0:05

Did you notice that this show doesn't have

0:07

any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers

0:10

or vitamins or smoothies or

0:12

gasoline. That's because I don't want corporate

0:14

sponsors telling us what to investigate and

0:17

what to say. Instead, you're our sponsors.

0:19

This is a production by our non-profit,

0:22

the Informed Consent Action Network. If

0:24

you want more investigations, more

0:26

hard-hitting news,

0:27

if you want the truth, go to I Can

0:29

Decide. org and donate now.

0:48

Good morning, good afternoon, good evening. Wherever

0:50

you are out there in this beautiful

0:53

world, it's time to step out on the

0:55

high wire. While you're

0:57

doing it, you may want to smell some

0:59

flowers, see the sunshine,

1:02

watch the clouds, enjoy being

1:04

outside. Can you imagine

1:06

if they ever decided to take that away from you

1:08

and lock you down in your house? We're going

1:11

to be talking a lot about that. In fact, we're

1:13

very focused today. If

1:15

you are alive on this planet or if you use social

1:18

media, you've probably seen this meme

1:20

that is going everywhere. Whatever

1:23

happens next, do not

1:25

comply.

1:27

If you don't know what that's referencing,

1:29

then this is probably your first day at the high

1:31

wire. So welcome. I'm

1:33

glad you're joining us. We are going to get into all

1:36

of the slippery details of what happens

1:38

when public health officials decide that

1:40

your life doesn't really matter and

1:43

all the things you care about, that the greater

1:45

good is really what matters. When

1:49

we think about that idea, no matter what happens

1:51

next, do not comply. So many people

1:53

think to themselves, and I think prior to the

1:56

last lockdown, they thought

1:57

I would stand up against any oppression

1:59

that didn't make

1:59

sense and then how quickly everybody

2:02

just bowed down and got

2:04

in line, took a knee. Well,

2:07

we should be asking ourselves what happens

2:09

if this happens again? If I

2:11

really got it now, do I know

2:13

what it means to stand up for yourself? How many of us

2:15

wore masks on airplanes,

2:18

for instance, only to find out that that was an illegal

2:20

mandate by the Biden administration? So

2:23

in this essence, we're all helping Biden

2:25

break the law. So what happens

2:27

if they try to do it again? Are we going to be

2:29

stronger? Are we going to be bolder? What if

2:32

our career depends on it? What

2:34

if the way we're viewed or what we say

2:37

or what we think, if we're public and we're honest,

2:39

we actually adhere to the tenant

2:41

of free speech, it could cost us our

2:44

job or our livelihood our ability

2:46

to feed our families? I think we

2:48

all have to think about that because we may be tested

2:50

again and we're going to be talking a lot about that. But

2:53

before we do, since I'm seeing so many people

2:55

online saying, I definitely

2:57

will stand up against any sort of insanity

2:59

like a lockdown. I'm never doing

3:01

it again or I never did it. Well,

3:04

I wanted to talk to somebody that did put it all on

3:06

the line. He joined us on the show in the

3:08

middle of COVID. He put his career

3:11

as a multimillion dollar basketball

3:14

player on the line to speak

3:16

his truth. This is what it was like

3:18

when we spoke to him back in

3:20

the middle of the COVID lockdowns.

3:22

I'm not anti-vax. I'm not anti-medicine. I'm not

3:25

anti-science. I

3:27

didn't come to my current vaccination status

3:29

by studying black history or watching

3:32

Donald Trump press conferences. It is my

3:34

belief that the vaccine

3:36

status of every person should be their

3:38

own choice and completely

3:40

up to them without the without bullying,

3:43

without being pressured, without being forced into doing

3:45

so. I'm not ashamed to say that

3:47

I'm uncomfortable with taking the

3:49

vaccine at this time. As you

3:51

were sort of stepping in front of those cameras,

3:54

were you aware of the firestorm

3:56

that would probably be set off by

3:59

stating your opinion?

3:59

around vaccination. I

4:02

knew 100% that I was walking into something that,

4:04

you know, that wouldn't be portrayed in my favor,

4:06

but I felt I had the right knowledge and understanding

4:08

about what was going on and that, you know, I was free

4:11

to make that decision for myself and give other

4:13

people reports that haven't had the opportunity

4:15

to. I think there's absolutely room to say that the NBA

4:17

and all these other corporations feel pressured to

4:19

kind of align themselves with what everybody's saying

4:22

politically and don't want to push back

4:24

against that. I've done a lot of due diligence

4:26

around the science and just, you

4:28

know, kind of weighing it for myself and

4:30

seeing that, you know, the most of the people that were at risk had

4:33

either comorbidities or that they were

4:35

elderly and that because of the physical state

4:37

that I was in and even the fact that I had

4:39

COVID already, I didn't feel the need to

4:41

take a vaccine that didn't stop me from getting the

4:45

infection or transmitting the infection. My

4:47

faith has played a role in making

4:49

me the man that I am today and has given

4:51

me the courage, the boldness, but also the

4:53

desire to stand up for what it is that I believe

4:56

in and offer it as an answer to

4:58

everything that we see.

5:01

All right, well, it's my honor and pleasure to be joined

5:03

now by Jonathan Isaac. Thank you for joining

5:06

us again today, Jonathan. How are you doing?

5:09

Man, I'm doing good. I feel like I look so young in

5:11

those videos. I know. I

5:14

feel like I've aged. Think of the truth as it's cost.

5:17

I went silver in the middle of all this, I think. Yeah,

5:20

that's how that happens. You know, when you look back

5:23

at that now, I mean, so many of

5:25

us just want to have all of that in

5:27

our rear view mirror, especially people like

5:29

you, I think, that just was so much unnecessary

5:33

turmoil and strife around the

5:35

idea that you just simply wanted control over

5:38

your body. You know, now

5:40

that we're sort of out of it, what is your perspective

5:43

looking back on that? Has anything changed

5:45

or, you know, what are your thoughts on what

5:47

you went through in the middle of all this and what this nation

5:49

went through?

5:51

Well, nothing has changed in terms of my position

5:54

on anything. I do

5:56

go back frequently and just thinking about how

6:00

crazy that time was.

6:02

And people forget, you know, things have died

6:04

down, a lot has changed already. But

6:07

it was crazy the amount

6:09

of pressure and social

6:11

pressure. You know, you had the celebrities,

6:13

you had the corporations, you had the

6:15

government, everybody coming out in, you

6:18

know, one viewpoint. And if you had any

6:21

hesitation, any concern, you

6:23

were an idiot, you were an anti-vaxxer, you

6:25

were somebody to be frowned upon. And

6:28

that's where I found myself and, you know,

6:30

millions of other people found

6:31

themselves in the same position. I kind of had

6:33

a center stage because of what I do for a living.

6:36

But my positions haven't changed. I've

6:38

saw all the- So you mean you're not all of a sudden after

6:40

all the scientists come out decided, I really like that

6:42

vaccine list, come out and get that thing? No,

6:46

not at all. So I'm still in the same

6:48

boat. Speaking

6:51

of, I mean, a lot of the science has,

6:53

you know, if anyone's paying attention or

6:55

doing any reading, you seem like someone that was

6:57

already staying on top of it. We now

7:00

know that, as you pointed

7:02

out there, not only did the vaccine not stop

7:04

transmission, but we know now that the heads of

7:06

Pfizer have said they didn't even test to see

7:09

if the vaccine could stop transmission before they

7:11

released it to the public. All of the

7:13

media pressure, all the pressure on the NBA,

7:15

NFL, all of sports was

7:18

based just completely

7:20

on conjecture and no scientific basis.

7:23

And, you know, they didn't test

7:25

to see if it stopped transmission. It did not stop transmission.

7:28

Is that, you know, at the moment you

7:30

were in the middle

7:31

of it, you said not a lot of- you were getting quiet

7:33

responses from some of the athletes you're with

7:35

that mostly just sort of stayed away from it. Is

7:38

the conversation changing in sports?

7:40

Like do our athletes say, if they ever try to do

7:43

that crap again, I'm out, man, I got

7:45

lied to? Or do you feel like everybody's

7:47

would kind of just do it all again?

7:50

Well, I don't have a grip on

7:52

the kind of wide range consensus

7:55

on everybody, but I've definitely had a

7:57

handful of kind of internal conversations

7:59

where

7:59

guys are saying if this does happen again,

8:02

you know, I'm kind of leaning on you and

8:04

what you did and I'm going to follow suit with, you

8:06

know,

8:07

making it a free choice and for me

8:09

personally not taking it. And so

8:12

that's the conversation that I've had.

8:14

Now you're preparing to go into this season

8:17

this fall and returning to basketball now,

8:19

is that correct? Do I have that right?

8:21

Yes, sir. So as you

8:23

prepare for that, have there been, first of

8:26

all, have there been any specific conversations

8:28

with you just around health and medical

8:31

decisions and how the NBA views it? And

8:34

are there broad, are there any changes in the language

8:37

and contracts or anything that would

8:40

sort of deal with the future situation if

8:42

this was to happen again? Are you seeing any writing

8:44

on the wall in the NBA?

8:47

Not heard. From the last, you

8:49

know, last thing that I have heard is that we don't have any

8:51

kind of regulations, you know, when it comes

8:53

to COVID anymore. I know there's

8:55

this talk about this kind of resurgence of a,

8:59

you know, a strain of the infection

9:01

or something like that coming back. So I don't know if that's

9:03

going to change. I'm sure it'll be

9:05

very quickly with everything that's ramping up right

9:07

now, you know, getting ready for the season. But

9:09

I haven't heard anything in terms of set in stone,

9:12

you know, we have to follow any certain rules or anything like

9:14

that.

9:15

All right. So they're not really talking about it. And

9:17

then I don't know how much you're paying attention,

9:20

but obviously, you know, in people that

9:22

have had their eye on this issue, there

9:25

are just an incredible amount of athletes

9:28

that have been dropping over with

9:30

heart attacks, basketball players, students

9:35

across America, across the

9:37

world. When

9:39

you look at that, you know,

9:41

and I know this is dangerous territory for you

9:43

to sort of speak to, but

9:46

what are your thoughts? Is this

9:48

something? Are people talking about it in

9:50

the league? Is there any thought beyond

9:53

just whether or not the vaccine works?

9:56

Are there conversations about whether the vaccine is dangerous?

9:59

Well, it's such a tough

10:02

conversation. Even with you coming

10:04

out and talking about, you know, certain things

10:06

weren't tested for before this

10:08

thing was put out.

10:10

What do we know about what was tested for

10:12

or more things that weren't tested for that we don't

10:14

know about? I think that

10:17

history is going to determine,

10:19

you know, what was done

10:21

at the end of the day. As more things

10:23

come out, as you see what's happening across

10:26

our world with people

10:28

struggling with different things, you know, are you going to

10:30

say it's completely the vaccine? Is it

10:32

completely COVID? Is it completely, you

10:34

know, you don't really know, but simple

10:36

fact is the way that it was handled was egregious

10:40

from top to bottom. And so

10:42

I would not be surprised if we

10:44

find out more things that weren't tested for

10:46

that

10:47

lead to some of the

10:49

things that are happening today.

10:51

As you prepare for the season

10:53

and the news, some of the things we're going to talk

10:55

about today, there's masking returning

10:57

to many universities across the country,

11:00

which we seem to be in the, you know,

11:02

who knows if, you know, we're going to get into the details later

11:04

on in the show. But is that a thought

11:06

of yours? Is there any sort of PTSD

11:09

as you go in back in this league

11:11

thinking, man, are these fools going to

11:13

do this again?

11:16

Well, I mean, and look, it's happening. I

11:19

really, really struggle with the whole mask

11:21

thing. But I think that's

11:24

the beard too. I was

11:26

the person that I was the person at the fight

11:28

attendance and the people always had to say, sir,

11:30

can you put your mask back up this then and there? And I would

11:32

just

11:33

I would be reluctant to

11:35

it. But at the end of the day, I try my best

11:37

to be, you know, compliant in the

11:40

moment for things like that. It's

11:42

tough. It looks like those things are coming back

11:45

in kind of small waves and we'll find out if it comes

11:48

to a large scale thing. I

11:51

think a lot of people have PTSD about what was happening,

11:54

people losing their jobs, people not

11:56

being able to provide for their families because of what

11:58

they believe in.

11:59

as freedom and free choice when it comes

12:02

to a vaccine. Again, I'm gonna take

12:04

the same position. I'm gonna be outspoken

12:07

about my desire to have

12:09

everybody make a free decision on what it is

12:11

that they wanna do. I'm not sure what the NBA

12:13

is gonna do, what other leagues are gonna do, but

12:15

that's my position.

12:17

When we look at the world we

12:19

live in today, it feels like in so many ways

12:21

we're more divided than ever. Unlike

12:24

most catastrophic events that tend

12:27

to have everybody put away their ideology

12:29

and we all come to the task, whether it's

12:32

an earthquake or whatever, COVID really

12:34

just seemed to divide us even more. A

12:37

lot of what you're focused on and things

12:39

that you're doing now, you're trying

12:42

to look at that and take a look at it. Tell me what you're up to these

12:45

days.

12:47

Talking about United's? Yeah, man.

12:51

Yeah, absolutely. So I gotta take

12:53

you back a little bit. Back during COVID,

12:55

I was a Nike signed athlete.

12:57

So that was back during 2020. I

12:59

got injured and I ended up not re-signing with Nike. But

13:02

from that point on, I had been playing with

13:04

the idea of what it could look like

13:07

to have a values-based sports and apparel company.

13:10

You talked about today, our world

13:12

being more and more divided and

13:14

it's the truth. And even to your point

13:16

about COVID and how something like

13:18

that should have had an effect on everybody saying,

13:20

okay, this is getting a little out of hand, this

13:23

is getting crazy, let's come together. More things

13:25

come out and more people hear about

13:27

the way that things were handled. That

13:30

spirit will come about. Well, obviously this

13:32

thing was done wrong, they handled it wrong. And

13:34

the people on the other side weren't insane for their

13:37

positions. But when it comes to United's

13:39

for me,

13:40

I wanted to see my values represented in the

13:42

marketplace. And tons of companies,

13:44

especially sportswear, are going

13:46

in one direction that I believe is, that

13:49

believe undermines godly values and

13:51

principles, but also principles

13:53

and values. And so what I wanted to do is

13:55

give faith-loving Americans and

13:58

freedom-loving Americans the freedom.

14:00

to buy with their values in the sports and

14:02

apparel space. And so that's where Unitas

14:04

was created and born. It's

14:07

gone off to a great start. We're looking to

14:09

innovate and continue to work. I'm gonna be wearing

14:11

my own sneaker this upcoming season that's produced

14:13

by Unitas. And I'm just super excited

14:15

about what it can be in the future, uniting

14:18

people around a set of values that I think lead to prosperity.

14:21

Where do we find the Unitas apparel

14:23

and things that you're putting out there? Yes, you can

14:25

head to weareunitas.com.

14:28

Weareunitas.com and also weareunitas

14:30

on Instagram and Twitter. Follow us, stay tuned.

14:33

Again, we started with something very simple, a kind

14:35

of leisure wear package, but

14:37

we're hoping to continue to expand and get into

14:39

all lanes, all sports. We're gonna be signing

14:42

our first brand ambassador this upcoming week.

14:44

I'm excited about it, so stay tuned for that drop.

14:47

You know, and I just love your

14:49

energy. I know, you know, everyone was

14:51

so excited to have you back on the show. No

14:53

matter what, you've always stayed positive

14:56

through all of it. And you stood positive through,

14:58

I think, one of the most difficult situations,

15:00

which is this sort of cancel culture idea. You

15:04

put out a book about, you

15:06

know, you know, standing

15:08

instead of kneeling and why you stand.

15:12

How is, you know, how is the response

15:14

to that? Because in some ways, you know, people

15:17

are so afraid to stand right now

15:19

when they feel like they can be attacked by this silent,

15:22

I don't know if it's a minority, majority, but this internet

15:25

attack system machine.

15:30

You know, where are you at with that? And how has it been

15:32

in response to your book?

15:35

The response to the book has been fantastic. I'm

15:37

excited to say that we became a national bestseller

15:40

shortly after the launch and everything

15:42

like that. It was fantastic. I've

15:44

also had, you know, my fair share of, you

15:46

talk about cancel culture or negativity or people

15:48

coming out and talking ill of, you

15:51

know, my intentions or what I did. What I've

15:53

always tried my best to do, and I

15:55

thank God for it. I thank the people that I have

15:57

in my life around me for it, but

15:59

try.

15:59

my best to focus on the positive. I

16:02

know where I'm coming from. I know the heart in

16:04

which I'm trying to create

16:06

and do. And I know that it's not coming from

16:08

a malicious place. And so I try my best

16:10

to stay focused on the message, stay focused on

16:13

the people that do agree with where I'm at and not

16:15

so much the people that disagree. And then also

16:17

for me, it's never been about hate. It's

16:20

never been about hating anybody or

16:22

going against the other side. It's simply saying

16:24

what I believe is valid. And if you

16:26

want me to tolerate your beliefs and

16:29

understand your beliefs, then you have to do the

16:31

same for me. And I'm not ashamed of what I believe.

16:33

I'm empowered in what I believe. I'm going to

16:35

stand for what I believe in along with

16:37

the people who are standing for what they believe in as well. And

16:40

we let the chips fall where they may.

16:42

It's beautiful, Jonathan. I think

16:44

if we could all just share that, I mean, you know,

16:46

here in this country in America, you

16:49

know, divided, we will fall. This nation's

16:51

in really dark times. I feel like it's

16:53

time for us to unite. It's time. I really

16:55

love it. You're into Unites that you are

16:58

putting out books that you're representing

17:01

thoughtful Americans in a beautiful

17:04

and loving way. Just

17:07

everything you stand for, we support. We're

17:09

so excited to see you back on the courts

17:12

coming up this fall. So

17:14

congratulations. And thank you for taking the

17:16

time to share a little bit of your thoughts today.

17:19

Yes, sir. Thank you so much, Del. I appreciate you.

17:21

All right. You take care.

17:23

You know, there's a lot

17:25

of people that make sacrifices and, you

17:27

know, we have a brand new

17:30

set of interviews,

17:33

if you will, the Freedom Files, which we captured

17:35

when we were at Freedom

17:38

Fest. We sat down with a lot of individuals.

17:40

I got the opportunity to sit down with another

17:43

basketball player, Enos Freedom,

17:46

who just really a beautiful

17:49

human being. And it's amazing when athletes

17:51

decide to use that visibility to put

17:54

it all the line. In this case, it did cost

17:56

him his career. This is a taste of what you're going to see this

17:58

Monday in the Freedom Files.

17:59

You're really, you know, one of

18:02

those heroic characters to me. You're

18:04

in the NBA, the American

18:06

dream. You get involved in human

18:08

rights to the point where it

18:10

ends up, you know, costing

18:13

you that career. Why?

18:15

Why give all of that? Good question. Well,

18:17

a lot of people ask me that question, actually. Well, I mean,

18:19

because it is bigger than myself. It is

18:21

bigger than NBA. It is bigger than basketball.

18:24

Because while we are dribbling

18:26

the ball in this country, while we are speaking, actually, there's a

18:28

genocide happening.

18:30

So I was like, you know what, I have to make a decision.

18:33

Should I really want to, you know,

18:35

get another 40, 50, whatever million dollars? Or

18:38

should I want to just stand up for the innocent people who

18:40

don't have a voice and be their voice?

18:43

The decision was easy.

18:49

So this Monday, as for the next several Mondays,

18:51

we're dropping two new Freedom

18:53

files. And really, that's available to you

18:55

if you're on our newsletter. I really

18:58

want to take today and all throughout this

19:00

day, I'm going to say it several times. There is

19:02

something we do. We provide you with free information,

19:05

absolutely free data. And,

19:07

you know, when you're going to have a new thing

19:09

drop like the Freedom files, you find out about it first.

19:12

And all you have to do to

19:14

get a hold of this is just put in

19:17

your email on our newsletter. Just go

19:19

down the

19:19

page, thehighwire.com. Just scroll down

19:21

there a couple of bars, and

19:23

there you go. All you do, type in your

19:25

email address there. There's several reasons

19:27

why I'm going to talk about you should do this today.

19:31

But one of it's just so that you can find out when the next

19:33

two Freedom files are being dropped, where

19:35

to find them, what they're about. And

19:37

all the other amazing things we're doing, whether they're

19:39

legal wins and things like that, all available. And

19:42

every single piece of information that comes

19:45

across this show, every single Thursday,

19:47

is in your hands. Not just

19:49

the excerpts, not just the little paragraph

19:52

that we show you like CNN and MSNBC

19:54

and even Fox. They'll tell you that's what it was all

19:56

about. Maybe they're cherry picking. How do you know

19:58

I'm not cherry picking? The only way you know

20:01

is if you actually go and take a look at

20:03

that study or that peer reviewed magazine

20:05

or whatever it is that we're providing

20:07

you every single Monday. The

20:10

best part about it is when you talk to your friends

20:12

you don't have to say, hey, Del Bigg Street said

20:14

you get to say, look what the CDC wrote

20:17

about this. Believe me, if

20:19

we're on the verge of lockdowns coming in the future,

20:21

you're going to want some ammunition and you better

20:23

be signed up for what we give you and put

20:26

into your lock, stock

20:28

and barrel. I

20:29

mean the truth.

20:31

All right. I have a great show coming

20:33

up. We're going to get into a lot with Jeffrey Jackson

20:36

here in a second about the lockdowns

20:38

and what may or may not be coming, what we know from the

20:40

past. But later on I'm going to

20:42

talk to a medical ethicist. Dr.

20:45

Alvin Moss is the director for health and ethics law at

20:47

West Virginia University.

20:49

This is a conversation we have not had

20:52

yet. We've talked a lot about science and medicine

20:54

and what the real truth is. But

20:56

there's a huge part of science and medicine

20:58

that is based on ethics. How should you

21:00

be treated? What is the Hippocratic

21:01

oath? Did they break

21:04

it during covid? He's written a brilliant

21:06

paper. We're going to get into that. But first, it's time

21:08

for the Jackson Report.

21:19

All right, Jeffrey, before before you

21:21

say anything, I wanted to take this moment

21:24

because sort of an odd thing happened last

21:26

week. You know, last Thursday we

21:28

had a huge show, right? We ended

21:30

up doing a really deep, beautiful

21:34

dive and expose on the

21:37

fires in Maui. And

21:39

then we knew that we had Dr. Peter

21:41

McCullough coming up and Geert, Band and Bosch

21:43

at the same time. So that was obviously

21:46

be long. And right in the middle of the show,

21:48

we made this decision. My God, this show could end

21:50

up being four hours. Why don't we

21:52

cut a piece of the Jackson Report out?

21:54

So live we told you we're just going to lose

21:57

one of the stories we were telling Friday.

22:00

morning you called me and you like

22:02

this almost never happens. You said, Dell,

22:05

I think we might have made a mistake. I think

22:07

we cut the wrong, you know, piece

22:09

of my reporting. The more I'm looking at

22:12

this new variant and that's what we're going to be talking about. We're

22:14

going to be talking about the new COVID variant.

22:17

You said, the more I look at this, the more the writing

22:19

appears on the wall to me. I think

22:21

we're going back in. I think they're going to

22:23

lock us down again. And I said, wow,

22:26

really? Well, let's definitely cover that

22:29

this week. And, you know, I thought

22:31

when we cut that, well, Geert's going to mention it. And we

22:33

did. And Peter McCaldin, this new variant. But

22:36

that was chilling. The fact that you said, I

22:39

think we're going to go into lockdowns again.

22:41

And literally, I think it was like three or four

22:43

hours later across my

22:45

feed came this.

22:48

I got a call yesterday. An individual

22:50

was in town, a high level manager

22:54

in the TSA.

22:56

They said, you got to warn people. Tuesday,

22:59

we got called in the

23:01

managers. And

23:03

told that by the middle of September,

23:07

you all have to wear a mask again

23:09

and so will airport employees.

23:12

Then by the middle of October,

23:15

they are going to say that everyone

23:17

flying has to wear a mask because

23:19

of the new variant in Canada and

23:22

because of the WHO. They may declare

23:25

this. But regardless, they were told

23:27

we expect by December

23:30

a return to the full

23:32

COVID protocol of 2020, 2021. Then

23:36

I left, called the

23:38

first federal connection that I was thinking

23:41

of, told them what I've been told. And they said,

23:43

what day was that? I said, Tuesday.

23:45

They said, yeah, we were told

23:47

yesterday. Expect

23:50

COVID protocols to begin rolling out

23:53

middle of September. The whole shooting

23:55

match, the children in the mask and the

23:58

attempt to push a new shot.

23:59

for the new variant and we're right back

24:02

in the same hellhole we were in

24:04

just a few years ago.

24:08

Obviously pretty scary thoughts and

24:10

an idea coming from Alex Jones

24:12

and I want to be clear because I know Alex Jones is triggering

24:15

for a lot of people including people in our audience. I'm

24:17

not playing this to say Alex Jones is always

24:19

right or that we follow him in the news

24:22

but he we did a brilliant interview. I had one of

24:24

my favorite interviews really of all times with Alex Jones

24:26

a super interesting unique

24:29

human on this planet and he'd be the

24:31

first one to say and he did in the interview look

24:33

I run things as soon as I get the story

24:35

sometimes those stories prove to be true sometimes

24:38

they don't but I'm out there just planting red

24:40

flags and letting people know what I'm hearing with

24:43

his ear to the ground. The reason I bring

24:45

it up though it was it was four hours after

24:48

you had just said the same thing to me

24:50

and that's what was shocking to me and

24:52

so what I'd like to do is

24:55

understand exactly what you were

24:57

looking at last Friday

24:59

morning that

25:01

really made you think that we

25:04

could potentially be going back into lockdowns.

25:07

Yes thanks Del so I saw

25:09

a lot of data points culminating to

25:11

one single piece here and let's take

25:13

the 10,000 foot view here let's go to the

25:16

legislation let's go to like the

25:18

prime movers of policy so we

25:21

have HR 307 this

25:23

is what is titled technical titles pandemic

25:25

and all hazards preparedness and reauthorization

25:27

act of 2013 so like it says 2013 it's been going

25:31

for a decade

25:32

and it's up for reauthorization at the

25:34

end of this fiscal year this is at the end of September

25:36

and you're gonna see an ongoing theme in my

25:39

report here the end of September the

25:41

end of September and so that's up

25:43

for reauthorization what did that do among

25:45

other things it created a couple of

25:48

offices one was the HHS office

25:51

of the administration for strategic

25:54

preparedness and response this is an operating

25:56

agency within the HHS Health and Human

25:58

Services this dealt with the pandemic

25:59

response, good and bad, a

26:03

And then also it created biomedical

26:06

advanced rece authority.

26:09

Bar to invest i measures.

26:11

It gave moderna for

26:14

boosters. It gave fis for

26:17

deployment of their v a 1.6

26:21

billion to finish t early

26:23

on. Essentially it' to

26:28

see the global m RNA v platform.

26:32

So no small thi this

26:35

does not get re auth are

26:38

gone. They're absolat no

26:41

more legislatively. So And

26:45

before we saw these h

26:47

you know,

26:49

there would hav do we

26:51

really want to have heavy

26:56

agencies when we're over.

26:58

Then we go further month

27:02

ago, the White House pandemic

27:05

office in the ex presidency

27:08

run by a former have

27:12

a permanent pandemic someone

27:15

with not somethin with people last

27:17

minute w kicks off. They're ready

27:20

push button pandemic offe And

27:23

that's not all. We hav pandemic

27:25

treaty.

27:26

This is i is

27:29

the headline looking a Treaty

27:31

zero draft wins, n will

27:34

be key. Many, many

27:36

co onto this, including the in

27:39

draft form at the end end

27:42

of september. This is and

27:45

this is going to deal response,

27:47

basically a one the

27:49

world for the pandemic for

27:53

vaccine rollout.

27:54

Again the

27:57

mix for the end of se

27:59

into the UK because this is when I started

28:02

to see the beginning of it.

28:03

And remember in 2021, we saw

28:06

a headline here. It was masks

28:08

were beginning to come off, the

28:11

mandates were winding down. We

28:13

saw this headline, face masks should continue forever,

28:16

says Sage Scientists. The Sage is

28:18

the UK's strategic advisory group for emergencies.

28:21

This is a British government body. And

28:23

who was a Sage member? Neil Ferguson

28:26

was a Sage member. Remember he said 2.2 million

28:29

people were going to die. He was an epidemiologist.

28:31

That was his prediction. That was handed

28:33

off

28:33

to Deborah Birx in the US and

28:36

she ran basically the COVID lockdowns.

28:39

And remember Deborah Birx,

28:41

she ran the NSC National Security Council.

28:43

She was the most powerful person in the coronavirus

28:46

task force essentially with her power. And

28:48

she is a army colonel. So

28:51

this is the Sage. I mean, when I look

28:53

at that image, I think, can you imagine if she'd have been standing

28:56

behind Donald Trump wearing

28:58

that instead of the scarves we saw? Because this is

29:00

the truth. This is the truth that this person

29:02

was. If we found out that she'd been hired

29:05

by the NSC and put in place

29:07

to run our lockdowns and lock us in

29:09

the buildings, I think a lot more people would have said,

29:11

wait a minute, is this a military operation?

29:13

Boy, she really threw us off with

29:15

the scarves. You know. Right.

29:18

And so that was, you know, it could be looked at

29:20

as a handoff from Sage,

29:22

Neil Ferguson to the US. So

29:25

Sage is governed body and what

29:27

emerged is something called an independent Sage.

29:29

So a lot of people are saying we need an independent

29:32

version of this because the government body

29:34

obviously has biases and conflicts

29:36

of interest. So we have an independent Sage, but we

29:38

had journalists during the pandemic do some research.

29:41

And this is what they wrote about the independent

29:43

Sage. They say the journalists run intelligence-linked

29:46

operation that warped British pandemic policy.

29:48

It says in this article, present it as an independent voice

29:50

for unbiased scientific advice.

29:53

I Sage provided a channel for media spinsters,

29:55

spies and SIAP specialists influenced

29:57

Britain's pandemic policy without account of.

30:00

Leaked internal emails show members fretting over

30:02

its unethical methods. And

30:04

speaking about an ethical method, just hold that ice

30:07

age there for a minute, independent stage. Speaking

30:09

of unethical methods, we had in

30:11

the UK a nudge unit. These are psychiatrists,

30:14

psychologists, people that understand human

30:16

behavior. They were using straight

30:18

up fear to get compliance

30:21

to these restrictions, the masking, the lockdowns.

30:24

And the head of this nudge unit, after

30:26

the pandemic was over, he started

30:28

doing a media tour. And these

30:30

are the headlines that came out of that just recently. Britain

30:33

drill to accept lockdown in future

30:36

pandemic says nudge unit chief. He's basically

30:38

saying we gave them the drill,

30:41

essentially like Pavlov's dog. We taught them

30:43

how to drool and they're ready to drool at

30:45

the drop of a hat because we trained them to do

30:47

that. So with all that in mind

30:49

coming from the UK,

30:51

I saw 10 days ago or so, this

30:53

headline, gloomy scientists call

30:55

for people to start wearing COVID masks again as they

30:58

sound alarm over a new variant B.A. 6 that

31:00

has a lot of mutations. Okay,

31:02

so we got masks. Now to be clear,

31:05

there's three variants going around, we're being told now.

31:08

And these headlines, at any point they can

31:10

run these headlines. These mutations are always

31:12

happening. And the fact that they ran a headline

31:14

like that alongside with start

31:16

wearing masks, the person they're talking about

31:19

in this article that is suggesting

31:21

we start wearing masks is from the independent

31:24

says member of independent sage in the UK.

31:26

This is Dr. Trish.

31:28

And

31:29

so that already

31:31

raised my alarm saying like, at that time,

31:33

not a lot of people were talking about wearing masks, but

31:35

that was that was an outlier. Why?

31:38

Well, there's a link there. So again, just keeping these

31:40

data points. And now bringing it up

31:43

to present day reporting, Neil Ferguson

31:45

is back. And what is he saying? He's

31:47

saying the same thing. Team

31:49

of government scientists, including Professor

31:52

lockdown, Neil Ferguson, warm of new COVID

31:55

spreading rapidly, blah, blah, blah. So how

31:57

is he back? Well, he had he was a sage member. He

31:59

had to step down. because he broke his own lockdown policy.

32:01

So he's part of the UK Health Security

32:04

Agency. This was an agency

32:06

that was formed in 2021. So another

32:09

new agency to deal with future pandemics.

32:11

So you can understand, they need an excuse

32:14

to really start working hard here. Now

32:16

at the same time, all of these headlines

32:19

are coming out, we have a conversation

32:21

about speech because during this

32:24

past pandemic response, American free

32:26

speech was targeted in

32:28

ways we've never seen before in this country,

32:31

all the way from the White House down to government agencies,

32:33

attacking individual scientists, even

32:36

members of the public, priests, it didn't

32:38

matter. The online debate

32:40

was highly, highly regulated and censored.

32:43

So during this time, I see this come out.

32:45

This is the CEO of Twitter,

32:47

Linda Yacarino. She does an

32:49

interview this

32:50

month, and she's talking about

32:53

some new things the platforms are doing. So

32:55

let's see if you can take a look at what may be concerning.

32:58

Since acquisitions, we

33:01

have built brand safety

33:04

and content moderation tools

33:07

that have never existed before at this

33:09

company. And we've introduced

33:12

a new policy to your specific

33:14

point about hate speech called

33:17

freedom of speech,

33:19

not reach. So

33:21

if you're gonna post something that's

33:24

illegal or against the law, you're gone,

33:26

zero tolerance. But more

33:28

importantly, if you're gonna post

33:31

something that is lawful,

33:34

but it's awful, you

33:37

get labeled. You get labeled,

33:40

you get deamplified, which means

33:42

it cannot be shared. And

33:44

it is certainly demonetized

33:46

back to your direct point about

33:49

brand safety. So they are protected

33:51

from the risk of

33:55

being next to that content. And it's

33:57

also why we're here. It's

34:01

really important to note that

34:03

once a post is labeled

34:06

and it can't be shared, and

34:09

the user sees that, 30% of

34:13

the time they take it down

34:15

themselves. Staggeringly

34:18

they take it down. And that reducing

34:21

that hateful content from being seen

34:24

is one of the best examples

34:27

how X is committed to

34:31

encouraging healthy behavior

34:33

online.

34:35

You know, we talked about her,

34:37

especially because we've been talking about Elon Musk so

34:40

much that he really seemed to be this

34:42

arbiter of truth and transparency

34:45

and exposure, putting out the Twitter files

34:47

and showing us all the censorship.

34:49

And then when he hires Yakareena, we were all like,

34:51

what are you doing? This is

34:54

as deep state, you know, and she was saying

34:56

then, upon the moment

34:59

he hired her, what she's saying right now is brand

35:01

safety. This is what we've said to people. This

35:04

is the problem. If the sponsors don't

35:06

want to be next to harmful

35:08

content or, you know, she's free

35:11

speech is not freedom of reach, then

35:14

we're just going to protect the brand. So now you're

35:16

protecting industry corporations

35:18

once again over the individuals

35:20

that are using this space to communicate.

35:23

And I'll be honest with you, I think we're beyond

35:25

the writing on the wall. It sure seems to me

35:28

that this is already taking effect. Just

35:31

over the last day, we put out

35:33

the high wire, put out an incredibly beautiful

35:35

post pointing out several

35:37

of the videos. We link several of the plotkin

35:40

videos. This is the leading godfather

35:42

of vaccinations on the stand

35:44

being grilled by our own Aaron Siri.

35:47

Every time we've done anything with these videos, we get massive

35:50

hits. We know so many people are watching us brand

35:52

new. It's also a huge conversation out

35:54

there in the world where we wanted people to say,

35:56

hey, here's multiple videos of your godfather

35:59

vaccines.

35:59

telling the truth when he's finally on the stand, I retweeted

36:02

it. Let's just bring this up. I retweeted

36:04

it and in, you know, over a day, August

36:07

23rd, that went out. I just have

36:09

what is it? Just a few posts, six quotes

36:12

there on the entire thing. One hundred

36:14

and seventy seven reposts. Folks, I

36:16

have two hundred eighty eight thousand

36:18

followers, two hundred eighty eight point seven

36:21

thousand followers. And only six

36:23

people made a comment on that post and

36:25

only one hundred and seventy seven shared four

36:27

hundred eleven likes. Usually used to

36:29

be that when I would post something

36:32

a year ago, certainly when Elon

36:34

Musk was around, you know, it'd be like

36:37

nine thousand, ten thousand, you

36:39

know, two thousand likes and, you

36:41

know, a thousand or two thousand, three

36:43

thousand retweets or

36:45

reposts. And so clearly

36:48

something is happening here where

36:50

as soon as we put out something, only

36:53

a few people are looking at it. I did a

36:55

little test just right before the show. I just

36:57

decided, what if I don't talk about vaccines

36:59

or anything? So I put out a puppy video. I

37:01

decided just this morning, try something,

37:03

enjoy this video of cute puppies. I just want

37:06

to say I'm trying something and, you

37:08

know, it's gotten some views. But more importantly,

37:10

is the comments that I've gotten. I haven't seen these comments.

37:13

This is the first post I've seen from you in in

37:16

my for you feed ever, ever.

37:20

If this factors into your test,

37:22

but this is the first tweet. Oh, I don't know if this factors

37:24

in your test, but this is the first tweet I've ever seen

37:26

from you. And I follow you. Thank

37:29

you for all that you do. So I've

37:31

been out there forever. They've been following me and all they finally

37:33

see this puppy video. This is the first post I've

37:35

seen of yours in months. We're

37:38

being throttled on what was supposed to be

37:40

the last remaining free space

37:43

for free speech on the Internet.

37:45

So Yaccarino is doing your job. Elon,

37:47

wake up, buddy. If you actually did care,

37:49

if you actually did care about freedom of speech,

37:52

your ex is exing

37:55

us out. It's stopping the conversation

37:57

that I thought he wanted to have.

37:59

And we've been down this road before. This reminds

38:02

me of 2016 again, shadow banning, deboosting.

38:05

And she's saying, we're prioritizing brand

38:07

safety. Sorry, $8 a month subscribers

38:09

for your blue check mark. We don't care about

38:11

you. We're prioritizing brand safety. Deamplified

38:15

labeling, demonetizing people. And

38:17

she said, don't worry. Almost gleefully,

38:20

almost half the people are self-censoring. They take

38:23

their own stuff down when we de-label

38:25

or de-amplify them. So this

38:27

is great. Now at the same time,

38:29

the same month I should say, in August here,

38:32

this is all happening right now, YouTube

38:35

updated its misinformation policy,

38:38

its medical misinformation policy. And this is

38:40

what that looked like. They're calling it a long-term

38:42

vision. So this thing isn't going anywhere anytime

38:45

soon. And it says, moving forward, YouTube

38:47

will streamline dozens of

38:49

our existing medical misinformation guidelines to

38:51

fall under three categories, prevention, treatment, and denial.

38:54

These policies will amplify, will

38:56

apply to specific health conditions, treatments,

38:59

and substances where content

39:01

contradicts local health authorities or

39:03

the World Health Organization.

39:06

So YouTube is now part of the World

39:08

Health Organization, at least in policy,

39:10

with WHO says, or local authorities

39:13

say, goes, and nothing else. It

39:15

doesn't matter if you want to have any other types of conversations.

39:18

And it's first, under the prevention

39:20

guideline, it's first guideline. Let's look at what that

39:22

has to say, because that's important. Prevention

39:24

misinformation. We will remove content that

39:27

contradicts health authority

39:29

guidance on the prevention and transmission of

39:32

specific health conditions and on the

39:34

safety and efficacy of approved vaccines.

39:36

So they're going to be the watchdogs on those

39:39

conversations now, which will make people.

39:41

This is like the social media version of

39:43

when you're out having margaritas with your friends on

39:45

the deck overlooking the ocean. And your neighbor

39:48

is madly putting plywood boards all

39:50

over their windows. You're like, what

39:52

do they know that we don't know? I

39:55

mean, it is pretty scary. All of a sudden, these social media

39:57

companies are battening down the hatches.

39:59

preparing for what the p need

40:02

to spread misinformation I

40:07

know. And it's again, i 2019 2020 or 2016.

40:09

This i people

40:15

around the world th open

40:17

conversation, open de people

40:20

to come together a conversations,

40:24

especially And

40:27

so this is an article that

40:29

this is Eric Weinsb professor

40:33

of philosophy at of south

40:35

florida is also and philosophy

40:37

at Universi wrote an article

40:40

titled w dissidents

40:42

now more than conclusion,

40:45

he says this, what

40:47

the evidence shows i things

40:50

are not always as mean

40:53

we should believe ev that

40:55

comes along, but it strongly resist the urge

40:58

them to call them racist their

41:01

claims. Indeed, he

41:02

the Journal

41:04

of the American put

41:07

this

41:08

original investi out

41:10

on august 15th, callin COVID-19

41:14

misinformation o by physicians

41:16

in the U. S find with

41:18

their deep dive major

41:21

themes they identif found

41:23

that physicians wer efficacy

41:26

and effectiveness it's

41:28

incredible. This is there's still

41:30

like this mo

41:32

Sorry, it's sort

41:34

of what I is

41:37

people are calling me a me in saying my universit

41:39

let me in. If I don't get the vaccine, the vaccine d if

41:42

your university believ product that doesn't

41:44

work harm's way is a good

41:46

idea to learn anything

41:48

from th would you ever read

41:51

a med in august

41:53

of 2023 is still talked

41:57

about the effectiv

41:59

is ineffective. God.

42:03

If you like that one, you're gonna like these next three. So

42:05

number two, they said some physicians

42:08

that they looked at, they investigated, were promoting

42:10

medical treatments lacking scientific evidence

42:13

and or US FDA approval. You mean like Ivermectin

42:15

that has science behind it? That the FDA just said

42:17

we're not gonna stop you from taking it in the future or at

42:19

least that's what

42:20

they say on the stand. Doctors really prescribe it, they

42:23

say in court. It says the Department of Justice

42:25

attorney. Number three, here's the best one. They

42:27

found doctors during this time disputing

42:30

mask wearing effectiveness.

42:32

I don't even know

42:34

where to go here. So in the last

42:36

one, unsubstantiated claims about

42:38

the virus origin, this was

42:40

still an ongoing conversation, government lies and

42:42

other conspiracy theories. Let's see how big

42:45

we can get with conspiracy theories. Alright, Jam has done.

42:47

Please just like every copy of you

42:49

Jam just burn it. There's no point. These people

42:51

have no mind.

42:53

Reading this, it's like was this hung on the shelf

42:55

around 2019, 2020 and they just took it off the shelf to

42:58

publish it now. I mean these are outdated, completely

43:01

outdated ideas. This is an embarrassment.

43:04

Ripped out of the dust bin in the middle of the Xerox.

43:06

Wait, what was this? Let's publish this. Who

43:08

published that? Years old. That's

43:11

when we didn't know anything at all.

43:13

So they're saying some doctors actually question the

43:16

effectiveness of masks. Well, let's go into the

43:18

effectiveness of masks. Let's look at what the science says because

43:20

this is a conversation that's now unfortunately

43:22

coming back around again. So we had the Cochrane collaboration.

43:25

This was the most respected,

43:27

independent collaboration of researchers around

43:29

the world. And this was their most up-to-date, 2023

43:32

study. They looked at the

43:35

physical interventions to interrupt or reduce

43:37

the spread of respiratory viruses. This

43:39

was an update of a study. They looked at total

43:41

of 78 studies. So this

43:43

was an analysis and they found this. Concluding,

43:46

wearing masks in the community probably

43:49

makes little or no difference to the outcome of influenza-like

43:52

illness. COVID-19-like illness

43:54

compared to not wearing masks. And they say the same

43:56

thing about laboratory confirmed influenza in

43:58

SARS-CoV-2. infographic

44:00

here that was created with some of the studies they looked

44:02

at. You can see little or no evidence masking

44:05

works. You can see all these studies here, not

44:07

statistically significant, says one study,

44:10

did not significantly differ, lacked

44:12

statistical power. So the

44:15

consensus, there's no scientific consensus

44:17

that masks work. This is complete and

44:20

total lie. And so not

44:22

only is the science showing this, but

44:25

this is a headline that just came out from Epoch

44:28

Times, secret letter to CDC,

44:30

top epidemiologists suggest agency

44:32

misrepresented scientific data to support masking

44:34

narrative. In November of 2021, eight

44:37

top health professionals, one of them was

44:39

Michael Osterholm, someone we've covered on this show

44:41

before, are sending secret behind

44:43

the scenes emails. These people weren't

44:46

brave enough to do this in public. So they were

44:48

sending or maybe they just know these CDC officials

44:51

personally, whatever, they're sending them

44:53

back door emails saying, look,

44:56

the information you have on masking is

44:58

not accurate on your website. You're saying this thing

45:01

stops, it stops the virus,

45:03

it stops the nasal concentration of

45:06

the SARS-CoV-2. You're dangering

45:08

public trust, you're misrepresenting the evidence,

45:11

and you're giving people false hopes that these masks

45:13

are working. You really need to change

45:15

this information on your website. That's the conversation

45:17

that was happening behind the scenes when everyone else was getting

45:19

censored. Now let's look at March 2023.

45:23

A study kind of slipped by us. Why?

45:25

Because no one cared about masks anymore. They

45:27

were off everyone's face. We

45:29

didn't think we were putting them back on. We've

45:32

even had that conversation. Should we cover it? We're

45:34

through it. What difference does it make? People feel like

45:36

they've moved on. So this

45:39

one slipped by.

45:41

Yeah. This really is the study.

45:43

You should take this one. Sign up for the newsletter.

45:46

You'll get this study in your email. Take

45:48

this one. If they try to re-implement

45:50

masks, you take them to study and show them this. Possible

45:53

toxicity of chronic carbon dioxide

45:55

exposure associated with face masks used particularly

45:58

in pregnant women, children, and adolescents. I'm

46:00

going to read a little bit from this, but I have to

46:02

because some of these, some of what they're

46:04

saying is really shocking. It says fresh

46:07

air has around 0.04% CO2

46:10

while wearing masks more than five minutes

46:12

bears a possible chronic exposure to carbon dioxide

46:15

of 1.41% to 3.2% of inhaled air. US

46:20

Navy toxicity experts set the

46:23

exposure limits for submarines carrying

46:25

a female crew to 0.8% CO2

46:28

based on animal studies, which indicated

46:30

an increased risk for stillbirths.

46:32

Additionally, mammals who were chronically

46:35

exposed to a 0.3% CO2, the experimental data demonstrate

46:40

a teratogenicity with irreversible

46:43

neuron damage in the offspring, reduced spatial

46:45

learning caused by brainstem

46:47

neuron apoptosis, that's cell

46:50

death, and reduced circulating levels

46:53

of insulin-like growth factor one.

46:55

Del, it goes on to say this, with significant- Just go

46:57

back, go back. Just so it can burn into people's, I'm

47:00

a visual person. Folks, 0.3%

47:03

is where you can have issues. 0.8% is

47:07

the limit the Navy will put you on a submarine.

47:09

Look at just, remember, 1.4% to 3.2%. Massive,

47:15

massive amounts wearing that

47:18

mask. I just want to make sure that we really

47:20

capture that in our minds. They're not even close.

47:24

Other worlds, when

47:25

we look at the amount of CO2 we're talking about.

47:28

After only five minutes of wearing the mask.

47:30

They go on to say this,

47:33

with significant impact

47:34

on three readout parameters, their morphological,

47:37

functional marker, this chronic 0.3% CO2

47:39

exposure has to be defined as toxic.

47:42

Additional

47:46

data exists on the exposure of chronic 0.3% CO2

47:48

in adolescent mammals, causing neuron

47:52

destruction, which includes less activity,

47:55

increased anxiety, and impaired learning

47:57

and memory. They conclude.

47:59

possible negative impact r extended

48:02

mass mandates, e subgroups,

48:05

circumstantia extended

48:07

mass use may be observations

48:11

of stillber motor

48:14

and overall cognit born

48:16

during the pandemic to

48:19

reconsider mass manda these

48:21

headlines about mas debate

48:25

on should we mask it's

48:28

worth the risk, just

48:29

you gotta start asking

48:32

q what we're doing here. I' brought

48:34

it up because we everything. I think luckl

48:37

watching this show. But w people

48:40

to share. I mean, my

48:42

son, we did a co to mo and

48:46

we even had OSHA say how

48:48

they would have done was

48:51

off the Richter scale types

48:54

of toxic numbers we did

48:56

the experiment we all when you

48:58

see people weari

48:59

to show them this every t world

49:02

is that doing anyth us.

49:05

This is total insanit this

49:07

study saying not on it's

49:10

dangerous, but I jus pop

49:13

across the facebook p for

49:15

everybody just so we around

49:18

it. This is everyth people

49:20

talk about for the and

49:23

the size of these par really these

49:25

masks were o make sure you're not drool you're

49:28

doing surgery on w surgery mass. It's

49:30

all it spit and

49:32

snot, not viruses bacteria.

49:36

Somebody put to animation

49:38

that shows you that

49:40

fit through what is chain

49:43

leak fence of that this

49:46

gets to millions and

50:00

Okay, there it is.

50:21

When

50:24

you see people telling you to wear a mask, you see them

50:26

wearing a mask. It

50:28

is just an absolute example

50:31

of either you are a shill, you're

50:34

a propagandist, or you certainly

50:37

lack information. I won't go as far as saying

50:39

you're not a smart person, you just

50:42

don't know where to find your information, where

50:44

it's going to be so important. This is why it's so important

50:46

for all of you people to start sharing the high wire with

50:48

everyone you know. While everyone's kind of relaxed,

50:50

maybe the tensions are a little bit lower, get

50:53

them tuning in. We got to get this truth into them

50:55

so that we do not comply, so that we

50:57

don't all go away along with this. We

50:59

can't be the minority again. We can't allow

51:01

ourselves to be the minority this time.

51:03

And so the study we just showed said

51:05

that there's circumstantial evidence that masks

51:08

reduce verbal, motor, and cognitive,

51:10

overall cognitive performance in children. So

51:12

then I see these headlines out of the telegraph.

51:14

These are older headlines, but we

51:17

have to connect these. Lockdown, harmed emotional

51:19

development of almost half the children.

51:21

And then this one, CDC data, suicides

51:24

in the US reach all time high in 2022, CDC data shows. They're

51:27

saying it's the highest since the dawn of World War

51:29

II. So just putting that

51:32

perspective there, I mean, obviously some of that

51:34

is the lockdowns of the schools, keeping these kids out of schools,

51:36

but masking them, we have to have this conversation. We

51:39

can't just slap a headline across the

51:41

screen and go, okay, guys, mask up again.

51:44

But let's talk about the vaccine. So we

51:46

have the legislative piece that's

51:48

happening in September. We have the

51:50

censorship from X Twitter platform

51:53

from YouTube happening now in August.

51:56

We have the

51:57

JAMA article saying we're talking about misinformation.

51:59

Now let's look at the booster shot in

52:02

kind of this whole picture of these new virus

52:04

variant headlines. So

52:07

several weeks ago, we saw headlines like this,

52:09

NIH flew jabs in COVID boosters

52:12

to be scrapped for millions. So at

52:14

that time they were saying, like, healthy people don't

52:16

need these things. The government's not going to pay for them for

52:18

you. We'll give them to, we'll pay for them,

52:20

subsidize it for immunocompromised, for the elderly,

52:23

people at risk like that. But the rest of the people,

52:25

it's going to have to go to the market. Let's

52:28

see what kind of market forces are for this vaccine. They're

52:30

going to have to fend for themselves. You'll have to pay out of pocket for

52:32

them for really vaccines that not a lot of people are taking.

52:35

And then here in the US, Dr. Mandy

52:38

Cohen, the CDC director, she

52:40

went on an interview in July

52:44

27th of this year, just last month, and

52:46

said this, CDC likely to recommend

52:48

annual COVID shots similar to flu, director

52:51

says. Well, this was a shock because this

52:53

was way before all the new virus headlines.

52:55

So people were saying, wait a minute, annual

52:58

shot, the pandemic's over.

53:00

We're not taking these shots anyway. Most people are already

53:02

up to date and they have the boosters because

53:05

a new booster is coming out when? At

53:07

the end of September. So at

53:09

that point, when she goes on that interview and

53:11

says that the House Subcommittee on the Coronavirus

53:14

response directly contacted

53:17

her, sent her a letter, House COVID panel requests

53:19

briefing on fall vaccine plans from new

53:22

CDC head. They're basically saying, look,

53:24

what you're doing, what's would mark a significant

53:26

change in federal policy and guidance. We

53:28

need all the evidence, all the emails and communications of

53:31

why you are even speaking like this,

53:33

which is great. So it's great these agents

53:35

that are getting out ahead of this. But from my understanding,

53:38

ACIP has just announced that September

53:41

12th will be a new regulatory

53:43

meeting and what are they going to talk about? COVID

53:45

vaccines. So we're going to keep an eye

53:47

on that. These things are happening very fast now.

53:50

So

53:51

this is

53:52

this is the headline on August 14th. So

53:55

last week we saw new COVID

53:57

vaccines are on the way as Uris variant.

53:59

again, the fear headlines

54:02

weren't quite there yet. They're just saying we got this new vaccine,

54:04

there's some variants. And then we go in this article, it's

54:07

very telling to look back just a week compared

54:09

to now. It says basically for

54:11

people giving these shots, they will be fighting

54:14

declining concern about the virus as

54:16

well as fatigue and skepticism about the merits of this vaccine. Kaiser

54:19

Family Foundation director of survey methodology Ashley Kurzinger

54:21

said. She goes on to say, public

54:24

health officials, if they want to see a majority

54:26

of adults get these annual vaccines, they're

54:28

going to have to make a case, make

54:31

the case to the American public that COVID

54:33

isn't over and it still poses a risk

54:35

to them, Kurzinger said. Well, that's interesting.

54:38

But then it goes on even further. COVID-19

54:41

vaccine makers have pared back

54:43

expectations for this fall's vaccination campaign

54:45

with Pfizer, the largest maker of mRNA

54:48

shots with BioNTech, recently warning that

54:50

it might need to cut jobs if

54:52

it does not do well. Its biggest rival, Moderna,

54:55

conceded demand could be as few as 50

54:58

million shots. And, Dell, let's

55:00

look at the headlines now. COVID

55:02

vaccine stocks jump as new

55:04

variants emerge ahead of

55:08

fall shot rollout. So

55:10

it looks like they got

55:13

that demand they wanted just by

55:15

the headlines. And then if you go to

55:17

sub-stack, you're getting people speaking a little more

55:19

freely here, as Jordan Satchel, time for

55:21

your eighth dose. Pfizer

55:23

says latest booster won't be tested

55:25

on humans, but it works great on mice, just like the rest of the boosters.

55:28

They're only testing them on mice. And then

55:30

if you go to NPR, it

55:31

says coronavirus questions and answers, is it

55:34

wiser to get a booster now or

55:36

wait for a new fall booster? And it says in here, the

55:38

minimum of four months is based on theory.

55:41

However, and not on study, says Dr. Aaron Glatt, Chief of

55:43

Infectious Diseases at Mount Sinai, South

55:46

Nassau in West Hampstead, New York. People

55:48

who were immunocompromised got the booster not as well,

55:51

along with guidance to talk to their doctor about

55:53

additional boosters two months apart. So

55:56

if I'm reading that right, they're saying, look, as

55:58

long as you're getting these boosters two months,

55:59

once apart keep on shooting because

56:02

that's all

56:03

you know as we look at this you know

56:06

I keep thinking about the interview we did last

56:08

week with doctor Peter mccollough and geared

56:10

and Bosch in you know for what anyone

56:12

thinks you know we're just putting it all out

56:14

in front of you, I'm not you know selling one

56:17

idea or another we are we are

56:19

looking into everything right now as we

56:21

move forward but geared said something that stuck

56:23

with me and it was talking about

56:26

sort of the fact that the

56:28

vaccine those have been vaccinated at a higher

56:30

risk he believes he mentioned that they should

56:32

be taking antiviral starting immediately

56:35

he is afraid that the virus

56:37

is about to mutate and get around

56:39

the protections of that vaccine which

56:42

can be very problematic for a lot of people

56:44

but when I read that they say you know one

56:46

of you know one a year is the the new

56:49

booster protocol unless you're immune

56:51

compromised unless you're immune suppressed

56:54

and I think essentially what geared

56:56

was saying if it's true everyone that

56:59

got the vaccine is immune suppressed their bodies

57:01

are not reacting to this virus correctly

57:04

and we know that every time you get a vaccine

57:06

that's winning faster and faster

57:09

even Dana carvey and we you know we played

57:11

the whole joke where they said you know a

57:13

new booster every hour in the next 15 minutes

57:15

it will work you better get to your car, but it's

57:17

not funny that's what's happening but for people that didn't

57:20

catch it just as what given Bosch

57:22

had to say again as we sort of look at this through

57:24

another lens.

57:25

My concern is

57:27

that the protection

57:31

that the vaccine is and of course

57:33

I'm not talking about all the vaccine because I've

57:35

even launched recently a video message

57:37

where was clearly saying people who got the one shot

57:40

don't worry you're not prime so one shot

57:42

you know one you're probably exactly into

57:44

the damage. People who got clearly

57:47

the infection before they got vaccinated

57:49

don't worry. I think they may you

57:51

know to some extent immunity may be compromised,

57:54

but they are certainly having innate immunity

57:56

that they can further develop and they

57:58

got prime it becomes very. when

58:01

you got vaccinated, especially with

58:03

the mRNA vaccines, early on,

58:05

before you got infected, and that

58:07

is primarily the case of all

58:09

the vulnerable people. Those

58:12

were vaccinated first. The elderly people with underlying

58:14

diseases, people who were immune

58:16

suppressed, etc. I'm

58:19

afraid these people will be without

58:21

any of their adaptive immune response. I continue

58:24

saying it's not true to say, oh,

58:26

there will be a variant that is highly, highly

58:28

virulent. No, this

58:30

variant will have

58:33

the capacity to overcome

58:36

the inhibitory

58:39

capacity of the non-neutralizing

58:41

antibodies to prevent severe disease in

58:44

the vaccinees. So it's not

58:46

that it's like this super deadly, it's not going to be super

58:48

deadly to the unvaccinated, who have

58:50

a perfectly working immune system. I recognize

58:52

that. I'm fighting that. It's just going to be

58:55

those whose bodies will not be able to mount

58:57

the proper defense. And they're going to take a virus that

58:59

isn't necessarily, but it's going to be deadly

59:01

for them. Exactly.

59:03

You know, there's always a lot of controversy

59:06

around anybody like Gert that we've brought on. He

59:09

is still working on future

59:11

innate vaccine programs for

59:13

the innate immune system. But

59:15

he comes from WHO. He worked for WHO.

59:18

He thinks like they do, and which

59:20

makes me always think more, have these conversations. Are

59:22

we getting a site if he thinks that,

59:25

that we potentially have put everyone

59:27

that's been vaccinated at risk, what

59:29

would our government do? What would the governments

59:31

of the world that have scientists just like Gert,

59:33

if they know the same thing he's saying, but

59:35

aren't telling us, what would that look like? Would

59:38

they say, well, we better lock down, we better met, don't tell

59:40

anybody why. But the truth is, is we've

59:42

ruined everybody's immune system. The common

59:44

cold could kill them this winter. I mean, I don't know.

59:46

I don't know. And that's why I find

59:48

Gert fascinating. Is he giving us a

59:50

vision into what the sort of other side, that

59:53

pro-vaccine science

59:55

space is really thinking and knows about

59:57

what they've done here? Certainly. they

1:00:00

must recognize that every time

1:00:02

they give someone a vaccine, it's lasting for

1:00:04

a shorter and shorter period of time, that the vaccinator

1:00:07

now being hospitalized at higher levels than

1:00:09

anybody else, and that

1:00:11

it appears that when

1:00:14

they're being vaccinated, it's increasing their

1:00:16

risk of being infected. All

1:00:18

of these things, the science is out there. I mean, are

1:00:21

they just totally daft and have

1:00:23

no concept of this is going on, or

1:00:25

do they know it and they're trying to cover the tracks

1:00:27

for the greatest scientific error that's

1:00:29

ever

1:00:29

been made? I mean, who knows? We

1:00:32

don't know what they're thinking, but all of

1:00:34

it is on the table here at the High Wire.

1:00:36

Right. And so, you have the public

1:00:39

declining interest in the vaccine. People concerned about

1:00:41

long-term safety issues, myocarditis. Pfizer

1:00:43

is saying, we're going to cut jobs if we don't get these vaccines

1:00:46

out. Moderna, pairing back expectations.

1:00:50

They need a new group,

1:00:52

a new subpopulation to really boost this

1:00:54

up. And this comes in February, 2023,

1:00:56

we reported on this. CDC

1:00:58

adds COVID-19 vaccinations to immunization

1:01:01

schedule for children and adults. What's happening now, school

1:01:03

starting. And remember, we covered this

1:01:05

in 2021 when they were trying to really

1:01:08

beat the drum and scare people then, because

1:01:10

they were trying to get an emergency use authorization

1:01:13

for the vaccine in kids that eventually happened

1:01:15

in October. But we covered this in May

1:01:17

of 2021, American Academy of Pediatrics

1:01:20

showing the data, the actual mortality rates,

1:01:22

percentage of child cases resulting in death

1:01:24

on that far right column, 0.01%, 0.02%, nothing going on there,

1:01:26

essentially. And so, we

1:01:32

have this conversation coming into

1:01:34

the fold too now with these new variants, these schools

1:01:37

can possibly start green lighting this thing.

1:01:39

And remember,

1:01:40

the issues for

1:01:42

COVID for kids, it's kind of

1:01:45

a non-starter looking at those

1:01:47

numbers. And

1:01:48

we have Rochelle Walensky, the former CDC

1:01:50

director, she was asked directly in a hearing,

1:01:53

why did you add this to the childhood immunization

1:01:56

schedule, the recommendation? Did

1:01:58

you look at the myocarditis? Like show me.

1:01:59

the science, what was going on? Listen to her answer.

1:02:02

This is really important. The

1:02:03

question I have is in October of 2022, the

1:02:05

advisory committee broke public health norms

1:02:08

by deciding to add the COVID-19 vaccine,

1:02:10

including those under emergency use authorization

1:02:13

to the childhood immunization

1:02:15

schedule that includes the bivalent booster

1:02:17

shots.

1:02:18

Obviously they're not a mandate, but they of course

1:02:20

are largely followed. So I

1:02:22

mean how do you view the cost benefit of scheduling

1:02:25

brand-new bivalent booster shots for this age

1:02:27

group? You know considering the children are very low

1:02:30

risk from COVID-19, 75% of children have

1:02:32

already caught the virus and the vaccine

1:02:34

is known to do pretty little to prevent

1:02:37

transmission in this age group.

1:02:39

The important thing I think that's really that

1:02:41

we need to recognize is the reason that ACIP

1:02:44

recommended and CDC put forward getting

1:02:46

the COVID-19 vaccine on the pediatric

1:02:48

schedule is not it was only

1:02:51

because it would it was the only way it could be covered

1:02:53

in our vaccines for children's program. It was the only

1:02:55

way that our undershared uninsured children would

1:02:57

be able to have access to the vaccines.

1:03:00

That was the reason to put it on the schedule. It can't

1:03:02

be eligible for vaccines for children's program

1:03:05

for to be available to the undershared,

1:03:08

unless it is on that schedule. That was the reason

1:03:10

to put it there.

1:03:11

I just keep to always be closing.

1:03:14

Boy, she closed on that. No, it really

1:03:16

isn't about your kids. This is just about the underserved

1:03:18

and those that wouldn't be insured so that

1:03:21

they could get a product that they would never ever

1:03:23

freakin need that doesn't do anything for them. But what's

1:03:25

this on the schedule? Guess what?

1:03:27

Every moron across America

1:03:30

running a school system is going to say, oh,

1:03:32

wait, look, and every doctor, by

1:03:34

the way, whether or not it's actually

1:03:36

mandated to go to school will just add

1:03:38

it as you walk through. If you don't know what you're doing

1:03:40

and you hand your kid over, oh, I just gave

1:03:42

him COVID. It was a part of the recommended schedule. You didn't

1:03:45

want the recommended schedule. We know where this goes.

1:03:47

She knows where this goes. CDC knows where this

1:03:49

goes. Our Children across

1:03:51

America are about to be poisoned for

1:03:53

no reason whatsoever.

1:03:55

Another way to look at that is it's a marketing decision,

1:03:58

a product distribution decision. I

1:04:00

called you last week because I saw some writing

1:04:02

on the wall that was concerning and during the last three years We

1:04:05

know that media organizations were

1:04:06

handed scripts completely divorced

1:04:09

from reality The facts that

1:04:11

were used to dominate these news cycles

1:04:13

We have been questioned our questioned

1:04:16

these dominant narratives that could never be touched

1:04:18

have fallen and as you turn on your TVs

1:04:21

now I ask everybody to just sit there and

1:04:23

ask themselves.

1:04:24

What are you seeing when you see stuff that looks

1:04:26

like this?

1:04:28

Covid is making a comeback this summer.

1:04:30

Covid cases are on the rise again

1:04:32

across the US across the country

1:04:34

Covid Hospitalizations jumped more than 14%

1:04:37

in the most recent week hospitalizations

1:04:41

up 60% in the last month according to the

1:04:43

CDC a fast-spreading new sub

1:04:45

variant of the coronavirus is raising concerns

1:04:48

among experts globally

1:04:49

the main driver of this is

1:04:51

a variant that's relatively newer to the scene

1:04:54

eg 5 It's easier to give

1:04:56

and get so that makes it kind

1:04:58

of easier to pass along the World Health Organization And

1:05:00

the CDC came out saying they were tracking

1:05:03

it closely a mask can be your best friend

1:05:05

Keep it private back in time. We

1:05:07

have them in our pockets in our coats and our backpacks

1:05:10

time to bring them out again Especially

1:05:12

as the school season starts. We don't

1:05:14

want to see kids missing school or things

1:05:17

that we could have prevented

1:05:18

One Atlanta College is now reinstating

1:05:20

a mask mandate for the next two weeks

1:05:23

all students and employees Must

1:05:25

wear a mask unless alone in their

1:05:27

office There will be social distancing

1:05:30

and no large student gatherings

1:05:32

upstate University Hospital putting a face

1:05:34

mask policy back in place So

1:05:37

this new requirement is for staff visitors

1:05:39

and patients in clinical areas of the

1:05:41

hospital Universal Covid testing is

1:05:43

also now mandatory for admitted patients

1:05:46

You should wear masks in crowded

1:05:49

areas, especially during a search. Covid

1:05:51

at home testing kits back in high demand

1:05:53

CVS is tracking uptick in purchases So

1:05:56

is Walgreens a spokesperson telling us quote

1:05:58

we are seeing greater demand in this category

1:05:59

nationwide which may cause temporary

1:06:02

isolated shortages. Stock up on

1:06:04

at-home tests. They do cover that new strength.

1:06:07

Keep a mask handy in case you're in a crowded

1:06:09

place and most of all get your shots. Your

1:06:12

best chance of staying healthy. A reminder

1:06:14

that COVID never went away. Didn't.

1:06:18

COVID never went away. I mean

1:06:20

that's what we've done to ourselves. Unbelievable.

1:06:23

You're right. Wow. And to think,

1:06:25

you know, last Friday you were predicting this. You

1:06:27

know, I get, we missed it by that much but

1:06:29

here we are. Here we are with

1:06:31

a lot more detail too.

1:06:34

And looking at that, masks are a physical

1:06:36

symbol. They're essentially a walking billboard with

1:06:38

really more psychological value than scientific

1:06:41

evidence backing it. So when we

1:06:43

see those comments and then headlines

1:06:46

after headlines that look like this, companies,

1:06:49

schools, Kaiser Permanente reinstates

1:06:51

COVID-19 mask mandate, Lionsgate,

1:06:54

major movie studio reinstates mask mandate,

1:06:56

effective immediately, Georgia College reinstates

1:06:59

mask mandate and physical distancing, Morris

1:07:01

Brown College and Atlanta College reinstate

1:07:04

mask mandate. Let's look at the

1:07:06

numbers here because

1:07:07

this looks pretty scary if you're seeing this for the first time, especially

1:07:10

after, you know, let's say... Something big must

1:07:12

be going on. Something big must

1:07:14

be going on. The public's traumatized. Remember they

1:07:16

were drilled to accept lockdown so they

1:07:19

are being really pushed into this. Let's look at the

1:07:21

cases chart. This is all world data,

1:07:23

our world data. This is Europe, Israel,

1:07:26

US, China, India. You can see all on the

1:07:28

right side there.

1:07:30

Not much going on, especially

1:07:32

not much going on from the highs that

1:07:34

we've experienced and seen.

1:07:36

Let's look at... Okay, those are just

1:07:38

cases, whatever, but what about mortality? Because

1:07:41

this thing is clearly killing people, right? Let's

1:07:43

look at the death chart. Not much going

1:07:45

on again. Still not much going on. Nowhere

1:07:48

near what we saw in the past in 2020, 2021. Let's

1:07:52

go to the US, CDC. We're talking

1:07:54

about hospitalizations chart.

1:07:56

Still a little uptick there.

1:07:58

Nothing compared to those...

1:07:59

previous upticks.

1:08:02

And then the death charts from the CDC actually

1:08:05

goes down. There's nothing going on.

1:08:07

So we have to question why are these headlines pushing

1:08:09

fear in unison? Why are they pushing remasking

1:08:11

when their effectiveness is not supported by

1:08:13

science?

1:08:14

How far are they willing to take at this time?

1:08:17

And what are people getting? It's a different world than

1:08:19

three years ago. People are awake.

1:08:21

What are we gonna do? What

1:08:23

an amazing report Jeffrey. Just

1:08:26

so much detail and we have all seen those

1:08:28

headlines. It's why we're seeing so many people posting

1:08:31

about it. I will not comply. But to

1:08:33

see all of those things lining up,

1:08:35

clearly we need to wake up everyone

1:08:38

we know right now so that

1:08:40

they recognize sooner than later

1:08:42

we have the majority. This isn't happening again.

1:08:44

We will vote you out. We will not

1:08:47

make we will not allow this to happen again. We're

1:08:49

too intelligent. We're not that stupid.

1:08:51

And a lot of that's thanks to you Jeffrey.

1:08:53

Amazing report. Thank you so much.

1:08:56

You're welcome. All right.

1:08:59

Well you know when you're watching

1:09:01

all of this and I want to make something clear

1:09:03

here that on the high wire

1:09:05

I've said it before I'm

1:09:08

incredibly curious as a person I

1:09:10

you know we have built a team of

1:09:12

incredibly curious scientists

1:09:15

and lawyers. We are investigating

1:09:18

everything that we see out there. We don't

1:09:20

know that everything is going to add up

1:09:22

or that is going to prove to be true. I know

1:09:25

Geert Vanden Bausch and Peter McCullough. Those

1:09:27

two very different scientists use different

1:09:29

perspectives. Many of

1:09:31

you would say Geert Vanden Bausch is planning on making

1:09:34

a vaccine. It's true. Why would he be on the high

1:09:36

wire? I said well because I think he

1:09:38

is making some interesting points and some

1:09:40

of them I agree with. Some I'm not sure

1:09:43

but I'm a person that likes to know. I'd like to at

1:09:45

least know what everyone's thinking. If I'm sitting at a table

1:09:47

I want to know what does everyone think on

1:09:49

a topic and then I can make up my own mind.

1:09:51

I don't want anybody hiding some

1:09:54

part of the story from me because

1:09:56

I consider myself to be fairly

1:09:58

intelligent. What I'm really good at is it at is taking

1:10:01

in a lot of information and coming up with my

1:10:03

own thought. I cannot have my own clear

1:10:05

thought if I'm robbed of a perspective.

1:10:08

So for some of you that may have difficulty

1:10:10

with some of the people that we interview out there, I

1:10:12

want to let you know. Just because I'm interviewing

1:10:15

them doesn't mean I absolutely agree with

1:10:17

them. And I know that this audience

1:10:19

comes from many different perspectives.

1:10:21

Some of you are just ultra,

1:10:23

you know, natural health and in

1:10:25

nature. And some of you don't even believe

1:10:28

a virus exists. That's okay. But

1:10:30

what we mostly talk about here is you don't want

1:10:32

to be injected with products that are going to poison

1:10:35

you that look like they may be bio

1:10:37

weapons themselves. You don't want to be getting CO2 in

1:10:39

mass. So we're there for everybody.

1:10:41

But one of the things that Geert

1:10:44

pointed out last week, this is something

1:10:46

that I know to be scientifically

1:10:49

true. And whether or not he works for

1:10:51

the CIA or he's just a rogue

1:10:54

scientist up in Belgium. I see all of your

1:10:56

comments out there. What

1:10:58

I will point out is the things that we should be nervous

1:11:00

about. And this is one of the things he said

1:11:02

last week and in all the things this is what stuck

1:11:05

with me through the week.

1:11:07

Take a listen to this one more time. There

1:11:09

is so much focus on what happened

1:11:11

at the beginning. Whereas

1:11:14

nobody seems to realize

1:11:17

that the huge gain of

1:11:19

function experiment that

1:11:22

we are doing in the population

1:11:24

on the very human species is

1:11:27

the mass vaccination.

1:11:28

Who has manipulated the virus and who is responsible?

1:11:31

For me, this is more political. The real biological

1:11:34

issue is the mass vaccination

1:11:36

experiment that has completely changed

1:11:38

the behavior of the virus. Why do you think

1:11:40

that WHO, CDC have been changing the definitions

1:11:44

all the time? Because the behavior

1:11:47

of the virus has been changing, right? Look,

1:11:49

we started out from a virus that had moderate

1:11:52

infective infections in it to viruses

1:11:55

that are now highly infectious. That is a

1:11:57

kind of change of function,

1:11:58

right? More and more. infectious when you

1:12:00

know it becomes more virulent. And that is at large

1:12:03

scale, right, on the very human

1:12:05

species.

1:12:07

From my perspective, I grew

1:12:09

up, you know, reading

1:12:12

science, doing the same science class as you

1:12:14

had. I worked at the Doctor's Television show

1:12:17

on CBS where I got to read a lot

1:12:19

of medical journals. And this concept of evolution

1:12:22

is a prominent concept when

1:12:24

we talk about how things move in nature.

1:12:27

What Jared has been talking about from the beginning is

1:12:29

that viruses and bacteria evolve. One

1:12:31

of the things I want to say to every person I see wearing

1:12:33

a mask in an airport is you do

1:12:36

realize that you're just arresting your development.

1:12:38

If that thing actually works, luckily for them it doesn't,

1:12:41

but if it actually works,

1:12:41

you're blocking your evolution,

1:12:44

meaning you're alongside a virus

1:12:46

and particles and all the things we live in this world. We have

1:12:48

this amazing immune system that keeps

1:12:52

evolving with everything around us so

1:12:54

that we are fit to live on this

1:12:56

planet. If you wear that mask, it's like

1:12:58

atrophying all of your muscles, never working

1:13:00

out, not being a part of your

1:13:03

environment. At some point, you may

1:13:05

catch up with this. It's going to catch you further

1:13:07

down the road and maybe it's a more deadly

1:13:09

version for you and not anybody else.

1:13:11

But think

1:13:11

about what Garrett said here, and this is

1:13:14

true. The vaccine doesn't stop transmission,

1:13:16

which means it's turning every single

1:13:18

person that got the vaccine into an incubator.

1:13:21

And when we think about gain of function, this is what

1:13:23

the question was that you didn't hear. Do

1:13:25

you believe this was escape from a lab

1:13:27

and gain of function research caused this thing?

1:13:30

And Garrett's basically saying, what difference does it make?

1:13:33

Where it came from, what we're doing

1:13:35

to it is far more terrifying. If

1:13:38

you imagine gain of function is taking a virus

1:13:40

that maybe infects bats and

1:13:41

seeing if you can get it to infect a human

1:13:43

cell in a petri dish and then see if you can keep

1:13:46

changing things to make it gain functions

1:13:48

from petri dish to petri dish, how many petri

1:13:50

dishes do you think they use to make something gain function?

1:13:53

10, 20, maybe 100? I

1:13:55

don't know, 1,000 if they really focused

1:13:57

on it. And what we've done is turn over.

1:13:59

billion people into

1:14:02

Petri dishes for viruses that

1:14:04

have no immune systems now that can't fight

1:14:07

anything off.

1:14:08

And what I asked myself and I really I honestly

1:14:11

I don't know the answer to this

1:14:13

but when I look at what's happening when I see

1:14:15

them telling us to all wear masks again

1:14:18

is it just a giant CyOp

1:14:21

experiment to control our minds? Maybe

1:14:23

I don't know. Or is

1:14:25

it possible that they're afraid

1:14:27

of what they know to be true? We just ruined the

1:14:29

immune systems of hundreds of millions

1:14:32

of Americans and billions of people worldwide.

1:14:35

They may be vulnerable to dying

1:14:37

from a common cold right now. What

1:14:39

would they do if that was the reality

1:14:42

that sunk into them?

1:14:43

I'm not saying that is a reality but what we

1:14:45

are saying is we have messed

1:14:48

with nature. We have certainly

1:14:50

if you believe in the Bible we

1:14:52

have definitely eaten of the tree of the knowledge

1:14:54

of good and evil. We were promised we will surely

1:14:57

die if we think we're smart enough

1:14:59

to start messing with viruses and bacteria

1:15:01

and turning human beings into walking

1:15:03

petri dishes and gain of function

1:15:05

science experiments. It's the world we

1:15:08

live in. We're gonna be covering all

1:15:10

parts of it here on the high wire. I'm not

1:15:12

selling any part of it to you.

1:15:13

I think you should know what everyone's saying

1:15:16

and then you make up your own mind. Here

1:15:19

on the high wire I am NOT trying

1:15:21

to tell you what to think. I'm trying

1:15:23

to tell you how to think, how to research.

1:15:25

I'm showing you where we're finding our information.

1:15:28

It takes a lot of work. We have an international

1:15:31

team of scientists that are advising

1:15:33

us. They're advising Jeffrey that are handing

1:15:36

him documents where he's saying, whoa Dell

1:15:38

hold on a second. I'm a little worried. A

1:15:40

couple of things puzzle pieces are adding up here

1:15:43

and I want you to think about where we're

1:15:45

going in the future. Hopefully this all falls

1:15:47

apart but once you see that script

1:15:49

running in your mainstream news, that

1:15:52

news agency you are funding, you're

1:15:54

funding it with your cable bill, you're funding

1:15:56

it when you turn on. Ask yourself

1:15:59

what is going to go up against that. What is going

1:16:01

to stop this takeover again? We

1:16:03

need more news agencies that tell the truth.

1:16:06

We need them to be able to advertise and be on

1:16:08

billboards like the high wire. We

1:16:11

are up against the wall. We are doing everything

1:16:14

we spend every single dollar

1:16:16

our nonprofit brings in. More

1:16:18

than most, more than, I think more than 90%

1:16:21

of what we do goes to the work that we do, to the

1:16:24

legal cases, to bringing out the truth, to

1:16:26

education. We are not fat.

1:16:28

We are putting it all on the line and

1:16:30

you decide, can we file another

1:16:33

case? We've got some amazing legal cases

1:16:35

that we think could just break

1:16:37

this things back. They could go all the way to the Supreme

1:16:39

Court,

1:16:40

but we can't do it if we can't say

1:16:43

yes.

1:16:44

I need you to help me

1:16:46

be able to say yes when Aaron

1:16:48

Seery calls me tomorrow and says, I think

1:16:51

we've got the case. I need

1:16:53

you to have me, give me the ability

1:16:55

to say yes the next time we want to fly

1:16:58

a scientist in that's got a truth that you need

1:17:00

to hear.

1:17:01

You make this possible.

1:17:03

This is the problem. Twitter is now sponsored.

1:17:06

They are now protecting their

1:17:08

sponsors, protecting the

1:17:10

brand. The high wire is the only

1:17:13

place. There's no ads running across

1:17:15

your screen right now. We're not letting YouTube

1:17:17

or anybody try and give us money. Nobody.

1:17:19

We are protecting no brands right now.

1:17:22

We're one of the only ones free

1:17:25

to speak our minds. So

1:17:27

please, if you're watching this show

1:17:29

on a constant basis, ask

1:17:32

yourself what you paid in your cable bill to fund

1:17:34

the lies that are brainwashing, hypnotizing

1:17:37

everyone you know and say, geez,

1:17:40

if everyone's gonna be hypnotized, probably better

1:17:42

that be the high wire.

1:17:44

I don't know how they hypnotize, but at least we'll

1:17:46

do our best to wake people up. I need

1:17:48

your help.

1:17:49

So become a recurring donor. Go to thehighwire.com.

1:17:52

Just click on donate to ICANN. You

1:17:54

are changing the world every

1:17:57

time you click these buttons. If you spend

1:17:59

the next minute of your life,

1:18:01

you can make a difference in someone's life. We

1:18:03

can stop a law. We can stop,

1:18:06

you know, the removal of your

1:18:08

religious exemption taking place in

1:18:10

states all across this country. We're asking for $23 a month, if you

1:18:12

can, but

1:18:14

honestly, $1, $2, whatever. Why

1:18:18

did you just, you know, why did you feel

1:18:20

what it feels like to be an active participant

1:18:22

in the evolution and

1:18:25

the waking up of the minds of the world?

1:18:27

That's what you can do today. We're

1:18:29

going to make it easy. All you have to do is text 72022, type

1:18:33

in the word donate, and we'll have

1:18:35

it clicking easy right there.

1:18:38

One thumb can do all the work to help us make

1:18:40

a difference and launch a couple of really

1:18:42

spectacular legal cases. I hope I get to

1:18:44

tell you about, tell you that we won a year

1:18:47

or so from now because you

1:18:50

made it possible. The high

1:18:52

wire is always an important tool

1:18:54

for you. As I've said, I

1:18:56

want you to sign up to the newsletter. If

1:18:58

you're not signed up to the newsletter, what happens? If

1:19:01

they run this pandemic again, if

1:19:03

they decide to lock us down again, you have to imagine

1:19:05

they know we're a threat. They know the high wire is a threat. What

1:19:07

are they going to do? What are they going to try to do to stop us? If

1:19:10

I have your email, I'll let you know where you can

1:19:12

find us. If they try to shut us down, we

1:19:14

will always find somewhere else to,

1:19:16

you know, put up a tent and tell our truth,

1:19:19

but you need to be able to know where we are

1:19:21

and we need to be able to help you do that. All

1:19:23

you have to do right now is just sign up to our newsletters

1:19:25

so that we're always in contact with you, no matter how

1:19:28

crazy this world gets. Remember,

1:19:31

this is the place where all of the

1:19:33

best scientists in the world that were being censored

1:19:35

by every other news organization, this

1:19:38

is where they came to speak their truth. We

1:19:40

brought them into our studio. We met

1:19:42

them out there in the world and thousands

1:19:45

of you turn into hundreds of thousands of you, turn

1:19:47

into millions, and God knows

1:19:49

that they try to do this again. Tens

1:19:52

of millions of people will be tuning in because

1:19:54

this is what the high wire is all about.

1:19:57

Our answer to

1:19:59

it...

1:20:00

Network. You know them as I

1:20:02

can. The High Wire and I can

1:20:05

fighting on your behalf. The High

1:20:07

Wire, you know Del Big Tree. Thank

1:20:09

you to all the individuals who are watching

1:20:12

on the High Wire across the world.

1:20:14

Without further ado from the

1:20:16

High Wire, friend of mine, a friend of yours,

1:20:19

Mr. Del Big Tree. We did

1:20:22

it! Here we are!

1:20:24

President accounted for!

1:20:26

You were at the doctor's show.

1:20:28

You

1:20:32

were being forbidden to talk about what you

1:20:34

were seeing and what you knew needed to be talked about.

1:20:36

So you went out and created the High Wire. Wherever

1:20:38

you are out there in the world,

1:20:40

how about we all step out onto the High

1:20:43

Wire. When the

1:20:45

whole pandemic started, this was really

1:20:47

where I got my knowledge from. I saw all

1:20:50

the scientists, all the doctors. Religiously,

1:20:52

you know, every Thursday we need that encouragement from

1:20:54

each other. You allowed a lot of us to take that

1:20:56

dive into the science and really get immersed in it.

1:20:59

So thank you. This is why I love watching

1:21:01

your show. This is why I love watching you. It's

1:21:03

a comprehensive overview, but it's also

1:21:06

built and supported with detail and with evidence.

1:21:09

CNN and Anderson Cooper has been reaching

1:21:11

out to us and all the other mainstream guys,

1:21:14

but I need to share my side

1:21:15

of the story and I know that there's only one

1:21:17

person who's going to do it right and

1:21:19

that's Del Big Tree. You guys are the mainstream

1:21:21

media now. They're done. Yeah, it's over. The

1:21:24

media, like the High Wire and

1:21:26

Del Big Tree, not only reporting

1:21:28

the truth every week, but also

1:21:31

fighting in court

1:21:32

for justice. I think what

1:21:34

we have in common is the passion for the truth, right?

1:21:37

I see you as somebody who's investigating,

1:21:40

you know, what are the real facts and

1:21:43

data. You are one of the beacons

1:21:45

for all of us. When things get really dark,

1:21:47

I turn on the high wire. It lifts me back up

1:21:49

every time. Del, your confidence is so

1:21:52

inspiring. Thank you

1:21:53

for doing all that you do, fighting the good fight. Del,

1:21:55

I really appreciate your hard work and you team. Thank

1:21:57

you for giving us a voice. I appreciate you so

1:21:59

much. It's an honor to be here, thank you. What can

1:22:02

we create when we connect together? Good to

1:22:04

be with you, Del. You too, brother. Thank you for your

1:22:06

continued support and your friendship, Del. We're just grateful

1:22:08

for the chance to talk to you and for

1:22:10

your support and interest in our latest

1:22:13

declaration. It's great to be on your show and thank

1:22:15

you for everything you've been doing in terms

1:22:17

of providing the truth to people regarding

1:22:19

COVID and the vaccines.

1:22:20

You've been in a war zone of your own.

1:22:22

It's a really lethal war zone, right?

1:22:25

When you get into the realm of Big Pharma and all

1:22:27

that money that is at stake there,

1:22:29

all the power players.

1:22:31

This is a war for survival, survival

1:22:33

of the soul of humanity. Ultimately,

1:22:35

it's going to have to take people ready to sacrifice

1:22:37

everything in order to bring the truth to

1:22:39

the world.

1:22:40

I've been one of the silent people with injured

1:22:42

children who have hidden behind you, rooting

1:22:45

you on for years, and it's

1:22:47

time that I stand beside you.

1:22:49

We're standing up and we're fighting

1:22:51

for you. We're fighting

1:22:53

for those who cannot fight for themselves.

1:22:56

That is what the truth is all about. That is what

1:22:58

being alive is all about. And that's

1:23:00

what the High Wire is about. I'll see

1:23:02

you next week.

1:23:11

Just want to give a shout out to everybody

1:23:13

that has been sponsoring and making

1:23:15

this incredible experiment of the High Wire possible.

1:23:18

We've done with a little social media

1:23:20

platform what I dreamed

1:23:22

to do when I worked on CBS and

1:23:25

on the Doctors' Television show. And frankly, we

1:23:27

have more viewers than most of the episodes they

1:23:29

ever did on CBS. So I want to thank

1:23:31

you for all of your support. I

1:23:33

want to take this conversation just a little bit deeper.

1:23:37

Hopefully with

1:23:39

knowledge there is power and the ability to understand

1:23:41

where we've been helps us guide

1:23:43

where we're going. And to

1:23:45

that avail, I read a brilliant article

1:23:48

by a fantastic doctor, Dr. Alvin

1:23:50

Moss, rethinking the ethics of the COVID-19

1:23:53

pandemic lockdowns. I don't

1:23:55

know if he was psychic. I don't know if he needed

1:23:57

to get this out right away because he knew we were

1:23:59

going to...

1:23:59

do this again, but

1:24:02

it's my honor and pleasure to be joined right now by Dr.

1:24:05

Alvin Moss. Dr.

1:24:07

Moss, it's really a pleasure to see

1:24:09

you again. How are you doing? Thank

1:24:12

you, Del. Pleasure to see you too. This

1:24:15

is a brilliant article, and frankly,

1:24:17

what I love about it is there's so

1:24:20

many of us that have

1:24:22

friends that may be just on

1:24:25

the verge of being able to ask a

1:24:27

few of the right questions that

1:24:29

are still reticent. We don't know how to approach

1:24:32

them. They're looking at us like we're conspiracy

1:24:34

theorists or something, but this article

1:24:36

is so brilliant. It just really

1:24:40

lays out all the details

1:24:42

of what any decent

1:24:44

doctor or scientist should have taken

1:24:46

away from the lockdowns and how

1:24:48

they affect our lives, the numbers,

1:24:51

whether it's worth it. But to begin

1:24:53

with, why did you

1:24:55

decide to write this article

1:24:57

now? Well,

1:24:59

if I can just give you a little context,

1:25:02

Del, in 2022,

1:25:04

I direct a statewide ethics committee network,

1:25:07

and our ethics committee network did not

1:25:09

have an annual symposium in 2020

1:25:12

because of the lockdowns.

1:25:14

In 2021, it was virtual. So in 2022, and

1:25:16

there's the brochure on the screen, we

1:25:20

were back together again in person.

1:25:22

And one of our discussions was

1:25:25

a panel session in which we talked

1:25:27

about lessons learned from

1:25:29

the COVID pandemic. And

1:25:32

honestly, it was a time when we all got

1:25:34

to share with each other what we had learned.

1:25:36

So we had physicians, nurses, chaplains,

1:25:39

administrators, lawyers, just

1:25:43

the whole wide spectrum of people

1:25:45

who had endured the pandemic and healthcare.

1:25:48

And the stories that we heard

1:25:51

were really very moving. For example,

1:25:53

a woman who says, I never speak in

1:25:55

large groups, but I just have to

1:25:58

speak. She was a nurse and a nurse.

1:25:59

and she talked about the lack

1:26:02

of dignity and respect, how nursing home residents

1:26:04

during the pandemic were moved from room to

1:26:06

room. And at one point she said, we even put them

1:26:08

in the kitchen. We are no longer using

1:26:10

the kitchen, so we put them in the kitchen.

1:26:13

You talk about a lack of dignity and respect. And

1:26:16

one of the panelists was a philosopher

1:26:18

ethicist, Dan Miller, and he co-wrote

1:26:21

this article with me. And he said, one of the problems

1:26:23

with the way we approached the response to

1:26:25

the pandemic is that there were no countervailing

1:26:29

considerations. There were

1:26:31

no considerations of what would be the harms

1:26:34

if we locked down society. And

1:26:36

his comment resonated

1:26:39

with really everybody in the audience.

1:26:42

And then Dan and I started talking

1:26:44

about, well, what were those countervailing

1:26:46

considerations? What

1:26:48

were the harms? And then over the next

1:26:50

year, we started keeping track

1:26:53

of all the harms as they were recorded.

1:26:56

So that's the context.

1:26:58

We were aware of harms. We knew

1:27:00

that there was a lesson to be learned, that

1:27:03

really that this

1:27:05

extended lockdown response was contrary

1:27:09

to what the public health ethics

1:27:11

literature would say was the appropriate response.

1:27:14

And we thought we needed to get the message

1:27:16

out so that before we thought about doing

1:27:18

an extended lockdown again, we

1:27:20

should review what we learned. So let me

1:27:22

stop there and just say, that's

1:27:24

what got us going. That's what the motivation

1:27:27

was. When you were writing this,

1:27:29

which I'm sure took some time, is

1:27:32

there any writing on the wall in your field?

1:27:35

And we just spent

1:27:35

the last hour and a half really

1:27:37

discussing that we're starting

1:27:40

to see this same languaging

1:27:42

that put us into a lockdown before. Did

1:27:45

you have a sense that this could happen again in

1:27:47

the near future? Is there something in your world

1:27:49

of medicine that, or were

1:27:52

you just making sure that we knew what we

1:27:54

had just been through? Or, where

1:27:56

are you at with that? We

1:27:58

were wanting to make sure that.

1:27:59

we knew where we had been and that

1:28:02

we didn't do it again without really

1:28:05

much stronger evidence to justify

1:28:07

it. I mean, the public health ethics

1:28:09

literature said use

1:28:12

the least restrictive means

1:28:14

possible. Use voluntary measures,

1:28:16

not mandatory measures. Whatever

1:28:19

you do, make sure you have the confidence

1:28:21

in the public behind you. And

1:28:24

recognize, and the language prior

1:28:27

to the lockdown was forced

1:28:29

quarantines, realize that forced

1:28:32

quarantines entail a significant

1:28:34

deprivation of liberty. And that you

1:28:36

just don't want to go there. And

1:28:38

previous public health ethicists have

1:28:40

referred to forced quarantines

1:28:43

as blunt measures or extreme,

1:28:46

you know, extreme instruments,

1:28:48

something that shouldn't really be done,

1:28:51

that voluntary measures should be done

1:28:53

instead. And above all

1:28:55

else, the public health ethics

1:28:57

literature said that whatever we do, it needs to

1:28:59

be equitable. We need to treat all

1:29:02

people fairly. There shouldn't be some

1:29:04

people who are disadvantaged more

1:29:06

than others by whatever public health interventions

1:29:09

we institute. And as you well know,

1:29:11

and I think maybe Jeffrey Jackson was talking

1:29:14

about it, you know, the people,

1:29:17

the disadvantaged people, the lower income,

1:29:20

unfortunately, black Americans, Hispanic Americans

1:29:23

were disproportionately harmed

1:29:26

by

1:29:26

the pandemic, not only in education

1:29:28

outcomes for their children, but in jobs

1:29:31

and loss of jobs or being required

1:29:33

to work in person when

1:29:35

others could work remotely. So

1:29:38

is that just is that an equity

1:29:40

issue when you say, you know, black

1:29:43

and Latinos? What

1:29:45

is it?

1:29:46

Why would a lockdown

1:29:49

and a pandemic where we all can't work?

1:29:51

Why does it affect them more? Well,

1:29:55

first of all, if

1:29:57

children are not allowed to go to school.

1:30:00

but one of the couple is deemed

1:30:02

an essential worker, or both of

1:30:04

them are maybe essential workers, but now you have

1:30:06

the children home. One of them has to

1:30:08

stay home with the children, the other goes to work and

1:30:10

their income drops. So

1:30:13

it hurts them economically. And

1:30:15

then there are all sorts of studies showing

1:30:18

that children who learned

1:30:20

remotely really suffered.

1:30:23

And again, remote learning was something

1:30:25

that was even more difficult. So

1:30:28

there's remote learning or there's no learning, but

1:30:30

if you are of a lower income and

1:30:32

you don't have access to the internet, or you don't have

1:30:35

a device to access the internet, then

1:30:37

you are disproportionately harmed. And

1:30:39

as some of the teachers that I've spoken to have said, they

1:30:42

knew that there were children who were getting no education

1:30:45

during this time when there was supposedly remote

1:30:47

learning.

1:30:48

Wow, we've seen like incredible drops

1:30:51

in scores in math and education

1:30:53

and reading comprehension.

1:30:57

You know, when we think about the

1:31:00

CDC and the NIH and

1:31:02

the FDA years ago, before

1:31:05

COVID, I stood at

1:31:07

ACIP at the ACIP meeting for

1:31:09

the CDC and I sat on a microphone during

1:31:11

my statement, we need

1:31:14

you. I am not a person, I mean, I know that

1:31:16

they knew who I was at that point, I'd been fairly

1:31:18

loud spoken, but I

1:31:20

said, we need you. I'm not against

1:31:23

having big, powerful, brilliant

1:31:25

scientific bodies watching

1:31:27

out for our health, our safety, the environment that

1:31:29

we live in, but you're making decisions

1:31:32

that go so totally against

1:31:35

all reason and science that

1:31:37

you are going to destroy your credibility.

1:31:40

And then where are we at when

1:31:42

that happens? You

1:31:45

know, where is it at? I mean, when you look

1:31:47

at ethics, this is something

1:31:48

you've been, you also are a nephrologist,

1:31:50

you're a doctor, you're not just some professor

1:31:53

that talks about ethics, you've treated people

1:31:55

your whole life, but when

1:31:57

you think about your relationship with the CDC,

1:31:59

the FDA through

1:32:02

all of your career, where is that

1:32:04

confidence at now for

1:32:06

doctors and citizens?

1:32:10

So let me just

1:32:12

sort of

1:32:13

back up one second. Confidence, the American

1:32:15

public's confidence in the CDC

1:32:18

has dropped dramatically. NBC News

1:32:20

did a poll in January of 2022. The

1:32:22

majority of Americans stated

1:32:24

at that time they did not trust the

1:32:27

CDC to manage the COVID pandemic.

1:32:29

Then if you look at the

1:32:33

number of people who got the third COVID

1:32:35

shot, if you will, you know, boosters were highly

1:32:37

promoted. But by August of 2022,

1:32:41

almost a year after the booster was

1:32:43

rolled out, only 30% of Americans

1:32:46

had gotten the booster. And then I just checked this morning,

1:32:48

only 18% have gotten the bivalent

1:32:51

booster. So people are no

1:32:54

longer following CDC

1:32:56

recommendations. It looks to me, based on this

1:32:58

data, that the majority of Americans

1:33:01

are no longer following CDC recommendations.

1:33:04

And recall what I said, public

1:33:06

health ethics said,

1:33:07

above all else, do not

1:33:09

lose the confidence in the public because you

1:33:11

need the public to be really

1:33:14

putting into action the CDC

1:33:16

recommendations in their own lives.

1:33:19

So

1:33:19

that's one thing. Then yesterday I was interviewing

1:33:22

a whole bunch of candidates, their physicians

1:33:24

who are applying for a fellowship position at

1:33:26

our university. And I was asking them,

1:33:29

where do you see trust in society

1:33:31

at this point? And 201, and they're all over

1:33:33

the country. One was from Montana, one was from

1:33:36

Florida, one was from Detroit. I mean,

1:33:38

all over the country. And they say, we

1:33:40

just don't have the trust. Our

1:33:42

patients don't trust us, our families don't trust us.

1:33:45

Really, what we've gone through has been very harmful

1:33:48

to the practice of medicine. Because

1:33:49

if you don't trust the physician, you're not

1:33:52

going to necessarily do

1:33:54

what they say. And if they're actually

1:33:56

recommending something that would help you,

1:33:59

to do it. That's

1:34:02

not good. Needless

1:34:05

to say.

1:34:06

You know, and I guess

1:34:09

I hold, you know, in some ways I think I'm partially

1:34:11

to blame for that. I am one of these people that's

1:34:13

out there saying you can no longer just

1:34:16

trust your doctor because your doctor,

1:34:19

you know, went along with a

1:34:22

protocol that made no sense. You

1:34:24

know, they were pushing

1:34:26

a vaccine that didn't stop transmission. I

1:34:28

knew that because I read the EUA,

1:34:31

the emergency use authorization, that clearly said

1:34:33

they had no idea from the trials of Pfizer

1:34:36

or Moderna whether or not it could stop

1:34:38

transmission. Yet every doctor

1:34:40

gave the same advice that the news

1:34:43

agencies gave. They're not doctors. But,

1:34:45

you know, coming from this very limited space

1:34:48

of understanding. And so in

1:34:50

order to get back to

1:34:52

a place, you know, where we can trust doctors,

1:34:55

I think one of the questions I have to ask you is

1:34:57

when you sit at these symposiums now, when you're

1:34:59

on a Zoom call, when you get involved

1:35:02

with all these other doctors, you said you had a panel.

1:35:05

Are doctors waking

1:35:06

up to how

1:35:08

poorly, how

1:35:10

poor the advice was that they shared

1:35:13

and how big a lie took place in the

1:35:15

CDC and the FDA? Because until

1:35:18

they come to terms and really wrap

1:35:20

their heads around what actually

1:35:22

happened there, how can

1:35:25

a patient trust a doctor? I mean,

1:35:27

are you feeling like the medical establishment

1:35:29

is waking up?

1:35:32

I wish I could say you,

1:35:34

oh, without a question, they are. But I think

1:35:36

you have to understand that physicians are still

1:35:38

under a lot of pressure

1:35:40

to comply and to go along with the narrative,

1:35:43

especially as they're rolling out more flu

1:35:45

shots and COVID

1:35:48

shots. You know, you

1:35:50

have been talking about the science and you've been

1:35:52

talking about rapidly waning effectiveness

1:35:54

and failure to prevent transmission and

1:35:57

the fact that the booster

1:35:59

wore off after the flu.

1:35:59

after 10, 12 weeks. You

1:36:02

know, the science is there. It's hard

1:36:04

to find. I mean, the Cleveland Clinic had a study

1:36:07

in June saying that the more COVID

1:36:09

shots you've gotten, the more likely you are to get

1:36:11

infected with COVID. So the

1:36:13

science is there in the corners,

1:36:16

but honestly, I think we

1:36:18

need physicians to listen a lot more

1:36:21

and to not bully or harass

1:36:24

patients into getting

1:36:26

treatments that they don't want to get. I

1:36:28

mean, we really need to

1:36:29

broaden this conversation. One of the

1:36:32

things in public health ethics is that

1:36:34

you need to listen to the community

1:36:36

and patients are part of the community.

1:36:38

And one of the big mistakes that was made during the

1:36:40

lockdowns was it was all driven

1:36:43

by the public health experts in

1:36:45

Georgia, at the CDC or in Washington,

1:36:48

DC. They were not getting out talking to the

1:36:50

people in the community. So one of the recommendations

1:36:53

is next time around, if anybody even thinks

1:36:55

about a lockdown, you should get some

1:36:57

businessmen, you should get some historians,

1:37:00

you should get some economists, you should have a

1:37:02

broad diversity of the community participating

1:37:05

in a

1:37:06

dialogue before you do

1:37:08

the most restrictive

1:37:10

measure that you could possibly use, especially

1:37:13

when public health ethics says use

1:37:15

the least restrictive approach. So

1:37:18

we really, one of the things I'm hoping,

1:37:21

Del and talking to you is that your listeners

1:37:23

will understand there is now

1:37:26

a large body of evidence

1:37:28

that says the lockdowns caused

1:37:30

huge harms. It was a mental health crisis

1:37:33

of alarming proportions. I think Jeffrey

1:37:35

Jackson talked about the suicide problem.

1:37:37

And, you know, girls 12 to 17 years

1:37:40

old

1:37:40

saw a 50% increase

1:37:42

in suicide attempts in 2021 compared

1:37:45

to prior to the pandemic. So

1:37:48

yeah, you've got that up on your screen now. Let me

1:37:50

read this really quick. By early May 2020, ED visit counts

1:37:54

for suspected suicide attempts began increasing

1:37:56

among adolescents age 12 to 17 years, especially

1:37:59

among girls.

1:37:59

During July 26th through August

1:38:02

22nd, 2020, the mean weekly

1:38:04

number of ED visits for suspected suicide

1:38:06

attempts among girls aged 12 to 17 years was 26.2% higher

1:38:09

than during the same period a year earlier. During

1:38:14

February 21st through March 20th, 2021,

1:38:17

mean weekly ED visit counts for suspected

1:38:19

suicide attempts were 50.6% higher among girls

1:38:22

aged 12 to 17 years compared with the same period in 2019.

1:38:29

Those are staggering numbers. There's

1:38:32

graphs that go along with this. This is CDC

1:38:35

numbers. And so when

1:38:37

I look at this, and this is part of what

1:38:40

is scary for everyone watching

1:38:42

the high wire right now, whether

1:38:44

or not we can get through people's

1:38:47

heads that the vaccine absolutely did

1:38:50

nothing and didn't work. Whether or not,

1:38:52

for whatever reason, since the

1:38:55

news is saying wear a mask and

1:38:57

the Cochrane collaboration looks at 72

1:39:01

studies all around the world saying

1:39:03

that masks don't work, all the science

1:39:05

shows they don't work. If the media is saying

1:39:07

it, that means the CDC is telling them

1:39:09

to say it. The FDA is behind

1:39:12

it. But with all of that, okay, they

1:39:14

can be close minded and literally

1:39:16

have their heads of the sand or up there, you know what.

1:39:19

But these numbers, these suicide

1:39:22

numbers that you're talking about, these mental

1:39:25

health numbers, you get into the numbers

1:39:27

of the rise in alcoholism

1:39:29

and drug use. Isn't

1:39:31

that enough to say clearly

1:39:34

the cure was worse

1:39:36

than the disease? These numbers are

1:39:38

astronomical. Shouldn't this protect

1:39:40

us from making this mistake again? Well,

1:39:43

that is one of the points we make in the paper.

1:39:45

Alcohol related deaths went up significantly.

1:39:48

Drug overdose deaths

1:39:51

went up significantly. There's something called deaths

1:39:53

of despair. And these are

1:39:55

people who just are so depressed and

1:39:58

they don't see a way out of their situation. And

1:40:00

again, these are younger people.

1:40:02

These are not older people. These are not the people

1:40:04

who would be vulnerable necessarily to COVID,

1:40:07

but these are people who are low income,

1:40:10

lower education level, and the

1:40:12

deaths of despair went significantly

1:40:14

up. So you would hope this

1:40:17

mental health crisis of alarming proportions,

1:40:19

in fact, Vivek Murthy, the US

1:40:21

Surgeon General earlier this year, had

1:40:24

a white paper on the epidemic of

1:40:26

depression and isolation and

1:40:29

loneliness

1:40:29

in this country. I mean, this country

1:40:32

is in no shape to tolerate another

1:40:34

lockdown and to usher in even worse

1:40:38

mental health outcomes. So the mental

1:40:40

health outcomes alone

1:40:42

should be enough to prevent us from going back into

1:40:45

extended lockdowns. But then there are the educational

1:40:47

outcomes. You alluded to them. The National

1:40:50

Center for Educational Research in the Department

1:40:52

of Education reported the worst

1:40:54

outcomes in mathematics in decades

1:40:57

in fourth graders and eighth graders.

1:40:59

And reading was also below.

1:41:02

But then the Office of Civil Rights of

1:41:04

the Department of Education reported

1:41:07

how much more black American children

1:41:09

were behind white American children in

1:41:12

their educational levels. So we

1:41:15

can't afford to do this to our children.

1:41:17

We can't afford to do this to our adolescents.