0:05

Did you notice that this show doesn't have

0:07

any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers

0:10

or vitamins or smoothies or

0:12

gasoline. That's because I don't want corporate

0:14

sponsors telling us what to investigate and

0:17

what to say. Instead, you're our sponsors.

0:20

This is a production by our non-profit,

0:22

the Informed Consent Action Network. If

0:24

you want more investigations, more

0:26

hard-hitting news, if you want

0:28

the truth, go to ikendecide.org

0:31

and donate now.

0:49

Good morning, good afternoon, good evening. Wherever

0:51

you are out there in the world, it's time for

0:54

us all to step out onto the high wire.

0:57

You know, it's amazing what a difference a year

0:59

makes. I mean, when we start to look back at some

1:01

of the things that happened and how the language

1:03

around all of these conversations

1:06

about COVID, about pandemics, about vaccines,

1:08

about lockdowns, it all seems to

1:10

be shifting. It feels like the world is waking

1:13

up and a lot of people that were awake but

1:15

weren't admitting it are now saying, yep, I

1:17

was always awake. This

1:19

week, a lot of attention has been brought to Ice

1:21

Cube. If you remember back in 2021, he was

1:23

fired off a set. This

1:27

was what the tweet said. Ice Cube will no

1:29

longer star in, oh hell no,

1:31

a perfect title actually for this, for

1:33

Sony after declining requests from producers to

1:35

get the COVID-19 vaccine. He

1:38

was set to be paid $9 million. Now the headlines

1:40

are talking about how he's basically bragging. Ice Cube seems

1:43

pretty proud about losing $9 million because

1:45

he wouldn't get vaccinated. Tucker

1:47

Carlson recently caught up with him

1:50

and had a very interesting interview. Take

1:52

a look at this.

1:53

Why wouldn't you take the vax? You

1:57

had a direct order to take it. You were told to take

1:59

it.

1:59

Yeah, I'm not real

2:02

good with direct orders, but

2:04

on a whole nother note, it wasn't

2:06

ready. You know, it

2:10

was six

2:12

months, you know, kind of rush

2:15

job. And I didn't

2:18

feel safe. But they told

2:20

you you were safe. I know what they

2:22

said. I know what

2:25

they said. And I heard them.

2:27

I heard them loud and clear.

2:29

But it's not their decision.

2:32

There's no repercussions if they're wrong. But

2:35

I can get all the repercussions if they're wrong. Was

2:38

it a tough call for you? No, it wasn't

2:41

a tough call. You know, I wanted to be

2:43

an example for my kids, you

2:45

know, really make sure they didn't take it either.

2:48

Show them that I, you know, I wanted to stand on my

2:50

convictions and that

2:52

I was willing, you

2:55

know, to lose $9 million and

2:57

more because we've probably lost more,

2:59

you

2:59

know, since then. The

3:02

idea is that people who stand on their convictions

3:04

are heroes. They're brave.

3:07

They have principles. You

3:09

know, they're the people we look to for inspiration. But

3:11

in this case, with this decision and these

3:13

principles, you were not

3:16

hailed as a hero. No.

3:20

You were attacked. Why

3:22

don't you get the vaccine, man? Hey, look, man,

3:25

I'd just rather be myself than

3:27

take that vaccine like you other three

3:29

billion bozos. I

3:32

never told anyone not to get

3:34

vaccinated publicly. That

3:37

was never my message to the world.

3:40

I didn't even want people to know whether

3:43

I got vaccinated or not. Do you know anyone

3:45

who was injured by the vaccine? I do. And

3:48

they suffer every day. And it's

3:51

hard to watch.

3:53

Sometimes you got to let people know what's going on.

3:55

So you can actually move the needle. Choose

3:58

to be vocal if it's true.

3:59

Why can't I say it? Well,

4:04

you can't say it because it is true. There

4:06

it is. Now that's the problem with the world today.

4:10

Thinking something is not a crime. Saying

4:13

it is not a crime. You know what I mean?

4:15

So I just tell what's real, you know, if the truth

4:17

hurts, say ouch.

4:22

Well,

4:22

there it is. Speaking truth to power

4:24

as he has most of his career and really

4:26

coming out now. Apparently he's

4:29

even gotten some trouble with his new basketball league

4:31

and he's speaking out about it. Ice Cube goes off

4:33

on the NBA mainstream media and gatekeepers

4:36

for trying to sabotage his brand, the big three,

4:38

because he isn't a part of their club. I'm

4:40

going on an F the gatekeepers podcast

4:43

tour to get the message out to the people. Hey,

4:46

you know, maybe we'll get lucky. Ice Cube, why don't you

4:48

drop in studio here on that tour? And we'd love

4:50

to have a conversation because

4:52

we've been calling you a hero all the way through.

4:54

That's what the High Wire does. Got a huge

4:56

show coming up, another big hero a little bit later

4:59

on in the show, Edward Dowd. I don't know about you,

5:01

but it just feels like there's this new

5:03

wave of strokes and

5:06

heart attacks and blood clots and,

5:08

you know, is the leading cause

5:11

of death now suddenly? We're

5:14

gonna get into all of those details. Is it really

5:16

on the rise? But first it's time for The

5:18

Jackson Report.

5:29

You know, we've been featuring comedians

5:31

and now musicians, you know, all

5:33

these people from Hollywood that seem to be towing the

5:35

line for a long time. They're breaking ranks. It's

5:37

an amazing moment.

5:39

It is an incredible moment. And speaking

5:41

of Hollywood, there's a hot new drug

5:44

out there and it's an injectable drug. It's not

5:46

a COVID vaccine. It's a diabetes

5:49

medication vaccine. It's a weight

5:51

loss drug. It's something, but a lot

5:54

of people are clamoring for this thing.

5:56

Take a look. All right. The hottest

5:58

drugs in the country right now. right now. The

6:00

medication has taken Hollywood by storm.

6:03

It's the talk of TikTok. I

6:05

just start dropping pounds left and right. The

6:08

topic Ozempic has over 300 million views.

6:11

People looking to lose weight have a new

6:14

tool in their arsenal. Baby, the

6:16

hype is real. Prescription drugs called

6:18

semiglutide that come in a now

6:21

unmistakable pen. Ozempic and

6:23

Wagovie, the brand names for semiglutide

6:26

drugs that were developed to help people with type

6:28

two diabetes.

6:29

They've been out for a long time for people

6:31

with type two diabetes. Now some

6:34

of them have FDA approval for treating

6:36

obesity. They're incredibly effective for

6:38

weight loss.

6:38

Ozempic works. They make you

6:40

feel full. They raise insulin levels. They decrease

6:43

gastric emptying and they do work.

6:45

The weight just started falling off. I

6:47

have been on semiglutide for a total of 10 weeks

6:49

now. After 20 weeks, I am down 68 pounds.

6:54

Big names like Elon Musk, Amy Schumer

6:56

and Chelsea Handler have admitted taking

6:58

it. And from celebrities to social

7:00

media influencers, this trend

7:03

has taken the weight loss world by storm.

7:06

Jolo, you look

7:06

thin. Thank

7:08

you. Ozempic? Yep. What

7:11

housewife isn't on Ozempic? Not one. Any

7:14

side effects? No. Really?

7:16

Just not hungry. Okay. Is it safe?

7:19

Yes, it's considered to be generally safe. Very

7:22

rare side effects of pancreatitis.

7:24

How much are you expecting this drug

7:27

to increase demand or how much demand

7:29

for the drug are you expecting to be increased in the next five

7:31

to 10

7:31

years? We expect this would be a very,

7:33

very significant part of our business. We're just

7:35

getting going. So it's a very, very sizable

7:39

market. This

7:42

is a gigantic market. Obviously

7:45

weight loss drugs have always been one of the leading

7:47

contenders, especially in a nation

7:49

like America that is struggling with obesity

7:52

on such a major level and diabetes

7:54

and all those things. So this certainly

7:56

has played into that and it does appear that almost

7:58

every time we talk about obesity, we're talking about the everybody

8:00

is taking this thing right now. I

8:02

mean, I hear reports, you know, my hair

8:04

salon is offering Ozempi, as he

8:07

calls it, and certainly

8:09

clinics, and you know, it just seems

8:11

like it's everywhere and everyone's down.

8:13

There's commercials everywhere for this thing. And

8:16

you mentioned all those people that woke up during

8:18

COVID to the realities of how pharmaceutical

8:20

companies operate, how messaging works. Let's

8:22

take those people along a ride of what we do here,

8:25

and we dig deeper into these drugs. So the

8:27

first really red flag is that pharmaceutical

8:29

exec saying it's a sizable market.

8:32

Anytime there's this much hype

8:34

around a drug, this much marketing, this much

8:37

push, this possibility for this

8:39

much money to be made, we have to

8:41

pump the brakes, have some caution here, and

8:44

let's look at some realities. Have a black and white conversation

8:46

about this thing, and let's look through the hype. So in 2021,

8:49

when we were focused on the pandemic, everyone was

8:51

focused on the pandemic, this was the headline that

8:53

came out. FDA approves new drug treatment

8:56

for chronic weight loss management. First since 2014, they've

8:58

been working on these for a long time. And

9:00

then sure enough, the American Academy of Pediatrics,

9:03

these make the kind of the rules for

9:05

children in the United States. They came

9:08

out and jumped right on board the bandwagon. So

9:10

you just saw all the Hollywood hype. They

9:12

have the adults, it's at hair

9:13

salons. It's a, your doctor's giving them out like

9:15

candy. What about the kids? American Academy

9:18

of Pediatrics said, we got you covered. Here's the

9:20

headline here. Consider drugs and

9:22

surgery early for obesity in kids.

9:24

New guidelines say, waiting doesn't work.

9:26

And it says children struggle with obesity, struggling

9:29

with obesity should be evaluated and treated early

9:31

and aggressively, including with medications

9:33

for kids as young as 12.

9:35

Aggressively with medications, again,

9:37

here's another red flag. We're treating kids

9:39

aggressively as young as 12 with medications

9:41

that just were recently approved off label

9:44

with an injectable diabetes drug. Third

9:46

red flag. We have Boris Johnson,

9:49

obviously someone that was at

9:52

the lead of the COVID pandemic response

9:54

in the UK. He steps down, goes

9:56

directly into writing op-eds.

9:59

for his first op-ed? Does he talk about his experience

10:02

with the COVID response? No, he pushes

10:04

this drug. The wonder drug I hoped would

10:07

stop my 1130 fridge raids for cheddar

10:09

and chorizo didn't work for me. And

10:11

you start reading this article and it sounds like

10:13

it was written by a pharmaceutical rep. Listen to this. It's

10:16

a cinch said the doctor all you need to do is inject a

10:18

tiny dose of clear ozimpic fluid into your abdomen

10:20

once a week and hey presto no more rating

10:22

the fridge at 1130 for cheddar and chorizo washed

10:25

down with a half a bottle of wine. It's

10:27

a dark life you got there for a second.

10:29

I don't think an injection is going to help on that one.

10:33

So but now we start uncovering the

10:35

story. So this thing's been out a couple years, it's

10:37

all the rage.

10:38

But then you start seeing headlines like this and

10:40

we're no stranger to these type of headlines.

10:42

Is ozimpic causing a wave of suicidal Americans

10:45

FDA has received 60 reports of side

10:47

effects

10:48

and drugmaker Nova Nordes says

10:50

it's taking the issue very seriously. Amid

10:53

fears of 5 million people taking the shot. We

10:55

go to ozimpics package insert is

10:57

required. We know these with vaccines is required

11:00

for every drug and injectable product.

11:02

Talk about everything including harms and adverse

11:04

events. You look on this product everywhere

11:07

and you see nothing about the word suicidal

11:09

ideation, suicidal attempts, suicidal

11:12

anything. So we got a problem. We're doing

11:14

this thing out in mass quantities. We

11:16

have I mean, a large marketing

11:18

campaign and we have a side effect

11:20

that is obviously a really big deal

11:22

that's no one really talking about. We're just starting to see in the headlines.

11:25

This is Reuters. Not only is the FDA looking at this but

11:28

the European Union is looking at this as well.

11:30

EU investigates ozimpic weight loss

11:32

drug, Saxendra, after suicidal

11:34

thoughts reported. There's a lot of brand names of these drugs. So

11:37

just try to follow me on that. Yeah, says although Iceland's

11:40

regulator has flagged only three cases, the

11:42

issue of suicidal thoughts linked to weight

11:44

loss drugs is sensitive and has hobbled

11:46

previous attempts by the drug industry to provide

11:48

to develop lucrative weight loss drugs. So we have a history

11:51

now. And it says here in clinical trials

11:54

for ozimpic and Saxendra.

11:56

Novo excluded people with a history of

11:58

psychiatric disorder.

11:59

disorders or recent suicidal behaviors.

12:02

So Del, they stack the deck in the pre-licensure

12:05

trials. Where have we saw that? Where

12:07

have we seen this before? Yeah.

12:08

And it's almost like they knew there might be

12:11

an issue.

12:12

Yeah, exactly. And so we go on

12:15

and it says here, Sanofi's accomplia

12:17

in the article of Reuters, which never won

12:20

US approval, was withdrawn in Europe

12:22

in 2008 after being linked to suicidal

12:24

thoughts. So we have drugs being

12:27

withdrawn, exactly, weight

12:29

loss drugs being withdrawn because of suicidal thoughts.

12:31

So I mean, there's a lot of breadcrumbs

12:33

here to follow. So I started digging even

12:35

more and we see this study. We

12:37

have a systemic review of this

12:40

is the post-marketing withdrawal of

12:42

anti-obesity medical products because of adverse

12:44

drug reactions. We go into this study and

12:46

we see this written. The authors

12:49

identified 25 anti-obesity medications

12:51

withdrawn between 1964 and 2009. Don't

12:54

you know there that me, I didn't. 23 of

12:57

these were centrally acting via monoamine

13:00

neurotransmitters. Case reports were

13:02

cited as evidence for withdrawal in 80% of instances.

13:05

Here we go. Psychiatric disturbances, cardiotoxicity,

13:09

mainly attributed to reuptake inhibitors,

13:11

and drug abuse or dependence, mainly

13:13

attributed to neurotransmitter releasing agents.

13:16

Together accounted for 83% of withdrawals. The

13:20

conclusion the authors gave was

13:22

this. Most of the drugs that affect

13:25

monoamine neurotransmitters licensed for the treatment

13:27

of obesity over the past 65

13:29

years have been withdrawn because

13:32

of adverse reactions. The reason

13:34

for withdrawal raised concerns about the

13:36

wisdom of using pharmacological agents

13:38

that target monoamine neurotransmitters and managing

13:41

obesity. So guess

13:43

what Ozipic and Wogowi

13:45

and all of these drugs flooding the market are. They

13:48

are the same monoamine transmitters. They're acting

13:50

on the same parts of the brain. If

13:53

you go to the Mayo Clinic, they

13:55

actually do have the warning. So all

13:57

of these drug brand names

13:59

are the drug. drug is semi-glutide.

14:02

And so you go to the Mayo Clinic and you look under semi-glutide

14:05

and you see this, this medicine may cause some

14:07

people to be agitated, irritable or display other

14:10

abnormal behaviors and may also cause some people to have suicidal

14:12

thoughts and tendencies or to become more

14:14

depressed. You know what's so upsetting about

14:16

this? It's the same story

14:19

we see when we've covered vaccines or everything

14:21

else. And this is what it is. It's the regulatory

14:24

agencies, folks. They're the ones that

14:26

are part of the corruption. This is what, you

14:28

want to talk about a swamp? This is it.

14:30

Because look at this. For 65

14:32

years you're telling me they

14:34

know that this line of drugs, that this

14:36

approach towards weight loss causes

14:39

suicidal thoughts and when they're overseeing

14:41

and looking into the trials for a zempic,

14:44

wouldn't you think if your regulatory agencies

14:47

care about you, they would at least ensure

14:49

that the one thing this trial was doing was

14:52

ruling out the fact that it would cause suicidal

14:54

thoughts. That's the one thing you know you should be looking

14:56

for and instead you look the other way

14:58

while they take away anyone that has depression or

15:01

any problems that might be

15:02

affected this way so you let them stack

15:04

their own deck. It's not like this is accidental.

15:06

This didn't just show up as this one drug suddenly has

15:08

this problem. Literally the entire line

15:10

of drugs like this for 65 years has

15:13

one major problem and your regulatory

15:15

agencies just push it all the way through. You've

15:18

got children being recommended to take this thing and

15:21

oh, all of a sudden you have a rise in school shootings

15:23

and couldn't have anything to do with pharmaceuticals.

15:25

It's all about guns. This is the

15:27

problem. This country is the problem of the regulatory agencies

15:30

and it's why we are very

15:32

focused on stories just like this.

15:34

And I think we are part of just a small handful

15:37

of voices in the darkness here against this massive

15:39

marketing campaign to say, hey, we need to take

15:41

a deeper look at this because as you said, 65 years

15:44

of history with dangers here, this

15:46

is why it's more dangerous. The only type of hype I've seen

15:48

around drugs like this before is the

15:50

opioids, OxyContin. Zoloft,

15:53

the SSRI, depression medication,

15:56

those things were blockbuster drugs

15:58

and they were. kind of a new

16:01

version of these drugs. So you can almost, you

16:03

know, we're not going to, but one could give a pass

16:05

to the regulatory agencies and say, well, this is a novel product.

16:08

We're just hitting the market with it. You know, as

16:10

we know, they didn't do the correct studies, but

16:12

with this drug, you have this history. So

16:14

there's no excuse. And so we look

16:16

at the prescription chart of how many

16:18

of these scripts are going out. And we can see in

16:20

like 2019, you know, just probably

16:23

a couple hundred thousand 2020, but by 2022, we're

16:25

up to about 5 million. And 2023

16:29

is where

16:30

this aggressive marketing campaign is really

16:32

taking off. So I would imagine that is

16:34

going to probably at least double what's

16:37

going on. It's hard to imagine it's only 5 million people when

16:39

I run into as many people that are taking this,

16:41

as many doctors I know that are giving it. 5 million

16:45

is a pretty small amount of people inside,

16:47

you know, the 330, 40 million, wherever

16:50

the count is at now in America. So

16:53

it seems like it must have exploded

16:55

recently.

16:56

I'm going to have to agree with you on that exactly

16:59

because of headlines like this, because they're actually having shortages

17:01

of these drugs. When have you heard of shortages

17:03

of drugs that are just coming out? This is

17:05

the headline Novo Nordis Diabetes Drug

17:07

Osympic back in supply in US after

17:10

months of shortage. And so starting

17:12

to research this topic, I'm

17:14

seeing the headlines of the suicidal thoughts,

17:17

but then more headlines start coming. And this

17:19

drug really has an uphill battle

17:21

for itself. This was out of CNN. So

17:24

this drug slows the gastric emptying

17:26

of the stomach. So you feel fuller longer. This

17:28

is CNN. They took blockbuster

17:30

drugs for weight loss and diabetes. Now their stomachs

17:32

are paralyzed. Oh my God. So

17:34

I mean, listen to these stories in here. These are just

17:37

people that have these experiences. It says,

17:39

and even now being off the medication

17:41

for almost a year, I'm still having a lot of problems,

17:44

Alan said. She said she was at urgent care

17:46

recently after vomiting so much that

17:48

she became dehydrated. Another person

17:50

said in September, 2022, her vomiting got much

17:52

worse. Standing in front of her classroom,

17:54

right, said, she began having burps that smelled so strongly

17:57

and soft from rotten eggs that the kids began

17:59

to comment on it.

18:00

What is that? Where is that coming

18:02

from, they ask? So I don't

18:05

even know what to say.

18:06

Well, what we have to say into our audience

18:08

out there is that these are pharmaceutical

18:11

products. They have side effects. We

18:13

have shown you time and time again that

18:15

you are not being told the truth. Even

18:17

here, reading the product insert,

18:20

you won't get the truth, which is rare. Usually there's

18:23

some truth to be

18:25

found hidden in the fine print, as they

18:27

say, but even here your regulatory agencies are going out

18:29

of the way to protect

18:31

the company over you. This is something that's gotta change

18:34

immediately. It's a major part of the work we do, but

18:36

I also

18:36

wanna say what's interesting about this, right? The suicidal

18:39

thoughts connected to your gut

18:41

biome. I think right now, as I'm reflecting

18:43

back on Zachary Bush, who

18:45

is just one of the dynamic and brilliant minds

18:48

that we've been lucky enough to interview on this show, and

18:50

I'll probably try and get him sometime in

18:52

the near future, but all the discussions he's had

18:54

about how your stomach is really your second brain,

18:57

so much of your serotonin and a lot

18:59

of your emotional chemicals

19:02

that are moving your body are directly

19:04

connected to your digestion. Folks,

19:06

if there's one thing you do not

19:08

wanna mess with in this world, it's your digestion,

19:11

okay? It just because I get it, we're

19:14

all having difficulty finding time

19:16

to work out or really watch our diet, watch

19:18

our food, but when you start messing

19:20

with your stomach, God knows what

19:23

can go wrong, what will happen to our children, and

19:25

what is the future of this? If you

19:27

start harming these drugs, if you start slowing your digestion,

19:30

slowing the whole way you're absorbing

19:32

toxins and

19:35

nutrients into your body, we

19:38

just have no idea what the long-term effects of that

19:40

are, all for some sort of short-term

19:42

gain. I just keep thinking,

19:44

growing up, my dad said, there's

19:47

no such thing as a free ride, everything

19:49

has consequences, there's a payment for everything. Just

19:52

be aware of that, be smart. All

19:54

of this sounds a little too good to be true.

19:57

Apparently now, showing us once

19:59

again.

19:59

that's the case.

20:01

Yeah, it's so important for people to do their own research,

20:03

like we always say. And if you know somebody that's taking

20:05

this and they're open to another form

20:08

of information, maybe send them this clip

20:10

and just plant a bug in their head so they

20:12

can monitor their own thoughts, they can monitor their

20:14

own health while they're taking this. Because

20:16

a lot of times they think, well, it's just another weight

20:18

loss drug, I'll just take this, it's no big deal. It's not

20:20

really that big of a deal. So Del, last

20:22

week we talked about an unredacted

20:25

version of an email by Tony Fauci at the

20:27

beginning of the pandemic. He was giving an update

20:29

to all of the people

20:31

that he was talking to, trying to figure

20:33

out where this thing came from,

20:35

what kind of works going on in China. He had virologists,

20:38

he had people like Jeremy Farrar

20:40

at the Welcome Trust, really quarterbacking it

20:42

as well. He had Francis Collins, NIH.

20:45

Well, that became unredacted by

20:47

the select subcommittee that has been looking at the

20:49

coronavirus response and all of

20:51

its faults. And so we

20:53

know that now. And what's happened is

20:56

we have Rand Paul, Senator Rand Paul, and

20:59

he has called for

21:01

basically Fauci to have

21:03

prosecution for lying under oath. This is what that

21:05

looked like in the media. All right. Anthony

21:08

Fauci came before my committee. He said, absolutely,

21:10

he funded no gain of function research

21:13

in China, but we now have an email

21:16

from him where he describes the research

21:18

they're doing and says, you know what, we

21:20

are suspicious of the lab because we know

21:23

they are doing gain of function research.

21:25

He describes the project, but the project

21:28

he described is the project he funded.

21:31

So everything he's been telling us from the very

21:33

beginning has been a lie. We've documented

21:35

that it's a lie and it's a felony

21:37

to lie to Congress. And so I've referred

21:39

him not once, but now twice to

21:42

the Attorney General of the United States for prosecution.

21:44

But as you know, this Attorney General's the most

21:47

partisan Attorney General we've ever had. And

21:49

it's good luck on getting him to do his job.

21:52

Once again, watching this government just cover

21:54

up for all sorts of problems all, you know, and

21:57

this is a big one, right? This is going to be big. Our

21:59

government agents.

21:59

You think about all the lying that went on.

22:03

Our president pushing a vaccine

22:05

that ended up not stopping transmission. This was promised,

22:07

jobs taken away, economy destroyed,

22:11

and all of it around this virus

22:13

that we have said from the beginning. Looks

22:15

like it's got Tony Fauci's fingerprints all over

22:17

it.

22:18

Yeah, and at

22:20

the beginning, too, you had two camps

22:22

that were really trying to figure out what was going on. You had Fauci

22:25

Collins, Jeremy Farrar, these higher

22:27

ups at NIH, Bethesda,

22:30

boys, they called them. And then you had

22:33

the virologists, the actual

22:35

nuts and bolts scientists, the evolutionary

22:38

scientists. And that was the other camp.

22:40

And they had their own separate conversations.

22:43

And what came out of all of that

22:45

was the paper. This was the paper. Remember,

22:47

everyone was trying to figure out what happened. Where

22:50

is this going? The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2.

22:52

This was published in Nature. And this

22:55

really, at the beginning of the pandemic, killed

22:57

the conversation of the lab situation, the lab leak.

22:59

And yet, it says here, our analyses clearly

23:02

show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a

23:04

laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated

23:07

virus. And so what that did,

23:09

and that was early on in the pandemic,

23:12

that just kicked off. The media ran with

23:14

this hook, line, and sinker.

23:16

That's what it looked like. Check this out.

23:18

This whole notion that the coronavirus

23:21

was developed in a Chinese lab,

23:23

that has been debunked. The people's things man

23:26

need. That's been pretty much completely

23:28

debunked. The scientists say, no, when

23:30

you look at its genetic makeup and the science

23:32

behind it, it has not been altered.

23:35

Dr.

23:35

Anthony Fauci rejected the conspiracy

23:38

that coronavirus was manmade in a lab

23:40

in Wuhan, China. This could

23:42

not have been artificially or deliberately

23:45

manipulated. A lot of people on the right love that

23:47

phrase, escape from the lab, because it sounds like something

23:49

from a Marvel movie or a comic book. It sounds like they're

23:51

talking about

23:52

a manmade virus that China

23:54

was weaponizing that got out of control. You

23:57

see, it turns out corona was never

23:59

just a virus. No, it was

24:01

actually a weapon created to

24:04

take old people out. Donald

24:06

Trump is still pushing the debunked bunkum,

24:09

despite his own intelligence community's findings

24:11

that that is simply not true.

24:14

It's really incredible to watch how

24:16

poorly all of those news reporters are aging

24:18

on this subject, and yet I don't know that

24:20

we've heard an apology from any of them, and why

24:23

anyone tunes into here what they have to say. What

24:25

you saw is the failure of modern news agency

24:28

or reporting, which

24:30

is it's doing the same thing as science. It's running

24:32

on assumptions. It's running on expert opinion.

24:35

And frankly, to all of my peers

24:37

out there in journalism, you're supposed

24:40

to have a little red flag go off when you recognize

24:42

that over the years, Tony Fauci

24:44

has been embroiled in an argument

24:46

over whether we should be doing gain-of-function

24:48

research. Clearly, if something went

24:51

wrong, someone close to that would be trying to

24:53

cover it, trying to cover it up. So

24:55

the way they took it, hook, line and sinker from

24:57

this guy, Tony Fauci of all

24:59

the people in the world, it didn't take rocket

25:01

scientists to say, you know what, this

25:04

guy has got his fingers in this space.

25:07

We certainly can't just take his word for it. The

25:09

first thing he would obviously do is try to cover

25:11

this up. And yet that instinct does not

25:13

seem to exist in journalism anymore, except

25:16

in a very few places, and the two of us are sitting here on the

25:18

high wire for everybody that was paying attention.

25:21

We were skeptical from the beginning. And

25:23

by the way, sacrificed our YouTube channel,

25:26

sacrificed our Facebook channel for

25:28

stating the obvious, which is

25:30

we do not see the evidence that you can prove

25:32

that this is a natural virus.

25:35

And what ultimately ends up being

25:37

the truth is not important

25:41

because what we're going to go through is kind of a forensic,

25:44

it's not important for this segment. What we're going to go

25:46

through is kind of a forensics of how

25:48

the medical community creates a narrative. And

25:50

you just saw the end result of that.

25:52

The media just grabs it and repeats.

25:55

So we have, thanks to the

25:57

select committee and the coronavirus pandemic, We

26:00

have the Slack channel. So the Slack

26:02

is a private communications

26:05

messenger system. And that's

26:07

the second camp, the virologists

26:10

and the scientists, they were using as one

26:12

of the forms of their communication was the Slack

26:14

channel. They were communicating with this, not Fauci,

26:16

not Collins, they weren't on here, but the

26:19

virologists were. And one of them was Christian

26:21

Anderson. He's Scripps Institute. He's

26:23

one of the authors on the proximal origin. And he

26:26

was one of the leaders when you start reading this

26:28

Slack messages, one of the leaders in really driving

26:32

this narrative in a gentle way and sometimes

26:34

not so gentle. So let's look at some of the messages here.

26:36

So this was February 1st. So this was right

26:39

when it was all kicking off. Fauci is going, what the heck is going

26:41

on? I need meetings. These guys are talking behind

26:43

the scenes. Christian Anderson says this, I think

26:45

the main thing still in

26:47

my mind is that the lab escape version

26:50

of this is so freaking

26:52

likely to have happened because they were already

26:55

doing this type of work and the molecular

26:57

data is fully consistent with that scenario.

26:59

Pretty strong statement. That's a strong statement. That's

27:02

a strong, completely obvious

27:05

that it looks like it came from the lab. Okay. Completely

27:08

obvious, completely opposite

27:10

of what he wrote and put his name on proximal

27:12

origins. But let's continue. He goes on to

27:14

say this, both Ron and Christian, now

27:17

those were other scientists,

27:19

both Ron and Christian are much too conflicted to think about

27:21

this issue straight to them. The hypothesis

27:23

of accidental lab escape is so unlikely and

27:26

not something they want to consider. Now

27:28

Christian Anderson goes on to say this. The main issue is

27:30

that accidental escape is in fact

27:33

highly likely. It's not some fringe

27:35

theory. I absolutely agree that

27:37

we can't prove one way or the other,

27:40

but we'll never be able to. However, that

27:42

doesn't mean that by default the data

27:44

is currently much more suggestive of a natural

27:47

origin as opposed to, for instance,

27:50

for example, passage. It is not the

27:52

fear and cleavage site. It's very hard

27:54

to explain. Then

27:56

you have the addition of another scientist.

27:58

This is Andrew Rambaugh. He's from the

28:01

University of Edinburgh, a molecular

28:03

evolutionary professor, and he

28:05

goes on to say this. Now, we start talking politics.

28:08

He says, given the S show, you

28:10

can kind of fill in the blank there, that would happen

28:12

if anyone serious accused the Chinese of

28:15

even accidental release. My feeling is

28:17

we should say that given there is no evidence

28:19

of a specifically engineered virus, we

28:22

cannot possibly distinguish between natural evolution

28:24

and escape. So we are content with

28:27

ascribing it to a natural process. Wow.

28:30

I mean,

28:31

just pause there for a second. Right. Because

28:34

we're kind of afraid of China, we have

28:36

evidence, but we really don't have the smoking gun evidence. So

28:39

let's just forget all that and let's just put this thing to

28:41

rest. Folks, yeah. I mean, for everyone

28:44

that may be watching the high wire new, if you've

28:46

watched it for some time, you're now going

28:48

through all the videos, all of the

28:50

Stanley Plotkin on the stand for vaccines.

28:53

Where there's an absence of science, I

28:55

assume safety in all of these things. Assumption,

28:58

assumption, assumption, assumption. It

29:00

is horrifying the day

29:01

you wake up and recognize that science,

29:04

the word as you knew it, where it was proving

29:07

a point, proving a hypothesis, challenging

29:09

it. I don't know how many decades ago

29:12

that disappeared, but clearly the science

29:14

we swim in now is just a religion, it's

29:16

political, and what you are watching is

29:19

how opinion and assumption and a desire

29:21

to paint a picture overcomes

29:23

and succeeds in drowning

29:26

out the actual truth. And it's really,

29:29

really horrifying and this

29:31

is in almost every branch of science now. Totally

29:34

corrupted, just as I sat here in

29:36

my debate with Neil deGrasse Tyson and I said, science

29:39

is dying, I am desperately asking you

29:41

to help me try to revive it. It's so

29:43

scary to watch this happening and how many millions

29:46

of lives are affected by these types of, you know,

29:49

political discussions, not science discussions.

29:52

Right, and so you have, Rambalt

29:54

says, you know, we don't want to really do any

29:56

kind of accusations towards China at this point. So,

29:59

Christian Anderson, This is still early

30:01

February, the first week in February. Christian

30:03

Anderson says this to the China comment,

30:06

yep, I totally agree that that's

30:08

a very reasonable conclusion.

30:11

Although I hate when politics is injected

30:13

into science,

30:14

but it's impossible not to, especially given the

30:16

circumstances, we should be sensitive to that.

30:19

Plus, none of this matters at this moment. Then he

30:21

goes on to say this, I'm starting to think

30:23

that for outbreak research, the bioRXIV

30:26

really needs to start screening submissions. It's

30:29

a slippery slope, but it's justified at this

30:31

stage. Well, just leave that up for a second. I

30:33

just leave that up. Everybody take a look at this. You

30:35

know, we talked about Andrew

30:37

Hill and how he, you know, turned coats

30:39

on the entire discussion around ivermectin

30:43

and those things. But look at this.

30:44

This guy started out by saying, I am,

30:47

it is so freaking obvious this came from a

30:49

lab. And look how quickly he sells

30:51

out. I mean, what a weak human

30:53

being. And this is when we talk about

30:55

Nazi Germany. How do people go down

30:58

that slippery slope? Not that I'm calling,

31:00

you know, Christian Anderson a Nazi, but this

31:02

is the compromise of humanity. And

31:04

where does he go? At first, it's like, no,

31:06

I mean, anybody that's saying this, you know, didn't

31:08

happen to lab is crazy. We got to like forget about

31:10

our friends that are just totally addicted to lying to the people.

31:13

And then he ends up saying, not only am I totally in agreement, oh,

31:15

well lie to the people. We better start,

31:17

you know, censoring all of the documents

31:19

coming in to the open space science

31:22

community, because if we don't stop it there, the

31:24

truth might actually get out. I mean, look how quickly

31:27

this guy just

31:29

throws science to the wind and

31:31

becomes a shill for the lie.

31:33

Unbelievable.

31:35

And these messages have not just

31:38

passed in the dark of the night. So

31:40

the media is picking up on this. A lot of people are talking

31:42

about this. This is one of the headlines here. Prominent

31:45

scientists downplayed COVID lab leak theory

31:47

to avoid upsetting China. But

31:49

you know, it makes me think we start seeing

31:51

all of this. And we think back

31:53

to how hard comedians were

31:56

aggressively, basically attack

31:58

neutralized, destroyed during the. pandemic

32:00

because they were able to just take these complex

32:02

ideas and break them down to simple things.

32:05

And who would have thought that John Stewart

32:07

of all people

32:09

would have probably had this thing sewn

32:11

up in the early days. The

32:13

greatest scientific mind of our times. Yeah,

32:16

I mean, with a monologue like this, remember

32:19

this? Check a

32:20

look. What do you mean by that? Do you mean like

32:22

there's a chance that this was created in a lab, there's an investigation?

32:25

A chance? Well, but I, I,

32:27

I, I, I, I, there's evidence I'd love to hear. There's

32:29

a novel

32:31

respiratory coronavirus overtaking

32:34

Wuhan, China. What do we do? Oh,

32:36

you know who we could ask? The Wuhan

32:39

novel respiratory coronavirus

32:42

lab. The disease is

32:44

the same name as the lab. That's

32:47

just, that's just a little too weird. Don't

32:50

you think? And then they asked the scientists, they're like,

32:52

how did this? So wait a minute. You work at the Wuhan

32:55

respiratory coronavirus lab. How

32:57

did this happen? They're like, a pangolin

32:59

kissed a turtle. And

33:02

you're like, no, I, you, you, the

33:05

name of your lab. If you look at the name,

33:08

look at the name. Can I, let me see your business

33:10

card. Show me your business card.

33:12

Oh, I work at the

33:15

coronavirus lab in Wuhan.

33:18

Oh, cause there's a coronavirus

33:20

loose in Wuhan. How did that happen? Maybe

33:24

a bat flew into

33:26

the cloaca of a turkey

33:29

and then it sneezed

33:31

into my chili and now we

33:34

all have coronavirus. Like, okay, okay. Wait a

33:36

second. Wait a second. What

33:38

about this? Wait a second. Wait a second.

33:41

All right. John. Oh my God.

33:44

Oh my God. There's been an

33:45

outbreak of chocolatey goodness

33:48

near Hershey, Pennsylvania. What

33:50

do you think happened? Like, Oh, I don't know. Maybe

33:53

a steam shovel mated with

33:55

a cocoa bean or it's

33:57

the chocolate.

34:00

that's it.

34:03

Not

34:05

that he gets it all

34:09

right but it seems like- he's aging pretty

34:11

well with

34:11

that scientific statement right there. And so

34:13

as you would think-

34:15

that there is a petition out there now to

34:18

retract this paper to kind of reshuffle

34:20

the deck on the science this is bio

34:22

safety now dot orgs petition. Retract the

34:24

proximal origins of SARS covie to a

34:27

fraudulent paper on the origin of SARS. And so if you're

34:29

interested in this- sign that petition now if

34:31

you think what your voice to be heard on this and

34:33

really just try to get science back to a neutral spot

34:36

after this. This dark age of suppression

34:38

and manipulation narrative control.

34:40

That's what

34:41

that's that's where we're at right now with us I

34:43

love it let's bring that back up everybody because this is

34:45

where we get to have some fun on the high wire let's show

34:47

them. They want to get what I need another a

34:50

thousand there I think we got that let's do this

34:52

everybody. I grab change dot org

34:54

slash P. slash retract dash

34:56

dot dash slash. And we'll have that in

34:58

our comments and if you're part of a newsletter you

35:00

will receive that but let's show them

35:02

what we can do here on the high wire let's just push that

35:05

right over the top because this is important that has to be retracted.

35:07

This is an abomination of science it cannot

35:10

stand and it's all part of our you

35:12

know goal to eventually.

35:14

See Tony Fauci- put in

35:16

a trial. And we've got to start removing

35:18

the science that they faked and lied about and

35:21

we this is where we have power right. This is where

35:23

we can speak out this is where we can speak out.

35:25

And we've got to cancel bad science shall we. And so afterwards- at

35:27

this thing is kind of

35:29

receding COVID's kind of in the rear

35:31

view mirror and we have. You

35:32

know the medical industrial complex people talk

35:35

about that all the time but we've had this like branch

35:37

office little bubble that came off of that of a pandemic

35:39

industrial complex it's his own. It's

35:41

his own thing with its own marketing arm in its own products

35:44

and its own. You know striving for its

35:46

own individual audience. And so we've

35:48

got to start. You know we've got to start.

35:51

You know we've got to start. You know we've got to start. You

35:53

know we've got to start. You know we've got to

35:59

this on your kid's shelf, a virus

36:02

play set. Plagues of the 21st century. Yes,

36:05

that's right. COVID flu, SARS-E So

36:28

in seriousness, the

36:29

White House has launched an Office

36:32

of Pandemic Preparedness and Response.

36:34

This is the kind of the newsletter

36:37

that went out or the press release. And

36:39

we go into this here, and it says this.

36:41

What is it going to do? It's going to coordinate the administration's

36:44

domestic response to public health threats that have

36:46

pandemic potential, or get this, or

36:48

just may cause significant disruption.

36:51

That's a nebulous term. And strengthen domestic

36:53

pandemic preparedness. This includes ongoing

36:56

work to address potential public health outbreaks

36:58

and threats from COVID-19, monkeypox, polio,

37:01

avian, and human influenza, and

37:03

RSV. And then it gets into the nuts

37:05

and bolts. How is it going to do that? Specifically,

37:08

OPPR will oversee efforts to

37:10

develop, manufacture, and procure the next

37:13

generation of medical countermeasures, including leveraging

37:15

emerging technologies and working with HHS

37:17

on next generation vaccines and treatments for

37:19

COVID-19 and other public health

37:22

threats. And Dell, it's not a

37:24

fleeting moment this thing's going to be in the White House.

37:27

It is permanent. This is stat news. White House launches

37:30

permanent pandemic office. And

37:32

those were the words in that press release. This is

37:34

going to be a permanent position. It's in the executive

37:36

branch of the White House. So this thing is

37:38

sitting, it's encapsulating right in

37:41

the president's office, if you will. You have

37:43

this vacuum seal pandemic office. And think

37:46

about why they're doing that. So who

37:48

are they putting at the head of this? Remember, we did a

37:50

whole expose on Dr. Deborah

37:52

Birx, where she came from, the

37:55

military background she had, the National

37:57

Security Council.

37:59

She was thrust to the head of that. She

38:02

was put and she was basically responsible

38:04

for the pandemic response. The point out that she

38:07

came from the military with the scarves threw

38:09

us all off. But the truth is she should have been

38:11

standing there in her epaulettes because

38:13

in many ways, this was a, you know,

38:15

national security, Department of Defense.

38:18

It was a military operation that was taking

38:20

place on America, whether it was just a test run

38:23

or was just but if we

38:25

had seen her standing there in military garb,

38:27

saying things that she did, I think we would have

38:29

realized

38:29

that this was much more of a martial law state

38:32

that was locking us down and not

38:34

necessarily a fluffy, you know, let's

38:36

all, you know, stay in this together and be

38:39

healthy.

38:40

And right. I remember Scott Atlas's

38:42

book. He was a coronavirus advisor to Trump who

38:44

came in there. He said some weird things happen.

38:47

She's going out and publicly countering

38:49

what the president's saying. She's saying the opposite. No

38:52

one can criticize her. She's doing all the state

38:54

visits on her own. I mean, this lady was really heading

38:56

things up. So who's heading this pandemic office

38:58

in the White House? This new one now, a retired

39:00

major general, Paul Fredericks.

39:03

Now, who is he? He came from the

39:05

Pentagon. He was a medical advisor

39:07

to the Department of Defense, COVID-19 Task

39:10

Force,

39:10

and he was from the National Security

39:13

Council, just part of the place that Deborah

39:15

Burks was heading during the COVID response. He

39:17

was from the National Security Council and he's now

39:19

been picked to come up to the office

39:22

and run this thing. So this

39:24

makes me think when we start connecting dots.

39:27

So we have this plug and play situation

39:30

here and it's a closed system. So it's already

39:32

in there. You have ex-military running

39:34

it from the Pentagon and you're not going

39:36

to get this porous boundaries.

39:38

You're not going to get a Scott Atlas floating in there and

39:40

disrupting things. You're not going to get a Robert Redfield

39:44

saying like, hey, we really need to investigate Wuhan,

39:46

China. This thing is closed start to finish.

39:48

They're going to work on the vaccine development

39:50

from that space. But remember, the

39:53

WHO has the legally binding treaty

39:55

that it's been working on for

39:58

the international health regulations. And

40:00

here's a headline from just a couple months ago.

40:02

So there's a lot of moving parts that seem to be gelling

40:04

how the World Health Organization could fight

40:06

future pandemics. It says here, they have a

40:09

target date of May, 2024 for

40:12

a legally binding agreement to be adopted

40:14

by the UN Health Agency's 194 member countries.

40:19

And we have Tedros in

40:21

there saying that this is a generational

40:24

commitment. That's the words he's using. So this is

40:26

something they really wanna make sure sticks

40:28

and not go back to the old way he's saying.

40:31

And remember, we have Jeremy Farrar going

40:33

in there as the chief scientific officer

40:35

of the WHO. He at the Wellcome

40:37

Trust co-founded CEPI. So

40:39

there's a lot of players that are now moving

40:42

into this space and making this like some big

40:44

league, big league movements right now. We

40:46

have to pay attention to this. We have to get out front on this. It's

40:48

really amazing. In many ways,

40:50

as you were sort of talking about this, I just thought this is

40:52

the new war economy, right? This

40:54

is the war on nature, on disease, on

40:56

the pandemic. And

41:00

the military is running it, not doctors, military.

41:02

And you think about all of those dystopian

41:05

novels and especially 1984 that

41:07

has some distant war that doesn't really make sense

41:10

to anybody, but it keeps us all sort of locked

41:12

in our own space, trying to stay safe.

41:14

This is just this ongoing, intangible,

41:17

invisible war that

41:19

we are pouring

41:20

billions and billions of dollars. And

41:22

the pharmaceutical industry is pouring

41:24

billions of dollars into our government officials

41:27

and buying up our regulatory agencies

41:29

that are refusing to do any proper safety

41:32

trials. I mean, the whole thing is really,

41:34

really a mess. These are dark

41:36

times, you know, and there's

41:39

some solutions there. I think the beauty

41:41

is the work that you're doing, that we're

41:43

doing here on the High Wire, other podcasters,

41:45

guys like Ice Cube, they're gonna get out there

41:47

and start speaking truth to power. This

41:50

is a moment for the people to really step up and make

41:52

a difference. So just thank

41:54

you for doing these deep dives where

41:56

everyone else is afraid to go. It's really

41:59

great work. And especially,

42:01

Jeffrey, I want to thank you because you do you go beyond,

42:04

you know, sometimes just doing the investigations.

42:06

You were just in giving testimony

42:08

in Massachusetts where they're trying to,

42:10

you know, this archaic idea of removing

42:13

the religious exemption from vaccinations

42:15

right after we won it back in Mississippi

42:17

having lost it since 1979. There's

42:19

still states that want to move back into the dark

42:22

ages and take away people's

42:24

rights to opt out or to have a

42:26

religious perspective. They don't want to be injecting

42:29

aborted fetal

42:29

DNA into their children. But you

42:32

were you gave a great testimony. So I

42:34

want to play that right now. Let's take a look at this. OK. I

42:36

sit here as a medical health journalist for

42:39

nearly a decade telling the story

42:41

of parents that you've heard here.

42:43

This is a common story telling the story of

42:45

parents who had vaccine injuries. Their

42:48

children have had vaccine injuries after mandated

42:51

vaccines. We hear a lot

42:53

about the immunocompromised child. Excuse

42:56

me. Immunocompromised child in these bills

42:58

trying to protect them. But there's another side of the story. There's

43:01

vaccine injury. It is real. And

43:03

it's been paid out to attune,

43:05

as you heard, of over four billion dollars by the Vaccine Injury

43:07

Compensation Program. This

43:10

is a liability free product that

43:13

market forces do not apply to it as it applies

43:15

to the rest of the products out there. Unfortunately,

43:19

these parents have been discriminated

43:21

against and essentially neutralized

43:23

by the media, trying to tell their story and

43:25

also by public health agencies. And

43:28

as you've heard by by the medical profession, when

43:30

they try to get their children help, they need one

43:33

of the things that we're left to do is to use

43:35

legal actions. And journalists

43:38

that are outside the corporate

43:39

media, if you will, that are influenced

43:42

by Big Pharma as they take their money and

43:44

the legal the legal

43:46

actions that have been pushed towards the

43:48

public agencies like the CDC have found

43:50

things like this. CDC and NIH

43:53

unable to provide a single study to support

43:55

the safety of injecting aluminum adjuvants, which

43:58

are widespread in childhood vaccines. CDC

44:00

concedes it's never conducted vaccinated

44:03

versus unvaccinated study. These are things

44:05

that we need answers to. These

44:07

are inconvenient facts that should

44:09

have been debated publicly in the public

44:11

space. And unfortunately, they haven't been. We've

44:14

just finished a COVID response where the

44:16

CDC has admitted it did a lot of

44:19

wrong things at her public trust. Unfortunately,

44:21

I was expecting to see bills that

44:23

would enshrine more public

44:25

trust and these civil liberties

44:28

in these bills. And I'm unfortunately

44:29

not seeing that.

44:31

Amazing job, Jeffrey. And just

44:33

to point out to everybody, I mean, it's not easy

44:35

to get on those microphones. I find that to be some of the

44:37

most stressful things I've ever done is sort

44:40

of speaking to, you know, in those political

44:42

spaces. But no teleprompter, no

44:45

script, Jeffrey. That was awesome. And,

44:48

you know, I also want to point out that the video glitching

44:51

was theirs. That's how the feed came out. It's not us,

44:53

you know, having a mistake with the video

44:55

that was the best that it came out. But and

44:58

also, you know, Aaron Seri weighed in. So let's go ahead and listen

45:00

to that. And I'm going to ask you a few questions.

45:01

Is Aaron Seri that I think came

45:03

in on via Zoom or something like that to

45:06

this same hearing? Take a look at this. Good

45:08

afternoon. My name is Aaron Seri. I'm an attorney. My

45:11

firm has over 30 professionals that engage

45:13

purely in vaccine-related work. We

45:17

do not represent pharmaceutical companies. So we

45:19

represent people who are injured by vaccines.

45:22

We do vaccine policy work. We brought, for

45:24

example, a lawsuit in Washington, D.C., challenging

45:27

a law that had permitted

45:29

doctors to vaccinate managers without parental consent

45:31

and it got struck down.

45:33

We also recently brought a lawsuit in Mississippi,

45:36

which challenged the lack of religious exemption there

45:38

in a federal court held that it

45:40

violated the First Amendment right to

45:42

free exercise, not to have a

45:44

religious exemption. And the state of Mississippi

45:47

has now reinstituted a religious exemption

45:49

in that state.

45:50

You've heard a lot of testimony

45:52

today from parents. Some are very motive.

45:57

I really do want to stress these are real. Real

46:02

hardships. These families are gonna

46:04

suffer greatly if you remove the religious exemption.

46:10

Folks don't always listen to what parents have

46:12

to say, but when they're telling you this is

46:14

their convictions, you should trust them, you should believe

46:16

them. That's what this country was founded upon, was

46:19

letting people live out their convictions. And

46:21

if I can't appeal to your emotion, maybe I can appeal to

46:24

some of your logic. Let me read you some quotes.

46:26

Here's a quote from the CDC about

46:29

an activated polio vaccine, the only vaccine

46:31

for polio using that I've seen for the last 20 years. Quote,

46:35

IPV, an activated polio vaccine, does

46:37

not contain live virus and cannot

46:40

cause disease. It protects people

46:42

from polio disease, but does not

46:45

stop transmission of the virus. End quote.

46:48

That's the CDC, because it creates a systemic

46:51

immunity in the blood. It doesn't create any coastal

46:53

immunity where polio proliferates. The

46:55

same is true of at least four of the

46:57

six vaccines that you are talking

47:00

about. They do not

47:01

prevent transmission, not my words. That's

47:03

the government words. There is what you're told

47:05

about vaccines, and there's a reality. When

47:07

you litigate it, you have to actually look at the facts and

47:10

proof.

47:10

And I can tell you what you're often told is not a chord

47:13

with what this fact, so thank you.

47:15

Wow, amazing. I mean, you

47:17

know, I can't zone Aaron

47:20

Siri there. And he puts

47:22

that, he points out such a great point. You know,

47:24

you're talking about the injuries. These are real. These

47:26

people are real. They need a recourse. They need to be in a way

47:29

to opt out. We need to be able to have people that can avoid

47:31

being injured. But as he pointed out, four

47:34

of the six of these products we've talked about a lot,

47:36

don't stop transmission, just like COVID had

47:38

the same issue. And at the heart of these laws,

47:40

as always, we've got to protect the immune suppressed child.

47:43

How do you protect the immune suppressed child if

47:45

all

47:45

you're doing is creating asymptomatic carriers?

47:48

In fact, most of these vaccines,

47:50

what we find is that they're more likely

47:52

to be carriers after they get the vaccine because

47:54

their body never mounts a totally, you

47:57

know, virus killing defense. It

47:59

leaves it.

47:59

linger around in their bodies. So they keep

48:02

carrying it around the immune suppressed

48:04

child. This is where we've been attacking this and having

48:06

a lot of effect around the nation. But what

48:08

all is going on in Massachusetts? Is this the only

48:10

law? I mean, it just seems like

48:13

they're really out of step with

48:15

America right now and where people are

48:18

at.

48:18

Yeah, that's a great analysis. Massachusetts

48:21

is one of the big pushes right now. And it's

48:24

interesting because obviously we've been covering

48:27

these legislative pushes since California,

48:29

like 2014, 2015. And

48:31

that was before the pandemic response. As

48:33

I said in my testimony, everything

48:36

changed. The public trust is

48:38

not a given right now. We have people

48:40

asking questions. And

48:43

then we have RFK Jr.

48:46

going on and trying to push this debate. People

48:48

now in their minds are like, wait a minute. We

48:50

should have a big open debate about all

48:52

vaccines. So this legislation

48:55

is interesting because it's a little myopic in that

48:57

it's picking up at the same pace

48:59

it did before the coronavirus response

49:02

never happened as if people are still on that same thing. So

49:04

Massachusetts right now, we have a bill.

49:06

It's H2151. The

49:10

companion bill is S1458. But

49:13

what this is doing is it's lowering the

49:15

age of consent for vaccinations. Remember in Washington

49:18

DC, we had this idea of the

49:20

minor. They passed this bill of

49:22

the minor consent. And they brought

49:24

that down. And they were covering it at the time at the

49:26

age of 11.

49:28

They said, we think that's reasonable. And they're

49:30

using these words, we're going to try to remove the parent

49:32

barrier. Because 11-year-old has a full

49:35

understanding of all of their previous

49:38

issues, health issues that their parents

49:40

have been watching. And they know all about

49:42

their own health history.

49:44

Right. And the question would be, do

49:46

they know about vaccine injury moving forward? Do they know

49:48

about the signs and symptoms of that? If their parents

49:50

are kept in the dark of the vaccination, the parents,

49:53

are they able to watch out for this child after the vaccine

49:56

to see if they develop anything? So

49:58

Massachusetts is pushing for this. bill to

50:00

lower the age of

50:03

no, no any age. And they' same

50:07

bill also allow schoo to

50:10

establish their own va they

50:12

can actually add mor on the schedule.

50:14

Remember 19 vaccine

50:17

has been push we

50:20

covered this about six in

50:23

studio. We really have beginning

50:25

of this school for

50:27

Cheryl Wolinski, the the

50:30

only reason we put th so we

50:33

can get paid for by children

50:36

had nothing to d if

50:38

these schools now add as

50:41

a requirement for schoo very interesting

50:43

because science and the

50:45

CDC direc bill

50:48

is H 604 and its comp 1991. This

50:51

one's among ou to

50:54

try to remove the reli So,

50:56

um, Massachusetts, if amongst

50:59

a minority of stat exemption,

51:02

uh, main and o focus

51:05

is we come one of t to

51:07

go in and bring a los that's

51:11

what they're going where we

51:13

can actually mak obviously

51:15

they're trying some truth

51:18

to power. But forward with

51:20

this, we're about it.

51:22

Right, right. A here

51:25

is h 582 and it brin gives

51:29

doctors and medical kind

51:32

of a wider breath for protects

51:34

them against any kind of like we

51:37

saw in Ca losing their license,

51:39

lec they were actually losing speaking

51:43

out during the c this

51:45

is kind of something to

51:47

protect that those mo doctors.

51:49

So however you f bills,

51:52

it's important. You online

51:54

testimony, you can as these things

51:56

move forwa to keep an eye out for

51:58

th Again, it seems like

52:00

Massachusetts is kind of a front-runner

52:03

right now in pushing this legislation, but I know other states

52:05

are starting to gear up in time for

52:07

the school year to start.

52:09

All right, everybody. Well, look, you can sit

52:11

back and just watch and see how your world gets

52:13

taken away from you. You can step up

52:15

and do something about it. Jeffrey Jackson, thanks for stepping up.

52:18

I mean, that was amazing. Great testimony, and again,

52:20

great reporting this week. I'll see you next week.

52:23

All right. You're welcome. Thank

52:24

you. All right. So, Jeffrey, once

52:27

in a while on the high wire,

52:30

you know, things perhaps don't get

52:32

stated exactly right, and we want to make

52:34

sure that you can be confident that

52:36

when you are watching the high wire,

52:38

that we have done our due diligence and we have the science

52:41

nailed to the wall. This is one

52:43

of those moments where I'm going to have to say that we

52:45

didn't fully state something right. This

52:48

was revolving around the story around trans

52:51

men or trans women, I forget which way that

52:53

goes, but that wanted to chestfeed, and

52:56

we're taking drugs so that they can lactate. We

52:58

talked about how this drug had

53:00

a lot of side effects, it was dangerous, should be taken

53:02

for short periods of time, and they were over

53:04

the top, that it was like twice as much as they should

53:06

be taking. This is what that moment looked like at

53:08

Freedom Fest. Take a look at this.

53:10

On physical examination, she was able to express

53:12

droplets of milk. The Dom Peridot dose

53:15

was increased to 20 milligrams

53:17

per quid. So now we have 20, 40, 60 milligrams

53:19

a day. Double

53:22

the dose every day. The max dose.

53:24

Max dose.

53:26

Right. So, Jeffrey was stating

53:28

that there was three doses throughout the

53:30

day. We have a very smart audience

53:32

of doctors and nurses. Many of you wrote

53:34

in, this is what one of those statements

53:36

was, Nurse Penny here, quid is four

53:39

times a day, not three. QD

53:42

is daily. Po means per OS,

53:44

which means by mouth. This means that the patient

53:46

was getting 20 milligrams four times

53:48

daily. The max safe dosage for

53:51

the adult was exceeded by 50 milligrams daily.

53:54

What might this mean long term for the child? I guess

53:56

all that screaming, Fauci and company

53:58

did about requiring randomized double blood.

53:59

placebo-controlled trials only matters

54:02

when the NIH, CDC, and FDA are trying

54:04

to block early and effective treatment for

54:06

COVID-19. So we were right that

54:09

they were taking way

54:11

beyond the max dosage. It was just worse than

54:13

we thought, but we wanted to make that

54:15

clear to everybody that, and we want to thank those

54:17

people always, you should write in. This

54:20

is important to us that we get

54:22

it right. And so in this case it's one

54:24

of the rare moments, I think that this may actually be

54:26

like our second correction, but

54:29

correcting ourselves is part of the

54:31

HIWIRE protocol. And

54:33

this is, if you want to find out where that is,

54:36

you just have to go to the HIWIRE.com,

54:39

scroll to the bottom of the page, and

54:41

you can read all about it right there. The HIWIRE

54:43

protocol, it lists what this means. It also

54:45

talks about the fact that we will correct

54:48

statements if we get it wrong. But most

54:50

importantly, there it is, correction of errors

54:52

or misstatements made in an episode of the HIWIRE shall

54:55

be corrected in the following week's episode or

54:57

no later than four weeks from original air date

54:59

of said error. For those of you that may be

55:01

brand new, this is a protocol that we're demanding

55:03

all other news agencies use,

55:05

which is we hand you our data, we

55:08

hand you our science, you will never hear well Tony

55:10

Fauci said that it happened, it didn't

55:12

come from a lab, it was natural, therefore it's been

55:14

debunked. No it hasn't. You have an expert

55:17

that is a bias because his

55:19

fingerprints are all over the, you know, the cookie

55:21

jar that he stole a cookie from. And so

55:24

that won't happen here. We're gonna send you our science,

55:26

our data, it's given to you every

55:28

Monday after a Thursday show. It's shocking

55:30

how few of you really take, you know, use of

55:33

this. You should be signing up right now because

55:35

this is how you win your arguments at the

55:37

dinner table with family and friends. Just

55:39

go, all you have to do is put in your email address

55:42

right there. We don't give it out to anybody

55:44

else. This is a way you can connect with you, but

55:46

also you can get all the science, all the

55:49

evidence, all the links to the videos, everything.

55:51

You don't have to go trying to figure it out, it's right

55:54

there in your inbox so that if you see

55:56

something you like you can look deeper into it. If you want

55:58

to question our science we're... we're coming

56:00

from, you get to read all of it. So that's

56:02

the high wire protocol folks. This is how

56:04

we do it. So as I said, there

56:07

are laws, they are still trying to take away your rights.

56:09

There's an authoritarian regime,

56:11

if you will, that is attempting to take

56:13

away control of your own body. I've said

56:16

it before, if you don't have the right to

56:18

decide what's going into your body, then

56:20

you have the same rights as a farm animal.

56:22

Forget about being a free citizen. The government

56:25

considers you property. If you don't

56:27

want to be property, and if Massachusetts

56:29

decides to pass that law, or maybe you

56:31

want to fight the other states that have

56:33

already taken away the right to religious

56:35

exemption, this is a spiritual

56:38

war. This is a war of light and darkness,

56:40

and I Can, our nonprofit and our

56:42

legal team, is the most successful

56:45

group to ever fight in the health, freedom,

56:47

space to fight for your religious rights, and

56:49

we need your help now. There are, there's

56:51

this, you know, more attacks are coming. We

56:54

are going to jump into courtrooms, but it's

56:56

very expensive. You can't imagine the millions

56:58

and millions of dollars it takes to fight these in every

57:00

state, everywhere it's happening, and you

57:02

are making that possible. So for every one

57:04

of you out there that has been a, you

57:07

know, a sponsor and helping

57:09

us, I want to thank you. For all of you that are

57:12

watching this show, that enjoy what

57:14

we're doing, love hearing about the great

57:16

wins, like the big win in Mississippi that

57:18

we celebrated just over a week ago, adding,

57:21

bringing back the religious exemption that was gone

57:23

since 1979. Instead of

57:25

going, wow, great job guys, you get to pat

57:28

yourself on the shoulder and said, I actually

57:29

did something that means something

57:32

in what appears to be more and more a meaningless

57:34

and crazy and chaotic world. If you

57:36

want to feel that,

57:37

then why don't you become a recurring donor? Just go to the top

57:40

of the page right now, thehighwire.com

57:42

or at ICanDecide.org, hit the donate

57:45

to I Can button, become

57:47

a recurring donor. We're asking for $23 for 2023,

57:51

but you can make it whatever you want. I don't care

57:53

how much it is. I want you to feel what it feels like

57:56

to be a part of change, to actually

57:58

feel how good it feels to.

57:59

to make a difference in this world. All

58:02

right, well, speaking

58:03

of this crazy world, I don't know about you, but

58:06

it just seems to me that

58:08

we were doing a lot of reporting, we were talking about athletes

58:11

that are collapsing in

58:13

soccer fields, in softball fields,

58:15

and in practices, in games

58:17

all around the country. And then

58:20

there seemed to be, I don't know if social media

58:22

shut those stories down, but it seemed like

58:24

that kind of quieted down and I think

58:26

we all thought maybe we're through it. And then suddenly,

58:28

just over this last week, it's

58:31

just felt like just more and more stories

58:33

like there's

58:33

this wave happening. You know, I don't

58:36

know if there is, but this is what it's looked

58:38

like in the news. Ronnie James suffered

58:40

cardiac arrest while at a practice.

58:43

He was live on air when Shaka Hislop

58:46

suffered a medical emergency. Orie Kelly

58:48

recovering this morning after collapsing

58:50

in public, reportedly now being treated

58:52

for blood clots.

58:53

Jamie Foxx now reportedly

58:56

recovering at a physical rehabilitation center.

58:58

Specializes in treating patients with stroke

59:01

and brain injuries.

59:02

The tubes running out of

59:04

me

59:05

and I just didn't want you to see me like that, man. She

59:07

passed out at dinner after her heart began beating

59:09

rapidly, saying Kelly was out

59:11

for a while. She was carried to a friend's

59:14

car and rushed to Cedar Sinai

59:16

Hospital, where doctors reportedly found

59:18

multiple blood clots near her vital

59:21

organs.

59:21

Tomorrow morning, Gion Sanders, set

59:23

to have emergency surgery to fix

59:26

blood clots in his legs.

59:28

Senate Minority Mitch McConnell had

59:30

to be escorted away from the cameras

59:32

after freezing. Goodbye, Parson, cooperation

59:36

and a string of... Oh, my God.

1:00:00

I'm sure it's going back to you. Do you want to say anything else to the press?

1:00:02

Okay. Alyssa Carlson suddenly collapses during

1:00:06

the live 7 a.m. broadcast.

1:00:11

Our

1:00:17

colleague, Elise Finch, passed away yesterday.

1:00:20

Her death is sudden and unexpected,

1:00:22

leaving us all trying to understand

1:00:25

how this could happen to our beautiful

1:00:27

Elise, who was just 51 years old.

1:00:30

The cardiac arrest, what exactly

1:00:32

triggered that, what caused that, that's what the

1:00:34

doctors are going to be sort of investigating. It's

1:00:36

still unclear what sent Jamie Foxx

1:00:39

to the hospital. I went to hell and then back.

1:00:41

This is a significant issue and it is a medical

1:00:43

emergency. It's not clear if weather

1:00:45

played a factor. This is rare.

1:00:52

Just as I said when we were playing the

1:00:54

athletes, the videos that we have

1:00:56

not, I want to be clear, we have not done an investigation

1:00:58

to find out if all these individuals

1:01:01

have gotten the vaccine. We don't know for sure

1:01:03

whether or not these incidents have anything to

1:01:05

do with the vaccine. But what we're asking

1:01:07

as journalists, as reporters and as

1:01:10

a network right now is do

1:01:12

we ever remember a time where there was

1:01:14

this many incidences of people collapsing,

1:01:17

of having blood clots, of having

1:01:19

heart attacks, of having strokes,

1:01:22

and then this term suddenly,

1:01:24

died suddenly, is

1:01:26

now everywhere. I even saw a meme recently

1:01:28

that really stuck with me, is the leading cause

1:01:30

of death now suddenly. We've

1:01:33

been looking at data around the world, but

1:01:36

we're not alone. This isn't a conspiracy theory

1:01:38

really. This is one headline that

1:01:40

is obviously alarmed. Experts call for

1:01:42

urgent investigation as excess

1:01:45

deaths spark dangerous theories.

1:01:48

Obviously they're worried about our imaginations running

1:01:50

away with why are people dying at higher rates.

1:01:53

This is what it says though, and this is something we've talked about. A

1:01:55

particular concern is the 15 to 44

1:01:58

age group where cumulative deaths are

1:02:00

tracking above all recent years, including 2020.

1:02:04

That's the youth of America, those

1:02:06

of the young people in the

1:02:08

healthy working group in

1:02:10

America and around the world. I'm

1:02:13

joined right now by someone that I think

1:02:15

really has had a really beautiful objective

1:02:17

view on this, not necessarily a medical

1:02:20

view, but just a numbers crunching view because

1:02:23

he used to be an executive

1:02:25

at BlackRock. Crunching numbers is what he does.

1:02:27

It's my honor and pleasure to be joined right now by Edward

1:02:29

Dowd.

1:02:31

Hi Edward. Good to be here. Thank

1:02:34

you. It's good to have you. And

1:02:37

again, under, you know, really

1:02:39

horrific, for really horrific reasons.

1:02:42

But I've been thinking about you a lot. I really have

1:02:44

because we keep watching, especially

1:02:47

data in England. I'm not sure our data

1:02:49

in America, it just feels like it's being

1:02:51

corrupted on purpose or is just tracking

1:02:53

really slow. But when we look

1:02:56

out there, there's just this

1:02:58

an alarming trend. And is

1:03:00

it our imagination

1:03:01

or how bad, you know, how bad is it? No,

1:03:05

it's not our imagination. And you mentioned

1:03:07

in the lead up to introducing me, there

1:03:10

seems to be a new rash of incidents of

1:03:12

celebrities and athletes collapsing and

1:03:14

what have you recently.

1:03:16

And the metadata actually supports that.

1:03:19

US disabilities,

1:03:21

as reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics,

1:03:23

hit a high in September of 22. We

1:03:26

started accelerating in September of 21, February

1:03:29

of 21.

1:03:30

We added 3.2 million Americans

1:03:32

to the disability survey.

1:03:35

And then the rate of change kind of stopped

1:03:38

and it was hovering around the old highs. And

1:03:40

then in May, it broke

1:03:43

to a slight new high. And then in June, we

1:03:45

added 850,000 people. So

1:03:47

we added 1.2 million in two months. So

1:03:51

there's something going on in the general population

1:03:53

that's reaccelerating

1:03:55

something. And

1:03:58

anecdotally, I don't know. I don't have the

1:04:00

data yet, but I'm hearing from some of my insurance

1:04:02

whistle blowers that their short-term

1:04:05

and long-term disability numbers

1:04:07

are accelerating again.

1:04:09

They're having panic meetings

1:04:11

about it, but most times they don't mention

1:04:13

the obvious elephant in the room.

1:04:15

They see excess deaths amongst

1:04:18

the millennials, 25 to 44, and

1:04:20

their group life insurance continuing

1:04:22

at abnormally high rates, around 23, 24 percent

1:04:25

excess mortality. So whatever's

1:04:27

going on, we all know what we think

1:04:29

it is, whatever's going on is

1:04:32

a disaster. And

1:04:34

recently we just dropped our UK

1:04:36

disability data. Before

1:04:39

we get into that, Edward, I just want to talk to you one

1:04:41

minute, because the anecdotal part of this that has

1:04:43

actually been dystopian for me is

1:04:45

I travel the country a lot, and

1:04:48

everywhere I go, the people I talk

1:04:50

to, every restaurant I walk into has

1:04:52

a help wanted sign. Everywhere

1:04:55

I go, I talk to construction

1:04:58

contractors like I can't find anyone

1:05:00

to do the work. I can't find

1:05:02

workers. Everywhere

1:05:05

I go, I flew into Memphis and

1:05:07

they said, we don't have any rental

1:05:09

cars. There was one budget rental car,

1:05:11

and there was that one place had a line

1:05:14

that was out the door and down the

1:05:16

block, and the rest of them were just people sitting

1:05:18

there. And then some guy says, it's not that

1:05:20

they don't have cars, they don't have workers to bring

1:05:22

the cars or wash the cars or whatever

1:05:25

it is. And I don't know, but

1:05:27

it is starting to feel like images of the Soviet

1:05:30

Union, where there's bread lines

1:05:32

for the one thing that's available.

1:05:35

And we just keep hearing that there's ...

1:05:38

I keep hearing the economy is great, we have a

1:05:40

very low unemployment rate. How do you have

1:05:43

a low unemployment rate? And

1:05:45

all the jobs that used to be filled just three years

1:05:48

ago, we had a working nation, we had restaurants

1:05:50

where the service was great. Now I can't

1:05:53

find anybody to bring me some ketchup.

1:05:57

I mean, it's like we're grinding to a halt,

1:05:59

and I just keep thinking.

1:05:59

thinking we're being lied to. It's

1:06:02

like there's no one here to work. Where

1:06:04

are these people? I mean, is this

1:06:06

what this is?

1:06:08

You and I are characters in a dystopian

1:06:11

film, unfortunately. And we're in

1:06:13

the know, and many people aren't. And the numbers

1:06:16

are actually

1:06:18

reaffirming

1:06:20

what you just said. So the disability numbers

1:06:23

went up to 4.2 million from a survey

1:06:25

in the US.

1:06:26

So that's an additional 4.2

1:06:29

million disabled workers.

1:06:32

More than half of those are employed. So the

1:06:34

employed workforce was hit hard. So

1:06:36

that's disabled. We also have a category called

1:06:38

injured. So there's two things going on. You have people

1:06:40

getting kicked out of the workforce

1:06:43

through death

1:06:44

that were employed. That's a small number relative

1:06:47

to the numbers we're talking about. Then disability.

1:06:49

Then we have the category called injured, where they're chronically

1:06:52

sick.

1:06:53

That data we found at the US Bureau of Labor

1:06:55

as well, where lost work

1:06:57

time is 13 standard deviations above

1:07:00

20-year average, meaning

1:07:01

people are missing work. And

1:07:04

so what that does, so

1:07:05

you have the disabled, you have the people who are chronically

1:07:07

ill, then you have those who are left who are OK having

1:07:10

to cover for these people, and their staff shortages

1:07:12

help wanted signs. And it's dystopian.

1:07:15

The anecdotes are coming in hard and fast. Friend

1:07:17

just flew here to Maui. There were mechanical

1:07:20

issues on the plane. They had to swap out planes.

1:07:23

And it's mechanical because they don't have people to do the

1:07:25

work. Colonel Theresa Long

1:07:27

in the military talked to me months

1:07:29

ago, saying, if we continue along this path

1:07:32

between the disabled, the dead, and the injured, and

1:07:34

the fact that they can't recruit to the woke

1:07:37

political environment, we won't have a standing

1:07:39

military in five years, meaning for

1:07:42

one pilot

1:07:43

to fly, it's 10 support people behind

1:07:45

that pilot. And what you said about the enterprise,

1:07:47

run a car, same thing.

1:07:49

The supply chains are breaking down. The Fed,

1:07:52

the Federal Reserve is looking at the employment number,

1:07:55

which is wrong.

1:07:56

Luke Grauman, a mainstream economist,

1:07:59

pointed out the disability figures going to new highs.

1:08:02

And he said maybe there's something

1:08:04

going on here. He didn't mention the vaccine, but

1:08:06

now it's getting into the mainstream conversation

1:08:09

that something is going on with our workforce.

1:08:12

I was with you in December in front of Senator

1:08:14

Ron Johnson. I said this is a national

1:08:16

security concern, and it

1:08:18

is, and it continues to be.

1:08:20

Wow. All right. So let's look at these numbers you've

1:08:22

got coming out of UK, because I think this is sort

1:08:25

of gives us an understanding of what

1:08:27

we're really dealing with.

1:08:31

Yeah. So what you're looking at is the

1:08:33

percentage clearances.

1:08:35

Oh, those are the absolute numbers, but I have

1:08:37

the percentage clearances. So just

1:08:39

really quickly, let me show this. I just want to show

1:08:42

this since we're looking at it, folks. When

1:08:44

you look at the years, these are just all the different

1:08:46

illnesses that have been reported, I think, and the

1:08:50

actual hard numbers, right? You have the disabilities,

1:08:53

the disabilities, you have the averages there is 2016 to 19 at 485,000.

1:08:56

I think that is. Look at 2020. It stays about the same. 2021, it ticks up.

1:09:03

Okay. Now we got hard COVID in there, 585,000.

1:09:05

But look at 2022. I mean, it's just skyrockets.

1:09:11

That makes no sense. If you believe vaccines

1:09:14

work, if you believe that we were supposed to

1:09:16

be making ourselves healthy and safer, something

1:09:19

went catastrophically wrong

1:09:21

in 2022. I mean, that

1:09:23

blew my mind, that number. It was mind blowing.

1:09:26

Yeah. Let me just describe this data set.

1:09:28

So this is a government disability

1:09:30

system, and you

1:09:33

put in a claim, and on average, 40%

1:09:35

of the claims are cleared.

1:09:38

That's what a clearance is. You get paid,

1:09:40

you get paid by the government, 60% are denied.

1:09:42

That ratio has stayed the same

1:09:45

throughout COVID. There was, and we

1:09:47

disclose this in our report, there was

1:09:49

a problem during COVID

1:09:52

of approving the clearances

1:09:54

that got up to a high of 24 weeks

1:09:57

average to clear a claim. of 2021,

1:10:00

it came down to 16 weeks for 2022 and as of Jan 23 it's 14

1:10:02

weeks. So the data in 2022

1:10:08

is pretty clean. In 2021 there might be some issues

1:10:10

but the bottom line is something

1:10:13

is gone horribly wrong in the UK and the

1:10:15

disability system. So

1:10:17

first is it systemic fraud? If

1:10:19

it is, the UK government should pay us,

1:10:21

the finance technology is a big

1:10:24

fat consulting fee. We just uncovered the

1:10:26

biggest fraud ever. If it's not fraud,

1:10:28

what is it? I believe it's the vaccine

1:10:31

but if it's not the vaccine, what is it? Why aren't you talking

1:10:33

about it? Because if you don't address this,

1:10:35

your pension system will go broke. These

1:10:38

numbers

1:10:38

accelerated in 2022. We can't

1:10:41

wait to get our hands on the data that comes out soon

1:10:43

for the up to date 23 numbers.

1:10:46

So this is the standard deviations above

1:10:49

the trend, the total. So

1:10:52

really quickly explain to me what a standard

1:10:54

deviation is. What does that mean? So

1:10:58

there's what's called an average

1:11:01

and around the average there are occurrences that

1:11:03

come up over time and it's a normal distribution

1:11:06

curve. A one standard deviation

1:11:08

is pretty normal, two standard deviation okay.

1:11:11

That's deviation from the average. Three

1:11:14

is when you start to get pretty excited

1:11:16

on wall street and in

1:11:18

science land. That's an anomaly.

1:11:20

It happens 0.3% of the time. That's three

1:11:23

standard deviations.

1:11:24

What's gone on in the UK system, total

1:11:26

body systems all across the spectrum, 34

1:11:30

standard deviations on an annual

1:11:32

basis. Now on a monthly basis, that

1:11:34

would come down because there's more occurrences

1:11:36

but you know who cares. 34 is what we

1:11:39

call black swan event.

1:11:41

That's like as likely as a black hole

1:11:44

appearing off

1:11:45

the orbit of the earth swallowing us in a year.

1:11:47

It's just a... Jeez, wow. Unless

1:11:49

something's changed. It happens if something's changed.

1:11:52

So something's changed. Right, right.

1:11:54

But so it was a gigantic change.

1:11:57

All right here we have another one. This is XSU.

1:11:59

You can be and Disease Score age group. And

1:12:02

now we're at 61.4 standard deviation. Hematological.

1:12:07

Yeah, so this is, hematological,

1:12:09

so 61 standard deviations

1:12:11

above

1:12:12

the trend

1:12:14

that we identified, the four year trend.

1:12:17

And then percentage wise,

1:12:19

that's 555% in 2022 over trend, excess

1:12:23

over trend.

1:12:24

And hematol, again, on a monthly

1:12:27

basis, the standard deviation will come down. We

1:12:29

have that data available as well. It's 25

1:12:33

standard deviations, but still 25, 61.

1:12:35

This

1:12:38

is a joke, hematological. Again,

1:12:40

we're not doctors. We don't pretend we're doctors.

1:12:43

We're just giving this data. And we called on scientists

1:12:45

and doctors to explain this.

1:12:47

We tried to say, hey,

1:12:49

if it's not the vaccine, what is it? This needs to be investigated.

1:12:52

The regulatory authorities at least

1:12:54

need to admit this is going on

1:12:56

and it's devastating. This is a disaster.

1:12:59

And we suspect what we're seeing in the UK is

1:13:02

definitely happening in the US. If we had access to

1:13:04

that data, we'd probably see similar numbers.

1:13:06

There are some organizations

1:13:08

working on getting that data and there's

1:13:10

FOIA requests in. We

1:13:13

hope they get it, give it to us. We'll do what we

1:13:15

did with the UK.

1:13:16

So what do, you know, you

1:13:19

are, as you sit there looking

1:13:21

at the world as I am, what

1:13:24

do we do? I mean, what do we do? I mean, it

1:13:26

does, it is really starting to get

1:13:28

eerie. You know, planes being canceled.

1:13:31

It's to the point now, if it's, you know, if

1:13:33

it's within a five hour drive, I'm just

1:13:35

gonna drive because I can't risk missing

1:13:38

an event because my planes are

1:13:40

getting canceled. I keep hearing, we don't, and it's always, now

1:13:42

it's just, there's not a pilot. We don't have a pilot. We

1:13:44

don't have the staff. We don't have a pilot.

1:13:46

Meaning it just, it's- Yeah,

1:13:50

yeah. It's paperwork. Oh, we have to

1:13:52

check off on some paperwork. It's all lies. And

1:13:56

it's getting, it's affecting the healthcare system as well.

1:13:58

We're gonna drop a-

1:13:59

study on the NHS, that's the UK

1:14:02

health system and their absence rate and work

1:14:04

time loss which is very similar to the general population.

1:14:06

So healthcare is collapsing.

1:14:09

You won't ever see the headline but you'll hear the

1:14:11

anecdotes. For instance on Maui, someone

1:14:13

went to the emergency room, I heard a story

1:14:16

and they didn't get seen for 13

1:14:18

hours. You can fly to Australia from

1:14:20

Honolulu in 13 hours. So it's either get

1:14:22

service at the emergency room on Maui or

1:14:25

go to Australia, Sydney. This is a joke

1:14:28

and that's only going to get worse. You can go

1:14:32

to Sydney and back and still make your

1:14:34

emergency room appointment. This is where

1:14:36

we are

1:14:38

and

1:14:40

it's going to affect our economy for years to come.

1:14:42

We're going to have to take precious resources

1:14:45

and wealth to take care of the disabled and

1:14:47

the sick

1:14:47

unless we have

1:14:50

a

1:14:50

come to Jesus moment,

1:14:52

we have some adults in Congress that call

1:14:54

me Dr. Malone, Peter McCullough, you,

1:14:57

others to testify so that

1:14:59

we can then address the problem which is your immune

1:15:01

system has gone haywire. That's why it's presenting

1:15:04

in so many different fashions. Chancers

1:15:06

are now starting to pick up in 2022. We have that

1:15:08

here. Look at this. Look at the cancer

1:15:11

folks. There's the cancer that we're

1:15:13

seeing, 15.9 standard

1:15:15

deviation rise in the data coming

1:15:17

out of the UK.

1:15:19

I looked

1:15:21

at just one age category under Breton. You can

1:15:24

go into the total cancer is the

1:15:26

human system. Then we have the underlying causes

1:15:28

that we have breast cancer in the data.

1:15:30

I just looked at 25 through 29 and I saw breast cancer was

1:15:33

up 174%

1:15:36

from trend

1:15:38

in 2022. Now, is that normal? Do

1:15:41

women normally get breast cancer at such a young

1:15:43

age or is that I'm not a doctor.

1:15:45

Maybe a doctor could answer that for me. It was something

1:15:48

like 17 standard deviations.

1:15:50

So, you know,

1:15:51

we're asking for help. We don't pretend we're

1:15:54

doctors and

1:15:56

this data is free and available for all doctors

1:15:58

to use and

1:15:59

explain, write papers, you know, you

1:16:02

can't debunk the data,

1:16:03

but you can, you can, certainly

1:16:06

you can come up with your reason as to what's going on

1:16:08

there. I mean you're absolutely right and this is the

1:16:11

issue is that what we're saying is there

1:16:13

is a crisis going on. We have a

1:16:15

major problem. We can't fix

1:16:18

it if we can't address it. I think about the billions

1:16:20

and billions of dollars, ten billion

1:16:22

dollars spent just to promote

1:16:24

the COVID vaccine on news channels

1:16:27

in America. How about we get together,

1:16:29

say we have a problem, we have an autoimmune

1:16:31

disease crisis, we have a cancer crisis, we

1:16:33

have a blood clotting crisis, we have a stroke

1:16:36

crisis, and we've got to figure out

1:16:38

what's going on. How about a few billion dollars in

1:16:40

the people that have been calling this out and predicted this

1:16:43

to begin with in that think tank as we

1:16:45

figure out how do we heal these people? How

1:16:47

do we get people back up and running

1:16:49

and into the workforce instead

1:16:52

of, you know, turning a blind eye? It's

1:16:54

really, it's always, it's

1:16:56

so interesting to see it from your perspective

1:16:59

because, you know, you're just, you're

1:17:01

not attached to the, you know, the

1:17:03

medical side of it, the story. You're just crunching

1:17:05

numbers as you would. Are there

1:17:08

going to be financial, you know, advantages

1:17:11

to some people that are studying this? Is anyone

1:17:13

sort of, I've asked you this before, but

1:17:16

what does this do to markets?

1:17:19

Well eventually the asset markets

1:17:21

are going to figure this out. We're in the process

1:17:23

of that probably starting to happen this

1:17:25

fall. There's going to be a global

1:17:28

economic collapse because of this,

1:17:30

you know, health care is going to become scarce,

1:17:33

people are going to get sick, productivity

1:17:35

will drop, productivity is one of the biggest drivers

1:17:37

of our economies, demand will drop.

1:17:40

So it's coming, it's called deflation and

1:17:42

Carlos Allegri and Yuri

1:17:44

Nunez, my two partners and I, Carlos

1:17:47

put out a paper saying

1:17:48

that deflation is coming. That's

1:17:50

what we're seeing coming in the first and second

1:17:52

quarter of next year. So all this inflation

1:17:55

talk will be replaced with deflation

1:17:57

talk and deflation is a credit contraction.

1:17:59

a destruction of credit and a slowdown

1:18:02

in economic activity. And

1:18:05

I suspect this is so bad, and

1:18:08

what's gone is so bad that the

1:18:10

powers have been needed distraction to cover this up,

1:18:12

and that's usually war.

1:18:13

And unfortunately,

1:18:15

Warren Buffett agrees with me. He

1:18:17

sold his Taiwan Sunday conductor stock

1:18:19

in the first quarter. He actually highlighted

1:18:22

war as one of the reasons he got out of the position.

1:18:24

Wow. I mean, we needed a

1:18:26

distraction at that level. This

1:18:29

headline just came in when we think about the myocarditis

1:18:31

and the issue with our youth. Look at this. This

1:18:34

is a study of sex-specific differences in myocardial

1:18:37

injury incidents after COVID-19 booster

1:18:40

vaccination. And it says this, in

1:18:42

conclusion, using active surveillance

1:18:45

mRNA-1273 vaccine-associated mild

1:18:47

transient myocardial

1:18:50

injury was found to be much more common than previously

1:18:53

thought. It occurred in

1:18:54

one out of 35 people. It's

1:18:57

unbelievable that one in 35

1:19:00

of the millions and millions that

1:19:02

have gotten this vaccine swelled

1:19:04

their heart. And they're saying, oh, it's not a big

1:19:06

deal. Don't worry. It's a light

1:19:09

swelling of the heart, if you will. Mild.

1:19:13

Mild. They call it

1:19:15

mild. I've talked to doctors. There's

1:19:17

no such thing as mild myocarditis.

1:19:19

So that's just marketing spin

1:19:21

from the propagandists as far

1:19:24

as I'm concerned.

1:19:24

And we've got this last slide

1:19:27

we have for me. This

1:19:29

is the cardiovascular. We

1:19:31

are at 19.3 standard deviations above normal.

1:19:39

And the ones that

1:19:41

scare me, really, what's scary is

1:19:43

these sort of strokes. We're starting to

1:19:45

see the blood clots, but especially

1:19:47

cancer. These are things we wouldn't

1:19:49

have seen early on. These things take a little

1:19:52

bit of time to develop. I'm really worried

1:19:54

that we're just going to start seeing an acceleration

1:19:56

there.

1:19:57

You know, who knows?

1:19:59

The cancer numbers were this. In 2020, cancers

1:20:03

went up in the UK PIP system 1.78%, 6.4% in 2021,

1:20:08

35% in 2022. And

1:20:12

that's what we call an acceleration.

1:20:14

And if this was a gross stock chart, I

1:20:16

would be buying this hand over fist, expecting

1:20:18

it to continue to pop higher. That's

1:20:21

unfortunately what I see.

1:20:23

Wow. What is the best way to follow

1:20:25

the work that you're doing so that we can sort of check in

1:20:27

and keep track and all that stuff?

1:20:30

Yeah, so our website

1:20:32

is Financetechnologies.com. We have all

1:20:35

of our reports there under the Humanities

1:20:37

Project tab, and then you go to Projects.

1:20:39

We have all-cause mortality by

1:20:41

different countries. We

1:20:44

analyze the Pfizer clinical trials.

1:20:46

We look at disability data in the US

1:20:49

and the UK now. We have absence

1:20:51

and work time loss reports.

1:20:53

We look at VAERS and the hospitalization

1:20:56

rate.

1:20:57

So

1:20:59

we're investors. And investors, you have an analyst

1:21:02

mosaic. Our thesis is the vaccine is causing

1:21:04

this damage.

1:21:05

And the mosaic and the reports we

1:21:07

drop

1:21:08

are basically a preponderance of the evidence

1:21:11

that at this point, anybody with any

1:21:13

kind of critical thinking skills would say, these

1:21:16

guys are onto something big here. Yeah.

1:21:18

I

1:21:19

mean, we're not doing double-blinded studies

1:21:21

vaccinated because we don't have the money,

1:21:24

nor would that get approved. But

1:21:26

if this was Wall Street and this was a stock,

1:21:29

we'd be right and early, and

1:21:31

we'd be thumping our chest. But unfortunately,

1:21:33

this is tragic. And we're trying to get the

1:21:36

adults in the room to stop this, pull

1:21:38

the vaccines, and talk about

1:21:40

healing the damage. And until we

1:21:42

do that, this tragedy is going to continue to grow.

1:21:44

I mean, what's amazing about when I think back, no

1:21:46

matter what anyone thinks, you made these

1:21:48

predictions a couple of years ago as this started.

1:21:51

We've been following you. And everything

1:21:53

you've said so far is aging well. It's a horrible

1:21:56

reality, as is the things that we've

1:21:58

stated here on The High Wire.

1:21:59

I think that we've got to start looking at the people that

1:22:02

have been getting this right. I think in many ways

1:22:04

we should be canonizing the Peter McCulloughs

1:22:07

and Robert Malone's and these doctors and scientists

1:22:09

that put it all on the line, have had their licenses

1:22:12

under attack for stating what was obvious.

1:22:15

These were top medical

1:22:18

professionals. It is

1:22:20

clear they had it right and the rest of the world got

1:22:22

it wrong. We better figure out what's going on here. Edward

1:22:24

Dowd, go ahead. What was your last thoughts? I

1:22:27

just wanted to say, all the people are heroes.

1:22:29

When they got canceled, I'm

1:22:32

just a curious person.

1:22:33

Like I'm off to a flame. I went and read

1:22:36

everything they said and it resonated with me. I

1:22:39

was lucky enough to meet Dr. Malone on this island

1:22:41

and my journey started. I said,

1:22:43

I'll look at the financial side of this, the insurance

1:22:46

companies and the funeral homes.

1:22:48

From there I built the team. So I think

1:22:50

these guys deserve to be canonized. They

1:22:53

did put it all on the line. So I just appreciate

1:22:56

them. So I've got 2 people like you and others.

1:22:58

So this has been a team effort to get the

1:23:00

truth out there and I think we're winning slowly

1:23:03

because word of mouth

1:23:04

is spreading. I'm going to put out on Twitter

1:23:06

soon I with website traffic. It's

1:23:08

really starting to take off now. I'll

1:23:10

show you eventually like when we started

1:23:12

and it's really

1:23:13

accelerating. So word of mouth

1:23:15

is spreading thank God. It's good to

1:23:17

hear. Thank God. Lots of work to do. Glad to

1:23:19

know you're out there and I look forward to seeing you again soon. Thank

1:23:22

you for taking the time to bring us this very important information this week.

1:23:26

Take care.

1:23:28

All right folks. Well you know we've

1:23:30

got to wake up the world. One of the ways we're

1:23:32

doing it is through books

1:23:34

and reading. I can has our own press

1:23:37

right now. We have two amazing books right now. If you don't

1:23:39

have these you should the war on Ivermectin

1:23:42

and I'm on backseat and that's OK. We just

1:23:44

talked about this last week. It's

1:23:46

skyrocketing book sales but all of

1:23:48

these are available at I can the

1:23:51

I can bookstore. But this is what our

1:23:53

press company is all about. Take a look at this.

1:23:55

At the informed consent action network we

1:23:57

are always working hard to inform educators.

1:24:00

and bring you the truth. That's why

1:24:02

I'm excited to announce our new book and publishing

1:24:04

division, I Can Press. Leveraging

1:24:07

the power of the written word, I Can

1:24:09

Press is partnering with dynamic writers, medical

1:24:12

professionals, and experts dedicated

1:24:14

to the truth, building a library that

1:24:16

will captivate, empower, and inform you

1:24:18

and your family. I Can Press

1:24:20

has already launched The Informant, an online

1:24:22

monthly magazine curating news from I Can

1:24:25

and The High Wire, offered exclusively

1:24:27

to our recurring donors. Sign up for The Informant

1:24:30

at ICanDecide.org slash The Informant.

1:24:32

Now, I Can Press is bringing you two

1:24:35

must-have books. First, The War on Ivermectin

1:24:37

from author Dr. Pierre Corey,

1:24:40

details a relentless attack on a decades-old,

1:24:43

Nobel Prize-winning medicine that could have ended

1:24:45

the pandemic. The War on Ivermectin

1:24:47

is available now, also available if I'm

1:24:49

unvaccinated and that's okay. A children's

1:24:52

book by Dr. Shannon Croner, which empowers

1:24:54

parents to talk to their children about the decision

1:24:57

to not vaccinate and how to navigate

1:24:59

any negativity

1:24:59

they may encounter out in the

1:25:02

world. Buy these must-have books wherever

1:25:04

books are sold and at ICanDecide.shop.

1:25:07

Start building your library from I Can

1:25:09

Press

1:25:09

today.

1:25:11

Well, I wanna thank all my

1:25:13

guests, Edward Dow, Jeffrey Jackson, who

1:25:15

just keeps rocking out every single week.

1:25:18

I just wanna let you know there's a great event happening next

1:25:20

weekend in San Diego, and

1:25:23

that is the Spellers. We've talked

1:25:25

about this. We've talked about that new communication

1:25:27

concept that's

1:25:31

being used by those that are suffering

1:25:33

from, you know, or on the autism spectrum

1:25:36

so that they can actually communicate. There's a

1:25:38

charity golf. This is a par three. It's

1:25:40

a lot of fun. Barbecue,

1:25:42

all of that, if you wanna join in Oceanside,

1:25:44

that's where it's taking place. We're one of

1:25:46

the big supporters and presenters

1:25:48

there. It'd be great to see you

1:25:50

out there supporting a really great cause. And

1:25:53

of course, you know, all the information

1:25:56

will be available to you right here in the comments.

1:25:58

We will also have it. available to you,

1:26:00

but be a sponsor, get involved.

1:26:03

You know, OHANA is

1:26:05

really working to sort of build a

1:26:07

space, a day space where

1:26:10

children and adults on the spectrum

1:26:13

can experience life in a grander way

1:26:15

and maybe work towards more independence,

1:26:18

something that we are really excited

1:26:20

to be a part of. So next

1:26:22

weekend OHANA you know,

1:26:24

is putting on this incredible golf

1:26:26

event, charity golf event August

1:26:29

4th, you can

1:26:29

get your tickets today. Just go to SpellersFreedomFoundation.org

1:26:33

slash OHANA dash

1:26:35

golf. I

1:26:37

just want to say, you know, sometimes

1:26:40

it can seem grim.

1:26:42

It is really hard to watch all these stories

1:26:45

out there of, you know, beautiful

1:26:48

people, young athletes that's

1:26:51

lives are being changed, you know,

1:26:54

possibly forever, but

1:26:56

we've got to think about number one,

1:26:58

how do we start helping these individuals? How

1:27:00

do we come up with cures? And how do

1:27:02

we make sure this never happens again? We

1:27:06

can look at the dark side of this, but we can also

1:27:08

look at the gift. The gift right now is

1:27:11

it is becoming really clear that

1:27:13

this no longer, these aren't conspiracies, these

1:27:15

aren't theories, these are the realities that

1:27:17

we're living in. So it's getting easier

1:27:20

and easier and easier to have these conversations.