0:06

Have you noticed that this show doesn't have

0:08

any commercials? I'm not

0:10

selling you diapers or vitamins

0:12

or smoothies or gasoline. That's

0:15

because I don't want any corporate sponsors telling

0:17

me what I can investigate or what

0:19

I can say. Instead,

0:21

you are our sponsors. This

0:24

is a production by our nonprofit,

0:26

the Informed Consent Action Network. So

0:29

if you want more investigations, if

0:31

you want landmark legal wins, if

0:34

you want hard-hitting news, if

0:36

you want the truth, go to

0:39

ikindecide.org and donate now.

0:42

All right, everyone, we ready? Yeah! Let's

0:45

do this. Action. Good

1:02

morning, good afternoon, good evening. Wherever you

1:04

are out there in the world, it's

1:06

time to step out onto the high

1:08

wire. Well, we

1:10

have, you know, over the last

1:13

month or so, been watching this

1:15

entire conversation around vaccines, especially COVID

1:17

vaccines, safety, lab leaks, all

1:19

of it crumbling down in Washington,

1:22

D.C., where hearings are taking place.

1:24

And finally, for the first

1:26

time ever, the right questions

1:29

are being asked. But one of the biggest

1:31

questions we get here on the high

1:33

wire from all of you that have

1:35

just joined us because of COVID, your

1:37

friend said, hey, man, you should check

1:39

out the show because they're saying something

1:41

completely different than what you're hearing in

1:43

mainstream news. And then as

1:45

the years went along, you've realized that we

1:47

had it right and they either just

1:50

didn't get it, got it wrong, or

1:52

maybe for some reason they were working

1:54

for their corporate sponsors, which

1:57

I guess is what they do. Your

2:00

question that's coming from COVID is, well,

2:02

what about all the other vaccines? Right?

2:04

I mean, there, I watched the COVID

2:06

vaccine getting rushed, but certainly good science

2:09

is behind all the other vaccines.

2:11

We have delved into much of

2:13

that, but there's a

2:15

really incredible story of

2:17

a cover-up that took place involving

2:21

the MMR vaccine and more

2:23

specifically the mumps, the mumps,

2:25

part of measles, mumps, and

2:28

rubella vaccine. Well, now there's

2:30

a major motion picture. That's right.

2:32

Not only are we watching Washington

2:35

DC wake up, we have a

2:37

film that is about to hit

2:39

the ground everywhere talking about this

2:42

incredible story. It's just one, but

2:44

it's really impactful. It's called Protocol

2:47

7. He

2:51

was an orphan of conflict in Africa. He

2:54

was smart and bright and then

2:57

we got him home and he crashed right in front of us. Apparently

3:01

we're in the midst

3:03

of a mumps outbreak. Another? Some

3:06

people, some very important people

3:08

are saying our vaccine does not work. You're

3:13

going to want to read this. We have a U.S.

3:15

monopoly and a major share of the world market. And

3:19

we own the only one that works. Except

3:21

that it does not. We all sign contracts.

3:24

Company interests above all

3:26

others make it work. They fake

3:28

the data. It's all there. They cheated

3:31

on every level. You said you're a lawyer.

3:34

Family law. And you want to understand why. When

3:36

I see it? They couldn't get

3:38

the wrong only one. So they

3:40

re-injured a that objective to empower

3:42

the vaccine to find something

3:48

that just Was

4:00

released on. We may have to

4:02

seek them and destroy them where

4:04

they live. Killing this thing is

4:06

he is in danger. What about

4:08

he saw your fun and every

4:11

other son and daughter depends on

4:13

whether or not you choose to

4:15

live by their rules. Incineration A

4:17

Media was. Interesting.

4:21

You keep it together. So

4:24

you have a son says you t the

4:26

weekends thrown at least in the Usa and

4:29

guess our where you're. at the last las

4:31

to demonstrate efficacy of the most taksim a

4:33

level required by the I. Know

4:35

to respond to the Fcs concern

4:37

and leave it dangerous. Vaccine on

4:39

the market. dangerous and tests strongly

4:41

recommended. Booster shots of course when

4:43

of a guy like nothing's with

4:46

I got winter. Please. Please

4:49

identify as. Discussed.

4:55

This. Is a com object he switched

4:57

from just as a protocol. No

5:04

more. Ever believe I'm. While.

5:09

The film is called Protocol Seven

5:12

in theaters may thirty first right

5:14

around the corner as my arm

5:16

pleasure be joined by the coal

5:18

writer and director Doctor Andrew Wakefield

5:20

n one the cast members and

5:22

be robin thing for like an

5:24

hour energy and will All right

5:27

Ah Miss. Any this

5:29

is this is really sort of a

5:31

combination of of of have a dream

5:33

which is you know you made documentaries

5:35

before I connected with you and then

5:37

we worked on Vax but you were

5:40

always you were working on this script.

5:42

You. Really want to get into the

5:44

narrative film? And. You've done

5:46

it and it's fantastic. I just want to be

5:48

the first one to say over the the really

5:50

really psyched to when I got through it just

5:53

said oh god I could tell any I love

5:55

it. It's. Aren't really awesome? That

5:57

means a great deal coming for Jago Group.

5:59

Do. Yeah, so, you know,

6:01

the process going through it, it

6:04

looks beautiful. What

6:06

was different, would you say, from moving

6:08

out of documentary filmmaking into feature filmmaking?

6:12

The time constraint. Yeah. You

6:14

know, you're shooting for six weeks, you got to get it done. You've got

6:16

a limited budget. People have got other

6:18

jobs to go to, the crew have

6:20

got another job, the cast have got another job. You've

6:23

got to get it done during that period. The

6:26

idiosyncrasy of this, we were right in the middle

6:28

of COVID at the time. So, you know, union

6:30

films were threatened with being shot

6:33

down and people were being tested and vaccinated

6:35

all over the place. And

6:37

do we go down that route or not? That was an easy one.

6:41

Thank God you did that. In

6:45

that, in the filmmaking, it was terrifying.

6:48

Yeah. You know, you're directing for the first time and

6:50

you rely. It's such a collaborative project, wonderful, but it's

6:52

terrifying. You look like you know what you're doing. I've

6:55

loved it. Over the years, I studied

6:57

directing. I learned the key is preparation.

6:59

Yeah. 90% preparation because

7:01

when you go on set, people say,

7:04

this guy knows what he's doing. You've no idea

7:06

what you're doing. Right. But

7:09

you prepare, you know, the shots you want, you know, where you

7:11

want your actors, you know what you want them to say. And

7:13

you say to them, come to

7:15

the set, knowing your lines. That's all I'm

7:17

asking of you. I know I've watched your,

7:19

you know, the reel you sent in, the tape you sent

7:21

in, I know you can do it. Yeah.

7:24

And you know, the lines and they were fantastic.

7:26

It was a joy. And the key to making

7:28

that happen were the two producers

7:30

who were outstanding, Joy Vifacka

7:33

and Brian Wendell. So it

7:35

was enormous fun. It was terrifying

7:37

throughout. I was greatly relieved when

7:40

it was over and it

7:42

was a joy. And I want to do it

7:44

all over again. So give us the insight, Skew.

7:46

What was it like to be an actor working

7:48

for a former doctor

7:51

now, film director? What was the

7:53

experience like? Well, I mean, as an actress,

7:55

you know, I've been on big sets of

7:58

big directors and Andy is. the

8:00

best director. He is so good. He's,

8:03

you're natural at it. He really is.

8:06

He knew how to give

8:08

motivation. He knew how to take these

8:10

actors who, I mean me specifically, I

8:12

was playing a scientist. I'm

8:15

not a scientist for sure. You know, I'm

8:17

saying this dialogue. I'm, you know, I have

8:19

to be in this mode. And he just

8:21

had a way before each scene with the

8:23

actors to really get you in that

8:26

moment. And not a lot of directors

8:28

will take that time out to do that. You know, the

8:30

actors do their prep that they do before

8:32

they come on. But he really had a

8:34

vision for this film. And he was very,

8:37

very involved in that way as a director.

8:39

He really wanted it to come across, you

8:42

know, the way he envisioned it. And through, you

8:44

know, just before each take, before, you know, he

8:46

would get the crew together, get the actor, you

8:48

know, why are we doing this? Why, you know,

8:52

what does this scene, what does it mean?

8:54

You know, and it's just, it's really incredible

8:56

as an actor to experience a director that's

8:58

really that passionate about doing

9:00

what they do. You made my job easy. You're so

9:03

good. Who knew?

9:05

Doctor to director, he's amazing. How

9:07

much of this story, because watching it, because you've

9:09

told me, you know, I don't really want, I

9:11

want people to see it, but ultimately the mumps

9:14

part of this vaccine started failing. You and

9:16

I, it was right while Vax was coming

9:18

out, we started seeing mumps outbreaks all over

9:20

the country in fully vaccinated

9:23

communities. So they realized that this, you

9:25

know, vaccine had been failing. That's

9:27

at the heart of the story. How

9:30

much of it is based on,

9:32

you know, fat? Like you had the

9:34

story, how much is fictionalized? Did you

9:36

change characters names? Were they really the

9:38

names of the scientists? Like how did

9:40

you make those types of decisions? Well,

9:43

Merck was Merck. Yeah. The

9:45

scientists were representations of characters

9:47

who were true

9:49

life characters. And who

9:52

either participated in the fraud

9:54

or the alleged fraud or

9:56

were those who exposed it. And

9:58

basically you see a level. edge because usually

10:00

we watch a film that's after this case

10:02

is all over. We're still

10:05

in the middle of this case. Is that right? We are

10:07

in the middle of this case. What makes this really unusual

10:09

is that we are in the heat of battle at the

10:11

moment that most of these, as you say,

10:13

most of these things, the film is made years

10:15

down the line where everything else has been resolved and

10:17

the book's been written and the script's written and the

10:19

film is made. This is right in the heat of

10:21

battle. It's in the court of appeals at

10:23

the moment. So it was

10:26

a risk, but it was, this was a

10:28

court case that had been going on for

10:30

years. People were still being exposed. Children were

10:32

still being exposed to this defective vaccine. It

10:34

should have been pulled off the market. They

10:36

should have been told, but they weren't. And

10:39

so I felt a moral and professional obligation to

10:41

step in and say enough is enough. Okay.

10:43

Now is the time that this story

10:46

gets told. And that's it. You

10:48

know, if they come after us,

10:50

they come after us. That's not the issue.

10:52

The issue is that people need to know what

10:54

is really going on. Did you realize when you

10:57

were taking this film, unlike other films, that there's

10:59

going to be massive controversy around it? I mean,

11:01

that, I mean, I suppose it has the ability

11:03

to be a career killer. Did you

11:05

say everyone down said, by the way, you know, I'm going to, you

11:08

know, one

11:10

of the characters in the movie says, if you give yourself

11:13

a lifeline, you'll take it. I mean, did you get that?

11:15

Did you get that talk? I can't speak for

11:17

the other actors in the film, but you know, when

11:19

2020 hit, um,

11:21

and I started getting auditions that

11:23

asked me to slate my vaccine

11:25

status, just to audition,

11:28

slate it. Wow. Hi,

11:30

my name's Emmy Robin and I'm unvaccinated.

11:32

Like I just, it was such a,

11:35

wow. I just felt sick.

11:37

I felt gross. I said, I don't want to be a

11:39

part of this industry anymore. So I kind of just took

11:41

acting and was like, you know,

11:43

and I, I'm so grateful for that because

11:45

it really threw me into, yeah,

11:48

it threw me into my, my passion and

11:50

my passion is protecting babies and

11:52

mothers. And you know, it coincides

11:55

with this film so beautifully, but

11:57

I've been very outspoken. I am

11:59

somebody. who lives in no fear.

12:03

And so, yeah, I wasn't going to get vaccinated just

12:05

to be in a movie. And so

12:07

when the script came across my desk,

12:09

I was like, oh, I got

12:11

to be in this film because I have I have

12:13

loved Andy for 20 years. I have I

12:16

have known of his work. I mean,

12:18

I my children, I like I said,

12:20

he's my hero because my children are

12:22

unvaccinated and they were so smart and

12:24

they are so advanced. And I really,

12:26

really am just so grateful

12:28

that I was able to make an empowered

12:30

decision because of his work and him being

12:32

so outspoken. And I only

12:34

aspire to be like that. But yeah, as an

12:36

actress, this was such a gift for me. But

12:38

also in my personal life, it just

12:40

it's one of those films that like I

12:43

couldn't have asked for a cooler project to

12:45

be a part of because it really does

12:47

mean something to me personally, as actors were

12:50

usually portraying something that we might not believe

12:52

in personally. But this was like this hit

12:54

home for me. And I loved it. You

12:56

had some, you know, I mean, first

12:58

of all, the acting is really stellar

13:00

all throughout. You had Eric Roberts, the

13:03

big name. Is it more intimidating to work with someone

13:06

with a name like that? You know, I called him

13:08

I called everybody, all the actors before they came. And

13:10

I and he was

13:12

the one that I thought, this

13:14

guy knows movies, okay, making hundreds

13:16

of movies. I think when

13:19

he came on our set, he

13:21

disappeared for one week somewhere else in Texas, made

13:23

two movies in that time came back and carried

13:25

on. The guy is incredible. He's

13:27

a machine. And I just thought, how am I

13:30

going to deal with this guy? He's you know,

13:32

I hear is a fledgling director

13:34

and he's just going to rip me. Anyway,

13:36

he was absolutely wonderful. We got on famously.

13:39

So Matthew Mardson. I mean, he

13:41

was very outspoken during that time.

13:43

And, you know, I

13:45

love that he got the opportunity to play the

13:47

character he did. He's such a really cool guy

13:49

off camera as well. So

13:51

speaking the truth and freedom.

13:54

Rachel was another one. She had she

13:56

was about to give up acting. You

13:58

know, she was living living in L. Louisiana the same

14:01

stories the same being

14:03

shunned from the profession. She was going to

14:05

give up. Thank heavens She didn't because she

14:07

was like a brand. She was fantastic

14:10

You got to work with arguably

14:14

Maybe top ten top five writers in

14:18

Hollywood Terry Rossio Shrek

14:20

Pirates of the Caribbean. I mean he

14:23

is in that category of the untouchables

14:25

really He was there when

14:27

we made backs some of the best notes I've

14:29

ever had my life I

14:31

learned so much from him. What was it like to work

14:34

with him as a co-writer like to be writing with

14:36

each other? I mean that that must have just been

14:38

a spectacular joy. It's a it's a Masterclass

14:41

every time you sit down with Kerry. Yeah,

14:43

it's a masterclass and he's Exquisitely

14:46

analytical healed, you know, why are we doing

14:48

this and let's just back up and move

14:50

into this and what are we trying to

14:52

achieve here? And and everything

14:55

is so well thought through there

14:57

is a reason Everything that

14:59

he does drives the script moves

15:02

the story forward. Nothing's wasted and so

15:05

even though this film was slightly out of

15:07

his genre he It

15:09

was just wonderful having him there you

15:12

could feel I mean you could feel just did the care

15:14

with it But it was I was

15:16

it was almost like a metronome the way you

15:18

established like the beat coming out. What's happening next?

15:21

That's very difficult to achieve. I would

15:23

say in a first film out I would think and

15:27

You know, obviously your talent all

15:29

those around you. It really is a tour

15:31

de force I think it's gonna be a

15:33

huge hit and it's gonna be

15:35

really cool to see You know,

15:37

there's all these documentaries. We've all made documentaries

15:40

around this subject, but it's really gonna be

15:42

one of the first Narrative films to

15:44

take on this issue and you know, just

15:46

see how people respond to it I'm

15:49

really looking forward to so how people gonna see the movie.

15:51

Okay, we have the people's premiere through gather

15:54

So this is theatrical on demand people. Okay,

15:56

Emmy is in a classic people go to

15:58

gather calm can they find? find it and then

16:00

maybe promote it. Well, they can go to our website, which is Protocol

16:02

7, number 7 dot movie. They

16:06

go there and it says, look for screening. You

16:08

scroll down and post the screening. Post the screening

16:10

and you go through the process. Then

16:13

we have the New York premiere. Okay, me 31st.

16:16

Then we have an LA premiere the

16:18

Friday after that and then it continues to play

16:20

throughout the Lemley theaters in South

16:23

California and then it goes out on general theatrical

16:26

release. So exciting. Was

16:28

that hard? Was it hard to get to the

16:30

theatrical release? It's not been my burden. It's

16:33

not been something I've had to worry about. Oh,

16:35

with a blessing. It produces. It's such

16:37

a burden on that. God. You can

16:39

just hand it off. And we've got a great

16:42

distributor and we'll

16:45

be in Canada and across North America

16:47

very soon. So exciting times. Very,

16:49

very exciting. Well, I want to thank you for

16:51

coming in, giving us a chance

16:53

to talk about it. I really look forward

16:56

to seeing an audience. I got to see

16:58

it. It really is spectacular. Congratulations. Thank you

17:00

very much. Thanks for having us. All right.

17:03

Thank you so much. Absolutely. Well,

17:05

we have a huge show coming up.

17:09

One of the authors of The

17:11

Indoctrinated Brain reached out to me.

17:13

He said, I really love talking about all that,

17:15

but did you know that there's really

17:18

almost like a miracle cure for

17:20

Alzheimer's and it does a

17:22

bunch of other things? Have you ever

17:24

thought of like microdosing lithium? You're going

17:26

to have to stick around to just

17:29

be involved in one of the most fascinating

17:31

discussions I can imagine having. But

17:33

first, it's time for The Jackson

17:35

Report. Hey,

17:46

Jeffrey. It's wild getting to talk to

17:48

Andy Wakefield and just think, you know,

17:50

what a wild trip this has been

17:52

for me, getting involved with Vax, with

17:54

him and how far we've come. Hearing

17:57

is going on now. Washington, D.C., about

18:00

vaccines, about COVID, just an amazing period of

18:02

time we're living in right now. And

18:05

yeah, and the activation from people is

18:08

an all time high. In fact, I'm happy

18:10

to report that the WHO

18:12

pandemic treaty has failed.

18:14

So the negotiations on this treaty

18:16

have failed. They're hoping to have

18:19

a final draft at this yearly meeting

18:21

of health ministers happening in Geneva. That

18:23

did not happen. Let's look at some

18:25

of the headlines here. This is after

18:27

years of negotiation. We reported on this

18:29

for several years as well. WHO pandemic

18:31

talks end without a deal. Governments to

18:33

decide next steps. Here's New York Times,

18:35

countries failed to agree on treaty to

18:38

prepare the world for the next pandemic.

18:40

And it says here negotiators plan to ask

18:42

more time among the sticking points are

18:44

equitable access to vaccines and financing to

18:46

set up surveillance systems, regardless of

18:49

how the media set up the surveillance systems,

18:51

by the way, they claim they had before

18:53

they rushed the COVID vaccine on to the

18:55

world, something that we pointed out. And I'll

18:58

tell you, Jeffrey, I mean, though,

19:00

I want to celebrate that this is great

19:02

news. I do not trust the WHO farther

19:04

that I could lift that empire myself and

19:06

throw it. They know we're coming, man. They

19:09

know we're coming to Geneva. They don't want

19:11

anyone to show up. They don't want a

19:13

giant scene. So hey, everybody, go home, stay

19:15

home. We're not doing this thing. So

19:19

no matter the case, I cannot wait to

19:21

go there because either we're going to do

19:23

the victory lap of all victory laps and

19:25

dance around in pride at what we've achieved

19:27

here. We will also make sure that they

19:29

never ever decide to do something like this

19:31

again, of course, and talk about the we

19:33

are change the change rally and

19:36

March, I'm going to be there. Just so

19:38

many incredible people are going to be there.

19:40

I'm looking forward to it. But I'll tell

19:42

you, they may say it's over. But you

19:44

know, those vacuum deals never end. We are

19:46

going to go and make sure they

19:48

never forget when the people stood up. But it's

19:51

great news. It's great news. I just I just

19:53

want to take it with just a spoonful of

19:55

sugar right now and make sure that we're thinking

19:57

clearly that this isn't something that we're going to

20:00

sort of trick? Well there's a

20:02

lot of other people that don't trust that this

20:04

may be the end. One of those is the

20:06

state of Louisiana here in the United States. They're

20:09

the first state to pass a bill. This is

20:11

SB 133. If we look at this bill and

20:15

look at the word, this is now

20:17

law in the state of Louisiana. It

20:19

says the World Health Organization, United Nations,

20:21

and the World Economic Forum shall have

20:23

no jurisdiction or power within the state

20:25

of Louisiana. No rural regulations, fee tax,

20:27

policy or mandate of any kind from

20:29

those organizations shall be enforced

20:31

or implemented by the state of Louisiana rating

20:34

agency. So it goes on to say that.

20:36

Now there's a lot of other states that

20:38

have similar bills in the works. We have

20:40

one in Ohio, Oklahoma, and other bills. So

20:42

if you're in those states and

20:44

you really want this in your state, please

20:46

pay attention, call your legislators. And so that's

20:48

what's going on in the front of the

20:51

WHO. A lot of people are still tracking

20:53

this international health regulations are still in the

20:56

works, but the pandemic treaty, as it stands

20:58

right now, it has failed to reach an

21:00

agreement. Fantastic. Yeah, but I mean,

21:02

look, I'm glad Louisiana is not taking

21:04

its eye off the ball. Nobody should.

21:07

Just because we get through these little,

21:09

you know, difficulties, these little pandemics they

21:11

throw at us, doesn't mean that these

21:13

globalists are going to give up trying

21:16

to take over the world, trying to

21:18

imprison Americans, trying to get rid of

21:20

freedom of speech and, you know, the

21:22

freedom to bear arms. I mean, you

21:24

name it, they don't like our freedoms.

21:26

They're coming after them. So let's not

21:28

take our eye off the prize, but

21:30

it's a great development. And

21:32

that's something we're not doing with this next story as

21:35

well. So last week we reported on

21:37

what we called really one of the greatest

21:39

health scandals from the United States government of

21:41

our time. And what we're talking about is

21:44

the National Institutes of Health and the emails,

21:46

over 150 of them that

21:48

were published by the Select Committee on the

21:50

Coronavirus pandemic from Dr. David Morin. Basically,

21:53

it was showing a whole, a

21:56

whole list of things that they were

21:58

doing using private Gmail accounts. so

22:00

they can avoid FOIA, deleting evidence.

22:03

And this is still ongoing now. So this

22:05

week, it's still unraveling. We're still in the

22:07

middle of this conversation. So this is one

22:09

of the tweets from the subcommittee.

22:12

It says this, did NIH's FOIA

22:14

lady teach Dr. Fauci's team how

22:16

to hide COVID information? New evidence

22:18

shows that NIH officials opened an

22:20

encrypted protonmail account, misspelled keywords, forwarded

22:22

confidential materials to Gmail. And we

22:24

can go into the letter that

22:26

sent to the director of the

22:28

NIH from the House Oversight. And

22:30

it says this, which is echoing

22:33

what we were talking about last

22:35

week. It says, this evidence taken

22:37

together suggests a conspiracy at the

22:39

highest levels of NIH and NIAID

22:41

to avoid public transparency regarding the

22:43

COVID-19 pandemic, a

22:45

pandemic that took the lives of more than

22:48

one million Americans. If what appears in these

22:50

documents is true, this is an apparent attack

22:52

on public trust and must be met with

22:54

swift enforcement and consequences for those involved. By

22:58

the way, it's a great time to be

23:01

a conspiracy theorist, because what we're talking about

23:03

is conspiracy. You have in those emails, we

23:05

looked at last week, this moron working for

23:07

Tony Fauci sending emails, hey, let's all switch

23:10

over to Gmail. That way they can FOIA

23:12

it. And I've learned from the FOIA lady

23:14

who runs FOIA, but hates FOIA, how we

23:16

trick the whole system and erase anything we've

23:19

talked about after it's been FOIAed, but before

23:21

they ever see it. I mean, it's idiots

23:23

like this that you always know exist. And

23:25

by the way, it's these

23:28

useful idiots you need to try

23:30

and to pull off

23:32

a conspiracy against humanity. It's just

23:34

like arresting the mob. Eventually, someone

23:36

that's cooking the book, someone that's

23:38

got the numbers is flapping their

23:40

lips, and here we are. But

23:42

you're right, it is a conspiracy

23:44

amongst a small group of people

23:46

to lie to this nation and

23:48

ultimately the world. So I love

23:51

seeing that in a document we're

23:54

told it's a bad word. Right,

23:56

yeah. I mean, literally the people that were

23:58

using the word conspiracy, that was a bad

24:00

word. most to label their detractors are the

24:02

ones that are admitting the

24:05

book definition of conspiracy. So

24:09

let's go into this letter. So there's evidence presented

24:12

here. So remember Christian Anderson. He was part of

24:14

those emails. He was part of the nature email

24:16

about the natural origins of

24:18

the COVID. Right. Basically, it was not something

24:21

that was lab made. This was something that

24:23

was natural. Well, he's in these emails here.

24:25

And if you look at the subject line

24:27

of these emails, you see his name in

24:30

here and it says Anderson. But if

24:32

you look real close, the S is

24:34

a dollar sign. And what does that

24:36

mean? So people looking at this may

24:38

go, who cares? Well, if I'm somebody

24:40

or somebody out there is foying these

24:42

emails, they'll say I want all emails

24:44

that are discussing Christian Anderson. All emails

24:46

with the subject matter of Christian Anderson.

24:48

Well, these will not come up in

24:50

FOIA. So this is what they're saying

24:52

by purposely misspelling emails. I

24:55

avoid this foil. They're using code. Using

24:58

code. Absolutely. And so now we have

25:00

NIH's FOIA lady. This is Margaret Moore.

25:02

Here's the headline here. She's now a

25:04

person of interest. House GOP

25:07

investigation investigates NIH FOIA officer

25:09

and COVID-19 cover-up inquiry. And

25:11

then next week, Monday,

25:15

June 3rd, 10 a.m. Eastern Standard Time

25:17

set your clocks less than one week

25:19

until Dr. Fauci's first public hearing since

25:21

we attended the federal service. This is

25:23

what we're looking at. He will be

25:26

appearing not behind closed doors in a transcribed

25:28

testimony. This is going to be with cameras

25:30

rolling for all to see. This is this

25:32

Monday. So this is going to be a

25:34

big day because with all this evidence coming

25:36

out at the very least,

25:38

we're going to get some sound bites. Hopefully we can

25:40

get some greater accountability. Well, it'll

25:42

be amazing to figure out, you know, to

25:44

see what the master of the word salad

25:46

has to say now that the

25:49

NIH is now saying it was gain of

25:51

function. So he was lying there. I mean,

25:54

this thing is a mess. He's got his

25:56

own moron assistant, you know, putting out emails

25:58

saying Fauci and you know, chances are

26:00

in on this, we're all conspiring, we're working

26:02

together, we're using Gmail, we're beating the system,

26:04

we're bucking the system, but by the way,

26:07

I mean we said it, right, we've said

26:09

it especially these last couple weeks, now that

26:11

this ship is going down the rats are

26:13

jumping, they're turning on each other and just

26:15

think about what we're talking about. These are

26:17

not mobsters, right, these are pencil pushing, you

26:20

know, people in back dark

26:22

rooms that deal with FOIA requests that quietly

26:24

just say, well if you want to just

26:26

cheat it, you put the

26:28

spotlight and indictment upon people like that,

26:30

she is going to sing like a bird,

26:32

oh use the dollar sign on Anderson, we

26:34

use an exclamation point and so and so,

26:36

you really want to find this, this is

26:38

how we hit it, she is going to

26:40

reveal it all, I guarantee you, this thing

26:42

is coming crashing down, it is really exciting

26:44

to be in this moment now

26:46

since we predicted we would be here. I

26:50

want to talk about something that

26:52

was popularized during the COVID response,

26:54

the pandemic response, that was digital

26:56

IDs and this growing influence to

26:58

get everything digitized, all of our

27:00

information, everything like that, the first

27:02

time we really saw this on

27:04

scale was during the COVID pandemic

27:07

for the vaccine passports and if you remember,

27:09

these were just foisted upon humanity

27:11

without really any conversation, it's just, this

27:13

was the headline, if people remember on

27:16

why they were justifying it, vaccine passports are the

27:18

only way we can return to normality, so I

27:21

guess we have to have them everywhere to get,

27:23

to just move and conduct businesses, remember

27:25

a lot of people lost their business. How do

27:27

we get to normality without it? I

27:30

love how these things age, right, amazing, it's

27:32

the only way, I guess

27:34

we figured out another way. With a

27:36

vaccine that didn't stop transmission. And so,

27:38

pretty quickly though, a lot of states

27:40

here in the US, they started to

27:42

push back, they actually had laws and

27:44

this was a tracking system by

27:46

US News, you can see here that

27:49

the These states

27:51

have banned vaccine passports, several states have now

27:53

enacted laws that ban certain requirements

27:55

such as so-called vaccine passports.

27:58

COVID pandemic's over. This,

28:00

you know, obviously looking back was kind of a

28:02

bad idea because a lot of people didn't like

28:04

this again at her businesses. But

28:07

in Australia, they're going full steam ahead

28:09

with this idea of digital IDs. In fact,

28:11

they just passed this through their parliament. It's

28:13

waiting to be signed. And

28:15

this is Katie Gallagher. She's the Senator and the

28:17

Minister of Finance there. And she took

28:19

the news recently to kind of sell this idea to

28:22

the public. Take a listen. Katie Gallagher

28:24

It sets up a way to have a

28:27

digital ID that works across the economy. It's

28:29

regulated. People who participate are accredited. And

28:32

we have it enshrined in legislation. So

28:34

those important privacy protections are

28:37

enshrined in legislation, as is the fact that

28:39

it's voluntary and that government services need to

28:41

continue to be provided in a range of

28:44

ways so that people who don't want a

28:46

digital ID don't have to have one. The

28:48

idea behind having it economy-wide is that, you

28:50

know, it's not only voluntary, but

28:52

it's a secure way and a

28:54

reduced way of providing a lot of

28:56

documentation to a range of

28:59

different businesses or governments. Katie Gallagher Okay. And

29:01

you're guaranteeing that it's not going to

29:03

be compulsory. You've used the word voluntary

29:05

a few times there. Katie Gallagher Yeah, because I

29:08

know there's a lot of myths out there

29:10

about the digital ID that it's, you know,

29:12

that it's somehow government tracking you or holding

29:14

all this information about you. And it's none

29:16

of those things. And that

29:18

the information you provide can't be used for

29:21

any other purpose. So I am

29:23

really trying to say to people, if you don't want

29:25

it, don't have one. If you do

29:27

want it, and increasingly people are, we've got

29:29

10 and a half million people with a

29:31

myGov ID in place

29:33

already, you know, it's

29:35

there and it's safe. And

29:37

we will review it over time as well to make sure

29:39

that we are ensuring that people's

29:42

trust is maintained. If

29:45

you don't want it, you know, don't have one. If you

29:47

do want it, could you get the phone numbers and addresses

29:49

of the people that didn't want it? You

29:53

just know where this is going.

29:55

Is anyone just like, okay, government's

29:57

not going to like tracking information?

30:00

Wow, Australia, I'm sorry. I'm

30:02

sorry that, you know, your

30:04

politicians think you're that stupid.

30:07

Unbelievable. I

30:10

remember hearing this this pitch, conspiracy

30:12

theorists think that the government's going

30:14

to mandate a COVID vaccine during

30:16

the pandemic. So this is not

30:18

something that people are forgetting. But

30:21

here, Gallagher is saying that, you

30:23

know, there's some there's a myth that government's

30:25

going to hold all your ID. Well, let's

30:28

go to the Australian government's own website. And

30:30

where they have basically a press release about

30:32

this digital ID passes parliament, let's read it

30:34

says this provides certainty for the expansion of

30:37

the Australian government digital ID system and for

30:39

providers and services to apply to join the

30:41

government's system. Right. There you go. It's the

30:43

government. So it sounds like they may be

30:46

holding some of the info in economy wide

30:48

digital ID system will provide many benefits to

30:50

Australians by improving privacy and security when

30:53

interacting online. Not everybody in Australia

30:55

is excited about this. Here is

30:57

Senator Ralph about saying something a

30:59

little different. Take a listen. Governments

31:01

around the world have been relentless

31:04

in their push for digital currency

31:06

and digital ID. Now I have

31:08

continually warned here in this place,

31:10

this is a recipe for disaster.

31:12

What happens when your data is

31:14

hacked? What happens when the government

31:17

blocks your access to money or

31:19

services as punishment for stepping out

31:21

of line like Nigel Farage? There's

31:23

an example. What happens when you

31:25

exceed your carbon limits and you

31:27

discover that your ability to buy

31:29

and sell is suddenly cut off.

31:32

People who value freedom, who

31:35

value freedom, and I hope that's most of us

31:37

here, we will resist the push to

31:39

digitize our lives, our identity

31:42

and our money. We must

31:44

resist while we still have

31:46

cash. That form of

31:48

currency that can be accessed

31:50

without being under, under

31:53

the prying all seeing eye

31:55

of the state. We

31:57

still remain free people. freedom

32:00

must not be taken and it must

32:02

not be surrendered by the people. We

32:04

must hold onto cash. All

32:08

right. So let's unpack this a little bit.

32:12

I mean, he really unpacked it there, but let's talk

32:14

about 2019. Wired

32:16

magazine had an op-ed. This was before

32:18

COVID before anybody ever heard of vaccine

32:20

passports, digital IDs going across the entire

32:23

population. This is a op-ed. Digital IDs

32:25

are more dangerous than you think. And

32:27

it really lays it out here in

32:29

a concise way. It says, for starters,

32:31

we're building near perfect facial recognition technology

32:34

and other identifiers from the human gate

32:36

to breath to iris. Biometric databases are

32:38

being set up in such a way that

32:40

these individual identifiers are centralized, insecure and opaque.

32:43

Then there is the capacity for geolocation

32:45

of identifiers. That is the tracking of

32:47

digital you in real time. A constant

32:49

feed of insecure data from the internet

32:52

of things may well connect you and

32:54

your identity to other identities and nodes

32:56

on the network without your consent. In

32:59

addition, systems using artificial intelligence

33:01

and machine learning are used to make

33:03

decisions based on our identities. Those

33:05

systems are often built on data

33:07

that can reinforce bias and discrimination

33:09

and are wielded without sufficient transparency

33:12

or human review. Ultimately, social credit

33:14

systems such as those that are

33:16

currently being developed in China will

33:18

be based on digital ID, thereby

33:20

enabling or disabling our full and

33:22

free participation in society. I

33:24

mean, that is anybody should

33:27

be pausing at that. That was five

33:30

years ago now, basically. So we saw chat

33:32

GPT come out. I mean, we have a

33:34

lot of these systems that have come out

33:36

and we've seen the biases in here already.

33:38

So it's almost prophetic when you're

33:40

reading that. But what that article

33:42

doesn't really go into too much

33:44

is finances, your banking and

33:47

your ability to bank. And so

33:49

we're already seeing this from the

33:51

banks themselves. They can't help

33:53

themselves. They have our data, our purchasing

33:55

data, and they're starting to just distribute

33:57

it and sell it. And this is

33:59

Chase. JPMorgan Chase, you can look

34:01

at this headline here, we covered this

34:03

just a couple weeks ago. JPMorgan Chase

34:05

cashes in on customer data, Visa, doing

34:07

the same thing. Visa adds new way

34:09

to share customer shopping data with retailers.

34:12

So they're giving your purchasing data to

34:14

companies so they can market to you

34:16

better. And what is that

34:18

doing? Well, once they connect that to

34:20

your identity, your biometrics, your body, this

34:22

becomes very, very dangerous. And

34:25

again, you're seeing this with the big

34:27

companies that handle finances. MasterCard, for example,

34:29

this is just a headline recently, MasterCard

34:32

launches tech that lets you pay with

34:34

your face or hand in stores. We're

34:36

seeing that Whole Foods as well. But

34:39

also, here's another one, you may soon be able

34:41

to pay for meals in new

34:43

way with your face. And

34:46

this is Steak and Shake is doing this at 300

34:48

locations when you read in the article, they're

34:50

just having facial, just straight up facial recognition

34:52

to pay for your meals. And

34:55

why is this a problem? You could say, well,

34:57

like Senator Babette said, well, we have

34:59

to hold on cash. We have cash. That's fine. Not

35:01

really. Not in Australia. These are the headlines

35:03

in Australia just a year ago. Australians

35:07

transition to cashless society raises concerns about

35:09

financial exclusion, privacy and safety because they're

35:11

aggressive on this. Another one, Australia to

35:13

be functionally cashless by 2025. You

35:17

go in this article, some of the experts are

35:19

saying this cash could be completely gone in a

35:21

decade. And who pushed for this? Well,

35:23

remember, in 2016, just less

35:26

than a decade ago, we had

35:28

a World Economic Forum that released

35:30

over 100 page white paper titled

35:32

A Blueprint for Digital Identity. And

35:34

of course, they called the COVID

35:37

pandemic the best opportunity to switch

35:39

over to this fourth industrial revolution,

35:41

this artificial intelligence of everything, this

35:44

Internet of Things. And so this appears

35:46

to be going forward, especially in Australia.

35:48

So when this legislation is being signed,

35:51

everyone's really paying attention to this because

35:54

we're seeing the slow moves in other countries and here in

35:56

the United States as well. Wow. I

35:58

mean, it's such a slippery. slope. I mean

36:00

it really it's so obvious. I don't know how

36:02

long I'm gonna be able to hold it off.

36:05

I've said it before. I won't stand

36:07

in front of those cameras and airports that are

36:09

taking pictures. You can opt out. It says you

36:11

can opt out. I'm still opting out. You

36:14

know I think that you know my mission

36:16

is to just personally slow this down as

36:18

much as I as a human being can.

36:20

Make it as difficult as I can for

36:23

to be tracked and you know

36:25

get to stop these systems. But I just it's hard

36:28

to imagine how long I'm gonna hold it off. I

36:30

mean and by the way I'm walking into that

36:32

airport. I know the camera is still taking my

36:34

photo as I walk by. So you just wonder

36:36

I mean it's really just about like how

36:39

much does the power of saying okay versus they already

36:41

have it anyway. I mean I think

36:43

these are the questions at hand and what are we gonna

36:45

do about it. Yeah

36:48

absolutely and so one of

36:50

our mission statements here is ending

36:52

man-made disease and that's from

36:55

our informed consent action network our nonprofit. And

36:57

one of the ideas here is to really

36:59

look at all the stuff in our environment

37:01

that could be causing these things. And we

37:03

have a new contender if you

37:05

will. This is a landmark study that just came

37:07

out recently and this is

37:09

titled landmark study links microplastics to

37:11

serious health problems. And it says

37:13

people who had tiny plastic particles

37:16

lodged in a key blood vessel

37:18

were more likely to experience heart attack stroke or death

37:20

during a three-year study. So this

37:22

is a very interesting study because this is one

37:25

of the first studies that's really telling of a

37:27

health consequences. There's been a lot of studies saying

37:29

well we found these but we actually don't know

37:31

what they're doing you know but I want to

37:34

I want to say a little bit of

37:36

a caveat. Anytime I see this type of

37:38

study talking about increases in heart attack strokes

37:41

at a time when there is record strokes

37:43

and heart attacks you know potentially from a

37:45

vaccine I read it with a

37:47

grain of salt I'm not saying microplastics

37:49

are not dangerous but it's interesting timing

37:52

as this comes out. And then just

37:54

around the same time we have another

37:56

study in the Journal of toxicological sciences

37:58

and this is microplastics. plastic presence in

38:00

dog and human testes and its potential

38:03

association with sperm count and weight of

38:05

testes and Epidibidivus so it says in

38:07

here the conclusion our study revealed the

38:09

presence of microplastics in all canine

38:12

and human testes with significant Interindividual

38:14

variability these findings highlight a pervasive

38:17

presence of microplastics in the male

38:19

reproductive system in both canine and

38:21

human testes with potential consequences on

38:24

male fertility And when I read

38:26

that I'm thinking we really got a pump breaks

38:28

here because anything in society That

38:30

has a potential to contribute to the

38:33

lowering of fertility Has

38:35

to be stopped and looked at immediately and

38:37

why is that well you can even go

38:39

over to CNN? These are the headlines you're

38:41

seeing from from organization like CNN US fertility

38:43

rate dropped in lowest in a century as

38:45

birth dipped in 2023 this is

38:48

happening all over the world Japan notorious

38:51

They don't have replacement rate at this

38:53

point And so we have we

38:55

have to look at all of this and so

38:57

where do we start first of all? How are

38:59

these getting into our environment these tiny shards of

39:01

microplastics? Well a study in 2018

39:03

looked at water bottles and found this

39:05

study finds microplastics in more than 90

39:10

90% of tested water bottles, so there's a good

39:12

place to start but again that was 2018 So

39:15

something happened obviously over the last four

39:17

years. We kind of reported on it

39:19

here and there It's called the pandemic

39:21

response and what was a big part

39:23

of that pandemic response personal protective equipment

39:25

masks gloves They flooded the

39:27

world in a very unnatural way all

39:29

of a sudden from zero to a

39:32

million percent of all of these and

39:35

Microplastics were a big part of this in

39:37

the nanoparticulates in these masks So let's go

39:39

through some studies here because they're actually pointing

39:41

to this as a major influence one of

39:44

these here is titled face masks as a

39:46

source of Nanoplastics and microplastics in the environment

39:49

and it says in this study

39:51

overall is concluded Our study indicates

39:53

that masks release a large quantity

39:55

of nanoparticles and microplastics that can

39:57

be inhaled by mask wares Additionally,

40:00

due to the substantial utilization of

40:02

masks during the COVID-19 pandemic, they

40:05

may be a significant source of

40:07

nanoplastics and microplastics in the environment.

40:09

And once released, these masks, nanoplastics

40:12

and microplastics, could pose a serious,

40:15

pose a health risk to both humans

40:17

and non-human organisms alike. And then we have a

40:19

study in 2024 looking at

40:21

microplastics being released from face masks.

40:24

And they actually point directly to

40:26

human health. And they say this,

40:29

at the bottom of their conclusion,

40:31

they say the types and the

40:33

use habits and weathering conditions significantly

40:35

influence microplastic release, but they also

40:37

say mask-derived microplastics pose risks to

40:39

the environment organisms, especially to human

40:42

beings. And how many are we talking

40:44

about here? Because we know a lot of

40:46

people use them, people that were

40:48

using them that I know, they had bags of

40:50

them, 10 pack bags, and

40:52

they would go through them in a

40:54

week. And so there's an estimate in

40:57

one of the studies I was able

40:59

to find here, COVID-19 pandemic repercussions on

41:01

the use and management of plastics. And

41:03

this says this, mismanagement of personal protective

41:05

equipment, PPE, during the COVID-19 pandemic with

41:07

a monthly estimated use of 129 billion

41:12

face masks and 65 billion

41:14

gloves globally is resulting in

41:17

widespread environmental contamination. This

41:20

is something that blew my mind. I

41:22

thought I knew a lot about the

41:24

pandemic response, but that is a significant

41:26

amount of monthly microplastics going

41:28

into the environment. And I'm sure not

41:31

all of that is being recycled. It's

41:34

really unbelievable. And it's what we've

41:36

said, right? We're just, we're being

41:38

bombarded by toxins from

41:40

so many different parts of

41:42

our environment and making

41:44

us wear masks. I mean, this just takes it

41:46

to a whole other level. Forget the CO2. Now

41:48

you're sucking in microplastics. But

41:50

I mean, really honestly, I think about

41:53

how much bottled water I drink. I'm

41:55

really not into tap water, but Then

41:57

you're like, wow. And Still. Ah,

42:01

We're getting hit and fry. The really get

42:03

around of you're using my own bottle everywhere

42:05

I go all those things but you know,

42:07

just seems like we did his did so

42:09

much ritual now and lived to have enough

42:11

of their things around you. Ah seguin, protect

42:14

yourself but that was all about. You know

42:16

we got we got a do our part

42:18

deadly, taking care of our kids aren't paying

42:20

attention These things every really great reporting that.

42:24

And. I thank you that are seen as we. Are

42:27

at well you know was you

42:29

all the investigation were doing When

42:31

you when when Jeffrey put set

42:33

up a lot of you don't

42:35

realize that we'd This is all

42:37

just based on a nonprofit called

42:39

Informed Consent Action Network. Of the

42:41

heart of that nonprofits is our

42:44

mission statement. We are dedicated to

42:46

eradicating man made disease or that

42:48

has been our mission. We don't

42:50

just do this show, We don't

42:52

just report on the problems or

42:54

this is a giant experiment. really.

42:56

Were reporting on what we are

42:58

finding, what were funding, and what

43:01

we are. You know, pushy lawsuits

43:03

on embry losses against government agencies,

43:05

regulatory agencies, and sometimes on manufacturers

43:08

and products all to try and

43:10

make your environment better. Every week

43:12

we like to present you with

43:15

sort of the the latest update

43:17

from my legal team and this

43:19

is what was that this week.

43:31

There are many safety signal that

43:33

have arisen after Koba Nineteen Vaccine.

43:36

One of them is that there

43:38

have been numerous reports of singles

43:40

occurring after covered nineteen vaccine singles.

43:42

You might say it isn't that

43:45

weird. Singles after all is the

43:47

reactivation of the chicken pox virus

43:49

that remain dormant in the nerves

43:52

of the body after somebody is

43:54

had the chickenpox. Why would the

43:56

coordinates vaccine result in that viruses

43:59

lane door. borders, governments hibernating

44:01

basically in the nerves of

44:03

people around the country to

44:05

be able to re-emerge. Well, it

44:07

theorizes that the COVID-19 vaccine

44:10

actually reduces your body's immune

44:12

system and its immune function,

44:15

so it's not able to fight off infections

44:17

, and deal with insults the way it

44:19

normally does. And that allows

44:21

the chicken pox virus zoster virus

44:23

to reemerge as shingles. Even

44:26

in numerous peer reviewed studies, and

44:28

now we have also seen it.

44:31

The free tech field v-safe

44:33

data that a court recently

44:35

ordered v-produced. In fact, there

44:37

are over 2500 entries into

44:40

the v-safe system where people took

44:43

the time to literally type in

44:45

that they were experiencing shingles after

44:47

COVID-19 vaccine. You

44:49

can read some of those entries for yourself on

44:51

the ICANN website. And of course, we

44:53

will continue to make sure that every single

44:56

v-safe free tech field entry is made available

44:58

to the public, which we hope will be

45:00

done by the end of this year. Well

45:12

there you have it, ICANN is really

45:14

America's public health watchdog. That's

45:17

what we're there for, is to

45:19

try and stop the insanity. All

45:22

of the things that are being

45:24

done that are poisoning us, that

45:26

are moving through the FDA, the

45:28

USDA, the CDC, the NIH. One

45:32

of the things I've said before, people

45:34

will say to me, Del, how do

45:36

you know that all of the chronic

45:38

illness and neurological disorders that skyrocket in

45:40

kids has anything to do with vaccines?

45:42

How do you know it's not the

45:44

air we breathe, which has all sorts

45:46

of pollution in it, or the water

45:48

we're drinking, and the fluoride in all

45:50

the toxic chemicals? How do

45:53

you know it's not the antibiotics and the

45:55

hormones that are being put into all of

45:57

our food? Or how about glyphosate that's

45:59

sprayed on all of our crops all across

46:01

America. I mean, that argument

46:03

actually gets made to me and I'm

46:05

like, okay, I mean, sure, those are

46:07

definitely poisonous too. And by the way,

46:10

we are invested into, you know,

46:12

bringing lawsuits against all of those

46:15

things. Also, but let's be clear,

46:18

all of the things that you just pointed out, I'll

46:20

say to somebody, all

46:22

came through the same pipeline, which

46:25

was they were all approved by

46:27

FDA, CDC, NIH, Health and Human

46:29

Services, and said, oh, this

46:31

is safe. Go ahead and put it on

46:34

the shelves of America. Go ahead. Let them

46:36

drink from those plastic bottles. It's fine. Microplastics,

46:38

who cares? We've approved it.

46:40

Your government has approved so many things.

46:42

In fact, America is now approving so

46:44

many more toxic chemicals in your lives

46:47

than like third world nations. We are

46:49

terrible. And by the way, we have

46:51

the sickest, you know, generation

46:53

of children we've ever seen in this

46:55

country. And we have one of the

46:57

sickest generations in all of

47:00

the industrialized world. Boy, those are things

47:02

to be really proud of. Well, we're

47:04

getting to the bottom. We're changing. We

47:06

talked about the amount of, you know,

47:08

people waking up to the reality and recognizing

47:11

what's going on. But if you want to

47:13

stop this stuff, I mean, it's not just

47:15

knowing it, right? Knowing it's one thing. Sure.

47:17

Telling your friends and sharing this program. Really

47:20

great. But just knowing it doesn't do everything.

47:22

We've actually got to stop it. We got

47:24

to threaten them. We got to move in.

47:26

We got to get people, you know, fired.

47:29

We've got to go after their jobs. We've got

47:31

to, you know, bring lawsuits that make a difference.

47:33

All of that is how they realize, you know

47:36

what, last time we did that, we got in

47:38

a lot of trouble. We're all

47:40

about getting these people in trouble. So you

47:42

want to help us out? Want to become

47:44

a recurring donor today? Just go to the

47:46

top of the page, thehighwire.com hit donate to

47:48

ICANN. You want to be a rebel with

47:51

a cause? Just give us a couple bucks

47:53

every week and sit back and watch the

47:56

magic. We're asking for $24 a month for 2020.

48:01

But anything you can give, honestly, if you can

48:03

only give $20,000 a month, then we'll take it.

48:07

But, you know, everybody has their

48:09

limit. Everybody has what matters to

48:11

them. I hope this matters

48:13

enough to you to make it today

48:15

that you start donating. Just

48:17

hit that number, 720-22, into your

48:20

cell phone and write the word

48:22

donate. And we'll make it so

48:24

easily. One click, boom, and

48:27

you're in and you're starting to change the

48:29

world. All right. There are

48:31

so many topics that, you know, we keep

48:33

looking back at when the line happened and

48:36

the knowledge that we have now. And, you

48:38

know, so often it's like the I told

48:40

you so. The show could just be

48:42

called out the highway, but I told you so. We've

48:45

been at this for some time. We've got a real track record.

48:48

But one of the things we were talking about

48:50

in the middle of COVID were these amazing studies

48:52

on vitamin D, that there

48:54

were certain blood levels of vitamin D

48:57

where people could not. No one died

48:59

from COVID if they had enough vitamin D

49:01

in their system. And, you

49:03

know, even over in England, they saw these studies.

49:05

So they set out to do their own study

49:07

and it looked something like this. Vitamin

49:11

D is one of the many things that we've

49:13

looked into to see whether it

49:15

reduces the incidence or the

49:17

impact of coronavirus. And

49:19

I've seen reports that it

49:21

does. So we therefore put it into a trial.

49:26

And unfortunately, the results were that

49:28

it doesn't appear to have any impact. So

49:30

that is the latest clinical advice, which of

49:33

course is always kept under review. Of

49:36

course, there's a lot of arguments on vitamin

49:38

D, but all the studies that we've shown

49:40

you through the last couple of years on

49:42

the High Wire show that it is really

49:44

important. But someone that's really at the heart

49:47

of this conversation is the author of The

49:49

Indoctrinated Brain, Dr. Michael Nels, who

49:51

joins me now. It's great

49:53

to have you back. I tell. I'm very grateful

49:55

that you have me again. This book was phenomenal, but that's

49:57

not what we're here. I mean, we've already talked about it.

50:00

We talked about the great work that you've

50:02

done here, but vitamin D, this is something

50:04

we just touched on when

50:06

I interviewed you before, but

50:10

how important is it? Well, it's very important. That's

50:12

actually why it's also an important part of this

50:14

book, by the way. Because

50:17

it told me that the question

50:20

about why everything happened, because we know a

50:23

lot about what happened and how

50:25

it happened last four years, but

50:27

the question that really bordered

50:30

me, mind bordered me for years

50:32

now, and I hope the answer

50:34

is in here, is why it

50:37

happened. And the troublesome question, why

50:39

it happened, began with vitamin D.

50:42

And that's why I put it in here to

50:44

a large extent, and pretty much what we

50:46

are talking about today is actually covered in

50:48

the book, because it

50:51

was totally clear if it were about the health

50:54

at the time, then vitamin D

50:56

should have been propagated dramatically. In

50:59

fact, if people had been given vitamin

51:01

D, the whole program would have disappeared.

51:04

Nothing would have happened. We wouldn't have even recognized

51:07

that there is a severe

51:09

disease, a virus roaming

51:11

around, because the fact

51:13

is the virus is not detrimental

51:15

to us. It's not dangerous to us as long

51:18

as we have a higher level of vitamin D. And

51:21

the study you just started with here,

51:23

our discussion, I know

51:25

about these studies which were fabricated to

51:27

tell us that vitamin D is

51:30

not working. How do they do it? How do you

51:32

fabricate a study like that? It's

51:34

very easy. So for example, in fall

51:36

2020, a publication came out

51:39

coming from the hospital of Córdoba in

51:42

southern Spain. And they did

51:44

something very smart. People

51:46

have to understand what vitamin D actually

51:48

is. Vitamin D is produced in

51:50

our skin, or we eat it as a supplement,

51:52

or we eat it with fish like the Inuit

51:54

does in the north of

51:56

Greenland. So, in just one minute,

51:59

we'll be back. vitamin D but vitamin D is

52:01

a vitamin if we have to eat it, if

52:03

we don't produce it ourselves and

52:05

then vitamin D essentially or the

52:08

bloodstream goes into the liver and

52:10

is transformed there biochemically into what

52:12

we call a pro-hormone, a precursor

52:15

form of a hormone and this

52:17

hormone then of course after the

52:20

leaf's liver is

52:22

stored in our fat cells for

52:24

example and it goes

52:28

via the bloodstream to the cells where it

52:30

actually is undergoing a second

52:32

transformation and a biochemical transformation which

52:34

makes it to a hormone, a

52:36

full hormone where it then goes

52:38

into the nucleus and regulates hundreds

52:41

of genes for example genes necessary

52:43

to defend us against viruses. So

52:47

when we measure vitamin D in the blood

52:49

we don't measure vitamin D, what we measure

52:51

is the vitamin D pro-hormone. This

52:54

is the level that we measure the

52:56

25-hydroxy vitamin D and the 25-hydroxy is

52:59

the addition that is made in the

53:01

liver. So it's vitamin D

53:03

plus the hydroxy group and that is the

53:05

vitamin D pro-hormone and this

53:07

transformation takes a few days. So if you

53:09

ingest today let's say 10,000 international

53:12

units of vitamin

53:14

D, the blood level

53:17

of vitamin D pro-hormone that what you measure

53:19

as the vitamin D level will take a

53:21

few days to rise. So

53:24

if you are sick with COVID,

53:26

sick enough that you have to go into a hospital

53:29

then of course when you are sick

53:32

because you have a low vitamin D

53:34

level then it's very important

53:36

to increase the vitamin D level very rapidly.

53:39

So if you give people vitamin D not much will

53:42

happen very quickly because it takes a few days to

53:44

get to the vitamin D. Well even the pro-hormone still

53:46

has to turn to a home, it still has a

53:48

whole other journey to get through to actually start

53:51

feeding the cells correctly. Yeah absolutely

53:53

because once the pro-hormone is formed

53:55

and it goes through the

53:57

blood stream to the target cells which might

53:59

recognize that there's a virus and

54:01

start to activate the next transformation

54:03

process from pro-hormone to hormone, that

54:05

goes very quickly. But what really

54:08

is required for a

54:10

response, for a quick response to a

54:12

virus, to a threat, is to have

54:14

a vitamin D pro-hormone level very high.

54:17

So that's what people don't have. We have low

54:19

levels of vitamin D in our bloodstream. And

54:22

that's why people get sick. So the

54:24

guys, the physicians at Prodoba realized

54:26

that. They realized that and said, okay,

54:29

what do we do with the patients

54:31

who come into the hospital knowing that the

54:33

low vitamin D level in their blood, the

54:35

pro-hormone level, is the cause of the severe

54:37

disease? Well, we have to give them pro-hormone.

54:40

So what they did is, at admission,

54:42

gave them a high dose of vitamin

54:44

D pro-hormone and continued every two or

54:46

three days to do that. And

54:49

the level rise, and then they tested

54:51

or checked out compared to a control

54:54

group, what happens to these people? And

54:56

what happened was the likelihood that they

54:58

have to be, that this disease worsens

55:00

and that they have to go to

55:03

the ICU unit as a

55:05

marker of worsening was

55:08

reduced by a factor of 25. Wow.

55:12

No drug on earth reduces the risk

55:14

of from severe COVID

55:16

to a deadly COVID. Or

55:20

let's say to ICU COVID by

55:22

a factor of 25. There's no drug out which can do

55:24

that. Now all of that really,

55:27

I mean, I would think what you're saying though,

55:29

is it's sort of too, I mean, you're certainly

55:31

too late, especially if you're going to try and

55:33

take vitamin D yourself. Now you've

55:35

got COVID. It's so late. Really, it's

55:37

about keeping a steady, I mean,

55:39

do you, I mean, let's just talk about you and

55:42

how you take vitamin D yourself. How much of it

55:44

is a part of your life? Well,

55:46

the, that was a publication

55:48

out in Germany in fall,

55:50

already 2020, before the whole

55:52

spiking program enrolled from

55:55

the German General Research Center. They showed nine

55:57

of 10 deaths would have been prevented by

55:59

taking vitamin D. as

56:01

a preventive measure. I

56:03

remember a shocking study we talked about before where

56:06

they just said everyone that

56:08

had a blood level of 50 whatever the nanomole

56:12

per milliliter. Yes, they

56:14

found no one dying of... Oh

56:16

that's what's nanogram per milliliter actually different dose

56:18

that would transform into 125 nanomole

56:21

per milliliter. I used

56:23

like the nanomole per milliliter kind of but there

56:25

were different versions of it. You

56:27

always have to ask somebody if somebody tells you

56:30

hey what's your vitamin D level

56:32

and it give you a number but they don't tell

56:34

what the... Which I think

56:36

is what makes this all so difficult.

56:38

Where do I go? I mean I

56:40

saw a post on Facebook recently of

56:42

someone that was like having liver failure

56:44

and then finally they found out

56:46

that they were taking too much

56:48

vitamin D. I mean I

56:50

don't know if that's possible obviously it's just

56:52

someone making a post but we get these

56:55

scare stories out there. That's another story. I

56:57

don't know about like I don't think you

56:59

can overdose vitamin C. You know you get

57:01

the run. You can overdose pretty much everything.

57:04

You can. Even overdose water. Right that's

57:06

true. So anyway,

57:08

overdosing is another part of

57:10

the anti vitamin D propaganda but just maybe

57:12

go back very quickly

57:14

to the introductory video that you

57:16

showed that this person said

57:19

well vitamin D doesn't help you know

57:21

in COVID. Now if you

57:24

give somebody it's a clinical

57:26

trial vitamin D pro hormone and

57:28

the outcome is is

57:31

so dramatically better for these people who

57:33

got the drug. Now

57:35

vitamin D pro hormone is actually

57:37

a drug. It's not the vitamin

57:39

anymore. It's the drug but it

57:41

goes into the same pathway showing

57:43

the essentiality or the causality of

57:45

the severe case if you have

57:47

low vitamin D. You know

57:50

what about vitamin D level because if you raise

57:52

the level the severe severeness of

57:54

the disease disappears. Yes. Even if you

57:56

already have a COVID

57:59

at a stage where you go to the hospital,

58:01

you can't be saved if you raise

58:03

the level. So that shows it

58:05

as causality. So how do you make

58:07

a study that proves the

58:10

opposite? Well, it's very

58:12

easy. What happened is

58:14

a few months after the study

58:16

came out from Córdoba, a

58:19

study was done in Brazil. I call

58:21

it the Brazilian study. And there they used,

58:23

I think it was 200,000 international units. The

58:27

same setting, people come to the hospital severely

58:29

sick of COVID, not severe enough to go

58:31

to the ICU, but severe enough that they

58:33

have to go to the hospital. They

58:36

admitted to the hospital and they did

58:38

the same setting. One half

58:40

of the group randomized got vitamin D, the other

58:42

one not vitamin D prohomin, just vitamin D, but

58:44

200,000 unit. That

58:47

really sounds big, big number, 200,000 units. And

58:51

of course, as we have discussed, it takes a few

58:53

days to raise the vitamin

58:55

D level. The vitamin D prohomin level. And

58:59

so what happened is nothing

59:01

happened. The control group and

59:03

intervention group which got the vitamin D had

59:05

the same result. The same

59:07

numbers had to go to the ICU

59:10

unit, the same number died. There

59:12

was no difference. And so these guys

59:14

can say, oh, vitamin D doesn't work. The study

59:16

was so short that they just went in. I

59:19

mean, you didn't have time for the vitamin D

59:21

to kick in? Yeah. It

59:23

takes time for the vitamin D

59:26

to raise the vitamin D prohomin

59:28

level, which is required for safety.

59:31

At that point, everyone's going to the ICU. Yeah.

59:34

You don't have a few days if you

59:36

are severely sick already that you have to

59:39

go to the hospital. You don't have a

59:41

few days to wait before your level is

59:43

rising. And then they did something very

59:45

interesting. They measured actually the

59:47

vitamin D prohomin level and told everybody

59:49

it was increased. And

59:53

I looked at the study and said, how can it

59:55

be that it increased and had no effect? So I

59:57

checked the study very in detail. actually

1:00:00

that they measured the vitamin D pro-h

1:00:02

hormone level after the people

1:00:04

left the hospital. Wow. So a week

1:00:07

or two weeks later. Really? Yeah.

1:00:10

But they didn't tell that the audience, they just

1:00:12

told them, okay, we gave them vitamin D and

1:00:14

the vitamin D pro-h hormone level increased. But

1:00:17

they didn't tell people that only the survivors were measured

1:00:20

at the eyes. Right. So

1:00:22

it was a really tricky study. In

1:00:25

my opinion- I mean, is it

1:00:27

just drug companies? I mean, why

1:00:30

attack something that really saves people? Why

1:00:32

are- I mean, there's a government regulatory

1:00:34

agencies involved in this cover-up. Well,

1:00:37

the why question is answered in my book The

1:00:39

Indulcanated Brain. Yeah. It's all

1:00:41

about empowering the WHO to a world

1:00:45

organization that is essentially controlling

1:00:47

everything. And it's very obvious.

1:00:50

If the pandemic is essentially the stepping stone

1:00:52

to get there, what is

1:00:54

the pandemic worth if nobody dies? So

1:00:59

how much power do you get next time and

1:01:01

how much fear can you create? Yeah, absolutely. But

1:01:04

you see, they counted everybody as

1:01:06

a COVID death that had a

1:01:08

positive PCR, even a car. Right.

1:01:10

A car accident was sufficient if there is a

1:01:12

cross contamination, whatever.

1:01:15

You don't have to be sick of COVID, but it's a COVID

1:01:17

case. So, but at

1:01:19

one point, things become kind of

1:01:21

tricky. You really have to have some

1:01:23

people really dying of COVID to make a case.

1:01:26

And by making a propaganda

1:01:28

against vitamin D, that's

1:01:31

what you have to do. You have to

1:01:33

tell people vitamin D is dangerous. You

1:01:35

don't need vitamin D. And

1:01:37

actually, the New England Journal of Medicine published

1:01:40

a paper on vitamin

1:01:43

D and bone health. And

1:01:46

based on the findings of this study,

1:01:49

it was also a

1:01:51

study which would never have been published at the

1:01:53

first place because it's a ridiculous study. But

1:01:56

the editors of the New England Journal of Medicine,

1:02:00

published all the spiking

1:02:02

clinical trials, all

1:02:04

the important ones that actually led

1:02:06

to the admission of this experimental

1:02:09

therapy, gene therapy. Anyway,

1:02:11

the New England Journal then, based on

1:02:14

this bogus study,

1:02:18

made an editorial. And the editorial

1:02:20

is named Final Verdict on Vitamin

1:02:22

D. And at the

1:02:24

end of this whole Final Verdict,

1:02:26

they claim that nobody needs Vitamin

1:02:28

D even if there's a deficiency.

1:02:31

Nobody should take Vitamin D, doctors

1:02:33

should stop measuring Vitamin D or

1:02:36

prescribing Vitamin D. Wow. So

1:02:39

in my opinion, humans have

1:02:41

made an evolutionary step. So

1:02:44

in order for us to survive, we

1:02:47

don't need Vitamin D hormone anymore. A

1:02:49

hormone is not necessary for us anymore according

1:02:52

to the New England Journal of Medicine. But

1:02:54

according to the New England Journal of Medicine,

1:02:56

survival is dependent on the regular shots of

1:02:59

the virus. Right, the spike protein. Right, it's

1:03:01

incredible. So the spike protein became more

1:03:04

important for survival of humans as Vitamin

1:03:06

D. Asking about the why,

1:03:08

read the book. There's a lot

1:03:10

of people out there in our audience that

1:03:12

are suffering from long COVID or

1:03:15

other issues, something, whatever you wanna call it.

1:03:17

There's a lot of illness out there that

1:03:19

seems to be getting hard to sort of

1:03:21

kick. And there's different theories.

1:03:24

Is it triggering, underlying other symptoms?

1:03:29

Issues, Lyme disease, all, I mean, I

1:03:31

hear everything. But you've

1:03:33

been doing some work with low dose lithium that

1:03:35

I think is really interesting. Tell me a little

1:03:37

bit about that. Yeah, I

1:03:39

mean, lithium is also an interesting

1:03:42

WHO story because lithium, as I

1:03:44

found out many, many years ago,

1:03:47

is essential. It's essential for humans. Not

1:03:50

of course, the lithium that the huge

1:03:53

amounts that people have getting prescribed

1:03:55

for- Like

1:03:58

we just always have to think of people like- wandering

1:04:00

around some. Yeah, yeah. Hidosylthium

1:04:04

is given to patients

1:04:06

with manic depression. And

1:04:10

nobody really knows how it works.

1:04:13

But what people found out is that

1:04:15

people, even if they have manic depression

1:04:18

and continuously having depression, is a

1:04:20

prelude to Alzheimer's. So

1:04:22

they should have an increase in Alzheimer's risk.

1:04:24

And that was found out, actually, you have

1:04:27

a six-fold increase of Alzheimer's risk and you

1:04:29

have manic depression. But if

1:04:31

the treatment is lyseum, it drops to

1:04:33

normal. Really? Yeah. So that

1:04:35

was interesting. So

1:04:37

it's protective against Alzheimer's? Yeah,

1:04:40

and they found out that even at hundreds

1:04:43

or even a thousand of the dose

1:04:45

is sufficient to do that. Really?

1:04:47

So microdosed. So I went into that

1:04:50

and I realized, in the history

1:04:52

of human development in our,

1:04:55

yeah, in the old times, you know, a

1:04:57

thousand years ago, humans were

1:04:59

forced to live at the ocean

1:05:01

based on an ice age lasting for

1:05:03

70,000 years. And

1:05:05

at the ocean, the stable food became

1:05:08

fish, fish and mussels and so

1:05:10

forth. And in

1:05:12

fish and mussels from the ocean, the

1:05:14

lyseum concentration is a hundred times higher

1:05:16

than from fish and mussels from freshwater.

1:05:18

Okay. So they had a dose

1:05:20

of 1 to 2 milligram of lyseum they essentially

1:05:23

eat every day. If

1:05:26

you eat average, you know, a hundred, 200 grams fish

1:05:28

or something like this. So

1:05:30

you get ingested the 1 to 2 milligrams.

1:05:32

And if you look at this 1 to

1:05:34

2 milligram, it essentially is an essential dose

1:05:37

because it extends the life. It was shown

1:05:39

for pretty much every animal that was studied,

1:05:41

every animal, even drosophila, you

1:05:43

know, fruit flies, worms,

1:05:46

goats, rats, rodents.

1:05:49

If you take lyseum, you extend the lifespan.

1:05:51

Wow. And the

1:05:53

major reason is it stops the

1:05:56

inflammation. It reduces inflammation. also

1:06:00

in the brain what we call neuroinflammation. And

1:06:03

the target is a molecule that

1:06:05

is on the signal transduction

1:06:08

which is triggered by the spike protein.

1:06:11

So as you know, the spike

1:06:13

protein is

1:06:16

manufactured, you know, changed genetically to

1:06:18

have a furine cleavage site. And

1:06:21

this furine cleavage site for whatever

1:06:23

reason was left in the mRNA

1:06:25

spiking program. So

1:06:28

whenever our cells produce the

1:06:30

spike protein, it's cleaved and

1:06:32

the S1 subunit which is,

1:06:34

you know, the S1 and

1:06:36

S2 subunit, like the sausage,

1:06:39

you cut it into pieces and the

1:06:41

outer part is able to

1:06:43

interact with our immune system. In the brain

1:06:45

there's a receptor for that, it's called TLR4.

1:06:49

The TLR4 is a danger receptor. It's

1:06:51

a receptor not only for viruses

1:06:54

and bacteria, it's even a danger receptor

1:06:56

if we have mental stress. And

1:06:59

if this receptor is triggered by

1:07:01

mental stress or by the S1

1:07:03

subunit which is now after the

1:07:06

furine cleavage allowed to transverse into

1:07:08

the brain over the blood-brain barrier,

1:07:11

it enters the brain, triggers TLR4,

1:07:13

TLR4 triggers GST3 beta, it's just

1:07:15

a number, a name, it doesn't

1:07:17

matter what it means. But GST3

1:07:20

beta is a signal transducer which

1:07:22

signals into this nucleus of the

1:07:24

cell to activate pro-inflammatory cytokines, the

1:07:27

same ones which do the cytokine

1:07:29

storm. So the spike

1:07:31

protein triggers the cytokine storm in the brain

1:07:34

and this is the reason for brain fog, so

1:07:37

what we call post-vac or like COVID. So

1:07:40

the natural inhibitor of GST3

1:07:42

beta, the natural inhibitor is

1:07:44

lithium. So if

1:07:46

you give lithium, the cascade is broken, the

1:07:50

pro-inflammatory cytokine storm is finished

1:07:53

and you have the activation of the

1:07:56

production of new nerve cells in our

1:07:58

auto biotrifecral memory center which... raises

1:08:01

our Cyclotron resilience and you get

1:08:03

rid of the brain fog and

1:08:05

the prospect problematic in your brain.

1:08:07

Is this something that I mean

1:08:11

Do you do you do people

1:08:13

take it daily? Is this I take it

1:08:15

daily for years really because it's essential I

1:08:18

mean, it's like and what is low dose like

1:08:20

it is this in America? Can we just buy

1:08:22

this over the counter and it's funny in America.

1:08:24

You can buy it over the counter OTC Even

1:08:27

though it's not regarded as an essential

1:08:30

micronutrient by the WHO so WHO

1:08:33

actually has a statement that

1:08:35

it's Essential for goats.

1:08:37

It's essential for rats I

1:08:40

can tell you it's essential for every animal

1:08:42

that we have tested so far But

1:08:45

it's not essential for humans So we

1:08:47

have this weird situation that in Germany the essential

1:08:49

dose of about one milligram a day one

1:08:52

milligram It's a hundred or five

1:08:55

hundred of what you use as a

1:08:57

drug Okay, so it's totally

1:08:59

safe. It's far away from any

1:09:01

side effects and this one milligram if

1:09:03

I want to Give it to

1:09:05

patients in Germany. They have to have

1:09:07

a prescription So

1:09:09

you don't get it over over the counter. Yeah here

1:09:11

in America. You get it over the counter in the

1:09:14

United States I've checked that so and

1:09:16

I take it for years because it's essential It's

1:09:19

almost like if you were asking me that do

1:09:21

you need vitamin C? Yeah, you need vitamins No,

1:09:23

what if someone doesn't have brain flow? Is this

1:09:25

something that like gives you more clarity anyway? I

1:09:27

mean or the look at the lithium was shown

1:09:30

not only to dampen any Stress

1:09:33

response leading to the activation of the

1:09:35

neuro inflammation. You can better

1:09:37

cope with Problems you

1:09:39

encounter in your life could use a

1:09:42

little bit of that Yeah, absolutely You

1:09:44

raise what you do is you activate

1:09:46

the production of new nerve cells in

1:09:48

the hippocampus the autobiographical memory center And

1:09:50

as I've shown in my book this

1:09:53

raises your psychological resilience

1:09:56

and with higher resilience you can manage better So

1:09:58

what lithium does it? not naturally erases

1:10:01

the psychological resilience, it

1:10:04

actually erases curiosity, it

1:10:06

raises our ability to think. So

1:10:09

by essentially inhibiting it. Curiosity, then

1:10:11

that makes sense why they wouldn't want anyone

1:10:13

taking it, right? I mean, I feel like

1:10:15

that word, I'm more and more cherishing this

1:10:17

word curiosity because it leads to

1:10:20

critical thinking, right? I just say I'm just

1:10:22

immensely curious, which is why I do this

1:10:24

show. And you run into so many people

1:10:26

now that just aren't curious about anything. So

1:10:28

it's interesting that they're like saying every animal

1:10:30

on the planet needs this, except human beings.

1:10:32

Yeah. The WHO plan on taking

1:10:34

over the world and this lithium thing could get

1:10:36

in the way. And it's not only the inflammation

1:10:38

in the brain, that's the problem with the

1:10:40

lack of lithium. It's also the inflammation

1:10:43

outside the brain. So when the

1:10:45

corona started, I published my first book

1:10:47

on this, which is called the Corona

1:10:49

Syndrome. And I've mentioned, of

1:10:51

course, the vitamin D, but it was clear

1:10:53

to me that you could have also other

1:10:56

deficiencies that might trigger the cytokine storm. And

1:10:58

one of these deficiencies is actually lithium. So

1:11:01

I proposed lithium as an

1:11:03

antidote against the cytokine storm.

1:11:06

And that was 21. 22, at

1:11:08

the end of 22, a paper was

1:11:11

published, a scientific period paper and a clinical

1:11:13

study that seemed like a Córdoba study I

1:11:15

mentioned. People went to the hospital, but they

1:11:17

didn't get vitamin D prohormone. What they gave

1:11:20

the people is lithium. Controlled

1:11:22

study. Really? So

1:11:25

randomized, one portion got lithium, the other one didn't get lithium.

1:11:28

And according to what I proposed, it should

1:11:30

stop the cytokine storm and it did. So

1:11:33

the cytokine storm subsided immediately. The

1:11:35

people with severe COVID were released from the hospital

1:11:37

in half the time. Now the single one had

1:11:40

to go to the ICU. And

1:11:42

no one does. Is there a specific kind of

1:11:44

lithium? Like I know, and I'm going to make a caveat at

1:11:46

the end of this, that we're not a doctor, you

1:11:50

are, but not a price of 100 American. People are going to

1:11:52

look into it. Please do. Is there

1:11:54

a specific kind of lithium that you're looking

1:11:56

for? There are many different combinations of lithium.

1:11:58

Lithium is like sodium. it has to

1:12:00

have a part of sodium chloride we know is

1:12:02

the salt we eat. And there's

1:12:05

actually lithium chloride out there as well.

1:12:07

It's the same, you know, elementary chart.

1:12:09

It's in the here on top of

1:12:11

each other. So they have similar chemical

1:12:13

properties. So lithium

1:12:15

acetate is used, lithium whatever.

1:12:18

But in my opinion, the best

1:12:20

formula of the lithium is lithium

1:12:22

oritate. Oritate. Oritate, because oritate

1:12:24

also is essential for us. We

1:12:27

don't produce enough so there are transporters

1:12:29

of oritate from the gut into

1:12:31

our bloodstream and there are transporters

1:12:33

from oritate from the bloodstream into the

1:12:36

brain over the blood brain barrier. So

1:12:39

essentially the lithium oritate,

1:12:41

the oritate is kind of

1:12:43

high checking the lithium and helps to

1:12:45

transport it. So we need very low

1:12:47

doses of lithium oritate to have a

1:12:49

traumatic effect. And vitamin

1:12:52

D, what's the amount you think you should take? I

1:12:54

take about 6,000 units, international

1:12:56

units in winter. Because per day.

1:13:00

And it was shown. You see, the normal level

1:13:02

of vitamin D if you don't take any vitamin

1:13:04

D is in winter is around 25 nanomole. What

1:13:09

you mentioned when you have zero deaths

1:13:11

of COVID is 125. It's

1:13:14

also peer reviewed published. So

1:13:16

125 nanomole is protecting you from COVID. It's

1:13:19

also the level that protects you

1:13:21

very heavily from Alzheimer's and

1:13:24

other neurological disease. So

1:13:26

125 is ideal. 25 is what people

1:13:28

usually have. From 25 to 125 is 100 units. You've

1:13:32

got some room there to play with. And

1:13:34

one unit increase you try approximately 50 to

1:13:37

60 international units. So you can, from your

1:13:39

own level, and you find this actually in

1:13:41

my book here, if you want to

1:13:43

learn more about vitamin D, it's all in

1:13:46

there. You can use your

1:13:48

measurement and then calculate with this formula what you

1:13:50

need to get to the 125. So

1:13:53

I need about 6,000 in winter and

1:13:55

in summer. I even take in summer if there

1:13:57

are days where I don't get half the time.

1:14:00

time to go outside and have the sun. Here's

1:14:02

one of the things that I would say

1:14:04

to people out there is they probably have

1:14:06

an alternative medicine doctor that's looking at a

1:14:08

lot of these things that maybe isn't quite

1:14:10

dialed in. Is there something that they're,

1:14:12

can you, you know, they go to their doctor and say, watch

1:14:14

the high wire. What should that doctor

1:14:16

do to really get a better grip on how to

1:14:19

help their patients? Well, one way would be to read

1:14:21

my book, but to make a shortcut is of course,

1:14:24

get the information, the relevant information

1:14:26

on lithium and vitamin D you'll

1:14:28

find on my website. That's

1:14:31

michael-nels.com. You'll

1:14:33

find documents on that with all the

1:14:36

relevant scientific papers attached to it. You

1:14:39

can follow me on Twitter where you have

1:14:41

all access to all the different channels I

1:14:43

have and I have a sub-stack where you

1:14:45

find everything. So I put everything in wording

1:14:48

in Germany and then I translated everything into English.

1:14:51

So you will find everything there. Fantastic. You're

1:14:54

a busy man. Great work. Everybody's

1:14:56

book is the indoctrinated brain. You can

1:14:58

find this at our store, but also

1:15:00

other places where you can find a

1:15:02

book. I highly, highly recommend this. We

1:15:05

cover this. If you didn't see that

1:15:07

show, go back and watch that episode.

1:15:09

I feel like this is sort of

1:15:11

the companion to the psychology of totalitarianism.

1:15:14

As I said, one is Brave New World. One

1:15:16

is 1984, but it really gives you a sense

1:15:19

of what's happened during the COVID epidemic with a

1:15:21

lot of these ideas about how

1:15:23

to be healthier. That's some serious

1:15:25

information. I want to say that we are not

1:15:27

a medical show. I

1:15:29

would consult your doctor on your vitamin

1:15:31

D levels, on lithium, how to use

1:15:34

that. Make sure that you have a professional

1:15:36

working with you. I don't want to just have you sending

1:15:38

it out there. It'd be like Dr. Google. But

1:15:41

this is, I think, a great place to have

1:15:43

your research. For those of you that are suffering

1:15:45

from things like long COVID, I know you're looking

1:15:47

at a lot of different things. You're already working

1:15:49

with specialists. Maybe take a look at all

1:15:51

the work that Michael Nels is doing. I know I'm going to

1:15:53

take a deeper look so that we

1:15:55

can get to the flu season and everything else. I've

1:15:58

already seen vitamin D. do

1:16:01

its job and of course Pierre, Corey

1:16:03

and so many others are backing up

1:16:05

that information. Which is why we created

1:16:07

I Can Press. Just check out some

1:16:09

of the great books that we are

1:16:11

making available. At the

1:16:13

informed consent action network we are always

1:16:15

working hard to inform, educate and bring

1:16:17

you the truth. That's why I'm excited

1:16:19

to announce our new book and publishing

1:16:21

division I Can Press. Leveraging

1:16:24

the power of the written word,

1:16:26

I Can Press is partnering with

1:16:28

dynamic writers, medical professionals and experts

1:16:30

dedicated to the team. Building a

1:16:32

library that will captivate and empower

1:16:34

and inform you and your family.

1:16:36

I Can Press has already launched the

1:16:38

informant online monthly magazine, curating news from

1:16:41

I Can and the High Wire offered

1:16:43

exclusively to our recurring donors. Sign

1:16:45

up for the informant at ikndecide.org/the

1:16:48

informant. Now I Can Press is

1:16:50

bringing you two must-have books. First,

1:16:52

The War on Ivermectin from author,

1:16:54

Dr. Pierre Corey details

1:16:56

a relentless attack on a decades

1:16:59

old Nobel Prize winning medicine that

1:17:01

could have ended the pandemic. The

1:17:03

War on Ivermectin is available now,

1:17:05

also available I'm Unvaccinated and that's

1:17:07

okay. A children's book by Dr.

1:17:09

Shannon Croner which empowers parents to

1:17:11

talk to the children about the

1:17:13

decision to not vaccinate and how to

1:17:15

navigate any negativity they may encounter out

1:17:18

in the world. Buy these must-have books

1:17:20

wherever books are sold and that I

1:17:22

Can Decide dot shop. Start building your

1:17:24

library from I Can Press today.

1:17:29

Well look there's so much information out there

1:17:31

you know places to get of course I

1:17:33

Can Press but hey everybody make sure you

1:17:35

get out and check out Protocol 7 in

1:17:37

theaters on May 31st but if you want

1:17:40

to know when it's coming to a theater

1:17:42

near you or how to start your own

1:17:44

gather event to bring it to you which

1:17:46

is this is how the whole movement started

1:17:49

with Vaxx then go to Protocol 7 dot

1:17:52

movie and get

1:17:54

involved Andy Wakefield is

1:17:56

obviously and for many years

1:17:59

was all our his own, paving this way

1:18:01

for all of us to bring this truth,

1:18:03

just a spectacular individual that I just feel

1:18:06

so blessed to have spent the time that

1:18:08

I did work with him on Vax, an

1:18:10

incredible wealth of knowledge, honestly one of the

1:18:12

smartest people I've ever known in

1:18:14

my life. Well, and for right now, I got

1:18:17

to get out of here because I got

1:18:19

to get out to Geneva and stop a

1:18:22

world domination takeover event, which

1:18:24

is what the pandemic treaty is

1:18:26

all about. We're going to go out and stop it.

1:18:28

And if it has actually been stopped, then we're

1:18:30

going to make sure it's dead, it's buried.

1:18:32

I'm going to pour cement all over it,

1:18:34

throw flowers on it to make sure it

1:18:36

never happens again. I hope to see you

1:18:38

there on the 30th of May through June

1:18:41

1st, road to geneva.com. Look at all the

1:18:43

amazing speakers that are there. If you're in

1:18:45

Europe, get over there. If you're

1:18:47

in America and you really want to

1:18:49

jump in, make it happen. We are,

1:18:51

the change is happening on Saturday, the

1:18:53

rally in March. And of course, for

1:18:55

those of you that maybe didn't get

1:18:57

tickets or aren't able to get there,

1:18:59

but want to be a part of

1:19:01

this historic world moment where we really

1:19:03

stand together, we're going to be streaming

1:19:05

it starting at 6 30

1:19:08

a.m. central time on Saturday, the

1:19:10

high wire.com. This is how we

1:19:12

do it, folks. I

1:19:15

can't wait to bring back reports on

1:19:17

what is going down this weekend in

1:19:20

Geneva, Switzerland. But for all

1:19:22

of you out there, take care of your health. And I

1:19:24

want to say this, don't stress

1:19:26

out too much about all the chemicals that are

1:19:28

out there. Guess what? We're all breathing it

1:19:30

in. We're all drinking. No one's escaping

1:19:32

all of it. The human body is

1:19:34

amazing. You know, the work that we're

1:19:36

doing here, we're working to reduce all

1:19:39

of those toxic inputs as much as

1:19:41

we can. But you know what

1:19:43

is the most important part of your health Is

1:19:45

being happy, having some fun, playing

1:19:47

with your kids, laughing, having joy.

1:19:49

That is the greatest treatment there

1:19:52

is. And Make sure you don't

1:19:54

forget that we can really get

1:19:56

ourselves bogged down with all that's

1:19:58

wrong in the world. There's

1:20:00

a lot this right in the

1:20:02

world. that sun still rises every

1:20:04

morning, We still have beautiful sunrise

1:20:06

and sunset. Take a look at

1:20:08

your child's face, look into your

1:20:10

spouse's eyes, and take a walk.

1:20:12

And whether it's on a beach

1:20:14

or through a park, look at

1:20:17

the trees, look at the clouds,

1:20:19

would the sky, look at the

1:20:21

rocks that don't believe anything is

1:20:23

wrong at all and remember this

1:20:25

is all our earth. This is

1:20:27

our moment. This is the moment

1:20:29

we shows. Act accordingly.

1:20:32

And I'll see you. Next week.