0:01

If you take away the Soviet Union and

0:03

its chief proxy, the PLO, Saddam's

0:10

regime, I guarantee you that

0:12

it will have enormous positive reverberations on

0:14

the change,

0:17

at least I would, in Iran, just as I would like

0:19

to see in Iraq. What

0:23

is the best place to proceed? It's not a

0:25

question of whether Iraq's regime should be taken out,

0:27

but when should it be taken out? It's

0:30

not a question of whether you'd like to see

0:32

a regime change in Iran, but how do we

0:34

achieve it? Are there any other nations that you

0:36

would recommend that the United States launch preemptive attacks

0:38

upon at this point? The

0:40

answer is categorically yes. The

0:43

two nations that are vying, competing with each other, who

0:45

will be the first to achieve nuclear weapons is Iraq

0:48

and Iran. A

0:50

third nation, by the way, is Libya as

0:52

well. Libya is trying very rapidly to build

0:56

an atomic bomb capability. So you have

0:58

here now three nations. Let's all

1:00

stand together to stop Iran's march

1:02

of conquest, subjugation and terror. Applause

1:14

I know that no matter on

1:16

which side of the aisle you sit, you

1:19

stand with Israel. Applause

1:43

Music Welcome

2:03

to the Daily Wrap Up, a concise

2:05

show dedicated to bringing you the most

2:07

relevant independent news as we see it

2:09

from the last 24 hours. Wednesday,

2:15

November 29, 2023, thank you for joining me today. Well,

2:19

October 7th narrative continues to collapse. I

2:21

think that's something that's been an ongoing

2:24

story and whether we're talking about the

2:26

discussion around what happened and whether it

2:28

was allowed, the involvement of Netanyahu

2:30

or the further aspects of

2:33

the Israeli government, or the

2:35

idea of the provable evidence of how

2:37

many people they killed in regard to

2:39

the idea of shooting hostages, shooting any

2:42

number of different people that were not necessarily

2:44

Hamas members. All of this has

2:46

been proven. To what degree is being debated,

2:49

is continually being admitted to, more evidence has

2:51

continued to come out. But

2:53

as we're going to get into more today,

2:55

we have another example of IDF members spinning

2:58

false stories into the Israeli media, one of

3:00

which was now called out by the Israeli

3:02

platform, pulling back the story, deleting

3:04

everything. We have somebody who was part of

3:06

one of these special screenings who has

3:09

now spoken out and said, apparently

3:12

everyone else is lying, saying

3:14

that I didn't see the things they claimed they're seeing. I

3:17

called multiple people, including US journalists, and I didn't

3:19

see any evidence of rape, any evidence of X,

3:21

Y, and Z, and went off on all the

3:23

things that a lot of these certain journalists are

3:25

out there saying. I saw all of it, describing

3:27

some of the most grotesque things you could possibly

3:29

imagine, like the cutting out of a fetus out

3:32

of a woman's stomach, except he

3:34

says that was not on the screening. So

3:36

it's a very interesting discrepancy. Now, this

3:38

is a disgusting topic. And the fact

3:41

that we even have to get into

3:43

debating whether this happened is only a

3:45

reality because of the lies being spun

3:47

by the group claiming

3:49

these things have happened when we can prove at

3:51

this point most of them have not, not

3:53

whether who did them even just did not happen

3:55

in the context of what happened on the 7th. Now,

3:59

that should bother people. Your

4:01

first response should not be outraged toward

4:03

me for pointing that out, proving it

4:05

as a lot of people are, but

4:07

outrage toward the entity trying to use

4:09

these horrible stories to, I

4:12

guess, get you to not acknowledge their

4:14

genocide, or many number of other

4:16

things. But we're going to talk about that primarily

4:18

today. I think that's a very important part of

4:20

this. We're going to go

4:23

over a few other important discussions. Follow-ups to the

4:25

stories we talked about yesterday that I think are

4:27

important to continue forward on. We're

4:29

going to talk about the Grey Zone article

4:31

that I touched on yesterday in regard to

4:33

the poster child, as he called it, for

4:36

the October 7th discussion. And it's now been

4:38

proven to have been killed by a tank.

4:42

This is not even contentious

4:44

anymore. And then we're going to

4:46

go over some of the hostage

4:48

prisoner conversation and the different

4:51

stories that are being spun and how obvious

4:53

this is that there's dishonesty. But

4:56

ultimately, I think we'll

4:58

probably get into the Elon Musk visit again. But

5:01

the point is, if we've got time, there's a lot of

5:03

other topics we're going to get into. I plan on discussing

5:05

Elon's IDF tour, as I'm calling

5:07

it, because it's really insulting to see how

5:09

this played out, and the fact that he

5:11

turned down any kind of visit to Gaza

5:13

that was offered by members

5:15

of Palestine, Hamas members, different groups, saying, we'll

5:17

come look at what's happening here. And

5:20

of course, that's not important. But

5:23

let's get right into it today, and I want to start with the clip

5:25

that we opened up

5:27

with, which is right here.

5:30

And this is – it's an interesting clip. As

5:33

I wrote, Netanyahu has been maliciously influencing

5:35

the U.S. government for decades, not

5:38

just Netanyahu. Netanyahu obviously designed his

5:40

agenda, quite frankly, but obviously he has

5:42

been an aggressive part of this. We

5:44

briefly touched on the last show yesterday,

5:47

the idea that going all the way back to the

5:49

Oslo Accords, that Netanyahu, even according to

5:51

Haaretz, played a central role in inciting

5:53

the violence that got that prime minister

5:55

assassinated, and then later when he

5:57

took power, absolutely rolled out all of the stuff that was going on in

5:59

the settlement projects, the whole one of the primary

6:02

issues that Clinton were more, I don't

6:04

think he cared about any of it quite frankly, but in regard

6:06

to the deal was making

6:08

sure no more settlements happened. Netanyahu

6:10

played a central role in inciting the violence

6:13

that got the person killed that was driving

6:15

forward the Oslo Accords and the

6:17

potential two state solution. And then from

6:19

there forward, it seems that ever aggressively in every way

6:21

went the other direction. What not to even say that

6:23

it was honest to begin with, but you

6:26

have to understand he has played a central role in

6:28

the worst that you everything you're seeing today

6:30

and the ongoing escalation of all the illegal

6:33

things that everybody acknowledges are illegal. He

6:36

played a central role in doing these

6:38

now in allowing and bolstering

6:40

these things. But

6:42

as I said, he's played a malicious. He's

6:44

been maliciously influenced in the US government

6:46

for decades, all while pushing for Americans

6:48

to die for the Zionist agenda. None

6:51

of these wars have been in the interest of Americans.

6:54

And as you saw in the clip in the starting, it's the start. I

6:57

mean, even the first one, should we

6:59

get rid of the the PLO, the

7:02

Soviet PLO, basically the Soviet Union's entity,

7:04

because at that point they were the

7:06

bad guy, right? And by the way,

7:08

for those that aren't aware of

7:11

the new answer, Russia is not the Soviet

7:13

Union, right? So to pretend that that's just

7:15

the same ongoing. It's not the same thing. In

7:18

fact, what appears to be the US government that's

7:20

played that kind of bolterous always power might makes

7:22

right kind of entity. Clearly they

7:24

took that roll over. But

7:26

what's interesting, other reason I say that is because people

7:28

would simply argue that Russia is just that one else.

7:30

Russia's entity. It's not that simple. It's obviously a different

7:32

context. The point, though, is if he's sitting

7:34

there saying, should we get rid of this, the

7:37

group that they later completely supported, that

7:40

will collapse international terrorism. Okay,

7:44

well, the Soviet Union went away. Weirdly enough, that did

7:46

not collapse. So if your argument is that

7:48

the Soviet Union was the main driver, well,

7:50

obviously you are the wrong or lying. I

7:53

think today we can all see that. It just it was a

7:55

can kick down the road. Who was our current adversary? Oh,

7:57

Libya. They're the one. Libya is the one doing all the work.

8:00

the bad things. Oh, let's get rid of them. Take,

8:02

okay, now it's Iraq. Now it's Iraq. We're all of

8:04

them simultaneously. The point is this has been

8:07

a constant evolution

8:09

of continuous lies that you

8:11

could prove have been based on just continuation

8:14

of time, like Iran's nuclear

8:17

weapons or Iraq WMDs. These are things

8:19

that largely stem from the Israeli government

8:22

and are false and

8:24

Americans have died because of it. And

8:26

all of these wars have proven to

8:28

be disastrous for American interests, even national

8:30

security. But you know who got, who

8:32

benefited wildly from every one of them?

8:35

The Israeli government. That's directly from Netanyahu's

8:37

mouth saying that all of

8:39

these things benefited them. Even the 9 11 attacks

8:41

were a benefit for Israel. That's a public statement.

8:43

In fact, so

8:46

understanding this is very important to the larger

8:48

conversation of what's happening. And again, well outside

8:50

the context of what's going on right now

8:52

and even post October 7, talking

8:54

about the COVID-19 illusion, talking

8:57

about a number of different manipulations that

8:59

the Israeli government plays a central role

9:01

in. Now

9:03

we'll come back to that, that was the opening clip. So I wanted

9:05

to make sure we touched on that first, but I wanted to go

9:07

over a couple of interesting points. Orl

9:09

sent me this that I thought was really, it

9:12

almost seems like we should all expect that this is what's

9:14

happening. It doesn't seem like it's even that hard to wrap

9:16

our mind around, but I don't think most people are aware

9:18

of how invasive this is. So

9:20

she got this, by the way, you guys have

9:22

known she's basically been boxed out of Twitter, like

9:24

this weird process where they don't have to prove

9:27

you're a human and it has taken weeks. Just

9:30

ridiculous. But after coming

9:32

back in, it says X has been

9:34

able to access your entire photo library

9:37

for six months. Do you

9:39

want to continue to allow full access? Now

9:42

usually what happens with this kind of stuff is that with us

9:44

a limit or allow, I would argue

9:46

typically when you say limit that limits your

9:48

accessibility on the entire platform, typically. But either

9:50

way, the point is when you start accessing

9:53

Twitter and you check the box for terms

9:55

of service without reading the 400 page document

9:57

like nobody does, well, that you didn't realize.

10:00

that they had access then instantly to all of your

10:02

different photos and so on. I'm sure there's ways you

10:04

can manipulate the metrics in the background and the tabs

10:06

and so on, but as far as I can tell

10:08

you can only allow some or

10:10

all photos, but the point is then you

10:12

try to access them when you're on Twitter. It's a

10:14

convenience aspect. My point is simple. Of

10:16

all your library, as you can see here, 20,000

10:19

photos, the

10:21

vast majority of which have nothing to

10:23

do with Twitter. But should somebody at

10:25

Twitter or somebody controlling through Twitter, Mossad

10:27

CIA or anything else, FBI, that it

10:29

could access all of this? Do

10:31

you think that they would even balk at doing that? That

10:34

happened with Apple and the FBI? We've seen

10:36

how this goes. That's just terrifying. And

10:38

that's a small, tiny,

10:41

publicly stated point that should

10:43

make you uncomfortable. Now imagine what else is happening. As

10:47

we all use it, I'm no different. I

10:49

just think it's, you know, and again, that shouldn't be okay. We

10:51

should try to... Well, and the bottom line is it's not that

10:53

we're... My point has always been,

10:56

the average person using these

10:58

platforms, whether it be YouTube or anything else,

11:00

I argue there's no reason you should be

11:02

doing so if you believe... If you want

11:04

to change things. If you don't, it's up

11:06

to you. You could do whatever you want. But if you're

11:08

interested in trying to change the way things are, using

11:11

these platforms is more about convenience. And

11:13

you enjoy them. You have things set up

11:15

the way you like. For somebody like us in the

11:17

independent platforms or anybody trying to inform, I think it's

11:19

important that we maintain a presence on these platforms. The

11:22

moment these are no longer important to reach the people that

11:24

are lost, I've said this for a long time. I will

11:26

no longer use them. I

11:29

mean, even right now, I barely use YouTube. I poke

11:31

it through on the pirate channel and that's about it.

11:33

I don't broadcast them or advertise. I don't even glean

11:35

in. I don't comment, anything. Anyway, the

11:37

point is, I think it's important that

11:39

we try to start moving away from some of these.

11:41

But that's the problem, isn't it? Because most

11:43

of the other ones aren't even are intentionally held

11:46

back. I saw that

11:48

with SuperU, right? Melicious

11:50

activities, corporate manipulation,

11:52

all sorts of stuff that makes sure you

11:54

are able to rise to the level that

11:56

can even compete. That

11:59

used to be called Monathil. But you know, they

12:01

don't care about laws anymore now on and

12:03

foreign policy. I thought this was really incredibly

12:05

stupid Where nobody's even

12:08

talking about Ukraine anymore largely

12:12

What's what's incredible to me is how obvious

12:15

all of this is that even even the

12:17

people inside of the you know In lead

12:19

is circles. They must that they're not stupid

12:21

some of them They must be aware that

12:24

they just on a dime drop what we

12:26

were 30 seconds ago told was the

12:28

most important thing ever sort

12:30

of like the most important elections of our lifetime

12:32

every two years or North

12:35

Korea is the biggest threat to our democracy until this

12:37

story starts and then we don't talk about it anymore

12:40

But it was the most important until that started

12:43

Why we were in kindergarten like

12:45

that's really lowbrow stuff That's really dumb that

12:47

we all can see it seems and

12:49

so now what we're being told is that well

12:52

now it's time to end The Ukraine war. Oh

12:54

did something change? No. No, did

12:56

you accomplish your goals? No, not at all. In

12:58

fact So why then is it

13:00

time to because now we're focused over here That's

13:03

what's happening guys. That's not what they're really gonna

13:05

say This constant teen kitchen

13:08

who i'm not familiar with simply says I have been

13:10

one of the most vocal supporters of our help to

13:12

Ukraine It was the right

13:14

thing to do sure keep telling yourself

13:16

that dave. Uh, uh, I was

13:18

trying to remember the guy's name That's

13:22

frustrating, you know the guy during covid that was like i'm

13:24

even though I was wrong I was right even though you

13:26

were right you were wrong that whole thing, right? It

13:28

was the right thing to do keep selling yourself that

13:30

as you Drop it and run to the next story

13:32

with no accomplishment and no benefit and you know other

13:35

than killing a lot of people And

13:37

even from the continent stopped russia that hinder russia

13:39

seeing as how you frame them as the worst

13:41

bogeyman alive. No Did

13:44

ukraine get what it needed? No, like point

13:46

is nothing they ever set out other than

13:48

spending money Whatever biolab context was

13:50

going on. Whatever kind of human trafficking was

13:52

going on whatever kind of Money

13:55

laundering those were the things but

13:57

it says but it's time to bring the war to an end like Who

14:01

honestly sits there and goes, yep, that makes

14:03

sense. Just because we up and

14:05

decided to? Because the life toll

14:07

is too high? No, not even that. Not

14:09

even claiming, well, we tried and we failed

14:11

and the lives are too important. No.

14:15

It says, as someone who has been very vocal of

14:18

Ukraine's fight for its sovereignty, right,

14:20

because a foreign enlisted power of

14:22

neo-Nazis is totally about their sovereignty,

14:24

I take no pleasure

14:26

in writing this article. Indeed, I do so with a

14:28

heavy heart, but the time has come to end the

14:30

war in Ukraine. To be clear, none of what follows

14:32

is to suggest that Ukraine was wrong to defend itself,

14:35

which is not even remotely what they were doing

14:37

in the ethnic cleansing for a decade before this

14:39

ever started, that we were wrong to encourage them, that

14:41

we were wrong to commit considerable financial another. As

14:44

this person says, 5,000 dead? For what? 500,000,

14:47

excuse me, which I'm not even sure is exactly accurate.

14:49

The point is a lot of people died. And

14:52

yet we're moving on, guys. I support

14:54

the current thing. The current

14:57

thing is what's most important. I

15:00

mean, this is sad, isn't it? Most

15:03

people are like, this can't be real.

15:05

I mean, are all of the people

15:07

in power that childish? Are they really

15:09

all that petty? Are they really all

15:11

this ridiculous? Maybe, maybe. But you

15:13

know what I'm happy about? People are actually starting to

15:15

pay attention. Now in the COVID-19

15:18

era, excuse me, all

15:22

this stuff, all the breaking stories that are still being

15:24

circled, which are important. I'm glad people are still talking

15:26

about them. Are things that you saw on this channel

15:28

in 2021, by and large, for

15:31

example, and this really started in 21, 2022 for

15:33

the most part, end of, and then 2022, and now obviously more than

15:38

ever, excess death. As

15:40

Simon says, data does not lie, which

15:43

ultimately is not, I agree with that in

15:45

the sense that data itself is just benign

15:47

data, but data can be used to lie.

15:49

But it says, how is it possible that

15:51

there is no significant excess mortality during the

15:54

outbreak of the pandemic of the century? Yet,

15:57

it's skyrocketed after

15:59

the global administration. of the experimental gene therapy.

16:01

We all know this, but just looking

16:03

back, it only got more clearer.

16:06

As he says, my takes are as follows. Actually, here,

16:09

let me grab this really quickly. I forgot I wanted to get

16:11

that. I think this is one of them. Yeah, right

16:14

here. Come

16:17

back to that next. So he points out, he

16:20

takes from why or understanding this. There

16:22

was no pandemic. You

16:24

know, PIC, PCR tests,

16:26

we've talked about all of it. Fear and the

16:29

fatal first treatments led to slight excess mortality in

16:31

April 2022, or excuse me, 2020. Now that doesn't

16:33

explain it all for

16:36

me right there, but I think we've gone over all the

16:38

other things that could have. And again, I'll just point to

16:40

this now. That's why when Denny Rancourt and I had this

16:42

discussion with his excellent research, his

16:45

data proves that COVID-19 is actually an

16:47

illusion, which doesn't have to mean that

16:49

it doesn't exist. But that's

16:51

where I think all of the evidence points today.

16:53

And the reality being that what we're talking about

16:55

again, and that doesn't even have to mean that

16:57

then therefore aren't viruses. But again, there's conversations that

16:59

we should be having. Well, my point is the

17:01

data proves that one wasn't even remotely what they

17:03

said it was. So it's an illusion, period. But

17:06

the question really becomes, did you even need

17:08

there to be a pathogen? Talked

17:11

about the parasite stress theory and the reality

17:13

of government research that proved that they knew

17:16

all they ever really needed was the threat

17:18

of a pathogen to drive you to

17:20

accept authoritarian government. There's been multiple studies

17:22

conducted by the US government that found

17:24

exactly that. And look at what just

17:26

happened. Now the point is

17:29

that this is obviously something with the conflation

17:31

of pneumonia and influenza and COVID, which is

17:33

the number they were giving you. The

17:36

PCR test set to high cycle thresholds,

17:38

guaranteeing high levels of false positives, just

17:41

all sorts of these things. It turns out that

17:43

the data, as we all know, proves that they

17:45

lied. The question is, was it

17:47

even actually present? Lies about the supposed adoration

17:50

of the virus and the fraudulent PCR test

17:53

made fake pandemic possible. All of these sentiments

17:55

I expressed very early in this conversation. Animal

17:57

studies on the effectiveness of the vaccines face

18:00

Nevertheless, they were approved due to political media

18:02

pressure. Many people like Bill Gates were

18:04

already privy to the plan. Making

18:07

investments in early years, 2019 and before,

18:09

the conspirators are ruthless mass murderers and should

18:11

be brought to trial. They have negatively affected

18:13

billions of human lives and more responsible for

18:16

millions of deaths. Completely

18:18

agree that this is usually where

18:20

it stalls. I'm glad there are people trying

18:22

to push forward on some legislation, but it doesn't seem

18:24

to be happening. I'm not saying we should stop any

18:26

of it. Keep talking about it. Keep trying. It

18:30

just seems we're all becoming very aware of that wall

18:32

we keep running up against. Where it

18:34

seems the very same people that are the ones

18:36

caught lying, who are then putting other

18:38

people in positions of power to help bolster those lies, are

18:40

the same ones that are in the positions to stop this

18:42

from going anywhere. Now,

18:46

here is a clip coming this to today.

18:49

I believe this actually came out today. At

18:52

this, guys, this is what blows me away. Now, the

18:54

rest of it, we know. Proven

18:57

this stuff, peer-reviewed science and otherwise. But

19:00

we were lied to about literally every single

19:02

aspect and angle of the entire COVID-19 illusion.

19:06

But you'd expect that now that so many people

19:08

have seen it, that even the people

19:11

that were taking the bait, dragged

19:13

along through four different shots and two boosters, are even

19:15

then the ones going, okay, I'm done. I'm not taking

19:17

this next one. Which

19:20

stalled at like 3%, 4% last time I checked. That's

19:22

with them telling these people they need

19:24

it. So you don't misunderstand that.

19:27

The person that has been screaming that you were

19:29

doing bad things by not doing it suddenly decided

19:31

to stop. Why? Either

19:35

they see it and don't want to admit it, or

19:37

they're starting to feel pretty sick and

19:39

getting constantly sick and all

19:41

sorts of negative side effects. So they just go, okay,

19:44

wait. So the point is everybody suddenly started, okay, so

19:46

that's where we are. And

19:48

then nonetheless, this is what they're still saying. This is

19:50

today. Our

19:54

vaccines are still

19:56

working very well against protecting severe disease

19:58

and death. really

20:00

critical that those of you who are

20:02

due for an updated vaccine of COVID-19

20:05

get that vaccine. I can't believe they're

20:07

still saying that. Like I guess this

20:09

is just about tripling quadrupling down so

20:11

you don't go to prison if

20:13

that's even on the, you know, if they even consider that.

20:16

But think about how wild that is.

20:18

That's not even the current level of

20:20

science doesn't even remotely back that up. In

20:23

regard to the DNA contamination, the onslaught of

20:25

just horrifying side effects that are only getting

20:27

worse. And

20:30

the fact that this is even, I

20:32

mean, even based on their released information,

20:34

this is minimally, if at all

20:36

effective against the current thing, especially not

20:38

before. And then guess what

20:41

she goes on to say? Whether

20:43

it's based on the new XBV.1

20:46

monovalent vaccine or

20:48

the vaccines based on the ancestral strains.

20:50

So the ancestral strain, okay, they just

20:53

removed the bivalent because that was a

20:55

tremendous failure. They won't tell you that

20:57

now, but they've admitted that by, you know,

20:59

by default, by revealing that even afterward, the

21:01

reason they need XBV is because that was

21:03

actually hurting people. They all were. But

21:06

you're now saying that you can go back and get

21:08

the answer. Where in the world even finding that, first

21:10

of all, probably all over the place. Here's

21:13

the thing that fights the strain that we

21:15

literally prove if there even any of them

21:17

there, that this definitely is nowhere anywhere and

21:20

has been continually shown the further away it gets

21:22

the leer, the more and more

21:24

ineffective it becomes, which then means

21:26

the aftermath, right? So that's

21:28

immediately ineffective. But then the aftermath, two,

21:30

three months later, it gets even further

21:33

into negative efficacy. Now the illusion is that

21:35

that's somehow the vaccine failing. No,

21:38

that's your immune system failing. They

21:41

very carefully kind of slight of hand

21:43

convince people that it's just, oh, your boost

21:45

unit updated booster. No, the

21:47

booster has nothing to do with the fact that your

21:49

body suddenly starts becoming a problem, that your body

21:51

starts driving you into negative

21:54

efficacy where you come across

21:56

very benign things and you're getting

21:58

wildly sick. That's

22:00

what they, so I can't even believe they're still

22:02

pretending like that thing. Antibody dependent

22:05

enhancement obviously being a problem. That you're

22:07

taking something for a struggle, assuming it's

22:09

even what's there. You're taking something they're

22:11

telling you is to treat something that

22:13

is not there. So you're going to

22:15

make antibodies for something they're admitting is

22:17

not circulating. Guys, that is like

22:20

the textbook reality of potentially creating

22:22

antibody dependent enhancement. And they're the

22:24

ones that tell you coronavirus vaccines

22:26

are prime for that problem. How

22:29

she said it? Many different

22:31

people said it. I

22:33

have that I don't even think I have it reflexively right here. I

22:35

was going to grab the one clip I played before, but yeah,

22:38

there it is. They're trying to train

22:40

the body's immune system to target the

22:42

right part of the virus because guessing

22:45

it wrong can be dangerous. We know

22:47

that historically with coronaviruses

22:50

that if you do vaccinate with the wrong

22:52

kind of vaccine, this is a

22:54

domestic cat, but if it's a viral

22:56

infection, then you can

22:58

make the disease more severe.

23:01

Yeah, what do you know? It's almost like this

23:03

classically held information that we've always regarded as a

23:05

reality is suddenly ignored by all the people who

23:07

used to tell you that. How

23:09

do you mean this is dishonesty? It's

23:12

just criminality. My

23:14

God. If you're an at risk group,

23:17

if you're of older age, if you have underlying conditions,

23:19

all of which they haven't tested for still. If

23:23

you're elderly, that means it means I think it was

23:26

elderly with what was it? Trail with comorbidities.

23:28

That was the category the way they frame

23:30

it. That means largely elderly. They

23:32

never tested. Never tested pregnant. They've

23:35

only ever used real world examples after the fact while ignoring

23:37

all the things that we can all see are happening. Then

23:39

saying, well, look at all the people that took it and

23:42

look, you can tell it's safe. As

23:44

they plug their ears and stomp their feet

23:46

around all, we don't see all of the

23:48

pregnant neonatal issues or the pre the early

23:50

birth or the I mean, it's absurd. So

23:53

they're telling you all the people that are in the category that

23:55

we know are hurt the most by these go out and get

23:57

it first. Make sure that you are up to date on your back.

24:00

vaccines. My God.

24:02

We're still here, guys. I'm

24:04

just really, genuinely, blow

24:06

my mind. Now this brings us into

24:08

the current conversation. UNICEF just

24:11

put this out. This

24:13

is two days ago. 7,600 doses

24:15

of vaccines. I

24:18

wasn't able to find what they sent. God

24:21

only knows. We're transported

24:23

to the Muscat Corona Clinic in

24:25

southern Gaza. Isn't that interesting? How

24:28

you're somehow able to bring in

24:30

7,500 vaccines but you can't get water and

24:32

food? What

24:35

does that tell you? Aiming

24:37

to boost routine immunization. Yeah, make sure

24:39

you don't get the flu while you're struggling

24:41

to not to die from starvation. Now

24:44

I'm not going to say that it's not important. Look,

24:46

the idea that... Let's put it this way. The idea...

24:49

When you say routine immunizations, 90% of

24:51

those have nothing to do with what they

24:53

need with what's going on. Right?

24:58

What they're doing is going to cause things like cholera and

25:01

other different illnesses based on the fact that there's open

25:03

sewage because of what they have created as the Israeli

25:05

government and what they have bombed and what they have

25:07

stopped and what they won't allow. And

25:10

that even goes long before October 7th, mind you. But

25:14

then it goes on to say, which was disrupted

25:16

due to shortage of supplies and ongoing hostilities. The

25:18

transfer was conducted as a joint UN mission. Right.

25:22

So 7,600 routine immunizations.

25:26

It just makes me very concerned. Now

25:29

what happens all of a sudden if these things get

25:31

deployed and people out there start getting sick? Of

25:34

course, they're going to blame it on everything else. Right? But

25:37

shouldn't we at least wonder whether this is some

25:39

other aspect of the same agenda being kind of

25:41

shoehorned into what's currently happening? All

25:44

of a sudden, they all start getting sick with COVID. And

25:46

then what do you know? Now we have to do something

25:48

too. Now we have to quarantine them. And in the process,

25:50

let's move them over here, which is one

25:52

of the things we're going to get into today. And

25:54

the revealed plan from the US

25:56

government to displace all of these people

25:58

in Palestine to... different countries and

26:00

pay those countries to do so. Of course

26:03

you're not going to hear that on Fox and CNN because they don't want

26:05

you to know yet. Now before

26:07

we go forward, the

26:10

point coming from this is about our

26:12

current medical system. Really what I

26:14

see as the obvious weaponization of our

26:16

medical system against the American people, but

26:18

really elsewhere in the world too, from

26:21

your health agencies, but also from the United

26:23

States in fact. So

26:26

this is important I think to understand. So

26:28

this point will bring us into the starting

26:30

point from the Israel-Gaza discussion, but

26:33

just from a medical standpoint, this

26:36

is from yesterday. It

26:38

says, when does life end? A father

26:41

didn't believe his daughter was dead. He says

26:43

the hospital still harvested her

26:45

organs. Now this is

26:47

not even connected by the way to the organ discussion I

26:49

just had, but except for the

26:52

fact that it just shows you that we're

26:54

in a very bad way when it comes

26:56

to how these top-down authoritarian power structures, pretending

26:59

to be democracies, are doing

27:02

stuff like this. It just shows you

27:04

that you really don't actually have control, if we

27:07

ever really do in life, but at the end of the

27:09

day that these people are not in your interest. And

27:12

this medical apartheid, that's not the best word

27:14

for it in this case, but that's coming from the

27:16

other conversation. But this medical, I mean

27:18

it really is though, quite frankly, but a

27:21

medical authoritarian

27:23

system where

27:25

you have a group of people in power

27:28

in these hospitals, or

27:30

rather a specific group of people in power that are

27:32

dictating what these hospitals will and will not do and

27:35

what they're allowed to do, coming through the COVID mania.

27:37

As I've said many times, you're left with all

27:39

the people that were either too stupid to know they

27:41

were wrong or didn't care. Everyone

27:44

else was boxed out, fired, gotten rid

27:46

of. So now you've got these power-hungry

27:48

maniacs, these nurses that will refuse to

27:50

let your father or brother be a

27:52

blood donor because they secretly think you're

27:54

a nanny vaxxer, disgusting people, even

27:56

though that's the best-case scenario. So

27:58

here we have a situation, and my point is all

28:01

throughout COVID-19 with the injections,

28:03

with the treatment to families,

28:05

it's maniacal, malicious.

28:11

Michael Connor had just been told that his daughter was

28:13

brain dead. Brittany had been in

28:15

the hospital for six days. One

28:17

end of the thick blue tube was taped under her

28:19

mouth, the other connected to a respirator which pushed into

28:21

her lungs, and basically she was on a mechanical breathing

28:23

device. Each day he'd come

28:26

to her bedside to hope and pray that she would open

28:28

her eyes, and that's where he was by her bed when

28:30

a policeman entered the room at

28:33

the intensive care unit in Fresno. Mike

28:36

didn't believe that Brittany was dead. Forcefully

28:39

he told the care team that she was

28:41

alive, that she was fighting, that they just

28:43

wanted her heart and her lungs, her kidneys

28:45

for donation. Of course there's

28:47

many people they're gonna go conspiracy theorists until you

28:49

find read the end of the story which is

28:52

literally what happened. He feared that the hospital would

28:54

remove her from life support and that the donor

28:56

network West would procure her organs. By

28:59

the way, which is one of the main reasons I

29:01

even as a young kid I never ever

29:03

allowed that sticker to be in my driver's license. That

29:06

wasn't stupid enough. I mean that doesn't mean everybody in

29:08

this process is malicious, but it means

29:10

that when there's a decision to be made and it's on

29:12

the fence like

29:14

this, the word they go well,

29:17

he had the sticker, right? These are

29:19

situations where we make the call and he's no one, so

29:21

we're gonna put an end to his life

29:24

so we can use the organs for other people. Well

29:26

that shouldn't be their decision, even

29:28

if you put yourself as an organ donor. Now

29:31

it says Mike believed the hospital and the organ

29:33

procurement organization, which is just creepy in and of

29:35

itself quite frankly, needed his consent.

29:38

He wrongly believed that. Yet the hospital

29:40

had now called a police officer to

29:42

remove him from her bedside, to

29:44

remove him from the hospital. He

29:47

says she is without doubt responding to my

29:50

touch, he told the officer. They

29:52

wanted to pull the plug. I said no, as a

29:54

father. He was

29:56

given three minutes to say goodbye. She

30:00

was 26 years old two

30:02

children It

30:06

says Mike wanted the officer who as

30:08

he saw it was charged to do what was right Naively

30:12

pretend naively thinking the police

30:15

are there to help you to force the

30:17

hospital staff to hear his pleas Quote

30:20

brain dead patients cannot respond to touch.

30:22

He said she's clearly is and pointing

30:24

at it Touching

30:27

Brittany's warm body. He said this brain dead

30:29

patients cannot respond to external stimuli He

30:32

says quote that doctor came in and started talking to

30:34

me about body parts and donating them Think about that

30:36

while his daughter is still alive and at least while

30:39

he's clearly expressing that he's not ready to stop Give

30:41

giving he's not ready to give up on her and

30:44

they come in and start discussing how to give up her organs

30:47

Talk about bedside manner. The

30:49

police officer told Mike that he was a father, too I don't

30:52

want to take you to jail. He says that's the last

30:54

thing I want to do. Think about this being the conversation

30:58

He said I'm afraid they're going to kill her. He told

31:00

the cop the officer Them

31:02

pulling the plug on her now would be murder

31:05

and now I'm worried about her safety. He says What

31:09

do you think happened? Did

31:13

the officer heard all of this Listening

31:15

to the father plea with him about his

31:17

daughter who is you know Technically still alive

31:20

on a breathing machine in the hospital's mind. You're

31:22

technically brain dead But

31:25

who ultimately has to say here? Are you not

31:27

paying for the treatment? This

31:30

has gotten out of hand after COVID-19 in

31:33

any number of facets whether it's chemo

31:35

or vaccines where these people Contorted

31:39

this system into somehow because they're

31:41

whatever their liability means in that moment

31:43

that they suddenly have a decision over your children

31:46

They'll say that well, they're sick and now they're here So

31:48

you can't tell us we'll do what we think is right

31:50

because we're responsible That never used

31:52

to be the way this was in certain circumstances.

31:54

Maybe after everything he said

31:58

After three minutes, they escorted him out of jail Now once

32:00

he got

32:03

home, he went to Facebook, screaming to anybody that would listen, tell

32:05

them not to pull the plug on my daughter. When

32:08

he called the next day, they refused

32:10

to even tell him where his daughter was. Throughout

32:13

the day, I mean think

32:16

about that even. This is my point. They've already labeled this man as a

32:18

problem. Why? Because he cares about his daughter.

32:22

And that's inconveniencing them and their organ harvesting

32:24

process. So

32:29

when you call the next day, whether or not

32:31

you're upset because of your fed daughter or because

32:33

of what's happening, you think they

32:35

will look, hey, I'm so sorry. I know this is hard for

32:37

you. We're going through the process.

32:39

We're required by law. We took her here. I'm

32:41

sorry. No, no, they just go nothing. We

32:44

refuse to let you know. These

32:47

people should not be in these positions if they cannot

32:50

understand why these people care about their family members. Throughout

32:53

the day, Mike posted Facebook messages trying

32:56

to get people to help him. He

32:58

wrote finally screaming, they want her organs, which

33:01

of course people said, you're a conspiracy theorist.

33:03

You're crazy. That's not true. What

33:06

Mike did not know the

33:08

moment he was posting that

33:11

is that they had already begun taking her organs. They

33:14

were already removing her heart and her kidneys and her liver

33:16

and her lungs, and the next day her tissue was collected

33:18

for donation. Right.

33:21

So at what point do you realize that he's right? Sure,

33:24

you could argue that they didn't do it explicitly

33:26

for the profit or because they wanted them at

33:29

the expense of it. Or you

33:31

could argue that they just thought it was the right thing to do, that

33:34

they just thought that this is what needs to happen and

33:36

he's distraught and he doesn't understand. Okay,

33:39

fine. Make that your argument. They still wanted her

33:41

organs. So they

33:44

went against the wishes of the father because they wanted

33:46

her organs. Whether or not it's an altruistic reason is

33:48

how you want to look at it. No

33:52

one from the hospital called him. He

33:54

said he did not receive confirmation that she was

33:57

even dead until three days later when the

33:59

coroner called him. to ask what Mike

34:01

wanted to do with the remains. This

34:05

makes me sick. The

34:07

fact that these people can't understand what he's going through,

34:09

or rather don't care, shows

34:12

you how far this has fallen. This

34:15

is the problem with the weaponized system. Somebody

34:18

does benefit from that. Somebody does

34:20

profit from that. And the fact

34:22

that this is suddenly that being

34:24

more important, look,

34:26

I get the reality that there are people that might

34:28

die, at

34:30

least that's how we're told this works.

34:33

I actually don't even know if that's really the reality. So

34:36

there's this kind of minute-by-minute process where they're waiting

34:38

for the lung to be able to move to

34:41

this child over here who's about to die. That's

34:43

what we all hear on the movies and see on the TV

34:45

shows, but is that really what happened? I don't know, honestly. Either

34:49

way, his life and

34:51

her life and his relationship is

34:53

all that matters to him in that moment. And

34:56

seeing as how he's paying for it, seeing as how they

34:58

don't have the right to make these decisions for

35:01

his daughter, that should not be

35:03

the way it goes. But that changed after COVID-19. Whether

35:06

it was that it actually changed or they

35:08

just finally admitted to you what they really were, or

35:10

whatever that means to you, it's up for you to decide.

35:13

Now, this brings us into the conversation from yesterday

35:16

about the harvesting of organs. Now,

35:18

Jason Bacellar's part of a great

35:21

clip segment. It really only

35:23

gets into the two parts I went into

35:25

here, the idea that from the West Bank

35:27

in general, Israel, two stories really, which is

35:29

just disgusting in its own right, while

35:32

they were giving back 116 children, or

35:36

young teens and children from

35:38

being illegally detained with no

35:40

charge in Israel for years in many cases,

35:42

I'll go over briefly again today, they

35:45

went right back out and scooped up 117 more. And

35:48

still are, by the

35:50

way. That should be insulting to

35:52

anybody. What's the honesty of

35:54

giving these people back? Well, the whole

35:56

point was about exchange. or

36:00

not you feel is just a fact. They took these

36:02

people so they could exchange them for people that were held

36:04

prisoner. Knowing that they just went right out and scooped them

36:06

up, that almost seems like it's not even the

36:08

interest of anybody but other than just saying,

36:11

ha ha, we got one over on you. Like

36:14

that kind of petty action. Now that's in

36:16

and of itself should outrage everybody. And

36:18

it's still happening. But the other thought was, okay, well,

36:20

what happens to the children that don't have parents anymore

36:22

that were killed in the bombings in Gaza? Who's

36:26

gonna fight for them? Who's gonna stand up and say, where is

36:28

X, Y, and Z? And

36:30

Israel knows this. So what happens then with

36:33

these people? What happens with the dead bodies they're

36:35

stealing? Well, I'll tell you in

36:37

many cases, not all of them. I'm not gonna say

36:39

I know for sure that children will be, yeah, I

36:41

don't know these things, but I'm proposing these possibilities because

36:43

we've seen what they're capable of. But this

36:45

gets into these discussion of the

36:47

children being taken. And also the

36:49

Euromed, what is it? It's

36:53

right here. Euromed

36:55

Monitor Human Rights Organization has exposed and

36:57

called out that the doctors are revealing

36:59

that the bodies they were brought back,

37:01

these ones you can see here in

37:03

the blue, that's

37:05

freezing on me, of course it is, good job, were

37:09

stolen from, that their bodies were

37:12

robbed. One aspect of the Israel's war

37:14

that has been underreported in the illegal

37:16

harvesting of organs by the Israeli regime.

37:18

Medical professionals from Gaza have confirmed signs

37:20

of organ theft, livers, kidneys, and so

37:22

on. Here's a link to the main

37:24

art show. I think I've got it right here as well.

37:26

Yeah, those bodies I was discussing. Now

37:28

let's get into this a little bit more. There's some points

37:31

I wanted to bring up. Here just again is the tweet,

37:33

if you wanted to see this for yourself, as it says,

37:35

while Western media keeps screaming about Israeli hostages, Israel released 117

37:37

Palestinians from illegal

37:39

detention, while simultaneously

37:41

capturing 116 more, including children. Oh,

37:47

and then on top, just on that same note, here's

37:49

an example of Israeli

37:52

soldiers taking more children, seemingly

37:55

for no reason, which by

37:57

the way, is exactly, is provably.

37:59

something that happens despite the screamings of the people

38:02

you might expect online. Amity

38:04

International, Human Rights Watch, United Nations, they've

38:06

all broken down long time ago

38:08

and right to today that they

38:10

continue to illegally detain children and

38:12

adults for no reason, for political

38:14

reasons, for detention with no charge.

38:18

That's why they're losing control of the narrative because people

38:20

are seeing this and no matter how many times

38:24

Ben Shapiro whines on Twitter it's not going to change

38:26

the reality of this. I

38:30

think that first part too

38:32

it says, yeah it says who is

38:34

this? Who

38:39

is this kid? Take him, take him. You don't know

38:41

who he is but take him anyway. Now this resulting

38:43

game they play where they

38:46

go he must have done X, Y and D, he's

38:48

probably Hamas,

39:03

he's probably going to throw a stone. Well do you know

39:05

that? It's a

39:07

kind of disgusting obfuscation and gaslighting of people

39:10

that just say, you know it shows you

39:12

that they don't care. They

39:14

have chosen the size and the narrative. Not

39:16

just half of it is, but what happens

39:19

in every conversation. Another

39:24

kid. Pushing the girl with, you

39:26

know, because they care. Another

39:34

one. Why are they

39:36

all children? Can you explain that for me? Why

39:38

are they explicitly scooping up children in the West Bank?

39:42

Right, it hasn't been going on for decades. Not new at

39:44

all. There's another

39:46

one. All

39:49

children. You know, young children, you know,

39:51

looks like 10, 11, 12, something like that. because

40:01

you need 14 IDF members like that classic

40:03

image of that beat-up kid with the with

40:05

the blindfold says the youth

40:07

were taken to the Bob Zawiya

40:09

checkpoint and held their handcuffs what

40:21

you have to understand too they

40:23

let people these are those are the journalists filming

40:25

that ask yourself

40:28

why they would want that like because

40:30

in most cases historically American audiences

40:32

don't see this and if they do people

40:34

add some context that explode they're all terrorists

40:36

they were all trying to stab people and

40:38

it most times not even true the

40:41

point is they do this to scare people in

40:43

Gaza and West Bank to

40:46

scare children that's what we've discussed that

40:48

I think Amnesty International broke that down

40:50

the idea of doing this in order

40:52

to scare the children to stay in

40:54

line which ultimately only really adds to

40:56

the resistance which they're seeing

40:59

today all these children

41:04

funny how we all these people care about all

41:06

the children in cages on the border odd of

41:09

those same people could care less about

41:11

these children isn't that funny because those

41:13

children on the border work for an agenda in regard

41:15

to your border fence and so on these ones you

41:17

don't care about another

41:22

example this

41:24

one was a child this

41:27

was today like I'm gonna make a

41:29

point about this later guys Twitter is on

41:31

a rampage right now like

41:33

this this is what they're doing it as far as I could tell you'll

41:36

find some graphic disgusting things and I'll show you in

41:38

a minute all these off you know the October 7th

41:41

massacre there's entire channels that are

41:43

dedicated and you'll find the worst

41:45

things on their graphic blown-up heads

41:47

and all kind of stuff not

41:49

censored yet anything that

41:51

even mildly gets into

41:54

violence from something that exposes Israeli

41:56

government actions well they post unavailable

41:58

because it violates We just don't like to show

42:01

graphic stuff. Well, it's weird how

42:03

you only allow things when it sides

42:05

with an Israeli narrative. And anything that

42:07

shows you the opposite, which I've shown you many times,

42:09

I'll actually make a point next, seems like it's being

42:11

removed. Here, Sam

42:14

Parker reveals an Israeli sniper, and this has been

42:17

publicly reported all around. Nine-year-old

42:19

boy, this kid right here, Adam

42:21

Al Ghul, shot in the head by

42:24

IDF members in the West Bank. Not

42:26

in Gaza, in the West Bank. Gosh, it's

42:33

just sickening. Does that

42:40

make you sick? This

42:47

is just another day for these kids. Sarah

42:53

Abdallah says, Israeli occupation

42:55

forces today just executed two Palestinian

42:57

boys in the streets of

42:59

Janine. They shot this in

43:01

the West Bank. They shot them with live

43:03

bullets in the head, nine-year-old and a 15-year-old,

43:06

just children. Israel

43:08

has decided to resume murdering children in the West Bank

43:10

since it temporarily halted its mass murder of children in

43:13

Gaza. Now,

43:15

of course, what people like Eli David will do

43:17

is go back and find pictures of this kid

43:19

with some kind of Hamas, regalia,

43:23

or some kind of a Palestinian rap,

43:25

or having them hold a gun. Right,

43:28

which immediately means they're terrorist members that

43:30

should be killed, right? Eli, of course, that's what they'll

43:32

tell you. Does that mean that

43:34

if you show an image of an American holding a gun, therefore they're

43:36

a KKK member? This

43:41

kind of logic is ridiculous. It's not

43:43

logic at all. It is broad-stroking, and

43:45

they know that because they're

43:48

basically telling you it's okay they shot a

43:50

child in the head because we think they

43:52

support this bad guy. But

43:55

in a democracy, that's how that works, right? They assume you

43:57

work with ISIS, they just shoot you in the head in

43:59

the street. Democracy, right?

44:02

No, you're supposed to go to be charged with a

44:04

crime and be brought to a fair trial. But

44:06

that never happens and never has

44:09

in the occupied area of Palestine.

44:11

I'll never tell you that. Now

44:13

we covered this. Israel's open secret of

44:15

Palestinian organ theft in this show,

44:18

No. 28, the reality of their

44:20

illegal settlements. So the point is showing

44:22

you the children is to show you that they're continuing to

44:24

kill children. Now, the

44:26

reason that's important is

44:28

because many times these bodies are never

44:31

returned. And

44:34

that is where this allegation comes in. And I wanted to

44:36

follow up on this topic. Please watch this show. I ended

44:39

it about two hours and I'm going to try to get

44:41

a breakdown more so. Again, this clip does quickly go over

44:43

some of the points. But please watch

44:45

this. It is an open secret. It is

44:48

not even debatable. And I'll show you the one that was most

44:50

important after this. Now, this is from two

44:52

days ago from Middle East monitor is Israel stealing

44:54

organs from dead Palestinians. It says, while

44:57

dozens of corpses were handed over to the

44:59

International Committee of the Red Cross, which in

45:01

turn transported them to the southern Gaza Strip

45:03

to complete the burial process. The Israeli army

45:06

is still holding dozens of them.

45:09

So, yeah, the image you're seeing of all the bodies, they didn't

45:11

give them all back. Now,

45:13

why does that make sense? This is

45:15

where the allegations begin. Even the ones they gave back,

45:17

mind you, show evidence of organs

45:19

harvested. But it says,

45:21

but to me, that doesn't make sense. If the

45:23

argument is they held them because that

45:26

would reveal what they did, then why did some of them

45:28

get returned that did show that? I mean, I don't know

45:30

that to me, that's an example of maybe this isn't exactly

45:32

what's going on. But either way, historically, there's

45:34

an endless amount of information coming from

45:36

every group, from the Guardian, from Reuters,

45:38

from Amnesty, from Human Rights Watch. I

45:40

want to show you the United Nations

45:42

post next again. That's just the most

45:44

obviously damning. But

45:47

it says, concerns about organ theft from the corpses were

45:49

brought up by the organization, citing reports from medical professionals

45:51

in Gaza, who examined a few bodies quickly after the

45:53

release. Now, of course, they could lie like anybody could.

45:56

These medical professionals found evidence of organ

45:58

theft, including missing coke. which

46:00

was the ear, that's right, corneas

46:02

as well as other vital organs, livers, kidneys, and

46:04

hearts. They detected several signs

46:07

of possible organ theft by the Israeli

46:09

military. Israel

46:11

has a history of holding on to the bodies

46:13

of dead Palestinians, explains the Euro Med Monitor Human

46:16

Rights Group. It continues to hold the remains of

46:18

at least 145 Palestinians

46:20

in its mortuaries and

46:22

approximately 255

46:24

of its so-called numbers cemetery near

46:27

the Jordanian border and off-limits to the public.

46:30

It's very strange. Why would they need that? As

46:32

well as 75 missing people who have

46:34

not been identified. According

46:36

to the rights organization, Israel stores the bodies

46:38

of dead Palestinians in what it refers to

46:41

as the enemy combatant graves. But not all

46:43

of them mind you, just these specific secret

46:45

ones, which are covert mass graves

46:47

situated in particular locations such

46:49

as closed military zones. Guys,

46:52

that's a crime. They have

46:54

no rights to hold the bodies of these

46:56

people, that in its collective punishment, or if

46:58

not some kind of religious violation. Like

47:01

these people, whether it's a Jewish thing or a Muslim

47:03

thing, it's very important

47:05

to them to have their bodies dealt with a certain

47:07

way by a certain time. I

47:10

mean really that matters for everybody. Now

47:13

it says, and again, you can see that

47:15

as just being malicious, vitriol,

47:18

right? Vindictive, just wanting to do this

47:20

to hurt these people. It

47:22

says the remains of the bodies of the

47:24

dead are marked only with metal plates in

47:26

this special secret cemetery. Moreover, Israel

47:29

has made it lawful to

47:32

hold Palestinians bodies and steal their

47:34

organs. In 2019,

47:36

Israeli Supreme Court ruling permits the military

47:38

to bury the bodies temporarily in number

47:41

cemetery, this weird location. By the

47:43

end of 2021 though, the Israeli

47:45

kinesthetic passed laws allowing the army

47:47

and police to hold on to

47:50

the bodies of dead Palestinians indefinitely. They

47:52

have been reports in recent years of the

47:54

unlawful use of Palestinian corpses held by Israel,

47:57

including, as we talked about yesterday in depth,

47:59

the theft of and the

48:01

use in Israeli university medical schools. Israeli

48:04

doctor Miram Weiss disclosed in her

48:06

book Over Their Dead Bodies as

48:08

the title. The organs taken from

48:10

dead Palestinians were utilized in medical

48:13

research at Israeli universities, medical facilities,

48:15

and were transplanted into Jewish Israeli

48:17

patients. Israel

48:19

has become ground zero for both

48:21

illegal and legal human organ transactions.

48:24

And this is according

48:26

to a 2009 report by the US-CNN

48:29

network of all places. Which also alleged

48:31

that Israel participated in the theft of

48:33

organs from dead Palestinians for illegal use.

48:39

This is the one we largely went over, that

48:41

general topic. Of

48:44

course, of course this is all in

48:46

this weird look because it's just something they probably don't want. This is

48:48

funny. But $100,000 buys a patient a new kidney. As

48:53

Israeli man paid $100,000 to broker a new kidney, this

48:58

installment examines two very different stories of Israelis involved

49:00

in the trade. We went over this in depth

49:02

yesterday. Showing

49:04

you those aspects of international trades involving Israeli

49:07

units and groups and different organizations, but

49:10

then specifically Israeli government involvement in Israel

49:12

and outside of Israel. Yurmed

49:14

monitored and confirmed that Israel is the only

49:16

country, apparently in the

49:18

world, that systematically holds onto the dead bodies of

49:21

those it kills. Now

49:23

why would they need to do that? Under

49:25

the pretext of security

49:28

deterrence. Well that's obviously collective

49:30

punishment then. Doing this to

49:32

punish them so they don't do more bad things

49:34

apparently, assuming they even did bad things. And in

49:36

total violation of international charters and agreements, of course.

49:39

Now here is the one from yesterday that's important. From 2010,

49:41

from the United Nations. Again,

49:46

it's also important to see, they start off with prepping

49:48

this by saying, Israel's,

49:50

the title Israel, Israeli illegal

49:52

trafficking in Oregon's of dead and kidnapped Palestinian

49:54

victims. That's what this is called. And

49:57

it says, as if it's not enough for Israel, and it goes

49:59

on. on the list for bullet points. One

50:01

of them is as if it's not enough

50:04

to create an illegal state on 80% historic

50:06

Palestinian land. For those that keep trying to

50:08

argue that UN is not saying that all

50:10

of Israel is occupied Palestine. Yes, they are.

50:12

They may not say it explicitly today, but

50:14

that's always been the reality. 80% historic

50:17

land because what West Bank and Gaza were the

50:20

rest. This is all Palestine,

50:22

per the United Nations. The

50:24

point is, if it's not enough for them to

50:26

stake all of their land and expel them all

50:28

into there and ethnically cleanse and massacres, all

50:31

the stuff that we know is true, they pretend isn't

50:33

real as if it's not enough for them to occupy

50:35

the rest of Palestine as if it's not enough for

50:37

to create open air prisons as if it's not enough

50:39

to let loose hordes of marauding gangs of Israeli settlers.

50:41

That's exactly what it says as

50:43

if that's not enough. Now it is

50:46

the turn of the dead, kidnapped and killed

50:48

Palestinians. Their human organ, as reported in the

50:50

press, can be a source of immense wealth

50:52

through illegal trafficking in the world market. Israel

50:55

Israeli physicians. Medical

50:58

centers and rabbis in Israeli army may be

51:00

involved, according to reports published in the Swedish

51:02

press and criminal investigations in the US. After

51:04

Israeli physicians remove organs they think marketable. The

51:06

soldiers bury the bodies engraved that can carry

51:09

only numbers and no names or points. That's

51:11

what we just talked about. Lastly,

51:16

it says we call upon physicians and

51:19

everybody else to call this out. But

51:22

fake news though, right? Open secret. That's

51:24

what these are. On

51:27

that note, by the way, not that this is necessarily

51:30

connected, I just thought this was interesting. And

51:32

this, by the way, is a developing story.

51:34

I was not trying to insinuate anything by

51:36

this, just stating what was being reported. Senior

51:38

Pentagon official, Steven Hovanak, chief of

51:40

staff for all military schools and

51:42

overseer of education of thousands of military

51:45

dependent children, found that interesting, is getting

51:47

arrested in this video. In this video,

51:49

it looks like he's engaging in prostitution.

51:52

He's been arrested in connection with a human

51:55

trafficking ring. That's not to say

51:57

that the video of the prostitution therefore implies

51:59

human trafficking. It's funny how people assume so

52:01

much on Twitter these days all our Twitter

52:03

files The point is just to say

52:05

this is interesting a member of the military who oversees

52:08

children is arrested in connection with human

52:10

trafficking I found that interesting I really do

52:12

believe that the Epstein overlap and all this

52:14

shows you a very dark network that stems

52:16

right back to massage the CIA that we

52:18

know exists and they

52:20

don't want you to see all of that now on that note another

52:23

update that I think is important is in regard to

52:25

the Wikipedia page that they've

52:27

now added information back to I found

52:29

this interesting and this will roll us into the conversation

52:31

of what they claim they're seeing which is now being

52:33

debunked by somebody Who saw the screening? but

52:36

as we've shown you before on the 22nd

52:38

that we caught the Wikipedia page for the

52:40

Al-Shifa hospital edited to remove the point that

52:42

They built a underground operating

52:45

room and tunnel structure in 1983

52:47

under the Al-Shifa Hospital Israel did

52:50

and then of course as you remember You

52:52

Barack admitted that to on CNN and she

52:54

was like that you misspeak No,

52:56

no, they did it and then here's a video of

52:58

Neto Lee Bennett Explaining how

53:00

they teach their people to edit Wikipedia to

53:03

benefit their agenda. It's just so blatantly obvious

53:05

Now the point is they changed it to say

53:08

during a renovation. They built a basement and

53:10

removed everything else now that was like that for weeks Somebody

53:14

notified me. Hey, they brought it back Why

53:16

does this make sense? This is so strange. So

53:19

here is the old version where you can see it That's

53:21

what it used to say It's from

53:23

November 16th. Here's what it says now

53:25

on the pub that looks refreshed you Okay,

53:28

so all this seems to be somewhat

53:30

the same No,

53:33

let's see the hospital the project. It's pretty close looks

53:35

a little bit different I'm not gonna get into it

53:37

now, but the bottom is the important part So

53:40

down here says the architects also designed and

53:42

built a large array of underground infrastructure Which

53:44

the IDF later pointed to as basically Hamas,

53:46

but then goes on to say that the it

53:49

was built by Israel That's not to say that

53:51

how often add on to it, but the actual Underground

53:54

control center and the tunnels as they claim were

53:56

built by them that you have to rock then

53:58

admit. Here's what it says says now during

54:01

a renovation in the 1990s a

54:03

large basement was added which the IDF later said

54:05

was appropriated by Hamas that was kind of the

54:07

same why would you start with that and

54:09

then go to 1880 1983 it's interesting then it says according

54:13

to Newsweek so now they're adding in all

54:15

these current framings of it the

54:17

bunker which is what he

54:19

who brought you the word he used see this is

54:21

very clumsy trying patching of the narrative constructed

54:24

decades ago includes a secure underground

54:26

operating room and tunnel network why

54:29

you would need to add that when this says it right there

54:31

by the way it's very weird according to

54:33

the you Barack in the interview with CNN the

54:35

tunnels were built in the 80s by Israel as

54:38

part of a hospital construction well yeah that's what

54:40

we're all telling you it says in particular in

54:42

1983 they built a secure underground

54:44

operating room beneath the building then

54:46

they added this according to Israeli officials Hamas

54:49

subsequently dug out the original basement later adding

54:51

new floors and connecting it with the hub

54:54

so what this appears to me to be is the

54:57

clumsy and embarrassing reality that when they

54:59

added this part which went

55:01

from we built this to no it was a basement

55:03

and that was it when

55:05

they know everybody saw and everyone's paying attention

55:08

they go well let's just put them both

55:10

in there which seemed to contradict each other

55:12

but hey at least you could pretend

55:14

you didn't lie right the point is

55:16

when this came out and

55:18

we said hey look they changed it I mean you go

55:20

look at the comments use how people who

55:22

dutifully were put to the task and jumped in

55:24

and said that never said it you made that up

55:27

you're a liar well okay well now they added it

55:29

back now what do you say that

55:31

was always there you're making that up as

55:34

we know Hasbara propaganda whatever they're trapping

55:36

these people out and they like Eli Dave and

55:38

the rest and they go that's fake news even

55:41

though now it says it again really embarrassing

55:43

isn't it well we also have this point and

55:45

I'm gonna go into the again but I want

55:47

to start with this website to make a point

55:49

about the lies because remember all the information so

55:51

in the podcast we're talking about this a mosque

55:53

massacre net website which is supported

55:55

and promoted by the Israeli government and

55:57

all of these things come directly from

56:00

Israeli information That's the only entity handing out

56:02

these grotesque images.

56:04

The point was that we caught them in real

56:06

time. First of all,

56:08

Max Blumenthal caught the use of this image that was old.

56:11

I caught them in real time deleting it from the website

56:14

after we all exposed it. Israel

56:16

used an image of a woman from at least 2022 claiming

56:18

it was proof of rape at the music festival. After

56:20

it was revealed to be an old image, it

56:23

was deleted with no comment. This

56:26

image here, and then suddenly

56:28

gone. Now

56:31

you can check the site for yourself. It's no longer there. You

56:33

can look back through archives. Everybody, including corporate

56:35

media, and all the same people you might imagine

56:37

I could list off, were all pointing at this

56:39

and using that as the proof of that happening.

56:41

That doesn't mean it didn't happen. What it means

56:43

is they were using something that wasn't true to

56:45

sell you on a narrative, which highly suggests that

56:47

it didn't happen. Again,

56:49

they deleted this. This

56:51

is my point about the censorship. So this violated

56:53

their rules. Oh, did it. So

56:56

that image over there on the on the Israeli page that

56:58

shows a blown open child, that one's okay. Right.

57:00

But this image of a

57:02

woman on her back, that one, that crosses the line. Right?

57:05

Apparently. My

57:08

point is, I think this was deleted because it proved

57:10

this was from 2022. Now I was

57:12

able to find it on the Wayback Machine, March

57:14

2022. As you guys all know,

57:17

for those that haven't seen them just relaying the information again,

57:19

this is what was opposed from this person going, look at

57:21

what Russia did. Same thing

57:23

as even the IDF used this before October 7th, claiming

57:25

something else as to what they do. Now,

57:29

the point is this website. Oh, and

57:31

by the way, here's the we go over this. Israel caught using an

57:33

old image. If you want to watch the full show. So here's

57:36

the website. Seems

57:38

to be kind of constantly changing, which doesn't make much

57:40

sense to me, seeing as how there's nothing new in

57:43

regard to what happened on the seventh, other than what

57:45

they add and change and alter, which suggests that there's

57:47

nothing something wrong here. But

57:50

first of all, I looked up this website on the who is kind

57:52

of what I just thought was interesting, who owns it and so on.

57:55

Well, you'll find if you look up TLAT, for example, you'll

57:57

see my name and you'll see that, you know, the business

57:59

location. and so on. But I found

58:02

this was listed as wix.com and

58:06

redacted for privacy. That's where my

58:08

name would be. That happens. Some

58:10

people just don't want their name, but I thought that

58:13

was interesting. Redacted for privacy,

58:15

the organization listed as wix.com. Why? Because

58:17

the address they use is literally some

58:19

San Francisco Wix building hub where people

58:21

can use their little outlets. Seems

58:24

like a strange thing to do, right? That they're

58:26

going to build this site that clearly is collaborating

58:28

with the Israeli government and

58:30

just build it in a US location out of a US

58:32

building, sort of like the Project Aerodynamic,

58:35

right? Where they set this Nazi war

58:37

criminal up in New York with the

58:39

Prologue Company. Anyway, the point is I

58:42

found it interesting. The number did not

58:44

go anywhere. Anyway, thought

58:46

that was interesting. Doesn't have to prove anything, but

58:48

I thought I was looking into it. So we

58:51

should keep keeping track of what's going on. Now,

58:53

here is a different point. On that

58:55

note, knowing that they're already altering and lying about the information that's

58:57

being used, we've seen a lot of these people. Oh, and that

58:59

was one of the ones, by the way, too,

59:01

from this image. The guy who we

59:03

showed you said explicitly described

59:05

that, as many of them have. So

59:08

he's either lying, and my point is

59:10

not seeing it on the screening, but claiming they saw this

59:13

in person. So

59:15

we know people are lying about stuff. So

59:17

this is where it becomes important when we get into this guy's

59:19

statements. This guy here,

59:21

Owen Jones, who says that he didn't see any of

59:23

these things that he's saying they saw on the screening,

59:25

and he was there with them. So

59:29

in my opinion, this is being proven that there

59:31

are people being put to the task to

59:33

literally lie about what they saw. Now,

59:36

why would that need to happen? Now,

59:38

this is what this guy says, Louis D'Cruz, saying,

59:41

I have just seen the video of

59:44

Palestinian terrorists. Interesting. Not

59:46

Hamas, but Palestinian terrorists. You

59:49

have to realize that not everybody in

59:51

Hamas is Palestinian, but they don't

59:53

care. Just like not everybody in Israel is a Jew, but

59:56

they only talk about Israeli Jews when it matters. That's how

59:58

this is a game. It's like trying to create. dynamic

1:00:00

not about an occupier and an

1:00:03

occupied but about a belligerent entity that

1:00:05

wants to kill Jews that's the way they need you to

1:00:07

understand the story it's not true but

1:00:10

he's just seen the video of Palestinian terrorists cutting

1:00:13

open the belly of an Israeli

1:00:15

pregnant woman while she was still alive that's that's

1:00:17

one of the earliest things they floated that was

1:00:19

immediately proven to be a lie same

1:00:22

with the 40 bed of babies that

1:00:24

is a story from one of these older pogroms

1:00:26

or whatever we want to call it in regard to what happened

1:00:28

to Palestinians it's that

1:00:30

doesn't mean that you can prove it didn't

1:00:33

happen now but we can prove as a

1:00:35

matter of fact that was something that was

1:00:37

committed by Israelis against Palestinians a long time

1:00:39

ago it's a horrific reality from

1:00:41

a long time ago now this was

1:00:43

floated and

1:00:45

nobody's provided a fraction of evidence to back

1:00:47

it up now this guy's claiming forcibly I've

1:00:50

just seen this in

1:00:53

real video he

1:00:55

says and made sure she was

1:00:57

kept away to not fade away and remove her

1:00:59

unborn baby I'm almost lost for words

1:01:02

yeah that's horrifying if

1:01:04

it actually happened like that he

1:01:07

says then I will publish this on soon

1:01:10

on October 7th org for everyone who wants

1:01:12

to see he said this on the 25th

1:01:14

it's not there right now but

1:01:17

for now I have to step away a couple days

1:01:19

all this and I'm madness I'm done and

1:01:21

if you want to hear if you want to

1:01:23

bear witness which is the thing they keep

1:01:26

saying around this screening they're using how disgusting

1:01:28

this is just read the comments below yeah

1:01:30

because that'll prove things to you right

1:01:32

people's reactions to your statements without evidence

1:01:34

and then it says

1:01:37

for those denying reality and saying international journalists

1:01:39

didn't report it which somebody claimed

1:01:41

that that's where it really started from but there's

1:01:43

never been any out proof about this by

1:01:46

the way the same kind of settler entities that claim

1:01:48

the 40 had it beheaded babies that was walked back

1:01:50

by everybody in by the way Biden keeps

1:01:52

saying that he says read this and

1:01:54

f you because you know that's how you respond right

1:01:56

you degenerate pieces of that yeah that's what we've been

1:01:58

getting Sort of like when

1:02:00

you tell somebody, no, the injections are hurting people.

1:02:03

You maniac liar! It's reaction.

1:02:05

It's sort of like when she went out with

1:02:07

a sign that says, Jews for ceasefire, and they

1:02:09

said, I hope you get raped! Is

1:02:12

that a logical and proportionate response? It

1:02:15

speaks to something else. Now,

1:02:18

he goes, yes, the video has existed and I've seen it.

1:02:20

And he links to an article that simply goes, there was

1:02:22

rape and stuff and we can't prove it. We've

1:02:26

shown you this article. The silence of the international

1:02:28

community about the allegations of rape. That's what the

1:02:30

article is really saying. Okay.

1:02:34

So maybe he's telling the truth. Maybe he saw it.

1:02:37

But that's pretty hard to wrap your mind around

1:02:39

when nobody else has seen it. This

1:02:42

person says, well, I hope you didn't see the

1:02:44

video of the Mexican cartel by mistake, as it

1:02:46

has been being passed around, as if it's from

1:02:48

October 7th. Big surprise. Another

1:02:51

thing we keep seeing is, just like during

1:02:53

the beginning of COVID, or even with

1:02:55

Ukraine, Russia, people just floating random things, and people

1:02:57

on one side or the other taking it to

1:02:59

face value because they already have decided that's the

1:03:01

truth. It happens on both sides. It's

1:03:04

as if they were, like the point is simply

1:03:06

that there's been other things that they're saying are the

1:03:08

facts. Now, here's the website. Go

1:03:11

through it yourself. I went through to the very bottom. There's a

1:03:13

lot of stuff on here. 99%

1:03:16

of it you've already seen, most of it

1:03:18

is unverifiable. Still shots

1:03:20

of bad things or first

1:03:22

person video? Now, look,

1:03:24

the same thing Owen's going to say. I've

1:03:27

never made the claim that they didn't commit

1:03:29

crimes. In fact, I think we've proven very

1:03:31

clearly that Hamas committed crimes, were crimes, whether

1:03:34

on civil, whether killing civilians or whether kidnapping

1:03:36

civilians or in any, the bottom line is

1:03:38

they have made clear why, doesn't

1:03:40

justify it, that they argue that

1:03:42

everybody there is part of the occupation. Now,

1:03:45

you can decide for yourself if you think that's valid. I

1:03:47

just, like Owen's going to say, I think it's an important

1:03:49

line that we draw, that there is no justification that allows

1:03:51

the targeting of civilians, ever. So

1:03:55

the point is,

1:03:57

all of this ultimately amounts to...

1:04:00

bad things happened but

1:04:03

does not in any way prove the

1:04:05

main allegations they keep floating to truly

1:04:08

justify what they're doing which is genocide.

1:04:12

Now here is this website just

1:04:14

kind of the point now this

1:04:16

is super proving anything in you know

1:04:18

definitively but October 7th at work and guess

1:04:21

what everything is redacted from

1:04:23

privacy everything. It

1:04:26

seems strange to me something

1:04:28

there is some entity that is driving these

1:04:30

things in my opinion you guys can decide

1:04:32

for yourselves. B22P

1:04:35

points out well Owen saw the same

1:04:37

stuff you did why is his

1:04:40

view different? Of course that

1:04:42

he won't respond to which is very telling

1:04:44

he was all full of vitriol and hate

1:04:46

and cursing when people ask him questions over

1:04:48

there this guy goes but he says you're

1:04:50

lying. Crickets. Very

1:04:53

very telling to me when people are that belligerent

1:04:56

with their responses but don't respond that

1:04:58

says something to me let's

1:05:01

listen to what Owen has to say Dili

1:05:03

Hussain says Owen Jones confirmed after

1:05:05

attending the official screening of the events which by the

1:05:07

way he also admits that most of what they show

1:05:09

is stuff that you can find everywhere else online he

1:05:12

says no proof of beheaded babies no proof

1:05:15

of Hamas killing children no proof of rape

1:05:17

no proof of beheading humans alive Hamas asked

1:05:19

Israeli partygoers if they were soldiers or civilians.

1:05:22

This destroys their absolutely completely destroys

1:05:25

their narrative and he was

1:05:27

somebody they invited guys the

1:05:29

43 minute screening was Israel's hand-picked footage

1:05:31

to convince the world that

1:05:33

the ongoing collective punishment and genocide of

1:05:36

Palestinians and Gaza's justified. Owen's

1:05:38

request for footage to be handed over to

1:05:40

experts to be independently verified is a reasonable

1:05:42

and standard journalistic request that's being

1:05:44

framed as insensitive or disgusting while

1:05:47

blindly taking at face value things you

1:05:49

can't prove that are being used to

1:05:52

kill others is somehow acceptable. I'm not

1:05:54

gonna play the whole thing it's a long clip it's the full

1:05:56

video but here's what Owen said in the

1:05:58

beginning. of

1:06:00

the 7th October atrocities committed by Hamas.

1:06:02

Now for context, I went to the

1:06:05

request of an Israeli-British friend who I've

1:06:07

known for a long time. It was

1:06:09

an idea of screaming in Westminster, with

1:06:12

a small selected crowd including Stephen Fry,

1:06:15

various LBC presenters like Rachel Johnson

1:06:17

and Nick Ferrari, and journalists from

1:06:19

media organisations like The Sun. Now

1:06:21

I thought carefully about attending. Like

1:06:23

most people, I have

1:06:25

a serious aversion to watching people

1:06:27

suffering horrible violence, and there

1:06:29

is something innately unpleasant about intruding

1:06:32

on people's last terrifying

1:06:35

moments. I've already

1:06:37

watched ample footage of crimes committed by Hamas,

1:06:39

but I am covering this crisis extensively,

1:06:41

and I believed good journalistic practice meant

1:06:44

I should attend. I did so with

1:06:46

my friend Michael Walker, who

1:06:48

you will know from Navarro Media, even

1:06:50

though I obviously dreaded doing so. Now

1:06:52

this was an IDF screening, as I

1:06:54

noted, and before the screening a few

1:06:56

people spoke, including some Mike, some

1:06:59

Mick Davis, businessman and former Conservative

1:07:01

Party Treasurer, the IDF

1:07:03

military attaché, and also somewhat confusingly,

1:07:06

the founder of Ted Baker, Ray

1:07:08

Kelvin. Now the purpose of the screening was made

1:07:11

very clear, that we were to bear witness, as

1:07:13

it was repeatedly put, to the horrors committed by

1:07:15

Hamas, but also make the

1:07:17

PR case for Israel's onslaught against Gaza.

1:07:20

A leaflet handout details what I

1:07:22

would describe as Israel's official narrative.

1:07:25

It used terms such as Judea and

1:07:27

Samaria, which in practice means the annexation

1:07:29

of the West Bank. That's

1:07:31

the terms they used to talk about Gaza,

1:07:33

and I think specifically West Bank. I

1:07:36

forget, but the bottom line is these are the terms

1:07:38

that they are, this is what will be when they

1:07:40

take all of the territory. Which at

1:07:43

this point is it explicitly is discussing

1:07:45

an illegal action. Just

1:07:48

like the settlements, everybody knows they're illegal, they

1:07:50

just don't care, they don't do anything about

1:07:52

it. Now the footsie goes often

1:07:55

deeply harrowing to watch, as I

1:07:57

expected. There's a feeling of dread.

1:08:00

about what might happen which never

1:08:02

goes away all the way through.

1:08:04

Now a significant amount I've already

1:08:06

seen is... and by the way

1:08:09

let's not forget and this has been it's stated

1:08:11

even by people that are why are on Israel's

1:08:13

side the video itself is is

1:08:15

a highly produced it's

1:08:17

you know it's his point about the

1:08:20

dread is because there is music like

1:08:22

it's designed to put you in a position

1:08:24

where you feel like like they can't like

1:08:27

why is it not enough just to show the terrible things

1:08:30

like it everything they're doing screams

1:08:32

an effort to manipulate in

1:08:35

my opinion. The

1:08:37

public domain a significant amount of it and confirms

1:08:40

Hamas as I expected there's a

1:08:42

feeling of dread about what might

1:08:44

happen which never goes

1:08:47

away all the way through now a

1:08:49

significant amount I've already seen it is

1:08:52

in the public domain a significant amount of

1:08:54

it and confirms Hamas committed war

1:08:56

crimes as I've always been aware of and been

1:08:58

clear about from the start as I said which

1:09:00

I agree with now the point though is that

1:09:03

why then after 50 plus

1:09:06

days are we why are

1:09:08

they still showing the same stuff which the

1:09:10

vast majority of is already out there you'll

1:09:13

hear him say in a second that they

1:09:15

admit they claim this is just what they've

1:09:17

selected they've got a whole whole lot more

1:09:19

that they haven't released well

1:09:21

okay then why would they release the stuff that as

1:09:23

he'll tell you is doesn't prove any other allegations and

1:09:26

is by the way the stuff that we can find on Twitter anyway

1:09:29

what does that suggest to you think it

1:09:32

clearly to me suggests that they don't have

1:09:34

other things that are more compelling or more

1:09:36

convincing otherwise they would release

1:09:39

the things that you have not seen for the people that are

1:09:41

the journalists I think that's very obvious. And

1:09:44

on Sky News three days before the attack

1:09:47

so three days after the attack no cause

1:09:49

on earth justifies the killing

1:09:51

of civilians yes a basic point of

1:09:53

principle which of course I

1:09:56

will always believe in it's amazing that anybody can

1:09:58

make an argument otherwise But just

1:10:00

realize that makes you a pretty detestable person

1:10:02

to somehow rationalize the directed killing of civilians.

1:10:04

Whether it's because this is

1:10:07

an occupation or because in reverse it's because they

1:10:09

support this person, they voted for that person because

1:10:11

they didn't choose to leave. Like it's just

1:10:13

it's grotesque and this is what we've been saying from the

1:10:15

beginning. Anybody with a soul and a heart has been saying

1:10:17

that from day one. And none of that is to say

1:10:19

that means we agree with this or we deny that. Just

1:10:22

dumb braining over the very basic and

1:10:24

reality, basic statements that we can all

1:10:26

prove are real. Now the

1:10:28

film consists of clips recorded

1:10:31

in GoPros worn by Hamas,

1:10:33

CCTV, mobile phones and car

1:10:35

dashcams. Now by the way, I still don't

1:10:37

know why that makes sense. Obviously

1:10:39

it does appear that they were GoPros, but

1:10:41

to me that's very weird. What's

1:10:43

the net what is the what's the purpose? Maybe there's

1:10:46

a military purpose. I mean, we know that all military

1:10:48

seem to do that for some. Maybe that's why. Maybe

1:10:50

that's it's just simple military practice. But it

1:10:52

makes me wonder if there was more coordination to this. Right.

1:10:55

To the maybe to the larger point of some people's

1:10:57

minds that this all is an orchestrated iPad. I mean,

1:10:59

who knows? I just don't find it

1:11:02

very strange they would wear GoPros. It seems to

1:11:04

undermine the security that they do. Compel that they

1:11:06

clearly act with everywhere else. Just want

1:11:08

to point that out. But yes, there were obviously GoPros.

1:11:11

Splice route is audio, which we are told

1:11:13

comes from intersected Hamas communications, which will come

1:11:15

on. Now it was 43

1:11:17

minutes long. We were told that this was only

1:11:19

a small glimpse of the thousands of hours that

1:11:21

Israel has in its footage. Right. But clearly, the

1:11:23

site hasn't been selected at random. You would expect

1:11:26

it to be the worst material that

1:11:28

they have. That's not actually a criticism. You'd

1:11:30

expect any state to do the same.

1:11:33

But genuinely independent journalists or historians

1:11:35

wouldn't conclude they could assess accurately

1:11:37

the full nature of what happened on 7th

1:11:39

of October from this election.

1:11:42

That's that's important. Right.

1:11:44

So first step, very plainly,

1:11:47

what they presented in no way confirms their

1:11:49

allegations. And equally, not all horrors will

1:11:51

have been recorded. Now, all of the

1:11:53

footage and audio in the possession of

1:11:56

the Israeli state should be given over to

1:11:58

independent journalists and professional. to

1:12:01

build a fully accurate picture of exactly what happened

1:12:03

that day. Now this should not be regarded as

1:12:05

a controversial thing to say in any

1:12:07

other circumstances people would regard it

1:12:09

as a very obvious statement of

1:12:12

basic journalistic practice. Now I

1:12:14

understand why many loved ones do

1:12:16

not want the footage released publicly

1:12:18

which must be respected that doesn't

1:12:20

mean of course that the material

1:12:22

can't be confidentially shared. Now

1:12:24

the video begins by stating that 900 Israeli

1:12:26

civilians and 300 Israeli soldiers were killed on

1:12:29

the 7th of October. We've

1:12:31

already proven that's not correct. It's

1:12:33

way more than that in regard to both.

1:12:35

Well specifically IDF. How many

1:12:38

were settlers, how many were police, I think that changes

1:12:40

the whole dynamic but the cradle broke this down before

1:12:42

we had the full number and

1:12:45

that was I think actually that pertained to the

1:12:47

900 specifically and that meant that was about half

1:12:49

of them were IDF and whatever

1:12:52

were police and settlers changes that too. But

1:12:54

that definitely changes the whole discussion. Now as he also

1:12:56

points out and I think that's an important point that

1:12:59

I haven't made a distinction on that I think is

1:13:01

to make very clear. The

1:13:04

obvious point is that if they're IDF, if

1:13:06

they're military that makes them a military target but

1:13:09

and this is I've always felt this way I just want to make sure

1:13:11

you guys hear this if they're unarmed

1:13:14

per the Geneva Conventions they're being

1:13:16

shot that's still a crime. I mean

1:13:18

I would think that's obvious but in case you

1:13:20

didn't get that that's an important reality. So

1:13:23

civilians always off the table but if

1:13:25

you're in basically or by the way

1:13:27

in the truth is though that

1:13:29

basically no military in the world seems to honor this

1:13:31

it seems anymore if somebody were to throw their guns

1:13:33

down let's say I forget I give up well there

1:13:35

you're not allowed to kill them and that's when you're

1:13:37

supposed to take them and treat them with all the

1:13:39

respect and blah blah blah which doesn't seem to happen

1:13:41

anywhere but you know maybe apparently

1:13:44

safer Hamas prison cells but that's what we've seen

1:13:46

so far who knows what the rest of them are

1:13:48

being treated like. As I keep

1:13:51

saying Hamas and other armed groups committed serious

1:13:53

war crimes that includes killing innocent civilians and

1:13:55

the taking of hostages which is itself a

1:13:57

grave war crime. None of my following

1:14:00

comments detract from any of this. For

1:14:02

me the worst moment is two little boys

1:14:04

and their dad running in their

1:14:06

pants to a shelter and then a Hamas

1:14:08

good man throwing in a grenade. Their

1:14:11

father is killed, they are injured, you see

1:14:13

them traumatized, you see them sobbing, asking

1:14:16

while they're still alive and then a

1:14:18

Hamas good man callously takes a bottle of

1:14:20

coke from the fridge in front of them

1:14:22

while they sob and wail. Now

1:14:26

I haven't seen that but if the

1:14:28

point is he's claiming he saw a Hamas member

1:14:31

which I mean I don't know why anybody would really dispute that

1:14:34

right especially since their framing is that they

1:14:37

regard all of these people as you know violating

1:14:39

them and their their sob which you know to

1:14:41

a degree there's an argument to be made but

1:14:43

that does not mean that you should be treating

1:14:46

these people as war targets or even just with

1:14:48

with disrespect right I mean it's just it's

1:14:51

almost weird how it's treated as

1:14:53

naive or somehow impossible

1:14:56

that we should treat

1:14:58

each other with respect even if we're enemies

1:15:00

or you know so on it's interesting now

1:15:02

of course there's obviously lines to certain things

1:15:04

but nonetheless the point is obvious if

1:15:07

that did indeed happen the way described it yeah that's

1:15:09

that's disgusting and that needs to be addressed but

1:15:12

equally on both sides because

1:15:15

obviously that happens as a matter

1:15:17

of policy on a daily basis to

1:15:19

Palestinians it's not what about is

1:15:21

image just being honest and objective

1:15:23

equal application of international law it's

1:15:25

a good place to start hideous

1:15:28

to watch and will stay with me for the

1:15:30

rest of my life no question about that oh

1:15:33

that's a good point actually I

1:15:35

poked spot I was like his name

1:15:38

says again where did the home OS pro GoPro videos

1:15:40

come from that's a good question isn't it are

1:15:42

we to believe that they just sent over

1:15:44

all their GoPro videos that's

1:15:47

a great point like something about that just

1:15:49

really doesn't add up to me the

1:15:52

terrified party go is hiding in some sort of container

1:15:54

and then many grievously injured

1:15:56

and presumably killed after a grenade

1:15:58

is thrown in Now that video

1:16:00

you can't, I don't think we can prove who actually

1:16:02

threw that. You can see a person, but my point

1:16:04

is if we do think there's involvement, why

1:16:06

is it that far fetched to argue they could have

1:16:08

dressed up like Hamas? I'm not saying that's even what

1:16:11

I believe or what we can prove, but

1:16:13

obviously we should ask these questions if we've gotten to

1:16:15

the point where we're proving that they deliberately shot their

1:16:18

own people, that now we're going to get to a

1:16:20

point in a minute where it seems they're deliberately covering

1:16:22

that up, burying the

1:16:24

cars before people can investigate. Like this

1:16:26

is all happening right now. A group

1:16:28

of unarmed soldiers, female soldiers, are

1:16:31

shot dead while hiding in barracks, even

1:16:33

if they're soldiers, as the Geneva

1:16:35

Convention states. Killing or wounding a

1:16:38

combatant who, having laid down

1:16:40

his arms or having no longer means of

1:16:42

defence, has surrendered at discretion, is

1:16:44

a war crime. As I've said, Hamas, like

1:16:46

he's saying, commits a terrible crime. You know,

1:16:48

a point that we shouldn't assert right there,

1:16:50

and this is the game that they always

1:16:52

play while projecting their idea of altruism and

1:16:54

freedom and blah blah blah. But

1:16:57

then the moment bad things happen, they go, but they did

1:16:59

it first. Okay, well then

1:17:01

just admit that you don't care about any of those things

1:17:03

then. Like it's not that we have

1:17:05

to be good as long as they're good. The point

1:17:07

is if you're projecting yourself as some type better, civil

1:17:10

society and all this stuff, you

1:17:12

don't go, well they used cluster bombs, so we will

1:17:15

too. That just means you're as bad as they are.

1:17:18

So the point is if we're going to project

1:17:20

the idea that we'll treat prisoners with respect, that

1:17:22

we will not harm civilians, that we won't target

1:17:24

protected areas, we don't just go, but they did

1:17:26

this so we'll do it then. Just

1:17:29

creating an asterisk or a loophole. It just

1:17:31

means you're just as bad. I

1:17:33

think that's what we're all starting to see. That doesn't mean you,

1:17:36

Israeli or American, it just means that governments

1:17:38

are that bad. And you are if you

1:17:40

support them. Some

1:17:43

high profile claims are not substantiated by this

1:17:45

footage. We were told that there was a

1:17:47

large scale beheading, including the beheading of 40

1:17:50

babies. Now in the footage we see a

1:17:52

dead soldier is beheaded, grim enough. I

1:17:55

looked away, couldn't watch that. But not the

1:17:57

same as beheading as a form of execution.

1:18:00

obviously deeply unpleasant

1:18:02

exception is an unsuccessful attempt to behead

1:18:04

a dying time migrant worker. Now that

1:18:06

video has been disputed on who was

1:18:09

actually doing that. So

1:18:12

at this point for me that one seems up in the

1:18:14

air. The allegation was that was a Hamas member but

1:18:16

I believe that that one... now some of these things I

1:18:18

haven't seen since the first week or so but my point

1:18:20

is that that one I believe was disputed. But

1:18:22

the real point is I don't think anybody should

1:18:24

dismiss that Hamas committed crimes. The

1:18:27

real point of this is whether we can

1:18:29

prove the larger allegations that are the central

1:18:31

points, right? The linchpin to

1:18:34

the larger argument for why this

1:18:36

is justifiable because of how horrible

1:18:38

it was. It was horrible regardless

1:18:41

but to create atrocity propaganda to overshadow

1:18:43

your atrocities is what's really happening

1:18:45

here. With the garden implement again,

1:18:48

hideous to watch, if living people

1:18:50

were beheaded otherwise we

1:18:52

are not showing that in any of the

1:18:54

video footage. If there was

1:18:56

torture too there's no

1:18:58

evidence given for it on camera. Now

1:19:01

if there was rape and sexual violence

1:19:03

committed we don't see this on the

1:19:06

footage either. Now a

1:19:08

warning here, deeply distressing. And you've

1:19:10

seen the procession of them coming

1:19:12

out saying we saw it all.

1:19:14

Rape and beheadings. You've seen

1:19:16

it. Are they all lying? See

1:19:19

it that way. Good shit. A clip

1:19:21

of an Israeli woman inspecting a badly

1:19:23

burned woman's corpse to see if she

1:19:25

was a relative and she

1:19:27

had no underwear. This has been offered

1:19:30

as evidence of rape but that's not

1:19:32

what you would consider conclusive evidence. We

1:19:35

don't see children being killed. Hamas

1:19:37

don't kill those poor those

1:19:40

two poor little boys for example. So they're not on camera

1:19:42

and I imagine we would have been told if they had

1:19:44

been killed. Now I am aware

1:19:46

of someone at the screening who claims we

1:19:48

did see children being killed

1:19:51

and this surprised me because the one thing

1:19:53

I would definitely remember is the killing of a child.

1:19:56

So when I asked them they said

1:19:59

there was footage of Hamas terrorists screaming at

1:20:01

a young girl of around 10 years

1:20:03

old. She was hiding under a cupboard and perhaps a table and

1:20:05

then they shot her. That wasn't.

1:20:08

I haven't seen that. And I've looked through

1:20:10

everything on the website. My recollection. I asked

1:20:12

Michael Walker. He couldn't recall that either. So

1:20:14

I messaged a US journalist. He watched the

1:20:16

same screening across Atlantic. And they

1:20:18

said they couldn't recall this either. Isn't

1:20:21

that important? So he's

1:20:23

confirmed this with two different journalists in two

1:20:25

different locations. None of them saw that. Yet

1:20:28

this Israeli journalist, oh, yep, yep, we saw

1:20:30

it and explained and described something that

1:20:32

goes through the website. If

1:20:34

you've got the stomach for it, you

1:20:37

won't find that. Nor the video of the woman's

1:20:39

stomach being cut open that he claimed he was

1:20:41

going to add because it's proven and you all

1:20:43

need to shut up about it. None

1:20:45

of them. That beforehand, the

1:20:47

IDF spokesperson explicitly said that he would not see

1:20:49

children being murdered. So I should have let it

1:20:52

play right there. So it was said

1:20:54

before it starts, the IDF explicitly says you

1:20:56

won't see that. So if

1:20:59

they told you you wouldn't see it, they can

1:21:01

tell you they didn't see it. It's obvious this other guy

1:21:03

is lying. That needs to be clear. And

1:21:05

then as that was a scene where someone

1:21:08

hides under a room and is

1:21:10

found it's not clear how old they were

1:21:12

or whether they died. So right

1:21:14

there, the point is simply that that person

1:21:16

adds the context himself. Why? Probably

1:21:19

because the IDF said so or because the Israeli

1:21:21

government adds that. So yet again, you're

1:21:23

being shown something without the context they add. You don't

1:21:25

know what they'll be. They shot her after that. I

1:21:27

was told or whatever you want to add. The

1:21:31

point is that is what we're actually dealing with here

1:21:33

at this point. Fifty days later,

1:21:35

we need to realize what that shows us. We're

1:21:38

being lied to. There's a lot of shadow and it's hard

1:21:40

to work out what's happening. That's how they recollected it. Now

1:21:42

we see bodies, photos of bodies of

1:21:44

children with their faces blurred.

1:21:47

Again, horrible enough to see if they

1:21:49

have been intentionally targeted by Hamas. That's

1:21:51

not filmed. You do see,

1:21:53

for example, on the other hand, a family dog being

1:21:55

shot dead. Now, again,

1:21:57

this isn't to say that none of this

1:21:59

happened. It's just not in the footage which

1:22:02

is being provided by the Israeli authorities. Now

1:22:05

I'll leave it there. Watch the whole thing. It's

1:22:07

important. I mean I think

1:22:09

it's very – I respect his balance take and the

1:22:12

fact that he's making sure to be objective. Like it's

1:22:14

very rare these days in

1:22:16

general, but he's telling you that

1:22:18

he didn't see any of that. Now interestingly enough, he

1:22:20

mentions the dog. I'll get into that

1:22:22

in a minute when we show the actual

1:22:25

released prisoners in regard to how

1:22:27

I'm just trying to be consistent with the words. You get

1:22:29

so many things flying around. Let's just say prisoners. The

1:22:31

point is that they're one of the ones

1:22:33

that was recently released. Still has her dog with her. Are

1:22:37

we going to pretend that the Israeli government would allow Palestinian

1:22:39

to keep his dog the whole time? I

1:22:41

think we all know that's not true. Now,

1:22:44

here's Jennifer Sey, just

1:22:46

post this saying – again, same

1:22:49

thing. This is from the 27th.

1:22:52

The Washington Post. Here's the

1:22:54

actual article. Well,

1:22:58

hold on. It

1:23:00

says, Israel investigates the

1:23:03

elusive and horrific enemy

1:23:05

rape as a weapon of war. So

1:23:08

the article is literally only saying

1:23:10

investigates. Hold on. Just lost my place.

1:23:13

Oh, that's right. We're way over here. So

1:23:21

this article is not proving

1:23:23

anything. What they're saying is we

1:23:25

have – what we're being told is what –

1:23:27

so the IDF and Israeli government are relaying what

1:23:30

they found. It's the same thing. It's exactly the same

1:23:32

thing. Here's an image. Here's what

1:23:34

we saw. And you read the article. Israel says

1:23:36

it's the point. It doesn't mean

1:23:38

it didn't happen, but it means we can't prove it, especially

1:23:40

since we've caught them lying more times

1:23:43

than not at this point. But here's

1:23:45

what it says. They cut off – they

1:23:47

cut limbs in genitals. They raped. They abused

1:23:49

corpses. They were sadistic sexual acts. Well, all

1:23:51

of these things have at the very least

1:23:53

been shown to not be proven by what

1:23:55

you're saying you saw. How

1:23:57

does that make sense? And this is that same

1:23:59

diagram. woman who states all these

1:24:01

things that we can't prove I saw

1:24:03

this and I saw that the

1:24:06

UN that what they're doing is they're calling

1:24:08

out the UN can't muster a statement condemning

1:24:10

what allegations and what

1:24:13

world you live in where people condemn

1:24:15

unverified allegations it's

1:24:18

crazy now here's

1:24:20

Roberts article all the way back from October 13th

1:24:23

beheaded Israeli babies raped women and other disinformation

1:24:25

to justify Gaza massacre his point was not

1:24:28

that they didn't happen for sure but at

1:24:30

this point you couldn't prove it that hasn't

1:24:32

changed he just put

1:24:34

up the new one about the hospitals and their bases breaking

1:24:37

down all their lives got a new one coming out soon

1:24:39

as well now here

1:24:41

is an IDF member being

1:24:44

caught lying by another

1:24:46

Israeli journalist Mohammed

1:24:48

and she had a points out an

1:24:50

IDF officer claimed he saw a row

1:24:52

of murdered Israeli babies hung on a

1:24:54

laundry line on October 7th apparently

1:24:57

that one didn't make it out to the mainstream right but

1:24:59

this is my point this has been an

1:25:02

agenda from the start the

1:25:04

interviewer Yashai Cohen now

1:25:06

says the story is fake and deleted it he

1:25:09

adds that it was the IDF spokesperson who tricked

1:25:11

him into doing it it's

1:25:13

just the images he shows and

1:25:15

the actual clip it's

1:25:19

all it's all in Hebrew so you can't hear it

1:25:21

I'll get to the point so this is somebody else

1:25:23

asking about it I'll show you these because you know

1:25:25

we don't just go off screenshots this is in the Twitter

1:25:27

files he adds from

1:25:29

an Israeli friend that says quote

1:25:31

the officer Yaron Bukila is head of

1:25:33

the Hibit Shownestism I'm not

1:25:35

sure what that is an organization founded by

1:25:37

foreign money that spreads Russian propaganda and is

1:25:40

also in very close contact with Netanyahu he

1:25:42

held a number of meetings with them in

1:25:44

the last two months only down here

1:25:46

it says number three another tweet

1:25:48

from the interviewer admitting quote I

1:25:50

was wrong for thinking the army

1:25:52

officer was a reliable source that wouldn't

1:25:54

lie here's

1:25:57

a tweet directly from the journalist himself

1:26:00

Here is his, let's look at his bio.

1:26:02

I think it just

1:26:05

simply says Shabbat

1:26:07

Square. But this is a journalist, a

1:26:09

local Israeli journalist, and

1:26:11

it says, As I emphasized yesterday, so this person

1:26:13

basically called it out saying, was

1:26:16

this fake? Like how dare you post this? And

1:26:18

he simply says, As I emphasized yesterday, written in

1:26:20

Hebrew, the interview was offered

1:26:22

to me by the IDF spokesperson.

1:26:24

So this is IDF caught in

1:26:26

real time blatantly lying. It

1:26:29

says, I did not know the interviewee before. A

1:26:32

representative of the DOC was present in

1:26:34

all the filming and approved the

1:26:36

broadcast. This wasn't a mistake. It

1:26:38

was a deliberate lie. In

1:26:42

other footage, when there were comments, they asked

1:26:45

to be edited or avoided. Like

1:26:48

how do we not everybody must see by now,

1:26:50

this is a class, this is a wag the

1:26:52

dog false flag agenda to lie about what's happening.

1:26:54

So at that point, we

1:26:56

should then be go further and ask, did

1:26:59

if the bigger ones don't seem

1:27:01

to have even happened. But what about the

1:27:03

other things? Now that we know that it's

1:27:05

been admitted that they shot their own people, what about the

1:27:07

things they do say they can prove? What

1:27:09

of them were conducted and done by the IDF

1:27:11

themselves? Simple question, not

1:27:13

saying I know that for sure. We

1:27:16

need to understand these are valid questions with what we

1:27:18

now prove. After posting

1:27:20

the promo, he says there were complaints. So

1:27:22

he immediately deleted it within minutes. And

1:27:24

yet, even this morning, the IDF

1:27:26

spokesman refrain from claiming that the story was a false

1:27:29

story. By the way, the interviewee insists

1:27:31

the story is accurate and there was even

1:27:33

another witness to this. But the point is,

1:27:35

he has now proven himself that it is

1:27:37

false. He deleted the story and you

1:27:39

can go through his timeline. The point

1:27:41

is, this is a fake story that does not end up

1:27:43

by the way, don't you the point of babies

1:27:46

hung up on a laundry line. The

1:27:49

point is, this is from the beginning. This is that this

1:27:51

was the 40 bad babies contorted in a

1:27:53

little different way. But

1:27:56

the point is that they're all trying to lie to you. And

1:27:58

really, here it is right here. If

1:28:00

you speak Hebrew, you can listen

1:28:02

to it for yourself. Think

1:28:04

about how crazy and obvious this all is. Now

1:28:07

we've already talked about many times October 7th. This

1:28:11

was our coverage from the Grey Zone article on the 27th. Where

1:28:14

is the article from Heretz where they've

1:28:16

confirmed that yes, it also shows that

1:28:18

the helicopter fired on people at the

1:28:20

festival. That's a fact, it can't

1:28:22

deny. We have the members of

1:28:24

the, the leader of the security

1:28:27

team at Kebusbe area telling you

1:28:29

that they shot passages. We

1:28:32

have party goers

1:28:34

who admit this. We

1:28:36

have people interviewed on Israeli radio and Heretz

1:28:38

telling you all of this and they still

1:28:40

deny it. Now they're even going out of

1:28:42

their way to try to get Heretz removed because

1:28:45

they're not toeing the line. We

1:28:49

have the other example of the tank driver,

1:28:51

the two young girls who drove the tanks

1:28:53

who fired on the Kebus admitting, as you

1:28:55

can see in this image right here, or

1:28:58

this one actually. It

1:29:01

says, are there civilians they ask? And he says,

1:29:03

I don't know, just shoot. Now

1:29:05

in this, he goes on to say, well, I

1:29:07

wasn't sure. So I instead opened fire with my

1:29:10

machine gun. Like that's better. But

1:29:12

then the point is, he goes on to say that yes,

1:29:14

they fired both projectiles and machine guns. So

1:29:16

yes, it's all admitted in real time. But

1:29:19

here is a new update. I was going to give you this yesterday,

1:29:21

but I want to make sure you saw this. Another one from the

1:29:23

Grey Zone. I invited Max on for

1:29:25

an interview, by the way. Now we've definitely,

1:29:27

I've never shied away from my critiques and

1:29:30

my issues. But I've reached out and

1:29:32

I said, look, I know we've had differences in the past,

1:29:34

but I obviously think your work

1:29:36

in this topic is important. And I

1:29:38

think you've been doing good work. As

1:29:40

always, showing you that to me, the only thing that really

1:29:42

matters is the truth. Regardless

1:29:45

of disagreements and different things, that is what you guys

1:29:47

should all want. That point is

1:29:49

on November 25th, he wrote

1:29:51

Israeli October 7th poster child. One

1:29:54

of the girls that they were using from the

1:29:56

very beginning to say this is one

1:29:58

of the girls they killed. We have

1:30:00

to get rid of Hamas Was

1:30:03

killed by a tank from the IDF per

1:30:06

eyewitness testimony It

1:30:09

says that a desperate bid for international sympathy the

1:30:11

Israeli government has sought to stir outrage Over

1:30:13

the killing of a 12 year old girl during the

1:30:16

Hamas led attack on southern Israel on October 7th Quote

1:30:19

this little girl's body was burned so badly

1:30:22

Yeah, we know how this goes that it took forensic Archaeologists

1:30:25

by the way, which we read in the beginning which I made

1:30:27

a point about Archaeologists

1:30:30

what are these dinosaur bones? It's not a it's

1:30:32

not an archaeologist But it's a weird way

1:30:34

they frame to make it sound like it

1:30:36

was so so intricate and the point was

1:30:38

the burned bodies Were only burned because of

1:30:41

their firing. That's what has been proven but

1:30:44

it says they were burned so badly that took more than

1:30:46

six weeks to identify and Remember,

1:30:48

they claimed that 200 of the Hamas members that

1:30:50

were burned so badly were their

1:30:52

own people Because they

1:30:55

were burned so badly But I guess

1:30:57

they didn't realize that inadvertently Admitted

1:30:59

that they had killed hostages too that they conflated

1:31:01

them because they were right next to each other

1:31:05

This is all the remains of a 12 year old is

1:31:07

ash and bone fragments Well,

1:31:09

that's what they said about the girl that was

1:31:12

recently returned, too So

1:31:14

who knows where you can take it face value from

1:31:16

these government liars? I think quite frankly They thought that

1:31:18

they've killed a lot of them by their bombing in

1:31:20

Gaza That they killed many of them when they

1:31:22

first tried to leave in the first place and

1:31:24

that they never expected any of them To come home. That's

1:31:27

what I kind of been getting from the way they've been

1:31:29

conducting this and now the ones that come home Sure

1:31:32

are showing us why that is telling you the opposite

1:31:34

of what we're told But

1:31:36

it says Aviva Klompus a

1:31:38

former speechwriter for Israel's United Nations

1:31:40

mission in one of the country's

1:31:42

top English language social media propagandists

1:31:44

claims on Twitter quote the

1:31:46

terrorists massacred all of the Catch

1:31:50

Roni's then torched the building

1:31:54

That they were talking these are the

1:31:56

innocent people in there with Hamas. They've

1:31:59

totally been the former Israeli Prime

1:32:01

Minister chimed in to proclaim that

1:32:03

Leo Hetrosy, the family of

1:32:06

Kebuzpe Eri, was murdered in her home

1:32:08

by Hamas monsters. We're fighting

1:32:10

the most just war to ensure this never

1:32:12

happens again, except in Gaza, right? Because that

1:32:15

one, that one's okay. Leo

1:32:17

Hetrosy was among the non-combatants

1:32:19

killed in Kebuzpe Eri when

1:32:22

the small southern Israeli community was momentarily

1:32:24

taken over by Hamas militants seeking to

1:32:26

captive, seeking captives to spur a prisoner's

1:32:29

change. During the standoff that

1:32:31

ensued, she was killed instantly alongside her

1:32:33

twin brother, great aunt, and

1:32:35

several other residents of Eri, not

1:32:37

by Hamas. However, it says, in

1:32:41

the cases we can prove, I'm talking about her, but you

1:32:43

can argue that some of them were killed inside the home

1:32:45

before they bombed it, that's certainly possible. However, it says the

1:32:47

12-year-old Hetrosy was

1:32:50

not slain by Hamas. According to

1:32:53

new testimony by an Israeli eyewitness

1:32:55

to her death in particular, she

1:32:58

was killed by an Israeli tank shell

1:33:00

alongside several neighbors. It

1:33:03

says, after Porat was freed from her captor, this

1:33:05

is Porat the woman that spoke on the record

1:33:07

with the, I think both arrests and the radio

1:33:09

station, and I think there's even,

1:33:11

no, I think electronic and a father shared her interview, I

1:33:13

don't think she spoke with them, but maybe

1:33:15

she did, I forget how that went, but it says

1:33:17

that she was freed and her captor surrendered. Now

1:33:20

Hamas member, she said 14 Israelis

1:33:22

remained hostage under the guard of

1:33:25

39 Hamas militants inside this home.

1:33:28

Among those left behind, she said, were the twins, the

1:33:31

Hetrosy twins, the children, along with their

1:33:34

great aunt and guardian, Ayla

1:33:37

Hetrosy. Now,

1:33:40

I mentioned those, the two boys, different

1:33:42

examples of children that were not just indiscriminately

1:33:45

murdered because they want to kill all the children.

1:33:47

You know, the thing we currently see happening

1:33:50

in Israel or rather occupied Palestine. Quote,

1:33:52

it says, I sat there with the commander of the unit,

1:33:55

Porat recalled, and I described to him

1:33:57

what the house looks like. So she's not,

1:34:00

outside telling the Israeli soldiers and where the

1:34:02

terrorists were and where the hostages were

1:34:04

I Actually drew it for him

1:34:07

like literally drew it Look

1:34:09

here on the lawn. There are four hostages

1:34:11

that are lying this way on the lawn

1:34:15

Here are two they're lying under the

1:34:17

terrace and in a living room.

1:34:19

There is a woman lying like this and a woman lying

1:34:21

like this She says

1:34:23

I tried to explain to them where they all

1:34:25

were It

1:34:27

says by 4 p.m a gun battle

1:34:29

began to rage between the militants inside the

1:34:31

home and the Israeli special forces stations are

1:34:33

across the street after Failing to

1:34:36

dislodge the fighters with kinetic

1:34:38

action, which doesn't seem to typically work with

1:34:40

a hostage situation Everyone knows that

1:34:43

the Israelis called in a tank Okay,

1:34:45

so, you know, there's full there's Israeli

1:34:48

citizens in here for those who

1:34:50

think it's more important Israeli Jews and

1:34:53

you pull up she tells

1:34:55

you they're in there and You

1:34:58

begin firing at the house. Okay, cuz that makes

1:35:00

sense. No, it doesn't But then

1:35:02

after apparently not trying to do anything else you call

1:35:04

in the tank from across the street.

1:35:07

She heard two loud explosions The

1:35:10

tank apparently had already fired a couple

1:35:12

of shells into the home Lying

1:35:15

down outside the house was her partner How

1:35:18

another man named how so basically two people

1:35:20

named how and the couple who owned the

1:35:22

house Adi and Hadass Dagan

1:35:25

there were also the 12 year old twins

1:35:27

the Hatteras II the Ditrasies along with

1:35:29

their great aunt That's

1:35:32

where they fired the tank mind you when the dust

1:35:34

cleared only Hadass Dagan emerged

1:35:36

from the house alive Porat

1:35:39

and Dagan later told her quote Yasmin

1:35:42

when the two big booms hit I felt like

1:35:44

I flew in the air It took me two

1:35:46

to three minutes to open my eyes. I didn't

1:35:48

feel my body I was completely paralyzed when I

1:35:50

opened my eyes. I saw

1:35:52

that my adi is dying Your towel was

1:35:55

also stopped moving at that point Dagan

1:35:57

confirmed the tank shells killed Leo

1:36:00

Atrocy. Atrocy.

1:36:03

That's interesting. Atrocy.

1:36:06

The girl did not stop screaming for

1:36:08

all those hours, she told

1:36:10

Porat, referring to Leo. This

1:36:13

is the point that makes it very obvious. So

1:36:16

this sad reality of a young child who

1:36:19

is scared enough, being taken hostage. She's

1:36:23

screaming in Oz. She

1:36:25

says she didn't stop screaming the whole time. She

1:36:28

didn't stop, so that means the Israeli idea

1:36:31

can hear her. It

1:36:33

says she didn't stop screaming, but

1:36:36

when those two shells hit, then

1:36:38

she stopped screaming. And then there

1:36:40

was silence. That

1:36:42

is clear as it gets. They

1:36:45

murdered her with these shells. Hannibal

1:36:48

directive. And then

1:36:50

blamed it on Hamas. Porat concluded,

1:36:53

so what can you take away from that?

1:36:55

That after that very massive incident, the shooting,

1:36:57

which concluded with two shells, that is pretty

1:36:59

much when everyone died. Dagan

1:37:02

emphasized to Porat that one of the hostages

1:37:04

had been intentionally killed by the Hamas fighters.

1:37:07

There were no executions, or anything like that. At

1:37:15

least not the people with her. Dagan

1:37:19

emphasized that none of the hostages had

1:37:21

been intentionally killed by the Hamas fighters.

1:37:23

Okay, I read it wrong. That's what I

1:37:25

thought it said. So they're basically saying, look, nobody was

1:37:27

killed by these people, at least from what we saw.

1:37:29

We're getting everything we hear from

1:37:31

the people that were there is the diametric

1:37:33

opposite from what we're being told by the

1:37:35

Israelis. There were

1:37:37

no executions, or anything like that. At least not

1:37:40

the people with her. So that's them saying that nobody died. So that

1:37:42

means everybody was killed by the tank. In

1:37:45

a separate interview on the 15th, Porat insisted

1:37:48

the Palestinian militants did not abuse us. They

1:37:51

treated us very humanely. And this is

1:37:53

why they're trying to put these people

1:37:55

in institutions, which is what's

1:37:57

happening, mind you. The people from the

1:37:59

best of the best. Many

1:38:01

of them have been involuntarily

1:38:05

committed because they're having mental problems. So

1:38:08

we're told anyway. Max

1:38:11

Blumenthal writes, As evidence of friendly fire

1:38:13

killings on October 7th mounts, Israel

1:38:16

now plans to bury the cars that we saw

1:38:18

containing important forensic evidence, which were burned in southern

1:38:20

Gaza. You know, the cars that show the burned

1:38:22

up bodies, which we know Hamas wasn't capable of

1:38:25

doing at the time. This is blatantly obvious. They

1:38:27

know that. People are starting to ask questions that

1:38:29

they probably didn't expect. So what are they going

1:38:31

to do? Bury the evidence. It

1:38:34

will shred the cars completely before...that says

1:38:36

it...they will shred the cars. Because

1:38:38

that makes sense. Completely before burying them

1:38:40

as to be environmentally friendly as possible.

1:38:43

How pathetically obvious is that? Plans

1:38:47

to bury hundreds of cars with ashes and blood

1:38:49

stains. In

1:38:53

order to save space, they will shred them.

1:38:55

This is a cover up in real time. According

1:38:58

to the Droslin Post, quote, To preserve

1:39:00

the sanctity of those murdered by Hamas, for

1:39:02

the first time since the establishment of the

1:39:04

state, they decided to bury the vehicles.

1:39:10

Oh, and this is why I was saying that before. So we just talked about

1:39:12

this. The link is right there. Music

1:39:14

festival massacre survivors involuntarily committed

1:39:17

due to mental breakdowns. As

1:39:21

I simply said, or they're saying things

1:39:23

we're not supposed to hear. I

1:39:25

know that's happening to some degree. If

1:39:27

you think they're not capable of doing that, you're not paying

1:39:29

attention. Now,

1:39:31

on the note of censorship here, Mohammed El-Kurd

1:39:34

points out, these awful gut wrenching images must

1:39:36

be seen. The Israeli

1:39:38

regime is bombing and burning Palestinians with intentionally

1:39:40

prohibited weapons and that they're

1:39:42

financed by your tax dollars. Zionism

1:39:45

of the death coal. That's what he wrote. November

1:39:47

8th, but unavailable because the

1:39:49

post is now gone. Well,

1:39:51

first of all, you can prove this again. Here's October 12th.

1:39:53

Here is. Earlier.

1:40:00

This is going all the way back to 2009. Israel's

1:40:02

unlawful use of white phosphorus. It's

1:40:04

October 12th. White phosphorus

1:40:06

used in Gaza and Lebanon. In

1:40:09

any one of these individual crimes

1:40:12

would be shouted from the rooftops for a decade

1:40:14

about Iran or about Syria or

1:40:16

about Russia or about China. But you

1:40:19

can have provable mounting evidence over the

1:40:21

process of decades from the very

1:40:23

groups that were supposed to tell us to look

1:40:25

to and nothing ever happened. It's

1:40:27

just that bad. It's so obvious. And

1:40:33

the point, so we have this being

1:40:35

deleted. So you can't see it now. It's

1:40:38

gone. It's not like

1:40:40

it's just being blacked as it's violated the

1:40:42

rules. Again, the point is,

1:40:45

well, some of them seem not to. Now you

1:40:47

can look. Here is never

1:40:49

forget October 7th massacre. Right.

1:40:52

Never forget who actually killed any of these people. Now

1:40:55

I don't want to go through it all, because it's

1:40:57

no point in just showing graphic things for no reason.

1:40:59

But there are plenty of them. There's one right there.

1:41:01

My point is, scroll through this. You'll

1:41:03

find all of the worst things you've seen everywhere

1:41:05

else. So why is it OK

1:41:08

for Twitter to allow those to be publicly

1:41:10

accessible, but evidence that continues to show crimes

1:41:12

that we can prove are committed by Israelis

1:41:14

are deleted for your safety, not

1:41:17

buying it. Now

1:41:20

let's get into what's being done to people

1:41:22

in the Israeli prisons, which we

1:41:24

can prove, which is not a new thing. It didn't start October

1:41:26

7th. Mohammed, I already

1:41:28

showed you this one. Mohammed Shihada points out, and

1:41:30

this has been roundly reported by plenty of outlets,

1:41:33

Israeli broke both of his arms in prison. That's

1:41:36

a kid. They

1:41:38