Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:15
Pushkin. When
0:22
the team behind the annual World Happiness Report
0:24
finds that Finns are happier than Danes, or
0:26
that Canadians are happier than Americans, those
0:29
broad results hide a ton of nuance. We've
0:32
been unpacking some of the reports more interesting
0:34
details in our last few episodes, but
0:36
today we're going to tackle one of the most
0:38
striking findings in this year's report.
0:41
What's been happening to young people's happiness
0:43
over the last few years. And the picture
0:46
is pretty complicated. The good
0:48
news is that youth happiness has been rising
0:50
in certain parts of the world. But the bad
0:52
news is that some of the wealthy nations out
0:54
there have seen worrying declines, and
0:57
that includes the young people where I live in
0:59
North America. But the big question
1:01
is why and what can be done to
1:03
halt this awful slide. If anyone
1:06
can help us figure it all out, it's Yon Emmanuel
1:08
Denev Hey Lauri.
1:09
I'm a professor of economics and behavioral science
1:11
at the University of Oxford, where I also
1:14
lead the Wellbeing Research Center.
1:16
He's also one of the co authors of the World Happiness
1:18
Report and the lead author of the chapter
1:20
that focused specifically on gen Z.
1:23
This year's report, we focus in on the age
1:25
categories, and my team and I we've
1:28
really worked hard on childhoodlessoned well being
1:30
and so the way we define child and adlesson it
1:32
is up for debate, but we've essentially
1:34
put it as between ten and twenty
1:37
four, so late adolescence, because there's still
1:39
some neurological development happening at these later stages
1:42
of late adolescents. And so it also
1:44
was convenient because that's where the data sort of starts.
1:46
The earliest subjective wellbeing data starts
1:48
around age ten thanks to the
1:51
Children's World's data set, and then we
1:53
do have the Gallop whirldpoll and that runs
1:55
from about fifteen years of age all the way to twenty four.
1:57
So it was also a convenient
2:00
to some extent to make sure that we have
2:02
these age cutoffs.
2:03
And so usually the World Happiness Report is often focused
2:05
on adult well being. Why is it important
2:07
to look at well being in children and adolescents?
2:10
Oh, I was absolutely adamant on the editorial
2:12
board to start thinking more seriously
2:14
about child adlesson well being is, as you say,
2:16
the world happen and support which does the World's rankings
2:18
of what the happiest populations are, but they
2:21
were really eighteen plus and so at some point,
2:23
and we obviously all knew with COVID putting a spotlight
2:25
on child mental health that we had to take
2:28
child and ad last and wellbeing way more seriously.
2:30
But there's always been a lack of data, and the Gallobral
2:33
Pole, our workhorse, if you will, for the rankings
2:35
only starts really from late adolescens onwards.
2:38
So it was a massive effort, and we waited in
2:40
a way for the PISA data. The OECD releases
2:42
the PISA data, but that only happens once every four
2:44
years or so, and so that combined
2:47
with two other data sets, Children's Worlds and HPSC,
2:50
allowed us to start piecing together the global
2:52
map of child and a lesson and Wellbeing. But to your
2:54
question of why it matters, child and lesson and well
2:56
being matters so much because
2:58
it's the best predictor of how you will be
3:01
doing as an adult d and
3:03
so mental health as a child or and as an adolescent
3:05
is the best predictor of life outcomes and quality of
3:07
life for life satisfaction as an adult. And
3:10
one particular study that I care much about
3:12
not just because I'm a quothor on it. It's about ten years
3:14
ago and the Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences,
3:16
Andrew Roswell and I published a paper
3:19
where we show that adolescent well being
3:21
and we were able to get data from the American National
3:23
Lujournal Study of Adolescent Health, and
3:26
we found that at different ages around
3:28
adolescents, their well being at those
3:30
ages was most predictive of
3:32
the same individual's earnings as they were
3:35
growing up. What we found is that ages I think
3:37
twelve, fifteen, nineteen and twenty
3:39
one. It's a panel study, so it's the same fifteen
3:41
thousand American youth that have been tracked
3:43
over time. This was started in the early nineties
3:46
and they continued to be followed with
3:48
surveys all the way into their thirties. So
3:50
we have what their well being when they're adolescents,
3:53
and we have their sort of adult outcomes, including
3:55
how much they're earning age thirty and above. And
3:57
what we found was that their levels of well being
3:59
adolescents was a massive predictor
4:02
of how they would be doing later in life, even
4:04
as measures through their earnings. Now one
4:07
could say, well, maybe it's because happy or
4:09
from richer families and socio economic
4:11
status is higher for these youngsters, but
4:13
we were able to control for that in a nifty
4:16
way, if I may say so, which is in that
4:18
sample of American youth of about fifteen thousand,
4:21
they were about three thousand siblings. So
4:23
what we did is introduce what we call
4:25
sibling fixed effects or family fixed effects,
4:27
where we would start looking at the differences
4:29
between the siblings well being and seeing
4:31
how explanatory that is of
4:34
the differences in the future earnings
4:36
of these siblings. So, say, Laura, you and I are sister
4:38
and brother, not unfeasible, and
4:42
we would be looking at your well being, my well
4:44
being, looking at the differences between them, and
4:46
then see whether that can explain differences
4:48
in our later earnings and labor market outcomes,
4:51
if you will, when we're thirty and above and low and
4:53
behold it did.
4:53
And so it's kind of like, if you know, if you and I were brother and
4:55
sister, but I was less happy, maybe I was
4:58
more depressed, even though we grew up in the same house, probably
5:00
went to the same schools and so on, I'd be
5:02
less happy as an adult and I'd be earning less
5:04
as an adult.
5:05
Too precisely, and it's quite significant. So
5:07
this is all data, but it was thousands of already
5:09
back in those days when the study was run.
5:11
So we really need to understand like kid mental health,
5:13
because it's having these important predicted outcomes.
5:16
But my understanding was always that the story was
5:18
that overall kids tended to be happier
5:20
than adults. So walk me through the kind of typical
5:23
patterns like happiness. Researchers have seen
5:25
it about what happens to age across the life course.
5:27
What we kind of used to think happened.
5:29
Well typically and we still find it
5:31
mostly to be the case around the world. Is
5:33
what you will know better than anyone else is
5:35
the U shape relationship between age and
5:38
well being. So essentially we start at quite
5:40
high in terms of our well being. We're happy
5:42
as kids, We're happy happy as we can be as
5:44
kids, and in fact then the report this to me
5:46
was insight for me, is just how happy
5:48
kids really are. So if you look at the earliest ages
5:51
that we have data for in life satisfaction, they
5:53
start like at nine out of ten as an average
5:55
in some countries in terms of life satisfaction.
5:57
So we start really happy, and then we slide
6:00
down the U curve towards the midlife
6:02
crisis, which typically late thirties early forties,
6:04
with the pressures of life coming through, mortgage
6:06
to be paid off, small kids to be dealing with,
6:08
and the prime of your careers and the pressures of that,
6:10
and then you sort of like things brighten up
6:12
again.
6:13
Kids leave.
6:14
You have the benefit of having kids, but without
6:17
the negativity around having to deal with it day
6:19
in day out. Your expectations become more
6:21
realistic and you start climbing
6:23
up the other side of the U shape between age
6:25
and well being that has broken down in certain
6:27
societies. So the big insight coming through
6:29
in this year's World Happy Sport with a focus
6:32
on age is that in North America, the US
6:34
in particular, needless to say, and to a lasser
6:36
extent in Western Europe and Britain, you
6:38
find that the first element of the U shape
6:41
is no longer there. It's completely flattened, and in the
6:43
US it's even reversed. Where youth
6:45
in this case is below thirty or below twenty
6:47
five, depending on which data set you look at,
6:49
they start lower in terms of their self
6:52
rated quality of life, their well being lower
6:54
than the adults and that's really disconcerting,
6:57
and that trend has started what
6:59
is it ten to fifteen years ago, but sort
7:01
of in twenty eighteen, it's sort of flipped where
7:03
you see that the youngsters in
7:05
America below twenty five
7:07
in this case are less happy than the
7:10
adults.
7:10
That's nowhere else to be seen.
7:12
And this is something that really affected me a
7:14
lot.
7:14
Right.
7:14
This is one of the reasons that I started my happiness class
7:16
at Yale is that, you know, I was looking at
7:18
college students who I remember back
7:21
when I was in college in the nineties. I remember them being
7:24
they weren't happy all the time, but not
7:26
the rates of depression and anxiety that we're seeing
7:28
in our current students, and I just felt
7:30
like there was an enormous shift there. It sounds like, at least
7:32
with the North American data that's being born out and the
7:34
report.
7:35
Absolutely so what your famous
7:37
experience there is born out in the data
7:39
has never seen before in this way, and that trend
7:42
that you picked up way back when you launched
7:44
your famous class has continued
7:47
and actually exacerbated during
7:49
COVID that hasn't recovered since either for
7:51
the first time in the world happening support We've done
7:53
this test to see if you were to split
7:56
the population youth, older, and everyone
7:58
in between. If you were to do a ranking
8:01
just on youth populations around the world, the
8:03
US would drop to sixty third.
8:05
Sixty third, sixty third.
8:07
We're usually in the top twenty.
8:09
Yeah, actually like in the
8:11
top end of the top twenty normally is the population
8:13
as a whole. But because of youth falling
8:15
off a cliff in terms of their well being, the
8:18
general population in the US has now dropped
8:20
from i think place fifteen to place twenty
8:22
third, and that's wholly driven by
8:24
youth not reporting
8:26
their life's going well.
8:28
And the problem is, it's probably not just the youth of today,
8:30
right, given what we talked about earlier, where
8:33
youth mental health is actually predicting something about
8:35
what those young people are going to be experiencing later
8:37
on. Not investing in the youth of today
8:39
being sixty third means or likely to
8:41
be sixty third, you know, into adulthood and
8:43
into many decades to come.
8:45
That is absolutely true.
8:46
So not only is there an urgent need to do something
8:48
because you can, but also because
8:51
you have to, because, as you say, the predictive
8:53
power of child and adolescent
8:55
wellbeing and mental health will track throughout
8:58
people's life course, and that doesn't bode
9:00
well for the future.
9:01
So I think one of the big puzzles though, is that, yes,
9:03
this is the trend that we're seeing in North America,
9:05
this is the kind of thing that I saw in my college students
9:07
in the US. But my understanding
9:09
is this doesn't seem to be the trend that we're seeing around
9:12
the world.
9:13
Correct.
9:13
Absolutely, So this is one of the other big insights
9:15
coming out from the World Happiness Support and
9:17
where really put the word world into the World
9:19
Happening Support because of this is we
9:22
piece data together from the global South, for example,
9:24
and unlike North America and
9:26
Western Europe, to some extent, you find in places
9:28
like Sub Saharan Africa you find that youth
9:31
has actually increased their self rate
9:33
a well being, so they find that the culity lives
9:35
is higher these days than it was before.
9:38
And that's in a way good news. It shows
9:40
that this is not a universal thing. It shows that
9:42
this can be reversed as a negative trend in
9:45
North America and the US in particular, and
9:47
I think that's really important to understand that
9:49
globally there are massive regional differences.
9:52
And so talk about what could be causing these differences,
9:55
because this isn't just kind of, you know, a subtle
9:57
pattern, like we're just seeing these extreme differences
9:59
in how unhappy North America and
10:01
to some extent Australia and New Zealand teens
10:04
are, but how much happier you know, folks
10:06
are in the global South and even
10:08
in in Europe. So like, what's
10:11
going wrong in North America?
10:13
Well, before we dig into North America, I
10:15
think the reason why you have sort of a convergence
10:17
really it's not like youth in Sub Sahara, Africa
10:20
is happier than youth in say Belgium
10:22
where I'm from, or the United Kingdom. It's
10:25
that they're sort of catching up and Western
10:27
Europe and North America coming down. So there's, if
10:29
you will, a global convergence to some extent,
10:31
and we've got an amazing figure in the World Happen Sport
10:34
Chapter three that kind of where you see that quite clearly, we
10:36
see North America, Western Europe come down, Central
10:38
Eastern Europe come up, sub so Aheran Africa come
10:40
up, and some regions in Asia come up as well.
10:43
And I think that global convergence
10:45
is probably a result of the global
10:48
inequalities reducing.
10:50
So we always talk about inequality rising,
10:52
and that's certainly the case within countries and especially
10:55
in North America and Western Europe and Australia
10:57
New Zealand, but globally you see
10:59
actually a reduction between countries
11:01
in wealth and income, and I think that's
11:03
partially also behind this convergence that we
11:06
see in well being and in youth
11:08
well being in particular.
11:09
So in some ways it's awesome that the youth of
11:11
these parts of the world are kind of getting happier
11:13
over time, But when we look at North America,
11:16
what factors are causing you know, North American
11:18
kids and kids in Australia and New Zealand to feel
11:21
so unhappy these days.
11:22
So I don't think there's one smoking
11:24
gun, if you will, that you can point to, but there's
11:27
a lot going on that it's not going in the
11:29
right direction. And so we can point
11:31
to the inequalities within
11:33
society in the United States, for example,
11:35
rising, which then obviously have to downstream
11:38
consequence on people's mental health and wellbeing
11:40
and opportunities for youth from less
11:42
privileged backgrounds. We can talk
11:45
about polarization, politics
11:47
teering people apart, social fabric being
11:49
in the US being torn apart, communities
11:51
being torn apart, within families,
11:54
youth and older generations, or between
11:56
youth, brothers and sisters, those discussions
11:58
falling apart, and then I think there's no way around that.
12:00
We also need to look at technology. You kind of get
12:02
around the fact also that the slide in
12:05
youth well being coincience with the
12:07
coming up of social media
12:10
and how people use social media, so that
12:12
can have positives and negatives, but if people use
12:14
it passively, people who are young and vulnerable,
12:17
and what they use in terms of social media and for
12:19
how long. And so we had the privilege
12:21
of speaking with Vec Murphy the USR
12:23
surge in general. Recently he noted
12:25
data that people now spent on average in the United
12:28
States about four and a half hours a day on
12:30
social media. And that's not even accounting for work
12:33
on your computer or Google or whatever.
12:35
It's really just social media.
12:37
So with the US falling to sixty
12:39
third position, if you were to just look at
12:41
youth to blow thirty, that is really
12:44
a shame. And I would challenge everybody
12:46
in the United States, the society is government
12:48
leaders to not
12:50
punch below its way by this much.
12:52
Because the objective dimensions
12:55
that you have in placed, wealth, health, and
12:57
much else, you should be doing a
12:59
lot better for you.
13:01
What can we do for our young people and
13:03
what can they do for themselves? John
13:06
has plenty of suggestions right after
13:08
the If
13:16
social media, driven by the big tech
13:18
firms that dominate our economy is to
13:20
blame for the unhappiness we see in young people
13:22
across North America, Western Europe
13:24
and as far away as Australia, there's
13:27
probably not much we can do about it, right
13:30
well, Oxford professor Joan Emmanuel Jenev
13:33
billed out a bit more hope.
13:35
Technologies have come around. They
13:37
tend to help and be helpful, but with
13:39
certain boundaries in place that evolve over
13:41
time as we better understand the impact of these technologies.
13:44
So an obvious one that we owe
13:46
to Vivicmurphy, the US serge in general, is
13:49
he made the parallel between cars,
13:51
and at first cars were driving
13:54
around in the streets with huge numbers
13:56
of traffic fatalities as a result because
13:58
of the cars weren't safe enough. We weren't wearing our seatbelts.
14:01
So over time we realize that this is
14:03
a good technology but needs specific limitations
14:05
in place, and then they were slowly but
14:07
gradually put in place, and now we're all
14:10
benefiting from mobility in a relatively
14:12
safe way as a result of this coevolution
14:14
between technology and social
14:17
norms. And the same could be done here with
14:19
social media. I think this can be
14:21
a cocreation where everybody benefits
14:23
from these new technologies, but with certain
14:26
guardrails in place.
14:28
And so the idea is that as a society, as
14:30
parents, as people, we can sort of advocate
14:32
for those guardrails. We can, you know, push
14:34
the government to say, hey, what does the seat belt look like
14:36
for Facebook, for TikTok or something like
14:38
that, What is maybe a speed limit look like for
14:41
maybe the amount of time you're on these kinds of things
14:43
and so on. Like, if we push for that, then we can
14:45
get maybe the benefits of technology would like
14:47
less of the limitation precisely.
14:49
And so we need to think carefully
14:52
about how we harness the
14:54
positives of social media and make sure
14:56
that these virtual connections ultimately
14:58
lead to physical connections amongst
15:01
people. Because we also
15:03
heard from the US Surgeon General that
15:06
in his tour around these colleges,
15:08
who's talking about a change of culture where
15:11
kids in high schools come up to them and say, look,
15:13
but we don't have a culture anymore of speaking
15:15
to each other, and let that sink in for a
15:17
moment. That's pretty bad. And it
15:20
also makes sense because if you now walk
15:22
into a lunch cafeteria in a high school,
15:24
people will be behind their screens and so
15:27
it's much harder to stroke up a conversation
15:29
between each other and bond as human beings
15:32
and not just through virtual means. So we
15:34
need to think very carefully as a society
15:36
to harness the good elements of technology
15:39
and make sure that social media puts the social
15:41
frankly and social media.
15:43
You know, this is something that I saw like rit large
15:45
when I was working with students at Yale. I
15:47
remember one kind of moment
15:50
where I was thinking, like, Wow, the youth are really struggling
15:52
with their social connection and they're turning to technology
15:55
to like solve it. We had this kind of competition
15:58
on campus for like a new app, right, you know, like
16:00
they're all these schools kind of do these like tech competitions,
16:03
And one of the potential apps that won
16:06
the competition that I was looking at
16:08
at Yale was this app that was called
16:10
Let's Get a Meal, And the idea is
16:12
like you go to the dining hall and you're scared
16:14
to talk to people, but you go in Let's get a Meal,
16:16
which is kind of like Tinder for the dining hall, and you say,
16:19
you know, I could want to get a meal with somebody who would
16:21
want to get a meal with me, And you sort of swipe and find like, oh,
16:23
I'll eat with that person. And like the
16:25
older folks who are judging this competition
16:28
like me, were like, wait, but it's the
16:30
dining hall. Why don't you just like sit down with
16:32
someone. It's like one hundred students that you all
16:34
should really know because they're like in your same dorm,
16:36
Like just talk to somebody. But the students
16:39
really felt like they needed a tool, a
16:41
technological tool, to like connect and
16:43
just talk with somebody in their lunch cafeteria.
16:46
I think that speaks to what Vivik Merthy
16:48
you as certain general toll is that that
16:51
culture has changed. It's now not easy
16:53
to sort of reach out to other people
16:55
in the cafeteria in person. We
16:58
need to bring it back into people's comfort zone
17:00
to be able and willing and actually
17:02
be able to reach out to human beings in
17:04
person and not necessarily neat
17:06
the technology enabling of that
17:09
when people are literally sitting in the
17:11
cafeteria.
17:12
But this idea raises a certain hypothesis,
17:15
which is that the way that technology
17:17
is affecting social connection is in some sense
17:19
worse for youth in North America and Australia
17:22
and New Zealand versus in Europe
17:24
and in Africa.
17:25
Do we know that that's the case, We
17:27
need to mean, it's an empirical question, you're asking, So we
17:30
need to find out data of how much time they
17:32
spend and obviously in the US
17:34
we now know it's about four and a half hours a day.
17:38
My guesstimate is that will be
17:40
slightly less in the Global South
17:42
or Central and Eastern Europe. Then the
17:44
question is also not just how much time they spend
17:46
on the social media, but also what kind
17:48
of social media and then how people
17:50
are using it. Is a passive use or is
17:53
it an active use, which is also very different. So
17:55
passive use is not to be recommended,
17:57
but active use of social media, where we actively
17:59
reach out to people, actively talk about yourself
18:01
and connect with others, can be beneficial
18:04
for people's well being and mental health. So
18:06
it's hard to say there is something
18:08
this is quirky, but we ran
18:10
an extra analysis to try and understand
18:13
this. And North America obviously is the
18:15
US and Canada. The Canada is split
18:17
between the Francophones Quebecua
18:19
and the English or Native
18:22
English Canadians, which are then obviously
18:24
closer with the US counterparts who
18:26
look at sort of US slash
18:28
Canadian English spoken medium and there's something
18:30
really striking there that could point us in the direction
18:33
a thought, which is Quebecqui
18:35
youth have seen a drop but by no means
18:38
as large as the English spoken
18:40
Canadian youth, and that was not obviously
18:42
in line with the American youth. And so
18:45
John Halliwell, my wonderful
18:47
colleague and really the heart and soul of the Royal
18:49
Happiness Report, has noted
18:51
that and sees it as suggestive
18:54
of the fact that the English slash
18:56
American media is perhaps
18:58
more dominated by negative news or
19:01
calls that out in more conflictual ways
19:04
then say, the more international global
19:07
Francophone way of news
19:10
access. And so this may not be social
19:12
media, but more how news is presented to
19:14
youth in the world, in the Francophone
19:16
world, it might be less conflectual,
19:18
less negative, speaking, less to our
19:20
negativity biases in terms of news than
19:23
it is in the English spoken the world in
19:25
North America. So there's an interesting hint
19:27
there of something going on that will
19:29
not explain everything, but it's quite striking, we thought,
19:32
and.
19:32
It fits with the thing that you were saying earlier, which is, you
19:34
know that many of the changes in the US
19:36
are about political polarization, and
19:38
if you have a news media that's kind of biased
19:41
towards pulling that out, and we have youth
19:43
have phones in their pockets that are dinging every time
19:45
some politicians says something mean or you
19:47
know that negativity bias can get
19:49
strugg over.
19:50
It can get overwhelming and dominates, and
19:52
it's really sad that then it doesn't allow any
19:54
space for positive news.
19:56
And if you think about, you know, just like the way college
19:58
was, news was back when I was in college.
20:00
You know, it was just so different then, right. I could pull
20:03
up a newspaper and read something terrible,
20:05
but then I would put the newspaper down and I could go
20:07
to the library and hang out with my friends. And again
20:09
it wasn't like diinging with a notification
20:11
in my pocket. About something terrible that was happening
20:13
in the world. And when I just think about the kind of
20:16
anxiety that can come from that theft
20:18
of my attention and that constant negative
20:21
information, like it just must feel so different
20:23
for the youth of today.
20:24
It certainly does.
20:25
And the algorithms behind social media are
20:27
obviously optimized to get our attention. And
20:30
as you know, well, we're hardwired to
20:32
be more attentive to negative things
20:35
that are potential threats or issues
20:37
that are alarming, rather than positive
20:39
news, and so the algorithm tries
20:41
to seek our attention and then obviously does it
20:43
by pinging us with negative news because
20:45
they know that we'll get our attention more easily than
20:48
positive news. So here too, maybe
20:50
we should start nudging or providing
20:52
frameworks in place to maybe balance us
20:54
out a bit more.
20:55
Or we can do this ourselves.
20:56
We can undertake these automatic notifications,
20:59
I'm sure than typically negative news. We can
21:01
perhaps subscribe to more positive
21:04
news sources. And I think I've actually
21:06
heard there's a sort of a new journal
21:09
that is meant to be mostly trying to balance
21:11
out towards pulsitive news.
21:12
Maybe we can subscribe to that. We'll find
21:14
out about.
21:15
When dogs are being found, we'll
21:17
find out about the World Happiness Report and the good
21:19
things that are happening, not just the bad things, et cetera,
21:21
et cetera, et c to help us ourselves
21:24
regain our sanity.
21:25
In that way.
21:25
So let's say you're a parent listening to this, maybe even
21:27
a parent in North America for example, watching
21:30
these trends and just feeling really worried. You
21:32
are there particular strategies or practices
21:34
you could suggest for parents for how they could reverse
21:37
the trend, maybe not in their whole country, but maybe in their
21:39
own community or in their own family.
21:40
Well, I think as parents who are really concerned
21:43
and probably rightly so, what they need
21:45
to do is, I think try and understand their kids
21:47
first foremost, because their kids are
21:50
good kids, but they're in a tough, complex
21:52
situation and not because of them,
21:54
because of society around them making it very difficult.
21:57
So the social media that tries to really attract
21:59
all of their attention, and there's everything possible
22:02
with the most brilliant designers and software
22:04
engineers designing algorithms to
22:06
really try and keep them hook to the screens. There's
22:09
AI automation that is making
22:12
the future of work cloak both interesting
22:14
but also difficult and complex. I
22:16
mean, as a youth today, think about
22:19
choices you need to make for say studies. You
22:21
might be saying, oh, I'd love to be a
22:24
lawyer and start legal studies. But by the end
22:26
of view four or five years of law school,
22:28
everything you've learned could be obsolete because they
22:31
chat GPT in some legal version of it.
22:33
So there's so many uncertainties
22:36
that kids live with today and
22:38
so many technologies trying to get
22:40
their attention. So I think the first thing
22:43
that parents need to do really is to try and understand
22:45
the complexity with which they live.
22:47
And I love this advice because, you know, honestly, even
22:49
with my yal students, sometimes I get people
22:52
who react of like, oh, what's their problem, you
22:54
know, those snowflakes, Like they really can't handle
22:56
it. But I think when you look carefully at the actual
22:58
societal struggles that young people are facing
23:00
today, like it makes sense that you're freaked
23:03
out and feeling anxious about what's happening in the world
23:05
of work. It makes sense that you're freaked out and
23:07
anxious about political polarizing and inequality.
23:10
We see, you know, at least in the United States, and so
23:12
I love this idea that what parents need to start
23:14
with is just to recognize, like, it's tough out
23:17
there for young people today, it's.
23:18
Very tough out there, and so they need to start with listening
23:21
to their own children rather than trying to bust them
23:23
around and put these hard limits in place, and
23:25
understand the pressures they're under. And if
23:28
they do that, then I think they'll understand,
23:30
for example, that there's lots of peer pressure.
23:33
So for example, if you say to your child
23:35
you cannot have an iPhone or an iPad,
23:37
or you can't go onto this particular app then your child
23:39
may actually be missing out on important things
23:42
happening in their.
23:43
Own school community.
23:45
And this then leads to a second
23:47
thought that parents could perhaps do is to coordinate
23:50
with other parents or their
23:52
local school to see, hey, if there
23:54
are specific peer pressures or
23:56
some people have access to something and
23:58
others do not, and that puts sort of inequalities
24:01
in place that are really harmful,
24:04
then can there be a coordinate approach
24:06
amongst the parents of kids that are
24:08
friends or in the same class, or can
24:10
they work at the school boards to say, like, hey,
24:12
can we have a norm or a
24:15
reference point or something that we would
24:17
recommend as a school or the parents of
24:19
a whole club of school friends.
24:22
And I think this is really important because it really is
24:24
not trying to intervene on, say, your kids
24:26
particular social media use or the fact that they're
24:28
on TikTok all the time. It's actually working
24:31
in their community to try to get these norms
24:33
changed around, which makes it easier for the individual
24:36
to end up engaging in practices that might be
24:38
healthier for people's happiness exactly.
24:41
And some of the folks listening to the Happiness Lab right
24:43
now might themselves be in the category of
24:45
folks that you put in there. You know, what is it ten to twenty
24:47
five is your definition of youth? If
24:49
there's a teenager listening right now, what advice
24:51
might you have for them as an individual for how to
24:53
kind of fight some of these trends.
24:55
I think the first thing is to understand
24:58
again that you are living in a complex
25:00
situation, that your attention is being fought
25:02
over, and that you should
25:04
not let yourself be had. If
25:07
you will buy the brilliant software engineers
25:09
of these social media platforms, take agency
25:12
over your own time. Follow Laurie's
25:15
principles.
25:16
Around listen to the rest of the happiness lab, observe
25:19
exactly and.
25:20
Apply these principles about setting your own
25:23
boundaries and not letting yourself be consumed
25:26
by the big social media platforms.
25:29
And by all means, try and re establish
25:31
a culture of connection. And
25:34
I know it's changed, there's no longer a
25:36
culture of speaking to each other, but
25:38
make efforts to get out of your comfort zone and do
25:41
so. And if I may want
25:43
very specific practical
25:45
piece of advice is one thing we've
25:47
seen in the wellbeing science is that it's
25:50
ultimately all about social connection and when
25:52
you do good things for other people pro
25:54
social behaviors as we call it in the industry,
25:57
but really benevolent acts like volunteering,
25:59
donating small amounts, helping strangers
26:02
in need, talking to strangers. That
26:04
doesn't just help the people on the receiving
26:06
end, but we've now shown over and
26:09
over again in large studies
26:11
with causal inference that this also
26:13
helps yourself. And so by all means,
26:16
try and do good things for other people, and
26:19
you will see it shouldn't be the goal line and of itself,
26:21
but you'll see that will help
26:24
improve your own well being too.
26:27
And So one of the reasons I've loved dear chapter
26:29
on the World Happiness Report is that it kind of calls
26:31
out the trends that I was seeing in North America.
26:33
But I think it also provides us with a lot of hope, right,
26:36
Like, it isn't just the case that youth mental health
26:39
is going down all over the world. If
26:41
anything, what we're seeing is like there are
26:43
possibilities for improving things. They involve
26:45
changes, and they involve both societal changes
26:47
like maybe making things more equal, and also
26:50
individual changes like engaging in more social
26:52
connection. But there's hope there. The trend
26:54
isn't just like, you know, a downward slope forever.
26:57
We can all take agency and change these things exactly.
26:59
And you mentioned social connection, and I think that's probably
27:01
the real key, and again putting social
27:04
in social media and connecting in
27:06
person. And it's a bit silly
27:08
to say it's a bit, but if you think
27:10
about moving from ill being to well
27:13
being, it doesn't take much. It takes
27:15
moving from I to E and you move
27:17
ill being to well being. And that's just not
27:20
just a symbolically or figuratively, but that's
27:22
for real. And the more I've
27:24
studied well being, and I know you've done
27:26
the same, Laurie. It's always about
27:28
ultimately social capital, the social fabric
27:31
of society, your own quality social connections.
27:33
So yes, by all means, do social media, but
27:36
make sure it's with people that you actually
27:38
connect with in a way that works
27:41
for your well being and in real life and in real
27:43
life. Actually, I'm not reminded your calling
27:46
down. Nick Christakis and James
27:48
Fowler way back they did some of the first
27:50
studies of social media around Facebook, and
27:52
they looked at sort of connections
27:54
on Facebook and numbers of connections,
27:57
and then they really cleverly look that
27:59
are these connections that are sort of quite remote or
28:02
quite close. And the way they did this is by looking
28:04
at the pictures you're posting. Are the people you were tagging
28:07
actual people that you were meeting also live
28:10
and so that sort of became a proxy for
28:12
qualitative social connections rather
28:15
than sort of more distant connections that are more virtual
28:17
in nature. And they found a big difference between
28:20
having actual ties with people
28:22
being tagged together with you in photos circling
28:25
in social media, then having lots of other friends that
28:27
weren't actually part of your actual
28:30
physical surroundings and environment, and
28:32
so that I think is a big hint.
28:33
It's an old study, but it was ahead
28:36
of.
28:36
Its time, and so so far we've been talking about kind
28:38
of what's gone wrong in North America. But I
28:40
love the World Happiness Report youths
28:42
data because it's really showing that something actually
28:45
much more positive is happening in the global
28:48
South and in Europe, and so I want to talk about
28:50
the positive trends in those countries.
28:52
You know, what do we think is changing that's actually
28:54
making people happier in those parts of the world.
28:57
So I think what's happening in say subseri,
28:59
in Africa, parts of Asia, and especially Central
29:01
and Eastern Europe. Because by the way, you
29:03
should know that if you were to do a ranking
29:05
of countries just based on youth in
29:08
the world happen sport rather than just the general population
29:10
of countries, it'd be Lithuania on
29:12
top for the below thirties. And that's really striking.
29:15
So the Central and Eastern European countries have really
29:17
come to the fore on that front. That's with driving obviously
29:20
their general rise and the rankings as well
29:22
into the top twenty really and so
29:24
that's exciting and we should look at those
29:27
cases in a bit like off a positive psychology
29:29
approach, we're rather than focusing in on what's
29:32
going wrong in America with youth, maybe
29:34
we can learn something from what's going right in say
29:36
Lithuania, or in other parts of the
29:38
world. And so in particular Subsiharan
29:41
Africa, we see that youth below twenty
29:43
five in this case is rising. Adults
29:45
are rising as well, but the delta difference
29:47
between youth and adults is increasing,
29:50
So youth are proportionally getting
29:52
happier and that's exciting. And it's obviously the exactly
29:54
opposite, the mirror image of what's happening in the United
29:56
States. Why and so why I
29:59
don't know is the honest answer,
30:01
But I think it will have
30:04
to do with something we touched upon earlier, which
30:06
is the global convergence
30:09
in terms of income, so globalization.
30:12
Of being an economist, we do think about the
30:14
economics of trade, global trade, globalization,
30:17
and it's probably behind much of the inequality
30:20
within countries, but it has effectively
30:22
reduced inequality between countries, and
30:24
so it has lifted lots of people
30:26
out of poverty. And for example, China having
30:29
become the blasto now but about
30:31
ten twenty years ago, because of globalization, became
30:34
sort of the factory of the world. While it brought a
30:36
lot of wealth, half a billion people rose
30:38
out of poverty, and it's the same across
30:40
Africa, parts of Asia, et cetera.
30:43
It's probably most striking.
30:45
In the context of Central and Eastern Europe because
30:48
you'll remember, in the early two thousands
30:50
the Central and Eastern European countries joined the EU,
30:53
and that meant a lot of wealth transfer
30:56
from Western Europe to Eastern Europe. So
30:58
I think Romania, Lithuania, and
31:00
the other Baltic nations, et cetera.
31:02
Poland probably a lot of hope among
31:04
the youth. Right we were thinking about their job prospects
31:07
in a different way now.
31:08
So suddenly from being a Polish youth
31:10
in Poland looking for jobs there, the whole
31:13
EU open up to you as essentially
31:15
a way of travel and job opportunities.
31:18
And then these wealth transfers through the
31:20
European Union's funds and subsidies,
31:22
if you will, from the western, richer
31:25
countries in Europe to the not so rich
31:27
Eastern European countries also meant a
31:29
certain degree of convergence in economic GDP
31:32
per capital levels. What's interesting here is
31:34
that in Eastern Europe there has always
31:37
been a foundation of redistribution
31:39
for good or bad reasons. They were in the orbit of communism
31:42
or socialism. So that meant that there's always
31:45
been sort of a DNA of redistributing wealth
31:47
to some extent, which isn't there in other countries.
31:49
So the reason why I'm emphasizing this is one
31:51
of the reasons why the Kandonavian countries do so well is
31:53
because they're wealthy, but more importantly, they redistribute
31:56
their wealth and there's an equality there which and also
31:58
feeds into the welfare state. There's
32:00
other wealthy countries out there, the United States
32:03
amongst others, the US amongst others,
32:05
where there's a lot of wealth. So gdpeper a capital,
32:07
the average wealth is huge, but it's not equally distributed.
32:10
So that then also feeds into well
32:12
being in equalities.
32:14
And so totally, particularly well being in
32:16
young people right who are looking at the next generation
32:19
and their economic prospects and so on.
32:21
Exactly and are not seeing the same prospects or
32:23
not as looking forward to the future as
32:25
previous generations were. Just to finish
32:27
the thought, so what could be driving say
32:29
central in Eastern Europe is not just sort
32:32
of a wealth transfer convergence between
32:34
West and Eastern Europe in terms of wealth, but
32:36
then also the foundations were in place in Eastern
32:38
Europe to build a welfare state
32:41
and redistribute this to a large extent so
32:43
that everybody sort of benefits from
32:45
the rising tide, if you will, And I think
32:47
that will probably be the fuel, the main
32:49
driver behind I think my
32:52
youth well being in this place is starting
32:54
to pick up. In addition to the prospect
32:57
of having way more job opportunities opening
32:59
up through the EU.
33:00
In addition to the sort of positive changes that we're
33:02
seeing in the global South
33:04
and in Europe, we're also seeing
33:07
some countries that are pushing to make child happiness
33:09
and national priority. So tell me about
33:12
some of the successes that we've seen in those countries
33:14
that really pay attention to this in particular and
33:16
push for improved child wellbeing.
33:19
So I know for a fact that in Japan they
33:21
have a whole new program around child
33:23
health and wellbeing, and they take this very
33:26
seriously, and part because they're moving
33:28
towards well being more generally, but
33:30
they've also really gotten the importance of
33:33
youth wellbeing today pays
33:35
dividends over time in the later
33:37
lives of these youngsters. You
33:39
see that the focus then goes into
33:41
schooling, the education system, what can we do there, And
33:44
so you find in places like Japan, but also China
33:46
and South Korea and many other places,
33:49
we're all sort of teaching to the test, the
33:51
SATs in the United States, the GCSS
33:53
and the A levels here in the United Kingdom. And
33:56
that's also raising questions because if that's
33:58
the only basis of sort of success
34:00
is to do well on these tests. And so you see
34:03
new programs being developed around say
34:05
Healthy Minds is one of the programs that
34:08
Lord Layard that they heard or mentor
34:10
has really introduced in the United Kingdom, showing
34:13
and teaching people life skills in addition
34:15
to stem science, technology, engineering,
34:18
math. And what we find is that introducing
34:20
life skills makes for happier,
34:22
more balanced human beings. It's pretty crazy
34:25
to think that we'd only focus in on the
34:27
science elements, or perhaps English literature
34:29
and others and not teach people to live
34:32
good lives, especially in the era of
34:34
social media where people need to be given
34:37
a sense of what's happening on that front. A
34:39
good example here on the policy front is actually
34:42
is Manchester, so they have the
34:44
whole school system round. Manchester is part
34:46
of a program called be Well where they are
34:48
introducing essentially life
34:50
skill courses and tracking
34:53
thousands and thousands students across many
34:55
dozens of schools to see what the impact is on
34:57
their well being and ultimately also their performance
35:00
on these testcores. Is to see that if you feel
35:02
better, feel more balanced as youth,
35:05
as a student, is that also improve
35:07
actually your performance. The big question here
35:10
is can we have it both? Can we have great performance
35:12
on our tests and SATs and
35:14
GCSS while being and
35:17
leading happier lives.
35:18
I think that's so important. I mean, it's one of the reasons
35:20
that I started my class at Yale. But
35:23
I agree completely, Like you know, those are twenty one
35:25
year old. You know, if we could just start that earlier,
35:27
when kids are ten, eleven, twelve, I
35:29
think it would make such a difference.
35:31
Anybody with young kids.
35:33
Mine are too young for this, but anybody I know who
35:35
has kids that are now in high school know the impact
35:37
of say high school, primary and secondary school
35:40
is huge and perhaps more influentially than
35:42
the parents have influence on their kids. We
35:44
need to work really with the schools and
35:46
the curriculum to make sure people get life
35:48
skills and learn how to lead fulfilling
35:51
lives.
35:52
As you know, I'd love to see the fundamentals
35:54
of happiness science taught to kids in more
35:56
schools around the world. I mean,
35:59
we do so much to educate young people about
36:01
math and literature. Why aren't we also
36:03
teaching young people the happiness skills they'll need
36:05
later in life. Why aren't we ensuring that
36:08
they know more about how to prioritize friendships,
36:10
sleep, gratitude, and doing good for others.
36:13
If you're a teen, or if you know a teen, you
36:15
should check out the new version of my happiness
36:17
course that's just for young people. It's called
36:20
The Science of well Being for Teens, and you
36:22
can access the course for free at Corsera
36:24
dot org. That's Coursera, the
36:27
word course ra dot org. And
36:29
again the free class is called The Science
36:31
of well Being for Teens. We're
36:34
leaving the World Happiness Report behind for now, but
36:36
we still have some happiness science treats in store
36:39
for you. On the day the report was
36:41
released, the United Nations International Day
36:43
of Happiness, I had the good fortune to
36:45
attend the World Happiness Summit in London. Welcome
36:48
to the WAHASU Live version of the Happiness
36:50
Lab, where
36:52
I got to speak to a medical doctor also
36:55
happens to be one of Europe's top wellness podcasters.
36:57
To introduce my guest, doctor Rungan
37:00
Chatterjee, the host of the Feel Better,
37:02
Live More podcast. Today, we're going to
37:04
be talking about why medical doctors
37:06
need to pay even more attention to happiness.
37:09
Well, how's the audience. Are you all interested in medical
37:11
doctors paying more attention to happiness? And
37:15
you'll get to hear more of my awesome conversation with
37:17
doctor Rungin Chatterjee Next time on
37:19
the Happiness Lab with me Doctor Laurie Santos
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More