0:01

Welcome to the Daily Wrap

0:03

Up, a concise show dedicated

0:05

to bringing you the most

0:07

relevant, independent

0:26

news as we see it from the

0:28

last 24 hours. Thursday,

0:33

November 30th, 2023. Thank

0:36

you for joining me today. I have an important

0:38

discussion about some developments in regard

0:40

to, in really, really just

0:43

kind of the way this has developed the

0:45

entire time. How from the very beginning, there's

0:47

been a narrative that was set. And interestingly

0:49

enough, it reminds me of sort of the

0:51

beginning of the COVID-19 timeframe where

0:54

Donald Trump and his administration, as we

0:56

seem to commonly see in the US

0:58

government, grabbed the microphone, set

1:01

the narrative, told us what we were supposed

1:03

to think. And now we can look back

1:05

and see that the vast majority of that was in fact

1:07

not what we were supposed to think. And

1:09

even people that were still supporting of Trump and

1:11

still supporting of the Republican side still can't seem

1:13

to kind of understand what that looked like. Some

1:15

people anyway. But we saw the same thing in

1:18

this conversation in regard to how, you

1:20

know, this all started with October 7th. This

1:22

is Israel's 9-11, atrocity propaganda, just all the

1:24

things that were laid out really aggressively right

1:26

in the beginning. And all of the Western

1:28

media towed those lines and it all just

1:30

pushed forward. And now only, you know, after

1:32

the fog of war, the fog of breaking

1:34

news, all the terms they use to hide

1:36

the fact that they're just wrong all the

1:38

time. We're looking

1:40

back at very quickly and seeing we were lied to

1:42

about a lot of this stuff, but the

1:45

same people want you to push past it and go, how

1:47

dare you look back there? Look at what we're pointing at

1:49

now. Well, the truth is that

1:51

most of what's been pushed forward has been dishonest,

1:53

if not blatantly misrepresented

1:57

lies. So today what we're going to

1:59

talk about is a really important. article that

2:01

is sourced incredibly well to

2:04

intelligence, IDF, people

2:06

in the know in the Israeli military

2:08

and the government apparatus telling you, telling

2:10

anybody that will listen, that what

2:12

they're doing in Gaza is not just pinpoint targeting

2:15

Hamas, but like we even need to be convinced

2:17

of that, destruction, not accuracy,

2:20

but that they're now discussing that this is not new

2:22

post-October 7. This is something that's been

2:24

ongoing, the way that they understand

2:26

the civilian casualties, decide what is

2:29

an acceptable amount, even bombing

2:31

buildings just to bomb buildings in order to

2:33

scare or kill civilian populations into doing what

2:35

they want them to do. And in many

2:38

cases that is in regard to Hamas,

2:41

that we want to murder their families so they know

2:43

that they want, you know, that they decide not to

2:45

help these groups. My point in talking

2:47

about this today is not just to say that

2:49

this is a crime, obviously these are crimes,

2:51

but to show you the intense nature, the

2:54

malicious, vicious, sinister nature of the

2:56

Zionist entity and what they are

2:58

carrying out against innocent people. And

3:00

understand that even if you think like

3:03

the Donald Trump conversation about how we're going to go

3:05

after their families, it's some contorted, backward,

3:07

broken reason you think that makes sense, that's up

3:10

for you to decide. Obviously

3:12

from a moral perspective that's detestable

3:14

and disgusting, but either way, the

3:17

point is that these are people that they claim

3:19

are connected, that they

3:22

allege are their family or that they're connected

3:24

or that they live in the same building

3:26

of, or they passed in one day on

3:28

the street. I mean that's how dumb this

3:30

gets, how abstract. But

3:33

even worse, these things aren't even verified. They

3:35

state these things in the high-minded journals of

3:38

the New York Times and Washington Post will

3:40

just say, well, this is what was reported.

3:43

Interestingly enough, when you get conversations from pretty

3:45

much any adversary area, you

3:47

obviously get something very different. So

3:49

we're going to talk about this really important article, which is the

3:52

earliest part of the show today. We're going

3:54

to then go on to talk about the shifting narrative

3:56

as we continue to see people like the Pope even

3:58

standing up and saying this is not the case. not

4:00

war, this is terrorism. In no

4:02

way does that mean I support and

4:04

believe in the Pope or even the

4:07

organized religious aspects of this despite being

4:09

a Christian. I'm very concerned about many

4:12

number of different, any number of different things

4:14

in regard to organized religion in particular, but

4:17

not least of which are the connections

4:19

and actions through this Pope and many

4:21

others that have ignored and covered up

4:23

outright, obfuscated or

4:26

covered up, pedophilia,

4:29

sexual abuse. Anyway, the point is any of these people,

4:31

just because we say, look at what they're saying, does

4:33

not then mean that we blindly believe in them or

4:35

think that they're always telling the truth. The fact that

4:38

we don't have to say that these days is just

4:40

a sense of, it shows you how bad of a way we're in,

4:43

but then we're also gonna get into some

4:45

very, very interesting developments in regard to new

4:47

settlements, which we already told you were coming.

4:50

The idea that before even October 7th, they

4:52

were saying, we're gonna build more illegal settlements.

4:55

Of course, they don't call them illegal, but

4:57

they are, no way you can

4:59

get away from that. Even the United States, the

5:01

White House said, don't do that, they're illegal, but

5:03

nobody ever does anything about it. But

5:05

now they're building a new one. Now there was a little

5:07

bit of confusion about where this was. It appears

5:10

to be in the Gaza envelope,

5:12

which is just basically along

5:14

the outskirts of this controlled area of

5:16

Gaza. The point is that it's

5:18

illegal. And while this is ongoing,

5:21

they're still building more settlements. It just shows

5:23

you the reality of what this is. It's

5:25

the colonial settler project that it is, which

5:28

we're all supposed to acknowledge as somehow

5:30

archaic and old and bad, except when

5:32

Israel does it, then it's democracy and

5:34

freedom. But we're also gonna

5:36

get into the difference of opinion coming

5:38

from Israel around these projects and how

5:40

from a US perspective, it's all good

5:42

and positive and freedom, but most Israelis

5:44

disagree, even though we're being told

5:46

that we're fighting for them. No, you're

5:49

actually fighting for the Zionist agenda through

5:51

the US government, but we're gonna get

5:53

into finally a real big point about

5:55

the misinformation. Some really

5:57

good catches, one from DDG geopolitics. catching

6:00

one of these Hasbarah propagandists on

6:03

Twitter accidentally using the wrong

6:05

account when responding to Netanyahu as if he was

6:07

from some kind of Indian side of the argument,

6:09

but he caught himself. And it's very, very important

6:11

to see this, as well as all the many

6:14

different examples of lies. Just

6:16

people like Eli David yet again just

6:18

blatantly misrepresenting what a crowd is saying

6:20

in Arabic. And when you can

6:22

easily prove that they're not saying, but they just don't care.

6:26

That's desperation for you. Knowing that there's millions

6:28

of Arabic-speaking people around the world, they're going

6:30

to say, well, that's not true. That's not

6:32

even remotely. Here's a camera calendar. Here are

6:34

your names. Same game. They

6:36

know people will see it. I guess they just don't care.

6:40

But important stuff will

6:42

pass this conversation. Some ceasefire things, hostages,

6:44

and so on. But if we have

6:46

time, we'll see what we get to. Let's

6:48

start today with

6:51

an important kind of peripheral – a

6:55

couple of points in regard to some

6:57

foreign policy stuff that connect with the larger point,

6:59

but one just because everyone's talking about it in

7:01

general. As

7:04

I tweeted when this first was – I

7:06

saw this yesterday when Kissinger has died.

7:08

I said, well, hey, finally, we get some

7:11

good news, right? Which

7:13

I'm usually not the one to do that because as

7:15

much as – I've said many times as much as Biden,

7:19

for example, I've said before,

7:21

where you watch him in one of

7:23

his senile moments and just a compassionate

7:25

human moment, I go, oh, that's sad.

7:28

But then immediately go, oh, but wait. He's a terrible war

7:30

criminal, so I don't think we should care. You're

7:34

allowed to have compassion even for your

7:36

enemies. It's the two-party paradigm and the

7:38

politics and that stuff that keeps us

7:40

from pretending it's like the right-wing manly

7:42

only drink beer and eat meat. There's

7:46

very few of that kind of extreme side of

7:48

it. Most people can find things in different –

7:50

you can be a manly man without all those

7:52

things. It's the way politics

7:54

works the way we see the world. At

7:57

this point, of course, you can have compassion

7:59

for your enemies. while still seeing them as enemies

8:01

while still holding them into account. In

8:03

my point saying that this person, I quite frankly,

8:05

I don't think I have compassion for Kissinger, but

8:07

the point is still the same. Is

8:11

it just a horrendous war criminal? And

8:14

just like we see with everyone, McCain

8:16

or anybody else, we see the tour

8:19

of, oh, he was such a wonderful person. He

8:21

did so much good for humanity. You know, all

8:23

the rest of the war criminals telling you what

8:25

a great not war criminal he was, because when

8:27

they die, they want those other war criminals to

8:29

say he was a great humanitarian and he did

8:31

it all for the people. Never

8:33

true. But I wanted to read this

8:35

for you. Red,

8:37

uh, red, I'm not familiar with the work. I

8:39

just saw this on Twitter. Red,

8:41

uh, scream net looks

8:44

like Henry Kissinger, one of

8:46

the world's most notorious war criminals has finally

8:48

died. Let's take a look back at the,

8:50

remember him for all the things he did. Cause you're

8:52

going to find these in the exact opposite light. So

8:54

I thought that was humorous that it's going to be

8:56

all of the wonderful things. And look, I'm not going

8:58

to say that you can't find something that you can

9:00

objectively say was a positive end for somebody or even

9:02

America. But at the end of the day, we're looking

9:05

at the full body of work of any of these people. They

9:07

have been complicit in and absolutely

9:09

accountable for some of the worst atrocities

9:11

that you can possibly think of right

9:14

now. There's just no way you

9:16

wipe that out by doing something else. Now

9:18

it says orchestrated the military coup in

9:21

Chile. And these were some of the

9:23

worst oppressive dictator. Like this is, we've

9:25

had a lot of conversations about the

9:27

different self-American people, the Pinochet's and the

9:29

different really, really, really bad. Cause

9:32

where I was going with that, but my mind jumps to the

9:34

current point today. The

9:37

Al-Musra, the High Terrell Shams, the

9:39

Saudi Arabia, the groups that

9:41

they continue to support that are the worst. Anyway,

9:43

the point is this is the person we're talking

9:46

about. This is a Pinochet dictatorship

9:48

in Chile. Tens of thousands of people forcibly

9:50

displaced, executed their children stolen, given away under

9:52

false idea. Yep. That's, that's what the U

9:54

S government supported. Gave the green light to

9:57

the Argentine and dictatorships to murderous crackdowns, which

9:59

saw thousands. His thousands kidnapped, tortured, and killed,

10:02

told General Suharto, quote, it

10:04

is important that whatever you do succeeds

10:07

quickly. Right before the Indonesian army

10:10

murdered at least a quarter of a million Timorese

10:12

during the illegal Indonesian occupation.

10:16

It shouldn't surprise you these days to be able to

10:18

look back and go, oh, all those terrible things we

10:20

were told about, turns out the U.S. government was involved.

10:22

Shocking. Sabotage Vietnamese

10:24

peace talks for his own political gain,

10:26

expanded the war in Laos and Cambodia,

10:28

advocated for the bombing of anything that

10:31

moves, estimated two million Vietnamese dead. Carpet

10:34

bombed Cambodia, which some of those are some

10:36

of the most horrific images, right? The

10:38

images you've seen that have just permeated through time.

10:42

Some of those, I think that's that really

10:44

famous one of the young girl naked running

10:46

through the street, right? These are, it's just,

10:48

it's amazing that we talk about these things

10:50

in school and lectures. Rarely

10:52

do these things come up. Who's

10:54

involved in why and who allowed it and who

10:57

funded the worst people that drove it into reality.

10:59

And then finally, the really one point I wanted

11:01

to say, people will debate all day long about

11:03

who was involved and what they did and why,

11:05

all the law. This you can't deny.

11:08

Public record. He said openly. Well,

11:12

technically it was made. This is a

11:14

real statement, put it that way. But

11:16

there's a lot of stuff today that wasn't, I think at

11:18

the time was not, they did not think

11:20

this would become public knowledge. He said,

11:23

quote, the illegal we do immediately, the unconstitutional

11:25

takes a little bit longer. Yeah,

11:28

guys, that's not just Kissinger, you understand. This

11:30

is the illegal, constitutional.

11:33

These are things that they use against you. Now,

11:35

I don't mean that in the sense that the

11:37

Constitution is something that's only used against people. The

11:40

point is they don't care about those things, but they

11:42

will happily pretend something is unconstitutional when they want to

11:44

use that. Or stop it from happening or blah, blah,

11:46

blah. They don't care about those things. That's

11:49

the point. That's the point. The illegal we

11:51

do right away because we don't care about the laws. The

11:53

unconstitutional, well, that takes a little longer, but we also

11:55

violate that is the point. Rest

12:02

in, you know, not

12:04

peace. Now, look,

12:07

this is another point I thought was important, just

12:09

interesting how people are almost

12:11

kind of pushing away from the Ukraine, that discussion and

12:13

going, oh, well, it's time to wrap that one up

12:16

now that we're completely invested over here. And we don't

12:18

talk about that anymore with no

12:20

metrics met, no changes, no like stopping bad

12:22

guy, Putin. Just let's just pull away from it

12:24

and say, oh, we did our best. It's

12:27

just it's just so comically stupid

12:30

how the how these people who I

12:32

don't even think are aware of themselves. They think this

12:34

is just what we're doing. Like they

12:36

really think they look at themselves in the mirror and think

12:38

they're fighting the best fight and they're out there doing

12:40

the right thing. And they can't stand

12:42

back and go embarrassed that they

12:44

would scream that everything everywhere must marshal

12:47

to make this stop and oh, wait, not now

12:49

this one. Now, we just don't

12:51

talk about that. Oh, let's wrap that one up. Like, I

12:53

don't think they really recognize how dumb that is. Like, I

12:55

think that these are the people that have been allowed to

12:57

think that they're that smart and they're not really that smart.

13:00

I mean, quite frankly, I'm watching these people talk and we'll

13:02

go through some of the videos today. I'm just blown away

13:04

by these people in the

13:06

highest positions of punditry. And if that's

13:08

even how you say that or or

13:10

news media or politicians and just

13:12

listen to the talk. Here's

13:15

Morgan, for example, these people you're going these people

13:17

aren't even that smart like these

13:19

are a collection of the most

13:21

petty, mindless, broad stroking

13:24

of giant hypocritical people I've ever seen

13:26

in my life. And they're all brand

13:28

berated around as if they're the smartest, most intelligent

13:30

people that know all the it kills me.

13:33

I'm not necessarily saying I'm that smart, but I'm sure it's

13:35

all smart enough to see that they're not that smart. Now,

13:38

the point here. That

13:40

all came from the point about people still pushing Ukraine. Look

13:42

at back to this, Ryan, quit quit going off on your

13:44

tangents. Lewis de Cruz, who I'm

13:46

not familiar with, but somebody, I guess, posted this

13:48

thing, I guess, in surprise that I was calling

13:50

him out, I guess, which I kind of did

13:52

because he was caught lying, in my opinion. I'll

13:55

make that clear point in a second. But here's what he said. This

13:58

slava Ukrainian. All

14:00

these different statements. He says

14:02

the defaming of Zelensky has

14:04

gone up considerably. Right,

14:07

it's not hard to defame an open, you know,

14:09

the leader of an open neo-nazi element that has

14:11

been conducting ethnic cleansing for a long time, who

14:14

is completely, you know, why we can get in

14:16

all the tangential points about drug use, whatever else

14:18

the guy is not somebody we should be looking

14:20

up to. But he says this, the man's a

14:22

hero. He says he's even losing the eyesight. Oh,

14:25

because he's got his glasses on. He's so

14:27

important. Still wearing that same old dumb green

14:29

shirt that he always wears from stress, apparently,

14:32

and maybe stressed because he thinks he might

14:34

be assassinated by the US because he's lost

14:36

importance to them and being without natural daylight

14:38

so much. I

14:40

guess because you just know he's, you know, these

14:43

people act like they know what's going on. Those

14:45

who criticize him would have ran had they been

14:47

in the same position because we know, right? You

14:49

just know that anybody else would have run because

14:51

I'm, I'm, I guess, psychic. The man's own generation's

14:54

Winston Churchill, or

14:56

our, excuse me, the man's our generation's Winston Churchill. That's

14:58

what he says. To some

15:01

people, that means a big important thing. Oh, man, Winston

15:03

Churchill was praised and important, you know, other than the

15:05

fact that he was an unbridled, disgusting

15:07

racist and a very, very terrible person as well

15:09

that did horrible things to people around the world

15:12

and the guys that Britain needed to do what

15:14

they needed to do. Even if you think that

15:16

was in the benefit of Brit, British people, it

15:18

was absolutely, openly at the expense of literally anybody

15:20

else. But you know, he's the greatest in our

15:23

history. The point is

15:25

that this man being compared to somebody that

15:28

at the very least we pretend was a

15:30

great hero in our history. I mean, it's

15:32

not only insulting to that illusion,

15:34

which I don't think is real. It's, it's

15:37

incredible to pretend after the failed

15:39

effort and the absolute

15:41

implosion of what they were trying

15:43

to accomplish and the lies and egregious

15:45

actions and torture and murder and

15:47

rape and everything else that happened. And

15:51

then pretend that he's our this generation's

15:53

Winston Churchill. It's just like, this

15:56

is the clumsy area. This is how

15:58

bad everything has gotten. Now, the reason

16:00

I wanted to point that out is just to show you how

16:02

desperate this all is. And how the

16:05

worst people in the world right now, I

16:07

mean like objectively in my opinion, are

16:10

all being framed as like the heroes of our time

16:12

by the other worst people in the world that are

16:14

funding them and supporting them. And people

16:16

see through it. At least that's what I

16:18

think. Tell me what

16:20

you think, especially if you think I'm wrong. Quite

16:22

frankly, I think it's plainly evident that people see

16:25

through this right now. But

16:27

this person, actually

16:29

we just talked about this guy

16:31

specifically, and this video

16:36

done by Owen Jones in this show

16:38

yesterday, entitled October 7th Narrative

16:40

Further Collapses and the Secret U.S. Plan

16:42

to Forcibly Displace All of Palestine. And

16:46

we talked about, one of

16:48

the most important ones early on this was

16:50

that this screening, this person was part of

16:52

a screening of the supposed special screening from

16:54

the IDF. And what did he

16:57

say? And you can listen to him over

16:59

in depth yesterday. He said there's no proof of

17:01

beheaded babies, no proof of Hamas killing children, no

17:03

proof of rape, no proof of beheading humans alive.

17:05

Hamas asked Israeli partygoers if they were soldiers or

17:07

civilians. That

17:10

doesn't line up with what we're told, does it? Why

17:12

would you ask them whether they were soldiers if you were

17:14

just murdering everybody there? Because we know that's not what happened

17:17

anymore. And I'm not saying that means

17:19

that we, it's just as likely

17:21

that Hamas killed an individual of

17:23

their own accord as any Israeli IDF would

17:26

have. But what we need to

17:28

understand is from a whole level, it's very

17:30

clear that the blunt, all-encompassing narrative they spun

17:32

in the beginning is just not true. Especially

17:34

since we know the IDF 100% killed their

17:36

own people to some degree.

17:39

It's starting to seem like the majority, quite frankly.

17:41

And that's per their people, mind you. They're not

17:44

going to hear that in CNN and Fox News,

17:46

but they're screaming it in Israel right now. Just

17:48

look at Israeli media. Even they're

17:50

talking about it. They're trying to bring down herets right now because

17:52

they keep saying things they don't want you to hear. Like the

17:55

helicopter people shot their own people. That was a

17:57

recent article. They got upset about that. The

18:00

point is that this screening exposed something. One,

18:03

that he says, I didn't see any of

18:05

this. He called US

18:07

journalists that were there and they said, I didn't see that

18:09

either. He called the journalists from Britain. They didn't

18:11

see that either. But this

18:14

person and some others were saying, I

18:16

saw it all. They said, I

18:18

saw a video of a woman

18:21

getting cut open with her baby being taken out. And

18:23

I can't take it. I need to take a break

18:25

from the Internet, but I'll come back and post it,

18:27

I promise. Despite the fact that this was today and

18:29

he still hasn't posted it. Not on the website, not

18:31

on his Twitter account. And this person

18:34

still says, I didn't see any

18:36

of that. So that's

18:38

what they mean by exposed. I don't know who the person

18:40

is, but quite frankly, why these people would lie about that?

18:43

Or how about in reverse? Why he

18:45

would tell the truth and literally everybody else would

18:48

say, I didn't see that. Obviously, one

18:50

of those seems far more likely. Well,

18:52

you can decide for yourself. I

18:54

think that's important. And I just want to show

18:57

you interestingly enough, the same person that I think

18:59

is blatantly lying for the Zionist agenda is also

19:01

pretending that Zelensky is this generation's Winston Churchill. So

19:03

now you see how that comes together. Obviously,

19:06

there is something fishy going on when it comes to

19:08

all of these wars and the government's pushing them. Now,

19:12

opening this up into what's currently happening to kind of

19:14

start there before we get into the main article that

19:16

I want to get into today. Mohammed

19:19

Shihada points out, and this is the same

19:21

things I'm confirming from people, whether it's Robert

19:23

and people he knows on the ground or

19:25

anybody else, that what we're told even through

19:27

the supposed ceasefire, which is not even remotely

19:29

what it was, it is just not happening.

19:31

Now, why Hamas in that sense is not

19:33

pointing that out as far as I can

19:35

tell, not to call it claiming that they

19:37

violated the ceasefire by not doing what they

19:39

claim they would is up for

19:42

you to decide. I honestly think

19:44

it's because Hamas doesn't necessarily need them to

19:46

meet their end of their bargain, strictly

19:49

from a political sense, because you can point

19:51

out that Israel hurting their

19:53

– killing the hostages while they're

19:55

there, well, that benefits Hamas, because then

19:58

they can point it out and say Israel did this. It

20:00

doesn't mean that they would do it intentionally, but it could put

20:03

them in harm's way, I mean. I

20:05

don't put anything past these people. They are not. Remember,

20:07

this comes from the same entities that are doing this.

20:09

Israel, the United States, funding, arming, and using this group

20:12

for a very long time. I'll end with a clip

20:14

like about that that we've talked about many times. But

20:18

what's interesting is

20:20

if they'd stood up and said, look, they did not put

20:22

the aid in like they said they did. They did. They've

20:25

been shooting people in the West Bank that they claim are

20:27

Hamas, but we're supposed to be at a ceasefire. Like if

20:29

they would have said this, they could have argued Israel did

20:31

not meet its demands. But then

20:33

I would be willing to bet you Israel would argue

20:35

something else and say they did this first. And

20:38

then all of the West would say Israel claimed they broke

20:40

the ceasefire. Wow, this has gone in the past. So

20:43

I think it behooves Hamas, no matter what

20:45

Israel does, to wait and let Israel make

20:47

the argument of the initiator of the breaking

20:50

of it. Just an overview thought. So my

20:52

point is they're saying they spoke with five

20:54

people in different parts of South and Northern

20:56

Gaza. Seven days of ceasefire didn't change much.

20:59

Zero electricity. Shops totally empty. Immense

21:02

difficulty getting even brackish

21:04

water, which in many cases makes

21:06

you sick. Hours-long queues just to

21:08

get bread or plain rice. Rubble

21:11

everywhere. Full societal collapse. Now,

21:13

obviously, not everything was in the agreement, but

21:15

at the very least it was

21:18

unfettered access to aid. That's

21:22

never been the case. Not only did Israel

21:24

in their own statements make the – they

21:26

never even used the same terminology. They just

21:28

said substantial aid. Well,

21:31

to them that means a very different thing, doesn't it? And

21:33

we're seeing that as they bring in a

21:36

single percentile of what they actually need throughout the

21:38

day. Now,

21:42

Sam McSaney also points out some very interesting shifts in

21:44

all of this. One

21:46

in particular that I've also noticed as well

21:48

as this discussion here about the

21:50

Hamas ISIS. All these different terms.

21:52

That's why one of the reasons I started with the opening about the

21:54

narrative. That

21:57

is, they're shifting now. They're

21:59

explanations. their justifications, day

22:02

by day they change. Like,

22:05

let's not forget in the very beginning the point was, well,

22:07

we can't show you all the evidence because it would get

22:09

censored and then we don't want that even though they've never

22:11

stopped showing you all these terrible images. So then why did

22:14

you still not share the image? Because they never had images

22:16

of 40-bedded babies because it's not real. But

22:18

that's what they said. Don't forget, Israel's main account made

22:20

that case. We'd show it to you, but

22:22

we just can't. It's not true. They've

22:25

been caught egregiously lying, verifiably

22:27

so. Many times. Now,

22:30

he says, Blinken has shifted his language

22:32

from right to defend Israel to

22:35

right to protect itself. Now,

22:37

this is a very important and I think

22:39

a very, very obvious shift. It

22:42

says, the United States support for Israel's

22:44

right to protect itself from terrorist violence

22:47

is in

22:50

compliance with international humanitarian law. It's not. That's

22:52

just a dumb statement. It's like saying, the

22:54

murder of that man was in compliance with

22:56

the law. Well, it obviously wasn't because

22:58

you murdered him. So that's a lie. Just saying

23:00

that does not change the fact that you're murdering

23:02

children in plain sight more than we've ever seen

23:04

in any time frame this small and this small

23:06

of an area in history. But we're

23:09

trying though. That's the more

23:11

we're going to get into to start is the reality

23:13

that they're not trying. And it's now been openly admitted

23:15

by the IDF. But

23:17

it says, this may or may not be meaningful. I

23:19

do think it is. This is what Sam says. Maybe

23:21

posturing for release of more captives or such, but

23:24

noteworthy. My opinion is that they don't want these people back.

23:27

Now that seems like a harsh opinion to some people, but

23:29

I think their actions have made that abundantly clear. And we're

23:31

going to get into that early about the Bebas family, which

23:34

I told you, I saw this coming. Now

23:37

they're claiming that that's a

23:39

demand. And Hamas is saying, as they've

23:42

said earlier, by the way, that that's a family that was

23:44

killed because of the bombings. Now

23:46

they could be lying, of course. But

23:48

it's interesting how this is developing because we know

23:50

that they have been indiscriminately bombing. And

23:52

of course, Hamas could have killed them in

23:55

order to make it look like Israel did it. Always

23:59

possible. My point though is that people

24:01

that will blindly take a face value what Israel

24:03

says without any evidence and then even

24:05

ignore what Palestine says or Gaza or Hamas says

24:08

with some evidence or none for that matter,

24:11

but a One-sided perspective

24:14

we have to acknowledge that it's sort of like

24:16

saying you see a video from somebody that you know Of

24:19

a hostage says one thing and you go

24:21

that's not true. They lied about X Y & Z or they're

24:23

misrepresenting that But then when Israel puts one out

24:25

you blindly take it at face value, right? Obviously,

24:27

we can all see that that's a one-sided thing. You should be

24:29

questioning all of it, shouldn't you? But

24:33

here's what it says in the State

24:35

Department post Secretary Blinken's meeting with Israeli

24:37

Prime Minister Netanyahu on the 30th today

24:40

The secretary reaffirmed the United States support

24:42

for Israel's right to protect itself from

24:45

terrorist violence now again The reason that's

24:47

important the right to defend yourself was

24:49

the entire point from the very beginning You know how

24:51

many times we heard that we all know It's

24:54

like build back better and all that if

24:56

they will in lockstep Everybody

24:58

every media apparatus every person across the board. They

25:01

have the right to defend themselves They have right

25:03

to defend themselves that was just endless and

25:06

all of a sudden it wins quiet now They're saying something

25:08

very different. Why? Well, first of

25:10

all because the right to defend yourself is

25:12

absurdly redundant Seeing as how literally everybody in

25:14

a general sense has the right to defend

25:16

themselves So what you wanted it was us

25:18

to in brain ingrained that in anything they

25:20

do as you murder a child in plain

25:22

day You go right to defend ourselves

25:27

But also It came into

25:29

the understanding and they didn't they I think didn't expect

25:31

this kind of Transparency or rather a

25:34

growing awareness of the reality that

25:36

they're occupying this area Therefore they forego

25:38

the right to self-defense Especially

25:40

with the idea that they are made they

25:42

are not respecting the rights of the people

25:44

as the belligerent occupier point Of

25:47

the civilians that they are occupying So in

25:49

any stretch of imagination under international law human

25:52

rights anything according to all the experts They

25:54

literally do not have this right so they

25:56

shift the term Because

25:58

how can you claim they don't have the right? protect themselves. But you

26:01

see, this also gets really insulting. Explain

26:03

for me how 50 plus days

26:05

of indiscriminate bombing is protecting yourself.

26:08

And you'll see even more, even more so how they

26:10

know that's not the case. People like Blinken and Biden

26:14

are either allowing

26:16

this open unbridled murder for

26:18

their agenda or, I mean,

26:21

I don't know how you want to spin this. They're

26:23

aware they're killing people. And

26:25

then creating terms and

26:27

narratives to make sure you don't think

26:29

that. Then behind the scenes, even getting

26:31

caught with leaked information going, yeah, stop

26:33

killing children. So they know what's happening. They're

26:36

even asking them, at least as the leaks are told,

26:38

maybe that's a lie too, to stop

26:40

doing it. But then they come out to you, Sam

26:42

Hussein, he asked them in public and they go, no,

26:44

no, they're in complete line with international law. Well,

26:47

we all go, well, we know that's not what you think.

26:50

Like, it's just this really stupid game where the only people

26:52

that defend what we're being told is people in the left,

26:54

right paradigm, or one side of the taxi, the other side

26:56

says it's true. And

26:58

then what, maybe the 80% of the world that actually

27:00

has a brain goes, then you're all lying. But

27:03

it says again, well, it's a point that simply that

27:05

we have the right to protect ourselves. I

27:09

think that's super important. And here's another one

27:11

more in Rabani points out about a week

27:13

ago, the US and Israel suddenly stopped comparing

27:15

Hamas to ISIS. Well, that's pretty telling. Wasn't

27:18

that those are the two things we heard incessantly.

27:22

The right to defend ourselves. The right Oh, by the

27:24

way, there's also the Bethlehem doctrine, which is really what

27:26

that comes from. That's an Israeli

27:28

concept that stems back to the beginning.

27:32

Or I mean, let's just place it in this context.

27:34

It's been used for a while by the UK, by

27:36

the United States and by Israel. And it simply means

27:38

that you have the right to preemptive self defense. That's

27:42

what the Bethlehem doctrine means. And all

27:44

that really amounts to is that we think you

27:46

might do something. And if we claim you have

27:48

a history of doing things that we say you

27:50

do all based on their accounts, right, then

27:53

we can just bomb you and say we thought you were

27:55

about to attack us first. It's sort

27:57

of like saying because we claim Hamas is there, we can murder

27:59

a thou. children or civilians.

28:02

That's just simply not true. They just keep saying

28:04

it though. And eventually it just becomes

28:07

the reality even though the international community has

28:09

never claimed that it is. So

28:12

the Bethlehem Doctrine is what they used to kill people

28:14

and claim they were about to be attacked first. Self-defense.

28:19

This point was also the other

28:21

one. Self-defense, right to defend ourselves and Hamas

28:23

is ISIS. Even though it doesn't really make much sense

28:25

that they were conflating Nazis and ISIS even though

28:28

they're not really the same thing at all,

28:30

in fact diametric opposites, as well as

28:32

the fact that Hamas and ISIS are

28:34

also adversaries. And you

28:37

can easily prove through international

28:39

entities and Israeli media mind you that Hamas

28:41

has gone on great lengths to make sure that

28:43

ISIS was not present. But that doesn't

28:45

matter because the facts don't matter to people that want to

28:47

spin a narrative. It

28:50

says along with their partners in crime in Washington

28:52

they often insisted Hamas was worse than ISIS. It's

28:55

a familiar playbook. In 2001 the

28:58

Twin Towers had barely collapsed. Ariel

29:00

Shannon immediately began insisting the PLO was

29:03

no different than Al Qaeda. And

29:06

that Yasser Arafat was worse than Osama bin Laden. Israel's

29:09

flunkies and apologists immediately and dutifully followed

29:11

suit. But Hamas, ISIS is

29:13

no longer. Israel's acolytes have for

29:16

the moment, or the most part, yet to receive

29:18

the message. That's the people online. As we keep

29:20

showing you, right, they're still saying before they've

29:22

had a baby they haven't caught up to the lies yet. They

29:24

haven't caught up with the shifting of the narrative. But

29:26

we'll probably follow suit at some point in

29:28

the next 24 months. It says so what

29:31

happened? Most obviously the US and Israel have

29:33

been negotiating, concluding, and implementing a series of

29:35

agreements with this ISIS character. Right?

29:38

It's the point that I was just making. Well you can't keep

29:40

claiming that they're the worst terrorist organization in the

29:42

world and then deal with them.

29:44

Right? That's what they're always saying. We can't deal with

29:46

terrorists. That's what I asked early. I said

29:49

why are they bombing the area where the

29:52

hostages are while claiming that they don't want

29:54

to deal for the hostages even though you're claiming

29:56

a Hamas that won't do it? And we now

29:58

know it's not the truth. We now can. Hamas

30:00

has offered this from the very first week

30:02

and Netanyahu turned it down until his

30:04

people forced him to make this truce,

30:07

this momentary pause. Because

30:10

if – oh, and the point was they would say

30:12

online, well, we don't deal with terrorists. Well,

30:14

apparently you do. So apparently you're dumb.

30:17

Or apparently you just said whatever you needed to

30:19

say so you could walk back – so people

30:21

wouldn't look at the problem that I was highlighting.

30:25

So this is the overall reality. We're going to

30:27

drift away from the ISIS part of it because

30:29

we need to deal with them because we didn't

30:31

achieve what we wanted to. Now,

30:35

since yesterday evening, according

30:38

to Mohammed Smiri, at least 40 more

30:40

Palestinians were arrested in the

30:43

West Bank, including two women and

30:45

ex-prisoners. Think about how

30:48

stupid this is. So they're releasing these people

30:50

under the argument of some kind of ceasefire

30:52

truce, and then within the same period

30:54

– they haven't even stopped the period of

30:56

truce – they've arrested the people, they've released.

31:00

You're scooping up people you've already let out.

31:03

Nothing about this is honest. This is

31:05

a ploy. This is a mirage being

31:07

done. They're probably just going to arrest them all

31:09

right back up as soon as possible, the moment that they go back to

31:11

this. And by

31:13

the way, they're telling you they're going to go back

31:16

to bombing the moment this stops. It makes

31:19

you sick. Now, Arnaud Bertrand

31:21

is the way I saw this. He says, wow, this

31:23

might be the most important piece of journalism on the

31:25

war on Gaza since it began. And it really just

31:28

means that – actually, I think he means post-doc Silver

31:31

7, but maybe he means that for 75 years. But

31:33

it's essentially

31:35

they confirm with unimpeachable sourcing that the

31:37

killing of civilians was all calculated and

31:39

intentional. Now,

31:41

he gives you a quick breakdown. I'm going to read you directly from

31:43

the article. November 30th

31:45

from Today, 972 Magazine.

32:00

of an artificial intelligence system to

32:02

generate more potential targets than ever

32:05

before. There's a very interesting

32:07

part of that for me that I'm going to

32:09

get into in the broad sense of artificial

32:11

intelligence and the allowance of, I guess,

32:14

the decision making being done by artificial

32:16

intelligence and the argument that you can

32:19

somehow have less accountability. You're like, well,

32:21

artificial, they aren't the AI told us.

32:24

At least you could make that argument. Like even Eric Schmidt

32:26

put that forward that, well, at some point we're going to,

32:28

the AI is going to be deciding things for us and

32:30

we'll have to bow to what they decide because it'll know

32:32

better. That's crazy.

32:34

That was paraphrasing, but that's something Eric Schmidt talked

32:37

about a while ago. The

32:39

idea that they have an artificial intelligence system that

32:41

is being put forward to decide who they bomb

32:43

and which is now why there's so many more

32:45

bombings than there ever have been, I'm

32:48

willing to bet you if this comes to it, they're going to try to

32:50

pass it off like, well, who made the AI? We're just following with the

32:52

AI. Or

32:54

that that's something that we'll see in the future in

32:56

some regard. I mark my words and

33:00

there's a name for this, which

33:02

is interesting. We've talked about Hasbara, right? Hasbara

33:06

being their propaganda kind of initiative.

33:09

This is called Habsura or

33:12

the gospel. And this

33:14

literally is a system of artificial intelligence

33:16

deciding who gets killed. That's

33:19

crazy. The

33:23

use of artificial intelligence and generate more potential

33:25

targets than ever before appear to have contributed

33:27

to the destructive nature of the initial stages

33:29

of Israel's current war on the Gaza Strip.

33:31

And an investigation by 972 magazine

33:33

and local cell local call

33:35

reveals these factors as

33:37

described by

33:40

current and former Israeli intelligence members

33:43

have likely played a role in producing

33:52

what has been one of the deadliest

33:54

military campaigns against Palestinians since the NACBA

33:57

of 1948. The

34:03

investigation by 972 and local

34:05

call is based on conversations with

34:07

seven current seven current

34:10

and former members of Israel's

34:12

intelligence community. So

34:15

that means if question

34:17

everything question the

34:19

platform who they're speaking to what their intentions

34:21

may be. Of course always. But

34:24

realize that in the US media sphere

34:28

the anonymous intelligence sources that drives 90%

34:30

of what we get through the corporate media. My

34:33

point saying that this meat looks so that's one

34:35

of the things we should distrust but realize that

34:37

this has the clout that the typical New

34:39

York Times Wall Street Journal kind of reporting typically

34:41

does in our sphere which by the ways what

34:43

we all. Should be questioning

34:45

but realize the point is not that this therefore

34:48

means that it's always true but simply that this

34:50

is where the narrative has gotten. That

34:53

like this is the point about having the

34:55

UN Oxfam and UNICEF and all of them

34:57

calling this genocide this may be an intentional

34:59

shift that is possible and we should be

35:01

on guard for that but nonetheless we

35:03

should realize that whether or not intentional

35:06

that this is the reality what

35:08

they have been doing is genocide

35:10

is murder is apartheid are war

35:13

crimes. So thank God for whatever

35:15

reason it's finally being pushed forward into the

35:17

even to the consciousness of the average person

35:20

but while we're still being on guard to

35:22

how that may be mobilized or used into

35:24

some new agenda. Thinking

35:27

back to the off-guard an article which I think is important

35:29

read. So former

35:32

and current intelligence community including military

35:34

intelligence and Air Force personnel who

35:36

were literally involved with Israel's operations

35:38

in the strip. In addition

35:40

to Palestinian testimonies data of their

35:42

own and documentation from the Gaza

35:44

Strip itself and even official statements

35:47

by the IDF spokesperson and other

35:49

Israeli state institutions. That

35:53

doesn't mean we can guarantee it's all anything

35:55

question everything but that is

35:57

impeccable sourcing in regard to the people

35:59

in the know. who are there. So

36:02

it's kind of hard to deny all

36:04

of this when this is coming directly

36:06

from IDF members, intelligence, and so on.

36:08

Now, as compared to previous Israeli assaults

36:10

on Gaza, the current war, which has

36:12

named itself, they've named Operation Iron Swords,

36:15

and which began in the wake of

36:17

the Hamas-led assault on southern Israel, rather

36:19

occupied Palestine areas on October 7th, I

36:22

mean that specifically as illegal settlements in the

36:24

area, has seen the army

36:26

significantly expand its bombing of targets that

36:28

are not distinctly military in nature. These

36:31

include private residences as well

36:33

as public buildings, infrastructure, high-rise

36:35

buildings, which sources say the

36:37

army defines as power targets.

36:41

Matrat Otsum, I guess, in Hebrew.

36:44

So that's important that this whole thing is going to be

36:46

power targets. Just

36:50

– I want to make this clear because I thought

36:52

somebody might think this. So when we're talking about this,

36:54

guys, we're not talking about – I mentioned Hasbara, the

36:57

propaganda discussion. But remember, what

36:59

I'm talking about is literally habsorah, not

37:03

hasbara. Habsorah, which means

37:05

the gospel. It is a different

37:07

term that applies to the artificial intelligence

37:09

that can use and generate these targets. We'll get

37:11

to that. Well, just so

37:13

we understand, this is not some misinterpre –

37:15

mispronunciation of hasbara. This is habsorah. We'll come

37:18

to that in a second. Now,

37:23

it says – these

37:26

include, as we – okay, as we said, the power targets.

37:28

Now, that's important. The

37:31

power targets are what they're predominantly

37:33

bombing today. What

37:35

these mean in

37:37

many cases are just residential buildings

37:40

that, if they were blown

37:42

up, would hurt the civilian infrastructure

37:44

to a degree that might

37:47

do two things. Hurt Hamas

37:49

in some abstract way because

37:51

they might need hospitals or they might need X, Y, and

37:53

Z, but on the

37:55

record, civilian infrastructure, or

37:58

might be used – to

38:00

shock and hurt civilians to

38:02

such a degree that they realize they can

38:04

no longer support Hamas even if they're not

38:07

present. These are real things.

38:12

The bombing of power targets, according to

38:14

the intelligence sources who had first-hand experience

38:16

with its application in Gaza in the

38:19

past, is

38:21

mainly intended to harm Palestinian

38:24

civil society. That's

38:29

important. To

38:31

create a shock is their quote. That

38:34

among other things will reverberate

38:36

powerfully and lead civilians to

38:38

pressure Han Hamas, as

38:40

one source put it. This is

38:42

the same as sanctions against Iran or

38:45

Yemen or whatever else, literally

38:47

designed to punish the

38:50

civilians so they turn on

38:52

their government. People

38:54

lie about that today, but it's literally documented

38:56

by people like Kissinger. When

38:59

they put these sanctions on these countries, starvation

39:02

tactics, those are

39:04

aimed at the civilians just

39:06

like this. What

39:08

we're hearing in this article is the admission that one

39:11

of the main things they're doing is trying

39:13

to hurt and torture and collectively

39:16

punish all

39:18

of Palestine in order to hurt Hamas. What

39:21

if you think it's about Hamas? What this

39:23

is is egregiously illegal. This

39:26

is a crime against humanity. This

39:28

goes to the level of genocide. Several

39:31

of the sources who spoke to 972

39:33

and local call on the condition of

39:35

anonymity confirmed that the Israeli army has

39:37

files on the vast majority of potential

39:39

targets in Gaza, including Homs, which

39:41

stipulate the number of civilians who are likely to

39:43

be killed in an attack on a particular

39:45

target. That's an important part of this, and it

39:47

gets into more detail. The idea being that they're

39:50

arguing, both because of the intelligence and

39:52

artificial intelligence and their own understanding

39:55

and long-term research, when

39:58

they are bred to attack a target. They

40:00

have a very specific breakdown of how

40:02

many civilians will be killed. They

40:05

know this and they act anyway Even

40:08

on areas where they think there may be

40:10

a Hamas target like with the Jabhat Jibli a

40:12

refugee camp They admitted

40:14

that one Says

40:16

the number is calculated and known in advance

40:20

So they're knowingly killing civilians make sure you

40:22

understand that to the army's intelligence

40:24

units Who also know

40:26

shortly before carrying out an attack roughly how

40:28

many civilians are certain to be killed In

40:32

one case discussed by the sources the

40:34

Israeli military command knowingly approved

40:36

the killing of hundreds of Palestinian

40:38

civilians in an attempt to assassinate

40:40

a single top Hamas

40:42

military commander we all know that example the

40:45

numbers increased from dozens of civilian deaths

40:47

permitted as collateral damage

40:49

as part of the attack on a

40:52

senior official in previous operations to Hundreds

40:54

of civilian deaths as collateral damage according

40:56

to a source meaning they've now

40:58

allowed that that's not some accidental byproduct

41:01

But they have documented Admitted

41:05

publicly to each to their own military

41:08

command That you're

41:10

up you are permitted to kill

41:13

one person Or

41:15

rather to frame it the right way to kill

41:17

hundreds of civilians if you think you may be

41:19

able to kill one Hamas member There's

41:22

just no everyone

41:24

with a somebody

41:26

waging frame it I Should go

41:29

I should avoid making it about get personal

41:31

concern based on the law

41:33

and Any

41:36

interpretation of it that is illegal? No

41:38

matter whether Hamas is using them as human fields And even

41:40

if you think that is the case you realize they're

41:42

they are required to prove that and they

41:45

have not That's what the international

41:47

community's been saying for the beginning. It's on them to

41:49

prove. That's the case technically before they're firing But they

41:51

don't care about that either and it gets into that

41:53

as well It says

41:55

quote nothing happens by accident

41:58

when a three-year-old girl is killed at a home

42:00

in Gaza. It's because someone in the army decided it

42:03

wasn't a big deal for her to be killed. That's

42:05

a quote. That it was a

42:07

price worth paying in order to hit another target.

42:10

It says we are not Hamas. These are

42:12

not random rockets. Everything is

42:14

intentional. We know exactly how much collateral

42:16

damage there is in every home. You're

42:20

damn right they do. According to the

42:22

investigation, another reason for the large number

42:25

of targets and the extensive harm to

42:27

civilian life in Gaza is the widespread

42:29

use of a system called Habsura, translated

42:31

to the gospel. Of course it is. Which

42:35

is largely built on artificial intelligence

42:38

and can quote generate targets almost

42:41

automatically at a rate that far exceeds

42:43

what was previously possible. This

42:46

is why it's the way it is

42:48

to a degree or at least that

42:50

they're using that as the excuse. This

42:52

AI system as described by a former

42:55

intelligence officer essentially facilitates a mass assassination

42:57

factory. That's a direct quote

42:59

from an IDF member or intelligence entity speaking

43:01

to them on the record. Mass

43:04

assassination factory. You don't use the word assassination when

43:06

you're killing people in a war. That's

43:09

an assassination is an extrajudicial killing

43:11

of usually people that are not

43:13

like civilians. So

43:16

what's interesting is what did they just say that Elon Musk

43:18

was talking about when he was there. That's right. Every

43:21

time they mentioned the primary point artificial

43:23

intelligence and why why would they talk about

43:25

that. That's what I thought I had while he was there

43:28

to look at all the things from October 7th. Well

43:30

now we know because they're using

43:32

artificial intelligence to kill these people

43:35

and they're now going to start using Starlink

43:37

according to their conversation. So

43:40

that makes Elon Musk complicit in

43:43

the genocide happening in Gaza. According

43:46

to the sources the increasing use of

43:48

AI based systems like Habsura allows

43:51

the army to carry out strikes on

43:53

residential homes where

43:55

a single Hamas member lives on a massive scale even

43:58

those who are junior Hamas. operatives. Yet

44:01

testimonies of Palestinians in Gaza suggest

44:03

that since October 7th, the army

44:05

has also attacked many private residences

44:08

where there was no known or apparent

44:10

member of Hamas or any other militant

44:12

group residing. That's the important part of

44:14

this. They'll keep putting forward

44:16

the idea that really all we need is that

44:18

maybe the possibility of

44:21

Hamas as if that somehow makes that

44:23

okay. But then even so finding out

44:25

that they many times didn't even have

44:27

that. That AI

44:29

doing it, is it them? Does it even matter?

44:31

It's still the responsibility of the Israeli government and

44:33

they are choosing to kill people. Innocent

44:36

people on a massive scale. Now

44:41

what's interesting too is the only reason back to the framing

44:43

part of it. The

44:46

narrative being set that this is the

44:48

worst terrorist organization in history, placing

44:51

that over the top of this, despite the fact that

44:54

the funding from Israel and the United States, the

44:56

arming, the use of it to keep them divided,

44:58

which then ultimately if you see it this way,

45:00

the fact that he propped them up and then

45:02

that hurt his people is all his fault. That's

45:05

obvious. What's

45:07

interesting is you know that there are people that grew

45:10

up in Palestine in Gaza and

45:12

their families were killed. They

45:15

were beat up, they were attacked, they were treated

45:17

like second-class people. So they grew up in a

45:19

position of wanting to change that. They want their

45:21

land back, they live in an apartheid system and

45:24

a brutal occupation. So what do they do? Well,

45:26

they look to one of the groups that are there to try to

45:28

fight back in many cases. So

45:31

all I'm trying to point out is is that

45:33

then immediately a terrorist because they

45:35

say that? Well no, because the point is

45:37

that that's a legal

45:39

resistance. Should those people commit

45:42

crimes, well then you could call them whatever you want.

45:44

The point is that they're acting within international

45:46

law. So too was October 7th

45:48

outside of the crimes they committed. Or

45:51

you know that it was and those crimes were

45:53

not part of the legal action. But

45:56

just because somebody breaks off and kills somebody that's illegal

45:58

does not then make that that whole action

46:01

illegal. It's just static

46:03

international law. You can't pretend otherwise. My

46:05

point though is by simply framing

46:07

all of them as immediate and the worst

46:09

kind of terrorism, you then get to pretend

46:11

that, oh, well, this junior person who joined

46:14

yesterday is suddenly a target and

46:16

therefore a target for, and again, in a sense

46:18

of war, he would be. But

46:21

in any sense of war, the

46:23

laws of war, international law, you don't

46:25

then get to collectively punish everybody around

46:27

them or bomb their homes or their

46:29

families are. It's always been the reality

46:32

just because they named them terrorists has not been

46:34

automatically to remove that. But this is why people

46:36

are seeing through this today. They've

46:38

lost control of this. It says

46:41

such strikes sources, sources confirmed

46:43

can knowingly kill an entire family

46:46

in the process and that's

46:48

allowed. That's allowed. Don't

46:50

forget Trump said the same thing. Where do you think that came from?

46:53

We're going to kill it on their families, which

46:55

are, which obviously drew a lot of shock. How

46:58

dare you say that now we're cheering it

47:00

on or the sycophants for Israel are and they're

47:02

telling you you're wrong for not. In

47:05

a majority of cases, the source has

47:07

added military activity is not conducted

47:09

from these targeted homes. The

47:13

point being that these are bombed

47:15

areas under the assumption that somebody

47:18

might live there or

47:20

even that you can prove a junior Moss member lives there. There's

47:23

no military activity from these locations. In

47:26

many cases, you're bombing a family when they're not even there. It

47:29

says, quote, I remember thinking that it was

47:31

like if Palestinian militants would bomb all the

47:33

private residences of our families when Israeli soldiers

47:35

go back to sleep at home on the weekend.

47:39

That's what they're doing. This is the end. He is admitting

47:41

to this. It

47:43

says another source said that a senior

47:45

intelligence officer told his officers after October

47:47

7 that the goal was to

47:50

quote, kill as many Hamas

47:52

operatives as possible for what's the

47:54

criteria around harming Palestinian civilians were

47:57

significantly relaxed. As such,

47:59

there are quote, cases in

48:01

which we shell based on

48:03

a wide cellular pinpointing of

48:06

where the target is, killing civilians. This

48:08

is often done to save time instead

48:11

of doing a little more work to

48:13

get a more accurate pinpointing. That

48:16

says everything. Like that alone should

48:18

end the conversation. You're admitting that you

48:20

are... that's destruction instead

48:23

of accuracy. That's what that is. You're

48:25

telling us on the record that you're

48:27

using a wide cellular signal,

48:32

which is not specific, and

48:34

targeting that general area when

48:36

you could simply take more time to get a more

48:38

of a pinpoint target and then

48:41

in the process knowing you're killing

48:43

civilians. So that there is a choice

48:45

to kill these people to save you

48:47

some time. That's called murder. That's what that's

48:49

called. The result of

48:51

these policies is the staggering loss of human

48:53

life in Gaza since October 7th. Over

48:56

3,300 families have

48:59

lost 10 or more family members

49:01

in Israeli bombings in the past two months. Robert

49:03

Inlakesh is one of them. A

49:06

number that is 15 times

49:08

higher than the figure from

49:10

what was previously Israel's deadliest war on Gaza

49:12

in 2014. 15 times higher in a shorter

49:15

period of time it's

49:21

just you just can't pretend that this

49:23

is somehow... this is unprecedented by every

49:25

stretch by every meaning of the word.

49:28

At the time of writing around 15,000 Palestinians

49:30

have been reported killed. I believe that's

49:33

over 20,000 now, especially including the assumption,

49:35

the estimates on how many are still

49:37

buried. It

49:40

says, quote, all of this is happening contrary

49:42

to the protocol used by the IDF in

49:44

the past. It's unprecedented

49:46

even for them. There

49:48

is a feeling that senior officials in

49:50

the army are aware of their

49:53

failure on October 7th and are busy

49:55

with the question of how to provide the Israeli

49:57

public with an image of victory that will salvage

49:59

their reputation. Look, even

50:02

Israeli media has wrote about this over

50:04

the years. They will kill people in

50:06

Gaza for a political benefit. Now,

50:10

if you think that's shocking, then you're just

50:12

not doing your research. It's Haaretz, Times

50:14

of Israel, people in Israel. They've been saying this

50:16

for years about Netanyahu, that he will initiate a

50:18

war in Gaza just to get you on his

50:20

side for the next election. It's just

50:24

amazing how many Americans will call you a

50:26

conspiracy theorist while you're citing Israeli media. Excuse

50:29

me. So

50:32

what they're telling you, we're willing

50:34

to murder tens of thousands of civilians just to

50:36

make it look like we're winning. From

50:39

the first moment after October 7, decision

50:42

makers in Israel openly declared that

50:44

the response would be of a

50:46

completely different magnitude to previous military

50:48

operations in Gaza, with the

50:50

state of aim of totally eradicating Hamas. The

50:54

emphasis, and by the way, that in 2014 seemed to be

50:56

the same point. So it's actually like,

50:58

this is different though. Then we

51:00

only meant to punish them. Clearly not.

51:03

You failed before and you're failing now, it

51:05

seems. The emphasis is on

51:07

damage, not accuracy. Said

51:09

IDF spokesperson Daniel Hagare, right

51:11

there. And it's right here. I've

51:14

shown you many times. It is just still kind of

51:17

alarming to me that we can have

51:19

this stated admission. Not only do

51:21

you not hear this, if you brought this up in front of Piers

51:23

Morgan, he would be like, where's that from?

51:26

That's not real. I never saw that. Whether

51:29

they're lying or they actually don't know is

51:31

probably the latter. It's just like they're so

51:33

shockingly uninformed. It's incredible. Or as

51:36

I pointed out, the debate was discussed. The

51:38

moderator, I think it's from the Patrick

51:41

Bette David show, has

51:43

completely had no idea what he was talking

51:45

about. Many points he brought up were shockingly

51:48

uninformed. But

51:51

these people are the ones apparently leading the conversation

51:53

in these circles. It's crazy. So emphasis

51:56

is on damage, not accuracy. But yet

51:58

we pretend that means they're old. only hitting

52:00

Hamas though. In fact, you should be embarrassed

52:02

if you're making that argument. So

52:04

here it is in the same article, making sure you

52:06

know that this is at

52:09

a proportion they've never yet seen. And

52:11

that's why they said it's, we're telling you it's

52:13

damage, not accuracy. But Biden comes out

52:15

and says they're pinpoint striking only Hamas.

52:18

And you're a racist if you say otherwise. Not

52:21

in so many words, but the same sentiment. According

52:23

to the sources who spoke with these

52:25

platforms, the targets in Gaza that have

52:27

been struck by Israeli aircraft can be

52:29

divided roughly into four categories. The first

52:31

tactical targets. So, you

52:34

know, what you would expect military weapons and

52:36

so on. The second is

52:38

underground targets. Now, even in the article, they

52:40

admit that means what they think are tunnels

52:42

under certain areas, and they're willing to bomb

52:45

anything, as long as they think that might

52:47

hinder the tunnel. Well, isn't that

52:49

exactly what we were saying before, that you're

52:51

bombing hospitals and homes and schools and mosques

52:53

because you claim the mosque has tunnels, you

52:55

never prove that. And even it turns out

52:58

the point is just to hurt the possible

53:00

tunnel beneath that. Is that the civilians fault

53:02

that possibly even you built those tunnels before

53:04

this? But even if not, that they're simply

53:06

using tunnels in general. So,

53:09

I mean, look, if you want to call that human

53:11

shields, go right ahead. I'm not debating that that might

53:14

be possible, except for the fact that we know on

53:16

the record, the UN investigated didn't find any evidence of

53:18

that. I get to see a single provable point

53:20

of evidence anywhere that shows that they have done

53:23

that and are doing that. But

53:25

we do have the evidence through the roof

53:27

that Israel does and has done for a

53:30

long time, use human shields. 2013,

53:33

Palestinian children tortured,

53:36

used as shields by Israel per the

53:39

United Nations. Reuters, Israeli

53:42

soldiers who used Palestinian boy

53:44

and nine-year-olds as human shields

53:46

avoid jail. Defense for

53:49

children, international and international human rights

53:51

group. Israel forces use five Palestinian

53:53

children as human shields. That's

53:55

2023. This

53:57

is from 2017. Generally, human shields.

53:59

Since the beginning of the occupation in 1967,

54:02

Israeli security forces have

54:05

repeatedly used Palestinians in

54:07

the West Bank and the Gaza Strip as

54:09

human shields. Israeli soldiers routinely

54:11

used Palestinian civilians as human shields

54:13

by forcing them to carry out

54:15

life-threatening tasks. It was also following

54:18

a high court petition against this

54:20

practice, which was filed by

54:22

human rights organizations around the world in

54:24

May 2002 that the IDF issued a

54:27

general order prohibiting the use of

54:29

Palestinians as a means of human shield against

54:31

gunfire or attacks by the Palestinian side. But

54:33

then it goes on to say, following the

54:35

order, the use of human shields dropped sharply.

54:38

However, the arms of the army

54:40

did not construe as a human

54:42

shield the use of Palestinians, provided

54:44

they consented. The army continued

54:46

the widespread use of this practice, which they

54:48

referred to as the neighbor procedure. Following

54:51

another petition filed by human rights organizations, the

54:53

High Court of Justice ruled that

54:55

this practice, too, violated international humanitarian law

54:58

and that this thus was illegal. And

55:00

guess what they've never stopped doing? Here

55:02

is the Institute for Middle East Understanding,

55:04

the neighbor procedure, Israel's use of Palestinian

55:06

human shields from 2012. Human

55:09

Rights Watch. During military

55:11

operations, Israeli soldiers routinely coerced

55:13

Palestinian civilians, including children, to

55:15

perform life-endangering acts that assisted military

55:17

operations, the practice known as the

55:20

neighbor procedure. Now

55:25

here is that article

55:28

or that to show if you'd like to... Oh, is it

55:30

open up? Oh, that's right. I was going to get

55:32

the rumble one as well. This

55:37

is one of the most obvious examples

55:39

of this kid, like literally tied to

55:41

the front of one of their IDF

55:43

vehicles while they engage with people shooting.

55:45

Like it's just so egregiously obvious. Then

55:49

let's see if it pops

55:54

up, actually. Oops. I

55:58

guess I can't spell. Here we go. Of

56:05

course not. Even

56:07

though I've got more views on it than most of these. Rumble's

56:11

not our friend. Let's see. It

56:16

should be down here. Let's

56:18

see. There

56:22

we go. I want to give you the shorter video

56:24

so you can watch that too. So

56:28

back to the article. Bombing

56:31

civilian infrastructure, knowing local civilians because

56:33

tunnel. Now

56:36

the third, and this is where it gets important, is power

56:39

targets. Which includes high rises

56:41

and residential towers in the heart of cities,

56:43

which is what we've seen this entire time.

56:46

And public buildings like universities, banks,

56:48

government offices. This

56:50

is a stated category. The idea

56:53

being hitting these targets. Says

56:57

the three intelligence sources who were involved in planning

56:59

or conducting these strikes on power targets in the

57:01

past. Is that a deliberate attack on

57:03

Palestinian society will exert civil

57:05

pressure on Hamas. That's

57:08

as clear as day. Not because

57:10

there's targets there. I mean that's some cases

57:12

they claim that. But their point is in

57:14

general, it's simply about bombing these buildings because

57:17

that puts pressure on overall Palestinian

57:19

society which then hurts Hamas. That's

57:22

collective punishment if you've ever heard it in your life.

57:25

The final category consists of family

57:27

homes or operative

57:30

homes. The stated purpose

57:32

of these attacks is to destroy private

57:34

residences in order to assassinate a

57:36

single resident suspected of being a Hamas

57:38

or Islamic Jihad operative. Suspected.

57:42

Killing the families because they may be a

57:44

Hamas member. However, in the current

57:46

war, Palestinian testimonies assert

57:48

that some of the families that were killed

57:50

did not include any operatives from these organizations.

57:54

According to statements on October 11th by

57:56

IDF spokesperson by the IDF spokesperson

57:58

during the first five days. of the fighting?

58:02

Just the first five days. Half of

58:04

the targets bombed, which was 1,329 out of

58:06

a total of 2,687 were power targets. Half of all the targets

58:14

bombed by October 11th. Or

58:19

rather just in the first five days, which yeah

58:21

that makes sense, were power targets.

58:23

Meaning civilian buildings,

58:26

universities, banks, government offices. Why to exert pressure on

58:29

Hamas? Not because we knew that they were bad

58:31

guys there. It's

58:33

all in the record. It's all open. It's very

58:35

obvious. It's just

58:37

because you've got powerful governments that are gas lighting

58:40

the world. Quote,

58:42

we are asked to look for high-rise buildings

58:44

with half a floor that can

58:46

be attributed to Hamas. Said one source

58:48

who took part in previous Israeli offensives.

58:51

Sometimes it is a militant group's

58:53

spokesperson's office or a point where

58:55

operatives meet. Or that's what

58:57

they claim anyway. I understood that the floor

58:59

is an excuse that allows the

59:02

army to cause a lot of destruction in

59:04

Gaza. That's what they told us he said.

59:06

That it's an excuse. We

59:08

just go yeah the Hamas was on floor

59:10

five so we bombed the whole building. That's

59:13

what this is guys. That's what they're telling you. Quote,

59:16

if they wanted, if they would tell the whole

59:18

world that the Islamic Jihad offices on the 10th

59:21

floor are not important as a target but that

59:23

its existence is a justification to bring down

59:25

the entire high rise with the aim

59:27

of pressuring civilian families who live in

59:29

it in order to put

59:31

pressure on terrorist organizations. This would itself

59:33

be seen as terrorism because

59:35

it is. So they don't say

59:38

that. Said the source on the

59:40

record. They're

59:42

very aware they're committing terrorism. They don't care.

59:46

Various sources who served in IDF and tell it

59:48

I should say that the leadership doesn't care. Some

59:50

of these people end up being very unhappy with

59:52

themselves or speak on the record about it. Various

59:55

sources who served in IDF intelligence units said

59:57

that at least until the current war any

1:00:01

protocols allowed for attacking power

1:00:03

targets, civilian buildings, only when the

1:00:05

buildings were empty of residents at the time

1:00:07

of the strike. So you can even see

1:00:09

on the record that before this, at least

1:00:11

they pretended to have their policy

1:00:14

publicly that, well, we have to make sure that

1:00:16

they're empty. But you can prove that that in

1:00:18

many cases didn't happen in the past. But my

1:00:20

point is, they at least knew that you cared,

1:00:22

that they pretended not to kill these people. Now

1:00:26

they just don't care. The mask is off. We'll

1:00:28

kill them if they're present. It

1:00:30

says, however, testimonies and videos from Gaza suggest

1:00:33

that since October 7th, some

1:00:35

of these targets have been attacked without prior notice,

1:00:38

killing entire families as a result. That's,

1:00:41

Amnesty International found the same thing. We

1:00:44

actually have that included right here, where

1:00:46

the point was, just

1:00:49

between the 7th and 12th of October, they

1:00:51

investigated five specific cases, and

1:00:54

they proved in each one of these

1:00:56

cases, Israel violated international law, by

1:00:59

either not taking precautions to spare civilians,

1:01:02

by carrying out indiscriminate attacks that failed to distinguish

1:01:05

between them in general, or

1:01:07

by specifically targeting civilians. And

1:01:09

they prove it in this investigation. But

1:01:12

again, nobody cares, apparently. So

1:01:15

what they're telling you, since

1:01:17

this started, they bombed entire buildings without

1:01:20

even notifying them. And in that investigation,

1:01:22

Amnesty reported that. In

1:01:24

one case, they told one person on the street, and

1:01:26

then right away after that, bombed the building. That

1:01:30

is about pretending you did that. Now

1:01:34

it says, the Israeli army estimates that it has

1:01:36

killed between 1,000 and 3,000 armed Palestinian militants. Isn't

1:01:41

it interesting that that's, I haven't heard that.

1:01:44

Where is this being reported? Every

1:01:47

time I ask about how many have they killed, we don't hear

1:01:49

anything. In fact, and on

1:01:51

top of that, I've had zero evidence of even

1:01:53

one of them, mind you. That's crazy to me.

1:01:56

You'd think after all this, you'd think they would be able to sh- and

1:01:58

you know they would. Show

1:02:02

me one person in a Hamas uniform you killed

1:02:04

or somebody that you even claim is Hamas We

1:02:07

haven't got that all we've seen is 20,000 civilians Children

1:02:10

being pulled from the rubble and

1:02:12

they say well human shields. Okay. Well, where are the people

1:02:14

that were supposedly using them as shields? They're

1:02:18

telling you they've killed 3,000 According

1:02:21

to the meteor ports in Israel some of the dead militants

1:02:23

are buried under the rubble. So, you know, we can't prove

1:02:25

it Yeah, there it is That's

1:02:28

what they're saying. We bombed them with that

1:02:30

kid with the killed all those civilians that we can see pulled

1:02:32

out of the rubble But the mosque was down there further. They're

1:02:34

dead. We got him or So

1:02:36

we're told Realize I

1:02:38

already told you that the number that they claim is about 30,000.

1:02:41

That's what we're supposed to believe

1:02:43

Hamas's membership I'm told it's far less than that.

1:02:45

But either way let's pretend it's even more the

1:02:48

reality is you're Collectively punishing

1:02:50

2.5 million people and

1:02:53

the amount that you have bombed which will get into the

1:02:55

number I think it's like 6,000 bombs 4,000

1:02:58

tons Let's just do

1:03:00

the math on that guys. That's that's arguing that

1:03:02

if let's just say There's

1:03:05

30,000 people that are Hamas That

1:03:08

means that's roughly about five people Hamas members that

1:03:10

would have been capped to have been killed by

1:03:13

every bomb For that to

1:03:15

be all 30,000 my

1:03:18

point is If you

1:03:20

just simply break it all down the map you

1:03:22

could you would argue that the amount of destruction

1:03:24

being killed the Briel is We're talking one of

1:03:26

these bombs is blowing up an entire building full

1:03:28

of people an entire residential area So we're talking

1:03:30

about the almost mathematical impossibility that what they're actually

1:03:33

doing is only going after Hamas, but we already

1:03:35

know that They're admitting

1:03:37

it. That's why But it

1:03:39

says again They're under the

1:03:41

rubble. So but they're there trust us Israel

1:03:44

said just like you're

1:03:46

saying Ukraine said same game as Documented

1:03:48

by all mazin and numerous images coming

1:03:51

out of Gaza Israel bombed the Islamic

1:03:53

University of Gaza The

1:03:55

Palestinian Bar Association a

1:03:58

UN building for an educational program for

1:04:00

outstanding students a building

1:04:03

belonging to the Palestinian telecommunications company

1:04:05

the Ministry of National Economy the

1:04:07

Ministry of Culture roads

1:04:09

dozens of high-rise buildings and homes especially

1:04:12

in Gaza's northern neighborhoods we're

1:04:14

supposed to believe every single one of those

1:04:16

were Palestinian hotspots nobody believes that I don't

1:04:18

even think Israeli people believe that UN

1:04:21

buildings remember I remember what I was saying in the

1:04:24

beginning because it was true that not even Israel

1:04:26

was claiming that the Hamas was in these UN locations

1:04:28

because that was a really hard pill to swallow for

1:04:30

the average person well the cats out

1:04:32

of the bag because it's obvious because they've killed

1:04:34

over a hundred UN members so as I'm going

1:04:37

to show you in a minute they've now shifted

1:04:39

the narrative they're now including

1:04:41

UN facilities as hot

1:04:44

as Hamas locations UN facilities

1:04:46

now it's certainly anything possible but

1:04:48

just think about how embarrassing he is that they had never

1:04:50

claimed that in fact they've always

1:04:52

already the point is that they have to now make

1:04:55

the allegations that nobody can verify

1:04:57

and all these journalists are parroting

1:04:59

what they said because

1:05:01

good journalism right there

1:05:05

will always be this is a quote from

1:05:07

one of these people there will always be

1:05:09

a floor in the high-rise associated

1:05:12

with a moss that's what

1:05:14

they're that's remember it's an excuse but for

1:05:17

the most part when it comes to the power

1:05:19

targets it is clear that the target doesn't have

1:05:21

military value that justifies an attack that would

1:05:23

bring down the entire empty building in the middle

1:05:25

of the city or full of people with the

1:05:28

help of six planes and bombs weighing several tons

1:05:34

even if you think that Hamas was located in that

1:05:36

building the argument has never been that you can bomb

1:05:38

and kill everybody in it because of that indeed

1:05:41

it says according to sources who were involved in the

1:05:44

comply the compiling of power targets

1:05:46

in previous wars although the target

1:05:48

file usually contains some kind of

1:05:50

alleged association with a moth or

1:05:52

other militant groups striking

1:05:54

the target functions primarily quote

1:05:57

as a means that allows

1:05:59

damage to civil society they keep telling you

1:06:01

this as we understand it's

1:06:03

really just an excuse to take down civil infrastructure

1:06:05

that's what we're being told the

1:06:07

source is understood some

1:06:10

explicitly and some implicitly that damage

1:06:12

to civilians is the real purpose

1:06:14

of these attacks of

1:06:18

course this will be ignored corporate media is

1:06:20

not going to care the Israel sycophants are

1:06:22

going to say it's all a bunch of

1:06:24

lies or it's from us propaganda even

1:06:27

without these IDF members admitting this it's all

1:06:30

readily apparent it is self

1:06:32

evident on

1:06:35

May 2021 for example and this is the

1:06:37

point about how this is not new this

1:06:39

all didn't just begin on October 7th for

1:06:42

example May 2021 Israel

1:06:44

was heavily criticized for bombing the

1:06:47

all Jala Tower which housed prominent

1:06:49

international media outlets such as Al

1:06:51

Jazeera Associated Press French Press Agency

1:06:53

I remember that if

1:06:56

you know so if you didn't realize then

1:06:59

that they can literally bomb corporate media locations

1:07:01

and get away with like clearly there was

1:07:03

a problem the army claimed just

1:07:05

like they're doing now that the building

1:07:07

was a Hamas military target they never

1:07:09

proved it sources told

1:07:11

972 that it was

1:07:13

in fact a power target see

1:07:16

it it's back then they know they're admitting that

1:07:18

no it wasn't really Hamas military it was a

1:07:20

civilian building that we knew would have maybe affect

1:07:23

Hamas so we bombed it and

1:07:25

even the corporate media that we bombed

1:07:27

even the US government that pretended to

1:07:29

care they didn't do anything about

1:07:31

it the

1:07:34

perception the quote goes on to say is that

1:07:36

it really hurts Hamas when

1:07:38

high-rise buildings are taken down because

1:07:41

it creates a public reaction in the

1:07:43

Gaza Strip that scares the population collective

1:07:45

punishment you're murdering

1:07:47

people destroying homes and infrastructure

1:07:50

to scare people in

1:07:52

hopes that may hinder Hamas quite

1:07:55

frankly that sounds like fear and desperation from the

1:07:57

Israeli side that you're willing to just carpet bomb

1:07:59

area in hopes that it may hinder what

1:08:01

they're doing. They wanted to

1:08:03

give the citizens of Gaza the feeling that Hamas is

1:08:05

not in control of the situation, which

1:08:08

almost seems to imply that they know that they

1:08:10

are. Sometimes they topple buildings and sometimes postal services

1:08:12

and government buildings. Just

1:08:14

casually admitting terrorism is what it

1:08:16

is. Although it is unprecedented

1:08:18

for the Israeli army to attack more than

1:08:20

a thousand power targets in five days, the

1:08:23

idea of causing mass devastation

1:08:25

to civilian areas for strategic

1:08:27

purposes was formulated in previous

1:08:29

military operations in Gaza and

1:08:32

honed by the so-called the

1:08:34

Haya Doctrine, or mowing

1:08:36

the lawn or grass, as Scott

1:08:38

Ritter put it, from the second Lebanon war

1:08:41

of 2006. So again,

1:08:43

the reality of this stuff, the idea that

1:08:45

this was developed because

1:08:48

of the idea of keeping them in check.

1:08:51

That's the same thing the US government does with their

1:08:53

foreign policy to the African

1:08:55

continent, to South America. You

1:08:58

keep them in check. You

1:09:01

make sure that they are dependent on you for what

1:09:03

they need most, so you can cut them

1:09:05

off so they go afoul of your agenda. Everything

1:09:08

you do is at the expense of the civilian population while

1:09:10

you pretend it's all for their freedom. That's

1:09:12

the same thing they're doing to Gaza. Mowing

1:09:15

the grass. Every so often you just throw a bomb in

1:09:17

there. Hey, you better keep in line. That's

1:09:19

what this is. Now

1:09:21

you can clearly tell that they are trying to take this

1:09:23

to its fullest extent. They're not

1:09:26

just mowing the lawn anymore. They're removing it.

1:09:29

According to the doctrine developed by

1:09:31

former IDF Chief of Staff, Gaddy

1:09:33

Isincott, who is now

1:09:35

a Knesset member and part of the current war cabinet,

1:09:38

of course he is, in

1:09:40

a war against guerrilla groups like

1:09:42

Hamas or Hezbollah, Israel must use

1:09:44

disproportionate and overwhelming force while targeting

1:09:46

civilian and government infrastructure in order

1:09:48

to establish deterrence. That's terrorism. And

1:09:50

force the civilian population to pressure

1:09:52

the groups to end their attacks.

1:09:54

That's a combination of the sanctions

1:09:57

mindset with kinetic military attacks.

1:10:00

That's terrorism guys. That's what every element

1:10:02

of terrorism has ever been why

1:10:04

now now you should wonder why it stems back to

1:10:06

these very groups The very logic

1:10:09

of the suicide bombings instead in the creation

1:10:11

of the very group they use for their

1:10:13

war on terror, right? This

1:10:15

is where it comes from. This is

1:10:17

their mindset. I'm not just talking about

1:10:19

the Zionists here I'm talking about the US government Britain the

1:10:22

same groups that have always carry these things out I'm

1:10:26

not saying that means that there aren't other people doing these things

1:10:28

but the reality They use

1:10:30

this to keep you in check that's happening to you

1:10:32

too, UK Americans

1:10:36

Everybody in Europe. It's what was what we're being dealt with

1:10:38

or really anywhere for that matter They

1:10:40

bomb civilian targets with disproportionate force

1:10:43

there goes their lie about proportionality

1:10:47

In order to establish deterrence What

1:10:50

do you mean? What do you think they're talking

1:10:52

about when they bomb the terrorist actions and you

1:10:54

know, whether it's a Solomon Lawton era

1:10:57

Syria whatever else when their proxy armies

1:10:59

bomb people and they claim it's them

1:11:01

that did it the point is about

1:11:03

trying to carry furniture Right

1:11:06

trying to pressure those people into supporting

1:11:08

somebody else when they say Assad is

1:11:10

gassing everybody and they're carrying out these

1:11:12

attacks What do they want that population

1:11:14

to turn on Assad and call for

1:11:16

US intervention? That is

1:11:19

terrorism It's no different

1:11:21

than somebody going in with a suicide best to

1:11:23

say we're doing this because you're doing XY and

1:11:25

Z in our country or because we hate your

1:11:27

freedom or whatever narrative they spin That's

1:11:30

them, too The first

1:11:32

time the Israeli Army publicly defined power targets

1:11:34

in Gaza was at the end of Aki

1:11:37

operation protective edge in 2014 Not

1:11:40

new the army bombed four

1:11:43

buildings for during

1:11:45

the last four days of the war three

1:11:47

residential multi-story buildings in Gaza City

1:11:49

and high-rise in Rafa Which was

1:11:52

crazy at the time the security establishment

1:11:54

explained because they needed to at that

1:11:57

time today. They don't need to explain

1:12:00

that the attacks were intended to convey

1:12:02

to the Palestinians of Gaza that quote

1:12:04

nothing is immune anymore so

1:12:07

admitting your terrorists and to

1:12:09

put pressure on Hamas to agree with ceasefire okay

1:12:13

on the record in 2014 on the record they made

1:12:17

it clear we were

1:12:19

bombing civilian locations to make sure Palestinians

1:12:21

not Hamas knew that nothing is off

1:12:23

the table now because you allow them

1:12:26

to exist even though at the time

1:12:28

we know that Hamas was being funded

1:12:30

by Israel on the record I

1:12:34

didn't finish my sentence hold on on the record

1:12:36

now by where

1:12:39

it was hold

1:12:48

on you

1:12:57

mass 2019 should pop up I

1:13:04

mean it's what's funny is this a public sentiment

1:13:06

it's oh here just the actual archive that's better

1:13:13

oh wait oh yeah

1:13:15

this is it let's

1:13:21

see there it is so

1:13:24

this is from her at I'm actually gonna make sure I save

1:13:26

this one because this is the actual article from her at where

1:13:31

it says very clearly anyone who

1:13:33

wants to thwart the establishment of

1:13:35

a Palestinian state has to support

1:13:37

bolstering Hamas and transferring

1:13:39

money to Hamas which

1:13:42

you can I mean weapons are part of this too but

1:13:44

they could buy these to give money they can buy weapons

1:13:46

so that's the same difference and again

1:13:48

he says this is part

1:13:50

of our strategy to isolate the Palestinians

1:13:53

in Gaza from the Palestinians in the

1:13:55

West Bank it's literally on the record

1:13:57

and public information That's

1:14:00

Netanyahu on the record saying that in 2019. So

1:14:03

again, the point is that

1:14:08

you're literally in 2014 pointing at Hamas and

1:14:10

saying we're murdering

1:14:13

civilians and bombing civilian locations because

1:14:16

we're trying to force you into turning on

1:14:19

them, even though literally Netanyahu is making

1:14:22

sure they're powerful. So to keep this

1:14:24

dynamic, so to use them to justify

1:14:26

bombing these civilians. You start

1:14:28

to see a pattern. The pattern is

1:14:30

just wanting to kill civilians. Hold

1:14:35

it. Bombed

1:14:38

four buildings and the time it was conveyed,

1:14:40

nothing was immune. The evidence

1:14:43

we collected shows that the massive destruction

1:14:45

was carried out deliberately and without any

1:14:47

military justification, according to an Amnesty

1:14:50

International report from 2014. So

1:14:53

here we are again with

1:14:55

the international groups going, yeah, they committed

1:14:57

crimes. There's literally no military justification

1:14:59

there. They bombed and they killed

1:15:01

civilians. That terrorism. And what happened?

1:15:03

Literally nothing. That it's like,

1:15:05

and how do people not see this? Because

1:15:08

most of them go to CNN, Fox News and

1:15:10

mindlessly go through their, their, their, their

1:15:13

TV boxes. Or at

1:15:15

least that's the people that speak up in the public

1:15:17

sphere. Israeli

1:15:20

operations have also shown how striking these targets

1:15:22

is meant not only to harm Palestinian morale,

1:15:24

but also to raise the morale inside

1:15:27

Israel. Right? So simultaneously killing

1:15:29

civilians to hurt Palestine, but make

1:15:31

Israel cheer. Arets revealed

1:15:33

that during Operation Guardian of the walls, Guardian of

1:15:35

the walls in 2021, the

1:15:37

IDF spokesperson's unit conducted a

1:15:39

PSYOP against Israeli civilians in

1:15:42

order to boost awareness of

1:15:44

the IDF's operations in Gaza and the damage

1:15:46

they cost to Palestinians. Right?

1:15:48

Promoting. Promising. Parading

1:15:51

around all the terrible things you did to them.

1:15:53

So hope that you, I mean, that says something for the

1:15:55

people that support Zionists. Plenty

1:15:57

of them don't. Soldiers who used fake.

1:16:00

social media accounts in 2014 to

1:16:02

conceal the campaign's origin, uploaded images

1:16:04

and clips of

1:16:07

the army strikes in Gaza to Twitter, Facebook,

1:16:09

Instagram, TikTok in order to demonstrate the army's

1:16:11

prowess to Israeli public. The

1:16:15

bottom line is that they knocked down

1:16:17

a high rise for the sake of knocking down

1:16:19

a high rise. According

1:16:25

to an investigation by the Associated Press conducted after the

1:16:27

2014 war, about 89%

1:16:31

of those killed in the aerial bombings of

1:16:34

family homes were unarmed

1:16:36

residents and most of them were children

1:16:38

and women. Or

1:16:41

Associated Press, Amnesty International, finding

1:16:43

terrorism, admission to terrorism, finding that

1:16:45

even if they did admit to

1:16:47

it that the bombings they carried out killed

1:16:50

89% of those killed. Right

1:16:53

up there with Obama's staff for drone bombing and

1:16:55

most of them were women and children. But nothing

1:16:57

happens. If we just move forward and you

1:17:00

pretend like that's fake news, you're starting

1:17:02

to see a problem, you should. What

1:17:04

this shows you is that it's always been there.

1:17:06

It's always been public. Ask

1:17:08

yourself how it's possible this information, even why the

1:17:11

Associated Press today doesn't cover this properly. Why Amnesty

1:17:13

International, even though they have been reporting on this

1:17:15

in their reports, does not step up in a

1:17:17

huge way and say, guys, it's all right

1:17:19

here. We've been covering this for

1:17:21

a decade. They're terrorists because clearly there

1:17:23

is overwhelming influence by the Zionist agenda

1:17:26

in all of this stuff. On

1:17:30

October 10th, Israel bombed the Babel

1:17:32

building in Gaza. According

1:17:34

to the testimony of

1:17:36

Beliyel Abu Hatriza, Hatzira,

1:17:39

who rescued bodies from the ruins

1:17:41

that night, 10 people were

1:17:43

killed in the attack on the building, including three

1:17:46

journalists. I think it's over 60 journalists now that

1:17:48

have been killed. Again, more journalists,

1:17:51

because of the time frame and the area,

1:17:54

this is more journalists killed in any war

1:17:56

in history in the time frame and the

1:17:58

area we're talking about. On

1:18:01

October 25th, the 12-story Altaj residential building

1:18:03

in Gaza City was bombed to the

1:18:05

ground, killing the families living inside it

1:18:07

without warning. Now that we're

1:18:09

in 2023 right now, about 120 people were buried under the

1:18:11

ruins of their apartments

1:18:15

according to the testimony of residents. Yusef

1:18:18

Omar Sharif, a resident at the building,

1:18:20

wrote on Twitter that 37 of his

1:18:22

family members who lived in the building

1:18:24

were killed. He says, quote, Now

1:18:27

what do you think he does after that? Seeks

1:18:34

peace? Residents stated that

1:18:36

a lot of bombs were dropped, damaging and destroying

1:18:38

apartments in nearby buildings too. Now

1:18:40

when I say things like that, I'm in no

1:18:42

way, as you know, and anybody honest should know,

1:18:45

as I've always stated, since I've ever started to

1:18:47

work in this work, I never advocate for violence.

1:18:49

I don't think violence is the answer. Violence begets

1:18:51

violence. But maybe I'm

1:18:53

wrong. But I do believe that. I

1:18:55

point to simply to point out that you understand

1:18:58

why people end up in these... When

1:19:00

you're in an area where you're not allowed to

1:19:02

do anything, and anything you do that's political or

1:19:05

non-violent is called racist or anti-Semitic, and

1:19:07

then violence too, and by the same reasoning, you

1:19:10

end up realizing that if you're going to be called

1:19:12

a terrorist, whether or not you're acting in violence, and

1:19:14

even then acting in violence is literally protected by international

1:19:16

law, well, what options do you have? That

1:19:20

is exactly why Netanyahu maintained this reality,

1:19:22

because he knew he could always claim

1:19:24

the what he's claiming today. Six

1:19:29

days later, October 31st, about

1:19:31

a month before this, a month ago

1:19:33

from today, the eight-story

1:19:36

all-Mahandasin residential building was bombed

1:19:38

without warning. Between 30

1:19:40

and 45 bodies were reportedly recovered from

1:19:42

the ruins that first day. One

1:19:44

baby was found alive without his parents. Journalists

1:19:47

estimated that over 150 people were killed in the

1:19:49

attack, as many remained buried under the rubble. Those

1:19:51

are all... Excuse me. Power

1:19:56

targets, every one of them.

1:19:59

Killing civilians. to kill civilians the

1:20:02

building used to stand in new Surat

1:20:04

refugee camp south of Wadi Gaza

1:20:06

in a supposed safe

1:20:08

zone to which Israel

1:20:10

directed the Palestinians who fled the homes from

1:20:13

north and central Gaza and Therefore were

1:20:15

told served as a temporary shelter for the displaced

1:20:18

But again, that was the building they bombed right

1:20:21

we Insultingly

1:20:23

obvious as anything I've ever seen Here

1:20:26

here come right over here and then we'll bomb

1:20:28

that place and then the media will pretend like

1:20:30

we're lying about it Or that it's all Hamas

1:20:32

propaganda Literally bombing the way

1:20:34

to the safe zone Bombing

1:20:36

the safe zone bombing the crossing that they might

1:20:39

take from the safe zone doesn't matter. Nobody cares

1:20:41

They're all just doing it's all a lot somewhere

1:20:44

The building used oh then it goes on to say

1:20:46

according to the investigation by amnesty international

1:20:49

This one right here from October. Oh,

1:20:51

yeah, excuse me. This is different one. They mentioned

1:20:53

both an Investigation

1:20:56

from October 9th that we've also referenced

1:20:59

Israel shelled at least three multi-story buildings

1:21:01

as well as an open flea market

1:21:03

on a crowded street in the Jabliya

1:21:06

refugee camp killing at least 69 people

1:21:09

the bodies were burned Quote

1:21:11

says the bodies are burned. I didn't want to look

1:21:13

I was scared of looking at the at Imad's face

1:21:16

Said the father of a child who was killed The

1:21:19

bodies were scattered on the floor Everyone

1:21:22

was looking for their children in these piles. I

1:21:24

recognized my son only by his trousers I

1:21:27

wanted to bury him immediately. So I carried my son and got

1:21:29

him out According

1:21:31

to Amis international's investigation the army said that

1:21:33

the attack on the market was

1:21:35

aimed at a mosque quote Where

1:21:38

there were Hamas operatives they said however

1:21:41

according to the same investigation by

1:21:43

Amis international satellite

1:21:46

satellite images prove that there's

1:21:48

no mosque there But we

1:21:50

all move forward right because you don't even need

1:21:53

to you just say mosque and people in the

1:21:55

West go Oh terrorism in

1:21:57

some cases the point is they can

1:21:59

they claim something something they know you can prove is

1:22:01

false and they know that

1:22:03

the people that already support them will to their death

1:22:05

apparently. Intelligence

1:22:07

sources who served in the previous operations also told

1:22:10

these outlets that for 10 days in 2021 and

1:22:12

three weeks in 2020 in 2014, an attack rate of 100 to 200 targets per

1:22:18

day led to a situation in which

1:22:20

the Israeli Air Force had no targets

1:22:22

of military value left. One

1:22:25

important question then, why

1:22:28

after nearly two months has the

1:22:30

Israeli Army not run out of

1:22:32

targets today? Well,

1:22:34

there's an answer for that. The

1:22:36

new AI system, the

1:22:39

Habsura system, the artificial

1:22:41

intelligence system. So

1:22:43

they're admitting openly that the reason that we are

1:22:45

bombing all of these civilian locations is because of

1:22:47

this system. Now, what they're claiming though is the

1:22:50

system is able to pinpoint and discern whether

1:22:52

there's Hamas there. They just know better

1:22:54

than we do. That's why we're bombing 15

1:22:57

times the amount of targets we ever did in the past

1:22:59

because this knows or

1:23:01

doesn't. Or is this just a way

1:23:04

to act like you're not accountable for

1:23:06

murdering civilians? In the statement, a senior

1:23:08

intelligence official is quoted as saying that

1:23:10

thanks to Habsura, targets

1:23:13

are created for precision strikes. Quote,

1:23:15

while causing great damage to the enemy

1:23:17

and minimal damage to non-combatants. Hamas

1:23:20

operatives are not immune no matter where they hide. That's

1:23:22

what they say anyway. Honestly

1:23:24

that's not true. Minimal damage to

1:23:26

non-combatants, 20,000 people, 7,000 children, hardly. I

1:23:32

think they know this. According to

1:23:34

intelligence sources, Habsura generates, among

1:23:36

other things, automatic recommendations for

1:23:39

attacking private residences where

1:23:41

people suspected of

1:23:43

being Hamas or Islamo-Jihad live.

1:23:47

Suspected. Israel then carries out large

1:23:50

scale assassination operations through the heavy shelling of these

1:23:52

residential homes. Period. So,

1:23:55

you have an artificial intelligence system that uses

1:23:58

whatever they input. Did

1:24:00

they post something on social media? Did

1:24:03

they support Hamas in one way or another? How

1:24:06

much this is what we're talking about your

1:24:08

the Israeli military are the ones inputting the

1:24:10

metrics Then this

1:24:12

rapid system is picking up all these residential homes

1:24:15

that meet some kind of metric and they bomb

1:24:17

it Without ever actually

1:24:19

proving Hamas was there This

1:24:22

is your future with everything

1:24:24

everything the artificial intelligence the way it's all

1:24:26

going Elon Musk He's helping

1:24:28

them do this guys. Well, he's making tours

1:24:30

about how AI is dangerous. You're damn right.

1:24:33

It's dangerous Habsora

1:24:37

Explained one of the sources

1:24:39

first processes enormous amounts of

1:24:41

data that quote tens of

1:24:43

thousands of intelligence officers could not process

1:24:47

and recommends bombing sites in real time It's

1:24:49

plain as a So they're

1:24:51

telling us that we are not capable

1:24:54

of breaking down what they show us We

1:24:56

just take it face value that their data is

1:24:58

correct It tens of thousands

1:25:00

of officers would couldn't process this so

1:25:03

they give us this real-time data and we

1:25:05

bomb in real time That's what they say

1:25:08

One former intelligence officer explained that

1:25:10

Habsora system enables the army to

1:25:13

run quote a mass assassination

1:25:15

factory in which

1:25:17

the emphasis is on quantity

1:25:20

not quality That's the same

1:25:22

thing That is the same

1:25:24

thing as damage not accuracy They're just saying

1:25:26

that that speaks to the actual system

1:25:28

not even just the operation in Gaza They

1:25:31

have Sora system is about Quantity

1:25:35

not quality. I think I

1:25:37

they're literally admitting that they're willing to just murder

1:25:39

civilians as long as they maybe get Hamas Doesn't

1:25:42

that seem to suggest that they're not even really going for Hamas

1:25:46

since Israel estimates there are approximately 30,000

1:25:48

Hamas members in Gaza and They

1:25:51

are all marked for death. The

1:25:54

number of potential targets is enormous

1:25:57

Now I would use another word. I would say endless

1:26:02

Now it says it really is like a factory in

1:26:06

regard to the automatic

1:26:08

system where the

1:26:10

AI picks targets automatically. It

1:26:13

says it really is like a factory. We work

1:26:15

quickly and here's the important part. He

1:26:17

says there is no time to delve deep into

1:26:19

the target. The view

1:26:22

is that we are judged according to how many

1:26:24

targets we manage to generate. This

1:26:26

really could be a way to not allow the

1:26:29

IDF soldiers to know that they are murdering civilians

1:26:31

indiscriminately. Because that has always been a historic problem.

1:26:33

Where some of these people are told to bomb

1:26:36

civilian targets or just make them up in

1:26:38

past wars and they are very unsettled

1:26:40

about that in some cases. So

1:26:42

now you have a thing where you have

1:26:44

IDF members inputting metrics that are probably just

1:26:46

benign. Are

1:26:49

they Palestinian for example? Things like that. I

1:26:51

am just making that up. My point would be though

1:26:53

you could literally enter in metrics that would make basically

1:26:55

everybody a potential target. So

1:26:58

then they are just going the AI said bomb it.

1:27:01

With the potential knowledge incorrect that they

1:27:04

thought they bombed Hamas instead of killing

1:27:06

civilians for an obvious purpose. There

1:27:08

is a lot of ways you could look at this. The bottom

1:27:11

line is you have an artificial intelligence system rapidly

1:27:13

pumping out targets that they don't take time

1:27:15

to break down. They

1:27:19

just blindly follow. And

1:27:23

then the people who are inputting the

1:27:25

metrics, the military, the

1:27:27

government, intelligence, they

1:27:31

are then judging these people on how many targets

1:27:33

they managed to get. Which then

1:27:35

clearly incentivizes them to not look at all.

1:27:38

Move, go, bomb, keep going. See

1:27:41

the point? So this seems very deliberate

1:27:43

to maximize the suffering and

1:27:46

the ethnic cleansing. Associated

1:27:49

systems like Habsorah have thus

1:27:52

greatly facilitated the work of

1:27:54

Israeli intelligence officers in making

1:27:56

decisions during military operations including

1:27:58

calculating potential casualties. Five

1:28:01

different sources confirmed to the platform that

1:28:04

the number of civilians who may be

1:28:06

killed in attacks on private residences is

1:28:08

known in advance to Israeli intelligence and

1:28:10

appears clearly in the target file under

1:28:13

the category of collateral damage. So

1:28:16

there's no pretending that they're not very aware

1:28:18

that every time they do this, they're killing

1:28:21

tens of thousands of, rather in the process, they've killed tens of

1:28:23

thousands of civilians. And

1:28:25

they knew. They knew and they got it. And they said,

1:28:27

yes, do it anyway. That's what they're telling you for this

1:28:29

report. Now,

1:28:31

under the category of concerted policy

1:28:34

to bomb family homes, on

1:28:36

October 22nd, the Israeli Air

1:28:39

Force bombed the home of

1:28:41

the Palestinian journalist Ahmed Anawak

1:28:44

in the city of Dar al-Bala. Ahmed

1:28:46

is a close friend and colleague of mine,

1:28:49

this person reports. Four years ago, we founded

1:28:51

a Hebrew Facebook page called Across the Wall

1:28:53

with the aim of bringing Palestinian voices from

1:28:55

Gaza to the Israeli public. The

1:28:58

strike on October 22nd collapsed blocks

1:29:00

of concrete onto his entire family,

1:29:03

killing his father, his brothers, his sisters, and all

1:29:05

of the children, including babies. Only

1:29:07

his 12-year-old niece, Malek, survived and remained

1:29:09

in critical condition. Her body covered and

1:29:11

burns and unfortunately died a few days

1:29:14

later. 21 members

1:29:16

of Ahmed's family were killed in total, burned

1:29:18

under their home, buried, excuse me. None

1:29:20

of them were militants. The youngest

1:29:23

was two years old. The oldest, his father, was

1:29:25

75. Ahmed, who is currently living

1:29:27

in the UK, is now alone out

1:29:29

of his entire family, arguably

1:29:31

because he was a journalist trying to document what's going

1:29:33

on. Ahmed's

1:29:36

case is common in Gaza these days.

1:29:39

In interviews to the press, heads of

1:29:41

Gaza hospitals have echoed the same description.

1:29:43

Families enter hospitals as a succession of

1:29:45

corpses. A child followed by his

1:29:47

father, followed by his grandmother. The bodies are all covered

1:29:49

in dirt and blood. Now,

1:29:52

the platform 972 and local call do

1:29:54

not have data regarding the number of

1:29:56

military operatives who were indeed killed or

1:29:58

wounded by Ahmed. aerial strikes on private

1:30:00

residences and current war. Meaning

1:30:04

there could be none for all we know. In

1:30:07

regard to Hamas members killed while they murder all these

1:30:09

civilians. But there's ample evidence that

1:30:11

in many cases none were

1:30:14

military or political operatives belonging to these

1:30:16

areas. So what they're saying

1:30:18

is we can't prove that there are in fact

1:30:20

none under these buildings they claim, but we can

1:30:22

prove there is rather lots of

1:30:24

evidence the fact that none of them were military

1:30:26

targets that were in these places to begin with.

1:30:30

So at best they were assuming that

1:30:32

something's got rid of pointed out. Under

1:30:35

international law even under the human shield

1:30:37

concept which would not apply to the idea that

1:30:39

there are thousands and maybe one person or that

1:30:41

they're under the building. Even

1:30:43

if the case was one person for

1:30:46

example with one Hamas member they're required

1:30:48

to prove that. Or a tunnel or

1:30:50

an operating area whatever it is. Before

1:30:53

but they don't. October 10th these

1:30:55

were on the Air Force bomb and apartment building in

1:30:58

their Sheikh Ridwan neighborhood in Gaza killing 40

1:31:00

people. Most of them women and children.

1:31:03

In one of the shocking videos taken following the

1:31:05

attack people are seen screaming

1:31:08

holding what appears to be a doll pulled from the ruins of

1:31:11

the house. When the camera zooms

1:31:13

in it turns out to be the body of a dead

1:31:15

baby. 19

1:31:18

members of the family were killed. Hamas

1:31:20

International investigated the attack and

1:31:23

discovered that a Hamas member did in fact

1:31:25

live on one of the upper floors of the building. But

1:31:28

he wasn't even there when they bombed it. This

1:31:31

is the reality of what they're doing. That

1:31:33

was the investigation here. Out of all five of these

1:31:36

only one of them did was there even

1:31:38

evidence that somebody might have been there but

1:31:40

he wasn't when they bombed. So they

1:31:43

killed everyone in that building to

1:31:45

go after that one person who wasn't even there. I

1:31:48

mean there's no way these aren't war crimes. The

1:31:51

bombing of the family homes where

1:31:53

Hamas or Islamic Jihad operatives supposedly

1:31:55

live likely became a more concerted

1:31:58

idea policy during Operation Protect. of

1:32:00

edge in 2014. Back then, 606 Palestinians,

1:32:03

about a quarter of the civilian deaths

1:32:05

during the 51 days of fighting were

1:32:07

members of families whose homes were bombed.

1:32:13

I just think that in and of itself shows that

1:32:15

these people are no better than what they pretend they're

1:32:17

fighting. A UN report defined it

1:32:19

in 2015 as both a potential war crime and

1:32:21

a new pattern of action that led to the

1:32:24

death of entire families. In

1:32:26

2014, 93 babies were killed as a result

1:32:28

of Israeli bombings

1:32:32

of family homes, of which 13 were

1:32:35

under one year old. A

1:32:37

month ago, 286 babies aged

1:32:40

one or under were already identified as

1:32:42

having been killed in Gaza since October

1:32:46

7. The numbers have since doubled or tripled.

1:32:49

However, in many cases, and especially during

1:32:51

the current attacks on Gaza, the Israeli

1:32:54

army has carried out attacks that struck

1:32:56

private residences, even when there is

1:32:58

no known or clear military targets. For

1:33:01

example, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists, by November

1:33:03

29, Israel had killed 50 Palestinian journalists

1:33:08

in Gaza, some of them in their

1:33:10

homes with their families. We

1:33:14

reported this to you already. Rashidi

1:33:17

Sarraj, 31, a journalist from

1:33:19

Gaza, born in Britain, founded

1:33:22

a media outlet in Gaza called

1:33:24

Ain Media. On October 22, an

1:33:26

Israeli bomb struck his parents'

1:33:28

home, where he

1:33:30

was sleeping, killing him. The journalist,

1:33:33

Salim Mima, similarly died under

1:33:35

the ruins of her home after

1:33:37

it was bombed, and

1:33:40

her three young children died with her, seven years old,

1:33:42

three years old. Excuse

1:33:44

me, it says, of her three

1:33:47

young children, two of them died, a seven year old, a three

1:33:49

year old. Excuse me,

1:33:51

am I misreading that? Of

1:33:55

her three young children, Hadi-7 died while

1:33:57

Sam-3 has not been killed. Has

1:34:00

not been found in the rubble excuse me two

1:34:03

other journalists Were

1:34:05

killed together with their children in their homes I?

1:34:08

Mean guys, this is just some of the most horrific

1:34:10

Lee of this. This is what terrorism looks like Two

1:34:16

weeks after the start of the bombings in Gaza and

1:34:18

before the ground invasion after the bodies of 1903

1:34:21

children And

1:34:23

approximately a thousand women and 187 elderly

1:34:25

men were counted in the Gaza

1:34:27

Strip Israeli come a commentator Avi

1:34:31

Isha Shahroff tweeted as

1:34:33

hard as it is to hear on

1:34:35

the 14th day of fighting It does not appear

1:34:37

that the military arm of Hamas has been significantly

1:34:39

harm Point being it

1:34:41

still appears that way actually that they were doing

1:34:43

all of this One of the argument that

1:34:45

it was hurting Hamas, and it wasn't even hurting Hamas Killing

1:34:49

people for no reason in response to

1:34:51

an inquiry from 972 and local call

1:34:53

for this article the IDF spokesperson Stated

1:34:56

quote the IDF is committed to international

1:34:58

law sure and acts according to it

1:35:00

No They don't and is doing so

1:35:02

according to military targets and does not

1:35:04

attack civilians Would you love it to

1:35:07

state the blatantly obvious untrue when we can

1:35:09

prove that's not true? By

1:35:11

their own admissions for that matter It's just they just state

1:35:14

the narrative they want you to go with the terrorist

1:35:16

organization Hamas places its operatives They go on to say

1:35:18

and military assets in the heart of civilian population Hamas

1:35:21

systematically uses the civilian population

1:35:23

as a human shield and conducts combat from

1:35:26

civilian buildings including sensitive sites such as hospitals

1:35:28

Moss schools and UN

1:35:30

facilities That's new. They're

1:35:33

now saying this as they're acting like that.

1:35:35

They've never that was not there in the beginning They've

1:35:37

now added on UN facilities They're

1:35:39

now literally arguing Hamas uses

1:35:42

UN facilities to conduct his terror activities

1:35:44

and so that implicitly means that means that

1:35:46

UN is part of this Which

1:35:49

in these possible? I just think

1:35:51

it's really hilarious because I think it's obvious That's not

1:35:53

what's happening Which by the way does not then mean

1:35:56

the UN body is on your side the point is

1:35:58

that this is just obviously something that they're using

1:36:00

to cover up the fact that they've been indiscriminately bombing.

1:36:03

And killing literally anybody there, including UN

1:36:05

members, including journalists, including members of the

1:36:07

medical community, they don't care. After

1:36:13

2014, in the protective edge operation during

1:36:15

which Israel began to systematically strike family

1:36:17

homes from the air, human

1:36:19

rights groups like Beth Sellem collected testimonies

1:36:22

from Palestinians who survived these attacks. The

1:36:25

survivors said the homes collapsed in on themselves, glass

1:36:27

shards cut the bodies of those inside, and the

1:36:29

debris smells of blood, and people were buried alive.

1:36:32

This deadly policy continues

1:36:35

today, thanks in part to

1:36:38

the use of destructive weaponry and sophisticated

1:36:40

technologies like Habsorah, artificial intelligence,

1:36:42

but also to a political and

1:36:44

security establishment that has loosened the

1:36:46

reins on Israel's military machinery. I

1:36:49

mean, that's such a soft way to say that. That's like

1:36:51

saying the terrorism they were already committing, you know, they've loosened

1:36:53

the reins. I mean, it's just if

1:36:56

they were committing terrorism before, which they were, what

1:36:58

word would you use for today? Less

1:37:02

worse than terrorism, you know, crimes

1:37:04

against humanity. That's because it's

1:37:06

worse than before. Fifteen years after insisting

1:37:08

that the army was taking pains

1:37:10

to minimize civilian harm, Gallant,

1:37:13

now defense minister, has clearly changed his

1:37:15

tune, as he said on the seventh,

1:37:17

we're fighting human animals and we must

1:37:19

act accordingly. Right. So they're not

1:37:21

even pretending unless you talk to Biden, unless

1:37:23

they're talking in the public sphere for corporate media in

1:37:25

the West, they make it clear we're

1:37:27

going after everybody. Oops,

1:37:35

I already saved it. Now this, just

1:37:37

to show you quickly, is what we already mentioned. This

1:37:39

is where this is going, whether that's

1:37:41

actually what's happening or just what they want

1:37:44

you to think is happening. Pentagon is moving

1:37:46

toward letting AI weapons autonomously decide to kill

1:37:48

humans. It's not far from what's happening there.

1:37:50

They're once pulling the trigger, but it seems to be

1:37:53

almost automated, where it tells them they fire anyway without even

1:37:55

thinking about it. So why not just let it fire on

1:37:57

its own? That seems like an argument that's

1:37:59

probably being made. Now

1:38:03

here is Abby Martin breaking

1:38:05

down the great march of return, the

1:38:08

peaceful protest that they were conducting that they

1:38:11

then pretended was terrorism because whether they're peaceful

1:38:13

or not, that's what they do. I

1:38:15

just want you to understand this has always been the reality. Line

1:38:22

with Israeli snipers that will shoot to

1:38:24

kill. If you wander too close to

1:38:26

the fence, it's called the no go zone. And

1:38:29

so 10s of 1000s of Palestinians peacefully

1:38:31

marched up to that zone. I

1:38:33

mean, with courage that I

1:38:35

will never understand. Braved

1:38:38

bullets, sniper fire. 8,000

1:38:42

Palestinians were shot with live ammunition. Actually,

1:38:44

10s of 1000s of people were shot

1:38:46

with live ammunition. 8,000, I think just

1:38:48

in a couple of weeks. Over

1:38:51

200 Palestinians were actually shot

1:38:53

dead, including women,

1:38:56

children, disabled people, journalists, and

1:38:58

medics. I mean, even in

1:39:00

an army and an actual

1:39:02

battle between sides in a

1:39:05

legitimate like battle and war

1:39:08

shooting those people would be

1:39:10

violations of the Geneva Convention. But

1:39:13

in just a peaceful protest where you

1:39:15

have medics trying to tend to the

1:39:17

wounded. These are all egregious war crimes,

1:39:20

and they were all documented on camera,

1:39:22

Brian, but the world completely ignored it.

1:39:25

And fast forward to today. All

1:39:28

the people involved in the Great March of Return, I mean,

1:39:30

they're on at our

1:39:32

time, the organizer of the Great

1:39:34

March of Return, an incredible poet,

1:39:36

peaceful guy, super chill guy,

1:39:38

I'm in contact with them all the

1:39:41

time, his house was targeted, his whole

1:39:43

family was bombed. He

1:39:46

lost five family members and his 10 year old son was

1:39:48

murdered. And he's in the hospital right now with

1:39:50

second degree burns with his other two children. And

1:39:54

it is so traumatizing to think that

1:39:56

that is what we are told all

1:39:58

the time. Where's the Palestinian gun? Where

1:40:00

are the nonviolent resistors? Well, you're

1:40:02

murdering them systematically. They're

1:40:05

dying because of you. You

1:40:08

are bombing them. All the journalists that they're

1:40:10

killing targeting, who else can get away with

1:40:12

this? Who else can do

1:40:14

this with impunity? They're

1:40:16

killing the truth. And

1:40:18

that even came out, like I think in a political article,

1:40:21

it said, where Biden and

1:40:23

his cohorts were scared that

1:40:26

journalists were going to get in

1:40:28

and show the complete devastation and

1:40:30

ruin in Gaza during the

1:40:32

truth and that that might shape American

1:40:34

minds. Brian, that's what they're scared of. They're

1:40:37

scared of Americans turning against

1:40:39

this colonial genocidal project because

1:40:42

they don't want us to see the truth.

1:40:44

That's why they're systematically taking out the journalists.

1:40:46

They want everyone to die. They don't want

1:40:48

any semblance of civic society left. That's why

1:40:51

they're taking out all the best and brightest

1:40:53

in Gaza. All the staff

1:40:55

of the hospitals, the surgeons.

1:40:58

I just saw a video today of

1:41:00

Nikhil babies that were left to die

1:41:02

from Israeli soldiers that were invading the

1:41:04

hospital. Who does that? Who with

1:41:06

any shred of humanity can see babies

1:41:09

laying helpless and leave

1:41:11

them to die. That is what's

1:41:13

going on and they don't want us to see

1:41:16

this. And that's why the disgusting,

1:41:18

the disgusting appendages of

1:41:20

US Empire, these so-called journalists that

1:41:22

are essentially just stenographers for the

1:41:25

Israeli media can just go up

1:41:27

there and just repeat lies. How

1:41:30

dare they call themselves journalists? How

1:41:33

dare they? How could you be a journalist

1:41:35

and not with every fiber of your

1:41:38

being speak out against this

1:41:40

country, this government that is

1:41:42

taking out your colleagues? How could they

1:41:44

do that? I still don't understand

1:41:46

Brian and you know, going back

1:41:49

to your last question about this

1:41:51

concept that this ages old battle

1:41:53

based on religious strife. It

1:41:55

is insulting to our intelligence. Christian

1:41:57

Muslims and Jews all lived in

1:41:59

historic. Palestine. It wasn't until colonizers

1:42:03

started to come, that problems started to arise.

1:42:05

It wasn't until they tried to create a

1:42:07

state on top of another people

1:42:09

based on ethnic cleansing. And

1:42:12

look, yes, a genocide happened here hundreds

1:42:14

of years ago. It was horrific. And

1:42:16

we have to acknowledge what this

1:42:18

country has founded on. If that were happening now, if

1:42:21

violent bloody conquest was happening

1:42:23

in my backyard, you sure as hell

1:42:26

know that I would not be accepting that. And none

1:42:28

of us should accept this. It's happening in real time.

1:42:30

It's being live streamed for all the world to see.

1:42:33

And it's our duty to stand up and

1:42:35

do everything we can to oppose it because

1:42:37

history will judge us. History will judge this

1:42:40

moment. And it will ask all of

1:42:42