Podchaser Logo
Home
459. Texas Children's Hospital Exposed for Illegal Gender Affirming Care | Dr. Eithan Haim

459. Texas Children's Hospital Exposed for Illegal Gender Affirming Care | Dr. Eithan Haim

Released Thursday, 27th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
459. Texas Children's Hospital Exposed for Illegal Gender Affirming Care | Dr. Eithan Haim

459. Texas Children's Hospital Exposed for Illegal Gender Affirming Care | Dr. Eithan Haim

459. Texas Children's Hospital Exposed for Illegal Gender Affirming Care | Dr. Eithan Haim

459. Texas Children's Hospital Exposed for Illegal Gender Affirming Care | Dr. Eithan Haim

Thursday, 27th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:01

Hello, everybody. I

0:16

had the pleasure and

0:18

the discomfort as well of

0:20

talking with Dr. Aitain Heim

0:23

today. And

0:25

he is a general and trauma surgeon operating

0:29

in Greenville, Texas. More

0:32

relevant to this story, he's come out

0:34

as a whistleblower recently against the

0:37

largest children's hospital in the world

0:40

in Texas, which

0:42

has been conducting illegal sex

0:44

change operations, pediatric

0:46

sex change operations. And

0:49

if that's not bad enough after he came

0:51

out as a whistleblower, the

0:54

Department of Justice sent federal agents

0:56

to his house twice,

0:58

the second time armed, the

1:01

second time to lay charges against

1:03

him, which are

1:06

very likely to prove, shall

1:08

we say, spurious

1:11

and motivated. And

1:13

so that's the state

1:15

of the medical justice

1:18

and also psychological communities

1:20

today in the face of this

1:23

absolutely catastrophic and pathological

1:25

onslaught of the gender

1:28

affirming care radicals. And

1:31

so we discuss all that.

1:34

Join us. Dr.

1:37

Heim, start by situating

1:39

yourself for everybody. Say who you

1:41

are, where you are in your

1:43

career, where you're working, where you're

1:46

located geographically. Just contextualize this for

1:48

everyone. Yeah. And thank

1:50

you for having me on. My name is Eitan

1:52

Heim. I'm a general and

1:54

trauma surgeon in a small town outside

1:57

of Dallas. I grew up in Florida. You have a

1:59

brother in the office. and sister, two parents, very

2:01

close with all of them. I

2:03

went to college in Florida and then medical school there

2:05

as well. And

2:08

I went to, did my surgical training

2:10

at Baylor College of Medicine in

2:13

Houston, Texas. And, you know, this was a big

2:15

deal for me because it's one

2:17

of the most prestigious surgery programs in the

2:19

country. You know, a lot

2:22

of legendary surgeons have come from that program.

2:24

So I started that program in 2018 and

2:28

was there for five years until 2023. So

2:32

I was able to see the world

2:35

of medicine surgery before

2:37

COVID and the transgender

2:39

insanity and then afterwards. So

2:42

I had a unique perspective because I

2:45

was at the bottom of the rung during this time. And,

2:48

you know, it had completely changed my life, changed

2:50

the way that I perceive medicine in

2:52

the world around me. And it was during

2:55

my time at this residency program

2:58

where we rotate at a few different hospitals.

3:01

So the program is Baylor College of Medicine,

3:03

but we'll rotate a few different hospitals. One of

3:05

those being Texas Children's Hospital,

3:08

which is the largest children's hospital in the world. One

3:11

of the best hospitals too. So

3:13

you spoke in that brief

3:15

description of the dawning

3:17

transgender insanity. Now, those are

3:19

pretty harsh words. And

3:22

you said you were in a very unique position

3:24

to be able to observe that. And

3:26

that was associated to some degree with COVID. So do you

3:28

want to flesh that out a bit? What

3:30

exactly did you see happening? And why do you refer

3:33

to it in those terms? Yeah, because

3:35

so when you're a surgical resident,

3:37

you're at the very bottom of

3:40

the totem pole of these big teams that take

3:42

care of a bunch of patients. So

3:44

all the grunt work is done by

3:46

the residents, talking to these

3:48

patients, doing the consents, seeing them

3:50

every single day. And these are

3:52

these big county hospitals, big children's

3:54

hospitals. So when I started in 2018,

3:56

this was like the apex. of

4:00

American medicine, where people would

4:03

be taken to the operating room, you know, cut

4:05

from the sternum to the belly, you know, have

4:07

their entire aorta replaced if they had disease, and

4:09

these people would go home, and I was able

4:11

to see this, and it was amazing. You know,

4:13

this is what I always dreamed of doing, because

4:15

my dad's was auditing, he would tell me stories.

4:18

And, you know, during that time, there was a

4:20

vigorous debate about issues in medicine

4:23

and surgery. We would have these meetings

4:25

every week where we would discuss these

4:27

topics, and we would discuss them freely.

4:29

We would have these

4:32

different points of view that were fleshed

4:34

out, you know, in really rigorous ways.

4:38

But in 2020, all that changed.

4:40

And this was, again, the time where I was at

4:42

the bottom of the totem pole, right? It was like

4:45

my second year in training. And

4:47

it was in March of 2020 that

4:50

everything had changed where the

4:52

medical profession and really

4:54

our society's institutions had

4:57

been transformed, I think, in two ways,

5:00

where they had, instead

5:03

of pursuing medicine

5:05

based on morality and evidence and science,

5:08

it was based on ideology. And

5:10

what I mean by that is this

5:12

belief that truth is subjective, that

5:16

it's not reflective of the object of

5:18

world, right? So that something is true

5:20

if you say it's true, not because

5:22

you can observe it or record it

5:24

or measure it. All you have

5:26

to do is just say it's true. And

5:29

this is a problem when you see it in like a college

5:31

classroom, but it's a totally

5:33

different thing when it's guiding the interventions

5:36

that you're recommending for patients.

5:39

And that's what

5:41

happened during COVID with the masks,

5:43

the lockdowns, the social distancing. None

5:46

of this was ever based on any type of

5:49

scientific thought. It was simply because

5:52

someone said it and everyone believed

5:54

in it. But

5:56

the second component that changed

5:58

was censorship. The ideology

6:00

had taken hold, but no one was able

6:02

to question it. No one was able to

6:04

debate it because of the censorship. It

6:07

happened in the media, it happened in

6:09

the news, but in academic medical centers,

6:11

I can attest that it was, this

6:14

is where the effect was most powerful.

6:17

Where if you questioned anything, you

6:19

would have the most severe repercussions

6:21

to your job, to your future,

6:24

to your opportunities, everything. So

6:27

a lot of people saw that in like this

6:30

very kind of bird's eye level, but I was

6:32

in the hospital. I saw

6:34

how people would die alone. They

6:36

would suffer for weeks in the

6:38

hospital. And then the

6:40

last day they're alive, there's

6:43

no one in the room with them except for me. And

6:46

I would see them pass away like this

6:48

and suffer. And the most important people

6:50

in their lives were not there. And then they have

6:52

to live with that guilt. But the worst thing I

6:54

saw is what was

6:56

happening to the children. Because when

6:59

these lockdowns were happening, we

7:01

would see bad cases of abuse before, but

7:04

the abuse we saw afterwards was the most shocking

7:06

thing I've ever seen. Where you would

7:08

have kids come in so frequently, because

7:10

they weren't in school, the signs of abuse weren't

7:12

being picked up. So it's like during

7:14

that time that became very familiar with the sound the mother

7:17

makes when you tell her that her child is dead. That's

7:20

a horrifying thing. So

7:22

that was my first few years of training. Let

7:24

me summarize that just to make sure that we've

7:26

got it. So the case you're making, you talked

7:29

about the dawn

7:31

of something approximating a subjective theory of

7:33

truth. And you say that things really

7:35

changed in March 2020. And

7:37

then you make a causal claim. You

7:39

said that in

7:41

the throes of the pandemic

7:44

lockdown, there

7:48

were hypothetical

7:51

medical practices that were implemented that

7:53

weren't based on evidence at all.

7:57

The social distancing, for example, and the

7:59

use of masks. And

8:01

if you oppose that, the introduction of

8:03

a very strict

8:06

form of censorship and your sense

8:09

is that that actually changed medical

8:12

culture quite dramatically and quite

8:14

suddenly and maybe quite comprehensively.

8:17

And you saw that extend to

8:19

the degree where we

8:21

were allowing or hospitals were allowing

8:23

or insisting that people who were

8:25

ill suffered and died alone

8:27

because they weren't allowed to see their loved ones.

8:30

And that perverted the

8:33

entire medical enterprise. And

8:36

then you said that you also saw the

8:38

dramatic effects of that, of

8:42

the lockdown practices on children who I

8:44

presume were exposed to more abuse partly

8:46

because they weren't, that

8:49

wasn't being monitored by schools,

8:51

but also partly I would

8:53

imagine that the additional economic

8:55

stress and sheer proximity that

8:57

two children that

8:59

was produced by the lockdowns also exaggerated

9:01

the conditions that would lead to abuse

9:03

to begin with. And so then

9:06

you maybe you'll tell us how that ties into

9:10

the transgender insanity because

9:12

that's the next step, right? So, okay.

9:14

So you saw a

9:16

perversion of the medical enterprise that you believed

9:18

was quite profound. Now, why do

9:20

you think you experienced that more dramatically in some

9:23

sense because you were at the bottom of the

9:26

medical hierarchy at that point? Why do you

9:28

think that gave you a particularly insightful viewpoint?

9:31

And the reason is because we would see

9:33

these people every single day. The ones who

9:35

would have to make the phone calls to

9:37

the families was us. The people who would

9:39

stay after and talk to the patients was

9:42

us. The breakdowns

9:44

these people would have were experienced by

9:46

us. We would see all the worst

9:49

parts of it. And

9:52

so yeah, that I believe laid

9:54

the groundwork because when you have

9:56

the entire medical establishment, every doctor

9:58

who participated in this, They like adopt

10:00

this sin, right, this shame, because

10:03

everyone knows it's wrong, but everyone's doing it.

10:06

And it's kind of like you prepare

10:08

them for what's next, because if they

10:10

don't speak out on that, then they're

10:13

not gonna speak out on anything else.

10:15

And it's in that environment, because the

10:17

transgender thing, if you remember, was always

10:19

there. Like the Jazz Jennings, he

10:22

was like 10 years before that, but

10:26

it was after COVID, where

10:30

the only way this becomes

10:32

as universal, as institutional

10:35

as it has now, is if

10:37

doctors don't say anything. Because

10:40

what these people are proposing has

10:42

zero therapeutic rationale. And

10:45

that goes before evidence. That's

10:47

upstream from evidence. Like

10:49

if I take out an appendix, right, I take

10:52

out someone's gallbladder, a colon mass, because I think

10:54

it's a tumor, I have

10:56

to have a logic, a rationale. I

10:58

have to be able to identify a

11:00

problem, make sure that the risks, sorry,

11:03

the benefits outweigh the risks, because

11:06

whatever intervention we're applying, you have

11:08

to do that calculus. But in

11:10

this case, with these transgender interventions,

11:12

there's none of that. The only

11:14

way it happens is if doctors

11:16

don't say anything about it, don't

11:18

point out how completely insane what

11:20

they're doing truly is. And

11:23

it was after that, around 2022, 23, that

11:27

you saw the transgender ideology

11:29

proliferate. It's like a wildfire,

11:32

right? Where you saw it. Yeah,

11:34

so that's an interesting, it's

11:36

an interesting hypothesis. You see, I hadn't

11:38

considered the fact that acceptance

11:41

of the lockdown

11:43

lies, especially on

11:45

the medical side, and

11:47

the emergence of that cancel culture around

11:49

any criticism, set

11:51

the stage for the

11:54

next sequence of lies.

11:57

I mean, there's other causal reasons I

11:59

presume. I mean, I read a PDF

12:01

a while back that was prepared by a

12:04

marketing agency that described the

12:06

growth opportunities on the transgender

12:09

treatment front, the so-called gender

12:11

affirming side of medicine,

12:13

which that gender affirming phrase, that's like

12:15

one of the most manipulative

12:18

lies I've ever heard in my life. It

12:20

goes along with the legislation

12:23

to forbid so-called conversion therapy, which I

12:25

as a therapist know that nobody has

12:27

been doing for like 70 years. That

12:30

was a complete bloody lie right from the beginning. And

12:33

the idea that this care is gender affirming

12:35

is it's

12:37

the antithesis of the truth. And

12:39

so your claim is part

12:41

of the reason that spread so quickly was because

12:43

there was a culture of compliance

12:47

and silence that had already established

12:49

itself firmly in the medical community.

12:51

Can you think of any other

12:54

reasons? Have any other

12:56

reasons occurred to you to account

12:58

for why this new idea, which

13:02

is so utterly insane, right? I

13:04

think it's Joseph Mangali level of

13:06

insanity. I've never seen the

13:08

medical and psychiatric community do anything

13:10

worse in my entire life than

13:12

what's been happening with so-called gender

13:14

affirming care. And so what

13:17

other reasons do you know that made

13:19

this occur? So, and just

13:21

one more thing about what you say for the language.

13:24

So it's anti-language, right? It's not just

13:26

a euphemism. It's not just

13:29

a few degrees off from the

13:31

truth. It's not oriented towards the

13:33

truth. It's oriented towards the exact

13:35

opposite. It's a complete lie. It's

13:37

an anti-truth. It's an anti-truth, it's

13:40

anti-language and it's anti-medicine. What this

13:42

is is not medicine. Completely, it's

13:44

diametrically opposed to reality and

13:46

to the truth, you bet. It's

13:48

really something to see. And like, as

13:51

you are implying, most lies are just

13:53

slightly off kilter, right? That's how people

13:55

get away with them. But there are

13:58

specific forms of lies that are- are diametrically

14:01

opposed to the truth. And

14:03

they're obviously insanely

14:05

pernicious. And that's

14:08

exactly the situation with so-called gender-affirming

14:10

care. Okay, so what did you

14:12

start seeing? You talked about the

14:14

kids that you'd seen who'd been

14:16

damaged by the COVID lockdowns

14:18

and the increase in abuse, but that's

14:20

a separate issue apart from the establishment

14:22

of the culture that we're describing. That's

14:25

a separate issue from the issues surrounding

14:27

gender-affirming care, which is at the heart of the

14:29

matter that you're concerned with. Okay, so lead us

14:31

into that. It

14:33

might be easy to just toss all of your

14:35

discipline to the side for the summer, but a

14:38

life of greatness doesn't happen by taking the easy

14:40

route. The Halo app offers an

14:42

incredible range of guided meditations and prayers

14:44

that are designed to help you deepen

14:46

your spirituality and strengthen your connection to

14:48

God. With Halo, you can

14:50

embark on a journey of exploration,

14:52

diving into different themes and types

14:55

of prayer and meditation. From gratitude

14:57

to forgiveness, each session offers a

14:59

unique experience, sparking your curiosity and

15:01

deepening your spiritual understanding. You

15:03

can choose different lengths of meditation to fit your

15:05

schedule, whether you have a few minutes or an

15:08

hour. With its user-friendly

15:10

interface and hundreds of guided meditations,

15:12

the Halo app has quickly become

15:14

a go-to resource for people seeking

15:16

spiritual growth and healing. You

15:19

can download the app for free at

15:21

halo.com/Jordan. It allows you to set prayer

15:23

reminders and track your progress. Halo

15:26

is truly transformative and it'll help you

15:28

connect with your faith on a deeper

15:30

level. Don't lose your prayer

15:32

habits this summer. Maintain your peace and

15:34

deepen your relationship with God. Download

15:37

the Halo app today

15:39

at halo.com/Jordan for an

15:41

exclusive three-month trial. That's

15:43

halo.com/Jordan. Yeah,

15:45

so it was around 2021, 2022. Everything

15:49

with COVID is happening and I'm

15:51

a part of it, right? So there's a part where

15:53

I've adopted this shame. I know this is wrong. I

15:56

know these people are being harmed. I know that what medicine

15:59

is doing is wrong. and people

16:01

are losing things that

16:03

can never be taken back, and

16:05

that I'm a part of that because

16:07

I was playing a role

16:09

in it. I tried to fight back

16:12

everywhere I could, but in

16:14

my inside, I knew that there

16:16

was a sense of shame within me. But

16:19

then it was during that time that the

16:22

transgender issue proliferated.

16:25

It became nationwide, worldwide. And

16:28

you think that these things

16:30

are happening in Washington State, Oregon,

16:32

New York, California, but you

16:34

don't think it's happening in Texas.

16:38

So the story starts in March of 2022,

16:42

where I was still a resident, the Texas

16:45

Children's Hospital had issued a

16:47

public statement unequivocally

16:49

saying they were going to shut

16:51

down their transgender clinic because

16:54

of potential criminal

16:56

liability. And that last part

16:59

is important because they acknowledged

17:01

that issue, potential criminal liability.

17:04

The reason they released that statement in March of 2022

17:08

is because a few weeks before, the

17:10

Attorney General of Texas, Ken Paxton, had

17:13

issued an opinion saying that these

17:15

interventions could be investigated as child

17:18

abuse, which they are. So

17:20

it makes sense why the hospital would release that

17:22

statement, right? They need to protect

17:24

themselves, avoid this criminal liability. So

17:27

they say we're shutting down the program.

17:30

And I

17:33

knew that that was a lie unequivocally. The

17:37

reason I knew that is because I worked

17:39

there. I did surgery there. The people who

17:41

were doing these procedures had told me they

17:43

were doing these procedures. So

17:45

over the next couple of months, people I worked

17:47

with had told me that, man, I

17:49

just implanted some puree block device in some 11, 12, 13 year

17:52

old kid who believes

17:54

they're transgender. And

17:56

I thought, man, that's odd. They

17:59

released this statement. and a few weeks before, a

18:01

few months before. So

18:04

I thought maybe this, maybe

18:07

like a few holdover cases, maybe they

18:09

were scheduled beforehand. You know, I

18:11

didn't believe it. It just seemed so absurd that the

18:13

hospital would be lying about something like this. I

18:16

just didn't think it was possible, right? So

18:18

over the next couple of months, it just gets

18:20

worse and worse, more and more frequent,

18:23

where it's becoming more frequent, but

18:25

also the stories are getting crazier, where

18:27

you have these kids with tons

18:30

of psychiatric issues. All of

18:32

those are being ignored, and they're just getting

18:34

these drugs, whether blockers, hormones, to

18:36

affirm their gender. So,

18:40

but I still didn't believe it, right?

18:43

Took me months. But then

18:45

it was January of 2023 that all doubt was gone,

18:50

because it was during that time that

18:52

the directors of the program, the transgender

18:55

program, the one that supposedly

18:57

did not exist, were given

18:59

the opportunity to speak at the hospital's

19:01

most prestigious lecture series. It's called Grand Rounds.

19:04

This is a lecture that's given every single week.

19:06

It's like, demonstrates the priorities

19:08

of the hospital. So

19:10

you have the directors of the transgender program who

19:13

are talking to the entire department, talking

19:16

about their algorithmic approach to

19:19

the hormones and the

19:21

blockers, advising general

19:23

pediatricians to ask about

19:26

gender identity behind the backs

19:28

of their parents, talking about

19:30

fertility preservation in

19:32

11, 12-year-old kids, talking about mastectomies when

19:34

kids get a little bit older. And

19:39

that was mind-blowing. But then

19:41

even, there was a few weeks after

19:43

that, there was a Zoom conference with a few

19:46

members of the transgender program with

19:48

a group of 150 medical students,

19:50

right? Like a public Zoom conference,

19:52

where you had one of the social

19:55

workers who talked about how they actively

19:57

concealed the existence of the program from

19:59

governing state. right, governing medical

20:01

bodies by saying, instead

20:03

of documenting consults, right, or

20:06

giving documentation to parents, she

20:09

would defer documentation, like

20:11

just calling consults or just tell

20:13

parents. The reason is to not

20:15

leave a paper trail. So these

20:18

people were explicitly talking about how

20:20

they were hiding this program. How did you

20:22

get access to that Zoom call? Because they

20:24

were public. The

20:27

entire medical school, it was a

20:30

medical student group who put on this conference

20:32

so anyone could join. There were like

20:35

150 people there. And the Grand

20:37

Rounds, yeah, the Grand Rounds lectures

20:39

are open to every person that texts his children,

20:41

every person at Baylor. So you have

20:43

like hundreds, if not like over a thousand people who

20:46

know the hospital said one thing, but

20:49

they're doing the exact opposite thing behind

20:51

closed doors. So

20:55

it took me months to make that conclusion because

20:58

it's just so insane and- Shocking,

21:01

right, right, of course, of course. Well,

21:04

I talked to Michael Schallenberger after

21:06

he broke the WPATH files. And

21:09

Michael is obviously a journalist who,

21:12

he broke the Twitter files too, him

21:14

and Tybee. And Barry

21:18

Weiss, I think was involved in that too. So he's

21:20

not a coward. And he told

21:22

me when we discussed the WPATH

21:24

revelations that he had watched Abigail

21:27

Schrier and I talk about her

21:31

book, Irreversible Damage and

21:33

the harm that gender affirming care, care,

21:36

God, I just, I can't even use those

21:38

words, is doing to

21:40

children. And he said that

21:42

he couldn't believe it. It

21:44

took him two years. It took him

21:47

two years to admit to what

21:49

might be going on.

21:51

And it's obvious that you were

21:53

suffering from the same conundrum and

21:55

it's not that surprising, right? Because-

22:00

Watching something like that unfold is the sort

22:02

of thing that makes you question your own

22:04

sanity because you're forced into a

22:06

position where you think, well, either

22:08

I'm seeing what's going on and a

22:10

thousand people are ignoring it even though

22:13

it seems extremely pathological and illegal and

22:16

anti-medical and immoral, and

22:19

that that's casting a dim light on the

22:21

entire profession. Or you're gonna

22:23

wonder if maybe there's something

22:25

wrong with the way you're looking at the

22:27

world. Both of those

22:29

are really stark and terrible choices. And

22:32

so it's not surprising it took

22:34

you a number of months

22:36

before you would even fully

22:39

admit to what was going on. What

22:41

was your emotional state like at that point?

22:44

You really look at who you are,

22:47

right? Like, who am I as

22:49

a person, right? Am I really a doctor? Am

22:51

I a surgeon? Because that was like the question, that was a

22:53

question that was going through my mind. I never thought about it.

22:56

I never answered that question

22:58

before, but because everything

23:00

that happened during COVID, I

23:02

was so angry. Every day I was

23:04

angry and my wife would tell me, like,

23:07

Aton, you're angry. My parents would tell me you're

23:09

angry. And I'm like a very not

23:11

angry person by disposition. Like,

23:13

I never have been angry in the

23:16

operating room. And that's saying something

23:18

for a surgeon to not be angry in the operating

23:20

room. But I was angry. And I

23:22

was, because I

23:24

hated to see what was happening to these people, to

23:27

these kids, to even

23:29

these adults, everyone, because everyone was

23:32

taking on these lies,

23:35

but people were

23:37

being harmed by it. People were dying alone.

23:39

These kids were suffering. And I was seeing

23:41

it every single day. So

23:44

when I would come home, I was angry. But what

23:46

I realized is that I was angry with myself, because

23:49

even though I'm at the bottom of the

23:51

totem pole, like, I still have a responsibility.

23:53

If I'm a doctor, I'm a surgeon, I

23:56

have to do something, because my dad's a doctor.

23:58

And he always told me, Like,

24:00

you have to take care of your patients. That's

24:03

the most important thing above anything else. But

24:05

he also said, you have to take care of

24:07

the profession. You have to be

24:09

a good doctor. You have to represent yourself

24:12

well. And I thought

24:14

about everything he had told me in was

24:17

I representing medicine? Like

24:19

surgery, like was I being a doctor in that moment? I

24:22

thought, if I don't do

24:24

something about this, I could never

24:26

live with myself, right? You have the biggest

24:28

children's hospital in the world. Lying

24:30

to the public about a program

24:33

that is manipulating, mutilating, and

24:36

sterilizing young children. You

24:38

have probably hundreds, if not a thousand people

24:41

who know about it, and I

24:43

know about it. So if I

24:45

didn't do something, right? You

24:48

know, for my wife's pregnant, she's,

24:50

my kids, she's doing October,

24:52

my first girl, she's

24:55

gonna be a daughter. If,

24:58

when she grows up and she looks back,

25:01

what is she gonna think of her father if

25:03

I didn't do something and just let this happen? Because

25:06

she's gonna know. So I thought I

25:08

had to do something. And that was in January of

25:10

2023, where I thought, you

25:12

know, the

25:15

reason I'm angry is because the shame

25:17

within myself for not doing something.

25:20

So, right? I knew that

25:22

there were risks. I knew that there were things to fear, but

25:24

there's something greater to fear rather

25:27

than the consequences within this world. Okay,

25:31

so I've got three questions. Like, how

25:33

many kids and adults do you think

25:35

were affected by this so-called

25:38

care during that time? How

25:43

did you come to the conclusion about what

25:45

to do? Because that's not

25:47

straightforward, right? Not at all. And

25:50

then what do you think

25:52

was the highest, the higher order issue

25:54

that was at hand that

25:57

was compelling you to both feel. guilty

25:59

and to speak. Do you mind if

26:02

I answer those in reverse order? Sure.

26:05

Yeah. So

26:09

in medicine, just like in anything

26:11

else, the only way to live

26:13

appropriately is to orient yourself

26:15

by the truth, to live by the truth.

26:19

There's nothing you can get away with. If

26:21

you lie, you're going to pay for it. So

26:26

that's the higher order

26:29

principle that was in my

26:31

mind that was driving that. But also

26:33

that, but number two is

26:35

something more physical, more granular,

26:37

is that there were kids being harmed, that

26:40

I could do something about it. There

26:43

were children who were an imminent threat of

26:45

being harmed. So

26:47

how many? Second

26:50

question, a lot. I

26:53

can't necessarily give you the exact numbers because

26:55

what I saw was limited, maybe

26:58

probably hundreds, a lot. But

27:02

then your first question is,

27:04

so I have this information, right?

27:08

I have to orient myself towards truth in order

27:10

to live, but also to fix this problem. There's

27:12

kids who are going to be hurt. And

27:15

I have the information, but what do I do about

27:17

it? Like I'm a no one,

27:20

right? I don't have social media.

27:23

I'm very private. I

27:26

live in a very small town now. So

27:28

I thought, well, we have to find someone who

27:31

can do something about this. So we just started

27:33

reaching out to anyone, everyone and

27:35

anyone who might do something about it.

27:38

So it took us five months to

27:41

get a hold of someone who would take this story.

27:43

And we reached out like tons

27:45

of emails. I just sent emails, like

27:47

emails to dozens of people. Who's us?

27:50

You said us. Yeah,

27:54

okay, fine. I just wondered, well, the reason

27:57

I asked, well, the reason I asked is

27:59

because... And this is useful maybe for anybody

28:01

watching and listening is that one

28:03

of the things that's useful to do if

28:06

you ever find yourself in a situation like this is

28:08

to see if there's a couple

28:10

of other people around that you can trust, that

28:12

you can ally with because it's

28:14

relatively easy to fire one person but it's

28:16

anti-pilary them, but it's a lot harder to

28:18

do that with two and it's probably impossible

28:20

to do it with four. So,

28:23

but you were doing this alone. Why

28:26

do you think you had to do it alone? Because

28:28

the American academic medical system

28:31

is like East Germany. Like

28:33

no joke, if there was

28:35

a colleague who kind

28:38

of thought the same way, we

28:40

would physically go to dark,

28:43

quiet corners and talk about

28:45

these things, right? But no, no,

28:48

it's, there is

28:50

a culture of censorship and

28:53

fear that is

28:56

very, very real. And

28:58

I can attest because I was there, I lived through it.

29:01

It's unimaginable. So no

29:04

one's gonna do anything like this. And I wouldn't

29:06

want to necessarily involve people because

29:08

especially we sacrifice

29:11

so much against that point. I

29:15

mean, many

29:17

people would be, that's why it's

29:19

so easy for doctors to say, I'm just not

29:22

gonna do anything. I'm not gonna, I'm

29:24

gonna stay silent, right? But their

29:26

calculus is incorrect. So

29:28

yeah, it was during that

29:31

time, I just would send emails. It's

29:33

like news organizations I thought would be

29:35

receptive to the story or journalists. Took

29:37

me five months because I think people just didn't believe

29:39

me. Well, that may be part of the

29:42

reason. The other part of the reason might be that they're

29:44

in a culture that's the same as yours, because

29:47

it's shocking. Look, I know what

29:51

you're saying already to some degree.

29:53

I mean, I'm being investigated by

29:55

my college in Ontario for daring

29:57

to question the gods of the

29:59

transgender. I don't know the extent of it.

30:02

And it could easily be

30:04

that if it's a movement of silence that's

30:07

infiltrated the medical and the psychological

30:10

communities that it's

30:12

no better in the world of,

30:14

especially in legacy media. In fact, maybe

30:16

it's worse. And that could easily

30:18

be the case. So who did you

30:21

reach out to just to make sure that you're

30:24

not in the right place? That

30:26

could easily be the case. So

30:28

who did you reach out to just

30:30

out of curiosity? And then who finally

30:32

responded? Yeah. So I won't say

30:34

the names of the organizations, but

30:36

these are the conservative organizations who would take a

30:38

story like this. So

30:41

I want to have a degree of... Charitable.

30:47

Charitable, yeah. Because they

30:49

may have not believed me. They had other things going on. Like

30:51

I get it. Like I'm just

30:54

some random guy who's like emailing him a

30:56

bunch of times. Probably saying I'm some weirdo.

30:59

So yeah, understandable. But

31:01

then after months, I

31:04

finally get in touch with Chris Farrufo in like

31:06

early to mid May of 2023. And

31:10

he demonstrated some interest in his

31:12

story. So we go through

31:14

the vetting process to make sure I'm not... I'm

31:17

a real person. I'm a surgeon. I work there. That

31:20

story is true. And it was the

31:22

perfect timing because I didn't know this at the

31:24

time, but the Texas Senate

31:26

was voting on the bill to

31:28

ban these interventions in the

31:30

state of Texas like a week

31:32

later. So we go through

31:34

this process to get the story ready. And

31:37

then the story comes out on May 16th, 2023

31:39

and blows up in

31:43

the news. It's everywhere. I

31:45

think you even retweeted about it, if

31:48

I remember correctly. But

31:50

the story does exactly what we hoped it would do. I

31:53

was the anonymous whistleblower. No

31:56

one knew my name. The story had

31:58

outlined how the hospital had worked. to the

32:00

public and not only continue

32:02

the program, but expanded it behind closed

32:04

doors. Within 24 hours of

32:06

that story coming out, the

32:10

Texas Senate passed that bill

32:12

with bipartisan support, banning

32:15

the interventions that we had exposed.

32:18

And it was passed with bipartisan support, partly because

32:20

our story came out the day before, because

32:22

there were multiple Democrats who didn't know this kind

32:24

of thing was happening in their districts. And

32:27

the reason I know that is because I spoke

32:29

with the guy who wrote that law, and he

32:31

had told me that they had printed out physical

32:34

copies of our story and handed it out to

32:36

every single member of the Texas Senate.

32:39

So within 24 hours of our story coming out,

32:42

the conduct we had exposed was

32:44

voted to become illegal in

32:47

the state of Texas. Yeah, well, it

32:49

was probably the case too that the

32:52

Democrats that you're speaking of and

32:54

the Republicans as well, were

32:56

also very loath to believe

32:59

this. You know, I've talked

33:01

to many Democrat, Congressman and

33:04

senators, especially at the

33:06

federal level. And especially

33:10

the Republicans are often blind

33:12

to what's really going on,

33:14

let's say in higher education,

33:17

in the medical schools, for example. There

33:19

are 10 years behind the time or 15 years

33:21

behind the time, but the Democrats

33:24

are, I would say willfully blind

33:26

to the pervasiveness and danger of

33:28

the radicals that are within their

33:30

midst. They say, for example, that

33:33

when someone like Kamala Harris

33:35

says equity, that

33:38

all she means is equality of opportunity, which

33:41

is complete bloody rubbish. She uses

33:43

a different word. And if she's

33:46

not smart enough to know the difference, then

33:48

she's too stupid to be vice president. That's

33:50

for sure. And if she does know the

33:52

difference, then she's too ideologically corrupt to

33:54

even be a proper citizen of the United States.

33:57

And so she's damned if she does and damned

33:59

if she doesn't. as far as I'm concerned.

34:01

And the fact that the moderate Democrats enable

34:04

that kind of idiot ideology

34:06

is, it's unforgivable as

34:09

you can see in consequence of

34:11

the trans catastrophe because it is a

34:13

catastrophe. Okay, so you got a hold

34:16

of Chris Rufo and he brought the

34:18

story forward. You're

34:21

anonymous at this point. It

34:23

makes a legislative difference. What

34:25

happens at the hospital? Bring

34:27

us forward from May, 2023. So

34:31

I'm anonymous at this point. No one knows

34:33

who I am. I'm so busy with surgery.

34:35

It's like nothing even happened. A

34:38

few days after that, another whistleblower comes

34:40

out, someone who worked in the transgender

34:42

clinic, who actually worked with these doctors

34:44

and was horrified by what was

34:46

happening. So this person comes

34:48

out in another story released by Christopher

34:50

Rufo, a few days

34:52

later. The attorney general, a few

34:55

days after that, announces an investigation to the

34:57

hospital. And then about

34:59

a week and a half after, the CEO

35:01

of Texas Children's says that he's gonna shut

35:03

down the program in accordance with

35:06

SB 14. After

35:08

that, everything goes quiet. That

35:11

was May of 2023. I

35:13

was getting ready to finish my residency,

35:15

my surgical training, because that was my

35:18

chief year of the program. So

35:20

you're doing all this while

35:23

you're not even completely finished

35:25

your medical training. So this really

35:27

is your introduction into modern

35:30

medicine as it's practiced currently.

35:33

I can't believe, I can't imagine how demoralizing

35:35

that would be. But it's for that

35:38

reason that I did it, right? It's

35:40

because of, I was seeing

35:42

what was happening. Of course, someone

35:44

has to do something about it. Because

35:46

if I want to pass on a career,

35:49

a profession to my children, a world to

35:51

my children, I

35:53

have to do it when it's the most difficult thing to do.

35:55

It's like, what options did I have? So

35:57

of course, you know. But

36:00

yeah, it's kind of funny to say that

36:02

because it was on the

36:05

day of my graduation from surgical training that

36:07

the next part of the story where it gets gets

36:09

really wild because Five

36:13

weeks later the day I'm graduating from surgical

36:15

training one of the most important days of

36:17

my life, right? You spend all this time

36:19

sacrificing you miss all these important events. So

36:22

it's a Friday June 23rd We

36:24

have the ceremony in a couple of hours about

36:26

to meet with my family My wife

36:28

and I are just getting ready in our apartment when

36:31

all the sudden I get an

36:34

aggressive knock on the door I think man

36:36

like that's weird. Like who could this be? So

36:38

I shuffle over I open it and

36:40

standing outside our two federal agents with Health

36:43

and Human Services They

36:45

show me their badges and tell me that

36:47

they're investigating a case regarding medical records so

36:50

in that moment everything

36:52

just you freeze right your mind just

36:54

shuts down and And but

36:57

in the back of my mind like, you know

36:59

in like my cerebellum somewhere, you know I I

37:01

just knew they were there to make an example

37:03

of me because I was anonymous

37:06

We were able to tell this story a bill

37:08

got passed another whistleblower came out They had to

37:11

shut down the program if I

37:13

was able to do this How many other people

37:15

were able to do this right? It was a

37:17

challenge to the dominant political ideology Of

37:20

course, I knew that's kind of what

37:22

was going on, but you freak out in the moment.

37:24

So I invite him in Sleep

37:27

is the foundation for our mental and physical health

37:29

In other words, you've got to have a consistent

37:31

nighttime routine to function at your best But if

37:33

you're struggling with sleep, then you've got to check

37:35

out beam beam isn't your run-of-the-mill sleep aid It's

37:37

a concoction carefully crafted to help you rest without

37:40

the grogginess that often accompanies other sleep remedies A

37:42

bunch of us here at the Daily Wire count

37:44

on beams dream powder to knock us out and

37:46

sleep better through the night So we can show

37:48

up ready for work the next day Just

37:50

makes beam dream into hot water or milk

37:53

stir or froth and then enjoy before

37:55

bedtime Then wake up feeling refreshed without the

37:57

next day grogginess caused by other sleeping

37:59

products dream It contains a powerful all-natural blend

38:01

of Reishi, magnesium, Eltheanine, Apigenin, and Melatonin

38:03

to help you fall asleep, stay asleep, and

38:06

wake up refreshed. And with it now

38:08

being available in delicious flavors like Cinnamon Cocoa,

38:10

Chocolate Peanut Butter, and Mint Chip, Better

38:12

Sleep has never tasted better. And today, listeners

38:14

of this show can get a special

38:16

discount on Beam's Dream Powder. Get up to

38:18

40% off for a limited

38:20

time when you go to shopbeam.com/Peterson and

38:23

use code PETERSON at checkout. shopbeam.com/Peterson

38:25

and use code PETERSON for

38:27

up to 40% off. So

38:33

we sit down and they want to... So

38:35

you figured that out right away. You basically

38:37

figured that out right away. How the hell did

38:39

they know who you were given that the story

38:42

had broken anonymously? Well, they

38:44

had most likely used

38:47

a huge amount of federal resources

38:50

to pursue this investigation in

38:53

that time to find out it was me. They had to mobilize

38:56

the agents, do an

38:58

investigation, find all

39:00

their evidence, surveil me to find out when

39:02

I was going to be home, surveil me

39:04

to find out when I was graduating, find

39:06

out where my address was, and then come

39:08

to my home a few hours before I

39:10

was graduating. So it's like when you have

39:12

the most power. Do you think they timed

39:14

that? Do you think they timed that to

39:16

coincide with your graduation? And also, who is

39:18

they as far as you know? Obviously,

39:22

the hospital wouldn't be very happy with you because

39:24

they had to shut down this program. And then

39:27

there are people pulling the strings behind the scenes

39:29

to keep the program going. But who

39:31

do you believe or perhaps know

39:34

was behind the investigation

39:36

into the whistleblowing? Well,

39:38

you know who runs Health and Human

39:41

Services and the FBI

39:43

and the

39:47

different legal organizations that

39:49

want to see this pursued? So,

39:52

yeah, you have the most powerful people in the

39:54

country who I believe are behind

39:56

this. And I think the timing was exactly

39:59

what I was looking for. exactly what

40:01

they were intending, because they have to use

40:03

the value of that accomplishment, the meaning of

40:05

that day, as their

40:07

method to extort the

40:10

threat, right? They have

40:12

to use that as the extortion

40:14

for my compliance, because

40:16

they know I'm starting my career. In

40:19

order to preserve that, they need

40:22

to do that so that I comply with them.

40:24

I admit to something that never happened, so

40:27

that I can participate in some phony

40:29

investigation and then close the door permanently

40:31

for other whistleblowers in the country. But

40:34

as they're coming to find out, they

40:36

knocked on the wrong door, because

40:39

that day we decided to fight. But

40:43

when they were setting up their little tripod to

40:45

do an interview, my wife comes out. She

40:48

was getting ready, and luckily my wife is

40:50

a brilliant attorney. She's actually

40:52

an assistant US attorney at

40:55

the Department of Justice. So my wife works at

40:57

the Department of Justice. She's a lawyer in the

40:59

Northern District of Texas. She

41:02

had been hired at the time, and that's an important point later in

41:04

the story, just kind of put that in the back of your mind.

41:06

But she comes out, and we both look

41:08

at each other and we'd say, bad idea. We

41:11

go to our bedroom, and we both say, you

41:13

know what, not a good idea to speak

41:15

with them without an attorney present. We

41:17

go back out and we tell them, we

41:20

won't speak with them further. They say, okay. They

41:22

pack up their things. Before leaving, they hand me a

41:25

target letter. And it's just a piece

41:27

of paper that says, I

41:30

am a potential target of a criminal

41:32

investigation, and it's signed by

41:34

a assistant US attorney in the Southern

41:36

District of Texas. So we

41:39

knew that a few minutes after

41:41

that door opened, the door closes,

41:43

our lives are gonna be changed forever,

41:46

because we had a choice, just like before. Do

41:49

we fight back? Do I fight back? Do

41:53

I submit to this ideology? Do

41:55

I compromise everything I believe in,

41:58

everything I believe my profession to be? You

42:00

know, do I, you know, compromise what

42:03

was happening to these children? So there

42:06

was, there was no question. There was no way I would

42:08

allow that to happen. So,

42:10

you know, I decided

42:13

to fight that day and we've been

42:15

fighting ever since. What do you think, what do you

42:17

think, what do you think

42:19

they wanted from you? Like they

42:21

presumed, I imagine, or knew that

42:24

you were the whistleblower at that

42:26

point. And they came using these

42:28

very sophisticated, I would say, and

42:31

well thought through intimidation tactics, extraordinarily

42:33

well-timed, I would say, sadistically well-timed.

42:36

And, but you've

42:39

already broken the story. And so

42:41

you've done most

42:44

of the damage that you could do, arguably. What

42:46

do you think they wanted from you at that

42:48

point? Fear and compliance.

42:52

Because they needed, right?

42:54

It's like, it's not the

42:56

typical justice system, right? Where it's

42:59

these people who are actually pursuing

43:01

the truth in order to obtain

43:03

justice. This is the exact opposite.

43:06

When you become a target of

43:08

a corrupt justice system investigation, people

43:11

believe that when you comply, when you give in

43:13

to them, you're actually gonna make it better for

43:15

yourself, but it's the exact opposite. Because

43:17

it's their virtue, it's the truth

43:20

that they are targeting. So

43:24

you believe that your participation, right?

43:26

If you're innocent, will exonerate

43:28

you, but it's the exact opposite. It's

43:31

because you're innocent, because you're virtuous, that

43:33

they're targeting you in the first place.

43:36

And I knew that at that

43:38

point, because I was able to see all

43:40

these investigations over the previous couple of years,

43:42

where this was happening. So at that point, I already

43:45

had the framework in my mind. Like, this

43:47

is a corrupt Department of Justice. What

43:50

kind of investigations are you referring to that

43:52

you had seen over the previous years? If

43:56

you think about the main political

43:58

investigations into. to political

44:01

opponents of the democratic party over the

44:04

past four years. So

44:06

for example, if you look at anyone

44:09

who spoke out during COVID, if

44:12

you look at Douglas Mackie, if you

44:14

look at the abortion- Batted sharia. Yeah,

44:17

by Chari, if you look at the

44:19

abortion protestors who are being sent

44:22

to prison for 10, 20 years for the face

44:24

act for sitting in front of a

44:27

clinic, right? You

44:29

know, your compliance does

44:31

not exonerate you, right?

44:34

It's because of your innocence, because of your

44:36

virtue that you're being targeted in the first

44:38

place. So I knew that, it was obvious.

44:40

So I still don't exactly understand

44:43

what, okay, say they wanted

44:45

your compliance, but compliance with regard to

44:47

what? For you to retract your accusations,

44:49

you're telling me that you knew that

44:51

complying wasn't going to help you, but

44:53

I still don't understand exactly what they

44:55

hope to accomplish other than to

44:58

intimidate you and to stop other whistleblowers. Is

45:00

that the gist of it? And

45:02

you know, that's actually a really

45:04

good question because compliance towards what?

45:08

I believe they needed me to comply,

45:10

right? In order to admit to a

45:12

crime, to grovel at their feet, to

45:14

issue some fake

45:17

apology for doing the right thing. So

45:21

basically, outline

45:23

for us what exactly the

45:25

charges were. So I see, so they brought these charges forward

45:27

to you. And the

45:29

presumption was that possibly you

45:32

could admit to them. Hypothetically,

45:35

that would mean things would go easier for you, which

45:37

is completely not true, but then it would also discredit

45:39

you and

45:43

serve as an object warning to anybody who was going

45:45

to pull the curtain back in

45:47

the future. Okay, so what exactly did they accuse you of?

45:52

So at that point, completely unclear. And

45:55

that's where it goes into the next part of the

45:58

story. But I think it's- Okay, okay. Yeah,

46:00

it's the point where they needed to make an

46:02

example as me, they needed to make me into

46:04

a criminal, right? Because if they

46:06

could do that, of course, they

46:09

shut the door permanently to every other

46:11

whistleblower in the healthcare system in our

46:13

country, they shut it permanently. Well, and

46:15

they discredit you too. Exactly.

46:18

Right, and that's gonna be very

46:21

convenient because you could imagine that

46:24

Ken Paxton, for example, and

46:26

the rest of the Texican Republicans aren't

46:29

going to take the rebellion of the

46:31

Texas Children's Hospital and their lies

46:33

lying down. And so you play a

46:35

pivotal role in that. Their best strategy

46:37

is to discredit you and turn you

46:39

into a criminal, obviously. Okay,

46:41

so continue with the story, let

46:44

it continue to unfold. Yep, so

46:46

after that, right, what do we do, right? So my

46:49

wife and I, we had the graduation, we go on

46:51

our patio and

46:53

we celebrate. So we put on Vietnam War

46:55

music, we opened a bottle of champagne, and

46:58

we celebrate because at that point, what do you do? Good

47:03

for you, so you went on with the

47:05

celebration? Of course, yeah, yeah. Yeah,

47:08

now we have you. Okay. And

47:10

it was kind of one of those moments where you look

47:12

back and you're like, oh my God, that's completely insane. But

47:14

what else could you do? When

47:17

the federal government comes to our country door, you

47:19

have to fight back. Well, I also think when

47:21

you're shocked like that, you

47:25

tend to revert to what would

47:27

be typical and habitual behavior, because

47:30

you don't know what else to do. I mean,

47:32

what the hell do you do when the feds

47:34

come knocking at your door, because you've blown the

47:36

whistle on people in

47:38

your children's hospital who are mutilating

47:41

kids? Like, that's

47:43

a nightmare that's really beyond comprehension. And

47:45

so it's not like you're gonna know

47:47

how to react. Yeah, and

47:49

it was at that point where it's

47:51

like, once you cross the Rubicon, you're

47:53

never gonna go back to that life,

47:56

that you become this new person. Like, you're

47:58

entering this unknown. where

48:01

you don't know what it's going

48:03

to be, right? It's like complete darkness, but

48:06

you have faith, it's the right place to go. So

48:10

we got in touch with our attorneys, right?

48:12

Through Christopher Roof, a brilliant people. Marcella

48:14

Burke, she's amazing, she's a fighter. So we

48:16

knew she was the right person for the

48:19

case. Over the next couple

48:21

of months, we go into like this state of

48:23

legal purgatory where we have

48:25

no idea what's going on, what

48:27

they're investigating, anything, because we had

48:30

exposed that the hospital was lying. They were

48:33

doing something that they acknowledged held criminal liability,

48:35

right? It's like, I'm a whistleblower. I had

48:37

made this public, a law got passed within

48:39

24 hours. Like, what could they

48:41

be potentially doing? But it was

48:43

over the next six months that

48:45

the corruption we saw coming from the Department

48:48

of Justice was so severe

48:50

that I had no choice but to take

48:53

this story public because

48:55

I had no intention of

48:57

doing this. We moved to a

48:59

very small town and I work in

49:02

an even smaller town. We just

49:04

wanted to get on with our lives, like

49:08

have a family, operate

49:11

on my patients and take care of them. But

49:14

it was during those six months where

49:16

we knew that I would

49:18

be destroyed if I stayed silent. And

49:22

that's why I took my story public. But to

49:24

outline that a little bit more, after

49:27

I took my story public in January of 2024, six

49:30

months after, my attorneys had

49:32

sent a letter to Congress outlining

49:34

that misconduct in a

49:37

letter to Jim Jordan. And just to

49:39

give you an example of a few things. Oh,

49:41

yes. So the misconduct, you're speaking

49:43

of the misconduct, sorry, you're speaking of

49:45

the misconduct of the Department of Justice

49:47

officials specifically? Yeah, yeah.

49:50

Okay, and the misconduct you're referring

49:52

to, is

49:54

it limited to their intervention

49:57

in your case and their

49:59

ill-defined threat? or were there more things

50:01

you said that you became aware of more corruption?

50:04

So obviously they came

50:06

to intimidate you with

50:08

ill formed and false charges. And

50:11

obviously that's bad enough, but you alluded to

50:14

the fact that you discovered other things as

50:16

well. Yeah, well, it was

50:18

the interactions between my attorney and

50:22

the prosecutor, my attorneys and the

50:24

prosecutor. And it was so shocking

50:26

that my attorneys felt obligated to blow

50:28

the whistle themselves. So

50:31

it was, for example, the prosecutor

50:33

in this letter says

50:36

that she was going to bring me into a jury trial, even

50:39

if she was going to lose, even on a

50:41

technicality. And

50:44

what that means is if there is no

50:46

crime, then you just pursue it if you're going to lose. The

50:51

implication being, right, the belief is that they're doing

50:54

this to an

50:56

innocent person because I had

50:59

blown the whistle, right? So they were

51:01

essentially telling us this. They had

51:04

threatened my wife. My wife was undergoing a

51:06

background check for

51:08

the Department of Justice. And

51:11

during those instances in this letter,

51:13

it says that one of the

51:17

first things I was brought up was that she

51:19

says, well, I'm surprised Andrea would

51:22

interfere with an investigation like this.

51:26

She won't have any issues unless she continues to

51:30

become a problem. And

51:32

what she was referring to was my wife

51:34

advising me of my constitutional rights. Not

51:37

only that, it's also saying I had no right

51:39

to blow the whistle. That for

51:42

my job as a doctor, it was

51:44

not my job to blow the

51:46

whistle on what was happening, that if I had

51:48

an issue, I should have just

51:50

stood outside with a sign. And

51:53

it was over

51:55

those months where I made

51:57

the conclusion, these people are going to

51:59

come after me. No matter what, no matter what

52:01

I do. Starting

52:05

a business can be tough, especially knowing

52:07

how to run your online storefront. Thanks

52:09

to Shopify, it's easier than ever. Shopify

52:12

is the global commerce platform that helps you

52:14

sell at every stage of your business. From

52:16

the launch your online shop stage all the way

52:19

to the did we just hit a million order

52:21

stage, Shopify is there to help you grow. Our

52:23

marketing team uses Shopify every day to sell

52:25

our merchandise, and we love how easy it

52:28

is to add more items, ship products, and

52:30

track conversions. Shopify helps you

52:32

turn browsers into buyers with the internet's

52:34

best converting checkout up to 36% better

52:37

compared to other leading commerce platforms.

52:40

No matter how big you want to grow, Shopify gives

52:42

you everything you need to take control and take your

52:44

business to the next level. Sign

52:46

up for a $1 per month

52:49

trial period at shopify.com/JBP.

52:51

Go to shopify.com/JBP now to grow

52:54

your business no matter what stage

52:56

you're at. That's

52:58

shopify.com/JBP. You.

53:05

You, well, you said something very relevant is like,

53:08

I told you earlier that Shellenberger had a

53:10

hard time believing what Shryer

53:13

and I had discussed. And

53:15

then I've also and

53:17

so that just shows you how difficult it is

53:19

for people to believe what's actually going on. But

53:22

then also it's the case that when

53:27

someone like you pops up or

53:29

arguably someone like me, say in

53:31

relationship specifically to the Ontario College

53:33

of Psychologists, it's a lot of

53:35

easier for everyone to assume that

53:38

you're a troublemaker or that I'm

53:40

a troublemaker, that there's something fundamentally

53:42

wrong with us. And

53:44

that the institution

53:46

that we're criticizing couldn't possibly be

53:49

that corrupt. And like that

53:53

impulse to demonize

53:55

the whistleblower is valid

53:59

when. institutions are

54:01

mostly sane and have

54:04

integrity. And our

54:06

institutions were mostly sane and had

54:08

integrity until quite recently. And

54:10

what that also applies is that it's

54:13

very hard for anyone to overcome their

54:16

suspicion of let's say someone like you.

54:18

When I first heard about your case

54:20

in detail, I had tweeted you

54:22

out a year ago or so as you pointed

54:24

out, but I became more aware of what was

54:26

going on with you again in recent months. There's

54:29

this little part of the back in the

54:31

back of my mind thinking, oh, this

54:33

guy, he's probably just a troublemaker. He's probably

54:35

just a narcissist, you know, because even

54:38

though I know that that

54:41

could well be not true, right? And I

54:43

have more reason to know that than most people.

54:45

And so what that also applies is that

54:48

moving ahead with a case against you

54:51

is perfectly, it's a perfectly

54:53

logical strategic move, even if they know you're

54:55

innocent and if it's doomed to failure, because

54:58

the mere fact that you'll be dragged through

55:00

the courts is enough to

55:03

have 25% of people or

55:05

50% of people write you off as

55:07

probably a criminal. You know, where there's

55:09

smoke, there's fire. There's no way you

55:12

would be being prosecuted if you hadn't

55:14

done something wrong. So it's a

55:16

very smart strategy. Yeah, and especially,

55:19

it's especially smart because there's gonna

55:21

be no consequences for them, right?

55:24

They can bring this case, right? It's based on

55:26

nothing. And they will

55:28

become princes and princesses

55:30

in this new empire of lies,

55:32

right? Their loyalty to the cause,

55:38

to go after an innocent person is like their

55:41

own blood sacrifice. If they

55:43

can protect this evil ideology, if

55:45

they can protect the harming of

55:47

these children, then they are demonstrated

55:49

to be, you know, loyal subservience.

55:52

But then I thought it's like

55:55

people are waking up to it, right? Like

55:57

people are seeing the justice system for what it is. Like

56:00

this is a corrupt investigation. This whole

56:02

thing is corrupt. And I'm

56:04

gonna be destroyed, right? Or worse,

56:07

especially when you think about what's happened to

56:09

other whistleblowers, right? Like

56:12

in Boeing's case where-

56:14

Yeah, right, no kidding. If you're

56:16

a problem. No kidding. So I

56:18

thought the only way to survive

56:20

this, both theoretically and

56:23

possibly physically, is to tell

56:25

this story because it's gonna happen either

56:27

way. Yeah. Right? Yeah, yeah, yeah. Okay,

56:29

so let me ask you again here.

56:32

So you mentioned earlier who

56:35

was leading the charge in

56:38

the legal battle against you. So

56:40

let's return to that for a minute because in

56:42

so far as it's possible and correct, I

56:46

would like the people who are doing this not to

56:48

be hidden. Now you mentioned

56:50

the assistant attorney general in the

56:52

South of Texas. Is that the

56:55

person who's pursuing this

56:57

case? Yep, yep. And people can- And

56:59

who is that? Yeah, people can-

57:01

Who is that? People can find it. If

57:04

they're interested, they can find out who that person is.

57:08

Okay, okay, fine, fine. So we'll leave it at that.

57:10

All right. And so why are

57:13

you loath to make the name public now?

57:15

Just out of, I'm not gonna press you,

57:17

I'm just curious. Just out

57:19

of caution. Yeah, and also just

57:21

for that. Yeah, okay, okay. Okay, that's fine,

57:23

that's fine. All right, so, oh,

57:26

and you mentioned I

57:28

believe it was Paxton's or maybe

57:30

the Senate's proclamation that the

57:33

practices that the Children's Hospital were

57:35

engaging in could be

57:37

construed as criminal. I'm

57:39

curious at a international

57:41

crimes level because I think

57:44

there's every reason to

57:46

assume that the sterilization and mutilation of

57:49

children is actually

57:51

a crime against humanity. It's not a

57:53

mere form of criminal activity, mere. And

57:56

I do believe, I mean, I'm not

57:58

a lawyer and that's a problem, but. But I read the

58:00

relevant description

58:03

of what constitutes crime against humanity.

58:05

And if this doesn't qualify,

58:07

then, well, either my comprehension

58:10

is addled or the

58:13

legislation is written badly. Those are the options, as

58:15

far as I can tell. And

58:17

just to take a little detour for a second,

58:19

I would actually challenge that.

58:22

Like Dr. Pearson, I

58:26

would say that this is already a crime. It's

58:29

always been a crime. If a

58:31

patient comes into my clinic, right, I

58:33

was doing surgery earlier today, I was

58:35

in clinic tomorrow. Someone comes

58:37

into my clinic and they say, Dr.

58:40

Heim, right, I'm

58:43

so overweight, right, I'm

58:46

so overweight, I need a gastric sleeve. And

58:50

they say it's my body image, I need this

58:52

surgery, I need it because you need to affirm

58:55

who I am. But they're

58:57

skinny, right, and their BMI is like 15. If

59:00

I were to operate on that person and do a

59:03

gastric sleeve, right, because they told me that,

59:05

I lose my license, I go

59:07

to prison. What's happening

59:09

here is no different, but it's worse. Right.

59:13

Right. Yeah, so

59:15

it's our Overton window has shifted

59:17

for this one single issue. Everywhere

59:20

else it's correct. But because this was

59:22

infused with politics from the

59:24

beginning, our Overton window has shifted. All

59:27

we have to do is shift it back. Well,

59:30

you already showed too though in

59:32

your earlier description is the Overton

59:34

window for what constituted acceptable medical

59:37

evidence shifted terribly during the pandemic. And

59:39

that set the stage for this next

59:41

sequence of lies. The fact that we've

59:43

accepted the shift of that Overton window

59:46

with regard to medical practice in this

59:48

one domain means for sure

59:50

it's going to shift in

59:52

other ways. Right. You

59:54

can see this happening already. There are

59:57

already papers being published in psychological journals.

1:02:00

Once you tell this story publicly, the corruption

1:02:02

becomes self-evident. Because it's like what,

1:02:04

in what you said earlier, it's like when people

1:02:06

hear it, like they naturally think,

1:02:08

man, there's, this guy's probably a criminal. He's

1:02:10

probably a scumbag. But like, I

1:02:13

wouldn't let them define the story.

1:02:16

If I'm gonna go through this, it's gonna be on my

1:02:18

terms, right? I'm not gonna let

1:02:20

them lie. That's a better strategy. That's a

1:02:23

better strategy, definitely. I'm not gonna let them

1:02:25

lie, just like

1:02:27

they have everything else to

1:02:29

manipulate, to cheat, to

1:02:31

coerce. In this case,

1:02:34

I have control. Even though, you know,

1:02:36

everyone would think I'm like the one

1:02:38

who's leasing control. When you're

1:02:40

the focus of an

1:02:42

investigation by a corrupt Department of Justice, you'd

1:02:44

think you're not in control, but

1:02:46

you have all the control. Because the

1:02:48

only way for them to maintain their

1:02:51

legitimacy is through your compliance, right? But

1:02:53

it's only through your compliance that you

1:02:55

get destroyed. So I took the

1:02:57

story public, and the reason was just to

1:03:00

protect myself, but also because the

1:03:03

story is meaningless unless there's offense,

1:03:06

right? And most of

1:03:08

our politicians aren't doing it, right? Most

1:03:10

of the people who we elect to represent

1:03:12

us aren't doing it. There's some good ones.

1:03:15

But now it's our responsibility,

1:03:17

right? And during those six months where

1:03:19

I was anonymous, we had

1:03:21

spent over $250,000, all

1:03:24

of our savings, our investments, everything. Like we're

1:03:26

broke. We've been broke for a long time.

1:03:28

That's okay. But we

1:03:30

had gone on the offense too, to

1:03:33

try to defend these bills, to try

1:03:35

to develop cases, not only to protect

1:03:38

whistleblowers, but also to make

1:03:41

sure this doesn't happen in the future. But

1:03:45

so I come out in January

1:03:47

of 2024 with my story publicly.

1:03:50

Over the next few months, until June, a

1:03:53

week and a half ago, I'm

1:03:55

just public, right? I was

1:03:58

working as a surgeon at the time. intermediation,

1:24:00

the idea that that's fully reversible

1:24:02

is absolute bloody nonsense. But do

1:24:04

you have a sense of

1:24:07

just what magnitude this problem is

1:24:10

and then of what

1:24:12

the magnitude is in

1:24:14

terms of the full movement towards

1:24:16

surgical intervention? Specifically

1:24:18

among minors, let's say. I

1:24:20

know that the diagnosis rate has gone way

1:24:23

up. It's now at minimum

1:24:25

thousands and thousands of children who

1:24:27

are diagnosed with gender dysphoria, but

1:24:30

this is more specific on the medical side.

1:24:33

Being administered hormonal

1:24:35

interventions and then

1:24:37

I know

1:24:39

what's that happens, the probability progressing towards

1:24:42

surgery is quite high. So

1:24:44

what kind of numbers do you think we're looking at here? So

1:24:47

I wanna answer your question in two ways. So

1:24:50

specifically the numbers, I would

1:24:52

say hundreds of thousands and

1:24:54

it's important for people to understand that once these

1:24:56

children are being put in this position, they

1:25:00

become a chronic medical patient for life because

1:25:03

puberty blockers are not reversible. And

1:25:06

especially because by their own protocols,

1:25:09

they shut off any exit ramp.

1:25:11

They shut off any alternative because

1:25:13

any alternative is prevented

1:25:15

by the threat of their

1:25:17

own suicide. They're blackmailed into

1:25:19

one pathway forward. So

1:25:22

they're not meant to be on puberty blockers for a short

1:25:24

period of time. I would implant

1:25:26

puberty blockers in kids who actually had

1:25:28

precocious puberty, this early onset when they're

1:25:30

like six years old, they start having

1:25:32

signs, but you take them out right when they become 11,

1:25:34

12, 13 years old, but

1:25:37

in this case, they're meant to block the

1:25:39

entirety of puberty, then hormones,

1:25:42

then surgery. But the

1:25:44

reason we can't give you

1:25:46

an exact number is because

1:25:48

there's illicit uses of drugs

1:25:50

over the internet for everyone.

1:25:53

But then I wanna answer your question

1:25:55

in a second way because those are numbers,

1:25:57

those are just statistics.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features