Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:02
In the spring of 2017, after
0:04
a preliminary injunction hearing, a federal
0:07
judge ordered Rutherford County to stop
0:09
using the filter system, their policy
0:12
for legally detaining kids.
0:14
The impact of that decision was massive.
0:17
The number of county kids sent to jail dropped
0:20
by almost 80% over the next year, which was good
0:23
for the kids of Rutherford County. And
0:25
that injunction was also good for Wes
0:27
and his legal team, who were still pursuing
0:30
a lawsuit against the county. Like
0:33
we thought, great, we've got the injunction,
0:35
and then, you know, they're going to have
0:37
to settle this thing or face a trial,
0:40
and we have all these good arguments, and we're going to
0:42
get these experts, and
0:44
we would have a really great shot at convincing
0:46
a jury of the value of these claims.
0:50
So Wes and the two other lawyers on the case,
0:52
Mark and Kyle, started gearing up
0:54
for the trial of their careers.
0:57
They did more depositions of jail and court
0:59
staff, and hired an expert witness
1:01
to testify on the trauma and impact
1:04
of jailing kids so young.
1:06
And in preparation to wow a jury, they hired
1:09
a photographer to take specialized
1:11
photos of the jail. Their plan
1:13
was to put VR headsets on jurors,
1:16
so they could feel what the kids did, being locked
1:18
up in a tiny cell. But
1:20
there's a problem with gathering all that evidence.
1:23
That's a ton of damn money. Here's Mark.
1:26
I remember getting the expert witness bills and being
1:28
like, oh my god, you know, and
1:31
so we'd get the bill, and then there'd be another one
1:33
like a month later for another $10,000 or $15,000. So
1:38
like that $15,000 was just a
1:40
kick in the balls.
1:42
While the lawyers were bleeding money, the
1:44
county was raking it in. Because
1:47
the thing is, Rutherford County's juvenile
1:49
jail wasn't just a place for its delinquent
1:52
kids. It was a place for other counties'
1:54
kids, too. As illustrated
1:56
by an infomercial the county sent out across
1:59
the state. Built
2:02
in 2008, the Rutherford County Juvenile Detention
2:04
Center is a 43,094 square foot facility that
2:09
is located in the heart of Tennessee.
2:11
It's narrated by Judge Davenport
2:14
and it's called, What Can the Rutherford County
2:16
Juvenile Detention Center Do For You? Well,
2:19
for starters, there
2:20
are 64 clean and secure
2:22
detention beds with 48 of those being
2:25
in a single occupancy room
2:28
that have a toilet, seat, water
2:30
fountain, private shower, desk
2:32
and intercom system. Over drone shots
2:35
and B-roll of kids in gray and white striped
2:37
jumpsuits, Davenport makes
2:39
her pitch to neighboring counties. Facility,
2:41
check. Great
2:43
employees, check. You
2:45
should send
2:46
your delinquents to Rutherford County's
2:48
state of the art juvenile jail.
2:50
Please contact us and let
2:52
us be your partner for the safe
2:55
custody and well-being of the detained
2:57
youth of your community.
3:08
In the year after
3:09
the county stopped using the filter system,
3:12
after the number of Rutherford County kids in
3:14
the jail plummeted, the detention
3:16
center's revenue doubled. Rutherford
3:19
County was still very much in the business
3:21
of jailing kids and business
3:24
was booming. A
3:27
federal judge had ordered the county to stop
3:29
jailing kids under the filter system, finding
3:32
it was likely unconstitutional. But
3:34
this was only a temporary injunction, not
3:37
a definitive ruling. And there seemed
3:39
to be no real fallout from it. No
3:41
consequences for any county employees,
3:44
not even a public apology. So
3:47
to the lawyers, this lawsuit felt like
3:49
the only avenue to some kind of justice
3:51
and accountability for what happened, which
3:54
meant they either had to win the case definitively
3:57
in a trial or negotiate a
3:59
large enough settlement. So the kids would get restitution.
4:03
But time is its own commodity in these kinds of
4:05
cases. And as the months and
4:08
then years went on, time worked
4:10
in the county's favor. Their
4:12
lawyers filed motions to get the case thrown
4:14
out. And the federal judge held
4:17
off on ruling on these motions, possibly
4:19
to push the two sides to settle, which
4:22
just caused more time to slip away. And
4:25
while that's going on, life happened
4:28
for Wes, Mark, and Kyle.
4:31
First, Kyle's marriage fell apart.
4:34
Then Mark and his wife moved to Canada, where
4:36
she grew up. He could still work on
4:38
the case from there, but it was a lot harder for
4:40
everyone involved. As
4:43
for Wes, he'd been sober
4:45
for over three years until... I
4:47
thought, you know, it won't hurt just to try. He
4:50
got back on OXIE. I could just do, like,
4:52
just one just today. It'll be
4:54
fine, you know. I won't mess
4:57
anything up. That relapse
5:00
actually happened earlier in the case and
5:02
lasted a few months. Mark and
5:04
Kyle didn't even find out. But
5:07
then he had a second relapse on alcohol
5:09
and prescription drugs, which was far
5:12
worse. He would end up in
5:14
an inpatient rehab for four months.
5:17
Another lawyer had to come in and help out while
5:19
Wes was gone. Then
5:21
back to Mark. His marriage
5:23
eventually ended, and so did his sobriety.
5:27
He started drinking again. The
5:32
lawyers told me the relapses didn't affect
5:34
anything. Mark and Kyle both
5:36
said there was enough of them to pass the work
5:38
around. Do
5:41
I totally believe none of this affected the case?
5:44
I'm not so sure.
5:45
But still, they were limping
5:48
to the finish line.
6:00
dedicated to the person.
6:17
In the fall of 2020, the
6:19
lawsuit rolled into its fourth year, and the
6:22
lawyers were getting increasingly concerned. They'd
6:25
sunk nearly $100,000 of their own money into
6:26
the case.
6:29
And they didn't know how much longer this whole thing
6:31
could drag on. A few more years,
6:34
maybe more. And what if in
6:36
the end they lost? Kyle,
6:39
usually so confident, said the decision to
6:41
settle was a product of fatigue.
6:44
It's cool and all to be these shoestring lawyers,
6:46
he told me. But he acknowledged that
6:48
there's a reason these kinds of cases are
6:50
often backed by a big firm with
6:52
the pockets. By
6:55
June 2021, the lawyers in the county had a deal. Here's
6:59
what they agreed to. First,
7:02
the preliminary injunction against the filter system
7:05
would become permanent. Second,
7:08
the county would pay out as much as $11
7:11
million in fees and restitution
7:14
to kids who'd been wrongfully arrested, jailed,
7:17
or both. In the
7:19
end, because of the statute of limitations,
7:22
it was determined that only about 1,200 kids
7:24
would qualify. And
7:26
while $11 million is significant,
7:29
the guys had made a big concession to get
7:31
there. The process
7:33
for paying the kids. What
7:36
they'd agreed to was a claims-made
7:38
settlement, which meant that each kid
7:41
who had an eligible claim, that kid
7:43
had to fill out a bunch of complicated paperwork
7:46
and send it in themselves. The
7:48
lawyers would help, but it was an arduous process.
7:52
For each valid claim, a kid would receive
7:54
about $1,000 for a wrongful arrest and $4,800 for an illegal jailing.
8:00
But a recent study of these types of settlements
8:03
found that only about 9% of
8:05
eligible claimants ultimately file
8:08
claims. And for this case,
8:10
the lawyers had allowed the county to keep
8:13
any money they didn't pay out. So
8:15
in order to make the county really pay the
8:17
full settlement amount, 11 million, the
8:20
lawyers were going to have to find these 1,200 kids. And
8:26
what's more, there was a hard deadline.
8:30
The lawyers had just
8:30
four months to cold call
8:33
people, cold email people, cold
8:35
doorknock people, and let them know,
8:37
hey, put in your claim,
8:40
get your money, and make the county pay
8:42
for what they did to you.
8:45
There
8:48
are snacks and drinks
8:51
and vape pods. Eyedrops?
8:54
Yeah. Might get dry.
8:56
In early October 2021, a
8:59
little less than a month before the deadline, I took
9:02
a ride with Wes and Kyle. Wes
9:04
had just gotten back from rehab. He
9:07
and Kyle were searching for people to file claims.
9:10
They had a printout of a bunch of names and addresses
9:12
they wanted to hit. These
9:14
were the high rollers of the lawsuit. Kids,
9:17
most of them now adults, with multiple
9:19
detention claims. In the
9:21
case of the law, the lawyers believed they were illegally jailed
9:24
at least three or four times, often
9:26
more. Like Wes
9:29
discovered that there was some 10
9:32
claims. There's some 10 claims,
9:34
but one person. That's the most you've
9:37
found. Yes, that's
9:38
the most of it. That's
9:40
by far the most. Ten claims
9:43
added up to $48,000.
9:45
So Wes and Kyle started referring to the
9:47
kid as their grand prize winner.
9:51
It was exciting to think about this young guy
9:54
answering the door to this news. A
9:56
sudden and unexpected windfall of
9:58
almost 50 grand. We
10:01
pulled up to the address, a rundown apartment
10:04
complex, and we decided Wes
10:06
and Kyle would go in first, then
10:08
let me know if the grand prize winner was comfortable
10:10
with me recording. All
10:13
the information they were going off of, the names
10:15
and addresses, was confidential, so
10:17
they had to be really careful with what they could share
10:20
with me. So I sat
10:22
in the backseat of Wes's black sedan,
10:25
until they came back with news.
10:26
What happened?
10:27
Someone is
10:30
there who says, I've never heard of that
10:32
person. And I've lived here since 2013. I've
10:35
lived here since 2013, so... They debated what
10:37
to do next. Should they take another crack,
10:40
or let this one go? But there's one thing left.
10:42
Ultimately, they decided to move on. Move
10:44
on, go on. To keep going down their list of plaintiffs.
10:48
As we drove off to the next address, in
10:51
search of the next kid on the list, I
10:53
stared out the window, trying to process
10:55
what just happened. That's very sad. Did $48,000
10:57
just vaporize right then and there? At
11:03
a subdivision of low-income apartments, things
11:06
didn't go any better.
11:08
Alright, so... We
11:11
ended up talking to someone who
11:14
seemed like the department manager, and
11:17
that family was evicted as me.
11:20
No forwarding information. No forwarding information.
11:22
No forwarding information.
11:23
No, I can't help you.
11:25
It started to occur to me that the
11:28
people who needed this settlement money the most,
11:30
people who were already struggling financially, who
11:33
didn't have a stable address, they were
11:35
the least likely to get what's owed to them. So
11:37
this is it. If they did this, this place or nowhere.
11:41
In the seven and a half hours we spent driving
11:43
around Rutherford County, we had a working-class
11:46
neighborhood. Well, Maribba,
11:49
what are you looking good so far? A
11:52
quiet cul-de-sac dotted with single-family
11:54
homes. Alright, well... Nobody
11:58
answered the door, you know, there's two cars.
11:59
The house was dark inside. And
12:02
a handful of bum address. No,
12:04
uh... Mark that as a bad-ass. Like a house number
12:07
that led to a shed and an empty field. There's
12:09
nothing there but trees. And
12:11
by the end of the day... Brutal. Oh,
12:14
man. What did they call it? We've gone
12:16
to 22 stops. And nothing.
12:19
I think she ain't gonna miss. Not
12:22
a single person to file a claim.
12:24
More! Sweet. Tragic.
12:28
My back of the envelope map was
12:30
that more than $430,000 was left on the table that
12:34
day. $430,000 the
12:43
kids maybe wouldn't get despite what was
12:45
done to them. In
12:50
the weeks that followed, I continued to wonder
12:53
about the grand prize winner. The
12:55
kid was $48,000 in claims. So
12:58
they kept checking with the guys, asking
13:00
if they'd gotten any leads in it. But
13:02
nothing. They couldn't find him.
13:06
He was far from the only one. Other
13:08
claimants were just as infinitable to
13:10
lawyers, no matter how many public
13:12
records databases they scribed. A
13:15
few had been killed. Some
13:18
were now in prison. That's
13:22
a shock at how few people were responding.
13:33
The lawyers didn't give up, though. They
13:35
got students at two local universities to
13:37
doorknock and make calls. They
13:39
did a media campaign, getting stories
13:42
into the local TV news, the local paper.
13:45
Kyle even went on WGNS. The
13:47
same radio station Davenport appeared on
13:49
to spread the word. Ladies
14:00
and gentlemen, we will be right back and we are
14:02
paying some bills. Finally the deadline came.
14:06
According to the lawyers, 278 kids got payouts from the
14:08
county. 278 kids.
14:14
That's 23% of the total eligible. What's
14:17
this happy with this number? It
14:19
was way above average for these kinds of settlements,
14:22
which again, is a dismal 9%. But
14:26
I have to admit, I
14:27
felt kind of deflated by the outcome.
14:30
I've reported on many lawsuits, but
14:32
nothing that I got to watch play out until the bitter
14:35
end. I had no idea about
14:37
what really came after the flashy headline
14:40
of kids win $11 million in federal
14:42
lawsuit. Because in
14:44
the end, Rutherford County paid
14:47
just a little over $5 million, less than half the
14:50
total settlement. Almost 3
14:53
million of that went to the lawyers in administrative
14:55
costs. The kids
14:58
only got $2.2 million, and
15:01
the county got to keep the rest, almost $6
15:03
million. The
15:05
county also admitted no wrongdoing.
15:10
I couldn't help thinking of the 900 or so
15:12
kids who didn't get paid, not
15:14
to mention the hundreds, maybe thousands
15:16
of others over the years, who weren't even
15:19
eligible because their arrests or detentions
15:21
fell outside the statute of limitations.
15:25
I told Wes I found the settlement a little
15:27
heartbreaking. Wes, understandably,
15:30
found me a little annoying.
15:33
Sure, in an ideal world,
15:35
there would be $100 million, and
15:38
the county would have to plow the detention
15:40
center under and do all these things they should
15:42
have done instead of building a
15:45
4-max kid prison. That's
15:48
ideal, but there was no mechanism
15:52
or possibility for that to
15:54
occur. So within the context
15:57
of what's possible here...
15:59
I feel like it's a really great
16:02
acting.
16:09
I understood Wes's perspective. At
16:11
least he got some kids paid.
16:14
But how did those kids feel about it?
16:16
Yes, Mom. I actually made $16,000 off of it.
16:21
You met Zeb in the last episode. He
16:23
was the kid arrested for taking a Bluetooth
16:25
speaker from his grandma when he was a teenager.
16:28
Zeb is now 22 years old.
16:31
What was it like to get that $16,000? Honestly,
16:36
it felt really good, but
16:39
it still $16,000 wouldn't
16:41
make up for
16:43
the traumatizing experiences
16:45
I actually felt in the juvenile system.
16:49
Zeb still remembers
16:50
his time in Jupe. The
16:52
booking process, the cold shower
16:54
in front of the guard, then into his jumpsuit
16:57
and into his cell, which was also
16:59
freezing cold. Lots of people told
17:01
me how cold the jail was. Everywhere.
17:04
Just so cold.
17:05
Zeb remembers finally
17:07
going in front of Judge Davenport,
17:09
who he says sent him back to the jail
17:11
for two more weeks. He
17:14
remembers that at some point he had
17:16
an anxiety attack. He remembers
17:18
calling for a guard that says it
17:20
took two hours for someone to finally check
17:22
on him. Nearly
17:24
a decade later is when he got his payout
17:27
from the county. He says the money
17:29
felt like an acknowledgment of what happened to him,
17:31
but not like an apology, not
17:34
a reckoning.
17:35
It kind of felt like they were just paying for the
17:37
wrongs I did, not knowing that they put a lot
17:39
of emotional abuse on people that didn't deserve
17:41
it.
17:44
Zeb knew others who got payouts too.
17:46
His brother got a claim. And also... Basically
17:50
one of my great friends got it too.
17:54
Wow, who is that? Or maybe, are you
17:56
still in touch with him? Yeah, I
17:58
mean, he's in jail now. He's just fine.
17:59
by this community corrections, but his name
18:02
was Quintarius Frazier. Wait,
18:04
I know Quintarius. Wait,
18:06
is he back in jail?
18:07
Yeah, he's here. Quintarius
18:11
Frazier, the kid from the solitary
18:13
case in episode two. Turns
18:15
out he too was paid by Rutherford County.
18:18
Just like Zeb, he got around $16,000. He's
18:23
also 22 years old now. He's
18:25
been in and out of the county jail for the last few
18:27
years, mostly for probation
18:30
violations, stemming from cases when he
18:32
was a juvenile. He's back this
18:34
time on another set of violations, drinking,
18:37
smoking weed, not letting his probation
18:40
officer search his phone. He's
18:42
been locked up for about a year.
18:48
It's hard to disentangle
18:50
what's going on with Quintarius today,
18:52
with what happened to him in the past, but
18:54
you've got to wonder. Several
18:57
of the kids I spoke to told me they felt
18:59
going to juvie, especially for such minor
19:01
stuff, marked them for the rest
19:03
of their youth. You don't fit in
19:05
with the good kids anymore. You're now
19:07
a bad kid, one said. I
19:10
really am like a bad kid now, another
19:13
told me. And so some lived
19:15
up to that, swapped one identity
19:17
for another. A number
19:19
of studies I've read say that kids who are
19:22
arrested and jailed are more likely
19:24
to re-offend, more likely to drop out
19:26
of school, and more likely to end
19:28
up in the adult system. Not
19:33
too long ago, I had lunch with Quintarius'
19:35
mother, Sharika.
19:38
I asked her where the settlement
19:39
money is now, and she told
19:41
me it's almost gone. With
19:43
no other income, Quintarius had been spending
19:46
some of it on his commissary and
19:48
phone calls from the county jail, meaning
19:50
a good chunk of his settlement money had
19:52
actually gone right back to Rutherford
19:55
County. Thank
19:57
you.
20:04
once the lawsuit wrapped up in the claims
20:07
at all been submitted the lawyers are ready
20:09
to move on mark was often
20:11
canada eventually going to rehab for
20:13
his drinking kyle a just
20:15
remarried and was looking for his next
20:17
big case and wes
20:20
he too had new lawsuits to file
20:22
other municipalities to sue he
20:25
told me cases fighting for sex offenders
20:27
rates are quote so
20:29
hot right now but
20:31
i wasn't so ready to move on from rutherford
20:34
county it's not like he got away
20:36
with something not just because
20:38
of the money but also because
20:41
the adults in charge still had their jobs
20:44
judge davenport
20:45
who oversaw juvenile justice system
20:48
that wrongfully arrested
20:49
and jailed over a thousand kids
20:52
she was about to run for another eight year term
20:55
and when due to put together
20:57
the filter system who called
20:59
the jail a well oiled machine
21:01
she was still the director they're
21:04
going or twenty first year i
21:07
wondered how much could have really
21:09
changed to fall the people running the place
21:12
where still the same more
21:14
on that after the break
21:29
you've gone deep into the kids
21:31
of rutherford county and now be want
21:33
to know even more here's one way
21:35
if you're in the nashville area you can come
21:37
here marrow been night in conversation
21:40
live with madeline baron of the in
21:42
the dark pod test though shed light
21:44
on their reporting and other work in
21:46
france systemic issues national
21:48
public radio presents this one night event
21:50
with pro publica on november twenty
21:53
ninth it's happening at the independent
21:55
nonprofit bellecourt theater in
21:57
nashville finally to the tickets
24:00
Nobody seemed to mind what they were doing.
24:06
Once we published the story, it
24:08
got a lot of attention. An
24:10
update now on one Tennessee County's
24:13
pattern of putting children in jail. According
24:15
to
24:15
a scathing ProPublica report, a Tennessee County
24:17
was brought up. Rutherford County, Tennessee, has obtained
24:19
a record...
24:20
Three police officers went to an... One
24:22
juvenile court judge in Rutherford
24:25
County, Tennessee. ...the former... The
24:29
story went national. And
24:31
then, there were meaningful demands for
24:33
change. Eleven members
24:35
of Congress wrote a letter to Attorney General
24:37
Merrick Garland, asking for the DOJ
24:40
to investigate
24:40
Rutherford County.
24:42
Tennessee's Republican governor called
24:45
for a review of Judge Davenport. And
24:47
state lawmakers introduced a resolution
24:49
to oust her. Just get her off the bench
24:52
as soon as possible.
24:54
Hi there, thank you for joining us today.
24:57
Late Friday afternoon, Representative
24:59
Johnson and I filed... In a
25:01
press conference over
25:02
Zoom, State Senator Heidi
25:04
Campbell explained why they took such
25:06
a drastic measure.
25:08
While judges are given judicial discretion
25:10
to interpret laws, they are not allowed
25:13
to make up their own laws.
25:14
The constitutional provision for removing...
25:17
This was January of 2022,
25:20
and Judge Davenport was up for re-election
25:22
that August. I had been wondering
25:24
if she still planned to run, and all my
25:26
sources were telling me she was.
25:29
But the day after that state senator's press
25:31
conference, she issued a statement
25:33
that read, In part, After
25:36
prayerful thought and talking with my family,
25:39
I have decided not to
25:40
run for re-election. I am
25:42
so proud of what this court has accomplished
25:44
in the last two decades, and how it
25:46
has positively affected the lives of young
25:49
people and families in Rutherford County.
25:51
After
25:57
more than 20 years on the bench.
27:49
Why
28:00
aren't you bringing this up?
28:02
I understood Jeff's concern. Rutherford
28:05
County had gotten knocked around pretty good in the
28:07
press, and he just wanted the whole thing
28:09
to go away. But I explained
28:11
to him that I was
28:12
curious, from his perspective, about
28:15
what happened and what could have gone differently,
28:17
you
28:18
know, so that history isn't doomed to
28:20
repeat itself. Jeff
28:22
got that, but still.
28:24
I just don't know how rehashing
28:27
all this stuff is
28:29
in the best interest of everybody in
28:32
Rutherford County to go back and say
28:35
over and over and over again that these
28:37
kids were treated unfairly. It
28:40
appears that all of them were treated unfairly.
28:42
We made a mistake. Let's
28:45
fix it and just move forward. Try
28:48
not to make those mistakes again.
28:50
Jeff said the
28:51
county commissioners, they're just a legislative
28:53
body. They approve funding, provide
28:56
resources. They don't have the knowledge
28:58
or expertise to really oversee the
29:01
operations of the justice system. That's
29:04
the point of the new oversight board, to staff
29:06
it with local citizens who hopefully have
29:08
professional skills they can bring to bear.
29:11
He said that as soon as the revelations
29:13
came out about what's been happening
29:15
in the court and the jail, the
29:17
county really has tried to make amends.
29:20
We
29:21
are not arguing that, at
29:23
least I'm not, and I don't know of any
29:25
other commissioner that would be arguing that what
29:28
happened was the right thing to do.
29:30
We think
29:34
we're just
29:35
trying to say, okay,
29:38
this happened. We're
29:42
not saying
29:44
that it was our fault that it happened or
29:46
it was anybody's fault that it happened. It
29:49
was a mistake that was made during
29:52
the judicial process. That
29:54
process, there
29:57
are mistakes made there like there are everywhere. I
30:01
mean, we weren't aware that
30:03
that was happening, and I'm
30:05
pretty sure that the juvenile detention center
30:07
was not aware that they were breaking
30:10
a law either. Maybe they should have been. I
30:12
don't know.
30:17
A longtime county official
30:19
admitting pretty clearly that the system
30:21
was a mistake, it's significant,
30:24
a meaningful starting point to some real accountability.
30:28
But it wasn't totally clear to me what
30:30
Jeff thought that mistake actually was,
30:32
or who made it. Which
30:35
brings us to what hasn't
30:37
changed in Rutherford County.
30:40
To my mind, if you're willing to admit
30:42
that this policy was a mistake and
30:44
harmful to kids, then the logical
30:47
extension is to hold the people responsible
30:49
for it. Well, responsible.
30:52
Have them face consequences for implementing
30:55
this system that went on for more than
30:57
a decade and was ultimately
30:59
the mass jailing of children.
31:02
But that has not happened.
31:04
Like I said, Judge Davenport
31:07
got to leave on her own terms, with
31:09
no formal punishment for her actions.
31:12
And Lynn Duke, the woman who implemented
31:15
and oversaw the filter system, she
31:18
still has her job. Despite
31:20
the fact that the jail she runs
31:22
has now been forced to comply with two
31:25
federal injunctions, one over
31:27
the filter system and the other over
31:29
its use of solitary confinement.
31:32
And all this has cost the county
31:33
significant money. But
31:38
ever since the lawsuits settled, county
31:41
officials have rallied around her. Rutherford
31:44
County's mayor told the local paper, Ms.
31:47
Duke is doing a fine job. And
31:50
those on the new oversight board have said they
31:52
have no plans to replace her. She
31:55
has our support, when board members said.
32:00
with Commissioner Jeff Phillips. When
32:02
I pressed him on who was responsible for
32:04
what happened, did he think it was Davenport?
32:08
Duke?
32:09
He was resolute.
32:10
You get this really clear. I
32:13
am not going to mention names, and I'm not going
32:15
to point fingers at anybody else. I'm
32:17
just not going to do that.
32:19
Why is it important for you to not do that? I've
32:21
been...
32:26
...because I think there are some
32:28
dedicated
32:30
public servants out
32:32
there
32:33
whose lives have the potential
32:36
to be ruined because of something
32:38
that might be said from
32:40
a negative perspective about
32:43
them and how they've conducted their
32:45
professional life. And I just don't
32:47
think that that's fair.
32:51
What strikes me about Jeff's response
32:54
is how he and other officials are
32:56
so willing to extend grace to Duke
32:58
and Davenport, two people
33:00
who so often refuse to extend
33:02
that same grace to the children
33:05
who came before them.
33:12
Recently, I went back to Rutherford
33:15
County to the juvenile courthouse.
33:18
It's a brutalist beige building that
33:20
sits across the street from a car dealership.
33:23
And now, a new judge is in charge.
33:26
Travis Lampley,
33:28
who sailed through the election on the Republican
33:30
ticket. When I asked him what
33:32
needs to change, he said, this
33:34
county needs a judge that will follow the statute,
33:38
which he seems to be doing.
33:40
But that doesn't mean the system is operating
33:42
totally fairly. For
33:45
one, even though a lot of kids are not being
33:47
jailed by the county anymore, there's
33:49
some pretty significant disparities in which
33:51
of them are. The year before
33:54
the filter system was stopped, the
33:56
racial disparities of the kids arrested
33:58
were pretty aligned with the rest of the state.
33:59
the country where a disproportionate
34:02
number of kids locked up were black.
34:05
But once the filter system ended,
34:07
the racial disparities shot up. Last
34:11
year, 67% of the kids locked up from Rutherford
34:14
County were black. This
34:16
isn't a place where just 17% of
34:18
the population is black. It
34:21
appears that the filter system,
34:23
with its vast overreach, had
34:26
its own twisted desegregation effect.
34:30
Beyond that, the jail continues
34:32
to
34:32
house kids from other places. More
34:35
than 40 different counties across Tennessee,
34:38
almost half the state, send their
34:40
wayward kids
34:40
to Rutherford County.
34:42
And when I took a close look at what's happening to
34:45
those kids, the out-of-county
34:47
kids, I noticed something. Reading
34:50
reports from the last few years, I
34:53
see the jail has been holding some of them for
34:55
too long on small charges. Truancy
34:59
held for two days. Unruly
35:02
held for six days. A runaway,
35:04
seven days. Another
35:06
runaway, ten days. All
35:09
of them, clear violations
35:11
of the law. But the thing
35:14
is, these are kids from other counties,
35:17
with different judges making their own decisions
35:20
on how long to jail them.
35:22
Sound familiar?
35:29
When I asked the state monitor who compiles
35:31
the reports about this, she said,
35:34
you're always going to have one somewhere. A
35:36
judge who tells you, this is my
35:38
court, and I'm just going to do what
35:40
I need to do. When
35:46
I eventually make my way into the juvenile courtroom,
35:49
I take a seat in the back, sliding
35:52
into a long wooden pew. And
35:54
I still see what I've always seen. A
35:56
room full of anxious kids and parents,
35:59
tired. looking attorneys, court
36:01
staff streaming in and out. It's
36:04
Tuesday, which means it's plea day,
36:07
so a docket full of kids taking plea deals.
36:10
Their charges were in the gamut, from
36:12
possession of marijuana to having a firearm
36:14
under age. There's a lot of domestic
36:17
assaults, kids fighting with parents,
36:19
also evading arrest, theft,
36:21
burglary.
36:24
The deals they make are often community
36:26
service or probation, and
36:28
for many, the promise of expungement,
36:31
the case wiped from their record, but
36:33
they gotta follow the program. No
36:36
more bad choices.
36:39
I noticed the courtroom's
36:40
less colorful now. Davenport
36:43
used to have lots of pictures drawn by
36:45
kids hanging on the walls. I
36:48
assumed she took them with her when she left. But
36:51
today, one picture catches
36:53
my eye, one that wasn't here before.
36:56
It's a large, almost life-size portrait
36:59
of Judge Davenport. It hangs
37:01
right next to the bench, peering
37:03
over the shoulder of the new judge,
37:06
smiling wide and proud,
37:09
the mother of Rutherford Kennedy. The
37:14
Kids of Rutherford County
37:16
is a co-production
37:28
of Serial Production in
37:30
New York Times, Pro Pabota,
37:33
and Nashville Public Radio. It was
37:35
reported by me, Maribyn Knight, with
37:37
additional reporting from Ken Armstrong.
37:40
The show was produced by Daniel Yimat,
37:43
with additional production by Michelle Navarro,
37:46
editing from Julie Snyder and Jen Guerra,
37:49
along with Sarah Blustein and Ken Armstrong
37:51
at ProPublica, and my colleague,
37:54
Tony Gonzalez, at Nashville Public
37:56
Radio. Additional editing from
37:58
Anita Baddagio and Al C
37:59
The supervising
38:02
producer for serial productions is
38:04
N. Day Chubu,
38:05
research and fact checking
38:07
by Ben Phelan with additional fact
38:10
checking Naomi Sharp, sound
38:12
design, music supervision and mixing
38:15
by Phoebe Wang. The original
38:17
score for our show is from the Blasting
38:19
Company. Susan Westling is
38:21
our standards editor and legal review
38:24
from Dana Green, Alameen Sumar
38:27
and Simone Prokus. The art
38:29
for our show comes from Pablo
38:31
Delcon. Additional
38:33
production from Janelle Peifer. Mac
38:36
Miller is the executive assistant for serial.
38:38
Sam Dolnick is the deputy managing
38:40
editor of the New York Times. Special
38:43
thanks to Kathy Sinbeck and Chris
38:45
Kleizer, Ben Holland and Pam
38:47
Holland as spotland productions. At
38:50
the New York Times, a huge thank you
38:52
to Jeffrey Miranda, Nina Lassam
38:55
and Mahima Chablani.
38:58
The kids of Rutherford County is produced
39:01
by serial productions The New York Times,
39:04
ProPublica and Nesh.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More