Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:02
Latitude Media Podcast At the
0:04
Frontier of Climate Technology. Where.
0:07
You either you fall on the ai optimism
0:09
spectrum. I. Just think. That
0:12
we're not as far along
0:14
as everybody is worried that
0:16
we are. I see the
0:18
applications, especially an energy and
0:20
so optimism is my default
0:22
setting. Well. I'm training your voices right
0:24
now. I'm going to replace you in the next
0:26
episode of I'm Just gonna write the commentary. Use
0:28
your voices and we'll see how optimistic you are.
0:31
Date our are going to put data and body.
0:34
Can't replace either of you to fit, but. This
0:39
is the carbon copy. I'm Steven Meisel.
0:43
By Dynamics' the Ai Revolution electrify
0:46
everything he's are more than just
0:48
slogans. They represent real physical changes
0:51
to the world around Us. As
0:53
President Biden screen industrial policies reignite
0:55
the Us manufacturing base. A I
0:58
computing workload, store and machines across
1:00
the economy turn electric. The power
1:02
grid is facing an historic increase
1:05
in demand after almost two decades
1:07
of flat electricity consumption. Suddenly America's
1:09
grid planners are doubling their forecasts
1:12
for demand, raising the. Urgency for
1:14
new infrastructure. We will ask this week
1:16
what is needed and what happens if
1:18
we can't build it. Then some major
1:20
changes in the world of tax Finance
1:23
will look at how transferable tax credits
1:25
are, opening up new kinds of deals
1:27
for clean energy, and take a deeper
1:29
dive into the long awaited and controversial
1:31
details of hydrogen tax credits Catherine Hamilton
1:33
and Shiny Romanov and or with really
1:36
talk about these trends coming right up.
1:45
What? Are you reading to help understand the
1:47
industry? If. Latitude Media's free weekly newsletter
1:49
isn't in the mix. You are missing
1:51
a vital piece of your energy business
1:53
news diet. Latitude Media is of course
1:55
the company that makes this podcast but
1:57
we're so much more were destination for
1:59
best. The business news, research and events
2:01
focused on the new frontiers of clean
2:04
energy and climate technology. When you signed
2:06
up for the newsletter, you'll get all
2:08
their coverage on tax markets and deals
2:10
across renewables, batteries, artificial intelligence, long duration
2:13
storage, carbon remove hydrogen and more. So
2:15
head on over to Latitude media.com or
2:17
you can tap that link in the
2:19
show notes and you'll get lots of
2:21
stories from our team of reporters to
2:24
help you dive even deeper into the
2:26
topics we cover on this show. Thanks
2:28
for reading. So.
2:35
It's the end of the months ever going
2:38
to be doing something this year where monthly
2:40
I bring to experts who are now familiar
2:42
to you shall any Roman ossining Catherine Hamilton's
2:44
where we're going to recap some of the
2:47
most influential stories playing out. and Catherine is
2:49
the chair of Thirty Eight North of Though
2:51
Catherine. Happy to be here again and happiness
2:53
of the irregular gag. And sounding
2:55
Ramona son is the director of a
2:57
region. A snack when Brick Infrastructure Partners
3:00
hello sell any welcome back. The loan
3:02
get to be here. So we are
3:04
going to talk about one of the
3:06
big stories. It emerged in December and
3:08
into this year, combining a couple different
3:10
trends. Firstly,
3:13
The. I is out with a
3:15
new analysis this month's showing that
3:17
global data center use could double.
3:20
In. The next three years and that's
3:22
largely to a I in Crypto
3:24
and there were a bunch of
3:26
experts at Davos recently who were
3:29
talking about this and open a
3:31
I see. Oh, Sam Altman, who
3:33
is also an investor in Advanced
3:35
Nuclear, said on stage that we
3:37
need energy breakthroughs in order to
3:39
power the computational demands of artificial
3:42
intelligence. and in reality, The.
3:44
Breakthroughs we need are probably less about technology
3:46
and more about grid infrastructure planning which were
3:48
going to get into. And. A
3:50
new report from Grid Strategies. Shows.
3:53
Us: Why are grid strategies recently
3:55
analyze us load gross and
3:57
these find your forecast some good
3:59
plan. There's an increase power
4:01
demand and it turns out that
4:04
these forecasts nearly doubled since
4:06
last year. That means thirty eight
4:08
gigawatts in new demand could come
4:11
on line from a combination
4:13
of data centers, new manufacturing facilities,
4:15
and residential industrial electrification. Any
4:17
sports as don't actually take into
4:19
account potential hydrogen production from
4:21
elect years that could be coming.
4:24
So meeting that demands gonna require
4:27
tens of billions of dollars in
4:29
new transmission. but transmission investments among
4:31
investor and utilities of actually declined
4:34
in the last few years and
4:36
so that's causing massive backlog of
4:38
renewables and batteries. This terror was
4:41
still backlog that's just sitting ensues.
4:43
So what is the end of
4:45
flat power demand? Moon.
4:48
Catherine. Give us a historical
4:50
context here how long as electricity demand
4:52
and flat in the Us and it's
4:55
why is this projection this five year
4:57
doubling? So. Important. And
4:59
attention grabbing. Yeah, so this is
5:01
not the first rodeo for increased demand.
5:03
Ah, I'm away back in the dark
5:05
ages when agonising was invented, there was
5:07
a significant increase in demand. We had
5:09
to build a lot more power plants
5:11
in this country and then from that
5:14
nineteen seventy five to two thousand and
5:16
five there was massive just economic growth.
5:18
That with when I was working at
5:20
a utility for about ten years designing
5:22
grads and we had to literally upgraded
5:24
medium voltage power line some like four
5:26
kb to twenty kb so we could
5:28
get more do through. we did things
5:30
like time I used to man response
5:32
we were even or even working on
5:34
thermal energy storage to try to bring
5:36
down the man so we could have
5:38
time to build out more feet or
5:40
lines and more sub say And then
5:42
for about twenty years. Who's. Really flat
5:44
and part of that was because we built
5:46
out what we needed to. We had the
5:49
system someplace that we needed when. we also
5:51
did a ton on energy efficiency so that
5:53
was really able to manage a lot of
5:55
the low growth and demands through a plant
5:58
standards. All of the efficiency standards that. We
6:00
have have been incredibly helpful but
6:02
now it looks see are changing
6:04
again and it's just like what
6:06
you were talking about. These data
6:08
centers a I manufacturing facilities thanks
6:10
in large part to a lot
6:12
of the investment that the Inflation
6:14
Reduction Act is creating here in
6:16
this country, but also electrification. So
6:18
now what do we have to
6:20
do? I mean this is significant
6:23
because it looks like and this
6:25
is compared to so point five
6:27
percent annual demand growth over the
6:29
last twenty years. Now it's
6:31
two point six percent and twenty twenty
6:33
two. And then and twenty twenty three.
6:35
It was revised to four point seven
6:37
percent. So as you say it's doubling.
6:39
It is really significant. And so the
6:41
question is, what do we do about
6:44
that now? Yes of when we
6:46
can see all the new manufacturing
6:48
facilities getting built, we can see
6:50
the state it infrastructure needs increasing
6:52
And then we've been talking about
6:54
electrify everything for years now. Sony
6:56
does this. Load forecasts, Does. A
6:59
surprise you at all. I
7:01
think it's an intensification of a
7:03
trend. We saw before I is
7:05
Catherine Benson and things like the
7:07
Electrification of Transportation Right have been
7:09
underway for. A while so that was
7:11
a predictable i'm upset and load ai
7:13
in the fourth the day I and
7:16
how quickly the data. Demands of Ai
7:18
is becoming a topic of conversation
7:20
and a real A real. Causes.
7:23
That how quickly a I is.
7:25
A scaling up and am
7:27
so quickly data centers for
7:29
a i need green power
7:31
that items is zoo and
7:34
a. Supervisor. It's let's remember
7:36
that disposes whole goals and go.
7:38
The high demand is not all
7:40
bad and need. A few years
7:42
ago i think probably seven years
7:44
ago is that the trough that
7:46
was our race to the bottom
7:48
climate and power purchase agreements. And
7:51
you know margins, we're we're not
7:53
very exciting. I'm if you were
7:55
doing solar wind projects and I
7:57
think that at the higher demand.
8:00
and the difficulty of getting
8:02
projects done, for all the reasons we've talked
8:04
about on the show, you know, transmission and
8:06
permitting and siting, does mean
8:08
that prices are more buoyant.
8:10
So it is an
8:12
interesting development that has, you
8:14
know, all kinds of implications.
8:17
Yeah, and Shani, 33% of those
8:19
global AI data centers are in
8:21
the US, 16% in the EU
8:23
and 10% China, but
8:25
the United States has a vast majority of them. Let's
8:28
pause on the data centerpiece for a second,
8:31
because I made this flippant remark in
8:33
my opening remarks about Sam Altman saying
8:35
we need to invest in new
8:38
nuclear. I don't think
8:40
we really need any energy breakthroughs to
8:42
serve these data centers, though. We just
8:45
need a lot more transmission to get
8:47
clean power to these data centers. And
8:49
it's an infrastructure challenge. And
8:52
there are a lot of ways that you can build
8:54
more modular data centers that basically
8:57
connect to, you know, there are
8:59
direct off takers of renewable electricity.
9:02
So there's ways that you can, and then you
9:04
can create data centers that
9:06
have specific workloads like data
9:08
centers with AI specific workloads
9:10
that can be cycled differently
9:12
than other services on the
9:14
internet. And so there
9:16
are ways to adjust the
9:19
output and computational workloads of data centers,
9:21
build them differently, and then just build
9:23
the infrastructure around it. We
9:25
don't need some advanced nuclear breakthrough
9:27
to serve this particular load. Yeah,
9:30
I totally agree. I talked to Rob Gramlich
9:32
from Grid Strategies that produced this report. And
9:34
I said, what do we need to do,
9:36
Rob? Help us fix this. And he said,
9:38
we really need to plan for the future.
9:40
We need to do much better planning. Over
9:42
the last couple of decades, a lot of
9:44
the planners, just kind of the
9:46
load forecasters, everything was sort of flat. We
9:48
didn't have to be super creative. We have
9:51
been super creative in the past. We need
9:53
to get that way in the future. So
9:55
Stephen, just as you talk about the data
9:57
centers and the sort of the load centers,
10:00
And I consider that part
10:02
of the resource mix, if you have customers
10:04
with resources like solar and storage,
10:06
that they could also be part of
10:08
the solution. But when you
10:10
think about what we need to plan for,
10:12
you also have to look at how do
10:14
we get every electron
10:17
out of every line? Because
10:19
our system has places that are, yes, congested,
10:21
but others that aren't. So how do we
10:23
best use our system? How do we plan
10:26
for the future? There are a lot of
10:28
ways we can tackle this, and we really
10:30
have to really put a lot of thought
10:32
into this without having to come up with some
10:35
kind of a new technology. And even
10:37
if we got a new technology, why
10:39
do we think it would be so easy
10:41
to roll out? Implementation,
10:44
this is something I have learned the
10:46
hard way, is I think we all
10:49
in our field get excited about technology.
10:51
I know I do. And
10:53
that is part of the puzzle. Technology is
10:55
part of the puzzle, but commercializing technology,
10:58
implementing projects to get it
11:00
out there, that's going to
11:02
be as hard for any
11:04
new technology as it has
11:06
been for wind and solar.
11:09
So might as well try to solve it for wind and
11:11
solar. Clearly, breakthroughs are not
11:13
needed. Better management of
11:16
the supporting infrastructure is needed. But
11:18
that is a simple thing
11:20
to say, not an easy thing to do. And
11:24
so it's still a big concern that
11:26
we can't actually build the transmission and
11:28
distribution infrastructure to support this new load.
11:30
Are either of you worried
11:32
at all that we see 38 gigawatts
11:34
of new potential demand coming and not
11:36
a great plan to connect
11:40
the infrastructure to service? So
11:42
Georgia Power has been one of
11:44
the largest beneficiaries of the Inflation
11:46
Reduction Act, $6.3
11:49
billion in investment in their service
11:51
territory of EV manufacturing,
11:53
solar, data centers, et cetera,
11:56
6,600 megawatts of
11:58
new load coming online. And
12:00
the issue is they are
12:03
doing RFPs for new solar
12:05
and batteries, but in the meantime, what
12:07
do we have to do to sustain
12:09
the demand? And they're looking at, well,
12:11
are we going to need to keep
12:13
some coal plants open in Mississippi and
12:15
cut a deal to be able to
12:17
use those as a bridge? Do we
12:19
keep some of these single cycle peaker
12:21
units going for a bit longer until
12:23
we can build out enough other infrastructure?
12:25
And what you want them to do
12:27
is say until we can make sure
12:29
we have enough renewables and storage on
12:31
the grid to be able to accommodate
12:33
that, rather than, oh, let's
12:36
instead try to build some more combined cycle
12:38
units, because those, of course, will have a
12:40
40-year lifespan and maybe the data centers won't.
12:42
I think Catherine nailed
12:44
it, is the
12:47
demand isn't met with clean energy.
12:49
And if it isn't reasonably easy to meet
12:51
it with clean energy, I do
12:54
worry that we will revert to
12:56
more polluting, more polluting field staff
12:59
just because it's easier to do. And
13:01
that would be a shame because we have an
13:03
opportunity to clean it up. Yeah,
13:06
it sure would. And in the southeast,
13:09
Kevin, I know you have been focused on
13:11
this. There are a lot of new commitments
13:13
to fossil gas plants. And what
13:15
are we seeing in terms of new
13:17
gas planning and how it's overshadowing renewables?
13:19
Yeah. Yeah, I think the
13:22
issue is just that, yes, they're trying to do
13:24
as much renewables as they can.
13:26
They're very used to doing gas. And we're
13:28
talking about the southeast. Like what parts of the southeast are
13:30
we talking about? Yeah, so I was just talking
13:32
about Georgia. But there are a bunch of
13:35
other states that are involved, too. So like
13:37
there is a big deal in Mississippi
13:39
with energy and Amazon where there is
13:41
going to be a deal cut. It's
13:43
basically going to let energy do whatever
13:45
it wants to do to supply Amazon
13:47
with reliable power. And
13:50
the thing is that the thought that
13:53
a reliable power source is
13:55
fossil gas is what's confounding
13:57
because there is still stealing
14:00
from Yuri and Elliot storms and
14:02
the insecurities in the gas system,
14:04
which have still not been addressed.
14:06
So part of this is we
14:08
got to fix that side
14:10
of the equation, the supplies of the equation
14:12
to make sure we meet the demand side.
14:14
I see some of the biggest
14:16
hang ups of all in
14:18
interconnection and actually being able to
14:20
show any like you say, get
14:23
renewables and storage on quickly because
14:25
they're cheaper and faster to build
14:28
and you can put them in a lot of different places
14:30
that you can't build a combined
14:32
cycle natural gas plant. And if we
14:35
can get that interconnection and we can
14:37
make the planning processes work for it,
14:39
that's going to resolve a lot of the issues. I
14:42
think market reform also has a role to
14:44
play here. You know, the West
14:46
is a lot of different RTOs,
14:49
a lot of different, a
14:52
lot of different ISOs. And because
14:54
of that, you know, you can't
14:57
necessarily get power to where
14:59
the demand is high. And it's,
15:01
it's been a
15:03
problem that we've been talking about for
15:05
a long time. There's some new energy,
15:07
I think around fixing it, especially, especially
15:09
in the West. And it's
15:12
a really important piece of the
15:14
puzzle because where it is cheapest
15:16
to generate renewable power may not
15:18
be where it's most needed
15:20
to be used. Unless, Stephen, to your
15:23
point, you're bringing in manufacturing, bringing in
15:25
data centers to follow
15:27
the physical location of renewables. So
15:29
market reform to use the existing,
15:32
you know, mechanisms
15:34
we have to deliver power, I think
15:36
is really important. Yeah, and
15:38
independent system operators or regional transmission
15:41
organizations are really helpful in that way, because
15:43
you are able to pull from a portfolio
15:45
of resources and manage and plan accordingly. So there
15:47
has been also a lot of energy, Shalini, in
15:50
the Southeast on trying to make that a more
15:52
organized market. And that would kind of feed into
15:54
what you're saying. And thank you
15:56
for defining the acronym. something
16:00
that you just mentioned, Shalini, which is
16:02
the co-location of these projects. And I
16:05
know that there are some developers that are thinking
16:07
about different offtake strategies and
16:09
partnering with data
16:12
centers or manufacturing facilities. Are you
16:14
seeing more of a co-location strategy
16:16
for renewable energy
16:18
projects and storage projects? It's
16:21
certainly a very appealing
16:23
concept. There are some
16:25
practical challenges, like what if you don't
16:28
have the fiber infrastructure for a data
16:30
center near where you have the renewables
16:32
develop that. There's certainly no guarantee they're
16:34
all going to be in the same
16:36
location. Workforce issues
16:38
are also a concern. If
16:41
you have a manufacturing plant, you need
16:43
people to work various jobs.
16:46
And those people come with families and
16:48
kids who need to go to school and spouses
16:50
who have
16:53
to find jobs. And those
16:55
may not exist in
16:58
rural areas. In many ways, it's
17:00
a great opportunity to
17:03
revitalize rural areas. But
17:05
if you're just one company trying to
17:07
make that decision, you may find that
17:10
all the factors are not in fact aligning.
17:13
So we have underinvested in
17:15
transmission distribution for decades. We
17:18
have seen outages increase.
17:20
We have seen massive backlogs
17:22
of clean energy projects. The
17:25
Biden administration has pulled together $30 billion
17:28
for potential grid upgrades.
17:31
Catherine, where are these dollars
17:33
going to and how will they make an
17:35
impact in the medium term? When will they
17:37
start making an impact? Yeah, first of all,
17:39
there's an unprecedented attention that
17:41
this administration is putting on
17:43
transmission. So that is huge
17:46
good news. Of
17:48
the $30 billion, about $5 billion has
17:50
been focused on new transmission lines. So
17:52
much of this is on really
17:55
the protocols, the rules, the
17:57
processes, permitting, they established. a
18:00
grid deployment office at the Department of Energy.
18:03
There's a lot that's going on to try to
18:05
get it set up. That certainly
18:07
dwarfs the investment that we really need
18:09
to build out. FERC
18:11
is also doing an interregional planning rule,
18:13
which is really important to make sure,
18:16
as we've spoken before, that
18:18
power is able to flow between regions,
18:20
that the markets are set
18:22
up to do so. That's supposed to come out in
18:24
April, so we're watching for that. Other
18:27
than that, we also need so much on
18:30
interconnection to make sure that we can
18:32
get these plants online,
18:35
all of these, whether it's storage,
18:37
any kind of renewables,
18:40
also transmission. One
18:43
thing that fell out of the mix in
18:45
the Inflation Reduction Act was an investment tax
18:47
credit for transmission, which would reduce the cost
18:49
of building these lines by 30 percent. That,
18:53
to me, was a huge miss. You
18:55
can't fix that just with good permitting
18:58
policy. You really need to have investment.
19:00
I would think Shalini would have something
19:02
to say about that too, investing
19:04
in infrastructure. Yeah. One
19:07
of the things about investing in
19:09
infrastructure is it really is a
19:11
public-private process. It is all something
19:13
that a private entity can do.
19:15
There have been, like Sunzia recently
19:18
reached a milestone this moving forward.
19:20
I think it's been 15 years under development,
19:24
like a really long time for maybe not
19:26
that long, but a long time for a
19:28
private entity to take this on. I
19:31
am glad. I agree with Catherine.
19:33
The focus on this issue is
19:35
great, but it feels like there
19:38
aren't easy solutions. It is just a
19:40
very technical discussion, and
19:42
I hope we can keep our eye on that.
19:51
I want to tell you about a few things our team
19:53
at Latitude Media is working on that you should check out.
19:55
Firstly, if you missed our January 31 frontier forum with Alfred
19:57
Johnson of Crutch, I'm going to turn it over to you.
20:00
the transferable tax credit market.
20:02
You can watch it at
20:04
latitudemedia.com/events. It was
20:06
a great conversation, tons of good info and
20:08
questions from the audience about how the market
20:10
is shaping up. In mid-February,
20:13
we've got a big report coming out that
20:15
our research team has been working on for
20:17
months. It's a first-of-a-kind study
20:19
on the pathways to adoption of
20:21
AI solutions in the power sector.
20:23
It is very comprehensive. It includes
20:25
what utilities are doing, the characteristics
20:28
of different kinds of utility adoption
20:30
and the vendor landscape. Go
20:33
to latitudemedia.com/research to find out more.
20:35
It will be worth your time.
20:38
And finally, subscribe to our newsletter. We're covering
20:40
tech deals and markets across a range of
20:42
sectors from solar to storage to microgrids to
20:44
carbon removal. Go to latitudemedia.com/newsletter
20:46
to sign up for free.
20:49
And thanks so much. Okay,
20:57
let's talk about two important
20:59
tax-related stories. We
21:02
finance a lot of clean energy through the tax code
21:04
in the U.S. That's how we've always done it. And
21:06
there's a shift happening in the market
21:09
right now, thanks to these new rules
21:11
under the Inflation Reduction Act that allow
21:14
tax credits to be transferable. And that just
21:16
means that project owners can now sell
21:19
tax credits for cash. And
21:21
that is so far with
21:23
about a half a year of real
21:26
trading opening
21:28
up the market to mid-sized deals that
21:30
maybe wouldn't get financed or
21:32
supported through complicated tax equity deals at
21:35
the limited number of banks that have
21:37
historically engaged with tax equity. And
21:40
the tax equity market is where
21:42
banks with enough tax appetite,
21:44
tax liability actually invest capital in projects
21:46
and then they take advantage of the
21:49
tax credits. And there are a lot
21:51
of different structures where
21:54
the bank can partner with the project. That
21:57
market was worth about $23 billion last year. year.
22:00
And the market for transferable tax credits
22:02
where a lot more companies can buy
22:04
these credits was somewhere in the seven
22:07
to nine billion dollar range last year
22:09
according to this new market analysis from
22:11
Crux. So that's actually growth that's a
22:13
lot faster than people expected. It could
22:16
help bring the value of tax financing of
22:19
clean energy to 50 billion dollars by the
22:22
end of the decade. And
22:24
so the big question is what does this mean for
22:26
the way we deploy capital? We
22:29
also have this really important story
22:31
on the tax credit side. We now
22:33
have guidance on the 45V tax credit
22:35
for hydrogen production. This is like a
22:37
really hot story in energy right now.
22:40
We alluded to it at the end of the year and
22:43
and then in December we got more details.
22:45
And so it looks like the government is
22:47
going to create rules that will ensure coming
22:50
hydrogen production is as clean as possible
22:53
but as we'll hear it is potentially
22:55
stalling the market and
22:59
there's a real debate over how stringent
23:02
these rules need to be and how much
23:04
hydrogen and whether they'll hold
23:06
back hydrogen production. And we're
23:09
going to talk about that now.
23:11
First let's talk about these Treasury
23:13
rules. Shalini, what did Treasury propose
23:15
about how these hydrogen tax credits
23:17
should work? So this guidance
23:19
has been hotly anticipated. As you said
23:22
it came out near the end
23:24
of last year, right before Christmas I think. That's my
23:26
memory of it. And it's
23:28
described as having three pillars.
23:30
So and this all goes
23:33
to what a project has to do to
23:35
qualify for the the highest
23:38
amount of the hydrogen
23:40
production tax credit. The most you can get
23:42
is three dollars a kilogram and for it
23:44
to do that you have to be emitting less
23:47
than 0.4 or 5 kilograms
23:49
of CO2 equivalent. So
23:52
it you know that's it's a high bar
23:54
and if you hit if you aren't quite
23:56
that clean then you get you
23:58
can still qualify for the PTC but you may
24:00
not get the full $3 a kg. So
24:03
the three pillars to get you
24:05
to, you know, that higher PTC
24:08
amount that you definitely want
24:10
to get are additionality. So
24:12
clean energy resources have
24:14
to begin operation within three years
24:16
of the hydrogen plant being
24:19
operational so that you're actually
24:21
incenting new generation and not
24:23
just using the renewables that are
24:25
already built and maybe taking it away from a
24:27
data center. The
24:29
second pillar is deliverability. So the clean
24:32
energy resource has to be in the
24:34
same region as the
24:37
green hydrogen project. And that's to prevent
24:41
actors from just buying, overbuying in one
24:43
market and then kind of spilling that
24:45
power on the grid where it isn't
24:47
really used and then using dirty grid
24:49
power where their project is located. So that's
24:51
the logic. The third one
24:54
is hourly matching and that requires
24:56
that an hour of electrolyzer
25:01
use, production of hydrogen, that
25:03
hour, specific hour must be matched
25:06
with an hour of green power
25:08
production. You can't just
25:10
say that, you know, on
25:12
the aggregate over a year with annual
25:14
matching, you can say, look, we purchased
25:16
as much green power, using as much
25:18
green power in the aggregate annually as
25:21
we did overall. This is
25:23
really holding to a tighter standard, which
25:25
is you have to match it per
25:27
hour. Okay. So there were a coalition
25:29
of folks who were pushing for these
25:33
more stringent requirements. Catherine, did they
25:35
get what they were asking? Why
25:37
does this matter? Explain
25:39
like the controversy and
25:41
lobbying leading up to this and then what the
25:43
outcome was relative to what folks wanted.
25:46
Yeah. So the three pillars were not in
25:48
the law. The law just stipulated that it
25:50
had to be, you know, very, very low
25:52
emission, but this was how they thought this
25:54
is the best way to implement this. This
25:57
is the, you know, Jesse Jenkins has spent
25:59
a lot of time I'm thinking about this, other folks
26:01
have looked at, what would this
26:03
look like? What would those three pillars look
26:05
like? And so in that regard, yes, they
26:08
won. I mean, this is gonna make sure
26:10
that you're not getting blue hydrogen qualifying
26:14
for $3 a kilogram credit when
26:17
it costs only $1 to $2
26:19
a kilogram to produce it. So
26:21
that's a good thing for really
26:24
spurring new renewables, for spurring clean
26:26
electrolysis, for making sure that this
26:28
doesn't just keep natural
26:31
gas from continuing
26:33
to produce hydrogen. So
26:35
the hydrogen producers are really glad
26:37
for this. So electric two, air
26:39
products, EDP Renew
26:41
was on board with this,
26:43
steel producers, MERSC. I mean,
26:45
a lot of folks who are trying to get to
26:47
net zero are really happy about this. On
26:50
the other hand, there were a lot of folks that are not
26:52
happy about it. And I would say, NEXTERRA,
26:55
Constellation, BP, Exxon,
26:58
Plug Power, which is an electrolysis
27:00
manufacturer. A lot of those folks
27:02
are not happy with these rules
27:04
for a bunch of different reasons. But
27:06
part of which is what this
27:09
would do is it would not
27:11
allow for existing renewable facilities. And
27:13
I would say, especially something like
27:15
hydropower that would
27:17
be able to be used more effectively, or
27:19
there may even be other ones that are not
27:21
at their full capacity factor that you'd be
27:23
able to still allow
27:25
the electrolyzer production to
27:28
be clean
27:30
that isn't
27:32
stipulated in these three pillars. That said, it
27:34
does look like there could be a 5%
27:37
carve out potential for existing resources. So we'll
27:39
kind of see how that turns out. They
27:41
are taking comments now, the Treasury Department
27:43
is taking comments until the end of February.
27:46
And I'm guessing they're gonna get a
27:48
lot of comments. And then
27:50
they will have to decide, well, what does this
27:52
mean? Are we gonna keep the three pillars as
27:54
they are? I suspect they will. I
27:56
suspect that they will simply come up with ways in
27:59
which you can use. existing resources at
28:01
certain times to be able to
28:03
qualify so that you
28:05
really are getting clean green hydrogen
28:07
and you're not
28:09
leaving plants that are that aren't really
28:11
at their full capacity out there on
28:14
the grid you know being
28:16
less than useful. Well, Shalini,
28:18
there's no better person to ask than you about
28:20
what the potential impact out in
28:22
the market could be. I know
28:24
you're evaluating a lot of deals and
28:27
this guidance potentially freezes some of them
28:29
or makes them more complicated. So tell
28:31
me about how this could play into
28:33
the numbers behind some of the hydrogen
28:35
projects you're evaluating. Yeah, as
28:37
Catherine described, this is a topic
28:40
that people have many, you know,
28:43
lots of different views on including with my
28:45
colleagues, right? It's not like we all have
28:47
the same perspective on it.
28:49
So I'll give you my view, which is
28:51
most of the projects that I have looked
28:53
at have assumed grid power
28:56
plus REX for,
28:58
you know, for the first wave of projects
29:00
and everyone wants to do better but the
29:02
projects have said, look, in order to
29:05
achieve a decent rate of
29:08
return, this is what we can
29:10
do. And I will point out that
29:12
data centers and tech companies, there are
29:14
now some tech companies that very prominently
29:17
are focused on hourly matching,
29:19
right? Every hour that data
29:22
center use is matched to an hour
29:25
of green production. They weren't doing that
29:27
at the beginning. When we first started
29:29
working on corporate PPAs, it was much
29:31
more, you know, just annual matching. You
29:33
know, you use this much power, you're
29:35
offsetting it by signing PPAs
29:37
for a similar amount. So from
29:39
my perspective, and again, you
29:42
know, even my colleagues may have
29:44
different views, from my perspective, what
29:46
we're doing is increasing the bar
29:48
for hydrogen to be clean
29:50
in a way that data centers and electric
29:53
vehicles, right? It's not like when I bought
29:55
my EV, I could, I mean,
29:57
I do charge it overnight with, you know, Texas wind
29:59
power. But it's not like I was
30:01
limited to doing that in a way that
30:03
affected the EBS utility. So
30:08
I think it is going to be challenging for
30:10
a lot of projects. There are going to be
30:12
some people who can absolutely
30:15
achieve those goals. And
30:17
I think you can see how
30:20
the market is divided by the
30:22
kind of power plans, the green power
30:25
strategies that companies have. But
30:27
I do worry that it will make
30:30
a lot of the
30:32
projects that I'm looking at that are not necessarily associated
30:35
with a large renewables IPP,
30:37
hard to move forward. It's
30:41
going to make a lot of those projects that I'm looking at tough
30:44
to pencil. I'll point out one other thing
30:46
about green hydrogen, which is there's
30:48
been a lot of hype around it. And
30:50
the incentives in the inflation reduction act
30:53
are supply side. They
30:55
are not stimulating demand. They
30:57
are providing tools in the IRA to
30:59
reduce the price of green hydrogen, which
31:01
we've just been talking about. But
31:03
they haven't said that they
31:06
hadn't in any way pushed anyone
31:08
to use this product with
31:11
a lower environmental impact.
31:14
And a lot of the domestic
31:16
users of green hydrogen are companies
31:18
like chemical refineries, oil and
31:21
gas companies. And that
31:23
is a big one because you can make green ammonia
31:25
with green hydrogen. And ammonia
31:27
is a key part of fertilizer production. And
31:30
so the challenge there is those are industries
31:33
that maybe are not as
31:35
focused on decarbonization as more
31:37
consumer facing industries. And
31:40
so how are you going to convince a
31:45
client, a customer to pay an
31:47
even greater premium than you had
31:49
to before the guidance came out.
31:52
So lots of different perspectives. And I
31:54
certainly agree with the goal of cleaning
31:57
the production of hydrogen that I was
31:59
hoping for maybe a more nuanced
32:01
baby step approach. I'll also point out
32:03
one more thing, that the demand
32:05
for green power, for which we started
32:07
talking about, the demand for power period,
32:10
also hurts the cause of green hydrogen
32:12
because if you are a wind
32:15
developer, who are
32:17
you gonna sign a power purchase agreement
32:20
with? A tech company that wants it
32:22
for a data center or a new
32:24
industry like green hydrogen. So it's another
32:26
barrier that I think has been put in
32:28
green hydrogen's path. Yeah, so
32:30
comments are due in February from
32:33
any stakeholder who wants to submit
32:35
comments and then they'll take
32:37
some period of time to, come
32:39
up with the final rulemaking and then it'll
32:42
move forward. They'll create the tax
32:44
forms and we'll move ahead. Okay, well,
32:47
we'll follow up on that when we get more details. And
32:49
let's turn now to this bigger shift in tax
32:51
financing on why transferable tax credits
32:54
matter. Shalini, over to you. I
32:56
know you're not specifically working on tax
32:58
finance, but you have a team that
33:01
does. And are you seeing any shift
33:03
in the way deals are getting done
33:05
or evaluated because of the way tax
33:07
credits are now structured? So
33:10
we're, I think everyone, this is across
33:12
the industry. I think we're all excited
33:15
that the market has
33:17
come together, transferable tax credits are
33:19
new. And it
33:22
was just really impossible to know how
33:24
long it was gonna take for companies
33:26
beyond the current pool to
33:29
decide they wanted to play in
33:31
this new area. So it's really very
33:34
encouraging that there is demand for tax
33:36
credits and there are companies willing to
33:38
get involved that previously hadn't done it. Having
33:41
said that, the mechanism
33:43
is still the same, which is there's still
33:45
a lot of due diligence on projects. And
33:48
I do think that, and
33:50
this is very early days it's
33:53
been very encouraging in these early days, but
33:55
we do have to get these big
33:58
renewables projects financed. And. And
34:00
it seems like right now it's
34:03
easier to move forward with smaller projects. Just
34:05
the risk is less, you need fewer entities
34:09
involved. So I'll be curious to see if the
34:12
market continues to develop. But look,
34:15
the demand is encouraging, the
34:17
deals that have been announced are encouraging, and
34:19
frankly, the amount of value that
34:22
projects are getting to keep, which is really a
34:24
sign of how much demand
34:26
there is. Everyone's not chasing
34:28
one new tax equity provider.
34:32
That value has been high. So it's
34:35
a good moment. Catherine,
34:38
you have lived in the
34:40
tax code for a long time. I felt like
34:42
every couple of years we would have a big
34:44
show at the end of the year and say,
34:46
ah, we've got a tax package done. And so
34:48
you have seen the
34:51
boom and bust cycles on the policy side
34:53
and on the market side as tax
34:57
credits have phased out, and then we've
34:59
passed extensions. And then the creation of
35:01
these 10-year tax credits that are now
35:03
transferable and sellable for cash is a
35:05
really big deal. What
35:07
did you expect to come out of this shift?
35:11
And did you expect it to ramp up as quickly as it did?
35:13
Yeah. So everybody
35:16
wanted it to ramp up, and everybody
35:18
just started investing like crazy, right? That's
35:20
why we're getting all of these demand
35:22
scenarios with all this manufacturing. Everybody's
35:25
like, yeah, let's do it. The issue is
35:27
you still need a lot of guidance written
35:29
because a lot of this has never had
35:31
tax credits before, and they're also structured differently.
35:34
So you had domestic content that
35:37
they had to figure out. They
35:39
have a bonus credit
35:41
for wages and apprenticeships, and
35:43
that's a little bit gnarly. Some
35:46
of these are self-reporting. So
35:49
that will be helpful that companies will be able
35:51
to self-report. Other
35:53
of these credits have platforms
35:55
that you have to apply for, one
35:58
of which is the low-income ad. So
36:00
that's for low-income rooftop community solar,
36:02
multi-family solar and tribal projects. And
36:05
you have to apply. There's a,
36:07
you know, it's only a 1.8
36:11
gigawatt limit for these projects. And those are,
36:13
a lot of them are already
36:15
claimed. They've already had all of
36:17
the applications filled. So there
36:19
is just a huge amount of pent-up
36:21
interest. And so yes, it is going
36:24
like gangbusters. One thing to keep in
36:26
mind, at the end of 2024, that would be this year. There
36:30
are a few credits that do
36:32
not continue, including the microgrid tax
36:34
credit, the constituting solar tax credit.
36:36
Now storage continues, solar
36:38
and wind continue, most of the renewables continue.
36:40
But some of them don't, because what they
36:42
ended up doing was only having credits through
36:44
the end of 2024. And
36:47
then in 2025, they become what's called
36:49
tech neutral. It's not really tech neutral.
36:51
It just means that it's pegged to
36:54
emission reduction rather
36:56
than being technology specific. But some of those
36:58
technologies didn't make it into the mix. And
37:01
so there are a lot of things that we're going
37:03
to need to do this year. One
37:05
is to figure out how do you get some of those to continue?
37:08
Because they haven't even finalized the
37:10
microgrid credit rules. You can't even
37:12
start putting any equipment into, or
37:14
projects into safe harbor before this
37:16
thing is going to expire. And
37:19
then in 2025, they have to set
37:22
up a totally different system for the
37:24
tax credit to be able to be
37:26
administered. So Treasury is trying
37:28
to get all those final guidance out
37:30
for all the different technologies that are going to
37:32
expire pretty quickly. And then they also
37:35
need to set up for 2025 to
37:37
make sure that when we flip the switch and
37:39
the new year comes, that you'll be able to
37:41
take advantage of a different tax structure. So I
37:43
am very focused on what does all that look
37:45
like? How do we get some of these things
37:48
over the finish line? How do you get something
37:50
like the transmission credit over the finish line that
37:52
wasn't ever there? And
37:55
so that's, and other little fixes
37:58
in the code that the inflation reduction... act,
38:01
put in a place that, you know, there were
38:03
just some things that technically weren't quite right. Like,
38:05
how do you get those little fixes done? So
38:07
that's going to take some work over the next
38:09
year to make sure we're all set up to
38:11
go because there's still a lot out there that
38:14
is a little bit uncertain. The
38:17
45Z in the IRA is, includes
38:19
sustainable aviation fuel, and that expires
38:21
in 2027, which is
38:24
just not very far away, especially given that that
38:26
is a new product
38:28
that we're still trying, you
38:31
know, the industry is still trying to figure out. So the second
38:34
thing, Catherine's comment that, you know,
38:36
this is, there's a lot of
38:38
short timelines and long processes.
38:41
Yeah, I'm really glad you mentioned that one too. That's another one we'll
38:43
have to put into the mix of things we have
38:45
to get done in the next year or two. Yeah,
38:48
so along with some of that policy
38:50
uncertainty and additional guidance, there's also a
38:53
little bit of uncertainty in the market
38:55
too. So you have buyers,
38:57
new buyers of tax credits that
39:00
are coming in and a little
39:02
bit nervous about the diligence process,
39:04
about how much they have to
39:06
pay for insurance. And
39:08
so it makes, you know, intermediaries pretty
39:10
important in the market. And then, you
39:12
know, sellers are obviously worried about pricing.
39:16
They want to make sure that they're getting good pricing and
39:18
have price transparency on the platforms that are
39:20
selling these credits. And so, you know, you
39:22
still have a lot of buyers
39:24
that are sitting on the sidelines and obviously
39:27
more sellers participating in the market because they
39:29
want to sell their credits and
39:31
expand their facilities. So with
39:33
that said, we are seeing some
39:35
new interesting deals. Just
39:38
recently, there was this $700 million sale of 45X tax credits by
39:40
First Solar. And
39:46
our team at Latitude Media has been digging
39:48
into this a little bit. And we just
39:51
released a recent story. We went around and
39:53
talked to some manufacturers. And many of them
39:55
are saying that they're thinking about expanding because
39:57
of the prospect of being able to sell
39:59
these credits. One
40:01
Canadian solar manufacturer, Halene,
40:04
said it's committed to 800 megawatts
40:06
of manufacturing capacity to the U.S.
40:08
and 500 more megawatts in Minnesota
40:10
in 2024, and that specific
40:13
investment was motivated by the ability
40:16
to sell 45X tax credits.
40:18
So this is having an
40:21
impact on new kinds of investment in
40:23
facilities. In that report
40:25
that I mentioned written by Crocs
40:28
where they interviewed 150 market participants, buyer-sellers,
40:32
intermediaries, they
40:34
did find that deal sizes were
40:36
much, much lower than traditional tax
40:39
equity, and although
40:41
they were mostly wind and solar deals, you
40:43
do see them across bioenergy
40:46
and in manufacturing, advanced manufacturing,
40:48
and so the market is
40:51
starting to diversify in terms
40:53
of deal type and deal
40:56
size. So some really
40:58
interesting changes there. You know,
41:00
you make a really good point that the
41:02
differentiation in the market might mean there's some
41:05
technologies, some kinds of projects
41:07
that maybe seem too
41:09
complicated to understand or the RIC
41:11
profile isn't what new tax equity
41:14
providers are comfortable with, so that's a
41:16
new element, right, because we do have
41:18
all these, as Catherine
41:21
laid out, all the different kinds of
41:23
credits, manufacturing credits and the domestic content
41:25
and all that, and
41:28
yet if the
41:30
market isn't there
41:32
to invest in
41:34
that from a tax equity perspective, then the
41:37
value of those credits is diminished, so TBD.
41:40
Yeah, so we're going to be reporting on how
41:43
these deals are structured. There's certainly going
41:45
to be hybrid deals as well with
41:47
traditional tax equity players that are combining
41:51
some of these transferable credits with traditional
41:54
tax equity deals, and
41:57
you will see lots of that. And
42:00
we're going to be covering how that's
42:02
evolving at Latitude. And actually, we're recording
42:04
this on a Tuesday. On
42:07
Wednesday, I'll actually be sitting down
42:09
with Crux CEO Alfred Johnson, and we're going to
42:11
walk through that report. And
42:15
we'll talk about pricing and why
42:18
some of the hesitations among buyers and
42:20
sellers, what's to come in 2024. So
42:22
that'll be an interesting conversation. It'll probably
42:24
already be done by the time this
42:27
episode comes out, but we will be
42:29
distributing it on the pod afterwards. So
42:31
stay tuned for that conversation. We're going
42:33
to dig into a bunch of different
42:35
market forces. And
42:38
with that, we're going to end with the forecast. This
42:40
is where we briefly talk about a story or an
42:42
observation that tells us something about the
42:44
near or distant future. Katherine, what
42:46
do you have? Yeah, so how many
42:48
TV streaming services do you think
42:50
you have? Do you
42:53
know, Stephen, how many you have? Well, I'm constantly
42:55
kind of cycling them through, canceling them, deciding
42:57
that I don't use it, then seeing a
42:59
show I like, and then
43:01
resubscribing. I would say five.
43:05
Oh, that's good. Show me how about
43:07
you? I think between four to five,
43:09
I'm going through them in my head. At
43:12
various points, the high tide has been like, you
43:14
know, like seven. Yeah, yeah, I
43:16
feel like it's infinite. It's like, oh, I'll have to
43:18
see Project One Runway, so that means I have to
43:20
subscribe to Hulu. It's like, that's the kind of thing
43:22
we're in. Well, I just, I'm saying
43:24
this because, you know, we sign up for
43:26
streaming services, it kind of willy-nilly, I would
43:28
say, because we want to see something, or
43:30
at least, you know, I find myself doing
43:32
that. But reporting is
43:34
really different, and I'm just
43:36
really saddened by a lot
43:39
of the stories about media
43:42
outlets, press news outlets, laying
43:45
off reporters. The LA Times laid
43:47
off 20% of its newsroom. Certainly
43:51
the Post had like 240 reporters
43:53
that took buyouts before the end
43:55
of the new year. The
43:58
Baltimore Sun was bought by kind of this
44:00
right-wing Sinclair guy who's going to kind of
44:02
change the tone. So I'm
44:05
just heartened by the fact that
44:07
a lot of these newsrooms are really having trouble.
44:10
A lot of community papers, it's something like five
44:12
local newspapers shut down every two weeks. I
44:14
mean, it's just crazy. And that's where a lot
44:16
of people get their news and get really
44:18
good stories. I mean, Sammy
44:21
Roth at the LA Times, luckily, is still
44:23
there. He's amazing. He's a great climate reporter.
44:26
And I'm glad to see that there
44:28
are so many other folks out there
44:30
reporting Bloomberg, E&E News, David
44:33
Roberts, of course, with Volts, and
44:36
of course, Latitude, which I call El
44:39
Apostrophe Attitude. Latitude
44:42
has great reporters. I mean, you guys are
44:44
doing great. But I look
44:47
at these papers and all the trouble they're
44:49
having, and I just hope that people still
44:51
invest. The way that you get streaming services
44:54
for TV, continue to invest in
44:56
our good reporting, because we desperately need that
44:58
to be able to tell stories about climate
45:00
and to tell stories about clean tech and
45:02
investment and all the things we talk about
45:04
and you talk about every day, Shalini
45:06
and Stephen. So I wanted to just raise that
45:08
up as something we need to pay attention to.
45:11
Oh, definitely. I mean, as a media professional,
45:13
this is certainly something I'm thinking
45:15
about a lot. And as someone who has recently
45:19
co-founded Media Brand,
45:22
we made an explicit choice to be really
45:25
strict, niche B2B journalism,
45:27
because you have a much closer
45:29
connection with your audience. You
45:31
can create research and live events that
45:33
get people to interact with what you're
45:35
doing. And some of these sort of
45:38
mid-sized news organizations have been hollowed out
45:40
because they don't have a close connection
45:42
with their listeners,
45:44
readers, viewers, and they've seen
45:47
advertising move over
45:49
to social media platforms. And so
45:51
there's this barbell effect in media
45:54
right now where you have a few very
45:57
large news organizations that
46:01
really good digital offerings, really good subscription
46:03
services like the New York Times that
46:06
invested heavily in digital offerings pretty
46:08
early on and are succeeding wildly. And
46:10
then at the other end, you
46:12
have individuals who are doing really well
46:14
on sub-stack, niche media
46:17
brands where people have a really
46:19
close connection with the
46:21
journalists and the folks that are running those
46:23
media groups. And the media
46:27
organizations in the middle are doing
46:29
really, really poorly. And
46:32
just to borrow from some of the analysis
46:34
that's been out there about this recent bloodbath
46:36
in the media ecosystem, I mean, it's sort
46:38
of started with the air of
46:40
the internet when a lot of publications actually
46:42
put their news online for free, not realizing
46:45
that many people were going to consume it. And
46:47
then people got used to not actually
46:49
paying for news. And
46:52
then social media came along and
46:54
sucked up all the classified ads.
46:57
They sucked up all the advertising,
46:59
local advertising that newspapers
47:02
and radio stations relied on. And
47:05
so they lost that massive revenue
47:07
stream. And then once
47:10
a lot of those media organizations
47:12
were struggling, you had a lot of
47:14
private equity firms that came in and
47:16
bought up a bunch of local newspapers
47:19
and hollowed them out because they didn't
47:21
see good journalists. What they saw were
47:23
printing presses, real estate, things
47:26
that they could sell off.
47:29
And then when the organization was completely
47:31
hollowed out, they could declare bankruptcy and they'd already
47:33
made their money back. And so private equity's role
47:35
in the news business has actually been a really
47:37
big story in causing some of these problems. And
47:39
then of course you have some of the billionaires
47:41
who've bought newspapers that don't know how to run
47:43
them and they do it for prestige. And so
47:46
it's a really complicated problem with a deep history
47:48
over the last two decades. But I mean,
47:50
I'm so glad you brought it up because it's something I think about
47:52
every day. Wow, Stephen, I'm glad you
47:55
could explain it back to me. That
47:57
wasn't man's flinging, was it? No, no, that was not.
48:00
That was great. That was great.
48:02
Shalini, any thoughts, given that your
48:04
husband is in the news business? I think
48:06
you described it perfectly. What's
48:09
ironic to me is that all of
48:11
us, I think, consume more
48:13
news than ever before. It's not like the
48:15
consumption or interest in the news
48:17
has dropped off. Sometimes
48:21
it can take a little discipline to read
48:23
about the war in Ukraine when it isn't
48:25
going well, which is right now. But
48:28
at the same time, on the whole, I feel
48:30
like people care about the news and
48:32
are engaged, but we don't think
48:34
about the fact that it takes people
48:36
with mortgages and kids and all
48:38
that to go gather the news.
48:42
I'm amazed at the
48:45
role of local newspapers, where
48:47
my husband works at the Houston Chronicle, the
48:50
role of newspapers in gathering the
48:53
info that then you
48:55
hear about on talk shows and
48:57
on social media and all of
48:59
that. But
49:01
the original reporting is
49:03
done by entities that were
49:05
not supporting. Absolutely.
49:09
Most of the content that is
49:11
out there is borrowed from a
49:13
small number of rigorous journalistic outfits
49:15
that are often not getting the
49:17
funding they need. So it's a real problem. Okay.
49:21
Well, I could go on and on about this. Let's
49:25
turn to your story, Shalini. What
49:28
is your forecast? So
49:30
my forecast is that I
49:32
think we're having good and
49:34
useful discussions about EVs,
49:37
electric vehicles. There was
49:39
a cold snap earlier this month, and there were a lot
49:41
of news stories about Tesla
49:46
chargers not working and people waiting in
49:48
line to charge their cars or having to charge
49:51
much more often than they had planned on. It
49:54
felt like it was not
49:56
a great moment for the EV industry.
50:00
I'm seeing more discussion around, you know, how do
50:02
you prepare for this? Like the same way that
50:04
if you know a Cold front is
50:06
coming if you know a storm is coming, you know,
50:09
you get water You have some food
50:11
in case the power goes out, you know There's some
50:13
practical preparation cover your faucets of course and
50:15
make sure your pets and plants are safe
50:17
There's also some things you can do, you
50:20
know with your EV you can before you
50:22
start driving You can turn on the heat
50:24
and like having a warm car You
50:26
know helps the battery perform better. You
50:28
obviously will need to charge more often
50:31
And so maybe planning for that, you
50:33
know, it is good and we're building
50:35
out more charging networks So I think
50:37
that's encouraging as well And
50:39
you know making sure that when you're done driving
50:41
that you're not leaving it with a low battery
50:44
because it drains down very quickly So
50:46
there are some there's some things that we can do
50:49
To cope with cold weather and I
50:51
just want to point out that extreme
50:53
weather causes interruption and all kinds of
50:56
infrastructure You know, we've had disruptions
50:58
where you know, they're long lines
51:00
of gas stations, you know Because
51:02
there was a you know a flood or or a storm
51:05
So I think that just I'm glad
51:08
to see that the discussion around, you
51:10
know, EV winter preparedness is is now
51:12
a thing Oh, I'm so
51:14
glad you mentioned that I I've been getting in We
51:17
we leased another EV over
51:20
the new year and You know, I
51:22
got in it was like yo, you're not getting as
51:24
far as you think you are because it's cold Okay,
51:28
but this is good good to know these are really
51:30
good tips and I'm glad you brought it up well,
51:33
I have a quick update to a major story
51:35
that got a lot of attention into the end
51:37
of last year and that is the impact
51:41
of America's liquefied natural gas exports
51:43
and what the Biden administration is
51:45
going to do about them. So
51:49
Under the Biden administration. We saw
51:51
massive build out and approval of
51:54
LNG facilities to send more gas
51:57
over to Europe in particular
52:00
particular. And environmentalists
52:02
started taking a look at this
52:04
and saying, wait a second, are we
52:06
just exporting our emissions now
52:09
to Europe? And there were a
52:11
couple of studies –
52:14
they were not peer-reviewed studies, but there were a
52:16
couple of studies looking at the potential emissions
52:19
impact. One of them came from Bob
52:21
Holworth from Cornell who has done
52:24
a bunch of peer-reviewed research comparing
52:26
the emissions impact of gas when
52:28
factoring in methane leakage to coal
52:31
and found that gas
52:33
was in fact not cleaner than coal and
52:35
in fact potentially dirtier than coal. And so
52:37
he took a look at what it
52:39
takes to store and
52:41
ship gas and found
52:43
that if all terminals that are being
52:45
proposed by companies in the US are
52:48
built, we could be adding the emissions
52:50
equivalent of Europe. It's a big deal.
52:52
Environmentalists rallied around it and put pressure
52:55
on the Biden administration to pause many
52:57
of these new terminals that are
53:00
being proposed, particularly one called
53:02
CP2, which would be the second
53:04
biggest LNG export terminal
53:07
on the Gulf Coast. And there
53:09
are two bodies that approve permits
53:12
for liquefied natural gas under the Federal
53:14
Energy Regulatory Commission and under the Department
53:16
of Energy. If FERC approves a facility,
53:18
a company can build
53:20
a terminal and then sell that gas
53:23
to free trade partners. But the Department
53:25
of Energy can give authority
53:27
for broader sales of that liquefied natural
53:29
gas, but it has to evaluate national
53:31
security concerns, potential economic
53:34
impact, and environmentalists are saying you should
53:36
be evaluating environmental impact. And so the
53:38
Biden administration this month said we are
53:41
going to put a pause on these
53:43
new facilities and take a look at
53:45
the impact on pricing and the impact
53:47
on the climate. So that's a big
53:49
deal. It's the first time the DOE
53:51
has ever done this. And definitely
53:54
a big win for those
53:56
concerned about these LNG facilities.
54:00
And who knows what's going to
54:02
come next because this is going to be like a
54:04
three month pause, I think. Catherine, any thoughts on how
54:06
this is playing out in Washington and what the pause
54:08
could look like? I know there
54:10
are a lot of people going to be very angry about that,
54:14
including Chairman Manchin of the Senate Energy
54:16
and Natural Resources Committee. I
54:19
think the initial push for
54:21
it was so predicated on
54:24
trying to get the EU off of Russian
54:26
gas. I mean, that is a real issue,
54:28
right? So part of it was, let's get
54:30
the gas from the US rather than from
54:33
Russia. So that's been, it's been a
54:35
national security argument for
54:37
a little while now. And I think that's
54:40
what people are continuing to hang their hats
54:42
on. But honestly, the emissions
54:44
piece is huge. And we have to take
54:46
that into consideration. So I'm glad you brought this up.
54:48
I mean, certainly in the aftermath of
54:50
Russia's invasion of Ukraine, when gas supplies
54:52
were really tight and Europe was in
54:54
a genuine crisis, this made sense. But
54:57
when people stepped back, when we
54:59
saw that Europe had enough gas,
55:02
suddenly the emissions impact became really
55:04
critical. And one study, again, not
55:06
a peer reviewed study, found that
55:08
if all these terminals were built,
55:10
we could wipe out all US
55:13
emissions gains from the last couple of decades.
55:15
So this is a big
55:17
deal and certainly a big deal politically as well.
55:19
So we'll see what the DOE does. I
55:22
think that's gonna close it out. Shalini Ramanathan
55:24
of Quinn Brook Infrastructure Partners. Thank you. Thank
55:26
you. This was fun. You want to come
55:28
back and do it monthly? I do. All
55:31
right. We're in. Catherine Hamilton of
55:33
38 North. Thank you. Thank you. I
55:35
can't wait to see you all next month. I
55:38
promise not
55:41
to AI
55:43
clone your
55:46
voice. And
55:48
that's it for the show. The
55:50
Carbon Copy is a production of
55:52
Latitude Media. The show is produced
55:54
by me and Sean Marquand, who
55:56
is also our technical director. He
55:58
mixes the show. and
56:00
he wrote our theme song. You can
56:02
get all our stories, show notes, and
56:04
transcripts at latitudemedia.com. And Latitude
56:06
is supported by Prelude Ventures. Prelude
56:09
backs visionaries accelerating climate innovation that
56:11
will reshape the global economy. Learn
56:13
more about their portfolio and investment
56:16
strategy at preludeventures.com. And
56:18
give us a shout out on X
56:20
if you have thoughts about what we
56:22
talked about here. We have some takes.
56:24
We want your takes and you can
56:26
also connect with us on LinkedIn or
56:28
wherever you're active on these issues.
56:30
Thanks for listening. We really appreciate it.
56:32
We'll catch you next week. I'm Stephen
56:34
Lacy and this is The Carving Club.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More