables, batteries, artificial intelligence, long duration

2:13

storage, carbon remove hydrogen and more. So

2:15

head on over to Latitude media.com or

2:17

you can tap that link in the

2:19

show notes and you'll get lots of

2:21

stories from our team of reporters to

2:24

help you dive even deeper into the

2:26

topics we cover on this show. Thanks

2:28

for reading. So.

2:35

It's the end of the months ever going

2:38

to be doing something this year where monthly

2:40

I bring to experts who are now familiar

2:42

to you shall any Roman ossining Catherine Hamilton's

2:44

where we're going to recap some of the

2:47

most influential stories playing out. and Catherine is

2:49

the chair of Thirty Eight North of Though

2:51

Catherine. Happy to be here again and happiness

2:53

of the irregular gag. And sounding

2:55

Ramona son is the director of a

2:57

region. A snack when Brick Infrastructure Partners

3:00

hello sell any welcome back. The loan

3:02

get to be here. So we are

3:04

going to talk about one of the

3:06

big stories. It emerged in December and

3:08

into this year, combining a couple different

3:10

trends. Firstly,

3:13

The. I is out with a

3:15

new analysis this month's showing that

3:17

global data center use could double.

3:20

In. The next three years and that's

3:22

largely to a I in Crypto

3:24

and there were a bunch of

3:26

experts at Davos recently who were

3:29

talking about this and open a

3:31

I see. Oh, Sam Altman, who

3:33

is also an investor in Advanced

3:35

Nuclear, said on stage that we

3:37

need energy breakthroughs in order to

3:39

power the computational demands of artificial

3:42

intelligence. and in reality, The.

3:44

Breakthroughs we need are probably less about technology

3:46

and more about grid infrastructure planning which were

3:48

going to get into. And. A

3:50

new report from Grid Strategies. Shows.

3:53

Us: Why are grid strategies recently

3:55

analyze us load gross and

3:57

these find your forecast some good

3:59

plan. There's an increase power

4:01

demand and it turns out that

4:04

these forecasts nearly doubled since

4:06

last year. That means thirty eight

4:08

gigawatts in new demand could come

4:11

on line from a combination

4:13

of data centers, new manufacturing facilities,

4:15

and residential industrial electrification. Any

4:17

sports as don't actually take into

4:19

account potential hydrogen production from

4:21

elect years that could be coming.

4:24

So meeting that demands gonna require

4:27

tens of billions of dollars in

4:29

new transmission. but transmission investments among

4:31

investor and utilities of actually declined

4:34

in the last few years and

4:36

so that's causing massive backlog of

4:38

renewables and batteries. This terror was

4:41

still backlog that's just sitting ensues.

4:43

So what is the end of

4:45

flat power demand? Moon.

4:48

Catherine. Give us a historical

4:50

context here how long as electricity demand

4:52

and flat in the Us and it's

4:55

why is this projection this five year

4:57

doubling? So. Important. And

4:59

attention grabbing. Yeah, so this is

5:01

not the first rodeo for increased demand.

5:03

Ah, I'm away back in the dark

5:05

ages when agonising was invented, there was

5:07

a significant increase in demand. We had

5:09

to build a lot more power plants

5:11

in this country and then from that

5:14

nineteen seventy five to two thousand and

5:16

five there was massive just economic growth.

5:18

That with when I was working at

5:20

a utility for about ten years designing

5:22

grads and we had to literally upgraded

5:24

medium voltage power line some like four

5:26

kb to twenty kb so we could

5:28

get more do through. we did things

5:30

like time I used to man response

5:32

we were even or even working on

5:34

thermal energy storage to try to bring

5:36

down the man so we could have

5:38

time to build out more feet or

5:40

lines and more sub say And then

5:42

for about twenty years. Who's. Really flat

5:44

and part of that was because we built

5:46

out what we needed to. We had the

5:49

system someplace that we needed when. we also

5:51

did a ton on energy efficiency so that

5:53

was really able to manage a lot of

5:55

the low growth and demands through a plant

5:58

standards. All of the efficiency standards that. We

6:00

have have been incredibly helpful but

6:02

now it looks see are changing

6:04

again and it's just like what

6:06

you were talking about. These data

6:08

centers a I manufacturing facilities thanks

6:10

in large part to a lot

6:12

of the investment that the Inflation

6:14

Reduction Act is creating here in

6:16

this country, but also electrification. So

6:18

now what do we have to

6:20

do? I mean this is significant

6:23

because it looks like and this

6:25

is compared to so point five

6:27

percent annual demand growth over the

6:29

last twenty years. Now it's

6:31

two point six percent and twenty twenty

6:33

two. And then and twenty twenty three.

6:35

It was revised to four point seven

6:37

percent. So as you say it's doubling.

6:39

It is really significant. And so the

6:41

question is, what do we do about

6:44

that now? Yes of when we

6:46

can see all the new manufacturing

6:48

facilities getting built, we can see

6:50

the state it infrastructure needs increasing

6:52

And then we've been talking about

6:54

electrify everything for years now. Sony

6:56

does this. Load forecasts, Does. A

6:59

surprise you at all. I

7:01

think it's an intensification of a

7:03

trend. We saw before I is

7:05

Catherine Benson and things like the

7:07

Electrification of Transportation Right have been

7:09

underway for. A while so that was

7:11

a predictable i'm upset and load ai

7:13

in the fourth the day I and

7:16

how quickly the data. Demands of Ai

7:18

is becoming a topic of conversation

7:20

and a real A real. Causes.

7:23

That how quickly a I is.

7:25

A scaling up and am

7:27

so quickly data centers for

7:29

a i need green power

7:31

that items is zoo and

7:34

a. Supervisor. It's let's remember

7:36

that disposes whole goals and go.

7:38

The high demand is not all

7:40

bad and need. A few years

7:42

ago i think probably seven years

7:44

ago is that the trough that

7:46

was our race to the bottom

7:48

climate and power purchase agreements. And

7:51

you know margins, we're we're not

7:53

very exciting. I'm if you were

7:55

doing solar wind projects and I

7:57

think that at the higher demand.

8:00

and the difficulty of getting

8:02

projects done, for all the reasons we've talked

8:04

about on the show, you know, transmission and

8:06

permitting and siting, does mean

8:08

that prices are more buoyant.

8:10

So it is an

8:12

interesting development that has, you

8:14

know, all kinds of implications.

8:17

Yeah, and Shani, 33% of those

8:19

global AI data centers are in

8:21

the US, 16% in the EU

8:23

and 10% China, but

8:25

the United States has a vast majority of them. Let's

8:28

pause on the data centerpiece for a second,

8:31

because I made this flippant remark in

8:33

my opening remarks about Sam Altman saying

8:35

we need to invest in new

8:38

nuclear. I don't think

8:40

we really need any energy breakthroughs to

8:42

serve these data centers, though. We just

8:45

need a lot more transmission to get

8:47

clean power to these data centers. And

8:49

it's an infrastructure challenge. And

8:52

there are a lot of ways that you can build

8:54

more modular data centers that basically

8:57

connect to, you know, there are

8:59

direct off takers of renewable electricity.

9:02

So there's ways that you can, and then you

9:04

can create data centers that

9:06

have specific workloads like data

9:08

centers with AI specific workloads

9:10

that can be cycled differently

9:12

than other services on the

9:14

internet. And so there

9:16

are ways to adjust the

9:19

output and computational workloads of data centers,

9:21

build them differently, and then just build

9:23

the infrastructure around it. We

9:25

don't need some advanced nuclear breakthrough

9:27

to serve this particular load. Yeah,

9:30

I totally agree. I talked to Rob Gramlich

9:32

from Grid Strategies that produced this report. And

9:34

I said, what do we need to do,

9:36

Rob? Help us fix this. And he said,

9:38

we really need to plan for the future.

9:40

We need to do much better planning. Over

9:42

the last couple of decades, a lot of

9:44

the planners, just kind of the

9:46

load forecasters, everything was sort of flat. We

9:48

didn't have to be super creative. We have

9:51

been super creative in the past. We need

9:53

to get that way in the future. So

9:55

Stephen, just as you talk about the data

9:57

centers and the sort of the load centers,

10:00

And I consider that part

10:02

of the resource mix, if you have customers

10:04

with resources like solar and storage,

10:06

that they could also be part of

10:08

the solution. But when you

10:10

think about what we need to plan for,

10:12

you also have to look at how do

10:14

we get every electron

10:17

out of every line? Because

10:19

our system has places that are, yes, congested,

10:21

but others that aren't. So how do we

10:23

best use our system? How do we plan

10:26

for the future? There are a lot of

10:28

ways we can tackle this, and we really

10:30

have to really put a lot of thought

10:32

into this without having to come up with some

10:35

kind of a new technology. And even

10:37

if we got a new technology, why

10:39

do we think it would be so easy

10:41

to roll out? Implementation,

10:44

this is something I have learned the

10:46

hard way, is I think we all

10:49

in our field get excited about technology.

10:51

I know I do. And

10:53

that is part of the puzzle. Technology is

10:55

part of the puzzle, but commercializing technology,

10:58

implementing projects to get it

11:00

out there, that's going to

11:02

be as hard for any

11:04

new technology as it has

11:06

been for wind and solar.

11:09

So might as well try to solve it for wind and

11:11

solar. Clearly, breakthroughs are not

11:13

needed. Better management of

11:16

the supporting infrastructure is needed. But

11:18

that is a simple thing

11:20

to say, not an easy thing to do. And

11:24

so it's still a big concern that

11:26

we can't actually build the transmission and

11:28

distribution infrastructure to support this new load.

11:30

Are either of you worried

11:32

at all that we see 38 gigawatts

11:34

of new potential demand coming and not

11:36

a great plan to connect

11:40

the infrastructure to service? So

11:42

Georgia Power has been one of

11:44

the largest beneficiaries of the Inflation

11:46

Reduction Act, $6.3

11:49

billion in investment in their service

11:51

territory of EV manufacturing,

11:53

solar, data centers, et cetera,

11:56

6,600 megawatts of

11:58

new load coming online. And

12:00

the issue is they are

12:03

doing RFPs for new solar

12:05

and batteries, but in the meantime, what

12:07

do we have to do to sustain

12:09

the demand? And they're looking at, well,

12:11

are we going to need to keep

12:13

some coal plants open in Mississippi and

12:15

cut a deal to be able to

12:17

use those as a bridge? Do we

12:19

keep some of these single cycle peaker

12:21

units going for a bit longer until

12:23

we can build out enough other infrastructure?

12:25

And what you want them to do

12:27

is say until we can make sure

12:29

we have enough renewables and storage on

12:31

the grid to be able to accommodate

12:33

that, rather than, oh, let's

12:36

instead try to build some more combined cycle

12:38

units, because those, of course, will have a

12:40

40-year lifespan and maybe the data centers won't.

12:42

I think Catherine nailed

12:44

it, is the

12:47

demand isn't met with clean energy.

12:49

And if it isn't reasonably easy to meet

12:51

it with clean energy, I do

12:54

worry that we will revert to

12:56

more polluting, more polluting field staff

12:59

just because it's easier to do. And

13:01

that would be a shame because we have an

13:03

opportunity to clean it up. Yeah,

13:06

it sure would. And in the southeast,

13:09

Kevin, I know you have been focused on

13:11

this. There are a lot of new commitments

13:13

to fossil gas plants. And what

13:15

are we seeing in terms of new

13:17

gas planning and how it's overshadowing renewables?

13:19

Yeah. Yeah, I think the

13:22

issue is just that, yes, they're trying to do

13:24

as much renewables as they can.

13:26

They're very used to doing gas. And we're

13:28

talking about the southeast. Like what parts of the southeast are

13:30

we talking about? Yeah, so I was just talking

13:32

about Georgia. But there are a bunch of

13:35

other states that are involved, too. So like

13:37

there is a big deal in Mississippi

13:39

with energy and Amazon where there is

13:41

going to be a deal cut. It's

13:43

basically going to let energy do whatever

13:45

it wants to do to supply Amazon

13:47

with reliable power. And

13:50

the thing is that the thought that

13:53

a reliable power source is

13:55

fossil gas is what's confounding

13:57

because there is still stealing

14:00

from Yuri and Elliot storms and

14:02

the insecurities in the gas system,

14:04

which have still not been addressed.

14:06

So part of this is we

14:08

got to fix that side

14:10

of the equation, the supplies of the equation

14:12

to make sure we meet the demand side.

14:14

I see some of the biggest

14:16

hang ups of all in

14:18

interconnection and actually being able to

14:20

show any like you say, get

14:23

renewables and storage on quickly because

14:25

they're cheaper and faster to build

14:28

and you can put them in a lot of different places

14:30

that you can't build a combined

14:32

cycle natural gas plant. And if we

14:35

can get that interconnection and we can

14:37

make the planning processes work for it,

14:39

that's going to resolve a lot of the issues. I

14:42

think market reform also has a role to

14:44

play here. You know, the West

14:46

is a lot of different RTOs,

14:49

a lot of different, a

14:52

lot of different ISOs. And because

14:54

of that, you know, you can't

14:57

necessarily get power to where

14:59

the demand is high. And it's,

15:01

it's been a

15:03

problem that we've been talking about for

15:05

a long time. There's some new energy,

15:07

I think around fixing it, especially, especially

15:09

in the West. And it's

15:12

a really important piece of the

15:14

puzzle because where it is cheapest

15:16

to generate renewable power may not

15:18

be where it's most needed

15:20

to be used. Unless, Stephen, to your

15:23

point, you're bringing in manufacturing, bringing in

15:25

data centers to follow

15:27

the physical location of renewables. So

15:29

market reform to use the existing,

15:32

you know, mechanisms

15:34

we have to deliver power, I think

15:36

is really important. Yeah, and

15:38

independent system operators or regional transmission

15:41

organizations are really helpful in that way, because

15:43

you are able to pull from a portfolio

15:45

of resources and manage and plan accordingly. So there

15:47

has been also a lot of energy, Shalini, in

15:50

the Southeast on trying to make that a more

15:52

organized market. And that would kind of feed into

15:54

what you're saying. And thank you

15:56

for defining the acronym. something

16:00

that you just mentioned, Shalini, which is

16:02

the co-location of these projects. And I

16:05

know that there are some developers that are thinking

16:07

about different offtake strategies and

16:09

partnering with data

16:12

centers or manufacturing facilities. Are you

16:14

seeing more of a co-location strategy

16:16

for renewable energy

16:18

projects and storage projects? It's

16:21

certainly a very appealing

16:23

concept. There are some

16:25

practical challenges, like what if you don't

16:28

have the fiber infrastructure for a data

16:30

center near where you have the renewables

16:32

develop that. There's certainly no guarantee they're

16:34

all going to be in the same

16:36

location. Workforce issues

16:38

are also a concern. If

16:41

you have a manufacturing plant, you need

16:43

people to work various jobs.

16:46

And those people come with families and

16:48

kids who need to go to school and spouses

16:50

who have

16:53

to find jobs. And those

16:55

may not exist in

16:58

rural areas. In many ways, it's

17:00

a great opportunity to

17:03

revitalize rural areas. But

17:05

if you're just one company trying to

17:07

make that decision, you may find that

17:10

all the factors are not in fact aligning.

17:13

So we have underinvested in

17:15

transmission distribution for decades. We

17:18

have seen outages increase.

17:20

We have seen massive backlogs

17:22

of clean energy projects. The

17:25

Biden administration has pulled together $30 billion

17:28

for potential grid upgrades.

17:31

Catherine, where are these dollars

17:33

going to and how will they make an

17:35

impact in the medium term? When will they

17:37

start making an impact? Yeah, first of all,

17:39

there's an unprecedented attention that

17:41

this administration is putting on

17:43

transmission. So that is huge

17:46

good news. Of

17:48

the $30 billion, about $5 billion has

17:50

been focused on new transmission lines. So

17:52

much of this is on really

17:55

the protocols, the rules, the

17:57

processes, permitting, they established. a

18:00

grid deployment office at the Department of Energy.

18:03

There's a lot that's going on to try to

18:05

get it set up. That certainly

18:07

dwarfs the investment that we really need

18:09

to build out. FERC

18:11

is also doing an interregional planning rule,

18:13

which is really important to make sure,

18:16

as we've spoken before, that

18:18

power is able to flow between regions,

18:20

that the markets are set

18:22

up to do so. That's supposed to come out in

18:24

April, so we're watching for that. Other

18:27

than that, we also need so much on

18:30

interconnection to make sure that we can

18:32

get these plants online,

18:35

all of these, whether it's storage,

18:37

any kind of renewables,

18:40

also transmission. One

18:43

thing that fell out of the mix in

18:45

the Inflation Reduction Act was an investment tax

18:47

credit for transmission, which would reduce the cost

18:49

of building these lines by 30 percent. That,

18:53

to me, was a huge miss. You

18:55

can't fix that just with good permitting

18:58

policy. You really need to have investment.

19:00

I would think Shalini would have something

19:02

to say about that too, investing

19:04

in infrastructure. Yeah. One

19:07

of the things about investing in

19:09

infrastructure is it really is a

19:11

public-private process. It is all something

19:13

that a private entity can do.

19:15

There have been, like Sunzia recently

19:18

reached a milestone this moving forward.

19:20

I think it's been 15 years under development,

19:24

like a really long time for maybe not

19:26

that long, but a long time for a

19:28

private entity to take this on. I

19:31

am glad. I agree with Catherine.

19:33

The focus on this issue is

19:35

great, but it feels like there

19:38

aren't easy solutions. It is just a

19:40

very technical discussion, and

19:42

I hope we can keep our eye on that.

19:51

I want to tell you about a few things our team

19:53

at Latitude Media is working on that you should check out.

19:55

Firstly, if you missed our January 31 frontier forum with Alfred

19:57

Johnson of Crutch, I'm going to turn it over to you.

20:00

the transferable tax credit market.

20:02

You can watch it at

20:04

latitudemedia.com/events. It was

20:06

a great conversation, tons of good info and

20:08

questions from the audience about how the market

20:10

is shaping up. In mid-February,

20:13

we've got a big report coming out that

20:15

our research team has been working on for

20:17

months. It's a first-of-a-kind study

20:19

on the pathways to adoption of

20:21

AI solutions in the power sector.

20:23

It is very comprehensive. It includes

20:25

what utilities are doing, the characteristics

20:28

of different kinds of utility adoption

20:30

and the vendor landscape. Go

20:33

to latitudemedia.com/research to find out more.

20:35

It will be worth your time.

20:38

And finally, subscribe to our newsletter. We're covering

20:40

tech deals and markets across a range of

20:42

sectors from solar to storage to microgrids to

20:44

carbon removal. Go to latitudemedia.com/newsletter

20:46

to sign up for free.

20:49

And thanks so much. Okay,

20:57

let's talk about two important

20:59

tax-related stories. We

21:02

finance a lot of clean energy through the tax code

21:04

in the U.S. That's how we've always done it. And

21:06

there's a shift happening in the market

21:09

right now, thanks to these new rules

21:11

under the Inflation Reduction Act that allow

21:14

tax credits to be transferable. And that just

21:16

means that project owners can now sell

21:19

tax credits for cash. And

21:21

that is so far with

21:23

about a half a year of real

21:26

trading opening

21:28

up the market to mid-sized deals that

21:30

maybe wouldn't get financed or

21:32

supported through complicated tax equity deals at

21:35

the limited number of banks that have

21:37

historically engaged with tax equity. And

21:40

the tax equity market is where

21:42

banks with enough tax appetite,

21:44

tax liability actually invest capital in projects

21:46

and then they take advantage of the

21:49

tax credits. And there are a lot

21:51

of different structures where

21:54

the bank can partner with the project. That

21:57

market was worth about $23 billion last year. year.

22:00

And the market for transferable tax credits

22:02

where a lot more companies can buy

22:04

these credits was somewhere in the seven

22:07

to nine billion dollar range last year

22:09

according to this new market analysis from

22:11

Crux. So that's actually growth that's a

22:13

lot faster than people expected. It could

22:16

help bring the value of tax financing of

22:19

clean energy to 50 billion dollars by the

22:22

end of the decade. And

22:24

so the big question is what does this mean for

22:26

the way we deploy capital? We

22:29

also have this really important story

22:31

on the tax credit side. We now

22:33

have guidance on the 45V tax credit

22:35

for hydrogen production. This is like a

22:37

really hot story in energy right now.

22:40

We alluded to it at the end of the year and

22:43

and then in December we got more details.

22:45

And so it looks like the government is

22:47

going to create rules that will ensure coming

22:50

hydrogen production is as clean as possible

22:53

but as we'll hear it is potentially

22:55

stalling the market and

22:59

there's a real debate over how stringent

23:02

these rules need to be and how much

23:04

hydrogen and whether they'll hold

23:06

back hydrogen production. And we're

23:09

going to talk about that now.

23:11

First let's talk about these Treasury

23:13

rules. Shalini, what did Treasury propose

23:15

about how these hydrogen tax credits

23:17

should work? So this guidance

23:19

has been hotly anticipated. As you said

23:22

it came out near the end

23:24

of last year, right before Christmas I think. That's my

23:26

memory of it. And it's

23:28

described as having three pillars.

23:30

So and this all goes

23:33

to what a project has to do to

23:35

qualify for the the highest

23:38

amount of the hydrogen

23:40

production tax credit. The most you can get

23:42

is three dollars a kilogram and for it

23:44

to do that you have to be emitting less

23:47

than 0.4 or 5 kilograms

23:49

of CO2 equivalent. So

23:52

it you know that's it's a high bar

23:54

and if you hit if you aren't quite

23:56

that clean then you get you

23:58

can still qualify for the PTC but you may

24:00

not get the full $3 a kg. So

24:03

the three pillars to get you

24:05

to, you know, that higher PTC

24:08

amount that you definitely want

24:10

to get are additionality. So

24:12

clean energy resources have

24:14

to begin operation within three years

24:16

of the hydrogen plant being

24:19

operational so that you're actually

24:21

incenting new generation and not

24:23

just using the renewables that are

24:25

already built and maybe taking it away from a

24:27

data center. The

24:29

second pillar is deliverability. So the clean

24:32

energy resource has to be in the

24:34

same region as the

24:37

green hydrogen project. And that's to prevent

24:41

actors from just buying, overbuying in one

24:43

market and then kind of spilling that

24:45

power on the grid where it isn't

24:47

really used and then using dirty grid

24:49

power where their project is located. So that's

24:51

the logic. The third one

24:54

is hourly matching and that requires

24:56

that an hour of electrolyzer

25:01

use, production of hydrogen, that

25:03

hour, specific hour must be matched

25:06

with an hour of green power

25:08

production. You can't just

25:10

say that, you know, on

25:12

the aggregate over a year with annual

25:14

matching, you can say, look, we purchased

25:16

as much green power, using as much

25:18

green power in the aggregate annually as

25:21

we did overall. This is

25:23

really holding to a tighter standard, which

25:25

is you have to match it per

25:27

hour. Okay. So there were a coalition

25:29

of folks who were pushing for these

25:33

more stringent requirements. Catherine, did they

25:35

get what they were asking? Why

25:37

does this matter? Explain

25:39

like the controversy and

25:41

lobbying leading up to this and then what the

25:43

outcome was relative to what folks wanted.

25:46

Yeah. So the three pillars were not in

25:48

the law. The law just stipulated that it

25:50

had to be, you know, very, very low

25:52

emission, but this was how they thought this

25:54

is the best way to implement this. This

25:57

is the, you know, Jesse Jenkins has spent

25:59

a lot of time I'm thinking about this, other folks

26:01

have looked at, what would this

26:03

look like? What would those three pillars look

26:05

like? And so in that regard, yes, they

26:08

won. I mean, this is gonna make sure

26:10

that you're not getting blue hydrogen qualifying

26:14

for $3 a kilogram credit when

26:17

it costs only $1 to $2

26:19

a kilogram to produce it. So

26:21

that's a good thing for really

26:24

spurring new renewables, for spurring clean

26:26

electrolysis, for making sure that this

26:28

doesn't just keep natural

26:31

gas from continuing

26:33

to produce hydrogen. So

26:35

the hydrogen producers are really glad

26:37

for this. So electric two, air

26:39

products, EDP Renew

26:41

was on board with this,

26:43

steel producers, MERSC. I mean,

26:45

a lot of folks who are trying to get to

26:47

net zero are really happy about this. On

26:50

the other hand, there were a lot of folks that are not

26:52

happy about it. And I would say, NEXTERRA,

26:55

Constellation, BP, Exxon,

26:58

Plug Power, which is an electrolysis

27:00

manufacturer. A lot of those folks

27:02

are not happy with these rules

27:04

for a bunch of different reasons. But

27:06

part of which is what this

27:09

would do is it would not

27:11

allow for existing renewable facilities. And

27:13

I would say, especially something like

27:15

hydropower that would

27:17

be able to be used more effectively, or

27:19

there may even be other ones that are not

27:21

at their full capacity factor that you'd be

27:23

able to still allow

27:25

the electrolyzer production to

27:28

be clean

27:30

that isn't

27:32

stipulated in these three pillars. That said, it

27:34

does look like there could be a 5%

27:37

carve out potential for existing resources. So we'll

27:39

kind of see how that turns out. They

27:41

are taking comments now, the Treasury Department

27:43

is taking comments until the end of February.

27:46

And I'm guessing they're gonna get a

27:48

lot of comments. And then

27:50

they will have to decide, well, what does this

27:52

mean? Are we gonna keep the three pillars as

27:54

they are? I suspect they will. I

27:56

suspect that they will simply come up with ways in

27:59

which you can use. existing resources at

28:01

certain times to be able to

28:03

qualify so that you

28:05

really are getting clean green hydrogen

28:07

and you're not

28:09

leaving plants that are that aren't really

28:11

at their full capacity out there on

28:14

the grid you know being

28:16

less than useful. Well, Shalini,

28:18

there's no better person to ask than you about

28:20

what the potential impact out in

28:22

the market could be. I know

28:24

you're evaluating a lot of deals and

28:27

this guidance potentially freezes some of them

28:29

or makes them more complicated. So tell

28:31

me about how this could play into

28:33

the numbers behind some of the hydrogen

28:35

projects you're evaluating. Yeah, as

28:37

Catherine described, this is a topic

28:40

that people have many, you know,

28:43

lots of different views on including with my

28:45

colleagues, right? It's not like we all have

28:47

the same perspective on it.

28:49

So I'll give you my view, which is

28:51

most of the projects that I have looked

28:53

at have assumed grid power

28:56

plus REX for,

28:58

you know, for the first wave of projects

29:00

and everyone wants to do better but the

29:02

projects have said, look, in order to

29:05

achieve a decent rate of

29:08

return, this is what we can

29:10

do. And I will point out that

29:12

data centers and tech companies, there are

29:14

now some tech companies that very prominently

29:17

are focused on hourly matching,

29:19

right? Every hour that data

29:22

center use is matched to an hour

29:25

of green production. They weren't doing that

29:27

at the beginning. When we first started

29:29

working on corporate PPAs, it was much

29:31

more, you know, just annual matching. You

29:33

know, you use this much power, you're

29:35

offsetting it by signing PPAs

29:37

for a similar amount. So from

29:39

my perspective, and again, you

29:42

know, even my colleagues may have

29:44

different views, from my perspective, what

29:46

we're doing is increasing the bar

29:48

for hydrogen to be clean

29:50

in a way that data centers and electric

29:53

vehicles, right? It's not like when I bought

29:55

my EV, I could, I mean,

29:57

I do charge it overnight with, you know, Texas wind

29:59

power. But it's not like I was

30:01

limited to doing that in a way that

30:03

affected the EBS utility. So

30:08

I think it is going to be challenging for

30:10

a lot of projects. There are going to be

30:12

some people who can absolutely

30:15

achieve those goals. And

30:17

I think you can see how

30:20

the market is divided by the

30:22

kind of power plans, the green power

30:25

strategies that companies have. But

30:27

I do worry that it will make

30:30

a lot of the

30:32

projects that I'm looking at that are not necessarily associated

30:35

with a large renewables IPP,

30:37

hard to move forward. It's

30:41

going to make a lot of those projects that I'm looking at tough

30:44

to pencil. I'll point out one other thing

30:46

about green hydrogen, which is there's

30:48

been a lot of hype around it. And

30:50

the incentives in the inflation reduction act

30:53

are supply side. They

30:55

are not stimulating demand. They

30:57

are providing tools in the IRA to

30:59

reduce the price of green hydrogen, which

31:01

we've just been talking about. But

31:03

they haven't said that they

31:06

hadn't in any way pushed anyone

31:08

to use this product with

31:11

a lower environmental impact.

31:14

And a lot of the domestic

31:16

users of green hydrogen are companies

31:18

like chemical refineries, oil and

31:21

gas companies. And that

31:23

is a big one because you can make green ammonia

31:25

with green hydrogen. And ammonia

31:27

is a key part of fertilizer production. And

31:30

so the challenge there is those are industries

31:33

that maybe are not as

31:35

focused on decarbonization as more

31:37

consumer facing industries. And

31:40

so how are you going to convince a

31:45

client, a customer to pay an

31:47

even greater premium than you had

31:49

to before the guidance came out.

31:52

So lots of different perspectives. And I

31:54

certainly agree with the goal of cleaning

31:57

the production of hydrogen that I was

31:59

hoping for maybe a more nuanced

32:01

baby step approach. I'll also point out

32:03

one more thing, that the demand

32:05

for green power, for which we started

32:07

talking about, the demand for power period,

32:10

also hurts the cause of green hydrogen

32:12

because if you are a wind

32:15

developer, who are

32:17

you gonna sign a power purchase agreement

32:20

with? A tech company that wants it

32:22

for a data center or a new

32:24

industry like green hydrogen. So it's another

32:26

barrier that I think has been put in

32:28

green hydrogen's path. Yeah, so

32:30

comments are due in February from

32:33

any stakeholder who wants to submit

32:35

comments and then they'll take

32:37

some period of time to, come

32:39

up with the final rulemaking and then it'll

32:42

move forward. They'll create the tax

32:44

forms and we'll move ahead. Okay, well,

32:47

we'll follow up on that when we get more details. And

32:49

let's turn now to this bigger shift in tax

32:51

financing on why transferable tax credits

32:54

matter. Shalini, over to you. I

32:56

know you're not specifically working on tax

32:58

finance, but you have a team that

33:01

does. And are you seeing any shift

33:03

in the way deals are getting done

33:05

or evaluated because of the way tax

33:07

credits are now structured? So

33:10

we're, I think everyone, this is across

33:12

the industry. I think we're all excited

33:15

that the market has

33:17

come together, transferable tax credits are

33:19

new. And it

33:22

was just really impossible to know how

33:24

long it was gonna take for companies

33:26

beyond the current pool to

33:29

decide they wanted to play in

33:31

this new area. So it's really very

33:34

encouraging that there is demand for tax

33:36

credits and there are companies willing to

33:38

get involved that previously hadn't done it. Having

33:41

said that, the mechanism

33:43

is still the same, which is there's still

33:45

a lot of due diligence on projects. And

33:48

I do think that, and

33:50

this is very early days it's

33:53

been very encouraging in these early days, but

33:55

we do have to get these big

33:58

renewables projects financed. And. And

34:00

it seems like right now it's

34:03

easier to move forward with smaller projects. Just

34:05

the risk is less, you need fewer entities

34:09

involved. So I'll be curious to see if the

34:12

market continues to develop. But look,

34:15

the demand is encouraging, the

34:17

deals that have been announced are encouraging, and

34:19

frankly, the amount of value that

34:22

projects are getting to keep, which is really a

34:24

sign of how much demand

34:26

there is. Everyone's not chasing

34:28

one new tax equity provider.

34:32

That value has been high. So it's

34:35

a good moment. Catherine,

34:38

you have lived in the

34:40

tax code for a long time. I felt like

34:42

every couple of years we would have a big

34:44

show at the end of the year and say,

34:46

ah, we've got a tax package done. And so

34:48

you have seen the

34:51

boom and bust cycles on the policy side

34:53

and on the market side as tax

34:57

credits have phased out, and then we've

34:59

passed extensions. And then the creation of

35:01

these 10-year tax credits that are now

35:03

transferable and sellable for cash is a

35:05

really big deal. What

35:07

did you expect to come out of this shift?

35:11

And did you expect it to ramp up as quickly as it did?

35:13

Yeah. So everybody

35:16

wanted it to ramp up, and everybody

35:18

just started investing like crazy, right? That's

35:20

why we're getting all of these demand

35:22

scenarios with all this manufacturing. Everybody's

35:25

like, yeah, let's do it. The issue is

35:27

you still need a lot of guidance written

35:29

because a lot of this has never had

35:31

tax credits before, and they're also structured differently.

35:34

So you had domestic content that

35:37

they had to figure out. They

35:39

have a bonus credit

35:41

for wages and apprenticeships, and

35:43

that's a little bit gnarly. Some

35:46

of these are self-reporting. So

35:49

that will be helpful that companies will be able

35:51

to self-report. Other

35:53

of these credits have platforms

35:55

that you have to apply for, one

35:58

of which is the low-income ad. So

36:00

that's for low-income rooftop community solar,

36:02

multi-family solar and tribal projects. And

36:05

you have to apply. There's a,

36:07

you know, it's only a 1.8

36:11

gigawatt limit for these projects. And those are,

36:13

a lot of them are already

36:15

claimed. They've already had all of

36:17

the applications filled. So there

36:19

is just a huge amount of pent-up

36:21

interest. And so yes, it is going

36:24

like gangbusters. One thing to keep in

36:26

mind, at the end of 2024, that would be this year. There

36:30

are a few credits that do

36:32

not continue, including the microgrid tax

36:34

credit, the constituting solar tax credit.

36:36

Now storage continues, solar

36:38

and wind continue, most of the renewables continue.

36:40

But some of them don't, because what they

36:42

ended up doing was only having credits through

36:44

the end of 2024. And

36:47

then in 2025, they become what's called

36:49

tech neutral. It's not really tech neutral.

36:51

It just means that it's pegged to

36:54

emission reduction rather

36:56

than being technology specific. But some of those

36:58

technologies didn't make it into the mix. And

37:01

so there are a lot of things that we're going

37:03

to need to do this year. One

37:05

is to figure out how do you get some of those to continue?

37:08

Because they haven't even finalized the

37:10

microgrid credit rules. You can't even

37:12

start putting any equipment into, or

37:14

projects into safe harbor before this

37:16

thing is going to expire. And

37:19

then in 2025, they have to set

37:22

up a totally different system for the

37:24

tax credit to be able to be

37:26

administered. So Treasury is trying

37:28

to get all those final guidance out

37:30

for all the different technologies that are going to

37:32

expire pretty quickly. And then they also

37:35

need to set up for 2025 to

37:37

make sure that when we flip the switch and

37:39

the new year comes, that you'll be able to

37:41

take advantage of a different tax structure. So I

37:43

am very focused on what does all that look

37:45

like? How do we get some of these things

37:48

over the finish line? How do you get something

37:50

like the transmission credit over the finish line that

37:52

wasn't ever there? And

37:55

so that's, and other little fixes

37:58

in the code that the inflation reduction... act,

38:01

put in a place that, you know, there were

38:03

just some things that technically weren't quite right. Like,

38:05

how do you get those little fixes done? So

38:07

that's going to take some work over the next

38:09

year to make sure we're all set up to

38:11

go because there's still a lot out there that

38:14

is a little bit uncertain. The

38:17

45Z in the IRA is, includes

38:19

sustainable aviation fuel, and that expires

38:21

in 2027, which is

38:24

just not very far away, especially given that that

38:26

is a new product

38:28

that we're still trying, you

38:31

know, the industry is still trying to figure out. So the second

38:34

thing, Catherine's comment that, you know,

38:36

this is, there's a lot of

38:38

short timelines and long processes.

38:41

Yeah, I'm really glad you mentioned that one too. That's another one we'll

38:43

have to put into the mix of things we have

38:45

to get done in the next year or two. Yeah,

38:48

so along with some of that policy

38:50

uncertainty and additional guidance, there's also a

38:53

little bit of uncertainty in the market

38:55

too. So you have buyers,

38:57

new buyers of tax credits that

39:00

are coming in and a little

39:02

bit nervous about the diligence process,

39:04

about how much they have to

39:06

pay for insurance. And

39:08

so it makes, you know, intermediaries pretty

39:10

important in the market. And then, you

39:12

know, sellers are obviously worried about pricing.

39:16

They want to make sure that they're getting good pricing and

39:18

have price transparency on the platforms that are

39:20

selling these credits. And so, you know, you

39:22

still have a lot of buyers

39:24

that are sitting on the sidelines and obviously

39:27

more sellers participating in the market because they

39:29

want to sell their credits and

39:31

expand their facilities. So with

39:33

that said, we are seeing some

39:35

new interesting deals. Just

39:38

recently, there was this $700 million sale of 45X tax credits by

39:40

First Solar. And

39:46

our team at Latitude Media has been digging

39:48

into this a little bit. And we just

39:51

released a recent story. We went around and

39:53

talked to some manufacturers. And many of them

39:55

are saying that they're thinking about expanding because

39:57

of the prospect of being able to sell

39:59

these credits. One

40:01

Canadian solar manufacturer, Halene,

40:04

said it's committed to 800 megawatts

40:06

of manufacturing capacity to the U.S.

40:08

and 500 more megawatts in Minnesota

40:10

in 2024, and that specific

40:13

investment was motivated by the ability

40:16

to sell 45X tax credits.

40:18

So this is having an

40:21

impact on new kinds of investment in

40:23

facilities. In that report

40:25

that I mentioned written by Crocs

40:28

where they interviewed 150 market participants, buyer-sellers,

40:32

intermediaries, they

40:34

did find that deal sizes were

40:36

much, much lower than traditional tax

40:39

equity, and although

40:41

they were mostly wind and solar deals, you

40:43

do see them across bioenergy

40:46

and in manufacturing, advanced manufacturing,

40:48

and so the market is

40:51

starting to diversify in terms

40:53

of deal type and deal

40:56

size. So some really

40:58

interesting changes there. You know,

41:00

you make a really good point that the

41:02

differentiation in the market might mean there's some

41:05

technologies, some kinds of projects

41:07

that maybe seem too

41:09

complicated to understand or the RIC

41:11

profile isn't what new tax equity

41:14

providers are comfortable with, so that's a

41:16

new element, right, because we do have

41:18

all these, as Catherine

41:21

laid out, all the different kinds of

41:23

credits, manufacturing credits and the domestic content

41:25

and all that, and

41:28

yet if the

41:30

market isn't there

41:32

to invest in

41:34

that from a tax equity perspective, then the

41:37

value of those credits is diminished, so TBD.

41:40

Yeah, so we're going to be reporting on how

41:43

these deals are structured. There's certainly going

41:45

to be hybrid deals as well with

41:47

traditional tax equity players that are combining

41:51

some of these transferable credits with traditional

41:54

tax equity deals, and

41:57

you will see lots of that. And

42:00

we're going to be covering how that's

42:02

evolving at Latitude. And actually, we're recording

42:04

this on a Tuesday. On

42:07

Wednesday, I'll actually be sitting down

42:09

with Crux CEO Alfred Johnson, and we're going to

42:11

walk through that report. And

42:15

we'll talk about pricing and why

42:18

some of the hesitations among buyers and

42:20

sellers, what's to come in 2024. So

42:22

that'll be an interesting conversation. It'll probably

42:24

already be done by the time this

42:27

episode comes out, but we will be

42:29

distributing it on the pod afterwards. So

42:31

stay tuned for that conversation. We're going

42:33

to dig into a bunch of different

42:35

market forces. And

42:38

with that, we're going to end with the forecast. This

42:40

is where we briefly talk about a story or an

42:42

observation that tells us something about the

42:44

near or distant future. Katherine, what

42:46

do you have? Yeah, so how many

42:48

TV streaming services do you think

42:50

you have? Do you

42:53

know, Stephen, how many you have? Well, I'm constantly

42:55

kind of cycling them through, canceling them, deciding

42:57

that I don't use it, then seeing a

42:59

show I like, and then

43:01

resubscribing. I would say five.

43:05

Oh, that's good. Show me how about

43:07

you? I think between four to five,

43:09

I'm going through them in my head. At

43:12

various points, the high tide has been like, you

43:14

know, like seven. Yeah, yeah, I

43:16

feel like it's infinite. It's like, oh, I'll have to

43:18

see Project One Runway, so that means I have to

43:20

subscribe to Hulu. It's like, that's the kind of thing

43:22

we're in. Well, I just, I'm saying

43:24

this because, you know, we sign up for

43:26

streaming services, it kind of willy-nilly, I would

43:28

say, because we want to see something, or

43:30

at least, you know, I find myself doing

43:32

that. But reporting is

43:34

really different, and I'm just

43:36

really saddened by a lot

43:39

of the stories about media

43:42

outlets, press news outlets, laying

43:45

off reporters. The LA Times laid

43:47

off 20% of its newsroom. Certainly

43:51

the Post had like 240 reporters

43:53

that took buyouts before the end

43:55

of the new year. The

43:58

Baltimore Sun was bought by kind of this

44:00

right-wing Sinclair guy who's going to kind of

44:02

change the tone. So I'm

44:05

just heartened by the fact that

44:07

a lot of these newsrooms are really having trouble.

44:10

A lot of community papers, it's something like five

44:12

local newspapers shut down every two weeks. I

44:14

mean, it's just crazy. And that's where a lot

44:16

of people get their news and get really

44:18

good stories. I mean, Sammy

44:21

Roth at the LA Times, luckily, is still

44:23

there. He's amazing. He's a great climate reporter.

44:26

And I'm glad to see that there

44:28

are so many other folks out there

44:30

reporting Bloomberg, E&E News, David

44:33

Roberts, of course, with Volts, and

44:36

of course, Latitude, which I call El

44:39

Apostrophe Attitude. Latitude

44:42

has great reporters. I mean, you guys are

44:44

doing great. But I look

44:47

at these papers and all the trouble they're

44:49

having, and I just hope that people still

44:51

invest. The way that you get streaming services

44:54

for TV, continue to invest in

44:56

our good reporting, because we desperately need that

44:58

to be able to tell stories about climate

45:00

and to tell stories about clean tech and

45:02

investment and all the things we talk about

45:04

and you talk about every day, Shalini

45:06

and Stephen. So I wanted to just raise that

45:08

up as something we need to pay attention to.

45:11

Oh, definitely. I mean, as a media professional,

45:13

this is certainly something I'm thinking

45:15

about a lot. And as someone who has recently

45:19

co-founded Media Brand,

45:22

we made an explicit choice to be really

45:25

strict, niche B2B journalism,

45:27

because you have a much closer

45:29

connection with your audience. You

45:31

can create research and live events that

45:33

get people to interact with what you're

45:35

doing. And some of these sort of

45:38

mid-sized news organizations have been hollowed out

45:40

because they don't have a close connection

45:42

with their listeners,

45:44

readers, viewers, and they've seen

45:47

advertising move over

45:49

to social media platforms. And so

45:51

there's this barbell effect in media

45:54

right now where you have a few very

45:57

large news organizations that

46:01

really good digital offerings, really good subscription

46:03

services like the New York Times that

46:06

invested heavily in digital offerings pretty

46:08

early on and are succeeding wildly. And

46:10

then at the other end, you

46:12

have individuals who are doing really well

46:14

on sub-stack, niche media

46:17

brands where people have a really

46:19

close connection with the

46:21

journalists and the folks that are running those

46:23

media groups. And the media

46:27

organizations in the middle are doing

46:29

really, really poorly. And

46:32

just to borrow from some of the analysis

46:34

that's been out there about this recent bloodbath

46:36

in the media ecosystem, I mean, it's sort

46:38

of started with the air of

46:40

the internet when a lot of publications actually

46:42

put their news online for free, not realizing

46:45

that many people were going to consume it. And

46:47

then people got used to not actually

46:49

paying for news. And

46:52

then social media came along and

46:54

sucked up all the classified ads.

46:57

They sucked up all the advertising,

46:59

local advertising that newspapers

47:02

and radio stations relied on. And

47:05

so they lost that massive revenue

47:07

stream. And then once

47:10

a lot of those media organizations

47:12

were struggling, you had a lot of

47:14

private equity firms that came in and

47:16

bought up a bunch of local newspapers

47:19

and hollowed them out because they didn't

47:21

see good journalists. What they saw were

47:23

printing presses, real estate, things

47:26

that they could sell off.

47:29

And then when the organization was completely

47:31

hollowed out, they could declare bankruptcy and they'd already

47:33

made their money back. And so private equity's role

47:35

in the news business has actually been a really

47:37

big story in causing some of these problems. And

47:39

then of course you have some of the billionaires

47:41

who've bought newspapers that don't know how to run

47:43

them and they do it for prestige. And so

47:46

it's a really complicated problem with a deep history

47:48

over the last two decades. But I mean,

47:50

I'm so glad you brought it up because it's something I think about

47:52

every day. Wow, Stephen, I'm glad you

47:55

could explain it back to me. That

47:57

wasn't man's flinging, was it? No, no, that was not.

48:00

That was great. That was great.

48:02

Shalini, any thoughts, given that your

48:04

husband is in the news business? I think

48:06

you described it perfectly. What's

48:09

ironic to me is that all of

48:11

us, I think, consume more

48:13

news than ever before. It's not like the

48:15

consumption or interest in the news

48:17

has dropped off. Sometimes

48:21

it can take a little discipline to read

48:23

about the war in Ukraine when it isn't

48:25

going well, which is right now. But

48:28

at the same time, on the whole, I feel

48:30

like people care about the news and

48:32

are engaged, but we don't think

48:34

about the fact that it takes people

48:36

with mortgages and kids and all

48:38

that to go gather the news.

48:42

I'm amazed at the

48:45

role of local newspapers, where

48:47

my husband works at the Houston Chronicle, the

48:50

role of newspapers in gathering the

48:53

info that then you

48:55

hear about on talk shows and

48:57

on social media and all of

48:59

that. But

49:01

the original reporting is

49:03

done by entities that were

49:05

not supporting. Absolutely.

49:09

Most of the content that is

49:11

out there is borrowed from a

49:13

small number of rigorous journalistic outfits

49:15

that are often not getting the

49:17

funding they need. So it's a real problem. Okay.

49:21

Well, I could go on and on about this. Let's

49:25

turn to your story, Shalini. What

49:28

is your forecast? So

49:30

my forecast is that I

49:32

think we're having good and

49:34

useful discussions about EVs,

49:37

electric vehicles. There was

49:39

a cold snap earlier this month, and there were a lot

49:41

of news stories about Tesla

49:46

chargers not working and people waiting in

49:48

line to charge their cars or having to charge

49:51

much more often than they had planned on. It

49:54

felt like it was not

49:56

a great moment for the EV industry.

50:00

I'm seeing more discussion around, you know, how do

50:02

you prepare for this? Like the same way that

50:04

if you know a Cold front is

50:06

coming if you know a storm is coming, you know,

50:09

you get water You have some food

50:11

in case the power goes out, you know There's some

50:13

practical preparation cover your faucets of course and

50:15

make sure your pets and plants are safe

50:17

There's also some things you can do, you

50:20

know with your EV you can before you

50:22

start driving You can turn on the heat

50:24

and like having a warm car You

50:26

know helps the battery perform better. You

50:28

obviously will need to charge more often

50:31

And so maybe planning for that, you

50:33

know, it is good and we're building

50:35

out more charging networks So I think

50:37

that's encouraging as well And

50:39

you know making sure that when you're done driving

50:41

that you're not leaving it with a low battery

50:44

because it drains down very quickly So

50:46

there are some there's some things that we can do

50:49

To cope with cold weather and I

50:51

just want to point out that extreme

50:53

weather causes interruption and all kinds of

50:56

infrastructure You know, we've had disruptions

50:58

where you know, they're long lines

51:00

of gas stations, you know Because

51:02

there was a you know a flood or or a storm

51:05

So I think that just I'm glad

51:08

to see that the discussion around, you

51:10

know, EV winter preparedness is is now

51:12

a thing Oh, I'm so

51:14

glad you mentioned that I I've been getting in We

51:17

we leased another EV over

51:20

the new year and You know, I

51:22

got in it was like yo, you're not getting as

51:24

far as you think you are because it's cold Okay,

51:28

but this is good good to know these are really

51:30

good tips and I'm glad you brought it up well,

51:33

I have a quick update to a major story

51:35

that got a lot of attention into the end

51:37

of last year and that is the impact

51:41

of America's liquefied natural gas exports

51:43

and what the Biden administration is

51:45

going to do about them. So

51:49

Under the Biden administration. We saw

51:51

massive build out and approval of

51:54

LNG facilities to send more gas

51:57

over to Europe in particular

52:00

particular. And environmentalists

52:02

started taking a look at this

52:04

and saying, wait a second, are we

52:06

just exporting our emissions now

52:09

to Europe? And there were a

52:11

couple of studies –

52:14

they were not peer-reviewed studies, but there were a

52:16

couple of studies looking at the potential emissions

52:19

impact. One of them came from Bob

52:21

Holworth from Cornell who has done

52:24

a bunch of peer-reviewed research comparing

52:26

the emissions impact of gas when

52:28

factoring in methane leakage to coal

52:31

and found that gas

52:33

was in fact not cleaner than coal and

52:35

in fact potentially dirtier than coal. And so

52:37

he took a look at what it

52:39

takes to store and

52:41

ship gas and found

52:43

that if all terminals that are being

52:45

proposed by companies in the US are

52:48

built, we could be adding the emissions

52:50

equivalent of Europe. It's a big deal.

52:52

Environmentalists rallied around it and put pressure

52:55

on the Biden administration to pause many

52:57

of these new terminals that are

53:00

being proposed, particularly one called

53:02

CP2, which would be the second

53:04

biggest LNG export terminal

53:07

on the Gulf Coast. And there

53:09

are two bodies that approve permits

53:12

for liquefied natural gas under the Federal

53:14

Energy Regulatory Commission and under the Department

53:16

of Energy. If FERC approves a facility,

53:18

a company can build

53:20

a terminal and then sell that gas

53:23

to free trade partners. But the Department

53:25

of Energy can give authority

53:27

for broader sales of that liquefied natural

53:29

gas, but it has to evaluate national

53:31

security concerns, potential economic

53:34

impact, and environmentalists are saying you should

53:36

be evaluating environmental impact. And so the

53:38

Biden administration this month said we are

53:41

going to put a pause on these

53:43

new facilities and take a look at

53:45

the impact on pricing and the impact

53:47

on the climate. So that's a big

53:49

deal. It's the first time the DOE

53:51

has ever done this. And definitely

53:54

a big win for those

53:56

concerned about these LNG facilities.

54:00

And who knows what's going to

54:02

come next because this is going to be like a

54:04

three month pause, I think. Catherine, any thoughts on how

54:06

this is playing out in Washington and what the pause

54:08

could look like? I know there

54:10

are a lot of people going to be very angry about that,

54:14

including Chairman Manchin of the Senate Energy

54:16

and Natural Resources Committee. I

54:19

think the initial push for

54:21

it was so predicated on

54:24

trying to get the EU off of Russian

54:26

gas. I mean, that is a real issue,

54:28

right? So part of it was, let's get

54:30

the gas from the US rather than from

54:33

Russia. So that's been, it's been a

54:35

national security argument for

54:37

a little while now. And I think that's

54:40

what people are continuing to hang their hats

54:42

on. But honestly, the emissions

54:44

piece is huge. And we have to take

54:46

that into consideration. So I'm glad you brought this up.

54:48

I mean, certainly in the aftermath of

54:50

Russia's invasion of Ukraine, when gas supplies

54:52

were really tight and Europe was in

54:54

a genuine crisis, this made sense. But

54:57

when people stepped back, when we

54:59

saw that Europe had enough gas,

55:02

suddenly the emissions impact became really

55:04

critical. And one study, again, not

55:06

a peer reviewed study, found that

55:08

if all these terminals were built,

55:10

we could wipe out all US

55:13

emissions gains from the last couple of decades.

55:15

So this is a big

55:17

deal and certainly a big deal politically as well.

55:19

So we'll see what the DOE does. I

55:22

think that's gonna close it out. Shalini Ramanathan

55:24

of Quinn Brook Infrastructure Partners. Thank you. Thank

55:26

you. This was fun. You want to come

55:28

back and do it monthly? I do. All

55:31

right. We're in. Catherine Hamilton of

55:33

38 North. Thank you. Thank you. I

55:35

can't wait to see you all next month. I

55:38

promise not

55:41

to AI

55:43

clone your

55:46

voice. And

55:48

that's it for the show. The

55:50

Carbon Copy is a production of

55:52

Latitude Media. The show is produced

55:54

by me and Sean Marquand, who

55:56

is also our technical director. He

55:58

mixes the show. and

56:00

he wrote our theme song. You can

56:02

get all our stories, show notes, and

56:04

transcripts at latitudemedia.com. And Latitude

56:06

is supported by Prelude Ventures. Prelude

56:09

backs visionaries accelerating climate innovation that

56:11

will reshape the global economy. Learn

56:13

more about their portfolio and investment

56:16

strategy at preludeventures.com. And

56:18

give us a shout out on X

56:20

if you have thoughts about what we

56:22

talked about here. We have some takes.

56:24

We want your takes and you can

56:26

also connect with us on LinkedIn or

56:28

wherever you're active on these issues.

56:30

Thanks for listening. We really appreciate it.

56:32

We'll catch you next week. I'm Stephen

56:34

Lacy and this is The Carving Club.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features