0:00

Why don't we blow the system up?

0:02

I mean, obviously, we can't just turn off

0:05

the spigot on the system we have.

0:07

and then say, hey, everyone in the world should get

0:09

this new vaccine we've given to anyone yet,

0:12

but there must be some way

0:14

that We grow vaccines

0:16

mostly in eggs the way we did in

0:18

nineteen forty seven. In order to

0:20

make the transition

0:22

from getting out of the tried

0:25

and true

0:26

egg growing, which we know gives us results

0:29

that can be beneficial. I

0:31

mean we've done well with that to

0:33

something that has to be much better.

0:36

You have to prove that this works,

0:39

and then you've got to go through all of

0:41

the clinical files, phase

0:43

ones, phase twos, phase three,

0:45

and then show that this particular

0:48

product is

0:49

going to be good over a period of years.

0:51

that alone,

0:53

if it works perfectly, is

0:55

gonna take a decade. There might be a

0:57

need or even an urgent

0:59

call for an entity

1:02

of excitement out there that's completely disruptive,

1:05

that's not beholden to bureaucratic

1:08

strings and and and processes. So

1:10

we really do have a problem of how the world

1:12

perceives influenza, and it's gonna

1:15

be very difficult to change

1:17

that

1:18

unless you do it from

1:20

within and say,

1:22

I don't care what your perception is.

1:24

We're gonna address the problem. In a disruptive

1:26

way, and in an iterative way

1:28

because you do need both. But in Wall

1:30

Street and biotechnology companies have

1:32

been very excited about this idea.

1:34

And what essentially it is is

1:37

trying to pack

1:39

the cells in the body

1:42

in order to make them into drug

1:44

to this.

2:05

Welcome to The Daily Wrap up, a concise

2:07

show dedicated to bringing you the most

2:09

relevant independent news as

2:11

we see it from the last twenty

2:13

four hours.

2:15

Thursday,

2:16

October twentieth, oops,

2:19

forgot I started with that. There's October twentieth

2:21

twenty twenty two. Thank you for joining me today.

2:23

I got a big show for you today. Kind

2:25

of teeter tottering these days where I get some I

2:27

squeak out a quick show when I've got time and then I

2:29

dumped everything out of four hour show, that's

2:31

kind of what it feels like lately. I

2:34

just there's so much going on that I I need

2:36

to get some of this out of my brain. Otherwise, it

2:38

makes me go crazy. I mean, jokingly.

2:40

But there's so much to include today.

2:42

I'm gonna do my best not to make it extremely

2:45

as long as we had that last show a couple

2:47

of days ago, but nonetheless, stay tuned

2:49

to the end because there's an entirely I

2:51

mean, this is one of those shows that I really tried to

2:53

connect everything from start to finish. We're

2:55

gonna start with a couple of different points. I think

2:57

are just kinda interestingly related to

2:59

how crazy things are today. little bit of

3:01

foreign policy where we're gonna with a big section

3:03

today on Ukraine. Not

3:06

so much overlapping things we've talked about before,

3:08

but in the same vein of the conversations

3:10

we've had, just continuing to prove

3:13

to you what's really going on there and

3:15

how clearly they're not talking about it. some

3:17

interesting conversations about some stuff that's in

3:19

their constitution, some information about

3:21

stuff that's going on in certain locations, and

3:23

it just and and really to to finalize

3:25

the point, of how all of this creates justification

3:28

for what the US government is actually

3:30

calling for now, which will probably scare

3:32

you. And then, of course, we're gonna

3:34

get into the COVID-nineteen conversation

3:36

around the vaccine or the injection, and

3:38

the CDC in what just happened. Now

3:40

obviously there's a large there's

3:42

nuance that needs to be discussed within this conversation,

3:44

you can't really fit into a title. But

3:47

we'll go over this in the show today. But as we

3:49

briefly made clear before, there

3:51

there's what's happening here with this

3:53

vote is exactly what it looks like.

3:55

But there's nuance with, as always, and

3:57

and the way that they'll argue this, The

3:59

real point is not necessarily not

4:01

necessarily whether this vote translates to

4:03

a mandate for children, which it

4:05

essentially does. But again, that's what the nuance

4:07

is and we'll get into that. but more

4:09

so about the fact that they're they're voting

4:12

for this in contradiction to

4:14

the evidence that shows you they don't need it.

4:16

that it's not necessary, that it's dangerous.

4:18

I mean, the the the COVID

4:21

nineteen as they frame it today is not even

4:23

remotely as dangerous as they would argue

4:25

I

4:25

mean, even the beginning,

4:27

they

4:27

work at risk. Now there are one one thousandth

4:29

of that risk. And we're gonna

4:32

get into a study today that shows the risk

4:34

breakdown globally. And

4:36

it will blow your mind even those of us

4:38

that are following along, how minuscule

4:40

this truly is, and yet they're still forcing

4:42

all of this. So we'll get into all

4:44

that nuance and what that means for the

4:46

childhood vaccine schedule,

4:48

for what that means from the CDC, the

4:51

lack of due diligence, the mouth beasants, and

4:53

and what that then means to how they're covering

4:55

it as well. And it's very it's it's sort of

4:57

like the transmission conversation. There's always a

4:59

narrative they have and the way

5:01

that they're kind of bending the truth. They do

5:03

use valid points in some cases,

5:06

but they use those to confuse the issue.

5:08

And I'll make that clear as we go through it. it's

5:10

it's undeniable what just happened. And then, of

5:12

course, the real point as we made clear, we

5:14

first talked about it, is what this then

5:16

does. However, it translates. simply

5:19

the action whether or not any states

5:21

then make this part of their schedule opens

5:23

the door or essentially allows

5:26

indemnity for anything that they have

5:28

Pfizer Moderna and the groups involved with these injections

5:31

we're talking about are no longer legally

5:33

accountable because of what just happened. That's

5:35

the reality. And that seems to be missed and even an

5:37

independent media conversation. We're

5:39

gonna go through that part

5:41

of it, as well as the

5:43

injection and the new

5:45

coming wave and how they're hyping up new variant

5:47

even as the evidence continues to show you the dangers,

5:49

which is really just mind blowing. But all of

5:51

this will translate into the digital ID and

5:53

the conversation we're having there. But of

5:55

course, there's an million unspoken

5:57

points throughout the show today that are super important

5:59

to stay tuned

6:00

for, so

6:01

make sure you do. But let's start off

6:03

today. with a point

6:05

that I just think is important to discuss,

6:08

very strange, just because of the way

6:10

that it's framed, But it does

6:12

give you some insight into the way that their mind

6:14

works and how some things matter and some

6:16

things don't despite being

6:18

equally concerning. It's a choice for

6:20

these people, which then seems to show you that they

6:22

don't really care about your safety, more

6:24

so using these concerns to

6:26

achieve an end. Now

6:27

here,

6:29

is a very very strange story, really

6:31

just because the headline, unacceptably high,

6:34

which is a quote, levels of radioactive

6:36

waste at Missouri Yellow Entry School

6:38

prompt outrage. Yeah. That's of course.

6:40

I don't imagine anybody would be okay with

6:43

that. But the interesting part about that I tweeted out,

6:45

I said I wasn't aware there was an acceptable

6:47

level of radioactive waste at

6:49

elementary schools, but apparently so.

6:51

That's unacceptably high. Just a

6:53

very weird way to say that, isn't it? Now

6:55

that it it begins unacceptably high

6:58

levels of radioactive waste was

7:00

found, that's strange, at a

7:02

Missouri elementary school, putting

7:04

students at risk and forcing them to switch

7:06

to virtual learning.

7:08

I mean, you just can't miss how no matter what

7:10

seems to happen today. The solution's always the

7:12

same. That is about as clear as it gets.

7:14

The board apologized to parents for putting their

7:16

children at risk and said it's doing

7:18

everything in its power to clean up hazardous

7:20

material. Interesting that

7:22

we pointed out now, as you'll just come to find out

7:24

that it's been there a really long time

7:26

and they've known about it. So why now?

7:29

I mean, it's hard not I mean, it's an easy

7:31

thing to say virtual learning certainly

7:33

could be. I guarantee it played a factor

7:35

where all these teachers that probably don't

7:38

want I mean, I shouldn't even make these assumptions, but look,

7:40

my opinion would be that most people in these fields

7:42

that are still there are there because they complied

7:44

and or and are forced to none of the

7:46

people. in many cases. So then you

7:48

get the teachers that then are probably upset

7:50

because the narrative they assign themselves to

7:52

is suddenly shifting even from the people they're trusting,

7:55

suppose the science. which is the government

7:57

saying, don't have to wear masks anymore. You don't have to do

7:59

this anymore.

7:59

And they're the ones disagreeing with that apparently

8:02

because they know better than the people that It gets

8:04

so convoluted. The science, even though it's not what

8:06

it is. But what's

8:07

what my point would be is that this would be an

8:09

easy thing to go, oh, well, there's an issue over

8:11

here. Let's just make that the problem and

8:13

declare that be why we need to go back to virtual

8:15

learning, wink wink it's because we want to. This

8:17

is all my opinion. But we've seen

8:19

how this is played out through COVID where they've

8:21

decided what is best for people because of the

8:23

virtue signaling narrative and made these

8:25

choices for you and many cases lied

8:27

about why they did that. or saying,

8:29

here's a flu shot than giving them the COVID

8:31

shot, which we've seen in endless amount

8:33

of examples of. We just talked about the military.

8:36

knowingly doing that to a reserve or a

8:38

national guard individual. But

8:40

going forward, the board apologized to parents for

8:42

putting their children at risk and said it's doing everything in

8:44

power to clean it up. Parents say they're

8:46

furious that they weren't told about

8:48

it sooner. And it's just so

8:50

great that the the almost non

8:53

shit long way this is written. I mean, this is

8:55

crazy. They they didn't tell them

8:57

about it, especially if it's the way that

8:59

they're hyping it, that it's

9:00

dangerous. It says, quote, I can't get a

9:02

call about a crayon or a pencil, but I can't

9:04

get

9:04

a call about nuclear waste. I mean,

9:07

exactly. mean, it just it doesn't make any sense.

9:09

I feel like there's more to this. Let him know

9:11

what that would mean at the moment.

9:12

In August after bringing you this

9:15

news, you all decided not to

9:17

communicate this to our community. I

9:19

did at RPT and RPTA did.

9:21

So the point is that the pay they had to

9:23

tell everybody they wouldn't they didn't even apparently

9:25

inform them about what was going on. That doesn't

9:27

make sense to me. Now the point is, this is from World

9:29

War two. Jana

9:31

Elementary is located close to cold

9:33

water creek, an area

9:35

contaminated with radioactive waste from World

9:37

War two weapons that from

9:39

World War two weapons was dumped. Who

9:41

wrote this? My God. I mean, I hate I'm

9:43

people make mistakes, but this is corporate media. They

9:45

got high levels of resources And

9:47

these are some pretty ridiculous type, not

9:49

even anyway. Doesn't matter. Bad

9:52

editing. Radioactive

9:54

waste from World War two weapons was dumped

9:56

in the nineteen forties and went to nineteen

9:58

fifties. Now what's interesting to me is that

10:00

this is again also what's still

10:02

happening now, by the way. We just don't talk

10:04

about it. with their burning pits of chemicals and

10:06

plastics and whatever other radioactive

10:08

or other waste. I'm just using that term to

10:10

connect it. But all sorts

10:12

of even far more dangerous things

10:14

and the way what's the term they

10:16

used? I forget that there's

10:18

there's a discussion about this and

10:20

there's a term that's usually regarded as pits that

10:22

they burn around the world in other

10:24

people's countries after they invade and

10:26

destroy and steal and so on and they will

10:28

then pollute And as you will

10:30

find, just look it up one day,

10:32

US government, military specifically,

10:35

largest polluter on the planet. what they are.

10:37

It's I mean, there's not even You can't just argue

10:39

well because freedom, so we're allowed to do

10:41

that. The point is that this is the kind of

10:43

thing that happens still to this day. but

10:45

that happened all the way back then. No different

10:47

is the point, but why wasn't it an issue

10:49

up until now? It was determined last week

10:51

that radioactive levels at the site were causing

10:53

an acceptably high risk of children.

10:56

Again, so what's the

10:58

acceptable level of risk here? Now, I

11:00

know there's a you could argue that it's

11:02

minuscule, the kind of thing that there's you know, a

11:04

almost non existent level, then it's like,

11:06

well, it's not you know, this is like the

11:08

generally accepted as safe nonsense they use

11:10

with pharmaceuticals and all sorts of

11:12

things, which generally mean that it's a

11:14

way that they play the game and it's not very

11:16

safe in any sense, but it's not

11:18

deadly as a game there, but this

11:20

is the case of radioactive waste. I don't see how

11:22

this can be allowed and be like it's acceptable

11:24

unless it's a government cover up. Contamination

11:26

was found in classrooms in the library

11:28

in the HVAC system and in

11:30

the playground nearby fields. Now look, this is

11:32

my point. If this is

11:34

just suddenly there, it's not the

11:36

radioactive waste from from

11:38

seventy years ago. If

11:40

But if if it if it always been

11:42

there, then somebody's been hiding this.

11:44

But what does all that line up with?

11:46

The classroom's library, the HVAC

11:48

system, everything, it just kind of screams

11:50

to me. again, I'm just

11:52

reading into this. There's nothing to me on

11:54

this article that suggests this was a cover

11:56

for something else, but am I wrong and feeling like

11:58

this feel seems strange? and the overlap

12:00

with things that are happening otherwise not

12:02

related to a random sporadic

12:04

radioactive waste that suddenly found itself in

12:06

the classrooms and libraries and HVAC

12:08

system. The CDC says high

12:10

levels of radiation can increase the risk of

12:12

cancer, while high levels of lead can affect

12:14

the children's development attention span. Well, gee,

12:16

maybe then you should get it out of every water

12:18

system in this country. you know, it's just it's just

12:20

funny how things matter when they want them

12:22

to. Anyway, that's just one a story I wanna

12:24

throw out there. I just doesn't This is

12:26

strange. The way that it's happening,

12:28

the way that some things matter and others don't. If

12:30

we care about the fact that they're in danger from

12:32

some, I guess, moderate

12:34

level of radioactive waste, what

12:36

about all the other things that are far more damaging,

12:39

dangerous than what they're pointing at

12:41

here? The the levels that are kind of drifting

12:43

over from a different from a river over

12:45

the way as opposed to the water

12:47

system that Derek writes about all the time that's completely

12:49

contaminated across this country. Or about just the

12:51

injections that they're giving those kids, they're

12:53

exponentially more dangerous. I mean, it just it

12:55

just frustrates me that this is what's focused

12:57

on. But that being said,

13:00

talking about foreign policy and getting

13:02

into the idea of Ukraine, and

13:04

how I do believe that there's all of this

13:06

tends to show you that these people,

13:08

generally speaking, I just mean governments, not even just

13:10

the US, abuse the

13:12

fact that we want good from them, that we

13:14

want them to be good, and we want to be

13:16

good people at our core. I

13:18

think most people are like that. That's why we're

13:20

run by the twenty percent give or

13:23

so portion of the population that are

13:25

psychopath and sociopath. We are run

13:27

by those groupings of people. That's not

13:29

hard to understand. There are studies that are

13:31

done about the overlap of the kind of sociopathy

13:33

in politics. and you'll find that the

13:35

percentage of people in politics are pretty much

13:37

exactly give or take the percentage that

13:39

are to psychopaths and and and and

13:41

sociopaths, which are a real percentage. I just think

13:43

that's very telling. But this

13:45

is these are the kind of examples that we're talking

13:47

about. Now, Dan Cohen points us out another

13:49

brief point connecting to the Haiti conversation,

13:51

which, you know, here comes another regime changed by

13:53

the US Monster

13:54

the UN wants to send its child

13:56

rapist back in to stop Asians

13:57

from rising up. Now remember,

13:59

this is the argument they're making down here

14:02

for really was Russia using

14:04

Viagra to rate people in or

14:06

Russia's peace troops in

14:08

Ukraine, I guess

14:08

that just kind of got gleamed just

14:11

gleamed over on I got let's start word

14:13

there. Driifted

14:14

over into this story too because apparently,

14:16

generally, it almost like

14:18

the same few day discussion, rape

14:20

has become a weapon for Haiti

14:22

Games says the United

14:24

Nations. Now look, I'm not gonna

14:26

pretend that they're the gangs MS

14:27

thirteen style kind of things. Don't

14:29

use sex and and, you

14:31

know, rape and things like that to abuse

14:33

a torture, to influence. I mean, these

14:35

are bad people. That's not the

14:37

point though. The point is how it's being

14:39

screamed about on the world stage.

14:41

And that's you being used to

14:43

justify. Guess what? a UN presence. And hey,

14:45

oh, weird exactly what the US government and

14:47

everybody else was calling for. So it's

14:49

a means to an end. So I

14:51

would argue if it is happening, always been

14:54

happening and they only care now because they want to

14:56

use it to justify their presence or it's

14:58

not and they're lying about it. Call me

15:00

pessimistic. Call me jaded. I think that's

15:02

the reality. But the point that Dan Cohen

15:04

is making is Okay. So let's send in

15:06

the peacekeepers to stop the people from raping

15:08

people even though they have a

15:10

dramatically obvious history of doing

15:12

exactly that. I mean, this is one of the

15:14

most absurdly. This story is

15:16

always there and never covered by the

15:18

corporate media. I mean, in general

15:20

sense, like, you can see this associated press, but

15:22

you will rarely see this on Fox and

15:24

CNN, New York Times, Washington Post, you know,

15:26

that kind of stuff. More than a hundred UN

15:28

peacekeepers ran a child sex ring in

15:30

Haiti. None were ever jailed. How do you

15:32

even possibly explain that?

15:34

when

15:34

they were caught. Right?

15:35

Don't forget the Haiti overlap with the

15:38

Clinton Foundation and Laura

15:40

Sillsbee and the trafficking of Haitian

15:42

children that they were caught. for do for

15:44

moving. And Hillary

15:46

Clinton personally got her off

15:48

the hook

15:48

and nothing ever happened about that. Kino

15:51

operates under Laura Gaylor. Last time

15:53

I checked, she was working for a tried

15:55

alert system. This is all

15:57

provable information. There's

15:59

obviously more going on underneath this, Haitian

16:01

women raped by UN, Chilean peacekeepers

16:03

seek justice. Two Pakistani

16:05

UN soldiers jail for raping Haitian

16:07

boy look, I'm not gonna say this that has

16:09

to mean that it's a UN centric

16:11

concept

16:11

or problem, because these

16:13

are just people from other countries that are taking

16:15

positions as peacekeepers, but realize this is a

16:17

never ending problem that never gets

16:19

dealt with. Why do some peace keep peacekeepers

16:22

rate the full report because they're in position

16:24

to power and they abuse people who are

16:26

vulnerable. It's just the way of the

16:28

world, sadly, not that it's all that

16:30

majority are always the case, but in

16:32

situations like this, where

16:34

people who have the power don't stand up for those

16:36

that don't, the bad people

16:38

slip in. And that's what's happening around

16:40

the world. Governments and so on because we

16:42

have become pacified and apathetic.

16:44

I don't mean everybody. I think

16:47

that's changing right now. I think that's what

16:49

they're so afraid of. possibly the majority

16:51

now. Now I do believe the majority can see

16:53

through this, but the majority is not standing

16:55

up and doing something about it. At least so

16:57

far, maybe again, that's changing right

16:59

now. that's what all this has to do with. But

17:01

now you see why this point is relevant to

17:03

me. Now, last point in regard to the foreign

17:05

policy before Ukraine discussion, this is just

17:07

showing you again how

17:09

they're driving this into reality. There's gonna

17:11

be another point in a moment about China and how

17:13

this overlaps. So don't forget this. I'll I'll

17:15

point back to it. This is from I mean, in

17:17

regard to Taiwan, US in talks with

17:19

Taiwan to co produce

17:22

American weapons. Can you even

17:24

imagine what the US

17:26

government would do if China even

17:28

suggested this in regard to let's

17:30

say Mexico or any

17:32

other country that was even remotely in the wheelhouse. Well,

17:34

I guess that applies to the world as far as US government

17:36

perceives it. But in the wheelhouse of the US, you

17:38

know, the stomping grounds. or

17:40

Russia for that matter. I mean

17:42

I mean, look, they're right now losing

17:44

their minds about Russia, supplying

17:47

legal energy to anybody anywhere at this point.

17:49

So imagine I mean, just

17:50

think about how crazy that is

17:51

in regard to China or Russia and how they perceive

17:54

the foreign policy dynamic.

17:57

Taiwan does not declare independence just because the

17:59

US

17:59

government

17:59

declares that does not mean that's the

18:02

case. Alternatively, we can

18:04

see the Don

18:06

Bass region or Crimea or Carson

18:08

or Zaparotia. These areas have

18:10

gone through the process, voted

18:14

observed by international observers hundreds of

18:16

them that it was legitimate and they made

18:18

their choice. Now, what's

18:20

crazy about it is the Ukraine government like those

18:22

people were occupied by Russia

18:24

except they're currently bombing those

18:26

people. And

18:26

it takes about two brain cells

18:28

to actually realize that they are

18:30

lying about this. But the

18:31

point is the US isn't talks with Taiwan to produce

18:33

weapons. China is not gonna be okay with that.

18:35

That's a gigantic red line. The US just

18:38

pretends like they shouldn't be allowed to

18:40

say no. However, if this was the exact

18:42

reverse situation, it would be war

18:44

footing. China is declaring

18:46

war by doing this. That's the kind of

18:48

ridiculous one-sided Bella Coast

18:50

near rhetoric we

18:51

get. Now, I'm

18:53

not saying either of them are okay. I mean,

18:55

I guess, there's another conversation we had,

18:57

but just the the double standard, the

19:00

hypocrisy. So when they take action like

19:02

this, knowing it will drive more

19:05

conflict, that's a choice. You

19:07

don't get to you know, that's the I the whole thing.

19:09

Like, stop hitting yourself with your brother. You don't get

19:11

to pretend that's their fault when you're the

19:13

one doing it. You're driving the action and

19:15

when they respond, you blame them for all

19:17

the fallout. This isn't very

19:19

clear action being driven into

19:21

reality just like Ukraine was,

19:23

is the at this

19:25

moment. Now,

19:28

despite all of the clear evidence

19:30

showing you that this was a choice to

19:32

make this app. And I mean, even

19:34

foreign policy article, the Whitney talked about before

19:36

this ever started that they wanted this. They

19:38

called it an insurrection because they expected

19:40

Putin to invade and occupy not

19:42

what happened. You don't have an insurrection unless

19:44

you take over then the group from within is

19:46

fighting back. Right? Currently, Ukraine

19:49

still controls part of its territory, most

19:51

of it, so it's not insurrection. but

19:53

ask yourself why all of these groups, the CIA, and

19:56

everyone involved US government, were planning this as an

19:58

intersection before that

19:59

never started. I

20:01

mean, it's just plainly obvious. The

20:02

point is they drove this into reality that's

20:04

not meant to ignore anything that Russia might

20:06

have done and has done that is something we should

20:08

be concerned about or call

20:11

out, whether it's crimes and war crimes and

20:13

whatever else, which by the way, I argue happen in

20:15

every single war. And yes, they should all be

20:17

held accountable. But the point is, this

20:19

is what they're saying about Putin as this

20:21

is happening. I mean,

20:22

this is the kind of stuff I keep making fun

20:24

of. Putin

20:24

wants a declaration of

20:25

war, he says.

20:27

against the entire

20:29

western Democratic world

20:31

says Bruno Cole, head of the German

20:33

intelligence services. Right. Great. A spook.

20:36

Okay. So he says Putin wants this.

20:38

He wants the declaration of war for the whole

20:40

Democratic West. Okay. I'm just did

20:42

you have a document that says that? Did he

20:45

sign it? Right? You catch him on video. Oh, okay.

20:47

None of that. So you're just saying

20:49

this. This is the stupid part of what this

20:51

is how childish this has gotten.

20:53

How exactly do they have inside knowledge and what Putin

20:55

wants? It's simply ridiculous. Anybody takes

20:57

these people seriously when they claim to know

20:59

what their enemies think want or feel.

21:02

but that's commonplace in the of fanic corporate media and

21:04

those they blindly pair it. Now look,

21:06

I can I can make the argument that

21:08

people in this position if

21:10

their job to to know these things.

21:13

They at least that's what they claim. Right? To have

21:15

inside knowledge about the ins and outs of maybe

21:17

they got a spy in his office. Right? That's all

21:19

certainly possible. My point is

21:21

that aside that

21:23

they float these things without ever

21:25

proving them and they almost always turn out to

21:27

not even be true. regardless of that, it should

21:29

not be something that they report to you that

21:31

hears what Putin feels. Because you can't

21:33

prove that. And so we're left going, well, I guess

21:35

we'll trust people that have lied to us our

21:37

entire lives. They know that. That's why

21:39

they often use it and abuse it. But the point

21:41

is, it's clearly not what I would

21:43

argue the evidence shows the Russian

21:45

government even remotely wants.

21:47

You can I mean, maybe, but shouldn't their

21:50

actions back that up? And if they don't, shouldn't you be

21:52

like, maybe that's not true? This is just

21:54

basic logic. guys. And the reality is their

21:56

actions have clearly shown that's not what they're

21:58

even remotely trying to do. But you know who is

21:59

very clearly walking through

22:02

those actions? the US government,

22:04

over and over and over declaring

22:06

war on anybody that does not go along

22:08

with what they think is the right direction.

22:10

You can argue that's in best interest of people or they

22:12

think it is? I don't know why you would

22:14

assume that. But at

22:15

the end of the day,

22:16

it's the direction in their wake over and over

22:18

and over and over. It's only one government you

22:20

can really paint that picture for right now.

22:22

But apparently, he

22:24

wants this, so we'll make that the case based on this

22:27

guy's statement that we can't

22:29

prove. Well, here in

22:31

contrast, here's what Lincoln is

22:33

actually saying. the United States must confront the

22:35

Russian Federation and Ukraine. Right

22:37

again, the reality that they literally

22:39

kept poking until it happened.

22:41

that they could make statements like this.

22:44

Pandora's box will

22:46

open. Not even sure what they mean by that. I

22:48

mean, I know what the analogy is,

22:50

but what so unless they confront Russia and

22:52

Ukraine, literally stepping in as a nuclear

22:54

power in Ukraine and confronting

22:56

them as the United States. mean,

22:58

that's nuclear war. It not amount to nuclear war, but

23:00

that's the potential for that. That is a world war,

23:03

which by the way,

23:03

I've always maintained, has always been happening.

23:06

We

23:06

just live in era proxy wars. That's why I'm only saying this

23:08

to be objective. I actually don't think that's where

23:10

this will go unless the maniacs on the

23:13

ground, the regime, the puppets in

23:15

in Ukraine, the Zelensky, Ulsov

23:17

movement types, make it happen

23:19

by pushing the US hand by they

23:21

using a tactical nuke, let's say,

23:24

But the point is he's saying that we have

23:26

to confront them in Ukraine. Whether

23:28

or

23:28

not something happens, otherwise

23:30

Pandora's box will open, which could

23:32

lead to new flicks in other parts of

23:34

the world. Oh, God forbid,

23:36

you mean like you like Iraq, oh no, you're already

23:38

there. You mean like Afghanistan say, oh no, you're already there.

23:40

Like Syria, oh no, you're already there. mean any

23:43

Those are all your wars. Russia's not even involved.

23:45

Isn't that interesting? So what other wars are

23:47

you talking about? You mean, on the

23:49

top of all the wars you're

23:51

currently conducting? illegally? You say,

23:53

I mean, how incredibly ridiculous

23:55

is this? That we have to pretend, like, the

23:57

like, so all those wars are okay

23:59

though. even though they're currently and acknowledged

24:03

acknowledged that's not a word, and

24:06

demonstrably illegal. United

24:08

Nations continues to make that clear. They're

24:10

illegally

24:10

occupying Syria, period. They're illegally

24:13

occupying Iraq, and their government has voted

24:15

them to leave more than once. doesn't

24:17

matter. Right? So why isn't it? What about

24:19

what about Yemen? What about any of these

24:21

locations that they don't even talk about? But

24:24

apparently, even though you can argue that Russia shouldn't

24:26

be doing it, there's far more

24:28

reasonable justifications for why they're

24:30

doing it than what you can claim as happening in

24:32

Yemen or Syria or

24:34

Iraq. You see my point?

24:36

These are these are the people you should be

24:38

most afraid of right now. That's how

24:40

I feel. Now, just

24:43

right beneath that, I would argue Russia's government,

24:45

China's government, all the rest of them. I don't

24:47

trust any of them, but my God. That

24:49

is crazy.

24:50

And then we could

24:52

point to what they're actually doing. Again, going

24:54

back to the beginning point about what they would

24:56

do in Taiwan. Right?

24:57

What would happen if

24:59

China decided to make weapons in Mexico? You

25:01

think the US would be okay with that?

25:03

Or

25:03

Cuba or anywhere else?

25:06

Well,

25:06

the US, October sixteenth,

25:09

four days ago, rehearses dropping

25:11

nuclear bombs in Europe.

25:13

Right. No big deal. like they always love to pretend like, oh, these are

25:15

just drills we're playing for them. That's never the

25:17

case. They always use these and they've admitted

25:19

it in the past, so does Russia

25:22

they use these supposed drills as threats

25:24

as shows of

25:26

force. Say, very

25:26

childish, isn't it? because it's not

25:28

like they're gonna go, oh, no.

25:31

look at all the things they just did in the ocean. We're scared. I mean,

25:33

it's it's I don't even know what they think it's accomplishing.

25:35

Maybe it's for us to see. I'm not sure.

25:37

But this is pretending

25:39

or practicing nuclear bombs

25:41

because of what's happening there.

25:43

And yet and yet Russia's

25:45

threatening nuclear war as Zelensky bombs is

25:47

that pressure power plant? As they for defend

25:50

that, as they welcome him in a NATO or if that's

25:52

not technically happening, but I know that's where it's

25:54

going, my

25:55

opinion. And

25:56

all we have alternatively is Putin saying,

25:59

I'll defend

25:59

myself if

25:59

you make me. Oh my god.

26:01

He's threatening nuclear war and I'm not even making

26:03

this up. That's a snap. What is

26:05

happening? And then the

26:08

US can

26:08

say that we'd have no way to take anything off the

26:10

table. We

26:10

have the right to act first, nuclear weapons and

26:13

otherwise. Bell Bethlehem, doctrine. as a

26:15

thousand reasons why what they're saying on

26:17

the surface is far more concerning. And then

26:19

they practice pop dropping nuclear. What if

26:21

Russia did this? You know what would happen, the medium

26:23

frame it as them threatening nuclear war.

26:25

On Monday,

26:25

NATO's military alliance will hold a

26:27

training exercise known as steadfast

26:29

noon In which, b fifty two bombers and F's

26:32

teams will simulate dropping atomic bombs

26:34

over Europe, amid a

26:35

deepening standoff with Russia, like nobody misses

26:37

what this is really

26:39

about. This is

26:39

the training exercise come just ten days after president

26:42

Biden warned of nuclear

26:43

apocalypse, saying the

26:45

risk of

26:45

nuclear war is the greatest since the Cuban

26:48

crisis and they're the only ones continuing to

26:50

poke that bear.

26:52

They're the ones driving that. They want you to be

26:54

concerned about this. And you know what? Plenty

26:56

of Americans especially like those kids

26:58

screaming at AOC, which good scream at

27:00

any politician, they're all ridiculous. But

27:02

they

27:02

are losing their minds about this.

27:04

And, you know, if there's concern to be had,

27:06

Like I Zelensky in the Ozov movement. But

27:08

my God, acting like if

27:10

you're not saying nuclear war, nothing

27:12

else matters. That's the kind of over the

27:14

top thing that happens though.

27:16

worry. So apparently, we're not allowed to talk about any of the

27:18

topic because you've decided this is the most important.

27:20

That's how that works. And it is important though.

27:24

Right? But this is this is mind

27:26

blowing that this is the kind of thing we're framing

27:28

as tactical

27:29

as as level

27:31

headed as defense well

27:33

well, they'll say we'll defend ourselves if pushed and

27:35

you frame that as the attack maniac

27:37

over the top. Soviet threat. Right? I

27:39

mean, it's just it is it is becoming

27:42

very very

27:43

clownish. And then this is

27:45

just hilarious to me. Putin's nuclear

27:47

threats, which aren't even real in the

27:49

sense that they're making them out to be,

27:50

are pushing people like Trump and Elon Musk,

27:53

you know, the dangerous bad ones,

27:55

the outright, crazy ones to

27:57

press for a peace deal. Oh, no.

27:59

What crazy madman calling for

28:01

peace and nuclear expert warns that

28:03

that's

28:03

dangerous. They even quoted

28:06

him.

28:06

Great. A nuclear expert warns that calling

28:09

for peace is

28:11

dangerous. I mean, how

28:11

do you even write that?

28:14

he

28:14

want us to use the word or William? Are you trying to

28:16

make that happen? War his peace? ignorance

28:18

of strength? I mean, this is just

28:21

ridiculous. I guess

28:22

because Trump and Elon Musk go, III

28:24

their argument is somewhere along lines that they don't really

28:26

mean it, that it's about manipulation. We want

28:28

Russia to take over, and therefore, that means more

28:31

war. Like, it's always these abstract arguments. Like,

28:33

nuclear weapons and gas are green because

28:35

we use them to fight

28:36

for freedom, which is literally what they

28:38

argue broken down paraphrasing.

28:40

but

28:41

that's stupid. That's just them giving themselves a pass on

28:43

the things they want you to stop doing or using

28:45

or saying or whatever we're talking about.

28:48

Now here,

28:49

Pearson

28:50

Sharp. Pearson Sharp, thank you

28:51

for sharing this. This is from OAN. This is

28:53

an interesting clip that I hadn't seen.

28:55

This is this is he says they've been planning this

28:57

for a while. And I agree. This is a clip from nineteen

28:59

ninety seven. Nope.

29:01

Nope. No preamble. I'm just gonna play it. No.

29:03

Listen to what they're saying

29:05

here. This this

29:05

is oh, that's

29:06

right. For I think this was

29:10

oh, yeah. It's a got

29:13

subtitles. I'm just gonna play it right

29:15

here. So I'll

29:15

I'll read

29:17

it. So what, I guess,

29:18

a little so for those in the podcast, essentially,

29:20

this is an old clip nineteen ninety seven.

29:23

outlining. I

29:25

believe

29:25

it's a Russian and a Ukrainian. I'm not good at picking

29:27

out the differences in the dialect, but you can

29:29

you'll listen for yourself. discussing

29:31

what they think this will be

29:33

used for. And just look

29:35

at how and I'll I'll say it out loud so you

29:37

guys can hear. He says,

29:39

I don't see a problem that Ukraine wants in the NATO.

29:41

He wants to have good relations with Europe and

29:43

with Russia. That's what he once

29:45

says on the one side.

29:47

Yeah. The guy responds. I

29:50

know that in some

29:52

US academia US

29:55

Academy. Hold on. I know

29:57

that in some US Academy, they held a drill. The year this

29:59

is crazy. The year

29:59

was twenty twenty five. And

30:01

hypothetical scenario Is

30:04

America? Was it war with Russia and China?

30:06

Right. So their planning is a

30:08

point, which they are. Like whether or not you think the

30:10

drills are meant to be what they want to happen,

30:13

They're still planning for this. So you could argue us because they saw

30:15

it coming, but we can see plenty

30:17

of action where they're the ones driving this

30:19

into reality. At least in part,

30:21

I believe it's entirely, not to say that China

30:23

and Russia don't have their own concerns in regard, you

30:26

know, like, I don't I don't need to make it clear over and over

30:28

that I don't trust any of these people. And I think if

30:30

left to their own designs, if the power structure were different,

30:32

Russia or China would be doing exactly what the

30:34

US is. That's what I believe. Plenty of people

30:36

wanna frame them as good guy, bad guy

30:38

from either side of this. don't

30:40

see it. I don't it's that simple. I think power tends to be

30:42

a problem. In any case, that's why the people need

30:44

to be engaged and they don't even necessarily just

30:46

mean the political process we see

30:49

it today. as whole in the conversation. As always, voting is

30:51

important if we live in an honest system, which we

30:53

don't. But even though it's

30:55

it's only one part. It's only one very small part

30:57

in my opinion. Anyway, getting back to

30:59

the point. they plan for this that they have these

31:01

drills because this is something that they drove

31:03

to action to to a degree. In

31:05

twenty

31:05

twenty five, I mean, how do you miss

31:08

the overlap? with the timing. It's

31:10

exactly what we continue to

31:11

see whether we're talking of vaccine, passports,

31:14

bio security drills, I it's

31:16

very telling.

31:17

He

31:25

says, and the reason was the Ukraine

31:27

I knew I was gonna do that. And the reason was

31:29

the Ukraine began a war with

31:32

Russia on the side of

31:34

NATO. We'll

31:34

look at that. Now technically, they're not

31:36

they're well, I mean, let's go it's not split hairs

31:38

here. They're not they're not in NATO,

31:41

technically, be right now despite being like a like an

31:43

honorary member, essentially, from people's

31:45

comments, but that they are on the

31:47

side of NATO. That's very clear.

31:49

So that's exactly what ended

31:51

up

31:51

happening. There

31:53

is a group of people in the US who support

31:56

Ukraine joining NATO for the purposes of creating

31:58

a conflict.

31:58

and turn Ukraine

31:59

into a buffer state. That's the

32:02

important part, guys.

32:03

Using them as a

32:05

buffer, that's

32:05

the proxy war dynamic, and this is what

32:07

people realize. And fighting to the last Ukrainian for

32:09

other people's agendas.

32:19

Finally, it says the main danger is not

32:22

Ukraine joining NATO

32:24

It takes a while. If does happen, it's the fact that Ukraine

32:26

and the Ukrainians really are being trained to

32:28

be a buffer state.

32:31

Guys, I mean, these these are people inside the situation

32:33

that are seeing this back in nineteen ninety seven.

32:35

Great great find by Pearson Sharp.

32:38

I mean, this that's that's incredible. Now that doesn't have to that I

32:40

wouldn't say that's proof because, you know, they could

32:42

just

32:42

be theorizing and it could just coincidentally end

32:44

up this way. But shouldn't we ask

32:46

whether or not there's more to this? Like, event

32:49

201 in criminal and contagion and

32:51

dark winter and all the other things that

32:53

are literally what ended up happening?

32:55

Just something we should consider. Now,

32:57

what you may have seen in the in the

32:59

conversation here and I'll show you how it's being

33:01

misrepresented as always by the

33:03

childish corporate media. On October

33:05

nineteenth yesterday, they're reporting that Putin has

33:07

declared martial law, which is true in

33:09

in certain areas. actually,

33:12

here's how the corporate media reports it, and

33:14

then I'll show you how the Russian side of the

33:16

media. Still, I shouldn't say corporate how

33:18

the US media reports it

33:20

versus the Russian media. Putin's grip on

33:22

Ukraine and Russia with martial law.

33:24

Russian president Putin declared martial

33:26

law Wednesday in four regions of Ukraine

33:28

that Moscow and Exxon gave all regional

33:31

governors in Russia emergency powers

33:33

that open the door for sweeping new

33:35

restrictions throughout the country. Poten didn't immediately

33:37

spell out the steps that would be taken under martial

33:39

law, except he literally did, but said

33:41

that his his order was effective starting

33:43

Thursday. Now again, this is by the way, I'll show

33:45

you the day this is written, this is the same day,

33:47

and I'll show you the complete outline of exactly

33:49

what's happening. And they don't they don't want I

33:51

think they it's rather they want a few

33:53

murky and so it seems like they're abusing power.

33:56

The upper house of Russia's parliament quickly

33:58

endorsed Putin's decision to impose martial

33:59

law in the annex donutsk

34:02

Kirsten, Lukas, and Zaprocha regions.

34:04

reasons According to

34:05

Russian legislation, martial law could

34:07

require banning public

34:10

gatherings, introducing travel bans,

34:12

and curfews, and conducting censorship among

34:14

other restrictions. So, again, it's just this

34:18

ubiquitous direction you can't miss or eat from either side of this that everything

34:20

seems to go in the same direction of what they

34:22

ultimately want us to be doing for the great

34:24

reset direction

34:26

or lockdowns and everything else. I mean, it's hard to miss. Maybe that's just because

34:28

that's what their

34:28

minds are. It doesn't I mean, but I I

34:30

think it's more than that personally. Okay.

34:33

So that's there's more to the article I could pick out and mean

34:35

it picky about. It's their corporate media is

34:37

a joke today in my opinion. It's just it's

34:39

bad. And so just

34:41

to quick points I'm making here the same

34:43

day, Putin announces new security measures in

34:45

Russia. Now it says Russia

34:47

has introduced emergency measures due to

34:49

the continued threat posed by Ukraine and the need for a

34:51

more efficient response to it, Putin

34:54

announced on Wednesday. Now, look, just to

34:56

be and it gets into the martial law part of it, but

34:58

listen to you can't

35:00

ignore

35:01

this this. Rehearsing,

35:02

dropping nuclear bombs. Right?threatening

35:04

that we

35:05

need to push in there

35:07

and

35:07

do something about this. the arming

35:09

of these people. Right? The the the the azaab movement on

35:11

the ground, sending them in

35:13

from sending

35:14

them drones, sending them

35:16

weaponry, sending them funding.

35:17

I mean, it's it's these people

35:19

are dangerous. What they're doing to the people in

35:21

Don Bass is

35:22

there were

35:24

criminals. They are committing massive crimes

35:26

against humanity every moment they're bombing into

35:28

these areas, and I'll show you some of

35:30

these clips. but they roundly ignore that are proven

35:33

and I don't use that lightly. There

35:35

are people

35:35

from multiple angles on the ground from

35:37

different outlets, different

35:40

political spheres, that

35:40

are watching the civilians get annihilated by bombing in

35:42

the middle of the area that you can then prove

35:44

came from Ukrainian locations.

35:47

and

35:47

yet the corporate media is just willfully ignorant

35:49

about it. It's it's it's incredible.

35:52

But so my point is that you can see all

35:54

this happening and you understand at the very least whether you agree with it, why

35:56

they would be driven to take this action. Now

35:58

here's the most important part and why I say that

35:59

they're willfully how am I

36:02

framed it?

36:04

Just intentionally misinforming you about this. Speaking

36:06

at a meeting of

36:07

the National Security Council, Putin said he had

36:09

signed several documents detailing

36:11

the policy changes. He also

36:13

reiterated accusations against Kyiv stating that it uses,

36:15

quote, terrorist methods against Russia. I

36:17

mean, it's pretty hard not to realize

36:19

that with the bridge and

36:21

the Nord which even they're essentially admitting was an

36:24

explosion. The Ukrainian forces

36:26

sabotaged crucial infrastructure and

36:28

staged

36:28

assassinations of

36:29

local officials. And by the

36:31

way, they've they assassinated Dougan's daughter in Moscow,

36:34

and they've the US government admitted

36:38

that. There's no

36:38

reason this doesn't make sense to people. Even if you don't agree with

36:40

what Russia is or what they're doing, this is

36:43

a rational choice to make in regard

36:45

to the border between these

36:47

very clear extremist people and the people are

36:50

trying to protect. I mean, that's of course what they're framing it

36:52

as. You don't want to trust what they're saying, but

36:54

you have to understand that that makes sense within even

36:57

within their narrative. Now it says,

36:58

just like their

36:59

ideological forefathers, Stefan

37:02

Bandero's Hitler collaborators, they try

37:04

to create a

37:06

criminal underworld send sabotage teams on our soil. Now

37:08

I'll show you a point about the the the the

37:10

pushback on the Bandara point. I'll show you

37:12

a group

37:12

in Ukraine's military like

37:15

days ago that was singing too

37:17

bad here. I mean, this is not a secret.

37:19

They just don't like to talk about it in the corporate media because it

37:21

makes them look stupid. He claimed

37:24

that Russia law enforcement

37:26

officials

37:26

have prevented several

37:28

planned attacks on mass gatherings,

37:30

transport energy, energy facilities, including

37:32

the nuclear power plant. Certainly, I mean, that's something we have

37:34

to consider that these We know that that

37:36

there are aiming at these things. Zelensky has

37:38

been proudly talking about other bombing

37:41

the

37:41

power plant and then claiming that's putting everyone in

37:44

nuclear threat. It doesn't make much

37:46

sense. Though it's likely that

37:47

that is the case, but you

37:49

can't prove what they're saying. but

37:51

martial law in four regions. Annette's, Lugans, the Don Bass

37:53

region, Corsian, and Zaporussia regions. Now it says the four

37:55

here's the important

37:56

part.

37:58

Now you can prove

37:59

this. The four provinces already had martial law

38:02

in place when Russia accepted their

38:04

bids

38:06

for annexation.

38:06

education

38:08

Right? So

38:08

I understand that these groups before they were

38:10

part of

38:12

Russia already declared their own version of

38:14

martial law because of what

38:16

was happening from from

38:18

Ukrainian forces. And we all

38:19

see what's happening there if you're paying

38:21

attention. So all Russia did was accept

38:24

their declaration of independence. and let them vote to

38:26

referendum to become part of Russia and

38:28

then just initiated Russia's, not

38:30

commercial law because

38:31

that's what they wanted.

38:32

I mean, you could do you just because that's not what you want to be the case, because

38:35

you wanna pretend they're doing wrong

38:37

by these people, did

38:40

just dismiss it

38:40

without looking at the evidence is ridiculous. But the reality

38:43

is you can prove this. Just ask the

38:45

people on the ground filming

38:48

this. documented

38:48

what's happening. The decree, which he expects parliament

38:50

to ratify swiftly, will give the legal basis

38:52

under Russian law for what is de facto

38:54

happening on the ground.

38:56

So

38:57

it's it's kinda hard to miss the reality, but of course, the corporate media frames it

38:59

as a power grab, which is always what

39:01

they

39:01

because that's

39:04

what all they know apparently. Now the rest of it

39:05

is alert regimes. It says the special

39:08

regime gives regional officials in

39:10

these areas

39:12

additional authority to ensure

39:14

security react rapidly to any

39:16

emergencies. Now the the

39:18

understanding is that this is what the local

39:20

areas want. But I can easily argue that now that they've taken control of the

39:22

areas that it doesn't really matter what they

39:24

want, that people may disagree with that, that the

39:26

government wouldn't do that because they're right

39:28

by that. whatever. I don't I

39:30

think governments have used, period. But regardless, the how this went down to

39:32

start was because that's what the areas wanted.

39:34

You can't ignore that. the

39:37

governors have different parts of and I say I say that in this context

39:39

because these people that are now in charge are

39:42

essentially being given broad authority by the

39:44

Russian government. So, you

39:46

know, I power will be abused. I argue that anywhere. The governors of

39:48

different parts of Russia face different challenges and

39:50

need different powers to deal

39:52

with them. that you have to

39:54

understand because of what's happening there. Even if

39:56

you disagree with it, it

39:58

makes sense based on what Ukraine is doing

39:59

and provably. government

40:02

coordination. That's kind of obvious. They're essentially

40:04

coordinating the different powers and regional people in

40:06

charge with the direction they're taking, support of

40:08

mobilized reservists. Another set of

40:10

instructions told the defense ministry to ensure

40:12

that people enrolled an active military

40:14

service under partial mobilization are paid for

40:16

their due. essentially making

40:18

sure that they get paid for their work. He said he

40:20

was reacting to reports in cases of wages not

40:22

being paid on time and stressed the importance to

40:24

provide in the military what it needed to

40:26

do his job. So there there's

40:28

your overarching reality of what they

40:30

framed as essentially a power grab. Now,

40:33

what's interesting about this is while

40:35

all this is happening, Turkey's Erdogan agreed

40:37

with Russia to make Turkey

40:40

a natural

40:40

gas hub for Europe, which

40:42

I'm sure that the NATO would

40:46

rather that be the case, but there's a weird dynamic here between Turkey and

40:48

the way they play this. Now, I don't know

40:51

if this is gonna be what

40:52

exactly

40:54

what NATO and the US

40:55

government want. Because I haven't I'm

40:57

gonna look

40:58

more into this. And,

41:01

you know, further details, I would argue that this is actually a

41:03

deal that would benefit Russia because I would argue this

41:05

is where Russia's inner oil gas,

41:08

natural gas will

41:10

go through, and still so all what ultimately really matters is

41:12

that they they don't want

41:13

Russia's

41:14

government to benefit.

41:16

at all.

41:17

And that's what this ultimately

41:18

adds up to is they want these people to

41:21

be the governments, the Russia specifically,

41:23

to be stuck here.

41:25

you know, it's a quackmire. They wanna create a situation where they're

41:27

overextended, where the resources being expensed, you know,

41:30

used. And

41:32

so on top of that stopping the nest

41:34

the need for energy

41:36

resources coming from Russia to

41:40

Europe. because then that allows them to have an agreement and connection and they

41:42

want this to be the and and to

41:44

be clear, what they're doing is justifying the actions

41:46

they're taking, which will get into the energy

41:50

part today by the necessary step because we can't be dependent on

41:52

Russia. But all of

41:54

that hinges on

41:54

the idea that just

41:55

Russia bad guy so that's why

41:57

that makes sense. But

41:59

all you're doing

41:59

is hurting people everywhere

42:02

under the

42:02

justification that it's necessary to stop Russia.

42:04

I saw a a really ridiculous me

42:07

or cartoon which is perfect.

42:09

funny, but it's sad, ridiculous. It's got a bunch

42:11

of people sitting on a campfire in some

42:13

kind of dystopian future, where the guy is

42:15

telling the children, yes, yes, we did

42:17

destroy the world. but we momentarily weakened

42:20

Russia. Right? I mean, that that's essentially

42:22

what's happening. You know, of course, we know

42:24

that the destruction of everything is leading

42:26

to another

42:28

agenda. but they're really rationalizing the ten thousand

42:30

dollar energy bills and

42:31

lack of food

42:32

because, well, Russia is powerful or you need

42:34

to stop them from influencing energy

42:36

under the I mean,

42:38

exactly what they're claiming Russia's doing with that is what

42:40

the US government is right now doing with

42:42

the same situation. Using it,

42:46

controlling people, influencing their direction, their policy.

42:48

I mean, it's exactly what they claim

42:50

Russia's doing. Just because they scream, freedom,

42:52

and good guy doesn't mean anything.

42:55

Interesting. But here are

42:57

the

42:57

Ukrainian people on the ground, Ukrainian

43:00

paratroopers singing

43:00

our father is Bandara, our

43:03

mother is Ukraine. Andero,

43:04

in case she forgot, was the leader of Ukrainian Nazi organization, Ukraine's

43:07

Nazi organization, and murdered over a hundred thousand

43:09

poles and Jews in nineteen forty three,

43:11

nineteen forty four. just in case you

43:13

still think the Ukrainian military government isn't filled with

43:16

Nazis. Now you could call

43:18

these neo Nazis, which would be more accurate, I would

43:20

argue, fascist, because remember if you're the

43:22

the Nazi name is specific

43:24

to a political

43:25

party and so on. So that's why when

43:27

I argue there are actual Nazis

43:29

because that's the truth, because people like my

43:32

COVID who was the original point of this was

43:34

a Nazi war criminal, and that

43:35

ideology did did continue

43:38

through to some people. and we've proven that

43:40

throughout this process. Even I was a little resistent

43:42

resistance to that in the beginning, but I

43:43

realized that is actually accurate. But

43:45

most

43:45

of this is neo Nazis, fascist

43:47

and just extremist in general. But here they are

43:50

singing exactly what you just heard.

43:52

The Our

43:53

father is Bandara.

43:59

wow

44:04

I,

44:04

again, I just can't help a point out how

44:05

absurd it is that you have a government

44:08

and specifically an administration.

44:10

It is spearheading fight

44:12

against white supremacy and extremism as

44:14

they're funding the most obvious example of

44:16

that on the planet right now.

44:18

alongside the other ones, they also fund

44:20

like al Qaeda and ISIS and you know, all the

44:22

rest. But what's interesting is that this is happening in

44:25

real time. As they're literally screaming that they

44:28

baldaire is their is their father

44:29

and they're going out of their way to fund their

44:31

fight for freedom while

44:33

they claim their fighting extremism. I mean, it just

44:35

it's it's insulting. But

44:37

Lindsey Snell, moral

44:39

award winner writes Germany's withholding

44:41

a tweet showing odds of fighters

44:43

in Ukraine doing the high liters or salute on the

44:45

basis of law against Nazi symbols his

44:48

can fund and arm them, but journalists

44:50

can't show photos of them, proudly

44:52

exhibiting their

44:54

white supremacy. Now, this is the

44:56

the interesting part as it says here, your

44:58

treatment was held in Germany

45:00

based on local laws. That's

45:02

local German laws

45:02

influencing the global platform of Twitter. Think

45:05

about crazy that is. And the reality

45:07

is they're simply hiding the tweet that shows you

45:09

that they're giving the Nazi salute.

45:12

her point is because the symbol is against the

45:14

law. So it's okay to fund them, but

45:16

you can't show that they're doing what you call

45:18

against the law. This is

45:20

counterintuitive. It doesn't make sense. It means they either don't

45:22

care

45:23

about the fact that these people are

45:25

extremist, which is what

45:26

I argue is happening. or

45:29

they're I

45:29

mean, how do you even frame I don't

45:32

even know how to frame the alternative to that. Like, it's

45:34

so very clear what they're

45:36

doing here. hiding the

45:37

truth while funding those people. I mean, it's

45:39

just insulting to your intelligence. Now here's

45:41

why it read. In

45:44

another example,

45:44

pointing out another example of

45:46

how they're actively holding back the truth.

45:48

And I I mean, this is why we know that

45:50

many of these people involved in these these

45:53

outlets are

45:54

not just willfully

45:55

or, I guess, willful is right. We're not just

45:57

not not ignorant of the reality.

45:59

Right? They're they've bought in the narrative. A lot of them

46:01

are like that. just not very intelligent I argue and

46:03

they're being used. But you can't do this

46:05

and then pretend like you

46:08

don't see that you're covering

46:10

this up. French

46:11

journalist and director Anne

46:13

Laura Bonneau has

46:14

been fired from the University of

46:16

Paris because

46:17

she made a documentary on what was going

46:19

on in Don Bass. quote, I was notified that I

46:21

was no I no longer met

46:23

the values of the university,

46:26

so they cannot allow me to

46:28

continue working. Think

46:30

about how wild that is. So you work there for, you

46:32

know, very long period of time. Doing

46:35

lots of work.

46:36

lot of work And you go to make

46:38

a documentary and because you simply

46:40

do it in a location

46:42

and objectively

46:43

cover that location, they

46:45

say you no longer meet the values of

46:47

the university? Like, at what

46:48

point did those values start to diminish? Is it just

46:50

the moment you went to down to the Don Bass region?

46:52

I mean, we all know what this really

46:55

is. journals from France told about threats after the

46:57

film about Don Bass. And he writes

46:58

after that, watch the documentary that

47:01

got her fired here. Now, actually, I will

47:03

let me just do that. I'll include that. Oh, I forgot. I

47:05

already put the links up. Well, in any case, right beneath it

47:07

is the link to the documentary.

47:09

Here's the article.

47:10

article

47:11

It says right

47:12

here French

47:13

journalism director author of the documentaries

47:16

about Don Bass

47:17

told RA

47:19

RIA Novosti that

47:20

she lost her job and began to receive threats just

47:22

because of her trip there.

47:24

You see the

47:26

reality

47:26

here guys? She's being

47:29

threatened just for going there. How in the world

47:31

do you argue

47:31

that by going to the location that

47:34

you're

47:34

breaking some kind of a

47:36

chord? Right? The reality is

47:38

they don't want that truth to be seen.

47:40

And the the governments here, the

47:42

top are aware of this. The university

47:44

here is aware of this.

47:47

She

47:47

or she she visited Eastern Ukraine in

47:49

two thousand fifteen and two thousand sixteen.

47:50

Right? This is what you know, Bart

47:53

was in pointing out eight years plus

47:54

they have been continually ethnically

47:56

cleansed, bombed, attacked, threatened, and

47:58

presented the documentary, Don

48:00

Bass. In the February of

48:04

this year, journey was returned to the region and shot a new film,

48:06

Don Bass eight years later.

48:08

According to her, the shooting took place

48:10

from May twenty fourth to March

48:12

eleventh, she arrived in Don Bass a few days

48:14

before the start of the

48:16

invasion. She then declared

48:16

decided to put her film

48:19

on the Internet. And you

48:20

can watch this for yourself, guys. It is it is

48:22

I mean, it's what anybody honest would do.

48:25

Interviewing people,

48:25

asking them questions and the reality

48:28

coming

48:30

But because

48:30

they say the things that they don't want you to see,

48:32

they shut it

48:33

down. Which

48:35

by

48:36

the way? Let's just

48:38

grab this one,

48:38

I myself, another one here somewhere. Why should

48:40

I just line this up next to it?

48:42

Here's another example of this.

48:44

French reporter

48:45

gets cut off

48:47

The second

48:47

she mentions Ukraine attacking hospitals. So

48:50

first of all, realize this is a

48:52

reporter on the ground who

48:54

is reporting that her

48:56

evidence shows that Ukraine is

48:58

attacking hospitals. That's why she reported

49:00

it. And the moment that she goes into that

49:02

information, they cut

49:04

the feed. Russian army

49:06

wants to Well, I'm

49:08

not gonna read the whole thing. It's a minute

49:10

long. The point is she gets you I'll

49:13

get GO FOR WHAT SHE TALKING. THEY

49:16

ASKED HER WHY DO RUSSIANS WANT TO EVACUATE

49:18

THE CITY, THE SCIVILIANS FROM THE CITY.

49:21

Right? because

49:21

this is Russia vacuuming civilians from a city. Now

49:23

this is again how they frame this when they

49:25

say Russia's retreating because we're

49:28

winning and you know, militarily overcoming them. You know, is that what's

49:30

happening? Or is there more to the story? Right?

49:32

That's the thing. So in this case, we can see that

49:34

they're evacuating civilians from

49:36

the city. AND THEY ASKED

49:37

WHY.

49:42

EVACUATION OF THE

49:42

CITY HAPPENS IN VIEW OF THE FAST

49:46

ADVANCEMENT. Ukraine troops toward the

49:48

city in the course of their counterattack, which

49:50

is currently underway in the south of this country.

49:53

Moscow admitted a harsh

49:55

and quite surprising step during

49:57

the war that his situation was really

49:59

rather tense. For Russian

50:01

soldiers in the field, the city of Christian,

50:03

I must say, was annexed by the Russian

50:05

army at

50:06

the end. Of September and

50:09

currently is a regular

50:11

object of

50:12

strikes by Ukraine

50:14

at

50:14

its infrastructure such

50:18

as hospitals cut.

50:20

Oh, we lost her. Oh, that's too

50:21

bad.

50:24

Right. I mean,

50:25

guys, it's it's You can't miss it. You're either there

50:27

like a Barbara Star character and

50:29

willfully being ignorant and hiding

50:31

everything you can. or a BBC,

50:33

for example, anybody at that outlet,

50:36

or you're there

50:36

and you try to report and they cut you off.

50:38

Or you're

50:39

honest like Emma Bartlett and Vanessa

50:41

Bailey, and Patrick Lancaster and Wyatt, all the rest of them out

50:43

there who are reporting this accurately because they're showing

50:45

you on the ground what they can see.

50:47

But it's just

50:48

it's just it's impossible

50:51

to miss. Now here's interesting

50:53

part

50:53

about this to show you the

50:56

reality of the extremism. Now

50:58

and look, this By the way, what we're gonna show next

51:00

is say, kind

51:01

of a tangential ex extended

51:03

part of what we've shown you. But

51:05

if you really wanna understand the reality of these groups, I

51:07

didn't even include the articles today. just

51:09

type in awesome movement on the last American

51:11

Vagabond and read the endless amount of articles

51:13

we've covered on this, about how

51:15

really, obviously, extremism as

51:17

these people are, But as Ref points out, never Google Article

51:19

sixteen of Ukraine's Constitution, worst mistake of my life.

51:22

Now, here it is, and I'll read it to you

51:24

next. Now, it's in the context

51:25

of Chernobyl.

51:27

But I still don't think

51:28

that explains what it says here. I

51:30

think that was it right here. So

51:32

here here's the actual constitution. It

51:35

says providing the eco providing of ecological safety and

51:37

support of ecological equilibrium on

51:39

territory of Ukraine overcoming

51:42

the consequences of this Chernobyl catastrophe is

51:44

the catastrophe of planetary scale

51:47

saving the gene pool of

51:49

the Ukrainian people is the duty of the

51:52

state. No, sure. You could argue it has

51:54

to do with, you know,

51:56

radioactive material.

51:58

But it's pretty simple

51:59

what that

51:59

says, and then you can overlap that with what they

52:02

sell, say,

52:04

elsewhere openly what they say they

52:06

wanna do with the races around the world,

52:08

what they wanna exterminate in certain

52:10

areas. I mean, this is their spoken words

52:12

from high level ranking officials currently

52:14

in his administration. We've shown you all this.

52:16

Of course, corporate media hides from

52:18

this. So then you start to really

52:20

see more of this information, saving the

52:22

gene pool of the Ukrainian people the duty of

52:24

the state. Well, that's a simple

52:26

statement, whether it's radiation related or

52:28

something else. I just find

52:29

it to be

52:32

pretty telling. Now, this Now, here's another interesting

52:33

one that I saw shared. And I tried

52:36

to assess this out, and I wasn't able to find

52:38

this provably.

52:40

I still want to share it with you for two

52:42

reasons. This person says Kia fertility clinics seek only pure Ukrainians. That's what

52:45

they're claiming. And they show this

52:47

image of a sign that

52:49

translates to

52:49

something. So I one of the words is pure in in

52:52

Ukraine as I can see that I looked that up.

52:54

But

52:55

what interesting what's interesting first

52:57

of all, is that this person responds when somebody

52:58

goes, that's fake, it's not real, and shows

53:00

you the actual thing on the door

53:04

which doesn't mean it's real, by the way, but I find it's more compelling,

53:06

that's where

53:08

this comes from. So in some kind of a a

53:10

medical room, which you can see where

53:12

it's all no white tile and

53:14

so on, you can see this image. Now that could

53:16

be faked easily. But that

53:17

is the exact image which

53:19

does say pure blood or pure Ukrainians. Very

53:21

strange. And I I

53:22

mean, the only reason I

53:23

would give this any like, usually, this kind

53:26

of this

53:28

is something I might leave off until I can find more about it. I don't think we will in

53:30

fact. But because of everything else about who

53:32

these the government is,

53:34

who's

53:35

been driving what they're doing, and the

53:37

odds of movement and and right

53:39

sector in SVODA and all these different

53:41

groups that are outwardly openly

53:43

fascist and extremist. it does not

53:45

surprise me. Their statements are openly racist and openly about exactly what

53:48

this is. So, the

53:50

point is though, the website itself says,

53:52

no, that's

53:54

fake. and shows the image and everything. So I

53:56

went through and I tried to

53:57

find it. I can't. I went the way back machine and so

53:58

on. So it could

53:59

be fake.

54:02

I just

54:02

think it's interesting in the overlap, but I did find this. On

54:05

this translation part, they go

54:07

through saying no, we can it's not

54:09

real and it's not the

54:12

name,

54:12

explain what they really do. We continue

54:14

to work for the benefit of our patients. But at the end, it

54:16

says everything will be Ukraine.

54:18

That's strange.

54:20

I mean, whether you take that as they'll take world

54:22

or or that everything will be

54:24

Ukraine in regard to their

54:25

genetic discussion. I mean, it's a strange statement. I'll just

54:27

put it that way.

54:30

But regardless of it,

54:31

I wanted to include it because I do think there I

54:33

do think there's something to this into

54:35

into how this is

54:37

in their constitution. how this is something

54:39

that is being pointed at. I hope somebody can find out whether or not this video

54:42

is actually true because it could be something

54:44

that was posted, it was not

54:46

in fact otherwise

54:48

listed on the website, something to consider.

54:50

Question everything.

54:51

Now going forward,

54:53

We

54:55

see a lot of white media reporting this. We see

54:57

a lot of these Ukrainians. And we've

54:59

seen this in other examples as well. People This

55:01

this is the point at which you can realize

55:03

that not every person that's there is what we're pointing at. Right?

55:05

The extremist element, I was cultivated by

55:08

the CIA since nineteen

55:10

forty eight. when it was the

55:12

OSS and became the CIND forty three. We

55:14

can see this, prove this, project

55:16

aerodynamic. But that doesn't

55:18

mean that all of them are like that. Like you can point out,

55:20

there's plenty of Jewish people in Israel that completely recognize that

55:22

Zionism has hijacked the Judi that

55:24

Jewish religion is using that to manipulate

55:26

people around the world. Orthonox

55:30

Communities all over is real point that out and get

55:32

attacked by the IDF. We just that's why you don't talk

55:34

about it though. They don't talk about it because it

55:36

shows you the illusion just like this. But here he is

55:38

pointing out more Ukrainians refused to be fed

55:40

into the Zelensky Meat Grinder. It says,

55:42

we

55:42

refused to carry out criminal

55:44

orders. saver

55:44

Ukrainian serviceman recording this message. Says here are

55:47

the boys who all departed. Now we've

55:49

seen Americans and UK individuals

55:52

leave because of how they're

55:54

being manipulated and lied to, but these

55:57

are Ukrainians. They're

55:59

all

55:59

the ones

56:00

who survived and left person. Who refused

56:02

to carry out criminal orders, namely,

56:05

to shoot at our

56:06

own people, to go on the offensive

56:09

without ammunition, without weapons, and all of this has been backed

56:11

up by numerous

56:13

people speaking out.

56:17

at

56:17

the gist of it, the reality is that

56:19

people are

56:20

leaving. Now, that's a

56:21

really sad video. In fact, there's a sixty year

56:23

old sixty eight year old woman from ribizone

56:26

ribizone, I believe, condemns the cursed

56:28

fascist from Ukraine, who

56:30

blew up her home with a with

56:33

a how do you pronounce that Himmers missile? I I'm I've read that many

56:35

times and I never said it out loud

56:37

and left her crippled.

56:43

barbara

56:45

the

56:50

though

56:53

Hold on. I

56:55

I feel

56:55

like I thought this

56:57

had a subtitles. me grab it real quick, and I'll I'll put

56:59

it on there for you.

57:00

But this is

57:03

just

57:04

it's it's very sad.

57:06

know, because this is the kind of video that they dismiss, like, you

57:08

know, and that's the sad reality about all

57:10

this today is that if it's something that they

57:12

don't want to agree with, it's

57:14

fake news in Russia propaganda, which is certainly possible. As those of us

57:16

honest, we point out, could it be? Of course. Right?

57:18

But then if it's something that goes

57:21

along with their agenda, It's

57:23

absolutely true whether they can prove it because, well, of

57:25

course, because and that's the kind of garbage we see

57:27

with the vaccine discussion or anything. Those

57:29

of us on this side are saying, well, could be fake,

57:31

but here's evidence that backs it up. But then on that

57:33

side, it's completely dismissed or taken

57:36

regardless of the facts. That's the kind of problem

57:38

we

57:38

see.

57:40

Play this for you. This one's pretty

57:41

sad.

57:43

Did you fire

57:45

these cases?

57:49

From those

57:56

current species, And

57:58

were you here when they

57:59

fire? So let's

58:02

hear on the first

58:05

floor What was like when

58:05

they

58:07

landed? there

58:14

was a huge blast and she had some injuries

58:15

her leg, like,

58:19

extension. Would you rather just

58:21

grow her

58:21

to go

58:30

former over

58:32

is this alone. The one, the

58:34

only one who lives in this block. And

58:37

what what sort of

58:38

setting? Is it is it the

58:40

the the rockets that are upsetting? Or

58:43

most of the

58:44

reaper

58:46

don't agree with that

58:49

well

58:54

you will need to my a

58:56

few or no

58:58

articles on houses

59:01

Everything will

59:02

be performed from yesterday to

59:05

Thursday. She has to go to someone

59:07

and she's working for help, but she cannot

59:09

move that car.

59:13

Yeah. What what else?

59:16

See, what what kind of things do you need? Do

59:18

you need food? Do what is

59:22

it?

59:26

the winner will be genuine sure

59:29

with user

59:31

group

59:36

tell her we can we can help her.

59:38

And

59:38

want to move move move would have ugh

59:40

a

59:43

sudden. Got it. Can I ask her,

59:45

what what does she think of these cast fascists

59:48

as she

59:58

couldn't went through. They're not human. They have nothing.

59:59

Like, humans

1:00:02

went down.

1:00:05

She says they're

1:00:07

not human. Now, you know,

1:00:09

you you could easily argue that this is an

1:00:11

example that could be made on either

1:00:13

side. of wayward missiles and rockets and so on, but

1:00:15

ask yourself why the corporate media never

1:00:18

points these kinds of things out.

1:00:20

As far as their

1:00:20

concern, this never happens on the

1:00:23

other side.

1:00:23

Right? It's only happens in Russia fires things because Ukraine

1:00:26

said so, and you don't even need to prove

1:00:27

that, which is certainly

1:00:28

possible. But of course, this

1:00:30

never happens on the side. You won't

1:00:32

anything like this on corporate media and in any way represents a

1:00:34

Ukrainian action at all. How can that

1:00:37

even be possible even

1:00:37

by accident?

1:00:40

I

1:00:40

mean, it it that's how easy this stuff is to prove that they're mis they're lying

1:00:42

to you about what's going on. But at the end

1:00:44

of the day, this is an area we can prove

1:00:47

was because of Ukrainian actions. Now

1:00:50

realize that these are the areas in the people that they're now attacking.

1:00:52

Even though they're the

1:00:54

ones claiming it wasn't a

1:00:56

real referendum in Russia took the area.

1:00:59

So then why are you attacking the people

1:01:01

of those areas? They claim if you

1:01:03

ask them, it's to punish

1:01:05

them for trying tradeers. Okay?

1:01:06

So they did vote to leave them. You say how easy this is to prove? They

1:01:09

can't even get their own narrative straight.

1:01:11

Very,

1:01:13

very sad. Russian

1:01:15

humanitarian aid volunteers were in fact able to provide some immediate assistance

1:01:17

to

1:01:17

the woman whose home was destroyed by

1:01:19

Ukrainian fascist with American weapons.

1:01:22

You know, why? Because people they there, present,

1:01:25

and they helped her.

1:01:29

Footage shows the consequences of the Ukraine strike directly

1:01:32

outside on Natalia's second floor home as

1:01:34

well as the fragments of the HMR's missile

1:01:36

recovered

1:01:38

nearby. Look at that.

1:01:40

Imagine this

1:01:40

was your house that

1:01:42

you've lived

1:01:43

your whole life.

1:01:45

I mean, just

1:01:45

think about how crazy that

1:01:48

is. And this kind of stuff is

1:01:50

ignored. It's happening to

1:01:51

Palestinians every day. It's happening to

1:01:52

minorities every day. Every single day.

1:01:54

No

1:01:55

one

1:01:55

cares. Now this is a subject

1:01:57

of human shields,

1:01:57

unfolding events in Corsin demonstrating

1:02:00

the difference between Russia and Kiev's

1:02:02

war strategy.

1:02:04

Excuse

1:02:04

me. As it says, people are transported

1:02:06

to other side of such ships.

1:02:12

This is the line to go

1:02:15

Goliath Pristan over there is a little

1:02:17

to the right. Employees

1:02:20

of the Ministry of Emergency Situations, dog handlers who inspect

1:02:22

bags are working on the spot.

1:02:28

Buses meet people on the

1:02:30

other

1:02:30

side? There

1:02:35

are two queues of people who signed

1:02:37

up at a call center. On the

1:02:39

right side, there's

1:02:41

a queue for the the

1:02:43

different areas they're going to and left side is a queue

1:02:45

for a different area.

1:02:47

Buses for a thousand people are waiting there. Now

1:02:50

realize this is the Russian

1:02:51

government doing this. Right?

1:02:52

The the very thing they say never happens. Like,

1:02:54

apparently according to the court media, they wanna

1:02:56

just murder everybody with gas and stuff and

1:02:58

bomb them for no reason because they're maniacs

1:03:01

and villains. Right? Everything's possible except

1:03:02

the evidence shows you the other

1:03:04

reality though in Syria and elsewhere where they bust

1:03:07

people out of the way and the

1:03:09

other side doesn't do that. But

1:03:11

they're the bad guys though. Right? Again, in the context

1:03:13

of this, in my opinion, there is no good guy,

1:03:15

bad guy. I'm using that as the the binary

1:03:18

absurdity of the way they

1:03:20

frame this. even though, in fact, you can see

1:03:22

that they're conducting actions they claim other

1:03:24

people are doing.

1:03:26

It's just it's it's impossible to miss.

1:03:29

After people

1:03:32

cross over,

1:03:34

they will then stay where they are going to Crimea

1:03:38

and elsewhere. Have you

1:03:41

decided

1:03:41

to take

1:03:44

your dog

1:03:46

with you?

1:03:51

My

1:03:53

hand is depressant.

1:04:01

Now the point, guys, is that this

1:04:04

is the exact opposite of what you

1:04:06

see almost anywhere

1:04:08

on

1:04:09

the Ukrainian side. You talk to people

1:04:11

that leave the areas, they'll tell you how they were held in

1:04:12

basements and forced to and they're not we're not

1:04:14

giving rations and and argued it's all because

1:04:17

Russia bad guy. then in

1:04:19

in in some cases not. Some cases just kidnapping people, abusing

1:04:21

them, especially if there are people that may they

1:04:23

may think are on the other side or

1:04:25

may not be pro

1:04:27

Ukraine or whatever.

1:04:29

It's just it just it simply shows

1:04:31

you that what they're saying is not

1:04:33

the full picture. Now, Wyatt Reed

1:04:35

again points out Zelensky's on education continues. And

1:04:38

here you can prove, this is the number ten

1:04:40

secondary school

1:04:42

in coup design with six US supplied missiles that got

1:04:44

hit three weeks ago. Patrick Lancaster has been

1:04:46

shown this for a

1:04:47

very long

1:04:50

time. There's no

1:04:50

denying

1:04:52

this. Now, of course, when when they get

1:04:54

put

1:04:54

to the question, like like Israel's government does

1:04:56

all the time, they simply go, oh, well, they were using

1:04:58

the school to base.

1:05:00

Now, that could be true, except we've already seen in reverse that they

1:05:02

are in fact the Ukrainian military using

1:05:05

schools with people and children in

1:05:07

them. That's been proven. But

1:05:10

see, there's only one side

1:05:11

of the coverage

1:05:13

being shown. Very

1:05:20

the said sad. Now here's

1:05:23

about more lies coming out from the

1:05:25

Ukrainian side of this discussion. rather people on Twitter in this

1:05:27

case, but in general, we see this across the board. John Carter

1:05:29

points out a photograph of a passenger train,

1:05:31

bound by American

1:05:33

aircraft in Serbia. in

1:05:35

April twelfth nineteen ninety nine is being passed

1:05:37

off as

1:05:37

an airstrike by the Russian

1:05:39

military. And of course, it's a fake and launched

1:05:41

by the Americans themselves. think think about the irony here of or

1:05:43

is that the right way to frame

1:05:45

that? Yeah. Essentially, the the

1:05:47

idea that this is civilian

1:05:50

train, it was bombed by the American military, which,

1:05:53

of course, no

1:05:54

sanctions, no war

1:05:55

crimes, no that.

1:05:58

Right? that's

1:05:59

now being framed on Twitter as the Russians bombing

1:05:59

Ukraine and train. Now I hear in the chat,

1:06:02

it looks like people are arguing this was

1:06:04

meant to be

1:06:06

a parody I'm they just I'm not sure. I could I was able to that

1:06:08

out. Regardless, though, we are seeing this

1:06:09

kind of

1:06:10

thing all across the

1:06:12

board. And even

1:06:14

if this person then finds out that it was, they,

1:06:16

you know, leave it up and so on. We see this everywhere.

1:06:18

This person responds

1:06:19

by showing you

1:06:22

that the a tweet remembering this from the

1:06:24

anniversary of of NATO's

1:06:25

aggression on Yugoslavia. Like, the idea

1:06:27

of all these things being overused and re the

1:06:29

point is the US

1:06:32

government is possible in many different

1:06:34

ways. I

1:06:35

mean, I've I've just endless examples

1:06:37

of doing this kind of

1:06:39

thing throughout history. over and

1:06:41

over and over.

1:06:42

Just look at

1:06:43

Vietnam.

1:06:44

Look at currently look at

1:06:46

the locations I just mentioned. I mean, it's

1:06:50

it's endless. but all

1:06:51

we get is lies. Here's an

1:06:52

interesting take from the

1:06:53

previous lie we talked about. Russia's

1:06:56

giving soldiers Viagra to rape Ukraine,

1:06:58

which is don't

1:07:00

see literally any evidence for

1:07:02

nothing other than them saying

1:07:04

that. And Ukraine telling them to say it,

1:07:05

it would have it seems. But this person

1:07:07

has an interesting point. Pfizer

1:07:09

should be investigated for circumvention of the

1:07:11

sanctions. Right? Of course, how's Viagra

1:07:14

getting in there? Supplying our

1:07:15

forces of Russian Federation

1:07:17

with Viagra? They

1:07:18

use the word Viagra. That's the main brand. So how exactly

1:07:20

is that happening? Is Pfizer circumventing

1:07:22

the sanctions? Is that funny?

1:07:25

That's

1:07:25

a great point. Right. But nobody cares as long as

1:07:28

Pfizer could do, it's just it's a funny point that

1:07:30

only certain things matter when they want them

1:07:32

to. Right? But the Pentagon

1:07:33

is considering paying for StarLink in Ukraine after

1:07:36

Musk suggests that he'll pull it back because he

1:07:38

was told to f off by

1:07:40

Ukrainian official.

1:07:42

just taking their advice. It's just

1:07:44

funny how how,

1:07:44

you know, again, childish these people are.

1:07:46

What's now that Penticon is gonna

1:07:48

step in? In fact, clearly, this is important

1:07:51

for them. clearly, this goes

1:07:52

beyond Elon

1:07:54

Musk. But why would

1:07:54

we pay for that? Because you're paying

1:07:56

for everything, guys. That's the point

1:07:58

here. That's why

1:07:59

Zelensky just demanded billions more

1:08:02

dollars.

1:08:02

This is an

1:08:04

interesting tweet from Sunshine.

1:08:07

It translates happy day survivors The

1:08:09

Russian ministry confirms that George

1:08:11

Soros has financed biological and

1:08:14

nuclear program laboratories in Ukraine through

1:08:16

Rosemont Seneca. an investment fund

1:08:18

headed by Hunter Biden. Let's see if Putin's role is now understood. Are the investment fund role?

1:08:20

Oh, here. Oh, you know what?

1:08:22

That's weird. I

1:08:23

thought that was

1:08:26

Same

1:08:26

thing I did before. Let me grab that real quick.

1:08:28

Keep thinking some of these

1:08:30

are are translated from another language.

1:08:34

There

1:08:36

yeah

1:08:39

we go.

1:08:40

Alright.

1:08:42

Here's

1:08:42

the

1:08:44

clip. Thanks. It

1:08:48

has

1:08:48

Caleb from RT or I

1:08:50

think previously from RT, I forget Bestman

1:08:52

fund Rosemont Seneca, which is headed

1:08:54

by Hunter Biden. Rosemont Seneca Partners is the firm

1:08:58

tied to Hunter by the US president's son, and

1:09:00

the Russian defense ministry is

1:09:02

listing financial entities that are

1:09:05

involved in these bio labs in

1:09:07

Ukraine. Now they also listed George Soros' Open Society

1:09:10

Institute and Open Society

1:09:12

Foundations, which are also

1:09:14

involved with them. And as

1:09:17

well as the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine and

1:09:19

the Ministry of Health of Ukraine and the US Department

1:09:21

of Threat Reduction. Of course,

1:09:23

it seemed to be hide

1:09:27

in with these Bio Labs. And it

1:09:29

appears that that Rosemont

1:09:31

Seneca partners, the

1:09:33

reason would be involved is because they have a

1:09:36

relationship with Metabayota and

1:09:38

beach, which are main

1:09:40

suppliers of

1:09:42

Pentagon BioLab materials. Now, Moscow is also coming forward

1:09:44

in saying that it appears

1:09:46

these bio labs are connected

1:09:49

with institutions and

1:09:52

research organizations. that are related to

1:09:54

nuclear missiles. This is what was said. Interesting. The scale of the program. I realize

1:09:56

this is coming from the Russian government.

1:09:58

Right? So take that as

1:09:59

you will. it

1:10:02

shouldn't it shouldn't mean you dismiss it without consideration because

1:10:04

it certainly adds up. But,

1:10:05

you know, that you consider that take

1:10:08

it with a grain of salt. No. In any

1:10:10

in any governance position, they will use it to their benefit. Amazon necessarily fake,

1:10:12

though. In addition to the military,

1:10:14

the US agencies for international development

1:10:18

The George Soros Foundation and the Center for

1:10:21

Disease Prevention Control are directly involved

1:10:23

in its implementation. Scientific supervision

1:10:25

is carried out by

1:10:27

leading research organizations including the Los

1:10:29

Alamos National Laboratory, which developed nuclear weapons as part of the Manhattan

1:10:31

project. All these activities are

1:10:34

carried out under the full

1:10:36

control of the Pentagon.

1:10:38

Now, the over thirty Bio Labs are accused by Russia of being involved

1:10:43

in weapons development. and trying to

1:10:45

develop biological weapons. Now Just to be clear, guys, I my my stance on

1:10:48

that

1:10:49

is

1:10:51

that it's unequivocal. I

1:10:52

don't care whether they call it

1:10:54

defense or say whatever word they want to insert. They're making weapons. That's what

1:10:57

that work is. Anywhere

1:10:59

you look at it.

1:11:01

period.

1:11:01

That's I mean, that's my stance on it, but I

1:11:03

know that's backed up by the facts. But now we just get into, you know, semantics here on whether you're

1:11:05

making a gun that is meant to

1:11:07

be a paperweight. Right?

1:11:11

It's still a gun. That's the point. But going forward, the USA

1:11:13

denies this. And it says they are

1:11:16

simply research facilities,

1:11:18

and we did hear

1:11:20

acknowledged of these

1:11:22

facilities existence from US

1:11:24

under secretary of Victoria Newland.

1:11:26

Ukraine has a biological research

1:11:28

facilities.

1:11:31

We are working with the Ukrainians on

1:11:33

how they can prevent any

1:11:36

of those

1:11:38

research materials from falling into the hands of

1:11:40

Russian forces should they

1:11:42

approach. Right. Even

1:11:43

just the way she says that

1:11:46

you can tell she's being very

1:11:48

careful biological

1:11:49

research facilities. Right. Like, very deliberate. And the

1:11:51

point is if you can end up in

1:11:53

the hands of the the bad guys

1:11:55

and it's a weapon, then

1:11:58

it's a weapon. It doesn't it doesn't matter

1:11:59

whether you just in your hands, you perceive it differently. If it's dangerous

1:12:02

in their hands, it's dangerous potentially in yours too. It's as simple as

1:12:04

that.

1:12:06

fact

1:12:07

that that she

1:12:09

expressed this concern

1:12:12

about their possibly

1:12:15

getting into the And going forward, Wyatt Reed

1:12:17

pointing

1:12:18

out, again, talking about the lies and

1:12:19

then this misrepresentations of the kind

1:12:22

of this part we're on right

1:12:24

now, he's

1:12:26

jokingly saying, it should be any day now

1:12:28

to them continually. I made a joke about

1:12:30

this already myself. Mark twenty

1:12:31

fifth, I think we'll see. We'll start at

1:12:34

the right one

1:12:35

right date here. January, October.

1:12:36

I think this is the

1:12:38

one. June eleventh twenty twenty two.

1:12:40

Russia's running

1:12:40

out of precision weapons.

1:12:42

Oh, wait. Maybe it's

1:12:44

not.

1:12:45

That is the one. Okay. March twenty fifth.

1:12:47

Russia running out oh, it is twenty twenty two. Okay. Right. Running out of

1:12:49

precision munitions and

1:12:52

Ukraine war. startling

1:12:54

Putin

1:12:54

is running out of missiles. UK

1:12:56

says May sixth, June eleventh, Russia is

1:12:59

running out of precision weapons.

1:13:01

October. Russia's running out of long range missile. I was

1:13:03

like, really, you'd think they'd ever run out by now. Right? I mean,

1:13:05

it's just it's just

1:13:08

talking points.

1:13:10

how was the corporate media reporting

1:13:13

that? What's their

1:13:14

fact? UK

1:13:15

says intelligence told

1:13:18

us, Somebody said, that's all they've got

1:13:20

anymore, and that's okay for them.

1:13:22

Think about what

1:13:23

that shows you though. They're lying to

1:13:25

you whether they know it

1:13:27

or not. because they want you to think that Russia's just on the edge

1:13:28

of losing. I don't even know why that translates

1:13:30

into some kind

1:13:30

of benefit to them, but, no, whatever,

1:13:33

it's it's very

1:13:35

clearly not true. Now here is

1:13:38

the real Here's the truth about how the the foreign policy perspective here.

1:13:40

Now it doesn't let's

1:13:41

just put it this way. It

1:13:43

doesn't matter whether

1:13:44

you believe

1:13:46

that what's happening in Ukraine is literally

1:13:49

everything that they're telling

1:13:50

you. Every bad

1:13:51

thing they've

1:13:53

argued. Which would mean

1:13:54

if there's war crimes being committed, and Russia should be held accountable. Sure. Fine. Let's just pretend that's the case for

1:13:57

the sake

1:14:00

of conversation. everything that

1:14:01

she talks about here

1:14:02

has to be also taken into consideration. So if you're gonna pretend that that's the case, then why

1:14:04

hasn't any of that happen

1:14:06

in the endless amount

1:14:07

of situations that

1:14:10

the US government's been involved in. Whether you thought they

1:14:12

were trying to do good or not, and tripped

1:14:14

the shoelaces and blew everything up. Right? This

1:14:16

wouldn't matter. Does it? because it ended

1:14:19

up the way it did. So why

1:14:20

does one matter and

1:14:22

one not? Yet again, Claire

1:14:23

Daily coming out with an outstandingly important

1:14:27

speech. States

1:14:27

sponsor of terrorism is a term of

1:14:29

US law. It doesn't exist in

1:14:31

EU law. But a Zelensky

1:14:33

adviser called for it in

1:14:35

the parliament magazine and here

1:14:37

we are again reporting for choosy. And all this will do is make peace harder to

1:14:40

achieve, excite

1:14:44

of course what the extremists

1:14:46

want.

1:14:46

No peace. No all fronts. All gracious burning

1:14:48

and Ukraine a permanent

1:14:51

abattoir

1:14:51

in a suicidal holy

1:14:54

crusade against Russia. So if

1:14:56

you want to start name and

1:14:58

state's sponsors of let's do it.

1:15:01

European sponsorship of Israeli terrorism in

1:15:03

Palestine, Western sponsorship of Saudi terror

1:15:07

in Yemen, ISIS product

1:15:09

of French, American, British, Turkish, and Gulf, sponsorship in Syria

1:15:11

and Iraq. Decades of

1:15:15

right wing US back terrorism

1:15:18

against the Cuban revolution, the contrast in Nicaragua, checkpoints in Guatemala

1:15:21

in El

1:15:24

Salvador. Remember, Vietnam,

1:15:26

Leos, Cambodia. Horr after horror,

1:15:27

terror after terror. There's nothing

1:15:30

constructive about the past

1:15:34

call in the kettle

1:15:35

black, would he ever hop on, start

1:15:37

champion and peace, and enter the war,

1:15:39

which is fatally in the

1:15:41

interests of EU,

1:15:43

Ukrainian, and Russian ending the war is.

1:15:45

Right? I mean, it the the the prop that

1:15:47

that's a that's a fraction

1:15:49

of the picture too. all of those things you

1:15:51

can look back on now. And the narrative now is is even

1:15:53

like a fraction of

1:15:54

the truth, but there's still the truth

1:15:57

that it was bad and people were killed and but you dig into it,

1:15:59

you find out that it was wildly intentional. And in

1:16:02

fact, many cases, they did it on purpose to

1:16:04

scare people and to cause

1:16:06

the I mean, it's these the actions were done, it's terrorism.

1:16:08

That's what the definition is regardless

1:16:10

of how

1:16:10

many times they try to change

1:16:12

it. It

1:16:12

is using violence to

1:16:15

achieve a political end.

1:16:17

That

1:16:17

is what they're doing

1:16:19

everywhere. Right? I mean, you can't deny that. So why were

1:16:21

those things

1:16:24

not addressed?

1:16:26

as

1:16:26

the UN calls for

1:16:27

action with Russia, I mean, despite the fact that in

1:16:30

this case, you can at least see on one side

1:16:32

of this that it was

1:16:34

driven to action. You're not gonna pretend that any other situation

1:16:36

drove them to illegally occupy

1:16:38

Afghanistan, drove them to illegally

1:16:41

occupy Iraq or Syria

1:16:43

or anything else. Oh, you

1:16:44

wanna talk about nine eleven? Don't even let's not

1:16:46

even pretend that that is even remotely what we think it is. Let's just watch the

1:16:48

documentary we just went over to

1:16:51

understand the lies around that.

1:16:53

to argue pretend we invade Afghanistan while convincing the American people, Iraq was involved. Like the truth of this is that none of these

1:16:56

justified. Anyway, I can go off

1:16:58

on this forever. The point about this

1:17:00

is

1:17:00

the

1:17:04

hypocrisy. Thank God, there's

1:17:04

people like Claire Daley that are willing to

1:17:06

stand up and say these things. Look at their faces.

1:17:08

Most of them are aware that

1:17:10

that's the reality, but just kind of like

1:17:12

upset she has

1:17:14

the

1:17:14

nerve to speak it out loud when they know they're not supposed to. But here is what government is

1:17:17

doing

1:17:18

using all of this.

1:17:21

Lawmakers in the United

1:17:23

States government seek emergency powers for the Pentagon's Ukraine war

1:17:27

contracting. Great.

1:17:28

Welcome to the age of emergency governance. Right? How long have

1:17:30

I been telling you that? So now because of something else over there, like, so

1:17:33

no, there this

1:17:35

is an emergency. how

1:17:37

exactly? How was this emergency for the US government? Of course, they'll use some abstract argument

1:17:39

that if we that

1:17:40

Russia will take

1:17:43

over the world

1:17:45

because

1:17:45

then you hear the the UK intelligence

1:17:48

tell us that's what Putin wants. Yeah, that's

1:17:49

all they got. The reality

1:17:51

is they're using the situation there

1:17:53

that they had a hand in creating to

1:17:55

justify that we're an emergency because of it, problem reacting solution. And guess They have

1:18:00

a solution. we'll

1:18:00

declare an emergency, and therefore, we'll circumvent

1:18:02

the control that we pretend we abide by around purchasing weapons.

1:18:06

Look

1:18:07

at that. Perfect.

1:18:08

even

1:18:09

though they never buy to buy them

1:18:11

anyway. Now it's just you know, they just remove any the

1:18:14

the illusion of the blocks. October seventeen. Bipartisan

1:18:15

legislation, of course. Right? Because legislation

1:18:17

of course right because The illusion

1:18:19

is clear when it comes to war and everything

1:18:21

else when you pay attention. Bipartisan

1:18:23

legislation introduced in the

1:18:25

Senate would grant the

1:18:28

Pentagon wartime procurement powers. So essentially, you

1:18:30

can argue with the declaration of war in another way, allowing it to buy massive

1:18:33

amounts, high

1:18:36

priority munitions, using multi year

1:18:38

contracts to help Ukraine, fight Russia, and of course, to refill your stock piles. You know, of course.

1:18:40

Weapon

1:18:44

sales. this is just a commitment

1:18:46

to exactly what we already told you is happening. They've already earmarked the money all the way to two thousand and thirty. I'll show you that

1:18:48

next.

1:18:52

an amendment to the annual defense authorization bill, of

1:18:54

course, because that's how these things are always slipped in there. It would let

1:18:59

the Pentagon lock in purchases of certain munitions made by Lockheed

1:19:01

Martin, Raytheon Technologies, you know, all the

1:19:03

merchants of death. They BAE

1:19:07

Systems and Kronzberg defense and aerospace over fiscal twenty twenty

1:19:09

three and twenty twenty four, a step

1:19:11

aimed at encouraging manufacturers because we know how

1:19:13

much the merchants of death need to be

1:19:15

encouraged to make weapons. Right? we

1:19:17

have to convince them, oh, please

1:19:20

make more bombs. Right? Encouraging manufacturers

1:19:22

to expand production lines for sought after

1:19:24

munitions. really, like we need

1:19:26

to coerce them into making more weapons. Really, this is how stupid they think we are. The point guys,

1:19:29

this is

1:19:32

already earmarked. This is the congressional

1:19:34

budget office. This is a lot more in here by the way,

1:19:35

but this is specifically Ukraine.

1:19:36

The whole page, by

1:19:38

fiscal year, millions of dollars.

1:19:40

i guess who you millions of dollars

1:19:42

And you can see that

1:19:43

twenty twenty three, they've already earmarked.

1:19:46

In this case, the Budget Authority

1:19:48

earmarked seven seven thousand

1:19:50

eight hundred and ten million

1:19:52

dollars someone else

1:19:52

to do the math in the chat and

1:19:55

let people know what that is. There's a lot. But estimated outlays for just twenty twenty three is

1:19:57

seventeen forty nine

1:19:59

million dollars and you can

1:20:02

see that the earmarks go all the way to twenty thirty. What a weird coincidence. million

1:20:04

what a weird coincidence

1:20:05

earmarked

1:20:06

in twenty thirty

1:20:08

But twenty twenty nine, they have two hundred

1:20:11

thirty three million. But you can go to twenty twenty six,

1:20:11

one thousand one hundred thirty million dollars earmarked for

1:20:13

twenty twenty

1:20:14

six for the the Ukraine conflict.

1:20:17

the ukraine conflict

1:20:18

So apparently, we're guaranteed to have this

1:20:20

going until two thousand and

1:20:21

thirty if you trust their earmarks just like

1:20:23

we

1:20:24

can look at the EU passports situation,

1:20:26

how they argue that this would be happening exactly

1:20:28

right now five to

1:20:29

six years ago, guess they were

1:20:32

just psychic. the point

1:20:34

remains, it's already decided. This is just them now making re justifying

1:20:36

that spending in twenty twenty three and

1:20:38

twenty twenty four at the very least.

1:20:43

The Pentagon would also be permitted to tee up with NATO to

1:20:45

buy weapons for its members and

1:20:47

mass quantities. Oh,

1:20:50

great. So now, Pentagon's gonna be buying weapons

1:20:52

for NATO. There's your world military. I

1:20:54

would

1:20:54

say that for a long time.

1:20:56

And for Ukraine related contracts,

1:20:58

the legislation

1:20:59

would ease several key legal restrictions because

1:21:01

that's what we all call for. Right? Please ease the restrictions

1:21:03

on military spending. God, isn't

1:21:05

that what every American

1:21:08

calls for? On the Pentagon

1:21:10

procurement through fiscal twenty twenty four, a signed lawmaker see the war dragging on. Yeah. Are

1:21:12

we really even pretending that this is not

1:21:14

the case? I just showed you the spending.

1:21:18

They they want this to carry on forever. Even

1:21:20

foreign policy we we talked about was

1:21:22

writing about this before it started. It's

1:21:25

meant to be a Gagmire for Russia.

1:21:27

Just like

1:21:27

it, they've planned in Afghanistan with them. Who's your den? It's

1:21:29

the same thing. It's written

1:21:30

in their documentation, and yet

1:21:33

somehow Fox CNN

1:21:35

can't rasp that. The

1:21:36

intent of the legislation is to spur the Pentagon and

1:21:38

industry to move more aggressively because that's what we all want.

1:21:40

I mean, my

1:21:42

god. This is like everybody Americans

1:21:45

calling for more war, more weapons,

1:21:47

and more industrially, that's not what anybody wants.

1:21:52

for the

1:21:52

move to move they want them to

1:21:54

move more aggressively by removing bureaucratic barriers. Don't you love that? You know, the

1:21:56

red tape that ties up everything you do

1:21:58

in every part of your life, except

1:22:01

they remove it for the war. You know,

1:22:03

red the But forbid, you

1:22:06

try to, you know,

1:22:08

do something barely outside the norm in any situation in your life and

1:22:10

you get all tied up. Try I mean, go to Canada and try to

1:22:12

open a business these days or build a building. It

1:22:15

could take you forty five years if

1:22:18

you're not with one of these groups. With an eye

1:22:20

not only on Russia but for

1:22:22

potential for a confrontation with

1:22:26

China over Taiwan. according to a senior congressional aide

1:22:28

who spoke to the defense

1:22:30

news on the condition of anonymity.

1:22:34

So

1:22:34

they're blatantly telling you we are increasing,

1:22:36

we are removing the blockages in

1:22:38

the red tape,

1:22:39

basically declaring an

1:22:42

emergency, so the so NATO and the US government, the

1:22:44

Pentagon, can rapidly buy weapons without

1:22:46

red tape and urugide barriers because

1:22:49

we're

1:22:51

warm China. That's coming. Why isn't I

1:22:53

mean, this is the kind of stuff that is telling you

1:22:55

what they're doing. So we're

1:22:55

gonna create this problem with China.

1:22:57

Oh, don't forget. We're already we're

1:22:59

talking about making Taiwan

1:23:01

develop weapons there. So China can get upset about that and we can blame them for actions that

1:23:03

we take. Whether you

1:23:06

want to call it

1:23:08

wartime contracting or

1:23:10

emergency contracting, we can't play around anymore. Don't miss how important that statement

1:23:12

is. They're

1:23:14

admitting to you right

1:23:16

there. I

1:23:18

don't care, call it war, call it

1:23:20

an emergency, but we're going there. We can't

1:23:21

mess around anymore. Great. So we're at war.

1:23:23

Are we gonna

1:23:23

pretend we're not?

1:23:26

If the

1:23:27

language becomes law, the Department of Defense would be

1:23:29

allowed to make non competitive awards

1:23:31

to arms manufacturers for

1:23:32

Ukraine related contracts.

1:23:35

It's all about

1:23:36

that. Now, interested in the

1:23:38

chat, give

1:23:39

me non competitive awards.

1:23:43

would seem to

1:23:43

suggest that there's no bidding. Right?

1:23:46

So, essentially, these

1:23:46

are people

1:23:47

these the the people in

1:23:50

the right positions that have the right powerful

1:23:52

friends will get the

1:23:54

right contracts. That's what it says

1:23:56

to me. The in half REIT amendment would also grant

1:23:58

special emergency procurement authorities reserved for

1:23:59

contingency preparations and

1:24:03

wave a requirement that contractors provide

1:24:04

certified costs and pricing data.

1:24:07

Great. So we're also gonna get

1:24:09

screwed for

1:24:09

it too, the American taxpayer. a safeguard

1:24:11

intended to help ensure the Pentagon is paying reasonable

1:24:14

prices. That's not what that sounds

1:24:17

like

1:24:18

to me. a require so

1:24:19

you're going to waive a requirement that contractors

1:24:22

provide certified costs and pricing data,

1:24:24

so the information about how

1:24:26

much it costs and certifying it.

1:24:28

And that's a safeguard to ensure that

1:24:30

we don't pay too much? Okay. It's the Patriot Act as we remove Patriot or,

1:24:35

you know, it's the opposite, it seems to me that that will play

1:24:37

out. I guess, maybe I'm wrong.

1:24:39

That was it. The

1:24:41

bottom line is,

1:24:43

this is them creating

1:24:45

the war emergency, which is we've had

1:24:46

that before, but

1:24:47

it's welcome to the age of

1:24:49

emergency governance. So

1:24:49

this is gonna drive you in a direction

1:24:51

that they want based

1:24:54

on arguments they make that are not rooted in

1:24:56

reality in my

1:24:57

opinion. I mean, look, what more

1:24:59

are you to see when they already

1:25:01

tell you that they're they're planning the

1:25:03

funding to go all the way to two thousand and thirty, and

1:25:05

then it just stops. So what

1:25:06

happens to two thousand and thirty? Apparently everything.

1:25:08

earlier

1:25:09

Here

1:25:12

here the no

1:25:13

cold war account shares.

1:25:16

I'm not familiar with this other than this

1:25:18

tweet. Let me follow them and look for

1:25:20

more. They say the chief

1:25:22

of US naval operations said yesterday, and this was on the twentieth it was yesterday, that the United

1:25:24

States has to be prepared to

1:25:26

go to war with China over Taiwan.

1:25:31

You see, they're laying

1:25:31

this groundwork. Why? Why

1:25:33

exactly

1:25:34

is that

1:25:35

do

1:25:36

Americans want

1:25:38

that? Look,

1:25:38

as I've said before, I will always stand by the idea

1:25:40

that any group should be allowed to declare their

1:25:42

independence from an authoritarian force or any

1:25:45

force or any governor for that matter. you know,

1:25:47

exactly the opposite of what the US would allow anywhere

1:25:49

they don't want it to happen, like

1:25:51