Podchaser Logo
Home
#196 Brent Beshore: Business Brilliance and Happiness at Home

#196 Brent Beshore: Business Brilliance and Happiness at Home

Released Tuesday, 11th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
#196 Brent Beshore: Business Brilliance and Happiness at Home

#196 Brent Beshore: Business Brilliance and Happiness at Home

#196 Brent Beshore: Business Brilliance and Happiness at Home

#196 Brent Beshore: Business Brilliance and Happiness at Home

Tuesday, 11th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

All investing at the end of the day

0:02

is the assumption of risk. The ideal investment

0:04

scenario is you are assuming a risk

0:07

that is knowable, you are being paid more

0:09

to assume that risk, and you

0:12

have some ability to mitigate that risk.

0:14

So we all have three basic moves

0:16

in conflict. It's called move against, which

0:18

is like the

0:20

second one is... And then the third

0:22

one is... And so if you

0:24

watch, all of your conflict will follow that

0:26

pattern. Let's talk about incentives. How do you

0:29

set incentives for the CDOs? I think

0:31

the ideal system is... What have you learned

0:33

about hiring people that most people miss? I

0:35

think that's probably been the biggest leap forward.

0:37

What most people get wrong is most people

0:40

don't understand. What's the playbook when

0:42

you take over a company? So

0:44

we are... Welcome

1:04

to the Knowledge Project Podcast. I'm your host,

1:06

Shane Parrish. In a world where knowledge is

1:09

power, this podcast is your leverage for mastering

1:11

the best of what other people have already

1:13

figured out. If you're listening to

1:15

this, it means you're not a supporting member. Members

1:18

get early access to episodes, my personal reflections

1:20

at the end of every episode, which a

1:22

lot of people now say is their favorite

1:24

part. No ads, exclusive content,

1:26

hand edited transcripts, and so much

1:29

more. Check out the link in

1:31

the show notes for more information. My

1:33

guest today is Brent Beschor. Brent

1:35

is the founder and CEO of Permanent Equity,

1:37

a private equity firm that buys and grows

1:40

boring businesses. And by boring, I mean the

1:42

kind of businesses that most people overlook, but

1:44

that are essential to making the world go

1:46

round. Some of his

1:48

companies include Ace Fence, the largest

1:50

residential fencing company in Texas, Chance

1:53

Rides, the leading amusement ride manufacturing

1:55

company in the United States, and

1:58

Pacific Air, which has one of the aerospace... industry's

2:00

largest selection of on-hand inventory.

2:03

I first met Brent about 10 years ago

2:05

now and we became friends right away. I've

2:08

met a lot of people in my life and

2:10

I remember flying home after the first time we

2:12

met thinking how incredibly special he was. After

2:15

this conversation when Brent was flying home,

2:17

I felt so grateful that that chance

2:19

encounter had turned into a great friendship.

2:22

Not only does Brent love the details,

2:24

he can talk about any company they

2:26

own or their competitors at the 50,000

2:28

foot level or the one inch level,

2:31

but he's also one of the most thoughtful and

2:33

kind people I've ever met. He's bigger on

2:35

the inside than the outside. While

2:37

his conversation is one continuous episode,

2:40

it comes in two distinct parts. The

2:42

first part is about life and the

2:44

second part is about business and his

2:46

wisdom is equally profound in both. We

2:49

discussed the small changes and mindset shifts

2:51

he's made that have had a profound

2:53

impact on his personal life. About 45

2:55

minutes in, we switch to business. We

2:58

cover operating out of abundance and what

3:00

that means, why longevity matters, why debt

3:02

is not a source of return, why

3:04

not having debt is actually a strong

3:06

signal of a good business, what it

3:09

means to own a business, incentives, his

3:11

first deal, taking outside capital, the advantages

3:13

of personality testing and so much more.

3:16

In a world where everyone is chasing the next

3:18

big thing, Brent is focused on

3:20

finding value in the overlooked and

3:22

underappreciated and that's a lesson we

3:25

could all learn from. It's

3:27

time to listen and learn. Some

3:38

of my favorite brands operate on

3:40

Shopify, including Alberts, Outway Socks and

3:42

Aeropress. Shopify

3:44

is the global commerce platform that helps

3:46

you sell at every stage of your

3:48

business. It doesn't matter if you just

3:50

have an idea right now or you

3:52

already operate a multi-million dollar company, Shopify

3:54

is there to help you grow. What

3:57

I love about Shopify is that it's like you

3:59

have your own multi-billion dollar tech

4:01

team working for you from day one. If

4:03

you're just starting, this means you can go

4:05

from idea to store in a few minutes,

4:07

but it also means if you're an existing

4:09

company, you can save money and time. If

4:11

you've ever checked out from a store

4:14

and thought, that was so easy, chances

4:16

are it was ShopPay, the internet's best

4:18

converting checkout. Sign up for a

4:21

$1 per month trial at

4:23

shopify.com/Shane. Go to shopify.com/Shane now

4:26

to grow your business no

4:28

matter what stage you're in.

4:31

That's shopify.com/Shane. The

4:34

No Lunch Project is sponsored by ProTech.

4:36

ProTech believes that when you are your

4:39

best self, you are of the most

4:41

service to others. Try hydration immediately upon

4:43

waking before your first cup of coffee

4:45

and before during or after your workout.

4:48

Try rest one hour before

4:50

bed and get the best

4:52

sleep of your life. Improve

4:54

your hydration and your sleep

4:56

and become the best version

4:58

of yourself. Get 30% off

5:00

your order at protech.com/knowledge. That's

5:02

protekt.com/knowledge or use code knowledge

5:04

at the checkout for 30%

5:06

off. Another day is here

5:08

and you're ready for it. What to wear?

5:10

Check. Breakfast, lunch, and dinner? Check. Planning for

5:12

what's next and how to save for it?

5:15

That's where Bank of America can help. For

5:17

your financial to-dos, Bank of America has experts

5:19

ready to help get you closer to your

5:21

goals. Get started at one of our local

5:23

financial centers or 24-7 in our mobile

5:26

banking app. Find a location near you at

5:28

bankofamerica.com/talk to us. What would you like the

5:30

power to do? Mobile banking requires downloading the

5:32

app and is only available for select devices.

5:34

Message and data rates may apply. Bank of

5:36

America and a member FDSE. What's

5:38

changed in your life in the past two years?

5:41

I would say my marriage has changed a lot.

5:43

My inner life has changed a lot. My

5:46

physical outer life has changed a lot. Ironically,

5:49

the business has not changed a lot.

5:53

It's been interesting how the different seasons do

5:55

and don't overlap, but there's been a lot

5:57

of changes about how I approach work that have changed, but the

5:59

actual work itself has not changed. Let's dive

6:01

into that. What's changed in your marriage? What's

6:04

changed in your exercise? Let's tackle exercise first.

6:06

Yeah. Well, I think maybe all

6:08

of it is connected to

6:12

a walk I went on, gosh,

6:14

I'm probably pushing now three years ago. And there

6:17

was a gentleman on this

6:19

walk who was at a small gathering

6:21

of people in Colorado. He kind of picked me out.

6:23

It was like 40 or 50 people in

6:26

the crowd. And afterwards he said, hey,

6:28

can I go to a walk

6:30

with you? I'm like, sure. And he said,

6:32

hey, can I speak truth into your life?

6:34

And he said, I

6:37

see a lot of shame in you. I see

6:39

a lot of fear in you. And I worry

6:41

that that's dramatically negative and

6:43

impacting a lot of your

6:46

relationships. It was more in depth than that. I

6:48

mean, we talked for another probably 20,

6:50

30 minutes about what he saw. And I just tried

6:52

to take posture. I mean, initially when somebody says something

6:54

like that to you, like cut you, how

6:57

dare you? I have great relationships. You've

6:59

known me for a long time now. We were talking about

7:01

this at least 10 years, if not more. And

7:04

I wouldn't have said six

7:06

or seven years ago that I had bad

7:08

relationships. I would have said I

7:10

had really good relationships. If you'd asked me how my

7:12

marriage was five years ago, I would

7:14

have said, oh, I guess six

7:17

or seven, we have our

7:19

challenges, but we get along and

7:21

compared to where it is today, I would

7:24

say it was like a two. I

7:27

just didn't know. I think about this idea

7:29

of everything's relative. So world-class is the best

7:31

you've ever seen. You ask somebody who's only

7:33

eating at fast food, what's their favorite restaurant

7:35

in the world? They're going to tell you

7:38

a fast food restaurant. So the question we

7:40

have to ask ourselves is like, what

7:43

do we have to compare it to? And are we talking

7:45

about relative or an absolute terms? And

7:47

to be honest, I don't think I had

7:49

been exposed three years ago

7:51

to what was possible in relationships or what

7:53

was possible in marriages. Like I had not

7:56

seen marriages up close where I was like I

7:58

was comparing my marriage to what I'd seen in other

8:00

marriages and I felt like we were doing fine. Like we were

8:02

probably right in the middle of the

8:04

ballpark. I think what this person did for me was

8:07

open my eyes to like, there was a

8:09

lot more out there. There's a lot more

8:11

possibilities that I didn't know.

8:13

That was like a seminal moment of like

8:16

a warning shot across the bow of,

8:19

oh my gosh, like I need to probably go

8:21

and look and study like, who

8:23

am I? What makes great friendships? What

8:26

am I giving to my relationships? How do I think about

8:28

my marriage? I'm like, what am I doing in my marriage?

8:30

And like, how should it

8:32

be? And am I willing to

8:35

settle for an interior life

8:37

filled with anxiety and shame and fear?

8:39

Am I willing to settle for a

8:41

marriage where things are being hidden and

8:43

there's disconnection and division?

8:45

Right? Am I

8:47

willing to settle for friendships that

8:49

maybe don't go that last 10% and

8:53

create that really meaningful, deep connection? Am I

8:55

willing to settle for a physical body that

8:58

is overweight and out of shape and

9:01

likely gonna become diseased? And so I

9:03

think that was a major moment. And

9:05

then that led into really finding these different

9:07

people who have shaped and changed my life,

9:09

including an incredible counselor who I started working

9:12

with and bringing to the surface a

9:14

lot of these issues that I didn't even know were

9:16

there. Yeah, I mean, I look back on the person

9:18

I was even three years ago and I was certainly

9:20

far better than I was 10 years prior, but I

9:22

was compared to sort of where I was now. Very

9:24

shut down and frustrated

9:27

and irritable and

9:29

competitive and... I feel a lot

9:32

of those things myself in terms

9:34

of competitive and maybe a

9:36

bit more anxious than I should be. What

9:38

was the next step that you took in

9:40

this journey that sort of like, okay, well,

9:42

I realized something, I feel it, now

9:45

what? I don't wanna sit here and pretend this

9:47

like self-reliance is the thing that got me through

9:49

this period in

9:51

my life because it felt like it happened to me

9:54

and it happened for me. It didn't

9:56

feel like that I somehow figured

9:58

out like... outsmarted the

10:01

world, outsmarted my shame

10:03

and fear. It felt like I had

10:06

these sort of people be put into

10:08

my life and these revelations that started to occur

10:11

that all of a sudden,

10:13

I mean, I think there's an old adage that

10:15

like when the student is ready, the teacher appears.

10:18

And I think there's very much, there's a choice I had

10:20

to make three years ago. It

10:23

was like, am I going to pretend like

10:27

everything's fine? Because that's what everything in me,

10:29

that's what my false self wanted

10:31

to do. No, screw you, you're

10:33

wrong. You don't know what you're talking about.

10:35

Who are you? You just met me. You

10:37

can't, you don't know me. You don't know anything about me.

10:40

And it was like, I remember having this very distinct

10:42

choice to make. And

10:45

I remember being like, if I continue on

10:47

the path that I'm on that would have

10:49

denied, you know, it's sort of this idea

10:51

of like self-promotion, self-protection, right? That's what our

10:53

false self wants us to do. Go around

10:56

self-promote, self-protect, because then we don't have to

10:58

really be vulnerable. Now we

11:00

also are shut down. We can't have great relationships. We

11:02

can't figure out the

11:04

real sort of us that comes through. But that

11:06

was the choice. And I remember kind of, it

11:09

was an act of surrender of being like, I

11:12

have to take the risk that I'm going to take a

11:14

look at myself and I'm not going to like myself very

11:16

much. I'm going to admit things to myself that are ugly

11:20

and that I've done more wrong maybe than

11:22

I'm willing to admit. And

11:24

that I've hurt people that I care about. That

11:27

was the choice that I had to make.

11:29

And I remember very clearly saying, okay, I

11:32

surrender and I want to know. And

11:35

then things started to change ever so slowly.

11:37

I mean, there's a weird dip that occurs.

11:39

I feel like when you go from denial

11:41

to awareness, it's

11:48

actually way worse. So like

11:50

the awareness of your faults and

11:53

awareness of your shortcomings without

11:56

the healing of those is actually

11:58

puts you in a far worse position. And

12:01

so I would say that, you know, that sort

12:03

of the period of time from three years ago

12:05

to two years ago was horrible. Like

12:08

it was not a year of joy. In

12:12

fact, if anything, it felt like harder. My

12:14

relationships felt more strained. And

12:17

I think it was because I was becoming acutely aware of

12:19

how broken they were as a result,

12:21

mostly as a result of me. I mean, yes, other

12:23

people's brokenness too, mostly result of me, but

12:25

I didn't have any healing in it. I didn't know how

12:27

to get healing. And,

12:29

you know, that season was just an

12:31

awareness building season, looking back

12:33

on that. But it's awful. If you

12:35

gain awareness without healing, it's way worse

12:38

than not being aware. Give me

12:40

an example of something that's changed

12:42

in your friendships. We were talking about one last

12:44

night. Actually, that's a perfect one, where

12:47

you always want to pay the bill.

12:49

Yeah. Talk to me about that

12:51

and the revelation behind it and how it

12:53

came about. Let's see here, about two years

12:55

ago, maybe a little less than two years

12:58

ago, I had a friend who was going

13:00

through some really tough times and

13:02

personally, professionally, and a

13:05

mentor of his said, hey, you got

13:07

to go to this intensive counseling

13:10

retreat. And he

13:12

kind of reluctantly, he's not a

13:14

touchy feely, he's

13:16

a finance guy, you know, he's not a-

13:18

This is voodoo. Yeah,

13:21

this is not, exactly. This is

13:23

ooey gooey squishy stuff is not

13:25

his ballgame. And I watched him

13:27

go into that hard and hardened and

13:29

just sort of like shut

13:31

down, shut off. Again,

13:34

very protective,

13:36

self-protective. And

13:38

he came out of that week, like

13:41

changed, like distinctively

13:43

different. And

13:45

I remember thinking to myself like, wow, I don't

13:48

know what happened there. That's incredible. He'd worked

13:50

with this woman the whole week and

13:52

he was like, you changed my life. Like, this is incredible.

13:54

Like how, you know, first of all, I never be able

13:56

to repay you, thank you. You know, like, I don't know

13:58

anything about you. Who are you? you?" And

14:01

she said, I've got, you know, I've got

14:03

these kids and whatever. And I live in

14:06

Columbia, Missouri. He's Columbia, Missouri? What? He

14:08

said, one of my best friends lives in Columbia, Missouri. I

14:11

live in Columbia, Missouri. And

14:14

so he said, Brent, I'm telling you, like,

14:16

you have to go see

14:18

this person. And it was right around this time

14:20

that I felt like I hit rock bottom in

14:22

my awareness of like my own brokenness and

14:25

like how I didn't really see a path

14:28

forward. Like I kept like sitting

14:31

in this dismal

14:34

state where you're like aware of

14:36

how messy everything is, but there's

14:38

no way to clean it up. And

14:41

all the self-help stuff, like none

14:43

of it works. Like at least for me, like I can

14:45

only speak in a one here,

14:48

but like, you know, the

14:50

self-reliant thing doesn't work. And so he

14:52

said, hey, I think you should meet

14:54

with her. And I'm like, man, this

14:56

is a true godsend. Like I had

14:58

no idea that somebody of that caliber,

15:00

national, international quality caliber was in Columbia,

15:02

Missouri. I started going there

15:04

and doing these three hour sessions and dredging

15:06

up things I didn't even know was there,

15:09

that were all connected to the behaviors. If you

15:11

think about like the way that I think about

15:14

it now, it's like we have these, we have

15:16

these behaviors that other people can see and that

15:18

we can kind of measure, right? Am I doing

15:20

good or am I not doing good? The reality

15:22

is there's so many layers underneath that though that

15:25

are influencing that behavior, right?

15:27

Like, oh, something

15:29

terrible happened and

15:32

I really don't feel anything. That's

15:34

weird, right? Or something very small

15:37

happened and I'm triggered into this

15:39

like spiral. That's weird. And

15:41

what I would do in the past is I would just kind

15:43

of like shove it down, right? Like, oh, I don't know. I

15:46

don't get it, but life's weird and whatever.

15:49

Got to go on. Yeah, you got to go

15:51

on. And so anyway, through this series of sessions,

15:53

and I mean, I've done a lot

15:55

now, like probably 25 or 30 of these

15:58

now, three hour sessions. So a lot of time. And we

16:00

got down to one of the sessions and it was actually probably

16:02

about four or five months ago out

16:04

of the blue, it was kind of seemingly unconnected.

16:06

And we were talking about friendship and

16:09

my counselor said, do you always pay? And

16:12

I said, yeah, of course I always pay. She

16:15

was like, hmm, I got out

16:17

of the last hundred times that you shared a meal

16:19

with somebody. How many times did you pay? And I was like,

16:22

like a hundred. And she kind of sat

16:24

back and I was kind of proud of myself, right?

16:26

Like I'm a good person. I pay for the bill.

16:28

I care about people, right? This is like the thing

16:30

I told myself in my head. I do the exact

16:32

same thing. Yeah. And

16:34

by the way, those motivations are I think real

16:37

and true. They aren't bad. But she said, yeah,

16:39

I wouldn't be your friend. And

16:41

I remember just being rocked by it. Like you wouldn't

16:43

be my friend. She goes, I was like, what? Why?

16:46

Like totally broke my paradigms. And she said,

16:48

because in a friendship, in

16:50

a real relationship, you

16:53

cede control to the other person. The other

16:55

person concedes control to you. It's not you're

16:57

always controlling. The whole

16:59

point of a friendship is that you can trust

17:02

and you can be vulnerable and you can cede

17:04

control. And so paying the bills merely just a

17:06

form of control that you're exerting over your friends.

17:08

And I remember being like, oh crap. Absolutely

17:11

right. And she goes, yeah, and

17:14

I suspect it's not just paying the bill. You

17:18

like to have your environment. You like to have

17:20

your way of doing things. And

17:22

I was like, yeah, I do force a lot

17:24

of relationships. Again, this is only like five months

17:26

ago, right? I force a lot of relationships into

17:28

these boxes where it's like, I

17:30

want you to be in my box. I tell

17:33

myself because I can provide great hospitality or because I

17:35

can do do these interesting things,

17:37

right? And I'm caring for them well. And

17:39

generally sometimes I suspect the same for you. Like

17:42

those are real motivations, but we are this

17:45

mixed bag. And I think that's what I

17:47

realized is like we hook the

17:49

good and the bad together. And then we do

17:51

things that come off to other people very

17:53

differently and confuse and frustrate and

17:55

constrain. It's really hard for somebody to be

17:57

frustrated at a friend who's

18:00

always buying them lunch or dinner

18:02

or whatever it might be. So

18:04

what it does is it builds up resentment

18:06

and frustration in the other and they don't

18:08

even understand, right? Like we're all confused. It's

18:11

very hard to see ourselves clearly. We can see each

18:13

other clearly, right? We can't see ourselves

18:15

clearly. I think that we're designed like

18:17

that because we're designed for a relationship. Like we need

18:20

one another. No one is an island. No

18:22

one is self-reliant, right? We need one another. So

18:24

how do you handle dinner now? So

18:27

what I say, only if I mean

18:29

it, by the way, sometimes I don't say this, but

18:31

if I don't mean it, I won't say it now. I say

18:34

it would give me great pleasure. I

18:37

would enjoy being able to buy dinner

18:39

tonight. But if

18:41

you don't want me to buy dinner,

18:43

I will respect your choice. I

18:45

give them the choice. And sometimes I

18:48

buy dinner and sometimes I don't. But if they say,

18:50

nope, I want to buy dinner tonight,

18:52

I say, okay, thank

18:54

you. The key there is they have agency

18:57

now. They have agency. And

18:59

so the resentment doesn't build even

19:01

unconsciously. Correct. In kind of psychology

19:03

circles, there's this idea of a

19:05

triangle where you have a

19:08

victim and a hero and like

19:10

a judge or a prosecutor.

19:15

And heroes are those who

19:17

are without knowing the good, like they

19:20

tell themselves that they want to do good for other people

19:23

and what they're really doing. And by the way, I

19:25

relate very strongly to this. This is

19:27

a lot of action that I see myself

19:29

having done and do is to

19:32

cover up my own shame and

19:34

insecurities and sort of to

19:36

push down the pain that I feel. It's like,

19:38

well, I'm going to go external and go try

19:41

to help somebody almost against their will. Like

19:43

they didn't ask me to help or if they did ask me to

19:45

help, my response to them

19:47

is so outsized that

19:49

it removes agency from them. And

19:53

so buying dinner is like a very small example of

19:55

this. And I've got, you know, unfortunately, a lot of

19:57

bigger examples of this. You know, I probably, I probably.

20:00

have really engaged in, I would say,

20:02

dramatic heroics five or six times

20:04

in my life where I perceived somebody was

20:07

in grave danger. They

20:10

needed my help and I sprung into

20:12

action and did this dramatic thing for

20:14

this other person. In

20:18

my head, the thing I'm going to get is, oh,

20:20

thank you so much, Brent. You're amazing. I'm so grateful

20:22

for you. Now, if you hear even the thoughts in

20:24

my head, it's all about me. It's actually not about

20:27

the other person. Yes, I

20:29

can justify it based on the other person, but really it's about

20:31

me. Five out of five or six

20:33

out of six times, it has been

20:35

met with initial, oh, man, thank

20:38

you so much. This is incredible.

20:40

Wow. I'm blown away at your

20:42

generosity. I'm like, oh, I got all the

20:44

good feelings. Then

20:46

I end up not having a very good relationship with

20:48

those people. It shocks me

20:51

and it almost feels like a slap in the

20:53

face. How could they do

20:55

that? How could they

20:58

not be better friends with me as a

21:00

result of this? Then

21:02

when I started doing the sessions and started working

21:04

with her, it became clear

21:06

that it's like, oh, heroes create

21:08

victims because you're removing

21:11

all agency from them and

21:13

you are telling them that they can't help

21:15

themselves, that they are helpless. When

21:20

you do that, you

21:22

are creating somebody who is

21:24

diminished and insulted. Now,

21:28

again, in the moment, that's not

21:30

how it feels, but

21:32

that's where we're constantly chewing on and

21:34

assessing our environments. A great example of

21:36

this, and this is not a close

21:38

personal relationship. I remember my wife and

21:40

I one Christmas, we

21:42

had a public school teacher who we knew and got to

21:45

be friends with. We were sitting

21:47

around the dinner table one night and she was

21:49

sharing. It's heartbreaking. She's like,

21:51

these kids around Christmas that I work

21:53

with in this particularly poor school district,

21:56

they don't have any Christmas presents. They don't have

21:58

any Christmas. There's no joy. And

22:00

it really like touched my wife

22:02

and I were like, wow, like,

22:06

what if we did this dramatic act and

22:08

anonymously, of course, we bought like

22:12

$30,000 worth of Christmas gifts for like every kid

22:15

in that school. And

22:17

in our heads, we were like, this is amazing.

22:19

This is wonderful. Um,

22:22

these kids, you know, you can imagine the kids who

22:24

were like, oh, we wouldn't have had Christmas, but now

22:26

we have Christmas and wow, somebody cares for us and

22:29

loves us. Like that's what we were hoping to have

22:31

done. And,

22:33

and so we did it. And the

22:35

response from the small

22:37

group of people that knew about it was like,

22:40

this is incredible. You all are so generous, you

22:42

know, pat, pat, pat on the back. We're feeling

22:44

great. We're in the, we're in the Christmas spirit.

22:46

Oh, what joy, you know, all this stuff. And

22:48

then it was about a month later and I

22:50

followed up with, um, the teacher and I

22:52

was just like, Hey, how did that, how did that go? And

22:55

she was like, it was

22:58

really good. You know, everyone was grateful,

23:00

you know, whatever. There's a few people

23:02

who, who had some

23:04

challenges. And I was like, had

23:07

challenges with us giving, giving gifts. She

23:09

said, well, some of

23:11

the parents of the kids, uh,

23:14

felt, felt really insulted by it.

23:19

And then it like hit me and I even like,

23:21

man, I'm trying to get emotional that it, it like

23:23

hit, hit, it cut me so deeply. Cause I realized

23:25

what I had done, but we had done

23:27

my life. I had done, we had taken

23:30

away the dignity of

23:33

those families and

23:35

yeah, they couldn't buy their kids, Christmas gifts, but they were

23:37

going to do something for them, whatever

23:39

they could do for them. And

23:42

instead, like any kid, you

23:44

give a kid a present. It's like amazing, you know, but

23:46

then it started asking all kinds of questions. Well, why can't

23:48

you buy me that present? Well,

23:51

do you not love me? Why do these other

23:53

people care more for me than you do? Kids

23:55

don't understand how money works. They don't understand how

23:58

some people have more than some people have less. They don't

24:00

understand anything about that. And so what

24:02

I'd inadvertently done when I was trying

24:04

to be kind and generous was

24:07

I didn't put myself in the position to

24:09

understand what the real consequences were gonna be,

24:11

the second, third order consequences. Yeah, a kid

24:14

would have had, you know, less

24:16

toys to play with at Christmas. That's

24:19

not the point of Christmas. I

24:21

missed the plot. The

24:24

point of Christmas is to show love and care. And

24:27

in doing what I did, I short circuited

24:29

the ability for those families to experience love

24:31

and care. And I hurt them. There's

24:35

a great book out there called When Helping Hurts. And

24:38

it afterwards, actually somebody gave it to

24:40

me and I read it and I mean, you talk

24:42

about being cut deeply. It's a book

24:44

about when you try to help and it hurts

24:46

people. It's one of

24:48

the best books I've ever read on sort of

24:51

philanthropy and how to think about caring

24:53

for those who you don't have a relationship with. And I think

24:55

that's the bottom line is like, it

24:58

all comes down to we can't go wrong

25:00

if we're in deep relationship

25:02

with somebody and we are respecting

25:04

what their needs are. Where

25:06

if somebody asks me for help, you're not a hero

25:08

if somebody asks you for help and you rise to meet the need.

25:11

That's called being a good friend. Where

25:13

you become a hero and you create victims is

25:17

when you don't know somebody, don't know

25:19

their needs. They

25:21

never asked you to do something and

25:24

you rise to meet a need they don't have.

25:26

And in turn, you take away agency and dignity

25:28

from them. So it's things like that. I

25:30

mean, these are deep waters, right? These are things

25:32

that are challenging and stuff that we

25:34

don't talk about a lot. But this is the stuff that I've

25:36

like, it's been a joy and

25:38

it's been awful in some ways to

25:40

explore the stuff in me and to see how frequently

25:43

I am engaging in this maladaptive

25:46

behavior under the name of goodness and virtue

25:48

and all these things that we tell ourselves.

25:50

Yeah, the story we tell ourselves to justify

25:52

sort of what we're doing, because we want

25:54

to be the hero in a way, unconsciously

25:56

in a lot of ways, right? Like we're

25:58

not consciously trying to save somebody. We

26:00

see a friend in need and then we want to jump in and

26:03

help them. When's the last time

26:05

you asked somebody for help? This morning,

26:07

I'm asking. I'm learning. This is a

26:09

new learned behavior though. Because in all

26:11

the years I've known you, this is

26:13

like, this is different recently. Yeah, this

26:15

is different. I would

26:18

always be the one who would

26:20

be eager to help, but rarely ask for help.

26:23

And again, that destroys relationships. There's

26:25

no way to have a real relationship with

26:28

somebody unless it's bi-directional. It

26:30

can't be you helping somebody

26:32

and never needing help. Because then

26:34

again, it's the exact same principle. You're

26:37

creating sort of a hero victim

26:39

dynamics, the power dynamics in any

26:41

relationship are super sensitive. And

26:44

where we have best relationships where we're on equal

26:46

footing, different but equal, right?

26:48

So I always think about it

26:50

as like, you know, the X-Men

26:52

or whatever, you know, you have everyone's got

26:54

different powers, but everyone can like fight the

26:56

battles together, right? And

26:58

you respect the other's opinion, right?

27:00

You respect the other person's skills and talents. But

27:03

if somebody is always the one who can shoot

27:05

laser beams and, you know, blow stuff up and

27:07

make stuff happen. And the other

27:09

person is just, oh, thank you. I appreciate that.

27:11

Thank you for helping me. It's

27:14

not a real friendship. I had never

27:16

thought about any of this until dinner last

27:18

night with you. And

27:20

I stayed up late last night just

27:22

going over all the different ways that

27:24

I do this in my own life.

27:27

With my friends from, you know,

27:30

always offering like to the not even offering

27:32

to pay for dinner. It's like I'll race

27:34

up to the waiter and you know, everybody's

27:36

sitting down and go to the bathroom to

27:38

make sure that I and I'd

27:40

read like I was just replaying this stuff

27:43

in my head going like, oh my god,

27:45

this is crazy. Yeah, I went

27:47

on an apology tour after I had that realization

27:49

to a lot of people and

27:51

I said, hey, I'm really sorry I did this to you. And

27:54

of course, people are kind of caught off guard because I don't even think

27:56

they realize it. But when I said it to him, they were like, yeah,

27:59

thank you. And so now like

28:01

my close friends, like

28:03

I, we had this understanding and oftentimes

28:05

I still am able to buy lunch

28:07

or dinner or whatever, because I enjoy

28:10

it and they know I enjoy it.

28:12

Like I love hospitality. I

28:14

love to be a provision and

28:16

provide care for people. It's like a core

28:18

part of my personality. But sometimes they say,

28:21

thank you, but no, thank you. And

28:23

you know what? I feel super loved in

28:25

that. I feel

28:27

super loved. So the cool part is

28:29

before I didn't

28:31

feel love either way. If

28:34

somebody else bought a

28:36

meal, I would feel frustrated and sort of

28:38

irritable about it. And they took

28:40

something away from me. Right. And

28:43

if I bought... Just how everybody else feels when you

28:45

do it. Right. Exactly.

28:47

And vice versa, right? If I did buy the meal,

28:49

it was a little bit like you start playing with

28:51

ideas in your head. Oh, am I

28:53

only a checkbook? Do people really like me? And it's like,

28:56

well, you're the one who insisted on buying dinner and you're

28:58

like, well, but the other person could have insisted on buying

29:00

dinner more, you know, and you start

29:02

getting into this like weird psychology. You didn't

29:04

fight back enough. Right. You hit the old

29:06

alligator arms, you know? And

29:09

so now it's like the inverse

29:11

of that. And I think this is like a good metaphor

29:13

for life. Like I think that the

29:16

more that I meet what I would call elders.

29:18

So there's a difference between elders and elderly. Or

29:22

like self-focused incur...

29:25

Blaise Pascal would call it incurvature. Right. They're

29:27

incurred on themselves. They're irritable. It's all... Life is

29:29

all about them and what they need and they're

29:32

scared and fearful. And you got elders who are

29:34

the inverse of this. Right. Who

29:36

are outwardly focused. Right. The more

29:38

I meet these types of elders that are like

29:40

genuinely caring and loving, the more that I see

29:42

them exhibiting this type of behavior, the

29:45

more that I see them, like, no

29:48

matter their circumstance, in good circumstances

29:50

or in bad circumstances, they look like they're living with

29:52

a joy and a lightness and a freedom. And

29:55

then you see Elder Lee and sort

29:58

of now I can pull it back and see in my life. that

30:00

like no matter my circumstances, like

30:03

I'm living in fear and shame and

30:05

hiding. And so it's like,

30:08

I think that's the thing that we're really

30:10

talking about here is like, these are all even like maybe

30:12

the second teardown or the third teardown, like at

30:14

the basement of all this stuff, at the very

30:16

core of all this stuff is there are really

30:18

only two ways to live. You're

30:21

going to live out of fear or you're

30:23

gonna live out of genuine love and care for others and

30:27

love and care for yourself. And like that's it, like

30:29

everything else rises between those two. Like

30:31

fear driven is scarce, it

30:34

is the way of the world, it is a famous

30:38

author in the 70s, she said that

30:40

nature is red and tooth and claw, right?

30:43

It's like this idea that it's like there's nothing

30:45

but you're either gonna be a predator

30:47

or you're gonna be prey. Everything is a

30:49

battle. Everything's a battle, everything's about

30:52

competition, right, and

30:55

believe me, like that's when I am at my

30:57

worst, that's who I am and by the way,

30:59

the world loves my false self, the world loves

31:01

that fear driven self. I can get an extraordinarily

31:04

incredible amount done in that time. A

31:06

friend of mine calls it clean fuel

31:08

versus dirty fuel. Like it's very difficult

31:10

to see, like the car looks

31:12

like the car from the outside, very difficult to

31:14

understand, is it clean fuel or

31:16

dirty fuel that's operating the car? And

31:19

I can, I mean, that car can go fast, it can

31:21

take a lot of people with it if I'm on dirty

31:23

fuel. And in some ways, dirty fuel is a, for

31:25

me, I'd learned through my life to be,

31:28

it's a more potent fuel in

31:30

the short term for me. Like

31:32

I get more stuff done quicker

31:35

and usually even sometimes with higher excellence out of

31:37

dirty fuel than I do clean fuel. That fear

31:39

is like a heck of a moment. It's higher

31:41

octane, almost. It's higher octane. The problem is it's

31:43

got all kinds of contaminants in it and you

31:46

eventually like torch yourself and the car breaks down

31:48

and you go off the rails

31:50

and blow yourself up, whatever analogy you wanna use. And

31:53

so getting back to the original question, like what's

31:55

changed? Like I think that more and more I'm

31:57

trying to operate on clean fuel. I'm trying to

31:59

be, self-unconcerned. I'm trying to

32:02

become an elder. I think people

32:04

listening resonate a lot with this.

32:06

So I'm curious what other ways you

32:09

found yourself subtly

32:12

controlling your relationships, whether it be your

32:14

marriage or your friends. The

32:17

paying is an example, but I'm sure you've

32:19

got other ones. You get older and you

32:21

get better at hiding your motivations, right? And

32:23

you end up wrapping them sometimes

32:25

consciously, sometimes unconsciously in these

32:28

maybe good packages. But

32:31

the reality was, it was like I

32:34

was demanding control. I

32:36

was demanding care.

32:39

I was demanding people to see me and sort of

32:41

praise me. And so how

32:43

do I do that on a daily basis? It was, and

32:45

by the way, this is not like it's a victory

32:48

declared or whatever. I mean, this is like an

32:50

ongoing battle, I would say on an hour by

32:52

hour, minute by minute basis is

32:54

I can tell so quickly, am I

32:56

operating out of fear of love? And

32:59

the test is, do I have peace or not? Am

33:01

I anxious or not? And

33:04

when I'm anxious and fearful and

33:06

when I'm, you know, I have

33:08

a tendency to catastrophize the future

33:10

and always be running down all these different

33:12

rapid holes of what ifs might happens. And I

33:14

haven't, I've been given an incredible capacity to do

33:17

that, which makes me like my

33:19

day job as an investor. It's really

33:21

useful because I can run down a

33:23

tremendous number of scenarios. My

33:26

personal life, it's terrible. And

33:28

I hate it. It's

33:30

the dark side of creativity, right?

33:33

When you have vision and creativity, you

33:35

can envision a future that

33:37

is beautiful and bright and loving and wonderful,

33:39

or you can envision a terrible future, dystopian

33:41

future. And so, yeah, I

33:45

mean, examples of this. I mean, I

33:47

would go into meetings and I would

33:49

need to take over the meeting to

33:52

get praise. And

33:54

by the way, I've been given

33:56

a gift to be able to say things and

33:58

think quickly on my own. my feet that people

34:01

genuinely were praising me. It's not like, I

34:03

hope, I mean, no one's

34:05

perfect, but like we create an organization

34:07

of permanent equity that's like very kindly

34:11

confrontational about ideas. Like we want to

34:13

be, we want

34:15

a lot of friction. And so the last thing in

34:17

the world I wanna do is create an organization of

34:20

a yes-men or yes-women, right? Like we

34:22

want divergent thinking, we want a lot of variety.

34:26

And so I don't think that they were

34:28

doing it because it was like, oh boss,

34:30

you're so good. You know, that type of

34:32

like, you know, sycophant type thing. I think

34:35

it was genuinely like in my

34:37

false self, when I'm

34:39

really charged up, like

34:41

I have a capacity to envision a future

34:43

that a lot of people like. I

34:46

know internally though, my

34:49

vision of that future is

34:51

really driving my need to

34:53

be liked, my need to be respected, my need

34:55

to be praised. And so, ugh, and

34:59

I would have this high anxiety in these meetings, right?

35:01

And then I get out of it and it's like,

35:03

I mean, I'm so wired up, I have

35:06

so much cortisol in my system. Cause

35:09

I craved that, I needed that, that was like

35:11

my sort of my drug of choice in that

35:14

setting to the degree that I almost lost my

35:16

right eye as a result of excess cortisol in

35:18

my system. That's how stressed,

35:20

and I wasn't stressed in the sense of, I

35:23

mean, yes, like what I would call normal stresses,

35:25

I mean, there's always gonna be sickness

35:28

and death. And as we've grown as an organization, there's

35:31

just a lot of people, and a lot

35:33

of people are a lot of brokenness. But

35:35

I would say the vast majority

35:37

of the stress that I

35:39

was experiencing was self-induced, was

35:41

because I wasn't okay, and

35:44

I knew I wasn't okay, but I didn't know how

35:46

else to cope with it, rather than try to get

35:49

praise, try to grab things from other people,

35:51

right? So I was

35:53

encouraged, as Blaise Pascal would say, I was

35:55

the one who was inwardly focused and focused

35:58

on my needs and what I wanted. I

36:00

was not on the path to being an elder.

36:03

I was on the track to being

36:05

elderly. And the inverse of

36:07

that is I get more freedom as I,

36:09

you know, this stuff kind of comes out

36:11

in relationships and friendships, in my marriage, in

36:13

counseling sessions, you know, as this stuff kind

36:15

of comes up now and there's healing around

36:17

it. I find myself sitting in meetings and

36:19

like letting other people talk. Imagine

36:22

that. Not having to

36:24

always be the leader of everything. Not

36:26

having to have my identity based on

36:28

short-term wins. Not being competitive. Competitiveness is

36:31

the opposite of relationship. It is

36:33

the antithesis of relationship. Like when we're competitive

36:35

with somebody, it's I win and you lose.

36:38

That's horrible. Especially when you're dealing

36:40

with, like

36:42

my profession doesn't have to be competitive.

36:46

When I go out and play tennis or pickleball with

36:48

somebody, like I don't have to win, but before I

36:50

had to win because I'm a winner. Winners

36:52

win, right? Like- And if I

36:54

don't win, I'm a loser. If I don't win, I'm a loser. If I don't

36:56

win, I'm not okay. If I don't win,

36:59

all that stuff's gonna bubble up from the basement and

37:01

I'm gonna feel terrible. I used to literally lose

37:03

in tennis and feel terrible for days. Another thing,

37:06

I would fight with my wife and I would

37:08

go do a bunch of email. That's

37:10

an interesting behavior. Well, why would I do that?

37:13

Well, because I get praise from doing email. I

37:16

get a lot of interactivity. Oh, hey, thank you so

37:18

much for that. Oh, wow, it's 11 o'clock at night

37:20

on a Friday night and just had

37:22

a blowout fight with my wife. I'm gonna go and do

37:24

some emails because people are gonna be like, look how hard

37:26

you work Friday night. You're

37:28

working so hard. Social media was

37:31

deadening to me. I mean, if you

37:33

look at the peak of my social media sort of

37:35

addiction, it was

37:37

probably five years ago to three years ago. Why?

37:41

Because I could go online and tickle the

37:44

ears of people and they would tell me,

37:46

oh, this is a really insightful thing. This

37:48

is really cool. Wow, you're so great because,

37:50

you know, whatever. Validation. Validation. Yeah. It

37:53

was praise. How many likes did I get? But

37:55

I found myself my personal relationship to people. Like,

37:58

are we optimizing our lives? for

38:00

the people who know us best or the people who know us least. That's

38:03

a question that haunts me. I've

38:05

watched a lot of people up close and personal

38:08

who the more you got to

38:10

know them, the less

38:14

you liked them. And I mean,

38:16

that's honestly the lie that we all engage in. People

38:18

really knew me, would they love me?

38:20

Would they even like me? There

38:22

are people, a lot of people I've come

38:24

in contact with. They're bigger on the

38:26

outside than they are on the inside. I'm

38:29

like, I want to be somebody. That was me,

38:31

by the way. Like I, I mean, I

38:34

think we all have this temptation, right? The

38:36

Instagram pic of, oh, my life's just a

38:38

vacation. Everything's amazing, right? Twitter's sort of the

38:40

intellectual version of that. All I

38:42

think is these great thoughts. Yeah, yeah. Have

38:44

all this wisdom, so wise. Now,

38:46

let alone my like marriage disaster, my business

38:48

disaster, all this stuff. It's like, well, yeah,

38:50

but I can spout platitudes

38:53

on Twitter and people will praise me for it, right?

38:56

Like that's the lie, that's the trap. Yeah, as this healing

38:58

has occurred, it's like I'm on social media far less, not

39:00

because like, I actually like genuinely want to help people and

39:02

like, when I have something to say that I think could

39:04

be helpful, when I'm engaging conversation, like I'll

39:06

go on and like I'll engage in it, but like, I

39:08

don't feel a need now to like hour

39:10

by hour, check and see how many people

39:13

have liked whatever. In my marriage, I'm trying

39:15

to be somebody who's focused purely on the

39:17

good for the other, focused on the good

39:19

of my wife. Like how can I serve

39:21

her and love her with no expectation of

39:23

reciprocity? Like it sounds foreign, it would sound

39:25

foreign to me. Like the

39:27

view we have of every relationship sort of

39:29

in that fear-based scarcity-based mindset is like, okay,

39:31

well, Alexis Dokker called it self interest rightly

39:33

understood, right? Which is like, I do things

39:35

for you, so you can do things for

39:37

me. Like that's not

39:40

true love and care, that's loving yourself.

39:42

There's a rabbi who calls that fish

39:44

love, right? He says, you know, we

39:46

treat our marriages like we do a

39:48

good fish dinner, right? Where you're like,

39:50

oh, I love this fish because it

39:52

tastes good, because it

39:54

makes me feel warm, because it satisfies

39:56

a need that I have, a desire that I

39:58

have. You're consuming it.

40:02

You're a consumer of that thing.

40:04

I think that without

40:07

a shift in mindset and the default assumption of

40:09

the world is we are all consumers of one

40:11

another. We are all eating one another, including in

40:13

our marriages and personal relationships. And it's

40:15

poison. Straight poison.

40:18

I want to spend a lot

40:20

of this conversation on investing and

40:22

running a business. But before we

40:24

transition, one of

40:26

the things that you said to me last night

40:28

that I found super interesting was that you'd stop

40:31

drinking unless it's a celebration. Tell

40:33

me about that. Well, yeah, the last couple of years

40:35

have been an exploration

40:37

of interior

40:40

and exterior. And I think

40:42

a lot of our exterior lives reflect

40:45

the accumulation of our interior lives. For

40:47

me, it certainly did. I

40:50

can remember the first time I was called a fat kid,

40:52

I was 10 years old. And

40:54

that was an identity that I adopted. I

40:57

always was just a little more overweight than everyone

40:59

else. I wasn't like morbidly obese, but I was

41:01

just I care a lot of weight. I was

41:03

athletic, but I but I was a little bit

41:05

heavier. You know, when I became an entrepreneur, it

41:08

was all consuming. I mean, my 20s were filled with

41:11

I had to

41:13

win at all costs. I had to

41:15

I had to put every bit of

41:17

energy into being successful. I thought

41:19

that that was going to make me OK. So my

41:21

20s were filled with a single

41:23

minded pursuit of achievement. I

41:27

put on 50 plus pounds in

41:29

my 20s. I tipped the scales at one point at 252.

41:32

I remember I'll be on the scale and I was like, whoa, I've

41:35

gotten big. I started beginning

41:38

of last year at 235 ish. So

41:42

I was down from my peak, but it was just

41:44

a battle. I've been engaged in like a decade long

41:47

battle with like I'd try this

41:49

diet or that diet. I'd try to work

41:51

out some. I'd make a little

41:53

progress. I'd slip back. It was kind of

41:55

like I had this set range. I really

41:57

couldn't couldn't get outside of it. Kind of

41:59

all part of the same. transformation occurring at

42:01

the same time, right? Like I

42:04

found out that food was

42:08

something I celebrated with, was

42:10

something I turned to for comfort, was

42:13

how I expressed love and joy and care. As

42:15

my counselor said, it sounds like you eat when

42:17

you're sad and you eat when you're mad and

42:19

you eat when you're happy. I think

42:22

you're going to probably be always eating. And I

42:25

was like, yes, I am always eating. I always

42:27

have a pull towards food, right? Because I was using food. And by

42:29

the way,

42:34

there are more maladaptive behaviors, right? It just happened

42:36

to be one that you can't hide very well.

42:38

But I was using food to do a job for

42:40

me. And sometimes that job was in

42:43

concert with joy and care. And sometimes that

42:45

was in concert with pain. But

42:48

food was like the tool of choice that would make

42:51

me both feel out of control

42:53

and in control at the same time. And

42:55

so as those sort of things started releasing and

42:57

the junk that was

42:59

underneath them that caused that pain started releasing,

43:01

like I felt a real freedom. You know,

43:04

you, I wrote this publicly in my annual

43:06

letter this year, like you had

43:08

a huge impact on me. And it's

43:10

funny how we don't often, I don't think when you said it, you

43:13

realized like how impactful it was going to be, but it was like

43:15

a lightning bolt. You told me I was complaining to you. I think

43:17

it was maybe January 4th or 5th of

43:19

last year. And you told me

43:21

that, you know, you were working out or everyone's

43:23

like, Oh man, yeah, like I've got a news

43:25

resolution. I'm gonna drop some weight, you know, whatever.

43:28

And it's just really hard to work out. And

43:31

I felt kind of defeated about it. Cause it's like,

43:33

you know, when you know, when you're

43:35

headed to failure and

43:37

it like sort of, that's the thing about dieting.

43:39

And that's the thing about these like short bursts

43:41

of like New Year's resolutions is like, they

43:44

head towards failure because they're

43:46

not sustainable. And so I remember you

43:48

saying this one thing to me that

43:50

completely shifted internally, how I thought about

43:53

health. And you said, well, I just

43:55

work out every day. It's part

43:57

of my identity. I don't have a choice.

44:00

If I'm gonna work out, I just have a choice what I do. And

44:03

I remember it hit me like a ton of bricks. I was like, oh

44:05

my gosh, yeah, you're

44:08

right. And around that

44:10

time, another good friend of ours,

44:12

Patrick, I was on the

44:14

phone with him and the best of friends

44:16

tell you the real truth. Like the

44:19

pinnacle of friendship is to tell each other the

44:21

real truth, the hard truth, the truth that, the

44:23

truth that you gain nothing from and you have

44:25

everything to lose. Because that is

44:27

true vulnerability. That is truly giving the other

44:29

person control. And I remember

44:31

Patrick took a risk and I'd said something about, I

44:34

used to make jokes about being a fat kid, right?

44:36

This is that identity that was imprinted upon me. And

44:38

they're funny, people laugh at jokes about being fat, right,

44:40

self-effacing and all this stuff. And he goes, would you

44:42

knock that shit off? And

44:44

it was like very stern voice. He was like, not

44:47

okay. I've heard you say this

44:49

over and over again. You've made jokes about you and me, like not

44:51

okay. Like you gotta quit that, you're not

44:53

a fat kid. He's

44:55

like, why do you do that to yourself? And

44:58

it's again, this idea, like we can't see each other. We

45:01

can see each other clearly, we can't see ourselves clearly. That really

45:03

flipped a switch in me. That I was like, I'm not a

45:05

fat kid. I'm gonna be healthy. I'm gonna be

45:07

a healthy person who's part of their identity is

45:09

I'm gonna work out every day. Now I'm

45:11

not putting my salvation in that. I'm not

45:13

putting my goodness in that. I don't think that

45:15

people who work out are better than people who

45:17

don't work out. But I'm gonna make it a

45:19

core part of me that I'm gonna like honor

45:21

this body that's been given to me. Like I've

45:23

got one container in this life and

45:27

it's important. When I say basically

45:29

every day, like I am now, I work with a

45:31

couple of people on the fitness side and like their biggest

45:33

problem with me is that I work out too much now.

45:35

Like literally this is not like a bragging thing.

45:38

This is like, I love it so much now. And

45:40

this is something I hated to work out. I hated

45:42

it. I would dread it. I

45:44

was out of shape. I mean, I hated working out.

45:46

And so now it's like, I feel

45:48

the joy and I feel

45:50

privileged that I get to work out. Like

45:53

I have an opportunity to move my body into like

45:55

experience this world. And so whether it's going on a

45:57

run or a bike or playing, I

46:00

love pickleball and tennis and or just getting

46:02

me on a hike or a walk with a friend. I

46:05

love it. You know, the Greeks had this

46:08

very like it's like body versus soul, like

46:10

dualistic view. Like we are embodied creatures. Like

46:12

we are one in the same. That's not

46:14

the proper view. Like our physical health

46:17

impacts our mental health and

46:20

vice versa. Right. And

46:22

so I've seen this like wonderful, like I

46:24

have more energy to play with my children

46:26

and the relationships are better. And like I

46:28

can I can I feel better just in

46:30

general. So like, you know, when you feel better and

46:32

you can move better, it's all this like it's like

46:35

this virtuous upward loop, right? And

46:37

inverse downward loop when when those things start

46:39

to fail. And so the alcohol thing, very

46:41

long winded way of saying it. I

46:43

just noticed that when I drink

46:45

alcohol, things felt hard.

46:48

And turns out alcohol is one of men,

46:52

especially one of the biggest inhibitors of testosterone.

46:55

And we think of testosterone as like the libido hormone

46:58

and it is. But like, that's

47:00

not the point. Like I wasn't like I

47:02

was like, oh, well, I'm drinking. I was

47:04

basically drinking almost every day and I

47:06

was drinking a lot. Like I got the point. I probably

47:09

drank to say this even now, I would never in a

47:11

million years have defined myself as like with

47:13

any sort of addiction. Yeah. And

47:16

like I could not drink and be OK, but I

47:18

was drinking like three or four or five drinks a

47:20

night every night. Like you know, you get home and

47:22

you open up in a bottle of white and you're

47:24

making dinner. We cook all the time. We love cooking.

47:26

My wife and I, it's like kind of a core part of

47:28

what we do. And we're making this meal and you know, you

47:31

know, open, you know, another bottle of wine, maybe a

47:33

red, you have a little bit of that. And then

47:35

it's like, oh man, you know, it'd be really great

47:38

tonight. Have a little H tequila or some cognac or

47:40

something. And you know, before long, it's like it really

47:42

adds up and it affects your sleep. And

47:45

for me, I just noticed like, you

47:47

know, testosterone, the best definition I've heard of testosterone

47:49

and what it does is it makes hard things

47:51

seem easy. And so

47:53

when I drink, hard things seem hard. And when I

47:55

don't drink, hard things seem easier. Like

47:57

I can very clearly tell. And so I just.

48:00

just said it's not worth it

48:02

and try to come up with other alternatives and how

48:04

to get the ritual of it and the specialness of

48:06

it. It's kind of like a, you know, you can

48:08

mark your days, right? I mean, I went for a

48:10

lot of my life. It was like alternating between like

48:12

caffeine was one part of my day and alcohol is

48:15

another part of my day and now

48:17

I don't drink caffeine and I don't

48:19

drink alcohol for very

48:21

different reasons, but both of them health related and

48:23

my life is way better for it. And

48:26

I, so I, so my, my, my excuse now, I

48:28

shouldn't say excuse my, the way I think about it

48:30

is like when I celebrate, it's the only time I

48:32

let myself drink. The interesting thing to me

48:34

when we were talking last night is you

48:36

mentioned you use the word rule,

48:39

which I thought was really interesting. Do you

48:41

have any other rules that you've

48:43

adapted in the last couple of years that have

48:45

really helped you sort of unlock the next level?

48:47

Yeah, this is actually a huge part of a

48:50

lot of these changes that I've made my life

48:52

as well. What, how we spend our

48:54

days is how we spend our lives. Like

48:57

our habits are who we are and

49:00

habits are very sticky and hard

49:03

to change. They require a

49:05

tremendous amount of focus and

49:07

it's very difficult to add multiple habits at once

49:09

is what I found. I'm

49:12

also not a personality that loves habits. I

49:16

don't love structure.

49:18

I really enjoy

49:20

the variety of life. And

49:22

so in many ways, like habits great on

49:25

me, but I've really come

49:27

as I get older to appreciate the value

49:29

of good habits. And so the habits I

49:32

try and I would say as I, these are most

49:34

days, almost all days I

49:37

get up and the first thing I do is read and pray. The

49:41

I always try to tell my kids and my wife

49:43

that I see them and I know them and I

49:45

love them and that there's nothing they can do to

49:47

ever move outside of my

49:49

love for them. One

49:53

of the questions I love asking my

49:55

kids now is what do I do

49:57

when you feel most loved? really

50:00

try to focus on doing those things

50:02

for them. Um that's sort of the

50:05

magic question that unlocks a tremendous amount

50:08

of intimacy with

50:10

anyone really. Any friendship if you ask that same

50:12

question, you'd you'd be shocked. I think what the

50:14

answers you get because in my marriage and in

50:16

my friendships, in my relationship with my children to

50:19

some degree like I used to try to love

50:21

them uh the

50:23

way I wanted to be loved. Mm. And

50:26

it doesn't work very well because really what you're doing

50:28

is you're loving yourself by doing that and

50:30

then I kinda went through a phase where I was like, okay,

50:32

Wama, love them the way they should want to be loved. Mm

50:35

hmm. That doesn't work

50:37

well either. Why don't they love it? Why don't they

50:39

love it? Yeah. Right. And

50:41

then I started really being like, okay,

50:43

I'm gonna pretend like I

50:45

have no preconceived notions of how somebody wants to be

50:48

loved. And you're just gonna ask them. I'm just gonna

50:50

ask them and do you know

50:52

what it's interesting is most people both can

50:54

tell you pretty quickly but a bit shocking to them what

50:56

comes out of their mouth. Oh, interesting.

50:58

So, most people don't actually know how

51:00

they wanna be loved. Like it's not something

51:02

they think about. It I mean, you can use this

51:05

analogy at work too, right? Like, you know, a question

51:07

I'll ask somebody is like, when do you really feel

51:09

seen and appreciated? But this is the question we're

51:11

all trying to ask is like, how do we wanna

51:13

be loved? I'm like really getting down

51:15

on somebody's level with them and getting in

51:17

the muck in the mire with them. Like

51:19

that's real relationship. Let's switch gears and talk about

51:22

business a little. But I think that a

51:24

good segue question is how do you

51:27

balance love with

51:29

operating and

51:31

you're one of the best operators I've ever met

51:33

in my life. How do you balance those two

51:35

things where we're

51:37

taught to come at everything from a

51:40

competitive point of view, which you do

51:42

exceptionally well or did exceptionally well for

51:44

a number of years and it

51:46

made you a huge success. And then

51:48

how do you get the same results or

51:50

better results operating out

51:52

of love? Well, I think the lie that

51:55

we tell ourselves is that

51:57

if we don't act out of scarcity that there

51:59

were no won't be enough. And

52:02

what that does is it isolates us

52:06

and it shuts us down and it isolates

52:08

and shuts down everyone. I mean, anxiety is

52:10

contagious. Scarcity is

52:13

contagious. As soon as you look at the

52:15

game theory of scarcity, as soon as one

52:17

person acts scarce, the fear ripples

52:19

through the entire crowd and

52:22

love is fragile. Care is genuinely

52:24

fragile. This either this fear mindset

52:26

or this abundance mindset, love mindset,

52:28

it requires a tremendous

52:30

amount of protection in order to engage

52:32

in it. And

52:35

look, I'm not going to sit here

52:37

and pretend that I would often make

52:39

the same decisions if I weren't already

52:41

in a position of success. You're operating

52:43

in a position of strength already. Yeah.

52:45

I'm coming oftentimes where I'm already coming

52:47

from position strength. I do think though,

52:49

I would hope if I hit

52:52

reset and I could go

52:54

back knowing what I know now, life is

52:56

just way better no matter how you slice it. Operating

53:00

from a position of abundance and love and care, no

53:03

matter if you have resources or not, but

53:06

money makes you more of what you already are. Right?

53:09

And so if you look at people with

53:11

tremendous amount of resources who made that money

53:13

through scarcity and through high competition and through

53:16

stepping on people on the way up, when they get to

53:19

the top, they continue to exhibit that

53:21

behavior. I think there are a number of people

53:23

who experienced that. And by the way, that was

53:26

me in my twenties. My twenties were filled

53:28

with doing whatever it took to

53:31

make it. And I would hide it and I

53:33

do it in a more gentle way,

53:36

but that my heart was scarce and

53:38

I still battle this on a daily basis now. So it's not

53:41

like, again, there's no victory declared here, but what

53:43

is sustainable long-term is

53:46

not a sort of Mexican standoff with

53:48

everyone in your life. I mean, that's

53:50

how most business is done. It's like there's

53:52

power structures and it's like, well, I'm going

53:54

to make myself indispensable so you can't get

53:57

rid of me. Right?

53:59

And it's like, oh, well, I

54:01

wish I could get rid of that guy, but I can't. It's

54:04

like, that's a horrible, confrontational,

54:08

competitive, scarce mindset to be in business.

54:10

I feel like this is the

54:12

norm. Unfortunately, it's really the norm in the finance

54:14

world. I mean, I feel like I've, I've, I

54:17

fell backwards into finance. I've

54:19

joked on the Forrest Gump of private equity, and it

54:21

is as scarce as it gets. I

54:23

mean, it is all zero sum is

54:26

how it's treated. As we've moved towards

54:29

a position of abundance, as we've moved towards

54:31

an ability to try to treat people with

54:33

honor and care and create win-win relationships. I

54:35

mean, that's really what we're trying to do.

54:38

You know, one of our mentors, both of

54:40

us, Peter Kaufman talks a lot about this,

54:42

right? As like the only sustainable long-term path

54:45

is that everyone has to win or it won't work.

54:48

If there's any losers in a system, it's

54:52

not sustainable. So I think that's just something that

54:54

we've really tried to pursue. And so what does

54:56

that practically look like? I think is a question,

54:58

right? It looks like

55:01

not protecting yourself always all

55:03

the time, but

55:06

giving people the ability, if they wanna

55:08

act scarce, to do

55:11

so, but in like lower stakes ways. So

55:13

like one of my favorite things to do is be, almost

55:16

open myself up to being taken advantage of early

55:19

on in a relationship. So

55:22

that if they do, then you're like, okay, great. By

55:25

the way, there's no judgment in this. It's not

55:27

like, how dare you, or I'm somehow better, whatever,

55:29

it's just, hey, I just don't think you're in

55:31

a position right now. I was

55:33

there before, but you're not in a position right

55:36

now to be able to engage in our system

55:38

because our system requires a tremendous amount of mutual

55:40

trust and care. Now

55:42

again, we're imperfect, we screw up all the time. We're

55:44

asking for forgiveness all the time. We say sorry all

55:46

the time. It's not, I don't wanna paint this picture

55:49

of idealistic, like we've got it all

55:51

together. We got a lot of things to work on, right?

55:53

But I think most of the people are

55:56

trying to operate out of

55:58

a position of abundance. Most of us are trying. We're

56:00

trying to work towards wins

56:02

for everyone. We're trying to be thoughtful with

56:05

not just the buyer and the seller, private

56:07

equity, so we buy businesses.

56:11

We're not trying to just think about the buyer and the

56:13

seller, buyer being us, seller being the person who's selling us

56:15

this thing. We're trying to be thoughtful about the executive leadership

56:17

teams at these companies. We're trying to be thoughtful about the

56:19

employees, the rank and file. We're

56:21

trying to be responsible and be thoughtful towards

56:23

our customers and our vendors and

56:25

the communities, maybe even regulators, depending on the

56:28

situation. What does a win look

56:30

like for a community that we purchase a business in?

56:33

I don't know, it's an interesting question. I think it's different for every

56:35

business. What does a win look like

56:37

for the construction worker on a job, business

56:40

we bought? Which

56:42

is an interesting question to ask, right? We

56:44

can't make anybody happy. We can't make anybody

56:46

fulfilled. But we certainly can

56:49

create an environment that allows more

56:51

for them to be happy, free,

56:53

fulfilled. This is where I think for the rest

56:55

of my career, the engaging part for me, it's

56:57

not about money for a long

56:59

time. Thankfully, I've not

57:01

had to worry about money for a while. Now for

57:04

me, I'm like, wow, what if when

57:06

we buy a business, not

57:08

only is the work environment better,

57:10

maybe we allow them, provide the

57:12

environment, maybe show them

57:15

a better way, this idea of everything's relative,

57:17

right? Maybe we can show them a better

57:19

way where their marriages get better and

57:21

their friendships get better and their relationship with their children get better.

57:24

They're more engaged people. They're more active.

57:28

I don't want people who are working 80, 100 hours

57:30

a week every week. Now look, there are weeks where I work 100,

57:33

100 hour weeks. Sometimes

57:36

you gotta get stuff done, right? So there's no

57:38

shame in that. But if that's your

57:40

norm, you

57:42

just cannot sustain a healthy lifestyle,

57:45

healthy relationships, healthy physical body,

57:48

working that much consistently. Just no way. There's not enough

57:50

time in the day to do it. And so I

57:52

don't want people who are sustainably

57:55

the whole finance world is

57:57

full of just chewing people up. spitting

58:00

them out. They use

58:02

people as objects, right? Then

58:04

they throw them away when the object doesn't become useful. I

58:06

mean, my fantasy, and this may be, you know, I

58:09

look at delusions of grandeur, illusions of grandeur,

58:12

is could we show people a better

58:15

way that actually you create higher returns

58:17

long term by treating

58:19

people well. You create

58:22

higher returns over time by using little to

58:24

no debt, as weird as that is

58:26

in the finance world. And believe me, I know all the people

58:28

who are watching this, I get the math, you don't have to

58:30

send me the math, I understand how leverage works, I

58:33

can do the math too. But

58:35

I think there's real value in examining why

58:37

is it that we have a system, especially

58:39

in the leverage bioworld of private equity, where

58:42

the norm is buy, lever,

58:45

strip, and flip, right? I'm

58:49

gonna lever this business to the moon, I'm gonna try

58:51

to use as little equity as I can, I'm gonna

58:53

try to sell it as quickly as I can to

58:55

generate the highest return I can. There's no way to

58:58

make good long term decisions with short term capital,

59:00

with short term time rises, there's no way. And

59:04

by the way, what are we doing if

59:06

all, there's no way to create a long

59:09

term enjoyable, sustainable life by

59:11

having a series of short term transactional relationships that

59:13

you move your life through. That's where you end

59:15

up with these people who can

59:18

buy anything, who've made hundreds

59:20

of millions and billions of dollars who are miserable,

59:22

like I've met these people. They

59:25

have their IRR etched on their tombstone, no

59:28

one gives a shit, no one cares. At the

59:30

end of the day, David

59:34

Brooks I think calls him eulogy

59:36

virtues. Yeah. No

59:38

one at somebody's eulogy was like, he

59:40

was a great man, made a ton of money,

59:43

hated his life, hated his wife. But

59:46

he got 26.5%. Right.

59:49

IRR. But that net IRR, woo, boy,

59:52

let me tell ya. He

59:55

was the one, one of the best. Yeah.

59:57

I mean, and look, we admire greatness. Like

1:00:00

we're, we're a society that worships

1:00:02

outliers. And

1:00:04

so you're not wrong to play that game. That

1:00:06

is a game to be played. There is a

1:00:08

game there and it does lead to certain things

1:00:10

that are good. It

1:00:13

also makes you lose your soul. And

1:00:17

also I don't want to get the impression.

1:00:19

Like we're trying to absolutely shoot the lights out in

1:00:21

returns. Yeah. Just in a

1:00:23

different way, how you go about it, your way, your

1:00:25

way is more sustainable. And there's

1:00:27

a couple of things I want to follow up on that we talked

1:00:29

about there, going back to the

1:00:31

first part, allowing people an opportunity to

1:00:34

almost take advantage of you. Often

1:00:36

I find that the first request

1:00:38

by somebody is very

1:00:41

telling or the first offer, here's

1:00:43

what we want. Here's what we need from you. And

1:00:46

if that doesn't come across as fair, it's

1:00:49

like the biggest signal in the world that

1:00:51

it's like, Oh, this is probably not a relationship

1:00:53

that is going to be win-win. I'm going to

1:00:56

have to work to try to make it win-win.

1:00:58

But you've, you've given me this valuable piece of

1:01:00

information on day one without even intentionally doing so.

1:01:02

Amen. But I would also, I would say is

1:01:05

the slight twist I'd make to that is and

1:01:07

give grace that like, I

1:01:10

will fall down, you will fall down and

1:01:12

make offers to people, even though maybe we

1:01:14

actually are like in a heart space most

1:01:16

of the time. That's not transactional. This

1:01:19

happens to me all the time where I will

1:01:21

fall down and, and, and, and do something transactional.

1:01:23

Totally. And so it's like what I often do

1:01:25

in that situation is say, Hey, maybe this was

1:01:27

unintentional. Maybe you're having a bad day. Whatever

1:01:30

the reason this came across to me as

1:01:32

transactional. If I misinterpreted it, maybe I don't

1:01:34

understand what you're actually that cement underneath it,

1:01:37

but it feels short-term feels transactional,

1:01:40

feels extractive in what

1:01:43

you offered. Did I misunderstand? And

1:01:45

usually that reaction, the more defensive they

1:01:47

are, the more kind of like, what

1:01:50

are you talking about? Right? Like

1:01:52

the water we swim in culturally

1:01:54

is transactive, extractive,

1:01:58

it removes control. It says it's. says you

1:02:00

will be okay if you can

1:02:02

build your own kingdom. So

1:02:05

like it's perfectly normal for that to be

1:02:08

the way people interact and transact. Like that

1:02:10

is the norm. So like I just want

1:02:12

to be careful with how steeped in that

1:02:14

somebody is and how much they've realized that

1:02:16

maybe that there's a better way. And

1:02:19

what I don't want to do is I don't

1:02:21

want to, I don't want to come across as

1:02:24

judging them or condemning them based on that, which

1:02:26

is a real danger, right? Because I mean you

1:02:28

can get self-righteous pretty quickly. It's just a signal.

1:02:30

Right. It's just a signal. If

1:02:32

anything, even if they are highly transactional and

1:02:35

sort of my, like I have

1:02:37

this, like it's like a weird feeling that rises

1:02:39

up in me. It's like a, like, I don't

1:02:41

know. Your Spidey sounds. Right. It's

1:02:43

that I think it's like a protective thing

1:02:46

where you're like, okay, I can feel

1:02:48

myself rising in, in competitiveness, rising in

1:02:51

scarcity to meet their scarcity. And I'm

1:02:53

like, Oh, I don't like that. That's that dirty fuel.

1:02:56

I feel like it's almost like a direct injection of

1:02:59

dirty fuel into my system. And I'm like,

1:03:01

Ooh. Yeah. And then it's like,

1:03:03

okay, well, even if I say, Hey, I don't think we're in

1:03:05

a position right now to probably do something on this or like,

1:03:07

I don't, I don't think the system it would work for you

1:03:09

engaging in the system right now. Try

1:03:12

to show them a better way and encourage them. Don't condemn them. Right.

1:03:15

I think that's the thing that we try to do now. Oftentimes I think people don't

1:03:18

take it as such. I mean, look, if

1:03:20

somebody makes you an offer and you decline, there's rejection

1:03:23

in that. And

1:03:25

again, I totally get

1:03:27

this because I feel this way is when

1:03:29

you get rejected, it touches things that are

1:03:31

way deeper than just that mere surface level

1:03:33

rejection. Totally. So when it travels down and

1:03:35

starts ping ponging around and hitting all those

1:03:37

things down below, that's where you

1:03:40

get these outside of reaction, outsized reactions to

1:03:42

things. And again,

1:03:45

the response that you want to have is when you

1:03:47

see somebody have an outsized reaction is to be, I

1:03:49

can feel stupid, belittle them. Your pattern

1:03:51

is something that I really have enjoyed

1:03:53

studying. So we all

1:03:56

have three basic moves in conflict. And

1:03:59

actually, if you. watch these, it's fun. Like now,

1:04:01

it's like whenever I engage in conflict, I

1:04:04

know my pattern and I very

1:04:06

much know my wife's pattern. And

1:04:09

I try to guess then

1:04:11

what other people's patterns are. You can watch people

1:04:13

go through these phases, but it's

1:04:16

called move against, which is like, no,

1:04:19

you're wrong, screw you,

1:04:21

I want to make you submit

1:04:24

to me. It's very much like a forced submission,

1:04:26

right? So this is somebody who gets up in

1:04:29

your face, who's yelling, or who's like, kind of

1:04:31

like talking down to you, like a

1:04:33

very, very confrontational, right? That's

1:04:35

kind of like one phase. And by the way, again, we

1:04:38

do all three of these. We

1:04:40

just depends on the order, but we all have an

1:04:42

order to how we do these things. And then by

1:04:44

the way, how they interact with one another is super

1:04:46

interesting as well. The

1:04:48

second one is move towards the person.

1:04:50

So the first one's move against. Second

1:04:52

one's move towards move towards is we

1:04:55

need to be okay. I'm not okay unless we're okay. Let's

1:04:58

just gloss over whatever's happened. It's okay.

1:05:00

It'll be fine. You know, let's just

1:05:02

water to the bridge. Let's just move

1:05:05

on. Right? Well, it's avoidant in a

1:05:07

way that is, it feels very relational,

1:05:10

but it's actually not because it's not for the good

1:05:12

of the other. It's actually for their good. They want

1:05:15

to have things be okay. But

1:05:17

it actually doesn't address the underlying issue at all. And then

1:05:19

the third one is move away. So this

1:05:22

is isolate. And so if you watch

1:05:24

all of your conflict will follow one

1:05:26

of like, we'll follow that pattern. Talk

1:05:28

to me about debt and your thoughts

1:05:30

on debt and the optionality it gives

1:05:32

you and when it's appropriate, when it's

1:05:34

not appropriate. Debt is not a

1:05:36

source of return. It is an amplifier

1:05:38

return. So it makes

1:05:41

good things be great.

1:05:44

It can take mediocre things and destroy them. And

1:05:47

of course it takes bad things and nukes them. The

1:05:50

higher your confidence in

1:05:52

the predictability of the future,

1:05:54

the more debt you can

1:05:57

use. I say can use

1:05:59

not should use. in a perfect world

1:06:01

of perfect information where you and I own a business. And

1:06:04

we're like, it's a recurring revenue business. We

1:06:07

are for sure going to make, unlevered,

1:06:10

we're going to make $2 million

1:06:12

this year, $3 million the following

1:06:14

year, $4 million the following year. And it

1:06:17

will go up exactly $1 million in free

1:06:19

cashflow every year into the future. Mathematically, you

1:06:21

can create a formula to

1:06:23

know exactly how much debt you can maximize

1:06:25

in that business. You pull out

1:06:27

the equity, the equity returns look out

1:06:30

of this world, incredible. And

1:06:33

because you know exactly the future is there's

1:06:35

no risk in that. So businesses that have

1:06:37

high predictability of revenues and incomes, and feel

1:06:40

like that they are, well,

1:06:42

I shouldn't say feel, in this case,

1:06:45

since we're creating scenario, they know that outside

1:06:48

events are really going to not affect them.

1:06:50

Then they can lever a tremendous amount. And

1:06:53

it makes complete perfect math

1:06:55

sense. The reality

1:06:57

is that the world,

1:06:59

I believe is largely

1:07:02

unknown and unknowable. The future

1:07:04

is murky. And

1:07:07

so it is a form

1:07:09

of pride, of hubris, to

1:07:11

use more debt than you should.

1:07:14

Now, this is very broad. This is like 60,000 foot because

1:07:17

everything's relative, right? How much debt should you

1:07:19

use? In the world I play in, we

1:07:22

are buying loosely functioning disasters

1:07:24

that sometimes make money. I

1:07:28

mean, these are small to medium sized businesses,

1:07:30

call it 3 million

1:07:32

to $20 million of free cashflow. You know,

1:07:34

my general view after looking behind the curtain

1:07:36

at thousands and thousands of businesses

1:07:38

is that all businesses are

1:07:41

loosely functioning disasters. Like whether it's a

1:07:43

not-for-profit or for-profit or government institution, like

1:07:45

people are messy. When

1:07:47

you get multiple people together, that mess

1:07:50

compounds, when you get large groups of

1:07:52

together, groups together, that mess compounds even

1:07:54

further, it's exponential. And the volatility of

1:07:56

that messiness is tremendous.

1:08:00

And so when you get to

1:08:02

smaller end of the market, these

1:08:04

are for-profit companies that are making

1:08:06

between three and $20 million a

1:08:08

year free cashflow, the volatility

1:08:10

of them is tremendous. And

1:08:13

hence the price that we pay is

1:08:16

on average less than,

1:08:18

because we're paying to accept that

1:08:20

risk. All investing at the end of

1:08:22

the day is the assumption of risk. The

1:08:25

ideal investment scenario is you are

1:08:28

assuming a risk that is knowable,

1:08:31

you are being paid more to

1:08:34

assume that risk and you have some ability

1:08:36

to mitigate that risk. And

1:08:38

that's what we're trying to do in our business.

1:08:40

We're trying to find things that are highly risky,

1:08:43

right? Because we wouldn't pay the price that we're paying

1:08:45

for them if they weren't highly risky. But

1:08:48

that we have talents and relationships

1:08:50

and systems that we can

1:08:53

diagnose what the risks are, properly

1:08:56

analyze the probability and the magnitude of that

1:08:58

risk, and then work to

1:09:00

mitigate it. And that's where our

1:09:02

returns come from. The math to me

1:09:04

is far less clear that over the

1:09:07

longterm debt makes you more

1:09:09

money. I'll give you an example of this. We

1:09:11

bought an aerospace business in

1:09:13

the fall of 2019. I

1:09:16

don't know if you know this, Shane, but aerospace never goes down.

1:09:19

It's always flat or goes up. We

1:09:21

were told by some of the people advising us on

1:09:23

that deal, they were like, are you guys, did you

1:09:25

guys get dropped on your head as a child or

1:09:28

something? You're not putting any debt on an aerospace business.

1:09:31

What is wrong with you? This is

1:09:33

tons of assets, highly leverable. Banks

1:09:36

would be happy to provide. Predictable. It's

1:09:38

predictable. Look at the history of the

1:09:40

business. And we said, yeah, we

1:09:43

don't feel like that's a responsible thing to do.

1:09:46

Again, debt only helps the buyer and the

1:09:48

seller. It doesn't help the leadership team.

1:09:50

It doesn't help the employees. It doesn't help the

1:09:52

communities. It doesn't help the regulators. It

1:09:54

doesn't help your customers. It doesn't help your vendors. There's

1:09:57

all these stakeholders at the table that it doesn't help.

1:10:00

But it does help in certain circumstances,

1:10:02

the buyer and the seller, which again, if

1:10:05

you sort of play short-term games,

1:10:08

win short-term prizes, area of scarcity,

1:10:10

non-recourse debt, heads I win, tails you

1:10:12

lose, there's a lot

1:10:15

of incentives to use debt irresponsibly.

1:10:17

I think that most private equity

1:10:19

firms look at, they're the

1:10:21

gas and the bankers of the breaks and

1:10:24

they'll just do whatever the bankers

1:10:26

allow them to do. And it's sort of up to the

1:10:28

bankers to say no. Our

1:10:31

aerospace business, we were

1:10:33

called idiots. I mean, actually even on Twitter, I think when

1:10:35

we came out with our annual letter that year, people were

1:10:38

like finance bros, were like,

1:10:40

you guys are morons. I was like,

1:10:42

maybe. And

1:10:44

oftentimes we are morons, which is good to be called out

1:10:46

for it. But in this particular case, I don't think we

1:10:48

were. And this is obviously way before we knew that there

1:10:51

was gonna be a pandemic. And

1:10:54

this idea of like, did we get

1:10:56

lucky? Did we get good? I think

1:10:58

you can know that things are not gonna

1:11:00

play out the way you want them to and

1:11:03

prepare for them not playing out and keep optionality

1:11:05

open, which is going to decrease your returns in

1:11:07

any given year, but give you the ability to

1:11:09

survive over decades. So

1:11:12

pandemic rolls around and we're

1:11:14

worried. You know, demand

1:11:16

in the industry in our segment

1:11:19

went off at one point by 88%. We

1:11:22

started to struggle and

1:11:24

we looked at it and we were like,

1:11:26

hey, let's, and by the way, the leadership team

1:11:28

there did an incredible job of

1:11:30

maintaining positive cashflow every

1:11:32

single month through the entire pandemic. Everyone else

1:11:35

was negotiating with their banks. Everyone else was

1:11:37

firing people. And we were the only ones

1:11:39

hiring and we were building systems

1:11:41

and we were taking risk. And we were able to

1:11:43

do that because we didn't need debt. Everyone else is

1:11:46

tied up. We didn't, we weren't tied up. And

1:11:48

the alternative is we lever the thing up. And

1:11:50

for, I don't know, four or five months, we

1:11:53

get a better return. And

1:11:56

then we negotiate with the bank. Hopefully we salvage it.

1:11:58

Maybe we have to inject more out. equity in down

1:12:00

the road. We're sure

1:12:03

as heck not hiring, we're not buying parked packages

1:12:05

for pennies on the dollar. We're not

1:12:07

setting up for 10 years of future success

1:12:09

and growth. We're

1:12:11

not implementing new ERP systems.

1:12:14

We're not implementing new process

1:12:17

and ordering system. The whole thing basically

1:12:19

gave us two years to completely

1:12:21

rebuild that business from the ground up and

1:12:25

to see the fruits of that is astounding. And

1:12:27

the business is dramatically worth more than

1:12:30

it was when we bought it in

1:12:32

spite of having a pandemic

1:12:35

and dramatically decreased demand.

1:12:38

We can't predict the future. When I was talking to

1:12:40

Chris Davis, who's on the

1:12:42

board of Berkshire, he

1:12:44

mentioned it's a strong signal if you're looking

1:12:46

for a good business that they don't have

1:12:49

any debt or they have very little debt

1:12:52

because that masks so many things

1:12:54

and the fragility involved is just

1:12:56

off the charts and people

1:12:58

don't realize the risks they're taking. And there's

1:13:00

also a world of difference between debt at

1:13:02

2%, if

1:13:05

you can get long-term debt at 2% versus

1:13:08

sort of now seven, eight, nine,

1:13:10

even higher, depending

1:13:13

on the circumstances. And when people enter

1:13:15

into a debt transaction, they just assume

1:13:17

that the world is gonna stay the

1:13:20

exact same that it is today. I'm

1:13:23

gonna make the same revenue. The

1:13:25

interest rates aren't gonna go up. They'll only

1:13:27

positively surprise me to the downside. And

1:13:29

then you find out that that's not the

1:13:32

case. And then all of

1:13:34

your free cashflow effectively starts getting consumed

1:13:36

by debt. And it doesn't take much.

1:13:38

It takes like a five to 10%

1:13:41

downturn in the business, which is a

1:13:43

perfectly normal- Business cycle. Reasonable cycle to

1:13:46

then throw the business into chaos. Yeah. I

1:13:52

can't imagine being an operator. And by the way, we've

1:13:55

never seen a business that we

1:13:57

wanna purchase ever the

1:14:00

firm that has debt on it. Like

1:14:02

when we buy it that has debt on it. Like

1:14:05

no families get wealthy

1:14:08

by being like, oh yeah, we have this great

1:14:10

operating business. Like let's pull a bunch of a

1:14:12

bunch of income from the future into the present

1:14:14

and lever up because that would be awesome. So

1:14:16

we can increase our consumption temporarily. So we can

1:14:18

buy a bigger house. Like no one does that

1:14:21

and for very good reason. Like it doesn't make any sense, but

1:14:23

somehow we've gotten ourselves as an

1:14:25

industry in the finance industry into this position where

1:14:27

it's like, it makes no sense how families

1:14:30

build businesses. By

1:14:32

the way, every business starts as a small business. Every

1:14:34

business starts as a family owned business. They then take

1:14:37

a business that has been operated a certain way for

1:14:39

a very long time, gone through ups and downs, survived

1:14:41

for 20, 30, 50, a hundred years

1:14:44

maybe. And then all of a sudden it's

1:14:46

like, actually what we want to do now

1:14:48

is completely gut how the

1:14:50

business operates and runs. We need to hit it with

1:14:52

the steroid needle. We're going to get, we're going to

1:14:54

jack it up with debt. We're going to strip it

1:14:57

of a bunch of cost structure. We're going to hire

1:14:59

a bunch of new people who are going to do

1:15:01

amazing things in a short period of time. And then

1:15:04

we're going to flip it to somebody else. And

1:15:06

by the way, once you get on that treadmill, like

1:15:08

once you sell the private equity, traditional private equity, do

1:15:10

a leveraged buyout, that business is forever

1:15:12

going to be flipped to the next person

1:15:15

or eventually might get sold to a strategic, but it

1:15:18

forever is relegated to a lack of

1:15:20

independence. Like it will never be an

1:15:22

independent ongoing concern for very long

1:15:24

after that. There's just no, no examples

1:15:27

of this. So for for us, like, you know, I

1:15:29

don't think we're smart. I

1:15:31

don't think we're trying to be geniuses. We

1:15:34

just look at like, okay, the whole

1:15:36

world is built on an

1:15:38

entrepreneur or small group of people,

1:15:40

entrepreneurs getting together, creating

1:15:42

something that the world needs. It's

1:15:45

hard. They built it over a

1:15:48

long period of time. They inherently acknowledge the

1:15:50

fragility of it. We just want to continue

1:15:52

to honor them, their legacy, honor the, all

1:15:54

the stakeholders, and all try to win together

1:15:56

the longterm. And I

1:15:58

couldn't imagine a worse thing. do than to

1:16:00

put debt on that. And I think

1:16:03

people miss over the long term, the

1:16:05

lack of debt actually works out better,

1:16:09

but over the short term, and I have the

1:16:11

saying, which is lack of patience changes the outcome.

1:16:15

And so when you lever up to

1:16:18

get your immediate returns and then you're

1:16:20

sort of playing with house money, you

1:16:23

can sort of justify

1:16:25

almost any behavior. And

1:16:28

when you think long-term, like a family thinks of a

1:16:30

business and you sort of go, well, we can't do

1:16:32

that because what we want is optionality.

1:16:34

You miss the fact that what you guys did,

1:16:36

you had a period of

1:16:39

two years where you made more

1:16:41

progress than you would have in

1:16:43

probably 10 or 20, where you're

1:16:45

strong and you're operating from

1:16:47

a position of strength. And

1:16:49

it's almost playing on easy mode in a way,

1:16:51

right? It's like, oh, like now we can expand

1:16:53

our business. People are

1:16:55

probably discounting parts at these fire

1:16:58

sale prices. We can stock up on them

1:17:00

and our margin is going to expand because

1:17:02

of that. We know the business is eventually

1:17:04

going to come back. I mean, I think

1:17:07

it depends on how you look at our

1:17:09

roles. Are we owners? And I'm not talking

1:17:11

about legal definitions here. I'm talking about mindset.

1:17:13

Yeah. If you own something, it

1:17:15

is your property to do with it, whatever you

1:17:17

want. You can do anything

1:17:19

you want with it. So like the pushback to everything,

1:17:21

if I was going to strong man, the opposing argument

1:17:23

is who are you to tell me what risk

1:17:25

to take? Oh, you can take it. Who are you to

1:17:28

tell me how to run my business? Like

1:17:30

I own it. I can do whatever I

1:17:32

want. I used to feel that way. Big shift for me

1:17:34

was becoming a steward, right? It's this

1:17:36

idea of stewardship and not ownership. So

1:17:39

the way I look at it is families are entrusting

1:17:41

us to be stewards of their company. It's

1:17:43

a responsibility that we have. Yes,

1:17:46

we get benefits from

1:17:49

being a steward. Yes, we get to

1:17:51

share in the fruits of the labor and

1:17:53

progress of the company. But at

1:17:55

the end of the day, my job is

1:17:57

to make sure that these businesses remain

1:17:59

intact. are healthy. And

1:18:02

when you look at it from that position, the

1:18:05

world becomes a lot clearer. What's

1:18:08

in the best interest of everyone else, but also me.

1:18:10

I mean, I don't want to do things that harm

1:18:12

us, but if we align incentives

1:18:15

properly, things that help us should help everyone

1:18:17

else and vice versa. Like we

1:18:19

will be taken care of if we take care of our people,

1:18:22

we'll be taken care of if we take

1:18:24

care of our customers. Like it's not

1:18:26

a complicated thing, but I think again,

1:18:29

are we owners or are we stewards?

1:18:31

Or I think often families take a

1:18:33

stewardship mindset of ownership. It's the, it's

1:18:36

interesting to me, I try

1:18:38

not to judge other people for what they do or

1:18:41

what they choose. Cause I mean, we're each

1:18:43

playing our own game. We're each sort of

1:18:45

like doing what's rationally makes sense for us

1:18:47

given everything going on in our life.

1:18:50

And if we switch shoes, we'd probably see the

1:18:52

world very differently than we do, but

1:18:55

people, I think they just under

1:18:57

appreciate the fact that you are

1:19:01

not thinking about really what

1:19:03

you're doing over a longer period

1:19:05

of time. And if you

1:19:08

structure your thinking stewardship is a great

1:19:10

example over a longer period of time,

1:19:12

you eliminate a lot of poor behavior

1:19:15

that you would otherwise

1:19:17

get or a lot of things that

1:19:19

can take you out of the game. Yeah, for

1:19:21

sure. Let's talk about incentives. How do you set

1:19:23

incentives for the CEOs of these businesses? How do

1:19:25

you think about them? Walk

1:19:27

me through one in detail, for example.

1:19:30

Yeah, well, so the, I think the

1:19:32

ideal system is everyone's eating at the

1:19:34

same table. Right. So

1:19:36

there's not different tables that the food falls

1:19:39

onto one and then falls onto the other,

1:19:41

right? Everyone's, everyone's incentives are aligned to, to

1:19:43

achieve the same goals. And

1:19:46

for us, when we look at traditional

1:19:48

private equity and the traditional two

1:19:50

and 20 model, right? So on

1:19:52

the amount of capital that you have either

1:19:56

gotten to invest or have invested, depending on the

1:19:58

terms of the agreement with your. limited

1:20:00

partners, you get a 2% fee

1:20:03

annually that goes to covering your overhead

1:20:05

costs and expenses of

1:20:07

the operations of the firm, the seeking out,

1:20:09

the doing of the deals, the oversight

1:20:12

and governance post-close. And then once you

1:20:14

pay them back with a return, typically

1:20:16

a 6% to 8%, maybe 10% depending

1:20:18

on the situation, then you get to

1:20:21

share in the upsides of that. And

1:20:23

the LPs, the people supplying you with

1:20:25

the money, provide

1:20:28

you that capital for usually

1:20:30

in private equity 10 years, roughly,

1:20:34

which again goes back to time horizon. 10 years sounds

1:20:36

like a long time. Shane, isn't that plenty

1:20:38

of time to buy a business and

1:20:40

hold it? Maybe. I

1:20:44

think if you've talked to most private equity people, they would say,

1:20:48

it's not the deals that they did that

1:20:50

really hurt that they did that went poorly. The

1:20:53

ones that hurt the most are the ones that they were

1:20:55

doing great and they could see a long future of compounding

1:20:57

that they just had to sell the business. You're

1:20:59

like, but 10 years is a long time. But

1:21:02

the reality is it takes time to find

1:21:04

a business, get the transaction

1:21:06

done. There's a sort of initial phase

1:21:08

of getting to know the business. Once you buy, you

1:21:11

really never know which you actually buy. No matter how

1:21:13

much due diligence you do, you don't really know until

1:21:15

you get into the weeds post-close. There's

1:21:17

a period of orientation, then there's a period of in

1:21:19

traditional private equity growth and trying to hit some sort

1:21:21

of metrics to then sell it to somebody else, which

1:21:23

by the way, selling takes time too. So you've got

1:21:25

to buy it takes time, you got to operate it

1:21:28

takes time, you got to sell it takes time. So

1:21:30

they're really at max, if you

1:21:32

hit it perfectly in the fun life cycle,

1:21:34

maybe you get five years, five

1:21:37

years at most. Most private

1:21:39

equity firms now are targeting what they'd

1:21:41

like is two to three years. So

1:21:44

from the time we buy something till the time we sell it

1:21:46

is two or three years. Again, maybe four

1:21:48

or five. If you get past

1:21:50

five, it's really distressed at that point. Like you're

1:21:53

trying to look for, you're trying to get

1:21:55

rid of it and you can't. When we think about incentives, incentive

1:21:58

for traditional private equity would be Shane,

1:22:01

I'd like for you to come on. I'd

1:22:03

like for you to run, do a tour of duty,

1:22:05

right? The tours of duty is kind of the way

1:22:07

that leadership has done in traditional private equity.

1:22:09

Once your tour of duty is gonna be two to

1:22:11

three years, look, you're not gonna see your family much.

1:22:13

You're gonna work your tail off. But

1:22:15

there's this pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. If you

1:22:17

can get us our

1:22:20

returns, you can get our investors our returns, then

1:22:22

you get to share in the upside of that.

1:22:24

It's a highly levered bet of sort of your

1:22:26

time and attention. We think

1:22:28

that that doesn't make much

1:22:30

alignment. And this is where you see private equity

1:22:32

detonating companies. This is where you see lots of

1:22:34

problems. I mean, private equity, you know, as

1:22:37

an industry, when I tell somebody I'm in private equity,

1:22:39

it's like we look up to lawyers and reputation these

1:22:41

days. You know, lawyers have a better

1:22:43

reputation than we do. And for a very

1:22:45

good reason, like there's been a lot of bad behavior. And

1:22:48

by the way, the incentives are

1:22:50

for the bad behavior. All of the polls

1:22:52

of traditional private equity, leverage buyout model is

1:22:55

towards bad behavior. Short-termism,

1:22:59

treating people poorly, cutting

1:23:01

all these things that hurt. I mean,

1:23:03

you're damaging when you fire somebody, you

1:23:06

are hurting not just them, but their entire

1:23:09

family, their friend group. Like you're

1:23:11

hurting communities. Now, it's also not healthy to keep somebody

1:23:13

in the role that they're in because you don't want

1:23:15

to fire. Then that's not healthy either. That's not kind. Be nice,

1:23:17

that's not kind. We can talk about that as a separate point.

1:23:20

For what we are trying to

1:23:22

do though, is we're trying to

1:23:25

have a complete perfect alignment between

1:23:27

our LPs, us,

1:23:30

and the people who operate these businesses on a

1:23:32

day-to-day basis. So we're trying to all leave from

1:23:34

the same table, trying to use the same metrics.

1:23:36

Practically, what does that look like? We

1:23:38

are, I used to say unusual in

1:23:41

our fee model. Now it's unique.

1:23:43

I mean, we couldn't even get audited

1:23:45

right out of the gate because no one knew what to do

1:23:47

with us. We take no fees of any kind, no

1:23:50

reimbursements of any kind. There's

1:23:52

no cash that comes from either our LPs

1:23:54

or the companies to

1:23:56

us. Zero guaranteed revenue,

1:23:58

which are like high. you run the firm.

1:24:01

Thankfully, when we started the firm, we were operators.

1:24:03

So we came in with cash flow and with

1:24:05

businesses and fell backwards into this whole

1:24:07

thing of private equity. I

1:24:09

remember the first deal

1:24:11

I did is I was close to accidental

1:24:13

as you could buy a business. I bought

1:24:15

it. I remember my lawyer, he

1:24:18

was like, we just got to do diligence. I

1:24:20

typed into Google, DO diligence. Was this media cross?

1:24:22

Yeah, it was media cross. So long as today,

1:24:24

I remember getting that deal done. And I called

1:24:26

up a friend who was like my one finance

1:24:29

friend from undergrad. And I was like, Hey, I

1:24:31

did this thing. Like, I think it's a good

1:24:33

deal. I don't know. And he goes, Oh, you did

1:24:35

a private equity deal. I literally Googled private equity. I

1:24:37

almost my career to Google. And

1:24:39

when I started studying it, I'm like, what, this doesn't make

1:24:42

any sense. Like all the incentives are off. And so what

1:24:44

I said was when we came in and we were, you

1:24:46

know, we ended up taking outside capital for the first time

1:24:48

in 2017, I was like, I don't need your fees. Like

1:24:50

I don't want

1:24:53

your fees. I don't want the incentive to

1:24:55

gather more and more capital, which forces you

1:24:57

to go up market. We can talk about

1:24:59

that. I said,

1:25:01

and I don't want to, I don't want to be able

1:25:04

to win when you lose. Like I want to win, win

1:25:06

or a lose, lose situation. Like I am willing to take

1:25:08

the risk. I wanted to be entrepreneurial because that was my

1:25:10

background. Like I was an entrepreneur. And so we have a

1:25:12

model where we take no fees of any kind, no reimbursements

1:25:14

of any kind from the portfolio companies or from our LPs.

1:25:17

We get a percentage of free cashflow as

1:25:19

we return cashback. That's how we share with our,

1:25:21

with our investors. Well, turns

1:25:24

out what that does for us is

1:25:26

it gives us the perfectly aligned ability to,

1:25:30

if there are high return, high probability projects

1:25:32

to reinvest in the portfolio, we would be

1:25:35

idiots not to take

1:25:37

the cash, defer gratification and

1:25:39

reinvest it often pre-tax at

1:25:42

high rates of return with high probability. That's

1:25:45

what any family would do. Right.

1:25:47

That's what we do. That's what our investors want.

1:25:50

They want to defer gratification. We want to

1:25:52

defer gratification. And the same thing.

1:25:54

We want to incentivize our leaders to do the exact same thing.

1:25:56

So oftentimes the metrics that they're measured

1:25:59

on is on. cash flow. But

1:26:01

again, it's not free cash flow in

1:26:04

a short period of time, it's free cash flow over a long period of time.

1:26:07

So when we don't have things

1:26:09

to do with the capital, high probability, high

1:26:11

return reinvestments, the dumbest possible thing you

1:26:13

could do is keep a bunch of cash. I call

1:26:15

the bladder problem, right? The more money you have, the

1:26:17

more likely you're going to piss it away. This

1:26:20

is where you see these businesses being

1:26:22

run in ways that you're like, they are

1:26:24

murdering money. They are destroying capital. How in

1:26:26

the world are they getting away with this?

1:26:28

And it's like, well, they're kingdom building, they're

1:26:31

feeding their incentives are build a bigger business.

1:26:33

Because by the way, you hire the compensation

1:26:35

consultants that tell you, well, yeah, the team

1:26:37

that same team and they

1:26:39

haven't really made a great return, but the business

1:26:41

is bigger. And by the way, bigger businesses command

1:26:43

higher salaries. So you play the game. It's a bigger

1:26:45

business. It's higher salary, more comp. It's

1:26:48

like their incentives are off the firm

1:26:50

who bought them, they're two and 20 by

1:26:52

lovers, strip and flip their incentives. And the

1:26:54

leadership teams and setups often are misaligned. LPs

1:26:57

are misaligned. Everyone up and down the value

1:26:59

chain of the traditional private equity structure is

1:27:01

misaligned. Now there's so much money flowing through

1:27:03

the system and there's enough safeguards and there's

1:27:05

enough discernment over a long enough period of

1:27:08

time. It all kind of has worked. You

1:27:10

can make an argument that when rates are

1:27:12

continually decreasing for the better part of two

1:27:14

and a half decades, interesting,

1:27:17

weird distortions happen in the market. We just want

1:27:19

a perfect alignment. So we want that operator in

1:27:22

the business to say, the first thing I want

1:27:24

to do is keep a healthy business

1:27:26

with strong cashflow, keep the

1:27:28

golden goose cranking out eggs. Second, we want to

1:27:30

take the proceeds for

1:27:33

cashflow and look for high return, high

1:27:35

probability projects in the companies. If

1:27:37

we can find them, especially pre-tax,

1:27:41

fantastic reinvest cash.

1:27:44

They want to reinvest cash because now they

1:27:46

reinvested a hundred dollars and now they've got 25 more

1:27:49

dollars every other year following that. We

1:27:52

love that too. We'd be happy to defer. We're

1:27:55

getting $25 as well ourselves. Now our investors are

1:27:57

like, of course, keep the capital. You've got great

1:27:59

things to do. to do with it, keep it. So

1:28:01

up and down the value chain, we're completely aligned. When

1:28:04

we should hold cash, we do

1:28:07

and reinvest it. And when we don't have anything good to

1:28:09

do with it, we send it out. So

1:28:11

is it a simple sort of like two

1:28:13

variable formula for all your CEOs then or

1:28:16

in terms of free cashflow and invested

1:28:18

capital? Yep. Everyone's just

1:28:21

incentivized on that. And then do

1:28:24

the CEOs get a compensation on

1:28:26

the cash distributed? Yeah, oftentimes. Yeah.

1:28:29

I mean, it depends on the situation where

1:28:31

sometimes having the CEOs are rolling forward quite

1:28:34

a bit of equity depending on the situation.

1:28:36

So sometimes they're getting equity or

1:28:38

getting cash kickers on top of that. But

1:28:40

oftentimes they're 10, 15, 20%

1:28:44

owners in these businesses. And so the incentives

1:28:46

naturally baked in. We love that. We don't

1:28:48

want to buy 100% of a company.

1:28:51

Like if we have our choice, we're buying 51% to 70%

1:28:54

of the business and we don't allow

1:28:57

non-strategic actors. We

1:28:59

want people who are actively engaged in the business to

1:29:01

own the remainder. How do you think about hiring and

1:29:03

firing CEOs? How do you know you have the right

1:29:05

CEO and how do you know

1:29:07

when it's time to move on? It's

1:29:11

hard and it's messy is the answer. Since we're

1:29:13

talking about comparing us to traditional private equity, I

1:29:16

would say is one of the things that traditional

1:29:18

private equity has gotten done better than us in

1:29:20

some ways is held people accountable. I think they

1:29:22

go too far in one direction.

1:29:24

I think we've reactionarily gone too far in

1:29:26

the other. In terms of the performance of

1:29:28

permanent equity as a firm, I would

1:29:32

say in absolute terms, we're not doing as

1:29:34

well, nearly as well as we could. And

1:29:37

this is an area of active learning for

1:29:39

us. I'm just being honest and transparent about

1:29:41

it. We've been tolerant of a lack of

1:29:43

performance to a degree that is unhealthy, not

1:29:45

only for the companies and the returns, but

1:29:47

also for the people that are engaging in

1:29:49

that behavior. And this is

1:29:52

an active area of discussion right now in the

1:29:54

firm. I mean, I'm giving you a real live

1:29:56

view of what we're discussing and it ultimately it's

1:29:58

a failure on my part. I'm

1:30:00

the CEO, I'm responsible for setting the

1:30:02

tone, and I deferred too

1:30:05

much early in my

1:30:07

career to the promises and to

1:30:09

the optimism that things would get

1:30:11

better when things weren't great. And

1:30:14

if you look at where we have really

1:30:16

succeeded is working with people who were doing

1:30:18

well and making them better. Where

1:30:20

we've really fallen down as a firm is

1:30:22

when things get dicey, we

1:30:25

tend to defer to relationship and

1:30:28

we tend to trust the people that we

1:30:30

have, even when there are many

1:30:33

warning signs that things are

1:30:35

not okay. And I would say this is the

1:30:37

nice versus kind principle that we've screwed up. Being

1:30:39

kind to somebody is saying, hey, I think

1:30:42

you're in the wrong role. And

1:30:44

they're stressed out. Their

1:30:47

lives are not, they're not enjoying life. They're not enjoying their

1:30:49

role. They're fear-based, right? When you get into a position where

1:30:51

things are not going well and you don't know why and

1:30:53

you don't know how to get out of it, it's

1:30:56

terrifying. And

1:30:58

part of what our role is is to help people.

1:31:01

We look fundamentally at like we, our job

1:31:03

is to serve and help others. If

1:31:06

we can serve and help others succeed, we're

1:31:08

going to succeed. Our LPs are going to succeed.

1:31:11

And to be honest, we screwed this

1:31:13

up. We have not done

1:31:15

a good job of getting people

1:31:18

the help and

1:31:20

moving people into roles that they should be in

1:31:22

or, or having them move on to outside roles.

1:31:25

And we need to do better at it. Does it ever work to change? I

1:31:28

mean, I don't have a ton of

1:31:30

experience with this working out. Maybe you do

1:31:32

where you change a role like, Hey, you're

1:31:35

CEO, but you'd really make a great CTO

1:31:37

in the same company because then you create

1:31:39

all these internal politics of like, who do

1:31:42

I report to and my loyalties to the

1:31:44

person who hired me and, or

1:31:46

is it just easier to sort of like transition and

1:31:48

move on? I mean, it would, that would

1:31:50

be wonderful to be able to do that.

1:31:52

I think that a lot of people's careers

1:31:54

would benefit if they had the humility to

1:31:56

be able to do that. Fundamentally, we all

1:31:59

struggle with pride. And

1:32:01

we can't see ourselves clearly. Like we

1:32:03

are a mystery to ourselves. And

1:32:06

what we, how we see ourselves in

1:32:08

our talents and our weaknesses

1:32:10

is often different than how other people see us. This is

1:32:12

why we need each other. This is the whole point of

1:32:15

relationship. This is the value. And this

1:32:17

is the terror of where we've gone as

1:32:19

a side note with social

1:32:21

media being so isolating with not having

1:32:23

in-person relationships. Like this is no

1:32:26

wonder that deaths of despair and suicide

1:32:29

attempts and anxieties through the roof, right?

1:32:31

We would love to be able

1:32:33

to take to somebody, hey, you're in the CEO

1:32:35

role or maybe the CFO role or whatever it

1:32:37

is. And we need you to take a step

1:32:39

back, you know, in order

1:32:41

to move forward. Careers often

1:32:43

die by suicide, not by homicide.

1:32:47

Like it's not- Double click on there.

1:32:49

Over and over and over again, I've

1:32:51

watched this tragedy happen, which is the

1:32:54

Peter principle. Someone rises and

1:32:57

they rise beyond their abilities and

1:33:00

then they can't take a step back.

1:33:02

Their pride, their ego, their identity is

1:33:04

rooted now in their title, in

1:33:06

their position. And you

1:33:10

say to them, we love you. We

1:33:12

think you're awesome. We'd love for you to continue to

1:33:15

be with us. The role

1:33:17

you're currently in is hurting you and

1:33:20

hurting those around you and hurting the company. And

1:33:23

they'll acknowledge that. And then you'll say, great,

1:33:25

could we get you into this role? No,

1:33:28

absolutely not. People

1:33:31

fight, claw for territory, kingdom

1:33:34

building. It's hard to go

1:33:36

from being king. Still

1:33:39

may be an important person in the kingdom, but you're not

1:33:41

the king anymore. It's hard. It'd

1:33:43

be hard for me too. Would I be okay with RLP's

1:33:46

coming to me and saying, Brent, I don't

1:33:49

think you're the right person to lead permanent equity. I'm

1:33:52

not gonna lie and be like, well, that'd be a great

1:33:54

conversation to have. I

1:33:57

hope that I would meet it with curiosity. I hope I'd

1:33:59

meet it with... self-reflection and say, wow, I

1:34:01

really wanna hear, I mean, I think I

1:34:03

disagree, but I wanna meet it

1:34:05

with curiosity and

1:34:07

see what they have to say and see

1:34:10

if I could discern out of it. Maybe I'm not in the right role. What

1:34:13

have you learned about hiring people that most

1:34:16

people miss? Well, another journey I've been on,

1:34:19

speaking of these like added tools

1:34:21

and toolkit is I've really become

1:34:24

much more familiar with different personality

1:34:26

testing. And

1:34:29

specifically, like I've looked at a bunch of

1:34:31

them, I really like the

1:34:33

combination of Myers-Briggs and Enneagram.

1:34:37

If you think about our business as, you

1:34:41

know, we take money and we turn it into

1:34:43

more money, I think you miss the most important

1:34:45

thing that we really do, which

1:34:47

is our whole business is

1:34:49

predicated on predicting the behaviors

1:34:52

of people. Like

1:34:54

if we can predict the behaviors of people, there's

1:34:58

no way to lose. And when we don't predict the

1:35:00

behaviors of people, we're almost certain

1:35:02

to lose, like an increase in incredible

1:35:04

volatility into the system. If I think about my

1:35:06

job as CEO, I need

1:35:08

to be helping our team to

1:35:10

be the most thoughtful, well-educated,

1:35:14

up to speed on predicting human

1:35:16

behavior. I mean, this

1:35:19

is where the Knowledge Project is been super helpful.

1:35:21

The work that you've done, collecting the best of what

1:35:24

other people have figured out, getting

1:35:26

it, distilling it, right? I mean, this is what

1:35:28

we're all trying to pursue. And specifically around the

1:35:30

wisdom of clicking over these lenses that

1:35:33

these personality tests provide, and

1:35:35

giving you a framework to create empathy

1:35:38

and create predictability in relationships. I think that's probably

1:35:40

been the biggest leap forward in what most people

1:35:42

get wrong, is most people don't

1:35:45

understand why people are doing what

1:35:47

they're doing, don't understand how they

1:35:49

should think about incentives based on

1:35:51

the person themselves, and not just

1:35:53

the financial incentives, and don't

1:35:56

have much empathy for how other people

1:35:58

react. So take things personally that aren't... You

1:36:00

know, everyone acts rationally in the moment. This

1:36:02

is the like the heroin addict who's

1:36:05

choosing heroin over eating a

1:36:07

meal or, you know, leaving their family.

1:36:10

In that moment. Believes

1:36:12

they're doing the right thing for them,

1:36:15

believes it's rational to pursue

1:36:17

that hit. Versus

1:36:19

do everything else. So

1:36:21

the question you have to ask yourself is why? Right.

1:36:24

And same thing in companies. Same

1:36:27

thing with leadership in these firms. Like

1:36:29

the question is why? What do we think? Why

1:36:32

did that person go off the rails? Or how did that person suddenly

1:36:35

disintegrate before our eyes? Or why is

1:36:37

that person performing so incredibly well? And

1:36:40

so these different personality testing, it

1:36:43

doesn't know in the box. No one is

1:36:45

a, you know, in the

1:36:47

16 types for Myers Briggs or whatever it might be. There's

1:36:50

no grouping that will perfectly

1:36:52

describe anyone. That's not the point. The point

1:36:54

you've missed it. If you think that you're

1:36:56

going to put somebody into a

1:36:58

box and it's going to predict 100% of their behavior. That's

1:37:01

why I like having multiple of these that

1:37:03

kind of give you a 3D look at people. I

1:37:06

mean, my experiences, it was an eye-opening. I assume

1:37:09

that everyone else operated the way I operate. I

1:37:11

assume people wanted what I wanted. Turns

1:37:14

out I am weird. So

1:37:16

are you. So is everyone you meet. They're

1:37:18

weird because they're mixtures of all

1:37:20

these different axes of how we sit on

1:37:23

these things. Right. And how we, how they

1:37:25

interplay and interact with one another. But

1:37:28

I can tell you as an example, once I

1:37:30

understand sort of the four axes of Myers Briggs.

1:37:34

So where do you gather your energy is

1:37:36

the first one. So this is introverted, extroverted.

1:37:39

This is not how you show up in the world. This is where

1:37:41

you gather energy. So introverts can

1:37:43

appear extroverted, extroverts can appear introverted. That's

1:37:45

where this like sort of you get

1:37:47

these very basic ideas about how the

1:37:49

world works. And you sort of hear

1:37:51

like a little bit of these things and you get misperceptions

1:37:53

of what they actually mean. So it's really important to understand.

1:37:56

Are you getting your energy from inner life or

1:37:58

are you more. or solar powered, right?

1:38:01

Getting your energy from other

1:38:03

people and from the world. The second one

1:38:05

is how do you process information? Are

1:38:07

you intuitive or are you high sensing? This

1:38:10

tells you a lot about where somebody starts in how

1:38:12

they think about life. So sensors

1:38:15

think about life in the present. They're

1:38:18

present oriented. They walk from the

1:38:20

present into the future. They're

1:38:22

very practical. They're very reasonable.

1:38:24

They're very rational people. Intuitives like

1:38:27

maniacs like me, we

1:38:29

start into the future and then

1:38:31

we walk back into the present. So we get

1:38:33

excited about ideas. We're like, oh, we vision this

1:38:35

future. Oh, what might that

1:38:37

be? How might that work? What might we do?

1:38:39

Who could come along with us, right? And then

1:38:41

somebody says, a sensor comes along and says, excuse

1:38:44

me, I'm glad that

1:38:46

you're 10 years in the future right now. And you

1:38:48

have these grandiose visions of where you're going. We've

1:38:50

got to make payroll this week. And by

1:38:53

the way, that's on fire and that's on fire. And

1:38:55

like, we need to be here. So you need both,

1:38:57

right? That's the beauty. None of these like being introverted

1:38:59

or extroverted, they're just strengths

1:39:01

and weaknesses, right? There's always

1:39:03

upsides and downsides to each one of these. But

1:39:06

once I can tell, okay, where's somebody

1:39:08

powered from, right? How

1:39:10

does somebody process information? The third one is how do

1:39:12

they make decisions? This is a really important one. So

1:39:15

thinkers and feelers, two basic categories. Thinkers

1:39:18

are all about ideas and about truth. So

1:39:22

they're seeking truth. They're seeking ideas. They're

1:39:25

very achievement oriented. They

1:39:28

want to get things ordered up

1:39:30

and neatly packaged. That's

1:39:33

how they make decisions. So they're making decisions based on

1:39:35

what is truth and how am

1:39:37

I seeking it? Feelers on the other

1:39:39

hand, by the way, most men

1:39:41

are thinkers. So 70% of men are thinkers,

1:39:43

30% are feelers. 70%

1:39:47

of women are feelers, 30% are

1:39:49

thinkers. When we go

1:39:51

back up to the sensing and intuitive, it's about 75,

1:39:53

25 sensing to intuitive. So

1:39:57

75% of people are present oriented, 25% are... future

1:40:00

oriented. And so I'm

1:40:02

like the super weird combination, right? Where I'm

1:40:04

external focused. I'm an extrovert

1:40:07

who is intuitive. So right there, I'm in

1:40:10

the 25%, right? Introvert extroverts

1:40:12

50 50. I'm in 25%. And then I'm

1:40:14

in the 30% of men that are feelers. So feelers base

1:40:20

everything on relationships and values. So

1:40:24

we feel our way to decision making. It's

1:40:26

how will it impact the world around me?

1:40:28

How will it impact my relationships? How will

1:40:30

it make people feel? Now,

1:40:32

again, it's not like I don't have a rational side and

1:40:34

I can't consider ideas. And it doesn't

1:40:36

mean a thinker can't

1:40:39

feel anything. That's not the point. The point

1:40:41

is, which is the primary lens that you

1:40:43

look through in life, right? And the last

1:40:45

one, which is really interesting is

1:40:48

lifestyle. This is a J

1:40:50

versus a P, a judger

1:40:52

versus a perceiver. And it's

1:40:54

really about how you like to

1:40:56

move through the world. Do

1:40:59

you move through the world in sort of an orderly

1:41:01

way? Do you like structure? Do you like to you

1:41:03

have a decision to make you gather information, you make

1:41:06

a decision, you move on, right?

1:41:08

You like things structured? Or

1:41:11

are you a maniac like me, who is a

1:41:13

perceiver, who is kind of open for

1:41:15

whatever I loop on things I need forced I

1:41:17

need to be forced to make a decision. I

1:41:21

need a deadline to

1:41:23

do things. And so again, if you understand

1:41:25

people based on these, these four parameters, then

1:41:27

you could really have a lot of empathy. Like my wife and

1:41:30

I did this personally testing

1:41:32

together in each other's presence.

1:41:35

And I'll never forget my, we were going

1:41:37

through this list of like, are you more like this? Are

1:41:39

you more like this? You know, whatever. And she's like,

1:41:41

of course this like only

1:41:44

an maniac would be fat.

1:41:46

And I'm like, yep, I'm the other one.

1:41:49

And literally at one point she looked over and

1:41:51

I could tell the look on her face was like,

1:41:53

I have children with this man. Like what, who

1:41:55

is this? Right? But again, we're all in our

1:41:57

own heads. We think that the world works. same

1:42:00

way. But for us, it created

1:42:02

a tremendous amount of empathy. Like

1:42:04

she, the how I made decisions and how she makes

1:42:06

decisions, by the way, we're opposite on every single category.

1:42:09

You can imagine that might create some friction in

1:42:11

a marriage. Same thing in work relationships, right? Right.

1:42:13

You asked what do people mostly get wrong? I

1:42:15

think we get wrong is we assume everyone is

1:42:17

like us. And so if you have a certain

1:42:19

attribute set, you tend to want to look at

1:42:22

the whole world through that attribute set and say,

1:42:24

Oh, well, everyone I hire should have that attribute

1:42:26

set. And if they don't,

1:42:28

they're bad. They're bad fit. Yeah, just totally not

1:42:30

true. And so we think about a lot of

1:42:32

this stuff as we are recruiting. We think about

1:42:35

a lot of like, okay, what are the things

1:42:37

that we're asking this person to do and what

1:42:40

type of person would

1:42:42

be good for that? And

1:42:44

then the other one that I've really

1:42:47

enjoyed is Enneagram because it really shows

1:42:49

you what is your underlying insecurity and

1:42:51

what are your primary drives? So there's

1:42:53

nine numbers and each one has a

1:42:55

very different set of pluses,

1:42:58

minuses, strengths and weaknesses. And so when you're able, again,

1:43:00

none of them are perfect. You're not, it's like, Oh,

1:43:03

I'm a B personally, like I'm a three,

1:43:05

two, right? Which in Enneagram

1:43:07

means I'm an achiever and I'm like a kind

1:43:09

of a people pleaser. Like I like to serve,

1:43:12

which is sounds, Oh, he's an achiever and likes

1:43:15

to serve people. Like that's again, like look at

1:43:17

it. No, no, no. It comes with huge downsides.

1:43:19

Like my worst fear is I'm not enough. My

1:43:22

worst fear is if people knew me, they wouldn't like me. I'm

1:43:25

adaptive to other people. And so it's like, do I know

1:43:27

the real me? Like my, my

1:43:29

serving of others quickly turns into people pleasing.

1:43:31

Do you give people personality tests as part

1:43:33

of the recruiting process? Yeah, we, we do.

1:43:35

Yeah, we really, and by the way, we

1:43:37

don't automatically ax people

1:43:40

as part of that. Like it's not like we're like, Oh,

1:43:42

if they don't fit this exact personality, then, but what it

1:43:44

does is it allows us if we're getting, you know, it's,

1:43:46

it's usually when we're pretty serious with a candidate, right? So

1:43:48

we're trying to make sure that we're, we

1:43:51

don't want to do is we don't want to

1:43:53

project onto them what we think they are and

1:43:55

then come to find out later that they're not

1:43:58

actually capable. And so when we get really. series

1:44:00

kind of down to the final like three to five candidates

1:44:02

is usually when we start testing and

1:44:04

they often learn things about it. And sometimes we actually

1:44:06

had this happen recently. Somebody was like, I

1:44:08

don't think based on the testing that I went through and

1:44:10

all that, that I actually would be good for this job.

1:44:13

They opted out. I want to switch to

1:44:16

acquisitions. So I think a good way to,

1:44:18

to dive into the subject is what's

1:44:21

the playbook when you take over a

1:44:23

company? So you go

1:44:25

through a process internally.

1:44:28

Uh, you come to a decision. Do you guys

1:44:30

write memos internally? Yeah, we do.

1:44:32

What's in that memo? So we are,

1:44:35

um, describing the, what I

1:44:37

would call the overall situation of the business,

1:44:40

um, who are they, what business are

1:44:42

they in? How does it work?

1:44:44

Oh, we also think about like, what is

1:44:46

the core action of the business? So oftentimes

1:44:48

things, our favorite deals are ones that look

1:44:51

weird or different on the surface. There may

1:44:53

be a little furry fuzzy things on the

1:44:55

deal, uh, or they're misunderstood

1:44:57

and hence the price and the connection

1:44:59

between the price and the

1:45:01

value is, is, is off, right? So

1:45:04

we're trying to look for mispriced opportunities.

1:45:07

And so in order to

1:45:09

be mispriced means that something about it is

1:45:11

either risky that we can do your

1:45:14

jobs, right? You know, this is assuming

1:45:16

we're correct in how we do this, not

1:45:18

always correct, but we're trying, uh, means

1:45:21

that there's a divergence between the

1:45:24

risk and our ability to mitigate

1:45:26

it and other people's ability to mitigate it,

1:45:28

right? Or there's a lack of information

1:45:31

that the other parties have based on

1:45:33

their ability to dive into the, into

1:45:35

the, um, weeds on a

1:45:37

deal. And so, uh, we

1:45:40

like things that are

1:45:42

misunderstood. I'll never forget. Um, this, the

1:45:44

second large deal I did was on

1:45:46

a pool business that we still

1:45:49

own. I never sold anything. So I mean, we still own

1:45:51

everything. I shouldn't keep caveatting that it's not like we've sold

1:45:53

anything. So, um, but the pool business, I

1:45:55

remember talking about it with you back in the day and

1:45:57

you know, most pool builders get.

1:46:00

big because they partner with

1:46:03

development firms and they go

1:46:05

through these massive boom and bust cycles, massive

1:46:08

boom and bust cycles. And

1:46:11

it's feast or famine all the time.

1:46:13

The other thing that they do is they're tempted

1:46:15

to be vertically integrated and do all the work

1:46:17

themselves, right? Because you make more money at every

1:46:19

step in the more margin, but

1:46:22

you're constantly then in the booms, you're

1:46:24

hiring a tremendous amount of people, which

1:46:26

creates cultural issues, tremendous liability, all kinds

1:46:28

of, I mean, just madness. Margins

1:46:30

end up not being nearly as good as you ever

1:46:32

think they should be. And then

1:46:34

in the bust cycles, you're having to let go of a whole bunch of

1:46:37

people who are, you want to keep, but you

1:46:39

have no choice because the business will implode. And

1:46:42

so there are two unusual things when I first got the

1:46:45

deal memo on this. I remember thinking

1:46:47

to myself, like, ah, pool

1:46:50

builder, big pool builder, like

1:46:52

largest, largest single location pool builder in the country.

1:46:54

So like at the time it's really large. And

1:46:57

I was like, yeah, they partner with, they're

1:46:59

probably vertically integrated and they probably partner with,

1:47:01

um, development firms. And like, that's

1:47:03

just not, you know, that's not something we

1:47:05

want to do. And then

1:47:07

I started asking just a few questions. I was like, Hey, can

1:47:09

you tell me what percentage of your revenue is direct to consumer?

1:47:11

Yeah. I was expecting it to be 10% or 15%. It

1:47:13

was 97%. And then I said, oh, interesting.

1:47:20

Like what is your capex capital

1:47:23

expenditures on an annual basis? And

1:47:25

it was like microscopic. I was like weird,

1:47:29

tiny capex, good

1:47:31

free cashflow, direct to consumer. And

1:47:34

that's a really durable business. That's

1:47:37

an example of like the risks we were taking

1:47:39

and the way that the company

1:47:41

appeared, like the core action of

1:47:43

that business is they are in the business of

1:47:46

marketing pools, selling pools, and

1:47:48

then handling the logistics. But they're, you know,

1:47:50

they're subbing out the actual construction, the hiring,

1:47:54

the firing, the risk, all those things, the

1:47:56

boom in the bus to other people. And

1:47:59

that what that creates is a. very capital

1:48:01

light, highly efficient, high

1:48:04

cash flow, high durability business.

1:48:07

That again, everyone else was looking at as

1:48:09

a quote-unquote construction business. So

1:48:13

other people that may be interested in it were turned

1:48:15

off and they're like, no, I don't want that because

1:48:17

that's a, I'm gonna put that in the bucket of

1:48:19

construction. I don't want to take that to a, you

1:48:21

know, my senior partner or to the loan committee or

1:48:23

to the investment committee and say, hey guys, I think

1:48:25

we should buy a mom and pop construction

1:48:27

business in Phoenix. They're gonna be like, what the world's

1:48:29

wrong with you. Right? Versus we

1:48:32

look at that and we're like, Ooh, that's

1:48:34

really attractive. Yeah. So those are the types of

1:48:36

examples where we're trying to put all that into the memo. We're

1:48:38

trying to put all in the memo, the things that we

1:48:40

think are holding it back. So first principles,

1:48:43

like let's go to kind of first principles

1:48:45

on and on a business that we would

1:48:47

acquire. So this is a business that's long

1:48:49

tenured. They've been around for on average, a

1:48:51

long time and they're still

1:48:53

fairly small. So

1:48:55

something is holding it back. We

1:48:58

think of it as the kind of lids on the

1:49:01

business and we're trying to figure out why they aren't

1:49:03

bigger. Right? There's something.

1:49:05

So by definition, there is

1:49:07

product market fit. If we're acquiring it

1:49:09

by definition, there's some sort of moat.

1:49:12

So a moat being defined as you can

1:49:14

generate above average returns on invested capital. There's

1:49:16

something unusual about the business that has allowed

1:49:19

them to get into business, build the business

1:49:21

into a successful again, minimum sort of $3

1:49:23

million of free cashflow. Not

1:49:25

a hard and fast rule. We've done some smaller

1:49:27

deals, but on average for new

1:49:29

platforms, we're, you know, 3 million. That

1:49:32

means there's something special about the business. It's really good in

1:49:34

some ways. And on

1:49:37

the flip side, if it's not bigger and it's

1:49:39

been around for a long time, there's something holding

1:49:41

it back. And so our

1:49:44

job is through those memos to

1:49:46

collect all the findings of where's

1:49:49

the moat? Why do we think it's transferable?

1:49:52

How durable do we think it is? And

1:49:55

on the flip side, what do we think the

1:49:57

opportunities are for growth and make sure that all

1:49:59

of that triangulation. with Price. Of

1:50:01

course, I had

1:50:04

the privilege of spending some time with Buffett at one

1:50:06

point and I asked him this

1:50:08

battery of questions. He kind of, I think

1:50:11

at some point got frustrated with me, I

1:50:13

was probably being annoying. He said,

1:50:15

Price is my due diligence. It

1:50:18

was kind of like the show stopper drop

1:50:20

the mic moment. He was like, because I was asking him

1:50:22

all kinds of like, how do you think about this or

1:50:24

how do you think about that? Ultimately, he was like, I

1:50:27

use Price as my major due diligence filter. So that was

1:50:29

brilliant. It's like this simple

1:50:31

heuristic, like the higher the price you

1:50:33

pay for it, the more you're pricing it to perfection. The

1:50:35

more things have to go right. The lower the price, the

1:50:37

more you can absorb things. And so, you

1:50:39

know, we are, uh, because of the

1:50:41

nature of these being smaller companies, they're

1:50:44

messy. They've got some weird

1:50:46

stuff going on usually in these things.

1:50:48

They're not bigger. So there must be some lids on

1:50:50

these things. We're trying to figure that out and we're

1:50:52

trying to correlate that to price. And

1:50:55

the cool part is after close, like all the problems

1:50:57

are merely opportunities. I try to remind our team of

1:50:59

this all the time because you get into these operating

1:51:01

situations. You're like, whoa, there's a lot going on. Like

1:51:04

sometimes relationships are very strained. There's weird power

1:51:06

dynamics, all this stuff's going on. And I

1:51:08

say to them, yeah, it's hard, but this

1:51:10

is what we get paid to do. Like

1:51:12

we're in the business of shaving fur. So

1:51:14

do you have projections

1:51:16

in this moment? Yeah. We're,

1:51:19

um, do you like do three scenarios like

1:51:21

base, upside, downside, or how do you, how

1:51:23

do you think about that? Yeah, we're trying

1:51:25

to stress test where we think based on

1:51:27

the history of the business, it's

1:51:30

going often assuming for most of

1:51:33

the deals we do that there is no

1:51:35

growth. So we want the business to underwrite

1:51:37

with no change in trajectory. Um,

1:51:40

if it can't stand on its own, like

1:51:42

we're not big on quote unquote synergies. We're

1:51:44

not big on trying to do this massive change.

1:51:46

Like if you've, if the business has been operating a

1:51:48

certain way on a certain trajectory for 30

1:51:50

years, it is nothing

1:51:52

but hubris to come in and think

1:51:54

that within a short period of time, you're can completely change the

1:51:57

trajectory of the business. It can happen.

1:52:00

are some tricks and

1:52:02

some outside perspective that you can kind of look

1:52:04

and see and run a playbook from time to

1:52:06

time. But for the

1:52:08

most part, like there's no easy solutions. Like

1:52:10

I was talking with a

1:52:12

Harvard educated search searcher the other

1:52:14

day, actually, I say the

1:52:17

other day is probably year and a half ago and

1:52:20

bought a business and had all

1:52:22

these grand plans. I was going to, he

1:52:24

was going to introduce all this technology, all these like

1:52:26

change and systems. It was an old school business and

1:52:28

he was going to revolutionize with technology. And this is

1:52:31

kind of like if you go on Twitter, the,

1:52:33

you know, I don't know what

1:52:35

we call it or wherever the group of people

1:52:37

that are trying to do this SMB land

1:52:39

or whatever. This

1:52:42

is often the dominant narrative of people who haven't done it,

1:52:45

right? So people who haven't actually been in the weeds,

1:52:48

who haven't bought a business, who haven't tried to change

1:52:50

it is like, this is super simple. You buy things

1:52:52

for cheap, huge amount of upside,

1:52:54

you go in and you transform them. These

1:52:56

guys are idiots. Yeah. Yeah. These

1:52:59

guys are idiots. They don't know what they're doing. You

1:53:02

may be well educated. That guy's been

1:53:04

working in the business for 30 years. Do you not

1:53:06

think that he knows at everything you know and far

1:53:08

more? Of course not. So anyway, this

1:53:10

guy came in, he had all these grand plans and I talked

1:53:12

to him about, I don't know, a year later, it was like

1:53:15

six months ago. And I was like, how's

1:53:17

all that going? And he was like, Oh

1:53:20

my gosh, I haven't done anything that

1:53:22

I wanted to do. I was like, Oh, interesting. Tell

1:53:24

me about that. And look, the

1:53:26

business is actually doing well. Like he's glad he bought it.

1:53:29

But how it went post close was not

1:53:31

filled with, Oh man, this

1:53:33

is perfect. Now we can hit this huge growth

1:53:35

trajectory or whatever. He's like, yeah, our servers went

1:53:37

out like the second day on the job. The

1:53:40

phones don't work. We have all these issues.

1:53:44

You know, the head of sales left shortly thereafter

1:53:46

had to replace, you know, it's like this constant

1:53:48

fire fighting mode. It's

1:53:51

running a business. The only people who think

1:53:54

buying a business and operating it are

1:53:57

easy. Most of the people have never

1:53:59

done it. There's a small group of people

1:54:01

who got lucky the first time. And

1:54:03

usually the second and third time they get smoked. I

1:54:05

mean, look, we took the better part

1:54:07

of a decade toiling away in obscurity, doing

1:54:10

things like, you know, I joked that like we

1:54:12

were running the world's smallest family office for a good amount

1:54:14

of time there. Just slowly

1:54:16

compounding, trying to learn systems, trying to

1:54:18

get, you know, we were just getting

1:54:21

smacked around constantly. But that then allowed

1:54:23

us through that decade to get good

1:54:25

at this. And then we were able to scale.

1:54:27

Like if I had been given 50, $100

1:54:30

million right out of the gate, I

1:54:32

would have lost every penny. And

1:54:35

this market is so inefficient, which is by the

1:54:37

way, good and bad inefficiency being

1:54:39

defined as can you make a lot of

1:54:41

money or lose a lot of money depending

1:54:43

on skill. Right. So like argument is if

1:54:46

I gave you a million dollars to invest in the stock

1:54:48

market and I said, Hey, I'm going to let you keep

1:54:51

everything you lose. Right. So lose

1:54:53

as much money as you can. And I'll give you 60 days

1:54:55

to try to lose as much money as you can in the

1:54:57

stock market. It'd be really difficult for

1:54:59

you to lose a lot of money that

1:55:01

you might end up making money in the private

1:55:03

markets. Like give me 48 hours and I can

1:55:05

lose a million dollars. Like

1:55:08

it's super easy, right? Which means skill really

1:55:10

matters, which means if you want to have

1:55:12

it as a career, there's a lot of

1:55:14

value in honing your skillset. So

1:55:17

to me, that's the ultimate mode is it's very

1:55:19

simple. What we're trying to do is just really,

1:55:21

really hard and judgment matters. And so

1:55:23

that's the reason why we put everything out on the internet. Like

1:55:25

we literally have our entire playbook on the internet. Like you can

1:55:27

go on the permanent equity website and you

1:55:29

can see our entire due diligence toolkit.

1:55:33

Like not only just the questions we asked, but

1:55:35

the why underneath each question, why

1:55:38

would we do that? Doesn't that spark a bunch of

1:55:40

competitors? Doesn't that help a bunch of people? Yeah,

1:55:42

sure. Helps everybody helps

1:55:44

everyone. Yeah. And we're

1:55:46

stewards and we're unconcerned. There's abundance. Do

1:55:48

you go back a year

1:55:51

later or is there a milestone, like a predictable

1:55:53

milestone where you go back and you review this

1:55:55

memo and now you've owned the business

1:55:57

for a while and like, what can we learn? Yeah,

1:55:59

we actually. do this quarterly. So

1:56:01

every single quarter we

1:56:03

have, we call

1:56:06

them baseball cards. They're like one pagers,

1:56:08

maybe a little bit longer than one pagers that

1:56:10

explain the overall strategy, the overall purchase price,

1:56:13

the rate of return so far, where

1:56:16

we've done well for

1:56:18

the wrong reasons where we've done well

1:56:20

for the right reasons, vice versa. So

1:56:22

it's like the entire memo is a

1:56:24

constantly updated living document of

1:56:26

every single investment we've ever made and

1:56:28

how we're doing. Almost like value line

1:56:30

for your businesses. Yeah, for

1:56:32

sure. And like, here's the thing is

1:56:34

how would we do it any other way? Yeah. Like if

1:56:36

we're in the business of investing,

1:56:39

of buying small private companies, trying

1:56:41

to make them better, we've

1:56:44

got to learn, we got to get better. Like

1:56:47

how would we know if we were getting better or

1:56:49

not? How would we know, how would

1:56:51

we learn if we weren't doing a look back? So

1:56:53

I mean, to me, it's just of course obvious. And

1:56:56

I mean, look, if we're not good at what we do, we should

1:56:58

do something else. Like don't waste this

1:57:00

life doing things that you aren't good at. For

1:57:03

God's sake, that'd be terrible. Do

1:57:06

the CEOs make that baseball card or does

1:57:08

the, because you guys, what's your structure? You

1:57:10

have almost like a portfolio manager who's in

1:57:12

charge of multiple CEOs. Yeah. So right now

1:57:14

our structure is we have a dual hook

1:57:16

in structure post-close where our financial team and

1:57:18

their financial team hook together. And

1:57:21

we're constantly getting feedback loops of what I've called

1:57:23

information from that. So our goal with our financial

1:57:25

team is keeping

1:57:28

scores the easy part. The hard

1:57:30

part is giving actionable real-time

1:57:32

information to all the stakeholders to make

1:57:34

good decisions. So that's their primary role

1:57:37

is to help those companies, which by

1:57:39

the way, this idea is completely foreign.

1:57:41

We come into most of these small businesses and they're

1:57:43

like, yeah, yeah, yeah. We give all our stuff to this

1:57:45

accountant and the accountant tells us how we did. And we're

1:57:48

like, sure, that's not what we're talking about at all.

1:57:50

What we're talking about is on a

1:57:52

day-to-day week-to-week basis, what are the metrics

1:57:54

you're looking at? How accurate are they?

1:57:56

How updated are they? How can you

1:57:58

make decisions? Right. So we've

1:58:00

got that group that's working with them to try to

1:58:02

increase the quality of those feedback loops. And

1:58:04

then we've got, you know, what to call like a board of directors

1:58:06

in a box model where there's one point

1:58:09

person for permanent equity that, that accesses

1:58:11

all the resources of permanent equity kind

1:58:13

of is the Sherpa, the guide for

1:58:15

the person internally. So Oh, you've got

1:58:17

an issue with marketing or you need

1:58:19

help with that. Like we've got external

1:58:21

internal resources, recruiting, external internal resources, legal,

1:58:24

external internal. So we've got all these sort

1:58:26

of helpers that we have and that person's

1:58:28

job is to help direct them as well as govern

1:58:31

the business. Those are updated based on

1:58:33

the constant feedback loops of

1:58:35

the business over that quarter, uh, in concert with

1:58:37

the leadership teams, but, but we're mostly doing the

1:58:40

authorship of them. And then you

1:58:42

don't step in and like start issuing directives.

1:58:44

You want the finance plugged in and you

1:58:47

want the metrics that they're looking at, or you want

1:58:49

specific metrics for you or both.

1:58:52

We want information every

1:58:54

which way, the more high signal, we're trying to

1:58:56

separate the signal from the noise rates. There's tremendous

1:58:58

amounts of information being thrown off by these businesses.

1:59:00

That doesn't matter. We're trying to

1:59:02

get down to a handful of metrics that

1:59:04

we can agree on that the leadership team

1:59:06

and us that we're working in concert to

1:59:08

understand what they're telling us. Um,

1:59:11

that's actually one of the most difficult things post

1:59:13

close is just getting on the same page about

1:59:15

what matters and when does it matter? And again,

1:59:17

we're coming in hopefully with high

1:59:19

humility saying you all are the experts.

1:59:21

We're not, but we're asking questions

1:59:23

like, okay, well, if that's the business

1:59:26

model, sometimes it makes sense that this would be like a

1:59:28

leading indicator. And sometimes it'll be like,

1:59:31

no, we're like, oh, interesting. Tell

1:59:34

us why, right? We try to come out from that

1:59:36

perspective is like, instead of just telling them what we

1:59:38

want to see, like, do you think this would be

1:59:40

helpful? Are you like, what are you looking at? And

1:59:42

why? Why aren't you looking at this? Why are you

1:59:44

looking at this? How does this work? Again, this is

1:59:46

not rocket science. Like this is like treat people as

1:59:48

humans, be humble, be

1:59:50

kind, be long-term things

1:59:52

usually work out. But do you

1:59:54

do anything within the business from otherwise from

1:59:56

the first day or you're just sort of,

1:59:59

what's the reporting? cadence back to you.

2:00:01

Is it is it weekly, monthly, quarterly?

2:00:04

Yeah, so we are usually in touch on a weekly

2:00:06

basis, depending on if we're

2:00:08

going through periods of negative

2:00:10

change or positive change, then we're

2:00:12

more active and helpful being

2:00:14

supportive, being corrective, maybe if we need

2:00:17

to be. If things are

2:00:20

in the box, smooth sailing, no storms

2:00:22

on the horizon, then we can be

2:00:24

a lot less hands on. We

2:00:27

always tell our leaders like we're always available. Everyone

2:00:29

has your cell phone. Like, yeah, you can get

2:00:31

in contact with the easiest people in the world

2:00:33

to get in contact with. Yeah. Running a business

2:00:35

is lonely. Yeah. If you've never run a business,

2:00:37

if you've never been in the CEO spot. You

2:00:41

can look up from in the organization and

2:00:43

it looks rosy. Oh, look, that

2:00:45

person gets paid a lot more with all

2:00:48

the freedom they have. Oh, I want to be

2:00:50

the one to set vision and whatever. Looking down

2:00:52

from that position, there's

2:00:54

usually no one to share sorrow with.

2:00:57

There's no frustrations like you. You're isolated.

2:00:59

So one of the things we do

2:01:01

is just try to be relationally connected

2:01:04

and offer to be a release valve

2:01:06

for the very natural human tendencies we

2:01:08

have to be seen and heard and

2:01:11

blow off steam and consult

2:01:13

on difficult situations. You

2:01:16

know, again, it's interesting going back to

2:01:18

like the personality typing. You know, we

2:01:20

try to understand for our CEOs if

2:01:22

they're internal or external processors, that's a

2:01:24

really important piece. If you're

2:01:26

a CEO is an internal processor, then

2:01:29

you can you can go away with your thoughts and be

2:01:31

fine. If you're an external

2:01:33

processor and you're the CEO, you have no one

2:01:35

to externally process with it or you end up

2:01:37

creating inappropriate relationships with people who

2:01:40

work for you. Yeah. So that's

2:01:42

fraught. So that's one of the things that we can

2:01:44

do is if we're adept at that and understanding the

2:01:46

people, then we can say, hey, that person's external processor.

2:01:49

Hey, they need somebody to talk to. Come

2:01:51

talk to us. Let's work through things. The

2:01:54

only things I would say is we're aggressive about

2:01:56

post close in the short term is if there's

2:01:59

just any laws being. broken, which

2:02:02

sounds funny to say, my guess

2:02:05

is 80% of the

2:02:07

small businesses out there are either

2:02:09

knowingly or should know that they're breaking some sort

2:02:11

of rules. There's a lot of government regulation,

2:02:13

depending on the state you're in. And often, by the way, federal

2:02:17

regulation, state regulation, and local regulation

2:02:19

will oftentimes conflict with one another,

2:02:21

and it requires a tremendous amount

2:02:23

of background and understanding to know

2:02:25

how to be

2:02:27

in compliance. I

2:02:29

wish they'd simplify this. I mean, the

2:02:31

amount of stuff you have to keep

2:02:34

up with is just insane. It's astonishing.

2:02:36

Yeah. Why don't you

2:02:38

do a totally hands-off model like Buffett?

2:02:41

Just because it would miserably fail. In the scale

2:02:43

of business you're dealing with, why would that fail?

2:02:46

People get divorced. People have

2:02:48

health issues. People die. People

2:02:51

lose interest. Things are constantly changing.

2:02:54

The ability to self-replicate is

2:02:57

unbelievably rare. The reason

2:02:59

why we are in the position we're in to be able

2:03:01

to buy these businesses is because we

2:03:03

are the best option for the business to transition.

2:03:08

Oftentimes there isn't a family

2:03:10

member who has the financial capacity

2:03:13

or talent capacity to

2:03:15

be able to do it or some combination of both. And

2:03:17

these businesses are not ones that you can just leave alone.

2:03:20

There's no passive income in working in small

2:03:22

business land. Another way to think about it

2:03:25

is sort of buying an index of small

2:03:27

businesses. From time to time people come

2:03:29

up with this idea of what if you just put $1,000 with

2:03:33

a thousand of these small businesses and created

2:03:35

an index. The reality is

2:03:37

over a long period of time that index is zero. It's

2:03:39

really hard. The governance of these things is difficult. The

2:03:43

norm for most small businesses

2:03:45

is entropy, is decay, is

2:03:48

dying a slow death and being wound down.

2:03:51

That's a norm in the small business world. You

2:03:53

have to fight to grow. It takes dynamic leadership.

2:03:55

It takes vision. It takes risk taking. It takes

2:03:58

capital. It takes mitigating. risk.

2:04:02

You're doing all these things. And

2:04:05

so yeah, the ability to do

2:04:07

that is non-existent in our

2:04:09

area of the market. And by the way, having

2:04:11

spent time with both Buff and Munger, they would

2:04:13

say the same thing. Go deeper on that. So

2:04:15

when you look at them early on in

2:04:18

their journey, so this is like, let's go back to

2:04:20

the Buffet partnership. Let's go back to actually when Buffet

2:04:23

first met Munger. Buffet was invested in Sandborn Maps

2:04:25

and Dimster Mill. Those are the two primary investments.

2:04:27

I think this represented 70 or

2:04:30

75% of the assets of the Buffet

2:04:32

partnership. One of the

2:04:34

things that Buffet and Munger connected very

2:04:36

early on about was struggling

2:04:39

businesses, was struggles he was having

2:04:41

with those two businesses. You know,

2:04:43

the story, I think it's been told a number of times, but

2:04:45

is not often remembered

2:04:47

because where they

2:04:50

are now, there's been like five seasons of

2:04:52

Berkshire and where they are now bears

2:04:54

zero resemblance to where they were in the early

2:04:56

days, where they were in the early days is

2:04:58

where we are, where we like to play. And this is where, again,

2:05:00

by the way, they said they generate the highest returns, right?

2:05:02

Smallest amount of capital, highest returns, being

2:05:05

able to access small companies. But

2:05:08

Dimster Mill was a disaster. Like Buffet

2:05:10

had gotten sideways relationally with people

2:05:14

and he was kind of desperate.

2:05:18

And he met this guy, Charlie

2:05:20

Munger, who we started to develop a relationship with. I mean,

2:05:22

they actually talked about the annual meeting this year, kind

2:05:26

of how they got together and they had a family that

2:05:28

brought them together. And when they met each other, it was

2:05:30

like kindred spirits. They stayed in touch. And one of the

2:05:32

things that Munger asked Buffet was, you know,

2:05:34

what problems are you facing? And

2:05:37

Buffet was like, oh, I've got this business

2:05:39

that like, I don't know what we're going

2:05:41

to do. It's, it's upside down. Sam where maps is a whole different

2:05:43

story. And it was kind of upside down in a different way that

2:05:45

worked out. But Dimster Mill was just a mess.

2:05:48

Like he needed somebody to go to the middle

2:05:50

of Iowa. I think

2:05:52

it was Iowa and fix this company

2:05:54

and get it fixed up and make money at

2:05:56

that business. And he's like, he didn't have anybody

2:05:58

because he was a. you know, stock

2:06:00

investor, passive investor, and become activist and active

2:06:02

in that business by the nature of how

2:06:04

much stock you bought. And again, this is

2:06:07

where, you know, look, the balance sheet was

2:06:09

stuffed. Like they had a lot of resources,

2:06:11

low free cashflow yield, all these things that

2:06:13

we get access to as well in our

2:06:15

area of the market. He got

2:06:17

access to then in his area of the market, right? Things

2:06:19

just don't work out. And so you

2:06:21

get sideways operating issues, the value of

2:06:23

the business that starts to go pear

2:06:25

shaped. And so he got

2:06:27

in touch with Munger and Munger said, Hey, I know this

2:06:29

guy, Harry bottle. Yeah. So the famous Harry bottle story, they

2:06:32

convinced Harry bottle to move his family from

2:06:34

Los Angeles to the middle of nowhere, middle

2:06:36

of the heartland, Harry bottle fixed the business.

2:06:38

They ended up selling it. And that, I

2:06:42

mean, Buffett said, without

2:06:44

Harry bottle, without Charlie Munger, without

2:06:47

a few of these things going a different way early

2:06:49

on, there is no Berkshire, there is no Warren Buffett,

2:06:51

there is no institution the way it is today. One

2:06:54

is good to acknowledge just how much luck plays a role

2:06:57

in all this stuff. Totally. I mean, like a big

2:06:59

part of humility is just acknowledging like, we're far less

2:07:01

in control than we really think we are. Also,

2:07:05

when things do happen and you do see a

2:07:07

need, talk about it, voice it, see

2:07:09

how you can access people

2:07:12

and resources. And so I

2:07:14

would just argue that no

2:07:17

one can take a business that's

2:07:19

small, loosely functioning, sometimes makes money,

2:07:22

and leave it alone. These are

2:07:24

highly variable assets with very difficult attributes

2:07:27

about them. And it's a knife fight. The

2:07:29

other story is like Berkshire Hathaway, right? If

2:07:31

you think he was hands off and

2:07:34

not talking, I think it was Malcolm Chase who

2:07:36

took it over. Yeah. Yeah. Like they were talking

2:07:38

daily and he wouldn't let him reinvest

2:07:40

in the business, but he knew the numbers better than

2:07:43

chased it. He still knows the numbers better than I

2:07:45

would imagine a lot of the operating CEOs do. For

2:07:48

sure. I mean, Buffalo News, like they

2:07:51

were buffing among or were very, very active

2:07:53

in many of their situations. Now,

2:07:55

as they've gotten into massive businesses that

2:07:58

are, you know, your higher. really

2:08:00

high-powered, really paid, high-paid operators,

2:08:04

they're gonna be better at the operating than they are. So

2:08:06

at a certain point, it flips, and

2:08:09

you have such an access to capital and such a

2:08:11

need for size, that

2:08:14

some of those problems take care of themselves. Now you got

2:08:16

the other problem, which is the fact that Berkshire hasn't beat

2:08:19

the market in 20 years, 25 years now. Well,

2:08:21

why? Because they're so freaking big.

2:08:24

So you got, I mean, there's problems either

2:08:26

way, and there's pluses and minuses either way.

2:08:28

You just get to choose which one you

2:08:30

wanna engage in. Where do people go wrong

2:08:32

doing what you're doing as they scale? They

2:08:34

try to go too fast, too

2:08:38

soon, assuming they know too much. So

2:08:41

we, from

2:08:43

the time we bought the first business to the time

2:08:45

I bought the second business was four years, four years

2:08:48

of toiling away and correcting and learning

2:08:50

and trying to get a good foundation

2:08:52

of capital and into position

2:08:54

to do the next deal. Now we

2:08:56

were looking for deals in between, but

2:08:59

it's hard buying one business, one

2:09:03

small medium-sized business, negotiating it,

2:09:05

documenting it, closing

2:09:07

it, operating it, and having some

2:09:09

sort of either through distributions or

2:09:11

through a sale, positive outcome, one

2:09:14

time is brutally difficult. It's

2:09:18

a brutally difficult thing to do. Now you get to

2:09:20

do that again, and again, and again. And oh, by

2:09:22

the way, this is an interesting

2:09:24

dip that happens where,

2:09:27

so now you've got, let's say, you've done this

2:09:29

three times, three brutally difficult, and you've just now

2:09:31

cash flowed them, so you still retain them. So

2:09:34

now you've got a portfolio of three companies. Well,

2:09:37

now you can't be a CEO of three

2:09:39

companies, I guess, unless you're Elon Musk and

2:09:42

somehow he's figured out how to do this, but most

2:09:44

normal people can't even operate one business well, let

2:09:46

alone two or three. So

2:09:48

you gotta make a choice. Okay, well now I'm gonna

2:09:50

take my free cash flow from three of these companies,

2:09:52

and I'm gonna build a layer of overhead

2:09:55

to be able to then scale and manage. So somebody's

2:09:57

gotta be out there looking for deals. interacting

2:10:00

with capital partners, diligence

2:10:02

really matters, legal due diligence, financial due diligence,

2:10:04

technology due diligence. Somebody's gotta be managing all

2:10:07

of that, documenting it,

2:10:09

negotiating that process all the way through, and

2:10:11

then of course post-close operating these things. It's

2:10:14

a lot to worry about. Oh, and by the way, you got regulators all

2:10:17

mixed in there as well. There's

2:10:20

a lot of places to hit a pothole. And

2:10:22

so you say, whew, I'm working 100 hours

2:10:24

a week, every week. And yeah, we're

2:10:26

making a bunch of money, things are going great. Making

2:10:29

up a scenario. But now

2:10:31

you gotta basically take all of your earnings, all

2:10:33

the free cash flow of your business, and go

2:10:35

to zero again. So

2:10:37

you started zero, or very little, you invest it,

2:10:39

you do well, you do well, you do well,

2:10:41

you run the gauntlet two or three times. Now

2:10:44

you gotta go back to zero, because

2:10:46

you gotta take all your free cash flow and you gotta

2:10:48

reinvest it in that next layer. That's

2:10:51

brutally difficult. Now you've got

2:10:53

a whole nother set of issues. Now you've got meta

2:10:55

problems at the head

2:10:57

level. Now you've

2:10:59

got personnel issues. Now you've got culture problems.

2:11:02

Now you've got technology issues. And

2:11:04

now you've got an operating business that's

2:11:07

trying to operate businesses. And you've got the same

2:11:09

issues in the operating business, the

2:11:12

parent co, as you do in all the smaller businesses.

2:11:18

It's brutally difficult. And then you go through another phase, where

2:11:21

you're like, okay, now we've got a tight group of people, it's

2:11:23

a small group. Now we've got three or four or five

2:11:25

companies, maybe six. Well, now

2:11:27

you've got to build a much larger organization. You gotta go

2:11:29

through the whole cycle again. So every time on the way

2:11:31

at the cycle up, you've got

2:11:34

to pass through this gauntlet of.

2:11:36

Over and over. Over and over and

2:11:38

over again. I

2:11:40

mean, it is a miracle that

2:11:42

permanent equity has 15

2:11:44

companies. It's a miracle. It's

2:11:46

a miracle that we have a team that, for the most

2:11:49

part, loves each other and cares about each other and wants

2:11:51

to do good things. Like it's a, literally, if not a

2:11:53

day goes by where I don't think it's a miracle. And

2:11:56

by the way, the future is not secure.

2:11:58

Like we might screw up. badly.

2:12:01

And so there's always work

2:12:04

to be done. There's no free lunch. Nothing's easy. Why

2:12:06

do you do what you do given all of that? I think

2:12:08

I have the best job in the world. I

2:12:11

get to meet

2:12:15

extraordinary people from very

2:12:17

different cultures around the United States. One

2:12:21

day we'll be doing a dinner in New York at a

2:12:23

Michelin-starred restaurant. The next day we're eating at Hardee's in the

2:12:25

middle of Ohio. We

2:12:28

will go from Oregon to Florida

2:12:30

to New Mexico. The cultures

2:12:33

are different. The food's different. The people are

2:12:35

different. The

2:12:37

businesses are all different. I mean, I can't imagine. I

2:12:40

mean, we have a blast doing what we

2:12:42

do. And it's hard and it's

2:12:44

stressful and it's tiring. Why

2:12:47

do I do it? Because I feel called to

2:12:49

help families transition. I

2:12:52

feel called. I mean, like, you know, in

2:12:54

my paradigm as a Jesus follower, work

2:12:57

is pre-fall. Work is for our good. Work is

2:12:59

something we should engage in deeply. This

2:13:02

is our co-creation that we get to do. And

2:13:05

I feel that. Like, I feel that on a daily

2:13:07

basis. And there's thistles and thorns. And it's difficult and

2:13:09

it's fallen and it's broken and it's messy. And

2:13:12

so that's life, though. Like,

2:13:14

that's what we get to do. And like, I

2:13:16

can't imagine a better job than getting to serve

2:13:18

the families and the institutions that give us capital,

2:13:20

the trust with their capital for 30 years, the

2:13:23

amount of trust that they have with us to give

2:13:25

somebody capital for 30 years. There's nothing you can get

2:13:27

back 30 years. I

2:13:29

don't take that lightly. That's incredible.

2:13:32

I feel honored that somebody would trust us that

2:13:34

much. I want to serve them.

2:13:36

I want to serve them well. The families that

2:13:38

sell us their life's work. Sometimes

2:13:41

generational work. That

2:13:44

is a heavy burden in some ways. And what

2:13:46

an honor in other ways. And

2:13:48

then all the people who we get to work

2:13:50

with who are trying to be as excellent

2:13:52

as they can at their craft. I

2:13:56

get to interact with so many interesting people and we

2:13:58

get to do such interesting things. things and I don't

2:14:01

know. Like I said, I think I have the best job in the world. We

2:14:04

always end on the same question,

2:14:08

which is what is success for you? Success

2:14:10

would be to be

2:14:13

an ambassador of the

2:14:16

kingdom of God. My life transformed when

2:14:18

I became a follower of Jesus and

2:14:20

I, I've been

2:14:23

rescued and, and the thing that I want to

2:14:26

do most is to, we're called to love and

2:14:29

serve people around us. Um,

2:14:31

we worship

2:14:33

a God who condescended himself

2:14:36

into the physical realm is the author

2:14:38

who wrote himself into the ultimate

2:14:40

book of reality and came to

2:14:43

serve, not to be

2:14:45

served and to,

2:14:47

um, to rescue. I

2:14:49

want to with that

2:14:51

same love that I've been given, give that to

2:14:53

other people and serve

2:14:57

them well. Beautiful way to

2:14:59

end this conversation. Thank you. Thanks

2:15:08

for listening and learning with us

2:15:11

for a complete list of episodes,

2:15:13

show notes, transcripts, and more go

2:15:15

to F S dot blog slash

2:15:17

podcast, or just Google the knowledge

2:15:20

project. Recently I've started

2:15:22

to record my reflections and thoughts

2:15:24

about the interview after the interview.

2:15:27

I sit down, highlight the key moments

2:15:29

that stood out for me. And I

2:15:31

also talk about other connections to episodes

2:15:33

and sort of what's got me pondering

2:15:35

that I maybe haven't quite figured out.

2:15:37

This is available to supporting members of

2:15:39

the knowledge project. You can go to F

2:15:41

S dot blog slash membership, check

2:15:44

out the show notes for a link and

2:15:46

you can sign up today. And my reflections

2:15:48

will just be available in your private podcast

2:15:50

feed. You'll also skip all the ads at

2:15:52

the front of the episode. The

2:15:54

front of street blog is also where you

2:15:56

can learn more about my new book, clear

2:15:58

thinking, turning ordinary moment. into extraordinary

2:16:01

results. It's a transformative guide

2:16:03

that hands you the tools

2:16:05

to master your fate, sharpen

2:16:07

your decision-making, and set yourself

2:16:09

up for unparalleled success. Learn

2:16:12

more at FS.blog slash clear.

2:16:15

Until next time.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features