Podchaser Logo
Home
Netanyahu Draws Up New Plan To “Thin The Population In Gaza To A Minimum” As Carpet Bombing Resumes

Netanyahu Draws Up New Plan To “Thin The Population In Gaza To A Minimum” As Carpet Bombing Resumes

Released Friday, 1st December 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Netanyahu Draws Up New Plan To “Thin The Population In Gaza To A Minimum” As Carpet Bombing Resumes

Netanyahu Draws Up New Plan To “Thin The Population In Gaza To A Minimum” As Carpet Bombing Resumes

Netanyahu Draws Up New Plan To “Thin The Population In Gaza To A Minimum” As Carpet Bombing Resumes

Netanyahu Draws Up New Plan To “Thin The Population In Gaza To A Minimum” As Carpet Bombing Resumes

Friday, 1st December 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

you god

0:17

damn yeah

0:31

yeah welcome

0:50

to the daily wrap-up a concise show

0:53

dedicated to bringing you the most relevant

0:55

independent news as we see it from

0:57

the last 24 hours friday

1:02

december 1st 2023 thank you for joining me

1:05

today i've got a good show planned for

1:07

you some follow-ups on the story we discussed

1:09

yesterday and kind of continuation of the story

1:11

in general the day

1:14

after the supposed ceasefire and a lot

1:16

of what we predicted is literally happening right in

1:19

front of us before we get anything else i

1:21

keep forgetting to do this and i wanted to

1:23

make sure that i shouted this out in general

1:26

as well as pretty much anybody else out

1:28

there that's ever sent anything that people

1:30

send us stuff and a lot of the times i get busy

1:33

and things fall by the wayside but i just people

1:35

that's sending things whether it's just a donation or

1:37

a letter or something like this i'm going to show

1:39

you it just it means more than

1:41

you could possibly know to me and everybody else here

1:43

it's it's it's stuff like this

1:45

that makes me realize not only that we've

1:48

built an amazing community here but that the

1:50

people inside that community are the kind

1:52

of people that i that i that

1:54

the kind of personality and the kind of compassion

1:57

and empathy that i hope i'm building in this

1:59

community that i project and try to be

2:01

in there strive to be things

2:03

like this. I just thought we're really amazing somebody made a

2:05

quilt It

2:08

says the last American vagabond if you can see that I'm

2:10

not holding it up very well Look

2:15

at that somebody made this by hand made this

2:17

quilt and then sent a Holder

2:20

for it as well, and I just wanted

2:22

to really I wanted to say That

2:24

it means more than you could possibly know something like that

2:26

to take so much time to put together And

2:29

I just wanted to just shout out our community in

2:31

general and they'll be amazing people within it and

2:34

on that note in general I've got something I'm supposed to

2:36

sign a book I'm supposed to send back to somebody that

2:38

I still haven't gotten to for like three months ago in

2:41

General just know that these things I don't

2:43

get lost on me the step that

2:45

people send Handmade knives or different pictures

2:47

or as somebody a really close friend

2:49

of mine here locally Close

2:51

to it, you know through this field in general that I know

2:53

very well Painted a picture of

2:55

my old my wonderful pup that passed away

2:57

Aries And just things like that We

3:01

got something special here guys. I just want you to know that

3:04

Now we're gonna get into as I said

3:07

some important follow-ups in regard to that story

3:09

that we discussed yesterday That is

3:11

now kind of making its way through

3:13

the different media areas And this is

3:15

the 972 article in regard to the

3:17

and I keep saying this wrong frustratingly

3:19

or hashtag. It's hab Sora Which

3:22

is not not has Barra very similar

3:24

term. This is hab Sora, which means

3:27

the gospel It's an Israeli term

3:29

that is it really just stands for this

3:31

artificial intelligence Platform that they're using

3:33

to decide who to bomb in Gaza and

3:35

we went over this yesterday I'm not gonna

3:37

go into it incredibly deep today, but really

3:39

watch the show from yesterday I read through

3:41

the not the entire article but all the

3:43

important parts through this article It took about

3:45

an hour to go through this in my

3:47

different discussion points because this is really important

3:50

Not only does it show you this

3:52

depth step into artificial intelligence even borderline

3:54

making its own decisions on who to

3:56

kill But also

3:58

the idea that it's proven This

4:01

article has multiple, I think it's eight

4:03

different sources, right back to the IDF,

4:05

Israeli intelligence, both former and current, admitting

4:07

on the record not only are they

4:09

deliberately killing civilians, but in many cases

4:12

doing so just to shock the

4:14

entire Palestinian people, but

4:17

in hopes that that might in some way negatively

4:19

affect Hamas. And in some cases, yes, bombing

4:21

like the Jablis refugee camp, in hopes that

4:24

they get one Hamas member. On

4:26

the record, this is the policy, not an accident,

4:28

not some kind of damage control. It's what they're

4:30

doing and admitting that

4:33

sometimes we just take down buildings just

4:35

to take down buildings. On the

4:37

record, guys, it's a really important story. So

4:39

make sure you read, go through that or just

4:41

read the article yourself. We're going to follow up

4:43

on that today because even the Guardian just confirmed

4:45

that that is in fact what's going on. They

4:48

have, as we've said a long time ago, officially lost

4:50

control of the story. We also have a

4:53

plan that was drawn up per

4:55

Netanyahu's direction. And

4:58

it explicitly actually says, I'm going

5:01

to read it exactly from, I think I quoted it

5:03

exactly on the title, but it

5:06

basically it says explicitly examines ways

5:08

to thin the population in Gaza

5:10

to a minimum. But

5:12

don't worry, guys, they're only going after Hamas,

5:15

as Biden keeps telling you. It's

5:17

just it's literally

5:19

it's the reality in your face.

5:22

I mean, this might as well be what like somebody

5:24

telling you that the air you're breathing is water.

5:26

I mean, that's how crazy this is. It's all

5:28

right in front of you. And

5:30

you just go, oh, well, I guess it's just we must

5:32

breathe water then. See, because that's what I'm supposed to think

5:34

as opposed to just acknowledging that it's air in front of

5:37

you. And it's very obvious. And everything in

5:39

history proves that we're in a situation

5:41

where the reality is blatant. Their

5:43

admissions are blatant. Their own

5:46

technology proves what we're discussing. The plans are

5:48

drawing up, make it clear it's not only

5:50

genocide and ethnic cleansing, but that they are

5:53

doing so not just for Hamas,

5:55

but all of Palestine. And

5:57

we just take the word of. somebody

6:00

who is directly tied in with people who

6:02

benefit from the agenda. Some people do anyway.

6:05

We're also going to talk about the

6:07

beginning, the continuation of what has

6:09

actually never stopped. The ceasefire was an illusion

6:11

in the first place. It wasn't a ceasefire.

6:14

It was some kind of weird pause that

6:16

they always intended to return to despite what

6:18

Biden was saying. And the reason

6:21

I say that didn't even really happen

6:23

is because as even Sky News is

6:25

reporting, and I was telling you during

6:27

the time, they were bombing both what

6:29

they claimed were Hamas connected something in

6:31

West Bank, but also just killing Palestinians

6:33

openly. So either, as I've

6:35

said before, if they were at a truce

6:37

or a ceasefire or a pause with Hamas,

6:40

well, then they clearly violated that ceasefire. It

6:42

wasn't just Gaza. It was a ceasefire with

6:44

Hamas. Or if you want to

6:46

claim they weren't doing that, so it wasn't a

6:48

violation of ceasefire, then they're just murdering Palestinians. You

6:51

can't pretend that it's what has to be. The

6:53

point is that if you claim that there

6:56

is Hamas there, then obviously they violated the

6:58

ceasefire by bombing them over there, or it's

7:00

not just about Hamas. I think that's very

7:02

obvious. And the only people trying to push

7:04

that lie are people that are invested

7:06

in the lie. I think that's very clear. Now,

7:08

we're also going to go through and

7:11

talk about the ongoing kind of, again,

7:13

the re-initiation, continuation of the

7:15

same things, targeting children, bombing

7:17

journalists, killing, bombing and demolishing

7:21

residential buildings. And we're also

7:23

going to go into an interesting story that

7:25

ties back into Ukraine again. But I

7:27

think it's very important why this is

7:30

coming out right now. Apparently today, or

7:32

rather yesterday, the argument is that Russia

7:34

bombed a building and it collapsed and

7:36

buried everybody out of the rubble. Very interesting

7:38

timing right after the story of how they're

7:40

bringing down entire buildings just to bring them

7:42

down. And it's being admitted to by the

7:44

IDF. And all of a sudden,

7:46

this happens over here. Now, is Russia capable? Of course they

7:48

are. It's

7:51

interesting to find out that everything comes directly

7:53

from the Ukrainian military saying this happened. Even

7:55

using the munitions that I can prove were

7:57

secretly sent by the United States to Ukraine.

8:00

per the Washington or Wall Street Journal. But

8:03

all that really proves is that we don't know. But

8:05

as usual, all of the corporate media says

8:07

exactly what Ukraine told him to say, just

8:09

like it's happening in Israel. And this is

8:12

the obvious game of maintaining,

8:14

well, trying to regain

8:16

control of the narrative. And we're

8:18

also going to finish with some discussion around more

8:21

of the fake news that is just, I mean,

8:23

guys, overwhelming. I almost, I had

8:25

to put off so many things, and I almost, I

8:27

have a sneaking suspicion that one of the agendas right

8:30

now, because they know they have

8:32

lost control of the narrative, is to flood

8:34

the conversation with almost provably false things. So

8:36

many of them that people have to kind

8:38

of knock them down, well, here, that's fake

8:41

and here, but it's easy to see. Like

8:43

saying, here's a person saying, kill all the

8:45

Jews in Arabic, and everybody in Arabic

8:48

says, well, that's not even what they're saying. This

8:50

debunked, and they just moved to the next one. And I think

8:52

there's, or just people that are that clumsy.

8:55

My point is that so much of it,

8:57

it just wasn't even worth getting into. Like

9:00

claims of people faking what's happening.

9:05

Even if there are fakes out there, which happen

9:07

on any side of any conversation, seemingly as far

9:09

back as you want to look, you don't need to

9:11

point that out. Or rather, the

9:14

argument is that that fake thing undermines that,

9:16

what, they're not killing children? I

9:19

think that's pretty damn obvious. Even Israel's admitting

9:21

that it's just, well, it's Hamas's fault. So

9:24

yet the argument that, you know, it's overwhelming the

9:26

amount of disinformation. I've never seen it like this

9:28

in my life. And I think it really does

9:31

show you where the source, not

9:34

all of it, but the primary source of

9:36

where most of this has been stemming from,

9:38

the Zionist agenda. And I think that's very

9:40

clear. And so what's

9:42

funny is that's always been framed as

9:45

racist, even though it's insultingly, obviously not.

9:47

It's a political party. We've gone over

9:49

this intently, or intensively, excuse me. So

9:52

the point is when we can recognize that the

9:54

reason it's been so, you know, shrouded

9:58

in any criticism. and

10:00

even our US Congress just

10:03

voted that anti-racism, anti-Semitism, anti-Semitism. It's

10:07

just, it's so, any

10:10

honest, objective person can say, well, that's just

10:12

stupid. Because obviously, somebody can be

10:14

against a political entity or the

10:16

Zionist government and they don't

10:19

just automatically hate Jews, their argument is,

10:21

well, then you just don't know that

10:23

you do. It's like, as I've said

10:25

probably 50,000 times to the start, this is why people

10:27

are beginning to see through it. So

10:29

let's start today with this clip that I showed you just

10:33

so you can see that – so you can actually see the

10:36

poster themselves, which was Rania. I

10:38

believe that she – I

10:40

don't actually know what group she's with now. I know

10:43

that she used to be with a few different ones,

10:45

but I haven't seen – she didn't have a list in

10:47

our thing anymore. But you guys are familiar with Rania. She

10:49

posted this, and really just it's

10:51

this disgusting picture of exactly what we're always talking

10:53

about. As she wrote,

10:55

the subhuman genocidal occupation forces. As

10:58

they just sit here and enjoy watching – so

11:00

here's the point to understanding this. You've seen

11:02

this in like U.S. stuff as well, where, you

11:04

know, U.S. personnel are bombing something and they

11:06

all enjoy – well, I think most people

11:09

would find some sort of enjoyment by watching

11:11

things explode or destruction, some people. But

11:14

that's usually when these are evacuated areas or

11:16

a wartime area where civilians are not

11:18

a part of. This

11:22

is them sitting around watching from the typical

11:24

area where settlers sit and watch and

11:26

eat popcorn, as even the Guardians written

11:28

about, and watch them bomb civilian areas,

11:31

as they literally bomb a

11:33

gigantic civilian area. That

11:36

is not a pinpoint destruction of Hamas

11:38

right there. That's a huge bombing of

11:40

a gigantic – multiple buildings right there.

11:44

And they all go, hooray and cheer as

11:46

they bomb where they know civilians are.

11:49

That is a special kind of brutality. That's

11:52

what you need to understand. Now,

11:55

before we come back to that, I wanted to open with

11:57

a couple – actually just one quick point I thought was

11:59

very relevant. to all this. The

12:01

United Nations posted this so far nearly

12:04

12,000 children have been vaccinated

12:08

at the health centers in Gaza. This

12:10

is the Palestinian Refugee Agency. 12,000.

12:12

Now we just saw what

12:15

they brought in. They said they brought in what, 7,000 and

12:17

something like around that, injections. And now

12:19

suddenly they're saying 12,000 vaccinated. That

12:22

first of all just doesn't even line up with what

12:24

they brought in. But who knows that could just be

12:26

a discrepancy with the numbers. But

12:28

this is saying as they warn of eminent

12:30

outbreaks of waterborne disease and emergence of hepatitis

12:32

and skin disease. Well

12:35

okay so my obvious question was injected

12:37

with what? It just

12:39

says they've been vaccinated. So did they

12:42

get multiple injections? Well that's not what you said when

12:44

you brought in individual injections.

12:46

You stated a number so that meant it was

12:48

one thing. So when you're

12:50

talking about waterborne diseases, emergence of hepatitis, are

12:53

we talking about some multi-bound thing that's probably

12:55

dangerous? Or are you talking about COVID-19 injections

12:57

which wouldn't apply to what you list? I

13:01

don't know. But it sure as hell concerns

13:03

me for many different reasons. And I said why is

13:05

this the focus? Instead of addressing

13:07

the reason that these issues are present

13:09

to begin with. You know the illegal

13:11

Israeli siege that's causing the problem. This

13:15

feels manipulative to me.

13:18

And these all had to go pass through

13:20

Israel's controls to get here. So

13:23

we should obviously keep an eye on this. I said

13:25

this before. All of a sudden if we start seeing

13:27

some kind of an outbreak of the very same problem

13:29

they say is out breaking elsewhere, well we should be

13:31

very suspicious about that. But also the very big concern

13:33

for me. It's

13:36

not out of the realm of possibility for this

13:38

to have been manipulated especially by somebody like Israel.

13:42

Or the reality. Especially when you know that these are

13:44

people that they're literally calling terrorists. Human

13:46

animals. There's nobody they're innocent. So let's put

13:49

aside the illusion and the childish game of

13:51

pretending like they don't just want to kill

13:53

all these Palestinians. They have said as much.

13:56

That's not contentious. That's

13:58

why you international rights. lawyers

14:00

are saying if the intent is the hardest part

14:03

usually and they made that clear they've

14:05

already stated their intent to kill all these people. So

14:08

my concern is things like the historical

14:10

conversations of well

14:13

they're disputed as most of these stories are

14:15

but locations in

14:17

Africa I think Kenya is one of

14:19

them saying our I think was tetanus

14:21

vaccinations they included a protein that was

14:25

either by byproduct or explicitly

14:27

designed to create infertility or

14:30

we can talk about the discussions in India

14:32

or the different Bill Gates connected concepts that

14:34

have literally led to that exact

14:36

accidental problem so

14:39

my concern would be if this would be something else and

14:42

let's read up to realize as we've made clear before

14:44

the UN is a gigantic entity

14:46

now this does not mean just because some

14:49

of these people that are working on the ground have

14:51

been screaming about how Israel's murdering their people does not

14:53

then mean that that would forgo some larger agenda

14:55

these are all hypothetical I've just

14:58

put in this in your mind so we can

15:00

keep this in the story as we go forward

15:02

because this will be quickly forgotten about in a

15:04

month suddenly something happens or two weeks well

15:07

probably with a lot what happened since then and

15:09

we'll might forget about this so this person simply

15:11

says considering oh oh this was

15:13

a link that this is where that was this is

15:16

the link they were referencing that it's not confirmed it's

15:18

a somebody says they deny and kind

15:20

of a story so the point is generally that

15:22

we know historically there have been injections that have

15:24

led to those problems a lot of them say

15:26

it's some kind of an accidental thing or what

15:28

we've talked about the different byproducts

15:31

of the things they've used like the

15:34

aluminums or the endocrine disrupting chemicals but

15:36

my point is that this is

15:39

not the thing that should be happening while

15:41

the problem it's like a it's a bandit on a

15:43

bullet hole right you're watching people who

15:46

are struggling and going here's an injection that

15:48

might help you from the problem as opposed

15:50

to just stopping the thing that's causing silly

15:52

to run through the streets right right

15:54

you pretend giving them these injections is I mean and

15:56

on top of that quite frankly when we

15:58

know what we're dealing with and People that have

16:00

no clear reason to be safe with

16:03

these, they've proven the intent is my

16:05

point. These things probably hurt

16:07

people anyway. Now, that probably

16:09

scared people away. Oh no, we got any bactrus here.

16:11

No, I'm talking about the intent and the people running

16:13

them. You know the CDC and the FDA that

16:15

have been caught lying in the most astronomical

16:18

ways. Huge,

16:20

high level, people resigning in

16:23

protest because they're lying or

16:25

covering up, and yet there's still people hugging their

16:27

ears and going, trust the science. My

16:29

point has always been the intent and the people within

16:31

that, not necessarily that everything

16:34

within vaccinology is somehow evil

16:36

and wrong. I don't know, in

16:38

fact, because my understanding comes from those same people

16:40

growing up and being taught about these things. So

16:42

if what we understand is correct, well, I argue

16:44

there's probably some benefit, but it should be your

16:46

choice. So when

16:48

this goes on from the same time what

16:50

we just came from, we should be very

16:52

concerned about that. Now

16:54

Robin Meinhard points out, Gaza

16:57

did not comply with the COVID mandates and

16:59

fared much better than the highly-backed Israelis. And

17:02

he breaks this down with some different, you can check

17:04

out these links, and there's down here is the link

17:07

specifically to one of the studies from before. It

17:10

makes an excellent point that obviously, and this is not

17:13

hard to wrap your mind around, when you compare this,

17:15

it's a peer-reviewed study, you can read it, but it's

17:17

before COVID and before all this. 2019,

17:19

I think, basically says that

17:21

Gaza's worse off in pretty much every way. In

17:24

health regards, regarding health. Except

17:28

when it came to this discussion. And then think about how

17:30

crazy that is. Seeing as how

17:32

this was Pfizer's lab, right? The one that's

17:34

supposed to be the best, even

17:36

though it killed the most people, and

17:39

every ball, most Israelis got multiple Pfizer shots.

17:41

And yet when you look back, it's weird

17:43

how Gaza fared better. You

17:45

see this, it's like every other conversation.

17:48

You already know the truth. Whether you choose

17:50

to admit it to yourself or not, the evidence is clear. Just

17:53

like with what we're watching today. It's right there. So

17:56

now again, I'm worried about what might happen with these

17:58

injections they just gave them. But let's

18:00

get into pretty much the main topic

18:02

for today, which is the conversation of

18:04

the Habsara

18:08

artificial intelligence platform that

18:11

is basically deciding for the IDF who

18:13

they will kill. Now,

18:15

this was the discussion from yesterday. The

18:18

IDF insiders admit to deliberate civilian bombings

18:20

and the AI mass assassination factory, which

18:26

is what one of these IDF members called it. The

18:29

mass assassination factory. Now,

18:32

this, by the way, I want to make this point.

18:34

This is Jason again posting this from yesterday's show, and

18:36

I appreciate it. He said, Ryan, once again, headed the

18:39

curve examining some of the most important information that's been

18:41

released since October 7 about the

18:43

authorization to bomb non-military target. Now,

18:46

just for you guys to remember again, maybe I should change

18:48

the image. When I first started this a long

18:50

time ago, even the name was different, but it

18:52

has evolved to become just the TLav

18:54

account. I'm not the only one that posted

18:56

this account. Jason is now

18:58

one of the people as well that posts through here and

19:00

post different spotlights and different things. I

19:03

just reached out and said, maybe you shouldn't frame

19:05

it in the third person because apparently everybody's like,

19:07

Ryan, that's dumb. Don't talk to a third person.

19:09

I'm like, I'm not doing that. Jason's

19:11

posting those. Anyway, my point is just to once

19:13

again, make sure you guys hear that there's other

19:15

people posting through the account. Just

19:18

understand that. I think that's important. Also,

19:21

shout out to Jason Basler for his amazing work

19:23

in regard to these spotlights and the

19:25

different ways we're highlighting the different work on TLav.

19:28

Now, we're going to get into that point. I'm not going to read

19:30

this through again, but the article is 972 from 972 Magazine, a

19:34

mass assassination factory inside Israel's calculated

19:36

bombing of Gaza, November

19:40

30th. Just

19:42

the main point, so you see

19:44

it, is the discussion of what

19:46

they call Habsorra. See,

19:50

I said it wrong again. Gosh darn it. I can't get

19:52

that right in my mind. I keep saying Habsorra, and I

19:54

keep forgetting it. Habsorra.

19:57

H-A-B-S-O-R-A. I think

19:59

my mind... mixes it up with Hasbarah and that's

20:01

why. But the point is, this is what

20:03

it stands for is the gospel. And it

20:06

is the, as it says, the widespread use

20:08

of a system which largely built on artificial

20:10

intelligence and can generate targets almost automatically at

20:12

a rate that far exceeds what is previously

20:14

possible. And the article discusses how it

20:16

not, tens of thousands of their analysts wouldn't be

20:18

able to comb through this. So

20:21

what they're admitting is

20:23

that they in real time use what this

20:25

proposes and they fire. Knowing

20:27

that they could not comb 10,000 of their people couldn't

20:30

comb through the information and decide. So they

20:32

are taking what this tells them to fire

20:34

on and just pressing the button. So

20:36

I mean, it might as well just be the AI firing. That's

20:39

their admission. And on top

20:41

of that, it says that their leadership

20:43

are incentivizing, almost

20:45

pressuring them to find

20:47

more targets than anybody else. That's

20:50

how they're graded based on how many targets

20:52

they end up firing on. So the point is,

20:54

it's clear the leadership is like, just go. Don't

20:56

look, don't consider, don't think, just press the button.

20:58

They also give them sort of a

21:01

way of not telling

21:03

themselves they're not just murdering civilians. Because a

21:05

lot of these idea people are just regular people

21:07

that are going through the military. They're not all

21:10

as crazy as the Zionist government. And

21:12

I think this is a way of sorta like in a

21:15

firing line, historically, you have 10 people

21:17

or some people do that and only one of them

21:19

has a bullet and they all fire. And

21:21

so they don't really know who's the one that killed the person. So they

21:23

don't have to live with that. I think there's a

21:25

part of that to this. The real

21:27

point though, is when you read through this and I'll

21:30

read you directly from the person who I saw this

21:32

from first, Arnad Batrand, who's doing great work, is

21:35

that this is about not just how they're arbitrarily

21:38

deciding where they bomb, but

21:40

within this admission, the IDF

21:42

members, but also the actual platform itself

21:44

makes clear that they're deliberately,

21:48

deliberately trying to hurt the

21:50

civilian population, deliberately trying to

21:53

collapse the civil infrastructure. That's

21:55

direct quotes, so that

21:57

that might hinder Hamas. So if you don't understand

21:59

what. That means that they would they

22:01

this is admitting that they will destroy

22:04

everything in Gaza if they think that will

22:06

achieve their goal And I've

22:08

realized that's coming from IDF members My

22:11

my opinion is that from a

22:13

Zionist leadership high level they're going

22:15

after Palestine

22:17

and Hamas

22:19

is a justification for that But

22:22

this is what it says He says this might be

22:24

the most important piece of journalism on the war since

22:26

Gaza began Since that this

22:28

this part began a spell it says

22:31

essentially they confirm with unimpeachable sourcing It's

22:33

like eight different members both current and

22:35

former in Intelligence and

22:37

the IDF that the killing of

22:39

civilians was all calculated and intentional

22:43

Their investigation is quote based on conversations

22:45

with seven current and former members

22:47

of seven of Israel's intelligence community

22:49

Including military intelligence and Air Force

22:51

personnel who were involved in Israeli

22:54

operations in the strip in addition

22:56

to Palestinian Testimonies data date

22:58

data and con and documentation from Gaza

23:01

Strip the official statements by the idea

23:03

of spokespersons and Israeli

23:05

state institutions that's about as

23:07

small sources. You can get doesn't necessarily prove that it's all

23:09

true question everything But

23:12

if you're going to question like if you're

23:14

going to question this well You damn well

23:16

better question Israel says when Netanyahu goes this

23:18

is what you're supposed to think and people

23:20

blindly go with that All right This is

23:22

the opposite of what they're saying with seven

23:24

different mean with about the best kind

23:26

of sourcing you can get But

23:28

that just like intelligence

23:30

telling New York Times They

23:33

could be lying But

23:35

when you add this up along with everything else

23:37

we're seeing and all the other admissions and all

23:39

the documentation It's quite obvious what's happening and

23:42

then a pop of that we'll get to the next part Which is

23:44

that the Guardian has just confirmed this yes

23:46

This is what's happening and not just

23:48

because the Guardian says so but because it's that obvious that

23:50

they seem I guess have to confirm it or To

23:53

the point we also make alternatively there's a they

23:55

may be a reason they want us looking at

23:57

this So keep that in your mind But

24:00

even if that is the case, that does not

24:02

mean we should ignore it or not take the

24:04

win, which is highlighting that the belligerent

24:07

genocidal Zionist government is definitely

24:10

trying to murder people. But

24:12

then also just be careful not to fall into

24:14

whatever trap they're using that truth to trap us

24:16

with. Now it says what

24:19

the investigation reveals is that the Israeli

24:21

army has files on the vast majority

24:23

of potential targets in Gaza, including

24:26

homes, which stipulate the number of

24:28

civilians who are likely to be killed in

24:30

an attack on a particular target. So

24:32

again, very specific information about how many

24:35

people they will kill and

24:37

they decide to do it. It's not like they

24:39

just hope they don't kill them or as we'll get

24:41

to in a second, as Elon clumsily says, they do

24:43

everything they can to not kill them. No, they don't.

24:46

But now on the record, they do not. They

24:48

just go, yeah, that's enough. It's OK. As

24:50

long as we kill him, they're just casual

24:52

or casualties. And one of

24:54

the other big parts is the idea of how they break

24:56

down the different groups. Power

24:58

targets are, I think, something like 70

25:01

percent of what they've been hitting both here and in

25:03

the past wars per their admission.

25:05

And that by definition means

25:08

civilian buildings, schools, hospitals

25:11

in some of their as they was a direct

25:13

quote, taking down buildings just

25:16

to take down buildings. If that

25:18

some way scare the population to

25:20

stop supporting Hamas, that guy is

25:22

in admission to collective punishment along with a

25:25

lot more. Now,

25:29

it says the Israeli they have the files which

25:31

stipulate the number of civilians that might be

25:33

killed. This number is calculated and known in

25:35

advance to the army's intelligence units, who

25:39

also know shortly before carrying out an attack

25:41

roughly how many civilians are certain to be

25:43

killed. Now, an interesting admission by Blinken, who

25:46

is increasingly showing himself to be clumsy in this job,

25:49

makes this case. I think it was an accident,

25:51

quite frankly. And I'll show you what I mean in a second. One

25:54

source told them, quote, nothing happens by

25:57

accident when a three year old girl

25:59

is killed in a home. in Gaza, it's because someone in

26:01

the army decided it wasn't a big deal for

26:03

her to be killed. That it

26:05

was a price worth paying in order to hit

26:07

another target. He says, we are not

26:09

Hamas. These are not random rockets. Everything

26:12

is intentional. We know exactly how much collateral damage

26:14

there will be in every home. It's an interesting

26:16

way. He almost admits that Hamas is not targeting

26:18

civilians, but rather they always use the idea

26:20

that the rocket systems don't have guidance, which

26:22

therefore means it could hit civilians. Therefore they're

26:25

aiming at civilians. Well, that's very different, isn't

26:27

it? Even more dystopian

26:29

as this might be a first in the

26:31

history of warfare, a lot of the targets

26:33

are identified by artificial intelligence. For

26:36

as far as I can tell, almost all of them. That's

26:39

per what they state in this article. It says,

26:41

for instance, and this is Bernad, or

26:43

nod speaking, they

26:46

quote, use a system called Habsura,

26:49

meaning the gospel, which is largely built on

26:51

artificial intelligence and can generate targets almost

26:54

automatically at a rate that far exceeds

26:56

what was possible for this AI system

26:58

as described by a former intelligence

27:00

officer, essentially facilitates

27:03

a mass assassination factory.

27:05

Like imagine stating that as your opinion

27:08

and then still people still disputing, like,

27:11

and then literally being able to see it.

27:13

And the only thing challenging that it's obvious

27:15

genocide and obvious mass assassination is that you

27:17

simply go, well, it's Hamas's fault. They

27:19

did it. They did what? They

27:22

built the system? No, they fired? No. They

27:25

did something over here. But then they should be accountable for

27:27

that. Explain for me

27:29

why 50 plus days later, your targeted

27:31

civilian killings is Hamas's fault. You

27:34

can't because that's absurd. But

27:37

they're still going with that. It's just not

27:39

working. According to the

27:41

sources, the increasing use of AI based systems

27:44

like Habsura allows the army to carry out

27:46

strikes on residential homes where a single Hamas

27:48

member lives or they might think they live.

27:50

And that's admitted in the article two on

27:53

a massive scale, even though even

27:55

those who are junior Hamas operatives, one of the things

27:57

they admit, one of these IDF members. Rather,

28:00

I think it's one of the intelligence operatives says

28:03

that we understand this to be basically an

28:05

excuse But they just go oh

28:07

well. He's on that floor so bomb the building When

28:10

really it comes down to this day as he says then

28:12

just bombing buildings to bomb buildings It

28:14

says I'm not going to copy this person our nod points

28:16

out I'm not going to copy face the whole thing you

28:18

have to read it which I agree Even

28:20

more even more than what I went over

28:22

yesterday. You've got to read this thing all

28:24

the way through They've essentially been running as

28:27

the sources say a mass assassination Factory at

28:29

a terrifying scale with massive and importantly impended

28:32

collateral collateral damage Often

28:34

the targets entire families or even sometimes

28:36

much of their neighborhoods without even telling

28:38

anybody even MSC International reported that alongside

28:41

an objective to destroy much of Gaza

28:44

to create a shock That's

28:46

collective punishment. These are on the record war

28:49

crimes all in a population

28:51

that had nothing to nowhere to escape and

28:54

Still don't it'll likely remain in

28:56

history books as one of the most depraved

28:58

massacres in modern history Assuming

29:00

we can comb through all the hot that

29:02

has borrowed Propaganda that is drowning all the

29:04

social media platforms right now even though nobody's

29:06

believing it. It's just everywhere

29:10

Yeah as As

29:14

Desensored news points out and

29:16

this is what I was referencing from Anthony Blinken before we

29:18

continue on the story This is

29:20

what he said on the record on the 30th yesterday Israel

29:23

has one of the most sophisticated militaries in

29:25

the world It is capable

29:27

of neutralizing the threat posed by Hamas

29:30

while minimizing harm to innocent men women

29:32

and children Yeah,

29:34

do you realize why that was a mistake? Because

29:37

what he's essentially saying without realizing it because I guess

29:39

he's just not that right is that

29:41

they're not doing that like

29:43

it doesn't take an Entire

29:45

intelligence to be able to look at what's going on

29:48

and say well then clearly they're not doing that you

29:50

can't pretend that I mean, I think there's images down

29:52

here. Somebody had an image Maybe

29:55

not. I think I didn't maybe I didn't include it. You know the images

29:57

we've seen I've just entire city blocks

29:59

destroyed So if your argument is

30:01

that they have the ability to do actually what I'll show you

30:03

in a second and we'll make fun

30:05

Of this guy yet again. This is what they're claiming Okay,

30:08

then why isn't that what's happening? Are

30:10

we to pretend that the entire residential

30:12

city block was all Hamas members? That's

30:16

obviously not true. Even if they claim that They

30:19

would need to prove that but the point overall is

30:21

that he's telling you that they have the ability to do

30:23

that to minimize civilian casualties and yet we see I

30:26

Don't think per capita is the right word but based on

30:29

the size of these area and the time this has been

30:31

going on in History unprecedented the

30:33

amount of civilians and what it were up to

30:35

think about 70% of who they've killed have been

30:37

women and children You

30:40

can't pretend that that's what they're doing.

30:42

It says even a conservative assessment This

30:44

is proven New York Times of the

30:46

reported Gaza casualty figures show that the

30:49

rate of death during Israel's assault has

30:51

few Precedents in this century more

30:53

children have been killed in Gaza

30:55

since the Israeli assault began than

30:57

in the world's major conflict zones

30:59

combined Across two

31:02

dozen countries during all of

31:04

the last year even with the

31:06

war in Ukraine They just

31:08

can't let's just read that last part again Cuz I didn't

31:10

even I just I referenced this article recently and I didn't

31:12

say this is in the article more

31:15

children in 50

31:17

plus days have been killed in

31:19

Gaza since the Israeli assault began

31:21

then in the world's major conflict

31:23

zones combined Across two

31:26

dozen countries during all of

31:28

last year even including Ukraine

31:31

Then let's read his statement again Israel

31:33

has one of the most sophisticated Militaries in the

31:35

world is capable of neutralizing with threat posed by

31:37

Hamas while minimizing harm to civilian men and women

31:39

and children So

31:41

then by basic detective logic, they're just

31:43

not doing that Okay,

31:46

just I hope that's very very clear and then he cites

31:48

the article the one we're just low and lost You know,

31:50

this is a different one. We didn't read this one our

31:52

nod but trend writes This is essentially

31:55

blinking consciously or not admitting that Israel

31:57

killing civilians was intentional since it's sufficiently

32:00

sophisticated military is capable not to. I

32:03

agree. Now, he

32:06

also points out the Guardian has confirmed this

32:08

investigation and how they're using AI to bomb

32:10

targets in Gaza at an unprecedented rate powering

32:12

a mass assassination factory in which the emphasis

32:15

is on quantity not quality. By the way,

32:17

which was also stated in the article, which

32:20

goes back right to the beginning statement

32:22

of damage not accuracy. They just

32:24

say it a different way, emphasis on quantity

32:26

not quality. Meaning we're

32:28

not pinpointing Hamas, meaning we are

32:31

being indiscriminate with our bombing. Now

32:35

I just realized by the way that I was going to

32:37

go through this and oh, of course they did that. That's

32:41

hilarious. Well, you know, I'm gonna leave it like this for now anyway,

32:43

since I forgot to highlight it. I was gonna go through and highlight

32:45

these and I realized I forgot to do that. But

32:48

the reason I said that for the podcast is all of a

32:50

sudden that it was open and now it just went to behind

32:52

a paywall. Funny how that works in real

32:54

time. But what is

32:56

pointing out? It's probably the most dystopian

32:58

revelation of the war so far. All

33:01

these women and children killed are literally selected

33:03

as targets by a machine. Now

33:08

this person simply says how many

33:10

how are they any different from Hamas? An

33:13

objectively fair statement, right? If

33:15

they're targeting civilians, which is what they say

33:17

Hamas is why there is the big bad thing that

33:20

they are. Nobody over here is

33:22

claiming that they're not something we should be concerned about. Especially

33:25

since we know that Netanyahu has been propping them

33:27

up and that and funding them per harrass. In

33:31

fact, I think

33:34

I already deleted it. Let

33:38

me see. Nope, it's right there. Just

33:45

so you can hear it again, we played it yesterday, but I

33:48

got apparently Dave Smith is blowing up all over

33:50

the place. I think he deserves it after that

33:52

absolute annihilation of Laura of ridiculous. Kind

33:55

of sounds like a conspiracy theory if you

33:57

haven't heard this before, but this is total. Really,

34:00

100% true was Benjamin

34:02

Netanyahu's strategy for years to

34:05

prop up Hamas, specifically because

34:08

then there would be no negotiating a

34:10

state for the Palestinians, because no one

34:12

in the international community is going to

34:15

look at Hamas, this terrorist organization, and

34:17

say, yeah, we recognize them. So the

34:19

plan was to undermine the more secular

34:22

Palestinian authority types so that they wouldn't

34:24

be in control, Hamas would be in

34:26

control, and then no one would ever

34:28

negotiate their state. So just

34:31

to be clear here, this is, and

34:33

by the way, I mean you can

34:35

find direct quotes from Benjamin Netanyahu saying

34:37

this in his own words, saying that

34:39

you must support Hamas, we must continue

34:41

funding and supporting Hamas so that they

34:43

can never get a state, specifically

34:46

for that intended reason. So basically

34:48

what Benjamin Netanyahu did was for

34:50

years prop up this terrorist organization

34:52

and then fail to defend his

34:54

people from them on October 7th.

34:57

It's mind boggling to me that

34:59

this element gets left out of the

35:01

conversation in America. But by the way, it's

35:03

not left out of the conversation in Israel.

35:06

Their newspapers are all talking about this, how this

35:08

plan blew up in his face. What's

35:12

even more amazing is that this, to us, we're like,

35:14

well, yeah, how do you not know that? It's

35:16

literally posted all over the place. But it's because

35:18

people in corporate media land or people

35:20

that watch corporate media land have no

35:22

clue about this stuff, even the

35:24

person that was moderating the debate while he was debating.

35:27

For years Netanyahu propped up Hamas. Now it's

35:29

blowing up in our faces. That was the

35:31

day after this happened, the day after

35:34

they're supposed to 9-11. They

35:36

were going, you did this Netanyahu. So it's

35:38

insulting to everybody's intelligence to not include that

35:40

in the conversation. My

35:48

computer is broken. So how

35:51

are they different from Hamas? Right?

35:53

What are they saying? Well, they're targeting.

35:55

They're targeting. They targeted civilians. He

36:00

is actually debatable based on all the

36:02

new information about October 7th. But I

36:04

also don't think that this – like my point in saying

36:06

that is we know they took civilians. But

36:09

who knows whether it was people that didn't know or

36:11

so on, but it's obvious that they committed a crime,

36:13

whether or not they knew they were civilians or somebody

36:15

took them not knowing and blah, blah, blah. But

36:17

what's different is whether they were

36:20

targeting killing and raping and mutilating, which is what the

36:22

story became. I think there's

36:24

a lot of evidence that suggests that they're being – were being lied to

36:26

about that, not to say that it's not possible. But

36:29

in return and reverse, well, we now have

36:31

the evidence that not only are they committing one of the most

36:33

obvious denicides in history, but they're choosing to,

36:35

that they're targeting civilians, which by the way,

36:37

if you've been paying attention long before October

36:39

7th, you'd be like, well, duh, it's obvious.

36:41

They talk about it. Amity has covered this.

36:43

Human Rights Watch has proved that. UN has

36:45

called it out for a decade. Yeah, but

36:47

we're still breaking it down in corporate media.

36:49

It's embarrassing. But this person

36:52

says Hamas killed proportionally less civilians on October

36:54

7th by many orders of magnitude. So

36:58

the person's just simply saying that, you know, well,

37:00

this – they killed a hell of a lot more people going forward. So

37:03

like that person's response that day when they were asked,

37:05

what about October 7th? And

37:07

he went on to – in repetition, say

37:09

what about October 8th? What about October 9th? What about

37:11

October 10th? And went all the way to November 8th.

37:14

So the guy just ended up walking away. Because the

37:16

point is, well, if you're going to make the argument, well,

37:18

yeah, we care about that day. People die. Civilians

37:20

die, and we care, as we've said every single time it

37:22

comes up. But why don't

37:24

you want to talk about all the civilians that

37:26

have been killed since? Even if you want to go on

37:29

and say, Hamas is false, well, that's

37:31

your argument. And there's a

37:33

hell of a lot of information that seems to undermine

37:35

it. That's even the reality. But Israel is the one

37:37

continuing to bomb. At what point is there – like,

37:39

if this went on for 10 years, would that still

37:42

be them defending themselves? How do you

37:44

make that argument? At some point, there has

37:46

to be a line. An argument of the clear reality

37:48

is that line was crossed 30 seconds

37:50

after this started. Because there was a

37:52

lot of other things that could have happened. Instead, as

37:54

we now know, they chose to

37:57

decimate Palestine. This person

37:59

says, that's a relic. that they've

38:01

killed more people since, irrelevant. Hamas targets

38:04

civilians, Israel targets Hamas.

38:07

Every death on both sides is the result of Hamas's

38:09

actions. Think about the

38:11

absolutism there, that's such a childish,

38:13

binary, naive statement. Every

38:15

death on both sides is the result of

38:18

Hamas's actions. So

38:20

if an IDF member went in and

38:22

just shot someone in the head today, that would

38:24

be Hamas's fault, that's what they're basically saying. But

38:26

let's just take it back and say, okay, they're

38:29

bombing after Hamas. Well, we've

38:31

proven, even corporate media

38:33

has had to admit countless

38:35

examples of civilian locations that do

38:38

not have military objectives. Amnesty broke

38:40

this down, I believe in this

38:42

one right here. No, sorry,

38:44

that's the torture one. I don't have it up today.

38:47

But they broke it down with the five different

38:49

things that they proved, the five different incidents they

38:51

investigated, and they were, only one

38:53

of them had any connection to Hamas, and

38:56

they even proved that he wasn't even there that day. So

38:59

the reality is that that's a childishly

39:01

stupid statement. And

39:03

I simply said, it's cute that you think these couched

39:05

responses where he says, well, in response to the same

39:07

thing, Israel is defending itself, that's how. Okay,

39:11

so by targeting, obviously he didn't

39:14

read the article, by targeting civilians, you're

39:16

just, they're defending themselves, even though they've now, I think

39:18

I say it right here. I

39:20

said, it's cute that you think that these

39:23

couched responses change anyone's mind, as Israel murders

39:25

children on live TV. By the way, they've

39:27

shifted into the right to protect itself, right?

39:30

We talked about this yesterday. So

39:32

I said, I guess you didn't get

39:34

the memo, because no one accepts 50

39:36

plus days of perfect bombing as defending

39:38

yourself. Literally nobody. Now,

39:43

the Guardian, the Gospel, or

39:46

Pobsara, how Israel,

39:48

by the way, which they don't list. Is

39:53

that interesting? Pobsara, right? Make

39:56

sure I'm not getting it wrong again. Habsora.

40:00

See, how – okay, what is – there's something –

40:03

some kind of brain glitch with me with this

40:05

word, habsora. Same

40:09

point, though. I looked it up earlier. So they don't have

40:11

it listed in here. Isn't that strange? So

40:14

it's almost like the word hasbara. People act

40:16

like that's some kind of racist trope. It's

40:18

a very provable thing. It's like the Hannibal

40:20

directive. It's on the record. They literally talk

40:22

about it when you actually engage with

40:24

it. They don't even have a minister of habsora. They

40:27

don't use the word minister, but it's very

40:29

public. So my point is that

40:31

it's strange they don't use these words. Wouldn't you use

40:34

the term they use to describe it? They don't call it the

40:36

gospel. Oh, they do in Hebrew,

40:38

but interesting, right? But it says, How

40:40

Israel uses AI to select bombing targets

40:43

in Gaza. Now understand, this is a

40:45

wildly watered-down discussion. But even

40:47

then, it is still very damning. Well,

40:52

on that note, please make sure you

40:54

watch this show to really understand how very obvious this all

40:56

is. We

40:59

have things like this weirdly popping up directly

41:01

after this story comes out. All right, so

41:04

this was today. This one was yesterday.

41:08

And Mr. Hazbara comes out himself 14 hours

41:10

ago. They, whatever they

41:12

means, just I guess he's referring to other people.

41:16

He probably means anybody but Jews or

41:18

Israelis because that's how bigoted these people

41:20

are. Israel is discriminately bombing Palestinians indiscriminately.

41:23

Yeah, like they just admitted to. But

41:25

that doesn't matter. The Israeli Air

41:27

Force, as he says, surgically destroys the

41:29

fourth floor where a terrorist lives while keeping the

41:31

rest of the building intact. What

41:34

childish garbage. We

41:37

can't just look up an endless amount of

41:39

videos of entire buildings being bombed. The

41:42

idea that they would ever do that is – I mean, by the

41:44

way, I didn't even get a chance to do this. I

41:46

would love to find out right now that this is an

41:48

image from a different year because they've already been caught

41:50

for doing that. For those who don't know,

41:53

by the way, TinEye is one of the different reverse

41:56

image searches that you should try to use.

41:58

Nope, zero matches. No,

42:01

but my so here's my point. It's

42:05

not even let's just say that

42:07

they did that. To then

42:09

point at this one example and act like

42:11

the every other indiscriminate bombing just because

42:13

you have this one image that every

42:15

other obvious example or the fact that

42:17

their IDF members have admitted this or

42:19

they openly say kill them all there's

42:21

no one innocent they're human animals make it

42:23

a parking lot like it's just so dumb

42:26

how these people keep pushing. By

42:28

the way I guess some people don't like that I call things dumb and

42:30

stupid some things are just dumb and

42:32

stupid like something that's sometimes just the best word

42:34

for these things that it's just ridiculous. There's

42:37

a lot of it today. But as

42:40

Nico House I guess he's changed his name to Free

42:42

Palestine Free Gaza says so they

42:44

could avoid destroying entire city blocks this whole

42:46

time but chose not to. Thanks for proving

42:48

our point. It's

42:51

well done. Actually I thought I shared that

42:53

right. The point is the same thing. Same

42:56

thing that Blinken just did like this is why this

42:58

is what happens when you're so blown that your narrative

43:00

is destroyed. That all you can do

43:02

is challenge a

43:04

previous law right blink into the same

43:07

thing you're admitting that they have the ability to do

43:09

that so why haven't they been doing that. My

43:11

point is that I don't even think that's even reality

43:13

I think this is about a stage thing. But

43:17

it doesn't matter either way nobody

43:19

is dismissing or denying that they are

43:21

literally doing this bombing entire buildings taking

43:23

on entire city blocks targeting hospitals and

43:26

mosques and schools. U.N. locations they

43:28

only just started saying Hamas affiliated

43:32

because the idea of their

43:34

intelligence admitted this and

43:37

we can see it happening. Somebody else

43:39

responds by saying oh wait that's the same

43:41

one. Oh here's

43:43

the first one. So this is just the idea of parity account

43:45

which again that's the picture I was going to show you earlier.

43:48

Look at this. So

43:50

what's the excuse there. We

43:52

could have used precision bombs here but our pilots were so

43:54

bored that we let them destroy the whole town. And

43:57

actually what's so crazy is that's actually

43:59

something. the article discusses. Sometimes

44:02

we just needed to make it look like we had

44:04

a win. So we bombed a big area and showed

44:06

our people and said, look, we got them, admitting that

44:08

it was just to make a point and there were

44:10

no Hamas members. Now

44:14

Sam Usaini points out something very important as

44:16

well, which simply just continues to make it

44:19

obvious that these people not only are lying, but

44:21

know that they're lying, which is

44:23

that there's another example on the record coming

44:26

from an Israeli outlet. I'll

44:28

read his first. Ethnic cleansing is a major

44:30

Israeli goal. Sam Usaini writes, I agree with

44:32

that. Are world leaders just going

44:34

to stand by or are

44:37

they going to

44:39

invoke the genocide convention? Jonathan

44:42

Shamir writes, and

44:45

he's a fellow at Jewish Currents.

44:48

So I don't know why, it's just funny how if

44:51

these people are Jewish and they challenge the narrative,

44:53

people like Ben Shapiro call them trash, showing

44:55

you who they really are, the real racist

44:57

and bigoted people. But what's interesting is that

45:00

it shouldn't really matter more, should it? That

45:03

somebody decides to point this out. If they're Jewish, it

45:05

shouldn't matter more just because they're discussing Jewish topics. But

45:07

it does to some people. But

45:10

if it matters to some people to see more of the

45:12

truth, then here you go. It says, and

45:14

this is coming from Israel Hayom. One option considered by

45:16

the war cabinet, I'll show you the article next, is

45:19

the thinning out of the Gaza population

45:21

to minimize possible level to the

45:23

minimum possible level. While

45:25

most of the security establishment opposes this,

45:28

Netanyahu sees this as a strategic goal.

45:31

And he asked Ron Dermer to formulate

45:33

a working plan. The article gives a

45:35

sense on how this may look, the

45:37

need to bypass international pressure and avoid

45:39

scenes in Egypt shooting refugees at Rafah.

45:41

The sea is also open to Gazans.

45:45

They've always talked about driving them into the

45:47

sea, except that's not considered genocide or racist,

45:49

but only statements of free Palestine are. Israel

45:52

can, which by the way, does not explicitly mean

45:54

no Israel. Israel can open the

45:56

sea crossing at its will and will enable a

45:58

mass exodus to Europe and American countries.

46:01

The reporter also echoes these

46:03

enabling euphemisms. Quote, this

46:05

is not about transfer, but about releasing

46:07

the stranglehold on Gaza's borders. Right.

46:10

Like that's what they want. Right. The point

46:12

is you're pretending this is about helping them. And that's the thing

46:14

I said from day one, you're going to

46:16

drive them into this insecure position and an act

46:18

like the thing that they, that nobody was ever

46:21

going to allow is suddenly the only thing that

46:23

helps them. Mass displacement. The

46:27

phenomena of refugees and war is an accepting

46:29

thing. It says the government itself is reportedly split

46:32

on the program. Smotrich, Ben Gavir, some of

46:34

the most extreme and some Luke administers see

46:36

this as a necessity. Of course they do

46:39

because they're extremists. While others

46:41

such as Gallant and Gantz and Eisencott see

46:43

this as someone somewhere between an unrealistic fantasy

46:45

and Obama and a bomb at all immoral

46:48

plan. Here's the article

46:51

itself. Trans translate

46:53

to English and

46:58

it says Ram the prob, the program for

47:00

the citizens of the Gaza strip right

47:02

here. It says examines

47:05

the ways to thin and it's per

47:08

at Netanyahu's request examines

47:10

the ways to thin the population in

47:12

Gaza to a minimum. There's

47:15

no way to misunderstand that. This

47:17

is about genocide. Now

47:20

remember, they already told you where we picked a little small

47:22

area over here in the South where tens

47:24

of thousands can fit. Go ahead and

47:26

go there without

47:28

any explanation about how 2 million

47:30

people can fit there. Assuming they haven't all been killed

47:33

so far, you know, many of them.

47:36

So it's obvious they're admitting to you what

47:38

they're doing. They want to whittle this down to a manageable

47:40

size of people that will never can never threaten

47:43

their Jewish majority coming from the Zionist

47:45

perspective because that's how they

47:47

control the population understand. And

47:51

all the rest of them were just dispensable.

47:55

It is impossible to see this and

47:57

not understand that these people are actively.

48:00

seeking genocide and all the western governments that

48:02

tell you you're wrong are allowing it if

48:05

not a part of it and Here's

48:08

mr. Elon Musk free speech right who

48:10

by the way we're gonna end with people being

48:13

censored on Twitter for saying the obvious It

48:16

says Elon Musk has said that Israel tries to avoid

48:18

killing civilians. This is simply

48:20

not true This is from Muslim now

48:22

Israel is repeatedly targeted civilians homes ambulances

48:25

bakeries The Twitter servers are

48:27

full of hours and hours of footage

48:29

proving this But here's

48:31

what even after what we just went over.

48:33

This is this is Elon free speech towing

48:35

the line I mean the

48:37

rebuttal is often made that well You

48:40

know, but you know Israel has

48:43

killed civilians You

48:45

know also in Gaza, but the isn't

48:47

yeah long before October 7th But

48:49

I guess we're pretending like it only starts

48:51

counting from there important difference here Which is

48:53

that Israel tries to avoid

48:55

killing civilians doing everything it has

48:58

to avoid killing civilians Israel

49:00

tries to avoid killing civilians doing

49:03

everything it has to avoid killing civilians Israel

49:05

tries to right so despite

49:08

the fact that they literally admit that that's the

49:10

agenda to kill them in order to hurt

49:12

civil civil infrastructure Or

49:16

any number of obvious examples where they're

49:18

bombing things you can prove don't hold them

49:20

or am the international Investigation that prove they

49:22

targeted civilians or going back before this 2014

49:25

or before Amis

49:27

international that's sell them human rights watch

49:29

UN all of them on the record

49:31

saying they targeted civilians and they are

49:34

war crimes And nobody does anything.

49:36

That's why San Jose Niki's pointing out.

49:38

Why doesn't anybody? Initiate

49:40

the genocide convention because the same thing as before

49:43

At best it seems we get an acknowledgement

49:46

of the crime but never accountability Which means

49:48

that they're not really fighting for truth of

49:50

freedom? They're just

49:52

hoping you don't condemn them along with

49:54

Netanyahu. That's what they're doing Think

49:57

about how gross this is that why so he goes

49:59

there takes the apology tour after they

50:01

call him anti-Semite and

50:04

lies. Like

50:06

it's not, there's no debating that it's a

50:08

lie because it's obvious historically based on

50:11

every human rights group and people in the

50:13

standing that caught, I mean, people that are there,

50:15

doctors, nurses, ambulance drivers, it's

50:17

everybody. And

50:20

this again is why everybody's calling this out because they can

50:22

even admit it on the record and we still deny it.

50:25

Now we've talked

50:27

about this family just recently, the Beba family. Now remember, we just

50:29

talked about this, I think it was yesterday and the day before,

50:31

it has now been admitted by Hamas at the very least that Israel's bombings killed

50:37

this family. Now,

50:43

I don't think it's provable, but it's not, the fact that it's

50:45

being dismissed is wildly irresponsible seeing as how

50:47

we have continued to point out that

50:51

it makes literally no sense to pretend that Israel is a

50:53

family. To pretend that Israel

50:55

wants these people back, but bombs exactly where

50:57

they may be. Or rather

50:59

put it better that they don't know where

51:01

they are, but yet continue to bomb in

51:03

unprecedented fashion all across Gaza Strip. I

51:07

mean, it takes, it really takes, that's willful

51:09

ignorance to not acknowledge that means at best

51:11

they don't care about them, which

51:14

they basically admitted to. Then we know that

51:16

the Hannibal directive on October 7th, yes, they did kill

51:18

their own people. In fact, we'll end again with some

51:21

points that add to that. Yes,

51:23

they did. It's been admitted

51:25

by people that were there,

51:27

the security team at Kebusmehere,

51:29

helicopter pilots, police, Harets, Israeli

51:32

radio. I

51:34

mean, it's just like the point

51:36

we were just making. It could be that stupidly

51:38

obvious and yet we're all you're breathing water. Just

51:41

shut up and go back to sleep. We

51:44

can see it. They've admitted it. The proof is there. And

51:47

yet we talk about things that they claim did happen,

51:49

even though there's no evidence and yet this is just,

51:52

again, this is so

51:54

jarring. Just

51:56

like the COVID-19 manipulation. I don't, it's again, I

51:58

just, like I said, then I. I wonder all

52:01

the time are we supposed

52:03

to be talking about this? I just don't see how

52:06

it can be that clumsy. But even if it's meant

52:08

to be, we still need to highlight it for people

52:10

that haven't seen it to realize that they'll lie

52:12

about the next thing too. But as

52:14

Yam Pellegge points out, Halas released a

52:16

video of the Bebas family's father. I

52:19

haven't seen the video, but it says as the video they

52:21

tell him his family was killed. Now

52:24

this says, for Hamas's own sake, they better be lying.

52:28

I'm dead serious. What do you mean? What are you

52:30

going to do? These people are just weird,

52:32

the way that they covered this stuff.

52:34

The point is that Hamas is

52:36

claiming that their bombings killed this family.

52:40

And I made this point long before this came out

52:43

that it was weird to me that

52:45

Israel was hyper-focusing on this one group.

52:48

And I was wondering why. Same with the other ones

52:50

that turned out to have been. Or the girl they

52:52

claimed was killed that turned out to come home. There's

52:55

a propaganda PR game being played here where they're

52:57

trying to take advantage of this. And I very

53:00

much think that they're not... I don't think they

53:02

ever intended for these people to come home. Which

53:04

is why they shot them as they were being

53:06

taken into Gaza. That's

53:08

the Hannibal directive. Because once they come back, well, they

53:10

can admit that they were shot at by the IDF.

53:13

As well as what almost every... I mean, as far

53:15

as I can tell, literally everyone

53:18

is speaking on their own accord. Not

53:21

through their aunt, or their IDF says that this

53:23

is what they said. But when they stand up

53:25

and speak right to this very day, they were

53:28

treated kindly, they had enough food, they got feminine

53:30

hygiene, they were... I mean, everything. Laughing,

53:33

shaking hands. Now that, again, does not mean

53:35

that they're not torturing some other people back there. But

53:38

it's this game where it continues to be the opposite of

53:40

what we're told, and they just go, you're stupid for buying

53:42

it. Well, I'm not buying

53:44

anything. I'm just simply going, well, that's not what you said.

53:48

And there's no evidence to support

53:50

what you're saying. So you're

53:52

asking me just to go along with your narrative despite

53:54

all the evidence to the contrary? That

53:56

seems like a willful ignorance situation.

54:00

Dan Cohen writes in reporting

54:02

on the deaths of the Bebas family CBS

54:04

has been forced to acknowledge They were killed

54:06

by Israeli airstrikes not Hamas instead of pressing

54:08

Israeli officials on the slaughtering of their own

54:10

people in addition to 20,000 Palestinians The

54:13

reporter shrieks at the Hamas official Israel can

54:15

never be questioned by the Western media Even

54:18

when it kills its own people this video

54:20

is very strange. I'll point out

54:22

a couple things about it Hostages have

54:24

been released many more remain in Gaza

54:27

Israel is demanding the return of all of

54:29

those who have been taken But

54:31

the Hamas leader who spoke with Holly Williams

54:33

says that may not be possible Holly is

54:35

in Tel Aviv Holly. Good morning Good

54:40

morning Nate 97

54:42

hostages have now been released since

54:44

the temporary ceasefire began on Friday

54:47

But I've been speaking with a senior

54:49

Hamas leader who claims some of the

54:51

hostages are dead Me

54:54

already know before he starts. I don't

54:56

understand why they're speaking with a person

54:59

Senior leader or not, which I think there's a

55:01

game that gets played with a lot of these

55:03

supposed senior leaders not saying They're not leadership position

55:06

But it's not it's these people are in Qatar by

55:08

the way The very group that

55:10

Israel is working with in order

55:12

to mediate the process well at work and

55:14

Netanyahu Openly said that they would give

55:17

them a pass Which doesn't

55:19

make much sense to me even though other people

55:21

said we're gonna settle up with Qatar after this

55:23

Okay, so then basically you're saying you're willing to

55:25

work with Hamas in order to

55:28

get what you want Well screaming we don't work

55:30

with terrorists to justify everything else you do Everything

55:33

to do is clumsy and completely contradictory at this point

55:36

But they bring on this guy who doesn't speak

55:38

very good English. So it's hard to really it

55:40

doesn't give you a good impression And what

55:43

they get into is the discussion about the

55:45

family and there's a very one-sided aggression coming

55:48

from her There's

55:50

no discussion about whether that made sense or

55:53

whether that's possible or the tens of thousands

55:55

of people that are being killed Her outrage

55:57

is only directed about the one discussion about

55:59

this one family. Hold

56:02

on, I went too far back. ...leader

56:06

who claims some of the hostages are

56:08

dead. We

56:11

are ready to give all evidence. Does he?

56:14

Hamad told us Hamas is willing to... Don't

56:17

you see, we are willing to give all

56:19

the evidence. Oh, I talked right over the top of him. We won't

56:21

let you hear the fact that he's going... Does

56:24

anybody want it? We'll give you the evidence. We'll prove it to you.

56:26

Nope, shut up. We don't want to talk about the evidence.

56:28

We don't want to label, level allegations at you and let

56:30

you... This is the... The

56:32

corporate media is just clownish,

56:35

more than I've ever seen it today. To provide

56:37

evidence that's three hostages. Four-year-old

56:40

Ariel Bibas, his ten-month-old brother

56:42

Kefir, and their mother Shiri

56:44

were all killed in

56:46

the Gaza Strip by an Israeli

56:48

airstrike. Israel says it's assessing

56:51

whether that claim is true. Isn't

56:53

that interesting? So at

56:55

the very least, that means that, yeah, definitely they could

56:58

have killed them in their bombings, even

57:00

based on Israel's response. I

57:05

feel like these days, I think, all

57:07

of us are on the same side in this conversation. And we're... The

57:10

only... Like, what we're talking about right now is

57:12

just at the people who won't agree no matter what

57:14

because they're in this for a clear agenda. I

57:16

just don't see how anybody honest cannot see right through all

57:18

of this. They pay

57:21

the price because of the occupation. So

57:24

this is what I'm talking about. You don't get

57:26

to hear the interview. They clip out the one

57:28

thing that she wants to get outraged about. They paid

57:30

the price for the occupation. Now,

57:33

do you think he's saying that... I

57:36

understand, first of all. He's

57:38

saying they were killed by an Israeli airstrike. And

57:41

then his statement is, I guess, the only part of

57:43

it you get, they paid the

57:45

price of the occupation. Now, does that... Would

57:48

you take that as they got what

57:50

they deserved? What

57:53

he's saying is Israel did this. The

57:56

occupation is why this is happening to us

57:58

and them. Obviously that's

58:01

what he means, but either she's not intelligent enough

58:03

to understand the real dynamic of what's going on

58:05

in this or It's

58:07

just about a point you want to make most

58:10

corporate journalism today You go into these things with

58:12

a point you already want to make and

58:14

we've made fun of this before and sometimes they don't get The

58:16

response they want so they just go right to the point they

58:18

want to make that's not your listen. That's

58:20

propaganda But that was a 10

58:23

months old baby and a four-year-old boy.

58:25

They have to boys appreciate a day

58:29

Now her response is 10 year

58:31

old boy. Yeah. Okay. So are you outraged Israel right

58:33

now? Why are you

58:35

outraged with him? Now

58:37

obviously report we don't in from her perspective. I would

58:40

argue they haven't taken it face value Israel did do

58:42

this But it goes on

58:44

to say they have to impose pressure in their

58:46

government to tell them that you pushed us to

58:48

the hell See what I mean?

58:51

Like it's just you can't really get what the real sentiment

58:53

is for the most part But what I get from what

58:55

he's trying to say they have

58:57

to impose pressure and I realize these are people that

58:59

are being allowed to comfortably live in Qatar as Israel

59:02

knows what they are and working with Qatar to Mediate

59:05

this process in my opinion these people

59:07

are in same reason We should question

59:10

all of Hamas because Netanyahu the

59:12

Israeli government and the US government have been working with

59:14

and funding this group for a long time But

59:17

many argue things have changed over the last 17

59:19

years, but it definitely does not mean that they're

59:21

completely Devoid of influence

59:24

from the outside Primarily

59:26

the ones that live in wealth and and

59:28

you know to mean like that's my point about What's

59:31

going on right now in Gaza with the

59:33

resistance groups? I don't think is it's increasingly

59:35

becoming distant from these outside parties that are

59:37

very clearly tied to Israel Israel Anyway,

59:40

he says they have to impose pressure in their government

59:43

Right. So I guess we would assume he

59:45

means the hostages but for all we know

59:47

this is regarding Israeli

59:50

people or anybody else

59:52

because it doesn't make sense to argue that they have

59:54

to impose pressure in their government But it says to

59:56

tell them that you pushed us to hell I

1:00:00

guess he would mean people

1:00:03

that care about civilian suffering, that they're living

1:00:05

in an open air prison. So we, I,

1:00:07

it's just, it's, I'm, I guess, guess at

1:00:09

what he means by this. In

1:00:11

the, their government to tell them that you

1:00:13

push us to the hell. But Dr. Hamid,

1:00:15

a 10 month old baby and

1:00:17

a four year old boy can't put

1:00:19

pressure on the Israeli government. So

1:00:24

this is my point about the discussion. There's

1:00:29

not even an effort to get into the

1:00:31

conversation about why they died. Just

1:00:34

the idea is no matter what

1:00:36

happens, it's your fault, which there's

1:00:39

obviously accountability here for them taking

1:00:41

a child and the family.

1:00:44

So they're accountable for that. And yet that's a crime and they

1:00:46

should be held accountable for that crime. But so too

1:00:49

should the people that bombed them without concern for

1:00:51

their lives. Why

1:00:55

did they have to pay for the

1:00:57

Israeli occupation? They said, I don't

1:00:59

think that's what he's even saying right there,

1:01:02

that they had to pay the price. He

1:01:04

didn't say that. But it

1:01:06

says the Israelis, they have a bigger problem

1:01:08

that they occupy the Palestinian people. You see my

1:01:10

point? He's talking about something else. And

1:01:12

she's importing this into

1:01:15

him, essentially saying they deserve to die.

1:01:18

Now, I guess I mean, I could be real. I haven't seen

1:01:20

the full context because all you get are the four

1:01:22

second excerpts of what he's saying. But

1:01:25

that does not seem like what he's actually saying.

1:01:27

They have a bigger problem that the Israeli policy

1:01:29

and the people, they have to accept. There was

1:01:31

a cut right there. That's

1:01:33

obvious. So just understand that that's how they

1:01:35

play this game. But then it says they have to exert

1:01:37

pressure in Israel, their government, in

1:01:39

order to tell them that they are going in

1:01:41

the wrong way. He's not talking about a child

1:01:44

in Gaza. He's talking about the

1:01:46

people that want this to stop. That's

1:01:48

how I would take this. Pressure

1:01:51

in Israel, their government, in order to tell

1:01:53

them that you are going in the wrong

1:01:55

way. Last minute, and

1:01:57

then just move away. over

1:02:00

another 16 hostages, including

1:02:02

an American, Liat Benin Atzili,

1:02:05

a mother of three whose

1:02:07

husband remains in captivity. Israel

1:02:10

held up its end of the bargain by

1:02:12

releasing 30 Palestinian prisoners.

1:02:15

I mean, I'm just right there. There's a difference

1:02:17

between how they look coming out, people that have

1:02:19

been beaten, tortured, starved, as everybody's

1:02:22

telling you, and by the way, has Amnesty

1:02:24

and the UN, and every group that's ever

1:02:26

talked about Israel's detention has proved it. I'll

1:02:28

give you another example today. That's what they

1:02:30

do as a matter of policy. But

1:02:33

I guess it's all fake news because we're racist, right?

1:02:35

That's all they have. That's the only argument. Bringing

1:02:38

the total to over 200. Hamad

1:02:42

told us Hamas wants a permanent

1:02:45

ceasefire to end the suffering of

1:02:47

Palestinians in Gaza. Yeah, like that

1:02:49

disabled man who was bombed in

1:02:51

his home. Where Hamas officials say

1:02:53

over 15,000 have been

1:02:56

killed by Israeli airstrikes and

1:02:58

fighting. So what would it

1:03:00

take for Hamas to hand

1:03:02

over all the remaining hostages?

1:03:05

See, this is what kills me. I

1:03:09

genuinely think that these people just don't know

1:03:11

all the information. One

1:03:13

being, Hamas has been offering

1:03:16

that since the first week. That's

1:03:18

been proven by Vice News, by Washington Post.

1:03:22

Netanyahu was forced to admit that when

1:03:24

they started this first process. Because

1:03:27

he kept going, we would do it, but Hamas won't

1:03:29

offer. And then it was forced to go, oh, well,

1:03:31

I'm just lying. He didn't say that. But he was

1:03:33

then forced to take the

1:03:35

deal that was then on the record that

1:03:37

he had refused. That's how that came out. Because

1:03:40

they just pushed the

1:03:43

same deal. And his people in Israel

1:03:45

pressured him to take that deal. Why?

1:03:47

Because they want their families back. And

1:03:50

he was the one that would not let that happen. Now,

1:03:53

aside from the military and IDF

1:03:55

and police and settlers that they have, the

1:03:58

civilians, I'm not saying it's okay that they have. But

1:04:01

in the, that's a crime. But

1:04:03

going forward, you also have to recognize

1:04:05

that Netanyahu has made a deliberate

1:04:08

policy to make them not even secondary,

1:04:10

third, fourth, who knows where they're on the list, if they care

1:04:12

about them at all, as they bomb and kill them, which I

1:04:14

think we can prove at this point. But

1:04:17

her only point is about that discussion, not about

1:04:19

the fact that they've then killed 20,000 people,

1:04:22

6,000, 7,000 children, depending on the

1:04:24

numbers you look at. That's an obvious

1:04:26

static reality. No one is even denying

1:04:28

that anymore. They're just quibbling about how much. So

1:04:32

the argument is, look at all the civilians that were

1:04:34

on October 7th, and that's why this has to continue.

1:04:37

It's just such a plainly disregard

1:04:40

for what Palestinians are going through as well. By

1:04:43

that logic, shouldn't we go, oh my God, here's

1:04:45

6,000 children, just children. Does

1:04:48

that then give them the right to go on and carpet

1:04:50

bomb Israel? Well, by that

1:04:52

logic, that would be a yes, but nobody should accept

1:04:54

that, because that's terrorism. We

1:04:58

can have a comprehensive deal that we can

1:05:00

release all the prisoners, the Palestinian detention. At

1:05:02

the same time, we can release all the

1:05:04

hostages. At

1:05:17

the same time, we can release all the hostages. There

1:05:20

were thought to be around 6,000 Palestinians

1:05:22

in Israel's presence. Thought to be. Or

1:05:25

a verified reality that Israel's admitted to and

1:05:27

the international community's talked about. But let's always

1:05:29

keep it ambiguous, because we don't want you

1:05:31

to really understand how terrible the Zionist government

1:05:33

is. Prisons. And by Israel's count,

1:05:36

around 150 hostages are

1:05:38

still being held in the Gaza

1:05:40

Strip. And this is being disputed, right, because

1:05:42

they're saying that some of them have died.

1:05:44

We've lost touch with some of them in areas that we can't

1:05:46

get to. The point is

1:05:48

that now there's a number that Israel hasn't

1:05:50

moved from that is impossible to meet.

1:05:53

So I think that's in their back pocket for when they want to

1:05:55

argue that they're violating something down the future. How

1:05:58

many hostages? Do you have left

1:06:00

in your hands that are still alive? I

1:06:03

don't know. You don't know?

1:06:06

You see, and this is my point about the

1:06:08

lack of information, the language barrier.

1:06:12

So the point is, he goes on to

1:06:14

say the number is not so important. But again,

1:06:16

if you could hear all of it in one

1:06:19

straight conversation, it might be different. But the point

1:06:21

is, they don't know. And they've made that clear

1:06:23

with more context from people that can actually speak

1:06:25

fluid, unbroken English, that are

1:06:27

saying, we don't know because there's been bombings. We've

1:06:29

lost touch with some of them. But

1:06:32

of course, she gets her outrage moment. You

1:06:35

don't know? The number is

1:06:37

not so important. By the way, there's not a lot of decorum

1:06:39

there as a journalist. That seems like

1:06:41

a weird emotional response. But what

1:06:43

do you mean the number isn't important? People in

1:06:46

Israel want to know whether their loved ones

1:06:48

are still alive or not. I

1:06:54

find it really hard to not be

1:06:57

upset that your only

1:06:59

conversation and only focus, almost to the points

1:07:01

of where you're screeching about this, is

1:07:05

about whether or not

1:07:07

they're still alive while you

1:07:09

have continued to ignore the

1:07:11

unbridled murder nonstop of

1:07:14

children and women and

1:07:16

medical personnel and journalists

1:07:20

and doctors. I

1:07:22

mean, on and on and on and on and on. But

1:07:24

no, that's just, I guess, Hamas's fault. We

1:07:26

ignored that. Now

1:07:28

we'll reach 70 people now. And

1:07:31

we are continuing to reach this civilians. That

1:07:36

does not seem like an honest interview, quite frankly. We're

1:07:38

expecting more hostages to come out tonight.

1:07:40

But we do not know if this

1:07:42

ceasefire will extend beyond 7 AM

1:07:45

local time tomorrow. And

1:07:47

it won't, it doesn't, because they made sure. Now the point

1:07:49

is that they have made it obvious what they wanted to

1:07:51

do. They told you they were going to do it. But

1:07:54

yet when it came to time, well, they didn't want to

1:07:56

say, well, we're just going to keep bombing again. Because we

1:07:58

said they would. They said, no, Hamas, violation. They did the

1:08:00

ceasefire exactly like we told you they would. So

1:08:03

they can go back to bombing. Because Hamas wanted

1:08:05

to continue the ceasefire. Israel just didn't

1:08:07

want to make it look like they just didn't want to.

1:08:10

So they said they broke the deal. And the US said

1:08:12

they broke the deal and they started bombing again. And

1:08:15

guess what else they did? They immediately stopped

1:08:17

the aid of everything. And now

1:08:20

said, no more aid indefinitely until we

1:08:22

say otherwise forever. Not

1:08:24

exactly paraphrasing, but that's what's happening. Now,

1:08:27

is that because you want to help the people? The

1:08:30

people you claim you want to keep safe? Now,

1:08:37

he also writes, oh, that was the... How

1:08:39

did I do that? Huh.

1:08:45

I guess I had the same thing twice. Now,

1:08:47

coming into the going forward on the ceasefire

1:08:50

conversation. And we really

1:08:52

should wonder how many people have been killed. Oh, and

1:08:54

the other point was about the whether or

1:08:56

not they're going to continue. Like

1:08:59

the amount of people that might have been killed,

1:09:01

the amount of people they're going to put forward.

1:09:03

Like this is almost set up to fail at

1:09:05

this point, knowing that what they're asking for is

1:09:07

an impossible deliver because of

1:09:09

what they have killed. And

1:09:12

we also have to remember that there's been random examples

1:09:14

of the woman found by the Al-Shifa hospital that they

1:09:16

just claimed. I mean, all of this is very good.

1:09:19

I think what's to look back on this, it's going to

1:09:21

be very... It's going to be impossible for anybody on us

1:09:23

to not see the trail. But

1:09:25

it says, the temporary truce ended on Friday morning,

1:09:27

today. It initially lasted for four

1:09:29

days and then was extended for several days. Israel

1:09:32

accused Hamas of violating the truce despite

1:09:35

reports of Israel killing several Palestinians during

1:09:37

the pause. There you go. Exactly

1:09:40

the point. Accuse them.

1:09:43

And I don't see... And again, it came back to

1:09:45

the body discussion, right? They said, well,

1:09:47

we were... They're going to turn these bodies. Israel didn't

1:09:49

want them back. But then didn't want...

1:09:52

I think they didn't want anybody to know that. So they pretended

1:09:54

they were going to accept the deal. Then Hamas said, we're going

1:09:56

to turn them back over anyway. I think that's what triggered this

1:09:58

sort of like, you broke it. In

1:10:01

my opinion, well,

1:10:05

per the Guardian, Israel-Hamasah wore 178 Palestinians

1:10:07

have been killed since the

1:10:10

truce ended this morning. Think

1:10:13

about that for a second. Hours

1:10:16

have gone by since this morning

1:10:19

would have been, well anyway, I'm not going to

1:10:21

break down the time difference. In

1:10:23

less than one day, after

1:10:26

a supposed truce, they

1:10:28

killed 178 people, not Hamas members, Palestinians,

1:10:33

because realize they have not provably

1:10:36

killed as far... I'm not going to dispute that

1:10:38

they haven't killed... They might have killed

1:10:40

some Hamas members. They

1:10:42

have not provably killed one since this started. I haven't

1:10:44

seen a single example of a Hamas member that they

1:10:46

took out. Don't you find that strange? Oh,

1:10:51

and then this was this was as well down here. Israel

1:10:55

blocking aid into the Gaza got

1:10:58

into Gaza until further notice. 178

1:11:01

killed. US, of course,

1:11:03

the US toes the line, blames Hamas for

1:11:05

the end of truth, saying they didn't come up

1:11:07

with a list of hostages. Guys,

1:11:09

you realize how insulting this is? They

1:11:12

have been offering all of them since

1:11:14

the first week. They've already

1:11:16

been admitted to and they

1:11:18

just roll back into a lie again, because what else are they going

1:11:20

to do? It

1:11:22

says Israel knew of Hamas attack

1:11:25

plan more than a year in advance. We'll get

1:11:27

to that in a second. US

1:11:31

intensely focused on hostage release. Lincoln

1:11:34

as he blames Hamas for ending the truce.

1:11:37

Just the same old, same old guys play one,

1:11:39

two, and three. They are tired and played out.

1:11:43

They can't pretend they didn't want to give Hamas

1:11:45

hostages when they've been trying to since the very

1:11:48

beginning and Netanyahu got caught pretending they weren't offering

1:11:50

it and took the same deal they offered in

1:11:52

the beginning. Now

1:11:56

Eunice Terewe, reporter in Palestine. Reports

1:12:00

what you were hearing from the Guardian as well Red

1:12:03

Crescent informs that Israel has decided to prevent

1:12:05

entry of aid that is

1:12:07

not about Hamas Because

1:12:09

you realize this is what was going on

1:12:11

during the supposed ceasefire on the UN and

1:12:13

and and Egypt involved The point was they

1:12:16

stopped this because they want to do what they already

1:12:18

admitted in the different articles their own statements Get

1:12:21

rid of all of them That's what

1:12:23

this is No

1:12:25

water no food and these are this is

1:12:27

collective punishment just like it was in the

1:12:29

beginning It's amazing. We can even

1:12:32

debate that as you are and even if you

1:12:34

want to say well We can't do that because

1:12:36

the Hamas might get some Okay,

1:12:38

I disagree that that's what the reality would be

1:12:40

but either way that still amounts to collective punishment

1:12:42

The point the reason why is that I would

1:12:44

disagree is because even Hamas was saying bring it

1:12:46

in We'll let the UN mediate so we don't

1:12:48

get any of it. They just

1:12:51

didn't want to do it Because they're

1:12:53

attacking all the Palestine But

1:12:57

this is collective punishment per any Understanding

1:12:59

of the word Geneva Convention international law.

1:13:02

These are war crimes Israel informed all

1:13:04

organizations of the Rafa crossing that aid trucks

1:13:06

from the Egyptian side many of which are

1:13:08

like stalled there are Prohibited from

1:13:11

entering and till further notice Israel

1:13:13

also informed the crossing must be emptied of the trucks

1:13:16

on that side as soon as possible So

1:13:18

they don't want to they don't want them to be seen waiting

1:13:20

there get it out of here We don't want people to

1:13:22

know that we're doing this This

1:13:25

absolutely vile Atray,

1:13:27

there's just Reuters in case that means

1:13:29

more to you stopped as the campaign

1:13:31

resumes. They're bombing their murder campaign

1:13:33

and Everything

1:13:35

else resumes as well realize this is one

1:13:38

day less than one day They killed a

1:13:40

journalist and a university professor killed

1:13:42

him along with his family, you

1:13:44

know, just like emissary national The rest have already proven

1:13:47

Not a moss member not him off in

1:13:49

his family's home. They just murdered him because he's a journalist.

1:13:52

They don't want people to know what's happening Thank

1:13:57

you to we are all hearts

1:14:01

for posting, tagging me on a lot

1:14:03

of good stuff. Here,

1:14:05

again, just from this morning forward,

1:14:08

Civil Defense Rescue efforts

1:14:10

are now underway to extract injured civilians trapped under

1:14:12

the rubble of their homes as they were bombed. Like

1:14:17

you'd think if this was some kind of a byproduct, or

1:14:20

they're doing their best to avoid this, that it wouldn't

1:14:22

be like instantaneously right back to the same problem. Instantly

1:14:24

back to civilians killed and under rubble and

1:14:27

being bombed. Why? Because

1:14:29

that's what they're doing. They're bombing civilians

1:14:31

and killing and destroying civilian infrastructure,

1:14:33

as they've admitted to. Israel

1:14:36

is now bombing multiple residential buildings at

1:14:38

once. Right

1:14:42

back to it, it went even harder. That is

1:14:44

your Habsora

1:14:47

campaign. Shh.

1:14:53

Habsora campaign. Habsora,

1:14:56

I'm going to write it on my hand. I

1:14:59

really believe that. That's what this looks like. That is the AI

1:15:01

just going here, here, here, and here. Go! They

1:15:04

admit in an article that they do not

1:15:06

have time or even the ability to actually

1:15:08

check it for themselves. So

1:15:11

it ends up being whoever's inputting the data. So

1:15:13

how much you want to bet being a Palestinian is a

1:15:15

target? Or if you happen to know somebody

1:15:17

who might know somebody who might be Hamas, makes you a

1:15:19

target. They've admitted to most of this, guys. Now,

1:15:23

Francesca Sinead, who's a UN special rapporteur,

1:15:25

an international lawyer

1:15:28

on human rights and all the rest of

1:15:30

it, says alarming phase 2 of the Gaza

1:15:32

War. Risks have pushed the exhausted Gaza population

1:15:34

to the border with Egypt into

1:15:36

deportation into the Sinai, which we told

1:15:38

you was the plan. This may result

1:15:41

in the largest forcible transfer of Palestinians

1:15:43

in a long history of forcible transfers

1:15:45

of Palestinians. They literally dropped more leaflets

1:15:48

and on top of that, what are they doing? They've

1:15:50

now broken up all of the

1:15:52

Gaza Strip into these, I think

1:15:54

it's 2,000 parcels in

1:15:57

order to force the movement of the civilian population.

1:16:00

The persistent question is whether this is done

1:16:02

to gain a military advantage or in some

1:16:04

way to offer a safe zone, excluding wrongfulness

1:16:06

of forcible transfers. The

1:16:08

point is, regardless of whether they actually want them in a

1:16:10

safe zone, what they're doing is a crime, no

1:16:13

matter how you look at this. Here

1:16:16

is one of these breaking down what it

1:16:18

says. To the residents of Al-Qura

1:16:21

and these different areas, you must evacuate

1:16:23

immediately or go to the shelters of

1:16:25

the city of Rafa. The city

1:16:27

of Kanyunas is a dangerous combat zone.

1:16:32

You mean the place that you told them to

1:16:34

go right before this? Well, yes, because it's the

1:16:36

process. They're driving them there. They're driving them out

1:16:38

just like we told you. So

1:16:41

what are they supposed to do? There's

1:16:44

nowhere to go. And

1:16:46

this was you check this. This plan is publicly to

1:16:48

go. I forgot I have the IDF page itself. The

1:16:52

IDF publishes a list of block numbers to

1:16:54

guide Gaza residents to evacuating the

1:16:56

targeted areas. Like

1:17:01

it's just it's the most obvious thing in

1:17:03

the world. This

1:17:05

is precisely what we told you was going

1:17:08

to happen part by part, piece by piece.

1:17:10

They're driving them forward. They're taking over the

1:17:12

areas and they're already beginning to take the

1:17:14

areas in the in the in the north.

1:17:18

Jahan Afara, a journalist in Gaza, reports that

1:17:20

her mom is telling them that they are

1:17:22

left with one option just to accept death.

1:17:25

It doesn't matter if we move or not.

1:17:27

Any minute now is our last. They say

1:17:29

leave Kanyunas for Rafa. Then they strike Rafa,

1:17:32

which already happens. We have nowhere to go.

1:17:34

If we die, at least we die in the house,

1:17:36

not on the streets. And this is many

1:17:39

of them are doing. As

1:17:41

Mohammed points out, no

1:17:44

place is safe in Gaza. No direction

1:17:46

is safe in Gaza. No school is safe in

1:17:48

Gaza. No hospital is safe in Gaza. No house

1:17:50

is safe in Gaza. No street is safe in

1:17:52

Gaza. No one is safe

1:17:54

in Gaza, which is exactly

1:17:56

what they want. Israel

1:18:02

urged the civilians in the southern area, which

1:18:04

they told them was the safe zone, to

1:18:06

evacuate to a temporary ceasefire end. Or

1:18:09

after, the temporary ceasefire end. Zuenya

1:18:13

points out at the beginning of the war, the

1:18:15

Israeli occupation army instructed the residents of northern Gaza

1:18:17

to go south, claiming it was the

1:18:20

safe zone. And what we

1:18:22

were all told is, they're going to go back, and even Netanyahu

1:18:24

said, don't worry, you're going to go back. And

1:18:26

I told you, he was lying. On

1:18:28

their way south, they were bombed, as we reported. Today,

1:18:31

the Israeli army asked people to move from

1:18:33

Konyunas, in the south, to Rafa, citing it

1:18:35

as a new safe zone. As

1:18:38

usual, the deceitful army's aim is to kill more

1:18:40

civilians. These videos document, which

1:18:43

was turned out to be the intense

1:18:45

bombing, that Rafa endured, today. Not

1:18:48

even waiting. So, you tell them to go left

1:18:50

the safe zone, just like they did before, and they

1:18:52

bombed them on the way, and they bombed the area

1:18:54

they claimed was the safe zone. You

1:18:57

realize how egregiously obvious this is, that the people like

1:18:59

the Blinkins and Bidens of the world, and the

1:19:01

rest of these governments, this is obvious. That

1:19:03

means that they're knowingly allowing and being

1:19:06

a part of targeted assassinations of civilians,

1:19:08

when you tell them to go to

1:19:10

a place that will be safe. What

1:19:14

would surprise you? It's no different than inviting Soleimani

1:19:16

under a peace banner, and then

1:19:18

murdering him in a protected airport,

1:19:20

in a civilian location. That

1:19:23

was Trump. Here's

1:19:27

what they're looking at. And

1:19:37

this is my point about radicalization. What

1:19:40

do you think this does to the families and people when you're

1:19:42

told to go here because it's safe, and then they bomb you

1:19:44

and kill your family in front of you, and then

1:19:46

you're told that you're the one causing the problem?

1:19:48

What do you think that does to your psyche?

1:19:56

Heavy airstrikes. on

1:20:00

the Rafah city. It's

1:20:06

almost taunting them. So

1:20:09

the Israel government knows that

1:20:11

they know they're being bombed in the

1:20:13

safe zone. And then Biden

1:20:16

stands up and says that it's Hamas and it's

1:20:18

only Hamas and it's Palestinian's fault that it's happening

1:20:20

and we're only defending ourselves, literally

1:20:23

creating terrorism. Now

1:20:26

in a reverse point, actually

1:20:30

I think this was, oh I think

1:20:33

that's in the wrong spot. Hold on, I'll come back to that.

1:20:37

So here the point was displacement,

1:20:40

bombing them while they're being moved and

1:20:43

then bombing the location they're supposed to go to. And

1:20:46

just so that's the most obvious thing in the world,

1:20:49

deliberately a sassy them in the place is

1:20:51

supposed to be safe. The real bigger point

1:20:53

is that this is about displacing them, driving

1:20:55

them there and driving them out, cattling

1:20:58

them into an area that they don't have any food

1:21:00

or water or security and then telling them they have

1:21:02

to move again. Where

1:21:05

do you think they're being fed from? Where do

1:21:07

you think they're getting water from? These people are dying

1:21:09

on the streets, just like was shown by

1:21:11

journalists who went in during the fake

1:21:13

ceasefire. But here is a former

1:21:17

member of the government admitting

1:21:19

on the record that this is

1:21:21

about removing all of them. She says

1:21:24

we need two million people to leave and

1:21:27

yet we bicker about this being the reality because

1:21:31

Zionists will pretend that that's not the truth.

1:21:35

The Israeli minister says solution for Gaza

1:21:38

is departure of two million people.

1:21:40

It says after we turn Kanyunis

1:21:42

into a soccer field, you're listening,

1:21:47

I'm sure there will be intent international pressure at

1:21:49

some point. To

1:21:55

rehabilitate Gaza, which

1:21:57

means removing all the Palestinians they see all as

1:22:00

terrorists and

1:22:03

see what needs to be done with Gaza. I thought

1:22:05

you just said rehabilitate it. So

1:22:07

what needs to see what needs to be done with

1:22:09

it is very different than rehabilitating the situation

1:22:11

where Palestinians live. Then

1:22:16

we need to take advantage of that. That

1:22:18

we will reek upon them.

1:22:30

These are genocidal maniacs. Just

1:22:35

casually over coffee talking about the absolute destruction

1:22:37

of an entire people. It

1:22:40

says that we will reek upon them.

1:22:42

In order to tell the countries of

1:22:44

the world, each one of them should

1:22:46

take a quota. It

1:22:49

could be 20,000, it could be 50,000, so that

1:22:51

they can also shoulder the burden, the burden

1:22:58

of the people that you pretend you want to protect. Most

1:23:02

transparent thing in the world. In

1:23:05

order to allow them to leave. But

1:23:08

you want to keep them all safe, right? You

1:23:10

have to understand. It

1:23:16

has been for them to leave

1:23:18

until, I mean, it has been, you have to

1:23:20

understand, it has been for them to leave until now.

1:23:23

It was complicated to leave Gaza. We

1:23:29

need to change our mindset and let them leave. Let

1:23:32

them leave like that's what they want. God,

1:23:34

these people are disgusting. We

1:23:38

need to let them leave as one

1:23:41

of the ministers said before. In

1:23:44

the last, in

1:23:49

the last few years, half a million young

1:23:51

people have immigrated. We

1:23:53

need two million to leave. In

1:23:57

all honesty, that's the solution for Gaza. Yeah,

1:24:00

the ethnic cleansing solution. The

1:24:03

final solution, right? That's what we're talking about,

1:24:05

guys. These people are

1:24:08

maniacal. And that's

1:24:10

what I've said so many times, the worst of the worst. Projecting

1:24:13

yourself as some kind of humanitarian

1:24:15

while you literally commit the most

1:24:18

egregious atrocities in human history. And I'm not saying

1:24:22

that necessarily applies to everything we're looking at right now. But

1:24:25

over the time of the Zionist agenda, yeah, that's

1:24:27

what we're talking about. We're

1:24:32

going to get to a point I'm going to make

1:24:34

about fake news. That guy that claimed to have the

1:24:36

video about the woman's stomach being cut open, that comes

1:24:38

from an Israeli doing it to Palestinians. That's

1:24:40

the atrocity propaganda being used. We'll

1:24:43

get to that in a second. And

1:24:45

again, just recognize we already discussed not just the

1:24:47

original plan that was leaked and WikiLeaks has confirmed,

1:24:50

but a new one that has been discussed from

1:24:53

the U.S. Congress being presented to

1:24:55

our government. The secret

1:24:57

U.S. plan to forcibly displace

1:24:59

all Palestinians. Weird how they're

1:25:02

now proposing that. And

1:25:04

they have your tax dollars. Typical,

1:25:06

right? Israel's government pleading

1:25:08

with Biden, the Christian Zionist,

1:25:10

to take your money to fund

1:25:13

the illegal

1:25:15

mass displacement of the Palestinians to

1:25:17

other countries. By the way,

1:25:20

two of which are occupied and treated

1:25:22

the same way. Iraq, Yemen. Egypt

1:25:25

being a place that I guarantee would change. There's

1:25:28

a very strong anti-Israel sentiment in Egypt.

1:25:30

The government is pocketed in U.S. and

1:25:32

Israel control. But

1:25:35

I guarantee if you put a bunch of

1:25:37

mass displaced Palestinians there, that would change

1:25:39

the way Israel looks at it. One of

1:25:41

the reasons why these countries are terrified to engage with this. But

1:25:44

on top of that, to show you what

1:25:46

they've been doing, we already talked about the new

1:25:48

settlement that Nia was already initiating in the Gaza

1:25:51

envelope. Mohammed points out

1:25:54

in the areas that they're claiming they can go

1:25:56

back to, Israel's soldiers are now openly

1:25:59

taking over. in Gaza and

1:26:01

declaring it theirs. The owners are either

1:26:03

dead or forcefully displaced to the south. Just

1:26:06

like the statues they tore down, they're now putting up

1:26:08

their own. On

1:26:12

top of buildings, they've now taken from people in

1:26:14

the south or in the north. Why

1:26:17

would that be happening if this was such a temporary

1:26:19

motion to get rid of Hamas? It

1:26:22

was always about displacing them. And then a

1:26:24

classic meme here coming from, now by the

1:26:26

way, this for those haven't seen this is

1:26:28

not some trope. It's like some racist cop.

1:26:30

This is a real video that you probably

1:26:32

have seen of this man being accused of

1:26:34

stealing somebody's home. And he openly says, well,

1:26:36

if I don't steal it, somebody else

1:26:38

will. Classic. It's a real video. And

1:26:41

that's the point. These settlers know what

1:26:44

they're doing. Now

1:26:46

on to the point about what's continuing to

1:26:49

happen. The onslaught against children. Here, who

1:26:51

who some zum lot from the P

1:26:53

and the pillow says this is a

1:26:55

war crime or this war is on

1:26:57

children, according to UNICEF. Here's

1:27:00

what he says. The

1:27:04

ceasefire is over. We can

1:27:06

already hear the bombing. And I'm at a

1:27:08

hospital. There was a hit about 50 meters

1:27:10

from here. This is the

1:27:12

biggest still functioning hospital in Gaza. It's

1:27:15

at 200 percent capacity. Yes,

1:27:17

this is a hospital. The health

1:27:19

system here is overwhelmed. This hospital

1:27:21

simply cannot take more children with

1:27:23

the wounds of war. There

1:27:25

are children everywhere. These children are sleeping. There

1:27:27

was a bomb literally 50

1:27:29

meters from here. I

1:27:33

cannot overstate how the

1:27:35

capacity has been reduced of hospitals in

1:27:37

our seven weeks. We cannot see more

1:27:39

children with the wounds of war, with

1:27:41

the burns, with the shrapnel littering their

1:27:43

body with the broken bones. Now

1:27:46

we know that's intentional. Inaction

1:27:50

by those with influence is

1:27:54

allowing the killing of children.

1:27:57

This is a war on children. Kind

1:28:03

of hard not to see that. Freddie

1:28:06

Pontone points out a buried, which they've

1:28:08

now deleted by the way, 2013 UNICEF report

1:28:11

revealed the extent of child abuse

1:28:13

in Israel long before October 7.

1:28:17

Here's just quickly examples of this report, which by the

1:28:19

way you should read for yourself. Here's the full report,

1:28:21

which we'll include, but here are just a

1:28:23

couple of quick excerpts from the beginning. It gets

1:28:25

way more damning. Now, first of all,

1:28:27

it just says it is understood, and by the way,

1:28:30

just in case you want to see it, we're talking about right here. It

1:28:35

is understood right there. It

1:28:38

is understood that in no other

1:28:40

country are children systematically tried by

1:28:42

juvenile military courts that by definition

1:28:44

fall short of providing the necessary

1:28:46

guarantees to ensure respects of their

1:28:48

rights. Just a basic understanding

1:28:50

that anybody who's honest understands and always

1:28:52

has, but yet weirdly chooses never to

1:28:54

really do anything about. So even

1:28:57

those that are willing to admit this is the static reality

1:28:59

still just don't ever push further because why

1:29:01

they get called racist or the Zionist influence,

1:29:03

the ADL, and APAC, and the rest of

1:29:05

it push on people above them and suddenly

1:29:07

lose their job. Yeah,

1:29:10

that's how it really works. Overall

1:29:12

the point is, yeah, they have the

1:29:14

only country in the world that

1:29:16

tries children and military courts and

1:29:19

by definition does not respect their rights.

1:29:22

Even though they stood there and all cheered and high fived about

1:29:24

the convention on children's rights or whatever, they

1:29:26

all act like Israel's on board. That's

1:29:30

how gross these people are. The government's involved with

1:29:32

that, know what Israel's doing, and still act like

1:29:34

they're all doing the right thing, the worst of

1:29:36

the worst. It

1:29:40

says, all children persecuted for offense as they

1:29:42

allegedly committed should be treated in accordance with

1:29:44

international juvenile justice standards. Meaning, Israel

1:29:46

does not do that. Here

1:29:49

is the important part. Since 2007,

1:29:51

the UNICEF office, which by the way they've deleted this

1:29:53

now, very telling, that's

1:29:55

my point, somebody leaned and applied

1:29:57

pressure. The

1:30:00

UNICEF office in the occupied Palestinian

1:30:02

territory has been leading interagency

1:30:04

efforts to systematically gather

1:30:06

accurate, timely, and

1:30:08

reliable information on grave

1:30:10

violations committed against children

1:30:13

in Israel and the occupied Palestinian

1:30:15

territory. The context is

1:30:17

this is only at Israel, guys. Israel

1:30:19

is doing this to kids in Israel and

1:30:22

in Palestine, occupied Palestine. It

1:30:24

says including the arrest

1:30:26

and detention of children. This

1:30:28

information, in addition to data on

1:30:30

killing and injuries, recruitment, and use

1:30:33

of children in armed forces and

1:30:35

groups, attacks against schools and hospitals,

1:30:38

denial of human access and forced

1:30:40

displacement, is reported regularly to the

1:30:42

United Nations Security Council Working Group

1:30:45

on children and armed conflicts via

1:30:48

the Office of the Special Representative of

1:30:50

the Security General for Children in Armed

1:30:52

Conflict, mounting allegations of

1:30:54

ill treatment of children. Hell, in

1:30:56

Israeli military detention systems led UNICEF

1:30:59

to monitor and review practices relating

1:31:01

to children in that system. And

1:31:04

you know what they found. It's horrific. And

1:31:08

I'll include these again. I've gone over these in past reports,

1:31:10

but I just want you guys to be able to see

1:31:12

this. A report from the United Nations from

1:31:15

years ago, 2015, making it very clear. Illegal

1:31:21

detention, torture, it's

1:31:23

all right in this. I've read over this many times.

1:31:26

Physical abuse, humiliation, violation of

1:31:28

humanitarian law. Children.

1:31:30

That's only about children. Here's

1:31:32

the box article that discusses the same thing. It

1:31:35

says allowing the target people for a range of

1:31:37

political activity, including speech and nonviolent protests, human rights

1:31:40

groups have deemed Israel's use of administrative

1:31:42

detention a blatant violation of international

1:31:44

law. And you remember this

1:31:46

article. This gets way more horrifying when you

1:31:48

read through it. I'm just giving you the

1:31:50

basic understanding that everybody knows what they're doing

1:31:52

is illegal. And

1:31:55

it's international again. This is only

1:31:57

route. This is from October 7th. Post

1:32:01

it on November 8th. Horrifying cases

1:32:04

of torture. Not hypothetical, not

1:32:06

investigating. Proveable cases of

1:32:08

torture and degrading treatment of Palestinian

1:32:11

detainees amid spike in arbitrary arrests. Arbitrary

1:32:14

arrests. But

1:32:16

you're racist, I guess, if you say that, even though you can prove it.

1:32:19

And many of them are children. Here,

1:32:24

this is before July 10th. They're

1:32:27

unlawful prison practices. International crimes

1:32:29

have turned into, it says,

1:32:33

basically saying that unlawful and

1:32:35

carceral prison practices in the

1:32:37

occupied Palestinian territory are

1:32:39

tantamount to international crimes

1:32:42

and have turned into an open-air prison. But

1:32:45

it's all racist and wrong, apparently. And

1:32:47

we just talked about this from the

1:32:49

Intercept, the insidious narrative about Palestinian prisoners,

1:32:51

which goes on to prove that they

1:32:55

arbitrarily detain children. Remember, 233 of the ones

1:32:57

on the list that they were allowed to

1:32:59

release, or were willing to release, 233 out

1:33:02

of 300 were never charged with a crime. That's

1:33:07

per Israel's information. And then what did they

1:33:09

do? They trotted out their own people to

1:33:11

say, they're all terrorists and they're all charged

1:33:13

with stabbings and shootings. They

1:33:16

knowingly lied about children committing

1:33:18

crimes. Think about

1:33:21

how disgusting that is. And

1:33:24

this is just what happens to them in

1:33:26

their Israeli prisons. They shot

1:33:29

her son in her arms and

1:33:31

forced her to throw his body.

1:33:33

Testimonies from death, oh, excuse me,

1:33:35

not the, oh, and that's why, see,

1:33:37

I was confused about, I moved it. This was related

1:33:40

to this part of it. Telling

1:33:44

people to go to Rafa and then

1:33:46

bombing them in Rafa. The point is,

1:33:48

this is about the death march on Salah al-Din

1:33:50

street, right? The street that we now saw littered

1:33:52

with dead bodies that they even tried to get

1:33:54

ahead of. Don't forget. They tried to

1:33:56

place that argument where Hamas was gunning them down

1:33:58

the streets, which was... quickly shown to be

1:34:01

false The point is

1:34:03

that we were proving that this was

1:34:05

the safe march zone And we had

1:34:07

vivid evidence of Israeli bombings while they

1:34:09

were on the street of Israeli shoot

1:34:11

Israel shooting people while they're on the

1:34:13

street even covered by corporate media and This

1:34:16

is testimony of what have some of these people went through that

1:34:19

they shot her Son while she had him

1:34:21

in his and then forced her to get rid of the body

1:34:24

It's just disgusting the soldier ordered me to

1:34:26

crawl through the checkpoints a

1:34:29

testimony of the soldiers sniping children from a

1:34:31

distance and forcing parents to abandon their corpses

1:34:36

This is just another day in occupied Palestine now

1:34:38

on the point of What

1:34:40

there's an overlap to this art this point coming

1:34:42

from the Ukraine, so let's briefly step over to

1:34:45

the Ukraine discussion Los Angeles

1:34:47

Times reports today Russian missiles

1:34:49

tear or excuse me yesterday Russian missiles

1:34:51

tear through buildings Bury residents

1:34:54

under rubble in East Ukraine. Oh,

1:34:56

I guess they forgot to write says Ukraine See

1:34:59

how bad this is everywhere right now. It's been even

1:35:01

even during the Ukraine company It was the focus they

1:35:03

were doing that now they just walked it back But

1:35:06

you'll see Russian missiles tore through apartment

1:35:08

buildings in Eastern Ukraine local

1:35:10

officials said That's the

1:35:12

point doesn't mean it's false But it means a

1:35:14

group that lied about damn near everything they've said

1:35:16

about this war is now claiming Weirdly

1:35:19

timed that Russia just bombed this residential

1:35:21

building and buried everybody You know

1:35:23

right on the heels of a massive story claiming

1:35:25

to prove that they're doing that in Gaza

1:35:30

Don't forget who is funding the Ozov

1:35:32

movement largely Israeli groups United States. We've

1:35:34

already proven all this right

1:35:37

Ozov Zelensky is chiefly

1:35:39

funded by Kolyomosky who was the chief I think

1:35:41

at one point was the head of the world

1:35:43

Jewish Congress and was also

1:35:45

the chief financier of the Ozov movement And

1:35:49

we have the evidence which I guess I bring up since we're

1:35:51

talking about it What

1:35:56

was it there

1:35:58

you go In

1:36:02

2018, Per

1:36:05

Haaretz, there were human rights groups

1:36:07

that were demanding Israel in a weirdly

1:36:09

confusing story for some people, demanding they

1:36:12

stop arming neo-Nazis in Ukraine. Yeah,

1:36:14

because that's what they're still doing. And they were talking

1:36:16

about the Azov movement, guys, back in 2018. Israel

1:36:19

was arming Nazis in Ukraine. So

1:36:22

it shouldn't be very surprising when you understand the

1:36:24

reality of the Zionist organization and how

1:36:26

they themselves tried to align with Nazi

1:36:29

Germany twice, once with Stalin. That's

1:36:31

on Wikipedia, guys. Not

1:36:34

that, again, that means it's true, but it

1:36:36

means mass adoption. So understand that that's the

1:36:38

general accepted reality, that the Ergun party, rather

1:36:40

the Lehi part of it, tried

1:36:42

to align themselves with Nazi Germany. The

1:36:46

point, though, is the

1:36:51

understanding of the overlap to these stories. So

1:36:55

as we're watching this provable information come out to

1:36:57

say, look, they're bombing civilians and destroying buildings with

1:36:59

them in it and burying them

1:37:01

in the rubble, weirdly enough,

1:37:03

breaking news! This happens right here. And

1:37:05

I think the reason this is being pointed at.

1:37:08

I'm willing to bet you Eli Davis already

1:37:11

made this point because he's that clumsy. To

1:37:13

say, like he's been saying about Syria, for

1:37:15

example, saying, like, oh, look at the destruction

1:37:17

in Gaza. Oh, wait, that's Syria. Nobody cares.

1:37:21

You mean, except literally everybody that's screaming about the

1:37:23

Syrian war for that? Like, it's

1:37:25

just they're creating false narratives to sell

1:37:27

you on things, even though people have

1:37:29

been protesting about Syria and the mass

1:37:31

civilian disruption there for years. But

1:37:34

apparently nobody cared when that happened. Yeah, we

1:37:37

all did, man. But the

1:37:39

point is, I'm willing to

1:37:41

bet you he's already trying to argue that, look,

1:37:43

nobody cares that Russia did this over here, I

1:37:46

guess, because they're not Jews. Even

1:37:48

though, interestingly enough, that's not that's inaccurate. But

1:37:50

the point overall is that, of course, we care.

1:37:54

If Russia did this, then they should be accountable. But

1:37:56

the real point is we don't know. And

1:37:58

all we get is Ukraine said. just like

1:38:00

we're getting Israel said, rapes happened and

1:38:02

we go, well, we haven't proven that and you

1:38:04

accuse us of denying something. As

1:38:06

it says here, Russia military units

1:38:08

simultaneously launched according to the Ukrainian

1:38:12

intelligence or Ukrainian officials,

1:38:15

that Russia launched six S-300

1:38:17

missiles during the night according

1:38:19

to Ukrainian internal affairs. Ehor

1:38:23

Klimenko, somebody we talked about before, who

1:38:25

is a very obvious integral part of

1:38:28

the worst part of Ukrainians, rather

1:38:30

the proxy

1:38:33

entities that are in Ukraine. But

1:38:35

if you go through the article, you see,

1:38:38

literally every claim, authority said, officials said, they

1:38:40

are striking the center of the house and the houses. They

1:38:43

are just destroying the civilian population. Weird

1:38:45

how this suddenly is starting to become a focal point to

1:38:48

take direction away from what's happening in Gaza. I'm almost

1:38:50

willing to bet my life on that. And

1:38:53

they're gonna start going, oh, weird,

1:38:55

nobody cares about these ones. But

1:38:57

yeah, we all do though, and that's the point. But

1:39:00

here's where this becomes interesting. And I've made this point

1:39:03

before when they already floated these kinds of arguments. It's

1:39:06

certainly possible that Russia did that. But

1:39:09

we should ask why. Well,

1:39:12

really the main point being that we don't know

1:39:14

for sure when it comes directly from Ukraine saying

1:39:16

something. And I think it makes

1:39:18

sense strategically that is that Russia wouldn't, especially

1:39:21

right now, just choose to bomb

1:39:23

civilian areas. To what end? I'm

1:39:26

not saying Russia's not capable of that. But this

1:39:28

is the same argument as saying Assad just murders

1:39:30

children because he likes to kill children. It

1:39:32

doesn't make much sense, certainly possible though. And

1:39:35

that's not by the way, the other thing I said to Eli when

1:39:37

he points out the idea that this is about

1:39:39

Syria and so on, I simply said, are

1:39:41

you now bringing up weapons of mass destruction

1:39:43

too? Like all these old, tired arguments. But

1:39:47

the Wall Street Journal reported on

1:39:49

the 21st of March in 2022, the

1:39:52

US was sending Soviet era

1:39:54

defense systems that it secretly

1:39:56

acquired to Ukraine. This

1:40:00

is the big this is and we're talking about the

1:40:02

S 300 air defense systems. That's

1:40:04

the point. So it

1:40:06

only the only all it means

1:40:08

is that we know that Ukraine has S 300s. And

1:40:12

we know that the US tried to secretly send them

1:40:14

over there. Soviet era weapons.

1:40:17

And now when it matters, we see them going look, look, they

1:40:19

fired S 300s in a location that

1:40:22

I don't think strategically makes sense or why they

1:40:24

would choose to bomb specifically civilian apartment buildings. But

1:40:27

it's certainly possible. So

1:40:30

my point is, I think that a lot of this is directed

1:40:33

propaganda to make us look a different direction and to try

1:40:35

to act like we only care about one side of this.

1:40:38

But let's see what happens. Also

1:40:41

to save the reputation of the mighty Abram tanks.

1:40:44

Apparently the US has asked Ukraine to return them.

1:40:46

Now I can't, this is just a local report.

1:40:49

I find it interesting, but it says it claims it's

1:40:51

coming directly from US sources. What's

1:40:54

interesting is that it just shows you how the

1:40:57

interest in the Ukraine discussion has completely

1:40:59

changed. And now they're going like, just

1:41:02

get, you know, get rid of the tank. So we don't end up

1:41:04

looking stupid. Like we did in Afghanistan. Now

1:41:07

back to the point about Gaza. I

1:41:12

think it's very interesting how there's

1:41:15

so much provable information. It's

1:41:18

sort of like the COVID-19 point where it's like, it's

1:41:20

just not even debatable. You couldn't get

1:41:22

into the breadth of how serious the

1:41:24

problem is, but to keep arguing

1:41:27

like they're still doing, safe and effective. It

1:41:31

just, it's, it's, it's,

1:41:33

there's not a good, there's not a strong enough word for it.

1:41:36

Right. It is

1:41:38

insulting very clearly. It's

1:41:41

clumsy. It's desperate. But

1:41:45

I feel like we need to create a special word

1:41:47

for that, what they're doing, where we can see

1:41:49

it. Like I was saying in the beginning, but they're

1:41:51

just going, no, no, you're, you're breathing water right now.

1:41:53

And you go, you go, okay, I guess we're breathing

1:41:55

water now. Like

1:41:57

that's how stupid it is. And we all see that that's not the

1:41:59

case. And I just

1:42:01

don't know why, as the collective

1:42:03

majority that definitely sees this, we allow

1:42:05

these screamers and manipulators to kind of

1:42:07

seemingly drive the focal point of the

1:42:09

conversation. Very strange. But

1:42:12

Norman Finkelstein points out, is

1:42:14

the human rights watch lying? And he

1:42:16

says human rights watch is in a preliminary

1:42:19

report on Ali

1:42:21

Hospital devoted

1:42:23

24 lines describing in minute

1:42:26

detail how Hamas was suppressing critical

1:42:28

evidence on the incident, which

1:42:30

does not even remotely seem to be the case. It

1:42:33

says Hamas has stated that it would provide

1:42:35

full access to the evidence. But

1:42:40

human rights watch refused to post a correction.

1:42:43

Let's look at the report. Now what we

1:42:45

need to understand about this, we covered

1:42:47

the Ali Hospital right when it happened.

1:42:50

Right away, even from I think it was BBC,

1:42:52

or maybe it was Associated Press, but it was

1:42:54

corporate media. Their

1:42:56

own investigation showed that

1:42:59

basic, just looking at the trajectory

1:43:01

of the alleged missile or rocket

1:43:04

rather, very clearly showed

1:43:06

that this was not fired from the area

1:43:08

they claimed it was, that Israel claimed. So

1:43:12

at best, as they ultimately find here, even though it's

1:43:14

being, even the title seems

1:43:16

to suggest that they know it was Hamas,

1:43:19

their own investigation makes it clear that we don't know as

1:43:21

it says a full investigation needed.

1:43:24

Evidence points to, remember what it says, the

1:43:27

explosion that killed and injured many civilians in

1:43:29

Ali resulted from an

1:43:31

apparent rocket propelled munition. The

1:43:34

point is they don't know that. So it's interesting they

1:43:36

just kind of start like, but they do as they

1:43:38

say apparent, such as those commonly used by Palestinian armed

1:43:40

groups, or that we very well know

1:43:42

Israel could pretend to use

1:43:45

or use and blame on them. But it says

1:43:47

they hit the hospital grounds, human rights watch says,

1:43:49

while misfires are frequent further investigation

1:43:52

is needed to determine who launched

1:43:54

the rocket. So they

1:43:56

don't know. So why would you publish this and

1:43:58

say, well, we have no idea. But

1:44:01

what's interesting is that at best what you're

1:44:03

really arguing is that this was Hamas trying

1:44:06

to fire a rocket and accidentally doing this.

1:44:09

In every other circumstance it's now been proven

1:44:12

and admitted to that Israel chose to

1:44:14

bomb all these hospitals. Isn't

1:44:16

that interesting? Let me

1:44:18

ask you this. If Hamas was saying an Israeli

1:44:21

soldier's in there, so

1:44:23

we bombed it because they're using people as

1:44:25

human shields, would you think that was okay?

1:44:28

If you go, oh okay, well there was an IDF member in

1:44:30

there, so they were allowed to kill all the people in the

1:44:32

hospital. Yeah, obviously you

1:44:34

would go, no way, that doesn't

1:44:36

make sense. Then realize that

1:44:39

you're a hypocrite if you think it's okay in reverse. But

1:44:42

it says, well it goes on to say, a

1:44:44

type of munition that Human Rights Watch has not

1:44:46

been able to conclusively identify. Okay,

1:44:48

so if you don't even know what munition was

1:44:50

used, why are you claiming that you know it

1:44:52

was an apparent rocket? Very

1:44:55

strange reporting. It says the Human Rights Watch review

1:44:57

of videos and photos suggest that on October

1:44:59

17th a rocket struck

1:45:01

the elderly ground hospitals. But that's not what

1:45:04

most of these investigations found, even from corporate

1:45:06

level. What they

1:45:08

found, let me finish it

1:45:10

first, it says need for an independent

1:45:13

investigation into the incident, which could be

1:45:15

conducted by the United Nations. There

1:45:17

are no known images of any munition

1:45:20

remnants publicly available and Human Rights Watch

1:45:22

was unable to visit the scene, preventing,

1:45:24

and why do you think that is,

1:45:26

preventing conclusive identification of the munition. Right,

1:45:29

it's interesting they wouldn't state, obviously

1:45:31

there's only one group controlling who goes into

1:45:33

Gaza. Israel wouldn't let them go and

1:45:35

look at this. Why do you think that is?

1:45:38

Evidence available to Human Rights Watch made the

1:45:40

possibility of a, makes

1:45:43

the possibility of a large air-dropped

1:45:45

bomb, such as those Israel

1:45:47

has used extensively in Gaza, highly unlikely, which

1:45:49

by the way doesn't mean false or

1:45:52

unlikely or impossible, but

1:45:54

realize what the investigation found. So this is why

1:45:56

I'm kind of shocked this is not included, because

1:45:58

this was, these were military people that found

1:46:00

these. And this was again corporate

1:46:03

level discussions. It was

1:46:05

highly likely that this was a, I forgot the term

1:46:07

they used, where they detonate

1:46:09

the bomb above the ground. And

1:46:11

that's what caused the crater and not the typical explosion

1:46:14

that you would see if it hit the ground. And

1:46:17

they also went on to show that the bombing and

1:46:19

the air and the way it looked was not capable

1:46:21

to be caused by a rocket. Gaza

1:46:25

authorities appear to be in possession of remnants

1:46:27

that would help make a conclusive determination of

1:46:29

the ammunition possible. And

1:46:31

to Norman's point, they go on to

1:46:33

basically make the argument that they won't,

1:46:36

they've made it clear, you

1:46:39

can come look at this. Israel's not letting

1:46:41

people in to look. That's already

1:46:43

been made clear. So it seems like Human

1:46:45

Rights Watch is trying to maintain this, whatever pressure

1:46:47

is coming from the Zionist government, but

1:46:51

basically admitting in their own investigation we don't know, we can't

1:46:53

prove it, and the evidence we need we're not allowed to

1:46:55

look at, why do you think that is? This

1:46:58

has been in my mind definitively proven

1:47:00

to not be what they claimed it was, Israel,

1:47:03

based on basic investigations, dimensions

1:47:06

of where it came from, but on

1:47:08

top of that, that they've gone on.

1:47:10

Oh, and the other main point, let's

1:47:12

not forget, they dropped leaflets claiming they

1:47:15

were going to bomb this hospital. Right?

1:47:19

They admitted this. They

1:47:21

said we're gonna, and then people in the Ali

1:47:23

hospital showed them and said look, they said

1:47:25

we're gonna bomb, leave the hospital, and

1:47:28

then they bombed the hospital, and they

1:47:30

said oh Hamas did it, and don't

1:47:33

forget that the next one they did the

1:47:35

same thing, but then they kind of just decided

1:47:37

to go with it, and don't forget, Naftali I

1:47:39

think was the one that posted saying Hamas was

1:47:41

there, just like they claimed here. Or

1:47:45

rather, no, that was the revert, they claimed Hamas was

1:47:47

there on the Al-Ali hospital

1:47:49

and deleted it, and then

1:47:51

went back and posted that we did it, or their

1:47:53

rocket did it. This

1:47:56

was even caught by Twitter. All

1:47:58

I'm trying to say here is that it's... very obvious that

1:48:01

they're just playing this game. Why

1:48:03

would we not acknowledge that they

1:48:05

threatened to bomb it and then

1:48:08

Hamas did instead? And then

1:48:10

they went on to do the same thing but bombed every one

1:48:12

of the ones after that by simply going Hamas

1:48:14

was there? They claimed Hamas was here too. Very

1:48:17

very strange. Overall guys that's my

1:48:19

point about how embarrassing this is. I think

1:48:23

they're very aware what's happening and what they're

1:48:25

doing. Now here's just a video coming

1:48:28

from... Oh I'm sorry this was supposed

1:48:30

to be over here with this

1:48:32

one. I wasn't even gonna play it. It was

1:48:34

just gonna be the video if you wanted to

1:48:36

watch it of what Ukraine is saying is you

1:48:38

know a baby they rescued from the rubble. Interestingly

1:48:40

that it's a baby. The whole story. I'm not

1:48:42

dismissing it. I just find the timing very suspicious.

1:48:46

And the video is just I guess a Ukrainian

1:48:48

soldier finding a child and the blown up area

1:48:50

and graphic images. You know it's the same kind

1:48:52

of stuff. And if this was

1:48:54

done whoever did it obviously

1:48:56

it matters. Civilians getting bombed by anybody

1:48:59

matter. Of course unless you're

1:49:01

Palestinian and from the Zionist government. Now

1:49:05

where we at? We're at 149. It's good timing. I think

1:49:07

we can wrap this up by two hopefully. So we talked

1:49:09

about Lewis de Cruz who I'm not I'm not familiar with

1:49:13

but somebody kind of was like shocked that I was like exposing

1:49:15

that he was lying I guess but I'm not familiar with his

1:49:17

work. But I made this point

1:49:19

before. On

1:49:22

the 25th and I think this was in I think

1:49:26

the show before last. I

1:49:28

simply pointed out here. Let me just grab that since we're. You

1:49:35

guys can watch the full show if you'd like to. This

1:49:38

one I believe. I

1:49:42

don't know this one. I believe

1:49:45

so. In any case with one of them I think I'll

1:49:47

conclude that one. The point here is

1:49:49

that what he says at the time on

1:49:51

the 25th he said I have just seen the

1:49:53

video of the Palestinian terrorists cutting open the belly

1:49:56

of an Israeli pregnant woman while she was alive

1:49:58

forcibly kept awake to not fade away. and

1:50:00

remove her unborn baby. I'm at a loss

1:50:02

for words." Now

1:50:05

he's talking about the same information that's

1:50:07

being presented in these

1:50:09

screenings. That's what he's talking about. I

1:50:12

will publish the video soon on October 7th.org for

1:50:14

everyone who wants to see it. But for now

1:50:16

I have to step away for a couple days

1:50:18

over this madness. I'm done. Now my point

1:50:20

was we went to look at the website

1:50:23

on that day. Didn't see it. Oh, this was

1:50:25

three days afterward actually. Wasn't there. I

1:50:27

went to the very bottom. It took forever. There's a million things

1:50:29

on there. 90% of them completely unverifiable. And

1:50:33

the ones that are don't actually get into any

1:50:35

of the atrocity stuff they claim to happen. But

1:50:38

here's my point. As of today, he

1:50:40

still has not posted this alleged video. You

1:50:43

know, in the video, the claim is of the

1:50:45

thing we can literally prove comes from what they're,

1:50:47

what they murder a Palestinian at the hands of

1:50:49

Zionists. Decades ago.

1:50:51

One of the most horrific things you could possibly imagine.

1:50:54

That was floated early. Remember by one of these settlers right

1:50:57

along the same time as the 40 beheaded babies, neither

1:51:00

of which happened. He

1:51:03

hasn't posted this yet. This being

1:51:05

a claim roundly admitted to being

1:51:07

false. And now even others at this

1:51:09

very screening held by Israel are openly stating

1:51:11

that not only was this not

1:51:14

shown for sure, not shown, but

1:51:16

also no proof of most of the

1:51:18

major claims. Here

1:51:21

is Owen Jones, one of

1:51:23

the journalists that was there and his

1:51:25

point, as it says, this person just repeating what he's

1:51:27

talking about. No proof beheaded babies. This

1:51:29

is a screening that other Israeli journalists

1:51:31

have claimed they watched and walked away saying

1:51:34

it proves everything. The babies and the

1:51:36

rape and everything we've seen. And now

1:51:38

we've got journalists going. That's none of it was there. And

1:51:41

no, no, no, Hamas killing children, no

1:51:44

proof of rape, no proof of beheading

1:51:46

humans alive. And

1:51:48

even on the record, Hamas asking Israeli

1:51:50

party goers if they were soldiers or

1:51:53

civilians. Think about that

1:51:55

for a second. Now,

1:51:58

he is telling you that he didn't. see any of

1:52:00

it. He then called a US journalist who was there

1:52:03

and said, do you see that? I said,

1:52:06

no, I didn't see that. He then called a British

1:52:08

journalist and said, did you see that? No, I didn't

1:52:10

see that either. So you've got different multiple

1:52:12

journalists from different parts of the world admitting

1:52:15

that they did not see any of the

1:52:17

things that these other people like this guy

1:52:19

are claiming they saw. This

1:52:21

is insidious. These people are

1:52:24

lying about horrible things, even

1:52:26

things they claim they saw or the discussion

1:52:29

of the rape discussion in general. We've

1:52:31

already talked about this ad nauseam. The image

1:52:34

they deleted from their website that they've been

1:52:36

throwing around, that was

1:52:38

from 2022. And the

1:52:40

admission by their own

1:52:44

forensics team saying that we didn't take any

1:52:46

evidence, which means they never proved it even

1:52:48

happened. And yet the people are saying, I

1:52:51

saw that in the graphs. I

1:52:53

was there. They're provably lying,

1:52:55

guys, which doesn't mean everybody is, but it

1:52:57

means that we have to be honest about

1:52:59

this. There are people being put to the

1:53:01

task of knowingly lying. Now, if

1:53:04

we can prove, which

1:53:07

then means that if they have to force

1:53:09

people or coerce or ask them to lie

1:53:12

about these things, why would

1:53:14

we believe they're real? Why

1:53:16

would we believe they have evidence for that if they have

1:53:18

to pretend they've seen the evidence? Now,

1:53:21

here's what he goes on to say. This is from today.

1:53:25

The Palestinian barbarians even

1:53:27

raped corpses, cut off women's breasts and strutted

1:53:29

around with severed heads. These are the same

1:53:32

things we've heard from day one from these

1:53:34

propagandists. Five weeks after

1:53:36

Hamas pogrom on October 7th,

1:53:39

imagine continuing to frame

1:53:41

this as the worst atrocity while ignoring the

1:53:43

bombing and killing of six thousand children plus.

1:53:46

Even experienced Israeli investigators are shocked and

1:53:48

brutal. So he's telling us. And

1:53:51

you know what this all comes from? A random

1:53:55

image of that screening room.

1:53:58

See my point? This just keeps going. Continues to build

1:54:00

and we're going look at the we were there and I

1:54:03

saw it even though other journalists have said that wasn't

1:54:05

happening I didn't see that One

1:54:09

of the people that was saying actually we

1:54:11

saw children executed no he said they did

1:54:13

not show that Then

1:54:15

that's why he double-checked. Maybe I missed it. Nope. I didn't see

1:54:17

that either So

1:54:19

he's putting this out again, why would you why what's

1:54:21

the point of this post? Repeating

1:54:24

the things you claim you saw and then

1:54:26

giving you an image that proves none of that What

1:54:30

it does prove is here's IDF saying these things

1:54:34

in brief in brief a briefing for journalists Israel

1:54:36

police explained the

1:54:38

difficulties It

1:54:41

is the largest mass atrocity Israel's history They

1:54:44

cut off the stating these things What

1:54:49

kind of absolute follower blindly

1:54:51

takes what they're telling you at face

1:54:53

value Now

1:54:56

we have this coming out as well Christine

1:55:00

kench from political

1:55:02

and wilt So

1:55:05

she reached out so

1:55:08

Hey, this is Christine from

1:55:10

wealth. We're about to publish

1:55:12

She claims an article with evidence for

1:55:15

widespread sexual violence from Hamas. So get

1:55:17

ready for another propaganda push against

1:55:19

Israeli women men and children So

1:55:23

now we're claiming they raped women men and children

1:55:26

Furthermore there are indications Documents

1:55:30

and testimonies documents It

1:55:33

says that Hamas fighters were given orders

1:55:36

to rape people. Ah So

1:55:39

now we're right back in the they told they

1:55:41

directed them to rape people in Libya

1:55:43

in Ukraine, Russia Oh,

1:55:46

you mean the stories that have all turned out to

1:55:48

be false every single one of them and no way

1:55:50

does that mean doesn't happen? You know why I know

1:55:52

that because it's on the record in a court of

1:55:54

law that soldiers were forced and ordered to rape people

1:55:56

in Iraq by

1:55:58

US military That's

1:56:01

on the record guys. That's what admitted to interesting

1:56:03

isn't it that we can prove that there But yet that

1:56:05

it's floated by these same people and it continues

1:56:07

to turn out to be false They gave them

1:56:09

by Agra at the right people though. They lied

1:56:11

about that in both places so

1:56:14

That bring it to this point as

1:56:17

I've said I'm not saying this

1:56:19

did not happen. What I'm saying is

1:56:21

to this very moment. They have yet

1:56:23

to prove any of it According

1:56:26

to their own forensics teams according to

1:56:28

international journalists and human

1:56:30

rights Or the UN has

1:56:32

reported by saying we need to conduct

1:56:34

an investigation Which now

1:56:36

they finally said well good Knowing

1:56:39

that they weren't going to win that battle Now

1:56:42

it says Israel's own physicians for

1:56:44

human rights explicitly rejected these interrogations

1:56:47

Confessions saying we have

1:56:49

not relied on accounts recorded in these

1:56:51

videos due to severe concern that interrogations

1:56:53

included the use of torture Even their

1:56:55

own people know that they will torture them to get

1:56:57

what they want out of them So they're not using

1:57:00

that in the investigation to find out whether it actually

1:57:02

happened But well, this sure as

1:57:04

hell gonna from Germany, of course sure as hell gonna

1:57:06

put out an article that says Everything

1:57:08

Israel said happened as fact There

1:57:12

is no evidence their forensic team have admitted that

1:57:14

it's a time path they didn't get it They don't know

1:57:16

so all the best we're gonna get

1:57:18

is the repetition of the same things Now If

1:57:22

you want to understand why this is going to continue to happen The

1:57:25

cradle breaks down the cradle the

1:57:28

absurd cradle they showed us the baby

1:57:30

crib Israel

1:57:33

claims that the baby crib presented to Elon Musk

1:57:35

during his visit Was

1:57:38

caught in the middle of a Hamas attack in the

1:57:40

shot with a child inside After

1:57:43

analyzing the footage the Turkish the

1:57:45

Turkish communication center for combating disinformation

1:57:47

interestingly enough Determined not only that

1:57:50

the crib showed no signs of

1:57:52

damage But also that the

1:57:54

shell casings allegedly fired by kasim

1:57:56

fighters were not in the crib when the

1:57:58

governor of New Jersey visited oh

1:58:01

no man you sort of like

1:58:03

when the BBC came and they said oh there's extra guns

1:58:05

you didn't have them that oh we found more oh but

1:58:08

the box wasn't there oh like they're

1:58:10

staging these things in a very clumsy

1:58:13

fashion and everybody's seeing through it furthermore

1:58:16

as we pointed out and I think Steve took

1:58:18

we pointed out to me the shell

1:58:20

casings oh actually not this point but our 7.62

1:58:24

by 5 1 ammunition from the MG 3 a

1:58:27

Merkava machine gun this

1:58:29

aligns with previous recent reports that

1:58:31

show that Israeli forces fired look

1:58:34

at that on themselves leading

1:58:37

to the wide-scale devastation caused by the settlements

1:58:40

so really what that says to me it's not that that's

1:58:42

the crib that was there but rather they took out the

1:58:44

ammunition from their own guns and threw it in the crib

1:58:46

and said see they're fired on the

1:58:48

crib like this begins

1:58:50

to shout like this either means that they

1:58:53

want us to see through this or this is always

1:58:55

how ridiculous they've been and it's only because of their

1:58:57

influence over our governments in the media that they've ever

1:58:59

gotten away with any of this I

1:59:01

kind of think it's somewhere in the middle but my

1:59:04

god lie after lie

1:59:06

after lie now what's

1:59:10

interesting is on that note we

1:59:13

need to understand how invasive this is

1:59:17

we keep pointing to things like the ADL or

1:59:19

APAC for example in regard to lobbying Nina

1:59:22

Turner from the from former

1:59:26

State Senate says it's wild that

1:59:28

this is allowed and what you're looking at

1:59:31

Netanyahu meeting

1:59:34

with an American lobbying

1:59:36

group shocking

1:59:38

I know it's supposed to be racist to make that

1:59:40

argument but there they are right that's why

1:59:42

it's always been really stupid to argue it's racist to

1:59:45

point out that they're using their lobbying group to influence

1:59:47

policy which by the way is literally what

1:59:49

lobbying groups do but of course if you

1:59:51

point out Israel's lobbying group is doing that that's

1:59:53

racist sort of like acknowledging their

1:59:56

crimes or or is racist

1:59:58

really it turns out that anything that exposes Israeli

2:00:00

government actions as a bad thing, coincidentally

2:00:03

enough, turns out to be racist. What do

2:00:05

you know? What an interesting overlap. My

2:00:08

God, this is terrifying, guys. This is

2:00:10

an American lobbying group that actively, and

2:00:12

by the way, if not the one

2:00:14

of the most powerful in this country,

2:00:18

who actively lobbies our government and bribes

2:00:20

them, which is what lobbying is, to

2:00:22

act in certain ways. Our politicians is

2:00:25

meeting with a foreign government. That's

2:00:30

the point. That

2:00:32

should be terrifying. If anybody else,

2:00:34

if this was any other government or any other lobbying

2:00:36

group, this would be a crime. As

2:00:38

you said, it's wild, this is allowed. Here's

2:00:42

an interesting point. Not only is this

2:00:44

group meeting with foreign governments to discuss

2:00:46

what they want so they can lobby

2:00:49

our government, this

2:00:51

very lobbying group then goes

2:00:53

out to petition you, calls

2:00:55

you directly, which by the way is a very real thing,

2:00:58

and asks you to tell what they

2:01:00

say, what they want you to say

2:01:03

to your government, and

2:01:05

then even goes, we'll call them, stay on the line. Guys,

2:01:10

there's nothing about this. That

2:01:12

is not terrifying. We

2:01:14

have American and real public affairs

2:01:16

committee. Oh, and just the actual tweet

2:01:18

says, what

2:01:21

to do if APAC calls you? APAC

2:01:24

called to connect

2:01:26

me with my Congressman Ted Lieu. Okay,

2:01:31

who's that? American

2:01:34

and real public affairs committee.

2:01:38

Okay, who's that? Are

2:01:40

you failing something? No sir, not signed.

2:01:44

I'm sorry, are you a salesman? Sir,

2:01:48

can you hear me? Yeah, I don't know

2:01:50

what you're talking about. I mean, what do you guys sell? Are

2:01:52

you an investor? I'm not. Can you hear me?

2:02:00

I mean, look, we've got to note, this person has

2:02:02

a harsh accent, but yet works for

2:02:04

an American lobbying group. I

2:02:14

can't have children, so your member of Congress

2:02:16

needs to hear a clear message to the

2:02:19

U.S. government us and Israel. So

2:02:22

they didn't ask his opinion. They

2:02:24

just said, this happened, and you must ask

2:02:26

your government for this. Isn't

2:02:29

that alarming? Thank

2:02:40

you so much for saving the children, you

2:02:42

know. I mean, yes, please transfer me. And

2:02:58

now you want to stand with Israel and the fight to

2:03:00

get terrorist, okay? I

2:03:02

mean, this is just so creepy. Like,

2:03:05

you might as well just speak for him. You're

2:03:08

literally, in a very aggressive way, calling

2:03:11

people and telling them, I'll connect you to

2:03:13

your representative. This is what you should say

2:03:15

and how you should say it. So,

2:03:18

for every one moment, I'm going to

2:03:20

transfer you now to the next point. Here will be

2:03:22

someone you represent as an officer. For every

2:03:24

one moment, I'm still in the line with you, okay? Hello,

2:03:28

you've reached the Office of Congressman Khattelou. How can I

2:03:30

help you today? Hi,

2:03:33

I'm calling on behalf of

2:03:35

all the civilians that have

2:03:37

been killed. And, you

2:03:40

know, we need to call for an

2:03:42

immediate ceasefire because, you know, these massacres,

2:03:44

genocides, being committed by the Israeli government

2:03:46

against the Palestinian people is absolutely insane.

2:03:50

So, the Congressman, we asked the Congressman

2:03:52

to do whatever he can. He's my

2:03:54

representative, my family living in Gaza right

2:03:56

now, being killed by the war machines

2:03:58

we're making. Think

2:04:00

about that too. This is a lobbying

2:04:02

group with absolute... I

2:04:05

mean classless, whatever, like it

2:04:07

matters, calling a person whose family is

2:04:09

in Gaza and telling them to petition

2:04:11

his government on behalf of Israel. So

2:04:15

I would ask the

2:04:17

representative to actually call

2:04:20

for a ceasefire. Absolutely,

2:04:23

sir. I'm surprised. I was

2:04:26

half expecting it, like they said they were on the

2:04:28

line still. I was half expecting him to hang up

2:04:30

the call for him, but it didn't happen. He basically

2:04:32

just goes on to say exactly what you'd expect. It's

2:04:36

just, it's alarming that this is something that we

2:04:38

don't... It

2:04:41

really does show that there is, I mean, if we, people

2:04:43

talk about Russia and China, which by

2:04:45

the way we should be concerned about any

2:04:47

government, invasively trying to influence or surreptitiously

2:04:49

involving themselves in what happens in this

2:04:52

country. But it's amazing that we can

2:04:54

do that and care about that, but watch

2:04:56

it happen, but because your politicians are still

2:04:58

so completely overtaken by this entity that we,

2:05:00

they just go, no, it's good. They're our

2:05:02

ally. So we don't care about it. Even

2:05:05

though what they're doing on the record is

2:05:07

in the interest of the other government and

2:05:09

not you and

2:05:11

not your country and what you want with your

2:05:13

tax dollars, which is what's funding, what's happening. It's

2:05:18

dangerous. Now, again,

2:05:20

they love to call that racist. It's not.

2:05:22

It's about a Zionist government or any government

2:05:25

influencing your government's policy. That's

2:05:28

it. I mean, it's quite clearly what I'm saying.

2:05:30

They'll just try to make it about Jews or

2:05:32

make it about whatever makes you think I'm racist.

2:05:35

Even though I've never made that claim. And in

2:05:37

fact, it's quite obvious by all of my work

2:05:39

I've done since I've started doing this, that's exactly

2:05:41

the opposite, but that's all they can do. That's

2:05:44

why it's obvious they've failed in this information war,

2:05:46

because they have no substance with which to argue

2:05:48

against what we're saying. They just say you're

2:05:50

a racist. Now, Samu

2:05:52

Sandy points out in regard to her question, Nina

2:05:55

Turner saying it's wild is allowed. Well,

2:05:57

he says it's allowed because a pack. got

2:06:00

around being labeled a foreign agent. The

2:06:02

anti-Zionist American counsel for

2:06:05

Judaism wrote to then Attorney

2:06:07

General RFK in 1963 about

2:06:11

their fight against the American Zionist council,

2:06:13

which would form APAC. RFK

2:06:16

tried to pursue it, but after JFK

2:06:18

was killed, didn't have much

2:06:20

pull. Then LBJ dropped

2:06:22

the matter. Now

2:06:24

you damn well better be able

2:06:26

to read between the lines. I think it's

2:06:29

very obvious. The Israeli influence on all of

2:06:31

this stuff, it's very telling

2:06:33

that the person who was trying to make

2:06:35

this happen suddenly got removed from the situation.

2:06:39

And of course, the point was that they

2:06:41

were very clearly recognizing the issue. And

2:06:43

the moment he got pulled out, it went the other direction.

2:06:46

That's American history for you right there in

2:06:48

a nutshell, when it comes

2:06:50

to wars and Israeli influence. Now

2:06:53

to finish in general, I wanna talk about

2:06:55

some of the other manipulations coming out in

2:06:57

regard to the people that have been released. You

2:07:00

get people like this, these egregious propagandists.

2:07:03

So think about how crazy it is. They were at

2:07:05

a point now where the beginning was they've

2:07:08

murdered everybody. They just wanted

2:07:10

to kill as many civilians as possible. They've

2:07:12

had all the children, raped everybody. That's everything.

2:07:14

It was all about everybody. Everybody was

2:07:16

killed, which again, I think they

2:07:19

did not expect any of these people to come home, which is

2:07:21

why they shot at all of them as they left. And

2:07:24

so that was the narrative. Because if

2:07:26

they all died, it's very easy to say they

2:07:28

murdered everybody. But

2:07:30

then they started coming home. They started waving and

2:07:33

shaking hands and smiling and telling you they were

2:07:35

treated nicely. So what has the

2:07:37

narrative become? Look at how

2:07:39

alarming this is. Look at how it looks

2:07:41

like they might not really mean it. God,

2:07:43

they're terrorists. Sure,

2:07:46

maybe you're right. Maybe they don't really mean it. Maybe they're

2:07:48

scared. But think about how embarrassing this must be for a

2:07:50

deal like David. To have gone from

2:07:52

the idea that look, these people were all murderers

2:07:54

and terrorists. You'd be like, look at how she's

2:07:56

kind of maybe not smiling all the way. Oh

2:07:58

my God. And

2:08:01

this person says well and what he says is

2:08:04

a gunpoint which nobody's pointing their guns

2:08:06

at anybody So I think he's just

2:08:08

anyway Dumb but says smile and

2:08:11

wave or you'll die. What would you do? Well,

2:08:14

somebody goes well, what happens when they're saying the same

2:08:16

thing from their home? Like literally everybody

2:08:18

has been saying every one of them

2:08:20

when they're speaking of their own accord

2:08:23

Has said they were treated kindly but they didn't do

2:08:25

anything wrong to them In

2:08:27

the context of once they were taken obviously

2:08:29

their civilians the ones that are that's a

2:08:31

crime Here is

2:08:34

what we get stuff like that

2:08:37

Very flimsy half-hearted things which are just your basic

2:08:39

opinion of what you're looking at when they

2:08:41

then go on to say I was free Kindly when they

2:08:43

leave He's just trying

2:08:45

to manipulate people or two are just willing

2:08:48

total foul people So we're gonna see

2:08:50

one thing and go well, it convinces me with no

2:08:52

further investigation He's aiming at

2:08:55

the lowest common denominator, which by the way

2:08:57

is what Israel thinks we all are Clearly

2:08:59

based on their flimsy propaganda, but

2:09:01

this other complete propagandist just been doing the same

2:09:03

thing as Eli David They just keep

2:09:05

putting out stuff like this. This is my point the

2:09:07

same point because most of these kids

2:09:09

were smiling later We're on to say everything was phone.

2:09:12

What do they do? Creates a story around

2:09:14

it, which we can't verify so you give it you

2:09:17

get a picture that was just of kids Handing

2:09:19

up then they're handing them water and what does

2:09:21

she add to it the context a

2:09:24

loss Statistically abused the child hostages.

2:09:26

Well, there's literally no evidence of that and every

2:09:28

one of them has said they were pretty kindly

2:09:30

But she wants to tell you why they're what

2:09:32

they that they're lying apparently So

2:09:35

now you're you're accusing your own hostages

2:09:37

as being liars says

2:09:40

terrorists burned or and Or

2:09:44

and Yagali's legs, I think maybe his name

2:09:46

is or with a motorcycle exhaust

2:09:48

So that if they got away, they'd

2:09:51

be identifiable identifiable by the burn marks.

2:09:53

Oh Thanks. I've

2:09:55

avia with nobody else is making that claim. So I guess

2:09:57

we'll just pretend that you're just where

2:09:59

you heard that from the children? They're

2:10:02

not saying that, so where'd that come from? Like

2:10:04

how do we even know that's the case seeing as how this image

2:10:06

shows nothing of the kind? What

2:10:09

if they just got burn marks as they were on the motorcycle when

2:10:11

they took them to the place where they kept them in good warm

2:10:13

areas with food and medicine and whatever else is

2:10:16

happening, per what they have said? This

2:10:19

just feels desperate as hell.

2:10:23

And this person goes on to say, yeah, crawler

2:10:26

is reeling all my memes. These

2:10:29

people are clearly at the very least, and

2:10:31

again, they've left and continue to say otherwise.

2:10:34

Here's an example of what I'm talking about. Eli

2:10:36

David says, Mia Shem was abducted

2:10:38

by Hamas animals when in

2:10:40

captivity, she underwent a surgery by a

2:10:43

veterinarian. 75% of

2:10:45

Palestinians support Hamas massacre. That's

2:10:47

not true, by the way. A nation without

2:10:49

a moral compass. A nation? You

2:10:52

mean an occupied territory? A

2:10:55

nation that has lost touch with civilized

2:10:57

humanity. God, think about

2:10:59

the desperation as you're ignoring the most obvious

2:11:01

genocide in history. But here's the main point.

2:11:04

First of all, what you're actually, this is the kind of the same idea.

2:11:07

They killed them all and raped everybody becomes,

2:11:09

well, they gave them medical treatment, but not

2:11:11

the right kind. Terrorists. Okay,

2:11:14

weird walk back. So you're

2:11:16

now letting us know that they treated them, but

2:11:18

because it wasn't the right kind of treatment,

2:11:20

that that's evil. What

2:11:22

about when you're not giving anybody treatment in the

2:11:24

prisons in Israel or as per Israel? See

2:11:27

what I mean? Like this is getting bad, worse

2:11:29

than it was bad to start. But here's

2:11:31

how it gets even worse. Guess

2:11:33

what she's saying now that she's released and

2:11:35

at home? The opposite. People

2:11:41

are very good, very kind

2:11:43

to me. All of

2:11:45

them are good and

2:11:48

the kindness and everything. So

2:11:52

they treated me kind and everything was fine. What's

2:11:55

your step? That

2:12:00

was the one they're both smiling, sitting right there. You

2:12:09

realize in this conversation, General, this is not to imply, to

2:12:11

mean that nothing bad happened or that nothing bad could happen.

2:12:14

It's just trying to engage honestly with what

2:12:16

we're looking at and what they continue to

2:12:18

say. Not going off what some

2:12:20

random propaganda says they said or meant. It's

2:12:23

just getting really bad. Laughing.

2:12:43

That's the one he's trying to highlight. Let's

2:12:45

watch the full thing. You tell

2:12:47

me if these people, look, it very well

2:12:50

could be the case that they're scared and

2:12:52

that they ask them to wave. I wouldn't say that's

2:12:54

false. I don't know. But what I do

2:12:56

know is that the body of all of it wildly

2:12:59

contradicts what they're trying to push

2:13:01

desperately. They're

2:13:08

making it out look weird with the way they clipped it. Look again. Just

2:13:13

based on the way it looks, they don't look uncomfortable at

2:13:15

all. But if you clip it weird and you make

2:13:17

it positive, that's what I think they're trying to do. Yeah,

2:13:26

the most important part? Oh

2:13:29

yeah, yeah, nice, nice, nice term of endearment on the way

2:13:31

out. Totally the

2:13:34

most important part is they're all continuing to say

2:13:36

that they were treated kindly. Weird how

2:13:39

Eli David doesn't talk about that part of it. Look

2:13:43

at how malicious and surreptitious this

2:13:45

is. He's

2:13:48

trying to frame it in a way that makes them like, so

2:13:50

you hate these people too. That's seeming clear

2:13:53

to me. You hate these people because they don't

2:13:55

toe your line. Now here's

2:13:57

Lewis de Cruz coming in with his propaganda. person.

2:14:01

It's disgusting anti-Semitism, he says. What?

2:14:04

Well, according to media reports, the Iranian

2:14:06

delegation left negotiations at the United Nations

2:14:08

climate conference in Dubai a

2:14:11

couple of minutes ago in

2:14:13

protest against the participation of

2:14:15

the representatives of the Israeli

2:14:17

state. Okay?

2:14:20

Anti-Semitism! Or

2:14:23

anti-Jedicide. Or

2:14:26

anti-anything Israel's government has done that has

2:14:28

a thousand reasons Iran has to be upset with them, but

2:14:30

of course the only thing you can call it

2:14:32

is they hate Jews because this is

2:14:34

the only card you have left to play. Now,

2:14:37

for all I know that might be true in

2:14:39

some cases, but the reality of trying to pretend

2:14:42

that they're walking out on a delegation that involves

2:14:44

Israel with all that's going on is only about

2:14:46

anti-Semitism is just laughably

2:14:50

stupid. And

2:14:54

here's the same point. Same guy.

2:14:57

Going out of his way to lie to you. It

2:15:00

says there was somebody with a swastika

2:15:02

at a pro-Palestine rally. And

2:15:05

of course at a pro-Palestine terrorist protest.

2:15:07

It's just so clumsy. And

2:15:10

you know what we're looking at?

2:15:13

This is hilarious by the way. Okay.

2:15:16

You get this very sideways glance.

2:15:19

He's hoping that you're not smart enough to

2:15:22

posit and look that it

2:15:24

says Israeli military. Right. Right.

2:15:27

So your best effort is to

2:15:29

try to pretend that these are people

2:15:32

in Palestinian protests that are proudly Nazis.

2:15:35

What they're doing, bud, is making you

2:15:37

understand that Israel's military are acting

2:15:39

the way that we understand Nazis acted.

2:15:42

But they just can't. That's the best they've got. And

2:15:45

you can see the other side of the sign goes on to say,

2:15:48

save Gaza and genocide.

2:15:52

But he wants you to think they're all Nazis.

2:15:54

They don't even hide their intentions anymore. This

2:15:57

is really, really clumsy. And of course...

2:16:00

He's mister supporting Ukraine as well Now

2:16:02

if you want to pick another couple great articles

2:16:05

You've probably already seen but this is from Robert

2:16:07

from the 30th the BBC claims to be impartial

2:16:09

continues lying about Gaza and Hamas

2:16:12

bases and hospitals exposing Israel's propaganda

2:16:14

and lastly to finish in general just understanding that

2:16:16

this is another example that they knew or Possibly

2:16:19

knew again because this could all be

2:16:21

practical Question everything but decentralized

2:16:24

points out get out of town Israel knew

2:16:26

Hamas's attack plan more than a year ago

2:16:28

According to New York Times a blueprint reviewed

2:16:30

by the Times laid out the attack in

2:16:32

detail If there is

2:16:34

really officials obtained Hamas's battle plan more

2:16:37

than a year before according to documents Israel

2:16:40

the authorities codenamed Jericho wall Outlined

2:16:44

point by point exactly

2:16:46

the devastating evasion invasion

2:16:51

It says the bottom a methodical assault

2:16:53

designed to overwhelm the fortifications around the

2:16:55

Gaza Strip take over Israeli cities and

2:16:57

storm key military bases Including division

2:17:00

could quarters now this more and more

2:17:02

continues to make me think that that's because Netanyahu was

2:17:04

part of plan There's just

2:17:06

no way you don't don't with everything with

2:17:08

Egypt warning with IDF members more than once

2:17:10

telling their people They saw them getting ready with

2:17:12

a plan that they knew they had a year ago

2:17:14

and 15

2:17:17

points with nobody there for hours on end a

2:17:19

checkpoint Right between the kabuts and

2:17:21

where the Nova people were coming from as we

2:17:23

now know they shot them This

2:17:26

was a false flag plan I

2:17:29

really did I genuinely think that to what

2:17:31

degree to everything that happened I don't know

2:17:33

but the atrocity propaganda is that that's

2:17:35

why this begins to make more sense than ever I Again,

2:17:39

some of this was lied about but I think

2:17:41

some of these things were conducted by people to make it look

2:17:43

like Hamas Here

2:17:46

Freddie Pontoan points out Israeli

2:17:48

squadron 161 which operates Israel's Zeke

2:17:51

drone fleet Now have details

2:17:53

that the drone fleet played a role in October

2:17:55

7th Including in the main

2:17:57

location of kabus be Eric. They

2:17:59

were the aircrafts to respond to

2:18:01

the attack. Guess what? They

2:18:04

targeted their own settlements, their own bases,

2:18:06

and their own people. All

2:18:09

of this is continuing to come out. These are direct reports. You

2:18:11

guys, it's very clear what happened. And here's

2:18:14

again Mr. Propagandas. After consultation with the military

2:18:16

rabbinate and the chief rabbinate, hundreds of vehicles

2:18:18

will be buried according to Israel in the

2:18:21

next few days. Lewister Cruz breaking down that

2:18:23

they're going to bury all the evidence. We

2:18:26

already told you this, but just to show you that they're now trying

2:18:28

to frame the narrative the way they want you to think, it

2:18:31

seems almost kind of seemed like all these people

2:18:33

are just trying to pick up the damage control

2:18:35

after all the reports we're doing. Israel

2:18:38

plans to bury the cars of terror

2:18:40

victims. Not all of the bodies of

2:18:42

October 7 victims have been found. Yeah,

2:18:46

I think we know why. I think it's obvious now

2:18:48

these things were... basically

2:18:51

we know that they removed things, whether this is

2:18:53

about organ trafficking too, but the idea ultimately we

2:18:55

know these bodies were burned alive, many of them

2:18:57

because of the bombings, that some of them were

2:18:59

tried to be used, or even as the Grey

2:19:01

Zone reported, one of the bodies was taken out

2:19:03

of a car, put on the ground, and

2:19:05

then it removed her clothes to claim she was raped. But

2:19:08

the rigor mortis makes it very clear that her arms were

2:19:10

like somebody sitting in the car of a chair. This

2:19:14

is grotesque, man, but we need

2:19:16

to understand what they're capable of.

2:19:18

And it says, then some will never probably be

2:19:20

found. Why would you say that? That

2:19:23

seems like a really strange statement. Unless

2:19:26

it is that we know they won't be found because we're

2:19:28

making sure of that because they were the ones that were

2:19:31

the most obvious. In order to give... why are they

2:19:33

burying all the cars without any investigation? Because

2:19:35

the cars prove that they bombed with

2:19:37

munitions that Hamas did not have. It

2:19:41

says, in order to give relatives a form of farewell,

2:19:44

Israel is thinking about an extraordinary ceremony. Oh

2:19:47

right, pretending like it's about them. Wouldn't it

2:19:50

matter to find out the truth, which is what they're all

2:19:52

demanding? For the first time since

2:19:54

the founding of the state, Israel wants to bury

2:19:56

the cars of the murdered. This is like

2:19:58

it's some kind of ceremony. This is

2:20:00

a straight up cover-up. There is a sad

2:20:02

reason behind this. According to the Zaka organization, which

2:20:04

provides aid after attacks,

2:20:07

there are no remains for the body parts of many of

2:20:09

those killed. How does that make sense to

2:20:11

anybody? During the investigation into

2:20:13

the barbaric attacks, Zaka came to the shocking

2:20:15

conclusion that not all of the remains were

2:20:18

there. A large

2:20:20

proportion of the victim's cars have blood stains or

2:20:22

ashes on them, are difficult to impossible to recover.

2:20:25

In order to preserve the peace of

2:20:27

the dead as best as possible, we are

2:20:30

going to bury all the evidence. That

2:20:32

doesn't even make sense to me. I

2:20:34

want you to pause the Bara stuff in my opinion. Now

2:20:37

we are going to end with your daily reminder

2:20:40

toward Judaism. Important remarks from

2:20:42

Rabbi Yisrael David Weiss, making

2:20:45

sure you understand that Zionism

2:20:48

is not Judaism. Judaism

2:20:52

is a mere hundred odd years. It was

2:20:54

a movement of Jews who were estranged in

2:20:56

the Torah, who detest the Torah and tried

2:20:58

to transform this Judaism into

2:21:01

a Zach Judaism, a new Judaism,

2:21:03

which is pure nationalism, material concept

2:21:05

of having an army, an Olympic

2:21:08

team, and to be a nation

2:21:10

proud amongst other nations, totally

2:21:13

removing in its essence the

2:21:15

concept of godliness, removing God from

2:21:18

the equation, and they will allow religion,

2:21:20

they say. Now realize what

2:21:22

he's talking about is the Zionist entity.

2:21:25

It doesn't necessarily apply to every Jew living

2:21:27

in Israel, but his point

2:21:29

is that what they've created leads them astray

2:21:32

for what they believe is true Judaism. I

2:21:34

agree with that. How

2:21:36

far they do, I don't. But they

2:21:38

have hijacked the name Israel, they've hijacked

2:21:40

the whole Judaism

2:21:42

to legitimize it, to put

2:21:45

a facade of that it's kosher, that it's

2:21:47

godly, what they're doing when in truth it

2:21:49

contradicts Judaism, and it's totally forbidden. I'll explain

2:21:51

why with God's honor. Can

2:21:53

you, before we go to break, can you be Jewish

2:21:55

and an atheist? Of course not. It's ridiculous. that

2:22:00

Judaism is belief in God, that's what it's

2:22:02

all about, a covenant with God. It's not

2:22:04

a national... And this is getting into what

2:22:06

they constantly coin out is the conflation of

2:22:09

the state of Israel with Judaism, as if

2:22:11

you can somehow culturally be a Jew. The

2:22:16

idea is it's a religion, that's the point. The

2:22:18

Zionist state of Israel has tried to

2:22:20

create some kind of national ideology around

2:22:22

this. That's what plenty of people,

2:22:25

Avi Shalom and plenty of historians and

2:22:27

experts around the topic have made very clear. It

2:22:30

is a manipulation of Judaism.

2:22:33

People are finally starting to see this. It's

2:22:36

not some type of a country that you can be... Of

2:22:39

course not. It's ridiculous that Judaism is belief

2:22:41

in God. That's what it's all about, a

2:22:43

covenant with God. It's not a nationalism. It's

2:22:45

not some type of a country that you

2:22:47

can be a Democrat, you

2:22:49

can be a Marxist or something. While

2:22:52

Zionism is exactly that. They

2:22:54

were Marxists and they claimed to

2:22:57

be Democrats and they proudly claim that

2:22:59

you don't have to be

2:23:01

a practicing Jew and to be a good Jew

2:23:03

as long as you're supporting the state. That

2:23:06

in itself shows the heresy and

2:23:08

the blasphemy in what this is. But there's

2:23:10

much more to what we're talking of the issue

2:23:12

of Zionism. I really have to elaborate a little

2:23:15

bit on what this is, on

2:23:17

what Zionism... How in every

2:23:20

facet it rebels against God

2:23:22

and it is

2:23:25

rooted in heresy and non-belief

2:23:27

in God and in doing

2:23:29

evil basically. Now

2:23:31

that's why it's so important to understand. I

2:23:34

do believe that there are religious extremists

2:23:37

with ideology. But

2:23:40

overall I believe that most of them are

2:23:43

very aware that this is more of a ploy. I

2:23:46

think that's important to understand. I don't think it's all across

2:23:48

the board. But that's my opinion. So

2:23:50

here is another point about censorship and this is where

2:23:52

we're going to end. We shared

2:23:54

this video, Torah Judaism says, on our TikTok account

2:23:57

today and it was claimed that the video was

2:23:59

against the community. Of

2:24:01

course, right after the new bill of

2:24:03

anti-Zionism is anti-Zemitism, right? It's not. It's

2:24:06

a ridiculous lie. It's

2:24:08

like saying, believe all women as if they can't lie,

2:24:10

or as if you can't see that Zionism is a

2:24:12

problem without also being a racist. It's just so ridiculous.

2:24:15

But he says, what we don't

2:24:17

understand is how this video could violate the rules. Since

2:24:20

TikTok is an anti-Semitic and

2:24:23

censorous platform, we will reconsider

2:24:25

whether to post on TikTok or not. Here's what the video is.

2:24:30

And therefore, we are here today

2:24:32

to conclude. One, Judaism

2:24:34

is not Zionism. Judaism

2:24:38

is a holy religion.

2:24:40

Zionism is a heretical,

2:24:43

political, nationalist movement. Two,

2:24:46

Israel is not the state of the

2:24:48

Jewish people. It's the state of the

2:24:50

Israeli people. Three,

2:24:54

Israel does not represent the Jews

2:24:56

and does not speak in their

2:24:58

name. And four,

2:25:00

Jews are not responsible for the

2:25:02

actions or the ideology of the

2:25:04

state of Israel. Right.

2:25:07

That last one was important for the average people

2:25:09

that somehow think that Jews are the source

2:25:11

of all problems. Right. And that is exactly

2:25:13

what Zionism wants from you. They

2:25:16

also add to this. They say, we closed our account

2:25:18

of TikTok after this. Even the

2:25:20

fact that it banned the first video we published is

2:25:23

proof that TikTok is a platform hostile to Jews. Now,

2:25:25

I think what's interesting is that I don't I would

2:25:27

I would frame it more about the fact that it's

2:25:30

blindly supporting of Zionism. Right.

2:25:32

Like, but I think that's what they're trying. They're trying to use the

2:25:34

art, the same kind of narrative back, I guess. But you can think

2:25:37

of it how you want. Either way,

2:25:39

I agree with the overall sentiment. And

2:25:42

this is why I think this is happening, as we just

2:25:44

showed you. Massey was the only

2:25:46

one, by the way, even to to leave

2:25:48

only voted president, which is just I mean,

2:25:50

if you're a Palestinian out there, that should

2:25:52

outrage you as the only policy representative. And

2:25:54

she can't even vote no against this insulting.

2:25:58

I think that shows you that all of them. Maybe

2:26:00

even Massey for all we know is just simply playing the

2:26:02

game, but he voted no Only

2:26:05

I really if there's anybody right now in any position of

2:26:07

power in Congress that I think is you know Possibly

2:26:10

it is a very small possibility might actually care about

2:26:12

some things it'd be Massey, but I quite frankly I'm

2:26:14

so jaded with this. I don't think any of them

2:26:16

are he cast a lone vote

2:26:19

against the bill that equates anti Zionism

2:26:21

with anySemitism So right

2:26:23

now they're you can argue you're breaking the

2:26:25

law But by the way,

2:26:27

which contradicts the Constitution which

2:26:29

therefore per the Supreme Court makes it

2:26:31

Nolan void neighbor versus Madison So

2:26:34

let's pray at the court will win But of

2:26:36

course they assuming the judicial system is actually honest anymore

2:26:38

Which I don't think it is But

2:26:41

it's all continuing down this path where they're

2:26:43

trying to judge they're trying to desperately hide

2:26:45

our speech Because they're losing the information war

2:26:49

And this is happening in Ireland And Is

2:26:55

addressing the extremist content online like hate

2:26:57

speech and incitement to violence and commission

2:26:59

a man is Ireland's new online Safety

2:27:01

and media regulator and will also be

2:27:04

joint regulator along with the European Commission

2:27:06

for the EU Digital Services Act My

2:27:09

department has ongoing engagement with on commission

2:27:12

and I have in method two weeks

2:27:14

ago method on commission again yesterday For

2:27:16

an update on last week's event and

2:27:18

they informed me that they had engaged

2:27:20

immediately With the large platforms

2:27:22

and with the guard the and the European Commission

2:27:24

and that the platforms had activated

2:27:27

their instant response plans And their

2:27:29

engagement is continuing on

2:27:31

commission is calling for those who see hate

2:27:33

speech or other illegal content online to report

2:27:35

it to the Platforms or to anger the

2:27:38

she a conno, right? So

2:27:40

they're saying if you see hate speech, whatever that

2:27:42

means to you Call the police and

2:27:44

we will put them in jail Right.

2:27:46

So this is this is what we've been warning about

2:27:48

long before even COVID the idea of rationalizing

2:27:51

that your words are violence Best

2:27:54

is important for the agenda to stop people like

2:27:57

us from being able to inform you, you know

2:28:00

the endless amount of things that we told you

2:28:02

while the government of the media told you otherwise

2:28:04

that have then later come to pass. Our

2:28:07

track record is astounding and I look I'm proud to say

2:28:09

that. That's I mean I

2:28:11

think it is me pat myself on the back but guys

2:28:13

my record there you could look at it. We have been

2:28:15

calling many different things long before they happen and a lot

2:28:17

of other people have too. The

2:28:19

point is that they're trying to stop us from doing

2:28:22

it even though our record shows you that we've been right more

2:28:24

often than not. Because

2:28:26

they don't want you to be informed. They

2:28:28

want you to be shut down. They're

2:28:32

trying to tell you that if you say Zionism is

2:28:34

a problem that you can be put

2:28:36

in jail not just censored. This

2:28:38

is happening everywhere you look in places like Ireland

2:28:41

that I think a lot of these people in

2:28:43

even in Congress, some of them anyway,

2:28:45

are openly speaking out. I

2:28:48

think this is where we're going to go next because they

2:28:50

can't control this and we're already seeing some

2:28:53

of this happen. Here's one of these guys we

2:28:55

mentioned earlier. AI and

2:28:57

war it is he says of course

2:29:00

almost see look almost admitting they're using

2:29:02

their AI system to murder people. It's

2:29:04

like almost like they're taunting it taunting you in

2:29:07

front of your face. He says

2:29:09

Marie Campbell is gone. Target

2:29:12

eliminated. No ceasefire on

2:29:14

the internet. Yeah because calling

2:29:17

for ceasefire is terrorism right? These

2:29:20

people are literally like

2:29:22

you calling for a ceasefire means an end to

2:29:24

hostilities on both sides. These

2:29:26

are people asking for murder and they're

2:29:29

framing people calling for ceasefire as terrorists.

2:29:32

Like think about how how just bizarro

2:29:35

world that is and that

2:29:37

means everybody with a brain can see right

2:29:39

through it but most of them are too afraid to

2:29:41

not say anything or too afraid to push back against

2:29:43

it. Marie Campbell who wrote

2:29:46

I'm not a facial expression expert but judging by

2:29:48

the look on her face on her eyes that's

2:29:50

that same picture of the girl who's clearly giving

2:29:53

a endearing look to this hot loss member simply

2:29:56

says by the expression her face I'd

2:29:58

say it looks like appreciation and thanks. Thanks. Might

2:30:01

it be that she is saying thanks for

2:30:03

being treated unexpectedly well whilst in captivity? How

2:30:06

in the world are you arguing that is a

2:30:08

violating term? While

2:30:10

you have these people lying blatantly,

2:30:12

which by the way shouldn't be censored, or posting

2:30:15

graphic and disgusting imagery, and

2:30:18

she gets censored for simply going, but she doesn't look like

2:30:20

she was hurt. Looks like they might have treated

2:30:22

her well. How dare you point out the

2:30:24

obvious? Censored.

2:30:29

This person responds by saying, how is censorship

2:30:31

something to be proud of on a platform

2:30:33

that claims not to censor? You're pathetic. And

2:30:35

so too are the platforms allowing it, but

2:30:37

pretending they're not. And

2:30:40

here's her account. Suspended. I'm

2:30:43

telling you guys, I see you writing on the wall. I feel

2:30:46

like it's coming our way next. I feel like it's going to

2:30:48

be happening soon. But the

2:30:50

interesting thing is how we've never changed, and yet we

2:30:52

hear censored, then we're back, and then we're censored, then

2:30:54

we're back. Interesting. Sort

2:30:57

of how from day to day we're a right wing shield and

2:30:59

a left wing shield and a right wing shield, a China shell,

2:31:01

China shell, Russia shell, China shell. Just back

2:31:03

and forth, and back and forth. Even though the point

2:31:05

is we maintain, I mean, my opinion has changed over

2:31:08

the year to some degree, but we're

2:31:11

not the ones changing. It is what's important that

2:31:13

day to the narrative. Like when we were on

2:31:15

COVID discussion, sort of like with many of these

2:31:17

people, everyone seemed like we're all high

2:31:19

fiving, we're all on the same side, and the Israel conversation

2:31:21

starts. And it's like, you've changed

2:31:23

completely. Or you just never

2:31:25

looked at what we've been saying about Israel

2:31:28

the entire time, because it's obviously a very

2:31:30

dangerous entity in the world, the Zionist government,

2:31:33

and it's on full display for everybody. And

2:31:36

that's too late. The cat's out of

2:31:38

the bag. You can't go back to that.

2:31:41

People even inside the establishment are

2:31:43

now arguing that the US government

2:31:45

is weighing the

2:31:48

options. And as soon as they're done murdering all these

2:31:50

people, they're going to do what they need to do

2:31:52

and get rid of Netanyahu. Which by

2:31:54

the way, clearly implies they're going

2:31:56

to allow the genocide. When the genocide's done,

2:31:58

then we'll do it. something about it because

2:32:01

they care about people, don't they? God,

2:32:04

it's just disgusting. This topic is so harsh. It

2:32:07

really is. It weighs on me. But

2:32:09

it's important. It's important

2:32:11

to continue to highlight the reality. And

2:32:14

just like any other topic we've covered in the past, without

2:32:17

fear of being labeled something you're

2:32:19

not, which will happen every single

2:32:21

time, which is why I think we're ahead of

2:32:23

these stories because we don't put our

2:32:25

finger in the air and go, is it right? Can we do it? Are

2:32:28

we going to get censored? Are they going to yell at me? Am I going to

2:32:30

be called a racist? The truth matters

2:32:33

at all costs. And if we can't be

2:32:35

on that page just yet, maybe you shouldn't be in this field. Push

2:32:38

for the truth. Stand by

2:32:40

the truth. And the truth, I argue, will protect you. I

2:32:42

mean, obviously not in every case all the time,

2:32:45

but I think the reality is that if we all

2:32:47

continue to stand by it, as we're

2:32:49

seeing right now, their allegations

2:32:51

fall flat. There's a lot

2:32:53

of people in the world that don't really

2:32:55

invest in this stuff like we do, that

2:32:58

have different things they find important, but

2:33:00

aren't stupid and aren't just swayed

2:33:02

by the two party paradigm. There is a huge portion

2:33:04

of people like that. And

2:33:06

the moment that we just continue to show them and

2:33:09

there's enough information in front of them, they see it.

2:33:11

We're watching it happen right now, largely

2:33:13

because the other corporate sources they may look at

2:33:15

are kind of also saying certain things, but

2:33:18

we can change understanding

2:33:22

with excellent work, sourced wealth

2:33:24

and dedication. Stay the course

2:33:26

and keep showing people, guys,

2:33:28

I'm telling you, we're changing things. And

2:33:30

yeah, they're going to try to rope us back in

2:33:32

with another agenda, like off guardian rightly warned about, but

2:33:35

we should still take the wins where

2:33:37

we can get them and remain skeptical.

2:33:41

Question everything. Come

2:33:43

to your own conclusions. Stay vigilant.

2:34:00

www.mytrendyphone.co.uk

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features